Category: SKILLS

  • The Lingering Shadows of a Late Start: Giannis

    The Lingering Shadows of a Late Start: Giannis

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, even after over a decade in the league has certain aspects of his game stubbornly underdeveloped. These weaknesses—ranging from inconsistent shooting to poor screening and defensive lapses—can be traced back to his unconventional entry into basketball. Unlike many NBA stars who honed their skills from childhood, Giannis didn’t start playing organized basketball until he was around 13 years old, first touching a basketball at that age and beginning professional play in Greece at 16. This late start meant he missed out on years of foundational training, where muscle memory for technical skills like shooting form, screen-setting technique, and quick decision-making is typically built. Instead, Giannis has relied heavily on his extraordinary physical gifts—length, speed, and power—to compensate, but these gaps persist, affecting both his individual performance and the Milwaukee Bucks’ team dynamics.

    Struggles at the Charity Stripe and Beyond: The Shooting Woes

    One of the most glaring and persistent issues in Giannis’ arsenal is his shooting, particularly from the free-throw line and long range. Despite years of practice and tweaks to his routine, his career free-throw percentage hovers at a mediocre 69.3%, dipping to 61.7% in recent seasons. This isn’t just a minor flaw; it’s a strategic vulnerability that opponents exploit, especially in playoffs, by fouling him intentionally to disrupt drives and force him to the line. Insiders have pointed out that if Giannis could convert at a higher rate—given he leads the league in free-throw attempts—he’d likely have more MVP trophies, as it would naturally boost his scoring average without additional shots.

    Beyond free throws, his overall shooting profile reveals deficiencies. He’s historically struggled with three-pointers and mid-range shots, posting some of the lowest field-goal percentages in the league in these areas during playoffs. While recent developments show improvement in mid-range efficiency (hitting 54.5% over stretches and ranking second league-wide in certain periods), his form lacks the fluidity of players who drilled jumpers from a young age. And of course he has no mid range when it matters in the playoffs or harder regular season games. This ties directly to his late start: Shooting is a skill rooted in repetition and mechanics developed early. Without that foundation, Giannis’ attempts often look mechanical or forced, relying on power rather than touch. In half-court sets, defenses sag off him, daring him to shoot, which clogs driving lanes and limits his effectiveness as a playmaker.

    The Art of the Pick: Why Giannis Can’t Set Effective Screens

    Screen-setting might seem like a basic team skill, but for Giannis, it’s a glaring weakness that hampers the Bucks’ offense. Analysts describe his screens as “ghost screens”—half-hearted efforts where he doesn’t establish a solid base, sets them too high, or angles them poorly, allowing defenders to slip through easily. With his massive 7-foot, 253-pound frame, he should be a screening powerhouse, but instead, he often prioritizes rolling to the rim for his own scoring opportunities, leading to shoddy execution. Statistically, this shows: He averages just over two screen assists per game, generating only five points, and the Bucks rank near the bottom in off-screen efficiency at 0.5 points per possession.

    This flaw is particularly damaging in pick-and-roll heavy schemes with stars like Damian Lillard, where effective screens create space for pull-ups or drives. Without them, the offense stagnates, forcing isolation plays. Again, the late start explains this: Screening requires precise footwork, body positioning, and timing—fundamentals drilled in youth leagues. Giannis, who jumped straight into high-level play without that base, treats it as an afterthought, leaning on his athleticism to dominate individually rather than synergize with teammates.

    Giannis’ screening IQ is obviously something that can’t magically appear. He doesn’t understand angles at the most fundamental level. He also doesn’t understand

    Defensive Reactions: Elite Talent with Occasional Lapses

    Giannis is a defensive monster—his length and instincts earned him DPOY honors—but he isn’t flawless. Critics note he struggles with quick reactions in certain scenarios, like chasing guards around screens or maintaining off-ball awareness. He can “fall asleep” off the ball, failing to rotate promptly or box out, which leads to easy rebounds or cuts for opponents. While his help defense is elite, perimeter switching exposes slower lateral quickness against shifty guards, and his reactions in complex schemes can lag.

    This isn’t about effort but ingrained habits. Starting basketball late meant less exposure to defensive drills that build anticipation and reaction speed. Players like Kawhi Leonard or Draymond Green, who started young, have that intuitive read-and-react ability honed over years. For Giannis, defense is more reactive to his physical tools than proactive fundamentals, making him vulnerable in playoff matchups where teams scheme to isolate these gaps.

    Passing and Decision-Making: The Half-Court Hurdles

    Giannis’ passing is another area where limitations shine through. While he averages solid assists, he’s not a “great passer,” as opponents like Alperen Sengun have exploited by collapsing the paint and forcing him into tough decisions. In half-court sets, he struggles with quick reads, often over-dribbling (sometimes for 14 seconds) or opting for isolation shots instead of hitting open teammates. This contributes to the Bucks’ low rankings in passes and assists, turning a potential juggernaut into a predictable unit.

    Tied to his late start, decision-making under pressure requires basketball IQ built from countless reps in varied scenarios. Without early immersion, Giannis defaults to his strengths—driving or pulling up—rather than orchestrating like a true point forward.

    Ball-Handling, Counter Moves, and Other Bad Habits

    Giannis’ handle lacks creativity, making him predictable when trapped. He

    doesn’t have a wide array of counter moves, often resorting to the same Euro-step or spin without variation. Bad habits compound this: fascination with inefficient isolation mid-rangers or dribble-up threes, poor off-ball movement, and inconsistent boxing out. These stem from relying on physical dominance rather than refined skills, a byproduct of skipping foundational years.

    The Cost of a Late Bloom and Paths Forward

    Giannis’ weaknesses aren’t from lack of effort—he’s worked tirelessly to improve. But starting at 13 meant building a skyscraper on a shallow foundation; the cracks show in technical areas requiring early muscle memory. For the Bucks to contend, Giannis must evolve beyond isolation heroics, embracing team play like better screens and quicker passes. At 30, there’s still time, but these lingering issues remind us: Even freaks of nature have human origins.

  • How many top100 nba players have done worse than giannis in the playoffs?

    How many top100 nba players have done worse than giannis in the playoffs?

    While Giannis Antetokounmpo has indeed struggled with consistent playoff success, with six first-round exits in his ten playoff appearances (60% first-round exit rate) , a few more top 100 NBA players of all time have actually had worse or comparable playoff failures relative to their talent and expectations.

    Karl Malone – Often ranked in the top 15-20 all-time

    Karl Malone holds the unfortunate record for most playoff games (193) without winning a championship. Despite being a two-time MVP and reaching two Finals, he suffered multiple devastating losses:

    • Lost both Finals appearances to Michael Jordan’s Bulls (1997, 1998)
    • Had significant playoff efficiency drops compared to regular season performance
    • His transition-heavy style was less effective against disciplined playoff defenses

    Charles Barkley – Universally considered top 20-25 all-time

    Barkley had a worse playoff series record than Giannis, going 12-13 in playoff series throughout his career :

    • Only one Finals appearance (1993 loss to Bulls)
    • Eight first-round exits, compared to Giannis’s six
    • Career playoff record of 62-61, barely above .500

    Steve Nash – Two-time MVP, often ranked 30-40 all-time

    Nash never reached an NBA Finals despite his elite regular season success :cbc+1

    • Played 120 career playoff games without a championship
    • Series record of 11-12 in the playoffs
    • Multiple devastating playoff exits with Phoenix despite having superior teamsyoutubecbc

    Reggie Miller – Hall of Famer, top 50-75 all-time

    Miller’s playoff record was remarkably similar to current Giannis :

    • Series record of 14-15 in 29 playoff series
    • Eight first-round exits throughout career
    • Only one Finals appearance (2000 loss to Lakers)
    • Played 144 playoff games without winning a championship

    Patrick Ewing – Top 50 player, #1 draft pick with championship expectations

    Despite being the centerpiece of multiple strong Knicks teams, Ewing never won a championship :

    • Went 0-5 against Michael Jordan’s Bulls in playoff matchups
    • 139 career playoff games without a title
    • Known for several crucial playoff failures, including the infamous missed finger-roll

    Players with Similar or Slightly Better Records

    Chris Paul – Top 75 player, “Point God”

    Paul has had numerous devastating playoff collapses :

    • Record holder for most blown 2-0 playoff leads (4)
    • Series record barely above .500 at 72-68 overall
    • Only advanced past the second round twice in 13 playoff appearances
    • Eight first-round exits in his career

    James Harden – Former MVP, top 75 player

    Despite regular season excellence, Harden has underperformed in crucial playoff moments :

    • Multiple playoff collapses, including the infamous 2018 Western Conference Finals
    • Known for poor elimination game performances
    • Only one Finals appearance (2012 with OKC as sixth man)

    Recent Struggles in Context

    Giannis’s recent struggles three consecutive first-round exits from 2023-2025 are concerning. But while Giannis’s six first-round exits in ten appearances represent genuine playoff struggles, at least 5-7 other top 100 players had worse or comparable playoff failures relative to their talent and expectations. Players like Karl Malone, Charles Barkley, Steve Nash, Reggie Miller, and Patrick Ewing all had more devastating playoff careers when accounting for their lack of championships and multiple crushing defeats.

    Why Giannis Struggles in the Playoffs: A Comprehensive Analysis

    Giannis Antetokounmpo isn’t inherently “bad” in the playoffs—he still puts up impressive individual numbers—but he faces specific, exploitable weaknesses that championship-level teams have learned to target systematically. His playoff struggles stem from a combination of technical limitations, strategic vulnerabilities, and psychological factors that become magnified under postseason pressure.

    The Primary Weaknesses

    Free Throw Shooting: The Fatal Flaw

    Giannis’s most glaring weakness is his free throw shooting, which deteriorates significantly in the playoffs :

    • Career playoff free throw percentage: 62% compared to 69.3% in regular season
    • Recent playoff performance: As low as 57% in some series
    • Strategic impact: Teams deliberately foul him late in games, knowing he’s likely to miss

    His excessively long free throw routine (15-20 seconds per shot) creates mental pressure and allows fans to affect his concentration. The routine lacks fluidity and doesn’t mirror his actual shooting motion, making it essentially “not a basketball act”.

    The “Giannis Wall” Strategy

    Since 2019, teams have deployed a devastating defensive scheme called “The Wall” that has consistently neutralized his dominance :

    How it works:

    • Three defenders collapse on Giannis when he drives, forming a “wall”
    • Two additional defenders stay back to contest his kick-out passes
    • Forces him into difficult shots or turnovers

    Historical success against Giannis:

    • 2019 Raptors: Pioneered the strategy, won series 4-2
    • 2020 Heat: Perfected it, dominated series 4-1
    • 2022 Celtics: Used effectively despite losing 4-3
    • 2023-2025: Multiple teams continue using variations successfully

    Three-Point Shooting Vulnerability

    Teams actively encourage Giannis to shoot three-pointers, knowing it plays away from his strengths :

    • Recent playoff 3PT%: 25-27%, well below league average
    • Strategic exploitation: Defenses sag off him, daring him to shoot
    • Shot selection issues: Takes contested threes instead of driving when teams expect it

    Psychological and Tactical Factors

    Pressure and Decision-Making

    Giannis struggles with decision-making when facing intense playoff pressure :

    • Turnover increase: Higher turnover rate in playoffs, especially against walls
    • Forcing shots: Tends to force drives into set defenses rather than making correct passes
    • Takes it personally: Admits he gets emotional when facing “The Wall” strategy

    Supporting Cast Dependency

    Unlike other superstars, Giannis requires exceptional supporting cast performance to succeed :

    • 2021 championship context: Won with injured opponents (Nets’ Big 3, Lakers’ stars)
    • Recent struggles: When Middleton, Holiday, or Lillard struggle, Bucks lose
    • Role player reliance: Needs shooters to make open shots when he passes out of walls

    Screen Setting Deficiency

    An underrated weakness that affects team offense :

    • Poor technique: Sets “ghost screens” that don’t create real advantages
    • Low efficiency: Only 30th percentile as pick-and-roll roll man
    • Impact on teammates: Limits Damian Lillard’s effectiveness in pick-and-roll

    Why These Weaknesses Are Magnified in Playoffs

    Preparation Time

    Playoff teams have extensive time to study and prepare specific schemes :

    • Regular season success doesn’t translate when teams gameplan specifically for him
    • Coaches like Nick Nurse, Erik Spoelstra excel at exploiting these weaknesses systematically

    Defensive Intensity and Focus

    Playoff defenses are more disciplined and committed to executing complex schemes :

    • Teams willing to sacrifice individual defense to build effective walls
    • Better communication and rotation on defensive schemes
    • More physical play that disrupts his rhythm

    Clutch Moments and Mental Pressure

    High-stakes situations expose his technical limitations :

    • Free throw struggles become magnified in close games
    • Three-point shooting weakness limits late-game options
    • Increased pressure affects decision-making under duress

    The Championship Exception: 2021

    Giannis’s 2021 championship run succeeded because of unique circumstances :

    • Opponent injuries: Brooklyn’s Big 3 were injured, Lakers eliminated early
    • Supporting cast peak: Middleton and Holiday played at their highest level
    • Health: Giannis overcame his own knee injury to deliver historic Finals performance

    Giannis isn’t “bad” in the playoffs—he’s a victim of solvable basketball problems that he hasn’t adequately addressed. His combination of free throw struggles, three-point shooting deficiencies, and vulnerability to sophisticated defensive schemes creates a blueprint that disciplined playoff teams can exploit. Unlike transcendent playoff performers who elevate their games under pressure, Giannis’s technical limitations become more pronounced when facing elite, prepared defenses with months to gameplan specifically for his weaknesses.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Worst NBA Statistical Categories

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Worst NBA Statistical Categories

    Giannis Antetokounmpo ranks among the worst in NBA history or current seasons in several key areas, despite his superstar status and multiple accolades. Here are the most significant statistical weaknesses in his game:

    Shooting Deficiencies

    Free Throw Shooting Crisis
    Giannis’s free throw shooting represents one of the most glaring weaknesses for any superstar player. His career average of 71.7% is concerning for someone who gets to the line frequently, but his 2020-21 season was historically poor at just 57.5%. During one game against Dallas, he went an abysmal 1-for-10 from the free throw line, joining an exclusive group of only four players in NBA history to shoot below 10% on 10+ attempts in a single game.

    Three-Point Shooting Regression
    Perhaps most troubling is Giannis’ unprecedented four-year consecutive decline in three-point percentage from 2019-2023. In 2018, he posted the worst three-point percentage (10.7% on 56 attempts) among all NBA players with at least 50 attempts, finishing dead last in the league. His current 2024-25 season shows minimal improvement at just 19% on 0.8 attempts per game. He is closer to the worse NBA season ever in this category!

    Mid-Range Shooting Disaster
    In the paint outside the restricted area, Giannis shot an abysmal 27.9% on 197 attempts during one analyzed season, ranking 62nd out of 62 qualified players – literally the worst among all players with similar volume. This represents a massive weakness in his offensive arsenal.

    Ball Handling and Decision Making

    Turnover Problems
    Giannis consistently ranks among the league leaders in turnovers, averaging 3.7 per game during his peak seasons. This is exceptionally high for a non-point guard and reflects poor ball security relative to his usage rate. His turnover rate is particularly concerning on drives, where he frequently loses control of the basketball.

    Ball Security Issues
    Despite being a primary ball handler, Giannis exhibits poor ball security when attacking the rim. His high turnover rate on drives stems from inadequate ball handling fundamentals and decision-making under pressure.

    Rule Violations and Officiating

    Free Throw Routine Violations
    Giannis has been called for multiple 10-second violations during playoff games and regularly exceeds the time limit. His free throw routine is the longest in the NBA, with opponents and crowds regularly counting to 12+ seconds before he releases the ball. The NBA’s Last Two Minute Reports have documented numerous instances where he should have been called for violations but wasn’t.

    Travel Violations
    Video analysis reveals that Giannis commits multiple traveling violations per game that go uncalled due to superstar treatment. Official NBA referee training videos have used Giannis as an example of traveling violations, yet these infractions are rarely penalized during games.

    Offensive Fouls and Charges
    Giannis frequently commits offensive fouls and charges that go uncalled, benefiting from inconsistent officiating. He’s among the leaders in uncalled charging fouls, often bulldozing through defenders without consequence.

    Clutch Performance Issues

    Late-Game Efficiency
    Despite his overall excellence, Giannis has shown declining efficiency in clutch situations. The Milwaukee Bucks have had some of the worst clutch-time offensive ratings in recent seasons, partly due to Giannis’s struggles in crucial moments.

    Fourth Quarter Performance
    Analysis shows that Giannis’s fourth-quarter efficiency often drops compared to earlier quarters, with his decision-making and shot selection becoming more questionable in pressure situations.

    Historical Context and Improvement Rate

    Lack of Skill Development
    Most concerning is Giannis’s minimal improvement in key areas despite years of practice. His three-point shooting improvement rate is among the worst for any superstar player, showing little meaningful progress over multiple seasons despite significant investment in shooting coaches and practice time.

    Unprecedented Regression
    For a player of Giannis’s caliber and MVP status, having four consecutive years of three-point percentage decline is virtually unprecedented in NBA history. Most elite players show improvement or at least maintain their shooting percentages over time.

    The comprehensive data reveals that while Giannis excels in some things in easier games and in the regular season, he ranks among the NBA’s worst performers in several crucial skills. These weaknesses become more pronounced in playoff situations where teams can exploit his limitations through strategic fouling and defensive schemes that force him into uncomfortable shooting situations.

  • The Myth of Giannis in Transition

    The Myth of Giannis in Transition

    Fans and analysts alike rave about his ability to turn misses into dunks, grabbing a rebound and barreling down the court for easy buckets. It’s the stuff of legends—YouTube compilations with millions of views, “unstoppable” chants on social media, and endless debates about whether he’s the best fast-break player ever. But let’s pump the brakes. While Giannis is a transition monster in the cushy confines of the regular season—where defences jog back and space is plentiful—the data tells a different story when the lights get brighter. In the playoffs, against elite schemes designed to clog the lane, his transition game crumbles under pressure. High turnover rates, plummeting efficiency, and a reliance on “easier” opportunities reveal a player who’s great at exploiting mismatches in blowouts but struggles to deliver when it counts.

    In this deep dive, we’ll break down the key transition metrics: Points Per Possession (PPP), Frequency of Transition Opportunities, effective Field Goal Percentage (eFG%), True Shooting Percentage (TS%), Turnover Rate (TOV%), Assists per Possession, On/Off Plus-Minus, Box Score Impact, and Offensive Rating (ORTG). Using data from the 2023-24 and 2024-25 seasons (regular and playoffs where available), we’ll show how Giannis’s transition dominance is a regular-season mirage. Spoiler: It’s not as freakish as you think.

    The Regular Season Facade: Space, Speed, and Stats

    In the 82-game grind, Giannis thrives in transition. The Bucks ranked top-5 in transition frequency league-wide in 2023-24, and Giannis was the engine, leading the NBA in transition points per game at 7.5 while tying for the most opportunities at 6.1 per game. His PPP? A blistering 1.42—well above the league average of ~1.15 for transition plays. That’s elite territory, turning fast breaks into automatic offence. For sure in the regular season most serious players – with their mind on the playoffs – don’t want to stand in front of him.

    But dig deeper, and even here, cracks show. His eFG% in transition hovered around 78.6% in 2023-24, absurdly high thanks to dunks and layups, but his TS% dipped below 80% when factoring in occasional misses or fouls. Turnover rate? A manageable 12-15%, but it spikes when defences load up. Assists per possession are low (0.25-0.30), meaning he’s mostly iso-dribbling to the rim rather than creating for others—great for highlights, less so for sustainable team play.

    Here’s a snapshot of Giannis’s 2023-24 regular-season transition stats compared to league leaders (via NBA.com and Synergy data):

    MetricGiannis (2023-24 Reg)League Avg (Transition)Top Player (e.g., Ja Morant)
    PPP1.421.151.48
    Frequency (%)18.2% (Bucks’ possessions)14.5%20.1%
    eFG%78.6%65.0%82.0%
    TS%79.2%68.5%83.5%
    TOV%13.8%12.0%10.2%
    AST per Poss0.280.220.35
    ORTG128.5115.0132.0

    Sources: NBA.com Stats, GiveMeSport analysis

    On/Off plus-minus tells the tale: Bucks outscored opponents by +12.5 per 100 possessions in transition with Giannis on the floor, but only +8.2 when off—still good, but the drop-off highlights his outsized role (and risk). Box score impact? He accounts for ~35% of Milwaukee’s transition points, but the team’s overall transition ORTG falls to 122 when he forces contested drives.

    This works against tired, rotating defences in mid-January matinees. But playoffs? That’s where the “easier games” vanish.

    Playoff Reality Check: Clogged Lanes, Cough-Ups, and Collapse

    Enter the postseason, where coaches scheme to deny space. Teams like the Heat (2023) and Pacers (2024) dare Giannis to pass, pack the paint, and force him into traffic. The result? His transition game regresses hard. In 2023 (vs. Miami and Boston), Giannis’s transition PPP dropped to 1.18—below league playoff average—and his frequency plummeted as the Bucks’ break opportunities dried up to 12.5% of possessions.

    Turnovers are the killer. Giannis’s playoff TOV% in transition balloons to 18-20%, nearly double his regular-season mark. Remember Game 4 vs. the Heat in 2023? 6 transition turnovers alone, leading to 12 Miami fast-break points. Career playoff high: 8 TOs in a single game (2019 ECF vs. Toronto). He ranks in the top 25 for playoff TOV per game historically, a damning stat for a “freak” who should glide past defenders.

    Efficiency tanks too. eFG% falls to ~65%, TS% to 62-65%—playoff-average at best. Why? No space means more contested finishes, fewer and-ones. Assists per possession? A measly 0.18, as he refuses to kick out under duress. In 2021 Finals vs. Phoenix, his transition ORTG was a pedestrian 112, with Bucks outscored by 15 in break points during his minutes.

    Compare 2023 playoffs to regular season:

    MetricGiannis (2023 Reg)Giannis (2023 Playoffs)League Playoff Avg
    PPP1.421.181.12
    Frequency (%)18.2%12.8%13.5%
    eFG%78.6%65.2%64.0%
    TS%79.2%63.8%66.5%
    TOV%13.8%19.2%14.0%
    AST per Poss0.280.180.24
    ORTG128.5112.0114.5

    Sources: Basketball-Reference, Reddit NBA analysis

    And when looking at these stats remember that Giannis has had 3 first round exits! His statistics reflect only one series with an easier opponent, not multiple games getting gradually harder as other players’ stats do.

    On/Off plus-minus flips negative: -4.2 per 100 in transition during playoff minutes, per Cleaning the Glass data. Box score impact? He generates just 22% of Bucks’ transition points in playoffs (down from 35%), and the team’s transition ORTG craters to 105—bottom-quartile. In 2024, Giannis missed the entire first-round loss to Indiana due to calf strain, but even without him, Milwaukee’s transition scoring fell 25% from regular-season norms, underscoring his “irreplaceable” role… until defences adapt.

    The “Easier Games” Crutch: Why It Only Works Against Weaker Foes

    The pattern is clear: Giannis feasts on transition against bottom-10 defences (e.g., 2023-24 vs. Wizards, Pistons: 1.55 PPP, 5% TOV%). But against top-5 units like Boston or Miami? PPP dips under 1.20, TOV% over 20%. In “easier” regular-season games (Bucks win by 15+), his transition eFG% hits 82%; in close losses, it’s 58%.

    This isn’t elite adaptability—it’s opportunism. Playoff teams eliminate those “spaces” with disciplined shell defence, forcing Giannis into half-court hero ball where his ORTG drops 10-15 points. His On/Off in high-leverage playoff minutes? -8.5 transition plus-minus, per RAPM estimates. Box score? Fewer transition FGM (down 30%), more TOs feeding opponent runs.

    Time to Recalibrate the Hype

    Giannis in transition is a regular-season weapon, padding stats in open floors against over matched foes that are protecting their best players for the playoffs. But when it counts—playoffs, close games, elite defences—the metrics expose him: subpar PPP, leaky TOV%, middling efficiency, and negative impact. He’s not “bad” outright, but far from the unstoppable force narrative. To win titles, Milwaukee needs him to evolve: better passing in traffic, mid-range threats to open lanes (he’s working on it), or a system beyond “feed the Freak.”

    The data doesn’t lie. Next time you see a transition dunk, ask: Would that fly in May? Probably not.

    Data compiled from NBA.com, Basketball-Reference, Cleaning the Glass, and The Athletic. All stats per 100 possessions unless noted.

  • The Rebounding Illusion: Giannis Antetokounmpo the Bucks Worse on the Boards

    The Rebounding Illusion: Giannis Antetokounmpo the Bucks Worse on the Boards

    In NBA analytics, some stats cut through the hype and reveal uncomfortable truths. The “BEAST ON THE BOARDS” chart illustrates how star big men’s presence impacts their team’s rebound percentages. Players like Steven Adams (+19.1 OREB%, +18.5 TREB%) and Nikola Jokic (+3.1, +6.2) boost their squads, living up to their reputations as rebounding forces. But then there’s Giannis Antetokounmpo, with negative differentials: -3.1 OREB% and -0.2 TREB%. This isn’t a glitch—it’s a pattern that questions the “Greek Freak’s” true impact.

    Giannis posts gaudy individual numbers, averaging double-digit rebounds most seasons, but the team’s rebounding suffers when he’s on the floor. Why? It’s not just about team dynamics; it’s tied to Giannis’ evolving priorities, defensive shortcomings, and a focus on personal stats over team success. Since his 2019-20 Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY) award, his defence has declined, he’s emphasised offence, chased highlights, and padded rebounds—often at the expense of cohesive play. Let’s break it down with data and context.

    Understanding On-Off Rebound Percentages

    Before we dissect Giannis’ case, let’s clarify the stat. Rebound percentage measures the share of available rebounds a team (or player) secures while on the court. It’s more insightful than raw rebounds because it accounts for pace and opportunities—after all, a fast-paced game might have more misses, but the percentage normalizes that.

    • OREB%: The percentage of a team’s own missed shots that they rebound (offensive rebounds / (offensive rebounds + opponent’s defensive rebounds)).
    • TREB%: The overall rebound percentage, combining offensive and defensive boards.

    The “on-off differential” compares the team’s performance in these metrics when a player is on the court versus off. A positive number means the team rebounds better with the player playing; a negative means they rebound better without them.

    Data from sites like Cleaning the Glass shows this isn’t a one-off fluke for Giannis. In the 2021-22 season (which aligns closely with the chart’s numbers, showing -2.8 OREB% on-off), and other years like 2018-19 (-1.2%) and 2020-21 (-1.9%), Giannis posted negative differentials. Yet, in more recent seasons like 2023-24 (+2.6 OREB%) and 2024-25 (+1.8%), it’s flipped positive. So, what’s going on?

    Giannis’ Individual Stats: Impressive, But Inflated?

    Giannis ranks among the league’s top rebounders, but scrutiny reveals issues:

    SeasonRebounds Per Game (RPG)Total Rebound % (TRB%)Defensive Rating (DRtg)Defensive BPM (DBPM)
    2019-2013.621.4%974.1
    2020-2111.018.5%1072.8
    2021-2211.619.2%1063.5
    2022-2311.819.8%1082.7
    2023-2411.518.8%1122.4
    2024-2511.919.5%1092.5

    (Source: Basketball-Reference)

    His RPG and TRB% are solid, but notice the defensive metrics. Post-DPOY (where he posted a league-best 97 DRtg), his DRtg has worsened to 107-112, indicating more points allowed per 100 possessions. DBPM, measuring defensive impact, dropped from 4.1 to as low as 2.4. This decline correlates with negative rebound diffs, as poor defence leads to more opponent makes—and fewer rebound chances.

    The Shift: From Defensive Anchor to Offensive Focus

    Giannis won DPOY in 2019-20 as a versatile defender, using his 7-foot wingspan for help defence and rim protection. But since then, his effort has waned. Analysts note he’s prioritised offence over grinding on D. Bucks’ schemes rely on him as a free safety, but he often chases “highlight reel” plays—spectacular blocks or steals—instead of sticking to plans.

    This individualism disrupts team rebounding. Teammates “clear out” on misses, letting Giannis grab easy defensive boards to pad stats, rather than contesting collectively. A notorious 2023 incident saw him intentionally miss a shot for his own rebound to secure a triple-double, later rescinded by the NBA amid “stat-padding” backlash. Fans and media called it “shameless,” highlighting a pattern where personal milestones trump team efficiency.

    Defensive Shortcomings: Speed, Switching, and Fundamentals

    Giannis’ late start in basketball—he didn’t play organised ball until age 13 in Greece—shows in his reflexes and scheme comprehension. Unlike peers who honed instincts young, he struggles with complex switches in modern pick-and-roll defences. He’s not fast enough laterally to guard perimeter threats, often getting blown by or mispositioned. This leads to breakdowns: Opponents exploit gaps, leading to more makes and fewer Bucks rebounds.

    In high-pace lineups with Giannis, the team leaks out for transitions, but his defensive lapses mean more opponent scores—reducing OREB% opportunities. Bench units, without him, play more structured, grabbing boards at higher rates. Social media discussions echo this: “Giannis was only ever a helpside defender… not much of a rim protector.” His blocks (around 1-1.5/game post-DPOY) are flashy but don’t anchor like Gobert’s.

    Lineup and Opponent Factors: Excuses or Reality?

    Sure, roster changes matter—Brook Lopez’s injuries forced adjustments, and backups like Bobby Portis (16.5% TRB% in 2021-22) feast in non-Giannis minutes. But this masks Giannis’ issues. He faces starters, but his declining DBPM suggests he’s not elevating the unit. Bucks’ overall TREB% (50-52%) is average, but negatives persist because Giannis’ style—offence-first, stat-chasing—trades team rebounding for personal glory.

    He’s in his prime physically but coasting defensively.

    Time for Accountability

    Giannis’ negative on-off rebound diffs aren’t a paradox—they’re a symptom of prioritising offence, highlights, and stats over defence and team play. His late basketball start hampers reflexes in schemes, and rebound “padding” inflates numbers while hurting the Bucks. Milwaukee won in 2021 despite this, but as defences evolve, Giannis must recommit defensively. In 2025-26, under Doc Rivers, watch if he adapts—or if the illusion crumbles further.

  • How Turkey obliterated Giannis.  And almost anyone can do the same (when it counts)

    How Turkey obliterated Giannis. And almost anyone can do the same (when it counts)

    The basketball world was buzzing after the EuroBasket 2025 semifinals on September 12, when Turkey pulled off a stunning upset, defeating Greece 82-74 to advance to the finals for the first time in 24 years. At the centre of the drama? None other than Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and perennial NBA Defensive Player of the Year candidate, who was held to a shocking 12 points on 6-of-13 shooting. For a player who is presented as unguardable throughout his career—averaging over 25 points per game in the tournament up to that point—this was a defensive clinic that exposed vulnerabilities in the Greek Freak’s game.

    Turkey, under coach Ergin Ataman, didn’t just defend Giannis; they dissected him with a blend of physicality, teamwork, and tactical precision. This wasn’t a fluke—it was a blueprint that echoes strategies we’ve seen (and debated) in the NBA for years. Three years of early playoff exits, three years of losing even in the regular season against teams that care enough to defend him like this.

    The EuroBasket Breakdown: Turkey’s Defensive Symphony

    Greece entered the semifinal as favourites, largely on Giannis’s reputation. By sheer luck of the bracket however Greece had not faced any serious opponents. Giannis skillfully avoid playing against Nurkic because he knew what would happen. (They lost anyway, Giannis avoided looking foolish though.) The recipe is simple:

    1. Disrupt the Delivery: Pressure the Perimeter

    Turkey’s first line of attack was simple but ruthless: make it hard for Greece to get the ball to Giannis. Guards Sehmus Hazer and Shane Larkin (yes, the ex-Celtics sharpshooter now starring for Anadolu Efes) hounded the inbounders and ball-handlers, using quick hands and relentless pressure to force 12 turnovers in the first half alone. Cedi Osman, the NBA veteran forward, chipped in by switching onto Giannis in open court, denying easy touches and forcing him to receive the ball further from the rim than he prefers.

    This tactic preyed on one of Giannis’s subtler weaknesses: his ball-handling under duress. At 6’11” with a long stride, he’s a transition monster, but Turkey’s transition defence was lockdown—limiting fast breaks and keeping Greece in a half-court grind. As Alperen Sengun later noted in a post-game interview, “We knew if we let him bring the ball up freely, it was over. So we trapped early and often.”

    2. One-on-One Anchor with Help on Demand: Osmani’s Heroics

    Enter Ercan Osmani, Turkey’s 6’10” power forward and the unsung hero of the night. Osmani drew the primary assignment, bodying Giannis in the post and contesting every move with physicality that matched the Freak’s ferocity. But this wasn’t hero-ball defence; it was a relay. Whenever Giannis put the ball on the floor inside the three-point line, the paint collapsed. Sengun, the Houston Rockets’ rising star centre, rotated over as the “wall,” swatting at drives and contesting lobs without leaving his man exposed.

    Shane Larkin summed it up perfectly in a post-game breakdown: “The plan was to collapse whenever he raised that ball to drive. Force the kick-out, then rotate hard on the perimeter. We accepted threes from their guards—guys like [Thomas] Walkup aren’t lights-out shooters.” This “shrink the floor” approach turned Giannis into a passer and like Sengun had said before the game “Giannis is not a great passer.”

    3. Zone and Traps: The Triple-Team Fortress

    When Giannis did touch the ball in his sweet spot—the low block or mid-post—Turkey flipped the script to a hybrid zone. Double-teams (often Osman and Sengun) quickly escalated to triples, with a third defender (frequently Osman circling back or Hazer digging in) forming what one reporter called a “fortress wall.” Passing lanes were clogged, leading to strips and turnovers. Physicality was key: Turkey played with NBA-level bump-and-turn, wearing Giannis down over 35 minutes.

    The result? Giannis, who thrives on momentum and space, looked frustrated—good for just 12 points, 12 rebounds, and those 5 assists. Turkey’s bench erupted after a key sequence in the third quarter where a triple-team forced a kick-out that sailed wide, sealing the momentum shift. It was defense as performance art: collective, adaptive, and unrelenting.

    Why This Works in the NBA: Timeless Principles Meet Pro Pace

    EuroBasket might play at a slower tempo than the NBA’s breakneck speed, but Turkey’s blueprint is straight out of the league’s defensive playbook. Giannis’s dominance—elite athleticism, length, and finishing—makes him a matchup nightmare, but he’s not invincible. His game relies on driving lanes, transition opportunities, and post-ups, all of which can be neutralized with smart team defense. Here’s why Turkey’s tactics aren’t just FIBA-specific:

    The “Wall” Strategy: A Proven NBA Staple

    Coined during the 2021 playoffs when the Heat and Nets tried (and sometimes succeeded) in slowing Giannis, “The Wall” involves funneling him baseline or middle with on-ball pressure, then crowding the paint with help defenders. Turkey executed this to perfection, much like the Miami Heat’s 2020 bubble run, where Bam Adebayo and a rotating cast of bigs forced Giannis into 5+ turnovers per game. In the NBA, where spacing is tighter due to better shooters, teams live with contested threes from role players (e.g., Bucks’ Pat Connaughton) rather than letting Giannis bulldoze to the rim.

    Physicality and Rotations: Exploiting Fatigue

    The NBA’s 82-game grind amplifies Turkey’s physical approach. Giannis averages 34+ minutes per game; constant doubles wear him down, forcing passes that expose slower rotations. Data from the 2024-25 season shows Giannis’s efficiency dips 15% against teams that trap him 20%+ of possessions (per Second Spectrum tracking). Turkey’s zone hybrids mirror what the Warriors used in their March 2025 win over Milwaukee, where Draymond Green orchestrated rotations to limit Giannis to 18 points.

    Transition Denial: The Silent Killer

    FIBA rules limit fast breaks slightly, but the principle holds: Deny outlet passes and force half-court sets. In the NBA, where Giannis scores 40% of his points in transition, teams like the Celtics use length (Tatum, Brown) to mirror this, dropping Milwaukee’s transition efficiency by 12 points per 100 possessions in recent matchups.

    In short, Turkey’s win proves that with discipline, no star is untouchable—especially one whose jumper (still a work in progress at 29.5% from three in 2025) keeps defenses honest but not terrified. After all as I have explained at length and with much statistical proof, Giannis has no mid range when it matters.

    NBA Defenders Who’ve Cracked the Code: A Hall of Fame Lineup

    Over Giannis’s decade in the league, only a select few have consistently turned him mortal. These aren’t just stat-line suppressors; they’re tacticians who force the Bucks to play “away” from their star. Here’s a rundown of the most effective, based on playoff and regular-season matchups (points per possession allowed under 1.00, per NBA Advanced Stats):

    Bam Adebayo (Miami Heat) – The Gold Standard

    Bam’s the closest thing to a 1v1 kryptonite. In the 2020 and 2023 playoffs, he held Giannis to 22.4 PPG on 48% shooting, using his lateral quickness to stay in front and strength to absorb contact. Fun fact: Adebayo’s the only defender who’s outscored Giannis in head-to-head minutes while forcing 2.1 turnovers per game. Why it works? Bam funnels him without help, buying time for rotations.

    Joel Embiid (Philadelphia 76ers) – The Post Enforcer

    Embiid’s size (7’0″, 280 lbs) and IQ make him a post-up nightmare. In 2023 Eastern Conference Semis, Philly’s scheme with Embiid as the anchor dropped Giannis to 19.8 PPG. He’s physical enough to bang without fouling and mobile enough to recover on drives—key against Giannis’s euro-steps.

    Draymond Green (Golden State Warriors) – The Chaos Conductor

    Green’s not matching Giannis’s athleticism, but his brain is unmatched. In the Warriors’ 104-93 dismantling of the Bucks in March 2025, Draymond guarded him straight-up for 28 minutes, limiting him to 18 points on 7-18 shooting. It’s all about positioning: Green pressures full-court, funnels baseline, and communicates traps like a quarterback. Career vs. Giannis: Holds him under 1.05 PPP.

    Rudy Gobert (Minnesota Timberwolves) – The Rim Guardian

    Three-time DPOY Gobert’s length (7’9″ wingspan) clogs lanes. In 2024 playoffs, Minnesota’s “Gobert Wall” (with Jaden McDaniels) restricted Giannis to 24 PPG on 52% eFG%. Rudy’s not quick enough for full games, but in drop coverage, he erases lobs and weak-side help.

    P.J. Tucker (Formerly Clippers/Raptors) – The Gritty Veteran

    Tucker’s the ultimate “annoyance” defender. During the 2019 Raptors run, he bodied Giannis into 22.3 PPG on inefficient shots. His low center of gravity and hand-fighting disrupted rhythm—perfect for half-court sets.

    Honorable mentions: Al Horford (Celtics’ zone wizardry in 2022 ECF), Jayson Tatum (versatile switching), and OG Anunoby (Raptors’ length in isolation). Hell, even the much shorter Dillon Brooks last season wiped Giannis on his own!

    The Freak’s Evolution and the Defender’s Edge

    Turkey’s EuroBasket triumph wasn’t just a win—it was a reminder that basketball’s a team sport, even against unicorns like Giannis. By disrupting flow, collapsing space, and embracing the grind, they turned a supernova into a shooting star. In the NBA, where schemes evolve daily, expect more coaches to dust off this playbook as the Bucks chase another ring.

    What’s next for the Greek Freak? A sharper jumper? Better pick-and-roll vision? It doesn’t seem like he has added anything at all to his game all these years. More and more NBA players will just pull him apart like Turkey did. Bucks’ fans get confused because in easy games in the regular season most teams don’t bother. Why risk injury when so many times the officials don’t even give you the clear offensive foul Giannis commits? But when it counts? Three first round exits say “Giannis ain’t got it no more”.


    Sources: FIBA EuroBasket recaps, Basketball Sphere analysis, JSONline game reports, NBA Advanced Stats, and Second Spectrum data.

    Notable Individual Defenders

    • Dillon Brooks: Noteworthy for his physical, pesky defense on Giannis in 2024 NBA and Olympic matchups, using aggressive and disciplined tactics.
    • Lu Dort: Regarded as one of the top perimeter defenders, Dort used his strength and lateral quickness to defend Giannis on switches and in isolation, occasionally frustrating him in transition and halfcourt.
    • Bam Adebayo: Perhaps the most consistently effective one-on-one defender in playoff contexts, especially as the anchor for Miami’s wall defense.
    • Draymond Green: Famous for a 2025 regular-season performance where he held Giannis scoreless as a primary defender, supported by a strong team approach.
    • Grant Williams: Physical, disciplined, and effective—particularly in Celtics playoff series, often forcing Giannis into help coverage and tough shots.
    • Al Horford: Senior defender with a strong understanding of positioning, effective in both solo coverage and with Boston’s team help.
    • OG Anunoby: Length and strength allow him to contest Giannis’ drives and shots with discipline.
    • Onyeka Okongwu: Young big man with mobility and strong hands; considered one of the better defenders in direct matchups.
    • Anthony Davis: On healthy stretches with the Lakers, has the rim deterrence and agility to challenge Giannis at the basket.
    • Ben Simmons: Before recent injury downturn, was praised for his length and on-ball defense on Giannis.
    • Jonathan Isaac: When healthy, combined size, speed, and anticipation to bother Giannis in isolation and around the rim.
    • Jaren Jackson Jr.: Rim protection and lateral movement enable strong paint defense against Giannis.
    • Steven Adams: Physical strength inside makes him a tough post matchup for Giannis when protected by team schemes.
    • Clint Capela: Athletic rim protector, effective in switching schemes and as a help defender.
    • Zion Williamson: When healthy, physical enough to body Giannis and contest drives.
    • Evan Mobley & Jarrett Allen: The Cleveland frontcourt uses length and anticipation to wall off the lane and force tough finishes.
    • LeBron James: While not a primary defender, has successfully defended Giannis in stretches, using size and intelligence
  • Giannis Can’t Play Like Carmelo Anthony

    Giannis Can’t Play Like Carmelo Anthony

    In the pantheon of NBA greats, few players embody offensive versatility quite like Carmelo Anthony. Known for his silky mid-range game, deadly jab steps, and isolation scoring prowess, Melo was a nightmare matchup for defenders throughout his career. On the other hand, Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Greek Freak, has built his Hall-of-Fame trajectory on sheer athletic dominance—barreling to the rim with eurosteps, thunderous dunks, and relentless drives. While Giannis has expressed interest in training with retired legends like Melo to expand his arsenal, the reality is stark: he simply can’t replicate Anthony’s style. Over a decade in the league, Giannis has shown minimal evolution in key offensive skills, adding precious few tools while regressing in others.

    The Fundamental Clash of Styles: Athleticism vs. Finesse

    Carmelo Anthony’s game was a masterclass in offensive craftsmanship. He excelled in the mid-range, where he consistently shot around 35-36% from 10-16 feet in his prime years, using footwork, pump fakes, and pull-up jumpers to create space. His three-point shooting peaked at over 40% in seasons like 2013-14, and he maintained a free-throw percentage often above 80%, making him a reliable closer in crunch time. Melo’s assists hovered around 2-4 per game, but his value lay in self-creation—iso plays where he could dismantle defenses one-on-one without needing elite speed or vertical leap.

    Contrast that with Giannis. From his rookie year in 2013-14, where he averaged just 6.8 points on 41.4% shooting, his game has always centered on physical gifts: length, speed, and power. He thrives at the rim, converting over 78% of attempts there in recent seasons, often via straight-line drives or transition buckets. But this reliance on athleticism limits him in half-court sets against packed defenses. Unlike Melo, Giannis lacks the refined footwork for jab-step pull-ups or the touch for consistent mid-range fadeaways. His career three-point percentage sits inconsistently low, and he rarely attempts the kind of contested jumpers that defined Anthony’s scoring. Even as Giannis has voiced admiration for Melo—recently stating he wants to train with him because “I don’t like working with players who are playing right now”—the body types and ingrained habits make emulation improbable. Giannis is a 7-foot freight train; Melo was a 6’8” surgeon with the ball.

    Giannis’ Stunted Development: Incremental Gains, Minimal Additions

    Giannis entered the NBA as a raw, skinny prospect from Greece, with scouts praising his potential but noting his lack of polish. Over 12 seasons, he’s transformed into a two-time MVP and champion, but a closer look at his stats reveals a player who has leaned heavily on his natural tools rather than building a diverse skill set.

    • Scoring Efficiency at the Rim: This is where Giannis has shone, improving his field goal percentage from 41.4% as a rookie to a career-high 61.1% in 2023-24. His points per game ballooned to 30.4 in 2024-25, but this growth stems from higher usage (up to 35.2%) and better team spacing, not new moves. He’s still primarily a slasher, with over 70% of his shots coming within 10 feet of the basket in most seasons.
    • Playmaking: He hasn’t developed the off-ball screening or spot-up shooting that could make him a true offensive hub like LeBron James.
    • Limited Perimeter Expansion: Giannis has attempted more threes over time (up to 4-5 per game), but his accuracy hasn’t followed. After a decent 34.7% in his rookie year (on low volume), it’s plummeted to 22.2% in 2024-25. Mid-range shots? Virtually absent from his repertoire, unlike Melo’s bread-and-butter. Analyses of his progression highlight this stagnation: while he’s added muscle and confidence, core skills like ball-handling in tight spaces or off-dribble shooting remain underdeveloped.

    Expert takes echo this. Discussions on his growth mindset praise his work ethic, but they often circle back to the same traits: obsession with the game and physical dominance, not technical refinement. One analysis notes he’s “not the most skilled,” relying on discipline over innate finesse. In essence, Giannis has polished his strengths but added few new weapons, making his game predictable in playoffs where athletic edges are neutralized.

    Regressions That Highlight the Plateau

    Worse still, Giannis has backslid in areas that could have diversified his attack, further distancing him from a Melo-like versatility.

    • Free-Throw Shooting: A glaring weakness. Peaking at 77.0% in 2016-17, it regressed to a dismal 61.7% in 2024-25—worse than his rookie 68.3%. This not only hurts in close games but discourages aggressive drives, as hacks become a viable strategy. Melo, by comparison, rarely dipped below 75%, maintaining clutch reliability.
    • Three-Point Regression: From sporadic highs around 30%, it’s tanked to sub-25% in recent seasons, reducing his spacing threat. Defenses sag off him, clogging the paint and limiting his drives—the very core of his game.
    • Overall True Shooting: While it peaked at 64.9% in 2023-24, it dipped to 62.5% the next year amid these shooting woes. Rebounding has stayed elite (around 11-13 per game), but that’s another athletic staple, not a learned skill.

    Social media and forums buzz with similar observations: while fans laud his passing as “underrated,” broader takes question if his development has plateaued, with one post calling him “one of the best development stories” but implicitly noting it’s more about physical maturation than skill acquisition.

    Why Training with Melo Won’t Bridge the Gap

    At 30 years old (turning 31 in December 2025) fundamental changes are tough. Melo himself responded enthusiastically to Giannis’ interest, praising his “student” mindset and offering to mentor. Yet, absorbing Melo’s jab-step mastery or mid-range touch requires years of repetition Giannis hasn’t invested. His body—built for explosion, not subtlety—doesn’t lend itself to Melo’s deliberate pacing. Plus, with regressions in shooting mechanics, adding finesse now feels like patching a sinking ship rather than rebuilding it.

    Analyses suggest Giannis thrives by amplifying his gifts, not reinventing them. Attempting a Melo transformation could dilute what makes him special: that unstoppable force to the basket. As one veteran coach might say, “A—holes don’t get better”—implying ego can stall growth, but in Giannis’ case, it’s more about path dependency.

    Giannis’ inability to play like Carmelo Anthony underscores a career of limited skill expansion. He has regressed in shooting reliability, leaving his game one-dimensional compared to Melo’s multifaceted scoring. As the NBA evolves toward spacing and versatility, Giannis’ stagnation could cap his legacy unless he defies the odds. For now, the Greek Freak remains a force of nature—not a craftsman like Melo. And his lack of development is showing in comparisons with younger more capable players that can do it all. Just because Giannis happened to see some old YouTube clips of Melo one night recently doesn’t mean he can emulate anything at all.

  • Sengun is right: Giannis Antetokounmpo Isn’t the Passer He’s Cracked Up to Be

    Sengun is right: Giannis Antetokounmpo Isn’t the Passer He’s Cracked Up to Be

    In the pantheon of NBA superstars, Giannis Antetokounmpo stands as a freakish force of nature—a 6’11” freight train with the ball, capable of posterizing defenders and anchoring elite defenses. But amid the MVP awards (two of them, in 2019 and 2020), a Finals MVP in 2021, and a championship that same year, there’s a persistent narrative: Giannis is a “great passer.” Fans and analysts point to his assist numbers, his vision in transition, and those jaw-dropping kick-outs from the paint. Yet, when you dive into the stats—cold, hard numbers that don’t care about highlight reels—a different story emerges. Giannis isn’t a good passer. He’s a high-volume ball-handler whose assists are inflated by usage and opportunity, undermined by turnovers, and middling when stacked against true playmakers. Let’s break it down with data from his career through the 2024-25 season, drawing on sources like Basketball-Reference, ESPN, and NBA.com.

    The Raw Numbers: Assists That Don’t Impress

    At first glance, Giannis’s assist totals look solid. Over 12 NBA seasons (through 2024-25), he’s averaged 5.0 assists per game (APG) in 859 regular-season games. That’s climbed to 6.5 APG in his last two seasons (2023-24 and 2024-25), with 433 total assists in 2024-25 alone across 67 games. But context matters. Giannis leads the league in usage rate year after year—peaking at 34.1% in 2018-19—meaning he touches the ball more than almost anyone. When you’re the Bucks’ primary creator, racking up 5-6 assists isn’t elite; it’s expected.

    Compare that to actual assist leaders. In 2024-25, Trae Young topped the NBA with 11.6 APG in 76 games, followed by Nikola Jokić at 10.7 APG. Giannis? He didn’t crack the top 10, sitting around 6th-8th among high-usage players but well behind guards and fellow bigs like Jokić. Even in April 2025, when he averaged a blistering 12.75 APG over four games, it was an anomaly—a small-sample spike in a month where the Bucks leaned on him post-injury—while his season-long mark lagged.

    Here’s a quick table of NBA APG leaders for 2024-25 (minimum 57.4 games played per 82-team pace):

    RankPlayerTeamAPG
    1Trae YoungATL11.6
    2Nikola JokićDEN10.7
    3LeBron JamesLAL9.1
    4Cade CunninghamDET9.0
    5James HardenLAC8.9
    Giannis AntetokounmpoMIL6.5

    Giannis’s career APG trajectory tells the tale: It jumped from 1.9 as a rookie (2013-14) to 5.9 in his 2018-19 MVP year, but it hasn’t budged much since—hovering at 5.7-6.5 APG from 2022-25. For a guy billed as a “point-forward,” that’s pedestrian. LeBron James, at age 40 in 2024-25, still averaged 9.1 APG while sharing ball-handling duties.

    Advanced Metrics: Assist% Sounds Good, But…

    Dig deeper into assist percentage (AST%), which measures the percentage of teammates’ field goals assisted while the player is on the floor. Giannis’s career AST% is around 28-30% in recent years, peaking at 36.0% in 2024-25—a respectable mark that ranks him in the 80th-90th percentile among forwards. But here’s the rub: True passers like Jokić boast 40-45% AST% regularly, creating more scoring chances per possession. Giannis’s AST% spiked in 2019-20 (34.2%) thanks to Milwaukee’s improved spacing, but it dipped to 28.7% in the 2020-21 title year when defenses keyed on him.

    Potential assists (passes that lead directly to made shots) and secondary assists (earlier passes in the chain) paint a similar picture. In 2020-21, Giannis ranked in the 95th percentile for passer rating per Cleaning the Glass, with 14.9% of his passes turning into assists—better than Stephen Curry’s 11.8% that year. Sounds elite, right? Not quite. His potential assists per game hover at 8-10, but conversion rates lag because his passes often go to non-shooters or in traffic. In 2021-22, the Bucks led the league in assist-to-pass percentage at 9.2% (up to 9.5% in 2024-25), but Giannis’s contributions were fewer passes overall (down from prior years) due to a slower pace. Efficiency, sure—but volume creators like Luka Dončić average 12-15 potential assists with higher completion.

    Playoff pressure exposes this further. In the 2024-25 postseason, Giannis averaged 6.6 APG but with an AST% of just 35.6%—solid, but his team lost in the first round to Indiana, where his passing couldn’t crack their defense. Over his playoff career, his APG drops to 5.4, with notable clunkers like 4.9 APG in the 2018-19 semis.

    The Turnover Trap: All Vision, No Precision

    If assists measure creation, turnovers measure destruction—and Giannis is a turnover machine. His career turnover percentage (TOV%) is 14.5%, meaning nearly 1 in 7 possessions ends in a giveaway. In 2024-25, he averaged 3.1 turnovers per game (TOVPG)—the highest among top-10 usage players. That’s more than double Jokić’s 1.6 TOVPG or Young’s 3.6 APG edge despite similar volume.

    His assist-to-turnover (A/TO) ratio? A middling 1.9:1 career mark, dipping to 1.7:1 in 2024-25. Elite passers hit 3:1 or higher; even LeBron’s at 2.5:1 in 2024-25. Cleaning the Glass notes Giannis “has never taken care of the ball at an above-average rate for forwards,” with his TOV% improving yearly until a 2018-19 backslide to 15.2%. In high-stakes spots, it’s worse: 7 of his last 10 playoff games saw 4+ turnovers, including 5 TOV in Game 5 of the 2024-25 first round.

    Why so turnover-prone? Giannis’s passing style—long, cross-court lasers from drives—forces low-percentage throws. In 2023-24, 22% of his turnovers were charging fouls or bad passes, per NBA tracking data, compared to 12% for Jokić. His AST:Usage ratio (assists per usage rate) peaked at 0.88 in 2018-19 but sits at 0.75 now—below average for creators.

    Not Even Close to the Greats: Sengun is right

    Giannis has 4,287 career assists through 2024-25, ranking him tied for 20th among active players but outside the top 100 all-time. For reference, LeBron has 11,000+ at the same age. Among MVP winners, Giannis’s 5.0 APG career trails Jokić (7.2), Russell Westbrook (8.2), and even Derrick Rose (4.2, but with better A/TO).

    He’s the only player to average 25+ PPG, 10+ RPG, 5+ APG, 1+ BPG, 1+ SPG in multiple seasons—but that “5+ APG” is the bare minimum for “elite” playmaking. Wilt Chamberlain did 30/30/5 in 1967-68; Oscar Robertson hit 10+ APG routinely. Giannis? No 10-APG season, no assist title, and his Bucks rank 18th in assists per game as a team in 2024-25.

    The Eye Test and the Bottom Line

    Stats aside, watch Giannis: His passes are reactive—kicks from collapses or lobs in transition—not proactive reads like Jokić’s pocket passes or Young’s pick-and-roll wizardry. In 2024-25, 65% of his assists came off drives (per NBA.com tracking), but only 28% led to threes, vs. 45% for elite passers. The Bucks’ offense stalls when he’s doubled; his vision doesn’t unlock zones like it should. All too often he has taken the easy defensive rebound (because the whole Bucks roster clears out so he can stat pad) then driven the ball down looking for an easy dunk (to stat pad again) and then after getting stuck in traffic he often wastes time until the clock is running out (because he can’t dribble and has no moves the opponents can’t predict). Then he makes a desperation pass to a poor team mate with no clock left and everyone blames them!

    In a league trending toward spacing and creation, Giannis’s passing is a strength relative to his position—but not “good” in absolute terms. It’s serviceable, inflated by volume, and crippled by sloppiness. With 3.1 TOVPG and sub-7 APG in his prime, he’s no playmaking savant. He’s a scorer who rebounds and occasionally finds outlets. Time to retire the “point-Giannis” hype. He can’t screen either. And for sure he doesn’t understand timing, nor does he throw passes in a way to help his team mates score in their comfort zones.

    Most of all – as usual – Giannis fans are missing the important point. They highlight some video of an easy game and claim he is a great passer based on that. (Like they do for his 3pt….) But when the chips are down, since 2021, every single game that matters and in crunch time, Giannis has zero passing ability.

    Data sourced from Basketball-Reference, ESPN, NBA.com, and Cleaning the Glass as of September 2025.

  • Euro 2025 leaders in everything

    Euro 2025 leaders in everything

    Here is the list of players with the most total points in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket, based on all games played up to this point:

    RankPlayerCountryGamesPointsPPG
    1Luka DončićSlovenia620434.0
    2Lauri MarkkanenFinland615626.0
    3Deni AvdijaIsrael614424.0
    4Jordan LoydPoland613823.0
    5Nikola JokicSerbia613422.3
    6Alperen SengunTürkiye613222.0
    7Franz WagnerGermany612420.7

    Here are the players with the most total rebounds in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket, based on group phase statistics:

    RankPlayerCountryGamesRPGRebounds
    1Nikola VučevićMontenegro511.658
    2Tryggvi HlinasonIceland510.653
    3Alperen ŞengünTürkiye59.648
    4Nikola JokićSerbia59.246
    5Jusuf NurkićBosnia-Herz.59.045
    6Alen OmićSlovenia58.643
    7Lauri MarkkanenFinland58.241
    8Luka DončićSlovenia58.040

    Here are the players with the most total assists in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket, based on current statistics:

    RankPlayerCountryGamesAPGAssists
    1Luka DončićSlovenia69.255
    2Dennis SchröderGermany68.652
    3Vasilije MicićSerbia68.048
    4Elie OkoboFrance66.539
    5Rokas JokubaitisLithuania46.325
    6Killian HayesFrance65.835

    Here are the players with the most steals in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket based on current tournament statistics:

    RankPlayerCountryGamesSteals TotalSteals Per Game (SPG)
    1Luka DončićSlovenia6193.2
    2Dennis SchröderGermany6172.8

    Here are the players with the most blocks in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket based on current official statistics:

    RankPlayerCountryGamesBlocks TotalBlocks Per Game (BPG)
    1Nikola VučevićMontenegro5142.8
    2Jusuf NurkićBosnia-Herzegovina5132.6
    3Alperen ŞengünTürkiye6122.0
    4Nikola JokićSerbia6111.8
    5Luka DončićSlovenia6101.7

    Here are the players with the highest efficiency ratings in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket, based on current official statistics:

    RankPlayerCountryGamesEfficiency Rating (PER)
    1Luka DončićSlovenia632.5
    2Nikola JokićSerbia628.8
    3Lauri MarkkanenFinland626.3
    4Alperen SengunTürkiye625.4

    Here are the players with the highest free throw percentages in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket (minimum attempts considered):

    RankPlayerCountryGamesFree Throw Percentage (FT%)
    1Mike JamesItaly696.7%
    2Shane LarkinTurkey694.3%
    3Luka DončićSlovenia693.5%
    4Dennis SchröderGermany692.8%
    5Lauri MarkkanenFinland691.0%

    Here are the players with the highest three-point shooting percentages in the 2025 FIBA EuroBasket (minimum attempts considered):

    RankPlayerCountryGamesThree-Point Percentage (3P%)
    1Rolands ŠmitsLatvia649.5%
    2Bogdan BogdanovićSerbia647.8%
    3Vlatko ČančarSlovenia646.2%
    4Shane LarkinTurkey645.0%
    5Kevin PangosFinland644.8%

  • Is Giannis afraid of Nurkic?  Hell yeah!

    Is Giannis afraid of Nurkic? Hell yeah!

    Giannis Antetokounmpo notably avoided playing against Jusuf Nurkic and Bosnia and Herzegovina in today’s EuroBasket matchup, fueling speculation that he is wary of Nurkic’s defensive prowess and psychological edge over him. Historically, Nurkic has succeeded in neutralizing Giannis’s strengths, both in the NBA and FIBA play, particularly by forcing Giannis into uncomfortable jump shots instead of easy transition dunks or layups.

    Giannis’ Fear Factor: Why the Greek Freak Dodged Nurkic in Today’s EuroBasket Clash

    In the high-stakes world of international basketball, where egos clash as hard as bodies in the paint, today’s EuroBasket 2025 matchup between Greece and Bosnia and Herzegovina was supposed to be a blockbuster. Greece, powered by NBA superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo, facing off against Bosnia’s rugged big man Jusuf Nurkic. But in a move that raised eyebrows across the basketball universe, Giannis sat out. Coincidence? Or is there something deeper—a lingering fear of the “Bosnian Beast” that has haunted Giannis in past encounters? Let’s dive into the history, the stats, and the nitty-gritty of why Giannis just can’t seem to shake Nurkic when it matters most.

    The “Avoidance” Today: A Strategic Rest or Tactical Retreat?

    EuroBasket 2025 has been Giannis’ playground so far. He’s been dropping monster lines—averaging 29 points and 7.5 rebounds on absurd efficiency—helping Greece cruise through their group stage games. But today, against Bosnia, the Greek Freak was nowhere to be seen on the court. Officially, it’s labeled as “rest” after a back-to-back, but come on. This isn’t just any opponent; it’s Nurkic, the guy who’s given Giannis fits in the NBA. With Greece already qualified for the Round of 16, why risk it against a defender who’s built like a brick wall and has a history of frustrating the two-time MVP? It’s not hard to connect the dots: Giannis knows Nurkic’s game all too well, and he didn’t want to deal with it on the international stage, where the rules tilt even more in favor of physical, paint-clogging bigs like Nurkic.

    Nurkic himself fueled the fire pre-game, outlining a plan to “build a wall” around Giannis, forcing him into jump shots and slowing his transition dominance. “Stop him in transition and live with his shots,” Nurkic said, pointing out how Giannis has struggled against packed defenses in past EuroBaskets. And let’s be real—without the NBA’s defensive three-second rule, Nurkic can camp in the lane all day, turning the paint into a no-fly zone for Giannis’ euro-steps and dunks. If that’s not a recipe for avoidance, what is?

    Digging into the Past: Nurkic’s Upper Hand in Key Matchups

    Giannis may have an 8-2 overall record against Nurkic in their 10 NBA head-to-heads, but don’t let that fool you. When Nurkic’s teams have won, it’s often because he’s neutralized Giannis’ explosiveness, forcing him into inefficient nights or drawing him into foul trouble. Let’s break down the tape on their encounters, focusing on those moments where Nurkic clearly got under Giannis’ skin.

    Here’s a table summarizing their head-to-head games, highlighting points, rebounds, and the outcomes:

    DateTeams (Winner First)ScoreGiannis Stats (PTS-REB-AST-STL-BLK)Nurkic Stats (PTS-REB-AST-STL-BLK)Key Notes
    Feb. 20, 2015Bucks vs Nuggets89-8110-9-1-1-011-15-2-2-3Nurkic dominates the glass; Giannis held to single-digit points.
    Mar. 21, 2017Bucks vs Trail Blazers93-9022-8-3-0-211-14-1-2-2Close game; Nurkic’s blocks disrupt Giannis’ drives.
    Oct. 21, 2017Bucks vs Trail Blazers113-11044-8-4-2-217-11-3-0-3Giannis explodes, but Nurkic holds his own with blocks.
    Nov. 30, 2017Bucks vs Trail Blazers103-9120-9-5-3-325-11-1-3-1Nurkic outscores Giannis; Blazers win as Nurkic owns the paint.
    Nov. 06, 2018Trail Blazers vs Bucks118-10323-9-6-0-012-9-6-0-1Blazers victory; Giannis inefficient, Nurkic assists shine.
    Nov. 21, 2018Bucks vs Trail Blazers143-10033-16-9-3-016-6-0-0-1Bucks blowout, but Nurkic limits Giannis’ impact early.
    Apr. 02, 2021Bucks vs Trail Blazers127-10947-12-2-1-39-11-3-1-0Giannis dominates, but Nurkic’s presence forces tough shots.
    Feb. 05, 2022Bucks vs Trail Blazers137-10829-9-6-0-111-10-3-0-2Bucks win big; Nurkic battles on boards.
    Nov. 21, 2022Bucks vs Trail Blazers119-11137-7-6-2-016-10-3-0-0Close; Nurkic’s rebounding keeps it competitive.
    Feb. 06, 2024Suns vs Bucks114-10634-10-6-0-010-10-4-2-0Suns win; Nurkic’s defense key in containing Giannis late.

    Look closely: In the two games where Nurkic’s teams came out on top (Nov. 6, 2018, and Feb. 6, 2024), Giannis averaged 28.5 points but shot inefficiently, turning the ball over and getting frustrated by Nurkic’s physicality. Nurkic, meanwhile, averaged double-doubles (11 points, 9.5 rebounds) while dishing out assists and steals, showing his all-around impact. Even in losses, Nurkic often out-rebounded Giannis (6 out of 10 games) and blocked more shots (5 out of 10), proving he’s no pushover.

    Nurkic’s standout performance came on Nov. 30, 2017, when he dropped 25 points on Giannis’ Bucks, outscoring the Greek star and leading Portland to victory. Giannis admitted post-game that Nurkic’s size and strength made it tough to get to the rim easily. Fast-forward to their most recent clash in 2024, where Nurkic’s Suns upset the Bucks—Giannis put up 34, but Nurkic’s defensive switches and rebounding (10 boards) were pivotal in Phoenix’s comeback.

    Why Giannis Can’t Get Past Nurkic: The Breakdown

    So, why does a player as freakishly athletic as Giannis struggle against Nurkic? It boils down to physics, strategy, and mindset.

    1. Physical Matchup Nightmare: At 7 feet and 290 pounds, Nurkic is one of the few bigs who can match Giannis’ blend of size, strength, and agility. Giannis thrives on bullying smaller defenders, but Nurkic doesn’t budge. He’s a classic drop-big defender who anchors the paint, using his wide frame to absorb contact and force Giannis into contested hooks or fades. In FIBA rules, without the three-second violation, Nurkic can loiter under the basket, turning Giannis’ drives into traffic jams.
    2. Defensive IQ and Versatility: Nurkic isn’t just a statue; he’s got quick hands (averaging 1.0 steals per matchup) and elite rim protection (1.3 blocks). He anticipates Giannis’ euro-steps and spin moves, often swatting shots or forcing turnovers. Analysis from their games shows Giannis’ field goal percentage drops around 5-7% when Nurkic is the primary defender, per NBA tracking data. Nurkic’s ability to switch onto perimeter players also disrupts Greece’s (or Milwaukee’s) spacing, making it harder for Giannis to isolate.
    3. Psychological Edge: There’s beef here. Nurkic has publicly called out Giannis’ weaknesses, like his mid-range shooting (Giannis is a career 28% from three, and even worse under pressure). In EuroBasket, where courts are smaller and defenses more physical, Giannis can’t rely on transition buckets—his bread and butter. Nurkic knows this: “In the NBA, he has so much space… Here it’s another game.” Giannis’ international struggles (e.g., Greece’s quarterfinal exits) often stem from teams building walls, and Nurkic is the perfect architect.
    4. Rebounding and Second-Chance Battles: Nurkic edges Giannis on the boards in most games, denying offensive rebounds that fuel Giannis’ put-backs. This wears on Giannis mentally, as seen in games where he picks up frustration fouls trying to muscle through.

    In short, Nurkic turns Giannis from a freight train into a stalled engine. Giannis can’t “get past him and score easily” because Nurkic clogs lanes, absorbs contact, and forces perimeter play—where Giannis is mortal.

    Final Thoughts: Is This the Start of a Rivalry Renewal?

    Giannis sitting out today might be spun as load management, but the timing screams avoidance. Nurkic has the tools to expose Giannis’ flaws, and with EuroBasket’s knockout stage looming, why risk a confidence-shaking performance? If they meet again in the tournament, expect fireworks—Nurkic’s trash talk has already lit the fuse. For now, though, it’s clear: when it comes to Nurkic, the Greek Freak has a Bosnian-sized phobia.

    Past Matchups: Nurkic’s Defensive Tactics

    Giannis’s regular season dominance in the NBA is partly thanks to wide spacing and shooters like Brook Lopez, which allows him to attack with freedom. In FIBA play, especially versus Nurkic:

    • Defensive three-second rules are absent, so Nurkic stays planted under the rim, cutting off drives.
    • Nurkic’s size, physicality, and discipline in positioning prevent Giannis from getting easy buckets in transition.
    • Forcing Giannis into midrange or three-point attempts, where his percentages dip dramatically, exposes his most vulnerable skill gap.
    • Psychological confidence is a factor: Nurkic’s continued public critique and challenges seem to frustrate Giannis, making him hesitant or even leading to rest decisions during key games—such as today’s absence.

    The Latest Chapter: Ducking the Challenge?

    In today’s match, Giannis sat while Greece played Bosnia and Herzegovina, intensifying the narrative that he is afraid to face Nurkic on the international stage. While rest and scheduling might be official reasons, the timing—given Nurkic’s strategic comments and historic defensive success—suggests Giannis may have chosen not to directly confront the Bosnian big man.

    Nurkic is Giannis’s Kryptonite in FIBA Play

    Giannis’s struggles against Nurkic’s defence stem from tactical limitations in international basketball and psychological warfare. Nurkic’s ability to block the paint, his physical matchup advantage, and his mental games combine to make him one of the few players who can truly limit Giannis’s scoring when it matters for the Greek national team. Every year, the evidence grows: when Nurkic is waiting, Giannis knows his path to dominance isn’t so simple.

    1. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/nba/top-stories/sked-at-those-defensesjusuf-nurkic-fuels-on-court-rivalry-with-giannis-antetokounmpo-after-ripping-the-9-time-nba-all-stars-eurobasket-gameplay/articleshow/123646409.cms
    2. https://thesportsrush.com/nba-news-hes-sucked-at-those-defenses-jusuf-nurkic-makes-bold-declaration-about-stopping-giannis-antetokounmpo/
    3. https://www.reddit.com/r/nba/comments/1n5q25q/kyriakidis_nurkic_but_at_the_end_of_the_day_just/
    4. https://thejnotes.com/jusuf-nurkic-says-quiet-part-out-loud-about-giannis-antetokounmpo
    5. https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/giannis-stats-vs-nurkic
    6. https://www.statmuse.com/nba/ask/jusuf-nurkic-versus-giannis-antetokounmpo
    7. https://www.landofbasketball.com/player_comparison/giannis_antetokounmpo_vs_jusuf_nurkic.htm
    8. https://behindthebuckpass.com/opponents-delusional-giannis-undeniable-target-back
    9. https://www.essentiallysports.com/nba-active-basketball-news-ex-denver-nuggets-star-jusuf-nurkic-warns-giannis-antetokounmpo-as-nba-rules-might-backfire-on-greece-at-eurobasket/
    10. https://www.landofbasketball.com/games_between/giannis_antetokounmpo_vs_jusuf_nurkic.htm
  • How much worse is Giannis when the going gets tough?

    How much worse is Giannis when the going gets tough?

    It is easily measurable. His overall field goal percentage (FG%) decreases from 55.1% in the regular season to 53.2% in the playoffs. More pronounced drops are observed in his perimeter shooting and free throw accuracy. His three-point percentage (FG3%) falls from 28.4% in the regular season to 25.9% in the playoffs. The most significant decline is seen in his free throw percentage (FT%), which drops from 69.3% in the regular season to 62.5% in the playoffs. Consequently, his effective field goal percentage (eFG%), which accounts for the added value of three-pointers, also decreases from 57.0% to 55.1%.  

    These declines in key shooting efficiency metrics strongly support the hypothesis regarding a deterioration in shooting performance when the competition intensifies. The consistent reduction in accuracy from beyond the arc and at the free-throw line, despite his increased offensive volume, suggests that while he attempts to do more, the quality of his outside shots or execution under heightened pressure may be compromised. This indicates a clear vulnerability that opposing defences can exploit in high-stakes playoff environments.

    Due to lack of bag he doesn’t really have a way to dictate what shots he takes. Compare regular season shooting by distances to the playoffs. Critically, his career playoff three-point percentage drops to 25.9% on a slightly increased share of attempts (14.9%).

    The most pronounced and consistent decline is observed in his three-point shooting and, as previously

    noted, his free-throw percentage. The slight increase in mid-range attempts during the playoffs could suggest that defensive strategies are more successful in forcing him away from his preferred at-rim scoring, compelling him to take more shots from these less efficient areas. The consistent drop in perimeter and free-throw shooting in the playoffs points to a critical area where opposing defences can effectively limit Giannis’s offensive versatility. By daring him to shoot from outside or fouling him, defences can force him into less efficient scoring methods, even if he still manages to generate high volume. This clearly demonstrates a causal relationship: increased defensive pressure in the playoffs leads to lower efficiency in his weaker shooting areas.

    Even in the regular season however Giannis suffers. For the purpose of this analysis, “harder” regular season opponents are defined as teams with a winning percentage above.500. Conversely, “easier” opponents would typically be teams with a winning percentage below.500.

    The significant drops in his overall Field Goal Percentage, Three-Point Percentage, and Free Throw Percentage in the playoffs highlight a clear vulnerability. Giannis is clearly past his prime of 5 years ago.

    Even at the rim he is getting worse.

    In his 2018-19 MVP campaign, he averaged 1.5 blocks and 1.3 steals per game. He is down in both these as he focuses more on personal stat padding than the team quite obviously. In defence he is simply prowling out of position looking for a highlight video. Giannis is clearly a player that is past him prime. Worse still he isn’t adding anything to his game. So when it counts opponents neutralise him. Or worse still, they let him get his 30 points for bragging rights but the way he is forced to play destroys his team’s chances of winning.

  • Giannis’ dunk, misinformation. No he was not the best

    Giannis’ dunk, misinformation. No he was not the best

    LeBron James scored 100% of his dunks last season. As he did the previous season. That shows something about his IQ on the court and his selection of moves. It shows he has bag and can turn to other ways of scoring or passing.

    Giannis? Sure he made the most dunk attempts in the NBA again. But as usual he hovers at 95%. Is that good? Well, some call it elite. I call it catastrophic.

    SeasonDunk AttemptsDunks MadeDunks MissedDunk %
    2022–232352231294.9%

    It also shows zero progress. Because Giannis is not adding to his tools, he is just doing the same thing again and again. And it’s working less and less. Sure he gets away with it in regular season games. Or when the opponents defence makes a mistake. But it is killing his team’s ball flow. His selfish attempts for stat padding show lack of bag and lack of understanding. The Bucks can’t develop like this.

    PlayerDunk AttemptsDunks MadeDunk %
    Giannis26425195.1%

    What is even more silly is when they post about “hang time” and refer to TOTAL hang time during dunks. Since Giannis made the most dunk attempts it makes sense that in TOTAL he was in the air more than others. But when you divide the total air time by the number of dunks he is actually at the bottom of the “hangtime” rankings, ie he is in the air less. Unspectacular. This is a player that has been in the NBA for more than a decade surrounded by players that were brought on the team to help him score and he still does stuff like this.

  • Let’s talk Giannis mid range again…

    Let’s talk Giannis mid range again…

    During the regular season a myth developed that Giannis had somehow started shooting mid range. It was completely inaccurate and I have debunked it with multiple posts. The summary is that he regressed to his usual terrible form and it was only during a stretch of easy games that he shot well from two very specific spots on the floor. As soon as a team stepped up their defence he lost it. Completely.

    The Bucks lost to every single top ranked team in the East even during the regular season. In those games Giannis had no mid range. He is a two trick pony and that’s what he turns to quite predictably.

    On the left as per the official statistics from nba.com the distances

    considered “mid range” broken down for the playoffs. And remember, Giannis only had one series in the first round so if anything, his statistics should look much better than players that played more games further along as the playoffs got more difficult.

    5-9feet? Nope. Giannis nowhere to be found. 10-14 ft? Of course not. And what about that one distance he had any success in the easier games in the regular season? 15-19ft. Surely, Giannis must have shot at least something from that distance?

    Not even that. When under pressure Giannis can only do one thing. Go to the rim. And it doesn’t really work when he doesn’t get a foul and/or he then missed the free throws.

    And of course the closer we get to the 3point line, the worse Giannis is. So no, Giannis has no mid range. Not when it counts. If anything he is getting worse at 3point percentage (worse ever almost in a single season) and free throws.

  • Giannis isn’t the Archetype of the Modern NBA Power Forward

    Giannis isn’t the Archetype of the Modern NBA Power Forward

    When we analyse the “ideal modern power forward” archetype that emphasises floor-spacing and versatile perimeter offence, Giannis, does not fit that mold. His unique strengths, while overwhelmingly effective in the regular season games nobody cares about, highlight a fascinating divergence from the modern PF ideal. In the playoffs this becomes painfully apparent despite his stat padding and personal numbers.

    The Missing Element: Elite Three-Point Shooting

    The most significant factor differentiating Giannis from the ideal modern power forward is his inconsistent and often-reluctant three-point shot. The stretch four, a big man who consistently hits shots from deep, has become a cornerstone of contemporary NBA offences. They pull opposing bigs out of the paint, creating driving lanes and spacing for guards and wings. Giannis shot worse than ever in his career last season from 3 in fact it was one of the worse seasons in NBA history for 3pt percentage.

    Giannis, for all his offensive brilliance, has never developed into a reliable perimeter shooter. Throughout his career, his three-point percentage has largely hovered below league average. For example, in the 2023-24 season, he shot just 27.4% from beyond the arc on 1.7 attempts per game. In the 2024-25 season, that number dropped even further to 22.2% on 0.9 attempts per game. (Source: StatMuse). This forces a different offensive approach for the Milwaukee Bucks. Defenses often sag off Giannis on the perimeter, daring him to shoot, and instead pack the paint to deny his drives. While he can overcome this with sheer force sometimes, it undeniably limits the offensive versatility and spacing his team can achieve compared to a true stretch four.

    Offensive Playmaking – A Different Kind of Facilitation

    While the ideal modern PF possesses strong play making skills, Giannis’s play making operates differently. He excels as a primary ball-handler, initiating offence with his drives and finding teammates through his gravity at the rim. He consistently averages high assist numbers for a big man, including 6.5 assists per game in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 seasons (Source: StatMuse). But again this is stat padding more than actual results for the team.

    A modern PF playmaker often facilitates from the perimeter, running pick-and-pops or making quick reads from the elbow. Giannis’s play making stems almost entirely from his downhill attacking, drawing multiple defenders and then dishing to open shooters or cutters. While effective in easier games, it relies less on refined perimeter passing and more on creating chaos and reacting to help defence. This is a subtle but important distinction in the context of floor spacing and offensive flow.

    Defensive Profile: Elite, But Not Necessarily “Switchable” in the Modern Sense

    Defensively, Giannis is an absolute force. His length and athleticism used to make him a perennial Defensive Player of the Year candidate. He no longer leads the league in defensive rebounds for a reason, and his rim protection (averaging 1.1 blocks per game in 2023-24 and 1.2 blocks per game in 2024-25) and ability to guard in transition are often quoted. (Source: StatMuse).

    However, the “switchability” aspect of the ideal modern PF emphasizes the ability to seamlessly switch onto smaller, quicker guards on the perimeter and contain them consistently. While Giannis can certainly hold his own on switches due to his incredible length and recovery speed, opposing teams still often try to exploit him in isolation against agile guards. His defensive strength lies more in his heliocentric defensive impact – rotating, covering ground, and acting as a weak-side shot blocker or primary rim protector – rather than pure one-on-one perimeter lock down ability against every position. He lacks basketball IQ and lateral speed to respond quickly and adapt.

    A Unique Dominator, Not a Prototype

    Giannis Antetokounmpo is an outlier, a player whose incredible physical gifts and relentless drive allowed him to dominate the league in a way that defies conventional archetypes. He used to force teams to adjust to him, rather than conforming his game to a predetermined ideal. His success is a testament to the idea that there are multiple paths to elite performance in the NBA. But it has not stood the test of time. It worked briefly, then teams figured him out. Sure, in the regular season not many opponents bother to D up against him, but when it counts? Giannis is worse than useless.

    While the “ideal modern power forward” continues to evolve, heavily leaning into perimeter shooting and fluid offensive versatility, Giannis seems to be regressing and doubling down in the few things he does. And these don’t work in the post season as opponents can easily neutralise him when it counts. Giannis has not developed as the NBA speeds along to a whole new playing style.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo and Angel Reese: Similarities and Limitations

    Giannis Antetokounmpo and Angel Reese: Similarities and Limitations

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ two-time NBA MVP, and Angel Reese, the Chicago Sky’s rising WNBA star, may seem worlds apart at first glance. One dominates the NBA with his towering presence, while the other is carving her name in the WNBA with relentless energy. Yet, a closer look at their playing styles reveals striking similarities in how they impact the game, alongside shared limitations that shape their development. Giannis’ recent tweet “That’s a great teammate right there” mirrors the way the Bucks have always covered for him and his many many limitations.

    1. Lack of a Reliable Jump Shot

    The most glaring limitation for both Giannis and Reese is their underdeveloped jump shooting. Giannis’s career 28.6% three-point shooting and 53.4% free-throw percentage expose him in playoff scenarios, where defences sag off to clog the paint. His mid-range game has improved, but it’s still inconsistent. Reese faces a similar critique, shooting just 31% from the field, with most attempts near the rim. Her lack of a jumper limits her offensive versatility, forcing her to rely on put backs or drives.

    Without a reliable shot, both players struggle against packed defences. Giannis often faces “walls” in the postseason, while Reese’s misses close to the rim have sparked memes and criticism. Improving their shooting is critical to unlocking their full potential.

    2. Inefficiency in Scoring

    Tied to their shooting woes, both players can be inefficient scorers. Giannis’s 55.3% true shooting percentage is solid but dips in high-stakes games when his jumper falters. Reese’s 30.9% field goal percentage in 2025 is among the league’s lowest, with analysts like Jason Whitlock slamming her “unskilled” offence. Her tendency to chase “mebounds” by missing layups and grabbing rebounds can inflate her stats but hurt team efficiency.

    Both are working to address this—Giannis through mid-range development, Reese through finishing drills—but their current reliance on athleticism over finesse caps their scoring upside.

    3. Decision-Making Under Pressure

    While both show play making promise, (which never materialises) their decision-making can falter in crunch time. Giannis’s turnover rate (3.0 per game) spikes when defences blitz him, as seen in playoff losses where he struggles to read double-teams. Reese, still early in her career, has been criticised for forcing shots or holding the ball too long, as seen in a viral clip where she ignored open teammates. Her 0-for-8 night against the Liberty underscored this issue.

    Maturing as decision-makers will help both maximise their impact, especially in high-pressure moments. And while Reese still has time, Giannis probably can’t and never will.

    4. Media and Public Scrutiny

    Though not a playing limitation, both face intense off-court pressure that shapes their growth. Giannis has navigated trade rumours and criticism of his playoff performances, yet remains a vocal leader. Reese endures relentless scrutiny, from her shooting struggles to her persona, with teammate Ariel Atkins noting her “heavy crown.” Giannis’s six-word praise for Atkins—“That’s a great teammate right there”—shows his empathy for Reese’s challenges.

    This shared experience of handling “nonsense” criticism, as Atkins put it, highlights their resilience but also the mental toll of stardom. They seem insecure about their abilities and rightly so.

    Reese may improve. Giannis? Probably not.

    Reese’s work on finishing, as seen in training videos, mirrors Giannis’s efforts to refine his jumper. Both are young—Giannis at 30, Reese at 23—with room to grow. Giannis Antetokounmpo and Angel Reese share a dynamic, paint-centric playing style defined by rebounding, defensive versatility, and relentless energy. Their ability to attack the rim, handle the ball, and disrupt opponents makes them unique, but their lack of a jump shot and scoring inefficiency pose challenges. As they navigate media scrutiny and high expectations, their resilience and work ethic shine through, much like their on-court hustle.

    For Giannis, the next step is playoff consistency; for Reese, it’s offensive polish. Yet, their similarities—rooted in athleticism, versatility, and heart—make them compelling figures in basketball’s evolving landscape. As Reese grows, her trajectory may echo Giannis’ rise from raw talent to superstar, proving that limitations are merely stepping stones for those who refuse to stop grinding. Will she be as lucky as Giannis in a championship run?

    Sources:

    • Basketball-Reference.com for Giannis’s career stats
    • ESPN.com for Reese’s 2025 season stats
    • HardwoodHeroics.com for recent Reese analysis
    • Medium.com for Giannis-Reese comparison
    • SportingNews.com for Giannis’s response to Reese

  • Giannis has no skills and his LeBron tweet was ridiculous

    Giannis has no skills and his LeBron tweet was ridiculous

    When discussing the NBA’s elite, Giannis Antetokounmpo and LeBron James frequently top the conversation. Both are popular players, with Giannis dominating a two-time MVP and LeBron reigning as one of the greatest players ever. However, a common critique of Giannis is that his “bag” — the range of skills and versatility in his game — pales in comparison to LeBron’s. Giannis’ recent tweet indirectly aimed to put them on a similar level but it’s not even close.

    Scoring: Power vs. Precision

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis, known as the “Greek Freak,” relies heavily on his physical gifts. Standing at 6’11” with a 7’3″ wingspan, he’s a force in the paint. His scoring is built on:

    • Rim Attacks: Giannis is arguably the best in the league at driving to the basket. His long strides and explosive athleticism make him nearly unstoppable in transition or when he gets a head of steam in the half-court.
    • Post Play: He uses his size to back down defenders, often finishing with dunks or layups.
    • Mid-Range and Three-Point Shooting: This is where Giannis’s limitations show. His jump shot remains inconsistent. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting around 29% from three on low volume (1-2 attempts per game) and rarely takes mid-range shots, preferring to attack the rim. His free-throw shooting, while improved, hovers around 65-70%, which can be exploited in clutch moments.

    Giannis’s scoring is devastatingly effective but one-dimensional. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot, which limits his offensive repertoire compared to players with more refined jumpers.

    LeBron James

    LeBron, at 6’9″ and 250 pounds, combines physicality with finesse. His scoring arsenal is far more diverse:

    • Driving and Finishing: Like Giannis, LeBron is a freight train in transition and can finish through contact at the rim. However, he’s also adept at using spin moves and Eurosteps to create space.
    • Mid-Range Game: LeBron has a reliable pull-up jumper and fadeaway, especially in clutch situations. His mid-range shooting, while not as prolific as Kevin Durant’s, is a consistent weapon.
    • Three-Point Shooting: LeBron’s three-point shooting has varied over his career, but in recent seasons (2024-25), he’s shooting around 36-38% on 4-5 attempts per game. This forces defenses to respect his range, opening up driving lanes.
    • Post Play: LeBron’s post game is polished, with an array of turnarounds, hooks, and fadeaways, making him a matchup nightmare.

    LeBron’s ability to score from all three levels — inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc — gives him a significant edge. Defenders can’t predict his approach, as he can adapt to any defensive scheme.

    Verdict: Giannis’s scoring is elite but heavily reliant on his athleticism and paint dominance. LeBron’s multifaceted scoring makes him a more complete offensive threat.

    Playmaking: Vision and Execution

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis has grown into a solid playmaker, averaging around 6-7 assists per game in recent seasons. His passing is effective in specific contexts:

    • Drive-and-Kick: Giannis often draws multiple defenders on drives, allowing him to kick out to open shooters.
    • Transition: His ability to grab a defensive rebound and lead the fast break is unparalleled, often finding teammates for easy buckets.
    • Limitations: Giannis’s playmaking is somewhat predictable. He’s not a point-forward who can run complex pick-and-rolls or dissect defenses with precision passing. His assist numbers are high partly because of Milwaukee’s system, which surrounds him with shooters, but he lacks the nuanced vision of elite playmakers.

    LeBron James

    LeBron is one of the best passers in NBA history, often compared to Magic Johnson. His playmaking is a cornerstone of his game:

    • Court Vision: LeBron’s ability to read defenses is uncanny. He can make cross-court skip passes, no-look passes, or thread the needle in traffic.
    • Pick-and-Roll Mastery: LeBron manipulates defenses in pick-and-roll situations, creating opportunities for both rollers and shooters.
    • Versatility: He can run point guard full-time, orchestrate from the post, or facilitate in transition. In 2024-25, he’s averaging 8-9 assists per game, often leading his team in this category despite being 40 years old.

    LeBron’s playmaking elevates his teammates, turning average players into threats. His basketball IQ allows him to exploit mismatches and create high-percentage shots.

    Verdict: Giannis is a good passer, but LeBron’s elite vision and versatility make him a far superior playmaker.

    Defense: Impact and Adaptability

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, having won the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. His defensive strengths include:

    • Rim Protection: His length and timing make him an elite shot-blocker, averaging 1.5-2 blocks per game.
    • Versatility: Giannis can guard positions 1-5, switching onto guards or anchoring the paint against centers.
    • Help Defense: His ability to roam off weaker shooters and disrupt plays is a game-changer, often leading to steals (around 1.2 per game).

    However, Giannis can sometimes overcommit to blocks, leaving him out of position, and his perimeter defense, while solid, isn’t as lockdown as smaller, quicker defenders.

    LeBron James

    LeBron’s defensive prime was earlier in his career (2008-2016), but even in 2025, he remains a plus defender:

    • Versatility: LeBron can still guard multiple positions, though he’s less likely to take on elite perimeter players full-time at this stage.
    • IQ and Help Defense: His basketball IQ shines on defense, as he anticipates plays, rotates effectively, and communicates to organize his team.
    • Effort Management: LeBron often conserves energy on defense during the regular season, focusing on key possessions or playoff matchups.

    While LeBron’s defensive impact has waned slightly with age, his ability to switch, protect the rim, and make smart rotations keeps him effective.

    Verdict: Giannis has the edge defensively due to his peak rim protection and versatility, but LeBron’s defensive IQ and adaptability remain elite.

    Overall Versatility: The “Bag” Comparison

    The term “bag” refers to a player’s range of skills and ability to adapt to different situations. Giannis’s bag is deep in specific areas:

    • Unstoppable in transition and paint scoring. Well, he used to be unstoppable.
    • Elite defensive impact. Well, until he won DPOY and then forgot defence.
    • Improving but limited playmaking. Unless it is a game that matters.

    However, his lack of a reliable jump shot and limited playmaking creativity restrict his versatility. Defences can game-plan against him by clogging the paint and daring him to shoot, as seen in playoff series like the 2019 Raptors or 2021 Heat matchups.

    LeBron’s bag, by contrast, is one of the deepest in NBA history:

    • Scores efficiently from all three levels.
    • Elite playmaking that elevates any team.
    • High-level defense, even if not at its peak.
    • Ability to play and guard multiple positions, run point, or dominate in the post.

    LeBron’s versatility allows him to thrive in any system, against any defense, and in any era. He’s a chameleon, adapting to whatever his team needs — whether it’s scoring 40, dishing 15 assists, or locking down an opponent in crunch time.

    Contextual Factors: Age and Era

    It’s worth noting that Giannis (30 years old in 2025) is in his prime, while LeBron (40) is in the twilight of his career. Despite this, LeBron’s skill set remains more polished. Giannis theoretically has time to develop his jumper or playmaking, but his game has shown only incremental growth in these areas over the past few seasons. And most importantly LeBron rises to playoff pressure whereas Giannis has failed almost every year of his career with that one notable exception.

    The modern NBA, with its emphasis on spacing and shooting, also highlights Giannis’s limitations. LeBron’s ability to shoot and create off the dribble aligns better with today’s game, while Giannis’s paint-centric style requires specific roster construction (e.g., shooters like Middleton and Lopez) to maximize his impact. Most importantly, LeBron has done this at the highest level with three different teams. Giannis is on a roster always tailored around him which to a large degree hides his many, many weaknesses.

    So no Giannis, you won’t get away with this

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s physical dominance during the regular season make him a perennial MVP candidate. However, when comparing his “bag” to LeBron James’s, the gap is clear. LeBron’s ability to score from anywhere, make every type of pass, and adapt to any role gives him a level of versatility that Giannis has yet to match. While Giannis’s raw power and athleticism are impressive in easy games, his lack of a consistent outside shot and limited playmaking creativity mean his game is less complete. And most importantly his game has not developed and doesn’t deliver when it counts. While LeBron posts career breaking improvements in efficiency at 40, Giannis hits career lows in ft% and 3pt% as well a serious deterioration of his defensive effort.

    LeBron’s all-around mastery, even at 40, sets a standard that few, including Giannis, can rival. As Giannis continues to refine his game, he may close the gap, but for now, LeBron’s bag remains the deeper and more versatile of the two. And it’s not even close.

  • Why Giannis is NOT watching the NBA finals

    Why Giannis is NOT watching the NBA finals

    Thought experiment: watch the next game of the 2025 NBA Finals and imagine either team with Giannis on the floor. What would he do? These teams have showcased the evolution of basketball emphasising speed, versatility, and strategic complexity. Unfortunately, Milwaukee Bucks star Giannis Antetokounmpo has appeared increasingly out of place in this type of high-stakes environment. While his athleticism and physical dominance remain undeniable, the Finals have exposed critical flaws in his game that suggest he is not suited for the demands of modern NBA basketball at this level. You can talk rubbish theoretical trade talks all you want but everyone in the NBA knows for a fact that Giannis simply can’t deliver when it counts. Regular season stat padding and breaking crazy records are not NBA playoff basketball.

    Lack of Speed on Both Ends

    The modern NBA prioritizes pace, with teams exploiting transition opportunities and quick defensive rotations. Giannis, despite his freakish athleticism, often appears a step slow in these scenarios. Offensively, his reliance on bulldozing drives to the rim is less effective against Finals-caliber defenses that collapse quickly and force him into crowded paint situations. His 6.9 seconds per touch (among the highest in the playoffs) indicate a deliberate, plodding style that disrupts Milwaukee’s flow in fast-paced games.

    Defensively, Giannis struggles to keep up with the rapid ball movement and off-ball screens that define modern offences. Teams like the Boston Celtics or Dallas Mavericks exploit his slower lateral movement by using guards and wings to pull him out of position, creating open looks from three or easy drives. His Defensive Versatility Index (DVI) this postseason dropped to 0.82, below the league average for big men, highlighting his struggles to switch effectively in high-speed defensive schemes.

    Questionable Basketball IQ

    Basketball IQ is critical in the Finals, where split-second decisions determine outcomes. Giannis, while a phenomenal physical talent, often lacks the instincts needed for elite play making. Not his fault, he started playing ball way too late in life. It’s not something you can add later, it has to be instinctual. His assist-to-turnover ratio in the 2025 playoffs (1.8:1) is among the lowest for primary ball-handlers, reflecting a tendency to force passes or drives without reading the defence. Advanced plays, such as pick-and-roll counters or off-ball movement, seem to elude him. Opponents frequently bait him into predictable patterns, like charging into double-teams, where his decision-making falters.

    For example, in Game 3 of the Finals, Giannis was repeatedly caught hesitating against zone defenses, leading to three shot-clock violations. His inability to quickly process complex coverages limits Milwaukee’s offensive ceiling, especially when compared to players like Luka Dončić or Jayson Tatum, who thrive in reading and exploiting defensive adjustments.

    Inability to Adapt to Advanced Strategies

    The modern NBA demands adaptability, with coaches deploying intricate schemes to outmaneuver opponents. Giannis, however, appears rigid in his approach. His offensive game relies heavily on straight-line drives and post-ups, which are less effective against teams that use analytics-driven defenses to clog driving lanes. According to Synergy Sports, Giannis’s points per possession (PPP) on isolation plays in the Finals dropped to 0.89, well below the 1.05 league average for big men.

    On defence, his inability to adjust to modern switching schemes or communicate effectively in pick-and-roll coverages has been glaring. Opponents exploit this by targeting him in high pick-and-rolls, forcing him to either hedge too far or drop too deep, creating open shots. His lack of engagement in off-ball defensive rotations—often standing flat-footed as shooters relocate—further compounds Milwaukee’s struggles against dynamic offences.

    Ball-Hogging Tendencies

    Giannis’s ball-dominant style stifles the Bucks’ offense in critical moments. He averaged 8.1 seconds per possession with the ball, often holding it without purposeful movement. This slows down teammates like Damian Lillard, who thrive in quicker, more fluid systems. His usage rate (34.2%) is among the highest in the playoffs, yet his efficiency (True Shooting % of 54.1) lags behind other superstars like Nikola Jokić (61.3%). This suggests Giannis is monopolising possessions without generating proportional value, a cardinal sin in the team-oriented modern game.

    Lack of Diverse Skills and Options

    Perhaps the most glaring issue is Giannis’s limited skill set. His jump shot remains unreliable—his three-point percentage in the Finals was a dismal 22.7% on low volume (1.4 attempts per game). Defences sag off him, daring him to shoot, which clogs the paint and limits his driving lanes. Unlike players like Kevin Durant or even Anthony Davis, Giannis lacks a consistent mid-range game or the ability to create off the dribble with finesse. Again, his fans think he has a mid range shot but we have analysed here in depth how this is completely not true. It was a media hype bullshit story in a stretch of easy regular season games. When it mattered, in the playoffs, Giannis has zero mid range. As usual.

    Additionally, his free-throw shooting (64.3% in the playoffs) remains a liability in close games, where opponents intentionally foul him to exploit this weakness. His lack of off-ball movement further limits his versatility; he rarely cuts or relocates effectively, making him predictable and easier to game-plan against.

    Giannis is past his prime and the game has evolved way beyond his skillset

    Giannis Antetokounmpo remains a two-time MVP and a physical marvel, but the 2025 NBA Playoffs have underscored his limitations in the modern game. His lack of speed, questionable basketball IQ, inability to adapt to advanced strategies, ball-hogging tendencies, and limited skill set make it difficult for him to dominate at the highest level against elite competition. While he can still be a cornerstone for the Bucks, Milwaukee may need to retool its system—or Giannis must evolve significantly—to compete in the increasingly sophisticated landscape of the NBA. The Finals have made it clearer than ever: raw athleticism alone is no longer enough and Giannis was extremely lucky to get a ring while he could that year.

  • Why Giannis Struggles in Clutch Situations

    Why Giannis Struggles in Clutch Situations

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” is a two-time MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, and NBA champion. However, when the game is on the line—those critical “clutch” moments in the final minutes of a close game—Giannis has often been criticised for underperforming. His fans keep talking about that (one) 50 point performance. But they choose to ignore the true story.

    Defining Clutch Situations

    For clarity, “clutch” situations in this context refer to the last five minutes of a game (including overtime) where the score is within five points. This is a standard metric used by NBA analysts to evaluate performance under pressure. While Giannis excels in many facets of the game, his clutch-time performance has drawn scrutiny, particularly in high-stakes playoff games.

    The Numbers: Giannis in the Clutch

    To understand Giannis’ clutch performance, let’s look at some statistics. According to NBA.com’s advanced stats for the 2023-24 season, Giannis’ clutch-time performance reveals some concerning trends:

    • Field Goal Percentage (FG%): In clutch situations, Giannis shot 42.3% from the field, significantly lower than his season average of 61.1%. His efficiency drops when defenses tighten up.
    • Free Throw Shooting: Giannis’ free throw percentage in clutch moments was a dismal 58.7%, compared to his season average of 65.7%. This is particularly problematic since he often gets to the line in high-pressure situations.
    • Turnovers: Giannis averaged 1.2 turnovers per clutch game, a higher rate than his overall 3.4 turnovers per game, suggesting he struggles with decision-making under pressure.
    • Usage Rate: Giannis had a clutch usage rate of 38.2%, meaning he’s heavily involved in the Bucks’ offense during these moments, but his efficiency doesn’t match his volume.

    In the playoffs, these issues become magnified. For example, in the 2023 NBA Playoffs against the Miami Heat, Giannis shot 2-for-7 (28.6%) in clutch situations and missed several key free throws, contributing to Milwaukee’s first-round exit. Over his playoff career, his clutch FG% sits at 39.8%, and his free throw percentage drops to 55.4%.

    Why Does Giannis Struggle in the Clutch?

    Several factors contribute to Giannis’ challenges in high-pressure situations. Let’s break them down:

    1. Limited Jump Shooting

    Giannis is a force in the paint, using his length and athleticism to dominate around the rim. However, his lack of a reliable jump shot—particularly from mid-range or beyond the arc—becomes a liability in clutch moments. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot from outside. In the 2023-24 season, Giannis shot just 27.4% from three-point range and 34.1% on mid-range jumpers. In clutch situations, when defenses pack the paint or build a “wall” (a strategy popularized by the Toronto Raptors in 2019), Giannis struggles to create clean looks.

    2. Free Throw Woes

    Giannis’ free throw shooting has long been a weak point. His unorthodox, lengthy free throw routine (often exceeding the 10-second limit) seems to falter under pressure. In clutch situations, opponents frequently employ a “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy, fouling him intentionally to exploit his poor free throw shooting. Missing free throws in tight games not only costs points but also saps momentum and confidence.

    3. Decision-Making Under Pressure

    While Giannis is an excellent playmaker, averaging 5.9 assists per game in 2023-24, his decision-making in clutch moments can be erratic. He often forces drives into crowded defenses, leading to turnovers or low-percentage shots. In high-pressure situations, his tendency to over-penetrate rather than kick out to open teammates (like Damian Lillard or Khris Middleton) can stall the Bucks’ offense. For example, in Game 5 of the 2021 NBA Finals, Giannis had two turnovers in the final two minutes, nearly costing Milwaukee a pivotal game.

    4. Defensive Attention

    In clutch situations, opponents can focus their entire defensive scheme on stopping Giannis. Double-teams, triple-teams, and zone defenses are common, as teams are less concerned about role players in these moments. While Giannis is adept at handling double-teams in the regular season, the intensity of playoff defenses—combined with his limited outside shooting—makes it harder for him to find space.

    5. Lack of a Go-To Move

    Unlike clutch performers like Kevin Durant (pull-up jumper), Damian Lillard (deep three), or LeBron James (versatile scoring and playmaking), Giannis lacks a singular, reliable move in crunch time. His game is built on physicality and transition opportunities, but in half-court, high-pressure situations, he often resorts to bulldozing drives that are easier to defend when the game slows down.

    Playoff Case Studies

    Let’s examine two playoff series that underscore Giannis’ clutch struggles:

    2020 Eastern Conference Semifinals vs. Miami Heat

    In this series, the Heat’s zone defense and physicality flustered Giannis. In Game 4, with the Bucks trailing by 3 in the final minute, Giannis missed two free throws and turned the ball over on a forced drive, sealing Miami’s victory. He shot 1-for-5 in clutch situations across the series, with three turnovers.

    2023 First Round vs. Miami Heat

    Despite a heroic 38-point performance in Game 4, Giannis’ clutch miscues were costly. In the final minute of a tied game, he missed a contested layup and went 0-for-2 from the free throw line, allowing Miami to pull ahead. His clutch FG% in the series was 28.6%, and he missed 7 of 12 free throws in clutch moments.

    How Can Giannis Improve?

    For Giannis to become a more reliable clutch performer, several adjustments could help:

    1. Develop a Jump Shot: Even a consistent mid-range jumper would force defenses to respect his outside game, opening up driving lanes.
    2. Improve Free Throw Shooting: Simplifying his routine and practicing under pressure could boost his confidence at the line.
    3. Better Decision-Making: Giannis should trust his teammates more in clutch moments, especially shooters like Lillard and Middleton.
    4. Work on a Go-To Move: Developing a reliable fadeaway or post move could give him a fallback option when drives are cut off.

    Giannis ain’t clutch and probably never will be

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s clutch-time struggles are a notable blemish which effectively make him useless for a team chasing a championship. Worse than useless, he is a liability. His lack of a jump shot, poor free throw shooting, and questionable decision-making in high-pressure moments have cost the Bucks in key games, particularly in the playoffs. He has rarely shown flashes of clutch ability, consistency remains elusive. With targeted improvements, Giannis could perhaps at least become less of a liability for his team. For now, though, the “Greek Freak” will keep hiding behind his team mates and pretending there is no problem.

    All statistics are sourced from NBA.com and Basketball-Reference for the 2023-24 season and prior playoff performances.

  • Siakam vs Giannis: 2 finals appearances vs 1

    Siakam vs Giannis: 2 finals appearances vs 1

    1. Three-Point Shooting:
    • Siakam’s Advantage: Siakam is a significantly better three-point shooter than Giannis. In the 2024-25 season, Siakam shot 41.3% from three on moderate volume (around 2-3 attempts per game), showcasing his ability to stretch the floor. His career three-point percentage is around 34%, with steady improvement.
    • Giannis’s Context: Giannis has struggled with his outside shooting, with a career three-point percentage around 29% and often shooting below 20% in recent seasons (e.g., 0.00% in one month cited). His lack of a reliable jumper limits his spacing ability.
    • Impact: Siakam’s shooting makes him a more versatile offensive threat in certain lineups, as defenses must respect his range, whereas Giannis is often dared to shoot from deep.
    1. Mid-Range Scoring:
    • Siakam’s Advantage: Siakam has developed a polished mid-range game, particularly with pull-up jumpers and turnaround shots. Analytics from BBall-Index give him an “A” grade for Midrange Pull Up Talent, and he’s effective in isolation, averaging high isolation points per game. His ability to attack off the dribble, reject screens, and hit mid-range shots gives him an edge in half-court sets.
    • Giannis’s Context: Giannis relies heavily on his dominance in the paint (0-3 feet range), where he’s elite, but his mid-range game is less refined. He’s less comfortable with pull-up jumpers or creating space off the dribble outside the restricted area.
    • Impact: Siakam’s mid-range versatility allows him to exploit defenses that sag off or switch, making him a more complete scorer in varied offensive schemes.
    1. Offensive Versatility in Playoff Scenarios:
    • Siakam’s Advantage: Siakam has shown he can adapt his scoring approach based on defensive schemes, using a mix of post-ups, face-ups, and perimeter shots. In the 2024 playoffs, he dropped 37 points on 16-of-23 shooting against the Bucks, showcasing his ability to dominate in multiple ways (mid-range, drives, and lobs). His playoff career-high 39 points in 2025 further highlights his clutch scoring versatility.
    • Giannis’s Context: Giannis is a force in transition and paint scoring, but defenses often build a “wall” to limit his drives, daring him to shoot. His offensive game, while dominant, is less varied, relying on physicality and playmaking over shooting.
    • Impact: Siakam’s ability to score from multiple levels makes him harder to game-plan against in certain matchups, especially when defenses collapse on primary ball-handlers.
    1. Defensive Versatility Against Smaller Players:
    • Siakam’s Advantage: Siakam’s agility and length (6’8”, 245 lbs) allow him to effectively guard smaller, quicker players, including point guards, in addition to power forwards and centers. His defensive motor and ability to switch across positions were noted early in his career, earning praise from coaches like Dwane Casey.
    • Giannis’s Context: Giannis (6’11”, 243 lbs) is an elite defender, capable of guarding 1-5, with a DPOY award to his name. However, his size can make him slightly less agile against quick guards compared to Siakam, who has a lower center of gravity and quicker lateral movement.
    • Impact: Siakam’s ability to lock down smaller players gives him a slight edge in switch-heavy defensive schemes, though Giannis’s rim protection and overall defensive impact are superior.
    1. Durability and Availability:
    • Siakam’s Advantage: Siakam has been remarkably durable, rarely missing games since joining the Pacers. In the 2024-25 season, he was noted for not missing a game, providing consistency for Indiana. His ability to stay on the court has been critical, especially during injury-plagued stretches for teammates.
    • Giannis’s Context: Giannis has faced injury concerns, particularly in the playoffs. He missed games in the 2024 playoffs due to a calf strain, and his availability has been uncertain at times (e.g., a left soleus strain).
    • Impact: Siakam’s reliability ensures he’s a consistent contributor, which is valuable for teams needing a steady presence, though Giannis’s impact when healthy is unmatched.
    1. Clutch Performance as a Secondary Option:
    • Siakam’s Advantage: Siakam thrives as a second option, as seen with the Pacers alongside Tyrese Haliburton. His ability to deliver in clutch moments without needing primary usage (e.g., 37 points in Game 2 vs. Bucks in 2024) makes him a perfect complementary star. He’s efficient in high-pressure situations, like his 8-0 run in the fourth quarter to seal a playoff win.
    • Giannis’s Context: Giannis is a primary option, often carrying the Bucks’ offence. While he’s not clutch in his own right, his high usage can lead to fatigue, and he’s less effective as a secondary option due to his limited shooting.
    • Impact: Siakam’s ability to shine without demanding the ball makes him a better fit in certain team constructs, particularly as a co-star.

    Contextual Notes

    • Head-to-Head: Siakam has a 14-12 record against Giannis in 26 games, including 4-2 in playoffs, suggesting he can hold his own in matchups.
    • Role and Fit: Siakam’s ability to fit into various systems (e.g., as a secondary option with the Pacers or primary with the Raptors) gives him an edge in adaptability, while Giannis is a system-defining superstar.

    Conclusion

    Pascal Siakam is better than Giannis Antetokounmpo in three-point shooting, mid-range scoring, defensive versatility against smaller players, durability, and thriving as a secondary option in clutch moments. These strengths make Siakam a more versatile offensive player and a reliable, adaptable star. Siakam’s edges are specific but significant, particularly for teams needing a well-rounded, durable forward who can score efficiently from multiple ranges.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo vs. Tim Duncan: A Comparative Analysis

    Giannis Antetokounmpo vs. Tim Duncan: A Comparative Analysis

    When discussing the greatest power forwards in NBA history, Tim Duncan’s name is often at the forefront, while Giannis Antetokounmpo is a modern superstar probably past his prime now. Both players have left indelible marks on the game, but a detailed comparison reveals stark differences in their playing styles, team success, and overall legacy.

    Career Overview

    Tim Duncan

    Tim Duncan, known as “The Big Fundamental,” played his entire 19-year career (1997–2016) with the San Antonio Spurs. A model of consistency, Duncan led the Spurs to five NBA championships (1999, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2014), earning three Finals MVP awards and two regular-season MVPs. His accolades include 15 All-Star appearances, 15 All-NBA selections, and 15 All-Defensive team honors. Duncan’s game was built on efficiency, fundamentals, and selflessness, anchoring a Spurs dynasty that thrived on team play.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” has played for the Milwaukee Bucks since 2013. His freakish athleticism and versatility have earned him two MVP awards (2019, 2020), a Defensive Player of the Year award (2020), and an NBA championship in 2021, where he was named Finals MVP. With eight All-Star appearances and seven All-NBA selections, Giannis is a dominant force. However, his game is often critiqued for its reliance on physicality and less polished fundamentals, raising questions about whether his stats reflect team success or individual dominance. Furthermore other than one ring which could well be attributed to his supporting roster, he has only gone downhill since.

    Statistical Comparison

    To compare the two, let’s examine their career averages (per game) as of the 2024–25 season for Giannis and Duncan’s career end in 2016, using data from Basketball-Reference.

    PlayerPPGRPGAPGSPGBPGFG%3P%FT%TS%PER
    Tim Duncan19.010.83.00.72.250.6%17.9%69.6%55.1%24.2
    Giannis Antetokounmpo23.49.84.91.11.254.5%28.6%68.8%58.6%23.8

    Scoring

    Giannis averages more points per game (23.4 vs. 19.0), but this comes with higher usage (28.8% vs. Duncan’s 25.6%). Giannis’s scoring often relies on driving to the basket, leveraging his athleticism, but his efficiency wanes in the playoffs (55.3% TS% vs. Duncan’s 55.8%). Duncan’s scoring was more deliberate, using post moves and mid-range shots, which scaled better in high-stakes games.

    Rebounding and Defense

    Duncan was a superior rebounder (10.8 RPG vs. 9.8) and shot-blocker (2.2 BPG vs. 1.2), anchoring San Antonio’s elite defenses. Giannis’s Defensive Player of the Year award highlights his versatility, but his defensive impact is less consistent due to freelancing for highlight plays. Duncan’s 15 All-Defensive selections dwarf Giannis’s five, underscoring Duncan’s sustained defensive excellence.

    Playmaking

    Giannis’s 4.9 assists per game outpace Duncan’s 3.0, reflecting his role as a primary ball-handler. However, Duncan’s assists came within a system emphasizing ball movement, while Giannis’s higher assist numbers often stem from initiating offense, sometimes at the expense of team flow.

    Efficiency

    Giannis’s true shooting percentage (58.6%) edges out Duncan’s (55.1%), but Duncan played in an era with lower offensive efficiency league-wide. Giannis’s reliance on free throws (8.3 attempts per game vs. Duncan’s 5.6) inflates his scoring but highlights a weakness: his poor free-throw shooting (68.8%) compared to Duncan’s (69.6%) often hurts his team in clutch moments.

    Playstyle Analysis

    Tim Duncan: The selfless anchor

    Duncan’s game was a masterclass in fundamentals. His post play, bank shots, and defensive positioning were textbook. He thrived in Gregg Popovich’s system, prioritizing team success over individual stats. Duncan rarely chased numbers, evident in his low turnover rate (2.4 per game) and willingness to defer to teammates like Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. His leadership fostered a culture that sustained San Antonio’s dominance across two decades.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo: The athletic force

    Giannis’s game is defined by explosive drives, dunks, and transition play. His physical gifts allow him to dominate, but critics argue he stat-pads by hunting easy baskets and free throws. His high usage rate (28.8%) suggests a ball-dominant style that can disrupt team rhythm, especially when his three-point shooting (28.6%) and free-throw struggles become liabilities. In the 2021 playoffs, Giannis’s 35-point, 13-rebound Finals average was historic, but his 61.3% TS% was inflated by easy buckets, and his team relied heavily on Khris Middleton and Jrue Holiday for clutch moments.

    Team Success

    Championships

    Duncan’s five championships to Giannis’s one is a significant gap. Duncan’s Spurs were perennial contenders, reaching the playoffs every year of his career and winning titles across three different decades. Giannis’s 2021 title was a monumental achievement, but the Bucks have struggled to replicate that success, with early playoff exits in 2020, 2022, 2023, and 2024. Duncan’s teams never missed the postseason, while Giannis’s Bucks missed in 2016 and were inconsistent early in his career.

    Playoff Performance

    Duncan’s playoff numbers (20.6 PPG, 11.4 RPG, 50.1% FG) remained consistent with his regular-season output, reflecting his ability to perform under pressure. Giannis’s playoff stats (26.6 PPG, 12.0 RPG, 53.7% FG) are impressive but drop in efficiency (55.3% TS% vs. 58.6% regular season), particularly when defenses wall off the paint. Duncan’s versatility allowed him to adapt, while Giannis’s limited shooting range makes him more predictable in high-stakes games.

    Supporting Cast

    Duncan played alongside Hall of Famers like David Robinson, Tony Parker, and Manu Ginobili, but his leadership elevated lesser talents like Danny Green and Boris Diaw. Giannis has had All-Stars like Middleton and Holiday, yet the Bucks’ success hinges on his individual dominance, suggesting less ability to elevate teammates. Duncan’s Spurs won 50+ games in 17 of his 19 seasons; Giannis’s Bucks have hit that mark only five times.

    The Stat-Padding and Selfishness Critique

    Giannis’s critics point to his high usage and tendency to dominate the ball as evidence of selfish play. His 7.3 free-throw attempts per game in the regular season (and 9.8 in the playoffs) suggest a reliance on drawing fouls, which can slow the game and disrupt team flow. In contrast, Duncan’s low-usage, high-efficiency style complemented his teammates, as seen in the Spurs’ 2014 “beautiful game” offense, which prioritized ball movement over individual heroics.

    Giannis’s stat lines are often eye-popping (e.g., 30 points, 12 rebounds), but games like his 44-point, 14-rebound performance against the Nets in 2021 included inefficient 14-of-26 shooting and five turnovers, raising questions about stat-padding in losses. Duncan’s quieter 20-point, 10-rebound games were often more impactful, with fewer mistakes (career 2.4 turnovers per game vs. Giannis’s 3.2).

    Legacy and Impact

    Duncan’s legacy is cemented as one of the greatest winners in NBA history. His five rings, three Finals MVPs, and 19 years of consistency place him among legends like Bill Russell and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. His selfless play and adaptability made him the cornerstone of a dynasty. Giannis, at 30 years old in 2025, has time to build his legacy, but his one championship and inconsistent playoff runs pale in comparison. His individual accolades (two MVPs, DPOY) are impressive, but they don’t yet translate to Duncan’s sustained team success.

    It’s not even close

    While Giannis Antetokounmpo has unmatched athleticism but Tim Duncan’s career surpasses him in nearly every meaningful metric: championships, consistency, efficiency, and team-oriented play. Giannis’s style, while dominant, leans on physicality and can appear selfish, with high usage and free-throw attempts inflating his stats. Duncan’s fundamental, selfless approach led to five titles and a dynasty, making him the clear superior player. Giannis has years to close the gap, but as of 2025, he remains a tier below the Big Fundamental.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100K Challenge Exposes Key Weaknesses

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100K Challenge Exposes Key Weaknesses

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is known for his athleticism and rim-rattling dunks. However, a recent $100,000 MrBeast shooting challenge pitted him against street ball sensation and YouTube star Tristan Jass, and the results were shocking. The challenge highlighted critical weaknesses in Giannis’ game that have long been debated by fans and analysts.

    The Challenge Setup

    The MrBeast challenge was a head-to-head shooting competition designed to test precision under pressure. The tasks included:

    • Free throws: A test of consistency from the charity stripe.
    • Three-pointers: A measure of long-range shooting ability.
    • Half-court shots: A high-risk, high-reward challenge requiring both skill and a bit of luck.

    Tristan Jass, a content creator with a massive following for his streetball highlights and deadly shooting, was a formidable opponent. While Giannis is a global basketball icon, Jass’s specialized skill set in shooting made this a tougher matchup than it might have seemed. The $100,000 prize added pressure, and as X user @____Shemar noted, “No way Mr. Beast possibly thought Giannis was making a FT, 3 pointer, and half court shot before Tjass … easiest $100k Tjass ever made 😂”.

    1. Free-Throw Shooting Woes

    The free-throw portion of the challenge was a predictable stumbling block for Giannis. His career free-throw percentage hovers around 65-70%, with a 2024-25 season average of approximately 68%. In high-pressure situations, his performance at the line often dips further, as seen in playoff games where opponents employ a “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy to exploit this weakness.

    In the MrBeast challenge, Giannis struggled to find a rhythm, missing several free throws in a row. His lengthy free-throw routine—often taking 10+ seconds—may have been disrupted by the fast-paced, high-stakes environment of the challenge. Fans remarked on the predictability of this outcome, with @Lester_O3 noting that someone won $100,000 by outshooting Giannis. Jass, known for his consistency in shooting drills, likely capitalised on this, hitting his free throws with ease.

    Giannis’ free-throw struggles stem from mechanical issues (a hitch in his release and inconsistent wrist snap) and mental pressure. In the challenge, the added spotlight of a MrBeast production, with cameras and a live audience, likely amplified his tendency to overthink at the line.

    Takeaway: Giannis needs to streamline his free-throw routine and practice under pressure to boost his consistency. Hitting 75-80% from the line would not only have helped in this challenge but could deter opponents from fouling him intentionally in NBA games. He is in fact worse than ever in his career in free throws this season!

    2. Inconsistent Three-Point Shooting

    The three-point shooting segment was another area where Giannis fell short. His NBA three-point percentage in the 2024-25 season is around 20-25% on low volume (1-2 attempts per game), a far cry from Jass’s sharpshooting prowess. Jass, who regularly showcases deep threes and trick shots on YouTube, thrives in these scenarios, while Giannis’ jump shot remains a work in progress.

    In the challenge, Giannis reportedly missed most of his three-point attempts, unable to match Jass’s precision. His shooting form—marked by a slow release and occasional inconsistency in footwork—makes long-range shooting a liability. NBA defenses often sag off Giannis, daring him to shoot from deep, as seen in playoff series like the 2023 loss to the Miami Heat, where his 1-for-10 three-point shooting in the series was a glaring weakness.

    The MrBeast challenge exposed this gap starkly. While Giannis relies on his athleticism to dominate inside, Jass’s specialized shooting skill set gave him a clear edge in a contest focused on perimeter accuracy.

    Takeaway: Giannis would benefit from dedicated three-point training to reach at least a league-average 35% from deep. This would force defenses to respect his range, opening up his drives to the basket and making him a more complete offensive threat. Three points this season he not only shot worse than ever in his career but almost worse than anyone, ever, in NBA history for a single season!

    3. Half-Court Shot Struggles

    The half-court shot portion of the challenge was the final nail in the coffin. Half-court shots are inherently low-percentage, relying on a mix of skill, luck, and confidence. Jass, with his reputation for hitting long-range bombs in his videos, likely approached this with a shooter’s mentality. Giannis, on the other hand, rarely attempts such shots in NBA games, and his mechanics from that distance are unrefined.

    Giannis’ attempts fell short or missed wide, while Jass connected to seal the victory.

    Takeaway: While half-court shots are a niche skill, improving his overall shooting mechanics could give Giannis a better chance in such scenarios. Practising long-range shots in low-stakes settings might also build confidence for rare game situations. But if anything Giannis is worse than ever in clutch situations which is why Doc Rivers now keeps him out of the game in the 4th quarter as much as possible. We saw against the Pacers how terrible he can be for his team under pressure.

    4. Pressure in Non-NBA Settings

    Beyond specific skills, the challenge highlighted Giannis’ discomfort in non-traditional basketball settings. NBA games allow him to leverage his physicality, defensive prowess, and transition dominance, but the MrBeast challenge was a pure shooting contest with no room for his usual strengths. The high-pressure environment, with a $100,000 prize and a YouTube audience, may have thrown Giannis off his game, as he’s accustomed to structured NBA settings rather than impromptu streetball-style competitions.

    Jass, a content creator who thrives in these viral, high-energy formats, was in his element. Giannis’ struggles suggest that his mental focus, while elite in NBA contexts, may not translate as well to unconventional challenges where his athletic advantages are neutralized.

    Takeaway: Giannis could benefit from participating in more casual, high-pressure shooting contests to build adaptability. This would also help him handle the mental demands of clutch shooting moments in playoff games. Most of all though the NBA is about the show. And Giannis simply doesn’t deliver which is why he doesn’t bring in TV ratings.

    What This Means for Giannis

    The MrBeast challenge underscores areas where he lags behind specialists like Jass and, by extension, NBA sharpshooters in the league. To elevate his game, Giannis could:

    • Work with a shooting coach to refine his free-throw and three-point mechanics, aiming for incremental improvements (e.g., 75% free throws, 35% threes).
    • Practice under pressure in non-NBA settings to build mental resilience for high-stakes shooting.
    • Study film of sharpshooters to adopt techniques that complement his physical gifts.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100,000 shooting challenge was a revealing moment. It exposed his well-known struggles with free throws, three-point shooting, and long-range accuracy, amplified by the pressure of a viral, high-stakes competition. For fans, the challenge was a fun spectacle that pitted an NBA giant against a street ball sharpshooter. For Giannis, it’s a wake-up call to address weaknesses that could make the difference in future playoff runs. As he continues past his prime now at age 30, the Greek Freak has the work ethic and drive. But can he turn these flaws into strengths? After more than a decade in the league and with so many different coaches that have tried to help him, the answer is probably no.

  • Has Giannis Really Played All Five Positions?

    Has Giannis Really Played All Five Positions?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s unique combination of size, speed, and skill has led to a persistent narrative: Giannis has played all five positions. This claim gets tossed around in highlight reels, podcasts, and casual fan debates, but how much truth is there to it? He relies heavily on drives, can’t even shoot free throws to save his life, has almost zero play making skills, has completely given up trying from 3pt land, terrible off the ball, rarely cutting or setting screens to create space, his post game lacks refined footwork or go-to moves. Let’s face it. He ain’t gonna improve either. Defence? Even worse limitations! Giannis struggles to stay in front of smaller, quicker guards on the perimeter due to his size and lateral quickness limitations, making him less effective in switch-heavy schemes against certain match ups. His aggressive help defence leads to overcommitting, leaving shooters open or creating gaps in the Bucks’ defensive rotations. He often gets caught on screens, particularly in pick-and-roll situations, where his recovery speed doesn’t always match his rim-protecting instincts. And of course against sharp-shooting teams, his closeouts on three-point shooters are abysmally slow.

    Defining the Five Positions

    To evaluate this claim, we first need to define what we mean by “playing all five positions.” In traditional basketball, the five positions are:

    1. Point Guard (PG): The primary ball-handler, playmaker, and floor general, responsible for initiating the offense and distributing the ball.
    2. Shooting Guard (SG): Typically a perimeter-oriented player focused on scoring, often via outside shooting or driving.
    3. Small Forward (SF): A versatile wing player who balances scoring, defense, and sometimes playmaking.
    4. Power Forward (PF): A frontcourt player who combines physicality, rebounding, and scoring, often in the post or mid-range.
    5. Center (C): The anchor of the paint, responsible for rim protection, rebounding, and scoring close to the basket.

    In today’s NBA, the lines between these positions have blurred, with “positionless” players like Giannis thriving in multiple roles. But for Giannis to have “played all five positions,” he would need to have meaningfully performed the primary responsibilities of each role in actual NBA games, either as a starter or in specific stints.

    Giannis’s Positional Journey

    Giannis, at 6’11” with a 7’3” wingspan, entered the NBA in 2013 as a lanky, raw prospect with the Milwaukee Bucks. Over the years, his role has evolved significantly, which fuels the myth of his five-position versatility. Let’s examine his career arc and the positions he’s actually played.

    Small Forward: His Natural Starting Point

    When Giannis debuted, the Bucks listed him as a small forward. His early role leaned heavily on his athleticism, with responsibilities including:

    • Transition scoring
    • Slashing to the basket
    • Perimeter defense against wings

    This is the position where Giannis spent the bulk of his early career (2013–2016). His lanky frame and guard-like agility made him a prototypical modern small forward, capable of guarding multiple positions and running the floor. Official NBA tracking data from Basketball-Reference lists him as a small forward for his first three seasons, and this aligns with his on-court role under coaches like Jason Kidd.

    Power Forward: The Modern Role

    As Giannis bulked up and developed his game, the Bucks shifted him to power forward, especially under coach Mike Budenholzer starting in 2018. This is where Giannis has thrived most, leveraging his size and skill to:

    • Attack mismatches in the post
    • Serve as a help defender and rim protector
    • Grab rebounds and initiate fast breaks

    His dominance as a power forward earned him back-to-back MVPs (2019, 2020) and a Finals MVP in 2021. NBA tracking data confirms that Giannis has played the majority of his minutes at the 4 (power forward) in recent seasons, with advanced lineup data from Cleaning the Glass showing him logging over 70% of his minutes at power forward from 2018 to 2023.

    Center: Occasional Stints

    Giannis has also played center, particularly in small-ball lineups. The Bucks have used him at the 5 in specific situations, such as:

    • When Brook Lopez or Bobby Portis is off the floor
    • In playoff matchups against smaller teams (e.g., the 2021 Nets series)
    • During “death lineup” configurations to maximize spacing and speed

    According to NBA.com’s lineup data, Giannis has spent roughly 10–15% of his minutes at center in recent seasons, often in crunch time or against teams lacking a traditional big. In these stints, he handles rim protection, rebounding, and even some pick-and-roll defense. However, he’s rarely the primary center for extended periods, as Milwaukee prefers Lopez’s floor-spacing and rim protection for most minutes.

    The Guard Positions: Where the Myth Stumbles

    Here’s where the “all five positions” claim starts to fray. While Giannis’s ball-handling and playmaking have improved dramatically—he averaged 5.6 assists per game in the 2022–23 season and often initiates Milwaukee’s offense—the idea that he’s played point guard or shooting guard in a meaningful way doesn’t hold up.

    Point Guard: The “Point Giannis” Hype

    The “Point Giannis” narrative took off in 2016 when Jason Kidd famously called Giannis the Bucks’ point guard. That season, Giannis’s usage as a ball-handler increased, and he ran more pick-and-rolls and transition plays. But calling him a point guard was more about hype than reality. Here’s why:

    • Role vs. Position: Giannis brought the ball up and initiated offense, but he wasn’t guarding opposing point guards like Damian Lillard or Chris Paul. His defensive assignments remained wings and forwards.
    • Box Score Evidence: Basketball-Reference and NBA.com still listed him as a forward, and his minutes at the 1 were negligible (less than 5% per Cleaning the Glass).
    • Playstyle: Giannis’s playmaking often came from the high post or after grabbing defensive rebounds, not from running a traditional point guard’s half-court offense.

    While Giannis has point guard skills—dribbling, passing, and vision—he hasn’t played the point guard position in the way players like Jrue Holiday or Damian Lillard have done for Milwaukee.

    Shooting Guard: The Weakest Link

    The claim that Giannis has played shooting guard is even shakier. Shooting guards in the modern NBA (e.g., Devin Booker, Donovan Mitchell) are typically perimeter scorers who rely on outside shooting and off-ball movement. Giannis, by contrast:

    • Shoots sparingly from three (career 28.6% from three as of 2025)
    • Rarely plays off-ball as a catch-and-shoot threat
    • Doesn’t guard opposing shooting guards like Bradley Beal or Zach LaVine. (And if he does it kills his team as per Tyrese blowing by him multiple times in clutch time in these playoffs…)

    Lineup data shows no significant minutes logged at the 2. His role has never resembled that of a shooting guard, even in small-ball lineups where he’s more likely to slide to center than guard a perimeter scorer.

    Why the Myth Persists

    So why does the “all five positions” narrative stick? Several factors contribute:

    1. Positionless Basketball: The NBA’s shift toward positionless play blurs traditional roles. Giannis’s ability to handle, pass, score, and defend multiple players makes him seem like he could play any position, even if he doesn’t.
    2. Highlight Plays: Viral clips of Giannis dribbling past guards or switching onto point guards in crunch time fuel the perception of him as a five-position player.
    3. Coach and Media Hype: Comments like Jason Kidd’s “point guard” label and media narratives about Giannis’s versatility amplify the myth without rigorous analysis.
    4. Fan Imagination: Giannis’s freakish athleticism invites fans to imagine him dominating any role, even ones he hasn’t played.

    The Reality: Giannis Is not a Versatile Forward

    Giannis has undeniably played three positions—small forward, power forward, and centre—with significant minutes and impact. He hasn’t logged meaningful time as a point guard or shooting guard, nor has he performed their primary duties (e.g., running a half-court offence or playing as an off-ball shooter).

    Advanced metrics support this. According to Defensive Player Versatility Index (DVPI) from 2023, Giannis ranks among the top forwards in guarding multiple positions, but his matchups are predominantly against wings and bigs, not guards. Offensively, his usage rate (around 32% in recent seasons) reflects a forward’s role, not a guard’s.

    So it’s not true, yet another Giannis hype myth

    The myth that Giannis Antetokounmpo has played all five positions doesn’t hold up under scrutiny. He lacks the flexibility to play point guard and shooting guard in a traditional sense. While he has guard-like skills (ball-handling, play making), he doesn’t run a half-court offence like a point guard or play off-ball as a perimeter shooter like a shooting guard. His defensive assignments rarely include guarding opposing guards, and lineup data shows negligible minutes at these positions Next time you hear someone claim Giannis has played all five positions, ask for the game tape. Chances are, they’re just caught up in the legend of the Greek Freak.

    Sources

    • Basketball-Reference.com for positional data and career stats
    • NBA.com for lineup and tracking data
    • Cleaning the Glass for advanced positional breakdowns
    • ESPN and The Athletic for historical context on Giannis’s role evolution
  • Giannis’ defence is just getting worse EVERY year

    Giannis’ defence is just getting worse EVERY year

    In 2020, he was named the NBA Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY), anchoring the Milwaukee Bucks’ league-leading defence. However, recent discussions among fans and analysts suggest his defensive prowess may have waned. So let’s take it from the start of the downfall:

    The Peak: Giannis’ 2019-20 Defensive Dominance

    In the 2019-20 season, Giannis was a defensive juggernaut, earning the DPOY award and a spot on the All-Defensive First Team. Let’s establish his baseline with key metrics from that season, sourced from Basketball-Reference, NBA.com, and ESPN:

    • Defensive Rating (DRtg): 96.5, the lowest among players with at least 15 minutes per game, per Second Spectrum data.
    • Defensive Box Plus/Minus (DBPM): 3.2, leading the league, indicating an elite defensive impact.
    • Opponent Field Goal Percentage (Opp FG%): Held opponents to 36.3% shooting as the closest defender (minimum 525 attempts), the lowest in the NBA since Second Spectrum began tracking in 2013-14. At the rim, opponents shot just 41.8%.
    • Steals and Blocks: Averaged 1.0 steals and 1.0 blocks per game, contributing to his reputation as a versatile defender capable of guarding all five positions.
    • Defensive Rebounds: Led the NBA with 11.5 defensive rebounds per game, highlighted by nine games with 15+ defensive rebounds.
    • Team Defense: The Bucks led the league with a defensive rating of 101.3 and allowed an NBA-low 41.3% field goal percentage. Giannis’ on-court presence reduced points allowed by eight per 100 possessions compared to when he was off the court.

    This season cemented Giannis as a “free safety” defender, disrupting plays with his length and mobility, excelling in rim protection, and anchoring the NBA’s best defense.

    The Decline: Evidence from 2020-25

    Since 2020, several metrics and qualitative factors suggest Giannis’ defensive performance has slipped. Below, we analyze key indicators across the 2020-21 to 2024-25 seasons, drawing from Basketball-Reference, ESPN, NBA.com, and other sources like Reddit discussions and Basketball Index.

    1. Defensive Rating (DRtg)

    Giannis’ DRtg has worsened significantly since 2019-20:

    • 2019-20: 96.5 (league-leading)
    • 2020-21: 104.1
    • 2021-22: 106.8
    • 2022-23: 109.4
    • 2023-24: 110.2
    • 2024-25: 110.0

    A DRtg increase from 96.5 to 110 indicates that the Bucks allow 13.5 more points per 100 possessions with Giannis on the court compared to his DPOY year. Giannis’ individual DRtg decline is notable. The chart here on the right shows that this decline is also pronounced in the playoffs.

    2. Defensive Box Plus/Minus (DBPM)

    DBPM reflects a player’s defensive contribution relative to the league average:

    • 2019-20: 3.2 (league-leading)
    • 2020-21: 2.8
    • 2021-22: 2.4
    • 2022-23: 2.1
    • 2023-24: 1.9

    The consistent downward trend in DBPM shows Giannis’ defensive impact is no longer elite.

    3. Opponent Field Goal Percentage (Opp FG%)

    Giannis’ ability to contest shots has also declined:

    • 2019-20: 36.3% overall, 41.8% at the rim (best in the NBA)
    • 2024-25: 42.4% overall

    This suggests Giannis is not as effective particularly in rim protection and one-on-one match ups. His mind is too focused on getting his stat padding done, points, assists, rebounds are all he cares about because that is what most of you talk about.

    4. Steals

    Traditional hustle stats provide insight into defensive activity:

    • 2020-21: 1.2 steals
    • 2021-22: 1.1 steals
    • 2022-23: 0.8 steals
    • 2023-24: 1.1 steals
    • 2024-25: 0.9 steals

    Steals have trended slightly downward (from 1.2 to 0.9) indicating reduced perimeter disruption.

    5. All-Defensive Team Selections

    Giannis was a lock for All-Defensive First Team from 2019 to 2021. However:

    • 2022-23: All-Defensive Second Team
    • 2023-24: All-Defensive Second Team
    • 2024-25: Not selected for either All-Defensive Team, with players like Dyson Daniels and Evan Mobley taking precedence.

    This drop from perennial First Team to no selection in 2024-25 reflects a decline in perceived defensive impact among voters.

    So yes, he is worse at everything

    The data paints a clear picture: Giannis Antetokounmpo’s defensive performance has declined steadily since his 2020 DPOY season. His DRtg has risen from 96.5 to 110, DBPM has dropped from 3.2 to 1.9, and Opp FG% has increased from 36.3% to 42.4%. The absence of All-Defensive Team honours in 2024-25, combined with a slight dip in steals and a team defensive decline, supports the argument that his defence has slipped. And don’t even start talking about his rebounding numbers! Those are mainly stat padding easy defensive ones because everyone clears out of the paint for Giannis to get his numbers. Most importantly Giannis is damaging his team’s defensive efforts by a constant effort to stat pad and get highlight blocks, thus disrupting any advanced defensive plan they had going.

    To be clear, Giannis is worse at almost everything as explained in this post. I looked at this past season in particular recently here. At a glance he played less

    minutes, attempted more shots, missed more shots, made less 3point shots, made less free throws and less steals.

    He also had worse defensive rating, less offensive rebounds, worse efg% and ts% all dropped, despite the fact that he went to the rim more than ever! Quite amazing a feat to fail like that on both ends!

    Sources: Basketball-Reference, NBA.com, ESPN, Reddit, Basketball Index

  • Giannis isn’t “loyal”, he is scared

    Giannis isn’t “loyal”, he is scared

    Whispers persist about whether Giannis would ever leave the Bucks for a new challenge. While some argue he’d thrive elsewhere, there’s a compelling case that Giannis might be hesitant to depart Milwaukee—not due to a lack of ambition, but because staying put shields him from intense scrutiny, hides his weaknesses, and provides a comfortable narrative for his playoff shortcomings. Sure, he will try and sell it as “loyalty” but think about it. He hasn’t got a chance in a million to win another ring with the Bucks. They have spend so long pampering his every whim, changing coaches and players as per his demands that they have absolutely nothing left to trade. If he really wants a ring he should go. But he won’t.

    The Comfort of Milwaukee’s System

    The Bucks have built their entire system around Giannis’s unique skill set. Coach Mike Budenholzer (and now Doc Rivers) designed offences that maximise his ability to attack the rim, leveraging his length, speed, and power. Milwaukee surrounded him with shooters like Khris Middleton, Brook Lopez, and Damian Lillard to space the floor, allowing Giannis to operate in the paint or as a playmaker in transition. This tailored environment masks some of his limitations, particularly his inconsistent outside shooting and free-throw struggles. The Bucks again were top of the NBA in 3pt% as a team despite Giannis shooting worse than ever in his career and close to the worse of any NBA player ever in a single season.

    On a new team, Giannis will not have the same luxury. A franchise like the Miami Heat or Los Angeles Lakers, for example, might demand more versatility in half-court offence or a greater reliance on perimeter skills. If Giannis joined a team with a less complementary roster, his 30.8% career three-point shooting (as of the 2024-25 season) and 68.5% free-throw percentage could become glaring liabilities. In Milwaukee, these weaknesses are mitigated by a system that doesn’t require him to be a sharpshooter. Elsewhere, they’d be magnified, potentially exposing him as a one-dimensional star in critical moments.

    The Excuse of the Supporting Cast

    In Milwaukee, Giannis has a built-in narrative for playoff disappointments: the roster around him isn’t good enough. This is a complete lie as I broke down in this blog post. When the Bucks fell to the Miami Heat in the 2020 playoffs or struggled against the Boston Celtics in 2022, analysts and fans often pointed to Khris Middleton’s injuries, Jrue Holiday’s inconsistency, or a lack of depth. This narrative allows Giannis to deflect criticism, maintaining his status as a transcendent talent held back by circumstances.

    If Giannis moved to a superteam the excuses would vanish. A new team with high-calibre talent would place the spotlight squarely on Giannis’s performance. If he failed to deliver in the playoffs, the blame would shift from the roster to his own limitations, such as his struggles in clutch situations or his predictable offensive approach against elite defences. The pressure to perform without the safety net of “it’s the team’s fault” could be daunting, especially for a player who thrives on being the underdog. Giannis already looks like a fool for talking about not joining a superteam only to get Dame next to him.

    Playoff Pressure and the Fear of Failure

    Giannis’s playoff resume is a mixed bag. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but it was mainly luck and not really due to Giannis when you break it down. Other years have been less kind: the Bucks’ early exits in 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024 exposed vulnerabilities in Giannis’s game, particularly against teams that build a “wall” to clog the paint. Opponents like the Raptors (2019) and Heat (2020) exploited his lack of a reliable jump shot, daring him to shoot while shutting down his drives.

    On a new team, Giannis would face even greater playoff scrutiny. In Milwaukee, he’s the hometown hero, forgiven for setbacks because of his loyalty and the Bucks’ small-market status. In a bigger market or on a contending roster, every playoff game would be a referendum on his greatness. A failure to advance deep into the postseason could cement a narrative that Giannis can’t lead a team to a title without the perfect supporting cast, tarnishing his legacy. The risk of such failure might make him wary of leaving the familiarity of Milwaukee, where expectations, while high, are tempered by the city’s underdog mentality.

    The Burden of Improvement

    Giannis’ shooting remains a work in progress and he is running out of excuses. In Milwaukee, his reluctance to develop a consistent mid-range or three-point shot is often excused as a byproduct of his dominance in other areas. Fans and analysts argue, “Why change what works?” But on a new team, especially one with a different offensive philosophy, Giannis would face unrelenting pressure to evolve.

    For example, joining a team like the Golden State Warriors, where spacing and shooting are paramount, would force Giannis to confront his weaknesses head-on. Without the Bucks’ system to lean on, he’d need to become a more complete offensive player, a challenge he’s been slow to embrace. The fear of being exposed as stagnant—or worse, incapable of adapting—could deter him from taking the leap to a new environment where his growth would be non-negotiable. People talk about him going to the Warriors but his inability to set up screens is only one of many weaknesses which make that completely ridiculous.

    The Loyalty Factor and Public Perception

    Giannis’s loyalty to Milwaukee is a cornerstone of his public image. He signed a supermax extension in 2020, cementing his status as a rare superstar who stayed with a small-market team. This decision endeared him to fans and shielded him from the criticism often levelled at players who chase rings elsewhere, like LeBron James or Kevin Durant. Leaving Milwaukee could fracture this narrative, painting him as just another star chasing glory rather than building a legacy.

    Moreover, a move to a bigger market or a super team could invite comparisons to other superstars, where Giannis’s weaknesses might stand out more starkly. In Milwaukee, he’s the undisputed alpha, free from the shadow of a co-star who might outshine him. On a team with another MVP-calibre player, he’d risk being seen as the “second option,” a label that could bruise his ego and alter how his career is perceived. Superstars avoid Giannis for various reasons I list here.

    The Psychological Weight of Change

    Beyond basketball, leaving Milwaukee would mean uprooting a life Giannis has built over a decade. He’s spoken openly about his love for the city, his teammates, and the organisation that believed in him as a scrawny teenager from Greece. The emotional and psychological toll of adapting to a new city, fan base, and team culture could weigh heavily, especially for a player who values stability. The fear of failing to mesh with a new team—both on and off the court—might make staying in Milwaukee the safer choice.

    Other Risks of Leaving

    1. Media Scrutiny in a Bigger Market: Milwaukee’s relatively small media market offers Giannis a buffer from the intense scrutiny of cities like New York or Los Angeles. A move to a high-profile team would invite relentless analysis of his every move, from his shot selection to his body language.
    2. Fan Backlash: Bucks fans have embraced Giannis as one of their own. Leaving could alienate a loyal fanbase, creating pressure to justify his decision with immediate success. The emotional toll of being booed in Milwaukee during return games could be a deterrent.
    3. Team Chemistry Risks: Giannis’s game relies on trust and chemistry with teammates who understand his style. A new team might struggle to integrate his ball-dominant, paint-focused approach, leading to friction or underperformance.
    4. Legacy Concerns: Giannis has a chance to be Milwaukee’s greatest player ever, a legend who brought a title to a city starved for success. Leaving risks diluting that legacy, especially if he fails to match or exceed his Bucks achievements elsewhere. We know he likes stat padding, well now he can smash every franchise record and pretend he is doing it to be loyal.

    Giannis is too chicken to move

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s fear of leaving the Milwaukee Bucks is about the risks of stepping out of a perfectly crafted comfort zone. In Milwaukee, his weaknesses are mitigated, his playoff failures are cushioned by roster excuses, and his loyalty shields him from harsh criticism. A move to a new team would strip away these protections, exposing him to scrutiny, demanding growth in areas he’s yet to master, and risking his carefully built legacy. It looks as if Giannis doesn’t have the skill set to succeed anywhere and he knows it. The fear of failure, magnified by a new environment, will probably keep him rooted in Milwaukee for years to come. As he showed this season, he is quite happy stat padding and making the rest of his team look bad.

  • Have many other players failed as badly as Giannis in the playoffs?

    Have many other players failed as badly as Giannis in the playoffs?

    To evaluate whether any well-known NBA players have failed more consistently than Giannis Antetokounmpo in the playoffs, we need to consider his playoff record, define what constitutes “failure,” and compare it to other prominent players with similar or worse postseason outcomes over a comparable career span. The query highlights Giannis’ decade-plus career and his limited success beyond the first round, so we’ll focus on players with significant reputations who have struggled to advance in the playoffs, particularly in the first round, while accounting for context like injuries, team quality, and expectations.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Playoff Record

    Giannis, a two-time MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, and 2021 NBA Champion, has played 12 seasons (2013–2025) and appeared in 9 playoffs, participating in 16 playoff series across 84 games. His postseason record includes:

    • 1 NBA Championship (2021, defeating the Phoenix Suns).
    • 1 Eastern Conference Finals appearance (2019, lost to the Toronto Raptors).
    • 2 second-round appearances (2020, lost to the Miami Heat; 2022, lost to the Boston Celtics).
    • 6 first-round exits (2015, 2017, 2018, 2023, 2024, 2025).
    • 2 seasons missing the playoffs (2014, 2016).

    His six first-round exits, including three consecutive from 2023 to 2025, and only one championship in 12 seasons have fuelled perceptions of postseason underachievement, especially given his individual accolades.

    “Failure” in this context likely refers to early playoff exits (first-round losses or failing to reach deep playoff rounds) relative to expectations for a player of Giannis’ calibre. Factors like injuries (e.g., his 2023 back injury and 2024 calf strain, which sidelined him entirely), co-star injuries (e.g., Khris Middleton in 2022, Damian Lillard in 2025), and team construction challenges (e.g., limited roster depth post-2021) have contributed to these outcomes.

    Criteria for Comparison

    To identify players who may have “failed more consistently,” we’ll look at:

    • Well-known players: Those with MVP awards, All-NBA selections, All-Star appearances, or significant cultural impact.
    • Playoff consistency: Players with frequent first-round exits, limited deep playoff runs (e.g., never reaching a Conference Finals), or no championships despite long careers.
    • Career span: Players with at least 10 seasons to match Giannis’ “more than a decade.”
    • Context: Team quality, injuries, and era-specific challenges (e.g., facing dynasties like the Warriors or LeBron-led teams).

    We’ll compare Giannis to players whose postseason resumes show similar or worse patterns of early exits or unmet expectations, focusing on the last few decades for relevance.

    Players with Comparable or Worse Playoff Struggles

    Here are several well-known NBA players who have arguably faced more consistent playoff disappointment than Giannis, based on frequent early exits, lack of deep runs, or no championships despite stellar individual careers:

    1. James Harden (2009–present, 16 seasons)

    • Accolades: 2018 MVP, 10x All-Star, 7x All-NBA, 3x scoring champion.
    • Playoff Record:
    • 19 playoff series across 14 appearances (2009–2024).
    • 1 NBA Finals appearance (2012 with OKC, lost to Miami).
    • 3 Conference Finals appearances (2015, 2018 with Houston; 2021 with Brooklyn).
    • 8 first-round exits (2009, 2010, 2011, 2013, 2014, 2016, 2023, 2024).
    • 3 second-round exits (2017, 2019, 2020).
    • Career playoff averages: 22.1 points, 5.6 rebounds, 6.2 assists over 166 games.
    • Why More Consistent Failure?:
    • Harden has more first-round exits (8 vs. Giannis’ 6) over a longer career, despite playing with elite teammates like Kevin Durant, Russell Westbrook, Chris Paul, and Kyrie Irving.
    • No championships and only one Finals appearance, which came early in his career as a sixth man.
    • Notorious for playoff underperformance, with true shooting percentage dropping significantly in postseason play (e.g., 5% decrease noted in some analyses). His 2018 and 2019 losses to the Warriors, despite leading 3-2 in 2018, and his inefficient 2023 playoff run with Philadelphia highlight recurring struggles.
    • Faced tough competition (e.g., Warriors dynasty), but criticism persists for failing to elevate in clutch moments, unlike Giannis’ 2021 Finals MVP performance.
    • Context: Harden’s teams often had high expectations, but injuries (e.g., Chris Paul in 2018) and matchup challenges hurt his chances. Still, his lack of a title and frequent early exits outweigh Giannis’ resume, which includes a championship.

    2. Carmelo Anthony (2003–2021, 19 seasons)

    • Accolades: 10x All-Star, 6x All-NBA, 2013 scoring champion.
    • Playoff Record:
    • 13 playoff series across 13 appearances (2004–2013, 2017, 2020, 2021).
    • 1 Conference Finals appearance (2009 with Denver, lost to the Lakers).
    • 10 first-round exits (2004–2008, 2010–2013, 2021).
    • 2 second-round exits (2017, 2020).
    • Career playoff averages: 24.5 points, 7.0 rebounds, 2.9 assists over 74 games.
    • Why More Consistent Failure?:
    • Carmelo has more first-round exits (10 vs. Giannis’ 6) and only one Conference Finals appearance in 19 seasons, compared to Giannis’ four series wins and a title in 12 seasons.
    • Never reached an NBA Finals and won only three playoff series total (2009 vs. Dallas, 2010 vs. Utah, 2017 vs. Charlotte).
    • Known for iso-heavy play that didn’t translate to postseason success, with teams like the Knicks and Nuggets often exiting early despite his scoring prowess.
    • Context: Carmelo often played on flawed rosters, especially in New York, and faced strong Western Conference teams (e.g., Spurs, Lakers). However, his inability to lead teams deep into the playoffs, even in his prime, marks a more consistent pattern of postseason disappointment than Giannis, who has a championship and multiple deep runs.

    3. Chris Paul (2005–present, 20 seasons)

    • Accolades: 12x All-Star, 11x All-NBA, 9x All-Defensive, 5x assists leader.
    • Playoff Record:
    • 24 playoff series across 15 appearances (2006–2023).
    • 1 NBA Finals appearance (2021 with Phoenix, lost to Milwaukee).
    • 3 Conference Finals appearances (2018 with Houston, 2021 with Phoenix, 2015 with the Clippers).
    • 8 first-round exits (2006, 2007, 2009, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017, 2023).
    • 5 second-round exits (2008, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2022).
    • Career playoff averages: 19.5 points, 4.7 rebounds, 8.2 assists over 149 games.
    • Why More Consistent Failure?:
    • Matches Harden with 8 first-round exits and has more seasons (20 vs. Giannis’ 12) without a championship.
    • Only one Finals appearance late in his career (2021, losing to Giannis’ Bucks), with no titles despite playing alongside stars like Blake Griffin, James Harden, and Devin Booker.
    • Known for clutch regular-season play but has faced criticism for playoff injuries (e.g., hamstring in 2018 vs. Warriors) and late-game miscues, contributing to a narrative of postseason underachievement.
    • Context: Paul often elevated mediocre teams (e.g., Hornets, Clippers) but ran into juggernauts like the Spurs, Lakers, and Warriors. Injuries and bad luck played a role, but his lack of a title and frequent early exits rival or exceed Giannis’ struggles.

    4. Russell Westbrook (2008–present, 17 seasons)

    • Accolades: 2017 MVP, 9x All-Star, 9x All-NBA, 2x scoring champion, 3x assists leader.
    • Playoff Record:
    • 22 playoff series across 13 appearances (2009–2020, 2023).
    • 1 NBA Finals appearance (2012 with OKC, lost to Miami).
    • 3 Conference Finals appearances (2011, 2014, 2016 with OKC).
    • 8 first-round exits (2009, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020).
    • 2 second-round exits (2020, 2023).
    • Career playoff averages: 24.2 points, 7.0 rebounds, 7.9 assists over 122 games.
    • Why More Consistent Failure?:
    • Like Harden and Paul, Westbrook has 8 first-round exits, more than Giannis’ 6, and no championships despite a longer career.
    • Only one Finals appearance (2012, as a young player with Durant and Harden), with most playoff runs ending early, especially post-2016 when leading Houston and Washington.
    • Criticized for inefficient shooting (e.g., 41.7% career playoff FG% vs. Giannis’ 51.2%) and poor decision-making in high-stakes games, leading to consistent early exits in his prime.
    • Context: Westbrook faced tough Western Conference competition and played without Durant after 2016, but his style often hindered team success in the playoffs, making his postseason resume less impressive than Giannis’, who has a title and better efficiency.

    5. Tracy McGrady (1997–2013, 16 seasons)

    • Accolades: 7x All-Star, 7x All-NBA, 2x scoring champion, 2001 Most Improved Player.
    • Playoff Record:
    • 9 playoff series across 9 appearances (1999–2005, 2007–2008, 2013).
    • 0 Conference Finals appearances.
    • 7 first-round exits (1999–2003, 2004–2005).
    • 2 second-round exits (2007–2008).
    • Career playoff averages: 25.2 points, 6.2 rebounds, 5.0 assists over 50 games.
    • Why More Consistent Failure?:
    • McGrady never advanced past the first round until 2007 (with Houston, as a secondary star), accumulating 7 first-round exits in his first 7 playoff appearances, worse than Giannis’ 6 in 9 playoffs.
    • No Conference Finals or Finals appearances, and no championships, despite being a top scorer in his prime.
    • His Orlando and Houston teams often underperformed, with McGrady’s 2003 Magic blowing a 3-1 lead to Detroit and his 2005 Rockets losing to Dallas after leading 2-0.
    • Context: McGrady dealt with injuries (e.g., back issues) and weak supporting casts in Orlando, but his inability to win a single series in his prime (1999–2005) marks a more consistent pattern of playoff failure than Giannis, who has a title and multiple series wins.

    6. Joel Embiid (2016–present, 9 seasons, but effectively ~7 due to early injuries)

    • Accolades: 2023 MVP, 7x All-Star, 5x All-NBA.
    • Playoff Record:
    • 11 playoff series across 7 appearances (2018–2024).
    • 0 Conference Finals appearances.
    • 4 first-round exits (2019, 2020, 2021, 2024).
    • 3 second-round exits (2018, 2022, 2023).
    • Career playoff averages: 24.6 points, 10.9 rebounds, 3.2 assists over 59 games.
    • Why Potentially More Consistent Failure?:
    • Embiid has fewer first-round exits (4 vs. Giannis’ 6), but zero Conference Finals appearances and no championships in a shorter career, compared to Giannis’ title and ECF run.
    • His playoff exits include high-profile collapses, like the 2019 loss to Toronto (Kawhi Leonard’s buzzer-beater) and the 2021 choke against Atlanta after leading 2-0. His 2024 first-round loss to the Knicks, despite averaging 33 points, raised questions about his clutch play.
    • Health issues (e.g., knee injuries, facial fractures) have limited his postseason impact, similar to Giannis’ injury woes, but Embiid’s lack of any deep runs is more glaring given Philadelphia’s strong rosters (e.g., with Harden, Butler, Simmons).
    • Context: Embiid’s career is shorter, so he may not yet surpass Giannis in “consistent failure,” but his inability to reach even a Conference Finals despite MVP-level play and talented teammates makes him a candidate. If his playoff struggles persist, he could overtake Giannis in this regard.

    Analysis and Comparison

    Giannis’ playoff record (1 championship, 1 ECF, 6 first-round exits in 9 playoffs) is underwhelming for a player of his stature, especially with three straight first-round losses from 2023 to 2025. Posts on X reflect this sentiment, noting his 1-8 record in playoff games over 32 minutes since 2022 and zero playoff wins from 2022 to 2025. However, his 2021 championship and Finals MVP, along with four series wins, set him apart from many peers who have no titles or fewer deep runs.

    • More Consistent Failures: Harden, Carmelo, Paul, Westbrook, and McGrady have worse postseason resumes due to more first-round exits (7–10 vs. Giannis’ 6), fewer or no championships, and fewer Conference Finals appearances. Carmelo and McGrady stand out for their near-total lack of playoff success, with McGrady never reaching a Conference Finals and Carmelo doing so only once. Harden and Westbrook, despite playing with multiple Hall of Famers, have only one Finals appearance each, both early in their careers.
    • Comparable but Less Severe: Embiid’s case is close, with no Conference Finals and four first-round exits, but his shorter career and fewer total exits (4 vs. 6) make his failures less extensive than Giannis’—though his lack of deep runs is arguably more disappointing given his team’s talent.

    Other Notable Mentions

    • Dominique Wilkins (1982–1999, 17 seasons): 8x All-Star, 7x All-NBA, 1x scoring champion. Reached one Conference Finals (1988) but had 7 first-round exits and no Finals appearances. His era included tough competition (Celtics, Pistons), but his playoff resume is thinner than Giannis’.
    • Vince Carter (1998–2020, 22 seasons): 8x All-Star, 2x All-NBA. Never reached a Conference Finals, with 6 first-round exits and only two second-round appearances. His longevity and lack of deep runs make him a candidate, but his lower peak (no MVP-level seasons) reduces his comparability to Giannis.
    • Allen Iverson (1996–2010, 14 seasons): 2001 MVP, 11x All-Star, 7x All-NBA. Reached one NBA Finals (2001, lost to Lakers) but had 5 first-round exits and only three series wins total. His iconic 2001 run overshadows a mostly disappointing playoff career, but Giannis’ title gives him an edge.

    So it’s looking bad for Giannis indeed

    Several well-known NBA players have failed more consistently in the playoffs than Giannis Antetokounmpo, primarily due to more first-round exits, fewer deep runs, and no championships over longer careers. James Harden, Carmelo Anthony, Chris Paul, Russell Westbrook, and Tracy McGrady are the strongest examples, with 7–10 first-round exits each and minimal or no Finals appearances. Carmelo and McGrady are particularly notable for their near-complete lack of postseason success despite superstar status. Joel Embiid is a close case but falls short due to a shorter career, though his ongoing struggles could surpass Giannis’ if they continue.

    Giannis’ six first-round exits and three straight from 2023 to 2025 are disappointing, especially for a two-time MVP, but his 2021 championship, Finals MVP, and four series wins (including a Conference Finals appearance) distinguish him from these peers. Injuries and roster issues have played a significant role in his recent failures, as they have for others, but his playoff production (27.0 PPG, 12.2 RPG) and historic series performances mitigate the perception of “consistent failure” compared to players with less postseason hardware or impact. However Giannis ain’t done yet! He can fail at least 5-6 more times either with the Bucks or another team if he gets traded.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 NBA Season: A Statistical Comparison to Previous Years. No accolades!

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 NBA Season: A Statistical Comparison to Previous Years. No accolades!

    The 2024-25 regular season saw some statistical declines in specific areas compared to his previous seasons. All statistics are sourced from reputable platforms like Basketball-Reference, ESPN, and NBA.com.

    Overview of Giannis’ 2024-25 Regular Season

    In the 2024-25 regular season, Giannis Antetokounmpo appeared in 67 games for the Milwaukee Bucks.

    Statistical Declines in 2024-25 Compared to Previous Seasons

    1. Points Per Game (PPG)

    2024-25: 30.4 PPG
    Giannis’ scoring output in 2024-25 was impressive but lower than his career-high 31.1 PPG in the 2022-23 season. Comparing to recent seasons:

    2. Free-Throw Attempts and Percentage

    2024-25: 10.8 FTA, 65.8% FT%
    Giannis’ free-throw shooting has long been a point of contention, and 2024-25 saw a decline in both attempts and efficiency:

    • Free-Throw Attempts (FTA):
      • 2023-24: 11.2 FTA2022-23: 12.3 FTA (highest in his career)2021-22: 11.4 FTA2020-21: 10.2 FTA2019-20: 10.0 FTA
      In 2024-25, Giannis averaged 10.8 free-throw attempts per game, lower than the previous three seasons. The league has figured him out.
    • Free-Throw Percentage (FT%):
      • 2023-24: 65.7% (nearly identical to 2024-25)2022-23: 64.5% (1.3% lower)2021-22: 72.2% (6.4% higher)2020-21: 68.5% (2.7% higher)2019-20: 63.3% (2.5% lower)
      His 65.8% FT% in 2024-25 was among his worst since 2019-20, significantly below his 72.2% peak in 2021-22. This regression in free-throw accuracy impacted his overall scoring efficiency, especially in close games and is a massive liability in a lot of situations.

    3. Steals Per Game (SPG)

    2024-25: 0.9 SPG
    Giannis’ defensive impact used to be a hallmark of his game, but his steals average in 2024-25 was a notable low:

    • 2023-24: 1.2 SPG
    • 2022-23: 0.8 SPG (career low, tied with 2021-22)
    • 2021-22: 1.1 SPG
    • 2020-21: 1.2 SPG
    • 2019-20: 1.0 SPG

    The 0.9 SPG in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, matching his 2019-20 output but falling short of his 2023-24 and 2020-21 figures. This dip may reflect a strategic shift, with Giannis focusing more on rim protection (1.2 BPG) or conserving energy on a Bucks roster dealing with injuries.

    4. Three-Point Shooting

    2024-25: 0.3 3PM, 25.9% 3P%
    Giannis has never been a prolific three-point shooter, but his 2024-25 numbers were particularly low:

    • Three-Point Makes (3PM):
      • 2023-24: 0.5 3PM
      • 2022-23: 0.7 3PM
      • 2021-22: 1.1 3PM
      • 2020-21: 1.1 3PM
      • 2019-20: 1.4 3PM
      His 0.3 three-pointers made per game in 2024-25 was the lowest since 2018-19 (0.2 3PM).
    • Three-Point Percentage (3P%):
      • 2023-24: 27.4%2022-23: 27.5%2021-22: 29.3%2020-21: 30.3%2019-20: 30.4%
      His 25.9% three-point shooting was the worst since 2017-18 (25.0%). This regression reflects a continued reluctance to shoot from beyond the arc, with only 1.1 three-point attempts per game in 2024-25. It is almost the worse 3pt shooting percentage in NBA history for a single season.

    5. Minutes Per Game (MPG)

    2024-25: 34.2 MPG
    Giannis played fewer minutes per game in 2024-25 than in most recent seasons:

    • 2023-24: 35.2 MPG
    • 2022-23: 34.2 MPG (tied with 2024-25)
    • 2021-22: 36.8 MPG
    • 2020-21: 33.0 MPG
    • 2019-20: 30.4 MPG

    The 34.2 MPG matches his 2022-23 figure but is lower than 2023-24 and 2021-22. This reduction could be due to load management, injuries to teammates like Lillard, or coaching decisions under Doc Rivers.

    Other stats

    1. Offensive Rebounds Per Game (ORPG) 2024-25: 2.7 ORPG

    Giannis’ offensive rebounding, a key component of his ability to generate second-chance points, saw a decline in 2024-25:

    2023-24: 2.9 ORPG 2022-23: 2.2 ORPG 2021-22: 2.0 ORPG 2020-21: 1.6 ORPG 2019-20: 2.1 ORPG His 2.7 offensive rebounds per game in 2024-25 were lower than his 2023-24 mark (2.9 ORPG) but higher than the four preceding seasons. The slight drop from 2023-24 could be due to a shift in role, with Giannis focusing more on playmaking (6.5 APG) or playing alongside other rebounders like Bobby Portis and Kyle Kuzma, reducing his opportunities on the offensive glass.

    2. Defensive Rebounds Per Game (DRPG) 2024-25: 9.2 DRPG

    Giannis’ defensive rebounding, which contributes to his league-leading total rebounds, also dipped slightly:

    2023-24: 9.6 DRPG 2022-23: 9.6 DRPG 2021-22: 9.9 DRPG 2020-21: 9.4 DRPG 2019-20: 11.4 DRPG His 9.2 defensive rebounds per game in 2024-25 were lower than every season since 2019-20. This decline may reflect increased competition for rebounds within the Bucks’ lineup or a strategic emphasis on transitioning quickly to offense rather than securing every defensive board.

    3. Assist-to-Turnover Ratio (AST/TOV) 2024-25: 1.91 AST/TOV (6.5 APG, 3.4 TOV)

    Giannis’ assist-to-turnover ratio in 2024-25 was worse than several prior seasons. He simply screws up more and more:

    2023-24: 1.92 (6.5 APG, 3.4 TOV) 2022-23: 1.44 (5.7 APG, 3.9 TOV) 2021-22: 1.75 (5.8 APG, 3.3 TOV) 2020-21: 2.07 (5.9 APG, 2.8 TOV) 2019-20: 1.61 (5.6 APG, 3.7 TOV) The 2024-25 AST/TOV ratio of 1.91 was slightly worse than 2023-24 (1.92) and significantly lower than 2020-21 (2.07). While Giannis maintained a high assist average (6.5 APG), his turnovers remained consistent at 3.4 per game, suggesting that his increased ball-handling responsibilities didn’t translate to better ball security compared to his peak efficiency in 2020-21.

    4. Player Efficiency Rating (PER) 2024-25: Estimated 28.0 PER

    Player Efficiency Rating (PER) measures a player’s per-minute productivity, normalised to a league average of 15.0. Giannis’ PER in 2024-25 was lower than several prior seasons:

    2023-24: 29.8 2022-23: 29.0 2021-22: 32.1 (career high) 2020-21: 29.2 2019-20: 31.9 His estimated 28.0 PER in 2024-25 (based on Basketball-Reference trends) was lower than four of the past five seasons, with only 2022-23 (29.0) being closer. This dip reflects slight regressions in scoring efficiency, turnovers, and defensive metrics like steals, though he remained among the league’s top performers.

    5. True Shooting Percentage (TS%) 2024-25: 59.8% TS%

    True Shooting Percentage accounts for field goals, three-pointers, and free throws to measure overall shooting efficiency. Giannis’ TS% in 2024-25 was:

    2023-24: 61.3% 2022-23: 60.5% 2021-22: 63.3% 2020-21: 61.7% 2019-20: 61.3% His 59.8% TS% in 2024-25 was the lowest since 2018-19 (59.7%) and worse than all five previous seasons. This decline is largely attributable to his poor free-throw shooting (65.8%) and reduced three-point accuracy (25.9%), which dragged down his overall efficiency despite a solid 55.7% FG%. Seeing as he mainly dunked this season, this drop is very worrying.

    6. Win Shares Per 48 Minutes (WS/48) 2024-25: Estimated 0.220 WS/48

    Win Shares Per 48 Minutes measures a player’s contribution to team wins, normalised per 48 minutes. Giannis’ WS/48 in 2024-25 was:

    2023-24: 0.233 2022-23: 0.208 2021-22: 0.281 2020-21: 0.260 2019-20: 0.279 His estimated 0.220 WS/48 in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, surpassing only 2022-23. This drop reflects declines in offensive efficiency (e.g., TS%) and defensive contributions (e.g., steals).

    7. Box Plus/Minus (BPM) 2024-25: Estimated 8.5 BPM

    Box Plus/Minus estimates a player’s contribution to team performance per 100 possessions. Giannis’ BPM in 2024-25 was:

    2023-24: 8.8 2022-23: 8.6 2021-22: 11.8 2020-21: 9.2 2019-20: 11.1 His estimated 8.5 BPM in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, with only 2022-23 (8.6) being comparable. This slight decline aligns with reduced efficiency (TS%, PER) and defensive metrics (SPG, DRPG), though he remained a top-tier contributor.

    Yes, Giannis is past his prime and not improving

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 regular season featured important and meaningful statistical regressions. He posted lower numbers in points (compared to 2022-23), free-throw attempts and percentage, steals, field goal attempts, three-point shooting, and minutes played compared to various prior seasons. As Giannis is past his prime at age 30, these declines signal a meaningful downward trend, yet another reason no teams are beating down the door for trades.

    Sources: Basketball-Reference.com, ESPN.com, NBA.com, RotoWire.com, Proballers.com, LandOfBasketball.com, Yahoo Sports, and posts on X. All stats are accurate as of April 30, 2025.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Summer Activities and why they lead to Stagnation

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Summer Activities and why they lead to Stagnation

    Each summer, as the NBA season winds down, fans and analysts turn their attention to what players like Giannis do during the off season. For Antetokounmpo, the summer is a blend of international competition, family time, philanthropy, and targeted training. However, a narrative persists that Giannis doesn’t significantly improve his game during these months.

    A History of Giannis’s Summer Activities

    Early Career (2013–2016): Building the Foundation

    In his early NBA years, Giannis was a raw prospect, drafted 15th overall by the Milwaukee Bucks in 2013. His summers were focused on adapting to the NBA’s physicality and pace. During this period, he spent significant time in the gym, working on his strength and conditioning to transform his lanky 6’9” frame into the 6’11” powerhouse he is today. Regarding physical strength nobody can really complain about Giannis, the problem is with his skillset.

    • 2013–2014: As a rookie, Giannis’s summer was about acclimating to the NBA. He participated in the Bucks’ training camps and worked on basic skills like ball-handling and shooting. His commitment to daily gym work—reportedly spending 5–7 hours a day—was evident, laying the groundwork for his versatility.
    • 2014–2015: Giannis represented Greece at the 2014 FIBA World Cup, averaging 6.3 points and 4.3 rebounds in limited minutes. This experience exposed him to high-level international competition but didn’t really lead to him enhancing his court vision and defensive instincts. He also played in the NBA Summer League, trying to refine his skills against other young prospects.
    • 2015–2016: This summer marked a pivotal shift. Bucks coach Jason Kidd began experimenting with Giannis as a point guard, a role that required him to improve his ball-handling and decision-making. He spent the off season working on these skills, which translated into a breakout 2016–17 season where he led the Bucks in all five major statistical categories. Has he improved in ball handling though? Not at an NBA elite level by any means. He is “passable” but still leads the league in travelling, palming and other violations in 2025.

    Mid-Career (2017–2020): Rising to Stardom

    As Giannis ascended to All-Star status, his summers balanced international play, NBA training, and growing off-court commitments. His work ethic remained relentless, but the focus shifted toward business aspects and less about the game.

    • 2017: After earning the NBA’s Most Improved Player award, Giannis spent the summer on his passing and playmaking. He worked with coaches to counter defensive strategies like double-teaming, which teams began employing as he became a focal point of the Bucks’ offence. It is now 2025 and he doesn’t seem even now to be able to handle double teams.
    • 2018: Giannis continued to train in Milwaukee, focusing on his physicality and finishing through contact. He also engaged in charitable activities, hosting tournaments in Greece with his brothers to give back to his community. Again, outside the court he is doing great, but the targets he set for on court improvement never showed up.
    • 2019: Following his first MVP season, Giannis played in the 2019 FIBA World Cup, averaging 14.8 points and 8.8 rebounds. Off the court, he spent time with his family, amidst rising fame which he seems to enjoy with high profile outings to Greek jet set destinations and media appearances.
    • 2020: The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted traditional offseason routines, but Giannis used the time to work on his midrange shooting and free-throw mechanics. Clearly none of this translated into results as 2025 was his worse free throw percentage ever in his career.

    Championship Era (2021–2023): Cementing Greatness

    After leading the Bucks to the 2021 NBA championship, Giannis’s summers became a mix of recovery, international duties, but not much targeted skill work. His global profile grew, adding media and endorsement obligations.

    • 2021: Fresh off a Finals MVP performance, Giannis dealt with a hyperextended knee injury from the playoffs. His summer focused on rehabilitation, but he still trained to maintain his conditioning. He also began working on his jump shot, aiming to address a career-long critique. After a terrible 2025 playoff performance in this respect (basically almost no mid range in the playoffs) it is clear that he can’t improve when it counts.
    • 2022: Giannis played for Greece at EuroBasket, dropping 31 points and 10 rebounds in just 20 minutes against Spain in a friendly match. He worked on his three-point shooting, going viral for hitting seven consecutive corner threes in warmups. While his in-game three-point percentage remained low (28.8% career), his form showed improvement. However 2025 marks not only his worse 3point percentage in his entire career but close to the worse 3pt percentage in a single season of anyone ever in NBA history.
    • 2023: Giannis prioritized rest and family time after another grueling season. He also engaged in philanthropy, donating to Milwaukee community centers, reflecting his commitment to his adopted city.

    Recent Years (2024–2025): Olympic Pride and Trade Rumors

    • 2024: Giannis was named Greece’s flag bearer for the Paris 2024 Olympics, a significant honour. He trained for the Olympic qualifiers, leading Greece despite getting terrible results. Off the court, he navigated trade rumours as the Bucks faced playoff disappointments, but he remained in Milwaukee.
    • 2025 (Ongoing): As of May 2025, Giannis is likely preparing for another season amid speculation about his future with the Bucks. His summer plans typically include training in Milwaukee or Greece, international competition, and family time.

    Why the Perception of Stagnation* persists*

    Giannis hasn’t improved significantly:

    • Three-Point Shooting: Giannis’s career three-point percentage is 28.4%, and he’s never shot above 31.7%. Viral videos of him hitting corner threes in warm ups raised expectations, but in-game results haven’t matched. This gap fuels criticism, though his mid range improvement suggests he’s prioritising more impactful areas.
    • Free Throws: His free-throw percentage (61.7% in 2024–25) remains a weak point. While he’s worked on his rhythm and mechanics, consistency lags, amplifying perceptions of stagnation.
    • Expectations: As a two-time MVP, Giannis faces sky-high expectations. Fans want trans formative leaps, like adding a reliable jump shot, but his dominance in other areas (driving, defence, play making) means incremental gains are less noticeable.

    Factors Limiting Perceived Improvement

    Several factors contribute to the narrative of stagnation:

    1. Summer Balance: Giannis’s summers involve international play, philanthropy, and family, which may limit dedicated skill work compared to players who focus solely on training. Yet, these activities enhance his leadership and mental resilience, which are harder to quantify.
    2. Peak Performance: At 30, Giannis is possibly past his prime. Dramatic improvements are harder to achieve when you’re already among the NBA’s best. More importantly it seems that when it counts, most teams can counter Giannis even with a single defender on him.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s training with Hakeem Olajuwon in 2023 generated buzz due to Olajuwon’s legendary status as a post-up maestro and Giannis’s expressed desire to refine his game. However this is a rare exception, Giannis doesn’t mingle with stars and seems socially unable to blend with them in order to learn. Olajuwon wasn’t really an exception:

    1. Short Duration of Training:
      The training session was brief, likely spanning just a few days. Skill development, especially for complex post moves like Olajuwon’s “Dream Shake,” requires extensive repetition and practice over weeks or months to integrate into a player’s game. Even for an elite athlete like Giannis, a short session might provide insights but not enough time to master new techniques.
    2. Giannis’s Existing Playstyle:
      Giannis’s dominance relies on his athleticism, speed, and ability to drive to the rim, often overpowering defenders. His post game, while effective, isn’t his primary weapon, and he excels in transition and face-up situations. Olajuwon’s expertise lies in low-post footwork and finesse, which may not align seamlessly with Giannis’s natural strengths. Adapting to a more finesse-based post game could require a significant shift in approach, which might not have been practical or prioritized.
    3. Limited Application in Game Context:
      Even if Giannis learned specific moves, incorporating them into NBA games is challenging. Defenses often scheme to neutralize Giannis by building “walls” to limit his drives, and his post-up opportunities are sometimes secondary. His struggles with mid-range floaters (27.9% from floater range in 2022-23) suggest a need for broader scoring versatility, but Olajuwon’s training focused on post moves, which may not address this specific weakness.
    4. Expectations vs. Reality:
      The hype around the training session, fueled by Giannis’s comments on the “48 Minutes” podcast and Olajuwon’s track record with players like Kobe Bryant and LeBron James, set lofty expectations. However, not all players see immediate transformations from such sessions. For example, Gilbert Arenas criticized the effectiveness of Olajuwon’s training, arguing that players like LeBron didn’t visibly adopt Olajuwon’s moves despite training with him. This suggests that the impact of such sessions can be overstated.
    5. Lack of Visible Evidence:
      While Giannis showed a post move resembling Olajuwon’s style in a preseason game against the Lakers, there’s little evidence of consistent incorporation into his regular-season play. Social media discussions, like those on Reddit, noted that Giannis’s footwork didn’t markedly improve, and some argued that Olajuwon’s fluid, coordinated style is hard for bigger, less agile players to replicate. The absence of standout post-up highlights or statistical improvements in post scoring could contribute to the perception of “no results.”
    6. External Criticism and Context:
      Gilbert Arenas’s vocal skepticism, claiming Olajuwon’s $50,000 sessions were a “cash grab” and ineffective for modern players, may have shaped public perception. While Arenas’s critique is controversial, it highlights a broader debate about the value of short, high-profile training camps versus long-term skill work. Additionally, Olajuwon’s praise for Giannis’s work ethic suggests the session was productive in intent, but intent doesn’t always translate to on-court results.

    Conclusion: The lack of “real results” likely stems from the brief nature of the training, the mismatch between Olajuwon’s finesse-based post game and Giannis’s athletic, power-driven style, and the difficulty of integrating new skills under NBA game pressure. High expectations and external critiques, like Arenas’s, further amplified the perception of underwhelming outcomes. While the session may have offered Giannis valuable lessons, translating them into consistent, observable improvements would require sustained practice and a shift in his playing style, neither of which seemed to fully materialize in the 2023-24 season.

    Why Giannis’s Approach doesn’t work

    Giannis’s summer activities reflect a holistic approach to growth. International competition sharpens his leadership and adaptability. Philanthropy and family time recharge him mentally, crucial for a player under constant pressure. His training targets specific weaknesses (mid range, passing) while maintaining his strengths (athleticism, defence). His large hands and unconventional form require extensive refinement, and he faces constant defensive pressure that limits clean looks. His physical gifts are a double-edged sword. They’re so overwhelming that he can often dominate without needing a polished outside game, reducing the urgency to overhaul his style. Also, mastering new skills under NBA scrutiny is challenging when you’re already a two-time MVP. Playoff defenses are more sophisticated, and Giannis is often double- or triple-teamed. Developing counters (e.g., consistent shooting, advanced play making) takes time, especially when opponents tailor entire game plans to stop him.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s summers are a blend of hard work, global representation, and personal balance. As Giannis navigates trade rumours and playoff pressures, his commitment to evolving—on his terms—ensures he’ll remain a force for years to come. He seems unable to understand how to improve his game in any significant way. Possibly he thinks he is good enough as he is. Maybe he thinks his style of game works and is self deluded in terms of evaluating just how little he really impacts games that matter. His regular season stats and personal achievements seem to be enough for his fans, his team and most of the NBA media. So why change?

  • Where is Giannis mid range? (He never had one)

    Where is Giannis mid range? (He never had one)

    During the regular season, in a stretch of easy games, the myth emerged that Giannis had “developed a

    mid range shot”. Various crazy statistics flew around. Of course as the

    season ended he regressed to his normal average. Under pressure Giannis has no mid range, we had already seen it in harder match ups in the regular season.

    Here are the official NBA.com statistics from the playoffs. Giannis is nowhere to be seen even in 5-9 feet shooting distance. He is nowhere to be seen in the next mid range distance , 10-14ft. Neither in volume, nor in percentage of successful shots.

    Giannis is a one trick pony and always has been, in fact he has regressed in many ways this season.

    Oh but wait, what about his favourite mid range shots? He has three very specific places he can make those, when defences don’t run him off them at least. Oh , well done Giannis, you make ONE shot per game from there on average in the playoffs, albeit with one of the lowest percentages among your peers!

    And of course 20-24 ft is also a mid range shot, it’s not yet a 3. And of course Giannis never had anything at that distance and he hasn’t even tried in the playoffs. Just for any fools still believing the Giannis mid range myth, here are the NBA leaders today (28/4/2025) as per nba.com for that distance too.

    Also, for those of you who only watch highlights and choose to forget the overall picture, here are the detailed shot

    charts. For example Game 1 you can see him fail from 3 and score 2 out of 5 from mid range.

    And it gets worse of course, here is game 2:

    The Regular-Season Hype

    His improvement in the regular season hype was attributed to dedicated off season work in Greece, where Giannis trained with a skills coach to refine his jump shot. ESPN detailed how he focused on mid-range shots to reduce physical wear from constant rim attacks, aiming to extend his career. His performance in the 2024 FIBA Olympic qualifying tournament, where he reportedly went 6-for-8 from mid-range against Croatia, further fuelled the narrative. The Bucks’ coaching staff, led by Doc Rivers, emphasised Giannis operating from the elbows, turning him into an “offensive nexus” with a polished jumper.

    The regular season provided plenty of highlight-reel moments: a 19-foot pull-up against Aaron Gordon, a fadeaway from the baseline, or a jumper from the nail in clutch situations. These plays led to bold claims that Giannis’ mid-range game was transforming the Bucks into title contenders, making him “unstoppable” by neutralizing defensive walls in the paint. But regular-season stats can be misleading, especially when games against lottery-bound teams or fatigued opponents inflate shooting percentages.

    The Playoff Disappearance

    When the playoffs roll around, the game changes. Defenses tighten, schemes adjust, and stars face relentless pressure. For Giannis, the mid-range jumper that sparkled in the regular season has consistently dimmed in the postseason. In the 2024-25 playoffs against the Indiana Pacers, Giannis posted gaudy stat lines—37 points, 12 rebounds in Game 3; 34 points, 18 rebounds in Game 2; 36 points, 12 rebounds in Game 1—but a deeper dive reveals a glaring absence of mid-range attempts.

    Social media chatter from fans, like a post on X noting Giannis took only one mid-range shot in a playoff game, underscores the trend: when the pressure mounts, Giannis reverts to his bread-and-butter, bullying his way to the rim. Playoff defenses, aware of his dominance in the paint, are content to let him take mid-range shots, knowing his efficiency drops under scrutiny. Unlike the regular season, where he faced softer coverages or mismatched defenders, playoff teams build walls, sag off, and dare him to shoot. The result? Giannis abandons the mid-range, opting for high-percentage drives or free throws.

    Historical playoff data supports this. In the 2021 championship run, Giannis leaned heavily on his rim attacks and free throws, with mid-range shots playing a minor role. His iconic 50-point Finals closeout game featured dunks, layups, and 17-of-19 free throws, not pull-up jumpers. Recent playoffs show similar patterns: when defenses lock in, Giannis’ mid-range attempts dwindle, and his shooting percentage from that range plummets compared to the regular season’s 47.8%. The “elite mid-range shooter” narrative crumbles under postseason pressure.

    Why the Disconnect?

    Several factors explain why Giannis’ mid-range game thrives in the regular season but falters in the playoffs:

    1. Defensive Intensity: Regular-season games often feature inconsistent effort from rebuilding teams or players coasting through the schedule. Playoff defenses, however, are laser-focused, with top-tier rim protectors and help defenders clogging the paint, forcing Giannis to settle for jumpers he’s less comfortable taking under pressure.
    2. Game Planning: Playoff teams scout Giannis meticulously, conceding mid-range shots to keep him away from the rim. A 45% mid-range jumper, while respectable, is far less threatening than his 60%+ efficiency at the basket. Giannis, aware of this, prioritizes drives to maximize efficiency.
    3. Physical Toll: Giannis himself has said mid-range shots reduce wear on his body, a strategy for career longevity. But in the playoffs, where every possession counts, he leans on his physical dominance, absorbing contact to draw fouls or finish through traffic, sidelining the jumper.
    4. Sample Size and Context: Regular-season mid-range stats can be skewed by small sample sizes or favorable matchups. A hot streak against teams like the Wizards or Pistons doesn’t translate to success against playoff-caliber defenses like Miami or Boston.

    The Myth’s Impact

    The overhyping of Giannis’ mid-range game creates unrealistic expectations. Fans and analysts touting his “evolution” overlook how his dominance has always stemmed from paint scoring, playmaking, and defense—not jump shooting. The Bucks’ 2021 title didn’t hinge on mid-range mastery; it came from Giannis’ relentless rim pressure and clutch free-throw shooting. Projecting him as a Kevin Durant-esque shooter ignores his core strengths and sets a false narrative for playoff success.

    So he can’t improve?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s mid-range improvement is a compelling story, but it’s largely a regular-season phenomenon that fades in the playoffs. The data, from his limited mid-range attempts in high-stakes games to fan observations of his rim-focused approach, paints a clear picture: the jumper is a supplementary tool, not a game-changer. Giannis remains a force of nature, but his path to another title lies in leveraging his athleticism and paint dominance, not in chasing a mid-range mirage. As the Bucks chase playoff glory, it’s time to let the myth of Giannis’ mid-range mastery rest.

    (For anyone still wanting to discuss the matter, here is Giannis’ shot chart for Game 4)

  • Giannis 2024-25 Season: review and statistics

    Giannis 2024-25 Season: review and statistics

    Before I even get into the overall picture regarding Giannis look at this:

    The man has played for more than a decade in the NBA and he gets the whistle for travelling violations 26 times in a season! (And another 26 they didn’t bother to blow the whistle on him at least.) 3 back court violations? Really Giannis? Palming? 32 offensive fouls? 13 charges? We all know he can’t dribble but maybe he needs to get the memo.

    1. Defensive Impact Took a Step Back

    Giannis has long been heralded as one of the NBA’s premier defenders, earning the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. However, in the 2024-25 season, his defensive impact waned compared to his peak years. While he averaged 1.2 blocks and 0.9 steals per game, these numbers are closer to his career lows than his elite defensive seasons (e.g., 1.5 blocks and 1.2 steals in 2019-20). His Defensive Box Plus-Minus (DBPM), a metric that estimates defensive contribution, dropped to 0.8, down from 1.4 in the previous season and significantly lower than his 2.1 in his DPOY year. This regression is particularly concerning as Giannis enters his age-30 season, where maintaining elite defensive production becomes more challenging.

    2. Free-Throw Shooting Remains a Liability

    Giannis’ free-throw shooting has been a career-long Achilles’ heel, and the 2024-25 season saw no meaningful improvement. He shot 64.5% from the line on a career-high 10.9 attempts per game, a slight dip from his 65.7% in 2023-24. This poor performance at the stripe continues to hurt the Bucks in close games, especially in the playoffs, where opponents often employ “Hack-a-Giannis” strategies.

    Impact of the Decline:

    • In clutch situations (final five minutes of games within five points), Giannis’ free-throw struggles were glaring. He converted only 60.2% of his clutch free throws, costing the Bucks valuable points in tight contests.
    • His high volume of attempts amplifies the issue. With 10.9 attempts per game, missing roughly 3.9 shots per game translates to nearly 320 missed free throws over an 82-game season—a significant point differential.

    3. Playmaking Inconsistency

    While Giannis tied his career-high with 6.5 assists per game, his play making became less consistent compared to prior seasons. Posts on X highlighted that his increased reliance on mid-range jumpers and low-post isolations led to more stagnant possessions, reducing his ability to create for teammates. His assist-to-turnover ratio (6.5 assists to 3.4 turnovers) was respectable but unchanged from recent years, indicating no growth in decision-making efficiency.

    Key Observations:

    • Giannis’ assists often came from straightforward kick-outs or dump-offs rather than complex reads. Advanced metrics like Assist Points Created (APC) show he generated 15.2 points per game via assists, but this figure is lower than playmaking savants like Nikola Jokić (22.7 APC) or Luka Dončić (19.8 APC).
    • His tendency to dominate the ball in isolation-heavy sets disrupted the Bucks’ offensive flow, especially when paired with Damian Lillard, whose off-ball movement was underutilized.

    4. Three-Point Shooting Regressed

    Giannis has never been a prolific three-point shooter, but his 2024-25 season saw a noticeable dip in both volume and efficiency. He attempted only 1.2 threes per game (down from 1.7 in 2023-24) and made them at a career-low 20.7%. This regression limits his ability to stretch defences, allowing opponents to clog the paint and dare clearer shots.

    Why It Matters:

    • Modern NBA offences rely on spacing, and Giannis’ reluctance to shoot from deep makes it easier for defenders to sag off him. This was evident in games against teams like the Boston Celtics, who packed the paint and forced Giannis into inefficient mid-range attempts.
    • His low three-point volume reduces his offensive versatility, as he rarely threatens defences from beyond the arc, unlike other bigs like Karl-Anthony Towns or even Joel Embiid.

    Areas Where Giannis Hasn’t Improved

    1. Post-Up Scoring Efficiency

    Giannis’ post-up game remains a work in progress. Despite his physical dominance, he struggles to convert consistently in the post, especially against savvy defenders who force him into tough fade aways or contested hooks. His post-up efficiency (points per possession) was 0.92, below the league average for big men (0.95). Critics on X noted that his post-up possessions often result in low-percentage shots or turnovers rather than drawing doubles and creating open looks for teammates.

    What’s Holding Him Back?:

    • Limited Footwork: Giannis relies heavily on power and athleticism rather than refined footwork or countermoves. Defenders who can match his physicality, like Draymond Green or Anthony Davis, often neutralize him in the post.
    • Predictability: His go-to moves (spin move or drop-step) are well-scouted, and he hasn’t developed a consistent counter to keep defenders guessing.

    2. Off-Ball Movement and Screening

    Giannis is not a natural off-ball player, a weakness that persisted in 2024-25. He rarely cuts, sets screens, or relocates to exploit defensive attention, which limits his fit in motion-based offences. Social media posts emphasise his lack of chemistry in pick-and-roll sets with guards like Lillard, as he doesn’t roll hard or set effective screens.

    Impact:

    • The Bucks’ offence often stagnates when Giannis isn’t the primary ball-handler, as he struggles to create value without the ball. This was evident in games where Lillard or Khris Middleton ran the offence, and Giannis was reduced to standing in the dunker’s spot.
    • His screening deficiencies reduce the effectiveness of Milwaukee’s pick-and-roll game, forcing Lillard to create in isolation or rely on other screeners like Brook Lopez.

    3. Mid-Range Shooting Stagnation

    While Giannis has worked to develop a mid-range jumper, his efficiency in this area hasn’t progressed significantly. He shot 39.4% on mid-range attempts (10-16 feet), roughly in line with his 40.1% in 2023-24. This lack of improvement limits his ability to punish defences that give him space in the mid-post or at the elbow.

    Why It’s a Problem:

    • Elite bigs like Kevin Durant or Nikola Jokić use mid-range shooting to keep defences honest, but Giannis’ inconsistency allows opponents to focus on rim protection without worrying about pull-up jumpers.
    • His increased reliance on mid-range shots (up to 3.1 attempts per game) without improved accuracy led to inefficient possessions, especially in crunch time.

    4. Clutch Performance Under Pressure

    Giannis’ clutch performance remains a mixed bag. While he delivered standout moments, such as his 59-point, 14-rebound game against the Pistons, his overall clutch stats (last five minutes, game within five points) were underwhelming. He shot 54.2% from the field in clutch situations (down from 58.7% in 2023-24) and, as mentioned, struggled at the free-throw line. His turnover rate in clutch scenarios also rose to 4.1 per 36 minutes, indicating issues with decision-making under pressure.

    Key Issues:

    • Over-Reliance on Hero Ball: Giannis often resorts to forcing drives or isolations in clutch moments, leading to contested shots or turnovers.
    • Lack of Go-To Move: Giannis lacks a reliable crunch-time move to generate clean looks consistently.

    As a player entering his prime, Giannis was expected to refine his weaknesses, particularly in shooting and off-ball play, to elevate the Bucks’ championship ceiling.


    Looking Ahead: Can Giannis Address These Shortcomings?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 season was marred by subtle regressions and persistent weaknesses. His defensive impact waned, his free-throw shooting remained a liability, and his play making lacked consistency. Meanwhile, his post-up scoring, off-ball movement, mid-range shooting, and clutch performance showed little to no improvement. While injuries and team context played a role, these shortcomings underscore the challenges Giannis faces as he navigates his prime. For the Bucks to contend in 2025-26, Giannis must address these areas. Otherwise he might as well already prepare some dumb “there is no failure in sports” speech…

    Sources Basketball-Reference.com for statistical data / ESPN.com for game logs and advanced stats / RotoWire.com for fantasy and performance analysis / Posts on social media for fan and analyst sentiment

  • Is Giannis washed? NBA on ESPN said it!

    Is Giannis washed? NBA on ESPN said it!

    This is the video that sparked a hundred wars in the comments section:

    The Case for “Giannis Is Washed”

    1. Post-Championship Playoff Struggles

    One of the primary arguments for labelling Giannis as washed stems from the Milwaukee Bucks’ postseason performance since their 2021 championship. Since hoisting the Larry O’Brien Trophy, the Bucks have won just one playoff series in the last three years, a stark contrast to their dominance in the regular season. Critics point to early exits—like the 2023 first-round loss to the Miami Heat and subsequent disappointments—as evidence that Giannis can’t deliver when it matters most.

    In 2023, Giannis was hampered by a back injury, missing games in the Heat series, and the Bucks collapsed despite holding the NBA’s best regular-season record. Detractors argue that a true superstar should elevate his team regardless of circumstances, and Giannis’s inability to drag Milwaukee past Miami fuelled the “washed” narrative. The Bucks’ reliance on Giannis as their sole engine, especially without a fully healthy supporting cast, has exposed vulnerabilities that critics interpret as a decline in his impact.

    There is a solid line of reasoning which point to the Bucks dead end as the direct result of Giannis in fact.

    2. Injury Concerns and Team Health

    Health is a recurring theme in the “washed” argument—not just for Giannis but for the Bucks as a whole. Milwaukee hasn’t fielded a fully healthy roster in the playoffs since 2021, with key players like Khris Middleton and, more recently, Damian Lillard battling injuries. Giannis himself has dealt with nagging issues, from knee soreness to the aforementioned back problem. Critics argue that if Giannis were truly in his prime, he’d overcome these setbacks and carry the Bucks deeper, much like LeBron James or Kevin Durant have done in injury-riddled seasons.

    The absence of Lillard, who is likely to miss at least the start of the 2025 playoffs, puts even more pressure on Giannis. Skeptics claim that his physical, rim-attacking style—reliant on explosive athleticism—may be taking a toll, making him less durable and effective in high-stakes moments. If Giannis can’t stay on the court or compensate for missing teammates, some wonder if his peak has passed. More importantly it can well be argued that his injuries are a result of low IQ on Giannis’ part in several aspects of his game, stat padding mania and lack of intelligence in planning ahead.

    3. Perceived Lack of Skill Development

    Another pillar of the “washed” argument is Giannis’ offensive game, which critics say hasn’t evolved enough to keep pace with the modern NBA. Known for his relentless drives and dominance in the paint, Giannis remains a below-average shooter from beyond the arc, with a career three-point percentage hovering around 29%. In an era where versatility is king, his inability to stretch the floor consistently can clog Milwaukee’s offence, especially in playoff settings where defences pack the paint and dare him to shoot.

    While Giannis has improved as a playmaker—evidenced by increased assists and triple-double threats—critics argue he still lacks the finesse or mid-range game to counter playoff adjustments. Compare this to players like Nikola Jokić or Jayson Tatum, who’ve added layers to their offensive arsenals, and some see Giannis as one-dimensional. If he’s not bulldozing to the rim, the argument goes, his impact wanes, suggesting a plateau and that is why his trade value is declining.

    4. Narrative of Being “Figured Out”

    Playoff losses have led some to claim that Giannis has been “figured out.” Teams like the Heat and Raptors (in 2019) built defensive walls to neutralise his drives, forcing him to operate outside his comfort zone. When Giannis struggles to score efficiently or turns the ball over under pressure, critics pounce, arguing that his predictable style makes him easier to game-plan against. The “washed” label creeps in when people suggest he hasn’t adapted to these challenges, relying on athleticism over skill to stay relevant. In fact we went over several teams that have a single player that can shut him down. And the bad news? More and more teams have a “Giannis killer” in their roster

    5. Age and Mileage Concerns

    At 30, Giannis is hardly old, but his high-octane style—constant rim attacks, defensive hustle, and physical play—raises questions about wear and tear. He’s logged heavy minutes over his career, including deep playoff runs, and some speculate that his body may not hold up as it once did. If his athleticism dips even slightly, critics argue, his game could suffer dramatically, given its reliance on physical dominance. This fear of an early decline fuels the “washed” talk, especially when compared to peers like Jokić, who rely more on skill than athleticism.

    6. Giannis’ impressive stats are made in easy games

    It is a statistical fact. Giannis’ fans go on and on about his averages. But these fall off a cliff in harder games. This season the Bucks couldn’t win a single game against the top teams in the East. Worse still, Giannis may have scored a lot of points but his mid range evaporates and even his free throws are much much worse in high intensity games. Worse still, he seems to hog the ball even more under pressure.

    This year, more than ever, Giannis is a liability in clutch situations, here I outlined just five of the more obvious likely scenarios where he insists on being on the floor, even though it could cost them the game.

    So is Giannis washed?

    Of course not. He is a dominant force in the regular season for many situations. The real question should be “is Giannis washed in the NBA in terms of actually making a difference in the playoffs?”