The Milwaukee Bucks entered the 2025 NBA Playoffs with high fan expectations, bolstered by a healthy Giannis Antetokounmpo and an eight-game winning streak to close the regular season. Facing the Indiana Pacers in a first-round rematch of last year’s series, the Bucks were poised to leverage their star power and newfound depth to reverse their 2024 postseason disappointment. However, Game 1 on April 19, 2025, resulted in a decisive 117-98 loss to the Pacers at Gainbridge Fieldhouse. While basketball is a team sport, and losses are rarely the fault of one individual, Giannis Antetokounmpo, as the Bucks’ superstar and leader, shoulders significant responsibility for the defeat due to his offensive inefficiencies, defensive lapses, and failure to elevate his teammates.
Over-Reliance on Isolation Plays
Giannis took 23 shots to reach his 36 points, shooting 15-for-23 (65.2%) from the field. While his field goal percentage was strong, his shot selection leaned heavily on isolation drives and post-ups, which played into the Pacers’ defensive strategy. Indiana, ranked 15th in defensive rating this season, is known for allowing a high percentage of shots in the paint (56%, the league’s highest) but has improved at contesting those attempts. Pascal Siakam, who guarded Giannis for 27 minutes across 130 possessions this season, and Myles Turner effectively crowded the paint, forcing Giannis into contested shots or passing out of double-teams.
The Bucks’ offense, typically a top-10 unit in the final weeks of the regular season, scored only 98 points in Game 1, well below their season average of 115.9. Giannis’ 23 shot attempts accounted for nearly a quarter of Milwaukee’s 94 field goal attempts, but his usage rate (estimated at 32.1% based on regular-season trends) meant the offence often stalled when he held the ball. For example, a second-quarter possession highlighted by The Athletic showed Giannis posting up after decoy actions, but his teammates’ positioning offered little support, leading to a forced shot or turnover. This lack of fluidity was a recurring issue, as Giannis failed to consistently involve teammates in high-percentage opportunities.
Turnover Troubles
Giannis committed turnovers on critical possessions, including a notable drive in the first half where he lost the ball to Andrew Nembhard, leading to a fast-break opportunity for Indiana. The Bucks turned the ball over 15 times in the game, with Giannis’ aggressive drives contributing to at least three, per NBA.com’s play-by-play data. These turnovers fuelled Indiana’s transition game, where they rank fourth in efficiency (130.4 points per 100 possessions). The Pacers capitalised, scoring 31 fast-break points, a stark contrast to Milwaukee’s 12. Giannis’ ball-handling, while improved this season (7.9 assists per game without Damian Lillard), lacked the precision needed against Indiana’s active hands and help defence.
Failure to Facilitate
Despite his regular-season assist average, Giannis’ playmaking was underwhelming in Game 1. He recorded fewer assists than expected (exact number not specified in sources but likely below his 6.5 season average), as Indiana’s defence collapsed on his drives, daring him to pass to open shooters. The Bucks’ starting lineup, including Ryan Rollins, Taurean Prince, Kyle Kuzma, and Brook Lopez, struggled to convert from beyond the arc, shooting just 4-for-17 (23.5%) from three. Giannis’ inability to set up teammates for open looks exacerbated this issue. In contrast, Tyrese Haliburton, despite an off shooting night, dished out 12 assists, showcasing the kind of facilitation that kept Indiana’s offence humming.
As you can see in the possession chart, Giannis hogged the ball much more than anyone, Kuzma hardly touched it (and is now blamed by a lot of people.) As Doc Rivers said in his post game interview, you can’t expect to make a bad pass as the clock runs out when the entire opposing team knows whoever gets the ball from Giannis will have to shoot it.
Defensive Lapses: Giannis as the Anchor That Wavered
As the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year, Giannis is expected to anchor Milwaukee’s defense, particularly against a high-octane Pacers offense that averaged 117.3 points per game (seventh in the NBA). While Giannis is no longer the Defensive Player of the Year, his presence in the paint is crucial for a Bucks team that improved its transition defense post-All-Star break, allowing 12.2 fast-break points per game compared to 14.3 before. However, in Game 1, Giannis’ defensive efforts were inconsistent, contributing to Indiana’s 61% shooting in the first half and 26 points in the paint in the opening 24 minutes.
Siakam vs Giannis
— Hoop Informatics (@hoopinformatics.bsky.social) 19 April 2025 at 20:29
[image or embed]
The Nembhard Dagger
A pivotal moment came late in the first half when Giannis was caught out of position defending Andrew Nembhard. After poking the ball away, Giannis failed to recover quickly, leaving Nembhard open for a 30-foot three-pointer that extended Indiana’s lead to 24 points. This play, detailed by The Athletic, underscored Giannis’ occasional lack of discipline in scramble situations. Nembhard’s shot not only swung momentum but also highlighted Giannis’ struggle to balance aggressive help defense with maintaining his assignment.
Struggles Against Siakam and Transition
Pascal Siakam, who scored 25 points, exploited mismatches against Giannis and others, using his versatility to score in the post and midrange. Giannis, tasked with guarding Siakam for significant stretches, allowed the All-Star forward to operate efficiently, as Siakam shot 10-for-16 (62.5%). Additionally, Giannis’ slow rotations in transition defense contributed to Indiana’s 31 fast-break points. The Pacers’ ability to run and gun, led by Siakam and Haliburton, overwhelmed Milwaukee’s half-court sets, and Giannis, as the defensive leader, failed to set the tone to slow Indiana’s pace.
Leadership and Teammate Elevation: Where Giannis Fell Short
As the Bucks’ franchise player, Giannis is expected to elevate his teammates, especially in the absence of Damian Lillard, who missed Game 1 due to a blood clot issue. The Bucks’ starting lineup, which scored 130.1 points per 100 possessions during the regular season (100th percentile), managed only 91.9 points per 100 possessions in 17 minutes in Game 1. Coach Doc Rivers pointed to poor offensive execution as the primary issue, stating, “We just didn’t play the way we played during this stretch to close the season offensively.” Giannis, as the focal point, bears responsibility for this disconnect.
Inability to Settle the Offence
Giannis acknowledged post-game that the team’s offense lacked patience, with players “inching toward the ball” out of anxiety to make plays. His leadership on the court could have mitigated this by orchestrating sets that prioritized ball movement over individual heroics. Instead, the Bucks’ offense devolved into predictable patterns, with Giannis’ post-ups and drives failing to create space for shooters like Kuzma (14.5 points per game as a Buck) or Lopez (a reliable three-point threat). The Pacers’ roster-wide contributions, with four starters scoring at least 14 points, exposed Milwaukee’s over-reliance on Giannis’ scoring.
Contrast with Haliburton’s Impact
Tyrese Haliburton, despite shooting poorly, impacted the game through playmaking and composure, rallying Indiana’s bench (led by T.J. McConnell and Obi Toppin in prior games) to maintain offensive flow. Giannis, by contrast, couldn’t inspire similar contributions from Milwaukee’s role players. Bobby Portis, recently returned from suspension, and Kevin Porter Jr., a key addition, failed to provide the spark seen during the Bucks’ late-season surge. Giannis’ inability to galvanize these players in a hostile road environment underscores a leadership gap in Game 1.
Contextual Factors: Not All on Giannis, But…
To be fair, Giannis wasn’t the sole reason for the loss. The Bucks were without Lillard, their second-highest scorer, and the starting lineup’s poor three-point shooting (23.5%) limited their spacing. Indiana’s home-court advantage, bolstered by a 29-11 home record and a raucous Gainbridge Fieldhouse crowd, also played a role. However, Giannis’ stature as an All-NBA first-team lock and the best player on the floor (as noted by multiple sources) means he’s held to a higher standard. His 36 points, while impressive, came at the cost of offensive rhythm, and his defensive miscues allowed Indiana to exploit Milwaukee’s vulnerabilities.
Looking Ahead: Can Giannis Bounce Back?
The Bucks’ 117-98 loss is not the end of the series, as Game 2 offers a chance for redemption. Giannis’ regular-season dominance against Indiana (30 points, 12.3 rebounds, 7.5 assists in four games) and his improved midrange game (averaging over 30 points with less than one three-pointer per game) suggest he can adjust. To turn the series around, Giannis must:
- Prioritize Playmaking: Increase his assist totals by finding open shooters, especially in transition, to counter Indiana’s fast-paced attack.
- Refine Shot Selection: Mix midrange jumpers with drives to keep Siakam and Turner off balance, reducing turnovers.
- Anchor the Defense: Stay disciplined in help situations and communicate to limit Indiana’s transition scoring.
- Lead with Poise: Settle his teammates early, fostering trust and patience to avoid the offensive stagnation seen in Game 1.
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Game 1 performance was a microcosm of his brilliance and flaws. His 36 points and 12 rebounds showcased his individual dominance, but his offensive inefficiencies, defensive lapses, and failure to elevate teammates allowed the Pacers to seize control. As the Bucks’ leader, Giannis bears significant responsibility for the loss, not because he didn’t produce, but because his production didn’t translate to team success. With a long series ahead, Giannis has the opportunity to learn from Game 1 and reassert his status as one of the NBA’s elite. Bucks fans, while disappointed, hope that the “Greek Freak” has the tools to turn the tide—starting with Game 2. Can Giannis stop being the selfish stat padding ball hog we have seen all year? Does he care more about himself looking good and a hero or about actually giving his team a chance to win and putting his ego aside?
Sources: NBA.com, The Athletic, ESPN, Yahoo Sports, Covers.com, Brew Hoop, JSONline.com, IndyStar.com, USA Today, Bleacher Report, and posts on X.
