Alex Antetokounmpo, the youngest member of the Antetokounmpo basketball family, is currently on a two-way contract with the Milwaukee Bucks, having spent previous seasons developing in the NBA’s G League and overseas. While his career is still in its early stages, his unique athletic profile and family name have kept him in the spotlight. However, the influence of nepotism on his NBA pathway and the Bucks’ roster construction continues to provoke discussion and criticism.
Player Profile and Physical Attributes
Standing at 2.03 meters (about 6’7″) with a wingspan reportedly reaching 7’2”, Alex is an athletic combo forward. His background includes experience in both European leagues (Aris Thessaloniki) and NBA G League teams, such as the Wisconsin Herd and Raptors 905. He’s known for his physical tools, competitive drive, and the potential to fill multiple forward roles on the floor.
Strengths
Athleticism and Length: Alex’s physical attributes—elite length, solid leaping ability, and good size for a wing—make him a versatile defender and potential transition weapon.
Energy and Hustle: He plays with effort, often making positive hustle plays, chasing rebounds, and disrupting passing lanes with deflections.
Open Floor Play: He’s particularly effective in transition and filling lanes for fast breaks, running the floor well and drawing fouls.
Passing Vision and Rebounding: Alex has shown flashes as a ballhandler with decent passing instincts, and he’s a strong offensive rebounder for his position.
Weaknesses
Raw Skillset: While his athleticism is undeniable, Alex is regarded as a raw prospect. He does several things at a decent level but doesn’t yet excel in any specific area.
Shooting Consistency: His shooting mechanics and shot selection are inconsistent, resulting in below-average percentages, especially from three-point range. His feet orientation and repetitive shooting form need significant work.
Ball Handling: He remains turnover-prone, with loose ball-handling, especially under pressure or when forced to use his left hand.
Decision Making: Tends to make questionable decisions with the ball, telegraphing passes or choosing poor moments for aggressive plays.
Defensive Awareness: Despite physical tools, he sometimes struggles with defensive rotations, help defense, and maintaining focus.
Statistical Snapshot (G League Averages):
Season
Team
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
FG%
3P%
FT%
2023-24
Wisconsin Herd
21.2
5.7
2.9
0.6
32.0
19.6
71.4
2022-23
Wisconsin Herd
22.3
5.8
3.1
0.8
37.2
24.7
55.9
Career
18.6
5.0
2.6
0.6
36.7
24.7
63.3
NBA Potential
Despite his potential upside, Alex currently projects as a fringe rotation player—his ceiling will depend on significant development in skill areas and decision-making. Scouts note he could become a switchable defender and secondary playmaker with 3-and-D value, but this requires improvement in perimeter shooting, ball security, and on-ball defense.
Nepotism and Its Impact on the Bucks
The Antetokounmpo family connection undeniably influences roster decisions. Giannis’s status as the franchise centerpiece has led the Bucks to extend opportunities to his brothers, including Thanasis and Alex, often at the expense of more competitive or developmental roster spots. High-profile commentators have called out this nepotism, suggesting it undermines meritocratic team building and can create resentment or frustration among teammates striving for opportunities on talent alone.
Limited Roster Spots: Two-way and end-of-bench positions are valuable for developing young talent. Allocating these to family members primarily for off-court harmony or star retention can stunt the growth of other prospects.
Locker Room Dynamics: Nepotism may strain relationships if players feel roles aren’t earned, potentially affecting locker room morale and on-court chemistry.
Team Performance: While strengthening Giannis’s ties to Milwaukee may have intangible benefits, it can impair overall competitiveness if the roster isn’t built purely on merit.youtube
So what’s the point?
Alex Antetokounmpo’s NBA journey is emblematic of both the opportunities and controversies created by family ties in pro sports. He embodies raw physical talent and hustle but lacks a specialized skill set at the moment. For now, his presence on the Bucks is less a product of exceptional on-court impact than of Giannis’s influence, and ongoing nepotism risks diminishing the franchise’s talent pipeline and fairness in player development.
The real problem is Giannis. A 30 year old adult claiming he needs his brothers around to perform? Are we all serious?
There really is not that much to go on so here are all my sources for this post.
In the NBA’s endless hypothetical superteam debates, few pairings spark as much intrigue as Giannis Antetokounmpo and Stephen Curry. On paper, the Greek Freak’s athletic dominance combined with Curry’s unparalleled shooting seems like a recipe for dynasty-level success. But dig deeper, and the fit starts to unravel. Giannis’s playing style—dominated by ball possession, physical drives, and limited off-ball contributions—clashes with Curry’s need for fluid motion, elite screening, and quick decision-making.
The Screening Issue: Giannis’s Weakness Undermines Curry’s Greatest Strength
Stephen Curry’s game revolves around off-ball movement and using screens to create space for his lethal three-point shooting. He’s thrived with screen-setters like Draymond Green, who not only set solid picks but also read defenses, slip when needed, and facilitate from the short roll. Giannis, however, is notoriously poor at this fundamental big-man skill, often prioritizing his own scoring over team play.
Observers have noted that Giannis tends to set screens too high or fails to establish a solid base, allowing defenders to slip around easily and disrupt the play. In pick-and-roll situations, he frequently slips the screen prematurely to hunt mismatches in the post, demanding the ball instead of creating opportunities for others. This self-focused approach was critiqued in analyses of his role with the Bucks, where even fans and analysts questioned his commitment to screening as a key offensive tool. For Curry, who relies on screens to generate 40% of his shots (per NBA tracking data), this would be disastrous. Without reliable picks, defenses could switch or hedge more aggressively on Curry, stifling his rhythm and forcing him into contested looks. Giannis’s athleticism might help in transition, but in half-court sets—where Curry does his damage—his screening lapses would turn the offense stagnant.
Social media echoes this sentiment, with recent discussions highlighting Giannis’s bad screening as a persistent flaw that hampers guard-big synergies. In a system like Golden State’s, where screening is an art form, Giannis’s habits would clash, leaving Curry isolated and underutilized.
Ball Dominance: Giannis’s Hogging Habits Would Starve Curry’s Off-Ball Brilliance
Giannis is one of the league’s highest-usage players, often controlling the ball for extended possessions to bulldoze to the rim. This “ball hog” label isn’t new—it’s been thrown at him in high-profile feuds, like with James Harden, who implied Giannis’s style lacks passing nuance. Stats back it up: Giannis’s usage rate hovers around 33-35%, meaning he touches the ball on a massive portion of possessions, often leading to iso-heavy play. Critics argue this pads his stats but doesn’t elevate teammates as effectively as true facilitators.
Curry, conversely, excels off the ball, using gravity to warp defenses even without possession. Pairing him with Giannis would force Curry into a spot-up role more often, diminishing his playmaking (he averaged 6.5 assists in 2024-25). Recent Bucks games highlighted this issue: when Giannis dominated the ball, teammates like Damian Lillard saw reduced touches, leading to frustration and inefficiency. On X (formerly Twitter), users frequently call out Giannis’s hogging, with posts noting how it led to losses despite his gaudy lines. In a Curry-led offense, this possessiveness would create tension, as Steph’s motion-based system demands quick ball movement—not prolonged dribble drives.
Clutch-Time Reliability: Giannis Falters When It Matters Most
Curry is synonymous with clutch performance, hitting game-winners and thriving under pressure with a career 43% three-point shooting in clutch situations. Giannis? His clutch stats tell a mixed story at best, often marred by poor free-throw shooting and decision-making. In 2024-25, he shot just 68.8% from the line in clutch minutes, missing key opportunities. Overall clutch efficiency ranks him mid-tier among stars, with a +15.1 net rating but inconsistent scoring (3.6 PPG in clutch games).
Critics point to playoff meltdowns, like the 2023 first-round exit where his free-throw woes (notably in clutch spots) contributed to the Bucks’ collapse. On X, discussions label him “not clutch,” citing games where he deferred or bricked in crunch time. For a duo with Curry, who’d draw double-teams late, Giannis’s unreliability—especially from the stripe—could cost championships. Defenses would foul him intentionally, turning potential wins into free-throw lotteries.
The Core Problem: Giannis’s Basketball IQ and Reaction Speed Don’t Fit Advanced Schemes
Most damning is Giannis’s perceived low basketball IQ, slow processing, and struggles with complex plays—traits that would torpedo a partnership with Curry’s cerebral, read-and-react style. Gilbert Arenas famously questioned Giannis’s smarts, asking if he’s “smarter than LeBron James or Stephen Curry” and arguing his success stems from athleticism, not intellect. Videos and analyses highlight players doubting his IQ, noting he relies on raw power over nuanced reads.
Reddit threads debate this, with many concluding he’s not “high IQ” despite stats. His reaction time in half-court offenses is slower, often leading to forced drives rather than exploiting mismatches creatively. Curry’s Warriors run intricate sets with split actions, back screens, and rapid decisions—Giannis’s inability to “think or react fast” would bog it down. Even his passing, while improved (7.3 APG in 2024), is critiqued as basic, not elite like Jokic’s or LeBron’s. In advanced plays, he’d struggle to adapt, turning a dynamic offense into a predictable one.
Hypothetical analyses of a Giannis-Curry pairing acknowledge the gravitational pull but warn of stylistic clashes. While some see it as “unfair” dominance, others note Giannis’s limitations would hinder Curry’s freedom.
A Superteam That Sounds Better Than It Plays
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a force of nature, but his screening deficiencies, ball-hogging, clutch inconsistencies, and limited IQ make him a poor fit for Stephen Curry’s ecosystem. Curry needs space creators and quick thinkers; Giannis provides brute force but at the cost of flow. In a league where chemistry trumps talent alone, this duo would frustrate more than dominate. Better to keep them apart—let Giannis bulldoze in Milwaukee, and Curry dance in the Bay. Real skills matter and Giannis simply hasn’t developed them at all. If anything he is getting worse (at ft% and 3pt% for sure.) As usual, Bucks (and Golden State) fans are talking as if the NBA is a video game.
In the ever-evolving drama of the NBA, few stories capture the tension between player power and organizational loyalty quite like the recent saga involving Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Milwaukee Bucks. On October 8, 2025, the two-time MVP made headlines with comments that hinted at a potential exit from Milwaukee if the team doesn’t contend for a championship this season. “Right now, my focus is on the Bucks,” Giannis said, “but it’s human nature to change your mind if things don’t go as planned.” These words, amid swirling trade rumors linking him to the New York Knicks—especially after their blockbuster acquisition of Karl-Anthony Towns—sparked immediate backlash.
Enter NBA legend Charles Barkley, who didn’t mince words during an appearance on ESPN. Barkley lambasted Giannis for what he perceives as entitlement, stating, “These guys, they feel like they’re entitled to play for the championship every year. … Everybody wants to win a championship, but the Bucks have done everything they possibly could.” Barkley’s critique resonates deeply, not just because of his Hall of Fame credentials, but because it highlights a stark reality: the Bucks have bent over backward to build a contender around Giannis, often at great cost to their future. In this blog post, we’ll dive into why Barkley is spot-on and why Giannis’s stance comes across as ungrateful, given the franchise’s extraordinary efforts.
The Bucks’ Investment in an Unknown Prospect
Let’s rewind to 2013. The Milwaukee Bucks, a small-market team often overshadowed in the NBA landscape, took a gamble on a lanky, relatively unknown teenager from Greece in the NBA Draft. Selected 15th overall, Giannis Antetokounmpo was far from a sure thing—raw talent with immense potential but little polish. The Bucks didn’t just draft him; they invested years in his development. Through dedicated coaching, strength training, and on-court opportunities, they transformed him from a skinny prospect into the “Greek Freak,” a dominant force who would go on to win two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year honor, and lead the team to glory.
This patience and belief paid off spectacularly in 2021 when Giannis delivered a championship to Milwaukee, ending a 50-year drought. His 50-point masterpiece in the Finals closeout game earned him MVP honors, cementing his legacy. But the Bucks’ commitment didn’t start or end there—it was a foundational bet on his future that no other team might have made.
All-In Moves: Trades, Contracts, and Coaching Changes
Barkley’s point about the Bucks doing “everything they possibly could” isn’t hyperbole; it’s backed by a series of bold, franchise-altering decisions. In 2020, sensing the need for a defensive anchor to complement Giannis, Milwaukee traded Eric Bledsoe, George Hill, and multiple first-round picks to acquire Jrue Holiday. This move was pivotal, directly contributing to the 2021 title run.
Post-championship, the Bucks rewarded Giannis with a five-year, $228 million supermax extension in December 2020, securing his services and signaling their long-term vision. When the team hit a rough patch, they didn’t hesitate to shake things up. In May 2023, they fired championship-winning coach Mike Budenholzer after a first-round playoff exit to the Miami Heat. They hired Adrian Griffin in June 2023, only to dismiss him mid-season despite a 30-13 record, replacing him with Doc Rivers—moves that aligned with Giannis’s preferences for change.
The Bucks went even further in September 2023, trading Jrue Holiday, Grayson Allen, and more picks to Portland for Damian Lillard, pairing Giannis with another superstar guard in a desperate bid to reignite contention. This trade mortgaged their draft capital through 2031, leaving the team with limited flexibility. As Barkley noted, “The Bucks have done everything they can.”
Entering the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee continued their all-in approach. They signed Myles Turner to a four-year, $107 million deal in July 2025, adding rim protection to bolster the frontcourt alongside Giannis. Free-agent additions like Gary Trent Jr., Taurean Prince, and Delon Wright deepened the roster, pushing the payroll over $170 million and deep into the luxury tax’s second apron. These aren’t half-measures; they’re sacrifices that have capped the team’s future options, all to maximize Giannis’s prime.
Even on a personal level, the Bucks have shown loyalty by keeping Giannis’s brother, Thanasis Antetokounmpo, on the roster since 2019. Despite his limited on-court impact, this provides family stability—a rare perk in the cutthroat NBA.
Injuries, Not Incompetence: The Real Culprit Behind Recent Struggles
Giannis’s hints at departure ignore a crucial factor: injuries, not front-office failures, have been the primary roadblock. In the 2024 playoffs, his absence due to injury contributed to a first-round loss to the Indiana Pacers. The Bucks’ core has been plagued by health issues, but the organization has responded by rebuilding the roster aggressively. As Barkley emphasized, “I want someone to love me as much as the Bucks love Giannis.”
In contrast to Barkley’s era, where stars like him endured years with underperforming teams without demanding trades (though Barkley himself requested one from the 76ers in the early ’90s for similar reasons), modern players expect perennial contention. But Milwaukee has delivered far beyond what’s typical for a small-market franchise. Ownership even changed hands in 2014 to fund arena upgrades and retain Giannis, demonstrating a commitment to infrastructure and stability.
The Entitlement Factor: Forgetting Roots and Undermining Loyalty
Giannis’s comments smack of entitlement because they overlook his origins. Without the Bucks’ faith and resources, he might not have evolved into the superstar he is today. He publicly praised the organization’s efforts in 2021, vowing loyalty, but his recent waffling undermines that narrative. Expecting annual titles ignores the NBA’s increasing parity, with powerhouse Eastern Conference rivals like the Boston Celtics and Philadelphia 76ers.
Barkley’s frustration is echoed across the league and media. As one analyst put it, “The Bucks have given Giannis everything he wanted—they traded a ton for Jrue, for Dame, and now put themselves in cap hell.” Giannis’s stance feels ungrateful, especially when compared to players who stuck it out in tougher situations. The Bucks aren’t a dysfunctional franchise; they’re a model of player-centric building, and Barkley’s call-out serves as a reminder that loyalty should be a two-way street.
Time for Gratitude, Not Exit Threats
Charles Barkley isn’t just stirring the pot—he’s highlighting a fundamental truth about the NBA’s player-empowerment era. The Milwaukee Bucks have exhausted every avenue to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo, from draft investments and blockbuster trades to coaching overhauls and massive contracts. In return, veiled threats of departure come across as entitled and ungrateful, especially from a player who owes much of his success to the franchise’s unwavering support.
As the 2025-26 season unfolds, Giannis has a chance to repay that loyalty with performance and commitment. But if Barkley’s words ring true, perhaps it’s time for the Greek Freak to reflect on how far the Bucks have carried him—and how much further they could go together. In a league where rings are the ultimate goal, true greatness also involves appreciating the journey and the team that made it possible.
In the high-stakes world of the NBA, superstar players like Giannis Antetokounmpo hold immense leverage, especially when their contracts include player options. As the 2025-26 season tips off, whispers about the Greek Freak’s future with the Milwaukee Bucks are growing louder amid trade rumors and questions about the team’s championship viability. While Giannis can’t walk away immediately after this season, his contract structure sets him up for unrestricted free agency as early as the summer of 2027 – at the end of the 2026-27 season. Once he declines his player option, the Bucks will have zero recourse to keep him. Let’s break down the rules, his contract details, and why Milwaukee is essentially at his mercy.
Giannis’s Contract: A Timeline of Security and Flexibility
Giannis has been a Buck since 2013, rising from a raw rookie to a two-time MVP and 2021 NBA champion. His loyalty has been rewarded with massive extensions, but the latest one – signed in October 2023 – gives him an exit ramp that’s hard for the front office to block.
The current deal is a three-year, $175 million maximum veteran extension that kicked in for the 2025-26 season. Here’s the breakdown:
2025-26: $54.1 million (guaranteed).
2026-27: $58.5 million (guaranteed).
2027-28: $62.8 million (player option).
The first two years are fully guaranteed, meaning Giannis is locked in through the end of the 2026-27 season. But the third year? That’s where his power shines. The player option for 2027-28 allows Giannis (or his representatives) to decide by June 29, 2027, whether to exercise it and stay with Milwaukee for one more year at that salary. If he declines – opting out – he hits unrestricted free agency (UFA) in the summer of 2027, free to sign with any team of his choosing.
This isn’t some obscure loophole; it’s a standard feature in NBA supermax contracts for stars like Giannis, who qualify under the Designated Veteran Player rules. These extensions allow teams to pay above the salary cap but often include player-friendly terms like options to maintain flexibility in a league where careers are short and contention windows narrow.
Prior to this extension, Giannis was already under a five-year, $228 million deal from 2020 that carried him through 2025-26, but the new extension superseded the final year for cap purposes. The Bucks front office, led by GM Jon Horst, structured it this way to keep their star happy while navigating the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) restrictions, including the over-36 rule (Giannis turns 33 in 2027, so no over-38 issues yet). But by building in the player option, they’ve handed Giannis the keys to his own destiny.
NBA Rules on Player Options and Free Agency: The Bucks’ Hands Are Tied
To understand why the Bucks can’t stop Giannis from leaving, we need to dive into the NBA’s free agency rules under the current CBA.
A player option is a contractual clause that gives the player – not the team – the unilateral right to decide whether to fulfill the final year(s) of the deal. If exercised, Giannis would play out 2027-28 in Milwaukee. But if he opts out, that year vanishes, and he becomes an unrestricted free agent. As a UFA, any NBA team can negotiate and sign him without restrictions – no qualifying offers, no right of first refusal, nothing. The Bucks’ Bird Rights (which allow over-the-cap re-signings) wouldn’t apply if he opts out and signs elsewhere; they’d only help if he stays or returns later.
Contrast this with restricted free agency, where teams can match offers. Player options like Giannis’s bypass that entirely. The CBA explicitly prohibits contracts from including clauses that limit a player’s free agency after the option period, ensuring stars can chase rings or bigger paydays elsewhere.
Moreover, Giannis doesn’t have a no-trade clause in this extension, meaning the Bucks could theoretically trade him before the opt-out deadline without his consent. But if Giannis wants to play out his guaranteed years and then bolt via free agency, Milwaukee has no leverage. They can’t force him to exercise the option, extend early (he’s eligible for a four-year, $275 million extension starting October 2026, but only if he stays), or block his departure.
In practice, this creates massive trade leverage for Giannis even before 2027. After the 2025-26 season, with just one guaranteed year left, his value skyrockets for contending teams. The Bucks would face a “trade now or lose for nothing” dilemma – a scenario that’s played out with stars like Kevin Durant and James Harden. Recent reports indicate Giannis is already exploring options, with interest from teams like the Knicks, and the Bucks are bracing for potential mid-season drama if results falter.
Why Now? The Bucks’ Window Closing and Giannis’s Leverage
Giannis has repeatedly affirmed his commitment to Milwaukee, saying he’s “locked in” but leaving the door open for change if the team doesn’t contend. The Bucks have surrounded him with talent like Damian Lillard and recent additions, but back-to-back early playoff exits have fueled doubts. At 30 years old (turning 31 in December 2025), Giannis knows his prime won’t last forever. Opting out in 2027 could net him a new supermax elsewhere – potentially over $300 million – with a contender.
For the Bucks, the nightmare is losing their franchise cornerstone for nothing. They can’t poison-pill his contract or use opt-out protections because the CBA doesn’t allow it. Their only plays are winning big this and next season to convince him to extend early or trading him on his terms to recoup assets.
The Bottom Line: Player Power in the Modern NBA
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s player option embodies the shift toward player empowerment in the NBA. By the end of the 2026-27 season, if he chooses to walk, the Bucks are spectators – unable to match offers, extend forcibly, or retain rights. It’s a stark reminder that even loyal stars like the Greek Freak prioritize championships over sentiment. As trade rumors swirl into the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee must deliver, or risk watching their MVP depart on his own terms.
If Giannis Antetokounmpo declines his player option, he would be able to leave the Milwaukee Bucks and become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2027, immediately after the conclusion of the 2026-27 NBA season. His current contract guarantees him two more years, covering the 2025-26 and 2026-27 seasons, with a player option for the 2027-28 season—which he can choose whether or not to accept. If he opts out, the earliest possible departure is July 2027. What is most likely? At the end of this (failed again) Bucks’ season, they try to trade him for as much talent and draft capital they can. Giannis has no choice. But at the end of that second season he returns to Greece.
In the whirlwind world of the NBA, where superstars chase championships and global endorsements, few stories tug at the heartstrings quite like Giannis Antetokounmpo’s. The man they call the Greek Freak—born in Athens to Nigerian immigrant parents, risen from street-hustling kid to two-time MVP and NBA champion—has always worn his roots on his sleeve. But today, a new chapter unfolds that’s less about highlight reels and more about family foundations: Giannis’ wife, Mariah Riddlesprigger, and their four young children have officially settled permanently in Athens, Greece. Their sons have even started kindergarten at the prestigious Athens College, marking a bold pivot toward the homeland that shaped him.
This isn’t just a seasonal relocation; it’s a seismic shift for a family that’s called Milwaukee home since Giannis was drafted in 2013. As the Bucks gear up for another title run, Giannis faces his first NBA season separated from his loved ones. What does this mean for the 30-year-old phenom? Could it fuel his fire on the court, or add an emotional weight to his already Herculean load? Or is he preparing for a return to Greece soon?
## A Family Forged in Adversity: Giannis’ Journey from Sepolia Streets to NBA Stardom
To understand the significance of this move, we need to rewind to Giannis’ origins. Born Giannis Sina Ugo Antetokounmpo on December 6, 1994, in Athens’ gritty Sepolia neighborhood, he grew up stateless for years—his parents, Charles and Veronica, had fled Nigeria in the early 1990s seeking better opportunities, only to face poverty and discrimination in Greece. The family scraped by selling watches and handbags on the streets, with young Giannis and his brothers (Thanasis, Kostas, and Alex) pitching in to keep food on the table.
Basketball became their escape. Scouted by local coach Spiros Velliniatis at age 13, Giannis’ raw athleticism— that impossible blend of 6’11” frame, speed, and power—propelled him from Filathlitikos’ youth teams to the NBA in a meteoric rise. By 2013, he was in Milwaukee, dragging his family across the Atlantic for a shot at the American Dream. Today, three of the four brothers play professionally in the NBA, and their AntetokounBros Academy in Athens offers free training to underprivileged kids, echoing the support they once received.
Enter Mariah Riddlesprigger, a philanthropist and former college volleyball star whom Giannis met in Milwaukee. The couple, who married in a lavish summer 2024 ceremony after welcoming three children, have built a life centered on quiet joys amid the spotlight. Their kids—Liam Charles (born February 10, 2020), Maverick Shai (August 18, 2021), Eva Brooke (September 14, 2023), and the newest addition, Aria Capri (born around June 2025)—represent the next generation of Antetokounmpos. Rarely seen in public, they’ve been fixtures at Bucks games and family milestones, like the 2022 premiere of Disney+’s *Rise*, the film chronicling their immigrant saga.
Giannis has always been vocal about fatherhood’s pull. In interviews, he’s said he’d retire on the spot if Liam asked for more playtime, underscoring how family anchors his relentless drive. Now, with the kids’ early years in flux, the pull of Greece feels inevitable.
## The Move: From Milwaukee Winters to Athenian Sunsets
Whispers of a Greek return have swirled for years—Giannis bought a sprawling, futuristic apartment complex in the upscale Paleo Psychiko suburb of Athens back in 2023 for an estimated €10 million ($11 million), complete with units for his mother and brothers. But this summer, it became reality. As of September 2025, Mariah and the four children have made the transatlantic leap permanent, trading Milwaukee’s chilly, humid climate (where even July highs rarely top 26°C/79°F) for Athens’ Mediterranean warmth.
The kids’ integration is already underway. Five-year-old Liam and four-year-old Maverick kicked off the school year at Athens College, one of Greece’s most elite institutions, known for its rigorous bilingual curriculum and alumni like shipping magnates and politicians. It’s no accident; Giannis, ever the planner, chose it to give his sons “only the best” from their formative years. Two-year-old Eva and four-month-old Aria are settling into the family rhythm, with the household buzzing in a quiet neighborhood where passersby remain blissfully unaware of their famous residents.
This isn’t a trial run. Sources close to the family confirm it’s a multi-year commitment, with Giannis commuting between continents during the offseason and, presumably, holidays. The Bucks star returned to Milwaukee practice just days ago, but the separation marks uncharted territory for a man who’s thrived on stability.
## Why Now? Roots, Climate, and a Vision for the Future
So, what sparked this bold step? It’s a cocktail of personal, cultural, and practical factors. Foremost: Mariah’s preference. When Giannis polled her on Milwaukee versus Athens, she chose the Greek capital without hesitation, citing the vibrant community, milder weather, and cultural richness. “Greece suits us better,” insiders note, a sentiment echoed in Giannis’ own long-held dreams of returning home.
Giannis has been candid about his love for Athens. In a July 2025 interview, he declared, “I’m definitely thinking of coming to Greece permanently when I retire… Athens is my home.” His tears after captaining Greece to a bronze at EuroBasket 2025—the country’s first medal since 2009—spoke volumes about his emotional tether. The move aligns with his vision: exposing his kids to their heritage, fluent Greek lessons, and summers on sun-drenched islands, all while nurturing the AntetokounBros legacy through local philanthropy.
Practically, it’s savvy. With business ventures blooming in Greece (from real estate to the family’s academy), and rumors of a post-NBA stint with Filathlitikos—the club that launched him—rooting the family there streamlines logistics. Unlike LeBron James, whom he admires, Giannis has hinted he’s not chasing a 40-year-old career; he wants to peak now and pivot sooner, perhaps ending his playing days in the Hellenic League.
## The Ripple Effects: Emotional Turbulence, On-Court Fuel, and Long-Term Legacy
No sugarcoating it: this separation could test Giannis like never before. For the first time, he’ll lace up for Bucks games without his family’s courtside cheers or post-practice cuddles. “It will not be easy,” those in his circle admit, especially with a newborn at home. The 8-hour time difference and grueling travel—private jets notwithstanding—could amplify the isolation of NBA life, potentially stirring anxiety or homesickness. We’ve seen stars like Kevin Durant grapple with similar family strains; for Giannis, whose identity is so intertwined with family, it might manifest as restless energy or, worse, distraction.
Yet, there’s profound upside. Psychologically, knowing his kids are immersed in their cultural bedrock could lighten his load, freeing mental bandwidth for the court. Imagine the motivation: every dunk a dedication to providing that “best” education, every assist a step toward a post-retirement life unmarred by regret. History shows fatherhood sharpens focus—post-Liam’s birth, Giannis averaged 29.5 points in the 2020-21 championship run. This move might supercharge that, turning transatlantic longing into unbreakable resolve.
On the family front, it’s a win for stability. Milwaukee’s transient NBA scene pales against Athens’ extended-family vibe, where Veronica can dote on grandkids and the brothers collaborate on ventures. For the children, it’s a bilingual, multicultural upbringing—Greek summers, American holidays—that mirrors Giannis’ own hybrid identity, fostering resilience they’ll need in a global world.
Career-wise, it signals maturity. At 30, with a supermax extension through 2028, Giannis is eyeing legacy beyond rings. Settling his family in Greece positions him as a bridge-builder: the immigrant kid who returns to uplift, not just extract. It could extend his prime by reducing burnout, and if whispers of an Athens NBA expansion hold water, who knows? The Greek Freak might one day headline a Euro league.
Of course, risks linger. If the Bucks falter or injuries mount (recall his 2023 knee scare), the pull of home might accelerate retirement talks. And logistically? Balancing Daddy duty with 82 games demands ninja-level scheduling.
## Closing the Circle: A Freakish Return to Roots
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s family move to Athens isn’t an ending—it’s a homecoming that closes the circle on a life story scripted in struggle and stardom. From Sepolia’s shadows to Milwaukee’s spotlight, he’s always chased wholeness: for himself, his brothers, his parents, and now his children. This decision, though laced with sacrifice, underscores his core value—family above all.
As the season tips off, watch for that extra gear in Giannis’ game. It might just be the fuel to chase another ring, knowing his little freaks are thriving where it all began. In a league of mercenaries, the Greek Freak remains gloriously grounded. And in doing so, he reminds us: true greatness isn’t measured in trophies alone, but in the homes we build across oceans.
Personally I think it will be a convenient excuse. When he fails again this year to achieve anything in the post season he will use his family as an excuse to justify playing in Europe with a Greek team. And all he has said over the years about loyalty to the Bucks and the place that has been home all these years will go out the window…
*Sources: Proto Thema English, New Greek TV, People Magazine, Greek Reporter, Hellenic Daily News.*
With Russell Westbrook still sitting on the free-agent market after declining his player option with the Denver Nuggets, ESPN’s Kendrick Perkins floated the idea that Milwaukee should swoop in and sign the 37-year-old veteran. On paper, it sounds intriguing: a win-now team desperate for backcourt stability after cutting ties with Damian Lillard, pairing Westbrook’s explosive energy with Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance. But let’s pump the brakes. This isn’t just a questionable fit—it’s a recipe for regression that could derail the Bucks’ championship aspirations. It’s uglier than a mid-range brick in overtime.
Westbrook’s Game in 2025: A Triple-Double Machine That’s Triple the Headache
Westbrook’s résumé is legendary—NBA MVP, nine-time All-Star, all-time leader in triple-doubles. But at 37, his game has devolved into a highlight-reel sideshow with diminishing returns. In his final season with Denver (2024-25), he posted 13.3 points, 6.1 assists, and 4.9 rebounds across 75 games—solid bench numbers, sure. He still brings that manic energy, pushing the pace and crashing the glass like it’s 2017.
The cracks, however, are canyon-sized. His field-goal percentage hovered around 44.9%, and his three-point shooting? A woeful 31.4% on low volume (just 2.1 attempts per game). That’s not “broken jumper” territory; that’s “defences dare you to shoot” territory. Add in his league-leading turnover rate among high-minute guards (3.2 per 36 minutes) and a defensive rating that drags units underwater, and you’ve got a player whose plus/minus has been negative for five straight seasons.
Westbrook’s style—ball-dominant, paint-attacking, reluctant passer in crunch time—worked in limited roles with the Clippers and Nuggets, where he came off the bench. But starting him? That’s where the wheels fall off. He logged a usage rate north of 25% last year, jacking up contested twos and forcing the issue when smarter reads were available. For a Bucks team already questioning its backcourt rhythm, injecting Westbrook’s chaos would amplify the noise, not harmonize it.
The Nightmare Fit: How Westbrook Would Break the Bucks’ Offence and Defence
Let’s game this out. Imagine Porter Jr. (or whoever starts) sharing the floor with Westbrook in a two-PG lineup. Both are undersized (Porter at 6’4″, Westbrook at 6’3″), both love to handle, and neither shoots well enough from deep to punish switches. Result? A backcourt traffic jam that funnels everything into the mid-range—precisely what killed Milwaukee’s spacing last year. Giannis would feast on lobs and cuts, but Portis’ spot-up game gets neutralized, and others off-ball movement turns into a crawl.
Offensively, Westbrook’s inefficiency would compound the Bucks’ issues. His true shooting percentage sat at 50.2% last season—below league average for guards—and he’d be chucking in high-leverage spots. Defensively? Forget it. Westbrook’s lateral quickness has eroded with age; opponents targeted him relentlessly in Denver, leading to a -4.1 net rating in his minutes. Pair that with Porter’s own defensive lapses, and Milwaukee’s perimeter D—already middling—becomes a sieve. The Eastern Conference is loaded with sharpshooters like Jalen Brunson, Tyrese Haliburton, and Trae Young; Westbrook’s gambling for steals would leave Giannis in iso hell on the other end.
Even in a bench role, it’s a mismatch. The Bucks need a microwave scorer or a true combo guard to spell Porter, not a volume creator who hogs touches from a second unit featuring Portis and Trent. As Brew Hoop astutely noted, “Milwaukee would be wise to pass” because Westbrook’s skill set doesn’t align with Doc Rivers’ preference for structured, ball-movement offenses. Rivers thrived with balanced units in Boston and Philly; Westbrook’s heliocentric approach would feel like a step backward.
The Greek Freak has chinks in his armour—flaws that have been dissected ad nauseam, from his inconsistent free-throw shooting (hovering around 71% career, with dips in high-pressure moments) to his limited outside game (a career 28.9% from three, forcing defences to pack the paint). Add in occasional half-court stagnation, where his ball-handling can lead to turnovers if lanes aren’t open, and play making lapses under duress, and you’ve got vulnerabilities that savvy teams exploit in the playoffs. Now, imagine pairing him with Russell Westbrook, a guard whose declining skill set would turn these weaknesses into glaring liabilities, potentially derailing Milwaukee’s offence and exhausting their star.
At the core of the mismatch is spacing—or the lack thereof. Giannis thrives when the floor is stretched, allowing him to euro-step through open driving lanes without meeting a wall of defenders. Westbrook, however, is a non-shooter from deep, converting just 31.4% on minimal attempts last season, which invites opponents to sag off him and dare the brick. This defensive strategy would clog the paint even more than usual, forcing Giannis into contested drives or pull-up jumpers—shots he’s notoriously inefficient at. We’ve seen this movie before: In the 2025 playoffs, without Damian Lillard’s gravity pulling defenders out, Giannis’ efficiency dipped in half-court sets, with turnovers spiking as he tried to force plays. Westbrook’s presence would exacerbate this, turning Giannis’ drives into a mosh pit and highlighting his reluctance (or inability) to punish from outside. Defenses could essentially play 5-on-4 in the lane, neutralizing Giannis’ greatest strength and pushing him toward more free throws—where his mental blocks and mechanical issues often rear their head, as evidenced by his sub-60% FT% in key 2025 EuroBasket games.
Defensively, the ripple effects would be just as damaging. Westbrook’s eroded lateral quickness and gambling tendencies have made him a target for opponents, often resulting in blow-bys and open looks that require help-side rotations. Giannis, already Milwaukee’s defensive anchor as a roaming rim protector, would be forced to cover more ground, cleaning up Westbrook’s messes while expending extra energy. This added workload could accelerate fatigue for the 30-year-old superstar, who’s shown signs of wear in recent seasons, and amplify his occasional lapses in perimeter containment—another subtle weakness when he’s stretched thin. Moreover, Westbrook’s ball-dominant style and high turnover rate (3.2 per 36 minutes) would disrupt rhythm, potentially reducing Giannis’ touches in favourable spots and forcing him into more isolation creation, where his playmaking vision isn’t elite. In a post-Lillard Bucks backcourt already lacking facilitators, this chaos would spotlight Giannis’ half-court limitations, turning him from a dominant force into a frustrated one-man army.
Chemistry Red Flags: Leadership Lessons from Westbrook’s Past
Beyond the tape, there’s the intangibles. Westbrook is a warrior—fiercely competitive and vocal—but his intensity has rubbed teammates the wrong way. Remember his Lakers tenure? What started as a “Big Three” experiment devolved into finger-pointing and a first-round exit. Perkins himself admitted to warning Westbrook about his “cancerous” behaviour back then, a comment that ended their friendship. In Denver, he was a positive vet, but that was as a reserve. Thrust him into a starting role on a pressure-cooker team like Milwaukee, and the alpha clashes could erupt—especially with a young, unproven Porter Jr. needing guidance, not competition.
The Bucks can’t afford distractions. With a win-now core entering its mid-30s window, they need cohesion, not controversy.
Steer Clear, Milwaukee
Russell Westbrook deserves a ring and a graceful fade-out on a contender’s bench. But the Bucks? They’re not that team—not with their spacing starvation, defensive vulnerabilities, and need for harmony. Pairing him with this roster wouldn’t unlock potential; it’d expose flaws. As Reddit’s NBA hive mind put it, Westbrook’s playstyle “only works on one team in the league,” and Milwaukee ain’t it. Doc Rivers and Jon Horst have built a contender; don’t let nostalgia torch it.
The basketball world was buzzing after the EuroBasket 2025 semifinals on September 12, when Turkey pulled off a stunning upset, defeating Greece 82-74 to advance to the finals for the first time in 24 years. At the centre of the drama? None other than Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and perennial NBA Defensive Player of the Year candidate, who was held to a shocking 12 points on 6-of-13 shooting. For a player who is presented as unguardable throughout his career—averaging over 25 points per game in the tournament up to that point—this was a defensive clinic that exposed vulnerabilities in the Greek Freak’s game.
Turkey, under coach Ergin Ataman, didn’t just defend Giannis; they dissected him with a blend of physicality, teamwork, and tactical precision. This wasn’t a fluke—it was a blueprint that echoes strategies we’ve seen (and debated) in the NBA for years. Three years of early playoff exits, three years of losing even in the regular season against teams that care enough to defend him like this.
The EuroBasket Breakdown: Turkey’s Defensive Symphony
Greece entered the semifinal as favourites, largely on Giannis’s reputation. By sheer luck of the bracket however Greece had not faced any serious opponents. Giannis skillfully avoid playing against Nurkic because he knew what would happen. (They lost anyway, Giannis avoided looking foolish though.) The recipe is simple:
1. Disrupt the Delivery: Pressure the Perimeter
Turkey’s first line of attack was simple but ruthless: make it hard for Greece to get the ball to Giannis. Guards Sehmus Hazer and Shane Larkin (yes, the ex-Celtics sharpshooter now starring for Anadolu Efes) hounded the inbounders and ball-handlers, using quick hands and relentless pressure to force 12 turnovers in the first half alone. Cedi Osman, the NBA veteran forward, chipped in by switching onto Giannis in open court, denying easy touches and forcing him to receive the ball further from the rim than he prefers.
This tactic preyed on one of Giannis’s subtler weaknesses: his ball-handling under duress. At 6’11” with a long stride, he’s a transition monster, but Turkey’s transition defence was lockdown—limiting fast breaks and keeping Greece in a half-court grind. As Alperen Sengun later noted in a post-game interview, “We knew if we let him bring the ball up freely, it was over. So we trapped early and often.”
2. One-on-One Anchor with Help on Demand: Osmani’s Heroics
Enter Ercan Osmani, Turkey’s 6’10” power forward and the unsung hero of the night. Osmani drew the primary assignment, bodying Giannis in the post and contesting every move with physicality that matched the Freak’s ferocity. But this wasn’t hero-ball defence; it was a relay. Whenever Giannis put the ball on the floor inside the three-point line, the paint collapsed. Sengun, the Houston Rockets’ rising star centre, rotated over as the “wall,” swatting at drives and contesting lobs without leaving his man exposed.
Shane Larkin summed it up perfectly in a post-game breakdown: “The plan was to collapse whenever he raised that ball to drive. Force the kick-out, then rotate hard on the perimeter. We accepted threes from their guards—guys like [Thomas] Walkup aren’t lights-out shooters.” This “shrink the floor” approach turned Giannis into a passer and like Sengun had said before the game “Giannis is not a great passer.”
3. Zone and Traps: The Triple-Team Fortress
When Giannis did touch the ball in his sweet spot—the low block or mid-post—Turkey flipped the script to a hybrid zone. Double-teams (often Osman and Sengun) quickly escalated to triples, with a third defender (frequently Osman circling back or Hazer digging in) forming what one reporter called a “fortress wall.” Passing lanes were clogged, leading to strips and turnovers. Physicality was key: Turkey played with NBA-level bump-and-turn, wearing Giannis down over 35 minutes.
The result? Giannis, who thrives on momentum and space, looked frustrated—good for just 12 points, 12 rebounds, and those 5 assists. Turkey’s bench erupted after a key sequence in the third quarter where a triple-team forced a kick-out that sailed wide, sealing the momentum shift. It was defense as performance art: collective, adaptive, and unrelenting.
Why This Works in the NBA: Timeless Principles Meet Pro Pace
EuroBasket might play at a slower tempo than the NBA’s breakneck speed, but Turkey’s blueprint is straight out of the league’s defensive playbook. Giannis’s dominance—elite athleticism, length, and finishing—makes him a matchup nightmare, but he’s not invincible. His game relies on driving lanes, transition opportunities, and post-ups, all of which can be neutralized with smart team defense. Here’s why Turkey’s tactics aren’t just FIBA-specific:
The “Wall” Strategy: A Proven NBA Staple
Coined during the 2021 playoffs when the Heat and Nets tried (and sometimes succeeded) in slowing Giannis, “The Wall” involves funneling him baseline or middle with on-ball pressure, then crowding the paint with help defenders. Turkey executed this to perfection, much like the Miami Heat’s 2020 bubble run, where Bam Adebayo and a rotating cast of bigs forced Giannis into 5+ turnovers per game. In the NBA, where spacing is tighter due to better shooters, teams live with contested threes from role players (e.g., Bucks’ Pat Connaughton) rather than letting Giannis bulldoze to the rim.
Physicality and Rotations: Exploiting Fatigue
The NBA’s 82-game grind amplifies Turkey’s physical approach. Giannis averages 34+ minutes per game; constant doubles wear him down, forcing passes that expose slower rotations. Data from the 2024-25 season shows Giannis’s efficiency dips 15% against teams that trap him 20%+ of possessions (per Second Spectrum tracking). Turkey’s zone hybrids mirror what the Warriors used in their March 2025 win over Milwaukee, where Draymond Green orchestrated rotations to limit Giannis to 18 points.
Transition Denial: The Silent Killer
FIBA rules limit fast breaks slightly, but the principle holds: Deny outlet passes and force half-court sets. In the NBA, where Giannis scores 40% of his points in transition, teams like the Celtics use length (Tatum, Brown) to mirror this, dropping Milwaukee’s transition efficiency by 12 points per 100 possessions in recent matchups.
In short, Turkey’s win proves that with discipline, no star is untouchable—especially one whose jumper (still a work in progress at 29.5% from three in 2025) keeps defenses honest but not terrified. After all as I have explained at length and with much statistical proof, Giannis has no mid range when it matters.
NBA Defenders Who’ve Cracked the Code: A Hall of Fame Lineup
Over Giannis’s decade in the league, only a select few have consistently turned him mortal. These aren’t just stat-line suppressors; they’re tacticians who force the Bucks to play “away” from their star. Here’s a rundown of the most effective, based on playoff and regular-season matchups (points per possession allowed under 1.00, per NBA Advanced Stats):
Bam Adebayo (Miami Heat) – The Gold Standard
Bam’s the closest thing to a 1v1 kryptonite. In the 2020 and 2023 playoffs, he held Giannis to 22.4 PPG on 48% shooting, using his lateral quickness to stay in front and strength to absorb contact. Fun fact: Adebayo’s the only defender who’s outscored Giannis in head-to-head minutes while forcing 2.1 turnovers per game. Why it works? Bam funnels him without help, buying time for rotations.
Joel Embiid (Philadelphia 76ers) – The Post Enforcer
Embiid’s size (7’0″, 280 lbs) and IQ make him a post-up nightmare. In 2023 Eastern Conference Semis, Philly’s scheme with Embiid as the anchor dropped Giannis to 19.8 PPG. He’s physical enough to bang without fouling and mobile enough to recover on drives—key against Giannis’s euro-steps.
Draymond Green (Golden State Warriors) – The Chaos Conductor
Green’s not matching Giannis’s athleticism, but his brain is unmatched. In the Warriors’ 104-93 dismantling of the Bucks in March 2025, Draymond guarded him straight-up for 28 minutes, limiting him to 18 points on 7-18 shooting. It’s all about positioning: Green pressures full-court, funnels baseline, and communicates traps like a quarterback. Career vs. Giannis: Holds him under 1.05 PPP.
Rudy Gobert (Minnesota Timberwolves) – The Rim Guardian
Three-time DPOY Gobert’s length (7’9″ wingspan) clogs lanes. In 2024 playoffs, Minnesota’s “Gobert Wall” (with Jaden McDaniels) restricted Giannis to 24 PPG on 52% eFG%. Rudy’s not quick enough for full games, but in drop coverage, he erases lobs and weak-side help.
P.J. Tucker (Formerly Clippers/Raptors) – The Gritty Veteran
Tucker’s the ultimate “annoyance” defender. During the 2019 Raptors run, he bodied Giannis into 22.3 PPG on inefficient shots. His low center of gravity and hand-fighting disrupted rhythm—perfect for half-court sets.
Honorable mentions: Al Horford (Celtics’ zone wizardry in 2022 ECF), Jayson Tatum (versatile switching), and OG Anunoby (Raptors’ length in isolation). Hell, even the much shorter Dillon Brooks last season wiped Giannis on his own!
The Freak’s Evolution and the Defender’s Edge
Turkey’s EuroBasket triumph wasn’t just a win—it was a reminder that basketball’s a team sport, even against unicorns like Giannis. By disrupting flow, collapsing space, and embracing the grind, they turned a supernova into a shooting star. In the NBA, where schemes evolve daily, expect more coaches to dust off this playbook as the Bucks chase another ring.
What’s next for the Greek Freak? A sharper jumper? Better pick-and-roll vision? It doesn’t seem like he has added anything at all to his game all these years. More and more NBA players will just pull him apart like Turkey did. Bucks’ fans get confused because in easy games in the regular season most teams don’t bother. Why risk injury when so many times the officials don’t even give you the clear offensive foul Giannis commits? But when it counts? Three first round exits say “Giannis ain’t got it no more”.
Sources: FIBA EuroBasket recaps, Basketball Sphere analysis, JSONline game reports, NBA Advanced Stats, and Second Spectrum data.
Notable Individual Defenders
Dillon Brooks: Noteworthy for his physical, pesky defense on Giannis in 2024 NBA and Olympic matchups, using aggressive and disciplined tactics.
Lu Dort: Regarded as one of the top perimeter defenders, Dort used his strength and lateral quickness to defend Giannis on switches and in isolation, occasionally frustrating him in transition and halfcourt.
Bam Adebayo: Perhaps the most consistently effective one-on-one defender in playoff contexts, especially as the anchor for Miami’s wall defense.
Draymond Green: Famous for a 2025 regular-season performance where he held Giannis scoreless as a primary defender, supported by a strong team approach.
Grant Williams: Physical, disciplined, and effective—particularly in Celtics playoff series, often forcing Giannis into help coverage and tough shots.
Al Horford: Senior defender with a strong understanding of positioning, effective in both solo coverage and with Boston’s team help.
OG Anunoby: Length and strength allow him to contest Giannis’ drives and shots with discipline.
Onyeka Okongwu: Young big man with mobility and strong hands; considered one of the better defenders in direct matchups.
Anthony Davis: On healthy stretches with the Lakers, has the rim deterrence and agility to challenge Giannis at the basket.
Ben Simmons: Before recent injury downturn, was praised for his length and on-ball defense on Giannis.
Jonathan Isaac: When healthy, combined size, speed, and anticipation to bother Giannis in isolation and around the rim.
Jaren Jackson Jr.: Rim protection and lateral movement enable strong paint defense against Giannis.
Steven Adams: Physical strength inside makes him a tough post matchup for Giannis when protected by team schemes.
Clint Capela: Athletic rim protector, effective in switching schemes and as a help defender.
Zion Williamson: When healthy, physical enough to body Giannis and contest drives.
Evan Mobley & Jarrett Allen: The Cleveland frontcourt uses length and anticipation to wall off the lane and force tough finishes.
LeBron James: While not a primary defender, has successfully defended Giannis in stretches, using size and intelligence
If you’ve been scrolling through NBA offseason chatter, you’ve probably seen the glowing takes on the Milwaukee Bucks’ revamped frontcourt. With Giannis Antetokounmpo anchoring the middle, the addition of Myles Turner for elite rim protection, and Bobby Portis providing that spark-plug energy, some pundits are calling it a “wall of bigs” that could reshape the Eastern Conference. Doc Rivers now has a trio of towers that, in theory, dominate both ends of the floor. Portis himself hyped it up: “We can grow together. We can get better together. You can’t really find three better bigs together on any other team.” It’s a seductive narrative—the Bucks rising back to championship glory with sheer size and athleticism.
But hold up. As much as I love a good underdog story (or in this case, a powerhouse resurgence), this view strikes me as overly optimistic. It’s the kind of hot take that ignores the gritty realities of NBA basketball: chemistry, spacing, match ups, and the unforgiving nature of playoff hoops.
The Spacing Nightmare: When Too Many Bigs Clog the Paint
At the heart of the optimism is the idea that Giannis, Turner, and Portis form a versatile, energy-packed unit. Giannis, the two-time MVP and perennial All-NBA force, is the engine—driving, dunking, and defending like a freight train. Turner brings modern big-man skills: stretch-five potential with his three-point shooting (career 35% from deep) and top-tier shot-blocking (he’s led the league in blocks multiple times). Portis? He’s the ultimate sixth man, a fearless rebounder and scorer off the bench who averaged 13.8 points and 7.4 rebounds last season while shooting 40% from three.
Sounds perfect, right? Wrong. The real issue is fit. All three players operate primarily in the paintor as rollers in pick-and-rolls. Giannis thrives on drives to the rim, where he draws fouls and collapses defences but he can’t screen, let’s face it. Turner, despite his shooting, is best as a drop-coverage centre who protects the rim without much mobility to switch onto guards. Portis is a bulldog inside, excelling in hustle plays but lacking the foot speed for perimeter defence. When you stack them together, you’re essentially turning the paint into a traffic jam.
Imagine a possession: Giannis posts up, Turner sets a screen and rolls, and Portis crashes the boards. Defenses like the Boston Celtics or Philadelphia 76ers—teams loaded with switchable wings—will simply pack the lane and dare the Bucks to shoot from outside. Milwaukee’s offense already ranked mid-tier in three-point attempts last season (around 35 per game), and without reliable spacing from this frontcourt trio, Giannis’s efficiency could dip. He already shot his worse season ever for 3pt% last season. Hell worse in NBA history almost! Turner’s three-point volume is solid (about 3-4 attempts per game), but he’s not a volume bomber like Karl-Anthony Towns. Portis hits spot-up threes, but his attempts are sporadic and his percentages can be streaky.
In the playoffs, where spacing is king, this could be fatal. Remember how the Bucks struggled against the Heat in 2023? Jimmy Butler feasted by exploiting poor floor balance. A “wall of bigs” might sound imposing, but without perimeter threats to pull defenders away, it’s more like a sitting duck.
Defensive Strengths… and Glaring Weaknesses
On paper, this trio screams defensive dominance. Giannis is a Defensive Player of the Year candidate with his length and instincts. Turner is a perennial blocks leader (1.5+ per game career average), providing the anchor Milwaukee lacked after trading away Jrue Holiday’s versatility. Portis adds rebounding grit, helping control the glass (the Bucks were top-10 in defensive rebounding last year).
But let’s pump the brakes. While they might stifle slashers and protect the rim, modern NBA offenses exploit bigs who can’t switch. Turner is a classic drop big—great at erasing shots at the hoop but vulnerable to pick-and-rolls where guards like Jalen Brunson or Tyrese Maxey can pull him out of position. Giannis can switch 1-4, but asking him to guard elite wings every night wears him down. Portis? He’s a liability on the perimeter; opponents targeted him in switches last season, and his 6’10” frame doesn’t translate to elite foot speed against quicker forwards.
The East is a minefield of versatile scorers: Jayson Tatum, Joel Embiid, Donovan Mitchell, and even Paolo Banchero. In a seven-game series, teams will hunt mismatches relentlessly. Doc Rivers’ defensive schemes have historically relied on communication and help defense, but integrating three bigs with overlapping roles could lead to breakdowns. And Giannis is not know for high IQ plays, adaptability or even managing to understand complex systems. It’s not just about blocks—it’s about containment. This “wall” might hold against lesser teams but crumble under sustained pressure from playoff juggernauts. Which is a very common Bucks’ theme. Everyone gets excited in the regular season but then when it matters? Zilch!
The Perimeter Creation Void: No Shooting, No Problem? Think Again
The optimism assumes Giannis can carry the offense as the “engine,” with Turner and Portis providing secondary scoring. But here’s the rub: Milwaukee lacks true perimeter creation. Without a secondary ball-handler or elite spot-up shooters in the frontcourt, the Bucks become predictable. Giannis’s heliocentric style works when there’s spacing, but against teams that double-team him (as the Celtics did effectively in recent years), who kicks out to? Turner’s shooting helps, but he’s not a playmaker (career 0.5 assists per game). Portis is more of a finisher than a facilitator. This trio doesn’t address Milwaukee’s need for off-ball movement or multiple creators—issues that plagued them in the playoffs.
Compare other front courts that stretch the floor, switch seamlessly, and have multiple threats. The Bucks’ setup feels like a throwback to the 90s bully-ball era, which the three-point revolution has largely rendered obsolete.
Injury Risks: A House of Cards Built on Health
No discussion of this frontcourt is complete without addressing durability. Giannis is a tank, playing 70+ games most seasons, but he’s had calf and hamstring scares that sidelined him at critical times. Turner? His injury history is a red flag—he missed 25 games last season with a stress reaction in his foot and has dealt with calf strains and ankle issues throughout his career. Portis is tougher, but at 29, he’s not immune to wear-and-tear from his high-energy style.
In a league where load management is king, relying on three bigs means depth is crucial. If Turner goes down (a real possibility given his track record), the Bucks fall back on Portis and maybe a less proven option like Sandro Mamukelashvili. Suddenly, that “unmatched trio” becomes a duo, and the wall crumbles. The optimism glosses over this fragility—health isn’t guaranteed, especially in a grind-it-out Eastern Conference. Especially the way Giannis plays. So far he has counted on teams not bothering to defend him all on in the regular season. But there are young teams and players who saw what happened in Greece vs Turkey and might want to take on the challenge. It’s not that hard. If Dillon Brooks can shut Giannis down, hey, many can.
Doc Rivers brings championship pedigree (2008 with the Celtics), but his Bucks tenure has been rocky. Last season, Milwaukee underperformed expectations, exiting in the first round despite superstar talent. Integrating Turner—a new acquisition—alongside Giannis and Portis requires time. Rivers’ systems emphasize veteran leadership, but bigs need reps to gel on rotations, pick-and-roll timing, and defensive coverages.
Portis’s quote about “growing together” is feel-good, but NBA reality is harsher. Chemistry takes preseason games, early-season tweaks, and avoiding early slumps. Rivers has a history of slow starts (e.g., with the Clippers), and if the frontcourt experiments flop, fan frustration could mount. This isn’t a plug-and-play unit; it’s a high-risk rebuild of the paint.
The Eastern Conference Gauntlet: No Room for Error
Finally, let’s zoom out. The East is stacked: Boston’s dynasty-level depth, Philly’s Embiid-led firepower, Cleveland’s young guns, New York’s grit, and Orlando’s athleticism. The Bucks’ bigs might bully some teams, but against elite defenses, they’ll struggle. The Celtics, for instance, ranked first in defensive rating last season and have wings who can body Giannis while shooters pull him away. Philly could match size with Embiid and Paul Reed, turning games into slugfests where Turner’s blocks are neutralized.
In simulations or advanced metrics (like those from Cleaning the Glass), heavy-big lineups often underperform in pace-and-space eras. The Bucks might win 50+ games, but a deep playoff run? That’s where optimism meets reality. Last season let’s not forget that the Bucks beat zero teams above 0,500 in the regular season even.
Tempered Expectations for the Bucks
One of the primary concerns with pairing Turner and Giannis is their overlapping preferences for operating near the basket, which could lead to congested spacing if not managed carefully. Giannis thrives on drives, post-ups, and transition attacks, averaging 30.4 points per game last season with a heavy emphasis on paint touches. Turner, while a capable stretch big (career 35% from three on about 3-4 attempts per game), isn’t a high-volume bomber like Kristaps Porziņģis or Karl-Anthony Towns, and his scoring often comes from pick-and-rolls or spot-ups rather than creating off the dribble. In Indiana, Turner’s teams weren’t dominant on the glass or in creating open looks, and analysts worry that without elite perimeter threats around them, defenses could sag off and pack the paint, limiting Giannis’s efficiency.
That said, Turner’s agility and shooting could mitigate this better than Brook Lopez did in recent years, allowing for more fluid movement offences like dribble hand-offs (DHOs) and short-roll decisions. Discussions online emphasise that Turner’s floor-spacing ability is a step up, potentially enabling three-guard lineups to pull defenders out. However, if Turner’s three-point volume doesn’t increase (he averaged just 3.5 attempts last season), the duo risks becoming predictable, especially in playoffs where teams like the Boston Celtics exploit poor spacing with switchable wings. Early posts from fans highlight the need for additional 3-and-D players to surround them, underscoring that their fit relies heavily on roster tweaks for optimal spacing. But this is just the common Bucks’ fans excuse isn’t it? “If only we had sharp shooters that never miss from the 3pt line…” Duh!
Secondary Scoring and Creation: Turner as a Limited Second Option
A glaring issue is Turner’s role as a potential second-leading scorer, especially after the Bucks traded Damian Lillard, leaving a void in perimeter creation and high-volume scoring. Turner’s career-high scoring is 18 points per game (from 2021-22), far below Lillard’s 25+ PPG output, and he’s more of a finisher than a self-creator, relying on screens and spot-ups rather than isolation plays. Analysts like those at The Athletic question whether Turner can handle the Bucks’ expectations to average more while maintaining two-way impact, noting that asking him to fill Lillard’s shoes could be overly demanding. Giannis has expressed excitement about Turner’s ability to shoot and drive, but reports suggest he’s internally questioning if Turner is a true championship-caliber second option.
This lack of secondary creation exacerbates the Bucks’ offensive predictability. Without a reliable playmaker to alleviate pressure on Giannis, the frontcourt duo might struggle in half-court sets against elite defenses. Pundits like Bill Simmons have called the signing “desperate,” arguing that paying Turner $27 million annually highlights deeper roster flaws rather than solving them. While the Giannis-Turner pick-and-roll has “scary” potential, the team’s offensive ceiling depends on a committee approach, which could lead to inconsistent production if Turner under performs.
Defensive Schemes: Strengths in Rim Protection but Vulnerabilities in Versatility
Defensively, the pairing shines in theory: Giannis is arguably the best help defender in NBA history, and Turner has led the league in blocks multiple times, providing elite rim protection. Turner’s mobility is an upgrade over Lopez, allowing for better switching and perimeter pressure, potentially enabling aggressive schemes with Giannis roaming. However, Turner’s drop-coverage style exposes weaknesses in isolation match ups against quicker forwards or guards, where his foot speed can be exploited. Analysts point out that Turner isn’t a direct Lopez replacement on defence, and without addressing the Bucks’ past perimeter vulnerabilities, the duo alone won’t fix team-wide issues. Giannis is no longer the best help defender, he seems more concerned with wondering aimlessly about looking for a highlight block.
Coaching and Team Dynamics: Integration Under Doc Rivers and Roster Depth
Head coach Doc Rivers’ system is a potential mismatch, with critics on Reddit warning that his outdated schemes could hinder Turner’s impact, limiting the duo to regular-season success rather than playoff dominance. The Bucks’ front office views Turner as an “evolution” of Lopez, but integrating him requires chemistry-building, especially with a younger roster post-Lillard. Depth remains a red flag; as ClutchPoints notes, the Bucks lack enough support around Giannis, meaning Turner must be exceptional, not average, to open the championship window—potentially necessitating midseason trades.
Giannis’s media day comments didn’t fully ease future concerns, hinting at underlying doubts about the roster’s competitiveness. While Turner is excited about the fit and their early communication, the pressure on this duo to gel quickly is immense, given Milwaukee’s recent first-round exits.
Overall Assessment: High Upside with Significant Risks
The Turner-Giannis pairing offers tantalising potential—a mobile, two-way frontcourt that could dominate the paint and stretch defences. Yet, fit issues in spacing, creation, defensive versatility, and team integration make it a gamble. For the Bucks to succeed, Turner must elevate his game, the roster needs bolstering, and Rivers must adapt. Without these, this “wall of bigs” might crumble under playoff scrutiny, as sceptics like Simmons suggest. As training camp approaches, watch for preseason chemistry; it could determine if this duo propels Milwaukee back to contention or exposes deeper flaws.Look, I get the excitement—the Bucks have talent for days, and if everything clicks, this front court could be special. Giannis is a generational force, and adding Turner’s defence addresses a key weakness. But labelling it an “unmatched trio” that will “reshape the East” ignores the NBA’s complexities. Spacing issues, defensive mismatches, creation gaps, injury woes, integration hurdles, and stiff competition make this more gamble than guarantee.
Giannis’ Inherent Limitations: Challenges for Any Teammate
Giannis Antetokounmpo, despite being one of the most dominant names in the NBA, possesses limitations that inherently make it challenging for any teammate to thrive alongside him, including someone like Turner. His subpar outside shooting—career 28.9% from three on low volume—forces defences to sag off him, clogging driving lanes and reducing spacing for others, which particularly hampers bigs who also prefer interior play and requires a supporting cast heavy on elite shooters to open up the floor. Furthermore, Giannis’s heliocentric playing style, where he handles the ball extensively (usage rate often above 30%), demands complementary pieces who excel in spot-up shooting and off-ball movement, limiting the effectiveness of players without strong perimeter skills and reducing opportunities for teammates to cut or create independently. His inconsistent free-throw shooting (around 70% career) invites “Hack-a-Giannis” strategies in crunch time, disrupting team rhythm and putting undue pressure on others to compensate during high-stakes moments. These factors create a roster-building puzzle, as analyses note how his approach maximises his own impact but can stifle team dynamics, making it tough for non-specialised players to fit seamlessly and often leading to frustrations in playoff scenarios where adaptability is key. You can’t blame it all on Doc Rivers!
As fans, we love bold predictions, but smart analysis demands balance. The Bucks could contend, but they’re not locks for the top. Keep an eye on training camp reports and early games— that’s where the real story unfolds. Check them when the going gets tough, in clutch, against better teams.
Over the last regular season, Milwaukee frequently began the final period with Giannis on the bench due to rotation planning under Coach Doc Rivers. During these stretches, the Bucks’ offense has shown surprising efficiency, posting positive net ratings and often building or maintaining leads before Giannis returns. Observers have noticed that lineups featuring Damian Lillard, or in the past Khris Middleton, and Brook Lopez allow for more spacing and ball movement, as the team often leans into a pick-and-roll-heavy approach and quick perimeter offence.
Three-point shooting success and better ball movement often mark these Giannis-less stretches, with role players stepping up to maintain pace and defensive intensity.
Milwaukee’s defensive rebounding and transition play also tend to improve, leading to quick scoring bursts that frustrate opponents.
Substitution Patterns and Mid-Quarter Swings
Midway through the fourth, Giannis is typically reintroduced, intended to stabilize and close out tight games. However, this move sometimes coincides with a downturn in offensive momentum:
Opponent defenses collapse in the paint, limiting Giannis’s drives.
Bucks’ spacing decreases as Giannis operates inside, sometimes attracting double teams and leading to stagnant perimeter offense.
Several game logs and fan recaps highlight occasions where the Bucks’ lead diminishes following Giannis’ return, as opponents ramp up their scoring against reconfigured rotations.
Teams adjust their coverage, intensity increases, and Milwaukee sometimes struggles with late-game execution and turnovers. Giannis doesn’t adapt. He can’t.
Game Examples and Fan Frustration
In the February 20th game against the Clippers, for example, Milwaukee surged in the early fourth quarter while Giannis was under a minutes restriction. The supporting cast led a rally that was only challenged once Giannis returned, with the Clippers mounting a comeback. Similar patterns have been documented on Bucks fan forums, sparking debate about substitution timing and the best offensive approach in high-stakes moments.
Many fans attribute this trend to Doc Rivers’ rotations, which sometimes disrupt offensive rhythm and make the Bucks more predictable late in games. This is a completely inaccurate take.
The frustration is amplified when Giannis’s re-entry is followed by scoring droughts or failed defensive stands. Which is not a random event. It happens everytime. Giannis is a ball hog and there is no advanced system he understands.
Understanding the Phenomenon: Beyond the Numbers
Statistically, Milwaukee’s net rating overall is higher with Giannis on the floor, but the nuance of fourth-quarter substitution patterns paints a more complex picture. These situational surges reflect not a flaw in Giannis, but the multifaceted nature of NBA lineup chemistry:
Role players thrive in the open system created by Giannis’s absence, taking on greater playmaking duty and spreading the floor.
Defences are less able to load up in the paint, freeing shooters and creating rapid ball movement sequences.
So yes, Giannis is the problem
While the Bucks are generally stronger with Giannis, the fourth quarter “surge-then-slowdown” phenomenon is real and supported by both game logs and widespread fan observation. This nuance should inform future coaching decisions, with a blend of non-Giannis lineups and better-utilized closing rotations potentially unlocking Milwaukee’s explosive late-game potential.
By understanding why and how these patterns emerge, fans and analysts gain a richer picture of the Bucks’ crunch time identity in a season defined by fascinating ups and downs.Recent Bucks seasons have featured a surprising trend: Milwaukee often performs better during the opening minutes of the fourth quarter when Giannis Antetokounmpo is on the bench, only to see momentum shift after he returns. This phenomenon, widely discussed in fan forums and supported by select game logs, raises questions about rotation strategy, offensive chemistry, and Milwaukee’s best crunch-time approach.
How This Trend Plays Out
Doc Rivers’ substitution patterns often have Giannis resting to start the fourth quarter. During these minutes, the Bucks’ lineup—with Lillard, Middleton, Lopez, and agile reserves—tends to play faster, lean into high-volume three-point shooting, and show improved ball movement. Their defensive rebounding also stabilizes, fueling quick transition buckets. Multiple times last season, these lineups outperformed the opposition, either growing leads or closing deficits.
Bucks role players take on greater offensive responsibility, exploiting space and pick-and-roll mismatches.
Transition play and perimeter shooting become more prominent, reducing opponent scoring and sometimes flipping the momentum.
The Giannis Re-Entry Paradox
As Giannis checks in midway through the fourth, a pattern emerges: opposing teams often ramp up scoring and Milwaukee’s offensive flow can stall. With Giannis on the floor, defenses collapse into the paint, sometimes bogging down the Bucks’ spacing and making ball movement more predictable. Whether the issue is increased defensive attention, fatigue, or sluggish rotations, the Bucks’ net rating tends to stall or even decline during these minutes. Games such as the February 20th win over the Clippers exemplify this—Milwaukee’s best fourth-quarter surge came while Giannis was resting, and the lead diminished after his return.
Defensive urgency from opponents increases during Giannis stints in the closing minutes.
Bucks struggle to get open looks and sometimes post lower fourth-quarter shooting percentages.
Giannis goes to his predictable moves the more desperate he gets. It doesn’t work.
Fan Reaction and Debate
Fan frustration over Doc Rivers’ rotation decisions became a consistent storyline. Many Bucks followers pointed out that Milwaukee’s quick ball movement and balanced scoring work optimally when Giannis is off the floor, while reintroducing him late can slow the offense and invite comeback runs from opponents. Whether the cause is substitution rhythm, defensive adjustment, or playcalling, the fourth-quarter splits remain a major point of discussion.
Interpreting the Data
While overall net ratings heavily favour Giannis’ presence across the season, these fourth-quarter bursts—when the game is fast and Giannis is off the floor—reveal the complexity of crunch-time basketball. The Bucks are not truly “better” overall without Giannis, but they do have specialised situations where secondary lineups generate unique advantages, and understanding these moments could help the team optimise future closing rotations. Giannis is not known for his basketball IQ nor for quick thinking in clutch situations. He often makes mistakes, turnovers and he can’t screen to save his life. Let him play his heart out in the easier games and easier situations.
This recurring fourth-quarter story is more than just anecdotal: it’s a tactical subplot that continues to shape Milwaukee’s late-game identity. By learning from these patterns, the Bucks could unlock even greater closing efficiency—combining Giannis’s strengths with lineups that maximise ball movement and outside shooting in the game’s most pivotal moments. But it is safe to say they can keep him on the bench longer. It would be great if they could copy what coach Spanoulis did with him in the Greek National team but truth be told it would not work with the much higher level of play in the NBA where more players can shut down Giannis effectively on their own.
Milwaukee Bucks fans are at it again. As the 2024-25 season wrapped up with another frustrating early playoff exit— a first-round flameout against the Pacers after scraping into the postseason as the East’s No. 5 seed at 48-34—the scapegoat du jour is Doc Rivers. Social media is ablaze with calls for his firing, memes about his “clutch-time meltdowns,” and hot takes blaming everything from his rotations to his post-game pressers. But let’s pump the brakes. Doc Rivers isn’t the villain here. He’s a championship-winning coach (2008 with the Celtics, remember?) who’s now saddled with a .548 winning percentage in Milwaukee despite inheriting a roster that’s equal parts superstar talent and glaring mismatches. The real culprit? Giannis Antetokounmpo. Yeah, the two-time MVP, Finals MVP, and perpetual All-NBA freak of nature. His limitations—stubborn refusal to evolve his game, a personality that keeps potential teammates at arm’s length, and a playing style that’s tailor-made for 82-game stat-padding but crumbles under playoff pressure—are the anchors dragging this franchise down. It’s time to stop with the excuses and face the music: Giannis is a regular-season monster who vanishes when the lights get brightest.
Doc Rivers: The Fall Guy for a Flawed Star System
Hired mid-2023-24 after Adrian Griffin’s abrupt firing, Doc Rivers walked into a pressure cooker. The Bucks were 30-13 under Griffin, but whispers of locker-room discord and defensive lapses were already swirling. Rivers steadied the ship somewhat, finishing that season at 13-7 after a rocky 5-6 start in his tenure. Fast-forward to 2024-25: 48 wins, a top-11 offense (115.5 PPG), and a middling defense (113.0 PPG allowed)—hardly the apocalypse. His overall Bucks record? A pedestrian 66-54.
Fans point to Doc’s “poor adjustments” in the playoffs—like last year’s second-round debacle against the Celtics in 2024, where Milwaukee got swept in five after Giannis’ calf injury sidelined him for two games. But even when healthy, Rivers’ teams have overachieved relative to talent. In Boston, he won 56 games with a balanced roster; in Milwaukee, he’s squeezing blood from a stone. As one insider noted ahead of 2025-26, Rivers is “uniquely qualified” to maximise this group’s defence, yet the Bucks’ interior personnel (hello, Giannis and Lopez) hasn’t translated to elite stops because the offence stalls in crunch time—more on that later.
Blame Doc if you want rotation roulette or sideline suits, but he’s not the reason the Bucks are 11-17 in the playoffs since their 2021 title run. That’s on the guy whose name is on the marquee.
Giannis’ Game: All Gas, No Brakes—And No Jumper
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a walking highlight reel: 6’11”, freight-train athleticism, and stats that scream superstar. Career regular-season averages? 23.9 PPG, 9.9 RPG, 4.9 APG on freakish efficiency. In 2024-25, he bumped that to 30.4 PPG and 11.9 RPG, finishing second in scoring. But playoffs? That’s where the mask slips. Career postseason: 27.0 PPG and 12.2 RPG—impressive volume, sure, but on brutal efficiency. His true shooting dips to 56% from 61% in the regular season, and his three-point volume craters (1.5 makes on 4.0 attempts at 38%, vs. 29% career). Teams pack the paint, dare him to shoot, and he obliges with wild drives that yield turnovers or contested bricks.
The real indictment? Clutch time. In his last seven playoff games (spanning 2024-25’s first-round exit), Giannis averaged 29.9 PPG but on laughable 53/25/60 splits—53% FG, 25% from three, 60% FT—and a 56% TS. That’s not elite; that’s inefficient heroism. Critics have roasted him for years: In 2020, he “choked” against the Heat by settling for jumpers instead of attacking; in 2023, Miami’s zone exposed his lack of shooting, forcing 20+ FT attempts per game (he shot 63% from the line). Even in the 2021 Finals, his 50-point closeout was iconic, but it masked a series of inefficient outbursts (e.g., 34 points on 28 shots in Game 4).
At 30, Giannis hasn’t grown. No reliable mid-range, no pull-up game, no off-ball movement. He’s a one-dimensional bulldozer who pads stats in open-floor regular-season romps but gets neutralized when schemes tighten. As one analyst put it, “Giannis is the only severely limited player of that caliber in the NBA,” and opponents exploit it ruthlessly. Doc can’t coach evolution into a guy who’s won two MVPs without bothering to add a jumper. He can’t screen either. Hell, he can’t even understand more advanced plays and dumbs down the entire team.
The Lone Wolf: Why Superstars Ghost the Bucks
Giannis’ personality doesn’t help recruitment. He’s infamously antisocial with rivals—refusing offseason workouts with other NBA players because it “takes off his edge.” In a league where chemistry is king (think Curry-Draymond or LeBron-AD), this “me vs. the world” vibe screams red flag. He doesn’t train with active players, doesn’t build bonds; it’s all business, no buddies. Damian Lillard joined in 2023, sure, but that was a salary-dump necessity, not a dream team-up. Dame’s fit was clunky—pick-and-rolls fizzle because Giannis clogs the lane—and whispers of friction emerged by mid-2025.
Other stars? Crickets. Why join a small-market grind where you’re the sidekick to a ball-dominant alpha who won’t pass out of doubles? Trade rumours swirl around Giannis himself—recent “very real” talks with the front office about his future—but no superstar is lining up for Milwaukee. As one Bucks beat writer noted, even Giannis knows trades happen to “superstars” if the front office falters, yet his isolated style makes building a superteam feel impossible. In an era of player empowerment, who’d choose iso-ball in the Deer District over Hollywood glamour?
Bucks Nation has a PhD in deflection. Let’s run through the classics:
Coaches Are the Cancer: Budenholzer “couldn’t adjust” in 2023 (fired after a first-round loss). Griffin was “too green” in 2024 (axed after 43 games). Now Doc’s “clueless rotations” and “awful clutch offense” get the boot. Reality? Three coaches in four years, same result: playoff no-shows. The constant? Giannis’ unchanged game.
Front Office Fiascos: Jon Horst gets roasted for trading Jrue Holiday for Lillard (a net loss in defense and vibes) or not surrounding Giannis with shooters. Fair, but Horst built the 2021 champs. Blaming execs ignores that no GM can fix a star who won’t shoot threes.
Refs Robbing Us Blind: “The league hates Milwaukee!” cries after every foul call (or non-call) on Giannis’ drives. But his 60% FT in playoffs? That’s on him, not zebras.
Injuries Are Curses: Giannis’ 2024 calf tear, Middleton’s endless ankles, Lillard’s groin—valid hurdles, but they’ve played 70+ games each in 2024-25. Excuses don’t win series.
Roster Rejects: “We need shooters!” Sure, but adding Portis and Crowder hasn’t moved the needle because Giannis’ gravity pulls defenders inward, killing spacing.
These aren’t conspiracies; they’re shields against the truth. As Kevin Garnett bluntly said, Doc’s struggles stem from “the players,” not his schemes—every roster can’t play for him, but Giannis’ limitations amplify flaws everywhere.
Time to Trade the Freak? A Reckoning for Milwaukee
The Bucks’ 2021 ring was lightning in a bottle—health, grit, and a perfect storm. Since? Four straight playoff disappointments: ECF loss in 2022, first-rounders in ’23 and ’24, and another quick exit in ’25. Giannis is the common denominator: a stat-sheet stuffer who feasts on regular-season cupcakes (30+ PPG on fast breaks) but wilts when schemed against. His “clutch block” in 2021 was magic; his 2025 closeouts were duds.
Doc Rivers might not be the saviour, but firing him now is just another excuse. The real fix? A hard reset around a star who can actually grow—or trade the one who won’t. Bucks fans, your loyalty is admirable, but denial is deadly. Face it: The Greek Freak’s limitations aren’t fixable by coaching tapes or trades. They’re baked in. Until Milwaukee admits that, the parade dreams stay on hold.
If you’re reading this in Milwaukee, stock up on therapy sessions. Stop sharing his points/assists/rebound numbers. We all know they are rigged for him, the entire team helping him get those numbers and sacrificing their own. Stop shouting “when he gets a jumper…” he never will. Or “wow, what a dribble” in the one time it works out. Giannis can’t shoot. He can’t dribble (tops the leagues in palming and other errors.) He can’t pass, Sengun is 100% correct. Forget about that highlight mid season when it didn’t count. He has no court vision and no basketball IQ. Stop judging him from highlights against easy opponents and re-watch the tougher games. The truth hurts, but it’s the only path forward.
Giannis Antetokounmpo on SPORT24, this is the original article here. All rights reserved and all that Disclaimer stuff, not my text, all photos from there, click for the original, I am just translating for foreign readers.
Literally everything has been written and said about Giannis Antetokounmpo. Pleasant and unpleasant. He has been deified and leveled, like every great athlete. Who he is is up to each person to decide .
But surely, the megastar of the Milwaukee Bucks and the Greek National Team goes to bed at night proud of what he has accomplished, happy for what he has offered on and off the field, happy because he never stopped trying to make the next day better than the previous one.
A few days after winning the bronze medal at EuroBasket 2025 and just before returning to the USA for the 13th season of his professional career, the kid who just wants to play basketball visited SPORT24 for the biggest conversation of his life.
Because what you are about to read was definitely not an interview.
The relief for the medal, the slap in the face to Larentzakis, Spanoulis’s words, the question to Sloukas, the trade of Doncic and his future in the NBA, the Bucks of 2026, the discussion about the “best player in the world” and the very likely possibility that he will come to Europe in a few years to end his career here.
This and much more, in a unique 73-minute conversation, which you will watch again and again.
I’m fine, I’m happy, I’m healthy, my family is fine. We came 3rd in Europe, I’m having a good time. Nothing changes for me.
I try to be the same person in both defeat and victory.
I was definitely very happy because so many people were happy, and when I go out on the street or when my family goes out on the street, I feel the love.
They pass by my house and shout ”
Yiannara, you made us proud, well done ” and all that, ”
give your mother kudos for the way she raised you “
It doesn’t change anything. I come home, the moment I walk in the door, I become a dad.
I take my kids to school, pick them up from school, then home, they eat, and then if mom lets us, we go for a couple of hours and play basketball. Nothing changes.
Certainly, with the fact that we won, a weight was lifted off me, because I always wanted to have success with the National Team in my career and it’s something I was missing.
You saw it, the world saw it, how I reacted at the end, you’d say I three-peat with the Chicago Bulls
For many, my reaction was excessive. Not for people here from Greece, but for people from America, they can’t understand it.
But why, while they have started watching EuroBasket more, don’t they understand the culture more?
What bothers me is that you can’t tell someone what’s important to them and what’s not.
For me, winning MVP may be important, but winning something with the National Team is more important.
Sorry, but it is. Anyway, it doesn’t matter.
I’m happy, now I’m smiling, yes, because now I’m not playing.
When I’m focused and playing, I always want the job to get done.
I want to give my best, I want to help the team.
I believe that God has given me an opportunity and put me in a position and I never want to take advantage of that position or take it for granted.
I know I have a few years ahead of me and I want to achieve my dreams and goals.
Right now, whatever I’ve set my mind to, I’ve accomplished and now I’ve just realized that I like living under pressure and adrenaline.
I want to set goals in my life, fight and try to achieve them.
Now I’m going to push you a little, I want to look at a photo and I want to see if you remember when and where it was taken.
Giannis Antetokounmpo at the 24MEDIA offices, a few days after his selection in the Draft, summer 2013
I had hair.
Oh, yes, and you were a kid.
And you were still short, you hadn’t gotten it yet.
I was 2.06 then, yes.
It was a few days after the Draft, you hadn’t even been to America yet. A few days later you started this journey and now we’re just before your 13th season in the NBA.
The years passed, very quickly.
Let me show you what you said in that live chat we had.
https://iframely.shorthand.com/ORrrw8rY
My voice hasn’t changed.
Twelve years ago, you loved the National Team ever since. You’ve already spent 10 summers with it and have played in nine of the 11 tournaments you could have played in. And yet, there are still people who believe that in the summers you’ll look for a way not to come.
I have said one thing, so I am healthy and I can, I will always be available for the National Team.
The one summer I didn’t come, I had surgery on my right knee, and in 2017, when I couldn’t, I tried to come.
You came, but you were injured in a friendly against Montenegro in Belgrade.
I tried. Okay, it doesn’t matter what 10% or 5% or 1% of the world thinks.
I have played nine tournaments with the National Team, I wish I could play 15-20 tournaments
And I did what I wanted to do, win a medal for the National Team.
We left the cellar, we have more to go than the copper.
Yes, yes, yes, we have, we have. It is definitely very difficult.
Both Serbia and France are improving a lot.
So in 2027, which is two years away, you will have Canada, the USA, South Sudan, Australia.
Countries that are very dangerous and will be very good.
We need to improve too. We need to train, find kids, have good years and be ready in two years from now to come and help the team.
But let’s go back a little to what I said.
I’m glad I had the success with the National Team and we won the medal, I did it with my brothers, which, you understand, is even more special for me.
And I’m so happy for my mother, who was able to see this.
I can’t imagine, as a father of four children, what it’s like to see three of your children make their dreams come true and win something for a country I’ve been in for 30 years, my mother for 32-33 years.
I believe it was a unique moment for my mother and she enjoyed it more than anyone.
In Vegas, last December, we had a conversation after winning the NBA Cup. You told me ” I want to be healthy, I want to play, we want to get the medal and we’ll have a lot to talk about .” At that time, I felt that you had something in you, but I didn’t want to pressure you. Now that this success has happened, what is this “something” that we have to talk about?
Okay, as you’ve known me for 13 years now, I always try to talk on the field. After the games I don’t like to make statements.
In the NBA, it’s mandatory, if you don’t do them, you get fined and they take the money from your salary.
But whenever I have the chance and I don’t get a fine, I don’t want to talk, I don’t like it, I prefer to talk on the field, that’s the kind of kid I am.
I believe that…
Okay, anyway, it doesn’t matter.
It’s just that sometimes people don’t understand that being Antetokounmpo is also a burden.
Because I never wanted to be famous, I never wanted to play for the money, I wanted to play for my family, not me
You’ll never see me in an interview saying ” I want to have a better life .”
I always said I want my mother and father to have it, because I believe they deserve it, because they raised us the way they raised us and made all these sacrifices, and I want them to have a better life.
My father had time from 2013 when I was drafted until 2017 when he passed away, four years, to see me do what I love.
And Thanasis and Kostas and Alex.
He caught up with this better life, he saw what I was able to offer.
I went to a public school, down in Sepolia, where I finished elementary, middle, and high school. The two younger brothers, Kostas and Alex, went to a private school.
I was in a position where I was able to offer this to my siblings, my father saw it, that’s enough
It’s not like he only saw me on the field.
He saw me grow from a child to a man, he met the woman of my life, whom I have married.
Okay, he didn’t meet my kids.
Anyway, I went too far.
Being Giannis Antetokounmpo isn’t all about the good, it also comes with a burden
You have to be right, you have to be a role model for the children.
You have to be able to inspire the next generation by being authentic and being low-key, that helps a lot.
And anyway, I’ve heard everything. Your friends write it down (laughs). I’ve heard everything.
You read everything.
Yes, I read them all, because they boost my morale, I get courage, I get motivation.
I get motivation because I’m like that, like a child, I like challenges.
I like being told I can’t do it, I go out there and give it my all.
I don’t believe there will ever be a game that you’ll play or watch after 5-6 years, 10 years, where I don’t give it my all, don’t sweat, or have a breather.
There are games where I can’t breathe because I give it my all, but I’ve certainly heard everything, that I don’t deserve to be in the National Team, that I don’t deserve to have a Greek passport, that I don’t.
That I can’t play in Europe because the European style is different.
This was ten years ago, of course.
Okay, I’ve heard of them though.
I’m glad that the 1% of the world or some journalists who say these things are the same ones who have helped me be in the position I am in today.
To be very tough mentally and to have made all my dreams come true.
I’ll ask you something as Haris, not as a journalist. In Slovenia, if you say that Luka is not the best in the world, they might beat you up. The same in Serbia with Jokic. In Greece, many say that Luka is the best, Jokic is the best. Doesn’t it seem a little strange to you?
Look, it’s the eye test.
And it’s what you like, what you prefer.
The public here in Greece may like a player who passes well.
With you, but you are our child.
Yeah, okay, it doesn’t work like that.
I might not be one of the best players in the world in five years.
They won’t say that Giannis is the best player in the world. But then again, it’s everyone’s preference.
The top five players I think are Luka, Jokic, SGA, Tatum and me
And it depends on the year you are doing it.
So if I, let’s say, go back this year and I’m improved and I help my team win the East and we go to the final and we play against whatever team is there, I automatically become the best player in the world.
But if Luca does it, he becomes the best player in the world.
If Jokic does it, he’s the best player in the world.
When you get to that point, what is your preference? What do you like to see?
My preference has always been to see a player who will not only be a good player, but will also be an example for his teammates in behavior.
It’s not enough to just score goals to be a leader, it also counts in the locker room how you are and on the bus, and when you eat as a team, how you are, how you behave.
Anyway, whoever has the best year will be the best player.
My preference is two-way players. I like one player, Anthony Edwards, I like him a lot.
I like Anthony Davis, see what I mean?
I mean, I like Leonard, I like him a lot.
I like players who can play both defense and offense and are dogs.
When we enter the field, know that they will always give 100%, they may not play well, but they will always give 100%.
Some people like shooters, others like passers, some people who have a very high IQ, the sharp-shooters.
Anyway, what I have to say is that preference doesn’t matter.
Maybe here in Greece they think I’m not the best player in the world, and right now I’m not saying I’m the best player in the world either.
Do I believe I’m one of the best? Yes, I’ve believed it for the last eight years, but it’s with the year.
If I have a good year and help my team be successful, then I believe I will come out on my own and say that I am the best player in the world.
You once got angry with a question I asked you during Covid. It was after a match in Miami and I asked you if as you get older you have to learn not to play at 100% all the time. In that match you were worn out with offensive fouls. You got angry and you answered me ” I only know how to play at 100% “. That was your answer. I’ll ask you this question again. How easy is it when you’ve learned for so many years to bring your A-game every night, to take more care of your body?
Look, I’ll tell you one thing.
I can’t stop playing at 100%, I don’t know, that’s how I’ve learned, I don’t know if it’s even possible
Last year I changed my game a bit, I shot a few more two-pointers, mid-range.
I hope as I grow older I can shoot three-pointers.
But I have learned one thing that helps me.
In the past, I played 100%, but I also trained 100%, meaning, in training I was even worse than what you saw in the game.
And for me and for all basketball players you can ask, training is much harder than playing.
In training, the coach allows fouls, do you understand?
So you make a mistake, he stops training, yells at you, curses at you, takes you out, kicks you out of training.
In the game, you can’t kick me out. That means I’m wrong, we continue, the game continues.
Training is more difficult.
I learned from Coach Ziva that to get a lot, you have to give a lot. Do you understand?
What you give, you get.
Now I’ve reached a point where I play in red all the time, not that I don’t train, I just train smarter.
I take better care of my body, I rest more, instead of training for eight hours or six or four in a row, I might do one and a half and then come back in the evening to do another one and a half.
I have learned to take better care of my body and train smarter.
This in the game helps me play 100% and not put so much wear and tear on my body.
In December, I’m going back to Vegas, you told me – and this was a statement that went around the world – that you were thinking about and that you wanted to play five years in Europe because it would be different for you and your body and you would enjoy a different game. Do you really believe that? Do you see it happening?
Yes. Last year, after the pre-Olympic, I was sitting with Thanasis, as I told you, we were watching some highlights and I said to him ” hey Thanasis …”.
Look now, he was looking at me like I was crazy.
The best player in the world, one of the best players in the world, to come and play in Europe?
Is this happening, my child?
Of course it can be done.
If you told Jokic he would get about the same money and be in Serbia, he would do it.
Okay, I think about my body a lot. Of course the amounts are very different and not just the amounts.
The organization is completely different, you’ve come to the NBA, you’ve seen how things are.
But every year I play for the National Team, I always say the same thing.
I told my wife too.
I say to her, ” What do you prefer, staying in Greece or going to Milwaukee? “
He looks at me, says ” in Athens, in Athens, it’s good in Athens .”
I say, ” Okay, think about it .”
I believe the game is much more physical here.
You take more punishment, but there are no bodies to punish you. Do you understand?
It’s a little more insidious.
Yes, it’s more insidious. It’s a little dirtier, but there’s no Duren from Detroit.
There’s Segev from Israel, who will elbow you in the middle, but you’ll get past him.
Yes, it’s not Adebayo, it’s not Steven Adams, it’s not Zach Eddy, it’s not Anthony Davis, it’s not Jaren Jackson.
I can tell you names now until tonight.
You’re kidding, but for me they just don’t have the same bodies here in Europe.
And maybe the wood is a little less.
So you see it happening. Is it possible at all?
Yes, this is where Messi went to MLS, he went to Miami
If the right specifications and timing are there, it doesn’t affect me at all.
I’m holding Athens – Milwaukee. You didn’t tell me Barcelona, Monaco, Milwaukee, you told me Athens – Milwaukee.
You got it.
A while ago you said that you went to a public school, where you were a classmate of Giannoulis Larentzakis. Is that right?
Yes, I was a classmate with him for a year and a half.
Everyone talked about this incident in Thessaloniki, everyone analyzed it, everyone did a psychogram. Now tell me, what happened?
Nothing happened.
You see, in the next game Larry was throwing me a bone, in the locker room we were ass and pants.
We’ve been like this since we were little kids, we’ve played in many tournaments together.
I didn’t throw it at him as hard as it seems, I really mean it, I didn’t throw it at him that hard.
We talked, we finished it, we laughed, that was it, it wasn’t anything.
But isn’t it amazing when you’re Giannis, when you’re such an important person, that something very small becomes so big?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. But I didn’t like it, it wasn’t right the way it happened.
And I was very sad, because it’s not just that I see it, Larry and I are friends – and Larry has slapped me more than I’ve slapped him.
It’s that we, two friends, gave anyone the right to talk about our relationship and say ”
if Giannis had it in for me, I would have punched him .”
And for all those who say this, you should know that I’m 2.10 and 115 kilos.
No one would slap me, because before you could reach me, Thanasis would have jumped in front of you and Kostas, you saw what happened with Valantsiounas.
We are three brothers who have slept in the same bed, worn the same shoes, worn the same clothes, eaten, had a loaf of bread, cut it to share.
You can’t understand.
To be on the field at the same time playing and me passing a pass to my brother to shoot and someone hitting him?
You don’t see, you forget the game.
You really forget about the game and try to protect your brother as best you can.
But Larry and I, guys, are friends.
I won a medal with my siblings and with the other kids, but the fact that I won a medal with my classmate is also very important.
We talked and we were both saddened by what was said, by the fact that I pushed.
Let’s go back to the National Team. You made this bronze look like gold and you did it with your good mood, with your smile. How difficult was this whole journey? No one believed in you. Or at least, almost no one.
Of course, they didn’t believe us. Some people said we weren’t even in the top ten in Europe, I saw that too.
They put us 8th in the power rankings, they said we wouldn’t be able to cope, they said about Olympiacos, about Panathinaikos, Giannis can’t, he’s not a leader, he doesn’t speak, we saw it all
I remember the first day I went to training.
I looked at coach Spanoulis, I said to him ” coach, we’re good “. He said to me ” I’ve built the team the way it should be, I’ve put shooters in, they’re all shooters “.
I tell him ”
Come on, coach, I’ll do it myself “
I think he built a very good team, but that was the beginning, then it’s the players who make the difference.
From the first moment I entered the locker room, I went straight to Sloukas and talked to him. I said to him, ” What do you see? ” He said, ” I believe it .”
I tell Sloukas ”
if you believe it once, I believe it a thousand times more, this is our year “
Every year, I say this for the first time, every year I play for the National Team, I always think of Nick Calathes, I think of Papanikolaou, every year, I’m like this like a child.
I always say ” let’s make it, because these kids deserve to get a medal” .
This year was the first year, I also told Papanikolaou that, who said ”
guys, I want the medal, I want it “
I knew that we hadn’t won a medal in 16 years.
The coach wanted it too, but above all, before that, before I thought about anything, I said ” I want it, I want it, I want to achieve this success .”
I entered the preparation very focused and I think I set an example for everyone, that ” guys, I’m not here to waste my summer, nor to play games, we’re here to get better, to be focused and to focus on ourselves .”
I was saying that we are a small flame that will be very difficult to extinguish.
If we’re all on the same page, we’ll do well.
And if you look at the entire tournament, beyond the match against Bosnia that we would have actually won if I had played, but even without me playing we would have won if it counted, we lost one game, against Turkey.
There they extinguished the flame a little.
They didn’t wipe it out for us, because in the end you always have to end the tournament with a win.
And playing on the last day of the tournament.
Yes, playing on the last day of the tournament, which we hadn’t done for 16 years, and ending with a victory.
Okay now, whether it’s gold or bronze, it didn’t matter at all, because as a national team we have won six medals in our history and we won one this year.
And we have tournaments ahead of us and we’re improving and we believe more that we can go and make a splash.
If you look at 2022, when Germany beat us, they came in 3rd.
We would have won it if we had beaten them in that match. I really believe it.
Look, to tell you the truth, Spain got it because it deserved it.
But we had beaten them that summer.
We had beaten them, we had beaten them by 20 points at OAKA. But I want to tell you something.
The Germans who beat us, came in 3rd and then went on to win the World Cup, then came in 4th at the Olympic Games and then went on to win the EuroBasket.
For what reason?
Because I believe that the medal gives you strength, it gives you motivation, it makes you believe.
After 2021 when we won the championship, every year I believed I would win.
Every year. This thing, I don’t know, makes you feel like a superhero and a maniac.
And right now I believe that this medal will also make it to our National Team.
I hope we are healthy in 2027, we will be here to go and play.
Will the coach be there?
I have no idea…
Okay, I don’t want to embarrass you. But I want you to tell me about the coach, what have you experienced? A conversation he has told you, that you have never discussed.
You’re not putting me in an awkward position.
I will say one thing, our collaboration with coach Spanoulis was AWESOME, from the first day we came into contact, from the first phone call.
I am a person who always says that you should do what is best for yourself and your family.
I wish we could continue together, but he will do what is best for his family.
Who am I to tell him what, that doesn’t exist.
I like it because it motivates me and tells me the truth.
He’s cruel to you, people don’t know that.
He’s very harsh on me and he knows I can handle it.
Because he understands that we are all the same, that we are dogs, that we are warriors, that when someone says we can’t, we go and prove to them that we can and that we have no fear when the time comes.
That we are not afraid because we have prepared so much, we have put in so many hours of work and we are ready.
I liked one thing, he told me throughout the preparation, ” I see it in your eyes, in your eyes, we will succeed .”
I don’t talk much, I was always nodding my head, saying ” yes coach, yes, yes, yes, yes “.
He tells me ” I don’t care, I don’t care, I can see it in your eyes, this is our year, we will make it, I can see it in your eyes “
And you know, when someone tells you, you start to believe it.
And he kept telling me that and I believed it more. Then, I believed it even more.
After the match with Turkey…
In my morning training, I have a routine where I sit for 5-10 minutes and just try to tell myself ” don’t take this moment for granted in life, having this pressure is nice, it’s a beautiful thing, go out on the field and give it your all because you have your family .”
He came next to me and told me some things, helped me understand what I had to do in the match against Finland to help my team win.
And at that moment, I didn’t tell him, but he’ll see now, it helped me a lot.
Many athletes say that in the finale, the feeling of relief is much greater than the feeling of happiness.
Yes… I felt relieved…
You didn’t celebrate. When Kostas and Thanasis caught you, you simply closed your eyes and let yourself be carried away in their arms, before what followed followed. You didn’t celebrate.
I know, I know…
Even when I won the championship, I didn’t celebrate.
I went straight to the locker room, put my hands up, hugged my mother, my brother, my wife, then sat on the bench.
Then you saw what happened, I cried, I cry a lot, I don’t know why.
Then I went to the locker room and called Thanasis. That was it.
Now that we won the medal, my brothers hugged me, which was a very beautiful moment and a very beautiful photo came out that I will frame at home and I just had a moment where I said ” well, he came, he came, okay, he came and a weight was lifted off me “.
But what weight? I’m putting the weight on, because I want it so much
And then I went live, we listened to Lex, we listened to Light, Thanasis played some songs, Sloukas was dancing.
Chaos, chaos ensued, the coach spoke, they were pouring champagne in the locker room, we were all soaked.
I sat down, that was it.
And then I went and was a dad, I went to the hotel and was a dad again.
Since you’re talking about victories, for Pantelis Vlachopoulos, the greatest moment in the history of SPORT24 in the 20 years we’ve been around – and we’ve been here for many of those 20 years – was this video that we’re going to watch.
https://iframely.shorthand.com/nolWXtTz
You went viral…
I don’t know if you’ve seen this video.
No, first time.
I’m moved, it was a terrible moment, remember, closed borders due to Covid, we had put in a lot of effort to be there. But I will always remember a thing you said, that you are a pleaser and that you want to make the people around you happy. And at least my life, you have changed it. You make your dreams come true, that’s how I’ve been making mine for so many years. And we thank you very much. Fortunately, you came today so that we could overcome that moment with something even greater. Has there come a time when you said ” man, I can’t carry this burden “?
Yes, of course. Okay, I’ve said this before.
Pressure is a privilege, but I’ve realized that now, in my 30s or 28, 29, 30.
In recent years, earlier, when I was a kid, there were times when I would go to the stadium and I didn’t even want to step on the court.
The match would end and I would say, ” Well, this match ended well. I’m going home to my child, I can’t do it anymore .”
Or after a Lakers game I was sitting with my brothers, I said to them ” Guys, I can’t play basketball anymore, I don’t know, for some reason now it’s become like a job, I don’t enjoy it like I used to “
Why you get into a routine, it’s not just your environment that does it, the environment will definitely do it as if it were a routine.
It’s a job, you have to be Giannis Antetokounmpo every day and get on the court and be the best and put up 30 and get them on your back and win the championship and all that, which the environment certainly does that, but then you do it to yourself.
Because if you’re a perfectionist and you always want to be one of the best, I might not say it, but I think it in my head.
I want to be among the best, I always want to be there.
There was a time when I saw it as a job and I spoke to a sports psychologist, we’ve been talking for seven years now and he has helped me a lot in my way of thinking, not only in the sports aspect, but also in life as a dad, as a husband, as a brother, as a son, as a person in general.
And it completely changed my mindset, you have to find joy.
I remember one day I was in the locker room and a teammate of mine, I don’t want to say his name, said to me, ” if you come in today and this player punches you in the face, I mean, you’ll be everywhere, they’ll put you on social media, you’ll be everywhere, they’ll laugh .”
And I tell him ” that’s not true, the way you’re thinking is very wrong, because I could punch him in the face or cut him off, so I’ll be everywhere .”
I found joy in what I do again from 2022 onwards.
And now I’m in the best phase of my life, not only in the way I think, but also in my body and the way I play.
I like it. I love basketball a lot and changing your environment sometimes helps you fall in love with basketball again.
Do you remember 2022? I had made a post with the National Team, that I had found the love for the sport again.
And the same this year and the same with the Olympics.
Every time I play for the National Team, I fall in love with basketball all over again because I understand what it is, why I do this thing.
Anyway, there are so many moments when I’ve said I want to give up, but don’t quit today.
If you gonna quit, don’t quit today, quit another day. You want to quit, ok, it’s ok. But, not today.
Score 30, score 50 and then quit, like Michael Jordan, three-peat and then quit
In 2015, you played a game with the Knicks in London. On that trip, I did an interview with Hakeem. He comes and says to me, “You’re from Greece.” I tell him, “yes.” He says to me, “You have Giannis, do you know if he’s of Yoruba descent?” I tell him again, “yes,” and he says, “I’m Yoruba too. This kid will become the best player in the world.” You worked with Hakeem. You worked with Garnett and Kobe. Tell me something that each of them has said to you. I’m mainly interested in what Kobe told you.
With Kobe…
I went to the stadium where his daughter was practicing. The practice was around 12, but since my flight was at 8:30, I had nowhere to go.
I arrived in Orange County, where he lived nearby, around 9, went to the stadium early and waited.
I stretched, I shot, I sat and waited.
When Kobe came and opened the door, it’s this thing that… The breeze, breeze, breeze…
He opened the door and walked towards me and it was as if everything was moving in slow motion.
I mean, imagine. God forbid. Imagine if Kobe or Jordan came in, you’d be in for a shock.
Are these 3, 5, 10 seconds that will be in slow motion and you’ll say, wait, wait, what’s going on here?
I wasn’t Giannis Antetokounmpo then, I wasn’t the player I am today, I was 22-23 years old and it was Kobe
It was Top5, Top10 of all time.
We talked about defenses, we talked about training.
He told me that I was one of his daughter’s favorite players and when he came he was embarrassed to talk to me.
You’re Kobe Bryant’s daughter, why are you ashamed?
He told me how to study defenses.
That it is very difficult for defenses to make adjustments in the NBA.
” Look at the previous three games and if the defenses playing those superstars are like this, get ready to face that defense too .”
And I say to him ” what if they change? “
He replied, ”
They don’t change, I’ve done it my whole career and I’ve destroyed them all, defenses don’t change .”
And I’m starting to see it.
And if you look from 2019, from Toronto, I’ve seen everything.
I’ve seen things that other players haven’t seen. Kobe was double-teamed, but they didn’t put a wall on him!
They always put the toughest guy on me, then comes the double-team, then there’s a wall from behind.
I’ve seen everything in my life. I’ve seen box-and-one, which is a four-man zone and one guy chasing me so I don’t get the ball.
Kevin Garnett now.
When you talk to Kevin Garnett, you feel like you can run through a wall, he’s incredible.
Hakim teacher, very relaxed, I don’t know what he was like when he played.
Kobe and Garnett were intense when I spoke to them, they were intense because they had recently retired.
Hakim had been retired for twenty years and was a little more relaxed, but a teacher.
He was awesome and whenever I play in Houston, he always comes and sees me, we still talk a lot about footwork.
Yes, of course I knew that we have the same origin and not only the same origin, the same number, everything, incredible.
I don’t like working with players who are playing right now.
I want to work with young people and with LeBron, for example. I could work with LeBron, but he’s still playing. I’ll see him in a month or two and he’ll be my opponent.
I like working with players who have retired. I think the next one is Carmelo Anthony, I would really like it, for the mid-range, for the face-jump, his game was very effortless, very easy, very relaxed.
What team has pushed you to your limits? I think the 2019 series against the Raptors is the first one that comes to mind. I remember you on the court looking for some oxygen. What other team has pushed you to your limits?
With Toronto I was young. If I was 27, 28, 26 to 30…
It was the first time I was in the top four, it was the first time I had been in such a big game, big stage, big series.
I was young, I was a kid, I was 24 years old.
I remember this series, but it helped me a lot, because that’s where the wall started.
This defense that I see, that has been made for me, started there and I don’t think Nick Nurse thought of it, but Scariolo.
And now you saw with Spain, the same thing again.
Miami is also a team that pushes me to my limits, because they have bodies, they have a culture that never gives up, they work very hard.
I believe that these series and these teams made me better.
It is these teams that have shaped who I am, shaped my character and helped me win the championship in 2021.
I was tougher as a player and as a person and in my mentality and everything.
I see these teams as helping me become who I am, just like Detroit helped Jordan become who he became.
If Detroit didn’t beat him up and there weren’t these Jordan Rules, he wouldn’t improve and he wouldn’t go for the three-peat.
Like me, it’s the same thing for me, okay, I didn’t get six championships, I got one.
Since you mentioned 2021, can you now that several years have passed, take us a little through the process after the injury in Atlanta, what followed until you stepped on the court again?
I came back after six days. I wasn’t 100%, but there was no other choice.
As I say to coach Vasilis who asks me ” are you hurting, are you hurting? “, it doesn’t matter if I’m hurting, I’ll play, what does it matter?
Why are you asking me if I’m in pain? Since I’m going to play, it doesn’t matter at all.
I still have it, it’s been four years and I still feel it.
For people working from home or watching online, you can go watch the moment.
I fell down, hurt my foot, went to the locker room and was walking, Thanasis helped me because my foot was upside down.
I went to the locker room with Thanasis and my leg was normal. They fix it, they do it like this, they tell me mmm…
I was listening to them. ” No, no, ” the doctors, the Americans, were saying. ” No, no, he can’t come back, ” something like that.
What do you mean? Did you want to get back into the match?
I’ll tell you, the GM comes and tells me ” John, finally, you’re not coming in .”
I grab his hand, pull it off me, tell him ” I’ll play! “
I walk outside, go to the goalie and when it was 14, I see Bogdanovic make a three-pointer for +17.
The third period was about to end and I said ” it’s 17, huh? So now I should rest, go back to Milwaukee and beat them there or go fight it out? “.
But they were holding me back, my manager, Alexis Saratsis, was holding me back, the GM was holding me back, the doctors were holding me back, I didn’t understand anything, I wanted to play.
And we get there, I see the three-pointer and I’m like, ” Oh, no, no, okay, let me go back to Milwaukee and rest, put some ice on it, do my treatments, eat well, see my family and get ready for Game 5. “
And I look at my leg as I say this and it’s doubled in size, wet everywhere, I’m like ” oh, what’s wrong with me? “
Anyway, I went home and because I’m very religious, I prayed with my mother, I cried a lot, I told her ” why me, why always me? “.
I was also injured with Miami, the previous year, in the bubble.
And he says to me, ” Because you are who you are and you are my child and I always knew, before you were born, that you would be great.”
I was crying, ” Leave me alone, Mom, leave me alone, Mom .”
He tells me ” no, we’ll pray .”
I prayed, I said, ” Please God, help me, I won’t take this moment for granted, help me come back, play, help my team if possible, if not, I understand .”
This is how it had to be done, this is how things had to be done. And okay, I didn’t stop for the next six days.
I slept two hours, two-three hours a day. I went to the pool and did gymnastics from 6 in the morning until night, I couldn’t walk, I couldn’t step on it.
Then, at night, I would hit it, then the next morning I would jog, then I would run a little more.
And then I had a thing over here so my leg wouldn’t bend at all.
What Tim Duncan and Dragic wore, I don’t know if you remember.
I said ” it doesn’t matter, I’ll play, I don’t care “.
They tell me ” if you play, you could get injured much worse and be out for a year, a year and a half, two years “
I don’t care, I’ll play. That helped me keep a very clear mind and when I came in and played in the first match, everyone was nervous and I was still saying it’s good that I’m playing.
So I was in a very different mindset than the others.
The others were stressed, it’s the final, I was saying ” six days ago I could have been out for two years “
And okay, in the first match I came in, I wasn’t 100% and we lost.
In the second match I got a little more confidence. I said ” okay, I can do it and I’m going to do it “.
We lost the match, but I scored 40.
Then in the 3rd match we won, I scored 40 again. The 4th match was very difficult.
Things weren’t going well, but given Giannis’s stats, any other player with 26/18/6 would have crossed the line and been very happy.
In the end, what happened happened. But I really like Game 5, because we played really good basketball, just like the game against Lithuania.
The game against Finland was really great, but the game against Lithuania was even better. We played really good basketball.
Kostas came in and was the X-Factor, Toliopoulos was very nice and aggressive, Samodurov took very nice shots, Papanikolaou was terrible in defense, Sloukas made very good choices, Kalaitzakis was terrible in defense.
I did my job, Thanasis had taken us all together. I liked this match, because this match had people.
I will remember Game 5.
We played really good basketball, Holiday was very aggressive, every choice was right, Middleton found me on every pick-and-roll, he made the shots.
We were down 18 points. We turned it around with three-pointers, the ball was going away too fast, no one was holding it.
Holiday takes the ball from Booker. You go and dunk, you go down and look at the camera. What did you feel in that moment? I think you must have gone to another world in that moment. The feeling must have been extreme.
It was a very nice feeling.
It was a moment that I knew cemented the victory, we locked it in, that’s why I looked at the camera.
I don’t celebrate much, I celebrated a little with my teammates.
The phase was a bit dangerous.
Paul’s foul was harsh. It was dirty, I’m saying it, you don’t have to say it. Your hand got stuck on the backboard too.
It’s a good thing I was able to hold on to the rim a little, because if I hadn’t, I would have been gone.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter, history was written and then, in Game 6, what happened happened.
I haven’t seen the last match, I won’t, I’ll see it when I retire.
I want you to tell me where you were and what you felt the night Luka Doncic was traded.
I was in therapy with a friend of mine, he tells me, ” John, Luka went to the Lakers .”
I say ” what are you saying, since he’s not a free agent, since he’s not free, how is he going to go to the Lakers, don’t bother me, let me watch the game now “.
And he answers me ” no, no, there was an exchange .”
Wait, where did the exchange take place?
He brings me the cell phone and I see that there was an exchange! I was shocked.
I won’t lie to you, I was kidding myself, I’m saying if Doncic was traded, everyone can be traded!
Doncic is one of the best players and last year he took his team to the final.
Get this out of your mind…
Of course it crossed my mind!
But you are not the same.
Yes, we’re not the same. But Luka, he’s Luka Doncic, guys. And in terms of age, he’s 25 years old.
But that’s how I live my life, I don’t take anything for granted.
Excuse me now. Has it ever crossed your mind that you might read your Twitter exchange? I don’t think that’s possible.
Look, I hope it never happens, but I’m still waiting for it.
Because it doesn’t mean that just because you’ve contributed to the team, the team won’t do what’s best for them.
It’s not always the owners themselves.
And when I say the owners, the presidents of the team now, they are not the same as the ones who won the championship, they are different.
And if Giannis doesn’t do it for me, can’t offer it to me, I’ll trade him.
I will do the best for my team and for my investment. Because I have put hundreds of millions into the team.
Surely, if I were flying in the clouds, I would say
“yeah, there’s no way I’m being traded, I’m Giannis Antetokounmpo”
Because I don’t fly in the clouds and I’m very normal, normal, down to earth, I say anything is possible, you never know.
Are you at a point in your career, in your life in particular, where you are more open to hearing another point of view, to thinking about a different possibility? To keep it short, you understand what I mean. Are you at this point in your career?
Now you’re talking about a team?
I’m saying it can change anything in your career.
One thing I want to say is that I like challenges.
I’ve realized that I like living with pressure. Is that good? Is that bad? I don’t know.
If I’m in an environment where there’s no pressure and I don’t believe we can achieve anything great, I don’t want to be there, things just go on.
It doesn’t make me happy anymore, as a person. When you get to 30 and you have four kids and you’re married, I think when you get married, you become more mature.
I want to do what makes me happy, because I believe I deserve it, because I have worked for it.
I want to do what makes me happy, and what makes me happy is winning and feeling like there’s a challenge.
To wake up in the morning and say ”
oh oh oh oh oh, we have to win today, if we don’t win today, what will we hear again? “
I mean, this, this thing.
This year you have a good challenge. The team is flying a little under the radar, but it could develop into a team that will play fun basketball. If you were the GM, how would you build the roster to get 100% from Giannis?
To get the best out of the team and to get the best out of me, I have to be a creator.
I need to feel like I can and do create.
If you look at the last two months of the team, where I had the green light, if I have the ball in my hands and I have that green light to create…
I don’t always have to execute, but I have to feel like I’m creating, that I’m part of the team and not just an executor, that I’m going in, I’m going to score 30, I’m going to get it in the post and I have to score it.
This is how my true self comes out, because that’s what I did at Filathlitikos and that’s what I always wanted to do.
And there were times when I did that in my career, but most of the time I was the executor.
In the last two months when I was more of a team creator, I had a good time.
I think the team did very well during that time.
We definitely don’t have a lot of experience, but we are young, we have legs, fresh legs.
We got a really good big man (Myles Turner). We got a good point guard, Cole Anthony, who I think will be an X-Factor and the surprise of the year.
Yes, there is a chance, definitely.
Slowly moving towards closure, I want to ask you about CAFF, first of all how much you miss your dad, how important this institution is to you and what it does.
I definitely miss my father. Not just me, the whole family.
I definitely know that he is looking down on us and is very proud of what we have accomplished and how we are like children and how we take care of mom.
It was also the first thing Kostas said after Finland, that if dad were here – and I think he was and posted a story about it on his social media – he would be very proud and happier than all of us.
We created a foundation in memory of my father to help people.
I am in this position because they helped me, not only me, but also my family, many institutions where my mother was registered and received fruit creams, diapers
The church helped us a lot.
We would go after school and he would always give us a plate of food before we went to practice.
Without these people we wouldn’t be here. And I’m trying to do the same, I’m trying to create a place, an environment where children and not just children, parents, can come and feel safe.
Because I remember when I went to church, to catechism, not only was I playing, it was also a way out of the house and I wasn’t at home when there was no light, no electricity, no water, I went to catechism and I felt safe.
I learned to play chess, to play board games.
He had a really nice basketball that I was shooting, I was there and I wasn’t on the streets.
If this hadn’t happened and I had grown up in Sepolia, Kolonos, Peristeri, Aigaleo, I might have done much worse things, because I may be low-key, but I am a child who would do everything in my power to help my family, just like so many people would do the same.
Now what would that be? I don’t know, it could be anything, anything
That’s why I want to create a place, an environment, with my family, where people will feel comfortable coming there, getting a plate of food, and playing.
To learn things, to give back to the world, as much as we can.
We have achieved this so far with the Academy that we have created and with many moves that we have made both in Greece and abroad.
And one thing I know is that my father, our father, because it’s not just me, it’s my siblings too, would be very proud of what we’ve done.
You don’t want to talk about your charity work and besides not wanting to advertise it, you don’t want us to talk about it either. And I think that’s enough to explain everything. Last question and I’m closing my papers because I have so many more. Tell me one thing you would do if you were prime minister for a month.
I keep my opinions to myself, but education would be free for everyone, for all children.
Why would someone have a better education? I mean, let’s say I was a very smart kid.
I have a crazy story to tell you. In the 2nd year of high school, I failed a class, History. I’ve never told this story.
Monday in high school, I’ve never stayed in the same class, I was pissed off, sorry for talking like that
My father used to tell me one thing, ” when you leave home you will go to school and after school you will come home before you go to practice, before you go to Triton to play, before you do anything. You will come home, I will see you .”
My father was strict, he had four boys and it had to be that way.
And he did a tremendous job because I’m so proud of my brothers and how they are, how they talk, how they behave, how they take care of their families, their wives.
I am very proud and very lucky to have these brothers, but this wouldn’t have happened if my father hadn’t been the way he was, he did a tremendous job and I wish I could do half the job.
My father used to say, ” I don’t care if you’re a good student, my boy, as long as you don’t have any absences .”
And I was like, ” Please, Dad, don’t worry, I won’t stay .”
Now that I’m older, I’ve realized that he just didn’t want us to get into trouble and be in the streets, on walks, in bad company.
Let’s say he didn’t want his children to get involved, and it’s very difficult for a dad who has come from another country to take care of his children in a foreign country where he doesn’t understand the language very well.
My father knew if it was possible for someone not to love people like us, foreign immigrants, he didn’t want them to corner us and beat us, break our legs, he didn’t know many people who could help him.
Anyway, I didn’t take many absences. I went to school, I was a smart kid.
On Monday of high school, I failed History and I go back home and say ” Dad “… He says ” What happened ?” I say ” Don’t be upset “, he says ” Okay “.
I tell him ” I missed a class “. He says ” Didn’t you study? ” I tell him ” Okay, I played a little basketball, I didn’t study much “.
He says to me, ” So what now, do you have to retake the class ?” I say, ” No, I have to retake it in September .”
Well, beyond all of that, I hope my kids have a better life than I had. What did I do? Second year of high school, I was 13, 14.
I would go and work with my mother because I was so scared, I didn’t want to stay, I didn’t want my father to get angry. I would go and work.
I tell her, ” Mom, because all the kids go to a daycare center behind the school, I want to go there .”
I went and spoke to someone myself and a lady told me it was 75 euros.
Seventy-five euros seemed like 20,000 euros to me then.
And I say, ” When we work together, can I save five euros, five-ten euros at a time, and then in September, can I go there for a week, take two or three lessons with her to pass the class? “
Anyway, I did it. I went, I passed the class, but what did I understand there?
I realized two things.
When I put my ass down and read and tried, I wrote 19 and passed.
And there I realized that if I had the freedom that all children had and didn’t work on the street and could go to a regular school that would help me, I would have a better chance.
Okay, I played basketball.
Many people from my neighborhood are still sending me messages asking me to help them.
What if I were… What if I were prime minister, it doesn’t matter.
I’m in this position I’m in, I can still do it through the foundation that my family and I have built, but this is what I would do.
Everyone should have free education and the best education, so that they can be very successful in Greece or abroad.
There I realized that all the things I’ve accomplished in my life, I achieved through hard work, man, no one gave me anything.
Even that, I went, worked on it myself and then got money and went and gave it away, 13-14 years old.
Will the children go to a Greek school?
Yes, that’s what I want is for them to learn a little bit about now, the culture, the traditions.
“BREAKING NEWS: Milwaukee bucks MVP/ Point Guard Giannis Antetokounmpo Donates Entire $20 Million Bonus and Sponsorship Deal to Charities and Homeless Relief” MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo Stated that” There are millions of people struggling every day — families without homes, kids without food, veterans without support.”
It is in hundreds of posts in social media from idiots who clearly don’t know how to research a little before posting. But it is not that simple. Because before that a similar rumour was circulating in Greece, to the extent that more serious media sources felt obligated to debunk it. (Link here – just use Google translate – https://mikropragmata.lifo.gr/zoi/ochi-o-giannis-antetokounmpo-de-eipe-oti-tha-dosei-25-ekatommyria-dolaria-se-filanthropies-stin-ellada-kai-sto-eksoteriko/ ) There is a similar “story” about Thanasis donating more than 12 million “bonus” (where the hell from?) Everytime the post has comments saying they are wonderful people etc.
So is it Giannis starting these rumours? As we documented before the voting for the NBA All Star is clearly problematic with serious indications of been manipulated by bots. While Giannis has not made a single, massive donation of that specific amount, he has a strong history of significant charitable giving. His efforts, often through the Charles Antetokounmpo Family Foundation, focus on causes he and his family care about, including supporting young people and addressing basic needs like housing, food, and education.
For instance the Milwaukee Homeless Shelter: He invested $7.5 million to open a shelter for homeless youth in Milwaukee. Sure, most of this money will be given in the future but even that amount is nowhere near the one mentioned in the fake news. “Powering Milwaukee Forward”: He and his foundation partnered with GE HealthCare to launch this initiative, which provides $1 million in grants to ten Milwaukee-area nonprofits. These organizations focus on improving access to basic needs like housing, food, and education for underserved communities. Again in the US, obviously as a tax write off. Giannis has also donated to Fiserv Forum staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, provided food boxes to people in his hometown of Sepolia, Greece, and partnered with UNICEF Greece to raise awareness for children’s rights. In general he seems more focused on doing philanthropy that appears in the news. Also he is clearly focused on trying to appear in Greek media for his many promotional efforts and sponsor deals there.
Giannis resorts to his personal story every time he fails on the court. Makes sense and good for him. But get a grip and maybe Google a bit before spreading misinformation. There are other NBA players with serious philanthropic projects that really make a difference.
As the FIBA EuroBasket 2025 tournament unfolds across Cyprus, Finland, Latvia, and Poland, basketball fans worldwide are witnessing a pivotal moment for one of the game’s greatest talents: Giannis Antetokounmpo. The “Greek Freak,” a two-time NBA MVP and champion with the Milwaukee Bucks, has long dominated the league but has yet to secure a major medal on the international stage with his home country. Greece’s last EuroBasket podium finish was a bronze in 2009, and while Giannis has led them to respectable showings—like a quarterfinal exit in 2022—the stars have never quite aligned for a breakthrough.
Fast forward to September 2025, and the landscape looks dramatically different. With the tournament already underway (as of September 1, Greece sits undefeated after strong wins over Cyprus and Georgia, including a 27-point outburst from Giannis against the latter), this could be the perfect storm for Greece to medal. Why? A combination of Giannis’ prime form, a solid supporting cast, and—crucially—weaknesses plaguing many of the traditional favorites. Several powerhouse teams are missing key stars due to injuries, fatigue from the 2024 Olympics and NBA seasons, or strategic rest ahead of the 2025-26 NBA campaign. This has opened up the field, making a medal not just possible but potentially “easy” for a Giannis-led Greece if they capitalize. They come first in their (let’s face it, very easy) first phase, then meet Israel and Latvia and presto! Quarterfinals. It is very doable and very likely.
Drawing from FIBA’s Smart Power Rankings and betting insights, Serbia tops the list, followed by Germany, France, and others like Lithuania, Slovenia, Turkey, Latvia, and Italy. Greece ranks fourth in those rankings, but with the absences hitting rivals hard, their path to the podium (top three) looks clearer than ever.
Serbia: The Undisputed Favorites, But Not Invincible
Serbia enters EuroBasket 2025 as the clear top dog, boasting odds of around +235 to win it all and holding the No. 1 spot in FIBA’s power rankings. Led by three-time NBA MVP Nikola Jokić of the Denver Nuggets, who is participating and already making waves, they have a stacked roster including Bogdan Bogdanović (Atlanta Hawks) and Nikola Milutinov. Their depth and chemistry make them a force—Jokić’s playmaking and scoring (he’s among the top players to watch) could carry them far.
But even Serbia isn’t without cracks this time. Jokić, fresh off a grueling NBA season and the 2024 Olympics (where Serbia earned silver), might face fatigue as the tournament progresses into its knockout stages ending September 14. Their overreliance on Jokić could be exploited if opponents like Greece force him into foul trouble or double-teams—something Giannis, with his defensive versatility, is uniquely equipped to handle. Historically, Serbia has dominated (runners-up in 2017), but in a field where other teams are depleted, any slip-up (e.g., injuries to supporting players like Vasilije Micić) could open the door. For Greece, avoiding Serbia until the finals might be key, but this isn’t the unbeatable juggernaut of past cycles.
As Serbia’s captain and all-time leading scorer, Bogdanović brings irreplaceable experience and clutch performance to the squad. His elite three-point shooting (often around 40-50% in international play), playmaking, and ability to create off the dribble complement Jokić’s interior dominance, forming a dynamic inside-out threat that opponents struggle to contain. Without him, Serbia’s offense becomes more predictable, relying heavily on Jokić, which could lead to fatigue for the superstar center or force less experienced players like Vasilije Micić or Ognjen Jaramaz into expanded roles they’re not fully prepared for. Defensively, his length and instincts help guard multiple positions, a loss that’s particularly felt against versatile wings from teams like Germany or Greece. Despite Nikola Jokić’s NBA dominance, the Basketball Federation of Serbia selected Bogdanović as the top player for the year, recognising his consistent international impact over Jokić’s occasional absences. His injury changes everything.
Germany: World Champs With Lingering Questions
As the reigning FIBA World Cup champions from 2023, Germany sits at No. 2 in the power rankings with odds around +650. Their core remains intact: Dennis Schröder (Brooklyn Nets), Franz Wagner (Orlando Magic), Moritz Wagner (Orlando Magic), and Daniel Theis (New Orleans Pelicans) are all suiting up, providing NBA-caliber talent across positions. Franz Wagner, in particular, ranks among the top NBA players at the tournament.
Yet, Germany is weaker than their 2023 squad due to the absence of some depth pieces and the toll of recent international play. The Wagner brothers and Schröder played heavy minutes in the 2024 Olympics (Germany exited in the quarters), and fatigue could set in during a condensed EuroBasket schedule. Moreover, their frontcourt lacks the dominant size to consistently counter superstars like Giannis or Jokić— Theis is solid but not elite. Pre-tournament predictions note Germany as a contender, but not the favorite, with some analysts questioning their ability to repeat without fresh legs. For Greece, this means a winnable matchup if they meet in the knockouts; Giannis’ athleticism could overwhelm Germany’s perimeter-oriented style.
France: A Powerhouse Gutted by Absences
France, bronze medalists at the 2024 Olympics and No. 3 in power rankings with +900 odds, would normally be a medal lock. But this edition is arguably their weakest in years, thanks to a slew of high-profile skips. Star center Victor Wembanyama (San Antonio Spurs) is out due to health concerns (a blood clot issue), Rudy Gobert (Minnesota Timberwolves) is resting after a long season and Olympics, Mathias Lessort is absent, and Evan Fournier is also missing. Even Vincent Poirier, another key big, is sidelined.
This leaves France’s frontcourt painfully thin—relying on players like Guerschon Yabusele and Nicolas Batum, who are talented but lack the rim protection and rebounding Gobert provides. Their perimeter game (with Isaïa Cordinier and others) is decent, but without their twin towers, they struggle against physical teams like Greece. Analysts have downgraded France significantly, with some predicting they might not even medal. For Giannis, this is a dream scenario: France’s weakened interior plays right into his slashing, dunking style, making a potential matchup a golden opportunity for Greece to advance.
Lithuania: Missing Their Anchor in the Paint
Lithuania, a perennial EuroBasket contender (No. 5 in rankings), thrives on tough, team-oriented play. They have Jonas Valančiūnas (Washington Wizards) anchoring the center spot, but the glaring absence is Domantas Sabonis (Sacramento Kings), who is skipping the tournament—likely due to rest after the Olympics and NBA commitments. Sabonis’ playmaking and scoring from the post were crucial in past runs (like their 2023 World Cup semis), and without him, Lithuania’s offense lacks fluidity.
Their guard play (Rokas Jokubaitis, etc.) is solid, but the team is vulnerable to elite bigs like Giannis, who could dominate the boards and paint. Previews highlight Lithuania as a dark horse, but the Sabonis void drops them from true favorite status. Greece, with Giannis’ brothers Thanasis and Kostas providing depth, has the physicality to exploit this—making Lithuania a beatable foe en route to a medal.
Slovenia: Doncic’s One-Man Show Amid Fatigue Concerns
Slovenia, powered by Luka Dončić (Dallas Mavericks), always punches above their weight—Dončić is No. 3 among top NBA players here. But with odds around +1200 or lower, they’re not top-tier favorites. Dončić, who slimmed down for the tournament, is fresh off a deep NBA Finals run and Olympics, raising fatigue risks—he’s already logged a historic triple-double early on.
The supporting cast (Vlatko Čančar, Mike Tobey) is serviceable but thin—Slovenia often relies on Dončić heroics, which can falter against balanced teams. If Greece draws them, Giannis’ defense could neutralize Luka, exposing Slovenia’s lack of depth. This vulnerability makes them less threatening than in 2017, when they won gold.
Other Contenders: Turkey, Latvia, Italy, and Spain’s Diminished Threats
Turkey (No. 6): Led by Alperen Şengün (Houston Rockets), they’re rising but young and inconsistent. No major absences, but their inexperience could show in knockouts—Greece’s veteran presence (Thomas Walkup, Kostas Sloukas) gives them an edge.
Latvia (No. 7): Kristaps Porziņģis (Atlanta Hawks? Wait, Boston Celtics) is a star, but Latvia’s overall roster lacks NBA depth. As a dark horse, they’re beatable if Porziņģis is contained.
Italy (No. 8): Simone Fontecchio (Miami Heat) and Danilo Gallinari lead, but Donte DiVincenzo’s skip hurts their guard play. Inconsistent historically, they’re not a major roadblock. Case in point , Fontecchio was terrible against Greece and they lost.
Spain: Once dominant, they’re in transition post-golden generation. With only Santi Aldama (Memphis Grizzlies) as a notable NBAer, they’re outside the top 8 and vulnerable.
Why This Equals Greece’s Perfect Opportunity
Greece’s roster, finalized with Giannis at the helm alongside his brothers, Walkup, and Sloukas, is built for success. In an easy Group C (with Cyprus, Georgia, Bosnia), they’ve already cruised to wins, preserving energy. The absences across Europe—over 9 noteworthy NBA players skipping, including Wembanyama and Gobert—have leveled the playing field like never before. While Serbia and Germany remain tough, the diluted competition means Greece can realistically aim for silver or bronze by navigating a softer bracket.
For Giannis this is the moment. Post-2024 Olympics fatigue has sidelined rivals, but he’s committed and dominant. If Greece medals, it’ll be a testament to seizing this wide-open window. Basketball purists, keep watching—history might be in the making. Not because Giannis has improved but because this year Greece has the easiest path to a medal.
Here is a ranking of notable non-American NBA players based on their contributions to their national teams in achieving medals in international and European championships:
Nikola Jokić (Serbia)
Olympic silver medalist in 2016 and bronze medalist in 2024 with Serbia
Led Serbia to a bronze medal at the 2024 Olympics with a historic triple-double
Serbia also won the 2023 FIBA World Cup (Jokić was pivotal)
Dirk Nowitzki (Germany)
Led Germany to bronze at 2002 FIBA World Championship and silver at EuroBasket 2005
Helped Germany qualify for 2008 Olympics; flag bearer and team leader
No Olympic medals but strong continental success and leadership
Pau Gasol (Spain)
Spain’s decorated star with two Olympic silver medals (2008, 2012) and a bronze (2016)
Three EuroBasket titles (2009, 2011, 2015) including two MVP awards
FIBA World Cup champion in 2006
Tony Parker (France)
Four medals with France: EuroBasket gold in 2013, silver in 2011, bronze in 2005 and 2015
Key in leading France to podium finishes in EuroBasket tournaments
Considered one of France’s most successful players in national team history
Luka Dončić (Slovenia)
Led Slovenia to EuroBasket gold in 2017
Secured Slovenia’s first Olympic berth in 2020 qualifying tournament
No Olympic medals yet, but his impact on Slovenia’s rise is significant
The list goes on. But Giannis? Much like with the Bucks, it seems he prefers to stick to the “I am superman but my supporting cast is inadequate”. Just blame the team mates, it seems to work with the fans and the media. After so many years though, does that excuse stack up? For over a decade, Giannis has repeatedly expressed his deep passion for representing Greece, often waxing poetic about family, heritage, and national pride. He talks about how much it means to him, how it’s bigger than any NBA accolade, and how he’s committed to bringing glory to his adopted homeland. Yet, despite all the effort, the sweat, and the soundbites, Greece hasn’t won a single major international tournament—or even meddled—in the Giannis era. No EuroBasket titles, no World Cup podiums, no Olympic hardware. Nothing.
The Rhetoric: All Talk About Pride and Legacy
Giannis has never been shy about his love for Greece. Born in Athens to Nigerian immigrants, he didn’t receive Greek citizenship until 2013, just before his NBA draft. Since then, he’s embraced his Greek identity with fervor, often using interviews and social media to highlight how representing the national team is a profound honor. Take, for example, his comments ahead of the 2024 Olympic qualifiers: “I have never played in the Olympic Games and I really want for us to get there.” Or after carrying the Greek flag at the Paris Olympics opening ceremony: “I know that my father is watching from heaven, and he’s dancing about this.”
He frequently emphasizes the emotional weight of donning the blue and white jersey. In 2022, he said, “I enjoyed being there for Greece, wearing the national team shirt is different because you represent 11 million Greeks and 4 million Greeks abroad.” Even in early 2025, as EuroBasket approached, Giannis reaffirmed his commitment: “If I am healthy, I will be there.” He describes national team play as more intense than the NBA: “It’s not easy to play for your club, but it’s easier [than the national team]. It’s win at all costs. We are representing our country.”
These statements paint a picture of a player deeply invested in his country’s success. Giannis positions himself as the flagbearer—literally and figuratively—for Greek basketball. He speaks of legacy, of inspiring the next generation, and of turning Greece into a powerhouse. But words are one thing; results are another. Let’s look at the track record.
The Timeline: A Decade of Near-Misses and Early Exits
Giannis made his senior debut for Greece in 2014, and since then, he’s participated in several major tournaments. Here’s a chronological breakdown of Greece’s performances with Giannis on the roster, based on official FIBA records and reports:
2014 FIBA Basketball World Cup: Greece finished 9th overall. They advanced to the Round of 16 but were eliminated by Serbia. Giannis, still a raw 19-year-old, averaged modest numbers in his international debut.
2015 EuroBasket: The team reached the quarterfinals, finishing 5th. They lost to eventual champions Spain. This was one of Greece’s better showings in the Giannis era, but still no medal.
2016 FIBA Olympic Qualifying Tournament: Greece hosted the qualifiers but fell short, losing the final to Croatia. No Olympic berth. Giannis played, but the team couldn’t capitalize on home advantage.
2017 EuroBasket: Giannis sat this one out due to an alleged injury amid contract disputes with the Bucks. Greece was eliminated in the Round of 16 without him.
2019 FIBA Basketball World Cup: A disappointing 11th-place finish. Greece was bounced in the second round despite high expectations. Giannis averaged 14.8 points and 8.8 rebounds but couldn’t carry the team past strong opponents like the USA and Brazil.
2021 FIBA Olympic Qualifying Tournament: Another qualifier failure. Greece lost to the Czech Republic in the final, missing out on Tokyo Olympics. Giannis was there, but the result was the same: no advancement.
2022 EuroBasket: Quarterfinal exit again, this time to Germany in a game where Giannis was ejected for a second technical foul. He put up monster stats—29.3 points, 8.8 rebounds per game—but the team crumbled.
2023 FIBA Basketball World Cup: Giannis missed the tournament due to knee surgery recovery. Greece finished 15th without him, highlighting the team’s dependence but also its limitations.
2024 FIBA Olympic Qualifying Tournament: Finally, a win! Greece qualified for the Paris Olympics by beating Croatia in the final. Giannis dominated, averaging 22.7 points and leading the charge at home in Piraeus. This was hailed as a breakthrough, but it was just a qualifier—not a major tournament victory.
2024 Paris Olympics: Hopes were high, but Greece was eliminated in the quarterfinals by Germany (again). Giannis scored 22 points in the loss, but the team couldn’t overcome a stacked field. They finished 5th-8th overall.
In summary, over 11 years and multiple tournaments, Greece’s best results with Giannis have been quarterfinal appearances and one Olympic qualification. No finals, no medals, no championships. Compare this to Greece’s pre-Giannis era: They won EuroBasket in 1987 and 2005, took silver in 1989, and bronze in 2009. Since Giannis joined, the trophy drought has persisted.
Critics might argue that qualifying for the 2024 Olympics was a “win,” but let’s be real: It’s a stepping stone, not a trophy. Greece hadn’t been to the Olympics since 2008, so Giannis did help end that drought. But in the actual Games? Another quarterfinal flameout. For a player who preaches “win at all costs,” the costs have been high, but the wins absent. Much like his tenure with the Bucks. With that one exception it has been mainly first round playoff exits despite much hype and hopes every time.
Time for Results Over Rhetoric?
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a phenomenal athlete and a proud Greek ambassador. His story—from undocumented immigrant to NBA icon—is inspiring. But when it comes to the national team, the gap between his words and the outcomes is glaring. He’s tried for years, pretending he is pouring heart and soul into it, yet Greece remains without a major international accolade in his era. And in fact Giannis hasn’t really put that much effort into it, turning up at the last minute and missing many dates. EuroBasket 2025 looms, this could be another chance for redemption. Will Giannis finally deliver a title, or will it be more of the same—eloquent speeches masking underwhelming results? Only time will tell, but based on history, skepticism is warranted. Greek fans deserve more than just effort; they deserve hardware.
Since 1999, FIBA limits each team to only one naturalized player on the roster, which forces teams to rely mostly on native or dual-national players (passport obtained before age 16). This rule aims to maintain competitive balance and national representation authenticity. Many strong teams carefully select their one naturalized player to fill key roster gaps especially at EuroBasket tournaments from 2017 to 2025.
Teams incorporating naturalized players often use them to address specific positional needs (e.g., point guard or centre) not adequately covered by native players, which can enhance overall team performance and competitiveness. For example, the European champion Slovenia in 2017 used the American naturalized player Anthony Randolph effectively alongside Luka Dončić. FIBA rules allow a team to have one naturalized player on their roster who obtained a passport after the age of 16. This creates a loophole for federations to recruit talented players, often from the United States, who have no genuine connection to the country they are representing. It is nationality for convenience. Tyler Dorsey, for instance, a player with Greek heritage who played for Greece in EuroBasket 2025, is still considered “naturalised” by FIBA because he received his passport after the age of 16. Other players, like Jordan Loyd for Poland and Darius Thompson for Italy, acquired citizenship to play in the tournament, despite having no prior ties. This practice is completely different from a player who has a true dual citizenship from birth or has lived in the country for a significant period. While these players may be skilled and contribute to their teams, their presence cheapens the meaning of “national team.” It transforms the competition from a battle of nations into a recruitment war, where the team with the most money and connections can simply buy a star to fill a hole in their roster.
NBA player presence on teams correlates with stronger competitive performance. EuroBasket 2025, for instance, features numerous NBA players across several teams such as Serbia (Nikola Jokić), Germany (Franz Wagner, Dennis Schröder), and France (Bilal Coulibaly). These teams with multiple NBA players generally are regarded as favourites due to elite talent and experience. Teams relying solely on native players without naturalised players sometimes emphasise homegrown talent and strong national basketball traditions (e.g., Latvia in EuroBasket 2025) but may lack the positional flexibility or depth that naturalised players provide. Dual citizenship and naturalisation policies add complexity but offer teams strategic roster-building tools. The trend across the past 5 European Championships (approx. EuroBasket 2009, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2022/2025) shows increasing integration of NBA talent and naturalized players, with most medal-contending teams having at least one NBA player and a naturalized player selected with tactical purpose. This turns the concept of a true “national team” into a marketing opportunity for the NBA, with fans tuning in not to see national pride, but to watch their favourite players in a different jersey. It dilutes the unique style of European basketball, which traditionally emphasises team-oriented play and structured offences, a point even acknowledged by Giannis’s former coach, Darvin Ham. The focus shifts from the collective to the individual, eroding the very essence of national team competition. Teams with only native players may rely on strong local development but tend to have less roster flexibility and fewer positional specialists brought in via naturalization or NBA experience.
Given the past 5 EuroBasket finals data winners had 1 to 4 NBA players.
Even outside the NBA, it is the NBA dictating who wins. More NBA players means you win basically. Is it a direct correlation? Well no, because some NBA players don’t impact games or don’t risk injury. So what are we even looking at? Some players playing to become famous while the best players are more concerned with protecting their health or getting knocked out early to return to their real work in the NBA.
And then of course is the second problem. Naturalised players, ie completely irrelevant to the country they are playing for usually, those that didn’t even make it in the NBA but are so good compared to local talent that they get on the teams. For example:
Turkey: Shane Larkin (naturalized)
Greece: Tyler Dorsey (naturalized)
Montenegro: Kyle Allman Jr. (naturalized)
Bosnia and Herzegovina: John Roberson (naturalized)
Cyprus: Darral Willis (naturalized)
Georgia: Kamar Baldwin (naturalized)
Portugal: Travante Williams (naturalized)
Italy: Darius Thompson
It is a bit like the old days when the NBA only allowed one negro per team “when the match was tough” as an unofficial rule between the team owners. European teams are playing a silly game with silly rules in fact by having various players naturalised but then only allowing one to play. This is covert racism which leads to a possibly dangerous type of nationalism. The winners are either teams with NBA stars (ie they have learned how to play and have been trained in the NBA) or naturalised players who are the NBA hand me downs. What sort of “national” team is it when the coach has to give instructions in English so that everyone understands?
And that’s not even the start of the problems with this tournament. Injuries come from the players playing too many games. Is it worth it? Why are there so many super weak teams in the tournament? Players get into the temptation to smash records playing against nations that are very weak. It’s not fun to watch either.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is often celebrated for his rags-to-riches story, infectious enthusiasm, and seemingly humble demeanor. From his early days as a lanky prospect from Greece to becoming one of the league’s dominant forces, Giannis has built a reputation as a hardworking, team-first player. However, like many elite athletes, he has had his share of controversial outbursts and behaviors that some fans and analysts label as “diva-like.” These moments often stem from high-stakes frustration, perceived slights, or intense competitiveness, but they’ve sparked debates about whether success has brought out a more demanding side. I
1. The Ladder Incident and Altercation with Montrezl Harrell (November 2022)
One of the earliest and most bizarre examples of Giannis’ temper flaring came after a tough loss to the Philadelphia 76ers. Frustrated by his poor free-throw shooting (4-of-15 in the game), Giannis stayed on the court postgame to practice. Things escalated when 76ers forward Montrezl Harrell, who was also shooting, took Giannis’ basketball and refused to return it, leading to a heated verbal exchange. Harrell reportedly yelled, “Yeah I took the ball, get the f— outta here,” while Giannis shouted back about doing his job.
The drama didn’t end there. As arena workers placed a ladder under the basket for maintenance, Giannis—still determined to shoot—pushed it away twice, the second time with enough force to knock it over, sending it skidding across the floor. Video footage captured the moment, showing Giannis arguing with a worker before the ladder toppled. Giannis later explained he meant no disrespect and didn’t intend for the ladder to fall, but the incident drew widespread criticism for endangering staff and appearing petulant. Critics called it a classic diva move: prioritizing personal practice over safety and common courtesy in a shared arena.
2. The Game Ball Controversy with the Indiana Pacers (December 2023)
Giannis made headlines again during a regular-season game against the Pacers, where he dropped a career-high 64 points in a Bucks victory. Postgame, he believed the Pacers had taken the official game ball as a trophy for rookie Oscar Tshiebwe’s first NBA points, denying him a memento of his milestone. Enraged, Giannis charged into the Pacers’ tunnel, yelling and demanding the ball back. The confrontation spilled over, with Giannis later admitting uncertainty about whether the ball he received was authentic.
In his postgame presser, Giannis explained the outburst as frustration over what he saw as disrespect, but Pacers players like Tyrese Haliburton clarified they hadn’t taken it intentionally. The incident painted Giannis as overly dramatic, with some fans accusing him of stat-padding by staying in against backups and then throwing a tantrum over a ball. It fueled discussions about his “diva mode,” especially as videos showed him pushing Haliburton and screaming in the aftermath.
3. Influencing the Firing of Coach Adrian Griffin
Midway through the 2023-24 season, the Bucks shocked the league by firing first-year head coach Adrian Griffin despite a strong 30-13 record. Reports emerged of locker room tensions, including Giannis’ dissatisfaction with defensive schemes and overall team direction. While Giannis publicly denied involvement, stating the decision “caught me by surprise” and that he “loved the guy,” insiders suggested his influence as the franchise cornerstone played a role. Griffin’s dismissal came amid reports of Giannis overriding play calls and refusing to sub out.
Analysts viewed this as diva behavior: a superstar wielding power to reshape the team around his preferences, even if it meant instability. Giannis trusted the front office but deflected blame, saying, “I get paid to block shots, not fire coaches.” This wasn’t the first coach change linked to him—some trace it back to Mike Budenholzer’s exit after the 2023 playoffs.
4. The Fake Handshake and Elbow on Jaylen Brown (November 2024)
During a matchup with the Boston Celtics, Giannis elbowed Jaylen Brown in the face early in the second quarter, earning an offensive foul. Later, as Brown approached for a handshake during a stoppage, Giannis extended his hand only to pull it back and run it through his hair in a mocking gesture. Brown called him “a child” postgame, criticizing the lack of sportsmanship.
Giannis downplayed it as playful, but the moment went viral, with former player Matt Barnes questioning his “weird behavior” on podcasts. Combined with the elbow, it reinforced perceptions of Giannis as someone who dishes out physicality but reacts poorly to pushback. Fans debated if this was harmless fun or diva entitlement.
5. Slapping a Teammate During Greece National Team Huddle (August 2025)
Most recently, during a friendly game prep for Greece against Montenegro, Giannis was caught on video delivering a forceful slap to teammate Giannoulis Larentzakis’ head in a team huddle. While some defended it as playful roughhousing, the clip went viral, with fans calling for suspension and labeling Giannis a “violent freak.” Larentzakis downplayed it, but the optics were poor, especially given Giannis’ leadership role.
This incident reignited diva accusations, suggesting Giannis sometimes oversteps boundaries in frustration or jest.
Other Notable Outbursts and Patterns
Beyond these headline-grabbers, Giannis has shown patterns of diva-like behavior. He’s been accused of leaving the court early after losses, overriding coaches, and demanding his brother Thanasis on the roster despite criticism. In 2023, he snapped at a reporter over a “failure” question, and podcasts have dissected his “activated diva mode.” He’s also been involved in on-court antics, like hyping up crowds or taunting opponents, which some see as arrogant.
The Human Side of a Superstar
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s “diva” moments don’t define his career—yet. For now they’re outliers in a story of triumph and dedication. Many stem from his ultra-competitive nature and the pressure of carrying a franchise. However, as his stardom grows, these incidents highlight the fine line between passion and petulance. Whether it’s knocking over ladders or slapping teammates, Giannis reminds us that even the most likable stars have their breaking points. Bucks fans hope these are learning experiences, as the Greek Freak chases more rings. But I see more and more people will see through his act.
As the 2025-26 NBA season tips off on October 22, with the Milwaukee Bucks hosting the Washington Wizards—and facing off against their former star Khris Middleton—the optimism in Milwaukee feels more like wishful thinking than genuine hope. Coming off a disappointing 2024-25 campaign that ended in a first-round playoff exit, the Bucks are staring down a roster ravaged by injuries, trades, and questionable decisions. Damian Lillard, acquired to form a super-duo with Giannis Antetokounmpo, is gone. Key additions like Myles Turner and Kyle Kuzma aim to bolster the frontcourt, but the team’s cap situation is tied up in aging or inconsistent talent like Bobby Portis and Kevin Porter Jr. Projections place them around sixth in the Eastern Conference, a far cry from championship contention. There are multiple gruelling stretches in the schedule, including a long road-heavy period in December and January and a total of 14 back-to-back sets. The Bucks will spend significant time away from home, compounding the stress on team leaders.
But let’s cut to the chase: the Bucks’ biggest roadblock isn’t just the roster flux or Lillard’s absence—it’s Giannis Antetokounmpo himself. Once hailed as the league’s unstoppable force, Giannis has plateaued in critical areas of his game, refusing to evolve beyond his dominant but predictable style. Worse, his selfishness—manifested in a ball-dominant approach and an obsession with personal stats—stifles team growth and chemistry. In a league where adaptability and selflessness win rings, Giannis’s unwillingness to change dooms the Bucks to mediocrity.
Giannis’s Game Hasn’t Evolved: Stagnation at the Top
Giannis Antetokounmpo entered the NBA as a raw prospect in 2013 and quickly became a superstar, earning two MVPs, a Defensive Player of the Year award, and leading the Bucks to their 2021 championship. His career averages—23.9 points, 9.9 rebounds, and 5.0 assists per game—paint the picture of a dominant force. But dig deeper into his progression, and it’s clear: Giannis hasn’t meaningfully improved in the areas that matter most for sustained success in today’s NBA.
Take his shooting, for instance. Giannis’s three-point percentage has hovered in the low 20s to high 20s for years, peaking at a career-high 30.3% in 2019-20 but dipping to a dismal 22.2% in 2024-25. His free-throw shooting, a perennial Achilles’ heel, sat at 61.7% last season—barely an improvement from his career 70.3% but still unreliable in crunch time. Defensively, while he was once the league’s best rim protector, his impact waned in 2024-25; he matched career lows in blocks and steals per game, prioritizing offense over the two-way dominance that defined his prime.
Critics have long pointed out how this lack of a reliable jump shot gets exposed in the playoffs. In the 2019 Eastern Conference Finals, Kawhi Leonard and the Raptors walled off the paint, daring Giannis to shoot—and he couldn’t. Fast-forward to recent postseasons, and the story repeats: teams pack the paint, force him into inefficient shots or turnovers, and the Bucks crumble. His playoff scoring jumps to around 28-30 points, but efficiency drops, and the team suffers. At 30 years old (turning 31 in December), Giannis is past his athletic prime, yet he hasn’t developed the perimeter skills needed to age gracefully like LeBron James or Kevin Durant. Instead, he relies on bulldozing drives and transition plays, which work in the regular season but falter against playoff defenses.
Without improvement here, the Bucks’ offense remains predictable and easy to scheme against—especially with Lillard out. Opponents will sag off Giannis, clog driving lanes, and watch as the team’s spacing collapses. This stagnation isn’t just a personal failing; it’s a team-killer in a season where Milwaukee desperately needs versatility.
The Selfishness Factor: Stats Over Substance
Giannis’s on-court demeanor has drawn increasing scrutiny, with accusations of selfishness undermining his leadership. His usage rate—consistently above 30% in recent years—means the ball is in his hands far too often, leading to a stagnant offense that discourages movement and off-ball play. Fans and analysts alike have noted how this “Giannis-ball” style leaves teammates disengaged, plugging them on defense as well when they’re uninvolved offensively.
A glaring example is his history of stat-padding. In March 2023, Giannis infamously chased a triple-double in a blowout win over the Wizards, re-entering the game late to grab a rebound and tipping it in—drawing widespread criticism for prioritizing personal milestones over team integrity. This isn’t isolated; social media buzzes with similar takes, labeling him a “stat-padding legend” who inflates numbers in low-stakes situations. Even in meaningful games, his focus on hero-ball—trying to do too much, as one Bucks fan observed after an early-season loss—leads to missed free throws, poor boxing out, and forced plays.
This selfishness extends to team dynamics. Former Bucks star DeMarcus Cousins suggested Giannis should “be selfish with his career” and consider a trade to a contender like Miami, implying his loyalty (or stubbornness) in Milwaukee is holding him—and the team—back. But on the court, it’s the opposite: he won’t relinquish control. With Lillard sidelined, Giannis’s ball dominance will only intensify, but as X users point out, this discourages the kind of fluid, team-oriented play that wins in the modern NBA. His high minutes (over 35 per game last season, up from Budenholzer’s era) and refusal to rest exacerbate injuries and burnout for everyone.
In a league where stars like Nikola Jokic or Jayson Tatum elevate teammates through unselfish play, Giannis’s approach feels outdated. He wants the spotlight on his triple-doubles and MVP chases, but that comes at the cost of collective success.
Preventing Team Development: The Giannis Shadow
Perhaps the most damning aspect is how Giannis’s presence hinders the Bucks’ overall development. By demanding the offense run through him, he limits opportunities for younger players or role guys to grow. The Bucks’ front office has depleted assets in trades—Jrue Holiday for Lillard, then Middleton out—leaving “nothing around Giannis,” as one podcaster lamented. GM Jon Horst’s extension despite this mess only compounds the issue.
With Lillard out, the burden falls squarely on Giannis, but his style doesn’t foster growth. New additions like Turner and Kuzma provide shooting and spacing, which the Bucks prioritized to surround him. Yet, as critics note, Giannis “makes his team worse all season by focusing on individual stat padding” and has “zero impact in games that matter.” The Bucks thrived in crunch time without him last season, suggesting the team plays more freely when not orbiting his gravity.
This season’s outlook is grim: fewer national TV games signal the league’s waning interest, and predictions hover around a play-in spot or low seed. In a stacked East with Boston, Cleveland, and New York reloading, the Bucks’ reliance on an unevolving, self-focused Giannis ensures early elimination. Injuries and bad luck played roles in past failures, but the core problem persists. And Giannis is largely to blame for the way every summer he fuels the trade rumours and then pretends all is well after having forced major moves. Well the Bucks have run out of trade chips to please him and what has it got them?
Time for a Reckoning in Milwaukee
The Milwaukee Bucks enter 2025-26 with talent but no cohesion, thanks largely to Giannis Antetokounmpo’s refusal to adapt or share the stage. His stagnant skills, selfish tendencies, and overshadowing presence turn a potential contender into a middling squad. Unless Giannis undergoes a dramatic shift—developing a jumper, embracing team play, and prioritizing wins over stats—the Bucks are headed for another frustrating season. Fans deserve better, but as long as the focus remains on “The Greek Freak’s” personal narrative, collective achievement will remain elusive. This isn’t a championship team; it’s Giannis’s stat sheet with a supporting cast. And that won’t cut it in today’s NBA.
The Milwaukee Bucks’ acquisition of Myles Turner in the 2025 offseason, a move that saw them waive Damian Lillard to clear cap space, was a bold gamble aimed at keeping Giannis Antetokounmpo satisfied and extending the Bucks’ championship window. Turner, a versatile 3-and-D center, brings shot-blocking prowess and floor-spacing ability to pair with the two-time MVP. However, while this move addresses some roster deficiencies, it falls short of solving Giannis’ challenges in high-pressure playoff games. This blog post delves into the reasons why Turner, despite his talents, is unlikely to be the complete solution for Giannis and the Bucks in critical postseason moments.
The Bucks have struggled in recent playoffs, with only one series win since their 2021 title. Injuries, including Giannis’ own and Damian Lillard’s Achilles tear in 2025, have played a role, but deeper issues persist in high-pressure games. In playoff scenarios, opponents often exploit Giannis’ limitations by building defensive “walls” to clog the paint, forcing him to rely on his developing jumper or playmaking under pressure. The Bucks’ lack of a reliable point guard and inconsistent perimeter creation has compounded these issues, leaving Giannis to shoulder an immense offensive load. The hope was that Turner, with his defensive versatility and three-point shooting, would alleviate these problems. However, several factors suggest he won’t fully address Giannis’ high-pressure struggles.
Strengths
Myles Turner, at 29, is a proven two-way center. His defensive impact is notable, having led the NBA in blocks multiple times, including a 2021 season where he averaged nearly four blocks per game. In the 2024-25 season, he set a Pacers’ playoff record with 46 blocks during their Finals run. His ability to switch on defence, roam, and protect the rim makes him a theoretical complement to Giannis, who also excels defensively with 1.1 blocks and 1.2 steals per game. Offensively, Turner’s 40.5% three-point shooting on passes from Tyrese Haliburton last season suggests he can stretch the floor, creating space for Giannis’ drives.
The Bucks envision Turner as a modernized replacement for Brook Lopez, who was a key floor-spacer during their 2021 championship run. With Giannis potentially taking on more point-forward duties, Turner’s ability to shoot “wide-open” threes (121 made in 2024-25, tied for first in the NBA) could keep defenses honest. Coach Doc Rivers has praised Turner’s fit, noting his ability to switch defensively and stretch the floor, which aligns with Milwaukee’s up-tempo vision.
Limitations
Despite these strengths, Turner’s game has notable weaknesses that may not fully address the Bucks’ needs in high-pressure situations:
Rebounding Deficiency: Turner has never been an elite rebounder, often criticized for not securing defensive rebounds to end possessions. In the 2024-25 season, he averaged just 6.9 rebounds per game despite his 6’11” frame, a stark contrast to Giannis’ 11.9 rebounds. In playoff games, where possessions are critical, Turner’s inability to dominate the glass could allow opponents to generate second-chance points, putting additional pressure on Giannis to clean up defensively.
Limited Playmaking: High-pressure games often require big men to make quick decisions under defensive scrutiny. Turner is not a strong playmaker, with career averages of 1.3 assists per game and a focus on finishing rather than creating. Unlike former teammate Domantas Sabonis, who facilitated offense for the Pacers, Turner relies on guards like Haliburton to set him up. With the Bucks lacking an elite point guard after waiving Lillard, Turner’s limited passing ability may not alleviate the playmaking burden on Giannis.
Inconsistent Playoff Performance: While Turner was a key contributor to the Pacers’ 2024 Finals run, he didn’t consistently close important games. For example, in matchups against Giannis, he struggled defensively, allowing Antetokounmpo to score 64 and 37 points in two games during the 2023-24 season. In high-pressure moments, Turner’s defensive impact can wane if opponents exploit his positioning or force him into foul trouble, a recurring issue given his physical style.
Offensive Dependency on Setup: Turner’s offensive production, particularly his three-point shooting, relies heavily on quality guard play. In Indiana, Haliburton’s elite passing (10+ assists per game) created open looks for Turner. Without a comparable facilitator in Milwaukee, Turner’s efficiency from deep could dip, especially in playoff scenarios where defences tighten and rotations are shorter. Giannis’ play making has improved (6.5 assists per game), but he’s not a traditional point guard, and his passes to shooters like Bobby Portis (50% from three on 34 attempts) were less frequent than Haliburton’s to Turner.
Giannis’ High-Pressure Challenges
Giannis thrives in transition and interior scoring, leading the NBA with 779 two-point field goals in 2024-25. However, in high-pressure playoff games, teams employ specific strategies to neutralize him:
Paint Clogging: Opponents like the Pacers in 2024 used multiple defenders to form a “wall,” forcing Giannis to shoot from mid-range or beyond (he shot 0-1 from three in Game 4). His jumper, while improved, remains inconsistent under pressure.
Playmaking Pressure: Without a reliable secondary creator, Giannis often faces double-teams, leading to turnovers or forced shots. In Game 5 against the Pacers, despite a 30-point, 20-rebound, 13-assist triple-double, the Bucks lost 119-118 in overtime, highlighting the lack of support.
Fatigue and Injuries: Giannis’ heavy minutes (44 in Game 5) and physical style make him prone to fatigue or injury, as seen in recent playoffs. A co-star who can take over games offensively is critical, but Turner’s role is more complementary than dominant.
Why Turner Falls Short
1. Lack of a Primary Creator
The Bucks’ decision to waive Lillard, a nine-time All-Star who averaged 28.0 points per game alongside Giannis, leaves a void in perimeter creation. Turner’s addition doesn’t address this. His offensive game relies on others to create opportunities, and with Giannis now expected to handle point-forward duties, the Bucks may struggle to generate consistent offence in crunch time. In high-pressure games, teams will likely dare Turner to create off the dribble or in isolation, areas where he’s unproven.
2. Defensive Redundancy
While Turner’s shot-blocking complements Giannis’ defensive versatility, it may not significantly elevate the Bucks’ playoff defence. Both players excel at rim protection, but the Bucks’ perimeter defence remains a concern without a lockdown guard like Jrue Holiday. In the 2024 playoffs, the Pacers exploited Milwaukee’s back court, with Tyrese Haliburton and Andrew Nembhard finding gaps in pick-and-roll coverage. Turner’s ability to switch is valuable, but he’s not a perimeter stopper, and opponents can target weaker defenders like Gary Trent Jr. or Kyle Kuzma.
3. Playoff Provenance
Turner’s playoff resume, while solid, doesn’t match the impact of a true co-star. During the Pacers’ Finals run, he was a secondary contributor behind Haliburton and Pascal Siakam. In contrast, Giannis needs a player who can take over games when he’s double-teamed or fatigued. Turner’s career-high 40-point games are rare, and he’s never been the focal point of a playoff offense. His 2021 Defensive Player of the Year candidacy was notable, but he hasn’t consistently dominated high-stakes games.
4. Financial and Strategic Risks
The Bucks’ move to waive Lillard and stretch his $113 million contract over five years ($22.5 million annually) limits their future flexibility. If Turner doesn’t elevate the Bucks to contention, Giannis, who has a player option in 2027-28, may grow restless. Reports indicate mixed feelings from Giannis about the move, with some sources suggesting he was “not pleased” with Lillard’s departure despite excitement for Turner. The pressure is on Turner to deliver immediately, but his skill set may not fully address the Bucks’ postseason shortcomings.
What Giannis Needs in High-Pressure Games
To truly solve Giannis’ problems in high-pressure games, the Bucks need:
A Primary Perimeter Creator: A guard who can break down defences, create shots, and alleviate Giannis’ play-making burden. Lillard, despite his struggles, provided this to an extent. Current options like Kevin Porter Jr. or Gary Trent Jr. lack the consistency of an elite point guard.
Versatile Wing Defender: A player like Jrue Holiday, who could guard multiple positions and handle the ball, was critical in 2021. Turner’s interior defense is strong, but the Bucks need perimeter stoppers to counter guards like Haliburton or Jalen Brunson.
Clutch Scoring: Giannis’ 62% field goal percentage is elite, but his free-throw shooting (65-70% in playoffs) and lack of a reliable jumper limit his clutch scoring. Turner’s three-point shooting helps, but he’s not a go-to scorer in tight games.
So will it move the needle?
Myles Turner is a valuable addition to the Bucks, bringing defensive versatility and floor-spacing that complements Giannis Antetokounmpo’s game. His shot-blocking and three-point shooting address some of Milwaukee’s needs, particularly in replacing Brook Lopez. However, Turner’s limitations—weak rebounding, lack of play-making, and inconsistent playoff impact—mean he’s not the complete solution for Giannis’ high-pressure struggles. The Bucks’ lack of a primary creator, perimeter defence, and clutch scoring options remain unaddressed, and the financial burden of Lillard’s stretched contract adds pressure for immediate results. Unless Turner significantly elevates his game or the Bucks make additional moves, Giannis may continue to face the same postseason challenges, potentially fuelling speculation about his long-term future in Milwaukee. If they are lucky, maybe they get to the second round of the playoffs this year. For Giannis the No1 priority is to make sure everyone keeps blaming the rest of the roster and not him.
Having all three (or even four) Antetokounmpo brothers—Giannis, Thanasis, and Kostas (occasionally including Alex)—on the same team, especially the Greek national basketball team, may sound like a dream for curious fans or as a marketing story. However, from a basketball and team-building perspective, it actually makes little sense.
1. Overlapping Skill Sets, Not Complementary Roles
The Antetokounmpo brothers, while all extremely athletic and hardworking, share similar physical profiles and playing styles. Giannis is a ball-dominant forward but Thanasis and Kostas (and Alex, to an extent) are also lengthy, athletic forwards—generally specialising in defence, hustle, and energy. They are not elite shooters or play makers. Having several players with similar roles and limitations (especially non-superstar siblings) can lead to roster redundancy and limit tactical flexibility. Most successful national teams are built by blending complementary skills: shooters, passers, rim protectors, and versatile role players.
2. Team Chemistry vs. Nepotism and Meritocracy
Bringing siblings onto the same roster can risk perceptions—and realities—of favoritism. The ideal for national teams is picking the absolute best in each position, giving the country the highest chance of success. The Greek national team routinely features NBA, EuroLeague, and top Greek league talent in every position, so spots are incredibly competitive. Choosing brothers as a package (especially if not all are among the country’s top players) could erode trust within the team and anger fans or other deserving players who are left out.
3. Distraction and Media Hype
The story of “all the Antetokounmpo brothers together” would attract enormous attention and media scrutiny. While this brings publicity, it can also distract from the squad’s actual preparations and objectives. The focus can shift from building a winning team system to the novelty of the family lineup, which could upset team dynamics or create unwanted off-court narratives the coach must manage.
4. Sibling Dynamics—Strengths and Pitfalls
There are benefits to sibling chemistry—knowing each other’s tendencies, supporting one another, and fostering a positive locker room culture. But this can easily turn into on-court arguments, frustrations, or unintended rivalry. Studies in team sports suggest that siblings on the same team sometimes struggle with boundaries, criticism, and balancing the family bond with broader team unity. If one of the brothers receives more or less playing time, it can create tension or even resentment—harming both family and team morale.
5. National Team Depth and Opportunity Cost
Greece doesn’t lack basketball talent. The national team regularly qualifies for major tournaments and features an array of EuroLeague and NBA players. Forcing the inclusion of multiple Antetokounmpos can mean other players—perhaps a needed shooter, ball-handler, or defensive specialist—are left out, reducing the overall ceiling of the team. National teams must put winning first, not family reunions.
6. Evidence: Actual Roster Decisions
Historically, while there have been moments when more than one Antetokounmpo was named to a preliminary roster, rarely are all three featured in the final 12-man squad for a major tournament, and performances suggest balancing the roster is prioritized. For instance, as recently as the EuroBasket 2025 preliminary roster, Giannis and Kostas are included, with Thanasis ruled out due to injury and Alex not among the final picks—demonstrating a merit-based approach and the challenges of fitting multiple brothers onto a balanced squad125.
Will it happen? While the Antetokounmpo brothers have each made notable achievements, and their shared story inspires millions, national team basketball demands the sharpest focus on fit, balance, and the high-stakes realities of international competition. Assembling all three brothers on the court, especially when not all are among Greece’s very best, risks sacrificing team strength for sentiment and spectacle—which doesn’t make sense if the goal is to win medals and maximise the nation’s basketball legacy. Despite consistently delivering strong individual performances and drawing global attention to Greek basketball, Giannis has failed to lead Greece to any significant international medals or deep tournament runs—a reality that has frustrated fans and analysts alike.
High Hopes, Early Exits
2016 Olympic Qualifiers: Giannis averaged a solid 15.3 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 2 blocks per game. However, Greece was eliminated by Croatia and failed to qualify for the Rio Olympics.
2019 FIBA World Cup: This tournament was highly anticipated, as Giannis entered as the reigning NBA MVP—the first to play in a FIBA World Cup. Expectations were sky-high, but Greece failed to progress past the second round, finishing 11th overall. This exit was widely described as disappointing, given the roster’s talent and Giannis’s status as an NBA superstar.
EuroBasket 2022: Antetokounmpo showcased extraordinary stats—29.3 points, 8.8 rebounds, 4.7 assists per game, leading all scorers and being named to the All-Tournament Team. Yet, Greece lost in the quarter-finals to Germany, and Giannis was ejected after two unsportsmanlike fouls in that match, again cutting short the team’s title aspirations.
2024 Paris Olympics: After helping Greece earn their first Olympic basketball appearance in 16 years, Giannis was the team’s flagbearer and central figure. He averaged a tournament-high 25.8 points with very efficient shooting, but Greece could only muster a 1–2 record in the group stage and were eliminated in the quarter-finals, this time by Germany.
Why Haven’t Results Matched the Hype?
No Medals Despite NBA Stardom: Across all major tournaments from 2014 through 2024, Giannis and Greece have never reached the semifinals of a EuroBasket, World Cup, or the Olympics, let alone won a medal.
Mismatch of Styles and Roles: Giannis’s unique playstyle—most effective as a ball-dominant forward in the NBA—has been harder to maximize in international basketball, where different rules, roster depth, and the absence of NBA spacing have limited his impact on winning at the highest level, despite impressive box scores.
Unmet Expectations: The gap between NBA success and international results has drawn criticism and disappointment from Greek fans and the media, putting extra pressure on Antetokounmpo each cycle. Greek journalists and some international observers have not hesitated to question why “the Greek Freak” has been unable to elevate his national team to the podium.
Giannis’s Perspective
Despite the lack of medals, Giannis has repeatedly pushed back on the idea of “failure” in sports, famously arguing that every loss is a step towards future success and that his journey with Greece—win or lose—is a source of pride and growth. Still, results on the court remain clear: Giannis’s time with the Greek national team has been marked by unfulfilled potential and a string of high-profile exits, fuelling debate about how best to build around such superstars in the international game. Especially someone like Giannis who is used being pampered with the Bucks where the entire roster essentially works to make him look good all the time.
The Milwaukee Bucks have undergone a dramatic transformation, unveiling a “new look” roster with several fresh faces flanking franchise cornerstone Giannis Antetokounmpo. Yet, despite the apparent infusion of talent and athleticism, there are substantial reasons for skepticism when projecting this team’s postseason prospects—most notably due to Giannis’s postseason limitations, the flawed supporting cast, and systemic issues that haven’t been addressed in recent years.
Giannis Antetokounmpo: The Superstar With Playoff Flaws
1. Stagnation and Lack of Adaptation
Giannis’s regular-season production remains stellar, but the story in the playoffs is increasingly familiar. For several years running, he has faced disciplined defensive schemes, walls, and late-game traps, yet his skill set hasn’t evolved to counter these strategies.
Limited Shooting: Giannis’s jump shot, both from mid-range and beyond the arc, remains unreliable. In crunch time, defences dare him to shoot, clogging driving lanes and neutralising his greatest asset: attacking the rim.
Playoff Regression: Against elite playoff defences, his efficiency plummets. He posts big numbers but often at the expense of team flow and offensive sustainability.
2. Inability to Influence Big Games
Stat Padding: Critics argue that Giannis’s box scores are often filled against weaker opponents or in blowouts, not when the Bucks desperately need him in competitive, high-stakes situations.
Lack of Playmaking Growth: Unlike true playoff risers (Jokic, Curry), Giannis rarely dictates games by elevating teammates. His assists often come as last-resort kickouts, not from genuine orchestration.
Poor Late-Game Decision Making: In crunch time, the offence stagnates, often devolving into predictable Giannis isolations, leading to forced shots, turnovers, or missed free throws.
3. Leadership Questions
Does Not Elevate Others: Giannis excels as a relentless worker and force of nature, but he struggles to inspire confidence in role players or help them thrive in the postseason cauldron.
Selfish Tendencies: At times, Giannis appears more focused on achieving personal milestones than adapting his game to team needs—a trait that manifests as stubborn drives into packed paints or ignoring better-positioned teammates.
The Supporting Cast: Talent, But Not Cohesion
While on paper this roster boasts shooting and length, none of the key starters or bench pieces have a proven track record of excelling deep in the playoffs.
Starting Five Flaws
Kevin Porter Jr.: A talented scorer but erratic and turnover-prone. He lacks the maturity and consistency of a championship-level floor general.
Gary Trent Jr. and Kyle Kuzma: While both can shoot, neither is a high-level defender or capable playoff playmaker; both can become black holes offensively.
Myles Turner: Great as a spacing big, but not a physical rebounder and often struggles against the top-tier centers in playoff series.
Bench Unit
Cole Anthony, Ryan Rollins: Unproven as reliable playoff guards, especially handling second-unit attacks from powerhouses like Boston or Denver.
Bobby Portis, Taurean Prince: Energy guys, but not high-level creators or defenders against elite opposition.
AJ Green, Gary Harris, Andre Jackson Jr.: Largely one-dimensional; offer some shooting or defence, but not both—crucial in deep playoff runs.
Two-Way Players
This group offers athleticism, but no playoff-tested contributors. Relying on them against NBA’s elite will likely spell disaster.
Why This Roster Won’t Work Against NBA Elites
1. Lack of True Playoff Creation
Without a true point guard or play making wing, the offence will likely bog down into predictable sets. Top teams shut down one-dimensional stars and force others to step up—something neither this Bucks roster nor Giannis has shown the ability to do.
2. Defensive Holes
Only Turner is an above-average defender in the starting lineup. The rest, including Kuzma and Porter Jr., have checkered histories and struggle with assignments—fatal when facing teams with multiple scoring options.
3. No Second Star
No player on the roster is capable of stepping into a superstar offensive load if Giannis is neutralised. Which he very often is in games that matter. Other title hopefuls feature multiple creators but the Bucks are a one-man show. And that one man has no answers when the going gets tough. All he does is try to look good and then blame his team mates.
So no, not very “fresh” team or anything new
The Bucks’ new lineup is a testament to splashy roster overhauls without foundational improvements. With Giannis’s game stagnating, his inability to evolve or truly uplift his teammates, and a cast of starters and bench pieces unproven against top-tier competition, Milwaukee seems destined for another postseason disappointment. Until Giannis adds strategic nuance and the franchise builds a more cohesive two-way roster, the Bucks are unlikely threats to the NBA’s best.
The narrative among some Milwaukee Bucks fans that the Eastern Conference in the NBA will be “wide open” next season is a hopeful but misguided belief. This theory often hinges on the idea that the Bucks, led by Giannis Antetokounmpo, can dominate the regular season and cruise through a supposedly weakened East in the playoffs. However, this perspective ignores the competitive depth of the conference and, more critically, Giannis’s consistent postseason shortcomings. Despite his undeniable talent and regular-season dominance, Giannis’s playoff performances over the past three seasons reveal significant flaws—stagnation in skill development, low basketball IQ in high-pressure moments, and a self-focused style that hampers team success. Below, we dissect why the “wide open East” narrative is delusional and why Giannis’s postseason struggles make the Bucks an unreliable playoff contender.
The Eastern Conference is Far From “Wide Open”
The notion that the East is “wide open” assumes a lack of elite competition, but the 2025-26 Eastern Conference landscape suggests otherwise. Several teams have strengthened their rosters, and the conference remains stacked with talent and depth.
Established Powerhouses and Rising Contenders
Boston Celtics: The recent champions boast a strong core and supporting cast . Their versatility, defensive prowess, and playoff experience make them perennial favourites. Boston’s ability to adjust schemes and exploit mismatches—especially against teams like the Bucks—ensures they remain a formidable obstacle.
New York Knicks: The Knicks have built a gritty, defensively sound team around Jalen Brunson and OG Anunoby, a playoff juggernaut. New York’s physicality and depth exploit Milwaukee’s lack of perimeter creation.
Cleveland Cavaliers and Indiana Pacers: Both teams have young, dynamic cores. Cleveland’s Donovan Mitchell and Evan Mobley, paired with a strong defensive system, make them a tough out. Indiana’s fast-paced offense exposed Milwaukee’s defensive weaknesses in the 2024 playoffs, and they’re only improving.
Miami Heat and Others: Miami’s culture under Erik Spoelstra ensures they’re always a playoff threat. Emerging teams like the Orlando Magic, with Paolo Banchero and Franz Wagner, add further depth to the conference.
The East is not a free-for-all; it’s a gauntlet. The idea that the Bucks can waltz through this field ignores the reality of these teams’ talent, coaching, and playoff-ready systems.
Bucks fans point to Giannis’s regular-season dominance as evidence of their playoff potential. While Milwaukee often secures a top-3 seed (they finished 49-33 in 2024-25, third in the East), regular-season success is a poor predictor of playoff outcomes. The postseason demands adaptability, clutch performance, and team synergy—areas where Giannis and the Bucks have consistently fallen short.
Giannis’s Postseason Struggles: A Three-Year Pattern
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s postseason performances over the last three seasons (2022-2025) reveal critical weaknesses that prevent the Bucks from being true contenders.
Lack of Skill Development
Giannis’s game has stagnated since his 2021 championship run. While he remains a force in the regular season (averaging 29.5 points, 11.6 rebounds, and 6.5 assists in 2024-25), his playoff production often comes with inefficiencies and predictable patterns:
Limited Shooting Range: Giannis’s jump shot remains unreliable. In the 2024 playoffs against Indiana, he shot 0% from three (0-for-7) and 61.7% from the free-throw line, allowing defences to sag off him and clog the paint. His inability to develop a consistent mid-range or three-point shot makes him easier to scheme against in high-stakes games.
Poor Half-Court Offence: In playoff settings, where games slow down and half-court execution is critical, Giannis struggles. His reliance on bull-rushing to the rim is neutralised by teams that build a wall (e.g., Toronto in 2019, Miami in 2020, Indiana in 2024). Without a go-to move or counters, he becomes predictable.
Turnovers in Clutch Moments: Giannis’s decision-making under pressure is suspect. In the 2023 playoffs against Miami, he averaged 3.6 turnovers per game, often forcing drives into crowded lanes or making errant passes. This trend continued in 2024, with 3.8 turnovers per game against Indiana.
Low Basketball IQ in High-Pressure Situations
Giannis’s basketball IQ, particularly in the playoffs, has been exposed repeatedly:
Poor Shot Selection: In clutch moments, Giannis often opts for low-percentage plays, such as contested drives or rushed shots, rather than finding open teammates. In Game 5 of the 2023 Miami series, his late-game turnover and missed free throws were pivotal in Milwaukee’s collapse.
Inability to Read Defenses: Playoff teams exploit Giannis’s tendencies by doubling him early or forcing him to pass. His slow processing in these situations leads to hesitation, turnovers, or forced shots. For example, in the 2024 Indiana series, the Pacers’ zone defence flustered Giannis, limiting his efficiency (53.3% true shooting percentage).
Lack of Adjustments: Unlike players like LeBron James or Nikola Jokić, who adapt to defensive schemes, Giannis rarely adjusts his approach. He continues to rely on physicality, which wanes against playoff-level defences and officiating.
Total inability to improve. It has been a decade now and Giannis has shown absolutely no sign of being able to improve anything at all for the elite level. He conquers and dominates in easy match ups that don’t count only.
Selfish Play and Lack of Team Building
The Bucks’ roster construction and Giannis’s playing style exacerbate their postseason issues:
Stat-Padding Over Team Play: Critics argue Giannis prioritises individual stats over team success. In the 2024 regular season, he often hunted for points and rebounds, leading to inefficient possessions. For instance, his 38.8% usage rate in the playoffs often left teammates like Damian Lillard underutilized (Lillard averaged only 16.7 shots per game in the 2024 postseason despite being a proven closer).
Poor Synergy with Teammates: Giannis’s ball-dominant style clashed with Lillard’s need for the ball. In the 2024 playoffs, the Bucks’ offence stagnated when Giannis forced drives instead of leveraging Lillard’s shooting or Khris Middleton’s mid-range game. His unwillingness to play off-ball limits Milwaukee’s offensive versatility.
Leadership and Culture Issues: Giannis’s public comments, such as questioning teammates’ effort or coaching decisions (e.g., after the 2023 Miami loss), suggest a lack of accountability. His focus on individual accolades over team cohesion undermines Milwaukee’s ability to build a championship culture.
Why the Bucks Fail in the Playoffs
The Bucks’ postseason failures aren’t solely on Giannis, but his limitations are a significant factor:
Defensive Exploits: Playoff teams target Giannis’s weaknesses. Indiana’s pace-and-space offense in 2024 exposed his struggles to guard in space, while Miami’s zone in 2023 neutralized his interior dominance.
Lack of Clutch Scoring: Unlike Tatum, Brunson, or Embiid, Giannis lacks a reliable go-to move in crunch time. His 58.7% free-throw shooting in the 2024 playoffs allowed opponents to foul him late without fear.
Roster Mismatches: The Bucks’ supporting cast, while talented, doesn’t complement Giannis’s style. Lillard’s defensive limitations and Middleton’s injury history leave Milwaukee vulnerable. Giannis’s inability to elevate lesser teammates (unlike Jokić or Luka Dončić) compounds these issues.
So no, the Bucks ain’t closer to anything
The “wide open East” narrative is a delusion born of optimism rather than evidence. The Eastern Conference is loaded with teams that have the talent, coaching, and versatility to outmatch Milwaukee in a seven-game series. Giannis Antetokounmpo’s postseason struggles—stemming from stagnant skill development, low basketball IQ in clutch moments, and a selfish playing style—cap the Bucks’ ceiling. While Giannis can carry Milwaukee to a top-3 seed in the regular season, his inability to adapt and elevate his team in high-pressure playoff games makes them a flawed contender. Bucks fans hoping for a championship run must confront these realities: the East is a gauntlet, and Giannis’s postseason shortcomings are a persistent barrier to success.
Giannis Antetokounmpo has ventured into live streaming, but the results are surprisingly lacklustre. Fans tuning into streams like his session with IShowSpeed on YouTube might expect the same high-energy charisma he brings to the court. Instead, they often get a snooze-fest that fails to capture his larger-than-life presence.
Lack of Structure and Engagement
Live streaming thrives on energy, interaction, and a clear sense of purpose. Unfortunately, Giannis’ streams often feel aimless. In the linked stream with IShowSpeed, much of the time is spent on casual banter that doesn’t quite land. The conversation meanders without a clear focus, leaving viewers waiting for something exciting to happen. Unlike top streamers who plan segments, games, or challenges to keep their audience hooked, Giannis’ approach feels like an impromptu chat that doesn’t translate well to the streaming format. Without a hook or engaging activities, the stream struggles to hold attention.
Mismatch with Streaming Dynamics
Giannis is a master of physicality and in-person charisma, but streaming demands a different skill set. The medium requires quick wit, constant audience interaction, and comfort with digital tools like chat moderation or game integration. In the IShowSpeed collaboration, Giannis seems out of his element, overshadowed by Speed’s frenetic energy. While Giannis’ chill vibe works in post-game interviews or locker room moments, it doesn’t carry the same weight in a medium where viewers expect non-stop entertainment. His laid-back demeanor, while authentic, comes off as disengaged in the fast-paced world of live streaming.
Technical and Production Shortcomings
Another factor dragging down Giannis’ streams is the lack of polish. The production quality in the referenced YouTube stream is bare-bones, with little attention to visuals, sound, or pacing. Top streamers invest in clean setups, good lighting, and dynamic overlays to keep things visually appealing. Giannis’ streams, by contrast, often feel like a FaceTime call gone public. Without a team to elevate the technical side—think clear audio, engaging graphics, or seamless transitions—the viewing experience feels amateurish and fails to compete with established creators.
Missed Opportunities for Unique Content
Giannis has a goldmine of potential content: behind-the-scenes NBA stories, fitness routines, or even playful challenges tied to his “Greek Freak” persona. Yet, his streams rarely tap into this. Instead of leveraging his unique background—like sharing tales from his rise to stardom or hosting basketball-themed games—the content often sticks to generic conversations or reactions. For example, the IShowSpeed stream leans heavily on Speed’s antics rather than showcasing Giannis’ strengths. Fans want to see Giannis be Giannis, not a supporting act in someone else’s show.
The Hype Doesn’t Match the Delivery
Part of the disappointment comes from expectations. Giannis is a global icon, and fans tune in hoping for something as epic as his on-court performances. But streaming isn’t like basketball; it’s a grind that requires consistency and a knack for digital showmanship. Without a clear strategy or practice, Giannis’ streams feel like a letdown compared to the hype. Even collaborations with high-energy creators like IShowSpeed can’t fully compensate for the lack of direction, leaving viewers bored and scrolling away.
Giannis fails again
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s foray into live streaming is a classic case of a superstar not quite clicking with a new medium. While his personality shines in person, the unstructured, low-energy, and technically underwhelming streams don’t do him justice. To turn things around, Giannis could benefit from a clear content plan, better production, and activities that play to his strengths—think basketball challenges, fan Q&As, or storytelling from his incredible career. Until then, streams like the one with IShowSpeed will remain a missed opportunity, leaving fans yawning instead of cheering.
The Milwaukee Bucks, champions just a few short years ago, are entering a critical juncture. While they possess one of the league’s most promoted forces in Giannis Antetokounmpo, a closer look at their current state, and specifically how Giannis’s unique skill set impacts the team, suggests that another championship run next season is highly improbable. The “Greek Freak’s” severe limitations, coupled with his overwhelming dominance on the way the team plays, create a structural imbalance that can not easily be overcome. Worse still, the team is paying for many mistakes Giannis made in his demands for coaching staff changes and roster changes. It has led to a dead end with no assets to use.
The Roster Roulette: A Step Backward
The 2024-25 off season has not been kind to the Bucks. The surprising waiver of Damian Lillard due to injury and contract issues, in favour of acquiring Myles Turner, marks a significant shift. While Turner is a top-tier rim protector and floor spacer, he doesn’t fill the void left by Lillard’s elite shot creation and offensive gravity. Reports suggest even Giannis himself was “not thrilled” with the Lillard decision, indicating potential friction within the team.
Furthermore, key pieces from their championship run have either departed or are ageing. Brook Lopez moved to the Clippers, and the current roster, beyond Giannis and Turner, consists of role players like Kyle Kuzma, Bobby Portis, Kevin Porter Jr., and Gary Trent Jr. While capable, this is far from a championship-calibre supporting cast. The team’s lack of draft capital (they don’t own their own first-round pick until 2031) severely limits their ability to acquire young talent or make significant trades for a legitimate second option. This leaves the Bucks in a precarious position, with few avenues for substantial improvement. And Giannis is in fact getting worse.
Giannis’s Dominance: A Double-Edged Sword
Giannis Antetokounmpo is undeniably a generational talent. His relentless attacking of the paint, unparalleled athleticism, and defensive versatility used to make him a nightmare for opposing teams. He’s one of the most physically dominant players in NBA history. However, his very dominance, paradoxically, can become a limitation in the modern playoff landscape.
1. The Lack of a Consistent Outside Shot: This remains Giannis’s most glaring weakness. While he has shown flashes of improvement, his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc, allows defences to “wall off the paint” and pack the lane. In the playoffs, where defences become more sophisticated and disciplined, this strategy can severely hinder the Bucks’ offensive flow. Without a reliable perimeter threat from their primary offensive initiator, the offence can become predictable and stagnant, especially in crunch-time situations against elite defences.
2. Offensive Predictability and Playoff Walls: Teams have consistently exploited Giannis’s preference for driving to the basket by building defensive walls. While he can often power through, this approach forces him into contested finishes or difficult passes, leading to turnovers or inefficient possessions. For the Bucks to truly contend, they need a more diversified offense that doesn’t solely rely on Giannis’s paint attacks. Without a true secondary play maker who can consistently create their own shot or exploit the space Giannis does create, the offence will continue to struggle against top-tier defences.
3. The Burden of Creation: Giannis’s dominance means he carries an immense offensive burden. While he’s improved as a passer, the team often lacks other players who can consistently create offence, particularly against set defences. This can lead to exhaustion for Giannis over a long playoff series and limit the overall creativity and unpredictability of the Bucks’ attack. The departure of Lillard only exacerbates this issue.
4. Screen-Setting Issues: While Giannis’s physical prowess suggests he’d be an elite screen-setter, his execution in this area has been criticised for inconsistency. Effective screens are crucial for generating offensive flow and creating advantages, especially in pick-and-roll heavy offences. If Giannis isn’t consistently setting strong, precise screens, it diminishes the effectiveness of plays designed to free up teammates or exploit mismatches. In fact you can safely say that Giannis is one of the worse screeners in the NBA. He simply does not understand angles and timing.
5. Over reliance on physicality. Giannis’ game is built on physical dominance, but this style is less effective in the postseason, where officiating tends to be more lenient, and physicality alone isn’t enough to overcome strategic adjustments. Teams with versatile defenders, such as the Boston Celtics with Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown or the Philadelphia 76ers with Joel Embiid, can challenge Giannis physically while exploiting his lack of perimeter finesse. His reliance on bullying his way to the rim becomes less effective when referees swallow their whistles, and his lack of a refined mid-range or post game limits his scoring versatility.
The Path Forward: A Difficult Reality
Given the current roster construction and the inherent limitations that arise from Giannis’s dominating yet specific skillset, the Milwaukee Bucks are unlikely to be a championship contender next season. Their salary cap situation and lack of draft assets further complicate any significant roster improvements.
For the Bucks to return to championship contention, a fundamental shift might be necessary. This could involve finding a truly elite, versatile secondary star who complements Giannis’s game and alleviates some of his offensive burden, or Giannis himself making significant strides in areas like his perimeter shooting and consistent off-ball movement to diversify the offence. However, with the current outlook, the path to another Larry O’Brien trophy for the Bucks appears steep and fraught with challenges. The future, while still anchored by a superstar, looks more like a struggle for playoff relevance than a march to the Finals.
The Competitive Landscape
The Bucks’ championship odds for 2025-26 remain mediocre, with most sports books placing them in the middle of the pack—far from the league’s elite. The Bucks rank outside the top 10 in both offensive and defensive rating, a historical red flag for championship aspirations. Elite teams typically dominate in at least one area; the Bucks, built around Giannis, are stuck in the middle. Since their extremely lucky (probably gifted by the league) 2021 championship, the Bucks have failed to advance past the conference semifinals, often falling to teams that exploit their offensive predictability and lack of late-game versatility. Giannis simply can’t perform at NBA playoff level.
A Ceiling Defined by Giannis’ Limitations
The Milwaukee Bucks’ championship hopes hinge on Giannis Antetokounmpo, but his limitations—poor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, limited play making, and reliance on physicality—create a ceiling that the current roster and system cannot overcome. While Giannis remains a transcendent talent, the Bucks’ over-dependence on his strengths without adequately addressing his weaknesses makes them predictable and exploitable in the postseason. Combined with an ageing core, defensive vulnerabilities, and a brutal Eastern Conference, Milwaukee is likely to fall short of championship contention in the 2025-26 season. For the Bucks to return to title contention, they would need to retool their roster, diversify their offensive approach, and hope for significant growth in Giannis’ skill set—none of which seem imminent.
Some former teammates have described Giannis as “tough to play with,” citing his high standards and occasional trust issues with teammates. John Henson noted that Giannis and Khris Middleton “butted heads” as Middleton had to earn Giannis’ trust, and that Giannis’ approach is challenging for some players to adjust to. This is not uncommon among superstar-led teams, where the franchise is built around one transcendent talent but Giannis is particularly limited in skill set and basketball IQ. I am not the only arguing that his style of play is out of touch with modern NBA basketball.
Giannis’ style used to be predicated on relentless effort, two-way play, and a focus on team defence and hustle. In the past years he has clearly toned down his defence though, focusing on points/assists and rebound statistics. This has shaped the Bucks’ roster construction, often favouring players who are willing to buy into a team-first, Giannis-oriented mentality over ball-dominant stars. This means that the Bucks are not the ideal destination for certain types of superstars, but have consistently attracted role players and two-way contributors who don’t mind never been in the limelight and putting up with Giannis‘ selfish stat padding.
The Bucks’ organisation is known for its lack of drama and its commitment to a collective culture. Players who embrace this culture—such as Jrue Holiday and Brook Lopez—have flourished one day and then received hate the next. In the long term it seems nice but it is a toxic and unwelcoming environment as the fans demand more rings unfairly. The pinnacle? Giannis saying he “did it the right way” and thus demoting his team as “not superstars”. The ultimate put down to the roster that got him there.
The Giannis Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword for Teammates
Giannis’s unique, drive-heavy, rim-attacking style used to be incredibly effective. He still seems to get to the basket at will in the regular season, drawing fouls and creating opportunities. However, this very strength can become a challenge for complementary players.
Spacing Concerns: Giannis thrives with open lanes to the basket. This often necessitates surrounding him with multiple high-volume three-point shooters. For players who prefer to operate in the mid-range or post, or who aren’t elite perimeter shooters, playing alongside Giannis can feel constricting. The paint can get clogged, limiting their own offensive creativity and effectiveness. While the Bucks have worked to optimize their offense around him, the core principle remains: Giannis needs space to wreak havoc.
Ball Dominance vs. Player Role: While Giannis is an unwilling passer and his game naturally dictates a high usage rate. He thinks he is at his best with the ball in his hands, attacking downhill. This can reduce opportunities for other star-level players who are accustomed to being primary ball-handlers or creating their own shots. Players might worry about their offensive rhythm, their statistics, and ultimately, their overall impact on a team where Giannis is the undisputed offensive hub.
“No Bag” Narrative : Giannis’ lack of a consistent jump shot, dribbling skills or diverse offensive arsenal is a real problem in 2025. Most players might prefer to play with a superstar who offers more traditional versatility, believing it opens up the game more for everyone. No two ways about it, Giannis is a ball hog and a one trick pony.
Team Building Challenges Around a Max Superstar
The nature of the NBA’s salary cap and luxury tax makes building a championship contender around a max-contract superstar incredibly challenging.
Limited Flexibility: With Giannis commanding a significant portion of the salary cap, the Bucks often have limited financial flexibility to acquire other high-caliber talent. They often rely on astute drafting, shrewd trades, and value free-agent signings to fill out the roster. This can make it difficult to consistently surround Giannis with the optimal supporting cast, especially as complementary players age or decline.
Pressure to Win Now: The presence of a superstar like Giannis creates immediate championship expectations. This “win-now” mentality can lead to short-term decisions that might not be sustainable, and if the team falls short, the pressure intensifies on everyone, including new additions.
It’s just a bad narrative and we have seen it play out every year since the championship. It’s always “Giannis was great but needs help” (which is 100% not true as I analyse here.) “Giannis got 30 but what about everyone else?” even though they hardly saw the ball at all! The entire Bucks organisation is built around satisfying his every whim and Giannis seems to have guided transfers and coaching changes to suit that. What room does that leave for anyone else?
It’s not about a lack of respect for Giannis, but rather a complex calculation of on-court fit, team dynamics, and personal aspirations that often dictates where top talent chooses to play. The quest for an NBA championship is multifaceted, and sometimes, the perfect fit isn’t just about raw talent, but about how all the pieces, including the superstar, truly complement each other. It is often said that Giannis lacks basketball IQ on the court. Well it seems he lacks it off the court as well in terms of a solid long term plan.
A while ago i explained why the way Giannis plays greatly increases the chances of him getting injured. Here it is for those who don’t remember. However I also need to explain how it may inadvertently contribute to an increased risk of injuries for his teammates. This blog post explores the reasons behind this phenomenon, analyzing his playstyle, its impact on team dynamics, and the physical toll it may take on those around him.
The Nature of Giannis’ Playstyle
Giannis is a unique force in the NBA, blending size (6’11”), speed, and strength in a way that few players can match. His game revolves around several key elements:
Aggressive Drives to the Basket: Giannis frequently attacks the rim with powerful, high-speed drives, often initiating contact with defenders to create space or draw fouls. His “Eurostep” and ability to absorb contact make him a constant threat in the paint.
Physicality: Giannis plays with an intense physical presence, using his body to muscle through defenders or secure rebounds in traffic.
Fast-Paced Transition Play: He thrives in transition, often leading fast breaks himself or finishing them with thunderous dunks.
High Usage Rate: As the Bucks’ primary offensive weapon, Giannis handles the ball frequently, dictating the flow of the game and drawing significant defensive attention while his team mates go cold.
While these traits make him a superstar, they also create situations that can put teammates in vulnerable positions on the court. Especially since Giannis has extremely limited flexibility (aka bag) in order to adapt to changing conditions of play. He is also slow to react which can be brutally painful.
How Giannis’ Playstyle Impacts Teammates
1. Increased Defensive Pressure on Teammates
Giannis’ ability to draw multiple defenders creates opportunities for his teammates, but it also places them in high-pressure situations. Defenders often collapse on Giannis when he drives, leaving Bucks players open for kick-out passes or cuts to the basket. However, this dynamic can lead to injury risks in several ways:
Scrambling Defenders: When defenders collapse on Giannis, they often scramble to recover to open shooters or cutters. These rapid, sometimes reckless movements can lead to collisions. For example, a defender sprinting to close out on a three-point shooter like Khris Middleton or Damian Lillard may inadvertently make contact, leading to awkward landings or physical challenges that increase the risk of sprains or strains.
Physical Play in the Paint: Giannis’ presence in the paint draws physical defenders, such as big men or help defenders, who may bump or shove teammates cutting to the basket. Players like Brook Lopez or Bobby Portis, who often operate near the rim, face increased physicality from opponents trying to counter Giannis’ dominance.
2. Fast-Paced Play and Fatigue
Giannis’ transition-heavy style pushes the Bucks to play at a high tempo, which can lead to fatigue among teammates. Fatigue is a well-documented risk factor for injuries in sports, as tired players are more likely to lose focus, misjudge movements, or fail to protect themselves during contact. For example:
Running the Floor: Players like Jrue Holiday (in past seasons) or current teammates are required to sprint alongside Giannis in transition to provide spacing or receive passes. This constant running can wear down players, particularly guards or wings who may not have Giannis’ exceptional stamina.
Defensive Responsibilities: Giannis’ aggressive drives often force opponents into transition defense, but they also require Bucks players to quickly get back on defense to prevent counterattacks. This back-and-forth pace can exhaust teammates, increasing the likelihood of injuries like muscle strains or knee issues due to overexertion.
3. Crowded Paint and Collision Risks
Giannis’ preference for attacking the rim often results in a crowded paint, with multiple defenders converging to stop him. This congestion can lead to unintended contact with teammates:
Screening and Cutting: Bucks players frequently set screens or cut to the basket to complement Giannis’ drives. However, the crowded paint increases the risk of collisions with defenders or even Giannis himself. For instance, a poorly timed cut by a teammate could result in contact with a rotating defender or Giannis’ own aggressive movements, leading to potential injuries like ankle sprains or bruises.
Rebounding Battles: Giannis is an elite rebounder, but his aggressive pursuit of rebounds can sometimes put teammates in harm’s way. When multiple Bucks players crash the boards alongside Giannis, they risk getting tangled up with opponents or each other, increasing the chance of awkward landings or elbow strikes. This is made worse by Giannis roaming out of position looking for a highlight block as he is not where his team mates expect him to be.
4. Defensive Attention and Retaliation
Giannis’ dominance often frustrates opponents, leading to more physical play or borderline dirty tactics. While Giannis’ size and strength allow him to absorb much of this physicality, his teammates may not be as equipped to handle it:
Targeted Physicality: Opponents may take out their frustration on Giannis’ teammates, especially role players like Grayson Allen or Malik Beasley, who may face harder screens, shoves, or aggressive closeouts. This physicality can lead to injuries, particularly for smaller players.
Retaliatory Fouls: When Giannis draws fouls or initiates contact, opponents may respond with harder fouls on his teammates to “send a message.” These plays can result in injuries, such as when a player is knocked to the floor or lands awkwardly after a tough challenge.
Statistical Context and Examples
While direct causation between Giannis’ playstyle and teammate injuries is difficult to prove, there are patterns worth noting. According to NBA injury reports from the 2020-2023 seasons, the Bucks have had several key players miss time due to injuries that could be linked to the high-intensity, physical style of play Giannis encourages:
Khris Middleton: Middleton has dealt with ankle sprains and knee issues, some of which occurred during games where he was forced to make quick cuts or absorb contact while operating in Giannis’ orbit. For example, in the 2022 playoffs, Middleton suffered a knee injury that some analysts attributed to the physical toll of Milwaukee’s aggressive style.
Brook Lopez: As a rim protector and rebounder, Lopez often faces physical battles in the paint, exacerbated by Giannis’ ability to draw big men to the rim. Lopez has missed time with back and foot injuries, potentially linked to the constant physicality.
Role Players: Players like Donte DiVincenzo (pre-trade) and Grayson Allen have suffered injuries like ankle sprains or bruises, often in situations involving fast breaks or crowded paint scenarios driven by Giannis’ play.
Data from Synergy Sports shows that the Bucks rank among the league leaders in points in the paint and fast-break points, reflecting Giannis’ influence on their style. However, this also correlates with a higher number of possessions involving physical contact, which can elevate injury risks for teammates.
Mitigating the Risks
While Giannis’ playstyle is a core part of his greatness, there are ways the Bucks can reduce the injury risks for teammates:
Improved Spacing: By emphasising better floor spacing, the Bucks can reduce congestion in the paint, giving teammates more room to operate without colliding with defenders or Giannis.
Load Management: Managing the minutes of role players to prevent fatigue can help reduce injury risks, especially for players who run the floor alongside Giannis.
Screening Discipline: Coaching staff can work on cleaner screening and cutting techniques to minimise collisions in the paint.
Defensive Awareness: Teammates can be coached to anticipate aggressive defensive rotations caused by Giannis’ drives, helping them avoid reckless closeouts or physical challenges.
However Giannis is not the sharpest tool in the shed and his lack of basketball IQ and flexibility on the court make it highly unlikely that he will be able to successfully navigate these changes. Worse still he is overly physical in the regular season when most teams are being careful and then not effective enough in the playoffs!
Giannis is largely to blame for Bucks’ injuries
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playstyle is a double-edged sword. His ability to dominate games with his physicality, speed, and aggression makes the Bucks a championship-calibre team, but it also creates challenges for his teammates. The increased defensive pressure, crowded paint, and fast-paced nature of his game can inadvertently put teammates in situations where injuries are more likely. While Giannis himself is built to withstand the physical toll of his style, his teammates—particularly role players—may face heightened risks due to the ripple effects of his dominance. By making strategic adjustments, the Bucks can continue to leverage Giannis’ unique talents while minimising the injury risks for the rest of the roster. But these past seasons have shown us that Giannis is more focused on stat padding and personal promotion than actually playing with his team for his team. He kills ball flow and most other players hardly touch the ball. Hard to get going like that or even to stay warm. And most importantly he has shown almost zero capacity to improve his game.
On June 13, 2025, ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith sparked a firestorm of debate on First Take by labelling Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo an “underachiever” if he fails to win another NBA championship. The comment, delivered in response to host Molly Qerim’s question about how to describe Giannis’ legacy without additional titles, drew immediate backlash from fans and analysts alike. Many pointed to Giannis’ remarkable journey—from a street vendor in Athens, Greece, to a two-time MVP, Finals MVP, and NBA champion—as evidence that the label is absurd. Yet, while Antetokounmpo’s story is undeniably inspiring, Smith’s argument has merit when viewed through the lens of Giannis’ dominance, postseason shortcomings, and the expectations placed on players of his calibre. Let me be the first to say that Stephen A Smith is a clown and very often his takes are ridiculous. But in this case he is 100% correct.
Giannis’ Unparalleled Dominance Sets a High Bar
Giannis Antetokounmpo over the last four years, across a minimum of 200 games, Giannis ranks second in the NBA with 30.4 points per game and fifth with 11.7 rebounds per game. His accolades are staggering: nine All-NBA selections, nine All-Star appearances, two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year award, and a Finals MVP in 2021. At 30 years old, in the prime of his career, Giannis is still a physical marvel but in terms of actual impact on games that matter?
This dominance is precisely why Smith’s “underachiever” label resonates. Players of Giannis’ stature—think Michael Jordan, LeBron James, or Kevin Durant—are judged not just by individual brilliance but by their ability to translate it into sustained postseason success. Smith argues, “You don’t look at somebody that dominant, that fantastic, with that kind of fire in his belly to compete on a night-in, night-out basis, and all you have is one championship to show for it.” The expectation for a player of Giannis’ caliber isn’t just to win once but to contend consistently and build a legacy of multiple titles. His 2021 championship was a historic triumph, but the Bucks’ inability to replicate that success raises questions about whether Giannis is fully capitalizing on his prime. Most importantly he doesn’t seem to be able to elevate those around him. Quite the opposite.
Postseason Struggles: A Pattern of Disappointment
Since their 2021 title, the Milwaukee Bucks have struggled in the playoffs, posting just one series win in the last four years. The team has suffered first-round exits in each of the past three seasons (2023–2025), a stark contrast to Giannis’ regular-season dominance. While injuries have played a role—Giannis missed significant time in the 2023 and 2024 playoffs due to back and calf injuries, respectively—the Bucks’ postseason woes extend beyond health concerns.
In 2022, the Bucks fell to the Boston Celtics in the second round, with Giannis playing all seven games. In 2023, despite Giannis’ absence for parts of the series, the Bucks were favored against the Miami Heat but collapsed in five games. In 2024, without Giannis, they lost to the Indiana Pacers in the first round. Even in 2025, with Giannis healthy, the Bucks fell to the Pacers again in five games. Smith highlighted this trend, noting that Giannis “has more All-NBA selections than postseason wins in the last four years.” For a player of his calibre, this discrepancy is striking.
Critics argue that these failures aren’t entirely Giannis’ fault. The Bucks have faced roster challenges, including an aging core and questionable front-office decisions. The 2023 trade for Damian Lillard, which cost them Jrue Holiday, a defensive anchor and clutch performer, has yet to yield the expected results, partly due to Lillard’s declining athleticism. The midseason trade of Khris Middleton to the Washington Wizards in 2024–25 further disrupted team chemistry. Yet, as the face of the franchise, Giannis bears the burden of elevating his team in critical moments. In the championship run, the more you look at it, the more it seems that Khris, Jrue and Brook did the job and Giannis just turned up for the Finals where it was easy. His inability to impact important games again and again, even in the regular season, lends credence to Smith’s critique.
The Championship-or-Bust Standard for Superstars
In the NBA, superstars are judged by championships, a standard that may seem unfair but is deeply ingrained in the sport’s culture. Legends like Kevin Garnett and Dirk Nowitzki, each with one ring, are often cited by Giannis’ defenders as proof that a single title can cement a legacy. However, both Garnett and Nowitzki faced criticism during their careers for not winning more, and their lone championships came against formidable opponents, much like Giannis’ 2021 title. The difference lies in expectations: Giannis, with his two MVPs and prime years ahead, is held to a higher standard than most.
Smith’s argument hinges on this championship-or-bust mentality. He acknowledges Giannis’ greatness but insists that “it’s unacceptable” for a player of his dominance to have just one title and limited playoff success. This perspective aligns with how other superstars are evaluated. LeBron James faced intense scrutiny until he won his first title in 2012; Kevin Durant was labelled a “ring-chaser” until he won in 2017. Even Nikola Jokić, a one-time champion, faces pressure to add more rings to his résumé. Giannis, with his unique blend of accolades and physical gifts, is no exception. It’s not just about the rings. It is about proving you can do it when it matters, not just regular season stat padding at which Giannis excels.
Organizational Limbo and Giannis’ Role
Superstars are expected to transcend organizational shortcomings. Michael Jordan carried flawed Bulls rosters to playoff success before Scottie Pippen’s arrival; LeBron James dragged undermanned Cavaliers teams to the Finals. Giannis’ recent playoff performances, while statistically impressive as individual numbers, haven’t yielded the same results. For example, in the 2025 playoffs against the Pacers, Giannis averaged 31.8 points and 12.4 rebounds but couldn’t prevent a five-game loss. Smith’s point is that a player of Giannis’ calibre should find ways to win, even when the odds are stacked against him. And he seems more incapable of doing that than ever. If anything, he is getting worse!
The Trade Rumors and Legacy Pressure
Giannis’ future with the Bucks has been a hot topic, with trade rumours swirling as Milwaukee struggles to build a contender around him. Reports from ESPN’s Brian Windhorst on June 10, 2025, indicate that there’s currently no trade market for Giannis, and he hasn’t requested a move. However, the speculation itself underscores the pressure on Giannis to deliver. If he were to leave Milwaukee without another title, his legacy could take a hit, as loyalty to a small-market team is often weighed against championship success.
Smith’s “underachiever” label is partly a warning: without another ring, Giannis risks being remembered as a player who didn’t fully realise his potential. This sentiment is echoed by some fans on social media, with one user (@bets_liam) noting the Bucks’ “organisational limbo” and lack of depth as barriers to Giannis’ success. Yet, the expectation remains that Giannis, as a top-tier superstar, should overcome these obstacles or seek a situation where he can win.
Excuses excuses
Giannis’ defenders have the same points they make every year. His journey from a No. 15 draft pick in the Greek second division to NBA stardom is one of the most inspiring in sports history. Injuries, both to Giannis and his teammates, have derailed potential deep playoff runs but these can also be attributed to their own mistakes in the way they approach their season. The Bucks’ roster moves, particularly the Lillard trade, haven’t panned out as hoped. Moreover, comparing Giannis to players like Jordan or James may be unfair, as few players in history have matched their postseason dominance. Legends like Jerry West, Oscar Robertson, and Julius Erving, each with one ring, are rarely called underachievers.
These excuses don’t negate Smith’s core point: Giannis’ talent demands more than one title. His regular-season excellence and 2021 heroics have set a sky-high standard, and the Bucks’ recent playoff failures fall short of that mark. Smith’s take, while harsh, reflects the unforgiving expectations placed on superstars in the NBA. “XYZ famous player didn’t win any titles?” come the Giannis fanboys in his defence. That is irrelevant. They had impact on the game when it mattered. They elevated their team mates or they did heroics on their own enough to get their teams along in the playoffs. They didn’t exit 4-1 in the playoffs like Giannis does all the time. It really looks like all he cares about is his individual stats. All season the story has been “Giannis gets 30+ points but…”
A Call to Action for Giannis
Stephen A. Smith’s “underachiever” label for Giannis Antetokounmpo is a provocative but defensible stance. Giannis’ dominance in the regular season, coupled with the Bucks’ postseason struggles, creates a gap between his potential and his achievements. While injuries, roster issues, and organisational missteps share the blame, superstars are judged by their ability to overcome adversity and deliver championships. Giannis’ 2021 title proved he’s capable of greatness, but without additional rings, his legacy risks being defined by what could have been. This season he couldn’t even beat any of the top teams in the East in the regular season! Not even once!
Rather than a condemnation, Smith’s comment is a call to action. For now, Smith’s take serves as a reminder of the relentless standard applied to the NBA’s elite: greatness isn’t just about what you’ve done, but what you continue to achieve. And after more than a decade in the NBA, Giannis’ excuses are getting very very stale. Especially when we are not seeing improvements in his game. On the contrary he is getting worse at most things on the floor. At 30, Giannis has time to add to his résumé, whether in Milwaukee or elsewhere. His response to this criticism—on the court, in the playoffs—will ultimately shape how history views him. But so many times he has made big statements and then gone off to simply fail again in the playoffs.
When discussing the NBA’s elite, Giannis Antetokounmpo and LeBron James frequently top the conversation. Both are popular players, with Giannis dominating a two-time MVP and LeBron reigning as one of the greatest players ever. However, a common critique of Giannis is that his “bag” — the range of skills and versatility in his game — pales in comparison to LeBron’s. Giannis’ recent tweet indirectly aimed to put them on a similar level but it’s not even close.
Scoring: Power vs. Precision
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis, known as the “Greek Freak,” relies heavily on his physical gifts. Standing at 6’11” with a 7’3″ wingspan, he’s a force in the paint. His scoring is built on:
Rim Attacks: Giannis is arguably the best in the league at driving to the basket. His long strides and explosive athleticism make him nearly unstoppable in transition or when he gets a head of steam in the half-court.
Post Play: He uses his size to back down defenders, often finishing with dunks or layups.
Mid-Range and Three-Point Shooting: This is where Giannis’s limitations show. His jump shot remains inconsistent. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting around 29% from three on low volume (1-2 attempts per game) and rarely takes mid-range shots, preferring to attack the rim. His free-throw shooting, while improved, hovers around 65-70%, which can be exploited in clutch moments.
Giannis’s scoring is devastatingly effective but one-dimensional. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot, which limits his offensive repertoire compared to players with more refined jumpers.
LeBron James
LeBron, at 6’9″ and 250 pounds, combines physicality with finesse. His scoring arsenal is far more diverse:
Driving and Finishing: Like Giannis, LeBron is a freight train in transition and can finish through contact at the rim. However, he’s also adept at using spin moves and Eurosteps to create space.
Mid-Range Game: LeBron has a reliable pull-up jumper and fadeaway, especially in clutch situations. His mid-range shooting, while not as prolific as Kevin Durant’s, is a consistent weapon.
Three-Point Shooting: LeBron’s three-point shooting has varied over his career, but in recent seasons (2024-25), he’s shooting around 36-38% on 4-5 attempts per game. This forces defenses to respect his range, opening up driving lanes.
Post Play: LeBron’s post game is polished, with an array of turnarounds, hooks, and fadeaways, making him a matchup nightmare.
LeBron’s ability to score from all three levels — inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc — gives him a significant edge. Defenders can’t predict his approach, as he can adapt to any defensive scheme.
Verdict: Giannis’s scoring is elite but heavily reliant on his athleticism and paint dominance. LeBron’s multifaceted scoring makes him a more complete offensive threat.
Playmaking: Vision and Execution
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis has grown into a solid playmaker, averaging around 6-7 assists per game in recent seasons. His passing is effective in specific contexts:
Drive-and-Kick: Giannis often draws multiple defenders on drives, allowing him to kick out to open shooters.
Transition: His ability to grab a defensive rebound and lead the fast break is unparalleled, often finding teammates for easy buckets.
Limitations: Giannis’s playmaking is somewhat predictable. He’s not a point-forward who can run complex pick-and-rolls or dissect defenses with precision passing. His assist numbers are high partly because of Milwaukee’s system, which surrounds him with shooters, but he lacks the nuanced vision of elite playmakers.
LeBron James
LeBron is one of the best passers in NBA history, often compared to Magic Johnson. His playmaking is a cornerstone of his game:
Court Vision: LeBron’s ability to read defenses is uncanny. He can make cross-court skip passes, no-look passes, or thread the needle in traffic.
Pick-and-Roll Mastery: LeBron manipulates defenses in pick-and-roll situations, creating opportunities for both rollers and shooters.
Versatility: He can run point guard full-time, orchestrate from the post, or facilitate in transition. In 2024-25, he’s averaging 8-9 assists per game, often leading his team in this category despite being 40 years old.
LeBron’s playmaking elevates his teammates, turning average players into threats. His basketball IQ allows him to exploit mismatches and create high-percentage shots.
Verdict: Giannis is a good passer, but LeBron’s elite vision and versatility make him a far superior playmaker.
Defense: Impact and Adaptability
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, having won the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. His defensive strengths include:
Rim Protection: His length and timing make him an elite shot-blocker, averaging 1.5-2 blocks per game.
Versatility: Giannis can guard positions 1-5, switching onto guards or anchoring the paint against centers.
Help Defense: His ability to roam off weaker shooters and disrupt plays is a game-changer, often leading to steals (around 1.2 per game).
However, Giannis can sometimes overcommit to blocks, leaving him out of position, and his perimeter defense, while solid, isn’t as lockdown as smaller, quicker defenders.
LeBron James
LeBron’s defensive prime was earlier in his career (2008-2016), but even in 2025, he remains a plus defender:
Versatility: LeBron can still guard multiple positions, though he’s less likely to take on elite perimeter players full-time at this stage.
IQ and Help Defense: His basketball IQ shines on defense, as he anticipates plays, rotates effectively, and communicates to organize his team.
Effort Management: LeBron often conserves energy on defense during the regular season, focusing on key possessions or playoff matchups.
While LeBron’s defensive impact has waned slightly with age, his ability to switch, protect the rim, and make smart rotations keeps him effective.
Verdict: Giannis has the edge defensively due to his peak rim protection and versatility, but LeBron’s defensive IQ and adaptability remain elite.
Overall Versatility: The “Bag” Comparison
The term “bag” refers to a player’s range of skills and ability to adapt to different situations. Giannis’s bag is deep in specific areas:
Unstoppable in transition and paint scoring. Well, he used to be unstoppable.
Elite defensive impact. Well, until he won DPOY and then forgot defence.
Improving but limited playmaking. Unless it is a game that matters.
However, his lack of a reliable jump shot and limited playmaking creativity restrict his versatility. Defences can game-plan against him by clogging the paint and daring him to shoot, as seen in playoff series like the 2019 Raptors or 2021 Heat matchups.
LeBron’s bag, by contrast, is one of the deepest in NBA history:
Scores efficiently from all three levels.
Elite playmaking that elevates any team.
High-level defense, even if not at its peak.
Ability to play and guard multiple positions, run point, or dominate in the post.
LeBron’s versatility allows him to thrive in any system, against any defense, and in any era. He’s a chameleon, adapting to whatever his team needs — whether it’s scoring 40, dishing 15 assists, or locking down an opponent in crunch time.
Contextual Factors: Age and Era
It’s worth noting that Giannis (30 years old in 2025) is in his prime, while LeBron (40) is in the twilight of his career. Despite this, LeBron’s skill set remains more polished. Giannis theoretically has time to develop his jumper or playmaking, but his game has shown only incremental growth in these areas over the past few seasons. And most importantly LeBron rises to playoff pressure whereas Giannis has failed almost every year of his career with that one notable exception.
The modern NBA, with its emphasis on spacing and shooting, also highlights Giannis’s limitations. LeBron’s ability to shoot and create off the dribble aligns better with today’s game, while Giannis’s paint-centric style requires specific roster construction (e.g., shooters like Middleton and Lopez) to maximize his impact. Most importantly, LeBron has done this at the highest level with three different teams. Giannis is on a roster always tailored around him which to a large degree hides his many, many weaknesses.
So no Giannis, you won’t get away with this
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s physical dominance during the regular season make him a perennial MVP candidate. However, when comparing his “bag” to LeBron James’s, the gap is clear. LeBron’s ability to score from anywhere, make every type of pass, and adapt to any role gives him a level of versatility that Giannis has yet to match. While Giannis’s raw power and athleticism are impressive in easy games, his lack of a consistent outside shot and limited playmaking creativity mean his game is less complete. And most importantly his game has not developed and doesn’t deliver when it counts. While LeBron posts career breaking improvements in efficiency at 40, Giannis hits career lows in ft% and 3pt% as well a serious deterioration of his defensive effort.
LeBron’s all-around mastery, even at 40, sets a standard that few, including Giannis, can rival. As Giannis continues to refine his game, he may close the gap, but for now, LeBron’s bag remains the deeper and more versatile of the two. And it’s not even close.
The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings, hosted at nbarankings.theringer.com, aim to provide a dynamic, year-round evaluation of the NBA players making the most significant impact in the league. Updated regularly to reflect current performance, the rankings are a valuable resource for fans and analysts alike. However, the 2025 iteration of these rankings has sparked debate, particularly regarding the placement of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. While Giannis is undeniably a phenomenal physical talent, his high ranking—near the very top—raises questions about the methodology and criteria used, especially when his playoff impact is scrutinised.
1. Overemphasis on Regular-Season Performance
The Ringer’s rankings claim to reflect players “making the biggest impact on the league right now” (). However, the methodology appears to heavily favor regular-season statistics and accolades over playoff performance, which is arguably the true measure of a player’s impact in high-stakes scenarios. This is particularly evident in Giannis Antetokounmpo’s case. Giannis consistently posts gaudy regular-season numbers—averaging 30.4 points, 11.5 rebounds, and 6.5 assists in the 2022-23 season, for example, while leading the Bucks to the best record in the NBA. His ability to dominate with sheer athleticism and force makes him a regular-season juggernaut, but the rankings fail to adequately weigh his postseason shortcomings.
In the 2025 playoffs, Giannis averaged an impressive 36 points in Game 1 against the Indiana Pacers, but his impact was limited by Milwaukee’s blowout loss and the team’s overall lack of cohesion (). The Bucks have not won a playoff game in which Giannis has played since Game 5 of the 2022 playoffs, going 0-5 in such games (). This pattern of playoff under performance—whether due to injuries, coaching mismatches, or roster limitations—suggests that Giannis’s ranking should reflect these struggles more heavily. The Ringer’s list, by prioritising regular-season dominance, risks inflating the value of players like Giannis who excel in less consequential games but falter when the stakes are highest.
2. Giannis’s Playoff Limitations: A Case for a Lower Ranking
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playoff resume is a mixed bag, and The Ringer’s high ranking of him—often in the top 5, alongside players like Nikola Jokić and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander—overlooks critical weaknesses. While Giannis led the Bucks to a championship in 2021 with a historic 50-point performance in Game 6 of the Finals, his postseason success since then has been inconsistent. The Bucks have faced early-round exits in each of the last four postseasons (2022-2025), with injuries, poor roster construction, and tactical limitations playing significant roles.
a. Injury Concerns and Availability
Giannis has struggled with durability in recent playoffs. Since the 2021 championship, injuries to either himself or key teammates like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard have derailed Milwaukee’s postseason aspirations (). In 2023, Giannis played in the Heat series but was hampered, and his team lost despite a 40-point, 20-rebound game (). In 2024, he missed significant playoff time, and in 2025, the Bucks’ Game 1 loss to the Pacers highlighted a lack of team support around him (). While injuries are not entirely within a player’s control, consistent absence or diminished performance in critical playoff moments should weigh heavily in rankings that claim to assess current impact.
b. Tactical Limitations
Giannis’s game, while dominant, has exploitable flaws in playoff settings. His lack of a reliable three-point shot (22.2% in 2024-25) and career-low 61.7% free-throw shooting make him vulnerable to defensive schemes that clog the paint and dare him to shoot (). Teams like the Miami Heat in 2023 and the Pacers in 2025 have capitalised on this, using physical defenders and zone schemes to neutralise his drives. The Ringer’s rankings do not seem to account for how these limitations reduce Giannis’ effectiveness in high-stakes games, where opponents can game-plan specifically to exploit his weaknesses.
c. Supporting Cast and Coaching Mismatches
The Ringer’s individual player rankings should consider how much of Giannis’ impact is diminished by his lack of ability to adapt to his playing environment. His high ranking feels like an endorsement of his individual stats rather than a holistic evaluation of his ability to elevate his team in the postseason. Which he obviously cannot do. Shouldn’t that be the most important thing in a team game?
d. Comparison to Peers
When compared to other top-tier players like Jokić, who led Denver to a championship in 2023 with a historically efficient offensive season (), or Gilgeous-Alexander, who has guided OKC to a dominant 2024-25 season (), Giannis’s playoff resume pales. Jokić’s versatility as a passer, shooter, and clutch performer makes him a more reliable playoff force, while Gilgeous-Alexander’s low turnover rate and ability to elevate teammates in big moments set him apart (). The Ringer’s failure to adjust Giannis’s ranking downward relative to these players suggests a bias toward his regular-season dominance and name recognition.
3. Lack of Transparency in Ranking Methodology
Another significant flaw in The Ringer’s rankings is the lack of clarity around how players are evaluated. The site describes the list as reflecting “the biggest impact on the league right now” but does not provide specific criteria, such as statistical weights, playoff performance, or qualitative factors like leadership or clutch play (). This opacity makes it difficult to understand why Giannis is ranked so highly despite his postseason struggles. For comparison, ESPN’s NBArank, which uses a panel of experts voting on player matchups, provides a clearer framework, even if it’s not perfect (). The Ringer’s rankings would benefit from a detailed explanation of how regular-season stats, playoff performance, and intangibles are balanced.
4. Overvaluing Star Power and Narrative
The Ringer’s rankings seem to lean heavily on star power and narrative, which may explain Giannis’s lofty placement. His transformation from a “gangly teenager to a modern-day Shaq” and his inspirational 2021 Finals run have cemented his status as a fan and media favorite (). However, this narrative-driven approach can overshadow objective analysis. Posts on X highlight skepticism about Giannis’s top-5 status, with users pointing out his poor shooting percentages (45/25% in some playoff series) and lack of playoff wins since 2022 (,). The Ringer’s rankings risk prioritizing Giannis’s brand and past achievements over his current playoff impact, which is inconsistent with the claim of evaluating “right now.”
5. Broader Issues with the Rankings
Beyond Giannis, The Ringer’s list has other issues that undermine its credibility:
Inconsistent Updates: While the rankings are described as “year-round, around-the-clock,” updates seem sporadic, with some entries dated months apart (e.g., February 27, 2025, and April 15, 2025) (,). This raises questions about whether the rankings truly reflect current performance.
Overranking Aging Stars: Players like Kevin Durant and LeBron James, ranked highly despite injury concerns and diminished playoff success, suggest a reliance on reputation rather than current output ().
Underrating Emerging Talent: Young players like Anthony Edwards and Victor Wembanyama, who are projected to dominate in the future, may be ranked lower than their current impact warrants due to a bias toward established names ().
Conclusion: Reassessing Giannis and The Ringer’s Approach
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a generational talent, but his high ranking in The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings is questionable given his recent playoff struggles. His injury history, tactical limitations, and reliance on a sub optimal supporting cast and coaching staff have hindered his postseason impact, yet the rankings do not seem to reflect these realities. Broader issues, such as the lack of transparent methodology, overemphasis on regular-season stats, and narrative-driven evaluations, further undermine the list’s credibility. To improve, The Ringer should clarify its criteria, give greater weight to playoff performance, and ensure rankings reflect current impact rather than past achievements or star power. Until then, Giannis’ placement near the top feels more like a nod to his regular-season dominance and fan appeal than a true measure of his league-wide impact.
When thinking about building a dream team around a Milwaukee Bucks player, past or present, the immediate instinct might be to choose Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Greek Freak, whose dominance has defined the franchise’s modern era. However, if forced to look beyond Giannis, one name stands above the rest: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the legendary center who brought the Bucks their first and only NBA championship in 1971 (until Giannis led the team to another in 2021). Kareem’s unique combination of skill, versatility, and basketball IQ makes him the ideal cornerstone for constructing a championship-caliber team. A quick look at why Kareem would be better and then a dive into why Giannis is really, really bad as a team leader and building block.
Why Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, originally drafted as Lew Alcindor by the Bucks in 1969, was a transformative force in the NBA. Standing at 7’2” with a wingspan that seemed to stretch across the court, Kareem was not just a physical specimen but a skilled technician. His signature skyhook—a virtually unblockable shot delivered with precision—made him a scoring machine. During his six seasons with the Bucks, he averaged 30.4 points, 15.3 rebounds, and 4.3 assists per game, showcasing his ability to dominate both offensively and defensively. His 1971 MVP season, where he led the Bucks to a 66-16 record and a championship alongside Oscar Robertson, cemented his legacy as one of the game’s all-time greats.
Kareem’s appeal as a team-building centrepiece lies in his versatility. He could score from anywhere, rebound at an elite level, block shots, and facilitate plays with his passing. Unlike many big men of his era, Kareem wasn’t just a post presence; he was a complete player who could adapt to different styles of play. His basketball IQ and leadership also made him a coach’s dream, capable of elevating those around him. Building around Kareem means constructing a roster that maximises his strengths while addressing the few gaps in his game, such as perimeter defence and three-point shooting, which weren’t as critical in his era but are vital in today’s game.
Why Not Giannis?
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a phenomenal player, but Kareem’s skill set offers more flexibility in team-building. Giannis thrives in a system with shooters to space the floor, as his limited outside shooting can clog the paint. Kareem, with his mid-range and post game, doesn’t require as much perimeter shooting to be effective, though this roster provides it anyway. Kareem’s defensive presence as a rim protector also gives him an edge over Giannis, whose defensive impact relies more on versatility than anchoring the paint. Finally, Kareem’s proven championship pedigree as the focal point of the 1971 Bucks gives him a slight edge in this hypothetical scenario.
While Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBA’s most dominant players, having led the Milwaukee Bucks to a championship in 2021, there are arguments why he might not be the ideal cornerstone for building a championship team, particularly when considering his style of play in the context of modern NBA trends. Below is a detailed list of reasons why Giannis’s game may be seen as less compatible with the needs of today’s NBA for constructing a championship roster, though it’s worth noting that these points are relative and don’t negate his elite status.
1. Limited Outside Shooting
Issue: Giannis is not a reliable three-point shooter, with a career three-point percentage of 28.5% (as of the 2024-25 season). His mid-range game is also inconsistent, limiting his ability to stretch the floor.
Impact on Team-Building: Modern NBA offenses prioritize spacing to create driving lanes and open three-point opportunities. Giannis’s lack of shooting allows defenses to sag off him, clogging the paint and forcing teammates to carry a heavier load as perimeter shooters. Building around him requires surrounding him with elite shooters (e.g., Khris Middleton, Damian Lillard), which can limit roster flexibility and increase reliance on specific player archetypes.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Teams like the Golden State Warriors or Boston Celtics thrive with versatile shooters at every position, including big men like Kevin Durant or Kristaps Porziņģis. Giannis’s inability to shoot forces a more predictable offensive scheme.
2. Heavy Reliance on Paint Dominance
Issue: Giannis’s game is centered on attacking the rim, using his size, speed, and athleticism to overpower defenders. He leads the league in points in the paint but relies heavily on this style.
Impact on Team-Building: Defenses can counter Giannis by building a “wall” in the paint, as seen in the 2019 and 2020 playoffs against Toronto and Miami. This strategy dares him to shoot from outside, exposing his weaknesses. To compensate, the team needs strong playmakers and shooters to create space, which can be costly and difficult to sustain across a playoff run.
Contrast with Modern Needs: The modern NBA favors offenses that can exploit mismatches through versatile scoring options. Players like Nikola Jokić or Joel Embiid, who can score from the post, mid-range, or beyond the arc, offer more diverse threats that are harder to scheme against.
3. Limited Playmaking in Half-Court Sets
Issue: While Giannis averages around 5-6 assists per game, his playmaking is more effective in transition than in structured half-court offenses. His passing is solid but not at the level of elite facilitators like LeBron James or Jokić.
Impact on Team-Building: Building a championship team often requires a primary ball-handler who can orchestrate complex half-court plays, especially in the playoffs when games slow down. Giannis’s limited ability to create for others in tight situations puts pressure on point guards or secondary creators, requiring the team to invest in players like Jrue Holiday or Damian Lillard to handle playmaking duties.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern championship teams often have big men who double as primary facilitators (e.g., Jokić’s 9+ assists per game or Draymond Green’s high-IQ passing). Giannis’s playmaking, while improved, doesn’t match this level of versatility.
4. Defensive Versatility Has Limits
Issue: Giannis used to be an elite defender, capable of guarding multiple positions and earning All-Defensive honours. However, his rim protection, while strong (1.1 blocks per game career average), is not as dominant as traditional centres like Rudy Gobert or Anthony Davis, and he can struggle against smaller, quicker guards on switches.
Impact on Team-Building: In today’s switch-heavy defenses, teams need big men who can either anchor the paint or seamlessly switch onto guards. Giannis excels in help defense and roaming but can be exploited by teams with quick guards or stretch bigs, requiring complementary defenders like Brook Lopez to cover the rim.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Players like Bam Adebayo or Draymond Green offer more switchability across all positions, while Giannis’s defensive impact is slightly less flexible in certain matchups, necessitating specific roster constructions to cover his weaknesses.
5. Free-Throw Shooting Struggles in Clutch Moments
Issue: Giannis’s free-throw shooting has been a persistent weakness, with a career average of 64.7%. In high-pressure playoff games, his slow free-throw routine and inconsistent shooting can be exploited, as seen in games where opponents use the “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy.
Impact on Team-Building: Championship teams need reliable clutch performers. Giannis’s free-throw woes can lead to late-game liabilities, forcing coaches to adjust strategies or rely on other players in crunch time. This requires a roster with strong closers, which can complicate lineup decisions.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern NBA stars like Stephen Curry or Kevin Durant are trusted to close games with efficient scoring, including at the free-throw line. Giannis’s struggles in this area limit his reliability in tight situations.
6. High Usage Rate Limits Teammate Involvement
Issue: Giannis’s usage rate is among the league’s highest (32.3% in 2023-24), reflecting his ball-dominant style. While effective, this can reduce touches for teammates and make the offense overly reliant on his production.
Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires players who thrive off-ball, as his drives and post-ups demand the ball. This can limit the effectiveness of other ball-dominant stars unless they adapt (e.g., Lillard’s reduced role in Milwaukee). The team must prioritize role players who don’t need the ball, which can restrict roster diversity.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern offenses often distribute usage more evenly, with players like Jokić or Luka Dončić creating for others while still scoring. Giannis’s style can sometimes stifle teammate involvement, requiring careful roster construction.
7. Playoff Predictability
Issue: In playoff series, Giannis’s lack of a reliable jump shot and predictable driving style allow elite defensive teams to game-plan against him. Teams like the 2019 Raptors and 2020 Heat successfully limited his impact by crowding the paint and daring him to shoot.
Impact on Team-Building: To counter this, the Bucks need elite shooting and secondary creators to punish defensive adjustments. This places a premium on acquiring high-cost talent, which can strain salary caps and limit depth. Without perfect roster construction, Giannis’s game can be neutralized in high-stakes series.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern playoff success often hinges on unpredictability. Players like Jayson Tatum or Devin Booker, who can score in multiple ways, are harder to scheme against. Giannis’s more one-dimensional scoring profile requires specific countermeasures.
8. Physical Wear and Tear
Issue: Giannis’s physical, high-energy style—relying on explosive drives and defensive hustle—puts significant strain on his body. He’s had injury concerns, like knee issues in the 2021 and 2023 playoffs, which can impact his availability.
Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires a deep roster to compensate for potential injuries, as his absence significantly alters the team’s identity. This demands investment in quality backups, which can be challenging under salary cap constraints.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Players with more finesse-based games (e.g., Durant’s jump-shooting or Curry’s off-ball movement) may have less physical wear, allowing for greater durability. Giannis’s style, while dominant, carries long-term risks.
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s lack of outside shooting, reliance on paint scoring, limited half-court playmaking, and other factors make him a less flexible building block for a championship team in the modern NBA compared to more versatile stars. His style requires a roster heavy on shooters, defenders, and secondary creators, which can limit flexibility and increase costs. These incompatibilities with the spacing, versatility, and unpredictability demanded by today’s game make players like Kareem, with a more adaptable skill set, better anchors for a championship roster.
The recent article from The Athletic, titled “Echoes of Kareem: The eerie parallels Bucks fans see in a potential Giannis-less future,” draws a dramatic comparison between the Milwaukee Bucks’ trade of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in 1975 and the potential trade of Giannis Antetokounmpo. It suggests that trading Giannis could plunge the Bucks into a decades-long championship drought, much like the 46 years that followed Kareem’s departure. While the historical parallel is intriguing, the argument hinges on an overstated view of Giannis’s impact, ignoring the critical weaknesses in his game that limit his ability to dominate when it matters most. This blog post dismantles the article’s premise, arguing that Giannis’s flaws make the comparison to Kareem—a player with a far more complete skill set—unconvincing.
Key points from the articles suggest:
Giannis’s current situation:
Giannis Antetokounmpo is reportedly considering being traded for the first time in his career.
His loyalty to Milwaukee has been tied to the team’s ability to contend for a title.
The recent first-round playoff exit and Damian Lillard’s injury (torn Achilles, leading to a long absence) have raised questions about the Bucks’ contention window and potentially accelerated Giannis’s decision-making process.
Giannis’s trade value is currently at its highest. He is 30 years old, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP, making him a highly desirable trade candidate for many teams.
He has not explicitly requested a trade yet, but teams are “quietly lining up” in case he does.
His contract runs through the 2026-27 season with a player option for 2027-28, and it does not include a no-trade clause.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s situation:
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the previous best player for the Bucks before Giannis, demanded a trade in the 1970s, specifically to New York or Los Angeles for personal reasons.
The Bucks’ goal is to avoid a repeat of the Abdul-Jabbar situation where he dictates his preferred destination, which could limit their trade return.
The Bucks’ dilemma:
Milwaukee needs to avoid a similar outcome to the Abdul-Jabbar trade, which led to a long period without a championship.
The team has limited cap flexibility and tradable assets, making it challenging to rebuild a contender around Giannis.
They are reportedly desperate to keep Giannis and might be willing to sacrifice a lot of assets to build a contender on the fly.
The article emphasizes the importance of Giannis’s decision in the coming weeks for the Bucks’ offseason plans.
Potential trade scenarios and suitors:
Many teams are being discussed as potential landing spots if Giannis becomes available, including the Golden State Warriors, New York Knicks, Boston Celtics, and Detroit Pistons.
The Lakers are mentioned, but it’s noted they have limited assets, and a trade there would likely only happen if Giannis specifically demanded to go there.
Trade packages would likely involve a combination of young players and draft picks.
In essence, the articles highlight the critical juncture the Milwaukee Bucks face with Giannis Antetokounmpo, drawing parallels to their past experience with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and the intense speculation surrounding Giannis’s future in the league.
The Article’s Core Claim
The Athletic’s piece posits that Giannis is the linchpin of the Bucks’ success, akin to Kareem in his era, and that trading him could doom the franchise to a prolonged rebuild. It points to Milwaukee’s 46-year title drought post-Kareem and implies a similar fate if Giannis is dealt. This narrative assumes Giannis’s current and future impact is on par with Kareem’s, a premise that doesn’t hold up when you scrutinize Giannis’s game.
Giannis’s Strengths? Limited
Let’s acknowledge Giannis’ postseason reveals the cracks in his game. Unlike Kareem, whose skyhook and all-around scoring made him nearly unguardable, Giannis’s skill set has exploitable flaws that teams have repeatedly targeted in high-stakes moments. These weaknesses undermine the article’s claim that his departure would be as catastrophic as Kareem’s.
Weakness #1: Limited Outside Shooting
Giannis’s lack of a reliable jump shot is his most glaring flaw. His career three-point shooting hovers around 28%, and in the 2024-25 season, he’s hitting just 27.3% from deep on 1.8 attempts per game. In the playoffs, teams like the Miami Heat (2020, 2023) and Boston Celtics (2022) have built “walls” in the paint, daring him to shoot. When he does, the results are inconsistent, allowing defenses to sag off and clog driving lanes. Kareem, by contrast, had a mid-range and post game that forced defenses to respect him at all levels. Giannis’s one-dimensional scoring profile makes him easier to game-plan against in crunch time.
Weakness #2: Free-Throw Struggles
Giannis’s free-throw shooting remains a liability, especially in close games. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting 65.2% from the line, a marginal improvement but still below average for a star. In the 2021 Finals, his 59.1% free-throw shooting nearly cost the Bucks key games, and opponents often exploit this with intentional fouls late in games. Compare this to Kareem, who shot 72% from the line during his Bucks tenure and didn’t face the same “hack-a-Giannis” strategy. This weakness hampers Giannis’s ability to close out tight playoff games, a critical factor the article overlooks.
Weakness #3: Playmaking Under Pressure
While Giannis is a capable passer, averaging around 6 assists per game, his decision-making falters under playoff pressure. His turnover rate spikes in the postseason—3.8 per game in his career compared to 3.2 in the regular season—often due to forced passes or charges into crowded defenses. Teams with elite defenders, like Toronto in 2019, have neutralized him by doubling him early and forcing him to make quick reads he’s not consistently equipped to handle. Kareem, with his high basketball IQ and versatile scoring, was a more reliable hub for his team’s offense, even under defensive scrutiny.
Weakness #4: Defensive Inconsistency
Giannis’s 2020 DPOY award highlights his defensive potential, but his impact on that end has waned. In the 2024-25 season, the Bucks’ defensive rating is worse with Giannis on the floor (112.3) compared to off (110.8), per NBA.com. His rim protection and versatility are still elite, but he often conserves energy on defense in the regular season, and in the playoffs, teams exploit his tendency to help off shooters, leaving open threes. Kareem, a three-time blocks leader with Milwaukee, was a consistent defensive anchor. Giannis’s defensive lapses, especially in critical moments, dilute his overall impact.
Why the Kareem Comparison Fails
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was a complete player: a scoring machine with the skyhook, a reliable free-throw shooter, and a defensive stalwart who anchored the Bucks’ system. His departure in 1975 was devastating because his skill set was irreplaceable. Giannis, while a generational talent, has clear holes in his game that teams exploit in the playoffs. The Bucks’ 2021 title required a perfect storm—Khris Middleton’s clutch shooting, Jrue Holiday’s defense, and injuries to opponents like Brooklyn’s Kyrie Irving. Without those factors, Giannis’s weaknesses have often led to early exits, like the Bucks’ first-round losses in 2023 and 2024.
The article’s claim that trading Giannis would mirror Kareem’s exit overstates his indispensability. Milwaukee’s recent trade of Khris Middleton for Kyle Kuzma shows they’re trying to retool around Giannis, not replace him as a singular saviour. A trade could bring assets to build a more balanced roster, addressing the team’s reliance on a star whose flaws are exposed in high-stakes moments.
Click bait from the NYT
The Athletic’s comparison of a potential Giannis trade to Kareem’s departure is so flawed it’s click bait. Giannis’s weaknesses—poor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, shaky play making under pressure, and defensive inconsistency—limit his ability to carry a team in the playoffs the way Kareem did. While he’s a phenomenal talent, he’s not the unassailable force the article suggests. Trading him wouldn’t necessarily doom the Bucks to decades of irrelevance; it could open the door to a smarter, more balanced roster. The Kareem parallel is more emotional than factual. Giannis is an antisocial player who will find it hard to fit in at any other team. Both due to his character flaws and – most importantly – due to his extremely low basketball IQ and limited skill set. He is playing a kind of basketball that has long been surpassed in the NBA and was extremely lucky to win that one championship.
The Bucks aren’t winning another one with Giannis. The whole point of this article makes no sense.