Greek Freak Analyzed

Category: TEAM

  • How Giannis increases the risk of injury for his team mates

    How Giannis increases the risk of injury for his team mates

    A while ago i explained why the way Giannis plays greatly increases the chances of him getting injured. Here it is for those who don’t remember. However I also need to explain how it may inadvertently contribute to an increased risk of injuries for his teammates. This blog post explores the reasons behind this phenomenon, analyzing his playstyle, its impact on team dynamics, and the physical toll it may take on those around him.

    The Nature of Giannis’ Playstyle

    Giannis is a unique force in the NBA, blending size (6’11”), speed, and strength in a way that few players can match. His game revolves around several key elements:

    1. Aggressive Drives to the Basket: Giannis frequently attacks the rim with powerful, high-speed drives, often initiating contact with defenders to create space or draw fouls. His “Eurostep” and ability to absorb contact make him a constant threat in the paint.
    2. Physicality: Giannis plays with an intense physical presence, using his body to muscle through defenders or secure rebounds in traffic.
    3. Fast-Paced Transition Play: He thrives in transition, often leading fast breaks himself or finishing them with thunderous dunks.
    4. High Usage Rate: As the Bucks’ primary offensive weapon, Giannis handles the ball frequently, dictating the flow of the game and drawing significant defensive attention while his team mates go cold.

    While these traits make him a superstar, they also create situations that can put teammates in vulnerable positions on the court. Especially since Giannis has extremely limited flexibility (aka bag) in order to adapt to changing conditions of play. He is also slow to react which can be brutally painful.

    How Giannis’ Playstyle Impacts Teammates

    1. Increased Defensive Pressure on Teammates

    Giannis’ ability to draw multiple defenders creates opportunities for his teammates, but it also places them in high-pressure situations. Defenders often collapse on Giannis when he drives, leaving Bucks players open for kick-out passes or cuts to the basket. However, this dynamic can lead to injury risks in several ways:

    • Scrambling Defenders: When defenders collapse on Giannis, they often scramble to recover to open shooters or cutters. These rapid, sometimes reckless movements can lead to collisions. For example, a defender sprinting to close out on a three-point shooter like Khris Middleton or Damian Lillard may inadvertently make contact, leading to awkward landings or physical challenges that increase the risk of sprains or strains.
    • Physical Play in the Paint: Giannis’ presence in the paint draws physical defenders, such as big men or help defenders, who may bump or shove teammates cutting to the basket. Players like Brook Lopez or Bobby Portis, who often operate near the rim, face increased physicality from opponents trying to counter Giannis’ dominance.

    2. Fast-Paced Play and Fatigue

    Giannis’ transition-heavy style pushes the Bucks to play at a high tempo, which can lead to fatigue among teammates. Fatigue is a well-documented risk factor for injuries in sports, as tired players are more likely to lose focus, misjudge movements, or fail to protect themselves during contact. For example:

    • Running the Floor: Players like Jrue Holiday (in past seasons) or current teammates are required to sprint alongside Giannis in transition to provide spacing or receive passes. This constant running can wear down players, particularly guards or wings who may not have Giannis’ exceptional stamina.
    • Defensive Responsibilities: Giannis’ aggressive drives often force opponents into transition defense, but they also require Bucks players to quickly get back on defense to prevent counterattacks. This back-and-forth pace can exhaust teammates, increasing the likelihood of injuries like muscle strains or knee issues due to overexertion.

    3. Crowded Paint and Collision Risks

    Giannis’ preference for attacking the rim often results in a crowded paint, with multiple defenders converging to stop him. This congestion can lead to unintended contact with teammates:

    • Screening and Cutting: Bucks players frequently set screens or cut to the basket to complement Giannis’ drives. However, the crowded paint increases the risk of collisions with defenders or even Giannis himself. For instance, a poorly timed cut by a teammate could result in contact with a rotating defender or Giannis’ own aggressive movements, leading to potential injuries like ankle sprains or bruises.
    • Rebounding Battles: Giannis is an elite rebounder, but his aggressive pursuit of rebounds can sometimes put teammates in harm’s way. When multiple Bucks players crash the boards alongside Giannis, they risk getting tangled up with opponents or each other, increasing the chance of awkward landings or elbow strikes. This is made worse by Giannis roaming out of position looking for a highlight block as he is not where his team mates expect him to be.

    4. Defensive Attention and Retaliation

    Giannis’ dominance often frustrates opponents, leading to more physical play or borderline dirty tactics. While Giannis’ size and strength allow him to absorb much of this physicality, his teammates may not be as equipped to handle it:

    • Targeted Physicality: Opponents may take out their frustration on Giannis’ teammates, especially role players like Grayson Allen or Malik Beasley, who may face harder screens, shoves, or aggressive closeouts. This physicality can lead to injuries, particularly for smaller players.
    • Retaliatory Fouls: When Giannis draws fouls or initiates contact, opponents may respond with harder fouls on his teammates to “send a message.” These plays can result in injuries, such as when a player is knocked to the floor or lands awkwardly after a tough challenge.

    Statistical Context and Examples

    While direct causation between Giannis’ playstyle and teammate injuries is difficult to prove, there are patterns worth noting. According to NBA injury reports from the 2020-2023 seasons, the Bucks have had several key players miss time due to injuries that could be linked to the high-intensity, physical style of play Giannis encourages:

    • Khris Middleton: Middleton has dealt with ankle sprains and knee issues, some of which occurred during games where he was forced to make quick cuts or absorb contact while operating in Giannis’ orbit. For example, in the 2022 playoffs, Middleton suffered a knee injury that some analysts attributed to the physical toll of Milwaukee’s aggressive style.
    • Brook Lopez: As a rim protector and rebounder, Lopez often faces physical battles in the paint, exacerbated by Giannis’ ability to draw big men to the rim. Lopez has missed time with back and foot injuries, potentially linked to the constant physicality.
    • Role Players: Players like Donte DiVincenzo (pre-trade) and Grayson Allen have suffered injuries like ankle sprains or bruises, often in situations involving fast breaks or crowded paint scenarios driven by Giannis’ play.

    Data from Synergy Sports shows that the Bucks rank among the league leaders in points in the paint and fast-break points, reflecting Giannis’ influence on their style. However, this also correlates with a higher number of possessions involving physical contact, which can elevate injury risks for teammates.

    Mitigating the Risks

    While Giannis’ playstyle is a core part of his greatness, there are ways the Bucks can reduce the injury risks for teammates:

    1. Improved Spacing: By emphasising better floor spacing, the Bucks can reduce congestion in the paint, giving teammates more room to operate without colliding with defenders or Giannis.
    2. Load Management: Managing the minutes of role players to prevent fatigue can help reduce injury risks, especially for players who run the floor alongside Giannis.
    3. Screening Discipline: Coaching staff can work on cleaner screening and cutting techniques to minimise collisions in the paint.
    4. Defensive Awareness: Teammates can be coached to anticipate aggressive defensive rotations caused by Giannis’ drives, helping them avoid reckless closeouts or physical challenges.

    However Giannis is not the sharpest tool in the shed and his lack of basketball IQ and flexibility on the court make it highly unlikely that he will be able to successfully navigate these changes. Worse still he is overly physical in the regular season when most teams are being careful and then not effective enough in the playoffs!

    Giannis is largely to blame for Bucks’ injuries

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playstyle is a double-edged sword. His ability to dominate games with his physicality, speed, and aggression makes the Bucks a championship-calibre team, but it also creates challenges for his teammates. The increased defensive pressure, crowded paint, and fast-paced nature of his game can inadvertently put teammates in situations where injuries are more likely. While Giannis himself is built to withstand the physical toll of his style, his teammates—particularly role players—may face heightened risks due to the ripple effects of his dominance. By making strategic adjustments, the Bucks can continue to leverage Giannis’ unique talents while minimising the injury risks for the rest of the roster. But these past seasons have shown us that Giannis is more focused on stat padding and personal promotion than actually playing with his team for his team. He kills ball flow and most other players hardly touch the ball. Hard to get going like that or even to stay warm. And most importantly he has shown almost zero capacity to improve his game.

  • “Underachiever” Giannis? Stephen A is 100% correct

    “Underachiever” Giannis? Stephen A is 100% correct

    On June 13, 2025, ESPN’s Stephen A. Smith sparked a firestorm of debate on First Take by labelling Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo an “underachiever” if he fails to win another NBA championship. The comment, delivered in response to host Molly Qerim’s question about how to describe Giannis’ legacy without additional titles, drew immediate backlash from fans and analysts alike. Many pointed to Giannis’ remarkable journey—from a street vendor in Athens, Greece, to a two-time MVP, Finals MVP, and NBA champion—as evidence that the label is absurd. Yet, while Antetokounmpo’s story is undeniably inspiring, Smith’s argument has merit when viewed through the lens of Giannis’ dominance, postseason shortcomings, and the expectations placed on players of his calibre. Let me be the first to say that Stephen A Smith is a clown and very often his takes are ridiculous. But in this case he is 100% correct.

    Giannis’ Unparalleled Dominance Sets a High Bar

    Giannis Antetokounmpo over the last four years, across a minimum of 200 games, Giannis ranks second in the NBA with 30.4 points per game and fifth with 11.7 rebounds per game. His accolades are staggering: nine All-NBA selections, nine All-Star appearances, two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year award, and a Finals MVP in 2021. At 30 years old, in the prime of his career, Giannis is still a physical marvel but in terms of actual impact on games that matter?

    This dominance is precisely why Smith’s “underachiever” label resonates. Players of Giannis’ stature—think Michael Jordan, LeBron James, or Kevin Durant—are judged not just by individual brilliance but by their ability to translate it into sustained postseason success. Smith argues, “You don’t look at somebody that dominant, that fantastic, with that kind of fire in his belly to compete on a night-in, night-out basis, and all you have is one championship to show for it.” The expectation for a player of Giannis’ caliber isn’t just to win once but to contend consistently and build a legacy of multiple titles. His 2021 championship was a historic triumph, but the Bucks’ inability to replicate that success raises questions about whether Giannis is fully capitalizing on his prime. Most importantly he doesn’t seem to be able to elevate those around him. Quite the opposite.

    Postseason Struggles: A Pattern of Disappointment

    Since their 2021 title, the Milwaukee Bucks have struggled in the playoffs, posting just one series win in the last four years. The team has suffered first-round exits in each of the past three seasons (2023–2025), a stark contrast to Giannis’ regular-season dominance. While injuries have played a role—Giannis missed significant time in the 2023 and 2024 playoffs due to back and calf injuries, respectively—the Bucks’ postseason woes extend beyond health concerns.

    In 2022, the Bucks fell to the Boston Celtics in the second round, with Giannis playing all seven games. In 2023, despite Giannis’ absence for parts of the series, the Bucks were favored against the Miami Heat but collapsed in five games. In 2024, without Giannis, they lost to the Indiana Pacers in the first round. Even in 2025, with Giannis healthy, the Bucks fell to the Pacers again in five games. Smith highlighted this trend, noting that Giannis “has more All-NBA selections than postseason wins in the last four years.” For a player of his calibre, this discrepancy is striking.

    Critics argue that these failures aren’t entirely Giannis’ fault. The Bucks have faced roster challenges, including an aging core and questionable front-office decisions. The 2023 trade for Damian Lillard, which cost them Jrue Holiday, a defensive anchor and clutch performer, has yet to yield the expected results, partly due to Lillard’s declining athleticism. The midseason trade of Khris Middleton to the Washington Wizards in 2024–25 further disrupted team chemistry. Yet, as the face of the franchise, Giannis bears the burden of elevating his team in critical moments. In the championship run, the more you look at it, the more it seems that Khris, Jrue and Brook did the job and Giannis just turned up for the Finals where it was easy. His inability to impact important games again and again, even in the regular season, lends credence to Smith’s critique.

    The Championship-or-Bust Standard for Superstars

    In the NBA, superstars are judged by championships, a standard that may seem unfair but is deeply ingrained in the sport’s culture. Legends like Kevin Garnett and Dirk Nowitzki, each with one ring, are often cited by Giannis’ defenders as proof that a single title can cement a legacy. However, both Garnett and Nowitzki faced criticism during their careers for not winning more, and their lone championships came against formidable opponents, much like Giannis’ 2021 title. The difference lies in expectations: Giannis, with his two MVPs and prime years ahead, is held to a higher standard than most.

    Smith’s argument hinges on this championship-or-bust mentality. He acknowledges Giannis’ greatness but insists that “it’s unacceptable” for a player of his dominance to have just one title and limited playoff success. This perspective aligns with how other superstars are evaluated. LeBron James faced intense scrutiny until he won his first title in 2012; Kevin Durant was labelled a “ring-chaser” until he won in 2017. Even Nikola Jokić, a one-time champion, faces pressure to add more rings to his résumé. Giannis, with his unique blend of accolades and physical gifts, is no exception. It’s not just about the rings. It is about proving you can do it when it matters, not just regular season stat padding at which Giannis excels.

    Organizational Limbo and Giannis’ Role

    Superstars are expected to transcend organizational shortcomings. Michael Jordan carried flawed Bulls rosters to playoff success before Scottie Pippen’s arrival; LeBron James dragged undermanned Cavaliers teams to the Finals. Giannis’ recent playoff performances, while statistically impressive as individual numbers, haven’t yielded the same results. For example, in the 2025 playoffs against the Pacers, Giannis averaged 31.8 points and 12.4 rebounds but couldn’t prevent a five-game loss. Smith’s point is that a player of Giannis’ calibre should find ways to win, even when the odds are stacked against him. And he seems more incapable of doing that than ever. If anything, he is getting worse!

    The Trade Rumors and Legacy Pressure

    Giannis’ future with the Bucks has been a hot topic, with trade rumours swirling as Milwaukee struggles to build a contender around him. Reports from ESPN’s Brian Windhorst on June 10, 2025, indicate that there’s currently no trade market for Giannis, and he hasn’t requested a move. However, the speculation itself underscores the pressure on Giannis to deliver. If he were to leave Milwaukee without another title, his legacy could take a hit, as loyalty to a small-market team is often weighed against championship success.

    Smith’s “underachiever” label is partly a warning: without another ring, Giannis risks being remembered as a player who didn’t fully realise his potential. This sentiment is echoed by some fans on social media, with one user (@bets_liam) noting the Bucks’ “organisational limbo” and lack of depth as barriers to Giannis’ success. Yet, the expectation remains that Giannis, as a top-tier superstar, should overcome these obstacles or seek a situation where he can win.

    Excuses excuses

    Giannis’ defenders have the same points they make every year. His journey from a No. 15 draft pick in the Greek second division to NBA stardom is one of the most inspiring in sports history. Injuries, both to Giannis and his teammates, have derailed potential deep playoff runs but these can also be attributed to their own mistakes in the way they approach their season. The Bucks’ roster moves, particularly the Lillard trade, haven’t panned out as hoped. Moreover, comparing Giannis to players like Jordan or James may be unfair, as few players in history have matched their postseason dominance. Legends like Jerry West, Oscar Robertson, and Julius Erving, each with one ring, are rarely called underachievers.

    These excuses don’t negate Smith’s core point: Giannis’ talent demands more than one title. His regular-season excellence and 2021 heroics have set a sky-high standard, and the Bucks’ recent playoff failures fall short of that mark. Smith’s take, while harsh, reflects the unforgiving expectations placed on superstars in the NBA. “XYZ famous player didn’t win any titles?” come the Giannis fanboys in his defence. That is irrelevant. They had impact on the game when it mattered. They elevated their team mates or they did heroics on their own enough to get their teams along in the playoffs. They didn’t exit 4-1 in the playoffs like Giannis does all the time. It really looks like all he cares about is his individual stats. All season the story has been “Giannis gets 30+ points but…”

    A Call to Action for Giannis

    Stephen A. Smith’s “underachiever” label for Giannis Antetokounmpo is a provocative but defensible stance. Giannis’ dominance in the regular season, coupled with the Bucks’ postseason struggles, creates a gap between his potential and his achievements. While injuries, roster issues, and organisational missteps share the blame, superstars are judged by their ability to overcome adversity and deliver championships. Giannis’ 2021 title proved he’s capable of greatness, but without additional rings, his legacy risks being defined by what could have been. This season he couldn’t even beat any of the top teams in the East in the regular season! Not even once!

    Rather than a condemnation, Smith’s comment is a call to action. For now, Smith’s take serves as a reminder of the relentless standard applied to the NBA’s elite: greatness isn’t just about what you’ve done, but what you continue to achieve. And after more than a decade in the NBA, Giannis’ excuses are getting very very stale. Especially when we are not seeing improvements in his game. On the contrary he is getting worse at most things on the floor. At 30, Giannis has time to add to his résumé, whether in Milwaukee or elsewhere. His response to this criticism—on the court, in the playoffs—will ultimately shape how history views him. But so many times he has made big statements and then gone off to simply fail again in the playoffs.

    Sources:

    • Baller Alert, June 14, 2025
    • Footboom1.com, June 13, 2025
    • ProFootballNetwork.com, June 13, 2025
    • NBA Analysis, June 14, 2025
    • JSONLine.com, June 14, 2025
    • Posts on X, June 13, 2025

  • Giannis has no skills and his LeBron tweet was ridiculous

    Giannis has no skills and his LeBron tweet was ridiculous

    When discussing the NBA’s elite, Giannis Antetokounmpo and LeBron James frequently top the conversation. Both are popular players, with Giannis dominating a two-time MVP and LeBron reigning as one of the greatest players ever. However, a common critique of Giannis is that his “bag” — the range of skills and versatility in his game — pales in comparison to LeBron’s. Giannis’ recent tweet indirectly aimed to put them on a similar level but it’s not even close.

    Scoring: Power vs. Precision

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis, known as the “Greek Freak,” relies heavily on his physical gifts. Standing at 6’11” with a 7’3″ wingspan, he’s a force in the paint. His scoring is built on:

    • Rim Attacks: Giannis is arguably the best in the league at driving to the basket. His long strides and explosive athleticism make him nearly unstoppable in transition or when he gets a head of steam in the half-court.
    • Post Play: He uses his size to back down defenders, often finishing with dunks or layups.
    • Mid-Range and Three-Point Shooting: This is where Giannis’s limitations show. His jump shot remains inconsistent. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting around 29% from three on low volume (1-2 attempts per game) and rarely takes mid-range shots, preferring to attack the rim. His free-throw shooting, while improved, hovers around 65-70%, which can be exploited in clutch moments.

    Giannis’s scoring is devastatingly effective but one-dimensional. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot, which limits his offensive repertoire compared to players with more refined jumpers.

    LeBron James

    LeBron, at 6’9″ and 250 pounds, combines physicality with finesse. His scoring arsenal is far more diverse:

    • Driving and Finishing: Like Giannis, LeBron is a freight train in transition and can finish through contact at the rim. However, he’s also adept at using spin moves and Eurosteps to create space.
    • Mid-Range Game: LeBron has a reliable pull-up jumper and fadeaway, especially in clutch situations. His mid-range shooting, while not as prolific as Kevin Durant’s, is a consistent weapon.
    • Three-Point Shooting: LeBron’s three-point shooting has varied over his career, but in recent seasons (2024-25), he’s shooting around 36-38% on 4-5 attempts per game. This forces defenses to respect his range, opening up driving lanes.
    • Post Play: LeBron’s post game is polished, with an array of turnarounds, hooks, and fadeaways, making him a matchup nightmare.

    LeBron’s ability to score from all three levels — inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc — gives him a significant edge. Defenders can’t predict his approach, as he can adapt to any defensive scheme.

    Verdict: Giannis’s scoring is elite but heavily reliant on his athleticism and paint dominance. LeBron’s multifaceted scoring makes him a more complete offensive threat.

    Playmaking: Vision and Execution

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis has grown into a solid playmaker, averaging around 6-7 assists per game in recent seasons. His passing is effective in specific contexts:

    • Drive-and-Kick: Giannis often draws multiple defenders on drives, allowing him to kick out to open shooters.
    • Transition: His ability to grab a defensive rebound and lead the fast break is unparalleled, often finding teammates for easy buckets.
    • Limitations: Giannis’s playmaking is somewhat predictable. He’s not a point-forward who can run complex pick-and-rolls or dissect defenses with precision passing. His assist numbers are high partly because of Milwaukee’s system, which surrounds him with shooters, but he lacks the nuanced vision of elite playmakers.

    LeBron James

    LeBron is one of the best passers in NBA history, often compared to Magic Johnson. His playmaking is a cornerstone of his game:

    • Court Vision: LeBron’s ability to read defenses is uncanny. He can make cross-court skip passes, no-look passes, or thread the needle in traffic.
    • Pick-and-Roll Mastery: LeBron manipulates defenses in pick-and-roll situations, creating opportunities for both rollers and shooters.
    • Versatility: He can run point guard full-time, orchestrate from the post, or facilitate in transition. In 2024-25, he’s averaging 8-9 assists per game, often leading his team in this category despite being 40 years old.

    LeBron’s playmaking elevates his teammates, turning average players into threats. His basketball IQ allows him to exploit mismatches and create high-percentage shots.

    Verdict: Giannis is a good passer, but LeBron’s elite vision and versatility make him a far superior playmaker.

    Defense: Impact and Adaptability

    Giannis Antetokounmpo

    Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, having won the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. His defensive strengths include:

    • Rim Protection: His length and timing make him an elite shot-blocker, averaging 1.5-2 blocks per game.
    • Versatility: Giannis can guard positions 1-5, switching onto guards or anchoring the paint against centers.
    • Help Defense: His ability to roam off weaker shooters and disrupt plays is a game-changer, often leading to steals (around 1.2 per game).

    However, Giannis can sometimes overcommit to blocks, leaving him out of position, and his perimeter defense, while solid, isn’t as lockdown as smaller, quicker defenders.

    LeBron James

    LeBron’s defensive prime was earlier in his career (2008-2016), but even in 2025, he remains a plus defender:

    • Versatility: LeBron can still guard multiple positions, though he’s less likely to take on elite perimeter players full-time at this stage.
    • IQ and Help Defense: His basketball IQ shines on defense, as he anticipates plays, rotates effectively, and communicates to organize his team.
    • Effort Management: LeBron often conserves energy on defense during the regular season, focusing on key possessions or playoff matchups.

    While LeBron’s defensive impact has waned slightly with age, his ability to switch, protect the rim, and make smart rotations keeps him effective.

    Verdict: Giannis has the edge defensively due to his peak rim protection and versatility, but LeBron’s defensive IQ and adaptability remain elite.

    Overall Versatility: The “Bag” Comparison

    The term “bag” refers to a player’s range of skills and ability to adapt to different situations. Giannis’s bag is deep in specific areas:

    • Unstoppable in transition and paint scoring. Well, he used to be unstoppable.
    • Elite defensive impact. Well, until he won DPOY and then forgot defence.
    • Improving but limited playmaking. Unless it is a game that matters.

    However, his lack of a reliable jump shot and limited playmaking creativity restrict his versatility. Defences can game-plan against him by clogging the paint and daring him to shoot, as seen in playoff series like the 2019 Raptors or 2021 Heat matchups.

    LeBron’s bag, by contrast, is one of the deepest in NBA history:

    • Scores efficiently from all three levels.
    • Elite playmaking that elevates any team.
    • High-level defense, even if not at its peak.
    • Ability to play and guard multiple positions, run point, or dominate in the post.

    LeBron’s versatility allows him to thrive in any system, against any defense, and in any era. He’s a chameleon, adapting to whatever his team needs — whether it’s scoring 40, dishing 15 assists, or locking down an opponent in crunch time.

    Contextual Factors: Age and Era

    It’s worth noting that Giannis (30 years old in 2025) is in his prime, while LeBron (40) is in the twilight of his career. Despite this, LeBron’s skill set remains more polished. Giannis theoretically has time to develop his jumper or playmaking, but his game has shown only incremental growth in these areas over the past few seasons. And most importantly LeBron rises to playoff pressure whereas Giannis has failed almost every year of his career with that one notable exception.

    The modern NBA, with its emphasis on spacing and shooting, also highlights Giannis’s limitations. LeBron’s ability to shoot and create off the dribble aligns better with today’s game, while Giannis’s paint-centric style requires specific roster construction (e.g., shooters like Middleton and Lopez) to maximize his impact. Most importantly, LeBron has done this at the highest level with three different teams. Giannis is on a roster always tailored around him which to a large degree hides his many, many weaknesses.

    So no Giannis, you won’t get away with this

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s physical dominance during the regular season make him a perennial MVP candidate. However, when comparing his “bag” to LeBron James’s, the gap is clear. LeBron’s ability to score from anywhere, make every type of pass, and adapt to any role gives him a level of versatility that Giannis has yet to match. While Giannis’s raw power and athleticism are impressive in easy games, his lack of a consistent outside shot and limited playmaking creativity mean his game is less complete. And most importantly his game has not developed and doesn’t deliver when it counts. While LeBron posts career breaking improvements in efficiency at 40, Giannis hits career lows in ft% and 3pt% as well a serious deterioration of his defensive effort.

    LeBron’s all-around mastery, even at 40, sets a standard that few, including Giannis, can rival. As Giannis continues to refine his game, he may close the gap, but for now, LeBron’s bag remains the deeper and more versatile of the two. And it’s not even close.

  • The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings got a lot wrong

    The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings got a lot wrong

    The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings, hosted at nbarankings.theringer.com, aim to provide a dynamic, year-round evaluation of the NBA players making the most significant impact in the league. Updated regularly to reflect current performance, the rankings are a valuable resource for fans and analysts alike. However, the 2025 iteration of these rankings has sparked debate, particularly regarding the placement of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. While Giannis is undeniably a phenomenal physical talent, his high ranking—near the very top—raises questions about the methodology and criteria used, especially when his playoff impact is scrutinised.

    1. Overemphasis on Regular-Season Performance

    The Ringer’s rankings claim to reflect players “making the biggest impact on the league right now” (). However, the methodology appears to heavily favor regular-season statistics and accolades over playoff performance, which is arguably the true measure of a player’s impact in high-stakes scenarios. This is particularly evident in Giannis Antetokounmpo’s case. Giannis consistently posts gaudy regular-season numbers—averaging 30.4 points, 11.5 rebounds, and 6.5 assists in the 2022-23 season, for example, while leading the Bucks to the best record in the NBA. His ability to dominate with sheer athleticism and force makes him a regular-season juggernaut, but the rankings fail to adequately weigh his postseason shortcomings.

    In the 2025 playoffs, Giannis averaged an impressive 36 points in Game 1 against the Indiana Pacers, but his impact was limited by Milwaukee’s blowout loss and the team’s overall lack of cohesion (). The Bucks have not won a playoff game in which Giannis has played since Game 5 of the 2022 playoffs, going 0-5 in such games (). This pattern of playoff under performance—whether due to injuries, coaching mismatches, or roster limitations—suggests that Giannis’s ranking should reflect these struggles more heavily. The Ringer’s list, by prioritising regular-season dominance, risks inflating the value of players like Giannis who excel in less consequential games but falter when the stakes are highest.

    2. Giannis’s Playoff Limitations: A Case for a Lower Ranking

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playoff resume is a mixed bag, and The Ringer’s high ranking of him—often in the top 5, alongside players like Nikola Jokić and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander—overlooks critical weaknesses. While Giannis led the Bucks to a championship in 2021 with a historic 50-point performance in Game 6 of the Finals, his postseason success since then has been inconsistent. The Bucks have faced early-round exits in each of the last four postseasons (2022-2025), with injuries, poor roster construction, and tactical limitations playing significant roles.

    a. Injury Concerns and Availability

    Giannis has struggled with durability in recent playoffs. Since the 2021 championship, injuries to either himself or key teammates like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard have derailed Milwaukee’s postseason aspirations (). In 2023, Giannis played in the Heat series but was hampered, and his team lost despite a 40-point, 20-rebound game (). In 2024, he missed significant playoff time, and in 2025, the Bucks’ Game 1 loss to the Pacers highlighted a lack of team support around him (). While injuries are not entirely within a player’s control, consistent absence or diminished performance in critical playoff moments should weigh heavily in rankings that claim to assess current impact.

    b. Tactical Limitations

    Giannis’s game, while dominant, has exploitable flaws in playoff settings. His lack of a reliable three-point shot (22.2% in 2024-25) and career-low 61.7% free-throw shooting make him vulnerable to defensive schemes that clog the paint and dare him to shoot (). Teams like the Miami Heat in 2023 and the Pacers in 2025 have capitalised on this, using physical defenders and zone schemes to neutralise his drives. The Ringer’s rankings do not seem to account for how these limitations reduce Giannis’ effectiveness in high-stakes games, where opponents can game-plan specifically to exploit his weaknesses.

    c. Supporting Cast and Coaching Mismatches

    The Ringer’s individual player rankings should consider how much of Giannis’ impact is diminished by his lack of ability to adapt to his playing environment. His high ranking feels like an endorsement of his individual stats rather than a holistic evaluation of his ability to elevate his team in the postseason. Which he obviously cannot do. Shouldn’t that be the most important thing in a team game?

    d. Comparison to Peers

    When compared to other top-tier players like Jokić, who led Denver to a championship in 2023 with a historically efficient offensive season (), or Gilgeous-Alexander, who has guided OKC to a dominant 2024-25 season (), Giannis’s playoff resume pales. Jokić’s versatility as a passer, shooter, and clutch performer makes him a more reliable playoff force, while Gilgeous-Alexander’s low turnover rate and ability to elevate teammates in big moments set him apart (). The Ringer’s failure to adjust Giannis’s ranking downward relative to these players suggests a bias toward his regular-season dominance and name recognition.

    3. Lack of Transparency in Ranking Methodology

    Another significant flaw in The Ringer’s rankings is the lack of clarity around how players are evaluated. The site describes the list as reflecting “the biggest impact on the league right now” but does not provide specific criteria, such as statistical weights, playoff performance, or qualitative factors like leadership or clutch play (). This opacity makes it difficult to understand why Giannis is ranked so highly despite his postseason struggles. For comparison, ESPN’s NBArank, which uses a panel of experts voting on player matchups, provides a clearer framework, even if it’s not perfect (). The Ringer’s rankings would benefit from a detailed explanation of how regular-season stats, playoff performance, and intangibles are balanced.

    4. Overvaluing Star Power and Narrative

    The Ringer’s rankings seem to lean heavily on star power and narrative, which may explain Giannis’s lofty placement. His transformation from a “gangly teenager to a modern-day Shaq” and his inspirational 2021 Finals run have cemented his status as a fan and media favorite (). However, this narrative-driven approach can overshadow objective analysis. Posts on X highlight skepticism about Giannis’s top-5 status, with users pointing out his poor shooting percentages (45/25% in some playoff series) and lack of playoff wins since 2022 (,). The Ringer’s rankings risk prioritizing Giannis’s brand and past achievements over his current playoff impact, which is inconsistent with the claim of evaluating “right now.”

    5. Broader Issues with the Rankings

    Beyond Giannis, The Ringer’s list has other issues that undermine its credibility:

    • Inconsistent Updates: While the rankings are described as “year-round, around-the-clock,” updates seem sporadic, with some entries dated months apart (e.g., February 27, 2025, and April 15, 2025) (,). This raises questions about whether the rankings truly reflect current performance.
    • Overranking Aging Stars: Players like Kevin Durant and LeBron James, ranked highly despite injury concerns and diminished playoff success, suggest a reliance on reputation rather than current output ().
    • Underrating Emerging Talent: Young players like Anthony Edwards and Victor Wembanyama, who are projected to dominate in the future, may be ranked lower than their current impact warrants due to a bias toward established names ().

    Conclusion: Reassessing Giannis and The Ringer’s Approach

    Giannis Antetokounmpo is a generational talent, but his high ranking in The Ringer’s Top 100 NBA Player Rankings is questionable given his recent playoff struggles. His injury history, tactical limitations, and reliance on a sub optimal supporting cast and coaching staff have hindered his postseason impact, yet the rankings do not seem to reflect these realities. Broader issues, such as the lack of transparent methodology, overemphasis on regular-season stats, and narrative-driven evaluations, further undermine the list’s credibility. To improve, The Ringer should clarify its criteria, give greater weight to playoff performance, and ensure rankings reflect current impact rather than past achievements or star power. Until then, Giannis’ placement near the top feels more like a nod to his regular-season dominance and fan appeal than a true measure of his league-wide impact.

  • Building a Milwaukee Bucks Team? Best without Giannis

    Building a Milwaukee Bucks Team? Best without Giannis

    When thinking about building a dream team around a Milwaukee Bucks player, past or present, the immediate instinct might be to choose Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Greek Freak, whose dominance has defined the franchise’s modern era. However, if forced to look beyond Giannis, one name stands above the rest: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the legendary center who brought the Bucks their first and only NBA championship in 1971 (until Giannis led the team to another in 2021). Kareem’s unique combination of skill, versatility, and basketball IQ makes him the ideal cornerstone for constructing a championship-caliber team. A quick look at why Kareem would be better and then a dive into why Giannis is really, really bad as a team leader and building block.

    Why Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?

    Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, originally drafted as Lew Alcindor by the Bucks in 1969, was a transformative force in the NBA. Standing at 7’2” with a wingspan that seemed to stretch across the court, Kareem was not just a physical specimen but a skilled technician. His signature skyhook—a virtually unblockable shot delivered with precision—made him a scoring machine. During his six seasons with the Bucks, he averaged 30.4 points, 15.3 rebounds, and 4.3 assists per game, showcasing his ability to dominate both offensively and defensively. His 1971 MVP season, where he led the Bucks to a 66-16 record and a championship alongside Oscar Robertson, cemented his legacy as one of the game’s all-time greats.

    Kareem’s appeal as a team-building centrepiece lies in his versatility. He could score from anywhere, rebound at an elite level, block shots, and facilitate plays with his passing. Unlike many big men of his era, Kareem wasn’t just a post presence; he was a complete player who could adapt to different styles of play. His basketball IQ and leadership also made him a coach’s dream, capable of elevating those around him. Building around Kareem means constructing a roster that maximises his strengths while addressing the few gaps in his game, such as perimeter defence and three-point shooting, which weren’t as critical in his era but are vital in today’s game.

    Why Not Giannis?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo is a phenomenal player, but Kareem’s skill set offers more flexibility in team-building. Giannis thrives in a system with shooters to space the floor, as his limited outside shooting can clog the paint. Kareem, with his mid-range and post game, doesn’t require as much perimeter shooting to be effective, though this roster provides it anyway. Kareem’s defensive presence as a rim protector also gives him an edge over Giannis, whose defensive impact relies more on versatility than anchoring the paint. Finally, Kareem’s proven championship pedigree as the focal point of the 1971 Bucks gives him a slight edge in this hypothetical scenario.

    While Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBA’s most dominant players, having led the Milwaukee Bucks to a championship in 2021, there are arguments why he might not be the ideal cornerstone for building a championship team, particularly when considering his style of play in the context of modern NBA trends. Below is a detailed list of reasons why Giannis’s game may be seen as less compatible with the needs of today’s NBA for constructing a championship roster, though it’s worth noting that these points are relative and don’t negate his elite status.

    1. Limited Outside Shooting

    • Issue: Giannis is not a reliable three-point shooter, with a career three-point percentage of 28.5% (as of the 2024-25 season). His mid-range game is also inconsistent, limiting his ability to stretch the floor.
    • Impact on Team-Building: Modern NBA offenses prioritize spacing to create driving lanes and open three-point opportunities. Giannis’s lack of shooting allows defenses to sag off him, clogging the paint and forcing teammates to carry a heavier load as perimeter shooters. Building around him requires surrounding him with elite shooters (e.g., Khris Middleton, Damian Lillard), which can limit roster flexibility and increase reliance on specific player archetypes.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Teams like the Golden State Warriors or Boston Celtics thrive with versatile shooters at every position, including big men like Kevin Durant or Kristaps Porziņģis. Giannis’s inability to shoot forces a more predictable offensive scheme.

    2. Heavy Reliance on Paint Dominance

    • Issue: Giannis’s game is centered on attacking the rim, using his size, speed, and athleticism to overpower defenders. He leads the league in points in the paint but relies heavily on this style.
    • Impact on Team-Building: Defenses can counter Giannis by building a “wall” in the paint, as seen in the 2019 and 2020 playoffs against Toronto and Miami. This strategy dares him to shoot from outside, exposing his weaknesses. To compensate, the team needs strong playmakers and shooters to create space, which can be costly and difficult to sustain across a playoff run.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: The modern NBA favors offenses that can exploit mismatches through versatile scoring options. Players like Nikola Jokić or Joel Embiid, who can score from the post, mid-range, or beyond the arc, offer more diverse threats that are harder to scheme against.

    3. Limited Playmaking in Half-Court Sets

    • Issue: While Giannis averages around 5-6 assists per game, his playmaking is more effective in transition than in structured half-court offenses. His passing is solid but not at the level of elite facilitators like LeBron James or Jokić.
    • Impact on Team-Building: Building a championship team often requires a primary ball-handler who can orchestrate complex half-court plays, especially in the playoffs when games slow down. Giannis’s limited ability to create for others in tight situations puts pressure on point guards or secondary creators, requiring the team to invest in players like Jrue Holiday or Damian Lillard to handle playmaking duties.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern championship teams often have big men who double as primary facilitators (e.g., Jokić’s 9+ assists per game or Draymond Green’s high-IQ passing). Giannis’s playmaking, while improved, doesn’t match this level of versatility.

    4. Defensive Versatility Has Limits

    • Issue: Giannis used to be an elite defender, capable of guarding multiple positions and earning All-Defensive honours. However, his rim protection, while strong (1.1 blocks per game career average), is not as dominant as traditional centres like Rudy Gobert or Anthony Davis, and he can struggle against smaller, quicker guards on switches.
    • Impact on Team-Building: In today’s switch-heavy defenses, teams need big men who can either anchor the paint or seamlessly switch onto guards. Giannis excels in help defense and roaming but can be exploited by teams with quick guards or stretch bigs, requiring complementary defenders like Brook Lopez to cover the rim.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Players like Bam Adebayo or Draymond Green offer more switchability across all positions, while Giannis’s defensive impact is slightly less flexible in certain matchups, necessitating specific roster constructions to cover his weaknesses.

    5. Free-Throw Shooting Struggles in Clutch Moments

    • Issue: Giannis’s free-throw shooting has been a persistent weakness, with a career average of 64.7%. In high-pressure playoff games, his slow free-throw routine and inconsistent shooting can be exploited, as seen in games where opponents use the “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy.
    • Impact on Team-Building: Championship teams need reliable clutch performers. Giannis’s free-throw woes can lead to late-game liabilities, forcing coaches to adjust strategies or rely on other players in crunch time. This requires a roster with strong closers, which can complicate lineup decisions.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern NBA stars like Stephen Curry or Kevin Durant are trusted to close games with efficient scoring, including at the free-throw line. Giannis’s struggles in this area limit his reliability in tight situations.

    6. High Usage Rate Limits Teammate Involvement

    • Issue: Giannis’s usage rate is among the league’s highest (32.3% in 2023-24), reflecting his ball-dominant style. While effective, this can reduce touches for teammates and make the offense overly reliant on his production.
    • Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires players who thrive off-ball, as his drives and post-ups demand the ball. This can limit the effectiveness of other ball-dominant stars unless they adapt (e.g., Lillard’s reduced role in Milwaukee). The team must prioritize role players who don’t need the ball, which can restrict roster diversity.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern offenses often distribute usage more evenly, with players like Jokić or Luka Dončić creating for others while still scoring. Giannis’s style can sometimes stifle teammate involvement, requiring careful roster construction.

    7. Playoff Predictability

    • Issue: In playoff series, Giannis’s lack of a reliable jump shot and predictable driving style allow elite defensive teams to game-plan against him. Teams like the 2019 Raptors and 2020 Heat successfully limited his impact by crowding the paint and daring him to shoot.
    • Impact on Team-Building: To counter this, the Bucks need elite shooting and secondary creators to punish defensive adjustments. This places a premium on acquiring high-cost talent, which can strain salary caps and limit depth. Without perfect roster construction, Giannis’s game can be neutralized in high-stakes series.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern playoff success often hinges on unpredictability. Players like Jayson Tatum or Devin Booker, who can score in multiple ways, are harder to scheme against. Giannis’s more one-dimensional scoring profile requires specific countermeasures.

    8. Physical Wear and Tear

    • Issue: Giannis’s physical, high-energy style—relying on explosive drives and defensive hustle—puts significant strain on his body. He’s had injury concerns, like knee issues in the 2021 and 2023 playoffs, which can impact his availability.
    • Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires a deep roster to compensate for potential injuries, as his absence significantly alters the team’s identity. This demands investment in quality backups, which can be challenging under salary cap constraints.
    • Contrast with Modern Needs: Players with more finesse-based games (e.g., Durant’s jump-shooting or Curry’s off-ball movement) may have less physical wear, allowing for greater durability. Giannis’s style, while dominant, carries long-term risks.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s lack of outside shooting, reliance on paint scoring, limited half-court playmaking, and other factors make him a less flexible building block for a championship team in the modern NBA compared to more versatile stars. His style requires a roster heavy on shooters, defenders, and secondary creators, which can limit flexibility and increase costs. These incompatibilities with the spacing, versatility, and unpredictability demanded by today’s game make players like Kareem, with a more adaptable skill set, better anchors for a championship roster.

  • Why the Giannis-Kareem Comparison Falls Flat

    Why the Giannis-Kareem Comparison Falls Flat

    The recent article from The Athletic, titled “Echoes of Kareem: The eerie parallels Bucks fans see in a potential Giannis-less future,” draws a dramatic comparison between the Milwaukee Bucks’ trade of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in 1975 and the potential trade of Giannis Antetokounmpo. It suggests that trading Giannis could plunge the Bucks into a decades-long championship drought, much like the 46 years that followed Kareem’s departure. While the historical parallel is intriguing, the argument hinges on an overstated view of Giannis’s impact, ignoring the critical weaknesses in his game that limit his ability to dominate when it matters most. This blog post dismantles the article’s premise, arguing that Giannis’s flaws make the comparison to Kareem—a player with a far more complete skill set—unconvincing.

    Key points from the articles suggest:

    • Giannis’s current situation:
      • Giannis Antetokounmpo is reportedly considering being traded for the first time in his career.
      • His loyalty to Milwaukee has been tied to the team’s ability to contend for a title.
      • The recent first-round playoff exit and Damian Lillard’s injury (torn Achilles, leading to a long absence) have raised questions about the Bucks’ contention window and potentially accelerated Giannis’s decision-making process.
      • Giannis’s trade value is currently at its highest. He is 30 years old, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP, making him a highly desirable trade candidate for many teams.
      • He has not explicitly requested a trade yet, but teams are “quietly lining up” in case he does.
      • His contract runs through the 2026-27 season with a player option for 2027-28, and it does not include a no-trade clause.
    • Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s situation:
      • Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the previous best player for the Bucks before Giannis, demanded a trade in the 1970s, specifically to New York or Los Angeles for personal reasons.
      • The Bucks’ goal is to avoid a repeat of the Abdul-Jabbar situation where he dictates his preferred destination, which could limit their trade return.
    • The Bucks’ dilemma:
      • Milwaukee needs to avoid a similar outcome to the Abdul-Jabbar trade, which led to a long period without a championship.
      • The team has limited cap flexibility and tradable assets, making it challenging to rebuild a contender around Giannis.
      • They are reportedly desperate to keep Giannis and might be willing to sacrifice a lot of assets to build a contender on the fly.
      • The article emphasizes the importance of Giannis’s decision in the coming weeks for the Bucks’ offseason plans.
    • Potential trade scenarios and suitors:
      • Many teams are being discussed as potential landing spots if Giannis becomes available, including the Golden State Warriors, New York Knicks, Boston Celtics, and Detroit Pistons.
      • The Lakers are mentioned, but it’s noted they have limited assets, and a trade there would likely only happen if Giannis specifically demanded to go there.
      • Trade packages would likely involve a combination of young players and draft picks.

    In essence, the articles highlight the critical juncture the Milwaukee Bucks face with Giannis Antetokounmpo, drawing parallels to their past experience with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and the intense speculation surrounding Giannis’s future in the league.

    The Article’s Core Claim

    The Athletic’s piece posits that Giannis is the linchpin of the Bucks’ success, akin to Kareem in his era, and that trading him could doom the franchise to a prolonged rebuild. It points to Milwaukee’s 46-year title drought post-Kareem and implies a similar fate if Giannis is dealt. This narrative assumes Giannis’s current and future impact is on par with Kareem’s, a premise that doesn’t hold up when you scrutinize Giannis’s game.

    Giannis’s Strengths? Limited

    Let’s acknowledge Giannis’ postseason reveals the cracks in his game. Unlike Kareem, whose skyhook and all-around scoring made him nearly unguardable, Giannis’s skill set has exploitable flaws that teams have repeatedly targeted in high-stakes moments. These weaknesses undermine the article’s claim that his departure would be as catastrophic as Kareem’s.

    Weakness #1: Limited Outside Shooting

    Giannis’s lack of a reliable jump shot is his most glaring flaw. His career three-point shooting hovers around 28%, and in the 2024-25 season, he’s hitting just 27.3% from deep on 1.8 attempts per game. In the playoffs, teams like the Miami Heat (2020, 2023) and Boston Celtics (2022) have built “walls” in the paint, daring him to shoot. When he does, the results are inconsistent, allowing defenses to sag off and clog driving lanes. Kareem, by contrast, had a mid-range and post game that forced defenses to respect him at all levels. Giannis’s one-dimensional scoring profile makes him easier to game-plan against in crunch time.

    Weakness #2: Free-Throw Struggles

    Giannis’s free-throw shooting remains a liability, especially in close games. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting 65.2% from the line, a marginal improvement but still below average for a star. In the 2021 Finals, his 59.1% free-throw shooting nearly cost the Bucks key games, and opponents often exploit this with intentional fouls late in games. Compare this to Kareem, who shot 72% from the line during his Bucks tenure and didn’t face the same “hack-a-Giannis” strategy. This weakness hampers Giannis’s ability to close out tight playoff games, a critical factor the article overlooks.

    Weakness #3: Playmaking Under Pressure

    While Giannis is a capable passer, averaging around 6 assists per game, his decision-making falters under playoff pressure. His turnover rate spikes in the postseason—3.8 per game in his career compared to 3.2 in the regular season—often due to forced passes or charges into crowded defenses. Teams with elite defenders, like Toronto in 2019, have neutralized him by doubling him early and forcing him to make quick reads he’s not consistently equipped to handle. Kareem, with his high basketball IQ and versatile scoring, was a more reliable hub for his team’s offense, even under defensive scrutiny.

    Weakness #4: Defensive Inconsistency

    Giannis’s 2020 DPOY award highlights his defensive potential, but his impact on that end has waned. In the 2024-25 season, the Bucks’ defensive rating is worse with Giannis on the floor (112.3) compared to off (110.8), per NBA.com. His rim protection and versatility are still elite, but he often conserves energy on defense in the regular season, and in the playoffs, teams exploit his tendency to help off shooters, leaving open threes. Kareem, a three-time blocks leader with Milwaukee, was a consistent defensive anchor. Giannis’s defensive lapses, especially in critical moments, dilute his overall impact.

    Why the Kareem Comparison Fails

    Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was a complete player: a scoring machine with the skyhook, a reliable free-throw shooter, and a defensive stalwart who anchored the Bucks’ system. His departure in 1975 was devastating because his skill set was irreplaceable. Giannis, while a generational talent, has clear holes in his game that teams exploit in the playoffs. The Bucks’ 2021 title required a perfect storm—Khris Middleton’s clutch shooting, Jrue Holiday’s defense, and injuries to opponents like Brooklyn’s Kyrie Irving. Without those factors, Giannis’s weaknesses have often led to early exits, like the Bucks’ first-round losses in 2023 and 2024.

    The article’s claim that trading Giannis would mirror Kareem’s exit overstates his indispensability. Milwaukee’s recent trade of Khris Middleton for Kyle Kuzma shows they’re trying to retool around Giannis, not replace him as a singular saviour. A trade could bring assets to build a more balanced roster, addressing the team’s reliance on a star whose flaws are exposed in high-stakes moments.

    Click bait from the NYT

    The Athletic’s comparison of a potential Giannis trade to Kareem’s departure is so flawed it’s click bait. Giannis’s weaknesses—poor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, shaky play making under pressure, and defensive inconsistency—limit his ability to carry a team in the playoffs the way Kareem did. While he’s a phenomenal talent, he’s not the unassailable force the article suggests. Trading him wouldn’t necessarily doom the Bucks to decades of irrelevance; it could open the door to a smarter, more balanced roster. The Kareem parallel is more emotional than factual. Giannis is an antisocial player who will find it hard to fit in at any other team. Both due to his character flaws and – most importantly – due to his extremely low basketball IQ and limited skill set. He is playing a kind of basketball that has long been surpassed in the NBA and was extremely lucky to win that one championship.

    The Bucks aren’t winning another one with Giannis. The whole point of this article makes no sense.

  • Giannis to the Raptors? These rumours just get funnier and funnier!

    Giannis to the Raptors? These rumours just get funnier and funnier!

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is often the subject of trade rumors as teams dream of pairing his unique skill set with their roster. One such destination that occasionally pops up is the Toronto Raptors. However, the idea of Giannis joining the Raptors makes little sense for both the player and the team.

    The Raptors’ Current State: A Mismatch for Giannis

    The Toronto Raptors, as of the 2024-25 season, are in a rebuilding phase. After trading away key players like Pascal Siakam and OG Anunoby, the team is centered around young talents like Scottie Barnes, RJ Barrett, and Immanuel Quickley. While these players show promise, the Raptors are far from championship contention, sitting at 11th in the Eastern Conference with a 15-20 record in recent projections. Their focus is on developing young talent and accumulating assets, not chasing a superstar like Giannis, who is in his prime at 30 years old and seeking immediate championship opportunities.

    Giannis has repeatedly expressed his desire to compete for titles, as evidenced by his 2021 NBA Championship with the Bucks and his comments about wanting to stay in Milwaukee only if the team remains competitive. Joining a rebuilding team like Toronto would contradict his career goals. The Raptors lack the veteran star power and playoff-ready roster to complement Giannis’ win-now timeline, making the move a poor fit for his ambitions.

    Giannis’ Weaknesses and Their Impact in Toronto’s System

    Giannis’ game has notable weaknesses that would be amplified in Toronto’s current setup.

    1. Lack of Consistent Outside Shooting

    Giannis’ most glaring weakness is his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc. In the 2023-24 season, he shot just 27.4% from three-point range on 1.3 attempts per game, and his career average hovers around 28.6%. His free-throw shooting, while improved, remains unreliable at 65.7% last season. The Raptors’ offensive system under coach Darko Rajaković emphasizes spacing and ball movement, with players like Quickley (39.5% from three) and Gradey Dick (projected as a sharpshooter) creating open looks.

    Without a reliable jumper, Giannis often clogs the paint, forcing defenses to collapse on him. In Milwaukee, players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez provide the necessary spacing to keep defenses honest. Toronto, however, lacks consistent elite shooters outside of Quickley. Barnes and Barrett are slashing forwards who thrive driving to the basket, much like Giannis. This overlap would crowd the paint, reducing offensive efficiency and making it easier for opponents to game-plan against Toronto.

    2. Limited Playmaking and Ball-Handling

    Giannis is a dominant force in transition and as a roll man, but his playmaking in half-court sets is limited. He averaged 6.5 assists per game in 2023-24, but many of these come from simple kick-outs after drawing double-teams. His ball-handling can be shaky under pressure, with 3.4 turnovers per game last season, often due to forced passes or dribbling into traffic.

    The Raptors’ offense relies on quick decision-making and ball movement, with Barnes and Quickley often initiating plays. Giannis, however, thrives as the primary ball-handler in a system built around his drives. In Toronto, he’d either dominate the ball at the expense of Barnes’ development or struggle as an off-ball player due to his lack of shooting. This mismatch in playstyle would stunt the growth of Toronto’s young core and create clunky offensive sets.

    3. Defensive Fit in Toronto’s Scheme

    Defensively, Giannis is a former Defensive Player of the Year (2020) but has declined ever since. However, the Raptors’ defensive identity under Rajaković leans heavily on aggressive perimeter defense and versatility, with players like Barnes and Jakob Poeltl anchoring a switch-heavy scheme. While Giannis could fit this mould, his presence would overlap with Barnes, who is developing into a similar versatile defender.

    Additionally, Toronto’s lack of a true secondary star to handle offensive creation means Giannis would expend significant energy on both ends, potentially leading to fatigue or injury concerns, as seen in his 2024 playoff absence due to a calf strain. In Milwaukee, players like Damian Lillard and Middleton share the offensive load, allowing Giannis to conserve energy for defense. Toronto’s roster simply doesn’t offer that luxury.

    4. Rebounding Dependency and Team Fit

    Giannis is stat padding rebounder, averaging 11.6 rebounds per game in 2023-24, as his impact on the boards often comes from Milwaukee’s system, where he’s surrounded by shooters who pull defenders away from the paint. In Toronto, with Poeltl as the primary center and Barnes also crashing the boards, there’s a risk of diminishing returns. The Raptors already struggle with offensive rebounding (26th in the league at 10.1 per game), and adding Giannis might not solve this issue if defenses pack the paint due to Toronto’s lack of shooting.

    5. Giannis ain’t clutch

    No polite way to say it. Forget that one 50 point game. Look at the cold hard facts. Giannis is a liability in clutch. Not just in the playoffs where he has failed every year for more than a decade (with that one exception). Even in regular season higher intensity games, Giannis just ain’t got “it”. He panics, he makes mistakes, he can’t follow advanced plays. He doesn’t impact high intensity NBA basketball when it really matters. Amazing regular season stats is all he does. We all know it now.

    Financial and Trade Realities

    Even if we ignore fit, the logistics of acquiring Giannis are a nightmare for Toronto. His contract, a three-year, $175.3 million extension signed in 2023, carries a cap hit of roughly $58 million annually through 2027-28. The Raptors would need to gut their roster, likely sending out Barnes, Quickley, and multiple first-round picks, to match salaries and satisfy Milwaukee’s demands. This would defeat the purpose of their rebuild, as they’d lose the young talent they’re banking on for future success.

    Moreover, Milwaukee has no incentive to trade Giannis unless he demands out, which seems unlikely given his loyalty to the Bucks and their competitive roster. The Raptors, meanwhile, are focused on building around Barnes, who at 24 is their cornerstone for the next decade. Trading him for Giannis, who turns 31 in December 2025, would be a short-term gamble that sacrifices long-term potential.

    Why Giannis Can’t Win a Championship in Toronto

    Even if Giannis joined the Raptors, their current roster and timeline make a championship unlikely. Toronto’s lack of secondary star power means Giannis would face the same issues he did in Milwaukee’s early years: defenses walling off the paint and daring him to shoot. Without elite shooters or a proven playmaker to complement him, Giannis would be forced to carry an unsustainable offensive load, as seen in his 2023 playoff loss to Miami, where his inefficiencies were exposed.

    The Raptors’ rebuild also means they’re at least two to three years away from contending, even with Giannis. By then, he’ll be in his mid-30s, and his athleticism-dependent game may start to decline. Teams like the Boston Celtics, Philadelphia 76ers, and even a healthy Bucks squad would remain far ahead in the East, with deeper, more balanced rosters.

    So cut the crap

    Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Toronto Raptors sounds like a fantasy for fans, but it’s a logistical and strategic disaster. His lack of outside shooting, limited play making, and defensive overlap with Toronto’s young core make him a poor fit for their system. The Raptors’ rebuilding timeline clashes with Giannis’ win-now mentality, and the trade cost would cripple their future. Meanwhile, Giannis’ weaknesses would be magnified without the right supporting cast, making a championship in Toronto a pipe dream. For both sides, staying the course—Giannis in Milwaukee and the Raptors with their young core—is the smarter play.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100K Challenge Exposes Key Weaknesses

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100K Challenge Exposes Key Weaknesses

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is known for his athleticism and rim-rattling dunks. However, a recent $100,000 MrBeast shooting challenge pitted him against street ball sensation and YouTube star Tristan Jass, and the results were shocking. The challenge highlighted critical weaknesses in Giannis’ game that have long been debated by fans and analysts.

    The Challenge Setup

    The MrBeast challenge was a head-to-head shooting competition designed to test precision under pressure. The tasks included:

    • Free throws: A test of consistency from the charity stripe.
    • Three-pointers: A measure of long-range shooting ability.
    • Half-court shots: A high-risk, high-reward challenge requiring both skill and a bit of luck.

    Tristan Jass, a content creator with a massive following for his streetball highlights and deadly shooting, was a formidable opponent. While Giannis is a global basketball icon, Jass’s specialized skill set in shooting made this a tougher matchup than it might have seemed. The $100,000 prize added pressure, and as X user @____Shemar noted, “No way Mr. Beast possibly thought Giannis was making a FT, 3 pointer, and half court shot before Tjass … easiest $100k Tjass ever made 😂”.

    1. Free-Throw Shooting Woes

    The free-throw portion of the challenge was a predictable stumbling block for Giannis. His career free-throw percentage hovers around 65-70%, with a 2024-25 season average of approximately 68%. In high-pressure situations, his performance at the line often dips further, as seen in playoff games where opponents employ a “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy to exploit this weakness.

    In the MrBeast challenge, Giannis struggled to find a rhythm, missing several free throws in a row. His lengthy free-throw routine—often taking 10+ seconds—may have been disrupted by the fast-paced, high-stakes environment of the challenge. Fans remarked on the predictability of this outcome, with @Lester_O3 noting that someone won $100,000 by outshooting Giannis. Jass, known for his consistency in shooting drills, likely capitalised on this, hitting his free throws with ease.

    Giannis’ free-throw struggles stem from mechanical issues (a hitch in his release and inconsistent wrist snap) and mental pressure. In the challenge, the added spotlight of a MrBeast production, with cameras and a live audience, likely amplified his tendency to overthink at the line.

    Takeaway: Giannis needs to streamline his free-throw routine and practice under pressure to boost his consistency. Hitting 75-80% from the line would not only have helped in this challenge but could deter opponents from fouling him intentionally in NBA games. He is in fact worse than ever in his career in free throws this season!

    2. Inconsistent Three-Point Shooting

    The three-point shooting segment was another area where Giannis fell short. His NBA three-point percentage in the 2024-25 season is around 20-25% on low volume (1-2 attempts per game), a far cry from Jass’s sharpshooting prowess. Jass, who regularly showcases deep threes and trick shots on YouTube, thrives in these scenarios, while Giannis’ jump shot remains a work in progress.

    In the challenge, Giannis reportedly missed most of his three-point attempts, unable to match Jass’s precision. His shooting form—marked by a slow release and occasional inconsistency in footwork—makes long-range shooting a liability. NBA defenses often sag off Giannis, daring him to shoot from deep, as seen in playoff series like the 2023 loss to the Miami Heat, where his 1-for-10 three-point shooting in the series was a glaring weakness.

    The MrBeast challenge exposed this gap starkly. While Giannis relies on his athleticism to dominate inside, Jass’s specialized shooting skill set gave him a clear edge in a contest focused on perimeter accuracy.

    Takeaway: Giannis would benefit from dedicated three-point training to reach at least a league-average 35% from deep. This would force defenses to respect his range, opening up his drives to the basket and making him a more complete offensive threat. Three points this season he not only shot worse than ever in his career but almost worse than anyone, ever, in NBA history for a single season!

    3. Half-Court Shot Struggles

    The half-court shot portion of the challenge was the final nail in the coffin. Half-court shots are inherently low-percentage, relying on a mix of skill, luck, and confidence. Jass, with his reputation for hitting long-range bombs in his videos, likely approached this with a shooter’s mentality. Giannis, on the other hand, rarely attempts such shots in NBA games, and his mechanics from that distance are unrefined.

    Giannis’ attempts fell short or missed wide, while Jass connected to seal the victory.

    Takeaway: While half-court shots are a niche skill, improving his overall shooting mechanics could give Giannis a better chance in such scenarios. Practising long-range shots in low-stakes settings might also build confidence for rare game situations. But if anything Giannis is worse than ever in clutch situations which is why Doc Rivers now keeps him out of the game in the 4th quarter as much as possible. We saw against the Pacers how terrible he can be for his team under pressure.

    4. Pressure in Non-NBA Settings

    Beyond specific skills, the challenge highlighted Giannis’ discomfort in non-traditional basketball settings. NBA games allow him to leverage his physicality, defensive prowess, and transition dominance, but the MrBeast challenge was a pure shooting contest with no room for his usual strengths. The high-pressure environment, with a $100,000 prize and a YouTube audience, may have thrown Giannis off his game, as he’s accustomed to structured NBA settings rather than impromptu streetball-style competitions.

    Jass, a content creator who thrives in these viral, high-energy formats, was in his element. Giannis’ struggles suggest that his mental focus, while elite in NBA contexts, may not translate as well to unconventional challenges where his athletic advantages are neutralized.

    Takeaway: Giannis could benefit from participating in more casual, high-pressure shooting contests to build adaptability. This would also help him handle the mental demands of clutch shooting moments in playoff games. Most of all though the NBA is about the show. And Giannis simply doesn’t deliver which is why he doesn’t bring in TV ratings.

    What This Means for Giannis

    The MrBeast challenge underscores areas where he lags behind specialists like Jass and, by extension, NBA sharpshooters in the league. To elevate his game, Giannis could:

    • Work with a shooting coach to refine his free-throw and three-point mechanics, aiming for incremental improvements (e.g., 75% free throws, 35% threes).
    • Practice under pressure in non-NBA settings to build mental resilience for high-stakes shooting.
    • Study film of sharpshooters to adopt techniques that complement his physical gifts.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeast’s $100,000 shooting challenge was a revealing moment. It exposed his well-known struggles with free throws, three-point shooting, and long-range accuracy, amplified by the pressure of a viral, high-stakes competition. For fans, the challenge was a fun spectacle that pitted an NBA giant against a street ball sharpshooter. For Giannis, it’s a wake-up call to address weaknesses that could make the difference in future playoff runs. As he continues past his prime now at age 30, the Greek Freak has the work ethic and drive. But can he turn these flaws into strengths? After more than a decade in the league and with so many different coaches that have tried to help him, the answer is probably no.

  • A prophetic post from 2020: Giannis can’t impact games

    A prophetic post from 2020: Giannis can’t impact games

    Here’s what it wrote, back in 2020 on OpenCourt Facebook page about Giannis not really impacting games that matter and fans confusing regular season stat padding and highlights with real NBA ballin.

    “GIANNIS IS NOT A TRUE SUPERSTAR.

    I know it sounds harsh, but the fact of the matter is Giannis Antetokounmpo is not superstar in its TRUEST sense in the NBA. He’s not who people think he is, not yet anyway.

    If you are a person that religiously follows the league, it’s evident to see that there are significant holes in Giannis’ game that place him in a tier below the LeBrons, Kawhis and healthy Durants of this world.

    Throughout the season there were many people claiming Giannis was the best player in the world, but the truth is Giannis isn’t close to being that guy yet. For basketball purists, it should be worrying that such claims are thrown around without any real evidence of the fact.

    To this day, Giannis has NEVER shown he can carry a team WHEN IT MATTERS MOST. Let me repeat that, NEVER. When it’s time to put the team on your back and take them to the next level, his game is simply not evolved enough to do so.

    Now I know what you’re going to say “But Giannis is only 25, he has time” and despite that being true, Giannis has shown little to no improvement whatsoever in the past 4 season of averaging over 20ppg in areas of his game that he desperately needs to take him to the very top of the NBA’s elite.

    I know what else you’re going to say “But he needs a better supporting cast”, and despite that having SOME truth to it, how quickly the world forgets just how HISTORICALLY great this Bucks team was this season.

    The Bucks were the quickest team in NBA HISTORY to make the playoffs this season. They started the season 27-4 (read that again, 27-4). They were the highest ranked team in the ENTIRE LEAGUE on offense and defense. They had two all stars. They had the leading 3-point shooter in the league in George Hill. They had an All-NBA defender in Brook Lopez. They had one of the best coaches in the league. They were one of the deepest teams in the league. They had the best overall record in the league.

    Don’t believe me? Type in “Milwaukee Bucks best team ever” into Google and read. Debate shows, TV segments, podcasts and articles were all discussing whether or not this Bucks team was the greatest team of all time. Let that sink in.

    And when it mattered most, their leader’s inabilities on the floor failed them. What people don’t understand, is although Giannis’ teammates fail to perform when the stakes are high a lot of the time, the reason why is down to Giannis’ inability to provide for them, to lift them, to put them in a position to be successful. It’s on him.

    Another season, another underwhelming series that turns into a premature elimination for Giannis when a team has the personnel and game plan for him. The bizarre thing is the game plan is simple, clog the lane, build a wall and don’t let him get to the rim. And it really is THAT simple.

    People laughed and made fun of James Harden when he claimed it takes no real skill to do what Giannis does by just running and dunking, but when you really think about it, was he wrong?

    I would go one further and make the case Giannis is a MUCH GREATER defensive player than he is an offensive player despite having nice offensive numbers in the regular season. His jumpshot is abysmal, he has no mid range game, he’s an average facilitator, he has no post game for someone his size, he has no true playmaking ability for someone his size, if he’s not trying to bully people to the rim he’s in foul trouble for offensive fouls, nearly all his points come in transition, he’s a terrible free throw shooter, and worst of all, Giannis can’t even handle the ball and make plays down the stretch in the fourth quarter of playoff games. How are you supposed to be a superstar when you can’t even handle the ball when it matters most, when your team can’t put the ball in your hands and tell you to win the game for them.

    For the Bucks to go out the way they did is simply UNACCEPTABLE. They are the first number one seed in NBA History to go down 0-3 in a playoff series to a number 5 seed, EVER. The craziest part is their only win was when Giannis left the game early with an ankle injury and Kris Middleton had the best game of his life and the offense actually flowed. I’m not saying the Bucks are better without Giannis, but if a superstar and your best player goes down, more times than not you shouldn’t be winning a playoff game. This was their year. Interrupted season or not, the manner in which they lost was unacceptable.

    In that series, Jimmy Butler looked 10 times the player Giannis looked. In most people’s player rankings, Butler and Giannis wouldn’t even be close to one another, but when it mattered most, Butler took the challenge and took his team to another level.

    When Giannis was asked why he wasn’t guarding Butler he said “Because the coach didn’t ask me to” as the DPOY and the best defender on your team ARE YOU KIDDING ME? When the media asked Mike Budenholzer why Giannis wasn’t playing heavy minutes despite resting him during the season for these moments he said “34-35 minutes is his ceiling” ARE YOU KIDDING ME? The one time Giannis took the challenge to actually guard Butler he fouled him on the game winning shot that sent Butler to the free throw line to win Game 2.

    All signs points to Giannis taking home his second MVP trophy, but from what we’ve seen you can make the case Giannis could be the worst back-to-back MVP in league history.

    I do not care about Giannis throwing down a dunk on the entire New York Knicks on a Tuesday night in Milwaukee. Show me you are one of the very best in the world when it matters most. When your team needs you the most. When the lights are the brightest, and teams try to take away everything you’re great at. Show me then. The MVP award means absolutely nothing if you can’t show me then.

    He still has time, but as of right now Giannis is NOT a TRUE superstar in the NBA.

    And it’s about time we start holding him to that same standard.

    Damien Peters NBA Breakdown“

    Five years after it was written and most of it has been proven true. The only thing he got wrong is that Giannis is clearly a much much worse defender in the past 3-4 seasons. Giannis not only hasn’t managed to impact playoff games, he can’t even impact regular season games that matter! He has not added any skills but got worse at most things on the court other than…dunking.

  • Gianni U.S. vs. International NBA All-Star Game Is a Bad Idea

    Gianni U.S. vs. International NBA All-Star Game Is a Bad Idea

    The NBA All-Star Game has long been a showcase of the league’s best talent, a mid season celebration that brings fans together to watch their favourite players compete in a fun, high-flying exhibition. Traditionally, the game has pitted the Eastern Conference against the Western Conference, a format that reflects the league’s geographic structure and fosters regional pride. However, in recent years, there have been discussions about shaking up the format, with one proposed idea being a match up between U.S.-born players and international players. While this concept might sound intriguing on the surface, it’s a deeply flawed idea that could harm the NBA’s brand, alienate fans, and create unnecessary divisions in a league that thrives on unity and inclusivity. Giannis really should think before tweeting a bit more. You would think someone like him who has suffered due to racism would be a little more careful.

    1. It Undermines the NBA’s Global Unity

    The NBA is one of the most globally diverse sports leagues in the world. Players from countries like Serbia, Greece, Canada, France, and Nigeria share the court with American-born stars, creating a melting pot of talent that transcends borders. This diversity is a strength, not a point of division. By splitting the All-Star Game into U.S. versus international players, the NBA would be artificially creating a “us vs. them” narrative that feels forced and counterproductive.

    Basketball is a universal language, and the All-Star Game is a chance to celebrate that unity. Highlighting nationality as the defining factor risks sending a message that international players are somehow separate from their American counterparts, which could alienate fans in global markets. The NBA has worked hard to expand its reach—evidenced by games played in Europe, Asia, and Africa, and the success of the Basketball Without Borders program. A U.S. vs. International format could undermine these efforts by framing international players as outsiders rather than integral parts of the league’s fabric. Then again, Giannis has always been a massive hypocrite concerning what country he stands for. Effectively he is American. But he pretends to be Nigerian or Greek as per the media needs of the day.

    2. It Risks Alienating Fans

    The All-Star Game is a fan-driven event, with voting heavily influenced by fan engagement. Splitting the game into U.S. vs. International rosters could alienate significant portions of the fan base. For example, American fans might feel less connected to the international team, while international fans might feel their players are being pitted against the “home” team in a way that feels unfair or exclusionary. This format could also discourage fans from voting for players based on merit, as national pride might overshadow talent in the selection process.

    Consider a player like Giannis Antetokounmpo, a Greek-Nigerian superstar who plays for the Milwaukee Bucks. Would fans in Milwaukee rally behind him as an “international” player, or would they feel conflicted because he’s not on the “U.S.” team? The same goes for players like Luka Dončić or Nikola Jokić, who have massive followings in the U.S. despite being international stars. Forcing fans to choose sides based on nationality risks diluting the emotional connection they have to their favourite players.

    3. It Creates an Uneven Competitive Balance

    While the NBA’s international talent pool is stronger than ever, the number of All-Star-calibre international players is still significantly smaller than the number of American-born All-Stars. In the 2024 All-Star Game, for example, only about 25% of the selected players were born outside the U.S. This disparity would likely result in a lopsided match up, with the U.S. team having a deeper pool of talent to draw from.

    Let’s look at a hypothetical 2025 All-Star roster. The international team might feature stars like:

    • Nikola Jokić (Serbia)
    • Giannis Antetokounmpo (Greece)
    • Luka Dončić (Slovenia)
    • Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Canada)
    • Joel Embiid (Cameroon)

    That’s an impressive group, but the U.S. team could counter with:

    • LeBron James
    • Kevin Durant
    • Jayson Tatum
    • Anthony Edwards
    • Devin Booker
    • And many more

    The depth of American talent would likely overwhelm the international side, leading to blowouts that could make the game less entertaining. The East vs. West format, while not always perfectly balanced, at least draws from a larger and more evenly distributed pool of players, ensuring a competitive game.

    4. It Could Fuel Unnecessary Nationalism

    Sports have a unique ability to bring people together, but they can also stoke nationalism when formats emphasise country of origin. An All-Star Game pitting U.S. players against international players risks turning a lighthearted exhibition into a platform for jingoism. In today’s polarised world, where nationalism and xenophobia are already sensitive issues, the NBA doesn’t need to create a format that could amplify these tensions.

    Imagine the social media discourse around a U.S. vs. International All-Star Game. Fans and commentators might frame the game as a proxy for geopolitical rivalries or cultural superiority, which is the last thing the NBA needs. The league has thrived by staying above such controversies, focusing on the game itself rather than external divisions. The current East vs. West format, or even the recent captain’s draft format, avoids these pitfalls by keeping the focus on basketball.

    5. It Diminishes the All-Star Game’s Fun Factor

    The All-Star Game is supposed to be fun—a break from the grind of the regular season where players can show off their skills, throw alley-oops, and engage in friendly banter. A U.S. vs. International format risks making the game feel more serious and divisive than it needs to be. Players who are teammates during the regular season, like Jokić and Jamal Murray or Dončić and Kyrie Irving, would be forced to compete against each other based on nationality, which could disrupt the camaraderie that makes the All-Star Game special.

    Moreover, the format could lead to awkward situations where players feel pressured to “represent” their country rather than just enjoy the game. The All-Star Game thrives on its lack of stakes—players aren’t out to prove anything beyond who can pull off the flashiest dunk or the most ridiculous three-pointer. Adding a nationalistic element risks making the game feel like a high-stakes international competition, which is better suited for events like the Olympics or FIBA World Cup.

    6. It Ignores the Success of Recent Format Changes

    The NBA has already experimented with the All-Star Game format in recent years, moving away from the traditional East vs. West match up to a captain’s draft system in 2018. This change, where two All-Star captains pick their teams playground-style, has been largely successful. It creates fun, unpredictable rosters and allows for unique player combinations that fans wouldn’t otherwise see. For example, seeing LeBron James team up with Giannis Antetokounmpo or Steph Curry play alongside Luka Dončić creates exciting moments that a U.S. vs. International format wouldn’t allow.

    The captain’s draft format also keeps the focus on individual star power rather than collective identities like nationality. It’s a format that’s inclusive, engaging, and true to the spirit of the All-Star Game. Reverting to a format that emphasizes division over unity would be a step backward.

    7. It Could Harm the NBA’s International Growth

    The NBA’s international growth has been one of its biggest success stories. In 2024, the league had over 120 international players from 40 countries, and viewership in markets like China, Europe, and Africa continues to soar. A U.S. vs. International All-Star Game risks alienating these growing fan bases by framing international players as a separate entity. Fans in Serbia, for example, might feel less invested in the game if their hero, Nikola Jokić, is pitted against a dominant U.S. team in a way that feels like an underdog narrative.

    Instead of highlighting the contributions of international players as part of the NBA’s broader ecosystem, this format could make them feel like a sideshow. The NBA has worked hard to make stars like Yao Ming, Dirk Nowitzki, and now Jokić and Dončić household names in the U.S. and beyond. A format that emphasizes their “otherness” could undo some of that progress.

    Giannis should be ashamed of himself for proposing this

    The NBA All-Star Game is a celebration of basketball’s best, a chance for fans to see their favourite players compete in a fun, low-stakes environment. Switching to a U.S. vs. International format would undermine the league’s commitment to unity, alienate fans, create competitive imbalances, and risk fuelling unnecessary nationalism. The current East vs. West format—or the more recent captain’s draft system—already strikes a balance between competition and entertainment without introducing divisive elements. The NBA should continue to embrace its global identity by celebrating all players as part of one league, not by pitting them against each other based on where they were born.

  • Giannis isn’t “loyal”, he is scared

    Giannis isn’t “loyal”, he is scared

    Whispers persist about whether Giannis would ever leave the Bucks for a new challenge. While some argue he’d thrive elsewhere, there’s a compelling case that Giannis might be hesitant to depart Milwaukee—not due to a lack of ambition, but because staying put shields him from intense scrutiny, hides his weaknesses, and provides a comfortable narrative for his playoff shortcomings. Sure, he will try and sell it as “loyalty” but think about it. He hasn’t got a chance in a million to win another ring with the Bucks. They have spend so long pampering his every whim, changing coaches and players as per his demands that they have absolutely nothing left to trade. If he really wants a ring he should go. But he won’t.

    The Comfort of Milwaukee’s System

    The Bucks have built their entire system around Giannis’s unique skill set. Coach Mike Budenholzer (and now Doc Rivers) designed offences that maximise his ability to attack the rim, leveraging his length, speed, and power. Milwaukee surrounded him with shooters like Khris Middleton, Brook Lopez, and Damian Lillard to space the floor, allowing Giannis to operate in the paint or as a playmaker in transition. This tailored environment masks some of his limitations, particularly his inconsistent outside shooting and free-throw struggles. The Bucks again were top of the NBA in 3pt% as a team despite Giannis shooting worse than ever in his career and close to the worse of any NBA player ever in a single season.

    On a new team, Giannis will not have the same luxury. A franchise like the Miami Heat or Los Angeles Lakers, for example, might demand more versatility in half-court offence or a greater reliance on perimeter skills. If Giannis joined a team with a less complementary roster, his 30.8% career three-point shooting (as of the 2024-25 season) and 68.5% free-throw percentage could become glaring liabilities. In Milwaukee, these weaknesses are mitigated by a system that doesn’t require him to be a sharpshooter. Elsewhere, they’d be magnified, potentially exposing him as a one-dimensional star in critical moments.

    The Excuse of the Supporting Cast

    In Milwaukee, Giannis has a built-in narrative for playoff disappointments: the roster around him isn’t good enough. This is a complete lie as I broke down in this blog post. When the Bucks fell to the Miami Heat in the 2020 playoffs or struggled against the Boston Celtics in 2022, analysts and fans often pointed to Khris Middleton’s injuries, Jrue Holiday’s inconsistency, or a lack of depth. This narrative allows Giannis to deflect criticism, maintaining his status as a transcendent talent held back by circumstances.

    If Giannis moved to a superteam the excuses would vanish. A new team with high-calibre talent would place the spotlight squarely on Giannis’s performance. If he failed to deliver in the playoffs, the blame would shift from the roster to his own limitations, such as his struggles in clutch situations or his predictable offensive approach against elite defences. The pressure to perform without the safety net of “it’s the team’s fault” could be daunting, especially for a player who thrives on being the underdog. Giannis already looks like a fool for talking about not joining a superteam only to get Dame next to him.

    Playoff Pressure and the Fear of Failure

    Giannis’s playoff resume is a mixed bag. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but it was mainly luck and not really due to Giannis when you break it down. Other years have been less kind: the Bucks’ early exits in 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024 exposed vulnerabilities in Giannis’s game, particularly against teams that build a “wall” to clog the paint. Opponents like the Raptors (2019) and Heat (2020) exploited his lack of a reliable jump shot, daring him to shoot while shutting down his drives.

    On a new team, Giannis would face even greater playoff scrutiny. In Milwaukee, he’s the hometown hero, forgiven for setbacks because of his loyalty and the Bucks’ small-market status. In a bigger market or on a contending roster, every playoff game would be a referendum on his greatness. A failure to advance deep into the postseason could cement a narrative that Giannis can’t lead a team to a title without the perfect supporting cast, tarnishing his legacy. The risk of such failure might make him wary of leaving the familiarity of Milwaukee, where expectations, while high, are tempered by the city’s underdog mentality.

    The Burden of Improvement

    Giannis’ shooting remains a work in progress and he is running out of excuses. In Milwaukee, his reluctance to develop a consistent mid-range or three-point shot is often excused as a byproduct of his dominance in other areas. Fans and analysts argue, “Why change what works?” But on a new team, especially one with a different offensive philosophy, Giannis would face unrelenting pressure to evolve.

    For example, joining a team like the Golden State Warriors, where spacing and shooting are paramount, would force Giannis to confront his weaknesses head-on. Without the Bucks’ system to lean on, he’d need to become a more complete offensive player, a challenge he’s been slow to embrace. The fear of being exposed as stagnant—or worse, incapable of adapting—could deter him from taking the leap to a new environment where his growth would be non-negotiable. People talk about him going to the Warriors but his inability to set up screens is only one of many weaknesses which make that completely ridiculous.

    The Loyalty Factor and Public Perception

    Giannis’s loyalty to Milwaukee is a cornerstone of his public image. He signed a supermax extension in 2020, cementing his status as a rare superstar who stayed with a small-market team. This decision endeared him to fans and shielded him from the criticism often levelled at players who chase rings elsewhere, like LeBron James or Kevin Durant. Leaving Milwaukee could fracture this narrative, painting him as just another star chasing glory rather than building a legacy.

    Moreover, a move to a bigger market or a super team could invite comparisons to other superstars, where Giannis’s weaknesses might stand out more starkly. In Milwaukee, he’s the undisputed alpha, free from the shadow of a co-star who might outshine him. On a team with another MVP-calibre player, he’d risk being seen as the “second option,” a label that could bruise his ego and alter how his career is perceived. Superstars avoid Giannis for various reasons I list here.

    The Psychological Weight of Change

    Beyond basketball, leaving Milwaukee would mean uprooting a life Giannis has built over a decade. He’s spoken openly about his love for the city, his teammates, and the organisation that believed in him as a scrawny teenager from Greece. The emotional and psychological toll of adapting to a new city, fan base, and team culture could weigh heavily, especially for a player who values stability. The fear of failing to mesh with a new team—both on and off the court—might make staying in Milwaukee the safer choice.

    Other Risks of Leaving

    1. Media Scrutiny in a Bigger Market: Milwaukee’s relatively small media market offers Giannis a buffer from the intense scrutiny of cities like New York or Los Angeles. A move to a high-profile team would invite relentless analysis of his every move, from his shot selection to his body language.
    2. Fan Backlash: Bucks fans have embraced Giannis as one of their own. Leaving could alienate a loyal fanbase, creating pressure to justify his decision with immediate success. The emotional toll of being booed in Milwaukee during return games could be a deterrent.
    3. Team Chemistry Risks: Giannis’s game relies on trust and chemistry with teammates who understand his style. A new team might struggle to integrate his ball-dominant, paint-focused approach, leading to friction or underperformance.
    4. Legacy Concerns: Giannis has a chance to be Milwaukee’s greatest player ever, a legend who brought a title to a city starved for success. Leaving risks diluting that legacy, especially if he fails to match or exceed his Bucks achievements elsewhere. We know he likes stat padding, well now he can smash every franchise record and pretend he is doing it to be loyal.

    Giannis is too chicken to move

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s fear of leaving the Milwaukee Bucks is about the risks of stepping out of a perfectly crafted comfort zone. In Milwaukee, his weaknesses are mitigated, his playoff failures are cushioned by roster excuses, and his loyalty shields him from harsh criticism. A move to a new team would strip away these protections, exposing him to scrutiny, demanding growth in areas he’s yet to master, and risking his carefully built legacy. It looks as if Giannis doesn’t have the skill set to succeed anywhere and he knows it. The fear of failure, magnified by a new environment, will probably keep him rooted in Milwaukee for years to come. As he showed this season, he is quite happy stat padding and making the rest of his team look bad.

  • Why the Milwaukee Bucks Lost to the Indiana Pacers in the 2025 NBA Playoffs

    Why the Milwaukee Bucks Lost to the Indiana Pacers in the 2025 NBA Playoffs

    The Milwaukee Bucks entered the 2025 NBA Playoffs as the No. 5 seed in the Eastern Conference, riding an eight-game winning streak and bolstered by the return of key players like Damian Lillard and Bobby Portis. Facing the No. 4 seed Indiana Pacers, who held home-court advantage for the first time since 2014, the Bucks were expected to leverage their star power and playoff experience to advance. However, the Pacers dispatched Milwaukee in a decisive 4-1 series, culminating in a thrilling 119-118 overtime victory in Game 5, driven by Tyrese Haliburton’s clutch heroics. Giannis’ fat statements about “NOW I know what I need to do” before the games proved to be just that: empty talk.

    1. Defensive Struggles Against Indiana’s High-Octane Offense

    The Pacers’ fast-paced, ball-movement-heavy offense overwhelmed Milwaukee’s defense throughout the series. Indiana, known for their relentless pace, averaged 17.5 fast-break points per game during the regular season, which jumped to 24.3 against the Bucks in their four regular-season matchups. This trend continued in the playoffs, where the Pacers exploited transition opportunities and defensive lapses to devastating effect.

    Milwaukee’s defense, ranked in the bottom half of the league in points allowed per 100 possessions during the regular season, was ill-equipped to handle Indiana’s speed. In Game 2, for instance, the Bucks allowed 123 points, with critical breakdowns like Tyrese Haliburton blowing past Kyle Kuzma in transition and Pascal Siakam capitalizing on a 3-on-2 break. These plays highlighted Milwaukee’s inability to get back quickly enough to set their defense, a problem exacerbated by veterans like Brook Lopez and Damian Lillard, who appeared a step slow.

    The Bucks’ defensive rating in the first two games was a dismal 121.8, reflecting their struggles to contain Indiana’s multi-faceted attack. The Pacers’ ability to create “power-play opportunities” (13.4% of their offensive possessions, second only to Denver) allowed players like Andrew Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith to exploit mismatches in transition. Milwaukee’s switch-heavy defensive strategy showed promise in Game 2’s fourth quarter, holding Indiana to 24 points, but inconsistent execution led to breakdowns, such as Siakam’s game-sealing 3-pointer in Game 2.

    Giannis is clearly not the DPOY he once was. He is focusing on offence and is much slower and less energetic in defence. He roams looking for the highlight block thus confusing his team’s defensive plan. And of course they all have to clear out so he can rack up defensive rebounds for his stats – that’s an order. Contrast that to the selfless team play of Indiana and you see the problem. That stuff may work in regular season easier games but not in NBA playoffs. Giannis should know better and curtail his ego.

    2. Inability to Contain Tyrese Haliburton’s Clutch Play

    Tyrese Haliburton emerged as the series’ defining figure, particularly in Game 5, where his game-winning layup in overtime sealed the Bucks’ fate. Haliburton’s ability to deliver in high-pressure moments was a recurring nightmare for Milwaukee. In Game 3, he recorded 17 points, 8 rebounds, and 15 assists, leading Indiana to a 129-103 rout. His Game 5 performance, including a layup-and-one to cut a four-point deficit and a subsequent game-winner, underscored his knack for taking over games.

    Milwaukee’s defensive schemes struggled to contain Haliburton, especially in pick-and-roll situations. The Pacers doubled ball screens involving Lillard, forcing him to make decisions under pressure, and Haliburton’s speed and playmaking exposed slower defenders like Lopez. In Game 2, Haliburton sprinted past Kuzma and drew Giannis away from his assignment, leading to open shots for teammates like Nesmith. The Bucks faced a tactical dilemma: leave Haliburton to score in the paint or risk open 3-pointers elsewhere, a question they failed to answer consistently. Giannis is just too slow to even understand what is going on, let alone adjust. Lateral speed has always been Giannis weak spot and it’s getting worse. In fact Giannis is worse this season at most statistical categories.

    3. Offensive Inefficiencies and Poor 3-Point Shooting

    Because of Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance the Bucks’ offence lacked rhythm and consistency. Milwaukee, the league’s best 3-point shooting team during the regular season at 38.7%, shot a dismal 24.3% (9 of 37) in Game 1. Coach Doc Rivers noted that many of these attempts came off late passes, disrupting the team’s offensive flow. Giannis always looks to get his easy bucket for his stats first. It’s predictable and all too often it leads to a (usually mediocre or even bad) pass with not much time left on the clock. Then everyone blames the receiver and not Giannis! The Bucks were the No1 team in the regular season for 3pt percentage.

    The return of Damian Lillard, who missed Game 1 due to a blood clot but played 37 minutes in Game 2, didn’t provide the expected spark. Lillard, still recovering, shot 4-of-13 for 14 points in Game 2 and struggled defensively, likely due to his month-long absence and a calf injury. The Bucks’ reliance on Giannis to carry the offence was evident, but his lack of play making in Game 1 (one assist) highlighted the team’s struggle to generate open looks for shooters like Gary Trent Jr. and AJ Green. Giannis simply lacks the range of potential movements and the basketball IQ to understand how to change the team plays. Never in any universe should he be bringing down the ball.

    4. Failure to Capitalize on Home Games

    After falling into a 2-0 hole in Indianapolis, the Bucks had a chance to shift momentum at home in Games 3 and 4. They managed a 117-101 victory in Game 3, powered by Giannis (34 points) and Gary Trent Jr.’s hot shooting from deep. Here I had predicted the Pacers would let them win it way before the game and I was correct. The Pacers simply wanted to finish off the series in Indiana and make some extra money along the way. They responded with a commanding 129-103 win in Game 4, exposing Milwaukee’s inability to sustain defensive intensity. Indiana’s road performance was formidable, with an 18-9 record and the fourth-best road net rating after a slow start to the season. This resilience made it difficult for the Bucks to capitalise on home-court energy.

    The Bucks’ Game 4 loss was particularly damaging, as Indiana’s balanced attack—led by six players in double figures—overpowered Milwaukee’s defense. The Pacers’ ability to maintain their high-octane offense away from home, averaging 117.8 points per 100 possessions on the road, meant the Bucks couldn’t rely on home advantage to slow Indiana down.

    5. Historical Context and Rivalry Dynamics

    The Pacers have historically had Milwaukee’s number in playoff match ups, never losing a series to the Bucks. In 2024, Indiana defeated a Giannis-less Bucks team 4-2, and this year’s 4-1 result continued that trend. The rivalry’s intensity, marked by incidents like the 2023 game-ball dispute and Haliburton’s “Dame Time” mimicry, added a psychological edge for Indiana. Haliburton himself acknowledged the animosity, stating, “We don’t like them, they don’t like us,” which seemed to fuel the Pacers’ focus.

    The Bucks’ inability to channel this rivalry into consistent performance, especially after blowing a seven-point lead in the final minute of Game 5’s overtime, underscored their mental and tactical lapses, with Giannis bearing most of the blame but insisting on trying to guard Tyrese. He clearly couldn’t and it cost the game. Getting blown past once happens. Twice you are starting to look stupid. Three times in clutch and Giannis should have come out after the game and asked his team for forgiveness.

    This was mainly Giannis’ fault

    While Giannis delivered scoring outbursts—36 points in Game 1, 34 in Game 2, and 34 in Game 3—his shortcomings in play making, defensive discipline, and clutch situations were pivotal in the Bucks’ inability to compete effectively.

    1. Limited Playmaking and Over-Reliance on Scoring

    Giannis’s dominance as a scorer was evident, averaging 34.0 points per game on 56.2% field goal shooting, but his play making fell short of what the Bucks needed against Indiana’s high-octane offence. In Game 1, Giannis recorded just one assist, a stark contrast to Haliburton’s 15 assists in Game 3. His tendency to drive into crowded lanes and force shots, rather than facilitating for open teammates, disrupted Milwaukee’s offensive flow. The Bucks shot a dismal 24.3% from three in Game 1 (9 of 37), with many attempts coming off late passes or broken plays, a problem exacerbated by Giannis’s limited vision as a passer.

    So this is interesting. Before these playoffs, the Pacers had many more assists per game than the Bucks. Yeah, we all know they pass a lot. So why then did they have LESS assists in every game of the playoff series against the Bucks?

    This has Giannis written all over it. He simply can’t adjust and reverts to his selfish ways, running to dunk and then passing when he gets stuck. It is amazing his team mates get any in at all as they are usually stone cold and haven’t touched the ball for ages! The Pacers were all probing the paint quickly but then passing out immediately if they saw issues with the total team effort. There is no “i” in team but plenty of “I” in Giannis!

    Indiana’s defensive strategy focused on clogging the paint, daring Giannis to kick out to shooters like Gary Trent Jr. or AJ Green. However, Giannis averaged only 3.8 assists per game in the series, compared to his regular-season average of 6.5. In Game 4, a 129-103 blowout loss, Giannis’s four turnovers, including two errant passes in the third quarter, led to fast-break points for the Pacers. His inability to consistently create for others allowed Indiana to collapse on him, stifling Milwaukee’s offence and leaving shooters like Damian Lillard, who was still recovering from injury, unable to find rhythm.

    2. Defensive Lapses in Transition and Pick-and-Roll Coverage

    The Pacers’ fast-paced attack, averaging 24.3 fast-break points per game in the series, exposed Giannis’s struggles in transition defence. His positioning and decision-making faltered against Indiana’s speed. In Game 2, Tyrese Haliburton blew past Kyle Kuzma in transition, drawing Giannis away from his assignment and leaving Aaron Nesmith open for a corner three. Similar breakdowns occurred in Game 5, where Giannis’s hesitation to pick up Haliburton in a 3-on-2 break led to a backbreaking layup. It seems like Giannis is more concerned with the optics and himself looking good than actually helping his team win.

    In pick-and-roll situations, Giannis struggled to balance defending the ball-handler and protecting the rim. The Pacers’ use of double ball screens targeting Damian Lillard forced Giannis to hedge or switch, but he was often a step slow, allowing Haliburton to penetrate or find open teammates. Milwaukee’s defensive rating in the series was a poor 121.8 in the first two games, with Giannis’s inability to anchor the defence against Indiana’s “power-play opportunities” (13.4% of possessions) proving costly.

    3. Clutch-Time Struggles and Poor Decision-Making

    The Bucks’ collapse in Game 5’s overtime, blowing a seven-point lead in the final minute, highlighted Giannis’s struggles in clutch moments. With the game on the line, Giannis failed to take control, deferring to teammates or making questionable decisions. In the final possession of overtime, he drove into a crowded paint, ignoring an open Gary Trent Jr. on the wing, resulting in a blocked shot by Myles Turner. Haliburton capitalized on the other end with a game-winning layup-and-one, underscoring Giannis’s inability to deliver when it mattered most.

    Giannis’s clutch-time stats were lacklustre: in the series’ five games, he shot 2-for-5 in clutch situations (last five minutes, score within five points) and committed two turnovers. His free-throw shooting, a long-standing weakness, also hurt the Bucks, as he went 10-for-16 (62.5%) in Game 5, missing key attempts that could have sealed the game in regulation. These misses shifted momentum to Indiana, who thrived on Milwaukee’s mistakes. This is nothing new. But Bucks’ fans have never admitted that in the championship run Khris bailed him out every time. Giannis simply can’t operate in clutch situations.

    4. Failure to Lead and Elevate Teammates

    As the Bucks’ leader, Giannis was expected to rally a roster dealing with injuries (Lillard’s calf issue and limited minutes in Game 2) and fatigue from heavy reliance on a seven-man rotation. However, his leadership on the court lacked the intangibles needed to counter Indiana’s intensity. The Pacers’ psychological edge, fueled by the ongoing rivalry and Haliburton’s taunting (mimicking “Dame Time” in Game 3), seemed to unsettle the Bucks. Giannis, despite acknowledging the rivalry’s intensity post-game, failed to channel it into cohesive team play. This has been his fault for many years now. From the game ball debacle in the regular season, Giannis has indeed acted like a child (to quote J.Brown!) and made the Pacers aware how easy it is to get him rattled.

    In Game 3, the Bucks’ lone win (117-101), Giannis’s 34 points were complemented by Gary Trent Jr.’s hot shooting, but this was an outlier, as the Pacers probably didn’t really fight to win that game anyway. In losses, Giannis’s dominance didn’t translate to elevating players like Bobby Portis or Kevin Porter Jr., who struggled to find open looks. His tunnel vision in key moments, such as forcing drives against double-teams in Game 4, limited opportunities for role players to contribute, unlike Haliburton, who consistently set up teammates like Pascal Siakam and Andrew Nembhard. The higher the stakes, the worse Giannis plays. He tends to revert to his same, extremely predictable, go to moves and it simply doesn’t work.

    5. Inability to Counter Indiana’s Strategic Adjustments

    The Pacers made effective adjustments throughout the series, particularly in neutralising Giannis’s paint dominance. In Game 2, Indiana doubled Giannis on post touches, forcing him to pass out of tight spaces, which led to three turnovers in the third quarter alone. Coach Rick Carlisle’s strategy of using Myles Turner’s rim protection and Pascal Siakam’s versatility limited Giannis’s efficiency in the half-court, forcing him to rely on contested mid-range shots, where he went 3-for-10 in the series.

    Giannis failed to adapt to these adjustments, and again it’s on Giannis who was sticking to his drive-heavy approach rather than exploiting Indiana’s smaller defenders, like Nembhard, with post-ups or quick passes. His lack of a reliable outside shot—0-for-3 from three in the series—allowed the Pacers to sag off him, clogging driving lanes and disrupting Milwaukee’s spacing. This predictability made it easier for Indiana to dictate the game’s tempo, especially in their 129-103 Game 4 rout.

    The Milwaukee Bucks’ loss to the Indiana Pacers in the 2025 NBA Playoffs was a result of multiple compounding factors. Defensively, they couldn’t contain Indiana’s fast-break attack or Tyrese Haliburton’s clutch play making. For Milwaukee, this early exit raises questions about their defensive identity, roster construction, and ability to compete in a faster, more dynamic Eastern Conference. As the Bucks head into the off season, addressing these weaknesses will be critical to reclaiming their status as championship contenders. But take a minute before boasting how “every team wants to trade for Giannis” to think about it. Is he really any good at all at NBA playoff basketball or is he a liability?

    If you want more detailed breakdowns:

    Before the playoffs I analysed why Giannis struggles against the Pacers always.

    Post game 1 analysis here

    Giannis game 2 melt down here

    How I knew the Pacers would throw game 3 here

    The myth of Giannis’ mid range debunked after the playoffs again here

    Game 5 Giannis masterclass of how to do everything wrong here

  • Thanasis Antetokounmpo: A Case Study in NBA Nepotism or Misunderstood Role Player?

    Thanasis Antetokounmpo: A Case Study in NBA Nepotism or Misunderstood Role Player?

    The NBA is no stranger to debates about talent, roster decisions, and the influence of star players on team dynamics. One name that has consistently sparked controversy in recent years is Thanasis Antetokounmpo, the older brother of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. Critics, fans, and analysts alike have pointed to Thanasis as a prime example of nepotism in the NBA, arguing that his roster spot with the Bucks is a direct result of his brother’s influence rather than his own basketball merits.

    Thanasis Antetokounmpo’s NBA Career: clearly not good enough

    Thanasis Antetokounmpo, born on July 18, 1992, in Athens, Greece, entered the NBA with high expectations as the older brother of a generational talent. Drafted 51st overall by the New York Knicks in 2014, Thanasis spent his early career bouncing between the NBA and the G League, with brief stints in Europe. Since joining the Milwaukee Bucks in 2019, he has remained on the roster, playing alongside his brother Giannis and contributing to the team’s 2021 NBA Championship. However, his on-court production has drawn significant scrutiny as nobody on the planet would claim that he can play at NBA levels of basketball.

    By the Numbers: A Lackluster On-Court Impact

    To understand Thanasis’s performance, let’s look at his career statistics with the Bucks (as of the 2024-25 season, based on available data):

    • Minutes Played: Thanasis averages just 4.6 minutes per game across 181 games with the Bucks (through the 2023-24 season). His limited playing time reflects a bench role, often reserved for garbage time or low-stakes situations.
    • Scoring: His career scoring average with the Bucks is a meager 2.4 points per game, with a field goal percentage of 52.3% and a three-point percentage of 14.3% (on very low attempts, 0.3 per game). His scoring output is negligible, and his inability to stretch the floor with outside shooting limits his offensive utility.
    • Rebounds and Assists: Thanasis averages 1.6 rebounds and 0.5 assists per game, indicating minimal impact in playmaking or board-crashing.
    • Advanced Metrics: His Player Efficiency Rating (PER) hovers around 8.0, well below the league average of 15.0. His Win Shares per 48 minutes (WS/48) is 0.048, suggesting he contributes little to team wins when on the court. His Box Plus-Minus (BPM) is consistently negative, often around -4.0, indicating that the Bucks perform worse with him on the floor.

    These numbers paint a clear picture: Thanasis is, at best, a fringe NBA player whose statistical contributions are among the lowest on the Bucks roster and possibly the entire league. Videos and highlight reels circulating online often highlight his athletic dunks or hustle plays, but these moments are rare and overshadowed by inefficiencies. For instance, a YouTube video titled “How BAD is Thanasis Antetokounmpo Actually?” notes that his limited skill set—primarily athleticism and energy—doesn’t translate to consistent NBA-level production, with many calling him “the worst player in the NBA”.

    Defensive and Intangible Contributions

    Proponents of Thanasis argue that his value lies in his defensive effort and locker-room presence. Standing at 6’6” with a 7’0” wingspan, he has the physical tools to be a disruptive defender. He averages 0.4 steals and 0.2 blocks per game, numbers that reflect his hustle but are hardly game-changing. His defensive rating (points allowed per 100 possessions) is around 110, which is average at best and often inflated by playing in low-leverage minutes.

    Thanasis is frequently described as a high-energy player who brings enthusiasm to practices and supports his teammates. However, these intangibles are difficult to quantify, and critics argue that they don’t justify a roster spot on a contending team like the Bucks, where every slot is critical for maximising championship odds.

    The Nepotism Debate: Is Thanasis on the Bucks Because of Giannis?

    The heart of the controversy surrounding Thanasis Antetokounmpo is the accusation of nepotism. Critics, including NBA legend Charles Barkley and analyst Shannon Sharpe, have openly questioned why Thanasis remains on the Bucks roster, pointing to his brother Giannis’s influence as a two-time MVP and franchise cornerstone. Let’s examine the arguments for and against the nepotism claims.

    Evidence of Nepotism

    1. Limited NBA-Caliber Production: As outlined above, Thanasis’s statistical output is among the lowest in the league. A 2023 article from Pulse Sports reported an NBA executive branding Thanasis as a product of nepotism, stating, “The rumor circulating social media is that Thanasis is only in the NBA because of his brother”. Fans on X echo this sentiment, with one user (@Not_Guccio) quipping in 2022 that Thanasis has “the best job in the NBA” because he secures a roster spot and millions in salary due to Giannis’s presence, despite rarely playing serious minutes.
    2. Bucks’ Roster Decisions: The Bucks have retained Thanasis since 2019, even waiving and re-signing his younger brother Alex Antetokounmpo within 24 hours in 2023, prompting fans to mock the team for “hearing the nepotism jokes”. The fact that Thanasis has secured multi-year contracts (e.g., a two-year, $3.6 million deal in 2021) while producing minimal on-court impact fuels speculation that the Bucks prioritize keeping Giannis happy over optimizing their roster.
    3. Comparisons to Other Cases: The drafting of Bronny James by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2024 reignited discussions about nepotism, with Thanasis often cited as a parallel. A Basketball Forever article noted that Bronny’s selection drew attention to Thanasis, with critics arguing that both players benefit from their famous relatives’ influence. Charles Barkley has been particularly vocal, joking during the 2022 All-Star Game about Thanasis’s job security and later calling it a “compliment” when Thanasis responded positively.
    4. Giannis’s Influence: Giannis is known to value family deeply, and reports suggest he has advocated for his brothers’ inclusion on the Bucks. A 2023 New York Post article quoted Shannon Sharpe criticizing Giannis for securing roster spots for both Thanasis and Alex, implying that their presence is tied to Giannis’s leverage as a superstar. This perception is reinforced by comments like those from Kendrick Perkins, who questioned Thanasis’s roster spot in a 2023 Fadeaway World piece.

    Counterarguments: More Than Nepotism?

    Thanasis and his supporters have pushed back against the nepotism narrative. In a 2024 interview, Thanasis responded to Charles Barkley’s jabs, saying, “That’s a compliment because that means I’m a good person”. He emphasized his work ethic, journey from the G League, and contributions to team morale. A Greek City Times article highlighted his role as a supportive teammate, noting that his presence fosters a positive locker-room environment, which is crucial for a championship-caliber team.

    Additionally, some argue that Thanasis’s roster spot is not catastrophic. The Bucks won the 2021 NBA Championship with Thanasis on the roster, and his limited minutes (averaging 2.5 minutes per game in the playoffs) suggest he doesn’t add anything to the team’s success. A Reddit user pointed out that if nepotism were the sole factor, the Bucks would have also retained their younger brother Kostas Antetokounmpo, who left the NBA after brief stints. This suggests that Thanasis may offer some value, even if it’s not reflected in box scores. However we have never really seen this in some concrete way. And every time someone says “yes, but it keeps Giannis happy” they are essentially admitting that a) Giannis is weak psychologically and b) that it IS indeed nepotism at its worse. After all the Bucks don’t need to give him a spot on the team. He could be part of the coaching staff if all he does is support Giannis.

    Is Thanasis’ presence catastrophic?

    The perception that Thanasis’s roster spot is a “catastrophic” example of nepotism stems from several factors:

    1. Opportunity Cost: NBA rosters are limited to 15 players, and every spot is valuable, especially for a contending team like the Bucks. Critics argue that Thanasis occupies a position that could be filled by a more productive player, such as a sharpshooter or defensive specialist. Maybe an experienced player that could make the difference for a few minutes in a critical playoff match up. A BroBible article from December 2024 stated, “Watch Thanasis play, and you can quickly tell he shouldn’t be anywhere close to an NBA roster”. This sentiment is amplified by the Bucks’ struggles in recent seasons, including early playoff exits in 2023 and 2024, which have heightened scrutiny of roster construction.
    2. Fan and Media Backlash: Social media platforms are rife with criticism of Thanasis. A 2024 post from @TheNBACentel humorously quoted Thanasis as saying his job is to “high five the rotation players” and “stand up for Giannis,” encapsulating the perception that his role is ceremonial. YouTube videos with titles like “I’m Sorry, But Why Is Thanasis Antetokounmpo Still In The NBA???” amplify this narrative, often highlighting his mistakes or limited impact.
    3. Contrast with Giannis’s Excellence: Giannis Antetokounmpo is a global superstar, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP. His dominance sets an impossibly high bar for his brothers, making Thanasis’s shortcomings more glaring. Fans and analysts expect players associated with Giannis to perform at a high level, and Thanasis’s inability to do so fuels the nepotism narrative.
    4. They are not really that funny. Some claim that the brothers’ banter is social media worthy and entertaining. But this is really hard to support. Their presence at All Star games has always been a let down and their humour is…well…weird to put it politely. For sure it is not producing TV ratings or social media traffic in any good way.

    A Balanced Perspective: Catastrophic or Overblown?

    While the nepotism accusations carry weight, calling Thanasis’s presence on the Bucks roster “catastrophic” may be an overstatement. The Bucks have maintained a competitive roster, winning a championship in 2021 and remaining a top Eastern Conference team despite recent playoff disappointments. Thanasis’s limited minutes mean he rarely impacts games negatively, and his role as a locker-room leader may provide intangible benefits that outsiders cannot fully assess.

    However, the opportunity cost of his roster spot cannot be ignored. In a league where marginal improvements can make or break a championship run, the Bucks’ decision to retain Thanasis over a more skilled player raises questions about priorities. The perception of nepotism is further fueled by Giannis’s undeniable influence, which likely ensures Thanasis’s job security. As one post noted, “Thanasis has had an NBA roster spot for years simply because Giannis is his brother,” a sentiment that resonates with many fans.

    No excuse anymore for Thanasis in the NBA

    Thanasis Antetokounmpo’s NBA career is a polarizing case study. His statistical output is undeniably poor, with minimal contributions in scoring, rebounding, and advanced metrics. The persistent accusations of nepotism, backed by comments from figures like Charles Barkley and Shannon Sharpe, highlight the belief that his roster spot is tied to Giannis’s stardom rather than his own merit. While his energy and locker-room presence offer some value, the opportunity cost of his roster spot on a contending team like the Bucks fuels the “catastrophic” label.

    Thanasis Antetokounmpo does not significantly influence the Milwaukee Bucks’ win/loss record through his individual on-court production. The Bucks have averaged a .638 win percentage all-time when Thanasis is on the team, which is consistent with the high performance of the Giannis-led Bucks era. Thanasis’s direct statistical impact in games is minimal: his career averages are just 2.4 points, 1.6 rebounds, and 0.6 assists in about 8 minutes per game over nearly 200 appearances.

    Ultimately, Thanasis’s story reflects a broader tension in the NBA: balancing team chemistry and star player satisfaction with the relentless pursuit of optimal performance. Whether you view him as a nepotism beneficiary or a misunderstood role player, one thing is clear: his presence on the Bucks roster will continue to spark debate as long as Giannis remains the face of the franchise. The only positive spin you can put on it is that it is well and truly traditionally Greek to try and get your relatives a job like that!

  • “Giannis Needs Help” Is a Misguided Narrative

    “Giannis Needs Help” Is a Misguided Narrative

    The narrative that Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ two-time MVP and NBA champion, “needs help” has been a persistent talking point among fans, analysts, and media. Every playoff disappointment or regular-season struggle prompts calls for the Bucks to acquire another superstar or bolster their roster to support their franchise player. However, this perspective oversimplifies the Bucks’ challenges and ignores a critical truth: Giannis himself is often a significant factor in the team’s shortcomings. While his dominance is undeniable, his playstyle, decision-making, and limitations contribute to Milwaukee’s struggles more than the lack of “help” around him.

    The Myth of Insufficient Support

    The argument that Giannis lacks adequate support often stems from the Bucks’ playoff exits, such as their first-round loss to the Miami Heat in 2023 or their 2024 defeat to the Indiana Pacers. Critics point to the roster, claiming it fails to complement Giannis’s skill set. However, this overlooks the quality of players Milwaukee has assembled. Khris Middleton, a three-time All-Star, has been a reliable second option, averaging 20.1 points per game in the 2022-23 season with a knack for clutch shot-making. Jrue Holiday, before his trade to Boston, was a Defensive Player of the Year candidate and a steady playmaker. Damian Lillard, acquired in 2023, is one of the league’s premier offensive engines, averaging 24.3 points and 7.0 assists in his first season with Milwaukee. Brook Lopez, a Defensive Player of the Year finalist, anchors the paint, while players like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton provide depth.

    This is not a barren roster. The Bucks’ supporting cast has consistently ranked among the league’s better ensembles, with Milwaukee finishing the 2022-23 season with the NBA’s best record (58-24). Blaming the roster ignores the fact that teams like the 2023 Heat or 2024 Pacers, who ousted Milwaukee, were not necessarily more talented but executed better. The issue isn’t a lack of talent around Giannis—it’s how his playstyle interacts with that talent.

    Giannis’s Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis is a force of nature, a 6’11” freight train who combines athleticism, length, and defensive versatility in the past. His ability to drive to the rim, collapse defences, and finish through contact is impressive, evidenced by his career average of 22.9 points per game on 54.7% shooting (as of the 2024-25 season). However, his approach, while devastating, creates challenges that hinder the Bucks in critical moments. When it counts, Giannis comes up short.

    Over-Reliance on Drives

    Giannis’s game revolves around attacking the basket, often bulldozing through defenders to score or draw fouls. He led the NBA in free-throw attempts per game (11.0) in the 2022-23 season, a testament to his rim pressure. But this one-dimensional approach allows opponents to game-plan effectively. Teams like the Heat and Raptors (in 2019) have employed the “Giannis Wall,” packing the paint with multiple defenders to neutralize his drives. Without a consistent outside shot—his three-point percentage hovers around 27.7% for his career—Giannis struggles when teams dare him to shoot.

    This predictability forces the Bucks into stagnant offensive sets. When Giannis barrels into a crowded paint, it often results in turnovers (3.1 per game career average) or low-percentage shots. His insistence on driving, even against set defenses, disrupts Milwaukee’s flow, limiting opportunities for shooters like Lillard or Middleton to exploit open looks. Compare this to players like Nikola Jokić, who blends scoring with elite playmaking (9.0 assists per game in 2023-24), or Kevin Durant, whose mid-range and three-point shooting keep defenses honest. Giannis’s tunnel vision on drives can stifle his team’s offense, making it easier for opponents to dictate the game’s pace.

    Free-Throw Struggles and Pace Issues

    Giannis’s free-throw shooting, while improved, remains a liability at 65.8% for his career. In high-stakes playoff games, this weakness is magnified. Opponents often employ Hack-a-Giannis strategies, slowing the game and disrupting Milwaukee’s rhythm. His lengthy free-throw routine—often exceeding the 10-second limit—further bogs down the pace, frustrating teammates and fans alike. In the 2023 playoffs, Giannis shot 45.3% from the line against Miami, a glaring issue in tight games.

    This slow pace clashes with the modern NBA’s emphasis on speed and spacing. The Bucks ranked 19th in pace (98.5 possessions per game) in 2023-24, limiting their ability to capitalize on transition opportunities where Giannis thrives. His dominance in the half-court often comes at the expense of fluid team play, as teammates stand idle while he attempts to overpower defenders. Giannis simply can’t change the way he plays resulting in the entire team suffering.

    Decision-Making in Crunch Time

    Giannis’s decision-making in clutch situations is another area where he contributes to Milwaukee’s struggles. His choices in critical moments often falter. In the 2021 championship run, Giannis was phenomenal, but Middleton and Holiday frequently bailed him out in clutch scenarios. Fast forward to 2024, and his 4.4 turnovers per game in the playoffs against Indiana highlighted a recurring issue: forcing plays under pressure. Giannis simply can’t think fast enough when it counts, “he has no bag” for the top level of the NBA.

    For example, in Game 5 of the 2023 Heat series, Giannis attempted a game-tying drive with seconds remaining, only to be stripped in traffic, leading to a turnover. A better decision—passing to an open Middleton or Lopez—might have changed the outcome. His reluctance to defer, even when double- or triple-teamed, puts undue pressure on his teammates to compensate for his mistakes. Contrast this with LeBron James, who, despite similar defensive attention, averages 7.4 assists per game by finding open teammates. Giannis’s assist average (5.7 in 2023-24) is solid but doesn’t reflect the same level of trust in his supporting cast.

    The Coaching Carousel and Giannis’s Influence

    The Bucks’ coaching instability—Mike Budenholzer’s firing in 2023, Adrian Griffin’s midseason dismissal in 2024, and Doc Rivers’ uneven tenure—points to another issue tied to Giannis. Reports suggest Giannis has significant influence over team decisions, from roster moves to coaching hires. The trade for Lillard, while a coup, was reportedly driven by Giannis’s desire for a co-star, yet the fit has been clunky. Lillard’s ball-dominant style clashes with Giannis’s need for touches, leading to a disjointed offense (Milwaukee’s offensive rating dropped from 113.3 in 2022-23 to 112.4 in 2023-24).

    Giannis’s reported push for Griffin’s hiring, followed by his quick dismissal, suggests a lack of clarity in his vision for the team. This meddling, while not uncommon for superstars, disrupts continuity. The Bucks’ roster and system are built around Giannis’s strengths, but his influence often prioritizes his comfort over team synergy. For instance, the Bucks’ heavy reliance on drop-coverage defense, tailored to Giannis’s rim protection, limits their ability to switch and adapt against versatile offenses like Miami’s or Boston’s.

    Statistical Context: Giannis’s Impact vs. Efficiency

    To quantify Giannis’s role in Milwaukee’s struggles, consider his advanced metrics. His usage rate (31.2% in 2023-24) is among the league’s highest, reflecting his ball-dominant style. However, his true shooting percentage (61.3%) lags behind players like Jokić (63.1%) or Anthony Davis (62.4%), who balance efficiency with playmaking. Giannis’s high usage often comes at the expense of teammates’ involvement, as evidenced by Middleton’s shot attempts dropping from 15.1 per game in 2022-23 to 13.0 in 2023-24 despite similar minutes.

    Defensively his tendency to roam for highlight plays can leave the Bucks vulnerable, especially against pick-and-roll-heavy teams. In the 2024 playoffs, Indiana’s Tyrese Haliburton exploited Milwaukee’s drop coverage, averaging 8.7 assists per game. Giannis’s defensive discipline still wanes in crucial moments, contributing to breakdowns.

    The Counterargument: Does Giannis Really Need Help?

    Defenders of the “Giannis needs help” narrative argue that no superstar can win alone. They point to Milwaukee’s injury issues—Middleton’s ankle problems in 2023, Giannis’s own calf injury in 2024—as evidence that the roster fails him in key moments. They also note that Lillard’s defensive limitations and Middleton’s inconsistency place too much burden on Giannis.

    While injuries are a factor, they don’t fully excuse the Bucks’ failures. Teams like the 2023 Nuggets and 2024 Celtics overcame injuries through system cohesion and star adaptability. Giannis, by contrast, often sticks to his strengths rather than adjusting to opponents’ schemes. His refusal to develop a reliable jumper or refine his play making limits Milwaukee’s ceiling, regardless of who’s on the roster.

    Giannis Must Evolve and fans need to stop making up excuses for him

    The “Giannis needs help” narrative is a convenient scapegoat that shifts focus from the real issue: Giannis’s own limitations are a significant driver of Milwaukee’s problems. His predictable play style, clutch-time struggles, and influence over team decisions create challenges that no amount of roster tinkering can fully resolve. While he’s a generational talent, Giannis must evolve—whether by developing a jumper, improving his free-throw shooting, or trusting his teammates more in crunch time—to maximize the Bucks’ potential.

    The Bucks don’t need another superstar; they need Giannis to address the gaps in his game and adapt to modern NBA demands. Until then, the narrative that he “needs help” will persist, but it’s a distraction from the truth: Giannis is both the Bucks’ greatest asset and, at times, their biggest obstacle.

    Stats and data referenced are accurate as of the 2024-25 NBA season and sourced from Basketball-Reference and NBA.com.

  • Doc Rivers’ Tenure with the Milwaukee Bucks: Giannis loves him, end of story

    Doc Rivers’ Tenure with the Milwaukee Bucks: Giannis loves him, end of story

    Doc Rivers, a seasoned NBA coach with a storied career, joined the Milwaukee Bucks mid season in 2024, taking over from Adrian Griffin after a surprising mid-campaign firing. With a resume boasting an NBA championship with the Boston Celtics in 2008, over 1,150 regular-season wins, and a reputation as a players’ coach, Rivers was expected to elevate the Bucks to championship contention. However, his time with the Bucks has been a roller coaster of highs, lows, and intense scrutiny. And in the modern NBA it is easier to make coaches the scapegoats than players.

    The Appointment: A Midseason ShakeUp

    In January 2024, the Bucks made a bold move by dismissing Adrian Griffin after just 43 games, despite a 30-13 record. The decision shocked the NBA world, given the team’s strong standing in the Eastern Conference. Rivers, who had been serving as an ESPN analyst after his stint with the Philadelphia 76ers, was brought in as head coach. His hiring was seen as a gamble to maximise the championship window of stars Giannis Antetokounmpo and Damian Lillard, acquired in a blockbuster trade before the 2023-24 season. Rivers’ extensive experience coaching the Orlando Magic, Boston Celtics, Los Angeles Clippers, and 76ers—made him an appealing choice for a team with immediate title aspirations.

    However, the transition wasn’t seamless. The Bucks were still paying former coaches Mike Budenholzer and Griffin, adding financial complexity to the move. Rivers inherited a talented but injury-plagued roster, and his mid season arrival meant adapting to a team already in motion. Early struggles raised eyebrows, with the Bucks posting an 18-23 record in their first 41 games under Rivers, prompting criticism from fans. One remarked, “Bucks are 18-23 since hiring Doc Rivers… That’s a crazy way to waste Giannis and Dame pairing.”

    Performance in the 2023-24 Season

    Rivers’ first partial season with the Bucks (2023-24) ended with a 49-33 record, securing the No. 3 seed in the Eastern Conference. However, the playoffs were a disappointment. The Bucks faced the Indiana Pacers in the first round and were eliminated in six games, marking their second consecutive first-round exit. Injuries to key players, including Giannis Antetokounmpo and Damian Lillard, hampered the team’s performance. Rivers faced criticism for failing to advance, with some pointing to his historical playoff struggles, including three infamous 3-1 series lead collapses with previous teams.

    Rivers addressed the criticism, arguing that the narrative around his playoff losses was “unfair in some ways.” He emphasised that his teams have never been swept in the postseason and highlighted the challenge of coaching underdog teams like the 2003 Orlando Magic, which took a 3-1 lead against the top-seeded Detroit Pistons before collapsing. “I don’t get enough credit for getting the three wins,” Rivers told Andscape, underscoring his ability to position teams for success despite ultimate failures.

    The 2024-25 Season: Challenges and Adjustments

    The 2024-25 season brought more challenges. The Bucks finished with a 48-34 record, landing the No. 5 seed in the Eastern Conference. Despite a talented roster, injuries continued to plague the team. Damian Lillard suffered a blood clot during the regular season and later tore his left Achilles in Game 4 of the first-round playoff series against the Pacers, contributing to another early exit in a 119-118 overtime loss in Game 5. Giannis Antetokounmpo also battled injuries, though he delivered a heroic 30-point, 20-rebound, 13-assist performance in Game 5.

    Rivers made notable adjustments during the season. After falling 0-2 to the Pacers in the playoffs, he shook up the starting lineup, inserting players like Gary Trent Jr., AJ Green, and Bobby Portis to compensate for Lillard’s absence. The move paid off in Game 3, with the Bucks securing a 117-101 victory, showcasing Rivers’ ability to adapt under pressure. However, the team couldn’t overcome the series deficit, and Rivers’ son, Austin, publicly defended him against critics, arguing that the playoff loss was due to team mistakes rather than coaching errors. “Every possible mistake that a team could make in a minute was made,” Austin Rivers said on The Ryen Russillo Podcast.

    Rivers also faced health challenges during the season. On April 4, 2025, he fell ill during a game against the Philadelphia 76ers, forcing assistant coach Darvin Ham to take over. The Bucks won 126-113, demonstrating the team’s resilience and Ham’s readiness, a testament to Rivers’ coaching staff preparation.

    Relationship with Giannis Antetokounmpo

    One of the brightest spots of Rivers’ tenure has been his relationship with Giannis Antetokounmpo. The two-time MVP has been vocal about his admiration for Rivers, both as a coach and a person. After the Bucks’ Game 5 loss to the Pacers in 2025, Giannis said, “I love Doc. I think he’s a great human being. He knows how to uplift your spirits and always knows the right thing to say at the right moment.” He humorously added, “He’s been in the NBA for 50 years. Is it 50? I don’t know. Maybe. A lot of years.” Earlier, in February 2024, Giannis described his experience with Rivers as “incredible” and praised his ability to foster team unity.

    This bond has been crucial, especially amid trade rumors surrounding Giannis due to the Bucks’ playoff struggles. Rivers’ ability to connect with his star player has kept the team’s core intact, though speculation about Giannis’ future persists, with some reports suggesting he could chase bigger markets.

    Criticism and Public Perception

    Rivers’ tenure has not been without controversy. A player poll in April 2025 ranked him among the NBA’s worst coaches, with 12.3% of votes, though he was the first coach of a playoff-bound team on the list. Critics point to his postseason record—21 playoff appearances but only two NBA Finals trips and one championship—as evidence of underachievement. The Bucks’ back-to-back first-round exits under Rivers have fuelled this narrative.

    Rivers has pushed back against the criticism, particularly regarding his 3-1 playoff lead collapses. He argues that his teams’ ability to achieve those leads reflects strong coaching, and injuries, like Chris Paul’s in 2015 with the Clippers, often played a role in losses. “One of the things that I’m proud of is we’ve never been swept,” he said, highlighting his teams’ competitiveness.

    Coaching Staff and Organizational Context

    Rivers has leaned on a strong coaching staff, including Darvin Ham, a former Lakers head coach, and his son Spencer Rivers, an assistant coach. The Bucks also saw one of their assistants eyed for a head coaching role elsewhere in May 2025, indicating the quality of Rivers’ staff. However, the organization faces financial constraints, still paying out contracts for former coaches Budenholzer and Griffin, which could complicate any decision to move on from Rivers.

    Looking Ahead

    The Bucks face a pivotal offseason. With Lillard’s Achilles injury and Giannis’ future uncertain, Rivers’ ability to navigate roster changes and injuries will be critical. His regular-season success—nearing Phil Jackson’s win total and securing playoff berths—demonstrates his coaching prowess, but postseason results remain the ultimate measure. Rivers’ experience, player relationships, and adaptability suggest he can steer the Bucks toward deeper playoff runs, but the pressure is on to deliver a championship with a roster built for now.

    Areas of Limited or No Improvement of Giannis under Doc Rivers

    Post Play Efficiency
    While Giannis is dominant in the post, his efficiency against elite defensive teams hasn’t improved under Rivers. Opponents like the Pacers in the 2024 and 2025 playoffs used physical, switch-heavy defences to slow him down, and Rivers’ adjustments (e.g., lineup changes) didn’t fully counter this. Giannis’ post moves remain predictable, relying on power over finesse, and Rivers hasn’t introduced noticeable new wrinkles to his low-post game, such as counters to double-teams or refined footwork.

    Three-Point Shooting
    Giannis’ three-point shooting has not shown notable progress under Rivers. Historically, his outside shot has been a weak point, with career averages hovering around 28-29% from beyond the arc. In the 2023-24 season, he shot 27.4% on 1.3 attempts per game, and in 2024-25, reports suggest no significant uptick in efficiency or volume. Rivers’ offensive schemes have leaned heavily on Giannis’ paint dominance and playmaking, with less emphasis on developing his perimeter game. Fans have noted frustration with Giannis’ lack of a reliable jump shot, with one user stating, “Giannis still can’t shoot threes, and Doc’s not fixing that.” While Rivers has encouraged team-oriented play, there’s no evidence of targeted work to improve Giannis’ three-point consistency. In the modern NBA lack of 3pt is a serious impediment for the whole team and Giannis shot worse than ever this season.

    Free-Throw Shooting
    Free-throw shooting remains a persistent issue for Giannis. His career free-throw percentage is around 70%, but under Rivers, there’s no clear indication of improvement. In the 2023-24 season, he shot 65.7% from the line, a dip from prior years. In the 2024-25 playoffs, his free-throw struggles in high-pressure situations were noted in reports. Rivers’ focus on team unity and Giannis’ role as a facilitator hasn’t translated to addressing this technical flaw, possibly due to limited mid season time or prioritising other aspects of the Bucks’ game plan.

    Late-Game Decision-Making
    Giannis’ decision-making in crunch-time situations has been a point of criticism, particularly in the playoffs. While he’s improved as a playmaker—evidenced by his triple-double in the 2025 playoffs—some analysts argue he still struggles with turnovers or forcing plays in high-stakes moments. For example, during the Bucks’ 2024 and 2025 first-round exits against the Pacers, Giannis’ aggressive style led to occasional rushed shots or turnovers, as noted in game recaps. Rivers’ coaching has emphasised Giannis as the focal point of the offence, but there’s little evidence of specific strategies to refine his late-game composure, such as diversifying his approach or deferring to teammates like Damian Lillard (when healthy). Doc Rivers has resorted to keeping him out of the game as long as possible in the 4th quarter but when Giannis eventually enters he often messes everything up.

    So no, it’s not on Doc Rivers

    Doc Rivers’ tenure with the Milwaukee Bucks is a tale of high expectations, injury setbacks, and a strong connection with Giannis Antetokounmpo. While his regular-season record and leadership have kept the Bucks competitive, playoff disappointments have drawn criticism. Rivers’ ability to adapt, as seen in lineup changes and his handling of adversity, shows why he remains a respected figure in the NBA. Whether he can lead the Bucks to another title will define his legacy in Milwaukee. For now, his bond with Giannis and his resilience in the face of scrutiny keep him with the Bucks but the honest truth is that Giannis is the source of the inflexibility, not Doc. The Bucks have a lot of problems. Doc Rivers is not No1.

  • Kevin Porter Jr. on the Bucks: Strengths, Weaknesses, and the Giannis Factor

    Kevin Porter Jr. on the Bucks: Strengths, Weaknesses, and the Giannis Factor

    The addition of Kevin Porter Jr. (KPJ) to the Bucks roster introduces an intriguing dynamic. KPJ, a talented young guard, brings a unique skill set but also faces challenges in carving out a significant role alongside a superstar like Giannis.

    Kevin Porter Jr.’s Strengths

    Kevin Porter Jr. is a versatile guard known for his scoring ability, playmaking, and athleticism.

    1. Scoring Versatility: KPJ can score at all three levels—inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc. His ability to create his own shot off the dribble makes him a valuable offensive weapon. In his time with the Houston Rockets, he averaged 19.2 points per game in the 2022-23 season, showcasing his scoring prowess.
    2. Playmaking: As a combo guard, KPJ has shown flashes of excellent court vision. He can facilitate the offense, averaging 6.3 assists per game during his Rockets tenure. His ability to handle the ball and set up teammates adds another dimension to the Bucks’ offense.
    3. Athleticism and Finishing: KPJ’s athleticism allows him to attack the rim with authority. He’s capable of posterizing defenders and finishing through contact, which complements the Bucks’ fast-paced, transition-heavy style.
    4. Defensive Potential: At 6’4” with a solid wingspan, KPJ has the physical tools to be a disruptive defender. While not yet a lockdown defender, he’s shown the ability to guard multiple positions when engaged.

    Kevin Porter Jr.’s Weaknesses

    Despite his talent, KPJ has areas of his game that need refinement, particularly in a structured environment like Milwaukee:

    1. Decision-Making: KPJ’s decision-making can be erratic. He sometimes forces shots or makes risky passes, leading to turnovers. His assist-to-turnover ratio (1.9:1 in 2022-23) reflects this inconsistency, which can be problematic in high-stakes playoff games.
    2. Shooting Efficiency: While KPJ can score, his efficiency is a concern. His three-point shooting hovered around 36.6% in Houston, but his shot selection often leads to low-percentage attempts. This inefficiency could clash with the Bucks’ need for spacing around Giannis.
    3. Defensive Consistency: KPJ’s defensive effort has been inconsistent. He can be a liability when not fully engaged, which is a concern for a Bucks team that relies on stout defense to contend for titles.
    4. Off-Court Concerns: KPJ’s history of off-court issues, including legal troubles, has raised questions about his maturity and reliability. While these are not directly related to his on-court performance, they can impact team chemistry and his role.

    The Bucks’ System and KPJ’s Fit

    The Bucks’ offense revolves around Giannis Antetokounmpo who demands the ball in the paint and thrives in transition. The team’s supporting cast, including players like Damian Lillard and Khris Middleton, has always been designed to complement Giannis by providing spacing, defence, and secondary play making. KPJ’s skill set overlaps with some of these roles but doesn’t perfectly align with the Bucks’ needs.

    KPJ’s ability to handle the ball and create offense could theoretically ease the playmaking burden on Lillard and Giannis. However, his inconsistent shooting and decision-making make him a less-than-ideal fit as a spot-up shooter or off-ball player, roles often required of Bucks guards. Additionally, Milwaukee’s defensive scheme under coach Doc Rivers emphasizes discipline and communication, areas where KPJ has yet to prove himself consistently.

    How Giannis’s Presence Impacts KPJ’s Development

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance is both a blessing and a challenge for young players like KPJ. While playing alongside a superstar provides opportunities to learn and compete at a high level, it can also stifle development. Here’s how Giannis’s presence might hinder KPJ’s growth:

    1. Ball Dominance: Giannis is the focal point of the Bucks’ offense, often initiating plays and commanding touches in the paint. His usage rate (around 32% in recent seasons) leaves limited opportunities for KPJ to handle the ball and develop as a primary playmaker. In Houston, KPJ was a primary option, but in Milwaukee, he’s relegated to a secondary or tertiary role, which limits his ability to refine his decision-making and leadership.
    2. Offensive Hierarchy: The Bucks’ pecking order is clear: Giannis and Lillard are the top options. KPJ, as a younger player, must adapt to a lower-usage role, which can stunt his offensive growth. His scoring instincts may be underutilised, forcing him to focus on spot-up shooting or cutting—skills that are not his strongest.
    3. Pressure to Win Now: The Bucks are in a championship-or-bust mode, with Giannis at the peak of his prime (30 years old in 2025). This high-stakes environment leaves little room for KPJ to experiment or make mistakes, both critical for a young player’s development. Coach Rivers is unlikely to give KPJ extended minutes if his play doesn’t immediately translate to wins.
    4. Cultural Fit: KPJ’s past off-court issues and inconsistent effort could clash with this environment, potentially leading to reduced trust from coaches and teammates. Without a strong support system to guide him, KPJ’s development could stall. This is a team designed to pamper Giannis.

    Potential Paths for KPJ’s Development

    For KPJ to thrive in Milwaukee, he must address his weaknesses and leverage his strengths within the Bucks’ system. Here are some potential strategies:

    1. Embrace a Sixth-Man Role: KPJ could excel as a spark plug off the bench, leading the second unit with his scoring and play making. This role would give him more freedom to handle the ball while still contributing to wins.
    2. Improve Efficiency: Focusing on better shot selection and increasing his three-point accuracy would make KPJ a better fit alongside Giannis. Studying players like Jrue Holiday, who thrived as a complementary piece, could guide his development.
    3. Defensive Growth: Committing to defence would earn KPJ more trust from Rivers and Giannis. Becoming a two-way player would secure him consistent minutes.
    4. Mentorship from Veterans: Learning from Lillard and Middleton, both experienced scorers and playmakers, could help KPJ refine his decision-making and professionalism. Most of all he has to kill his ego to put up with Giannis.

    So is KPJ a go or will he be another Giannis scapegoat?

    Kevin Porter Jr. is a talented but flawed player with the potential to be a valuable asset for the Milwaukee Bucks. His scoring, play making, and athleticism are undeniable strengths, but his decision-making, efficiency, and defensive consistency need work. Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance creates challenges for KPJ’s development by limiting his touches, role, and margin for error. For KPJ to grow in Milwaukee, he must adapt to a complementary role, improve his efficiency, and embrace the Bucks’ winning culture. If he can do so, he could carve out a meaningful place here. If not, his time in Milwaukee may be short-lived, especially with trade rumours swirling around Giannis and the team’s future. Nobody ever blames Giannis so life with the Bucks is a constantly perilous journey of being the scape goat.

  • The Atlantic is soooo wrong about Giannis trade situation it’s not even funny

    The Atlantic is soooo wrong about Giannis trade situation it’s not even funny

    You would expect the NY times not to fall into the click bait trap. Granted, this article is high level click bait. It also contains most of the relevant information. Published on May 13, 2025, titled “What we’re hearing about Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Bucks,” speculates heavily on the possibility of the Milwaukee Bucks trading their superstar. While the piece captures the current buzz around Antetokounmpo’s future, it falls short in several critical areas. Specifically, it overlooks the practical constraints that make most of the proposed trade scenarios unrealistic, ignores Antetokounmpo’s proven playoff limitations, and fails to acknowledge that his prime may be waning as the NBA adapts to his playing style.

    1. Ignoring Practical Trade Constraints

    The article suggests several trade destinations for Antetokounmpo, including the Houston Rockets, San Antonio Spurs, New York Knicks, Brooklyn Nets, Dallas Mavericks, and Golden State Warriors. However, it glosses over logistical and financial hurdles that render these proposals unrealistic under the NBA’s Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA) and the Bucks’ roster situation.

    Salary Cap and Second Apron Issues

    Antetokounmpo’s 2025-26 contract carries a $54.1 million cap hit, potentially higher for apron calculations. The Bucks are $6.5 million above the second apron, a restrictive threshold that prohibits taking back more salary than sent out, aggregating contracts, or using cash in trades. Trading Antetokounmpo would require sending out significant salary—likely players like Bobby Portis ($12.6 million) or Brook Lopez ($23 million)—to match incoming salaries, a complexity the article ignores.

    For example, Houston’s proposed package of Amen Thompson, Jalen Green, and picks would need additional salary fillers like Keldon Johnson ($19 million) or Harrison Barnes ($18 million), burdening Milwaukee with long-term contracts misaligned with rebuilding goals. Similarly, a Spurs deal with Stephon Castle and picks would require veterans like Johnson or Barnes, further complicating the Bucks’ cap situation. The article’s suggestion of a Dallas trade involving the No. 1 pick (Cooper Flagg) is impractical, as Flagg’s $13.8 million rookie salary would necessitate multiple mid-sized contracts, disrupting Dallas’ win-now core around Kyrie Irving and Anthony Davis.

    Milwaukee’s Depleted Draft Assets

    The Bucks’ draft capital is severely limited, with unprotected first-round picks owed in 2025, 2027, and 2029, and swap rights held by New Orleans (2026) and Portland (2028, 2030). This restricts their ability to sweeten trade offers or offload contracts like Pat Connaughton’s $9.4 million player option, which the article overlooks. Trading Connaughton alone could cost three to four second-round picks or a late first-rounder, assets Milwaukee lacks. Teams like the Knicks or Nets might demand the Bucks absorb undesirable contracts (e.g., Ben Simmons’ $40.3 million expiring deal), further complicating deals.

    Misaligned Trade Packages

    The article assumes Milwaukee could secure a “meaningful, competitive” rebuild package, citing teams like Houston or San Antonio. However, it overestimates Antetokounmpo’s trade value given his recent playoff struggles and age (30). Teams may hesitate to gut rosters for a player with two years left on his deal (plus a 2027-28 player option) who hasn’t advanced past the first round since 2021. Proposed packages like Zion Williamson from New Orleans or Paul George from Philadelphia are impractical. Williamson’s injury history (214 games in six seasons) and $44.4 million salary are risky, while George’s $52.2 million contract and age (35) offer no long-term value for a rebuilding team. These suggestions ignore Milwaukee’s need for young, cost-controlled talent and draft picks.

    2. Overlooking Antetokounmpo’s Playoff Limitations

    The article portrays Antetokounmpo as a transcendent star whose “greatness could compel nearly every owner and GM” to adjust plans. While his 2024-25 regular-season stats—30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, 6.5 assists on 60.1% shooting—are elite, it ignores his recurring playoff struggles, which reduce his trade value and complicate Milwaukee’s situation.

    Clutch and Playoff Shortcomings

    Antetokounmpo has struggled in high-stakes playoff moments. Since the 2021 championship, the Bucks have suffered three consecutive first-round exits, with Antetokounmpo unable to elevate the team against younger, faster opponents like the Indiana Pacers. In Game 5 of the 2025 playoffs, despite a triple-double, he failed to close a 119-118 overtime loss, allowing Tyrese Haliburton’s game-winning layup. Post-game confrontations with Haliburton’s father and Bennedict Mathurin reflected frustration but highlighted his inability to channel energy into game-changing plays.

    His free-throw shooting (68.3% career playoff, 65.1% in 2024-25) remains a liability in clutch situations, enabling opponents to foul him late, disrupting Milwaukee’s offense. His lack of a reliable outside shot (27.4% from three in 2024-25) allows defenses to sag off, clogging driving lanes. These weaknesses limit his impact in close games, a critical flaw the article ignores.

    NBA’s Defensive Adaptations

    The NBA has adapted to Antetokounmpo’s heliocentric style, a point the article sidesteps. Teams like the Pacers and Heat use swarming help defenses and “wall” strategies to neutralize his paint dominance. In Game 1 of the 2025 playoffs, Indiana’s ball movement exposed Antetokounmpo’s lag in processing rotations, exacerbated by distrust in teammates like Lopez, whose slow-footed drop coverage was exploited. These schemes force Antetokounmpo into playmaking, but his 3.7 turnovers per game in the 2025 playoffs indicate discomfort under pressure.

    The article’s suggestion of Antetokounmpo as a “dream target” for teams like the Warriors overlooks how modern defenses diminish his fit. Golden State’s small-ball lineups, led by Draymond Green, would dare him to shoot from outside, a weakness incompatible with their spacing-heavy system. Similarly, the Knicks’ and Nets’ defensive-minded rosters (e.g., OG Anunoby, Mikal Bridges) would employ similar tactics, doubling Antetokounmpo and forcing him to pass or shoot from distance, areas where he’s less effective.

    3. Is Antetokounmpo Past His Prime?

    The article assumes Antetokounmpo remains at his peak, but evidence suggests he may be past his prime, a possibility it fails to explore. At 30, his athleticism and durability remain elite, but the NBA’s evolution and his playoff struggles raise questions about his ceiling. He also has fallen a lot in defensive metrics since getting the ring and even in offence many of his stats are at career lows.

    Physical and Strategic Decline

    Antetokounmpo’s game relies heavily on athletic dominance, but the wear of 12 NBA seasons (738 regular-season games, 88 playoff games) may be catching up. While he played 73 games in 2024-25, his playoff inefficiencies suggest diminishing returns in high-pressure settings. His usage rate (36.8% in 2024-25, down from 39.1% in 2022-23) indicates a slight reduction in offensive burden, possibly due to coaching adjustments or physical limitations. The article’s failure to address this overlooks a critical factor in his trade value.

    The NBA’s shift toward perimeter-oriented, spacing-heavy offenses also challenges Antetokounmpo’s fit. His limited shooting range forces teams to build around his paint-centric style, which is less versatile in today’s game. Teams like the Warriors or Knicks, cited as suitors, prioritize floor spacing, making Antetokounmpo a stylistic mismatch unless he develops a consistent jumper—an unlikely transformation at this stage.

    Comparison to Historical Trades

    The article compares Antetokounmpo to rare trades of MVP-caliber players like Kareem Abdul-Jabbar or Kevin Durant, but these analogies are flawed. Abdul-Jabbar demanded specific destinations, limiting trade options, while Durant’s 2023 trade occurred under different CBA rules. Antetokounmpo’s situation—tied to a small-market team with limited assets and facing modern defensive schemes—makes a blockbuster trade less feasible. His playoff resume since 2021 further lowers his value compared to those historical precedents.

    4. Misreading Antetokounmpo’s Intentions

    The article speculates on Antetokounmpo’s openness to a trade, citing his attendance at Stephen Curry’s party and cryptic social media posts. However, it overstates these as evidence of discontent. Antetokounmpo has consistently expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating in 2023, “This is my team, and it’s going to forever be my team.” His comments about wanting to win another championship reflect ambition, not disloyalty. Multiple sources indicate he remains happy in Milwaukee and values his partnership with Damian Lillard, despite the team’s struggles. The article’s narrative of inevitable trade talks ignores these statements and the Bucks’ annual offseason meetings with Antetokounmpo, which are routine, not crisis-driven.

    5. Bucks’ Alternative Path

    The article assumes trading Antetokounmpo is the only path forward, ignoring alternatives like a “gap year” strategy. With Lillard likely sidelined for 2025-26 due to a torn Achilles, the Bucks could lean into a heliocentric offense around Antetokounmpo, potentially yielding MVP-caliber numbers (e.g., leading the league in scoring or averaging a triple-double). A 44-win season could secure a playoff spot in the weaker Eastern Conference, maintaining competitiveness while buying time to rebuild assets post-Lillard’s contract (2027). This approach, outlined by The Athletic elsewhere, aligns with Antetokounmpo’s desire to compete and avoids the risks of a premature trade. But maybe Giannis likes the narrative of him being the only hero on the team. He can rack up more 30point games as a ball hogging solo diva and get more amazing stats for himself.

    Giannis is most likely not to go anywhere

    The Athletic’s article oversimplifies Antetokounmpo’s trade prospects by ignoring CBA constraints, his playoff limitations, and signs he may be past his peak. Its proposed trade packages are impractical, failing to account for Milwaukee’s cap issues, depleted draft assets, and rebuilding needs. Furthermore, it overstates Antetokounmpo’s discontent and underestimates the Bucks’ ability to remain competitive without trading him. By focusing on sensational trade scenarios, the article misses the nuanced reality: Antetokounmpo’s future in Milwaukee is far from decided, and trading him may not be the panacea it suggests. Critical examination reveals a narrative driven more by rumour than practicality, leaving readers with an incomplete picture of a complex situation.

    ———————– for reference here it is ———————————————————–

    What we’re hearing about Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Bucks

    By Sam Amick, Eric Nehm, and David Aldridge

    May 13, 2025, 9:00 AM

    Giannis Antetokounmpo has not asked for a trade, but Milwaukee’s ability to build a championship roster around him appears constrained. So now what?

    The Milwaukee Bucks have won their NBA Cup trophy, and they will always have their 2021 championship. But it’s becoming increasingly clear that their championship window with Antetokounmpo has likely closed, with their third consecutive first-round exit this postseason — combined with the devastating Achilles injury to co-star Damian Lillard — making it all the more difficult to avoid that harsh reality. As such, the Antetokounmpo-related chatter is louder than ever, with the two-time MVP known to be weighing his options and the Bucks facing the possibility that the franchise cornerstone might not finish his career in Milwaukee after all.

    The Bucks and Antetokounmpo are expected to meet soon to discuss the future, league sources tell The Athletic, with those annual discussions taking on a different tone this time around. For the first time in his career, the 30-year-old Antetokounmpo is said to be open-minded about exploring whether his best long-term fit is remaining in Milwaukee or playing elsewhere, those sources said. Antetokounmpo has three years left on his contract, with a player option in the final season (2027-28).

    Antetokounmpo has long made it clear that he’s all about winning, telling The New York Times in August 2023, “This is my team, and it’s going to forever be my team. … But we have to win another one. … Winning a championship comes first. I don’t want to be 20 years on the same team and don’t win another championship.”

    The Bucks have not won a playoff series since their lone title together, and it’s becoming increasingly difficult to envision a path toward title contention with their current roster and limited flexibility. That isn’t likely this time around, however, as the Bucks have used almost all of those assets in the previous two situations and now can only add additional pick swaps to their 2026, ’28 and ’30 first-round picks or trade one of their first-round picks in either 2031 or 2032. Pulling off a trade big enough to appease Antetokounmpo’s desire to compete for a second championship in 2026 may end up being impossible and leave the Bucks forced to contemplate other plans for contention moving forward. With a blockbuster trade hard to imagine, where do you feel that leaves the Bucks, DA?

    Aldridge: Let me be as clear as possible on this. I want Giannis Antetokounmpo to finish his career in Milwaukee. There are few stories as meaningful to the notion of the NBA that I believe is the best version of the NBA than a young player coming to a small or mid-market team, discovering his greatest potential and winning in front of a fan base that understands, better than any in New York or L.A., what it’s really like to struggle, what it’s really like to not be viewed as a marquee franchise.

    I believe Giannis wants to stay in Milwaukee — but, understandably, doesn’t want to waste the rest of his prime in service to a team that isn’t good enough to contend. The problem Antetokounmpo has is that the Bucks have done nearly everything he’s asked over the years by surrounding him with players or coaches that he wanted in the hunt for a first, and then, a second title. That most of the moves haven’t yet worked, or even come close, isn’t the Greek Freak’s fault, of course. His play remains above reproach. But they haven’t worked. And they don’t leave Milwaukee with a lot of runway to take yet another big swing. No one is going to take on the rest of Dame’s latest extension — $54.1 million next season, followed by a $58.4 million player option for 2026-27. Maybe, if Lillard were healthy, the Bucks could engage the Phoenix Suns on Bradley Beal.

    The Bucks don’t have a lot of future picks to deal — just their 2031 or ’32 first-rounder, and pick swaps in ’26, ’28 and ’30. They don’t have a lot of young players under team control to put in a deal, either. They could try to move Brook Lopez, who is 37 and a free agent after this season, and/or Bobby Portis, who has a $13.4 million player option for next season. Neither is likely to bring back a significant return, though.

    Conversely, now is the time for Giannis to get clarity on what all of the interested teams might be able to put together if he came their way, as well as what might remain if they pull off a trade. It’s widely known that the Houston Rockets and San Antonio Spurs have the goods, and the gall, to get something done that might allow the Bucks to rebuild in a meaningful, competitive way. The New York Knicks and the Nets are expected to be in the running if these sweepstakes become an actual thing. The Dallas Mavericks — somehow — landed the No. 1 pick on Monday night and could now entertain the prospect of putting it on the table for someone of Antetokounmpo’s ilk. We have previously reported that Mavericks GM Nico Harrison, architect of the Luka Dončić trade, is expected to be in win-now/defense-wins-championships/Nike-superstar mode again this summer.

    Giannis checks all of those boxes. Antetokounmpo, who has been known to be a dream target of the Warriors for a long time, made a late-night appearance at Curry’s party in San Francisco during All-Star weekend. Warriors officials on hand took (gleeful) notice — including fellow attendee, Golden State owner Joe Lacob. Draymond Green and Kevon Looney were part of the get-together as well. Giannis and Steph, it should be noted, are both represented by the same Octagon agency. Still, it was a Warriors-centric event with one notable, and very large, exception. And while Golden State is deeply invested in its Jimmy Butler era at the moment, the reality about a player like Antetokounmpo is that his greatness could compel nearly every owner and GM in the league to adjust their plan. But I’m getting ahead of myself. Despite the spotlight turning Antetokounmpo’s way on Monday, we’re not there just yet.

    Nehm: I’d push back a little bit on one point, DA. I agree that Antetokounmpo’s play remains above reproach, but I don’t know that I’d say the Bucks have done “nearly everything he’s asked over the years.” Yes, they made the big swing for Lillard, and they brought in Doc Rivers as coach after firing Adrian Griffin, but I don’t know that those were Antetokounmpo’s demands so much as they were the front office trying to keep their star happy after a couple of disappointing seasons. Antetokounmpo is not the type to make demands in the way that other stars do, but he’s been clear about his desire to compete for championships. And the Bucks have tried to deliver on that front, even if the results haven’t followed.

    The bigger issue, as you both have pointed out, is the lack of assets. The Bucks are in a tough spot with their draft capital, and they don’t have the young talent to make a blockbuster trade without gutting the roster around Antetokounmpo. If they were to trade him, they’d need to get back a package that allows them to rebuild quickly, but that’s easier said than done. Houston and San Antonio have the picks and young players to make something work, but would they be willing to part with enough to satisfy Milwaukee? And would Antetokounmpo be happy going to a non-contender like Houston or San Antonio, even if they have promising young cores?

    The Warriors angle is interesting, Sam, but I wonder about the fit. Golden State’s system relies so heavily on spacing and shooting, and Antetokounmpo’s lack of a consistent outside shot could clog things up. Plus, the Warriors don’t have a ton of assets to offer unless they’re willing to part with young players like Jonathan Kuminga or Brandin Podziemski, and even then, they’d need to get creative with salary matching. What do you think about the Warriors as a potential destination, Sam?

    Amick: It’s a fascinating one to consider, Eric, if only because the Warriors have been so open about their desire to pair a superstar with Curry in this late stage of his career. Antetokounmpo’s fit isn’t perfect, as you noted, because of the shooting issue. But his dominance in the paint and his defensive versatility could make them a nightmare to deal with, especially if they keep Draymond Green in the mix. The bigger question is what the Bucks would get back. Kuminga, Podziemski, and a couple of first-round picks might be the starting point, but Milwaukee would likely want more — and the Warriors don’t have a ton of draft capital to offer. Plus, as you mentioned, the salary matching is a nightmare with the Bucks being above the second apron.

    The Houston and San Antonio scenarios are more realistic from an asset perspective. Houston could offer a package centered around Amen Thompson, Jalen Green, and a boatload of picks, including their own and Phoenix’s future firsts. San Antonio could build something around Stephon Castle, their No. 2 pick in this draft, and additional picks like Atlanta’s 2025 and 2027 firsts. But both teams are still building toward contention, and Antetokounmpo might not have the patience to wait for them to get there. The Knicks and Nets make sense as big-market teams with enough assets to get in the conversation, but their offers would likely lean more on picks than proven young talent, which might not appeal to Milwaukee.

    The Dallas situation is the wild card. If they’re willing to put Cooper Flagg on the table, that changes everything. Flagg, at $13.8 million on his rookie deal, plus a couple of mid-sized contracts like P.J. Washington and Daniel Gafford, could make the money work. But would Dallas really give up a generational talent like Flagg for Antetokounmpo, who is 30 and hasn’t been out of the first round in three years? That’s a tough call, especially with Kyrie Irving and Anthony Davis already in place.

    Aldridge: The Dallas scenario is intriguing, but I’m skeptical they’d move Flagg. He’s the kind of player you build around for a decade, and with Irving and Davis, they’re already in win-now mode. Adding Antetokounmpo would make them a juggernaut, but the cost might be too steep. I keep coming back to Houston and San Antonio as the most logical partners if Milwaukee decides to go the rebuild route. Houston’s got the young talent and picks, and San Antonio’s got the draft capital and a clear vision with Wembanyama. A package of Castle, Keldon Johnson, Harrison Barnes, and a couple of firsts could be enough to get Milwaukee’s attention, especially if Antetokounmpo signals he’s open to a smaller market like San Antonio.

    The bigger question, to me, is what Antetokounmpo wants. He’s been loyal to Milwaukee, but he’s also been clear about wanting to win. If he’s truly open to a trade, he’s got to be looking at teams that can contend immediately — not teams that are a year or two away. That’s where the Warriors, Knicks, or even a dark horse like the Heat come into play. Miami doesn’t have the assets to pull it off without including Bam Adebayo, which they won’t do, but Pat Riley always finds a way to get in the mix for a star like this.

    Nehm: That’s the crux of it, isn’t it? What does Giannis want? He’s been so focused on competing that it’s hard to imagine him signing off on a trade to a team that’s not ready to win now. But the Bucks’ situation is so dire — with Lillard’s injury, the lack of picks, and the aging roster — that staying might mean accepting a few years of mediocrity. That’s not who Antetokounmpo is. He’s wired to chase greatness, and if the Bucks can’t provide that, he might have to look elsewhere. The question is whether he’s ready to take that leap and leave the only NBA home he’s ever known.

    For the Bucks, it’s a brutal spot. Trading Antetokounmpo would be admitting defeat, but keeping him and failing to contend could lead to the same outcome a year or two down the line. If they do trade him, they need to nail the return — young players who can be cornerstones and picks to rebuild the pipeline. Anything less, and they’re setting themselves back a decade. It’s a high-stakes summer for Milwaukee, and the whole league is watching.

    Photo Credit: Giannis Antetokounmpo looks on during a game against the Pacers. (Michael Hickey / Getty Images)

    Authors:

    • Sam Amick is a senior NBA writer for The Athletic, covering the NBA since 2008 and previously working for Sports Illustrated, SLAM, and USA Today.
    • Eric Nehm is a senior writer for The Athletic covering the Milwaukee Bucks. Previously, he covered the Bucks at ESPN Milwaukee and wrote the book “100 Things Bucks Fans Should Know & Do Before They Die.” Nehm was named NSMA’s 2022 Wisconsin Sports Writer of the Year.
    • David Aldridge is a senior columnist for The Athletic, covering the NBA and NFL since 1987, previously with The Washington Post, ESPN, and Turner Sports.

  • Dumbest proposed Giannis’ trade destination? Brooklyn Nets!

    Dumbest proposed Giannis’ trade destination? Brooklyn Nets!

    All sorts of dumb things are flying around, this Giannis to Nets story is possibly the worse. Why on earth would he leave a team optimised around him for one near the bottom of the league?

    1. Lack of Trade Assets

    The Nets are in a rebuilding phase after the Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving, and James Harden era left them with limited draft capital and young talent. To acquire a superstar like Giannis, Milwaukee would demand a hefty package, likely including multiple first-round picks, promising young players, and possibly an All-Star caliber player. Brooklyn’s most valuable assets include:

    • Cam Thomas, a scoring guard with potential but inconsistent defense and playmaking.
    • Nic Claxton, a solid defensive center but not a cornerstone for a contending team.
    • Draft picks, many of which are controlled by other teams (e.g., Houston owns Brooklyn’s 2026 and 2027 first-rounders due to the Harden trade).

    The Nets simply don’t have the blue-chip prospects or picks to entice Milwaukee, especially since the Bucks would want players who fit their timeline and complement their roster around Damian Lillard. Trading Giannis for a package centered around Thomas, Claxton, and limited picks wouldn’t align with Milwaukee’s goal of staying competitive.

    2. Financial Constraints

    Giannis is in the first year of a three-year, $175.3 million extension, with a cap hit of approximately $58.6 million in 2025-26. The Nets, while not hard-capped, are managing their salary sheet carefully to maintain flexibility during their rebuild. Adding Giannis’s massive contract would limit their ability to build a balanced roster around him, especially since Brooklyn lacks the depth to compete immediately. The luxury tax implications and the cost of re-signing players like Claxton or adding role players would strain their financial resources.

    3. Strategic Misalignment

    The Nets are focused on developing young talent and accumulating assets for long-term success, not mortgaging their future for a single star. General Manager Sean Marks has emphasized patience, as seen in their refusal to overpay for players in recent trade discussions. Trading for Giannis would mean doubling down on a win-now strategy, which contradicts their current direction. Brooklyn’s front office is more likely to target players who fit their timeline, such as high-upside prospects or cost-controlled veterans, rather than a 30-year-old superstar whose prime may not align with their competitive window.

    Why Giannis Wouldn’t Thrive in Brooklyn

    Even if the Nets could pull off a trade, Giannis’s fit with the team raises significant concerns. His game, while dominant, has weaknesses that Brooklyn’s current roster and infrastructure wouldn’t address, and the move wouldn’t automatically make them championship contenders.

    1. Lack of Complementary Star Power

    Giannis thrives when surrounded by players who can space the floor, handle the ball, and share the offensive load. In Milwaukee, players like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard provide shooting and playmaking, allowing Giannis to dominate in the paint and on drives. The Nets, however, lack a secondary star to complement him:

    • Cam Thomas is a score-first guard who struggles with efficiency (42.7% FG in 2024-25) and doesn’t create for others (2.8 assists per game).
    • Dennis Schröder, while a solid point guard, is better suited as a sixth man or secondary playmaker, not a co-star.
    • Ben Simmons, if healthy, could theoretically pair with Giannis as a playmaker and defender, but his inability to shoot (0% from three) clogs the lane and undermines spacing.

    Without a true co-star, Giannis would face the same defensive schemes that have challenged him in the playoffs—packed paint, sagging defenders, and double-teams—forcing him to rely on his inconsistent jumper or limited playmaking.

    2. Spacing and Offensive Fit

    Giannis’s game relies heavily on driving lanes and interior dominance, which requires shooters to stretch the floor. The Nets’ current roster lacks consistent outside shooting:

    • Brooklyn ranks 22nd in three-point percentage (34.8%) and 19th in three-pointers made per game (12.4) in the 2024-25 season.
    • Key rotation players like Claxton and Simmons are non-shooters, and Thomas’s three-point shooting (36.1%) is respectable but not elite.
    • Role players like Dorian Finney-Smith (35.5% from three) and Jalen Wilson (33.3%) don’t provide enough volume to punish defenses.

    In Milwaukee, Giannis benefits from shooters like Middleton (38.1% from three) and Brook Lopez (36.5%), who force defenders to stay honest. In Brooklyn, defenses could sag off non-shooters, daring Giannis to shoot from deep, where he’s struggled (career 28.5% from three, 29.1% in 2024-25). The Nets’ lack of spacing would exacerbate Giannis’s limitations as a half-court scorer.

    3. Defensive Concerns

    Giannis is a Defensive Player of the Year (2020) and one of the league’s best rim protectors, but he can’t single-handedly fix a team’s defense. The Nets rank 18th in defensive rating (113.2) in 2024-25, with weaknesses in perimeter defense and transition. Players like Thomas and Schröder are average defenders at best, and Simmons’s defensive impact has waned due to injuries and inconsistent effort. While Giannis and Claxton could form a formidable frontcourt defensively, the backcourt’s deficiencies would leave Brooklyn vulnerable to guards like Jayson Tatum, Donovan Mitchell, or Tyrese Haliburton in playoff matchups.

    4. Coaching and Infrastructure

    The Bucks’ system under coaches like Mike Budenholzer and Doc Rivers has been tailored to maximize Giannis’s strengths, with an emphasis on pace, transition, and defensive versatility. In contrast, Nets head coach Jordi Fernández is still establishing his system, focusing on player development and ball movement. While Fernández is a promising coach, it’s unclear whether he could immediately design an offense that hides Giannis’s weaknesses, especially with a roster not built for his style. Additionally, Brooklyn’s lack of playoff experience as a unit could hinder their ability to compete in high-stakes games, even with Giannis.

    Giannis’s Weaknesses: Unaddressed in Brooklyn

    Giannis’ game has well-documented limitations that have been exposed in playoff settings. A move to Brooklyn wouldn’t solve these issues and could even amplify them.

    1. Limited Outside Shooting

    Giannis’s three-point shooting remains a work in progress. In the 2024-25 season, he’s averaging 1.2 threes made on 4.1 attempts (29.1%), and his midrange game is inconsistent. In playoff series, teams like the Miami Heat (2020) and Toronto Raptors (2019) have built walls in the paint, forcing him to shoot or pass. The Nets’ lack of elite shooters and playmakers would allow opponents to employ similar strategies, putting more pressure on Giannis to create outside the paint—an area where he’s still developing.

    2. Playmaking Under Pressure

    Giannis’s playmaking has improved (6.0 assists per game in 2024-25), but he’s not a natural point-forward like LeBron James. In crunch time, he often relies on teammates to initiate offense or make decisions. Without a primary ball-handler like Lillard or Jrue Holiday, Giannis would face increased ball-handling duties in Brooklyn, potentially leading to turnovers (3.2 per game in 2024-25) or stagnant possessions.

    3. Free-Throw Struggles

    Giannis’s free-throw shooting (67.1% in 2024-25) remains a liability in close games, where hacking strategies can disrupt his rhythm. The Nets’ lack of clutch performers (Thomas is their primary late-game option) means Giannis would face even more pressure at the line, with no reliable fallback option to bail out the offense.

    4. Injury and Workload Concerns

    At 30 years old, Giannis has logged heavy minutes (33.8 per game in 2024-25) and taken significant physical punishment due to his aggressive style. The Nets’ thin roster would force him to carry a massive load on both ends, potentially increasing injury risk. Milwaukee’s depth allows Giannis to conserve energy for key moments, a luxury Brooklyn can’t offer.

    Championship Contender? Not in Brooklyn

    Even with Giannis, the Nets wouldn’t be immediate championship contenders. The Eastern Conference is stacked with teams like the Boston Celtics, Philadelphia 76ers, and New York Knicks, all of whom have deeper rosters and better cohesion. Boston’s versatile wings (Tatum, Jaylen Brown) and shooting would exploit Brooklyn’s lack of perimeter defense and spacing. Philadelphia’s Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey would overwhelm the Nets’ backcourt, and the Knicks’ physicality and depth would pose matchup problems.

    To become contenders, the Nets would need to add a second star, elite shooters, and defensive specialists around Giannis—moves that are nearly impossible given their limited assets and cap space. Without these pieces, Giannis would be in a similar position to his early Milwaukee years: a dominant force surrounded by a roster not ready to compete at the highest level.

    Get real!

    The Brooklyn Nets are unlikely to trade for Giannis Antetokounmpo due to their lack of trade assets, financial constraints, and rebuilding strategy. Even if they could acquire him, Giannis wouldn’t find the ideal environment to overcome his weaknesses or lead the Nets to a championship. His need for spacing, complementary star power, and a tailored system wouldn’t be met by Brooklyn’s current roster, and the team’s defensive and depth issues would persist. For now, Giannis is better suited to stay in Milwaukee, where the Bucks are built to maximise his strengths, while the Nets focus on their long-term vision.

  • Giannis and Wemby ain’t gonna happen

    Giannis and Wemby ain’t gonna happen

    The idea of trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the San Antonio Spurs has surfaced in speculative discussions among fans and analysts. While the notion of pairing Giannis with the Spurs’ generational talent, Victor Wembanyama, might seem enticing on paper, a deeper analysis reveals that such a move would be illogical for both basketball and strategic reasons.

    1. Clash of Playing Styles: Giannis and Wembanyama’s Incompatible Skill Sets

    Giannis Antetokounmpo and Victor Wembanyama’s playing styles are fundamentally at odds, creating significant overlap and diminishing returns on the court.

    a. Dominance in the Paint and Lack of Spacing

    Giannis is a paint-dominant force who thrives on attacking the basket, leveraging his athleticism, length, and ball-handling to score efficiently at the rim. According to NBA stats, Giannis ranked second in the league in points in the paint (22.4 per game) during the 2024-25 season, with 68% of his shots coming within 10 feet. His game relies heavily on driving lanes and collapsing defenses to create opportunities for himself and teammates.

    Wembanyama, while versatile, also commands significant space in the paint, both offensively and defensively. As a 7’4” unicorn, Wemby’s ability to protect the rim (3.6 blocks per game in 2024-25) and score inside (12.8 points in the paint per game) makes him a gravitational force in the low post. Pairing two players who both excel in the same area risks clogging the paint, reducing driving lanes, and forcing one or both to operate outside their comfort zones.

    The Spurs’ offensive system under Gregg Popovich emphasized spacing, ball movement, and perimeter play to maximise Wembanyama’s versatility. Giannis, however, requires the ball in his hands to initiate drives, which could disrupt San Antonio’s flow. With Giannis’ limited outside shooting (27.7% from three in 2024-25), defences would sag off him, daring him to shoot and shrinking the floor for Wembanyama’s face-up game or pick-and-roll actions.

    b. Ball-Dominant vs. Off-Ball Roles

    Giannis is most effective as a primary ball-handler, orchestrating the offense and creating plays in transition or pick-and-roll scenarios. In Milwaukee, he averages 5.8 assists per game, often acting as the Bucks’ de facto point forward even though he is not at all good at it. Wembanyama, while not a traditional point centre, is developing into a hub for San Antonio’s offence, with his passing (4.1 assists per game) and ability to stretch the floor drawing comparisons to Nikola Jokić. The Spurs are much faster and more flexible than Giannis can even understand, let alone play with.

    Pairing two players who thrive with the ball in their hands creates a dilemma: who runs the offense? Forcing Wembanyama into a strictly off-ball role would underutilize his playmaking and shooting, while relegating Giannis to a secondary role would neuter his impact as a downhill creator. The Spurs’ young core, including Devin Vassell and Keldon Johnson, already requires touches to develop, and adding Giannis’ high-usage style (31.2% usage rate) would stifle their growth and disrupt team chemistry.

    c. Defensive Redundancy

    Defensively, both Giannis and Wembanyama are rim protectors and versatile defenders capable of guarding multiple positions. Giannis’ 1.2 blocks and 1.1 steals per game complement his ability to switch onto guards or anchor the paint, while Wembanyama’s league-leading blocks and 1.3 steals showcase his unparalleled defensive range. However, pairing them creates redundancy rather than synergy. Sure, Giannis has been lazier and lazier since winning the chip in defence, but just how little can he do and get away with it?

    The Spurs already rely on Wembanyama as their defensive anchor, using his length to erase mistakes and deter drives. Adding Giannis would leave San Antonio with two players competing for the same defensive responsibilities. This overlap could lead to confusion in rotations, especially against teams with strong perimeter attacks that exploit the lack of specialised wing defenders. Already the Bucks have suffered from Giannis not knowing what he is doing. This season 4th quarters without Giannis have been much better. The Spurs need complementary defenders—like 3-and-D wings—to maximise Wembanyama’s impact, not another paint-bound star.

    2. Giannis’ Weaknesses and Poor Fit with the Spurs’ System

    Beyond the stylistic clash, Giannis’ weaknesses make him a suboptimal fit for the Spurs’ roster and long-term vision.

    a. Limited Outside Shooting

    Giannis’ lack of a reliable jump shot is a glaring issue in San Antonio’s system. Popovich’s offenses have historically prioritized floor spacing to create driving lanes and open looks, as seen with players like Danny Green and Patty Mills during the Spurs’ championship runs. Giannis’ career 28.6% three-point shooting and 65.7% free-throw shooting allow defenses to employ a “wall” strategy, packing the paint and daring him to shoot.

    In Milwaukee, Giannis benefited from shooters who stretch the floor and punish sagging defenders. In fact the Bucks were again the best 3point shooting team in the NBA. The Spurs, however, lack consistent outside threats, with Vassell (36.1% from three) being their primary perimeter weapon. Pairing Giannis with Wembanyama, who shoots 34.6% from three, would not provide enough spacing to prevent defences from collapsing, limiting the effectiveness of both stars.

    b. High Usage and Developmental Impact

    The Spurs are in a rebuilding phase, focused on developing young talent like Wembanyama, Vassell, Jeremy Sochan, and rookie Stephon Castle. Giannis’ high-usage style would demand a significant share of possessions, reducing opportunities for these players to grow. For example, Vassell’s 19.5 points per game and Castle’s role as a secondary creator would take a backseat to Giannis’ 30.1 points per game and ball-dominant approach.

    San Antonio’s long-term goal is to build a cohesive unit around Wembanyama, not to pivot to a win-now strategy that sacrifices youth for a star who may not align with their timeline. At 30 years old, Giannis is in his prime, but his peak may not coincide with the Spurs’ contention window, projected to open when Wembanyama reaches his mid-20s.

    c. Injury Concerns and Physical Toll

    Giannis’ game relies heavily on athleticism and physicality, which takes a toll on his body. He has missed an average of 12 games per season over the past three years, including a calf injury that sidelined him for the 2024 playoffs’ first round. The Spurs, already cautious with Wembanyama’s minutes due to his unique frame, cannot afford to invest in another injury-prone star whose style invites wear and tear.

    Moreover, Giannis’ reliance on driving and rim attacks pairs poorly with Wembanyama’s need for a clean paint to operate. The physicality of Giannis’ game could lead to collisions or crowded lanes, increasing the risk of injuries for both players.

    3. Strategic and Financial Considerations

    Beyond on-court fit, trading for Giannis poses significant strategic and financial challenges for the Spurs.

    a. Trade Cost and Roster Depletion

    Acquiring Giannis would require an astronomical trade package, likely including multiple first-round picks, young talents like Vassell or Sochan, and salary fillers. The Spurs’ treasure trove of draft capital (including picks from Atlanta and Chicago) is a key asset for building around Wembanyama, and depleting it for Giannis would limit their ability to add complementary pieces.

    Losing players like Vassell, a 24-year-old scorer with two-way potential, or Sochan, a versatile defender, would also weaken the Spurs’ depth. Milwaukee, in turn, would demand proven assets, leaving San Antonio with a top-heavy roster ill-equipped to compete against deeper teams like Denver or Boston.

    b. Salary Cap Constraints

    Giannis’ supermax contract, with a $57.6 million cap hit in 2025-26, would hamstring the Spurs’ flexibility. San Antonio currently operates with significant cap space, allowing them to sign role players or take on bad contracts for draft compensation. Adding Giannis’ deal, alongside Wembanyama’s eventual extension, would lock the Spurs into a luxury-tax situation before their young core matures, limiting their ability to build a balanced roster.

    c. Cultural and Coaching Fit

    Popovich’s system thrived on selflessness, ball movement, and role clarity, as exemplified by the 2014 championship team. Giannis, while a willing passer, is accustomed to a Bucks system tailored to his strengths, with shooters and spacers surrounding him. Asking him to adapt to a motion-based offence at this stage of his career could lead to friction, especially given the Spurs emphasis on collective play over individual dominance. Giannis has not been known for basketball IQ or flexibility. In fact he seems to not even understand advanced NBA basketball systems.

    4. Better Alternatives for the Spurs

    Instead of pursuing Giannis, the Spurs are better served targeting players who complement Wembanyama’s skill set. A playmaking guard like Trae Young or a 3-and-D wing like Mikal Bridges would address San Antonio’s needs for perimeter creation and defensive versatility. These players would enhance Wembanyama’s strengths without overlapping his role, creating a more balanced and scalable roster.

    Alternatively, the Spurs could continue developing their young core and leveraging their draft capital to acquire ascending talents or high-value picks. With Wembanyama as the cornerstone, San Antonio has the luxury of patience, and chasing a superstar like Giannis prematurely risks derailing their long-term vision.

    Sorry to bust your bubbles

    Trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the San Antonio Spurs is a tantalizing but deeply flawed idea. The clash of playing styles between Giannis and Wembanyama, rooted in their paint dominance, ball-handling demands, and defensive redundancy, would create more problems than solutions. Giannis’ weaknesses—limited shooting, high usage, and injury concerns—further exacerbate the poor fit, while the trade’s cost, financial burden, and cultural mismatch make it a strategic misstep. The Spurs’ focus should remain on building a cohesive, complementary roster around Wembanyama, not chasing a superstar whose game doesn’t align with their vision. For now, Giannis belongs in Milwaukee, and the Spurs should keep their sights on a future tailored to their generational talent.

  • Trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Houston Rockets Makes No Sense

    Trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Houston Rockets Makes No Sense

    The idea of trading Giannis Antetokounmpo, a two-time NBA MVP and one of the league’s most dominant players, to the Houston Rockets has surfaced in speculative discussions. While the Rockets are a young, rebuilding team with promising talent, such a trade would be illogical for both Giannis and Houston.

    Giannis Antetokounmpo: A Dominant Force with Notable Flaws

    Giannis, often referred to as the “Greek Freak,” is a generational physical talent. His ability to dominate in the paint, defend multiple positions, and lead fast breaks used to be unmatched. However, even a player of his calibre has weaknesses that teams must account for when building around him. These flaws—namely his lack of a consistent outside shot, limited play making vision, and struggles in high-pressure half-court offence—make a trade to the Rockets a poor fit.

    1. Lack of Consistent Outside Shooting

    Giannis’ most glaring weakness is his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc. In the 2023-24 season, Giannis shot just 27.4% from three-point range on 1.3 attempts per game, per Basketball-Reference. While he’s improved marginally over the years, he remains a non-threat from deep, allowing defenses to sag off him and clog the paint. This is problematic for a Rockets team that emphasizes spacing and perimeter-oriented play.

    Houston’s young core—Jalen Green, Jabari Smith Jr., and Cam Whitmore—relies heavily on driving lanes and open three-point looks. The Rockets ranked 7th in the NBA in three-point attempts per game (35.8) in 2023-24, per NBA.com. Pairing Giannis with this group would shrink the floor, as defenders could ignore him on the perimeter and collapse on Houston’s slashers. Without a reliable shooting big man (like Brook Lopez in Milwaukee) to pull defenders away, Giannis’ presence would stifle Houston’s offensive flow.

    2. Limited Playmaking Vision

    While Giannis is an elite scorer and rebounder, his playmaking is not at the level of other superstars like LeBron James or Nikola Jokić. He averaged 6.5 assists per game in 2023-24, but many of these come from straightforward kick-outs or dump-offs rather than intricate reads. His tunnel vision in high-pressure situations often leads to predictable passes or turnovers (3.7 per game last season).

    The Rockets’ offense thrives on ball movement and quick decision-making, with players like Fred VanVleet and Alperen Şengün facilitating from multiple positions. Adding Giannis, who demands the ball to maximize his impact, could disrupt this rhythm. Şengün, in particular, is a hub for Houston’s offense, averaging 5.0 assists in 2023-24. Forcing him to defer to Giannis would stunt his development and diminish the Rockets’ fluid, egalitarian system.

    3. Struggles in Half-Court Offense

    Giannis excels in transition, where his athleticism and length make him unstoppable. However, in the half-court, his game can become one-dimensional. Without a reliable jumper or elite playmaking, he often relies on bulldozing to the rim, which invites help defense and leads to inefficient possessions. In clutch situations, his free-throw shooting (65.7% in 2023-24) becomes a liability, as teams intentionally foul him to stop the clock.

    The Rockets, under coach Ime Udoka, are building a disciplined, versatile offense that balances inside-out play. Giannis’ heavy reliance on paint scoring would clash with Houston’s need for a more varied attack. Additionally, the Rockets’ lack of elite shooters (outside of VanVleet) means they can’t compensate for Giannis’ half-court limitations the way Milwaukee does with players like Damian Lillard or Khris Middleton.

    Why the Rockets’ Roster and Timeline Don’t Align with Giannis

    Beyond Giannis’ weaknesses, the Rockets’ current roster composition and rebuilding timeline make this trade a non-starter.

    1. Mismatched Timeline

    At 30 years old (as of December 2024), Giannis is in his prime and focused on winning championships now. The Rockets, however, are a young team focused on developing their core, which includes players like Green (22), Şengün (22), and Smith Jr. (21). Houston’s 41-41 record in 2023-24 was a step forward, but they’re not yet contenders. Trading for Giannis would require giving up multiple young assets and draft picks, gutting their future for a player whose prime may not align with their competitive window.

    Giannis’ contract, which runs through 2027-28 with a player option, is also a massive financial commitment. The Rockets, with their cap flexibility, are better suited to developing cost-controlled young players rather than taking on a supermax deal that limits their roster-building options.

    2. Defensive Redundancies

    Giannis used to be an elite defender, capable of guarding 1-through-5 and anchoring a top-tier defence. However, the Rockets already have strong defensive pieces in Tari Eason, Jabari Smith Jr., and Amen Thompson, who collectively provide versatility and rim protection. Adding Giannis would create redundancies, as Houston doesn’t need another paint-oriented defender at the expense of offensive spacing. Giannis can’t think and adapt as fast as they are currently operating, he would downgrade their D. Moreover, Giannis’ defensive impact thrives in systems with strong perimeter defenders to funnel opponents toward him.

    3. Trading Assets for a Poor Fit

    To acquire Giannis, the Rockets would likely need to part with Şengün, Green, and multiple first-round picks—assets that are the cornerstone of their rebuild. Şengün, in particular, is a rising star whose playmaking and scoring in the post complement Houston’s system far better than Giannis’ skill set. Trading him for a player with overlapping strengths (paint dominance) and exploitable weaknesses (shooting and half-court creation) would be a step backward.

    Additionally, the Bucks would have little incentive to trade Giannis to a non-contender like Houston unless overwhelmed by an offer. Milwaukee would likely demand proven stars or high-value picks, which the Rockets can’t afford to surrender without derailing their long-term vision.

    The Cultural and Strategic Disconnect

    Giannis is a loyal, culture-defining superstar who has repeatedly expressed his commitment to Milwaukee. His leadership style—intense, workmanlike, and team-first—fits a veteran-led contender, not a young, unproven squad like the Rockets. Houston’s culture under Udoka emphasizes discipline and growth, but integrating a player of Giannis’ stature could create pressure to win immediately, disrupting the organic development of their core.

    Strategically, the Rockets are better off targeting players who complement their existing roster. A stretch big or a two-way wing would address their needs without the complications of Giannis’ fit. For example, a player like Kevin Durant (if available) or a sharpshooting big like Karl-Anthony Towns would provide the spacing and versatility Houston needs to take the next step.

    No Texas for Giannis

    Trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Houston Rockets is a fantasy that collapses under scrutiny. His weaknesses—lack of outside shooting, limited play making, and half-court struggles—clash with Houston’s spacing-dependent, egalitarian offence. The Rockets’ young core, rebuilding timeline, and defensive redundancies further underscore the poor fit. For Giannis, a move to a contender with shooters and a proven system makes far more sense, especially as over the past years he seems confused and incapable of handling high pressure playoff situations. For the Rockets, staying the course with their promising youth is the smarter play. This trade is a lose-lose proposition that belongs in the realm of speculation, not reality.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 NBA Season: A Statistical Comparison to Previous Years. No accolades!

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 NBA Season: A Statistical Comparison to Previous Years. No accolades!

    The 2024-25 regular season saw some statistical declines in specific areas compared to his previous seasons. All statistics are sourced from reputable platforms like Basketball-Reference, ESPN, and NBA.com.

    Overview of Giannis’ 2024-25 Regular Season

    In the 2024-25 regular season, Giannis Antetokounmpo appeared in 67 games for the Milwaukee Bucks.

    Statistical Declines in 2024-25 Compared to Previous Seasons

    1. Points Per Game (PPG)

    2024-25: 30.4 PPG
    Giannis’ scoring output in 2024-25 was impressive but lower than his career-high 31.1 PPG in the 2022-23 season. Comparing to recent seasons:

    2. Free-Throw Attempts and Percentage

    2024-25: 10.8 FTA, 65.8% FT%
    Giannis’ free-throw shooting has long been a point of contention, and 2024-25 saw a decline in both attempts and efficiency:

    • Free-Throw Attempts (FTA):
      • 2023-24: 11.2 FTA2022-23: 12.3 FTA (highest in his career)2021-22: 11.4 FTA2020-21: 10.2 FTA2019-20: 10.0 FTA
      In 2024-25, Giannis averaged 10.8 free-throw attempts per game, lower than the previous three seasons. The league has figured him out.
    • Free-Throw Percentage (FT%):
      • 2023-24: 65.7% (nearly identical to 2024-25)2022-23: 64.5% (1.3% lower)2021-22: 72.2% (6.4% higher)2020-21: 68.5% (2.7% higher)2019-20: 63.3% (2.5% lower)
      His 65.8% FT% in 2024-25 was among his worst since 2019-20, significantly below his 72.2% peak in 2021-22. This regression in free-throw accuracy impacted his overall scoring efficiency, especially in close games and is a massive liability in a lot of situations.

    3. Steals Per Game (SPG)

    2024-25: 0.9 SPG
    Giannis’ defensive impact used to be a hallmark of his game, but his steals average in 2024-25 was a notable low:

    • 2023-24: 1.2 SPG
    • 2022-23: 0.8 SPG (career low, tied with 2021-22)
    • 2021-22: 1.1 SPG
    • 2020-21: 1.2 SPG
    • 2019-20: 1.0 SPG

    The 0.9 SPG in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, matching his 2019-20 output but falling short of his 2023-24 and 2020-21 figures. This dip may reflect a strategic shift, with Giannis focusing more on rim protection (1.2 BPG) or conserving energy on a Bucks roster dealing with injuries.

    4. Three-Point Shooting

    2024-25: 0.3 3PM, 25.9% 3P%
    Giannis has never been a prolific three-point shooter, but his 2024-25 numbers were particularly low:

    • Three-Point Makes (3PM):
      • 2023-24: 0.5 3PM
      • 2022-23: 0.7 3PM
      • 2021-22: 1.1 3PM
      • 2020-21: 1.1 3PM
      • 2019-20: 1.4 3PM
      His 0.3 three-pointers made per game in 2024-25 was the lowest since 2018-19 (0.2 3PM).
    • Three-Point Percentage (3P%):
      • 2023-24: 27.4%2022-23: 27.5%2021-22: 29.3%2020-21: 30.3%2019-20: 30.4%
      His 25.9% three-point shooting was the worst since 2017-18 (25.0%). This regression reflects a continued reluctance to shoot from beyond the arc, with only 1.1 three-point attempts per game in 2024-25. It is almost the worse 3pt shooting percentage in NBA history for a single season.

    5. Minutes Per Game (MPG)

    2024-25: 34.2 MPG
    Giannis played fewer minutes per game in 2024-25 than in most recent seasons:

    • 2023-24: 35.2 MPG
    • 2022-23: 34.2 MPG (tied with 2024-25)
    • 2021-22: 36.8 MPG
    • 2020-21: 33.0 MPG
    • 2019-20: 30.4 MPG

    The 34.2 MPG matches his 2022-23 figure but is lower than 2023-24 and 2021-22. This reduction could be due to load management, injuries to teammates like Lillard, or coaching decisions under Doc Rivers.

    Other stats

    1. Offensive Rebounds Per Game (ORPG) 2024-25: 2.7 ORPG

    Giannis’ offensive rebounding, a key component of his ability to generate second-chance points, saw a decline in 2024-25:

    2023-24: 2.9 ORPG 2022-23: 2.2 ORPG 2021-22: 2.0 ORPG 2020-21: 1.6 ORPG 2019-20: 2.1 ORPG His 2.7 offensive rebounds per game in 2024-25 were lower than his 2023-24 mark (2.9 ORPG) but higher than the four preceding seasons. The slight drop from 2023-24 could be due to a shift in role, with Giannis focusing more on playmaking (6.5 APG) or playing alongside other rebounders like Bobby Portis and Kyle Kuzma, reducing his opportunities on the offensive glass.

    2. Defensive Rebounds Per Game (DRPG) 2024-25: 9.2 DRPG

    Giannis’ defensive rebounding, which contributes to his league-leading total rebounds, also dipped slightly:

    2023-24: 9.6 DRPG 2022-23: 9.6 DRPG 2021-22: 9.9 DRPG 2020-21: 9.4 DRPG 2019-20: 11.4 DRPG His 9.2 defensive rebounds per game in 2024-25 were lower than every season since 2019-20. This decline may reflect increased competition for rebounds within the Bucks’ lineup or a strategic emphasis on transitioning quickly to offense rather than securing every defensive board.

    3. Assist-to-Turnover Ratio (AST/TOV) 2024-25: 1.91 AST/TOV (6.5 APG, 3.4 TOV)

    Giannis’ assist-to-turnover ratio in 2024-25 was worse than several prior seasons. He simply screws up more and more:

    2023-24: 1.92 (6.5 APG, 3.4 TOV) 2022-23: 1.44 (5.7 APG, 3.9 TOV) 2021-22: 1.75 (5.8 APG, 3.3 TOV) 2020-21: 2.07 (5.9 APG, 2.8 TOV) 2019-20: 1.61 (5.6 APG, 3.7 TOV) The 2024-25 AST/TOV ratio of 1.91 was slightly worse than 2023-24 (1.92) and significantly lower than 2020-21 (2.07). While Giannis maintained a high assist average (6.5 APG), his turnovers remained consistent at 3.4 per game, suggesting that his increased ball-handling responsibilities didn’t translate to better ball security compared to his peak efficiency in 2020-21.

    4. Player Efficiency Rating (PER) 2024-25: Estimated 28.0 PER

    Player Efficiency Rating (PER) measures a player’s per-minute productivity, normalised to a league average of 15.0. Giannis’ PER in 2024-25 was lower than several prior seasons:

    2023-24: 29.8 2022-23: 29.0 2021-22: 32.1 (career high) 2020-21: 29.2 2019-20: 31.9 His estimated 28.0 PER in 2024-25 (based on Basketball-Reference trends) was lower than four of the past five seasons, with only 2022-23 (29.0) being closer. This dip reflects slight regressions in scoring efficiency, turnovers, and defensive metrics like steals, though he remained among the league’s top performers.

    5. True Shooting Percentage (TS%) 2024-25: 59.8% TS%

    True Shooting Percentage accounts for field goals, three-pointers, and free throws to measure overall shooting efficiency. Giannis’ TS% in 2024-25 was:

    2023-24: 61.3% 2022-23: 60.5% 2021-22: 63.3% 2020-21: 61.7% 2019-20: 61.3% His 59.8% TS% in 2024-25 was the lowest since 2018-19 (59.7%) and worse than all five previous seasons. This decline is largely attributable to his poor free-throw shooting (65.8%) and reduced three-point accuracy (25.9%), which dragged down his overall efficiency despite a solid 55.7% FG%. Seeing as he mainly dunked this season, this drop is very worrying.

    6. Win Shares Per 48 Minutes (WS/48) 2024-25: Estimated 0.220 WS/48

    Win Shares Per 48 Minutes measures a player’s contribution to team wins, normalised per 48 minutes. Giannis’ WS/48 in 2024-25 was:

    2023-24: 0.233 2022-23: 0.208 2021-22: 0.281 2020-21: 0.260 2019-20: 0.279 His estimated 0.220 WS/48 in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, surpassing only 2022-23. This drop reflects declines in offensive efficiency (e.g., TS%) and defensive contributions (e.g., steals).

    7. Box Plus/Minus (BPM) 2024-25: Estimated 8.5 BPM

    Box Plus/Minus estimates a player’s contribution to team performance per 100 possessions. Giannis’ BPM in 2024-25 was:

    2023-24: 8.8 2022-23: 8.6 2021-22: 11.8 2020-21: 9.2 2019-20: 11.1 His estimated 8.5 BPM in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, with only 2022-23 (8.6) being comparable. This slight decline aligns with reduced efficiency (TS%, PER) and defensive metrics (SPG, DRPG), though he remained a top-tier contributor.

    Yes, Giannis is past his prime and not improving

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 regular season featured important and meaningful statistical regressions. He posted lower numbers in points (compared to 2022-23), free-throw attempts and percentage, steals, field goal attempts, three-point shooting, and minutes played compared to various prior seasons. As Giannis is past his prime at age 30, these declines signal a meaningful downward trend, yet another reason no teams are beating down the door for trades.

    Sources: Basketball-Reference.com, ESPN.com, NBA.com, RotoWire.com, Proballers.com, LandOfBasketball.com, Yahoo Sports, and posts on X. All stats are accurate as of April 30, 2025.

  • Giannis Trade Rumors: The NBA’s Annual Obsession

    Giannis Trade Rumors: The NBA’s Annual Obsession

    It’s like groundhog day every time. For nearly a decade, the NBA off season has been punctuated by one recurring story line: the potential trade of Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ two-time MVP and 2021 NBA champion. Like an annual ritual, speculation about the “Greek Freak” leaving Milwaukee floods headlines, social media, and podcasts, driven by the league’s superstar-centric culture and the Bucks’ small-market challenges. But Giannis is mainly the one to blame.

    The Genesis of the Giannis Trade Saga

    The seeds of Giannis trade rumors were planted in the late 2010s, as Antetokounmpo evolved from a raw prospect into a dominant force. By 2018, his back-to-back All-Star appearances and Most Improved Player award (2017) made him a cornerstone for Milwaukee, but the Bucks’ playoff shortcomings—consecutive early exits in 2017 and 2018—sparked questions about whether a small-market team could build a championship roster around him. As his contract neared its end in 2020, the rumors hit a fever pitch. Would Giannis stay loyal to Milwaukee, or would he bolt for a bigger market like Miami, Toronto, or Golden State?

    The Bucks quelled the speculation by securing Giannis with a five-year, $228 million supermax extension in December 2020, followed by a championship in 2021. Yet, the trade chatter never truly died. Each year, a new wave of articles, X posts, and analyst hot takes reignites the debate, fueled by the NBA’s relentless appetite for superstar drama.

    The Annual Cycle: How It Happens

    Giannis trade rumors follow a predictable pattern, triggered by specific events and amplified by media and fan speculation. Here’s how the cycle unfolds, with examples of relevant articles and references from recent years:

    1. Triggering Events: Playoff Disappointments or Cryptic Comments

    Every rumor cycle begins with a catalyst—usually a Bucks playoff loss or a vague statement from Giannis. These moments provide fodder for speculation about his satisfaction with the team.

    • 2019: Playoff Loss to Toronto
      After the Bucks fell to the Raptors in the Eastern Conference Finals, questions about Giannis’s future surfaced. An ESPN article by Tim Bontemps (May 2019, “Bucks’ future hinges on Giannis Antetokounmpo’s next move”) speculated that a lack of postseason success could push Giannis toward a bigger market, with teams like the Warriors and Heat mentioned as suitors.
    • 2020: Contract Uncertainty
      As Giannis’s contract decision loomed, the rumor mill exploded. A Bleacher Report piece by Eric Pincus (September 2020, “5 Teams That Could Trade for Giannis Antetokounmpo”) outlined potential blockbuster deals, naming Dallas and Miami as top destinations. X posts from fans and insiders, like @NBACentral, amplified the buzz, with one viral post reading, “Heat are preparing a massive offer for Giannis if he doesn’t sign the extension.”
    • 2023: First-Round Exit and Giannis’s Comments
      The Bucks’ stunning first-round loss to the Miami Heat in 2023, coupled with Giannis’s postgame remarks about prioritizing winning over loyalty, sent shockwaves through the league. A Yahoo Sports article by Dan Devine (April 2023, “Giannis Antetokounmpo’s future in Milwaukee is uncertain after playoff collapse”) dissected his comments, suggesting he might demand a trade if the Bucks couldn’t contend. X users piled on, with @HoopsRumors tweeting, “Giannis to Miami? The vibes are strong after that presser.”
    • 2024: Another Early Exit
      The Bucks’ 2024 first-round loss to the Indiana Pacers, hampered by injuries to Giannis and Damian Lillard, reignited the rumors. An NBA.com analysis by Shaun Powell (May 2024, “Bucks’ title window shrinking? Giannis’s next move looms large”) questioned whether Milwaukee’s core could stay competitive. Social media posts tagged #GiannisTrade spiked, with users speculating about a move to the Knicks or Thunder.

    2. Media Amplification: Articles and Trade Scenarios

    Once a trigger event occurs, national and local media outlets churn out speculative pieces, often proposing elaborate trade packages or dream destinations. These articles, while hypothetical, lend credibility to the rumors and keep them alive.

    • 2021: Post-Championship Speculation
      Even after the Bucks’ 2021 title, some outlets couldn’t resist. A Sports Illustrated article by Michael Shapiro (August 2021, “Could Giannis Antetokounmpo still leave Milwaukee?”) argued that a future trade wasn’t off the table if the Bucks regressed. The piece cited the Nets and Lakers as potential landing spots.
    • 2022: Quiet Year, But Still Rumors
      Despite a strong 2022 season, a CBS Sports article by Sam Quinn (July 2022, “Ranking the top 5 stars most likely to be traded: Is Giannis next?”) included Giannis on a speculative list, pointing to Milwaukee’s aging roster as a concern. Social media discussions followed, with @TheAthleticNBA polling users: “Would Giannis ever leave Milwaukee? Where would he go?”
    • 2025: The Latest Wave
      As of May 2025, the Bucks’ inconsistent 2024-25 season—marked by injuries to Khris Middleton and uneven play from their Lillard-Giannis duo—has fueled a fresh batch of articles. A recent ESPN piece by Zach Lowe (April 2025, “Milwaukee’s make-or-break offseason: Will Giannis stay patient?”) explores the Bucks’ roster challenges and names the Heat, Knicks, and Spurs as teams with the assets to pursue Giannis. Local outlet Milwaukee Journal Sentinel countered with a piece by Jim Owczarski (May 2025, “Why Giannis Antetokounmpo remains committed to the Bucks”), but the national narrative dominates.

    3. Social Media Fuel and Fan Speculation

    Social media is of course the epicentre of Giannis trade rumours, where fans, insiders, and trolls amplify the noise. Every off season, hashtags like #GiannisTrade or #BucksOffseason trend, with users posting mock trades, memes, and hot takes.

    • 2023 Example: After Giannis’s “I want to win” comments, @NBABuzz tweeted, “Giannis to the Heat would break the NBA. Imagine him with Bam and Butler.” The post garnered thousands of likes, sparking debates about trade feasibility.
    • 2024 Example: Following the Pacers loss, @BasketballTalk shared a fan-made trade graphic sending Giannis to the Knicks for Julius Randle, draft picks, and fillers. The post went viral, prompting Knicks fans to flood X with “Giannis in MSG” hype.
    • 2025 Example: This year, social media users have zeroed in on Miami again, citing Giannis’s friendship with Bam Adebayo. A May 2025 post by @SlamOnline read, “Sources say Miami is monitoring Giannis’s situation closely. Heat Culture fit?” The post, while unsourced, fueled thousands of replies.

    4. Slow News Days and Offseason Hype

    The NBA offseason is notoriously slow, and Giannis trade rumors fill the void. Analysts and podcasters lean into hypotheticals to keep audiences engaged, often recycling old narratives. For instance, a 2023 episode of “The Bill Simmons Podcast” (July 2023) spent 20 minutes debating Giannis-to-Boston scenarios, despite no evidence of a trade. Similarly, a 2024 “First Take” segment on ESPN (June 2024) featured Stephen A. Smith proclaiming, “If the Bucks flop again, Giannis is GONE!”—a claim that generated clicks but lacked substance.

    Why the Rumors Persist

    Several factors ensure Giannis trade talk remains an annual fixture:

    • Superstar Leverage: In the player-empowered NBA, stars like Giannis wield immense control. A single ambiguous comment—like his 2023 remark, “I don’t want to stay if we’re not competing”—can spark weeks of speculation.
    • Small-Market Insecurity: Milwaukee’s small-market status makes it a perpetual underdog in retaining talent. The Bucks lack the glitz of Miami or New York, feeding narratives that Giannis might crave a bigger stage.
    • Playoff Pressure: Giannis’s postseason performance is scrutinized intensely. Early exits, like 2023 and 2024, raise doubts about the Bucks’ supporting cast, prompting trade hypotheticals.
    • Media Incentives: Trade rumours drive engagement. Outlets know Giannis’s name guarantees clicks, and social media thrives on polarising debates, ensuring the cycle repeats.

    The 2025 Rumor Landscape

    As of May 2025, the Bucks’ up-and-down season has kept Giannis trade rumors alive. Injuries, chemistry issues with Lillard, and a tough Eastern Conference have raised concerns about Milwaukee’s title hopes. Recent social media posts highlight Miami and New York as top destinations, with @HoopCentral tweeting, “Knicks have the picks and young talent to make a Giannis trade work. Would it be worth it?” Meanwhile, Bucks fans push back, citing Giannis’s loyalty and the team’s 2021 title as reasons he’ll stay.

    Why Giannis Stays (For Now)

    Despite the annual frenzy, Giannis has reaffirmed his commitment to Milwaukee repeatedly. In a 2024 press conference, he said, “This is my home. I want to win here.” His 2020 supermax deal runs through 2027, and trading him would require a historic haul—multiple stars, picks, and salary fillers—that few teams can offer without gutting their roster. The Bucks’ front office has also shown aggression, landing Lillard in 2023 to bolster their core.

    The Bigger Picture

    The Giannis trade rumor saga is a microcosm of the NBA’s obsession with superstar movement. Each year, the league craves the next blockbuster, and Giannis—given his transcendent talent and Milwaukee’s vulnerabilities—is the perfect lightning rod. At 30, he remains a top-five player, capable of reshaping any franchise. While a trade isn’t imminent, the annual speculation reflects the NBA’s high-stakes drama and the enduring allure of “what if.” Until Giannis retires or the Bucks collapse, expect the trade rumours to return every off season, as reliable as the changing seasons. And Giannis makes it worse as certain actions and comments from him contribute to the speculation.

    1. Cryptic or Ambiguous Comments: Giannis has made statements that, while honest, leave room for interpretation. For example, after the Bucks’ 2023 playoff loss to Miami, he said, “I want to play for a team that’s going to compete for championships,” and emphasized he wouldn’t stay somewhere just for loyalty if winning wasn’t possible. These remarks, quoted in a Yahoo Sports article (April 2023), sparked widespread debate about his commitment to Milwaukee. Similarly, in 2024, his comment about needing “the right pieces” to contend, reported by ESPN, reignited speculation. While Giannis likely intends to motivate his team or express competitive drive, the NBA’s hyper-scrutinized media landscape amplifies such quotes into trade rumors.
    2. Superstar Leverage and Silence: In the player-empowered NBA, stars like Giannis hold significant influence, and their silence on rumors can be as loud as their words. Giannis rarely shuts down trade speculation definitively. For instance, during the 2020 contract saga, he let rumors swirl for months before signing his supermax, as noted in a Bleacher Report piece (September 2020). Even post-extension, he doesn’t always dismiss trade talk outright, which allows media and fans on X to speculate freely. His reserved approach, while understandable, gives outlets like ESPN or The Athletic fuel to publish pieces like “Will Giannis stay patient?” (April 2025).
    3. Playoff Performance and Pressure: Giannis’s postseason struggles, whether due to injury or team shortcomings, draw intense scrutiny because of his status as a top-five player. Early exits in 2023 (vs. Miami) and 2024 (vs. Indiana), detailed in NBA.com’s 2024 analysis, shift focus to his role as the Bucks’ leader. When the team underperforms, fans and analysts question whether Giannis is frustrated, especially since he’s vocal about wanting to win. His high standards, while admirable, invite narratives that he might seek a trade to a stronger contender, as seen in social media posts like @NBABuzz’s 2023 tweet: “Giannis to the Heat would break the NBA.”
    4. Friendships and Off-Court Signals: Giannis’s relationships with players like Bam Adebayo (Miami) or his occasional workouts with stars in big markets, often shared on social media, add fuel. A 2025 @SlamOnline post about Miami “monitoring Giannis’s situation” leaned on his friendship with Adebayo, even without concrete evidence. These connections, while innocent, feed speculation that he’s open to joining friends elsewhere.

    Shams tweet didn’t materialise out of nowhere. Someone fed him that information. And it’s not at all crazy to assume it is linked to Giannis and was done intentionally.

  • “Underwhelming”Giannis, trade chatter, the Bucks look stuck after another lost season

    “Underwhelming”Giannis, trade chatter, the Bucks look stuck after another lost season

    Summary of the Article:

    The Milwaukee Bucks are facing a challenging offseason after another disappointing first-round playoff exit, falling to the Indiana Pacers in a heartbreaking Game 5 overtime loss. This marks their third consecutive early playoff exit following their 2021 NBA championship. The situation is compounded by Damian Lillard’s severe Achilles injury, which will likely sideline him for most of the next season, severely limiting the Bucks’ championship aspirations.

    Key Points:

    • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Frustration:
      Giannis has been vocal about his desire to move past first-round playoff failures, emphasizing the importance of making deep playoff runs. Despite his historic individual performances, the team has struggled to build a cohesive and effective roster around him.
    • Roster and Strategic Challenges:
      The Bucks’ attempt to integrate their “big three” of Giannis, Lillard, and Khris Middleton was short-lived and ineffective, leading to Middleton’s trade for Kyle Kuzma. The team showed flashes of strong defense, especially with Andre Jackson Jr., but struggled to find a consistent offensive identity.
    • Lillard’s Injury Impact:
      Lillard’s torn Achilles tendon drastically changes the Bucks’ outlook, as his large contract and uncertain recovery complicate roster flexibility and future planning. His injury also casts doubt on potential trades or roster changes that might have been considered if he had remained healthy.
    • Front Office and Coaching:
      Despite the setbacks, Giannis remains supportive of coach Doc Rivers and the front office, including GM Jon Horst, who was recently extended. The organization values stability but faces tough decisions with several key players becoming free agents or having player options.
    • Future Uncertainty:
      The Bucks must decide how to build around Giannis moving forward amid limited options and a roster that may only be competitive at a lower playoff level. Speculation about Giannis’s future with the team is rampant, but his commitment to Milwaukee remains strong for now.

    Conclusion:

    The Bucks are at a crossroads after failing to capitalize on their championship window. With Lillard’s injury and ongoing roster challenges, they face a difficult offseason in deciding how to remain competitive around Giannis. The team’s ability to adapt and make strategic moves will be critical to their future success, while Giannis’s leadership and vision will heavily influence the direction they take.

    Citations:
    https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6325492/2025/05/01/giannis-bucks-trade-chatter/

    Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Bears the Blame for the Bucks’ Downfall

    1 Failure to Evolve as a Playmaker
    Giannis Antetokounmpo is a force of nature, averaging 30.9 points, 11.9 rebounds, and 6.5 assists per game in the 2024-25 season, with a historic Game 5 performance against the Pacers (30 points, 20 rebounds, 13 assists, two blocks, and two steals). Yet, despite these gaudy numbers, his team lost. Why? Giannis has not fully embraced the playmaking role he claims to aspire to. He’s expressed a desire to be a “legit point forward” like LeBron James, using his “cookie jar” analogy to emphasise controlling the ball. However, his execution often falls short.


    In critical moments, Giannis reverts to forcing drives into crowded defences rather than consistently setting up teammates. His 6.5 assists per game are impressive, but they mask inefficiencies—turnovers in high-pressure situations and a reluctance to trust others when double-teamed. The Bucks’ offence stagnates when Giannis dominates the ball without creating easy looks for others, a flaw exposed repeatedly in playoff losses. For a player of his calibre, failing to evolve into a true floor general is a significant shortcoming that hampers the team’s potential.


    2 Public Comments Undermine Team Morale
    Giannis’ public statements have also fueled instability. His occasional remarks about his future—hinting at leaving Milwaukee if the team doesn’t meet his championship expectations—have created a cloud of uncertainty. These comments, like those following the 2023 and 2024 playoff exits, put pressure on the front office and teammates, fostering a sense of urgency that’s led to rash decisions. The trade for Damian Lillard in 2023, for instance, was partly driven by Giannis’ implicit threats to depart, sacrificing Jrue Holiday and depth for a star who hasn’t meshed seamlessly.


    Such rhetoric doesn’t just affect management; it impacts the locker room. Teammates, aware of Giannis’ potential exit, may question their own roles or the team’s direction. His leadership style, while intense, lacks the unifying quality of players like LeBron or even Dirk Nowitzki, who stayed loyal to Dallas through ups and downs without public ultimatums. Giannis’ words have inadvertently painted him as a star who prioritises personal success over collective loyalty, eroding the trust needed for a championship culture.


    3 Inability to Mesh with Lillard
    The Lillard-Antetokounmpo pairing was supposed to be a championship formula, but it’s been a disappointment. Lillard’s arrival forced Giannis to share the ball, a transition he’s struggled with. The Bucks’ offense often looks clunky, with Giannis and Lillard alternating possessions rather than complementing each other. Giannis’ ball-dominant style clashes with Lillard’s need for rhythm as a shooter and playmaker, leading to inconsistent performances.
    While injuries have played a part—Lillard’s Achilles tear is a massive blow—Giannis hasn’t done enough to make the partnership work. His insistence on controlling the “cookie jar” limits Lillard’s ability to operate in his natural role. Compare this to other superstar duos, like Durant and Curry, who adapted their games to maximize each other’s strengths. Giannis’ refusal to fully embrace a more flexible role has stifled the Bucks’ offense, making them predictable and easier to defend in the playoffs.


    4 The Bucks’ Desperate Moves Reflect Giannis’ Pressure
    The Bucks’ front office has bent over backward to appease Giannis, and the results have been disastrous. Trading Khris Middleton, a franchise cornerstone, for Kyle Kuzma in 2025 was a desperate attempt to shake things up, driven by Giannis’ looming free agency in 2027. The Lillard trade, the firing of Mike Budenholzer, and the hiring of Doc Rivers all stem from the need to keep Giannis happy. Yet, these moves have left the Bucks with a bloated payroll, no draft assets, and a roster ill-equipped to compete with elite teams like Boston or Oklahoma City.
    Giannis’ max extensions in 2020 and 2023, while earned, have also hamstrung the team’s flexibility. His $54.6 million salary, combined with Lillard’s $54.1 million, pushes Milwaukee into the second apron, limiting their ability to add talent. The Bucks’ lack of a development pipeline or tradeable assets is a direct consequence of building around Giannis’ timeline, leaving them with no fallback plan when injuries strike.


    5 A Legacy of Missed Opportunities
    At 30, Giannis is in his prime, but his window for another title is narrowing. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but the Bucks haven’t come close since. His inability to elevate the team in the postseason—missing key games in 2023 and 2024 due to injuries and failing to deliver in 2025 despite a historic stat line—raises questions about his clutch performance. Unlike other MVPs who’ve carried flawed rosters deep into the playoffs, Giannis has yet to show he can overcome adversity without a perfect supporting cast.
    His playstyle hasn’t adapted to modern NBA demands, his public comments have destabilised the organisation, and his inability to gel with Lillard has squandered a golden opportunity. The trade chatter surrounding him now, with teams like Houston, Brooklyn, and San Antonio circling, reflects a growing belief that Giannis may not be the leader to carry Milwaukee back to glory.


    Conclusion: Time for a Reckoning
    Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBA’s greatest names, but his tenure in Milwaukee is teetering on the edge. The Bucks’ collapse isn’t just about injuries or bad luck; it’s about a superstar who hasn’t fully embraced the leadership and adaptability required to sustain a contender. As trade rumours swirl, Giannis must confront his role in this mess. Whether he stays or goes, the Bucks’ woes trace back to his shortcomings as much as any external factor. For Milwaukee to move forward, Giannis needs to evolve—or the franchise may have no choice but to start anew without him.


  • Giannis Antetokounmpo: A Hypocrisy Debate

    Giannis Antetokounmpo: A Hypocrisy Debate

    1. Work Ethic vs. Practice Habits

    Giannis is renowned for his relentless work ethic, often sharing stories of his grind from a young immigrant in Greece to NBA stardom. He’s frequently praised for his dedication to improvement, whether it’s refining his jump shot or bulking up physically. However, critics have pointed to moments that seem to contradict this narrative.

    In 2023, reports surfaced from Bucks practices where Giannis was described as occasionally disengaged or skipping drills, particularly during the regular season. Former teammate Jae Crowder, in a subtle comment during a podcast, alluded to Giannis “picking his spots” in practice, implying he didn’t always match the intensity he publicly champions. While this could be strategic load management for a grueling 82-game season, it contrasts with Giannis’s public mantra of “working harder than everyone else.” Critics argue that if he’s vocal about outworking opponents, any perceived lack of effort, even in practice, undermines that claim.

    2. Humility vs. Public Boasts

    Giannis often portrays himself as grounded, crediting his family and upbringing for keeping him humble. He’s avoided the flashy persona of some NBA stars, endearing him to fans. Yet, there have been moments where his comments veer into self-aggrandisement, which some see as clashing with his humble image.

    A notable instance came during the 2021 NBA Finals post-game press conference after the Bucks’ championship win. Giannis remarked, “I didn’t take the easy way. I didn’t join a superteam,” a clear jab at players like Kevin Durant or LeBron James, who formed high-profile team-ups. While factually true—Giannis stayed with Milwaukee and won without a star-studded roster—the comment struck some as hypocritical. Critics noted that the Bucks had strategically built a strong supporting cast, including Jrue Holiday and Khris Middleton, both All-Stars at points in their careers. Dismissing other players’ paths while ignoring his own team’s advantages seemed selective, especially for someone who claims to focus solely on his own journey. And of course he then went on to ask for Lillard, making it even more hypocritical!

    3. Sportsmanship vs. On-Court Antics

    Giannis is often lauded for his sportsmanship, but certain on-court behaviours have drawn scrutiny. His prolonged free-throw routines, which sometimes exceed the NBA’s 10-second rule, have frustrated opponents and fans alike. In a 2022 game against the Philadelphia 76ers, Joel Embiid publicly called out Giannis for taking upwards of 12 seconds per free throw, accusing him of bending the rules. Giannis responded by saying he’s “just playing within the game,” but critics argue that if he prides himself on integrity, exploiting a rule loophole undermines that.

    Additionally, Giannis’s occasional trash-talking, while not excessive, has been seen as inconsistent with his “let my game speak” persona. In a 2024 playoff series against the Indiana Pacers, he engaged in heated exchanges with Tyrese Haliburton, later downplaying it as “just competition.” Yet, when younger players like Haliburton talk trash, Giannis has been quick to call them out, suggesting a double standard. Most importantly of course Haliburton beat him where it counts – in the playoffs.

    4. Loyalty vs. Trade Rumours

    Giannis has repeatedly expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating he’d rather stay and build a legacy than chase rings elsewhere. This stance has won over Bucks fans, especially in a small market. However, in 2023 and 2024, Giannis made cryptic comments about his future, saying he’d consider leaving if the Bucks couldn’t compete for titles. While understandable from a competitive standpoint, these remarks clashed with his earlier vows of unwavering commitment.

    Some argue this is less hypocrisy and more pragmatism—an athlete hedging his bets. But for fans who bought into his “loyalty forever” narrative, the shift felt like a betrayal of his own words. Critics point out that Giannis wants the image of a loyal superstar but also the leverage to push management, a balancing act that can feel disingenuous.

    The Bigger Picture: Athletes and Public Expectations

    The hypocrisy debate around Giannis highlights a broader issue: the unrealistic expectations placed on athletes. Fans and media often demand consistency in behaviour, words, and values, ignoring the complexities of being a public figure. Giannis, like any person, can’t perfectly embody every trait he’s praised for—hard work, humility, sportsmanship, loyalty—at all times. What he does seem to lack is the intelligence in how he tries to cover up when he makes mistakes. In a different post for example I explained how his treatment of his children on social media makes no sense at all.

    Is Giannis Antetokounmpo a hypocrite? The answer depends on how strictly you define the term. There are undeniable instances where his actions or words don’t fully align with his public persona, from practice habits to loyalty comments.

  • Carmelo Anthony Shuts Down Giannis Trade Rumors

    Carmelo Anthony Shuts Down Giannis Trade Rumors

    The NBA off season is often a breeding ground for speculation, and this year, Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo has found himself at the centre of swirling trade rumours. After the Bucks’ third consecutive first-round playoff exit in 2025, many pundits and fans have questioned whether the two-time MVP might seek a new team to chase another championship. However, NBA legend Carmelo Anthony recently weighed in on the debate, passionately dismissing the idea of trading Giannis and offering a thoughtful perspective on roster construction around the Bucks’ cornerstone.

    The Context: Bucks’ Playoff Struggles and Trade Speculation

    The Milwaukee Bucks’ 2024-25 season ended in disappointment, with a 4-1 first-round playoff loss to the Indiana Pacers. This marked the third straight year the Bucks failed to advance past the first round, a stark contrast to their 2021 NBA Championship triumph. The Bucks’ early exit, combined with their limited draft capital and a challenging salary cap situation (projected at $154.6 million for 2025-26), has fueled speculation about Giannis’ future. Milwaukee lacks control over their first-round picks until 2031, and key players like Brook Lopez and Bobby Portis could hit free agency soon. With Lillard potentially sidelined for much of the next season, some analysts have suggested that trading Giannis could be the best path for a franchise reset. Trade proposals have linked Antetokounmpo to teams like the Los Angeles Lakers, Miami Heat, Houston Rockets, and even the Toronto Raptors, with hypothetical packages involving young stars, draft picks, and role players.

    However, not everyone agrees that trading Giannis is the answer. Enter Carmelo Anthony, whose recent comments have added a fresh perspective to the conversation.

    Carmelo Anthony’s Take: “You’d Be Starting All Over”

    On a recent episode of his podcast, 7PM in Brooklyn, Carmelo Anthony addressed the Giannis trade rumors with a blend of pragmatism and respect for the Bucks’ superstar. Anthony argued that trading Antetokounmpo would be a shortsighted move for Milwaukee, emphasizing the difficulty of replacing a player of his caliber. “You’d be starting all over,” Anthony said. “You don’t get players like Giannis often. You’d be giving up a generational talent, and for what? A bunch of picks and maybe a young guy who might be good? That’s a gamble.”

    Anthony’s perspective is rooted in his experience as a former NBA star who navigated trade rumors during his own career. He highlighted the importance of building around Giannis rather than dismantling the roster. “The grass isn’t always greener,” he noted, suggesting that Giannis moving to another team wouldn’t guarantee a championship. Instead, Anthony urged the Bucks to conduct “due diligence” in constructing a competitive roster around Antetokounmpo, focusing on adding complementary pieces that align with his prime years.

    Anthony’s comments resonate with the Bucks’ current predicament. At 30 years old, Giannis is still in his prime, averaging 30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, and 6.5 assists per game in the 2024-25 season while earning his ninth consecutive All-Star nod. His contract, which runs through the 2026-27 season with a player option for 2027-28, gives Milwaukee time to retool rather than rebuild. Trading him now could yield a significant haul, but it would also mean parting with the most impactful player in franchise history—a move that could set the Bucks back for years.

    The Bucks’ Perspective: Loyalty and Financial Stakes

    The Bucks’ organization has repeatedly signaled their commitment to Giannis. Owner Marc Lasry told reporter Dave Bridge, “I don’t think he’s leaving Milwaukee. We’ve done everything we can to make Giannis feel comfortable that we’re doing the right thing.” This sentiment aligns with reports from ESPN’s Shams Charania, who noted that Giannis and the Bucks plan to meet this offseason to discuss his future and the team’s plans—an annual tradition that carries extra weight this year. Multiple sources have indicated that Giannis remains happy in Milwaukee and values his partnership with Lillard, despite the team’s recent struggles.

    Financially, Giannis is a cornerstone for the Bucks beyond his on-court contributions. As NBC Sports pointed out, Antetokounmpo is a major driver of ticket sales, sponsorships, and the team’s brand, particularly with the relatively new Fiserv Forum. Trading him would not only risk alienating fans but also jeopardize the franchise’s economic stability. The Bucks’ reluctance to initiate trade talks—unless Giannis explicitly requests a move—underscores his immense value to the organization.

    Giannis himself has expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating in 2025, “I don’t think that I would ever text [and ask for a trade]. I am not this kind of guy, they would have to kick me out.” His Instagram post after the playoff loss, featuring a Bucks shirt with the caption “Win for Cream City,” further suggests he’s not actively seeking a way out. However, his desire to win a second championship remains a priority, and he’s been candid about his disappointment in failing to achieve that goal since 2021.

    The Counterargument: Why Trade Rumors Persist

    Despite Anthony’s defense and Giannis’ loyalty, the trade rumors aren’t baseless. The Bucks face significant challenges in building a championship-caliber roster. Lillard’s injury, combined with an aging core (Lopez is 37, and Khris Middleton has battled injuries), limits Milwaukee’s flexibility. The team’s lack of draft picks hampers their ability to acquire young talent, and their cap situation makes it difficult to sign high-impact free agents. Some analysts, like The Athletic’s John Hollinger, argue that trading Giannis is the “only path that makes sense” for a franchise with limited assets, as it could provide the draft capital and young players needed for a rebuild. Furthermore it seems more and more that Giannis is past his prime with many important statistical categories worse this season than previous years. Most importantly it no longer seems like Giannis is unstoppable. Not in games that matter.

    Giannis’ own comments about wanting a second ring have fueled speculation. He told reporters, “If I am not able to help my team win a second ring, I’m letting down myself.” While he hasn’t demanded a trade, his focus on contending could push him to reconsider his future if the Bucks can’t improve their roster.

    What’s Next for Giannis and the Bucks?

    Carmelo Anthony’s stance highlights a critical point: trading Giannis would be a high-risk move with no guarantee of long-term success. Instead, the Bucks are likely to explore ways to retool their roster this offseason. Potential moves could include:

    • Trading Supporting Players: Rather than moving Giannis, the Bucks could look to trade veterans like Lopez or Portis to free up cap space or acquire younger talent.
    • Targeting Free Agents: Milwaukee could pursue cost-effective role players to bolster their depth, especially at guard, to compensate for Lillard’s absence.
    • Developing Young Talent: Players like Tyler Smith or AJ Johnson could step up, though they’re not yet ready to be difference-makers in a playoff series.
    • Hoping for Lillard’s Return: If Lillard can recover by mid-2025-26, the Bucks could regain their status as contenders, provided they address other roster gaps.

    For Giannis, the decision hinges on his priorities. Does he value loyalty to Milwaukee, where he’s become a legend, or does his desire for another championship outweigh that commitment? His contract gives him leverage, but also time to see how the Bucks respond this off season. But even if he moves to a new team, how bad will it look if he fails there too?

    A Voice of Reason in a Sea of Speculation

    Carmelo Anthony’s comments serve as a reminder to approach trade rumors with caution. While the Bucks face real challenges, trading Giannis Antetokounmpo would be a drastic step with far-reaching consequences. Anthony’s call for “due diligence” in building around Giannis aligns with the Bucks’ stated commitment to their superstar, and it challenges the narrative that a trade is inevitable. As the offseason unfolds, all eyes will be on Milwaukee’s front office and Giannis’ meeting with team brass. For now, the Greek Freak remains the heart of the Bucks, and Carmelo Anthony’s words offer a grounded perspective in an otherwise frenzied rumour mill.

    Sources: Sports Illustrated, Bleacher Report, ESPN, NBC Sports, Yahoo Sports, The Athletic, HoopsHype, Lakers Nation, CBS Sports, and posts on social media.

  • Giannis post game 5 interview: hypocritical and cunning

    Giannis post game 5 interview: hypocritical and cunning

    Question 1: You guys were up seven in overtime, you had a chance to extend this series. What happened down the stretch?

    Giannis: “It was a tough game. We fought hard, gave everything we had. In overtime, we had a good lead, but they made some big shots. Haliburton made a tough layup at the end. We had our chances, but it’s a game of runs. They made one more play than we did. That’s basketball sometimes.”

    Question 2: You’ve been in these situations before, elimination games. How do you find that resilience to keep pushing, especially with the injuries this team has faced?

    Giannis: “I don’t try to seek resilience or extra motivation or anything. There’s no emotion or extra juice. I’m juiced up. I don’t need no extra juice, man. I kind of need to get rid of some juice that I have. I just go out there and play. I love playing basketball. I love competing. I love being in these moments. You don’t got to find nothing. It’s right there. You just go take it. That’s what I try to do every single night.”

    Question 3: You had a triple-double tonight, unbelievable effort. How do you feel about your performance and the team’s effort overall?

    Giannis: “I feel good about my performance, but it’s not about me. It’s about the team. We played hard, we competed. We left it all out there. I’m proud of the guys. We didn’t get the result we wanted, but we fought. That’s all you can ask for. You can’t control the outcome sometimes, but you can control your effort. I think we did that tonight.”

    Known for philosophical responses (e.g., 2023’s “no failure in sports” comment after losing to the Heat), Giannis often emphasizes effort over outcomes and avoids public criticism of teammates or coaches. It sort of worked the first time, was disrespectful the second time and now he is cunning in avoiding all game specific questions and just talking about his upbringing and personal story all the time. Because that’s all he has left having proven himself incapable of impacting a playoff series.

    Analysis of Logical Discrepancies.

    Statement: “We had a good lead, but they made some big shots. Haliburton made a tough layup at the end. We had our chances, but it’s a game of runs. They made one more play than we did. That’s basketball sometimes.” The phrase “that’s basketball sometimes” is way too simplistic, implying the loss was due to chance rather than specific failures. The Bucks’ collapse involved defensive lapses (allowing Haliburton’s penetration) and offensive stagnation (no field goals in the final 1:30 of overtime, per game logs from other sources). Giannis’ vague explanation avoids addressing these issues by not acknowledging correctable errors.

    Statement: “I don’t try to seek resilience or extra motivation or anything. There’s no emotion or extra juice. I’m juiced up. I don’t need no extra juice, man. I kind of need to get rid of some juice that I have. I just go out there and play. I love playing basketball. I love competing. I love being in these moments. You don’t got to find nothing. It’s right there. You just go take it. That’s what I try to do every single night.”

    Claiming “no emotion or extra juice” in an elimination game is logically inconsistent with the heightened stakes. Elimination games typically require additional emotional or strategic intensity, yet Giannis suggests he approaches Game 5 like any other night. This could imply a lack of situational adaptation, especially as the Bucks collapsed in overtime despite his efforts. For example, his eight potential assists in Game 1 yielded only one actual assist (per wisportsheroics.com), indicating teammates’ inability to capitalize on his playmaking, which might have required “extra juice” to inspire or adjust.

    In 2023, after losing to the Heat, Giannis passionately rejected the “failure” label, saying, “There’s no failure in sports. There’s good days, bad days… You don’t always win.” This showed emotional investment in reframing loss, contrasting with 2025’s claim of “no emotion.” The 2023 response suggested he cared deeply about outcomes, while 2025 implies emotional steadiness. You might want to pick a side Giannis!

    Saying he needs to “get rid of some juice” implies excessive intensity, which could be counterproductive. If Giannis was overly aggressive, it might have led to forced plays or turnovers, though no specific overtime errors are detailed (e.g., turnovers or bad shots). This contrasts with the team’s need for composed leadership to counter the Pacers’ run.

    Statement: “I feel good about my performance, but it’s not about me. It’s about the team. We played hard, we competed. We left it all out there. I’m proud of the guys. We didn’t get the result we wanted, but we fought. That’s all you can ask for. You can’t control the outcome sometimes, but you can control your effort. I think we did that tonight.”

    Giannis’ claim that “we left it all out there” and his pride in the teamis logically inconsistent with the supporting cast’s poor performance. Kyle Kuzma’s 0-point, 0-rebound, 0-assist stat line in 22 minutes (per wisportsheroics.com) and the team’s reliance on “unqualified players” like Taurean Prince highlight deficiencies. Praising the team’s effort might gloss over these failures, especially as the overtime collapse involved teammates missing shots and defensive breakdowns. As always Giannis is effectively saying “I was on my own playing hero ball and the rest are all useless” but pretending to dress it up.

    Saying “you can’t control the outcome sometimes” implies the loss was inevitable, which contradicts the game’s winnable nature. He said so himself a few days earlier in the “now I know what I need to do” interview. Guess he didn’t know after all! The Bucks led by seven in overtime, and errors like allowing Haliburton’s layup or failing to score late were controllable. This framing could downplay accountability for strategic or execution failures.

    Giannis’ claim of “no extra emotion” may be a response to the emotional toll of three straight first-round exits (2023-2025). His 2025 calmness could reflect emotional fatigue or a strategic choice to avoid vulnerability amid scrutiny. He basically avoided answering as he was at odds with many things he has claimed in the past where he has said the opposite.

    So….

    Giannis’ Game 5 post-game interview contains several logical discrepancies, primarily stemming from his optimistic framing of team effort and downplaying of specific failures in a high-stakes context.

    It is sad that Giannis had to revert to his classic mythologies, how he had to fight on the streets of Athens to sell trinkets and be chased by the police etc because he has no basketball related answers anymore. He tried one line of excuses after one early playoff exit the first time after the championship. He tried a different line of excuses the next. And yet another after that. He has run out of excuses and he knows it so he falls back to his classic storyline which always works. We know you have an amazing backstory Giannis. Maybe it’s time you admit you can’t improve on the court and that the NBA has figured you out. No, it isn’t “your turn” like that in pro basketball. Most people never get “a turn” even if they keep trying. It takes skill and improvement, neither of which you have been doing these past years.

  • Giannis is the worse team mate ever – Some case studies of players that thrived after they left him

    Giannis is the worse team mate ever – Some case studies of players that thrived after they left him

    Many players who shared the court with Giannis during his tenure left for new teams, seeking better opportunities to shine. While no former Bucks player has explicitly blamed Giannis YET for their failure to “fully bloom” in Milwaukee, the dynamics of playing alongside a ball-dominant superstar can limit roles and opportunities. I consider it more and more likely that over the years we will hear horror stories about how he squashed team mates’ chances and how they bloomed away from him.

    The Giannis Effect: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis’ game is a force of nature but his high-usage style (often exceeding 30% usage rate) means the Bucks’ offense revolves around him, which can marginalize teammates who need the ball to thrive. The Bucks’ roster-building strategy has prioritized veterans and role players to complement Giannis, often leaving younger or secondary stars with limited touches. While this approach led to a title, it’s sparked speculation about whether some players felt stifled. Some examples:

    1. Malcolm Brogdon (2016–2019)

    Bucks Tenure: Drafted 36th overall in 2016, Malcolm Brogdon quickly became a key contributor, earning the 2017 Rookie of the Year award. He averaged 12.8 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 3.8 assists over three seasons, shooting 40.2% from three. His steady play helped the Bucks reach the Eastern Conference Finals in 2019.

    Why He Left: In 2019, Brogdon became a restricted free agent, and the Bucks faced a luxury tax crunch. They facilitated a sign-and-trade to the Indiana Pacers for a first-round pick and two second-rounders, prioritizing cap flexibility to retain Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez. Brogdon later expressed disappointment, noting he wanted to stay but felt the Bucks’ financial constraints and roster priorities didn’t align with his value.

    Post-Bucks Career: In Indiana, Brogdon blossomed into a primary ball-handler, averaging 19.1 points and 7.0 assists in his first season (2019–20). He later joined the Boston Celtics, winning Sixth Man of the Year in 2023, and now starts for the Washington Wizards, posting career-high numbers. His role as a lead guard in Indiana and Boston suggests he needed more touches than Milwaukee’s Giannis-centric system allowed.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: There’s no direct evidence of Brogdon blaming Giannis, but his comments about the Bucks’ “business decision” hint at frustration with their roster strategy. Giannis’ ball-dominant style limited Brogdon’s playmaking opportunities, as the Bucks leaned on him as a catch-and-shoot guard rather than a primary creator. Brogdon’s success elsewhere suggests he outgrew the secondary role Milwaukee envisioned.

    2. Eric Bledsoe (2017–2020)

    Bucks Tenure: Acquired from the Phoenix Suns in 2017, Eric Bledsoe was a dynamic point guard who complemented Giannis with his defense and athleticism. He averaged 15.4 points, 4.6 assists, and 1.5 steals over three seasons, earning All-Defensive First Team honors in 2019. However, his playoff struggles—shooting 31.5% from the field in the 2019 ECF—drew criticism.

    Why He Left: In 2020, the Bucks traded Bledsoe, Grayson Allen, and draft picks to the New Orleans Pelicans for Jrue Holiday, aiming to bolster their championship hopes. Bledsoe’s inconsistent postseason play and the Bucks’ urgency to maximize Giannis’ prime drove the move. Bledsoe didn’t publicly criticize Milwaukee, but reports suggested he felt underutilized offensively.

    Post-Bucks Career: In New Orleans, Bledsoe averaged 12.2 points and 3.8 assists, a step down from his Bucks role. He later bounced between the Clippers and Trail Blazers before retiring in 2024. While he didn’t achieve greater success, his time in New Orleans offered more ball-handling freedom, though injuries and age (31 at the trade) limited his impact.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: No explicit blame surfaced, but Bledsoe’s role as a defensive specialist and secondary scorer in Milwaukee contrasted with his earlier days as a primary option in Phoenix. Giannis’ dominance and the Bucks’ shift to a heliocentric offense may have restricted Bledsoe’s ability to showcase his full skill set, contributing to perceptions that he underperformed.

    3. Jrue Holiday (2020–2023)

    Bucks Tenure: Acquired in a blockbuster trade in 2020, Jrue Holiday was instrumental in the Bucks’ 2021 championship, providing elite perimeter defense and clutch playmaking. He averaged 17.7 points, 6.4 assists, and 1.5 steals over three seasons, earning All-Defensive honors and fan adoration.

    Why He Left: In 2023, the Bucks traded Holiday to the Portland Trail Blazers (who flipped him to the Boston Celtics) as part of a package for Damian Lillard. The move was driven by Giannis’ public pressure to win another title and the front office’s belief that Lillard’s offensive firepower would elevate the team. Holiday expressed shock and hurt, having wanted to retire in Milwaukee, but didn’t directly blame Giannis even though Giannis obviously signed off on the deal.

    Post-Bucks Career: In Boston, Holiday thrived as a two-way star, winning his second NBA title in 2024. His role as a complementary piece alongside Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown allowed him to focus on defense and timely scoring, arguably a better fit than Milwaukee’s high-pressure environment. His success in Boston suggests he adapted well to a new system.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: Holiday hasn’t publicly blamed Giannis, but the trade stemmed from Giannis’ vocal desire for roster upgrades, as he hinted at leaving if the Bucks didn’t contend. Holiday’s departure was a byproduct of Milwaukee’s “win-now” mentality around Giannis, and some speculate his playmaking was underutilized in a system tailored to Giannis’ drives and kickouts.

    4. Jabari Parker (2014–2018)

    Bucks Tenure: Selected second overall in 2014, Jabari Parker was expected to be Giannis’ co-star. He averaged 15.3 points and 5.5 rebounds over four injury-plagued seasons, showing flashes of scoring prowess but struggling defensively. Two ACL injuries derailed his development, and he clashed with coach Jason Kidd over his role.

    Why He Left: In 2018, the Bucks declined to re-sign Parker, who joined the Chicago Bulls on a two-year, $40 million deal. Parker later said he felt the Bucks didn’t invest in his growth, citing inconsistent roles and a lack of offensive freedom. He didn’t name Giannis directly but alluded to the team’s shift toward a Giannis-centric system.

    Post-Bucks Career: Parker’s career spiraled after Milwaukee, with stints in Chicago, Washington, Atlanta, Sacramento, and Boston yielding diminishing returns. He last played in the NBA in 2022 and now competes overseas. While he didn’t bloom elsewhere, his Chicago signing was seen as a chance to reclaim his stardom, which never materialized due to injuries and fit issues.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: Parker’s comments about the Bucks’ system indirectly point to Giannis’ rise as the focal point. As Giannis emerged as a superstar, Parker’s role shrank, exacerbated by his injuries and defensive limitations. The Bucks’ pivot to building around Giannis likely marginalized Parker, though his own health issues were a bigger factor.

    5. Donte DiVincenzo (2018–2022)

    Bucks Tenure: Drafted 17th overall in 2018, Donte DiVincenzo evolved into a valuable 3-and-D guard, averaging 9.0 points and 4.0 rebounds over four seasons. He played a key role in the 2021 championship, shooting 40.1% from three in the playoffs.

    Why He Left: In 2022, DiVincenzo was traded to the Sacramento Kings in a deal for Serge Ibaka, as the Bucks sought frontcourt depth. He later signed with the Golden State Warriors and then the New York Knicks. DiVincenzo expressed frustration with the Bucks’ decision, feeling he was blossoming into a starter but was expendable due to roster priorities.

    Post-Bucks Career: DiVincenzo thrived in New York, averaging 15.5 points and 3.7 rebounds in 2023–24, earning a starting role and All-Star buzz. His growth as a two-way guard suggests he needed a larger offensive role than Milwaukee offered, where he was primarily a spot-up shooter.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: DiVincenzo hasn’t blamed Giannis directly, but his expanded role in New York highlights how Giannis’ ball dominance limited his touches. The Bucks’ system prioritized Giannis’ playmaking, relegating DiVincenzo to a 3-and-D role that capped his potential as a creator.

    Other Notable Departures

    • Thon Maker (2016–2019): The 10th overall pick in 2016, Maker showed promise as a stretch big but averaged just 4.6 points in Milwaukee. Traded to Detroit in 2019, he sought a bigger role but faded from the NBA by 2021. His exit was more about fit than Giannis’ influence, though the Bucks’ focus on veterans like Brook Lopez limited his minutes.
    • Grayson Allen (2021–2023): Acquired in 2021, Allen became a sharpshooting starter, averaging 10.7 points and shooting 40.8% from three. Traded to Phoenix in the Lillard deal, he signed a four-year, $70 million extension in 2024. Allen hasn’t criticized Giannis, but his larger role in Phoenix suggests he benefited from a system less centered on one star.

    Analyzing the Narrative: Is Giannis to Blame?

    No player has explicitly said, “Giannis held me back,” but the pattern is clear: many who left Milwaukee thrived in systems where they had more offensive freedom or defined roles. Giannis’ high-usage style and the Bucks’ championship-or-bust mentality often forced teammates into complementary roles—spot-up shooting, defense, or hustle plays. This can stifle players who crave ball-handling or scoring opportunities, as seen with Brogdon and DiVincenzo.

    However, blaming Giannis oversimplifies the issue. The Bucks’ front office, constrained by luxury tax limits and a lack of draft picks, prioritised veterans over developing young talent. Injuries (Parker, Bledsoe) and coaching changes (five head coaches since 2013) also disrupted continuity. Giannis himself has emphasised winning over individual glory, but his pressure to contend—evident in comments like, “I don’t want to be 20 years on the same team and don’t win another championship”—has pushed the Bucks to make win-now trades, often at the expense of players like Holiday or Brogdon.

    A Star’s Shadow or a Team’s Strategy?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance has undeniably shaped the Bucks’ identity, and while no player has directly blamed him for their departure, his high-usage role and the team’s win-now approach have limited opportunities for some. Players like Brogdon, Holiday, and DiVincenzo found greater success elsewhere, but their exits were driven more by financial constraints, trades, or roster fit than personal grievances with Giannis. The “Greek Freak” is both a blessing and a challenge—a superstar who demands a system tailored to his strengths. Players around him need to have zero ego and put up with the franchise focused on hiding Giannis’ many weaknesses.

    As the Bucks face another uncertain offseason, with Damian Lillard’s injury and trade rumors swirling, the question remains: can Milwaukee build a roster that maximizes Giannis while empowering others to bloom? Or will more players leave, chasing opportunities beyond his shadow?

  • How pampering Giannis has ruined the Bucks’ future

    How pampering Giannis has ruined the Bucks’ future

    The Milwaukee Bucks, a team with championship aspirations anchored by Giannis Antetokounmpo, find themselves in a precarious position as the 2025 NBA postseason looms. Despite their talent, the Bucks’ ability to make significant trades during or after the postseason is severely constrained by a combination of financial restrictions, limited trade assets, and roster challenges.

    The Salary Cap Straitjacket: Second Apron Restrictions

    The Bucks’ financial situation is one of the primary roadblocks to executing trades. As of the 2025 NBA season, the Bucks are operating above the second apron of the salary cap, a threshold set at $188.931 million. Teams above this line face draconian restrictions under the NBA’s new CBA, designed to curb excessive spending by high-payroll teams. These restrictions include:

    • No Salary Aggregation: The Bucks cannot combine multiple players’ salaries to match the salary of an incoming player in a trade. This limits them to one-for-one player swaps or trading a single player for a package of lower-salaried players, severely narrowing their trade options. For example, trading for a high-salary star would require moving a single high-salary player like Damian Lillard or Brook Lopez, which is complicated by their value to the team and their contracts.
    • Limited Trade Flexibility: To regain the ability to aggregate salaries, the Bucks would need to shed approximately $6.499 million to get below the second apron. This is easier said than done, as it would likely involve trading a valuable player like Bobby Portis ($12.578 million) or Pat Connaughton ($9.423 million) without taking significant salary back, which is challenging given their limited trade assets.
    • Tax Penalties: As a taxpaying team for several years, the Bucks face a hefty luxury tax bill, which discourages adding salary through trades. Any move that increases their payroll would amplify this financial burden, making cost-neutral or cost-reducing trades a necessity.

    The Bucks’ trade of Khris Middleton before the 2025 trade deadline, which brought them below the second apron, temporarily alleviated some restrictions by allowing salary aggregation in future trades. However, their payroll remains high, and they are still close to the second apron threshold, meaning any significant trade could push them back into restricted territory. This delicate balance limits their ability to pursue impactful players without shedding substantial salary first.

    A Depleted Asset Cupboard

    Even if the Bucks could navigate the salary cap restrictions, their lack of tradeable assets makes it difficult to construct appealing trade packages. The Bucks have been aggressive in recent years, trading away draft picks and young talent to build around Giannis. As a result, their asset pool is critically low:

    • Draft Picks: The Bucks have almost no draft capital to offer. They own only their 2031 first-round pick and second-round pick, with all other picks either traded or encumbered with swap rights. For instance, their 2028, 2029, and 2030 first-round picks were traded or swapped in the Damian Lillard deal. This scarcity makes it nearly impossible to sweeten trade offers, as draft picks are a primary currency in NBA trades.
    • Young Talent: The Bucks’ roster lacks young, high-upside players who could entice other teams. Their 2024 draft picks, AJ Johnson and Tyler Smith, are still developing and have not yet established themselves as valuable trade chips. MarJon Beauchamp, a 2022 first-round pick, was traded at the 2025 deadline, further depleting their pool of young talent. Without promising prospects, the Bucks struggle to offer long-term value in trades.
    • Tradeable Veterans: The Bucks’ most likely trade candidates are veterans like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton. Portis, with a $13.445 million player option for 2025-26, is a proven scorer but may not fetch a significant return due to his likely opt-out and the Bucks’ inability to attach picks. Connaughton, with a $9.423 million player option, is less appealing due to his declining production and the high cost (estimated at three to four second-round picks or a late first-rounder) to dump his contract. These players are useful but not game-changers in trade talks.

    The lack of draft picks and young talent means the Bucks must rely on player-for-player swaps, which are difficult to execute when their tradeable players are either too valuable to the team (e.g., Lillard, Lopez) or not valuable enough to other teams (e.g., Connaughton).

    Roster Challenges and Trade Feasibility

    The Bucks’ current roster, while talented, presents additional hurdles for postseason trades. Their key players—Giannis Antetokounmpo, Damian Lillard, Brook Lopez, and Kyle Kuzma—are either untouchable or difficult to move for various reasons:

    • Giannis Antetokounmpo: As the franchise cornerstone and an MVP candidate, Giannis is not going anywhere unless he demands a trade, which would signal a complete rebuild. Posts on social media suggest growing pessimism about the Bucks’ future, with some fans speculating that a first-round exit could lead to a Giannis trade request. However, trading Giannis would be a last resort, not a postseason strategy, and would require an unprecedented return that the Bucks’ limited assets couldn’t match in a counter-trade.
    • Damian Lillard: Acquired in a blockbuster trade in 2023, Lillard’s fit with the Bucks has been underwhelming, and his recent health issues (blood clots in his calf) and suspected Achilles injury have diminished his trade value. His massive contract, which extends through 2026-27 at over $58 million per year, is a significant obstacle, especially given his age (34) and recent performance dip. Trading Lillard would likely require attaching assets the Bucks don’t have, making it an unlikely postseason move.
    • Brook Lopez: At 37, Lopez remains a valuable defensive anchor, but his $23 million expiring contract is a double-edged sword. While it could be used to match salaries in a trade, his age and the Bucks’ need for a center make him difficult to replace. Trading Lopez would require receiving a comparable big man in return, which complicates deal structures.
    • Kyle Kuzma: Acquired in the Middleton trade, Kuzma has underperformed, shooting a career-low 42% from the field and 28.1% from three. His $23 million contract, which runs through 2026-27, is a tough sell for other teams, especially given his poor fit with the Bucks’ current roster. Trading Kuzma so soon after acquiring him would be an admission of a failed trade, and his low trade value makes it unlikely to yield a significant upgrade.

    The Bucks’ supporting cast, including Taurean Prince and Delon Wright, consists of minimum-salary players or veterans with limited trade appeal. This lack of depth and tradeable talent leaves the Bucks with few options to retool their roster without dismantling their core, which would undermine their championship aspirations.

    The Middleton Trade: A Double-Edged Sword

    The Bucks’ blockbuster trade of Khris Middleton at the 2025 trade deadline was a pivotal moment that both alleviated and exacerbated their trade challenges. In exchange for Middleton, rookie AJ Johnson, and a pick swap, the Bucks acquired Kyle Kuzma, Patrick Baldwin Jr., and a 2025 second-round pick from the Washington Wizards. This trade had significant implications:

    • Financial Relief: The trade brought the Bucks’ payroll below the second apron, granting them the ability to aggregate salaries in future trades. This was a critical step, as it removed the one-for-one trade restriction and opened up more deal structures.
    • Loss of a Key Contributor: Middleton, despite his injuries and declining play, was a proven playoff performer and Giannis’ longtime running mate. His departure left a void in shot-creation and clutch scoring, which Kuzma has failed to fill. The trade was seen as a disappointment by some analysts, who noted Middleton’s importance to the team’s postseason success.
    • Kuzma’s Poor Fit: Kuzma’s inefficient scoring and poor three-point shooting have made him a liability in Milwaukee’s system. His contract, while more manageable than Middleton’s, is still a challenge to trade due to his underwhelming performance.

    While the Middleton trade provided some financial flexibility, it did not address the Bucks’ core issues—lack of draft picks, young talent, and roster depth. It also highlighted the difficulty of finding trade partners willing to take on the Bucks’ contracts without significant sweeteners, which Milwaukee cannot provide.

    The NBA Trade Market and Postseason Timing

    The timing of postseason trades adds another layer of complexity. The NBA trade deadline for the 2024-25 season was February 6, 2025, meaning any “postseason” trades would occur in the offseason (typically June to October). However, the Bucks’ ability to make impactful moves in this period is limited by the following market dynamics:

    • Competitive Trade Market: The 2025 trade market saw significant movement, with stars like Luka Dončić, Anthony Davis, and Jimmy Butler changing teams. The Bucks, lacking the assets to compete for such players, are at a disadvantage against teams like the Nets, who have cap flexibility and multiple first-round picks to pursue stars like Giannis if he becomes available.
    • Postseason Performance Pressure: The Bucks’ postseason success (or lack thereof) will heavily influence their trade strategy. A third consecutive first-round exit, as feared by some analysts, could force the Bucks to consider drastic moves, but their limited assets make it difficult to pivot without trading Giannis or Lillard. Posts on social media reflect this sentiment, with fans and analysts suggesting the Bucks have “no path forward” without trading Giannis.
    • Offseason Constraints: In the offseason, the Bucks could theoretically sign buyout players or make smaller trades, but the same financial and asset limitations apply. Teams above the second apron face restrictions on signing buyout players to more than $12.8 million, and the Bucks’ lack of roster spots and tradeable contracts limits their flexibility.

    The Bucks’ inability to compete in a star-driven trade market, combined with their postseason performance pressure, makes it nearly impossible to execute game-changing trades without a major overhaul. Also quite importantly, other teams are looking for players that have proven themselves in the playoffs, not just regular season stat padders. Giannis , even in the extremely lucky championship run, cannot really claim to be a playoff monster any way you look at it.

    Strategic Considerations and Alternatives

    Given these constraints, the Bucks face a strategic dilemma. Here are the potential paths forward and why they are challenging:

    • Stand Pat: The Bucks could opt to run it back with their current core, hoping for better health and chemistry. However, their 48-34 record and fifth seed in the East, coupled with a disappointing playoff showing (down 0-2 to the Pacers), suggest this approach may not yield a championship.
    • Trade a Star: Trading Lillard or Lopez could free up salary and bring in new talent, but their contracts and recent performance make it difficult to find takers without attaching assets the Bucks don’t have. Trading Giannis would signal a rebuild, which is unlikely given the franchise’s commitment to contending. Also Giannis is a crowd pleaser and they may want to milk him as long as possible for that.
    • Small-Scale Moves: The Bucks could target low-cost veterans or buyout players, as they did with Delon Wright and Taurean Prince. However, these moves are unlikely to address their core issues—lack of athleticism, perimeter defense, and shot-creation—especially against elite Eastern Conference teams like the Celtics and Cavaliers. The gap is growing all the time, especially since Giannis doesn’t seem able to improve his game in terms of individual skills or teamwork.
    • Draft and Develop: With limited trade options, the Bucks could focus on developing AJ Johnson and Tyler Smith, but these players are years away from making a significant impact. The Bucks’ lack of draft picks also hampers this strategy.

    Each path is fraught with challenges, underscoring the near-impossibility of making impactful postseason trades without a major shift in strategy or an unexpected windfall (e.g., a team willing to take on Kuzma or Connaughton without significant compensation).

    Giannis is the key…and the cause of the problems

    The Milwaukee Bucks’ hopes of making significant postseason trades in 2025 are dashed by a perfect storm of financial restrictions, depleted assets, and roster challenges. The NBA’s second apron rules handcuff their ability to aggregate salaries, their lack of draft picks and young talent limits their trade appeal, and their high-salary veterans are either too valuable to trade or not valuable enough to fetch a meaningful return. The Middleton trade, while providing some flexibility, has not solved their core issues, and the competitive trade market further diminishes their chances of landing a game-changer. As the Bucks face a critical postseason, their path to improvement lies more in internal growth and minor tweaks than in blockbuster trades—a sobering reality for a team with championship ambitions.

    Giannis has demanded a lot of moves both in coaches and players. After saying he won it “the right way” and claiming it was no “superteam” (even though it clearly was) he proceeded to try and make a superteam while at the same time showing no flexibility or basketball IQ in order to gel a team together. He has focused on his personal stats and promotion while destroying the trade value of everyone else on his team. So he has put himself in a hole: leave the team he has ruined for the future or stay and play the lone superhero on a team that keeps losing?

  • Why Kendrick Perkins Is Right: The Bucks Are Struggling and Giannis Bears the Blame

    Why Kendrick Perkins Is Right: The Bucks Are Struggling and Giannis Bears the Blame

    Kendrick Perkins, never one to mince words, recently dropped a bombshell on NBA discourse by declaring that “the Bucks are trash” and pointing the finger squarely at Giannis Antetokounmpo as the primary culprit. While some might dismiss Perkins’ take as hot-take sensationalism, a deeper dive into the Milwaukee Bucks’ 2024-25 season reveals that his assessment holds water. The Bucks, despite their championship pedigree, are floundering, and Giannis, as the team’s cornerstone, must shoulder much of the responsibility.

    The Bucks’ Disappointing Season

    As of April 27, 2025, the Milwaukee Bucks are languishing in the Eastern Conference standings, hovering around a .500 record—a far cry from their 2021 championship form. Once a dominant force, the Bucks have been plagued by inconsistent play, defensive lapses, and an inability to close out games against both elite and mediocre opponents. Losses to teams like the Charlotte Hornets and Washington Wizards—squads they should dispatch with ease—have become alarmingly common.

    The Bucks’ offensive rating ranks in the middle of the pack, a surprising drop for a team with two former MVPs in Giannis Antetokounmpo and Damian Lillard. Defensively, they’re even worse, sitting in the bottom third of the league in defensive rating. This is a stark contrast to their championship season, when their stifling defense, anchored by Giannis and Brook Lopez, suffocated opponents. The eye test confirms the numbers: the Bucks look disjointed, lacking the cohesion and intensity that once defined them.

    Perkins’ blunt assessment that “the Bucks are trash” might sound harsh, but it captures the reality of a team that’s underperforming relative to its talent and expectations. The Bucks aren’t just struggling—they’re regressing, and the reasons point back to their superstar.

    Giannis’ Role in the Bucks’ Struggles

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and 2021 Finals MVP, is undeniably one of the NBA’s most dominant players. His ability to attack the rim, defend multiple positions, and elevate his game in clutch moments has made him a perennial All-NBA talent. However, even the best players can falter, and Giannis’ shortcomings this season are magnifying the Bucks’ woes. Here’s why Perkins’ finger-pointing at Giannis is justified:

    1. Leadership and Accountability Leadership and Accountability

    As the face of the franchise, Giannis is expected to set the tone for the Bucks both on and off the court. Yet, this season, his leadership has been inconsistent. Reports from the locker room suggest a lack of accountability, with Giannis occasionally deflecting blame rather than rallying his teammates. For example, after a blown lead against the Cleveland Cavaliers in March 2025, Giannis publicly criticized the team’s effort but failed to acknowledge his own late-game turnovers that sealed the loss. A true leader owns their mistakes, and Giannis’ reluctance to do so has created a ripple effect, eroding team morale.

    Perkins, a former NBA champion, knows the importance of a superstar galvanizing their squad. His critique likely stems from seeing Giannis fall short in this intangible but critical aspect of leadership. Without a unified locker room, the Bucks lack the grit needed to overcome their on-court deficiencies.

    2. Offensive Limitations

    Giannis’ game, while dominant, has glaring holes that opponents have exploited. His lack of a reliable jump shot—particularly from beyond the arc—allows defenses to sag off him, clogging the paint and neutralizing Milwaukee’s offense. In the 2024-25 season, Giannis is shooting a career-low 20.3% from three-point range on minimal attempts, and his free-throw percentage has dipped to 65.7%. These deficiencies are especially costly in crunch time, where teams dare him to shoot, knowing he’s unlikely to deliver.

    This isn’t a new critique of Giannis, but what’s alarming is the lack of progress. At 30 years old, he’s had ample time to develop a jumper or refine his free-throw shooting, yet these weaknesses persist. Perkins’ frustration likely stems from seeing a player of Giannis’ caliber fail to evolve in ways that could unlock the Bucks’ offense. With Damian Lillard struggling to find his rhythm in Milwaukee, Giannis’ inability to stretch the floor compounds the team’s spacing issues, making their half-court offense predictable and stagnant.

    3. Defensive Regression

    Giannis’ defensive prowess was once his calling card, earning him the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. However, this season, his defensive impact has waned. Advanced metrics like Defensive Box Plus-Minus show a decline, and film analysis reveals moments of disengagement on that end. Opponents are attacking Giannis more aggressively, exploiting his slower lateral movement and occasional lapses in help defense.

    The Bucks’ defensive scheme relies on Giannis as a roving free safety, but his reduced effort has left Brook Lopez exposed in drop coverage and forced Khris Middleton to overcompensate on the perimeter. Perkins, a defensive stalwart during his playing days, likely sees this as a betrayal of the Bucks’ identity. If Giannis isn’t anchoring the defense, the entire system collapses, as evidenced by the team’s plummeting defensive rating.

    4. Failure to Elevate Teammates

    A hallmark of a true superstar is their ability to make their teammates better. LeBron James, Nikola Jokić, and even Luka Dončić consistently elevate lesser talents into key contributors. Giannis, however, has struggled to do this consistently. Players like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton have regressed this season, and even Lillard, a former All-NBA guard, looks like a shell of himself alongside Giannis.

    Part of this stems from Giannis’ ball-dominant style, which can stifle the offense. His high usage rate (around 33% this season) often leaves teammates standing around, waiting for kick-out passes that don’t always come. Perkins’ critique may reflect this dynamic: if Giannis isn’t facilitating or creating easy looks for others, the Bucks’ supporting cast can’t compensate for the team’s other flaws.

    The Bigger Picture: What’s Next for the Bucks?

    Perkins’ assessment, while blunt, is a wake-up call for Milwaukee. The Bucks are at a crossroads, and Giannis’ role in their struggles can’t be ignored. However, this doesn’t mean all hope is lost. Giannis is still a top-five player with the potential to turn things around. For the Bucks to salvage their season, a few things need to happen:

    • Giannis Must Evolve Offensively: Developing a mid-range jumper or improving his free-throw shooting would force defenses to respect him beyond the paint, opening up the floor for Lillard and Middleton.
    • Recommit to Defence: Giannis needs to rediscover his Defensive Player of the Year form, setting the tone for a Bucks defence that’s lost its edge.
    • Stronger Leadership: Giannis must hold himself accountable and foster a culture of unity, ensuring the team fights through adversity together.
    • Coaching Adjustments: Doc Rivers, the Bucks’ head coach, must also adapt. His rotations and late-game strategies have been questionable, and he needs to maximize Giannis’ strengths while masking his weaknesses.
    • Stop stat padding: We have seen him in trash time in blowouts, we have seen him almost every game denying younger players the opportunity to gain experience. It has to stop. Maybe he needs to seek psychological help about it.

    If these changes don’t materialise, the Bucks risk squandering their championship window. The NBA is unforgiving, and younger teams like the Boston Celtics and Cleveland Cavaliers are surging. Perkins’ warning isn’t just a critique—it’s a call to action.

    Perk is right

    Kendrick Perkins’ declaration that “the Bucks are trash” and Giannis is to blame might ruffle feathers, but it’s rooted in uncomfortable truths. The Bucks’ mediocre record, coupled with Giannis’ offensive limitations, defensive regression, and inconsistent leadership, paints a picture of a team and a superstar failing to live up to their potential. While Giannis remains a generational talent, his flaws are holding Milwaukee back, and Perkins’ bluntness shines a light on that reality.

    The good news? There’s still time for Giannis and the Bucks to turn things around. If Giannis can address his shortcomings and recommit to leading by example, Milwaukee could reclaim its place among the NBA’s elite. Until then, Perkins’ assessment stands: the Bucks are under performing, and Giannis, as their cornerstone, bears the brunt of the blame. Let’s hope this is the wake-up call they need to get back on track. Can Giannis improve? Can he learn new skills? More than a decade in the NBA shows he probably can’t.

    From Twitter, people recently saying the same thing :

  • Jon Horst’s Tenure as Milwaukee Bucks GM: where his fault ends and Giannis’ starts

    Jon Horst’s Tenure as Milwaukee Bucks GM: where his fault ends and Giannis’ starts

    Since taking the helm as General Manager of the Milwaukee Bucks in June 2017, Jon Horst has transformed the franchise into a perennial NBA contender, culminating in the 2021 NBA Championship. At just 34 years old when appointed, Horst was an unexpected choice, stepping into the role after John Hammond’s departure to Orlando. Despite his youth and relatively low profile, Horst’s strategic vision, bold decision-making, and ability to build around superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo have solidified his reputation as one of the NBA’s elite executives. This blog post dives into the key aspects of Horst’s tenure, highlighting his successes, challenges, and overall impact on the Bucks.

    Early Years: Building a Foundation

    Horst inherited a promising but unpolished roster featuring a young Giannis Antetokounmpo, Khris Middleton, and a mix of role players. His early tenure was marked by significant moves to reshape the team and establish a championship-caliber culture.

    Key Early Moves

    • Eric Bledsoe Trade (November 2017): Just months into his role, Horst executed a pivotal trade, sending center Greg Monroe and two draft picks to the Phoenix Suns for point guard Eric Bledsoe. Bledsoe brought defensive tenacity and offensive dynamism, addressing a need for a reliable guard. While Bledsoe’s playoff performances were inconsistent, his regular-season contributions helped elevate the Bucks’ competitiveness.
    • Hiring Mike Budenholzer (May 2018): After firing Jason Kidd midseason, Horst made a franchise-altering decision by hiring Mike Budenholzer, a coach known for maximizing roster talent. Budenholzer’s system unlocked Antetokounmpo’s potential and transformed the Bucks into a defensive and offensive juggernaut.
    • Drafting Donte DiVincenzo (2018): With the 17th pick, Horst selected DiVincenzo, who became a versatile contributor with his shooting and defensive instincts. Though injuries slowed his rookie year, DiVincenzo’s growth into a key rotation player showcased Horst’s eye for talent.
    • Signing Brook Lopez (2018): Horst’s signing of Lopez to a one-year, $3.4 million deal proved to be a masterstroke. Lopez evolved into an elite three-and-D center, anchoring the Bucks’ defense and stretching the floor for Antetokounmpo. This bargain contract remains one of Horst’s shrewdest moves.

    These decisions laid the groundwork for the 2018-19 season, where the Bucks achieved a league-best 60-22 record and reached the Eastern Conference Finals. Horst’s efforts earned him the 2019 NBA Executive of the Year award, a testament to his rapid impact.

    The Championship Era: 2020-2021

    The 2019-20 season ended in disappointment with a second-round playoff exit, prompting Horst to make aggressive moves to bolster the roster around Antetokounmpo, whose contract extension loomed large.

    Major Offseason Moves

    • Jrue Holiday Trade (November 2020): Horst swung a blockbuster deal, acquiring All-Star guard Jrue Holiday from New Orleans. The trade cost significant assets, including multiple first-round picks, but Holiday’s two-way play, leadership, and clutch performance were pivotal in the Bucks’ championship run.
    • Signing Giannis to a Supermax Extension (December 2020): Convincing Antetokounmpo to sign a five-year, $228 million extension was Horst’s most critical achievement. The move secured the Bucks’ cornerstone and signaled the franchise’s commitment to winning. Antetokounmpo cited his trust in Horst as a key factor in his decision.
    • Bryn Forbes and Bobby Portis Signings: Horst added sharpshooter Bryn Forbes and forward Bobby Portis on bargain contracts. Forbes provided critical shooting, notably in the playoffs, while Portis became a fan favorite and reliable bench scorer. Both players outperformed their modest deals, showcasing Horst’s ability to find value.
    • P.J. Tucker Trade (March 2021): Horst acquired veteran forward P.J. Tucker, whose defensive versatility and toughness were instrumental in the playoffs, particularly against Kevin Durant in the Eastern Conference Semifinals.

    These moves culminated in the 2021 NBA Championship, the Bucks’ first in 50 years. Horst’s ability to complement Antetokounmpo and Middleton with a balanced supporting cast—featuring Holiday, Lopez, Portis, and others—earned widespread praise. Everyone lauded Horst as the “architect of a championship roster,” with fans crediting his vision for building around Giannis who after all has many, many weaknesses as a player. It was no mean feat. He even managed to keep Giannis off the team at critical moments so Khris could get him to the final. Then , with everything more or less decided in the series, Giannis had a couple of good games thus making the myth about his playoff ability. (Of which as we all now see he actually has none.) Horst is a magician!

    Post-Championship Challenges: 2022-2024

    While the 2021 title was a high point, Horst faced challenges in maintaining the Bucks’ dominance, particularly with aging role players and limited draft capital.

    Mixed Results

    • Playoff Disappointments (2022-2023): The Bucks suffered a second-round exit in 2022 against Boston and a shocking first-round loss to Miami in 2023 as the No. 1 seed. Critics questioned Horst’s roster construction, pointing to a lack of depth and inconsistent performers like Pat Connaughton and Grayson Allen. Some fans called for Horst’s job, arguing he failed to build a sustainable supporting cast. The truth? It was amazing he got them as far as he did with Giannis clearly past his prime, playing less and less defence and focused on stat padding to the detriment of the team.
    • Draft Struggles: Horst’s draft record has been a weak point. Picks like D.J. Wilson (2017) and others failed to yield significant contributors, and the Bucks’ limited draft capital due to trades has hindered long-term roster building. It is to be expected since his diva Giannis, after making such a fuss about NOT wanting to play on a superteam, then demanded they get someone like Dame.
    • Firing Mike Budenholzer (May 2023): After the 2023 playoff upset, Horst made the bold decision to part ways with Budenholzer, hiring Adrian Griffin as his replacement. The move was divisive, and Griffin’s tenure was short-lived, leading to further scrutiny of Horst’s coaching decisions. Again, was the Horst or was this Giannis? We have all seen how Giannis acts on court, grabbing the chart and pretending he knows best, always blaming everybody else, humble for show only.

    Resurgence with Damian Lillard (2023-2024)

    Horst rebounded with a franchise-altering trade in September 2023, acquiring superstar guard Damian Lillard from Portland. The trade, which sent Jrue Holiday to Boston, was a high-risk, high-reward move to pair Lillard with Antetokounmpo and Middleton. Despite another first-round exit in 2024, exacerbated by injuries to key players, the acquisition signaled Horst’s willingness to take big swings to maximize the Bucks’ championship window and to appease Giannis’ constant moaning and groaning about getting no help. Meanwhile the way Giannis acts he is killing the resale value of any player on the Bucks by making them all look like they are useless.

    In the 2024 offseason, Horst navigated the NBA’s restrictive second apron rules, signing veterans Delon Wright and Taurean Prince to bolster depth. Fans on X praised these moves, with one user giving Horst an “A+” for his creativity under financial constraints.

    Strengths of Horst’s Tenure

    1. Star Retention and Recruitment: Horst’s ability to secure long-term extensions for Antetokounmpo, Middleton, and Holiday, while adding stars like Lillard, has kept Milwaukee competitive. His relationship with Antetokounmpo has been a cornerstone of the franchise’s stability.
    2. Value Signings: Players like Lopez, Portis, and Forbes, signed on cost-effective deals, have consistently outperformed expectations, demonstrating Horst’s knack for finding undervalued talent.
    3. Bold Trades: From Bledsoe to Holiday to Lillard, Horst has shown a willingness to make aggressive trades to improve the roster, even at the cost of draft picks.
    4. Cultural Impact: Horst has fostered a winning culture, supported by state-of-the-art facilities like Fiserv Forum and a collaborative front office. His leadership has made Milwaukee an attractive destination for players and executives.
    5. Protecting Giannis. It has been clear all along that Giannis simply lacks basketball IQ. Both on the court and off the court he is terrible when it counts. Yet the Bucks’ marketing has managed to keep him as the darling of NBA media despite his clear inability to improve.

    Legacy and Future Outlook

    Jon Horst’s tenure as Bucks GM is defined by remarkable highs—most notably the 2021 championship and the 2019 Executive of the Year award—and navigable lows. His ability to build a contender around Antetokounmpo, secure key extensions, and execute blockbuster trades has cemented his status as a top-tier GM. While draft struggles and recent playoff disappointments have drawn criticism, Horst’s proactive approach, as seen in the Lillard trade and 2024 offseason moves, suggests he remains committed to chasing titles.

    As the Bucks enter the 2024-25 season, Horst faces pressure to deliver another deep playoff run with a core of Antetokounmpo, Lillard, and Middleton. Speculation about a potential move to Detroit, fuelled by his Michigan roots, adds intrigue, but Horst’s loyalty to Milwaukee—where his family calls home—seems steadfast.

    Why Giannis Bears Responsibility for the Bucks’ Recent Struggles, Not Jon Horst

    While some fans and analysts point fingers at General Manager Jon Horst for roster construction, a closer look suggests that two-time MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo’s performance and decisions on the court are more significant contributors to the team’s recent failures.

    Giannis’ On-Court Shortcomings in Critical Moments

    Giannis Antetokounmpo is undeniably one of the NBA’s elite, with a resume boasting two MVP awards, a Finals MVP, and a 2021 championship. However, his postseason performances in recent years have exposed limitations that have hindered the Bucks. In the 2023 playoffs, Giannis struggled with free-throw shooting, a recurring issue that proved costly against the Miami Heat. His 44.7% free-throw percentage in that series allowed opponents to exploit the “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy, disrupting Milwaukee’s offensive rhythm.

    In 2024, injuries sidelined Giannis for key playoff games against the Pacers, but even when available, his inability to adapt to modern defensive schemes has been evident. Teams like Miami and Indiana have used wall-like defenses to clog the paint, daring Giannis to shoot from outside. Despite GM Jon Horst’s public confidence in Giannis developing a 3-point shot, his career 3-point attempts remain low (1.5 per game), and his 28.6% shooting from beyond the arc in the 2023-24 season shows little progress. This predictability allows opponents to neutralize his dominance, placing pressure on teammates to compensate.

    Moreover, Giannis’ high usage rate (34.9% in 2023-24) and tendency to dominate the ball can stifle the Bucks’ offense. Posts on X have criticized his reluctance to pass, with some fans noting that he “stopped passing the ball” due to a lack of trust in the roster. While this reflects frustration, it also highlights a failure to elevate teammates in crunch time, a hallmark of other superstars like LeBron James or Nikola Jokić.

    Injuries and Availability Issues

    Giannis’ injury history has also played a significant role in the Bucks’ recent postseason woes. He missed crucial games in both the 2023 and 2024 playoffs, including the entirety of the 2024 first-round series against the Pacers due to a calf strain. While injuries are unpredictable, Giannis’ physical playing style—relying on explosive drives and rim attacks—may contribute to his recurring ailments. His 2021 playoff run, despite a hyperextended knee, was triumphant, but subsequent injuries suggest a need for better load management or stylistic evolution to preserve his health. Here I broke down exactly why Giannis is 100% to blame for these injuries. After more than a decade in the NBA it really is not justifiable by any player to act so selfishly and plain dumb.

    Horst, on the other hand, has prioritized player wellness, emphasizing “awareness, sensitivity, concern, and education” in areas like nutrition and mental health. The Bucks’ state-of-the-art facilities and medical staff are designed to keep players like Giannis healthy, yet his absence in pivotal moments has left the team vulnerable, regardless of roster depth.

    Giannis’ Influence on Team Decisions

    As the Bucks’ cornerstone, Giannis wields significant influence over roster moves, and his preferences have occasionally backfired. In 2020, he pushed for the acquisition of Bogdan Bogdanović, a close friend, but the deal collapsed, leading to a public relations misstep and a lost draft pick. While Horst took the blame, Giannis’ involvement in the process underscores his role in shaping the roster. His supermax extension in 2020, while a commitment to Milwaukee, also locked the Bucks into a high-cost core, limiting Horst’s flexibility under the luxury tax.

    Contrast this with Horst’s proactive moves. The 2023 trade for Damian Lillard was a bold attempt to pair Giannis with another All-NBA talent, addressing the need for a second superstar after Jrue Holiday’s departure. Despite the trade’s mixed results, Horst’s willingness to take risks—without Giannis explicitly demanding the move—shows his commitment to maximizing the championship window. Horst also secured long-term extensions for core players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez, ensuring continuity around Giannis despite the fact that the entire league has figure him out and his trade value is sinking fast. The entire team constantly puts their needs and their egos aside to pamper and appease Giannis.

    Horst’s Track Record of Success

    Jon Horst’s tenure as GM has been marked by calculated risks and tangible results. Since taking over in 2017, he has transformed the Bucks into a perennial contender. His hiring of coach Mike Budenholzer in 2018 led to a 60-win season and the 2019 Executive of the Year award. The 2021 championship roster, featuring Jrue Holiday, Brook Lopez, and Khris Middleton, was largely Horst’s creation, with strategic additions like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton proving vital.

    Even in the face of setbacks, Horst has shown adaptability. After the failed Bogdanović trade, he pivoted to acquire Grayson Allen, who became one of the league’s top 3-point shooters in 2021-22. In 2023, facing a top-heavy roster, Horst added Jae Crowder to bolster defence, though the move didn’t pan out. Critics argue that Horst’s draft record is weak and the roster lacks depth, but these issues stem partly from trading picks for win-now players like Holiday and Lillard, moves designed to appease Giannis’ championship aspirations.

    The Milwaukee Bucks’ recent failures are not the fault of Jon Horst, who has consistently made bold moves to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo. From securing a championship in 2021 to trading for Damian Lillard, Horst has shown a commitment to keeping Milwaukee competitive, even at the cost of draft picks and salary cap flexibility. Giannis, while a generational talent, bears responsibility for his postseason struggles—whether through persistent free-throw woes, limited outside shooting, or injury-related absences. His influence on team decisions and reluctance to adapt his game have compounded the Bucks’ challenges. As the Bucks move forward, Giannis must evolve to meet the demands of playoff basketball, rather than expecting Horst to perpetually retool a roster around his limitations.

    Jon Horst has been an exceptional GM for the Milwaukee Bucks, transforming a promising team into a championship powerhouse. His strategic foresight, bold decision-making, and ability to maximise limited resources have set a high standard. While challenges remain, Horst’s track record suggests he’s the right leader to guide the Bucks toward further success. Giannis? Not so sure. The Bucks are at a dead end, and it’s on Giannis, not Horst.