Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks superstar and NBA icon, is no stranger to the spotlight. Known as the “Greek Freak” for his extraordinary athleticism and down-to-earth personality, Giannis has built a public persona that balances fierce competitiveness with endearing humility. Off the court, he’s a devoted family man, often sharing glimpses of his life with his fiance, Mariah Riddlesprigger, and their three children—Liam, Maverick, and Eva—on social media. But one peculiar habit has raised eyebrows among fans and critics alike: his tendency to slap cartoonish, fake sunglasses on some of his kids’ faces in photos posted online. It’s a move that, at first glance, seems like a quirky attempt at privacy—until you consider the bigger picture.
The Illusion of Privacy in a Public Life
Let’s start with the obvious: Giannis is one of the most recognisable athletes on the planet. His life, both on and off the hardwood, is a matter of public fascination. From his MVP-winning performances to his post-game press conferences filled with quotable one-liners, he’s a media darling. And that spotlight doesn’t dim when the cameras shift to his family. His children have been seen courtside at Bucks games, featured in family-oriented brand endorsements, and even captured on live television during high-profile events like the NBA Finals or All-Star Weekend. These aren’t fleeting glimpses either. Liam, Maverick, and Eva are often front and centre, their faces unblurred and unmistakable.
So why, then, does Giannis bother with the fake sunglasses on Instagram? If the goal is to shield his kids from public scrutiny, it’s a flimsy shield at best. A pair of cartoon shades—often comically oversized or garishly coloured—doesn’t obscure their identities. Anyone who’s seen them on TNT, ESPN, or even Giannis’s own highlight reels can connect the dots. It’s like putting a Band-Aid on a broken window and calling it security. The gesture feels performative when the reality is that his children’s faces are already out there, broadcast to millions.
The Hypocrisy of Selective Privacy
What makes this habit even more baffling is the inconsistency. Giannis isn’t exactly locking his family away in a fortress of anonymity. He and Mariah frequently share family moments online—vacations, birthdays, holidays—with their kids in full view, sans sunglasses. They’ve embraced their roles as a high-profile couple, even partnering with brands like Nike and Disney that capitalize on their wholesome family image. During the 2021 NBA Championship run, Giannis brought Liam onto the court to celebrate, a heartwarming moment that aired live and went viral. No sunglasses there, just pure, unfiltered joy.
Yet, in seemingly random social media posts, the fake sunglasses pop up. It’s as if Giannis wants to signal, “Hey, I care about privacy!” while simultaneously living a life that contradicts that notion. If privacy were truly the priority, wouldn’t he refrain from posting his kids altogether? Or at least blur their faces consistently across all platforms? Instead, the sunglasses feel like a half-hearted nod to discretion—a way to appease critics or quiet his own conscience without committing to any real boundary. It’s hypocritical to play the privacy card in one breath while inviting the world into his family’s life with the next.
A Pointless Exercise in a Digital Age
In 2025, the idea of maintaining privacy through superficial edits like fake sunglasses is laughably outdated. We live in an era of facial recognition tech, paparazzi drones, and fan accounts that dissect every pixel of a celebrity’s life. For someone like Giannis, whose every move is chronicled, the sunglasses are about as effective as a paper umbrella in a hurricane. His kids aren’t anonymous—they’re the offspring of a global superstar, and no amount of digital doodling changes that.
Moreover, his audience isn’t fooled. Fans have already pointed out the absurdity. Comments like “Bro, we’ve seen Liam on TV a hundred times, why the sunglasses now?” or “Giannis out here acting like we don’t know what Maverick looks like” are common. The gesture doesn’t protect his kids—it just invites more attention, turning a simple family photo into a talking point. If anything, it’s counterproductive, highlighting the very thing he’s supposedly trying to downplay.
The Bigger Picture: Why It Matters
Now, to be fair, Giannis isn’t the first celebrity to pull this move. Plenty of stars—athletes, actors, influencers—have used emojis, filters, or edits to “hide” their kids’ faces online, only to parade them in public later. But for someone like Giannis, whose authenticity is a cornerstone of his appeal, it feels particularly off-brand. This is the guy who once said he’d rather be broke than fake, who wears his heart on his sleeve and owns his story, from his humble beginnings in Greece to NBA stardom. The fake sunglasses clash with that narrative. They’re a cheap gimmick from someone who’s usually anything but.
And let’s not overlook the optics. In a world where parents—famous or not—are increasingly vocal about protecting kids from the internet’s perils, Giannis’s approach looks inconsistent at best, disingenuous at worst. If he’s worried about privacy, why not set a firmer boundary? If he’s fine with the exposure, why bother with the sunglasses? The middle ground he’s chosen satisfies no one and achieves nothing. Young children are in a unique phase of life—they’re sponges, soaking up the world around them, forming their sense of self, and learning how to navigate relationships and emotions. When they’re thrust into the public eye, whether through a celebrity parent’s fame, social media exposure, or reality TV, that natural process gets disrupted in ways that can have lasting consequences. Here’s why keeping them out of the spotlight is often the smarter, kinder choice.
1. Privacy Fuels Healthy Development
Kids need a safe, private space to grow up. They’re figuring out who they are—making mistakes, throwing tantrums, testing boundaries—without the pressure of a million eyes judging their every move. When a child’s life is broadcast to the world, whether it’s on Instagram or a court side Jumbo tron, they lose that buffer. Suddenly, their awkward moments, cute quirks, or even bad days become fodder for public consumption. That’s not just invasive—it can mess with their ability to develop a secure identity. Imagine being 5 years old and knowing strangers are commenting on your haircut or your shy smile. It’s a lot, and it’s not a burden kids are equipped to carry.
Psychologists often point to the importance of a “secure base” for young children—a stable, low-pressure environment where they can explore and retreat without fear of scrutiny. Public exposure rips that away. A child who’s constantly on display might start performing for the crowd instead of just being themselves, which can lead to anxiety or a warped sense of self-worth tied to external validation.
2. Safety Risks Are Real
Let’s talk practicalities: the public eye isn’t always a friendly place. High-profile kids—think celebrity offspring or viral internet stars—can become targets. Stalkers, paparazzi, or even well-meaning but overzealous fans can pose physical risks. And in the digital age, it’s worse. A photo of a child posted online can reveal locations, routines, or personal details that predators could exploit. The FBI and child safety experts have long warned about the dangers of “sharenting”—parents oversharing kids’ lives online—because it creates a digital footprint that’s impossible to erase. For famous families, that risk is amplified tenfold.
Even if the worst-case scenario doesn’t happen, the constant attention can feel suffocating. Kids deserve to play at the park or attend school without cameras in their faces. Privacy isn’t just a luxury for them—it’s a shield.
3. They Don’t Get to Choose
Here’s the kicker: young children can’t consent to being public figures. When a parent posts their kid’s face on social media or parades them at events, they’re making a choice the child has no say in. Sure, a toddler might giggle for the camera, but they don’t grasp the long-term implications—how that photo could live online forever, be meme’d, mocked, or used against them years later. By the time they’re old enough to have an opinion, the damage might be done.
Take the kids of influencers or athletes as an example. Some grow up resenting the exposure, feeling like their childhood was hijacked for likes or brand deals. Others lean into it, but only because it’s all they’ve ever known—not because it’s what they’d have picked. Giving kids the chance to opt in later, when they can understand the stakes, feels fairer than signing them up for fame at birth.
4. The Mental Health Toll
Study after study shows that public scrutiny takes a toll on mental health, even for adults who’ve chosen the spotlight. For kids, who lack the emotional tools to cope, it’s worse. Constant attention can breed insecurity—am I cute enough? Funny enough? Likable enough?—at an age when they should be focused on finger painting and playgrounds, not public perception. Research from the American Psychological Association has linked early media exposure in children to higher rates of anxiety, depression, and even body image issues down the line.
Look at former child stars: for every success story, there’s a cautionary tale of burnout or rebellion. Now imagine that pressure without even being the star—just the kid of one. Being “famous adjacent” still means living under a microscope, and young minds aren’t built for that kind of heat.
5. It Robs Them of Normalcy
There’s something sacred about a regular childhood—bike rides, sleepovers, scraped knees—that gets lost when you’re a public figure. Kids in the spotlight often miss out on those quiet, unglamorous moments because their lives are curated for an audience. They might get VIP treatment or cool perks, sure, but they also lose the freedom to be ordinary. Friendships can feel transactional (are they here for me or my fame?), and simple joys like a trip to the zoo turn into photo ops.
Normalcy isn’t just nice-to-have—it’s a foundation. It teaches resilience, independence, and the value of relationships that aren’t tied to status. Strip that away, and you’re setting a kid up for a life where they’re defined by their public image, not their private reality.
6. The Long Game: A Digital Legacy They Can’t Escape
Finally, there’s the permanence of it all. A photo posted today could haunt a kid in 10, 20, or 30 years—whether it’s an embarrassing moment that resurfaces or a persona they outgrow but can’t shed. The internet doesn’t forget, and kids in the public eye don’t get a clean slate. That’s a heavy load to carry into adulthood, especially if they want to carve out their own path separate from their parents’ fame.
Drop the Shades, Giannis
At the end of the day, Giannis Antetokounmpo’s fake sunglasses routine is a pointless charade—and a hypocritical one at that. His kids are already part of his public story, whether he likes it or not, and no cartoon accessory is going to change that. It’s time for him to either fully embrace the transparency that comes with fame or take meaningful steps to shield his family from it. Anything less is just noise, a distraction from the genuine, larger-than-life figure we’ve come to admire. So, Giannis, do us all a favour: drop the shades and keep it real. Your fans will love you for it, and your kids won’t care either way. In fact with so many kids it is almost certain statistically that one or more of them will actively not want to be in the media. You have no right to deprive them of their privacy without asking them. If you really wanted to protect them from publicity (which would have been advisable) you would have kept them out of the limelight all together.
Right now it’s a pretty bad look. hypocritical and a far cry from the family values Giannis pretends to cherish. Especially getting them involved in commercials looks like a desperation move to make as much money as possible now that he is in the limelight as his star has begun to fade on the court and this will inevitably start to affect his value. Add to that the other hypocrisy concerning being Greek, Nigerian or American depending on what he is selling this week and you have a recipe for disaster.
