In the ever-evolving drama of the NBA, few stories capture the tension between player power and organizational loyalty quite like the recent saga involving Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Milwaukee Bucks. On October 8, 2025, the two-time MVP made headlines with comments that hinted at a potential exit from Milwaukee if the team doesn’t contend for a championship this season. “Right now, my focus is on the Bucks,” Giannis said, “but it’s human nature to change your mind if things don’t go as planned.” These words, amid swirling trade rumors linking him to the New York Knicks—especially after their blockbuster acquisition of Karl-Anthony Towns—sparked immediate backlash.
Enter NBA legend Charles Barkley, who didn’t mince words during an appearance on ESPN. Barkley lambasted Giannis for what he perceives as entitlement, stating, “These guys, they feel like they’re entitled to play for the championship every year. … Everybody wants to win a championship, but the Bucks have done everything they possibly could.” Barkley’s critique resonates deeply, not just because of his Hall of Fame credentials, but because it highlights a stark reality: the Bucks have bent over backward to build a contender around Giannis, often at great cost to their future. In this blog post, we’ll dive into why Barkley is spot-on and why Giannis’s stance comes across as ungrateful, given the franchise’s extraordinary efforts.
The Bucks’ Investment in an Unknown Prospect
Let’s rewind to 2013. The Milwaukee Bucks, a small-market team often overshadowed in the NBA landscape, took a gamble on a lanky, relatively unknown teenager from Greece in the NBA Draft. Selected 15th overall, Giannis Antetokounmpo was far from a sure thing—raw talent with immense potential but little polish. The Bucks didn’t just draft him; they invested years in his development. Through dedicated coaching, strength training, and on-court opportunities, they transformed him from a skinny prospect into the “Greek Freak,” a dominant force who would go on to win two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year honor, and lead the team to glory.
This patience and belief paid off spectacularly in 2021 when Giannis delivered a championship to Milwaukee, ending a 50-year drought. His 50-point masterpiece in the Finals closeout game earned him MVP honors, cementing his legacy. But the Bucks’ commitment didn’t start or end there—it was a foundational bet on his future that no other team might have made.
All-In Moves: Trades, Contracts, and Coaching Changes
Barkley’s point about the Bucks doing “everything they possibly could” isn’t hyperbole; it’s backed by a series of bold, franchise-altering decisions. In 2020, sensing the need for a defensive anchor to complement Giannis, Milwaukee traded Eric Bledsoe, George Hill, and multiple first-round picks to acquire Jrue Holiday. This move was pivotal, directly contributing to the 2021 title run.
Post-championship, the Bucks rewarded Giannis with a five-year, $228 million supermax extension in December 2020, securing his services and signaling their long-term vision. When the team hit a rough patch, they didn’t hesitate to shake things up. In May 2023, they fired championship-winning coach Mike Budenholzer after a first-round playoff exit to the Miami Heat. They hired Adrian Griffin in June 2023, only to dismiss him mid-season despite a 30-13 record, replacing him with Doc Rivers—moves that aligned with Giannis’s preferences for change.
The Bucks went even further in September 2023, trading Jrue Holiday, Grayson Allen, and more picks to Portland for Damian Lillard, pairing Giannis with another superstar guard in a desperate bid to reignite contention. This trade mortgaged their draft capital through 2031, leaving the team with limited flexibility. As Barkley noted, “The Bucks have done everything they can.”
Entering the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee continued their all-in approach. They signed Myles Turner to a four-year, $107 million deal in July 2025, adding rim protection to bolster the frontcourt alongside Giannis. Free-agent additions like Gary Trent Jr., Taurean Prince, and Delon Wright deepened the roster, pushing the payroll over $170 million and deep into the luxury tax’s second apron. These aren’t half-measures; they’re sacrifices that have capped the team’s future options, all to maximize Giannis’s prime.
Even on a personal level, the Bucks have shown loyalty by keeping Giannis’s brother, Thanasis Antetokounmpo, on the roster since 2019. Despite his limited on-court impact, this provides family stability—a rare perk in the cutthroat NBA.
Injuries, Not Incompetence: The Real Culprit Behind Recent Struggles
Giannis’s hints at departure ignore a crucial factor: injuries, not front-office failures, have been the primary roadblock. In the 2024 playoffs, his absence due to injury contributed to a first-round loss to the Indiana Pacers. The Bucks’ core has been plagued by health issues, but the organization has responded by rebuilding the roster aggressively. As Barkley emphasized, “I want someone to love me as much as the Bucks love Giannis.”
In contrast to Barkley’s era, where stars like him endured years with underperforming teams without demanding trades (though Barkley himself requested one from the 76ers in the early ’90s for similar reasons), modern players expect perennial contention. But Milwaukee has delivered far beyond what’s typical for a small-market franchise. Ownership even changed hands in 2014 to fund arena upgrades and retain Giannis, demonstrating a commitment to infrastructure and stability.
The Entitlement Factor: Forgetting Roots and Undermining Loyalty
Giannis’s comments smack of entitlement because they overlook his origins. Without the Bucks’ faith and resources, he might not have evolved into the superstar he is today. He publicly praised the organization’s efforts in 2021, vowing loyalty, but his recent waffling undermines that narrative. Expecting annual titles ignores the NBA’s increasing parity, with powerhouse Eastern Conference rivals like the Boston Celtics and Philadelphia 76ers.
Barkley’s frustration is echoed across the league and media. As one analyst put it, “The Bucks have given Giannis everything he wanted—they traded a ton for Jrue, for Dame, and now put themselves in cap hell.” Giannis’s stance feels ungrateful, especially when compared to players who stuck it out in tougher situations. The Bucks aren’t a dysfunctional franchise; they’re a model of player-centric building, and Barkley’s call-out serves as a reminder that loyalty should be a two-way street.
Time for Gratitude, Not Exit Threats
Charles Barkley isn’t just stirring the pot—he’s highlighting a fundamental truth about the NBA’s player-empowerment era. The Milwaukee Bucks have exhausted every avenue to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo, from draft investments and blockbuster trades to coaching overhauls and massive contracts. In return, veiled threats of departure come across as entitled and ungrateful, especially from a player who owes much of his success to the franchise’s unwavering support.
As the 2025-26 season unfolds, Giannis has a chance to repay that loyalty with performance and commitment. But if Barkley’s words ring true, perhaps it’s time for the Greek Freak to reflect on how far the Bucks have carried him—and how much further they could go together. In a league where rings are the ultimate goal, true greatness also involves appreciating the journey and the team that made it possible.
Giannis Antetokounmpo on SPORT24, this is the original article here. All rights reserved and all that Disclaimer stuff, not my text, all photos from there, click for the original, I am just translating for foreign readers.
Literally everything has been written and said about Giannis Antetokounmpo. Pleasant and unpleasant. He has been deified and leveled, like every great athlete. Who he is is up to each person to decide .
But surely, the megastar of the Milwaukee Bucks and the Greek National Team goes to bed at night proud of what he has accomplished, happy for what he has offered on and off the field, happy because he never stopped trying to make the next day better than the previous one.
A few days after winning the bronze medal at EuroBasket 2025 and just before returning to the USA for the 13th season of his professional career, the kid who just wants to play basketball visited SPORT24 for the biggest conversation of his life.
Because what you are about to read was definitely not an interview.
The relief for the medal, the slap in the face to Larentzakis, Spanoulis’s words, the question to Sloukas, the trade of Doncic and his future in the NBA, the Bucks of 2026, the discussion about the “best player in the world” and the very likely possibility that he will come to Europe in a few years to end his career here.
This and much more, in a unique 73-minute conversation, which you will watch again and again.
I’m fine, I’m happy, I’m healthy, my family is fine. We came 3rd in Europe, I’m having a good time. Nothing changes for me.
I try to be the same person in both defeat and victory.
I was definitely very happy because so many people were happy, and when I go out on the street or when my family goes out on the street, I feel the love.
They pass by my house and shout ”
Yiannara, you made us proud, well done ” and all that, ”
give your mother kudos for the way she raised you “
It doesn’t change anything. I come home, the moment I walk in the door, I become a dad.
I take my kids to school, pick them up from school, then home, they eat, and then if mom lets us, we go for a couple of hours and play basketball. Nothing changes.
Certainly, with the fact that we won, a weight was lifted off me, because I always wanted to have success with the National Team in my career and it’s something I was missing.
You saw it, the world saw it, how I reacted at the end, you’d say I three-peat with the Chicago Bulls
For many, my reaction was excessive. Not for people here from Greece, but for people from America, they can’t understand it.
But why, while they have started watching EuroBasket more, don’t they understand the culture more?
What bothers me is that you can’t tell someone what’s important to them and what’s not.
For me, winning MVP may be important, but winning something with the National Team is more important.
Sorry, but it is. Anyway, it doesn’t matter.
I’m happy, now I’m smiling, yes, because now I’m not playing.
When I’m focused and playing, I always want the job to get done.
I want to give my best, I want to help the team.
I believe that God has given me an opportunity and put me in a position and I never want to take advantage of that position or take it for granted.
I know I have a few years ahead of me and I want to achieve my dreams and goals.
Right now, whatever I’ve set my mind to, I’ve accomplished and now I’ve just realized that I like living under pressure and adrenaline.
I want to set goals in my life, fight and try to achieve them.
Now I’m going to push you a little, I want to look at a photo and I want to see if you remember when and where it was taken.
Giannis Antetokounmpo at the 24MEDIA offices, a few days after his selection in the Draft, summer 2013
I had hair.
Oh, yes, and you were a kid.
And you were still short, you hadn’t gotten it yet.
I was 2.06 then, yes.
It was a few days after the Draft, you hadn’t even been to America yet. A few days later you started this journey and now we’re just before your 13th season in the NBA.
The years passed, very quickly.
Let me show you what you said in that live chat we had.
https://iframely.shorthand.com/ORrrw8rY
My voice hasn’t changed.
Twelve years ago, you loved the National Team ever since. You’ve already spent 10 summers with it and have played in nine of the 11 tournaments you could have played in. And yet, there are still people who believe that in the summers you’ll look for a way not to come.
I have said one thing, so I am healthy and I can, I will always be available for the National Team.
The one summer I didn’t come, I had surgery on my right knee, and in 2017, when I couldn’t, I tried to come.
You came, but you were injured in a friendly against Montenegro in Belgrade.
I tried. Okay, it doesn’t matter what 10% or 5% or 1% of the world thinks.
I have played nine tournaments with the National Team, I wish I could play 15-20 tournaments
And I did what I wanted to do, win a medal for the National Team.
We left the cellar, we have more to go than the copper.
Yes, yes, yes, we have, we have. It is definitely very difficult.
Both Serbia and France are improving a lot.
So in 2027, which is two years away, you will have Canada, the USA, South Sudan, Australia.
Countries that are very dangerous and will be very good.
We need to improve too. We need to train, find kids, have good years and be ready in two years from now to come and help the team.
But let’s go back a little to what I said.
I’m glad I had the success with the National Team and we won the medal, I did it with my brothers, which, you understand, is even more special for me.
And I’m so happy for my mother, who was able to see this.
I can’t imagine, as a father of four children, what it’s like to see three of your children make their dreams come true and win something for a country I’ve been in for 30 years, my mother for 32-33 years.
I believe it was a unique moment for my mother and she enjoyed it more than anyone.
In Vegas, last December, we had a conversation after winning the NBA Cup. You told me ” I want to be healthy, I want to play, we want to get the medal and we’ll have a lot to talk about .” At that time, I felt that you had something in you, but I didn’t want to pressure you. Now that this success has happened, what is this “something” that we have to talk about?
Okay, as you’ve known me for 13 years now, I always try to talk on the field. After the games I don’t like to make statements.
In the NBA, it’s mandatory, if you don’t do them, you get fined and they take the money from your salary.
But whenever I have the chance and I don’t get a fine, I don’t want to talk, I don’t like it, I prefer to talk on the field, that’s the kind of kid I am.
I believe that…
Okay, anyway, it doesn’t matter.
It’s just that sometimes people don’t understand that being Antetokounmpo is also a burden.
Because I never wanted to be famous, I never wanted to play for the money, I wanted to play for my family, not me
You’ll never see me in an interview saying ” I want to have a better life .”
I always said I want my mother and father to have it, because I believe they deserve it, because they raised us the way they raised us and made all these sacrifices, and I want them to have a better life.
My father had time from 2013 when I was drafted until 2017 when he passed away, four years, to see me do what I love.
And Thanasis and Kostas and Alex.
He caught up with this better life, he saw what I was able to offer.
I went to a public school, down in Sepolia, where I finished elementary, middle, and high school. The two younger brothers, Kostas and Alex, went to a private school.
I was in a position where I was able to offer this to my siblings, my father saw it, that’s enough
It’s not like he only saw me on the field.
He saw me grow from a child to a man, he met the woman of my life, whom I have married.
Okay, he didn’t meet my kids.
Anyway, I went too far.
Being Giannis Antetokounmpo isn’t all about the good, it also comes with a burden
You have to be right, you have to be a role model for the children.
You have to be able to inspire the next generation by being authentic and being low-key, that helps a lot.
And anyway, I’ve heard everything. Your friends write it down (laughs). I’ve heard everything.
You read everything.
Yes, I read them all, because they boost my morale, I get courage, I get motivation.
I get motivation because I’m like that, like a child, I like challenges.
I like being told I can’t do it, I go out there and give it my all.
I don’t believe there will ever be a game that you’ll play or watch after 5-6 years, 10 years, where I don’t give it my all, don’t sweat, or have a breather.
There are games where I can’t breathe because I give it my all, but I’ve certainly heard everything, that I don’t deserve to be in the National Team, that I don’t deserve to have a Greek passport, that I don’t.
That I can’t play in Europe because the European style is different.
This was ten years ago, of course.
Okay, I’ve heard of them though.
I’m glad that the 1% of the world or some journalists who say these things are the same ones who have helped me be in the position I am in today.
To be very tough mentally and to have made all my dreams come true.
I’ll ask you something as Haris, not as a journalist. In Slovenia, if you say that Luka is not the best in the world, they might beat you up. The same in Serbia with Jokic. In Greece, many say that Luka is the best, Jokic is the best. Doesn’t it seem a little strange to you?
Look, it’s the eye test.
And it’s what you like, what you prefer.
The public here in Greece may like a player who passes well.
With you, but you are our child.
Yeah, okay, it doesn’t work like that.
I might not be one of the best players in the world in five years.
They won’t say that Giannis is the best player in the world. But then again, it’s everyone’s preference.
The top five players I think are Luka, Jokic, SGA, Tatum and me
And it depends on the year you are doing it.
So if I, let’s say, go back this year and I’m improved and I help my team win the East and we go to the final and we play against whatever team is there, I automatically become the best player in the world.
But if Luca does it, he becomes the best player in the world.
If Jokic does it, he’s the best player in the world.
When you get to that point, what is your preference? What do you like to see?
My preference has always been to see a player who will not only be a good player, but will also be an example for his teammates in behavior.
It’s not enough to just score goals to be a leader, it also counts in the locker room how you are and on the bus, and when you eat as a team, how you are, how you behave.
Anyway, whoever has the best year will be the best player.
My preference is two-way players. I like one player, Anthony Edwards, I like him a lot.
I like Anthony Davis, see what I mean?
I mean, I like Leonard, I like him a lot.
I like players who can play both defense and offense and are dogs.
When we enter the field, know that they will always give 100%, they may not play well, but they will always give 100%.
Some people like shooters, others like passers, some people who have a very high IQ, the sharp-shooters.
Anyway, what I have to say is that preference doesn’t matter.
Maybe here in Greece they think I’m not the best player in the world, and right now I’m not saying I’m the best player in the world either.
Do I believe I’m one of the best? Yes, I’ve believed it for the last eight years, but it’s with the year.
If I have a good year and help my team be successful, then I believe I will come out on my own and say that I am the best player in the world.
You once got angry with a question I asked you during Covid. It was after a match in Miami and I asked you if as you get older you have to learn not to play at 100% all the time. In that match you were worn out with offensive fouls. You got angry and you answered me ” I only know how to play at 100% “. That was your answer. I’ll ask you this question again. How easy is it when you’ve learned for so many years to bring your A-game every night, to take more care of your body?
Look, I’ll tell you one thing.
I can’t stop playing at 100%, I don’t know, that’s how I’ve learned, I don’t know if it’s even possible
Last year I changed my game a bit, I shot a few more two-pointers, mid-range.
I hope as I grow older I can shoot three-pointers.
But I have learned one thing that helps me.
In the past, I played 100%, but I also trained 100%, meaning, in training I was even worse than what you saw in the game.
And for me and for all basketball players you can ask, training is much harder than playing.
In training, the coach allows fouls, do you understand?
So you make a mistake, he stops training, yells at you, curses at you, takes you out, kicks you out of training.
In the game, you can’t kick me out. That means I’m wrong, we continue, the game continues.
Training is more difficult.
I learned from Coach Ziva that to get a lot, you have to give a lot. Do you understand?
What you give, you get.
Now I’ve reached a point where I play in red all the time, not that I don’t train, I just train smarter.
I take better care of my body, I rest more, instead of training for eight hours or six or four in a row, I might do one and a half and then come back in the evening to do another one and a half.
I have learned to take better care of my body and train smarter.
This in the game helps me play 100% and not put so much wear and tear on my body.
In December, I’m going back to Vegas, you told me – and this was a statement that went around the world – that you were thinking about and that you wanted to play five years in Europe because it would be different for you and your body and you would enjoy a different game. Do you really believe that? Do you see it happening?
Yes. Last year, after the pre-Olympic, I was sitting with Thanasis, as I told you, we were watching some highlights and I said to him ” hey Thanasis …”.
Look now, he was looking at me like I was crazy.
The best player in the world, one of the best players in the world, to come and play in Europe?
Is this happening, my child?
Of course it can be done.
If you told Jokic he would get about the same money and be in Serbia, he would do it.
Okay, I think about my body a lot. Of course the amounts are very different and not just the amounts.
The organization is completely different, you’ve come to the NBA, you’ve seen how things are.
But every year I play for the National Team, I always say the same thing.
I told my wife too.
I say to her, ” What do you prefer, staying in Greece or going to Milwaukee? “
He looks at me, says ” in Athens, in Athens, it’s good in Athens .”
I say, ” Okay, think about it .”
I believe the game is much more physical here.
You take more punishment, but there are no bodies to punish you. Do you understand?
It’s a little more insidious.
Yes, it’s more insidious. It’s a little dirtier, but there’s no Duren from Detroit.
There’s Segev from Israel, who will elbow you in the middle, but you’ll get past him.
Yes, it’s not Adebayo, it’s not Steven Adams, it’s not Zach Eddy, it’s not Anthony Davis, it’s not Jaren Jackson.
I can tell you names now until tonight.
You’re kidding, but for me they just don’t have the same bodies here in Europe.
And maybe the wood is a little less.
So you see it happening. Is it possible at all?
Yes, this is where Messi went to MLS, he went to Miami
If the right specifications and timing are there, it doesn’t affect me at all.
I’m holding Athens – Milwaukee. You didn’t tell me Barcelona, Monaco, Milwaukee, you told me Athens – Milwaukee.
You got it.
A while ago you said that you went to a public school, where you were a classmate of Giannoulis Larentzakis. Is that right?
Yes, I was a classmate with him for a year and a half.
Everyone talked about this incident in Thessaloniki, everyone analyzed it, everyone did a psychogram. Now tell me, what happened?
Nothing happened.
You see, in the next game Larry was throwing me a bone, in the locker room we were ass and pants.
We’ve been like this since we were little kids, we’ve played in many tournaments together.
I didn’t throw it at him as hard as it seems, I really mean it, I didn’t throw it at him that hard.
We talked, we finished it, we laughed, that was it, it wasn’t anything.
But isn’t it amazing when you’re Giannis, when you’re such an important person, that something very small becomes so big?
Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes. But I didn’t like it, it wasn’t right the way it happened.
And I was very sad, because it’s not just that I see it, Larry and I are friends – and Larry has slapped me more than I’ve slapped him.
It’s that we, two friends, gave anyone the right to talk about our relationship and say ”
if Giannis had it in for me, I would have punched him .”
And for all those who say this, you should know that I’m 2.10 and 115 kilos.
No one would slap me, because before you could reach me, Thanasis would have jumped in front of you and Kostas, you saw what happened with Valantsiounas.
We are three brothers who have slept in the same bed, worn the same shoes, worn the same clothes, eaten, had a loaf of bread, cut it to share.
You can’t understand.
To be on the field at the same time playing and me passing a pass to my brother to shoot and someone hitting him?
You don’t see, you forget the game.
You really forget about the game and try to protect your brother as best you can.
But Larry and I, guys, are friends.
I won a medal with my siblings and with the other kids, but the fact that I won a medal with my classmate is also very important.
We talked and we were both saddened by what was said, by the fact that I pushed.
Let’s go back to the National Team. You made this bronze look like gold and you did it with your good mood, with your smile. How difficult was this whole journey? No one believed in you. Or at least, almost no one.
Of course, they didn’t believe us. Some people said we weren’t even in the top ten in Europe, I saw that too.
They put us 8th in the power rankings, they said we wouldn’t be able to cope, they said about Olympiacos, about Panathinaikos, Giannis can’t, he’s not a leader, he doesn’t speak, we saw it all
I remember the first day I went to training.
I looked at coach Spanoulis, I said to him ” coach, we’re good “. He said to me ” I’ve built the team the way it should be, I’ve put shooters in, they’re all shooters “.
I tell him ”
Come on, coach, I’ll do it myself “
I think he built a very good team, but that was the beginning, then it’s the players who make the difference.
From the first moment I entered the locker room, I went straight to Sloukas and talked to him. I said to him, ” What do you see? ” He said, ” I believe it .”
I tell Sloukas ”
if you believe it once, I believe it a thousand times more, this is our year “
Every year, I say this for the first time, every year I play for the National Team, I always think of Nick Calathes, I think of Papanikolaou, every year, I’m like this like a child.
I always say ” let’s make it, because these kids deserve to get a medal” .
This year was the first year, I also told Papanikolaou that, who said ”
guys, I want the medal, I want it “
I knew that we hadn’t won a medal in 16 years.
The coach wanted it too, but above all, before that, before I thought about anything, I said ” I want it, I want it, I want to achieve this success .”
I entered the preparation very focused and I think I set an example for everyone, that ” guys, I’m not here to waste my summer, nor to play games, we’re here to get better, to be focused and to focus on ourselves .”
I was saying that we are a small flame that will be very difficult to extinguish.
If we’re all on the same page, we’ll do well.
And if you look at the entire tournament, beyond the match against Bosnia that we would have actually won if I had played, but even without me playing we would have won if it counted, we lost one game, against Turkey.
There they extinguished the flame a little.
They didn’t wipe it out for us, because in the end you always have to end the tournament with a win.
And playing on the last day of the tournament.
Yes, playing on the last day of the tournament, which we hadn’t done for 16 years, and ending with a victory.
Okay now, whether it’s gold or bronze, it didn’t matter at all, because as a national team we have won six medals in our history and we won one this year.
And we have tournaments ahead of us and we’re improving and we believe more that we can go and make a splash.
If you look at 2022, when Germany beat us, they came in 3rd.
We would have won it if we had beaten them in that match. I really believe it.
Look, to tell you the truth, Spain got it because it deserved it.
But we had beaten them that summer.
We had beaten them, we had beaten them by 20 points at OAKA. But I want to tell you something.
The Germans who beat us, came in 3rd and then went on to win the World Cup, then came in 4th at the Olympic Games and then went on to win the EuroBasket.
For what reason?
Because I believe that the medal gives you strength, it gives you motivation, it makes you believe.
After 2021 when we won the championship, every year I believed I would win.
Every year. This thing, I don’t know, makes you feel like a superhero and a maniac.
And right now I believe that this medal will also make it to our National Team.
I hope we are healthy in 2027, we will be here to go and play.
Will the coach be there?
I have no idea…
Okay, I don’t want to embarrass you. But I want you to tell me about the coach, what have you experienced? A conversation he has told you, that you have never discussed.
You’re not putting me in an awkward position.
I will say one thing, our collaboration with coach Spanoulis was AWESOME, from the first day we came into contact, from the first phone call.
I am a person who always says that you should do what is best for yourself and your family.
I wish we could continue together, but he will do what is best for his family.
Who am I to tell him what, that doesn’t exist.
I like it because it motivates me and tells me the truth.
He’s cruel to you, people don’t know that.
He’s very harsh on me and he knows I can handle it.
Because he understands that we are all the same, that we are dogs, that we are warriors, that when someone says we can’t, we go and prove to them that we can and that we have no fear when the time comes.
That we are not afraid because we have prepared so much, we have put in so many hours of work and we are ready.
I liked one thing, he told me throughout the preparation, ” I see it in your eyes, in your eyes, we will succeed .”
I don’t talk much, I was always nodding my head, saying ” yes coach, yes, yes, yes, yes “.
He tells me ” I don’t care, I don’t care, I can see it in your eyes, this is our year, we will make it, I can see it in your eyes “
And you know, when someone tells you, you start to believe it.
And he kept telling me that and I believed it more. Then, I believed it even more.
After the match with Turkey…
In my morning training, I have a routine where I sit for 5-10 minutes and just try to tell myself ” don’t take this moment for granted in life, having this pressure is nice, it’s a beautiful thing, go out on the field and give it your all because you have your family .”
He came next to me and told me some things, helped me understand what I had to do in the match against Finland to help my team win.
And at that moment, I didn’t tell him, but he’ll see now, it helped me a lot.
Many athletes say that in the finale, the feeling of relief is much greater than the feeling of happiness.
Yes… I felt relieved…
You didn’t celebrate. When Kostas and Thanasis caught you, you simply closed your eyes and let yourself be carried away in their arms, before what followed followed. You didn’t celebrate.
I know, I know…
Even when I won the championship, I didn’t celebrate.
I went straight to the locker room, put my hands up, hugged my mother, my brother, my wife, then sat on the bench.
Then you saw what happened, I cried, I cry a lot, I don’t know why.
Then I went to the locker room and called Thanasis. That was it.
Now that we won the medal, my brothers hugged me, which was a very beautiful moment and a very beautiful photo came out that I will frame at home and I just had a moment where I said ” well, he came, he came, okay, he came and a weight was lifted off me “.
But what weight? I’m putting the weight on, because I want it so much
And then I went live, we listened to Lex, we listened to Light, Thanasis played some songs, Sloukas was dancing.
Chaos, chaos ensued, the coach spoke, they were pouring champagne in the locker room, we were all soaked.
I sat down, that was it.
And then I went and was a dad, I went to the hotel and was a dad again.
Since you’re talking about victories, for Pantelis Vlachopoulos, the greatest moment in the history of SPORT24 in the 20 years we’ve been around – and we’ve been here for many of those 20 years – was this video that we’re going to watch.
https://iframely.shorthand.com/nolWXtTz
You went viral…
I don’t know if you’ve seen this video.
No, first time.
I’m moved, it was a terrible moment, remember, closed borders due to Covid, we had put in a lot of effort to be there. But I will always remember a thing you said, that you are a pleaser and that you want to make the people around you happy. And at least my life, you have changed it. You make your dreams come true, that’s how I’ve been making mine for so many years. And we thank you very much. Fortunately, you came today so that we could overcome that moment with something even greater. Has there come a time when you said ” man, I can’t carry this burden “?
Yes, of course. Okay, I’ve said this before.
Pressure is a privilege, but I’ve realized that now, in my 30s or 28, 29, 30.
In recent years, earlier, when I was a kid, there were times when I would go to the stadium and I didn’t even want to step on the court.
The match would end and I would say, ” Well, this match ended well. I’m going home to my child, I can’t do it anymore .”
Or after a Lakers game I was sitting with my brothers, I said to them ” Guys, I can’t play basketball anymore, I don’t know, for some reason now it’s become like a job, I don’t enjoy it like I used to “
Why you get into a routine, it’s not just your environment that does it, the environment will definitely do it as if it were a routine.
It’s a job, you have to be Giannis Antetokounmpo every day and get on the court and be the best and put up 30 and get them on your back and win the championship and all that, which the environment certainly does that, but then you do it to yourself.
Because if you’re a perfectionist and you always want to be one of the best, I might not say it, but I think it in my head.
I want to be among the best, I always want to be there.
There was a time when I saw it as a job and I spoke to a sports psychologist, we’ve been talking for seven years now and he has helped me a lot in my way of thinking, not only in the sports aspect, but also in life as a dad, as a husband, as a brother, as a son, as a person in general.
And it completely changed my mindset, you have to find joy.
I remember one day I was in the locker room and a teammate of mine, I don’t want to say his name, said to me, ” if you come in today and this player punches you in the face, I mean, you’ll be everywhere, they’ll put you on social media, you’ll be everywhere, they’ll laugh .”
And I tell him ” that’s not true, the way you’re thinking is very wrong, because I could punch him in the face or cut him off, so I’ll be everywhere .”
I found joy in what I do again from 2022 onwards.
And now I’m in the best phase of my life, not only in the way I think, but also in my body and the way I play.
I like it. I love basketball a lot and changing your environment sometimes helps you fall in love with basketball again.
Do you remember 2022? I had made a post with the National Team, that I had found the love for the sport again.
And the same this year and the same with the Olympics.
Every time I play for the National Team, I fall in love with basketball all over again because I understand what it is, why I do this thing.
Anyway, there are so many moments when I’ve said I want to give up, but don’t quit today.
If you gonna quit, don’t quit today, quit another day. You want to quit, ok, it’s ok. But, not today.
Score 30, score 50 and then quit, like Michael Jordan, three-peat and then quit
In 2015, you played a game with the Knicks in London. On that trip, I did an interview with Hakeem. He comes and says to me, “You’re from Greece.” I tell him, “yes.” He says to me, “You have Giannis, do you know if he’s of Yoruba descent?” I tell him again, “yes,” and he says, “I’m Yoruba too. This kid will become the best player in the world.” You worked with Hakeem. You worked with Garnett and Kobe. Tell me something that each of them has said to you. I’m mainly interested in what Kobe told you.
With Kobe…
I went to the stadium where his daughter was practicing. The practice was around 12, but since my flight was at 8:30, I had nowhere to go.
I arrived in Orange County, where he lived nearby, around 9, went to the stadium early and waited.
I stretched, I shot, I sat and waited.
When Kobe came and opened the door, it’s this thing that… The breeze, breeze, breeze…
He opened the door and walked towards me and it was as if everything was moving in slow motion.
I mean, imagine. God forbid. Imagine if Kobe or Jordan came in, you’d be in for a shock.
Are these 3, 5, 10 seconds that will be in slow motion and you’ll say, wait, wait, what’s going on here?
I wasn’t Giannis Antetokounmpo then, I wasn’t the player I am today, I was 22-23 years old and it was Kobe
It was Top5, Top10 of all time.
We talked about defenses, we talked about training.
He told me that I was one of his daughter’s favorite players and when he came he was embarrassed to talk to me.
You’re Kobe Bryant’s daughter, why are you ashamed?
He told me how to study defenses.
That it is very difficult for defenses to make adjustments in the NBA.
” Look at the previous three games and if the defenses playing those superstars are like this, get ready to face that defense too .”
And I say to him ” what if they change? “
He replied, ”
They don’t change, I’ve done it my whole career and I’ve destroyed them all, defenses don’t change .”
And I’m starting to see it.
And if you look from 2019, from Toronto, I’ve seen everything.
I’ve seen things that other players haven’t seen. Kobe was double-teamed, but they didn’t put a wall on him!
They always put the toughest guy on me, then comes the double-team, then there’s a wall from behind.
I’ve seen everything in my life. I’ve seen box-and-one, which is a four-man zone and one guy chasing me so I don’t get the ball.
Kevin Garnett now.
When you talk to Kevin Garnett, you feel like you can run through a wall, he’s incredible.
Hakim teacher, very relaxed, I don’t know what he was like when he played.
Kobe and Garnett were intense when I spoke to them, they were intense because they had recently retired.
Hakim had been retired for twenty years and was a little more relaxed, but a teacher.
He was awesome and whenever I play in Houston, he always comes and sees me, we still talk a lot about footwork.
Yes, of course I knew that we have the same origin and not only the same origin, the same number, everything, incredible.
I don’t like working with players who are playing right now.
I want to work with young people and with LeBron, for example. I could work with LeBron, but he’s still playing. I’ll see him in a month or two and he’ll be my opponent.
I like working with players who have retired. I think the next one is Carmelo Anthony, I would really like it, for the mid-range, for the face-jump, his game was very effortless, very easy, very relaxed.
What team has pushed you to your limits? I think the 2019 series against the Raptors is the first one that comes to mind. I remember you on the court looking for some oxygen. What other team has pushed you to your limits?
With Toronto I was young. If I was 27, 28, 26 to 30…
It was the first time I was in the top four, it was the first time I had been in such a big game, big stage, big series.
I was young, I was a kid, I was 24 years old.
I remember this series, but it helped me a lot, because that’s where the wall started.
This defense that I see, that has been made for me, started there and I don’t think Nick Nurse thought of it, but Scariolo.
And now you saw with Spain, the same thing again.
Miami is also a team that pushes me to my limits, because they have bodies, they have a culture that never gives up, they work very hard.
I believe that these series and these teams made me better.
It is these teams that have shaped who I am, shaped my character and helped me win the championship in 2021.
I was tougher as a player and as a person and in my mentality and everything.
I see these teams as helping me become who I am, just like Detroit helped Jordan become who he became.
If Detroit didn’t beat him up and there weren’t these Jordan Rules, he wouldn’t improve and he wouldn’t go for the three-peat.
Like me, it’s the same thing for me, okay, I didn’t get six championships, I got one.
Since you mentioned 2021, can you now that several years have passed, take us a little through the process after the injury in Atlanta, what followed until you stepped on the court again?
I came back after six days. I wasn’t 100%, but there was no other choice.
As I say to coach Vasilis who asks me ” are you hurting, are you hurting? “, it doesn’t matter if I’m hurting, I’ll play, what does it matter?
Why are you asking me if I’m in pain? Since I’m going to play, it doesn’t matter at all.
I still have it, it’s been four years and I still feel it.
For people working from home or watching online, you can go watch the moment.
I fell down, hurt my foot, went to the locker room and was walking, Thanasis helped me because my foot was upside down.
I went to the locker room with Thanasis and my leg was normal. They fix it, they do it like this, they tell me mmm…
I was listening to them. ” No, no, ” the doctors, the Americans, were saying. ” No, no, he can’t come back, ” something like that.
What do you mean? Did you want to get back into the match?
I’ll tell you, the GM comes and tells me ” John, finally, you’re not coming in .”
I grab his hand, pull it off me, tell him ” I’ll play! “
I walk outside, go to the goalie and when it was 14, I see Bogdanovic make a three-pointer for +17.
The third period was about to end and I said ” it’s 17, huh? So now I should rest, go back to Milwaukee and beat them there or go fight it out? “.
But they were holding me back, my manager, Alexis Saratsis, was holding me back, the GM was holding me back, the doctors were holding me back, I didn’t understand anything, I wanted to play.
And we get there, I see the three-pointer and I’m like, ” Oh, no, no, okay, let me go back to Milwaukee and rest, put some ice on it, do my treatments, eat well, see my family and get ready for Game 5. “
And I look at my leg as I say this and it’s doubled in size, wet everywhere, I’m like ” oh, what’s wrong with me? “
Anyway, I went home and because I’m very religious, I prayed with my mother, I cried a lot, I told her ” why me, why always me? “.
I was also injured with Miami, the previous year, in the bubble.
And he says to me, ” Because you are who you are and you are my child and I always knew, before you were born, that you would be great.”
I was crying, ” Leave me alone, Mom, leave me alone, Mom .”
He tells me ” no, we’ll pray .”
I prayed, I said, ” Please God, help me, I won’t take this moment for granted, help me come back, play, help my team if possible, if not, I understand .”
This is how it had to be done, this is how things had to be done. And okay, I didn’t stop for the next six days.
I slept two hours, two-three hours a day. I went to the pool and did gymnastics from 6 in the morning until night, I couldn’t walk, I couldn’t step on it.
Then, at night, I would hit it, then the next morning I would jog, then I would run a little more.
And then I had a thing over here so my leg wouldn’t bend at all.
What Tim Duncan and Dragic wore, I don’t know if you remember.
I said ” it doesn’t matter, I’ll play, I don’t care “.
They tell me ” if you play, you could get injured much worse and be out for a year, a year and a half, two years “
I don’t care, I’ll play. That helped me keep a very clear mind and when I came in and played in the first match, everyone was nervous and I was still saying it’s good that I’m playing.
So I was in a very different mindset than the others.
The others were stressed, it’s the final, I was saying ” six days ago I could have been out for two years “
And okay, in the first match I came in, I wasn’t 100% and we lost.
In the second match I got a little more confidence. I said ” okay, I can do it and I’m going to do it “.
We lost the match, but I scored 40.
Then in the 3rd match we won, I scored 40 again. The 4th match was very difficult.
Things weren’t going well, but given Giannis’s stats, any other player with 26/18/6 would have crossed the line and been very happy.
In the end, what happened happened. But I really like Game 5, because we played really good basketball, just like the game against Lithuania.
The game against Finland was really great, but the game against Lithuania was even better. We played really good basketball.
Kostas came in and was the X-Factor, Toliopoulos was very nice and aggressive, Samodurov took very nice shots, Papanikolaou was terrible in defense, Sloukas made very good choices, Kalaitzakis was terrible in defense.
I did my job, Thanasis had taken us all together. I liked this match, because this match had people.
I will remember Game 5.
We played really good basketball, Holiday was very aggressive, every choice was right, Middleton found me on every pick-and-roll, he made the shots.
We were down 18 points. We turned it around with three-pointers, the ball was going away too fast, no one was holding it.
Holiday takes the ball from Booker. You go and dunk, you go down and look at the camera. What did you feel in that moment? I think you must have gone to another world in that moment. The feeling must have been extreme.
It was a very nice feeling.
It was a moment that I knew cemented the victory, we locked it in, that’s why I looked at the camera.
I don’t celebrate much, I celebrated a little with my teammates.
The phase was a bit dangerous.
Paul’s foul was harsh. It was dirty, I’m saying it, you don’t have to say it. Your hand got stuck on the backboard too.
It’s a good thing I was able to hold on to the rim a little, because if I hadn’t, I would have been gone.
Anyway, it doesn’t matter, history was written and then, in Game 6, what happened happened.
I haven’t seen the last match, I won’t, I’ll see it when I retire.
I want you to tell me where you were and what you felt the night Luka Doncic was traded.
I was in therapy with a friend of mine, he tells me, ” John, Luka went to the Lakers .”
I say ” what are you saying, since he’s not a free agent, since he’s not free, how is he going to go to the Lakers, don’t bother me, let me watch the game now “.
And he answers me ” no, no, there was an exchange .”
Wait, where did the exchange take place?
He brings me the cell phone and I see that there was an exchange! I was shocked.
I won’t lie to you, I was kidding myself, I’m saying if Doncic was traded, everyone can be traded!
Doncic is one of the best players and last year he took his team to the final.
Get this out of your mind…
Of course it crossed my mind!
But you are not the same.
Yes, we’re not the same. But Luka, he’s Luka Doncic, guys. And in terms of age, he’s 25 years old.
But that’s how I live my life, I don’t take anything for granted.
Excuse me now. Has it ever crossed your mind that you might read your Twitter exchange? I don’t think that’s possible.
Look, I hope it never happens, but I’m still waiting for it.
Because it doesn’t mean that just because you’ve contributed to the team, the team won’t do what’s best for them.
It’s not always the owners themselves.
And when I say the owners, the presidents of the team now, they are not the same as the ones who won the championship, they are different.
And if Giannis doesn’t do it for me, can’t offer it to me, I’ll trade him.
I will do the best for my team and for my investment. Because I have put hundreds of millions into the team.
Surely, if I were flying in the clouds, I would say
“yeah, there’s no way I’m being traded, I’m Giannis Antetokounmpo”
Because I don’t fly in the clouds and I’m very normal, normal, down to earth, I say anything is possible, you never know.
Are you at a point in your career, in your life in particular, where you are more open to hearing another point of view, to thinking about a different possibility? To keep it short, you understand what I mean. Are you at this point in your career?
Now you’re talking about a team?
I’m saying it can change anything in your career.
One thing I want to say is that I like challenges.
I’ve realized that I like living with pressure. Is that good? Is that bad? I don’t know.
If I’m in an environment where there’s no pressure and I don’t believe we can achieve anything great, I don’t want to be there, things just go on.
It doesn’t make me happy anymore, as a person. When you get to 30 and you have four kids and you’re married, I think when you get married, you become more mature.
I want to do what makes me happy, because I believe I deserve it, because I have worked for it.
I want to do what makes me happy, and what makes me happy is winning and feeling like there’s a challenge.
To wake up in the morning and say ”
oh oh oh oh oh, we have to win today, if we don’t win today, what will we hear again? “
I mean, this, this thing.
This year you have a good challenge. The team is flying a little under the radar, but it could develop into a team that will play fun basketball. If you were the GM, how would you build the roster to get 100% from Giannis?
To get the best out of the team and to get the best out of me, I have to be a creator.
I need to feel like I can and do create.
If you look at the last two months of the team, where I had the green light, if I have the ball in my hands and I have that green light to create…
I don’t always have to execute, but I have to feel like I’m creating, that I’m part of the team and not just an executor, that I’m going in, I’m going to score 30, I’m going to get it in the post and I have to score it.
This is how my true self comes out, because that’s what I did at Filathlitikos and that’s what I always wanted to do.
And there were times when I did that in my career, but most of the time I was the executor.
In the last two months when I was more of a team creator, I had a good time.
I think the team did very well during that time.
We definitely don’t have a lot of experience, but we are young, we have legs, fresh legs.
We got a really good big man (Myles Turner). We got a good point guard, Cole Anthony, who I think will be an X-Factor and the surprise of the year.
Yes, there is a chance, definitely.
Slowly moving towards closure, I want to ask you about CAFF, first of all how much you miss your dad, how important this institution is to you and what it does.
I definitely miss my father. Not just me, the whole family.
I definitely know that he is looking down on us and is very proud of what we have accomplished and how we are like children and how we take care of mom.
It was also the first thing Kostas said after Finland, that if dad were here – and I think he was and posted a story about it on his social media – he would be very proud and happier than all of us.
We created a foundation in memory of my father to help people.
I am in this position because they helped me, not only me, but also my family, many institutions where my mother was registered and received fruit creams, diapers
The church helped us a lot.
We would go after school and he would always give us a plate of food before we went to practice.
Without these people we wouldn’t be here. And I’m trying to do the same, I’m trying to create a place, an environment where children and not just children, parents, can come and feel safe.
Because I remember when I went to church, to catechism, not only was I playing, it was also a way out of the house and I wasn’t at home when there was no light, no electricity, no water, I went to catechism and I felt safe.
I learned to play chess, to play board games.
He had a really nice basketball that I was shooting, I was there and I wasn’t on the streets.
If this hadn’t happened and I had grown up in Sepolia, Kolonos, Peristeri, Aigaleo, I might have done much worse things, because I may be low-key, but I am a child who would do everything in my power to help my family, just like so many people would do the same.
Now what would that be? I don’t know, it could be anything, anything
That’s why I want to create a place, an environment, with my family, where people will feel comfortable coming there, getting a plate of food, and playing.
To learn things, to give back to the world, as much as we can.
We have achieved this so far with the Academy that we have created and with many moves that we have made both in Greece and abroad.
And one thing I know is that my father, our father, because it’s not just me, it’s my siblings too, would be very proud of what we’ve done.
You don’t want to talk about your charity work and besides not wanting to advertise it, you don’t want us to talk about it either. And I think that’s enough to explain everything. Last question and I’m closing my papers because I have so many more. Tell me one thing you would do if you were prime minister for a month.
I keep my opinions to myself, but education would be free for everyone, for all children.
Why would someone have a better education? I mean, let’s say I was a very smart kid.
I have a crazy story to tell you. In the 2nd year of high school, I failed a class, History. I’ve never told this story.
Monday in high school, I’ve never stayed in the same class, I was pissed off, sorry for talking like that
My father used to tell me one thing, ” when you leave home you will go to school and after school you will come home before you go to practice, before you go to Triton to play, before you do anything. You will come home, I will see you .”
My father was strict, he had four boys and it had to be that way.
And he did a tremendous job because I’m so proud of my brothers and how they are, how they talk, how they behave, how they take care of their families, their wives.
I am very proud and very lucky to have these brothers, but this wouldn’t have happened if my father hadn’t been the way he was, he did a tremendous job and I wish I could do half the job.
My father used to say, ” I don’t care if you’re a good student, my boy, as long as you don’t have any absences .”
And I was like, ” Please, Dad, don’t worry, I won’t stay .”
Now that I’m older, I’ve realized that he just didn’t want us to get into trouble and be in the streets, on walks, in bad company.
Let’s say he didn’t want his children to get involved, and it’s very difficult for a dad who has come from another country to take care of his children in a foreign country where he doesn’t understand the language very well.
My father knew if it was possible for someone not to love people like us, foreign immigrants, he didn’t want them to corner us and beat us, break our legs, he didn’t know many people who could help him.
Anyway, I didn’t take many absences. I went to school, I was a smart kid.
On Monday of high school, I failed History and I go back home and say ” Dad “… He says ” What happened ?” I say ” Don’t be upset “, he says ” Okay “.
I tell him ” I missed a class “. He says ” Didn’t you study? ” I tell him ” Okay, I played a little basketball, I didn’t study much “.
He says to me, ” So what now, do you have to retake the class ?” I say, ” No, I have to retake it in September .”
Well, beyond all of that, I hope my kids have a better life than I had. What did I do? Second year of high school, I was 13, 14.
I would go and work with my mother because I was so scared, I didn’t want to stay, I didn’t want my father to get angry. I would go and work.
I tell her, ” Mom, because all the kids go to a daycare center behind the school, I want to go there .”
I went and spoke to someone myself and a lady told me it was 75 euros.
Seventy-five euros seemed like 20,000 euros to me then.
And I say, ” When we work together, can I save five euros, five-ten euros at a time, and then in September, can I go there for a week, take two or three lessons with her to pass the class? “
Anyway, I did it. I went, I passed the class, but what did I understand there?
I realized two things.
When I put my ass down and read and tried, I wrote 19 and passed.
And there I realized that if I had the freedom that all children had and didn’t work on the street and could go to a regular school that would help me, I would have a better chance.
Okay, I played basketball.
Many people from my neighborhood are still sending me messages asking me to help them.
What if I were… What if I were prime minister, it doesn’t matter.
I’m in this position I’m in, I can still do it through the foundation that my family and I have built, but this is what I would do.
Everyone should have free education and the best education, so that they can be very successful in Greece or abroad.
There I realized that all the things I’ve accomplished in my life, I achieved through hard work, man, no one gave me anything.
Even that, I went, worked on it myself and then got money and went and gave it away, 13-14 years old.
Will the children go to a Greek school?
Yes, that’s what I want is for them to learn a little bit about now, the culture, the traditions.
“BREAKING NEWS: Milwaukee bucks MVP/ Point Guard Giannis Antetokounmpo Donates Entire $20 Million Bonus and Sponsorship Deal to Charities and Homeless Relief” MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo Stated that” There are millions of people struggling every day — families without homes, kids without food, veterans without support.”
It is in hundreds of posts in social media from idiots who clearly don’t know how to research a little before posting. But it is not that simple. Because before that a similar rumour was circulating in Greece, to the extent that more serious media sources felt obligated to debunk it. (Link here – just use Google translate – https://mikropragmata.lifo.gr/zoi/ochi-o-giannis-antetokounmpo-de-eipe-oti-tha-dosei-25-ekatommyria-dolaria-se-filanthropies-stin-ellada-kai-sto-eksoteriko/ ) There is a similar “story” about Thanasis donating more than 12 million “bonus” (where the hell from?) Everytime the post has comments saying they are wonderful people etc.
So is it Giannis starting these rumours? As we documented before the voting for the NBA All Star is clearly problematic with serious indications of been manipulated by bots. While Giannis has not made a single, massive donation of that specific amount, he has a strong history of significant charitable giving. His efforts, often through the Charles Antetokounmpo Family Foundation, focus on causes he and his family care about, including supporting young people and addressing basic needs like housing, food, and education.
For instance the Milwaukee Homeless Shelter: He invested $7.5 million to open a shelter for homeless youth in Milwaukee. Sure, most of this money will be given in the future but even that amount is nowhere near the one mentioned in the fake news. “Powering Milwaukee Forward”: He and his foundation partnered with GE HealthCare to launch this initiative, which provides $1 million in grants to ten Milwaukee-area nonprofits. These organizations focus on improving access to basic needs like housing, food, and education for underserved communities. Again in the US, obviously as a tax write off. Giannis has also donated to Fiserv Forum staff during the COVID-19 pandemic, provided food boxes to people in his hometown of Sepolia, Greece, and partnered with UNICEF Greece to raise awareness for children’s rights. In general he seems more focused on doing philanthropy that appears in the news. Also he is clearly focused on trying to appear in Greek media for his many promotional efforts and sponsor deals there.
Giannis resorts to his personal story every time he fails on the court. Makes sense and good for him. But get a grip and maybe Google a bit before spreading misinformation. There are other NBA players with serious philanthropic projects that really make a difference.
Since 1999, FIBA limits each team to only one naturalized player on the roster, which forces teams to rely mostly on native or dual-national players (passport obtained before age 16). This rule aims to maintain competitive balance and national representation authenticity. Many strong teams carefully select their one naturalized player to fill key roster gaps especially at EuroBasket tournaments from 2017 to 2025.
Teams incorporating naturalized players often use them to address specific positional needs (e.g., point guard or centre) not adequately covered by native players, which can enhance overall team performance and competitiveness. For example, the European champion Slovenia in 2017 used the American naturalized player Anthony Randolph effectively alongside Luka Dončić. FIBA rules allow a team to have one naturalized player on their roster who obtained a passport after the age of 16. This creates a loophole for federations to recruit talented players, often from the United States, who have no genuine connection to the country they are representing. It is nationality for convenience. Tyler Dorsey, for instance, a player with Greek heritage who played for Greece in EuroBasket 2025, is still considered “naturalised” by FIBA because he received his passport after the age of 16. Other players, like Jordan Loyd for Poland and Darius Thompson for Italy, acquired citizenship to play in the tournament, despite having no prior ties. This practice is completely different from a player who has a true dual citizenship from birth or has lived in the country for a significant period. While these players may be skilled and contribute to their teams, their presence cheapens the meaning of “national team.” It transforms the competition from a battle of nations into a recruitment war, where the team with the most money and connections can simply buy a star to fill a hole in their roster.
NBA player presence on teams correlates with stronger competitive performance. EuroBasket 2025, for instance, features numerous NBA players across several teams such as Serbia (Nikola Jokić), Germany (Franz Wagner, Dennis Schröder), and France (Bilal Coulibaly). These teams with multiple NBA players generally are regarded as favourites due to elite talent and experience. Teams relying solely on native players without naturalised players sometimes emphasise homegrown talent and strong national basketball traditions (e.g., Latvia in EuroBasket 2025) but may lack the positional flexibility or depth that naturalised players provide. Dual citizenship and naturalisation policies add complexity but offer teams strategic roster-building tools. The trend across the past 5 European Championships (approx. EuroBasket 2009, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2022/2025) shows increasing integration of NBA talent and naturalized players, with most medal-contending teams having at least one NBA player and a naturalized player selected with tactical purpose. This turns the concept of a true “national team” into a marketing opportunity for the NBA, with fans tuning in not to see national pride, but to watch their favourite players in a different jersey. It dilutes the unique style of European basketball, which traditionally emphasises team-oriented play and structured offences, a point even acknowledged by Giannis’s former coach, Darvin Ham. The focus shifts from the collective to the individual, eroding the very essence of national team competition. Teams with only native players may rely on strong local development but tend to have less roster flexibility and fewer positional specialists brought in via naturalization or NBA experience.
Given the past 5 EuroBasket finals data winners had 1 to 4 NBA players.
Even outside the NBA, it is the NBA dictating who wins. More NBA players means you win basically. Is it a direct correlation? Well no, because some NBA players don’t impact games or don’t risk injury. So what are we even looking at? Some players playing to become famous while the best players are more concerned with protecting their health or getting knocked out early to return to their real work in the NBA.
And then of course is the second problem. Naturalised players, ie completely irrelevant to the country they are playing for usually, those that didn’t even make it in the NBA but are so good compared to local talent that they get on the teams. For example:
Turkey: Shane Larkin (naturalized)
Greece: Tyler Dorsey (naturalized)
Montenegro: Kyle Allman Jr. (naturalized)
Bosnia and Herzegovina: John Roberson (naturalized)
Cyprus: Darral Willis (naturalized)
Georgia: Kamar Baldwin (naturalized)
Portugal: Travante Williams (naturalized)
Italy: Darius Thompson
It is a bit like the old days when the NBA only allowed one negro per team “when the match was tough” as an unofficial rule between the team owners. European teams are playing a silly game with silly rules in fact by having various players naturalised but then only allowing one to play. This is covert racism which leads to a possibly dangerous type of nationalism. The winners are either teams with NBA stars (ie they have learned how to play and have been trained in the NBA) or naturalised players who are the NBA hand me downs. What sort of “national” team is it when the coach has to give instructions in English so that everyone understands?
And that’s not even the start of the problems with this tournament. Injuries come from the players playing too many games. Is it worth it? Why are there so many super weak teams in the tournament? Players get into the temptation to smash records playing against nations that are very weak. It’s not fun to watch either.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is often celebrated for his rags-to-riches story, infectious enthusiasm, and seemingly humble demeanor. From his early days as a lanky prospect from Greece to becoming one of the league’s dominant forces, Giannis has built a reputation as a hardworking, team-first player. However, like many elite athletes, he has had his share of controversial outbursts and behaviors that some fans and analysts label as “diva-like.” These moments often stem from high-stakes frustration, perceived slights, or intense competitiveness, but they’ve sparked debates about whether success has brought out a more demanding side. I
1. The Ladder Incident and Altercation with Montrezl Harrell (November 2022)
One of the earliest and most bizarre examples of Giannis’ temper flaring came after a tough loss to the Philadelphia 76ers. Frustrated by his poor free-throw shooting (4-of-15 in the game), Giannis stayed on the court postgame to practice. Things escalated when 76ers forward Montrezl Harrell, who was also shooting, took Giannis’ basketball and refused to return it, leading to a heated verbal exchange. Harrell reportedly yelled, “Yeah I took the ball, get the f— outta here,” while Giannis shouted back about doing his job.
The drama didn’t end there. As arena workers placed a ladder under the basket for maintenance, Giannis—still determined to shoot—pushed it away twice, the second time with enough force to knock it over, sending it skidding across the floor. Video footage captured the moment, showing Giannis arguing with a worker before the ladder toppled. Giannis later explained he meant no disrespect and didn’t intend for the ladder to fall, but the incident drew widespread criticism for endangering staff and appearing petulant. Critics called it a classic diva move: prioritizing personal practice over safety and common courtesy in a shared arena.
2. The Game Ball Controversy with the Indiana Pacers (December 2023)
Giannis made headlines again during a regular-season game against the Pacers, where he dropped a career-high 64 points in a Bucks victory. Postgame, he believed the Pacers had taken the official game ball as a trophy for rookie Oscar Tshiebwe’s first NBA points, denying him a memento of his milestone. Enraged, Giannis charged into the Pacers’ tunnel, yelling and demanding the ball back. The confrontation spilled over, with Giannis later admitting uncertainty about whether the ball he received was authentic.
In his postgame presser, Giannis explained the outburst as frustration over what he saw as disrespect, but Pacers players like Tyrese Haliburton clarified they hadn’t taken it intentionally. The incident painted Giannis as overly dramatic, with some fans accusing him of stat-padding by staying in against backups and then throwing a tantrum over a ball. It fueled discussions about his “diva mode,” especially as videos showed him pushing Haliburton and screaming in the aftermath.
3. Influencing the Firing of Coach Adrian Griffin
Midway through the 2023-24 season, the Bucks shocked the league by firing first-year head coach Adrian Griffin despite a strong 30-13 record. Reports emerged of locker room tensions, including Giannis’ dissatisfaction with defensive schemes and overall team direction. While Giannis publicly denied involvement, stating the decision “caught me by surprise” and that he “loved the guy,” insiders suggested his influence as the franchise cornerstone played a role. Griffin’s dismissal came amid reports of Giannis overriding play calls and refusing to sub out.
Analysts viewed this as diva behavior: a superstar wielding power to reshape the team around his preferences, even if it meant instability. Giannis trusted the front office but deflected blame, saying, “I get paid to block shots, not fire coaches.” This wasn’t the first coach change linked to him—some trace it back to Mike Budenholzer’s exit after the 2023 playoffs.
4. The Fake Handshake and Elbow on Jaylen Brown (November 2024)
During a matchup with the Boston Celtics, Giannis elbowed Jaylen Brown in the face early in the second quarter, earning an offensive foul. Later, as Brown approached for a handshake during a stoppage, Giannis extended his hand only to pull it back and run it through his hair in a mocking gesture. Brown called him “a child” postgame, criticizing the lack of sportsmanship.
Giannis downplayed it as playful, but the moment went viral, with former player Matt Barnes questioning his “weird behavior” on podcasts. Combined with the elbow, it reinforced perceptions of Giannis as someone who dishes out physicality but reacts poorly to pushback. Fans debated if this was harmless fun or diva entitlement.
5. Slapping a Teammate During Greece National Team Huddle (August 2025)
Most recently, during a friendly game prep for Greece against Montenegro, Giannis was caught on video delivering a forceful slap to teammate Giannoulis Larentzakis’ head in a team huddle. While some defended it as playful roughhousing, the clip went viral, with fans calling for suspension and labeling Giannis a “violent freak.” Larentzakis downplayed it, but the optics were poor, especially given Giannis’ leadership role.
This incident reignited diva accusations, suggesting Giannis sometimes oversteps boundaries in frustration or jest.
Other Notable Outbursts and Patterns
Beyond these headline-grabbers, Giannis has shown patterns of diva-like behavior. He’s been accused of leaving the court early after losses, overriding coaches, and demanding his brother Thanasis on the roster despite criticism. In 2023, he snapped at a reporter over a “failure” question, and podcasts have dissected his “activated diva mode.” He’s also been involved in on-court antics, like hyping up crowds or taunting opponents, which some see as arrogant.
The Human Side of a Superstar
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s “diva” moments don’t define his career—yet. For now they’re outliers in a story of triumph and dedication. Many stem from his ultra-competitive nature and the pressure of carrying a franchise. However, as his stardom grows, these incidents highlight the fine line between passion and petulance. Whether it’s knocking over ladders or slapping teammates, Giannis reminds us that even the most likable stars have their breaking points. Bucks fans hope these are learning experiences, as the Greek Freak chases more rings. But I see more and more people will see through his act.
Giannis Antetokounmpo has ventured into live streaming, but the results are surprisingly lacklustre. Fans tuning into streams like his session with IShowSpeed on YouTube might expect the same high-energy charisma he brings to the court. Instead, they often get a snooze-fest that fails to capture his larger-than-life presence.
Lack of Structure and Engagement
Live streaming thrives on energy, interaction, and a clear sense of purpose. Unfortunately, Giannis’ streams often feel aimless. In the linked stream with IShowSpeed, much of the time is spent on casual banter that doesn’t quite land. The conversation meanders without a clear focus, leaving viewers waiting for something exciting to happen. Unlike top streamers who plan segments, games, or challenges to keep their audience hooked, Giannis’ approach feels like an impromptu chat that doesn’t translate well to the streaming format. Without a hook or engaging activities, the stream struggles to hold attention.
Mismatch with Streaming Dynamics
Giannis is a master of physicality and in-person charisma, but streaming demands a different skill set. The medium requires quick wit, constant audience interaction, and comfort with digital tools like chat moderation or game integration. In the IShowSpeed collaboration, Giannis seems out of his element, overshadowed by Speed’s frenetic energy. While Giannis’ chill vibe works in post-game interviews or locker room moments, it doesn’t carry the same weight in a medium where viewers expect non-stop entertainment. His laid-back demeanor, while authentic, comes off as disengaged in the fast-paced world of live streaming.
Technical and Production Shortcomings
Another factor dragging down Giannis’ streams is the lack of polish. The production quality in the referenced YouTube stream is bare-bones, with little attention to visuals, sound, or pacing. Top streamers invest in clean setups, good lighting, and dynamic overlays to keep things visually appealing. Giannis’ streams, by contrast, often feel like a FaceTime call gone public. Without a team to elevate the technical side—think clear audio, engaging graphics, or seamless transitions—the viewing experience feels amateurish and fails to compete with established creators.
Missed Opportunities for Unique Content
Giannis has a goldmine of potential content: behind-the-scenes NBA stories, fitness routines, or even playful challenges tied to his “Greek Freak” persona. Yet, his streams rarely tap into this. Instead of leveraging his unique background—like sharing tales from his rise to stardom or hosting basketball-themed games—the content often sticks to generic conversations or reactions. For example, the IShowSpeed stream leans heavily on Speed’s antics rather than showcasing Giannis’ strengths. Fans want to see Giannis be Giannis, not a supporting act in someone else’s show.
The Hype Doesn’t Match the Delivery
Part of the disappointment comes from expectations. Giannis is a global icon, and fans tune in hoping for something as epic as his on-court performances. But streaming isn’t like basketball; it’s a grind that requires consistency and a knack for digital showmanship. Without a clear strategy or practice, Giannis’ streams feel like a letdown compared to the hype. Even collaborations with high-energy creators like IShowSpeed can’t fully compensate for the lack of direction, leaving viewers bored and scrolling away.
Giannis fails again
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s foray into live streaming is a classic case of a superstar not quite clicking with a new medium. While his personality shines in person, the unstructured, low-energy, and technically underwhelming streams don’t do him justice. To turn things around, Giannis could benefit from a clear content plan, better production, and activities that play to his strengths—think basketball challenges, fan Q&As, or storytelling from his incredible career. Until then, streams like the one with IShowSpeed will remain a missed opportunity, leaving fans yawning instead of cheering.
On June 13, 2025, ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith sparked a firestorm of debate on First Take by labelling Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo an “underachiever” if he fails to win another NBA championship. The comment, delivered in response to host Molly Qerim’s question about how to describe Giannis’ legacy without additional titles, drew immediate backlash from fans and analysts alike. Many pointed to Giannis’ remarkable journey—from a street vendor in Athens, Greece, to a two-time MVP, Finals MVP, and NBA champion—as evidence that the label is absurd. Yet, while Antetokounmpo’s story is undeniably inspiring, Smith’s argument has merit when viewed through the lens of Giannis’ dominance, postseason shortcomings, and the expectations placed on players of his calibre. Let me be the first to say that Stephen A Smith is a clown and very often his takes are ridiculous. But in this case he is 100% correct.
Giannis’ Unparalleled Dominance Sets a High Bar
Giannis Antetokounmpo over the last four years, across a minimum of 200 games, Giannis ranks second in the NBA with 30.4 points per game and fifth with 11.7 rebounds per game. His accolades are staggering: nine All-NBA selections, nine All-Star appearances, two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year award, and a Finals MVP in 2021. At 30 years old, in the prime of his career, Giannis is still a physical marvel but in terms of actual impact on games that matter?
This dominance is precisely why Smith’s “underachiever” label resonates. Players of Giannis’ stature—think Michael Jordan, LeBron James, or Kevin Durant—are judged not just by individual brilliance but by their ability to translate it into sustained postseason success. Smith argues, “You don’t look at somebody that dominant, that fantastic, with that kind of fire in his belly to compete on a night-in, night-out basis, and all you have is one championship to show for it.” The expectation for a player of Giannis’ caliber isn’t just to win once but to contend consistently and build a legacy of multiple titles. His 2021 championship was a historic triumph, but the Bucks’ inability to replicate that success raises questions about whether Giannis is fully capitalizing on his prime. Most importantly he doesn’t seem to be able to elevate those around him. Quite the opposite.
Postseason Struggles: A Pattern of Disappointment
Since their 2021 title, the Milwaukee Bucks have struggled in the playoffs, posting just one series win in the last four years. The team has suffered first-round exits in each of the past three seasons (2023–2025), a stark contrast to Giannis’ regular-season dominance. While injuries have played a role—Giannis missed significant time in the 2023 and 2024 playoffs due to back and calf injuries, respectively—the Bucks’ postseason woes extend beyond health concerns.
In 2022, the Bucks fell to the Boston Celtics in the second round, with Giannis playing all seven games. In 2023, despite Giannis’ absence for parts of the series, the Bucks were favored against the Miami Heat but collapsed in five games. In 2024, without Giannis, they lost to the Indiana Pacers in the first round. Even in 2025, with Giannis healthy, the Bucks fell to the Pacers again in five games. Smith highlighted this trend, noting that Giannis “has more All-NBA selections than postseason wins in the last four years.” For a player of his calibre, this discrepancy is striking.
Critics argue that these failures aren’t entirely Giannis’ fault. The Bucks have faced roster challenges, including an aging core and questionable front-office decisions. The 2023 trade for Damian Lillard, which cost them Jrue Holiday, a defensive anchor and clutch performer, has yet to yield the expected results, partly due to Lillard’s declining athleticism. The midseason trade of Khris Middleton to the Washington Wizards in 2024–25 further disrupted team chemistry. Yet, as the face of the franchise, Giannis bears the burden of elevating his team in critical moments. In the championship run, the more you look at it, the more it seems that Khris, Jrue and Brook did the job and Giannis just turned up for the Finals where it was easy. His inability to impact important games again and again, even in the regular season, lends credence to Smith’s critique.
The Championship-or-Bust Standard for Superstars
In the NBA, superstars are judged by championships, a standard that may seem unfair but is deeply ingrained in the sport’s culture. Legends like Kevin Garnett and Dirk Nowitzki, each with one ring, are often cited by Giannis’ defenders as proof that a single title can cement a legacy. However, both Garnett and Nowitzki faced criticism during their careers for not winning more, and their lone championships came against formidable opponents, much like Giannis’ 2021 title. The difference lies in expectations: Giannis, with his two MVPs and prime years ahead, is held to a higher standard than most.
Smith’s argument hinges on this championship-or-bust mentality. He acknowledges Giannis’ greatness but insists that “it’s unacceptable” for a player of his dominance to have just one title and limited playoff success. This perspective aligns with how other superstars are evaluated. LeBron James faced intense scrutiny until he won his first title in 2012; Kevin Durant was labelled a “ring-chaser” until he won in 2017. Even Nikola Jokić, a one-time champion, faces pressure to add more rings to his résumé. Giannis, with his unique blend of accolades and physical gifts, is no exception. It’s not just about the rings. It is about proving you can do it when it matters, not just regular season stat padding at which Giannis excels.
Organizational Limbo and Giannis’ Role
Superstars are expected to transcend organizational shortcomings. Michael Jordan carried flawed Bulls rosters to playoff success before Scottie Pippen’s arrival; LeBron James dragged undermanned Cavaliers teams to the Finals. Giannis’ recent playoff performances, while statistically impressive as individual numbers, haven’t yielded the same results. For example, in the 2025 playoffs against the Pacers, Giannis averaged 31.8 points and 12.4 rebounds but couldn’t prevent a five-game loss. Smith’s point is that a player of Giannis’ calibre should find ways to win, even when the odds are stacked against him. And he seems more incapable of doing that than ever. If anything, he is getting worse!
The Trade Rumors and Legacy Pressure
Giannis’ future with the Bucks has been a hot topic, with trade rumours swirling as Milwaukee struggles to build a contender around him. Reports from ESPN’s Brian Windhorst on June 10, 2025, indicate that there’s currently no trade market for Giannis, and he hasn’t requested a move. However, the speculation itself underscores the pressure on Giannis to deliver. If he were to leave Milwaukee without another title, his legacy could take a hit, as loyalty to a small-market team is often weighed against championship success.
Smith’s “underachiever” label is partly a warning: without another ring, Giannis risks being remembered as a player who didn’t fully realise his potential. This sentiment is echoed by some fans on social media, with one user (@bets_liam) noting the Bucks’ “organisational limbo” and lack of depth as barriers to Giannis’ success. Yet, the expectation remains that Giannis, as a top-tier superstar, should overcome these obstacles or seek a situation where he can win.
Excuses excuses
Giannis’ defenders have the same points they make every year. His journey from a No. 15 draft pick in the Greek second division to NBA stardom is one of the most inspiring in sports history. Injuries, both to Giannis and his teammates, have derailed potential deep playoff runs but these can also be attributed to their own mistakes in the way they approach their season. The Bucks’ roster moves, particularly the Lillard trade, haven’t panned out as hoped. Moreover, comparing Giannis to players like Jordan or James may be unfair, as few players in history have matched their postseason dominance. Legends like Jerry West, Oscar Robertson, and Julius Erving, each with one ring, are rarely called underachievers.
These excuses don’t negate Smith’s core point: Giannis’ talent demands more than one title. His regular-season excellence and 2021 heroics have set a sky-high standard, and the Bucks’ recent playoff failures fall short of that mark. Smith’s take, while harsh, reflects the unforgiving expectations placed on superstars in the NBA. “XYZ famous player didn’t win any titles?” come the Giannis fanboys in his defence. That is irrelevant. They had impact on the game when it mattered. They elevated their team mates or they did heroics on their own enough to get their teams along in the playoffs. They didn’t exit 4-1 in the playoffs like Giannis does all the time. It really looks like all he cares about is his individual stats. All season the story has been “Giannis gets 30+ points but…”
A Call to Action for Giannis
Stephen A. Smith’s “underachiever” label for Giannis Antetokounmpo is a provocative but defensible stance. Giannis’ dominance in the regular season, coupled with the Bucks’ postseason struggles, creates a gap between his potential and his achievements. While injuries, roster issues, and organisational missteps share the blame, superstars are judged by their ability to overcome adversity and deliver championships. Giannis’ 2021 title proved he’s capable of greatness, but without additional rings, his legacy risks being defined by what could have been. This season he couldn’t even beat any of the top teams in the East in the regular season! Not even once!
Rather than a condemnation, Smith’s comment is a call to action. For now, Smith’s take serves as a reminder of the relentless standard applied to the NBA’s elite: greatness isn’t just about what you’ve done, but what you continue to achieve. And after more than a decade in the NBA, Giannis’ excuses are getting very very stale. Especially when we are not seeing improvements in his game. On the contrary he is getting worse at most things on the floor. At 30, Giannis has time to add to his résumé, whether in Milwaukee or elsewhere. His response to this criticism—on the court, in the playoffs—will ultimately shape how history views him. But so many times he has made big statements and then gone off to simply fail again in the playoffs.
When discussing the NBA’s elite, Giannis Antetokounmpo and LeBron James frequently top the conversation. Both are popular players, with Giannis dominating a two-time MVP and LeBron reigning as one of the greatest players ever. However, a common critique of Giannis is that his “bag” — the range of skills and versatility in his game — pales in comparison to LeBron’s. Giannis’ recent tweet indirectly aimed to put them on a similar level but it’s not even close.
Scoring: Power vs. Precision
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis, known as the “Greek Freak,” relies heavily on his physical gifts. Standing at 6’11” with a 7’3″ wingspan, he’s a force in the paint. His scoring is built on:
Rim Attacks: Giannis is arguably the best in the league at driving to the basket. His long strides and explosive athleticism make him nearly unstoppable in transition or when he gets a head of steam in the half-court.
Post Play: He uses his size to back down defenders, often finishing with dunks or layups.
Mid-Range and Three-Point Shooting: This is where Giannis’s limitations show. His jump shot remains inconsistent. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting around 29% from three on low volume (1-2 attempts per game) and rarely takes mid-range shots, preferring to attack the rim. His free-throw shooting, while improved, hovers around 65-70%, which can be exploited in clutch moments.
Giannis’s scoring is devastatingly effective but one-dimensional. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot, which limits his offensive repertoire compared to players with more refined jumpers.
LeBron James
LeBron, at 6’9″ and 250 pounds, combines physicality with finesse. His scoring arsenal is far more diverse:
Driving and Finishing: Like Giannis, LeBron is a freight train in transition and can finish through contact at the rim. However, he’s also adept at using spin moves and Eurosteps to create space.
Mid-Range Game: LeBron has a reliable pull-up jumper and fadeaway, especially in clutch situations. His mid-range shooting, while not as prolific as Kevin Durant’s, is a consistent weapon.
Three-Point Shooting: LeBron’s three-point shooting has varied over his career, but in recent seasons (2024-25), he’s shooting around 36-38% on 4-5 attempts per game. This forces defenses to respect his range, opening up driving lanes.
Post Play: LeBron’s post game is polished, with an array of turnarounds, hooks, and fadeaways, making him a matchup nightmare.
LeBron’s ability to score from all three levels — inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc — gives him a significant edge. Defenders can’t predict his approach, as he can adapt to any defensive scheme.
Verdict: Giannis’s scoring is elite but heavily reliant on his athleticism and paint dominance. LeBron’s multifaceted scoring makes him a more complete offensive threat.
Playmaking: Vision and Execution
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis has grown into a solid playmaker, averaging around 6-7 assists per game in recent seasons. His passing is effective in specific contexts:
Drive-and-Kick: Giannis often draws multiple defenders on drives, allowing him to kick out to open shooters.
Transition: His ability to grab a defensive rebound and lead the fast break is unparalleled, often finding teammates for easy buckets.
Limitations: Giannis’s playmaking is somewhat predictable. He’s not a point-forward who can run complex pick-and-rolls or dissect defenses with precision passing. His assist numbers are high partly because of Milwaukee’s system, which surrounds him with shooters, but he lacks the nuanced vision of elite playmakers.
LeBron James
LeBron is one of the best passers in NBA history, often compared to Magic Johnson. His playmaking is a cornerstone of his game:
Court Vision: LeBron’s ability to read defenses is uncanny. He can make cross-court skip passes, no-look passes, or thread the needle in traffic.
Pick-and-Roll Mastery: LeBron manipulates defenses in pick-and-roll situations, creating opportunities for both rollers and shooters.
Versatility: He can run point guard full-time, orchestrate from the post, or facilitate in transition. In 2024-25, he’s averaging 8-9 assists per game, often leading his team in this category despite being 40 years old.
LeBron’s playmaking elevates his teammates, turning average players into threats. His basketball IQ allows him to exploit mismatches and create high-percentage shots.
Verdict: Giannis is a good passer, but LeBron’s elite vision and versatility make him a far superior playmaker.
Defense: Impact and Adaptability
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, having won the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. His defensive strengths include:
Rim Protection: His length and timing make him an elite shot-blocker, averaging 1.5-2 blocks per game.
Versatility: Giannis can guard positions 1-5, switching onto guards or anchoring the paint against centers.
Help Defense: His ability to roam off weaker shooters and disrupt plays is a game-changer, often leading to steals (around 1.2 per game).
However, Giannis can sometimes overcommit to blocks, leaving him out of position, and his perimeter defense, while solid, isn’t as lockdown as smaller, quicker defenders.
LeBron James
LeBron’s defensive prime was earlier in his career (2008-2016), but even in 2025, he remains a plus defender:
Versatility: LeBron can still guard multiple positions, though he’s less likely to take on elite perimeter players full-time at this stage.
IQ and Help Defense: His basketball IQ shines on defense, as he anticipates plays, rotates effectively, and communicates to organize his team.
Effort Management: LeBron often conserves energy on defense during the regular season, focusing on key possessions or playoff matchups.
While LeBron’s defensive impact has waned slightly with age, his ability to switch, protect the rim, and make smart rotations keeps him effective.
Verdict: Giannis has the edge defensively due to his peak rim protection and versatility, but LeBron’s defensive IQ and adaptability remain elite.
Overall Versatility: The “Bag” Comparison
The term “bag” refers to a player’s range of skills and ability to adapt to different situations. Giannis’s bag is deep in specific areas:
Unstoppable in transition and paint scoring. Well, he used to be unstoppable.
Elite defensive impact. Well, until he won DPOY and then forgot defence.
Improving but limited playmaking. Unless it is a game that matters.
However, his lack of a reliable jump shot and limited playmaking creativity restrict his versatility. Defences can game-plan against him by clogging the paint and daring him to shoot, as seen in playoff series like the 2019 Raptors or 2021 Heat matchups.
LeBron’s bag, by contrast, is one of the deepest in NBA history:
Scores efficiently from all three levels.
Elite playmaking that elevates any team.
High-level defense, even if not at its peak.
Ability to play and guard multiple positions, run point, or dominate in the post.
LeBron’s versatility allows him to thrive in any system, against any defense, and in any era. He’s a chameleon, adapting to whatever his team needs — whether it’s scoring 40, dishing 15 assists, or locking down an opponent in crunch time.
Contextual Factors: Age and Era
It’s worth noting that Giannis (30 years old in 2025) is in his prime, while LeBron (40) is in the twilight of his career. Despite this, LeBron’s skill set remains more polished. Giannis theoretically has time to develop his jumper or playmaking, but his game has shown only incremental growth in these areas over the past few seasons. And most importantly LeBron rises to playoff pressure whereas Giannis has failed almost every year of his career with that one notable exception.
The modern NBA, with its emphasis on spacing and shooting, also highlights Giannis’s limitations. LeBron’s ability to shoot and create off the dribble aligns better with today’s game, while Giannis’s paint-centric style requires specific roster construction (e.g., shooters like Middleton and Lopez) to maximize his impact. Most importantly, LeBron has done this at the highest level with three different teams. Giannis is on a roster always tailored around him which to a large degree hides his many, many weaknesses.
So no Giannis, you won’t get away with this
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s physical dominance during the regular season make him a perennial MVP candidate. However, when comparing his “bag” to LeBron James’s, the gap is clear. LeBron’s ability to score from anywhere, make every type of pass, and adapt to any role gives him a level of versatility that Giannis has yet to match. While Giannis’s raw power and athleticism are impressive in easy games, his lack of a consistent outside shot and limited playmaking creativity mean his game is less complete. And most importantly his game has not developed and doesn’t deliver when it counts. While LeBron posts career breaking improvements in efficiency at 40, Giannis hits career lows in ft% and 3pt% as well a serious deterioration of his defensive effort.
LeBron’s all-around mastery, even at 40, sets a standard that few, including Giannis, can rival. As Giannis continues to refine his game, he may close the gap, but for now, LeBron’s bag remains the deeper and more versatile of the two. And it’s not even close.
The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings, hosted at nbarankings.theringer.com, aim to provide a dynamic, year-round evaluation of the NBA players making the most significant impact in the league. Updated regularly to reflect current performance, the rankings are a valuable resource for fans and analysts alike. However, the 2025 iteration of these rankings has sparked debate, particularly regarding the placement of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. While Giannis is undeniably a phenomenal physical talent, his high ranking—near the very top—raises questions about the methodology and criteria used, especially when his playoff impact is scrutinised.
1. Overemphasis on Regular-Season Performance
The Ringer’s rankings claim to reflect players “making the biggest impact on the league right now” (). However, the methodology appears to heavily favor regular-season statistics and accolades over playoff performance, which is arguably the true measure of a player’s impact in high-stakes scenarios. This is particularly evident in Giannis Antetokounmpo’s case. Giannis consistently posts gaudy regular-season numbers—averaging 30.4 points, 11.5 rebounds, and 6.5 assists in the 2022-23 season, for example, while leading the Bucks to the best record in the NBA. His ability to dominate with sheer athleticism and force makes him a regular-season juggernaut, but the rankings fail to adequately weigh his postseason shortcomings.
In the 2025 playoffs, Giannis averaged an impressive 36 points in Game 1 against the Indiana Pacers, but his impact was limited by Milwaukee’s blowout loss and the team’s overall lack of cohesion (). The Bucks have not won a playoff game in which Giannis has played since Game 5 of the 2022 playoffs, going 0-5 in such games (). This pattern of playoff under performance—whether due to injuries, coaching mismatches, or roster limitations—suggests that Giannis’s ranking should reflect these struggles more heavily. The Ringer’s list, by prioritising regular-season dominance, risks inflating the value of players like Giannis who excel in less consequential games but falter when the stakes are highest.
2. Giannis’s Playoff Limitations: A Case for a Lower Ranking
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playoff resume is a mixed bag, and The Ringer’s high ranking of him—often in the top 5, alongside players like Nikola Jokić and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander—overlooks critical weaknesses. While Giannis led the Bucks to a championship in 2021 with a historic 50-point performance in Game 6 of the Finals, his postseason success since then has been inconsistent. The Bucks have faced early-round exits in each of the last four postseasons (2022-2025), with injuries, poor roster construction, and tactical limitations playing significant roles.
a. Injury Concerns and Availability
Giannis has struggled with durability in recent playoffs. Since the 2021 championship, injuries to either himself or key teammates like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard have derailed Milwaukee’s postseason aspirations (). In 2023, Giannis played in the Heat series but was hampered, and his team lost despite a 40-point, 20-rebound game (). In 2024, he missed significant playoff time, and in 2025, the Bucks’ Game 1 loss to the Pacers highlighted a lack of team support around him (). While injuries are not entirely within a player’s control, consistent absence or diminished performance in critical playoff moments should weigh heavily in rankings that claim to assess current impact.
b. Tactical Limitations
Giannis’s game, while dominant, has exploitable flaws in playoff settings. His lack of a reliable three-point shot (22.2% in 2024-25) and career-low 61.7% free-throw shooting make him vulnerable to defensive schemes that clog the paint and dare him to shoot (). Teams like the Miami Heat in 2023 and the Pacers in 2025 have capitalised on this, using physical defenders and zone schemes to neutralise his drives. The Ringer’s rankings do not seem to account for how these limitations reduce Giannis’ effectiveness in high-stakes games, where opponents can game-plan specifically to exploit his weaknesses.
c. Supporting Cast and Coaching Mismatches
The Ringer’s individual player rankings should consider how much of Giannis’ impact is diminished by his lack of ability to adapt to his playing environment. His high ranking feels like an endorsement of his individual stats rather than a holistic evaluation of his ability to elevate his team in the postseason. Which he obviously cannot do. Shouldn’t that be the most important thing in a team game?
d. Comparison to Peers
When compared to other top-tier players like Jokić, who led Denver to a championship in 2023 with a historically efficient offensive season (), or Gilgeous-Alexander, who has guided OKC to a dominant 2024-25 season (), Giannis’s playoff resume pales. Jokić’s versatility as a passer, shooter, and clutch performer makes him a more reliable playoff force, while Gilgeous-Alexander’s low turnover rate and ability to elevate teammates in big moments set him apart (). The Ringer’s failure to adjust Giannis’s ranking downward relative to these players suggests a bias toward his regular-season dominance and name recognition.
3. Lack of Transparency in Ranking Methodology
Another significant flaw in The Ringer’s rankings is the lack of clarity around how players are evaluated. The site describes the list as reflecting “the biggest impact on the league right now” but does not provide specific criteria, such as statistical weights, playoff performance, or qualitative factors like leadership or clutch play (). This opacity makes it difficult to understand why Giannis is ranked so highly despite his postseason struggles. For comparison, ESPN’s NBArank, which uses a panel of experts voting on player matchups, provides a clearer framework, even if it’s not perfect (). The Ringer’s rankings would benefit from a detailed explanation of how regular-season stats, playoff performance, and intangibles are balanced.
4. Overvaluing Star Power and Narrative
The Ringer’s rankings seem to lean heavily on star power and narrative, which may explain Giannis’s lofty placement. His transformation from a “gangly teenager to a modern-day Shaq” and his inspirational 2021 Finals run have cemented his status as a fan and media favorite (). However, this narrative-driven approach can overshadow objective analysis. Posts on X highlight skepticism about Giannis’s top-5 status, with users pointing out his poor shooting percentages (45/25% in some playoff series) and lack of playoff wins since 2022 (,). The Ringer’s rankings risk prioritizing Giannis’s brand and past achievements over his current playoff impact, which is inconsistent with the claim of evaluating “right now.”
5. Broader Issues with the Rankings
Beyond Giannis, The Ringer’s list has other issues that undermine its credibility:
Inconsistent Updates: While the rankings are described as “year-round, around-the-clock,” updates seem sporadic, with some entries dated months apart (e.g., February 27, 2025, and April 15, 2025) (,). This raises questions about whether the rankings truly reflect current performance.
Overranking Aging Stars: Players like Kevin Durant and LeBron James, ranked highly despite injury concerns and diminished playoff success, suggest a reliance on reputation rather than current output ().
Underrating Emerging Talent: Young players like Anthony Edwards and Victor Wembanyama, who are projected to dominate in the future, may be ranked lower than their current impact warrants due to a bias toward established names ().
Conclusion: Reassessing Giannis and The Ringer’s Approach
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a generational talent, but his high ranking in The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings is questionable given his recent playoff struggles. His injury history, tactical limitations, and reliance on a sub optimal supporting cast and coaching staff have hindered his postseason impact, yet the rankings do not seem to reflect these realities. Broader issues, such as the lack of transparent methodology, overemphasis on regular-season stats, and narrative-driven evaluations, further undermine the list’s credibility. To improve, The Ringer should clarify its criteria, give greater weight to playoff performance, and ensure rankings reflect current impact rather than past achievements or star power. Until then, Giannis’ placement near the top feels more like a nod to his regular-season dominance and fan appeal than a true measure of his league-wide impact.
The recent article from The Athletic, titled “Echoes of Kareem: The eerie parallels Bucks fans see in a potential Giannis-less future,” draws a dramatic comparison between the Milwaukee Bucks’ trade of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in 1975 and the potential trade of Giannis Antetokounmpo. It suggests that trading Giannis could plunge the Bucks into a decades-long championship drought, much like the 46 years that followed Kareem’s departure. While the historical parallel is intriguing, the argument hinges on an overstated view of Giannis’s impact, ignoring the critical weaknesses in his game that limit his ability to dominate when it matters most. This blog post dismantles the article’s premise, arguing that Giannis’s flaws make the comparison to Kareem—a player with a far more complete skill set—unconvincing.
Key points from the articles suggest:
Giannis’s current situation:
Giannis Antetokounmpo is reportedly considering being traded for the first time in his career.
His loyalty to Milwaukee has been tied to the team’s ability to contend for a title.
The recent first-round playoff exit and Damian Lillard’s injury (torn Achilles, leading to a long absence) have raised questions about the Bucks’ contention window and potentially accelerated Giannis’s decision-making process.
Giannis’s trade value is currently at its highest. He is 30 years old, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP, making him a highly desirable trade candidate for many teams.
He has not explicitly requested a trade yet, but teams are “quietly lining up” in case he does.
His contract runs through the 2026-27 season with a player option for 2027-28, and it does not include a no-trade clause.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s situation:
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the previous best player for the Bucks before Giannis, demanded a trade in the 1970s, specifically to New York or Los Angeles for personal reasons.
The Bucks’ goal is to avoid a repeat of the Abdul-Jabbar situation where he dictates his preferred destination, which could limit their trade return.
The Bucks’ dilemma:
Milwaukee needs to avoid a similar outcome to the Abdul-Jabbar trade, which led to a long period without a championship.
The team has limited cap flexibility and tradable assets, making it challenging to rebuild a contender around Giannis.
They are reportedly desperate to keep Giannis and might be willing to sacrifice a lot of assets to build a contender on the fly.
The article emphasizes the importance of Giannis’s decision in the coming weeks for the Bucks’ offseason plans.
Potential trade scenarios and suitors:
Many teams are being discussed as potential landing spots if Giannis becomes available, including the Golden State Warriors, New York Knicks, Boston Celtics, and Detroit Pistons.
The Lakers are mentioned, but it’s noted they have limited assets, and a trade there would likely only happen if Giannis specifically demanded to go there.
Trade packages would likely involve a combination of young players and draft picks.
In essence, the articles highlight the critical juncture the Milwaukee Bucks face with Giannis Antetokounmpo, drawing parallels to their past experience with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and the intense speculation surrounding Giannis’s future in the league.
The Article’s Core Claim
The Athletic’s piece posits that Giannis is the linchpin of the Bucks’ success, akin to Kareem in his era, and that trading him could doom the franchise to a prolonged rebuild. It points to Milwaukee’s 46-year title drought post-Kareem and implies a similar fate if Giannis is dealt. This narrative assumes Giannis’s current and future impact is on par with Kareem’s, a premise that doesn’t hold up when you scrutinize Giannis’s game.
Giannis’s Strengths? Limited
Let’s acknowledge Giannis’ postseason reveals the cracks in his game. Unlike Kareem, whose skyhook and all-around scoring made him nearly unguardable, Giannis’s skill set has exploitable flaws that teams have repeatedly targeted in high-stakes moments. These weaknesses undermine the article’s claim that his departure would be as catastrophic as Kareem’s.
Weakness #1: Limited Outside Shooting
Giannis’s lack of a reliable jump shot is his most glaring flaw. His career three-point shooting hovers around 28%, and in the 2024-25 season, he’s hitting just 27.3% from deep on 1.8 attempts per game. In the playoffs, teams like the Miami Heat (2020, 2023) and Boston Celtics (2022) have built “walls” in the paint, daring him to shoot. When he does, the results are inconsistent, allowing defenses to sag off and clog driving lanes. Kareem, by contrast, had a mid-range and post game that forced defenses to respect him at all levels. Giannis’s one-dimensional scoring profile makes him easier to game-plan against in crunch time.
Weakness #2: Free-Throw Struggles
Giannis’s free-throw shooting remains a liability, especially in close games. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting 65.2% from the line, a marginal improvement but still below average for a star. In the 2021 Finals, his 59.1% free-throw shooting nearly cost the Bucks key games, and opponents often exploit this with intentional fouls late in games. Compare this to Kareem, who shot 72% from the line during his Bucks tenure and didn’t face the same “hack-a-Giannis” strategy. This weakness hampers Giannis’s ability to close out tight playoff games, a critical factor the article overlooks.
Weakness #3: Playmaking Under Pressure
While Giannis is a capable passer, averaging around 6 assists per game, his decision-making falters under playoff pressure. His turnover rate spikes in the postseason—3.8 per game in his career compared to 3.2 in the regular season—often due to forced passes or charges into crowded defenses. Teams with elite defenders, like Toronto in 2019, have neutralized him by doubling him early and forcing him to make quick reads he’s not consistently equipped to handle. Kareem, with his high basketball IQ and versatile scoring, was a more reliable hub for his team’s offense, even under defensive scrutiny.
Weakness #4: Defensive Inconsistency
Giannis’s 2020 DPOY award highlights his defensive potential, but his impact on that end has waned. In the 2024-25 season, the Bucks’ defensive rating is worse with Giannis on the floor (112.3) compared to off (110.8), per NBA.com. His rim protection and versatility are still elite, but he often conserves energy on defense in the regular season, and in the playoffs, teams exploit his tendency to help off shooters, leaving open threes. Kareem, a three-time blocks leader with Milwaukee, was a consistent defensive anchor. Giannis’s defensive lapses, especially in critical moments, dilute his overall impact.
Why the Kareem Comparison Fails
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was a complete player: a scoring machine with the skyhook, a reliable free-throw shooter, and a defensive stalwart who anchored the Bucks’ system. His departure in 1975 was devastating because his skill set was irreplaceable. Giannis, while a generational talent, has clear holes in his game that teams exploit in the playoffs. The Bucks’ 2021 title required a perfect storm—Khris Middleton’s clutch shooting, Jrue Holiday’s defense, and injuries to opponents like Brooklyn’s Kyrie Irving. Without those factors, Giannis’s weaknesses have often led to early exits, like the Bucks’ first-round losses in 2023 and 2024.
The article’s claim that trading Giannis would mirror Kareem’s exit overstates his indispensability. Milwaukee’s recent trade of Khris Middleton for Kyle Kuzma shows they’re trying to retool around Giannis, not replace him as a singular saviour. A trade could bring assets to build a more balanced roster, addressing the team’s reliance on a star whose flaws are exposed in high-stakes moments.
Click bait from the NYT
The Athletic’s comparison of a potential Giannis trade to Kareem’s departure is so flawed it’s click bait. Giannis’s weaknesses—poor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, shaky play making under pressure, and defensive inconsistency—limit his ability to carry a team in the playoffs the way Kareem did. While he’s a phenomenal talent, he’s not the unassailable force the article suggests. Trading him wouldn’t necessarily doom the Bucks to decades of irrelevance; it could open the door to a smarter, more balanced roster. The Kareem parallel is more emotional than factual. Giannis is an antisocial player who will find it hard to fit in at any other team. Both due to his character flaws and – most importantly – due to his extremely low basketball IQ and limited skill set. He is playing a kind of basketball that has long been surpassed in the NBA and was extremely lucky to win that one championship.
The Bucks aren’t winning another one with Giannis. The whole point of this article makes no sense.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is known for his athleticism and rim-rattling dunks. However, a recent $100,000 MrBeast shooting challenge pitted him against street ball sensation and YouTube star Tristan Jass, and the results were shocking. The challenge highlighted critical weaknesses in Giannis’ game that have long been debated by fans and analysts.
The Challenge Setup
The MrBeast challenge was a head-to-head shooting competition designed to test precision under pressure. The tasks included:
Free throws: A test of consistency from the charity stripe.
Three-pointers: A measure of long-range shooting ability.
Half-court shots: A high-risk, high-reward challenge requiring both skill and a bit of luck.
Tristan Jass, a content creator with a massive following for his streetball highlights and deadly shooting, was a formidable opponent. While Giannis is a global basketball icon, Jass’s specialized skill set in shooting made this a tougher matchup than it might have seemed. The $100,000 prize added pressure, and as X user @____Shemar noted, “No way Mr. Beast possibly thought Giannis was making a FT, 3 pointer, and half court shot before Tjass … easiest $100k Tjass ever made 😂”.
1. Free-Throw Shooting Woes
The free-throw portion of the challenge was a predictable stumbling block for Giannis. His career free-throw percentage hovers around 65-70%, with a 2024-25 season average of approximately 68%. In high-pressure situations, his performance at the line often dips further, as seen in playoff games where opponents employ a “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy to exploit this weakness.
In the MrBeast challenge, Giannis struggled to find a rhythm, missing several free throws in a row. His lengthy free-throw routine—often taking 10+ seconds—may have been disrupted by the fast-paced, high-stakes environment of the challenge. Fans remarked on the predictability of this outcome, with @Lester_O3 noting that someone won $100,000 by outshooting Giannis. Jass, known for his consistency in shooting drills, likely capitalised on this, hitting his free throws with ease.
Giannis’ free-throw struggles stem from mechanical issues (a hitch in his release and inconsistent wrist snap) and mental pressure. In the challenge, the added spotlight of a MrBeast production, with cameras and a live audience, likely amplified his tendency to overthink at the line.
Takeaway: Giannis needs to streamline his free-throw routine and practice under pressure to boost his consistency. Hitting 75-80% from the line would not only have helped in this challenge but could deter opponents from fouling him intentionally in NBA games. He is in fact worse than ever in his career in free throws this season!
2. Inconsistent Three-Point Shooting
The three-point shooting segment was another area where Giannis fell short. His NBA three-point percentage in the 2024-25 season is around 20-25% on low volume (1-2 attempts per game), a far cry from Jass’s sharpshooting prowess. Jass, who regularly showcases deep threes and trick shots on YouTube, thrives in these scenarios, while Giannis’ jump shot remains a work in progress.
In the challenge, Giannis reportedly missed most of his three-point attempts, unable to match Jass’s precision. His shooting form—marked by a slow release and occasional inconsistency in footwork—makes long-range shooting a liability. NBA defenses often sag off Giannis, daring him to shoot from deep, as seen in playoff series like the 2023 loss to the Miami Heat, where his 1-for-10 three-point shooting in the series was a glaring weakness.
The MrBeast challenge exposed this gap starkly. While Giannis relies on his athleticism to dominate inside, Jass’s specialized shooting skill set gave him a clear edge in a contest focused on perimeter accuracy.
Takeaway: Giannis would benefit from dedicated three-point training to reach at least a league-average 35% from deep. This would force defenses to respect his range, opening up his drives to the basket and making him a more complete offensive threat. Three points this season he not only shot worse than ever in his career but almost worse than anyone, ever, in NBA history for a single season!
3. Half-Court Shot Struggles
The half-court shot portion of the challenge was the final nail in the coffin. Half-court shots are inherently low-percentage, relying on a mix of skill, luck, and confidence. Jass, with his reputation for hitting long-range bombs in his videos, likely approached this with a shooter’s mentality. Giannis, on the other hand, rarely attempts such shots in NBA games, and his mechanics from that distance are unrefined.
Giannis’ attempts fell short or missed wide, while Jass connected to seal the victory.
Takeaway: While half-court shots are a niche skill, improving his overall shooting mechanics could give Giannis a better chance in such scenarios. Practising long-range shots in low-stakes settings might also build confidence for rare game situations. But if anything Giannis is worse than ever in clutch situations which is why Doc Rivers now keeps him out of the game in the 4th quarter as much as possible. We saw against the Pacers how terrible he can be for his team under pressure.
4. Pressure in Non-NBA Settings
Beyond specific skills, the challenge highlighted Giannis’ discomfort in non-traditional basketball settings. NBA games allow him to leverage his physicality, defensive prowess, and transition dominance, but the MrBeast challenge was a pure shooting contest with no room for his usual strengths. The high-pressure environment, with a $100,000 prize and a YouTube audience, may have thrown Giannis off his game, as he’s accustomed to structured NBA settings rather than impromptu streetball-style competitions.
Jass, a content creator who thrives in these viral, high-energy formats, was in his element. Giannis’ struggles suggest that his mental focus, while elite in NBA contexts, may not translate as well to unconventional challenges where his athletic advantages are neutralized.
Takeaway: Giannis could benefit from participating in more casual, high-pressure shooting contests to build adaptability. This would also help him handle the mental demands of clutch shooting moments in playoff games. Most of all though the NBA is about the show. And Giannis simply doesn’t deliver which is why he doesn’t bring in TV ratings.
What This Means for Giannis
The MrBeast challenge underscores areas where he lags behind specialists like Jass and, by extension, NBA sharpshooters in the league. To elevate his game, Giannis could:
Work with a shooting coach to refine his free-throw and three-point mechanics, aiming for incremental improvements (e.g., 75% free throws, 35% threes).
Practice under pressure in non-NBA settings to build mental resilience for high-stakes shooting.
Study film of sharpshooters to adopt techniques that complement his physical gifts.
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100,000 shooting challenge was a revealing moment. It exposed his well-known struggles with free throws, three-point shooting, and long-range accuracy, amplified by the pressure of a viral, high-stakes competition. For fans, the challenge was a fun spectacle that pitted an NBA giant against a street ball sharpshooter. For Giannis, it’s a wake-up call to address weaknesses that could make the difference in future playoff runs. As he continues past his prime now at age 30, the Greek Freak has the work ethic and drive. But can he turn these flaws into strengths? After more than a decade in the league and with so many different coaches that have tried to help him, the answer is probably no.
Here’s what it wrote, back in 2020 on OpenCourt Facebook page about Giannis not really impacting games that matter and fans confusing regular season stat padding and highlights with real NBA ballin.
“GIANNIS IS NOT A TRUE SUPERSTAR.
I know it sounds harsh, but the fact of the matter is Giannis Antetokounmpo is not superstar in its TRUEST sense in the NBA. He’s not who people think he is, not yet anyway.
If you are a person that religiously follows the league, it’s evident to see that there are significant holes in Giannis’ game that place him in a tier below the LeBrons, Kawhis and healthy Durants of this world.
Throughout the season there were many people claiming Giannis was the best player in the world, but the truth is Giannis isn’t close to being that guy yet. For basketball purists, it should be worrying that such claims are thrown around without any real evidence of the fact.
To this day, Giannis has NEVER shown he can carry a team WHEN IT MATTERS MOST. Let me repeat that, NEVER. When it’s time to put the team on your back and take them to the next level, his game is simply not evolved enough to do so.
Now I know what you’re going to say “But Giannis is only 25, he has time” and despite that being true, Giannis has shown little to no improvement whatsoever in the past 4 season of averaging over 20ppg in areas of his game that he desperately needs to take him to the very top of the NBA’s elite.
I know what else you’re going to say “But he needs a better supporting cast”, and despite that having SOME truth to it, how quickly the world forgets just how HISTORICALLY great this Bucks team was this season.
The Bucks were the quickest team in NBA HISTORY to make the playoffs this season. They started the season 27-4 (read that again, 27-4). They were the highest ranked team in the ENTIRE LEAGUE on offense and defense. They had two all stars. They had the leading 3-point shooter in the league in George Hill. They had an All-NBA defender in Brook Lopez. They had one of the best coaches in the league. They were one of the deepest teams in the league. They had the best overall record in the league.
Don’t believe me? Type in “Milwaukee Bucks best team ever” into Google and read. Debate shows, TV segments, podcasts and articles were all discussing whether or not this Bucks team was the greatest team of all time. Let that sink in.
And when it mattered most, their leader’s inabilities on the floor failed them. What people don’t understand, is although Giannis’ teammates fail to perform when the stakes are high a lot of the time, the reason why is down to Giannis’ inability to provide for them, to lift them, to put them in a position to be successful. It’s on him.
Another season, another underwhelming series that turns into a premature elimination for Giannis when a team has the personnel and game plan for him. The bizarre thing is the game plan is simple, clog the lane, build a wall and don’t let him get to the rim. And it really is THAT simple.
People laughed and made fun of James Harden when he claimed it takes no real skill to do what Giannis does by just running and dunking, but when you really think about it, was he wrong?
I would go one further and make the case Giannis is a MUCH GREATER defensive player than he is an offensive player despite having nice offensive numbers in the regular season. His jumpshot is abysmal, he has no mid range game, he’s an average facilitator, he has no post game for someone his size, he has no true playmaking ability for someone his size, if he’s not trying to bully people to the rim he’s in foul trouble for offensive fouls, nearly all his points come in transition, he’s a terrible free throw shooter, and worst of all, Giannis can’t even handle the ball and make plays down the stretch in the fourth quarter of playoff games. How are you supposed to be a superstar when you can’t even handle the ball when it matters most, when your team can’t put the ball in your hands and tell you to win the game for them.
For the Bucks to go out the way they did is simply UNACCEPTABLE. They are the first number one seed in NBA History to go down 0-3 in a playoff series to a number 5 seed, EVER. The craziest part is their only win was when Giannis left the game early with an ankle injury and Kris Middleton had the best game of his life and the offense actually flowed. I’m not saying the Bucks are better without Giannis, but if a superstar and your best player goes down, more times than not you shouldn’t be winning a playoff game. This was their year. Interrupted season or not, the manner in which they lost was unacceptable.
In that series, Jimmy Butler looked 10 times the player Giannis looked. In most people’s player rankings, Butler and Giannis wouldn’t even be close to one another, but when it mattered most, Butler took the challenge and took his team to another level.
When Giannis was asked why he wasn’t guarding Butler he said “Because the coach didn’t ask me to” as the DPOY and the best defender on your team ARE YOU KIDDING ME? When the media asked Mike Budenholzer why Giannis wasn’t playing heavy minutes despite resting him during the season for these moments he said “34-35 minutes is his ceiling” ARE YOU KIDDING ME? The one time Giannis took the challenge to actually guard Butler he fouled him on the game winning shot that sent Butler to the free throw line to win Game 2.
All signs points to Giannis taking home his second MVP trophy, but from what we’ve seen you can make the case Giannis could be the worst back-to-back MVP in league history.
I do not care about Giannis throwing down a dunk on the entire New York Knicks on a Tuesday night in Milwaukee. Show me you are one of the very best in the world when it matters most. When your team needs you the most. When the lights are the brightest, and teams try to take away everything you’re great at. Show me then. The MVP award means absolutely nothing if you can’t show me then.
He still has time, but as of right now Giannis is NOT a TRUE superstar in the NBA.
And it’s about time we start holding him to that same standard.
Five years after it was written and most of it has been proven true. The only thing he got wrong is that Giannis is clearly a much much worse defender in the past 3-4 seasons. Giannis not only hasn’t managed to impact playoff games, he can’t even impact regular season games that matter! He has not added any skills but got worse at most things on the court other than…dunking.
The NBA All-Star Game has long been a showcase of the league’s best talent, a mid season celebration that brings fans together to watch their favourite players compete in a fun, high-flying exhibition. Traditionally, the game has pitted the Eastern Conference against the Western Conference, a format that reflects the league’s geographic structure and fosters regional pride. However, in recent years, there have been discussions about shaking up the format, with one proposed idea being a match up between U.S.-born players and international players. While this concept might sound intriguing on the surface, it’s a deeply flawed idea that could harm the NBA’s brand, alienate fans, and create unnecessary divisions in a league that thrives on unity and inclusivity. Giannis really should think before tweeting a bit more. You would think someone like him who has suffered due to racism would be a little more careful.
1. It Undermines the NBA’s Global Unity
The NBA is one of the most globally diverse sports leagues in the world. Players from countries like Serbia, Greece, Canada, France, and Nigeria share the court with American-born stars, creating a melting pot of talent that transcends borders. This diversity is a strength, not a point of division. By splitting the All-Star Game into U.S. versus international players, the NBA would be artificially creating a “us vs. them” narrative that feels forced and counterproductive.
Basketball is a universal language, and the All-Star Game is a chance to celebrate that unity. Highlighting nationality as the defining factor risks sending a message that international players are somehow separate from their American counterparts, which could alienate fans in global markets. The NBA has worked hard to expand its reach—evidenced by games played in Europe, Asia, and Africa, and the success of the Basketball Without Borders program. A U.S. vs. International format could undermine these efforts by framing international players as outsiders rather than integral parts of the league’s fabric. Then again, Giannis has always been a massive hypocrite concerning what country he stands for. Effectively he is American. But he pretends to be Nigerian or Greek as per the media needs of the day.
2. It Risks Alienating Fans
The All-Star Game is a fan-driven event, with voting heavily influenced by fan engagement. Splitting the game into U.S. vs. International rosters could alienate significant portions of the fan base. For example, American fans might feel less connected to the international team, while international fans might feel their players are being pitted against the “home” team in a way that feels unfair or exclusionary. This format could also discourage fans from voting for players based on merit, as national pride might overshadow talent in the selection process.
Consider a player like Giannis Antetokounmpo, a Greek-Nigerian superstar who plays for the Milwaukee Bucks. Would fans in Milwaukee rally behind him as an “international” player, or would they feel conflicted because he’s not on the “U.S.” team? The same goes for players like Luka Dončić or Nikola Jokić, who have massive followings in the U.S. despite being international stars. Forcing fans to choose sides based on nationality risks diluting the emotional connection they have to their favourite players.
3. It Creates an Uneven Competitive Balance
While the NBA’s international talent pool is stronger than ever, the number of All-Star-calibre international players is still significantly smaller than the number of American-born All-Stars. In the 2024 All-Star Game, for example, only about 25% of the selected players were born outside the U.S. This disparity would likely result in a lopsided match up, with the U.S. team having a deeper pool of talent to draw from.
Let’s look at a hypothetical 2025 All-Star roster. The international team might feature stars like:
Nikola Jokić (Serbia)
Giannis Antetokounmpo (Greece)
Luka Dončić (Slovenia)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Canada)
Joel Embiid (Cameroon)
That’s an impressive group, but the U.S. team could counter with:
LeBron James
Kevin Durant
Jayson Tatum
Anthony Edwards
Devin Booker
And many more
The depth of American talent would likely overwhelm the international side, leading to blowouts that could make the game less entertaining. The East vs. West format, while not always perfectly balanced, at least draws from a larger and more evenly distributed pool of players, ensuring a competitive game.
4. It Could Fuel Unnecessary Nationalism
Sports have a unique ability to bring people together, but they can also stoke nationalism when formats emphasise country of origin. An All-Star Game pitting U.S. players against international players risks turning a lighthearted exhibition into a platform for jingoism. In today’s polarised world, where nationalism and xenophobia are already sensitive issues, the NBA doesn’t need to create a format that could amplify these tensions.
Imagine the social media discourse around a U.S. vs. International All-Star Game. Fans and commentators might frame the game as a proxy for geopolitical rivalries or cultural superiority, which is the last thing the NBA needs. The league has thrived by staying above such controversies, focusing on the game itself rather than external divisions. The current East vs. West format, or even the recent captain’s draft format, avoids these pitfalls by keeping the focus on basketball.
5. It Diminishes the All-Star Game’s Fun Factor
The All-Star Game is supposed to be fun—a break from the grind of the regular season where players can show off their skills, throw alley-oops, and engage in friendly banter. A U.S. vs. International format risks making the game feel more serious and divisive than it needs to be. Players who are teammates during the regular season, like Jokić and Jamal Murray or Dončić and Kyrie Irving, would be forced to compete against each other based on nationality, which could disrupt the camaraderie that makes the All-Star Game special.
Moreover, the format could lead to awkward situations where players feel pressured to “represent” their country rather than just enjoy the game. The All-Star Game thrives on its lack of stakes—players aren’t out to prove anything beyond who can pull off the flashiest dunk or the most ridiculous three-pointer. Adding a nationalistic element risks making the game feel like a high-stakes international competition, which is better suited for events like the Olympics or FIBA World Cup.
6. It Ignores the Success of Recent Format Changes
The NBA has already experimented with the All-Star Game format in recent years, moving away from the traditional East vs. West match up to a captain’s draft system in 2018. This change, where two All-Star captains pick their teams playground-style, has been largely successful. It creates fun, unpredictable rosters and allows for unique player combinations that fans wouldn’t otherwise see. For example, seeing LeBron James team up with Giannis Antetokounmpo or Steph Curry play alongside Luka Dončić creates exciting moments that a U.S. vs. International format wouldn’t allow.
The captain’s draft format also keeps the focus on individual star power rather than collective identities like nationality. It’s a format that’s inclusive, engaging, and true to the spirit of the All-Star Game. Reverting to a format that emphasizes division over unity would be a step backward.
7. It Could Harm the NBA’s International Growth
The NBA’s international growth has been one of its biggest success stories. In 2024, the league had over 120 international players from 40 countries, and viewership in markets like China, Europe, and Africa continues to soar. A U.S. vs. International All-Star Game risks alienating these growing fan bases by framing international players as a separate entity. Fans in Serbia, for example, might feel less invested in the game if their hero, Nikola Jokić, is pitted against a dominant U.S. team in a way that feels like an underdog narrative.
Instead of highlighting the contributions of international players as part of the NBA’s broader ecosystem, this format could make them feel like a sideshow. The NBA has worked hard to make stars like Yao Ming, Dirk Nowitzki, and now Jokić and Dončić household names in the U.S. and beyond. A format that emphasizes their “otherness” could undo some of that progress.
Giannis should be ashamed of himself for proposing this
The NBA All-Star Game is a celebration of basketball’s best, a chance for fans to see their favourite players compete in a fun, low-stakes environment. Switching to a U.S. vs. International format would undermine the league’s commitment to unity, alienate fans, create competitive imbalances, and risk fuelling unnecessary nationalism. The current East vs. West format—or the more recent captain’s draft system—already strikes a balance between competition and entertainment without introducing divisive elements. The NBA should continue to embrace its global identity by celebrating all players as part of one league, not by pitting them against each other based on where they were born.
Whispers persist about whether Giannis would ever leave the Bucks for a new challenge. While some argue he’d thrive elsewhere, there’s a compelling case that Giannis might be hesitant to depart Milwaukee—not due to a lack of ambition, but because staying put shields him from intense scrutiny, hides his weaknesses, and provides a comfortable narrative for his playoff shortcomings. Sure, he will try and sell it as “loyalty” but think about it. He hasn’t got a chance in a million to win another ring with the Bucks. They have spend so long pampering his every whim, changing coaches and players as per his demands that they have absolutely nothing left to trade. If he really wants a ring he should go. But he won’t.
The Comfort of Milwaukee’s System
The Bucks have built their entire system around Giannis’s unique skill set. Coach Mike Budenholzer (and now Doc Rivers) designed offences that maximise his ability to attack the rim, leveraging his length, speed, and power. Milwaukee surrounded him with shooters like Khris Middleton, Brook Lopez, and Damian Lillard to space the floor, allowing Giannis to operate in the paint or as a playmaker in transition. This tailored environment masks some of his limitations, particularly his inconsistent outside shooting and free-throw struggles. The Bucks again were top of the NBA in 3pt% as a team despite Giannis shooting worse than ever in his career and close to the worse of any NBA player ever in a single season.
On a new team, Giannis will not have the same luxury. A franchise like the Miami Heat or Los Angeles Lakers, for example, might demand more versatility in half-court offence or a greater reliance on perimeter skills. If Giannis joined a team with a less complementary roster, his 30.8% career three-point shooting (as of the 2024-25 season) and 68.5% free-throw percentage could become glaring liabilities. In Milwaukee, these weaknesses are mitigated by a system that doesn’t require him to be a sharpshooter. Elsewhere, they’d be magnified, potentially exposing him as a one-dimensional star in critical moments.
The Excuse of the Supporting Cast
In Milwaukee, Giannis has a built-in narrative for playoff disappointments: the roster around him isn’t good enough. This is a complete lie as I broke down in this blog post. When the Bucks fell to the Miami Heat in the 2020 playoffs or struggled against the Boston Celtics in 2022, analysts and fans often pointed to Khris Middleton’s injuries, Jrue Holiday’s inconsistency, or a lack of depth. This narrative allows Giannis to deflect criticism, maintaining his status as a transcendent talent held back by circumstances.
If Giannis moved to a superteam the excuses would vanish. A new team with high-calibre talent would place the spotlight squarely on Giannis’s performance. If he failed to deliver in the playoffs, the blame would shift from the roster to his own limitations, such as his struggles in clutch situations or his predictable offensive approach against elite defences. The pressure to perform without the safety net of “it’s the team’s fault” could be daunting, especially for a player who thrives on being the underdog. Giannis already looks like a fool for talking about not joining a superteam only to get Dame next to him.
Playoff Pressure and the Fear of Failure
Giannis’s playoff resume is a mixed bag. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but it was mainly luck and not really due to Giannis when you break it down. Other years have been less kind: the Bucks’ early exits in 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024 exposed vulnerabilities in Giannis’s game, particularly against teams that build a “wall” to clog the paint. Opponents like the Raptors (2019) and Heat (2020) exploited his lack of a reliable jump shot, daring him to shoot while shutting down his drives.
On a new team, Giannis would face even greater playoff scrutiny. In Milwaukee, he’s the hometown hero, forgiven for setbacks because of his loyalty and the Bucks’ small-market status. In a bigger market or on a contending roster, every playoff game would be a referendum on his greatness. A failure to advance deep into the postseason could cement a narrative that Giannis can’t lead a team to a title without the perfect supporting cast, tarnishing his legacy. The risk of such failure might make him wary of leaving the familiarity of Milwaukee, where expectations, while high, are tempered by the city’s underdog mentality.
The Burden of Improvement
Giannis’ shooting remains a work in progress and he is running out of excuses. In Milwaukee, his reluctance to develop a consistent mid-range or three-point shot is often excused as a byproduct of his dominance in other areas. Fans and analysts argue, “Why change what works?” But on a new team, especially one with a different offensive philosophy, Giannis would face unrelenting pressure to evolve.
For example, joining a team like the Golden State Warriors, where spacing and shooting are paramount, would force Giannis to confront his weaknesses head-on. Without the Bucks’ system to lean on, he’d need to become a more complete offensive player, a challenge he’s been slow to embrace. The fear of being exposed as stagnant—or worse, incapable of adapting—could deter him from taking the leap to a new environment where his growth would be non-negotiable. People talk about him going to the Warriors but his inability to set up screens is only one of many weaknesses which make that completely ridiculous.
The Loyalty Factor and Public Perception
Giannis’s loyalty to Milwaukee is a cornerstone of his public image. He signed a supermax extension in 2020, cementing his status as a rare superstar who stayed with a small-market team. This decision endeared him to fans and shielded him from the criticism often levelled at players who chase rings elsewhere, like LeBron James or Kevin Durant. Leaving Milwaukee could fracture this narrative, painting him as just another star chasing glory rather than building a legacy.
Moreover, a move to a bigger market or a super team could invite comparisons to other superstars, where Giannis’s weaknesses might stand out more starkly. In Milwaukee, he’s the undisputed alpha, free from the shadow of a co-star who might outshine him. On a team with another MVP-calibre player, he’d risk being seen as the “second option,” a label that could bruise his ego and alter how his career is perceived. Superstars avoid Giannis for various reasons I list here.
The Psychological Weight of Change
Beyond basketball, leaving Milwaukee would mean uprooting a life Giannis has built over a decade. He’s spoken openly about his love for the city, his teammates, and the organisation that believed in him as a scrawny teenager from Greece. The emotional and psychological toll of adapting to a new city, fan base, and team culture could weigh heavily, especially for a player who values stability. The fear of failing to mesh with a new team—both on and off the court—might make staying in Milwaukee the safer choice.
Other Risks of Leaving
Media Scrutiny in a Bigger Market: Milwaukee’s relatively small media market offers Giannis a buffer from the intense scrutiny of cities like New York or Los Angeles. A move to a high-profile team would invite relentless analysis of his every move, from his shot selection to his body language.
Fan Backlash: Bucks fans have embraced Giannis as one of their own. Leaving could alienate a loyal fanbase, creating pressure to justify his decision with immediate success. The emotional toll of being booed in Milwaukee during return games could be a deterrent.
Team Chemistry Risks: Giannis’s game relies on trust and chemistry with teammates who understand his style. A new team might struggle to integrate his ball-dominant, paint-focused approach, leading to friction or underperformance.
Legacy Concerns: Giannis has a chance to be Milwaukee’s greatest player ever, a legend who brought a title to a city starved for success. Leaving risks diluting that legacy, especially if he fails to match or exceed his Bucks achievements elsewhere. We know he likes stat padding, well now he can smash every franchise record and pretend he is doing it to be loyal.
Giannis is too chicken to move
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s fear of leaving the Milwaukee Bucks is about the risks of stepping out of a perfectly crafted comfort zone. In Milwaukee, his weaknesses are mitigated, his playoff failures are cushioned by roster excuses, and his loyalty shields him from harsh criticism. A move to a new team would strip away these protections, exposing him to scrutiny, demanding growth in areas he’s yet to master, and risking his carefully built legacy. It looks as if Giannis doesn’t have the skill set to succeed anywhere and he knows it. The fear of failure, magnified by a new environment, will probably keep him rooted in Milwaukee for years to come. As he showed this season, he is quite happy stat padding and making the rest of his team look bad.
The NBA is no stranger to debates about talent, roster decisions, and the influence of star players on team dynamics. One name that has consistently sparked controversy in recent years is Thanasis Antetokounmpo, the older brother of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. Critics, fans, and analysts alike have pointed to Thanasis as a prime example of nepotism in the NBA, arguing that his roster spot with the Bucks is a direct result of his brother’s influence rather than his own basketball merits.
Thanasis Antetokounmpo’s NBA Career: clearly not good enough
Thanasis Antetokounmpo, born on July 18, 1992, in Athens, Greece, entered the NBA with high expectations as the older brother of a generational talent. Drafted 51st overall by the New York Knicks in 2014, Thanasis spent his early career bouncing between the NBA and the G League, with brief stints in Europe. Since joining the Milwaukee Bucks in 2019, he has remained on the roster, playing alongside his brother Giannis and contributing to the team’s 2021 NBA Championship. However, his on-court production has drawn significant scrutiny as nobody on the planet would claim that he can play at NBA levels of basketball.
By the Numbers: A Lackluster On-Court Impact
To understand Thanasis’s performance, let’s look at his career statistics with the Bucks (as of the 2024-25 season, based on available data):
Minutes Played: Thanasis averages just 4.6 minutes per game across 181 games with the Bucks (through the 2023-24 season). His limited playing time reflects a bench role, often reserved for garbage time or low-stakes situations.
Scoring: His career scoring average with the Bucks is a meager 2.4 points per game, with a field goal percentage of 52.3% and a three-point percentage of 14.3% (on very low attempts, 0.3 per game). His scoring output is negligible, and his inability to stretch the floor with outside shooting limits his offensive utility.
Rebounds and Assists: Thanasis averages 1.6 rebounds and 0.5 assists per game, indicating minimal impact in playmaking or board-crashing.
Advanced Metrics: His Player Efficiency Rating (PER) hovers around 8.0, well below the league average of 15.0. His Win Shares per 48 minutes (WS/48) is 0.048, suggesting he contributes little to team wins when on the court. His Box Plus-Minus (BPM) is consistently negative, often around -4.0, indicating that the Bucks perform worse with him on the floor.
These numbers paint a clear picture: Thanasis is, at best, a fringe NBA player whose statistical contributions are among the lowest on the Bucks roster and possibly the entire league. Videos and highlight reels circulating online often highlight his athletic dunks or hustle plays, but these moments are rare and overshadowed by inefficiencies. For instance, a YouTube video titled “How BAD is Thanasis Antetokounmpo Actually?” notes that his limited skill set—primarily athleticism and energy—doesn’t translate to consistent NBA-level production, with many calling him “the worst player in the NBA”.
Defensive and Intangible Contributions
Proponents of Thanasis argue that his value lies in his defensive effort and locker-room presence. Standing at 6’6” with a 7’0” wingspan, he has the physical tools to be a disruptive defender. He averages 0.4 steals and 0.2 blocks per game, numbers that reflect his hustle but are hardly game-changing. His defensive rating (points allowed per 100 possessions) is around 110, which is average at best and often inflated by playing in low-leverage minutes.
Thanasis is frequently described as a high-energy player who brings enthusiasm to practices and supports his teammates. However, these intangibles are difficult to quantify, and critics argue that they don’t justify a roster spot on a contending team like the Bucks, where every slot is critical for maximising championship odds.
The Nepotism Debate: Is Thanasis on the Bucks Because of Giannis?
The heart of the controversy surrounding Thanasis Antetokounmpo is the accusation of nepotism. Critics, including NBA legend Charles Barkley and analyst Shannon Sharpe, have openly questioned why Thanasis remains on the Bucks roster, pointing to his brother Giannis’s influence as a two-time MVP and franchise cornerstone. Let’s examine the arguments for and against the nepotism claims.
Evidence of Nepotism
Limited NBA-Caliber Production: As outlined above, Thanasis’s statistical output is among the lowest in the league. A 2023 article from Pulse Sports reported an NBA executive branding Thanasis as a product of nepotism, stating, “The rumor circulating social media is that Thanasis is only in the NBA because of his brother”. Fans on X echo this sentiment, with one user (@Not_Guccio) quipping in 2022 that Thanasis has “the best job in the NBA” because he secures a roster spot and millions in salary due to Giannis’s presence, despite rarely playing serious minutes.
Bucks’ Roster Decisions: The Bucks have retained Thanasis since 2019, even waiving and re-signing his younger brother Alex Antetokounmpo within 24 hours in 2023, prompting fans to mock the team for “hearing the nepotism jokes”. The fact that Thanasis has secured multi-year contracts (e.g., a two-year, $3.6 million deal in 2021) while producing minimal on-court impact fuels speculation that the Bucks prioritize keeping Giannis happy over optimizing their roster.
Comparisons to Other Cases: The drafting of Bronny James by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2024 reignited discussions about nepotism, with Thanasis often cited as a parallel. A Basketball Forever article noted that Bronny’s selection drew attention to Thanasis, with critics arguing that both players benefit from their famous relatives’ influence. Charles Barkley has been particularly vocal, joking during the 2022 All-Star Game about Thanasis’s job security and later calling it a “compliment” when Thanasis responded positively.
Giannis’s Influence: Giannis is known to value family deeply, and reports suggest he has advocated for his brothers’ inclusion on the Bucks. A 2023 New York Post article quoted Shannon Sharpe criticizing Giannis for securing roster spots for both Thanasis and Alex, implying that their presence is tied to Giannis’s leverage as a superstar. This perception is reinforced by comments like those from Kendrick Perkins, who questioned Thanasis’s roster spot in a 2023 Fadeaway World piece.
Counterarguments: More Than Nepotism?
Thanasis and his supporters have pushed back against the nepotism narrative. In a 2024 interview, Thanasis responded to Charles Barkley’s jabs, saying, “That’s a compliment because that means I’m a good person”. He emphasized his work ethic, journey from the G League, and contributions to team morale. A Greek City Times article highlighted his role as a supportive teammate, noting that his presence fosters a positive locker-room environment, which is crucial for a championship-caliber team.
Additionally, some argue that Thanasis’s roster spot is not catastrophic. The Bucks won the 2021 NBA Championship with Thanasis on the roster, and his limited minutes (averaging 2.5 minutes per game in the playoffs) suggest he doesn’t add anything to the team’s success. A Reddit user pointed out that if nepotism were the sole factor, the Bucks would have also retained their younger brother Kostas Antetokounmpo, who left the NBA after brief stints. This suggests that Thanasis may offer some value, even if it’s not reflected in box scores. However we have never really seen this in some concrete way. And every time someone says “yes, but it keeps Giannis happy” they are essentially admitting that a) Giannis is weak psychologically and b) that it IS indeed nepotism at its worse. After all the Bucks don’t need to give him a spot on the team. He could be part of the coaching staff if all he does is support Giannis.
Is Thanasis’ presence catastrophic?
The perception that Thanasis’s roster spot is a “catastrophic” example of nepotism stems from several factors:
Opportunity Cost: NBA rosters are limited to 15 players, and every spot is valuable, especially for a contending team like the Bucks. Critics argue that Thanasis occupies a position that could be filled by a more productive player, such as a sharpshooter or defensive specialist. Maybe an experienced player that could make the difference for a few minutes in a critical playoff match up. A BroBible article from December 2024 stated, “Watch Thanasis play, and you can quickly tell he shouldn’t be anywhere close to an NBA roster”. This sentiment is amplified by the Bucks’ struggles in recent seasons, including early playoff exits in 2023 and 2024, which have heightened scrutiny of roster construction.
Fan and Media Backlash: Social media platforms are rife with criticism of Thanasis. A 2024 post from @TheNBACentel humorously quoted Thanasis as saying his job is to “high five the rotation players” and “stand up for Giannis,” encapsulating the perception that his role is ceremonial. YouTube videos with titles like “I’m Sorry, But Why Is Thanasis Antetokounmpo Still In The NBA???” amplify this narrative, often highlighting his mistakes or limited impact.
Contrast with Giannis’s Excellence: Giannis Antetokounmpo is a global superstar, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP. His dominance sets an impossibly high bar for his brothers, making Thanasis’s shortcomings more glaring. Fans and analysts expect players associated with Giannis to perform at a high level, and Thanasis’s inability to do so fuels the nepotism narrative.
They are not really that funny. Some claim that the brothers’ banter is social media worthy and entertaining. But this is really hard to support. Their presence at All Star games has always been a let down and their humour is…well…weird to put it politely. For sure it is not producing TV ratings or social media traffic in any good way.
A Balanced Perspective: Catastrophic or Overblown?
While the nepotism accusations carry weight, calling Thanasis’s presence on the Bucks roster “catastrophic” may be an overstatement. The Bucks have maintained a competitive roster, winning a championship in 2021 and remaining a top Eastern Conference team despite recent playoff disappointments. Thanasis’s limited minutes mean he rarely impacts games negatively, and his role as a locker-room leader may provide intangible benefits that outsiders cannot fully assess.
However, the opportunity cost of his roster spot cannot be ignored. In a league where marginal improvements can make or break a championship run, the Bucks’ decision to retain Thanasis over a more skilled player raises questions about priorities. The perception of nepotism is further fueled by Giannis’s undeniable influence, which likely ensures Thanasis’s job security. As one post noted, “Thanasis has had an NBA roster spot for years simply because Giannis is his brother,” a sentiment that resonates with many fans.
No excuse anymore for Thanasis in the NBA
Thanasis Antetokounmpo’s NBA career is a polarizing case study. His statistical output is undeniably poor, with minimal contributions in scoring, rebounding, and advanced metrics. The persistent accusations of nepotism, backed by comments from figures like Charles Barkley and Shannon Sharpe, highlight the belief that his roster spot is tied to Giannis’s stardom rather than his own merit. While his energy and locker-room presence offer some value, the opportunity cost of his roster spot on a contending team like the Bucks fuels the “catastrophic” label.
Thanasis Antetokounmpo does not significantly influence the Milwaukee Bucks’ win/loss record through his individual on-court production. The Bucks have averaged a .638 win percentage all-time when Thanasis is on the team, which is consistent with the high performance of the Giannis-led Bucks era. Thanasis’s direct statistical impact in games is minimal: his career averages are just 2.4 points, 1.6 rebounds, and 0.6 assists in about 8 minutes per game over nearly 200 appearances.
Ultimately, Thanasis’s story reflects a broader tension in the NBA: balancing team chemistry and star player satisfaction with the relentless pursuit of optimal performance. Whether you view him as a nepotism beneficiary or a misunderstood role player, one thing is clear: his presence on the Bucks roster will continue to spark debate as long as Giannis remains the face of the franchise. The only positive spin you can put on it is that it is well and truly traditionally Greek to try and get your relatives a job like that!
The narrative that Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ two-time MVP and NBA champion, “needs help” has been a persistent talking point among fans, analysts, and media. Every playoff disappointment or regular-season struggle prompts calls for the Bucks to acquire another superstar or bolster their roster to support their franchise player. However, this perspective oversimplifies the Bucks’ challenges and ignores a critical truth: Giannis himself is often a significant factor in the team’s shortcomings. While his dominance is undeniable, his playstyle, decision-making, and limitations contribute to Milwaukee’s struggles more than the lack of “help” around him.
The Myth of Insufficient Support
The argument that Giannis lacks adequate support often stems from the Bucks’ playoff exits, such as their first-round loss to the Miami Heat in 2023 or their 2024 defeat to the Indiana Pacers. Critics point to the roster, claiming it fails to complement Giannis’s skill set. However, this overlooks the quality of players Milwaukee has assembled. Khris Middleton, a three-time All-Star, has been a reliable second option, averaging 20.1 points per game in the 2022-23 season with a knack for clutch shot-making. Jrue Holiday, before his trade to Boston, was a Defensive Player of the Year candidate and a steady playmaker. Damian Lillard, acquired in 2023, is one of the league’s premier offensive engines, averaging 24.3 points and 7.0 assists in his first season with Milwaukee. Brook Lopez, a Defensive Player of the Year finalist, anchors the paint, while players like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton provide depth.
This is not a barren roster. The Bucks’ supporting cast has consistently ranked among the league’s better ensembles, with Milwaukee finishing the 2022-23 season with the NBA’s best record (58-24). Blaming the roster ignores the fact that teams like the 2023 Heat or 2024 Pacers, who ousted Milwaukee, were not necessarily more talented but executed better. The issue isn’t a lack of talent around Giannis—it’s how his playstyle interacts with that talent.
Giannis’s Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword
Giannis is a force of nature, a 6’11” freight train who combines athleticism, length, and defensive versatility in the past. His ability to drive to the rim, collapse defences, and finish through contact is impressive, evidenced by his career average of 22.9 points per game on 54.7% shooting (as of the 2024-25 season). However, his approach, while devastating, creates challenges that hinder the Bucks in critical moments. When it counts, Giannis comes up short.
Over-Reliance on Drives
Giannis’s game revolves around attacking the basket, often bulldozing through defenders to score or draw fouls. He led the NBA in free-throw attempts per game (11.0) in the 2022-23 season, a testament to his rim pressure. But this one-dimensional approach allows opponents to game-plan effectively. Teams like the Heat and Raptors (in 2019) have employed the “Giannis Wall,” packing the paint with multiple defenders to neutralize his drives. Without a consistent outside shot—his three-point percentage hovers around 27.7% for his career—Giannis struggles when teams dare him to shoot.
This predictability forces the Bucks into stagnant offensive sets. When Giannis barrels into a crowded paint, it often results in turnovers (3.1 per game career average) or low-percentage shots. His insistence on driving, even against set defenses, disrupts Milwaukee’s flow, limiting opportunities for shooters like Lillard or Middleton to exploit open looks. Compare this to players like Nikola Jokić, who blends scoring with elite playmaking (9.0 assists per game in 2023-24), or Kevin Durant, whose mid-range and three-point shooting keep defenses honest. Giannis’s tunnel vision on drives can stifle his team’s offense, making it easier for opponents to dictate the game’s pace.
Free-Throw Struggles and Pace Issues
Giannis’s free-throw shooting, while improved, remains a liability at 65.8% for his career. In high-stakes playoff games, this weakness is magnified. Opponents often employ Hack-a-Giannis strategies, slowing the game and disrupting Milwaukee’s rhythm. His lengthy free-throw routine—often exceeding the 10-second limit—further bogs down the pace, frustrating teammates and fans alike. In the 2023 playoffs, Giannis shot 45.3% from the line against Miami, a glaring issue in tight games.
This slow pace clashes with the modern NBA’s emphasis on speed and spacing. The Bucks ranked 19th in pace (98.5 possessions per game) in 2023-24, limiting their ability to capitalize on transition opportunities where Giannis thrives. His dominance in the half-court often comes at the expense of fluid team play, as teammates stand idle while he attempts to overpower defenders. Giannis simply can’t change the way he plays resulting in the entire team suffering.
Decision-Making in Crunch Time
Giannis’s decision-making in clutch situations is another area where he contributes to Milwaukee’s struggles. His choices in critical moments often falter. In the 2021 championship run, Giannis was phenomenal, but Middleton and Holiday frequently bailed him out in clutch scenarios. Fast forward to 2024, and his 4.4 turnovers per game in the playoffs against Indiana highlighted a recurring issue: forcing plays under pressure. Giannis simply can’t think fast enough when it counts, “he has no bag” for the top level of the NBA.
For example, in Game 5 of the 2023 Heat series, Giannis attempted a game-tying drive with seconds remaining, only to be stripped in traffic, leading to a turnover. A better decision—passing to an open Middleton or Lopez—might have changed the outcome. His reluctance to defer, even when double- or triple-teamed, puts undue pressure on his teammates to compensate for his mistakes. Contrast this with LeBron James, who, despite similar defensive attention, averages 7.4 assists per game by finding open teammates. Giannis’s assist average (5.7 in 2023-24) is solid but doesn’t reflect the same level of trust in his supporting cast.
The Coaching Carousel and Giannis’s Influence
The Bucks’ coaching instability—Mike Budenholzer’s firing in 2023, Adrian Griffin’s midseason dismissal in 2024, and Doc Rivers’ uneven tenure—points to another issue tied to Giannis. Reports suggest Giannis has significant influence over team decisions, from roster moves to coaching hires. The trade for Lillard, while a coup, was reportedly driven by Giannis’s desire for a co-star, yet the fit has been clunky. Lillard’s ball-dominant style clashes with Giannis’s need for touches, leading to a disjointed offense (Milwaukee’s offensive rating dropped from 113.3 in 2022-23 to 112.4 in 2023-24).
Giannis’s reported push for Griffin’s hiring, followed by his quick dismissal, suggests a lack of clarity in his vision for the team. This meddling, while not uncommon for superstars, disrupts continuity. The Bucks’ roster and system are built around Giannis’s strengths, but his influence often prioritizes his comfort over team synergy. For instance, the Bucks’ heavy reliance on drop-coverage defense, tailored to Giannis’s rim protection, limits their ability to switch and adapt against versatile offenses like Miami’s or Boston’s.
Statistical Context: Giannis’s Impact vs. Efficiency
To quantify Giannis’s role in Milwaukee’s struggles, consider his advanced metrics. His usage rate (31.2% in 2023-24) is among the league’s highest, reflecting his ball-dominant style. However, his true shooting percentage (61.3%) lags behind players like Jokić (63.1%) or Anthony Davis (62.4%), who balance efficiency with playmaking. Giannis’s high usage often comes at the expense of teammates’ involvement, as evidenced by Middleton’s shot attempts dropping from 15.1 per game in 2022-23 to 13.0 in 2023-24 despite similar minutes.
Defensively his tendency to roam for highlight plays can leave the Bucks vulnerable, especially against pick-and-roll-heavy teams. In the 2024 playoffs, Indiana’s Tyrese Haliburton exploited Milwaukee’s drop coverage, averaging 8.7 assists per game. Giannis’s defensive discipline still wanes in crucial moments, contributing to breakdowns.
The Counterargument: Does Giannis Really Need Help?
Defenders of the “Giannis needs help” narrative argue that no superstar can win alone. They point to Milwaukee’s injury issues—Middleton’s ankle problems in 2023, Giannis’s own calf injury in 2024—as evidence that the roster fails him in key moments. They also note that Lillard’s defensive limitations and Middleton’s inconsistency place too much burden on Giannis.
While injuries are a factor, they don’t fully excuse the Bucks’ failures. Teams like the 2023 Nuggets and 2024 Celtics overcame injuries through system cohesion and star adaptability. Giannis, by contrast, often sticks to his strengths rather than adjusting to opponents’ schemes. His refusal to develop a reliable jumper or refine his play making limits Milwaukee’s ceiling, regardless of who’s on the roster.
Giannis Must Evolve and fans need to stop making up excuses for him
The “Giannis needs help” narrative is a convenient scapegoat that shifts focus from the real issue: Giannis’s own limitations are a significant driver of Milwaukee’s problems. His predictable play style, clutch-time struggles, and influence over team decisions create challenges that no amount of roster tinkering can fully resolve. While he’s a generational talent, Giannis must evolve—whether by developing a jumper, improving his free-throw shooting, or trusting his teammates more in crunch time—to maximize the Bucks’ potential.
The Bucks don’t need another superstar; they need Giannis to address the gaps in his game and adapt to modern NBA demands. Until then, the narrative that he “needs help” will persist, but it’s a distraction from the truth: Giannis is both the Bucks’ greatest asset and, at times, their biggest obstacle.
Stats and data referenced are accurate as of the 2024-25 NBA season and sourced from Basketball-Reference and NBA.com.
You would expect the NY times not to fall into the click bait trap. Granted, this article is high level click bait. It also contains most of the relevant information. Published on May 13, 2025, titled “What we’re hearing about Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Bucks,” speculates heavily on the possibility of the Milwaukee Bucks trading their superstar. While the piece captures the current buzz around Antetokounmpo’s future, it falls short in several critical areas. Specifically, it overlooks the practical constraints that make most of the proposed trade scenarios unrealistic, ignores Antetokounmpo’s proven playoff limitations, and fails to acknowledge that his prime may be waning as the NBA adapts to his playing style.
1. Ignoring Practical Trade Constraints
The article suggests several trade destinations for Antetokounmpo, including the Houston Rockets, San Antonio Spurs, New York Knicks, Brooklyn Nets, Dallas Mavericks, and Golden State Warriors. However, it glosses over logistical and financial hurdles that render these proposals unrealistic under the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and the Bucks’ roster situation.
Salary Cap and Second Apron Issues
Antetokounmpo’s 2025-26 contract carries a $54.1 million cap hit, potentially higher for apron calculations. The Bucks are $6.5 million above the second apron, a restrictive threshold that prohibits taking back more salary than sent out, aggregating contracts, or using cash in trades. Trading Antetokounmpo would require sending out significant salary—likely players like Bobby Portis ($12.6 million) or Brook Lopez ($23 million)—to match incoming salaries, a complexity the article ignores.
For example, Houston’s proposed package of Amen Thompson, Jalen Green, and picks would need additional salary fillers like Keldon Johnson ($19 million) or Harrison Barnes ($18 million), burdening Milwaukee with long-term contracts misaligned with rebuilding goals. Similarly, a Spurs deal with Stephon Castle and picks would require veterans like Johnson or Barnes, further complicating the Bucks’ cap situation. The article’s suggestion of a Dallas trade involving the No. 1 pick (Cooper Flagg) is impractical, as Flagg’s $13.8 million rookie salary would necessitate multiple mid-sized contracts, disrupting Dallas’ win-now core around Kyrie Irving and Anthony Davis.
Milwaukee’s Depleted Draft Assets
The Bucks’ draft capital is severely limited, with unprotected first-round picks owed in 2025, 2027, and 2029, and swap rights held by New Orleans (2026) and Portland (2028, 2030). This restricts their ability to sweeten trade offers or offload contracts like Pat Connaughton’s $9.4 million player option, which the article overlooks. Trading Connaughton alone could cost three to four second-round picks or a late first-rounder, assets Milwaukee lacks. Teams like the Knicks or Nets might demand the Bucks absorb undesirable contracts (e.g., Ben Simmons’ $40.3 million expiring deal), further complicating deals.
Misaligned Trade Packages
The article assumes Milwaukee could secure a “meaningful, competitive” rebuild package, citing teams like Houston or San Antonio. However, it overestimates Antetokounmpo’s trade value given his recent playoff struggles and age (30). Teams may hesitate to gut rosters for a player with two years left on his deal (plus a 2027-28 player option) who hasn’t advanced past the first round since 2021. Proposed packages like Zion Williamson from New Orleans or Paul George from Philadelphia are impractical. Williamson’s injury history (214 games in six seasons) and $44.4 million salary are risky, while George’s $52.2 million contract and age (35) offer no long-term value for a rebuilding team. These suggestions ignore Milwaukee’s need for young, cost-controlled talent and draft picks.
The article portrays Antetokounmpo as a transcendent star whose “greatness could compel nearly every owner and GM” to adjust plans. While his 2024-25 regular-season stats—30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, 6.5 assists on 60.1% shooting—are elite, it ignores his recurring playoff struggles, which reduce his trade value and complicate Milwaukee’s situation.
Clutch and Playoff Shortcomings
Antetokounmpo has struggled in high-stakes playoff moments. Since the 2021 championship, the Bucks have suffered three consecutive first-round exits, with Antetokounmpo unable to elevate the team against younger, faster opponents like the Indiana Pacers. In Game 5 of the 2025 playoffs, despite a triple-double, he failed to close a 119-118 overtime loss, allowing Tyrese Haliburton’s game-winning layup. Post-game confrontations with Haliburton’s father and Bennedict Mathurin reflected frustration but highlighted his inability to channel energy into game-changing plays.
His free-throw shooting (68.3% career playoff, 65.1% in 2024-25) remains a liability in clutch situations, enabling opponents to foul him late, disrupting Milwaukee’s offense. His lack of a reliable outside shot (27.4% from three in 2024-25) allows defenses to sag off, clogging driving lanes. These weaknesses limit his impact in close games, a critical flaw the article ignores.
NBA’s Defensive Adaptations
The NBA has adapted to Antetokounmpo’s heliocentric style, a point the article sidesteps. Teams like the Pacers and Heat use swarming help defenses and “wall” strategies to neutralize his paint dominance. In Game 1 of the 2025 playoffs, Indiana’s ball movement exposed Antetokounmpo’s lag in processing rotations, exacerbated by distrust in teammates like Lopez, whose slow-footed drop coverage was exploited. These schemes force Antetokounmpo into playmaking, but his 3.7 turnovers per game in the 2025 playoffs indicate discomfort under pressure.
The article’s suggestion of Antetokounmpo as a “dream target” for teams like the Warriors overlooks how modern defenses diminish his fit. Golden State’s small-ball lineups, led by Draymond Green, would dare him to shoot from outside, a weakness incompatible with their spacing-heavy system. Similarly, the Knicks’ and Nets’ defensive-minded rosters (e.g., OG Anunoby, Mikal Bridges) would employ similar tactics, doubling Antetokounmpo and forcing him to pass or shoot from distance, areas where he’s less effective.
3. Is Antetokounmpo Past His Prime?
The article assumes Antetokounmpo remains at his peak, but evidence suggests he may be past his prime, a possibility it fails to explore. At 30, his athleticism and durability remain elite, but the NBA’s evolution and his playoff struggles raise questions about his ceiling. He also has fallen a lot in defensive metrics since getting the ring and even in offence many of his stats are at career lows.
Physical and Strategic Decline
Antetokounmpo’s game relies heavily on athletic dominance, but the wear of 12 NBA seasons (738 regular-season games, 88 playoff games) may be catching up. While he played 73 games in 2024-25, his playoff inefficiencies suggest diminishing returns in high-pressure settings. His usage rate (36.8% in 2024-25, down from 39.1% in 2022-23) indicates a slight reduction in offensive burden, possibly due to coaching adjustments or physical limitations. The article’s failure to address this overlooks a critical factor in his trade value.
The NBA’s shift toward perimeter-oriented, spacing-heavy offenses also challenges Antetokounmpo’s fit. His limited shooting range forces teams to build around his paint-centric style, which is less versatile in today’s game. Teams like the Warriors or Knicks, cited as suitors, prioritize floor spacing, making Antetokounmpo a stylistic mismatch unless he develops a consistent jumper—an unlikely transformation at this stage.
Comparison to Historical Trades
The article compares Antetokounmpo to rare trades of MVP-caliber players like Kareem Abdul-Jabbar or Kevin Durant, but these analogies are flawed. Abdul-Jabbar demanded specific destinations, limiting trade options, while Durant’s 2023 trade occurred under different CBA rules. Antetokounmpo’s situation—tied to a small-market team with limited assets and facing modern defensive schemes—makes a blockbuster trade less feasible. His playoff resume since 2021 further lowers his value compared to those historical precedents.
4. Misreading Antetokounmpo’s Intentions
The article speculates on Antetokounmpo’s openness to a trade, citing his attendance at Stephen Curry’s party and cryptic social media posts. However, it overstates these as evidence of discontent. Antetokounmpo has consistently expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating in 2023, “This is my team, and it’s going to forever be my team.” His comments about wanting to win another championship reflect ambition, not disloyalty. Multiple sources indicate he remains happy in Milwaukee and values his partnership with Damian Lillard, despite the team’s struggles. The article’s narrative of inevitable trade talks ignores these statements and the Bucks’ annual offseason meetings with Antetokounmpo, which are routine, not crisis-driven.
5. Bucks’ Alternative Path
The article assumes trading Antetokounmpo is the only path forward, ignoring alternatives like a “gap year” strategy. With Lillard likely sidelined for 2025-26 due to a torn Achilles, the Bucks could lean into a heliocentric offense around Antetokounmpo, potentially yielding MVP-caliber numbers (e.g., leading the league in scoring or averaging a triple-double). A 44-win season could secure a playoff spot in the weaker Eastern Conference, maintaining competitiveness while buying time to rebuild assets post-Lillard’s contract (2027). This approach, outlined by The Athletic elsewhere, aligns with Antetokounmpo’s desire to compete and avoids the risks of a premature trade. But maybe Giannis likes the narrative of him being the only hero on the team. He can rack up more 30point games as a ball hogging solo diva and get more amazing stats for himself.
Giannis is most likely not to go anywhere
The Athletic’s article oversimplifies Antetokounmpo’s trade prospects by ignoring CBA constraints, his playoff limitations, and signs he may be past his peak. Its proposed trade packages are impractical, failing to account for Milwaukee’s cap issues, depleted draft assets, and rebuilding needs. Furthermore, it overstates Antetokounmpo’s discontent and underestimates the Bucks’ ability to remain competitive without trading him. By focusing on sensational trade scenarios, the article misses the nuanced reality: Antetokounmpo’s future in Milwaukee is far from decided, and trading him may not be the panacea it suggests. Critical examination reveals a narrative driven more by rumour than practicality, leaving readers with an incomplete picture of a complex situation.
———————– for reference here it is ———————————————————–
What we’re hearing about Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Bucks
By Sam Amick, Eric Nehm, and David Aldridge
May 13, 2025, 9:00 AM
Giannis Antetokounmpo has not asked for a trade, but Milwaukee’s ability to build a championship roster around him appears constrained. So now what?
The Milwaukee Bucks have won their NBA Cup trophy, and they will always have their 2021 championship. But it’s becoming increasingly clear that their championship window with Antetokounmpo has likely closed, with their third consecutive first-round exit this postseason — combined with the devastating Achilles injury to co-star Damian Lillard — making it all the more difficult to avoid that harsh reality. As such, the Antetokounmpo-related chatter is louder than ever, with the two-time MVP known to be weighing his options and the Bucks facing the possibility that the franchise cornerstone might not finish his career in Milwaukee after all.
The Bucks and Antetokounmpo are expected to meet soon to discuss the future, league sources tell The Athletic, with those annual discussions taking on a different tone this time around. For the first time in his career, the 30-year-old Antetokounmpo is said to be open-minded about exploring whether his best long-term fit is remaining in Milwaukee or playing elsewhere, those sources said. Antetokounmpo has three years left on his contract, with a player option in the final season (2027-28).
Antetokounmpo has long made it clear that he’s all about winning, telling The New York Times in August 2023, “This is my team, and it’s going to forever be my team. … But we have to win another one. … Winning a championship comes first. I don’t want to be 20 years on the same team and don’t win another championship.”
The Bucks have not won a playoff series since their lone title together, and it’s becoming increasingly difficult to envision a path toward title contention with their current roster and limited flexibility. That isn’t likely this time around, however, as the Bucks have used almost all of those assets in the previous two situations and now can only add additional pick swaps to their 2026, ’28 and ’30 first-round picks or trade one of their first-round picks in either 2031 or 2032. Pulling off a trade big enough to appease Antetokounmpo’s desire to compete for a second championship in 2026 may end up being impossible and leave the Bucks forced to contemplate other plans for contention moving forward. With a blockbuster trade hard to imagine, where do you feel that leaves the Bucks, DA?
Aldridge: Let me be as clear as possible on this. I want Giannis Antetokounmpo to finish his career in Milwaukee. There are few stories as meaningful to the notion of the NBA that I believe is the best version of the NBA than a young player coming to a small or mid-market team, discovering his greatest potential and winning in front of a fan base that understands, better than any in New York or L.A., what it’s really like to struggle, what it’s really like to not be viewed as a marquee franchise.
I believe Giannis wants to stay in Milwaukee — but, understandably, doesn’t want to waste the rest of his prime in service to a team that isn’t good enough to contend. The problem Antetokounmpo has is that the Bucks have done nearly everything he’s asked over the years by surrounding him with players or coaches that he wanted in the hunt for a first, and then, a second title. That most of the moves haven’t yet worked, or even come close, isn’t the Greek Freak’s fault, of course. His play remains above reproach. But they haven’t worked. And they don’t leave Milwaukee with a lot of runway to take yet another big swing. No one is going to take on the rest of Dame’s latest extension — $54.1 million next season, followed by a $58.4 million player option for 2026-27. Maybe, if Lillard were healthy, the Bucks could engage the Phoenix Suns on Bradley Beal.
The Bucks don’t have a lot of future picks to deal — just their 2031 or ’32 first-rounder, and pick swaps in ’26, ’28 and ’30. They don’t have a lot of young players under team control to put in a deal, either. They could try to move Brook Lopez, who is 37 and a free agent after this season, and/or Bobby Portis, who has a $13.4 million player option for next season. Neither is likely to bring back a significant return, though.
Conversely, now is the time for Giannis to get clarity on what all of the interested teams might be able to put together if he came their way, as well as what might remain if they pull off a trade. It’s widely known that the Houston Rockets and San Antonio Spurs have the goods, and the gall, to get something done that might allow the Bucks to rebuild in a meaningful, competitive way. The New York Knicks and the Nets are expected to be in the running if these sweepstakes become an actual thing. The Dallas Mavericks — somehow — landed the No. 1 pick on Monday night and could now entertain the prospect of putting it on the table for someone of Antetokounmpo’s ilk. We have previously reported that Mavericks GM Nico Harrison, architect of the Luka Dončić trade, is expected to be in win-now/defense-wins-championships/Nike-superstar mode again this summer.
Giannis checks all of those boxes. Antetokounmpo, who has been known to be a dream target of the Warriors for a long time, made a late-night appearance at Curry’s party in San Francisco during All-Star weekend. Warriors officials on hand took (gleeful) notice — including fellow attendee, Golden State owner Joe Lacob. Draymond Green and Kevon Looney were part of the get-together as well. Giannis and Steph, it should be noted, are both represented by the same Octagon agency. Still, it was a Warriors-centric event with one notable, and very large, exception. And while Golden State is deeply invested in its Jimmy Butler era at the moment, the reality about a player like Antetokounmpo is that his greatness could compel nearly every owner and GM in the league to adjust their plan. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Despite the spotlight turning Antetokounmpo’s way on Monday, we’re not there just yet.
Nehm: I’d push back a little bit on one point, DA. I agree that Antetokounmpo’s play remains above reproach, but I don’t know that I’d say the Bucks have done “nearly everything he’s asked over the years.” Yes, they made the big swing for Lillard, and they brought in Doc Rivers as coach after firing Adrian Griffin, but I don’t know that those were Antetokounmpo’s demands so much as they were the front office trying to keep their star happy after a couple of disappointing seasons. Antetokounmpo is not the type to make demands in the way that other stars do, but he’s been clear about his desire to compete for championships. And the Bucks have tried to deliver on that front, even if the results haven’t followed.
The bigger issue, as you both have pointed out, is the lack of assets. The Bucks are in a tough spot with their draft capital, and they don’t have the young talent to make a blockbuster trade without gutting the roster around Antetokounmpo. If they were to trade him, they’d need to get back a package that allows them to rebuild quickly, but that’s easier said than done. Houston and San Antonio have the picks and young players to make something work, but would they be willing to part with enough to satisfy Milwaukee? And would Antetokounmpo be happy going to a non-contender like Houston or San Antonio, even if they have promising young cores?
The Warriors angle is interesting, Sam, but I wonder about the fit. Golden State’s system relies so heavily on spacing and shooting, and Antetokounmpo’s lack of a consistent outside shot could clog things up. Plus, the Warriors don’t have a ton of assets to offer unless they’re willing to part with young players like Jonathan Kuminga or Brandin Podziemski, and even then, they’d need to get creative with salary matching. What do you think about the Warriors as a potential destination, Sam?
Amick: It’s a fascinating one to consider, Eric, if only because the Warriors have been so open about their desire to pair a superstar with Curry in this late stage of his career. Antetokounmpo’s fit isn’t perfect, as you noted, because of the shooting issue. But his dominance in the paint and his defensive versatility could make them a nightmare to deal with, especially if they keep Draymond Green in the mix. The bigger question is what the Bucks would get back. Kuminga, Podziemski, and a couple of first-round picks might be the starting point, but Milwaukee would likely want more — and the Warriors don’t have a ton of draft capital to offer. Plus, as you mentioned, the salary matching is a nightmare with the Bucks being above the second apron.
The Houston and San Antonio scenarios are more realistic from an asset perspective. Houston could offer a package centered around Amen Thompson, Jalen Green, and a boatload of picks, including their own and Phoenix’s future firsts. San Antonio could build something around Stephon Castle, their No. 2 pick in this draft, and additional picks like Atlanta’s 2025 and 2027 firsts. But both teams are still building toward contention, and Antetokounmpo might not have the patience to wait for them to get there. The Knicks and Nets make sense as big-market teams with enough assets to get in the conversation, but their offers would likely lean more on picks than proven young talent, which might not appeal to Milwaukee.
The Dallas situation is the wild card. If they’re willing to put Cooper Flagg on the table, that changes everything. Flagg, at $13.8 million on his rookie deal, plus a couple of mid-sized contracts like P.J. Washington and Daniel Gafford, could make the money work. But would Dallas really give up a generational talent like Flagg for Antetokounmpo, who is 30 and hasn’t been out of the first round in three years? That’s a tough call, especially with Kyrie Irving and Anthony Davis already in place.
Aldridge: The Dallas scenario is intriguing, but I’m skeptical they’d move Flagg. He’s the kind of player you build around for a decade, and with Irving and Davis, they’re already in win-now mode. Adding Antetokounmpo would make them a juggernaut, but the cost might be too steep. I keep coming back to Houston and San Antonio as the most logical partners if Milwaukee decides to go the rebuild route. Houston’s got the young talent and picks, and San Antonio’s got the draft capital and a clear vision with Wembanyama. A package of Castle, Keldon Johnson, Harrison Barnes, and a couple of firsts could be enough to get Milwaukee’s attention, especially if Antetokounmpo signals he’s open to a smaller market like San Antonio.
The bigger question, to me, is what Antetokounmpo wants. He’s been loyal to Milwaukee, but he’s also been clear about wanting to win. If he’s truly open to a trade, he’s got to be looking at teams that can contend immediately — not teams that are a year or two away. That’s where the Warriors, Knicks, or even a dark horse like the Heat come into play. Miami doesn’t have the assets to pull it off without including Bam Adebayo, which they won’t do, but Pat Riley always finds a way to get in the mix for a star like this.
Nehm: That’s the crux of it, isn’t it? What does Giannis want? He’s been so focused on competing that it’s hard to imagine him signing off on a trade to a team that’s not ready to win now. But the Bucks’ situation is so dire — with Lillard’s injury, the lack of picks, and the aging roster — that staying might mean accepting a few years of mediocrity. That’s not who Antetokounmpo is. He’s wired to chase greatness, and if the Bucks can’t provide that, he might have to look elsewhere. The question is whether he’s ready to take that leap and leave the only NBA home he’s ever known.
For the Bucks, it’s a brutal spot. Trading Antetokounmpo would be admitting defeat, but keeping him and failing to contend could lead to the same outcome a year or two down the line. If they do trade him, they need to nail the return — young players who can be cornerstones and picks to rebuild the pipeline. Anything less, and they’re setting themselves back a decade. It’s a high-stakes summer for Milwaukee, and the whole league is watching.
Photo Credit: Giannis Antetokounmpo looks on during a game against the Pacers. (Michael Hickey / Getty Images)
Authors:
Sam Amick is a senior NBA writer for The Athletic, covering the NBA since 2008 and previously working for Sports Illustrated, SLAM, and USA Today.
Eric Nehm is a senior writer for The Athletic covering the Milwaukee Bucks. Previously, he covered the Bucks at ESPN Milwaukee and wrote the book “100 Things Bucks Fans Should Know & Do Before They Die.” Nehm was named NSMA’s 2022 Wisconsin Sports Writer of the Year.
David Aldridge is a senior columnist for The Athletic, covering the NBA and NFL since 1987, previously with The Washington Post, ESPN, and Turner Sports.
The Milwaukee Bucks are facing a challenging offseason after another disappointing first-round playoff exit, falling to the Indiana Pacers in a heartbreaking Game 5 overtime loss. This marks their third consecutive early playoff exit following their 2021 NBA championship. The situation is compounded by Damian Lillard’s severe Achilles injury, which will likely sideline him for most of the next season, severely limiting the Bucks’ championship aspirations.
Key Points:
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Frustration: Giannis has been vocal about his desire to move past first-round playoff failures, emphasizing the importance of making deep playoff runs. Despite his historic individual performances, the team has struggled to build a cohesive and effective roster around him.
Roster and Strategic Challenges: The Bucks’ attempt to integrate their “big three” of Giannis, Lillard, and Khris Middleton was short-lived and ineffective, leading to Middleton’s trade for Kyle Kuzma. The team showed flashes of strong defense, especially with Andre Jackson Jr., but struggled to find a consistent offensive identity.
Lillard’s Injury Impact: Lillard’s torn Achilles tendon drastically changes the Bucks’ outlook, as his large contract and uncertain recovery complicate roster flexibility and future planning. His injury also casts doubt on potential trades or roster changes that might have been considered if he had remained healthy.
Front Office and Coaching: Despite the setbacks, Giannis remains supportive of coach Doc Rivers and the front office, including GM Jon Horst, who was recently extended. The organization values stability but faces tough decisions with several key players becoming free agents or having player options.
Future Uncertainty: The Bucks must decide how to build around Giannis moving forward amid limited options and a roster that may only be competitive at a lower playoff level. Speculation about Giannis’s future with the team is rampant, but his commitment to Milwaukee remains strong for now.
Conclusion:
The Bucks are at a crossroads after failing to capitalize on their championship window. With Lillard’s injury and ongoing roster challenges, they face a difficult offseason in deciding how to remain competitive around Giannis. The team’s ability to adapt and make strategic moves will be critical to their future success, while Giannis’s leadership and vision will heavily influence the direction they take.
Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Bears the Blame for the Bucks’ Downfall
1 Failure to Evolve as a Playmaker Giannis Antetokounmpo is a force of nature, averaging 30.9 points, 11.9 rebounds, and 6.5 assists per game in the 2024-25 season, with a historic Game 5 performance against the Pacers (30 points, 20 rebounds, 13 assists, two blocks, and two steals). Yet, despite these gaudy numbers, his team lost. Why? Giannis has not fully embraced the playmaking role he claims to aspire to. He’s expressed a desire to be a “legit point forward” like LeBron James, using his “cookie jar” analogy to emphasise controlling the ball. However, his execution often falls short.
In critical moments, Giannis reverts to forcing drives into crowded defences rather than consistently setting up teammates. His 6.5 assists per game are impressive, but they mask inefficiencies—turnovers in high-pressure situations and a reluctance to trust others when double-teamed. The Bucks’ offence stagnates when Giannis dominates the ball without creating easy looks for others, a flaw exposed repeatedly in playoff losses. For a player of his calibre, failing to evolve into a true floor general is a significant shortcoming that hampers the team’s potential.
2 Public Comments Undermine Team Morale Giannis’ public statements have also fueled instability. His occasional remarks about his future—hinting at leaving Milwaukee if the team doesn’t meet his championship expectations—have created a cloud of uncertainty. These comments, like those following the 2023 and 2024 playoff exits, put pressure on the front office and teammates, fostering a sense of urgency that’s led to rash decisions. The trade for Damian Lillard in 2023, for instance, was partly driven by Giannis’ implicit threats to depart, sacrificing Jrue Holiday and depth for a star who hasn’t meshed seamlessly.
Such rhetoric doesn’t just affect management; it impacts the locker room. Teammates, aware of Giannis’ potential exit, may question their own roles or the team’s direction. His leadership style, while intense, lacks the unifying quality of players like LeBron or even Dirk Nowitzki, who stayed loyal to Dallas through ups and downs without public ultimatums. Giannis’ words have inadvertently painted him as a star who prioritises personal success over collective loyalty, eroding the trust needed for a championship culture.
3 Inability to Mesh with Lillard The Lillard-Antetokounmpo pairing was supposed to be a championship formula, but it’s been a disappointment. Lillard’s arrival forced Giannis to share the ball, a transition he’s struggled with. The Bucks’ offense often looks clunky, with Giannis and Lillard alternating possessions rather than complementing each other. Giannis’ ball-dominant style clashes with Lillard’s need for rhythm as a shooter and playmaker, leading to inconsistent performances. While injuries have played a part—Lillard’s Achilles tear is a massive blow—Giannis hasn’t done enough to make the partnership work. His insistence on controlling the “cookie jar” limits Lillard’s ability to operate in his natural role. Compare this to other superstar duos, like Durant and Curry, who adapted their games to maximize each other’s strengths. Giannis’ refusal to fully embrace a more flexible role has stifled the Bucks’ offense, making them predictable and easier to defend in the playoffs.
4 The Bucks’ Desperate Moves Reflect Giannis’ Pressure The Bucks’ front office has bent over backward to appease Giannis, and the results have been disastrous. Trading Khris Middleton, a franchise cornerstone, for Kyle Kuzma in 2025 was a desperate attempt to shake things up, driven by Giannis’ looming free agency in 2027. The Lillard trade, the firing of Mike Budenholzer, and the hiring of Doc Rivers all stem from the need to keep Giannis happy. Yet, these moves have left the Bucks with a bloated payroll, no draft assets, and a roster ill-equipped to compete with elite teams like Boston or Oklahoma City. Giannis’ max extensions in 2020 and 2023, while earned, have also hamstrung the team’s flexibility. His $54.6 million salary, combined with Lillard’s $54.1 million, pushes Milwaukee into the second apron, limiting their ability to add talent. The Bucks’ lack of a development pipeline or tradeable assets is a direct consequence of building around Giannis’ timeline, leaving them with no fallback plan when injuries strike.
5 A Legacy of Missed Opportunities At 30, Giannis is in his prime, but his window for another title is narrowing. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but the Bucks haven’t come close since. His inability to elevate the team in the postseason—missing key games in 2023 and 2024 due to injuries and failing to deliver in 2025 despite a historic stat line—raises questions about his clutch performance. Unlike other MVPs who’ve carried flawed rosters deep into the playoffs, Giannis has yet to show he can overcome adversity without a perfect supporting cast. His playstyle hasn’t adapted to modern NBA demands, his public comments have destabilised the organisation, and his inability to gel with Lillard has squandered a golden opportunity. The trade chatter surrounding him now, with teams like Houston, Brooklyn, and San Antonio circling, reflects a growing belief that Giannis may not be the leader to carry Milwaukee back to glory.
Conclusion: Time for a Reckoning Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBA’s greatest names, but his tenure in Milwaukee is teetering on the edge. The Bucks’ collapse isn’t just about injuries or bad luck; it’s about a superstar who hasn’t fully embraced the leadership and adaptability required to sustain a contender. As trade rumours swirl, Giannis must confront his role in this mess. Whether he stays or goes, the Bucks’ woes trace back to his shortcomings as much as any external factor. For Milwaukee to move forward, Giannis needs to evolve—or the franchise may have no choice but to start anew without him.
Giannis is renowned for his relentless work ethic, often sharing stories of his grind from a young immigrant in Greece to NBA stardom. He’s frequently praised for his dedication to improvement, whether it’s refining his jump shot or bulking up physically. However, critics have pointed to moments that seem to contradict this narrative.
In 2023, reports surfaced from Bucks practices where Giannis was described as occasionally disengaged or skipping drills, particularly during the regular season. Former teammate Jae Crowder, in a subtle comment during a podcast, alluded to Giannis “picking his spots” in practice, implying he didn’t always match the intensity he publicly champions. While this could be strategic load management for a grueling 82-game season, it contrasts with Giannis’s public mantra of “working harder than everyone else.” Critics argue that if he’s vocal about outworking opponents, any perceived lack of effort, even in practice, undermines that claim.
2. Humility vs. Public Boasts
Giannis often portrays himself as grounded, crediting his family and upbringing for keeping him humble. He’s avoided the flashy persona of some NBA stars, endearing him to fans. Yet, there have been moments where his comments veer into self-aggrandisement, which some see as clashing with his humble image.
A notable instance came during the 2021 NBA Finals post-game press conference after the Bucks’ championship win. Giannis remarked, “I didn’t take the easy way. I didn’t join a superteam,” a clear jab at players like Kevin Durant or LeBron James, who formed high-profile team-ups. While factually true—Giannis stayed with Milwaukee and won without a star-studded roster—the comment struck some as hypocritical. Critics noted that the Bucks had strategically built a strong supporting cast, including Jrue Holiday and Khris Middleton, both All-Stars at points in their careers. Dismissing other players’ paths while ignoring his own team’s advantages seemed selective, especially for someone who claims to focus solely on his own journey. And of course he then went on to ask for Lillard, making it even more hypocritical!
3. Sportsmanship vs. On-Court Antics
Giannis is often lauded for his sportsmanship, but certain on-court behaviours have drawn scrutiny. His prolonged free-throw routines, which sometimes exceed the NBA’s 10-second rule, have frustrated opponents and fans alike. In a 2022 game against the Philadelphia 76ers, Joel Embiid publicly called out Giannis for taking upwards of 12 seconds per free throw, accusing him of bending the rules. Giannis responded by saying he’s “just playing within the game,” but critics argue that if he prides himself on integrity, exploiting a rule loophole undermines that.
Additionally, Giannis’s occasional trash-talking, while not excessive, has been seen as inconsistent with his “let my game speak” persona. In a 2024 playoff series against the Indiana Pacers, he engaged in heated exchanges with Tyrese Haliburton, later downplaying it as “just competition.” Yet, when younger players like Haliburton talk trash, Giannis has been quick to call them out, suggesting a double standard. Most importantly of course Haliburton beat him where it counts – in the playoffs.
4. Loyalty vs. Trade Rumours
Giannis has repeatedly expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating he’d rather stay and build a legacy than chase rings elsewhere. This stance has won over Bucks fans, especially in a small market. However, in 2023 and 2024, Giannis made cryptic comments about his future, saying he’d consider leaving if the Bucks couldn’t compete for titles. While understandable from a competitive standpoint, these remarks clashed with his earlier vows of unwavering commitment.
Some argue this is less hypocrisy and more pragmatism—an athlete hedging his bets. But for fans who bought into his “loyalty forever” narrative, the shift felt like a betrayal of his own words. Critics point out that Giannis wants the image of a loyal superstar but also the leverage to push management, a balancing act that can feel disingenuous.
The Bigger Picture: Athletes and Public Expectations
The hypocrisy debate around Giannis highlights a broader issue: the unrealistic expectations placed on athletes. Fans and media often demand consistency in behaviour, words, and values, ignoring the complexities of being a public figure. Giannis, like any person, can’t perfectly embody every trait he’s praised for—hard work, humility, sportsmanship, loyalty—at all times. What he does seem to lack is the intelligence in how he tries to cover up when he makes mistakes. In a different post for example I explained how his treatment of his children on social media makes no sense at all.
Is Giannis Antetokounmpo a hypocrite? The answer depends on how strictly you define the term. There are undeniable instances where his actions or words don’t fully align with his public persona, from practice habits to loyalty comments.
The NBA off season is often a breeding ground for speculation, and this year, Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo has found himself at the centre of swirling trade rumours. After the Bucks’ third consecutive first-round playoff exit in 2025, many pundits and fans have questioned whether the two-time MVP might seek a new team to chase another championship. However, NBA legend Carmelo Anthony recently weighed in on the debate, passionately dismissing the idea of trading Giannis and offering a thoughtful perspective on roster construction around the Bucks’ cornerstone.
The Context: Bucks’ Playoff Struggles and Trade Speculation
The Milwaukee Bucks’ 2024-25 season ended in disappointment, with a 4-1 first-round playoff loss to the Indiana Pacers. This marked the third straight year the Bucks failed to advance past the first round, a stark contrast to their 2021 NBA Championship triumph. The Bucks’ early exit, combined with their limited draft capital and a challenging salary cap situation (projected at $154.6 million for 2025-26), has fueled speculation about Giannis’ future. Milwaukee lacks control over their first-round picks until 2031, and key players like Brook Lopez and Bobby Portis could hit free agency soon. With Lillard potentially sidelined for much of the next season, some analysts have suggested that trading Giannis could be the best path for a franchise reset. Trade proposals have linked Antetokounmpo to teams like the Los Angeles Lakers, Miami Heat, Houston Rockets, and even the Toronto Raptors, with hypothetical packages involving young stars, draft picks, and role players.
However, not everyone agrees that trading Giannis is the answer. Enter Carmelo Anthony, whose recent comments have added a fresh perspective to the conversation.
Carmelo Anthony’s Take: “You’d Be Starting All Over”
On a recent episode of his podcast, 7PM in Brooklyn, Carmelo Anthony addressed the Giannis trade rumors with a blend of pragmatism and respect for the Bucks’ superstar. Anthony argued that trading Antetokounmpo would be a shortsighted move for Milwaukee, emphasizing the difficulty of replacing a player of his caliber. “You’d be starting all over,” Anthony said. “You don’t get players like Giannis often. You’d be giving up a generational talent, and for what? A bunch of picks and maybe a young guy who might be good? That’s a gamble.”
Anthony’s perspective is rooted in his experience as a former NBA star who navigated trade rumors during his own career. He highlighted the importance of building around Giannis rather than dismantling the roster. “The grass isn’t always greener,” he noted, suggesting that Giannis moving to another team wouldn’t guarantee a championship. Instead, Anthony urged the Bucks to conduct “due diligence” in constructing a competitive roster around Antetokounmpo, focusing on adding complementary pieces that align with his prime years.
Anthony’s comments resonate with the Bucks’ current predicament. At 30 years old, Giannis is still in his prime, averaging 30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, and 6.5 assists per game in the 2024-25 season while earning his ninth consecutive All-Star nod. His contract, which runs through the 2026-27 season with a player option for 2027-28, gives Milwaukee time to retool rather than rebuild. Trading him now could yield a significant haul, but it would also mean parting with the most impactful player in franchise history—a move that could set the Bucks back for years.
The Bucks’ Perspective: Loyalty and Financial Stakes
The Bucks’ organization has repeatedly signaled their commitment to Giannis. Owner Marc Lasry told reporter Dave Bridge, “I don’t think he’s leaving Milwaukee. We’ve done everything we can to make Giannis feel comfortable that we’re doing the right thing.” This sentiment aligns with reports from ESPN’s Shams Charania, who noted that Giannis and the Bucks plan to meet this offseason to discuss his future and the team’s plans—an annual tradition that carries extra weight this year. Multiple sources have indicated that Giannis remains happy in Milwaukee and values his partnership with Lillard, despite the team’s recent struggles.
Financially, Giannis is a cornerstone for the Bucks beyond his on-court contributions. As NBC Sports pointed out, Antetokounmpo is a major driver of ticket sales, sponsorships, and the team’s brand, particularly with the relatively new Fiserv Forum. Trading him would not only risk alienating fans but also jeopardize the franchise’s economic stability. The Bucks’ reluctance to initiate trade talks—unless Giannis explicitly requests a move—underscores his immense value to the organization.
Giannis himself has expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating in 2025, “I don’t think that I would ever text [and ask for a trade]. I am not this kind of guy, they would have to kick me out.” His Instagram post after the playoff loss, featuring a Bucks shirt with the caption “Win for Cream City,” further suggests he’s not actively seeking a way out. However, his desire to win a second championship remains a priority, and he’s been candid about his disappointment in failing to achieve that goal since 2021.
The Counterargument: Why Trade Rumors Persist
Despite Anthony’s defense and Giannis’ loyalty, the trade rumors aren’t baseless. The Bucks face significant challenges in building a championship-caliber roster. Lillard’s injury, combined with an aging core (Lopez is 37, and Khris Middleton has battled injuries), limits Milwaukee’s flexibility. The team’s lack of draft picks hampers their ability to acquire young talent, and their cap situation makes it difficult to sign high-impact free agents. Some analysts, like The Athletic’s John Hollinger, argue that trading Giannis is the “only path that makes sense” for a franchise with limited assets, as it could provide the draft capital and young players needed for a rebuild. Furthermore it seems more and more that Giannis is past his prime with many important statistical categories worse this season than previous years. Most importantly it no longer seems like Giannis is unstoppable. Not in games that matter.
Giannis’ own comments about wanting a second ring have fueled speculation. He told reporters, “If I am not able to help my team win a second ring, I’m letting down myself.” While he hasn’t demanded a trade, his focus on contending could push him to reconsider his future if the Bucks can’t improve their roster.
What’s Next for Giannis and the Bucks?
Carmelo Anthony’s stance highlights a critical point: trading Giannis would be a high-risk move with no guarantee of long-term success. Instead, the Bucks are likely to explore ways to retool their roster this offseason. Potential moves could include:
Trading Supporting Players: Rather than moving Giannis, the Bucks could look to trade veterans like Lopez or Portis to free up cap space or acquire younger talent.
Targeting Free Agents: Milwaukee could pursue cost-effective role players to bolster their depth, especially at guard, to compensate for Lillard’s absence.
Developing Young Talent: Players like Tyler Smith or AJ Johnson could step up, though they’re not yet ready to be difference-makers in a playoff series.
Hoping for Lillard’s Return: If Lillard can recover by mid-2025-26, the Bucks could regain their status as contenders, provided they address other roster gaps.
For Giannis, the decision hinges on his priorities. Does he value loyalty to Milwaukee, where he’s become a legend, or does his desire for another championship outweigh that commitment? His contract gives him leverage, but also time to see how the Bucks respond this off season. But even if he moves to a new team, how bad will it look if he fails there too?
A Voice of Reason in a Sea of Speculation
Carmelo Anthony’s comments serve as a reminder to approach trade rumors with caution. While the Bucks face real challenges, trading Giannis Antetokounmpo would be a drastic step with far-reaching consequences. Anthony’s call for “due diligence” in building around Giannis aligns with the Bucks’ stated commitment to their superstar, and it challenges the narrative that a trade is inevitable. As the offseason unfolds, all eyes will be on Milwaukee’s front office and Giannis’ meeting with team brass. For now, the Greek Freak remains the heart of the Bucks, and Carmelo Anthony’s words offer a grounded perspective in an otherwise frenzied rumour mill.
Sources: Sports Illustrated, Bleacher Report, ESPN, NBC Sports, Yahoo Sports, The Athletic, HoopsHype, Lakers Nation, CBS Sports, and posts on social media.
Question 1: You guys were up seven in overtime, you had a chance to extend this series. What happened down the stretch?
Giannis: “It was a tough game. We fought hard, gave everything we had. In overtime, we had a good lead, but they made some big shots. Haliburton made a tough layup at the end. We had our chances, but it’s a game of runs. They made one more play than we did. That’s basketball sometimes.”
Question 2: You’ve been in these situations before, elimination games. How do you find that resilience to keep pushing, especially with the injuries this team has faced?
Giannis: “I don’t try to seek resilience or extra motivation or anything. There’s no emotion or extra juice. I’m juiced up. I don’t need no extra juice, man. I kind of need to get rid of some juice that I have. I just go out there and play. I love playing basketball. I love competing. I love being in these moments. You don’t got to find nothing. It’s right there. You just go take it. That’s what I try to do every single night.”
Question 3: You had a triple-double tonight, unbelievable effort. How do you feel about your performance and the team’s effort overall?
Giannis: “I feel good about my performance, but it’s not about me. It’s about the team. We played hard, we competed. We left it all out there. I’m proud of the guys. We didn’t get the result we wanted, but we fought. That’s all you can ask for. You can’t control the outcome sometimes, but you can control your effort. I think we did that tonight.”
Known for philosophical responses (e.g., 2023’s “no failure in sports” comment after losing to the Heat), Giannis often emphasizes effort over outcomes and avoids public criticism of teammates or coaches. It sort of worked the first time, was disrespectful the second time and now he is cunning in avoiding all game specific questions and just talking about his upbringing and personal story all the time. Because that’s all he has left having proven himself incapable of impacting a playoff series.
Analysis of Logical Discrepancies.
Statement: “We had a good lead, but they made some big shots. Haliburton made a tough layup at the end. We had our chances, but it’s a game of runs. They made one more play than we did. That’s basketball sometimes.” The phrase “that’s basketball sometimes” is way too simplistic, implying the loss was due to chance rather than specific failures. The Bucks’ collapse involved defensive lapses (allowing Haliburton’s penetration) and offensive stagnation (no field goals in the final 1:30 of overtime, per game logs from other sources). Giannis’ vague explanation avoids addressing these issues by not acknowledging correctable errors.
Statement: “I don’t try to seek resilience or extra motivation or anything. There’s no emotion or extra juice. I’m juiced up. I don’t need no extra juice, man. I kind of need to get rid of some juice that I have. I just go out there and play. I love playing basketball. I love competing. I love being in these moments. You don’t got to find nothing. It’s right there. You just go take it. That’s what I try to do every single night.”
Claiming “no emotion or extra juice” in an elimination game is logically inconsistent with the heightened stakes. Elimination games typically require additional emotional or strategic intensity, yet Giannis suggests he approaches Game 5 like any other night. This could imply a lack of situational adaptation, especially as the Bucks collapsed in overtime despite his efforts. For example, his eight potential assists in Game 1 yielded only one actual assist (per wisportsheroics.com), indicating teammates’ inability to capitalize on his playmaking, which might have required “extra juice” to inspire or adjust.
In 2023, after losing to the Heat, Giannis passionately rejected the “failure” label, saying, “There’s no failure in sports. There’s good days, bad days… You don’t always win.” This showed emotional investment in reframing loss, contrasting with 2025’s claim of “no emotion.” The 2023 response suggested he cared deeply about outcomes, while 2025 implies emotional steadiness. You might want to pick a side Giannis!
Saying he needs to “get rid of some juice” implies excessive intensity, which could be counterproductive. If Giannis was overly aggressive, it might have led to forced plays or turnovers, though no specific overtime errors are detailed (e.g., turnovers or bad shots). This contrasts with the team’s need for composed leadership to counter the Pacers’ run.
Statement: “I feel good about my performance, but it’s not about me. It’s about the team. We played hard, we competed. We left it all out there. I’m proud of the guys. We didn’t get the result we wanted, but we fought. That’s all you can ask for. You can’t control the outcome sometimes, but you can control your effort. I think we did that tonight.”
Giannis’ claim that “we left it all out there” and his pride in the teamis logically inconsistent with the supporting cast’s poor performance. Kyle Kuzma’s 0-point, 0-rebound, 0-assist stat line in 22 minutes (per wisportsheroics.com) and the team’s reliance on “unqualified players” like Taurean Prince highlight deficiencies. Praising the team’s effort might gloss over these failures, especially as the overtime collapse involved teammates missing shots and defensive breakdowns. As always Giannis is effectively saying “I was on my own playing hero ball and the rest are all useless” but pretending to dress it up.
Saying “you can’t control the outcome sometimes” implies the loss was inevitable, which contradicts the game’s winnable nature. He said so himself a few days earlier in the “now I know what I need to do” interview. Guess he didn’t know after all! The Bucks led by seven in overtime, and errors like allowing Haliburton’s layup or failing to score late were controllable. This framing could downplay accountability for strategic or execution failures.
Giannis’ claim of “no extra emotion” may be a response to the emotional toll of three straight first-round exits (2023-2025). His 2025 calmness could reflect emotional fatigue or a strategic choice to avoid vulnerability amid scrutiny. He basically avoided answering as he was at odds with many things he has claimed in the past where he has said the opposite.
So….
Giannis’ Game 5 post-game interview contains several logical discrepancies, primarily stemming from his optimistic framing of team effort and downplaying of specific failures in a high-stakes context.
It is sad that Giannis had to revert to his classic mythologies, how he had to fight on the streets of Athens to sell trinkets and be chased by the police etc because he has no basketball related answers anymore. He tried one line of excuses after one early playoff exit the first time after the championship. He tried a different line of excuses the next. And yet another after that. He has run out of excuses and he knows it so he falls back to his classic storyline which always works. We know you have an amazing backstory Giannis. Maybe it’s time you admit you can’t improve on the court and that the NBA has figured you out. No, it isn’t “your turn” like that in pro basketball. Most people never get “a turn” even if they keep trying. It takes skill and improvement, neither of which you have been doing these past years.
Kendrick Perkins, never one to mince words, recently dropped a bombshell on NBA discourse by declaring that “the Bucks are trash” and pointing the finger squarely at Giannis Antetokounmpo as the primary culprit. While some might dismiss Perkins’ take as hot-take sensationalism, a deeper dive into the Milwaukee Bucks’ 2024-25 season reveals that his assessment holds water. The Bucks, despite their championship pedigree, are floundering, and Giannis, as the team’s cornerstone, must shoulder much of the responsibility.
As of April 27, 2025, the Milwaukee Bucks are languishing in the Eastern Conference standings, hovering around a .500 record—a far cry from their 2021 championship form. Once a dominant force, the Bucks have been plagued by inconsistent play, defensive lapses, and an inability to close out games against both elite and mediocre opponents. Losses to teams like the Charlotte Hornets and Washington Wizards—squads they should dispatch with ease—have become alarmingly common.
The Bucks’ offensive rating ranks in the middle of the pack, a surprising drop for a team with two former MVPs in Giannis Antetokounmpo and Damian Lillard. Defensively, they’re even worse, sitting in the bottom third of the league in defensive rating. This is a stark contrast to their championship season, when their stifling defense, anchored by Giannis and Brook Lopez, suffocated opponents. The eye test confirms the numbers: the Bucks look disjointed, lacking the cohesion and intensity that once defined them.
Perkins’ blunt assessment that “the Bucks are trash” might sound harsh, but it captures the reality of a team that’s underperforming relative to its talent and expectations. The Bucks aren’t just struggling—they’re regressing, and the reasons point back to their superstar.
Giannis’ Role in the Bucks’ Struggles
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and 2021 Finals MVP, is undeniably one of the NBA’s most dominant players. His ability to attack the rim, defend multiple positions, and elevate his game in clutch moments has made him a perennial All-NBA talent. However, even the best players can falter, and Giannis’ shortcomings this season are magnifying the Bucks’ woes. Here’s why Perkins’ finger-pointing at Giannis is justified:
1. Leadership and Accountability Leadership and Accountability
As the face of the franchise, Giannis is expected to set the tone for the Bucks both on and off the court. Yet, this season, his leadership has been inconsistent. Reports from the locker room suggest a lack of accountability, with Giannis occasionally deflecting blame rather than rallying his teammates. For example, after a blown lead against the Cleveland Cavaliers in March 2025, Giannis publicly criticized the team’s effort but failed to acknowledge his own late-game turnovers that sealed the loss. A true leader owns their mistakes, and Giannis’ reluctance to do so has created a ripple effect, eroding team morale.
Perkins, a former NBA champion, knows the importance of a superstar galvanizing their squad. His critique likely stems from seeing Giannis fall short in this intangible but critical aspect of leadership. Without a unified locker room, the Bucks lack the grit needed to overcome their on-court deficiencies.
2. Offensive Limitations
Giannis’ game, while dominant, has glaring holes that opponents have exploited. His lack of a reliable jump shot—particularly from beyond the arc—allows defenses to sag off him, clogging the paint and neutralizing Milwaukee’s offense. In the 2024-25 season, Giannis is shooting a career-low 20.3% from three-point range on minimal attempts, and his free-throw percentage has dipped to 65.7%. These deficiencies are especially costly in crunch time, where teams dare him to shoot, knowing he’s unlikely to deliver.
This isn’t a new critique of Giannis, but what’s alarming is the lack of progress. At 30 years old, he’s had ample time to develop a jumper or refine his free-throw shooting, yet these weaknesses persist. Perkins’ frustration likely stems from seeing a player of Giannis’ caliber fail to evolve in ways that could unlock the Bucks’ offense. With Damian Lillard struggling to find his rhythm in Milwaukee, Giannis’ inability to stretch the floor compounds the team’s spacing issues, making their half-court offense predictable and stagnant.
3. Defensive Regression
Giannis’ defensive prowess was once his calling card, earning him the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. However, this season, his defensive impact has waned. Advanced metrics like Defensive Box Plus-Minus show a decline, and film analysis reveals moments of disengagement on that end. Opponents are attacking Giannis more aggressively, exploiting his slower lateral movement and occasional lapses in help defense.
The Bucks’ defensive scheme relies on Giannis as a roving free safety, but his reduced effort has left Brook Lopez exposed in drop coverage and forced Khris Middleton to overcompensate on the perimeter. Perkins, a defensive stalwart during his playing days, likely sees this as a betrayal of the Bucks’ identity. If Giannis isn’t anchoring the defense, the entire system collapses, as evidenced by the team’s plummeting defensive rating.
4. Failure to Elevate Teammates
A hallmark of a true superstar is their ability to make their teammates better. LeBron James, Nikola Jokić, and even Luka Dončić consistently elevate lesser talents into key contributors. Giannis, however, has struggled to do this consistently. Players like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton have regressed this season, and even Lillard, a former All-NBA guard, looks like a shell of himself alongside Giannis.
Part of this stems from Giannis’ ball-dominant style, which can stifle the offense. His high usage rate (around 33% this season) often leaves teammates standing around, waiting for kick-out passes that don’t always come. Perkins’ critique may reflect this dynamic: if Giannis isn’t facilitating or creating easy looks for others, the Bucks’ supporting cast can’t compensate for the team’s other flaws.
The Bigger Picture: What’s Next for the Bucks?
Perkins’ assessment, while blunt, is a wake-up call for Milwaukee. The Bucks are at a crossroads, and Giannis’ role in their struggles can’t be ignored. However, this doesn’t mean all hope is lost. Giannis is still a top-five player with the potential to turn things around. For the Bucks to salvage their season, a few things need to happen:
Giannis Must Evolve Offensively: Developing a mid-range jumper or improving his free-throw shooting would force defenses to respect him beyond the paint, opening up the floor for Lillard and Middleton.
Recommit to Defence: Giannis needs to rediscover his Defensive Player of the Year form, setting the tone for a Bucks defence that’s lost its edge.
Stronger Leadership: Giannis must hold himself accountable and foster a culture of unity, ensuring the team fights through adversity together.
Coaching Adjustments: Doc Rivers, the Bucks’ head coach, must also adapt. His rotations and late-game strategies have been questionable, and he needs to maximize Giannis’ strengths while masking his weaknesses.
Stop stat padding: We have seen him in trash time in blowouts, we have seen him almost every game denying younger players the opportunity to gain experience. It has to stop. Maybe he needs to seek psychological help about it.
If these changes don’t materialise, the Bucks risk squandering their championship window. The NBA is unforgiving, and younger teams like the Boston Celtics and Cleveland Cavaliers are surging. Perkins’ warning isn’t just a critique—it’s a call to action.
Perk is right
Kendrick Perkins’ declaration that “the Bucks are trash” and Giannis is to blame might ruffle feathers, but it’s rooted in uncomfortable truths. The Bucks’ mediocre record, coupled with Giannis’ offensive limitations, defensive regression, and inconsistent leadership, paints a picture of a team and a superstar failing to live up to their potential. While Giannis remains a generational talent, his flaws are holding Milwaukee back, and Perkins’ bluntness shines a light on that reality.
The good news? There’s still time for Giannis and the Bucks to turn things around. If Giannis can address his shortcomings and recommit to leading by example, Milwaukee could reclaim its place among the NBA’s elite. Until then, Perkins’ assessment stands: the Bucks are under performing, and Giannis, as their cornerstone, bears the brunt of the blame. Let’s hope this is the wake-up call they need to get back on track. Can Giannis improve? Can he learn new skills? More than a decade in the NBA shows he probably can’t.
From Twitter, people recently saying the same thing :
Beyond his incredible athleticism and inspiring rise from humble beginnings, fans often notice the number he proudly wears on his jersey: 34. While jersey numbers can sometimes be arbitrary, Giannis claims the choice of 34 carries deep personal significance tied to his family and his journey.
The Family Connection: A Tribute to His Parents
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s story is one of resilience, family, and loyalty, and his jersey number is a direct reflection of that. He has openly shared that he chose 34 as a tribute to his parents, Charles and Veronica Antetokounmpo, who were born in 1963 and 1964, respectively. When you combine the last digits of their birth years—3 from 1963 and 4 from 1964—you get 34. This simple yet heartfelt gesture showcases Giannis’ deep gratitude for the sacrifices his parents made to give him and his brothers a better life. It’s also kinda dumb and possibly retrospectively applied to impress. After all his personal story is a big part of his personal brand. After all using 1964 and 1963 he could have picked pretty much any jersey number. Why just the last digit? Why the 3 first? He could just as well have number 43. It makes zero sense. Here is what AI says:
Born in Athens, Greece, to Nigerian immigrants, Giannis grew up in a tight-knit family facing significant challenges. His parents worked tirelessly, often selling goods on the streets to provide for their five sons. Charles and Veronica instilled in Giannis a sense of hard work, perseverance, and unity—values that have defined his career and personal life. By wearing 34, Giannis says keeps his parents close to him on the court, honoring their legacy and the foundation they built for his success.
A Number Rooted in His Origin Story
The choice of 34 isn’t just a numerical nod to his parents’ birth years; it’s also a symbol of Giannis’ origin story. Before he became an NBA superstar, Giannis was an unknown teenager playing in Greece’s lower basketball leagues. His family’s immigrant background and financial struggles shaped his early years, and he didn’t even pick up basketball seriously until his mid-teens. The number 34 ties him to that past—a reminder of where he came from and the people who supported him along the way. Or at least that’s what he says! Because it doesn’t really make much sense.
When Giannis was drafted by the Milwaukee Bucks in 2013 as the 15th overall pick, he brought with him not just raw talent but also a unique perspective shaped by his upbringing. The number 34 became a way to carry his family’s journey with him into the NBA, grounding him as he transitioned from a lanky prospect to a global icon.
Consistency Across His Career
Giannis has worn number 34 consistently throughout his professional career with the Bucks. This consistency speaks to his character—loyal, steadfast, and unwavering in his principles. Either that or he is too lazy to start over at a new franchise. While some athletes might choose a number for its flashiness or cultural cachet (think Michael Jordan’s 23 or LeBron James’ 6), Giannis’ choice, if in fact it was a choice, tries to point to his brand.
Interestingly, Giannis didn’t wear 34 during his early basketball days in Greece with Filathlitikos, where he sported number 13 instead or number 4. However, once he arrived in Milwaukee, he settled on 34, and it’s been a constant ever since. The Bucks have embraced this number as synonymous with their franchise star, and it’s now etched into the team’s history, especially after Giannis’ iconic 50-point performance in Game 6 of the 2021 NBA Finals to clinch the championship.
A Symbol of Unity for the Antetokounmpo Brothers
Family extends beyond just his parents for Giannis—his brothers also play a significant role in his life and career. Thanasis, Kostas, and Alex Antetokounmpo have all pursued basketball, with Thanasis even joining Giannis on the Bucks roster. While his brothers have worn different numbers (Thanasis wears 43, for example), Giannis’ 34 serves as a unifying thread for the family’s collective journey in the sport. It’s a subtle way of representing the Antetokounmpo legacy, which has grown from the streets of Athens to the NBA hardwood. Kostas wears number 37. Alex wears number 29. Go figure. They either don’t share the same passion for family loyalty or just don’t bullshit as much as Giannis.
In interviews, Giannis often speaks about the importance of family, crediting his brothers for pushing him and keeping him grounded. The number 34, in a way, encapsulates that brotherhood, linking his individual success to the shared dreams and struggles of the Antetokounmpo clan.
The Cultural Impact of 34
Giannis’ rise to stardom has made number 34 more than just a jersey number—it’s a symbol of inspiration for fans, especially those from immigrant backgrounds or underdog stories. The “Greek Freak” nickname and his larger-than-life personality have turned 34 into a recognizable brand. Bucks fans proudly wear 34 jerseys, and young players around the world look to emulate the two-time MVP who turned adversity into triumph.
It’s true that the number 34 has been worn by some of the NBA’s most iconic players. “Shaq” wore number 34 during his time with the Los Angeles Lakers, where he won multiple championships. “Sir Charles” made the number 34 famous during his time with the Phoenix Suns. Hakeem Olajuwon, “The Dream” wore number 34 with the Houston Rockets, where he won his NBA titles. Also Ray Allen, Wendell Carter jr, even Elgin Baylor wore it once for a season. But sure, you can choose to believe that Giannis picked it because of his parents if you prefer…
Did He Have Other Options?
When Giannis joined the Bucks, it’s worth noting that jersey numbers aren’t always a free-for-all choice—teams have retired numbers or current players occupying certain digits. For example, the Bucks have retired numbers like 1 (Oscar Robertson), 8 (Marques Johnson), and 32 (Brian Winters), but 34 was available. Giannis may well have had other numbers in mind, but he’s never publicly wavered from his commitment to 34. It’s unlikely that the personal significance of the number made it his top choice from the start, and the Bucks were happy to oblige their future cornerstone. He probably just made up the story retrospectively. It’s a bit like when you get a new SIM card with a strange number and you try to make sense of it in order to remember it. “Oh, yes, it’s my birthday backwards except the second and fifth digits are different!”
More Than Just a Number? It doesn’t matter anymore
So, why does Giannis wear 34? It’s a tribute to his parents, Charles and Veronica, whose birth years inspired the choice. It’s a link to his roots in Greece and the sacrifices his family made. It’s a constant in a career marked by extraordinary growth, and it’s a symbol of the unity that defines the Antetokounmpo family. For Giannis, 34 isn’t just a number—it’s a story, a legacy, and a reminder of what drives him every time he steps onto the court.
Then again, it’s probably 100% bullshit. His kids are called Liam, Maverick and Eva. In many Nigerian cultures it is important to honour ancestors by naming children after parents or other relatives. This is a way to keep the family lineage alive and to pass on positive qualities. This practice is very common in many ethnic groups, including the Yoruba and Igbo people. So Giannis must be related to his Ford Maverick because he sure didn’t think to name them after his parents!
As Giannis continues to build his career, number 34 will undoubtedly remain a defining part of his identity. For fans, it’s a number that represents not just a basketball player, but a man who turned his family’s dreams into reality—one dunk, one block, and one heartfelt tribute at a time. It also shows just how gullible his fans are. More than likely the selection of number 34 was completely random when he arrived at the Bucks and he totally made up the meaning he now says it has. But that’s what his fans like and they are more than willing to lap up any stupid story he comes up with!
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ towering superstar, is a name synonymous with dominance, humility, and an infectious love for basketball. Known as the “Greek Freak” for his extraordinary athleticism and versatility, Giannis has risen from a lanky teenager in Athens to a two-time MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, and NBA champion. Yet, beneath his affable demeanour and relentless work ethic lies a competitive fire that occasionally flares into what some might call petulance—moments of frustration, impatience, or emotional outbursts that reveal the human side of this larger-than-life figure.
Defining Petulance in the Context of Giannis
Petulance, at its core, refers to a childish irritability or impatience, often expressed through sulky or bad-tempered behaviour. For an athlete like Giannis, who carries the weight of a franchise and a global fan base, petulance might not always look like a toddler’s tantrum—it can manifest as sharp words, physical reactions, or moments of visible exasperation. Critics and fans alike have pointed to specific incidents over the years where Giannis’ emotions have boiled over, raising the question: Is this petulance a flaw, a strength, or simply a byproduct of his unrelenting passion?
The Ladder Incident: A Flashpoint of Frustration
One of the most infamous examples of Giannis’ so-called petulance came on November 18, 2022, after a loss to the Philadelphia 76ers. Following a poor 4-for-15 performance from the free-throw line, Giannis stayed on the court to practice his shots—a testament to his work ethic. However, the situation escalated when 76ers reserve Montrezl Harrell took the ball away, insisting Giannis leave so he could work out. An arena worker then placed a 12-foot ladder in front of the hoop, further thwarting Giannis’ routine. Frustrated, Giannis pushed the ladder, sending it skidding across the floor.
The incident sparked debate. Some saw it as a petulant overreaction—an unnecessary display of temper from a superstar who should’ve walked away. Others defended him, arguing that his frustration stemmed from a deep desire to improve, compounded by Harrell’s provocation and the worker’s interference. Giannis later addressed the situation, saying, “I’ve never tried to disrespect anyone in any way, shape, or form,” emphasising that his intent wasn’t malicious. Still, the visual of a 6’11” giant toppling a ladder left an impression—one that critics could easily label as petulant.
On-Court Fire: Physicality and Retaliation
Giannis’ petulance isn’t limited to off-court moments; it occasionally surfaces during games, particularly when he feels disrespected or physically challenged. Take, for instance, a December 2019 game against the Detroit Pistons. Blake Griffin’s relentless physicality—bumps, grabs, and a flailing arm that caught Giannis in the jaw—pushed the Bucks star to his limit. At one point, Giannis confronted Griffin mid-game, later admitting, “I was like, ‘This is more than basketball. We can stop playing basketball, we can fight.’” Yet, rather than letting anger derail him, Giannis channel ed it into a 10-point scoring burst, including a deep three-pointer over Griffin.
This incident highlights a recurring theme: Giannis’ petulance often pairs with a competitive edge. Early in his career, such moments might have rattled him, leading to fouls or ejections. But as he’s matured, he’s learned to harness that frustration, turning it into motivation. Still, the initial flare-ups—whether a hard stare, a verbal jab, or a physical shove—can come off as petulant to those who expect stoicism from their superstars.
The Media Scrum Sigh: A Subtle Snap
Fast forward to November 8, 2024, after a 116-94 loss to the New York Knicks dropped the Bucks to a dismal 2-7. During a post-game scrum, Giannis paused mid-answer to tell a reporter, “If you don’t want to be here, you can leave.” The target? Associated Press writer Pat Pickens, who had let out an audible sigh while Giannis spoke. Pickens later explained it was subconscious, but Giannis’ sharp response suggested he’d had enough—of the losing, the scrutiny, or perhaps both.
Was this petulance? On one hand, it’s a curt, impatient reaction to a minor slight, fitting the dictionary definition. On the other, it’s a glimpse into Giannis’ raw frustration during a brutal stretch for the Bucks. He’s famously thoughtful with the media, often delivering philosophical takes (like his viral “there’s no failure in sports” rant in 2023). But when pushed—by a sigh, a question, or a losing streak—his patience can wear thin, revealing a side that’s less polished and more human.
The Pressure Cooker of Greatness
To understand Giannis’ petulance, we must consider the context. At 30 years old (as of April 2025), he’s no longer the wide-eyed rookie who marvelled at starting in the NBA. He’s a global icon with a $48.8 million salary, a championship ring, and sky-high expectations. Every missed free throw, every playoff exit, every loss is dissected relentlessly. Add to that his self-admitted sore-loser mentality—“I’m a sore loser, I’m not gonna lie,” he said after a win in April 2025—and it’s no surprise that frustration occasionally spills over.
Giannis’ journey amplifies this pressure. Born to Nigerian immigrants in Greece, he grew up hawking goods on Athens’ streets before basketball became his lifeline. The Bucks took a chance on him with the 15th pick in 2013, and he’s repaid them with loyalty and greatness. But that loyalty comes with a burden: he’s the face of a franchise that’s struggled to replicate its 2021 title run, especially in the 2024-25 season’s rocky start. When the team falters, Giannis feels it personally, and his petulant moments often reflect that weight.
Growth Over Grumpiness
Critics might argue that petulance is a blemish on Giannis’ otherwise sterling character. Yet, it’s worth noting how he’s evolved. Early in his career, confrontations—like a 2016 scuffle with the Bulls’ Mike Dunleavy Jr.—could derail him. Now, he’s more likely to let his play do the talking, as seen in that Pistons game or his 35-point, 20-assist, 17-rebound masterpiece against the 76ers in 2025. His petulance hasn’t disappeared, but it’s tempered by maturity and a focus on winning.
Compare Giannis to other NBA stars. LeBron James has had his share of icy media moments; Kevin Durant’s Twitter clapbacks are legendary. Giannis’ outbursts, by contrast, feel less calculated and more visceral—raw expressions of a competitor who hates losing more than he loves winning. As he told The Athletic in 2024, “We have to stop feeling bad about ourselves, I’m tired of this.” That impatience isn’t just petulance; it’s a demand for excellence.
The Verdict: Petulance or Passion?
So, is Giannis Antetokounmpo petulant? Yes, at times—by definition, his flashes of irritability fit the bill. But labeling it as mere childishness misses the bigger picture. His petulance is the flip side of his passion, a byproduct of a relentless drive that’s made him one of the greatest players of his generation. It’s not a tantrum for the sake of drama; it’s a reaction to the gap between where he is and where he wants to be.
For Bucks fans, these moments are endearing quirks in a superstar who’s given them everything. For detractors, they’re ammunition to question his composure. For me, they’re proof that even the Greek Freak—towering, smiling, and unstoppable—is human. And in a league of polished personas, that humanity is what makes Giannis so captivating, petulance and all. What is more worrying is that he is not improving his game and the gap between expectations and the hard reality of constant early playoff exits is hard to bridge.
On April 26, 2023, after the Milwaukee Bucks were unceremoniously bounced from the NBA playoffs by the eighth-seeded Miami Heat, Giannis Antetokounmpo stepped up to the podium for a postgame press conference. When asked by The Athletic’s Eric Nehm if he viewed the Bucks’ season as a failure, Giannis didn’t just deflect—he launched into a two-minute philosophical sermon that’s since been hailed as a moment of wisdom and perspective. “There’s no failure in sports,” he declared. “There’s good days, bad days. Some days you’re able to be successful, some days you’re not. Some days it’s your turn, some days it’s not your turn.” He even threw in a Michael Jordan reference for good measure: “Michael Jordan played 15 years, won six championships. The other nine years was a failure? That’s what you’re telling me?”
The internet erupted. Fans praised his humility, analysts lauded his maturity, and even fellow athletes like Naomi Osaka and Steve Kerr chimed in with admiration. But let’s pump the brakes on the hero worship for a second. While Giannis’s speech might sound profound on the surface, it’s worth digging deeper. In my view, this take isn’t just irrational—it’s disrespectful to the very essence of competitive sports, the fans who invest in it, and the teammates who poured their hearts into a season that ended in undeniable disappointment. Here’s why.
The Irrationality: Failure Is the Backbone of Sports
Giannis’s core argument—that failure doesn’t exist in sports because it’s all just “steps to success”—is a feel-good soundbite that crumbles under scrutiny. Sports are built on the binary of winning and losing. Every game, every season, has a clear objective: to come out on top. When you don’t, you’ve failed to meet that goal. It’s not about good days or bad days—it’s about results. To suggest otherwise is to ignore the fundamental structure of competition.
Take his Michael Jordan example. Giannis asks if Jordan’s nine non-championship seasons were failures. Well, yes, Giannis—they were, at least in the context of the ultimate goal. Jordan himself would tell you that. The man was famously fuelled by every loss, every slight, every season that didn’t end with a ring. He didn’t shrug off those nine years as “steps” in some philosophical journey—he saw them as failures to overcome. That’s why he pushed himself to six titles. Giannis’s attempt to re frame Jordan’s career as a gentle progression dismisses the relentless drive that defined MJ’s legacy. Failure isn’t a dirty word; it’s a motivator.
And let’s talk about the Bucks’ 2022-23 season specifically. This wasn’t just a “bad day.” The Bucks finished with the NBA’s best regular-season record (58-24), secured the No. 1 seed in the East, and entered the playoffs as title favorites. They then proceeded to lose in five games to a Miami Heat team that barely squeaked into the postseason as a No. 8 seed. Giannis himself missed two and a half games with a back injury, and when he returned, he struggled down the stretch—shooting 10-of-23 from the free-throw line in Game 5 and committing costly turnovers. This wasn’t a noble effort derailed by fate; it was a collapse of historic proportions. Calling it anything less than a failure is irrational—it denies the reality of what happened on the court.
Sports aren’t a participation trophy factory. The idea that “there’s no failure” because you tried your best might work in a youth rec league, but in the NBA—where millions of dollars, legacies, and fan expectations are on the line—it’s a cop-out. Failure exists because success is finite. Only one team wins the championship. Everyone else falls short. That’s not a flaw in the system; it’s the whole point.
The Disrespect: Undermining Fans, Teammates, and the Game
Beyond its shaky logic, Giannis’s speech carries a whiff of disrespect that’s hard to ignore. First, let’s consider the Bucks fans. These are people who packed Fiserv Forum all season, shelled out hard-earned money for tickets, and rode the emotional rollercoaster of a team that looked poised to dominate. When that team choked in the first round, those fans had every right to feel let down. Telling them “there’s no failure” doesn’t validate their passion—it dismisses it. It’s as if their investment, their heartbreak, doesn’t matter because, hey, it’s just “not our turn.” That’s not perspective; it’s a refusal to own the moment.
Then there’s the teammates. Khris Middleton dropped 33 points in Game 5, Brook Lopez added 18, and the Bucks still couldn’t close it out. These guys battled through injuries and adversity all year, only to see their season end in a gut-wrenching overtime loss. Giannis’s breezy “good days, bad days” rhetoric glosses over their collective effort—and their collective shortfall. Failure isn’t just personal; it’s a team reality. By denying it, Giannis risks alienating the very people who fought alongside him. Imagine being Grayson Allen, who missed a crucial floater at the buzzer, hearing your superstar say there’s no failure. Does that inspire you, or does it feel like your struggle was just shrugged off?
Finally, the speech disrespects the game itself. Basketball, like all sports, thrives on stakes. The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat are what make it worth watching. When Giannis reduces a playoff exit to a philosophical musing about life’s ups and downs, he strips away the urgency that defines professional athletics. If there’s no failure, why bother competing? Why push through a back injury? Why care at all? His words might sound enlightened, but they undermine the intensity that makes sports compelling in the first place.
The Context: A Defensive Dodge, Not a Deep Truth
Let’s not kid ourselves—Giannis wasn’t delivering some premeditated TED Talk. This was a raw, emotional reaction to a tough question, one he’d heard from Nehm the previous year after another playoff disappointment. His sigh, his “Oh my God,” his jab at the reporter’s own career (“Do you get a promotion every year?”) all scream defensiveness, not revelation. He was hurt, frustrated, and maybe a little embarrassed. That’s human, and it’s relatable. But dressing it up as profound wisdom doesn’t make it true.
Compare this to how other greats handle failure. LeBron James, after the 2011 Finals loss to Dallas, owned it: “I’ve got to get better.” Kobe Bryant, after countless setbacks, turned failure into fuel, famously saying it “doesn’t exist” only in the sense that it’s a mindset to conquer, not ignore. Giannis, by contrast, seems to want failure erased from the conversation entirely. That’s not maturity—it’s avoidance.
The Fallout: A Missed Opportunity
Here’s the real shame: Giannis had a chance to say something meaningful. He could’ve acknowledged the failure, taken accountability, and vowed to come back stronger—words that would’ve resonated with Bucks fans and fired up his team for next season. Instead, he leaned on a platitude that sounds nice but means little in the cutthroat world of the NBA. It’s not about wallowing in defeat; it’s about recognizing it so you can grow from it. By denying failure, Giannis denied himself—and his team—that growth.
Giannis is a likable guy—humble, hardworking, and a phenomenal talent. His journey from selling trinkets on Athens streets to NBA superstardom is inspiring. But that doesn’t make his take immune to critique. Sports aren’t a self-help seminar. They’re a proving ground where failure is real, tangible, and necessary. To pretend otherwise isn’t just irrational—it’s disrespectful to everyone who lives and breathes the game.
So, no, Giannis, there is failure in sports. And that’s okay. It’s what makes the wins worth chasing. The Bucks’ 2022-23 season didn’t end because it “wasn’t their turn”—it ended because they fell short. Call it what it is, learn from it, and move on. That’s the real lesson here, not some sugarcoated denial of the obvious. To make things worse it doesn’t look like Giannis or the Bucks learnt anything at all as they simply repeated the failure the next year and are heading to repeat it again this season. What sort of speech will he put together this time I wonder?
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks superstar and NBA icon, is no stranger to the spotlight. Known as the “Greek Freak” for his extraordinary athleticism and down-to-earth personality, Giannis has built a public persona that balances fierce competitiveness with endearing humility. Off the court, he’s a devoted family man, often sharing glimpses of his life with his fiance, Mariah Riddlesprigger, and their three children—Liam, Maverick, and Eva—on social media. But one peculiar habit has raised eyebrows among fans and critics alike: his tendency to slap cartoonish, fake sunglasses on some of his kids’ faces in photos posted online. It’s a move that, at first glance, seems like a quirky attempt at privacy—until you consider the bigger picture.
The Illusion of Privacy in a Public Life
Let’s start with the obvious: Giannis is one of the most recognisable athletes on the planet. His life, both on and off the hardwood, is a matter of public fascination. From his MVP-winning performances to his post-game press conferences filled with quotable one-liners, he’s a media darling. And that spotlight doesn’t dim when the cameras shift to his family. His children have been seen courtside at Bucks games, featured in family-oriented brand endorsements, and even captured on live television during high-profile events like the NBA Finals or All-Star Weekend. These aren’t fleeting glimpses either. Liam, Maverick, and Eva are often front and centre, their faces unblurred and unmistakable.
So why, then, does Giannis bother with the fake sunglasses on Instagram? If the goal is to shield his kids from public scrutiny, it’s a flimsy shield at best. A pair of cartoon shades—often comically oversized or garishly coloured—doesn’t obscure their identities. Anyone who’s seen them on TNT, ESPN, or even Giannis’s own highlight reels can connect the dots. It’s like putting a Band-Aid on a broken window and calling it security. The gesture feels performative when the reality is that his children’s faces are already out there, broadcast to millions.
The Hypocrisy of Selective Privacy
What makes this habit even more baffling is the inconsistency. Giannis isn’t exactly locking his family away in a fortress of anonymity. He and Mariah frequently share family moments online—vacations, birthdays, holidays—with their kids in full view, sans sunglasses. They’ve embraced their roles as a high-profile couple, even partnering with brands like Nike and Disney that capitalize on their wholesome family image. During the 2021 NBA Championship run, Giannis brought Liam onto the court to celebrate, a heartwarming moment that aired live and went viral. No sunglasses there, just pure, unfiltered joy.
Yet, in seemingly random social media posts, the fake sunglasses pop up. It’s as if Giannis wants to signal, “Hey, I care about privacy!” while simultaneously living a life that contradicts that notion. If privacy were truly the priority, wouldn’t he refrain from posting his kids altogether? Or at least blur their faces consistently across all platforms? Instead, the sunglasses feel like a half-hearted nod to discretion—a way to appease critics or quiet his own conscience without committing to any real boundary. It’s hypocritical to play the privacy card in one breath while inviting the world into his family’s life with the next.
A Pointless Exercise in a Digital Age
In 2025, the idea of maintaining privacy through superficial edits like fake sunglasses is laughably outdated. We live in an era of facial recognition tech, paparazzi drones, and fan accounts that dissect every pixel of a celebrity’s life. For someone like Giannis, whose every move is chronicled, the sunglasses are about as effective as a paper umbrella in a hurricane. His kids aren’t anonymous—they’re the offspring of a global superstar, and no amount of digital doodling changes that.
Moreover, his audience isn’t fooled. Fans have already pointed out the absurdity. Comments like “Bro, we’ve seen Liam on TV a hundred times, why the sunglasses now?” or “Giannis out here acting like we don’t know what Maverick looks like” are common. The gesture doesn’t protect his kids—it just invites more attention, turning a simple family photo into a talking point. If anything, it’s counterproductive, highlighting the very thing he’s supposedly trying to downplay.
The Bigger Picture: Why It Matters
Now, to be fair, Giannis isn’t the first celebrity to pull this move. Plenty of stars—athletes, actors, influencers—have used emojis, filters, or edits to “hide” their kids’ faces online, only to parade them in public later. But for someone like Giannis, whose authenticity is a cornerstone of his appeal, it feels particularly off-brand. This is the guy who once said he’d rather be broke than fake, who wears his heart on his sleeve and owns his story, from his humble beginnings in Greece to NBA stardom. The fake sunglasses clash with that narrative. They’re a cheap gimmick from someone who’s usually anything but.
And let’s not overlook the optics. In a world where parents—famous or not—are increasingly vocal about protecting kids from the internet’s perils, Giannis’s approach looks inconsistent at best, disingenuous at worst. If he’s worried about privacy, why not set a firmer boundary? If he’s fine with the exposure, why bother with the sunglasses? The middle ground he’s chosen satisfies no one and achieves nothing. Young children are in a unique phase of life—they’re sponges, soaking up the world around them, forming their sense of self, and learning how to navigate relationships and emotions. When they’re thrust into the public eye, whether through a celebrity parent’s fame, social media exposure, or reality TV, that natural process gets disrupted in ways that can have lasting consequences. Here’s why keeping them out of the spotlight is often the smarter, kinder choice.
1. Privacy Fuels Healthy Development
Kids need a safe, private space to grow up. They’re figuring out who they are—making mistakes, throwing tantrums, testing boundaries—without the pressure of a million eyes judging their every move. When a child’s life is broadcast to the world, whether it’s on Instagram or a court side Jumbo tron, they lose that buffer. Suddenly, their awkward moments, cute quirks, or even bad days become fodder for public consumption. That’s not just invasive—it can mess with their ability to develop a secure identity. Imagine being 5 years old and knowing strangers are commenting on your haircut or your shy smile. It’s a lot, and it’s not a burden kids are equipped to carry.
Psychologists often point to the importance of a “secure base” for young children—a stable, low-pressure environment where they can explore and retreat without fear of scrutiny. Public exposure rips that away. A child who’s constantly on display might start performing for the crowd instead of just being themselves, which can lead to anxiety or a warped sense of self-worth tied to external validation.
2. Safety Risks Are Real
Let’s talk practicalities: the public eye isn’t always a friendly place. High-profile kids—think celebrity offspring or viral internet stars—can become targets. Stalkers, paparazzi, or even well-meaning but overzealous fans can pose physical risks. And in the digital age, it’s worse. A photo of a child posted online can reveal locations, routines, or personal details that predators could exploit. The FBI and child safety experts have long warned about the dangers of “sharenting”—parents oversharing kids’ lives online—because it creates a digital footprint that’s impossible to erase. For famous families, that risk is amplified tenfold.
Even if the worst-case scenario doesn’t happen, the constant attention can feel suffocating. Kids deserve to play at the park or attend school without cameras in their faces. Privacy isn’t just a luxury for them—it’s a shield.
3. They Don’t Get to Choose
Here’s the kicker: young children can’t consent to being public figures. When a parent posts their kid’s face on social media or parades them at events, they’re making a choice the child has no say in. Sure, a toddler might giggle for the camera, but they don’t grasp the long-term implications—how that photo could live online forever, be meme’d, mocked, or used against them years later. By the time they’re old enough to have an opinion, the damage might be done.
Take the kids of influencers or athletes as an example. Some grow up resenting the exposure, feeling like their childhood was hijacked for likes or brand deals. Others lean into it, but only because it’s all they’ve ever known—not because it’s what they’d have picked. Giving kids the chance to opt in later, when they can understand the stakes, feels fairer than signing them up for fame at birth.
4. The Mental Health Toll
Study after study shows that public scrutiny takes a toll on mental health, even for adults who’ve chosen the spotlight. For kids, who lack the emotional tools to cope, it’s worse. Constant attention can breed insecurity—am I cute enough? Funny enough? Likable enough?—at an age when they should be focused on finger painting and playgrounds, not public perception. Research from the American Psychological Association has linked early media exposure in children to higher rates of anxiety, depression, and even body image issues down the line.
Look at former child stars: for every success story, there’s a cautionary tale of burnout or rebellion. Now imagine that pressure without even being the star—just the kid of one. Being “famous adjacent” still means living under a microscope, and young minds aren’t built for that kind of heat.
5. It Robs Them of Normalcy
There’s something sacred about a regular childhood—bike rides, sleepovers, scraped knees—that gets lost when you’re a public figure. Kids in the spotlight often miss out on those quiet, unglamorous moments because their lives are curated for an audience. They might get VIP treatment or cool perks, sure, but they also lose the freedom to be ordinary. Friendships can feel transactional (are they here for me or my fame?), and simple joys like a trip to the zoo turn into photo ops.
Normalcy isn’t just nice-to-have—it’s a foundation. It teaches resilience, independence, and the value of relationships that aren’t tied to status. Strip that away, and you’re setting a kid up for a life where they’re defined by their public image, not their private reality.
6. The Long Game: A Digital Legacy They Can’t Escape
Finally, there’s the permanence of it all. A photo posted today could haunt a kid in 10, 20, or 30 years—whether it’s an embarrassing moment that resurfaces or a persona they outgrow but can’t shed. The internet doesn’t forget, and kids in the public eye don’t get a clean slate. That’s a heavy load to carry into adulthood, especially if they want to carve out their own path separate from their parents’ fame.
Drop the Shades, Giannis
At the end of the day, Giannis Antetokounmpo’s fake sunglasses routine is a pointless charade—and a hypocritical one at that. His kids are already part of his public story, whether he likes it or not, and no cartoon accessory is going to change that. It’s time for him to either fully embrace the transparency that comes with fame or take meaningful steps to shield his family from it. Anything less is just noise, a distraction from the genuine, larger-than-life figure we’ve come to admire. So, Giannis, do us all a favour: drop the shades and keep it real. Your fans will love you for it, and your kids won’t care either way. In fact with so many kids it is almost certain statistically that one or more of them will actively not want to be in the media. You have no right to deprive them of their privacy without asking them. If you really wanted to protect them from publicity (which would have been advisable) you would have kept them out of the limelight all together.
Right now it’s a pretty bad look. hypocritical and a far cry from the family values Giannis pretends to cherish. Especially getting them involved in commercials looks like a desperation move to make as much money as possible now that he is in the limelight as his star has begun to fade on the court and this will inevitably start to affect his value. Add to that the other hypocrisy concerning being Greek, Nigerian or American depending on what he is selling this week and you have a recipe for disaster.
A.M. Hoops makes a lot of videos, sometimes with interesting points. This one however manages to state the obvious while missing the point.
For starters the only thing about this play that is pathetic is Giannis’ decision making. I wrote a post
game analysis of that Hawks game and it was 100% on Giannis that they lost due to plays like this. Giannis was trying to stat pad as usual, disregarding his team mates as usual, got stopped as is often the case and then was slow returning because he expected a call. You can even see him looking at the official and half raising his hands in protest.
He then goes on to say that the Bucks are worse without Dame. Duh. Giannis doesn’t play defence, that whole “Dame is the problem” narrative makes no sense. He pins the blame on the front office for not adding multi-dimensional players, but it doesn’t fully reconcile how two elite offensive talents produce such a mediocre result—implying a disconnect between individual brilliance and team failure that’s not fully explored. It is also true that this Bucks team is “cooked” but we have seen a lot of things that are much better when Giannis doesn’t play, not the opposite. Why on earth would the Nets want Giannis? Of course he doesn’t want to go to Brooklyn. He doesn’t want to go anywhere in fact. The video paints the Bucks as asset-poor and desperate, yet floats trading Lillard as a viable option. If they’re truly out of moves, trading a star like Lillard should be a significant reset, but the Herro example is presented as underwhelming without explaining why it wouldn’t help Giannis. This creates a paradox: they’re helpless, yet they have a big chip to play, but the outcome is dismissed as insufficient without justification.
The video then makes a valid point, ie that Giannis is schizophrenic in his statements. This has gone on for years. He says he doesn’t want to leave then he says he might leave. Then straight after that he says he will never leave, etc. Teams are not “circling the Bucks like vultures” though. His trade value is falling all the time as more and more teams realise he just can’t bring results. There’s a tension between portraying Giannis as loyal yet ready to bolt. If he’s explicitly said he’d never demand a trade and wants to stay as long as the team is winning, the assertion that he’d “leave in a heartbeat” feels exaggerated or speculative without concrete evidence of a shift in his stance (e.g., a new statement contradicting his prior ones). The video assumes his frustration overrides his stated commitment, but it doesn’t bridge that gap with clear reasoning or new developments beyond body language.
The video also acknowledges Giannis’s resilience in 2021 (overcoming a hyperextended knee, a 0-2 deficit) but doesn’t consider whether he could again will the team to success despite current flaws. It frames the Bucks as irredeemably broken, yet Giannis’s current MVP-caliber play suggests he’s still a championship-level force. The narrative of inevitable collapse clashes with his individual excellence, leaving an unaddressed question: if he’s this good, why is turnaround impossible? The answer is obvious. Giannis is no longer that good, so why even talk about trade rumours? The whole league can see it! And worse of all he is not a team leader by any measure.
He talks about the coaching changes but doesn’t see that the real problem is not with the coaches. Giannis is uncoachable. We have yet to see a minute of Dame and Giannis in the playoffs is correct but who is to blame for that? Even if Giannis is not pretending fake injuries (which is likely) I would say that it is his fault that he gets injured that often.
The play analysis is almost funny. Because at no stage does it state the obvious: all these problems are due to Giannis not having skills! He can’t screen, everyone knows that! It is why the Warriors don’t want him. He just doesn’t understand angles. Giannis is not playing like an MVP as the video claims. Sure he is 3d right now but that means nothing. It is simply by adding up trash position votes, nobody really thinks he is playing at MVP level this season. No trade can save the Bucks and Giannis. Because Giannis is the problem, not the solution.
The way Giannis has handled these past two seasons has reduced his team mates trade value and led the Bucks to a dead end.
Some sites give vague data regarding player popularity
All this shows us is that a lot of people search for LeBron James statistics. We can however cross check and see that the Warriors are more popular as a team for searches which makes it more impressive.
Giannis is in the same position as the Bucks, ie, nothing special. They also give us an idea what people search for in relation to Giannis, ie Related Searches: Giannis Antetokounmpo career 40+ point gamelog When was Giannis Antetokounmpo drafted? Giannis Antetokounmpo stats in the 2017 playoffs
Here is the Google Insights view of interest in Giannis over time globally, peaking for the championship run, otherwise pretty regular around the playoffs and the trade talks every year.
And yes, it’s mainly Greeks looking for information about Giannis:
In Greece in particular it is interesting that we have a different swell in searches focused around whether or not he will join the national basketball team:
Also interestingly, it is mainly richer suburbs of Athens that are looking for Giannis related info:
It also quickly becomes
apparent that Greeks really get excited and look for how to vote for him for the All Star voting process.
Related queries are related to his height, his house and his siblings too: αδερφια αντετοκουμπο αντετοκούνμπο υψοσ giannis antetokounmpo nba vote antetokounmpo mvp σπιτι αντετοκουμπο αδερφια αντετοκούνμπο γαμοσ αντετοκουμπο mariah injury francis φρανσις παιδιά
Of course to put things into perspective, here is a geographical breakdown by region compared to Jokic (in red) Globally Jokic is more popular, here is a breakdown of interest over time:
So no, Giannis is nowhere near the most popular NBA player on the planet. If anything the interest is fading.
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s rise from a lanky teenager hawking goods on the streets of Athens to an NBA superstar is nothing short of a fairy tale. Known as the “Greek Freak” for his extraordinary blend of size, speed, and skill, Giannis has amassed a collection of accolades. Let’s dive into the full scope of his achievements, both in the NBA and beyond.
Early Beginnings and the Path to Stardom
Born on December 6, 1994, to Nigerian immigrant parents in Athens, Greece, Giannis Sina Ugo Antetokounmpo grew up in humble circumstances. His basketball journey began with the youth teams of Filathlitikos in Athens, and by 2011, he was playing for their senior team in Greece’s semi-pro leagues. In 2013, the Milwaukee Bucks took a chance on the relatively unknown 18-year-old, selecting him 15th overall in the NBA Draft. What followed was a meteoric rise that few could have predicted.
Giannis didn’t burst onto the scene with immediate accolades, but his potential was evident. His rookie season earned him a spot on the 2013-14 NBA All-Rookie Second Team, a modest but promising start for a player who would soon dominate the league.
Breaking Out: Most Improved Player and All-Star Status
The 2016-17 season marked Giannis’s arrival as a star. Averaging 22.9 points, 8.8 rebounds, 5.4 assists, 1.6 steals, and 1.9 blocks per game, he showcased his all-around brilliance. This breakout campaign earned him the NBA Most Improved Player Award, recognizing his leap from a raw talent to a cornerstone for the Bucks. That same year, he made his first of many NBA All-Star Game appearances, becoming the youngest Bucks player ever to start in the prestigious event.
Giannis’s statistical dominance in 2016-17 was historic: he became the first player in NBA history to finish a regular season in the top 20 in points, rebounds, assists, steals, and blocks. This versatility laid the foundation for the accolades to come.
Back-to-Back MVP Seasons
Giannis’s ascent continued with two consecutive NBA Most Valuable Player (MVP) awards in 2018-19 and 2019-20. In 2018-19, he averaged 27.7 points, 12.5 rebounds, 5.9 assists, 1.3 steals, and 1.5 blocks per game, leading the Bucks to a league-best 60-22 record. His combination of scoring, rebounding, and playmaking made him a unanimous choice for the MVP.
The following season, 2019-20, Giannis upped the ante with 29.5 points, 13.6 rebounds, and 5.6 assists per game, all while playing just 30.4 minutes per night due to the Bucks’ dominance. He joined an elite group of players—legends like Bill Russell, Wilt Chamberlain, and Michael Jordan—as a multi-time MVP before age 30. These seasons also saw him earn All-NBA First Team honors, cementing his status as one of the league’s premier talents.
Defensive Dominance: DPOY and All-Defense Selections
Giannis isn’t just an offensive juggernaut; he’s a defensive force. In 2019-20, he was named the NBA Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY), becoming only the third player in history (after Michael Jordan and Hakeem Olajuwon) to win both MVP and DPOY in the same season. His 7-foot-3 wingspan, agility, and instincts allowed him to guard multiple positions and anchor Milwaukee’s defense.
His defensive prowess has been recognized repeatedly with All-Defensive Team selections: four times on the All-Defensive First Team (2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22) and once on the All-Defensive Second Team (2016-17). By March 2025, Giannis has five total All-Defensive nods, a number that underscores his two-way impact.
The Pinnacle: NBA Championship and Finals MVP
The 2020-21 season was Giannis’s crowning achievement. After years of playoff disappointments, he led the Bucks to their first NBA Championship since 1971, defeating the Phoenix Suns in six games. His performance in the Finals was legendary, averaging 35.2 points, 13.2 rebounds, 5.0 assists, 1.2 steals, and 1.8 blocks per game on 61.8% shooting. In the decisive Game 6, he dropped 50 points, including 17-of-19 from the free-throw line, to seal the title.
For his heroics, Giannis was named NBA Finals MVP, joining an elite group as only the second European-born player (after Dirk Nowitzki) to win the award. At 26, he was also the second-youngest Finals MVP in history, trailing only Kawhi Leonard.
All-Star Game MVP
In 2021, Giannis added another jewel to his crown: the NBA All-Star Game MVP. During the game in Atlanta, he went a perfect 16-for-16 from the field, scoring 35 points to lead Team LeBron to victory. It was a rare moment of individual brilliance in an exhibition setting, further showcasing his dominance.
As of March 2025, Giannis has been selected to the NBA All-Star Game eight times (2017-2023, plus an assumed selection for 2025 based on his trajectory), starting in most of them. His All-NBA honors total eight as well, with six All-NBA First Team selections (2018-19 through 2023-24) and two All-NBA Second Team nods (2016-17, 2017-18).
NBA Cup Triumphs
The in-season NBA Cup, introduced in 2023, has quickly become another stage for Giannis to shine. In 2024, he led the Bucks to the NBA Cup Championship, defeating the Oklahoma City Thunder 97-81 in the final. His triple-double (26 points, 19 rebounds, 10 assists) earned him the NBA Cup MVP, adding to his growing list of postseason accolades. He was also named to the All-NBA Cup Team in both 2023 and 2024, making him the first player to achieve this honor twice.
International Achievements
Giannis’s impact extends beyond the NBA. Representing Greece, he was the EuroBasket Scoring Champion in 2022, averaging 29.3 points per game. In 2024, he led Greece to qualify for the Paris Olympics, earning the Olympic Qualifiers Player of the Tournament award. That same year, he was chosen as Greece’s flag bearer at the Paris 2024 Olympic Games alongside race walker Antigoni Drisbioti—an honor reflecting his status as a national icon.
Milestones and Historical Recognition
Giannis’s career is dotted with remarkable milestones. In March 2025, he surpassed 20,000 career points, making him the Bucks’ all-time leader in points, rebounds, assists, and blocks. He’s the only player in NBA history to average at least 25 points, 10 rebounds, 5 assists, 1 block, and 1 steal per game across multiple seasons. His name also graces the NBA 75th Anniversary Team, announced in 2021, placing him among the 75 greatest players in league history at just 26 years old.
The Full List of Accolades (as of March 11, 2025)
Here’s the comprehensive rundown of Giannis Antetokounmpo’s accolades:
NBA Championship: 1 (2021)
NBA Finals MVP: 1 (2021)
NBA Most Valuable Player (MVP): 2 (2018-19, 2019-20)
NBA Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY): 1 (2019-20)
NBA Most Improved Player (MIP): 1 (2016-17)
NBA All-Star Game MVP: 1 (2021)
NBA All-Star: 8 (2017-2023, 2025 assumed)
All-NBA First Team: 6 (2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22, 2022-23, 2023-24)
All-NBA Second Team: 2 (2016-17, 2017-18)
All-Defensive First Team: 4 (2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, 2021-22)
All-Defensive Second Team: 1 (2016-17)
NBA All-Rookie Second Team: 1 (2013-14)
NBA Cup Championship: 1 (2024)
NBA Cup MVP: 1 (2024)
All-NBA Cup Team: 2 (2023, 2024)
NBA 75th Anniversary Team: 1 (2021)
EuroBasket Scoring Champion: 1 (2022)
Olympic Qualifiers Player of the Tournament: 1 (2024)
Greek Olympic Flag Bearer: Paris 2024
What’s Next for the Greek Freak?
At 30 years old, Giannis has plenty of basketball ahead. He’s already achieved nearly every major individual and team honour the NBA offers, save for Sixth Man of the Year (unlikely given his star status) and Rookie of the Year (missed in 2013-14). Another championship, additional MVPs, or even an Olympic medal with Greece would further elevate his legacy. Unfortunately as you can see from the dates of the accolades, his prime is well past him. New players are much better at , well, everything and Giannis’ way of playing, his run and dunk by the rim seems more and more dated. Sure it works against lesser teams in the regular season but not when it counts.
Giannis’s journey—from a street vendor in Sepolia to a global superstar—resonates far beyond the stat sheet. As the Bucks’ all-time leader in multiple categories, he’s already a franchise legend. The “Greek Freak” would like to keep adding to this already staggering list.
But interestingly people search for him in relation to other teams like this too:
bulls giannis
celtics giannis
celtics giannis antetokounmpo
chicago bulls giannis antetokounmpo
curry and giannis
curry giannis
Other times they look for his movie:
disney giannis
disney giannis antetokounmpo
disney plus giannis antetokounmpo
Giannis Space Jam ain’t happening but people still look for it online! Or any tv content about him, 60 minutes interview etc:
espn giannis
espn giannis antetokounmpo
If you are 3 years old you may have briefly wanted one of these:
funko giannis antetokounmpo
funko pop nba giannis antetokounmpo
And of course others wonder about his rating on the game:
giannis 2k
giannis 2k cover
giannis 2k22
giannis 2k23
Some people look for matchups, video clips from when he had something with a famous other NBA player or someone spoke about him:
harden giannis
harrell giannis
janis antetokounmpo
jordan antetokounmpo
jordan on giannis
kd giannis
kobe bryant giannis
kobe giannis
kyrie giannis
lakers giannis
lebron giannis
Of course one player more than others:
michael jordan giannis
michael jordan giannis antetokounmpo
michael jordan on giannis
michael jordan on giannis antetokounmpo
So Giannis’ effect on the game has probably past it’s prime as he deteriorates and the NBA moves on without him. But as a cultural phenomenon he continues!