In the NBA’s endless hypothetical superteam debates, few pairings spark as much intrigue as Giannis Antetokounmpo and Stephen Curry. On paper, the Greek Freak’s athletic dominance combined with Curry’s unparalleled shooting seems like a recipe for dynasty-level success. But dig deeper, and the fit starts to unravel. Giannis’s playing style—dominated by ball possession, physical drives, and limited off-ball contributions—clashes with Curry’s need for fluid motion, elite screening, and quick decision-making.
The Screening Issue: Giannis’s Weakness Undermines Curry’s Greatest Strength
Stephen Curry’s game revolves around off-ball movement and using screens to create space for his lethal three-point shooting. He’s thrived with screen-setters like Draymond Green, who not only set solid picks but also read defenses, slip when needed, and facilitate from the short roll. Giannis, however, is notoriously poor at this fundamental big-man skill, often prioritizing his own scoring over team play.
Observers have noted that Giannis tends to set screens too high or fails to establish a solid base, allowing defenders to slip around easily and disrupt the play. In pick-and-roll situations, he frequently slips the screen prematurely to hunt mismatches in the post, demanding the ball instead of creating opportunities for others. This self-focused approach was critiqued in analyses of his role with the Bucks, where even fans and analysts questioned his commitment to screening as a key offensive tool. For Curry, who relies on screens to generate 40% of his shots (per NBA tracking data), this would be disastrous. Without reliable picks, defenses could switch or hedge more aggressively on Curry, stifling his rhythm and forcing him into contested looks. Giannis’s athleticism might help in transition, but in half-court sets—where Curry does his damage—his screening lapses would turn the offense stagnant.
Social media echoes this sentiment, with recent discussions highlighting Giannis’s bad screening as a persistent flaw that hampers guard-big synergies. In a system like Golden State’s, where screening is an art form, Giannis’s habits would clash, leaving Curry isolated and underutilized.
Ball Dominance: Giannis’s Hogging Habits Would Starve Curry’s Off-Ball Brilliance
Giannis is one of the league’s highest-usage players, often controlling the ball for extended possessions to bulldoze to the rim. This “ball hog” label isn’t new—it’s been thrown at him in high-profile feuds, like with James Harden, who implied Giannis’s style lacks passing nuance. Stats back it up: Giannis’s usage rate hovers around 33-35%, meaning he touches the ball on a massive portion of possessions, often leading to iso-heavy play. Critics argue this pads his stats but doesn’t elevate teammates as effectively as true facilitators.
Curry, conversely, excels off the ball, using gravity to warp defenses even without possession. Pairing him with Giannis would force Curry into a spot-up role more often, diminishing his playmaking (he averaged 6.5 assists in 2024-25). Recent Bucks games highlighted this issue: when Giannis dominated the ball, teammates like Damian Lillard saw reduced touches, leading to frustration and inefficiency. On X (formerly Twitter), users frequently call out Giannis’s hogging, with posts noting how it led to losses despite his gaudy lines. In a Curry-led offense, this possessiveness would create tension, as Steph’s motion-based system demands quick ball movement—not prolonged dribble drives.
Clutch-Time Reliability: Giannis Falters When It Matters Most
Curry is synonymous with clutch performance, hitting game-winners and thriving under pressure with a career 43% three-point shooting in clutch situations. Giannis? His clutch stats tell a mixed story at best, often marred by poor free-throw shooting and decision-making. In 2024-25, he shot just 68.8% from the line in clutch minutes, missing key opportunities. Overall clutch efficiency ranks him mid-tier among stars, with a +15.1 net rating but inconsistent scoring (3.6 PPG in clutch games).
Critics point to playoff meltdowns, like the 2023 first-round exit where his free-throw woes (notably in clutch spots) contributed to the Bucks’ collapse. On X, discussions label him “not clutch,” citing games where he deferred or bricked in crunch time. For a duo with Curry, who’d draw double-teams late, Giannis’s unreliability—especially from the stripe—could cost championships. Defenses would foul him intentionally, turning potential wins into free-throw lotteries.
The Core Problem: Giannis’s Basketball IQ and Reaction Speed Don’t Fit Advanced Schemes
Most damning is Giannis’s perceived low basketball IQ, slow processing, and struggles with complex plays—traits that would torpedo a partnership with Curry’s cerebral, read-and-react style. Gilbert Arenas famously questioned Giannis’s smarts, asking if he’s “smarter than LeBron James or Stephen Curry” and arguing his success stems from athleticism, not intellect. Videos and analyses highlight players doubting his IQ, noting he relies on raw power over nuanced reads.
Reddit threads debate this, with many concluding he’s not “high IQ” despite stats. His reaction time in half-court offenses is slower, often leading to forced drives rather than exploiting mismatches creatively. Curry’s Warriors run intricate sets with split actions, back screens, and rapid decisions—Giannis’s inability to “think or react fast” would bog it down. Even his passing, while improved (7.3 APG in 2024), is critiqued as basic, not elite like Jokic’s or LeBron’s. In advanced plays, he’d struggle to adapt, turning a dynamic offense into a predictable one.
Hypothetical analyses of a Giannis-Curry pairing acknowledge the gravitational pull but warn of stylistic clashes. While some see it as “unfair” dominance, others note Giannis’s limitations would hinder Curry’s freedom.
A Superteam That Sounds Better Than It Plays
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a force of nature, but his screening deficiencies, ball-hogging, clutch inconsistencies, and limited IQ make him a poor fit for Stephen Curry’s ecosystem. Curry needs space creators and quick thinkers; Giannis provides brute force but at the cost of flow. In a league where chemistry trumps talent alone, this duo would frustrate more than dominate. Better to keep them apart—let Giannis bulldoze in Milwaukee, and Curry dance in the Bay. Real skills matter and Giannis simply hasn’t developed them at all. If anything he is getting worse (at ft% and 3pt% for sure.) As usual, Bucks (and Golden State) fans are talking as if the NBA is a video game.
In the ever-evolving drama of the NBA, few stories capture the tension between player power and organizational loyalty quite like the recent saga involving Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Milwaukee Bucks. On October 8, 2025, the two-time MVP made headlines with comments that hinted at a potential exit from Milwaukee if the team doesn’t contend for a championship this season. “Right now, my focus is on the Bucks,” Giannis said, “but it’s human nature to change your mind if things don’t go as planned.” These words, amid swirling trade rumors linking him to the New York Knicks—especially after their blockbuster acquisition of Karl-Anthony Towns—sparked immediate backlash.
Enter NBA legend Charles Barkley, who didn’t mince words during an appearance on ESPN. Barkley lambasted Giannis for what he perceives as entitlement, stating, “These guys, they feel like they’re entitled to play for the championship every year. … Everybody wants to win a championship, but the Bucks have done everything they possibly could.” Barkley’s critique resonates deeply, not just because of his Hall of Fame credentials, but because it highlights a stark reality: the Bucks have bent over backward to build a contender around Giannis, often at great cost to their future. In this blog post, we’ll dive into why Barkley is spot-on and why Giannis’s stance comes across as ungrateful, given the franchise’s extraordinary efforts.
The Bucks’ Investment in an Unknown Prospect
Let’s rewind to 2013. The Milwaukee Bucks, a small-market team often overshadowed in the NBA landscape, took a gamble on a lanky, relatively unknown teenager from Greece in the NBA Draft. Selected 15th overall, Giannis Antetokounmpo was far from a sure thing—raw talent with immense potential but little polish. The Bucks didn’t just draft him; they invested years in his development. Through dedicated coaching, strength training, and on-court opportunities, they transformed him from a skinny prospect into the “Greek Freak,” a dominant force who would go on to win two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year honor, and lead the team to glory.
This patience and belief paid off spectacularly in 2021 when Giannis delivered a championship to Milwaukee, ending a 50-year drought. His 50-point masterpiece in the Finals closeout game earned him MVP honors, cementing his legacy. But the Bucks’ commitment didn’t start or end there—it was a foundational bet on his future that no other team might have made.
All-In Moves: Trades, Contracts, and Coaching Changes
Barkley’s point about the Bucks doing “everything they possibly could” isn’t hyperbole; it’s backed by a series of bold, franchise-altering decisions. In 2020, sensing the need for a defensive anchor to complement Giannis, Milwaukee traded Eric Bledsoe, George Hill, and multiple first-round picks to acquire Jrue Holiday. This move was pivotal, directly contributing to the 2021 title run.
Post-championship, the Bucks rewarded Giannis with a five-year, $228 million supermax extension in December 2020, securing his services and signaling their long-term vision. When the team hit a rough patch, they didn’t hesitate to shake things up. In May 2023, they fired championship-winning coach Mike Budenholzer after a first-round playoff exit to the Miami Heat. They hired Adrian Griffin in June 2023, only to dismiss him mid-season despite a 30-13 record, replacing him with Doc Rivers—moves that aligned with Giannis’s preferences for change.
The Bucks went even further in September 2023, trading Jrue Holiday, Grayson Allen, and more picks to Portland for Damian Lillard, pairing Giannis with another superstar guard in a desperate bid to reignite contention. This trade mortgaged their draft capital through 2031, leaving the team with limited flexibility. As Barkley noted, “The Bucks have done everything they can.”
Entering the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee continued their all-in approach. They signed Myles Turner to a four-year, $107 million deal in July 2025, adding rim protection to bolster the frontcourt alongside Giannis. Free-agent additions like Gary Trent Jr., Taurean Prince, and Delon Wright deepened the roster, pushing the payroll over $170 million and deep into the luxury tax’s second apron. These aren’t half-measures; they’re sacrifices that have capped the team’s future options, all to maximize Giannis’s prime.
Even on a personal level, the Bucks have shown loyalty by keeping Giannis’s brother, Thanasis Antetokounmpo, on the roster since 2019. Despite his limited on-court impact, this provides family stability—a rare perk in the cutthroat NBA.
Injuries, Not Incompetence: The Real Culprit Behind Recent Struggles
Giannis’s hints at departure ignore a crucial factor: injuries, not front-office failures, have been the primary roadblock. In the 2024 playoffs, his absence due to injury contributed to a first-round loss to the Indiana Pacers. The Bucks’ core has been plagued by health issues, but the organization has responded by rebuilding the roster aggressively. As Barkley emphasized, “I want someone to love me as much as the Bucks love Giannis.”
In contrast to Barkley’s era, where stars like him endured years with underperforming teams without demanding trades (though Barkley himself requested one from the 76ers in the early ’90s for similar reasons), modern players expect perennial contention. But Milwaukee has delivered far beyond what’s typical for a small-market franchise. Ownership even changed hands in 2014 to fund arena upgrades and retain Giannis, demonstrating a commitment to infrastructure and stability.
The Entitlement Factor: Forgetting Roots and Undermining Loyalty
Giannis’s comments smack of entitlement because they overlook his origins. Without the Bucks’ faith and resources, he might not have evolved into the superstar he is today. He publicly praised the organization’s efforts in 2021, vowing loyalty, but his recent waffling undermines that narrative. Expecting annual titles ignores the NBA’s increasing parity, with powerhouse Eastern Conference rivals like the Boston Celtics and Philadelphia 76ers.
Barkley’s frustration is echoed across the league and media. As one analyst put it, “The Bucks have given Giannis everything he wanted—they traded a ton for Jrue, for Dame, and now put themselves in cap hell.” Giannis’s stance feels ungrateful, especially when compared to players who stuck it out in tougher situations. The Bucks aren’t a dysfunctional franchise; they’re a model of player-centric building, and Barkley’s call-out serves as a reminder that loyalty should be a two-way street.
Time for Gratitude, Not Exit Threats
Charles Barkley isn’t just stirring the pot—he’s highlighting a fundamental truth about the NBA’s player-empowerment era. The Milwaukee Bucks have exhausted every avenue to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo, from draft investments and blockbuster trades to coaching overhauls and massive contracts. In return, veiled threats of departure come across as entitled and ungrateful, especially from a player who owes much of his success to the franchise’s unwavering support.
As the 2025-26 season unfolds, Giannis has a chance to repay that loyalty with performance and commitment. But if Barkley’s words ring true, perhaps it’s time for the Greek Freak to reflect on how far the Bucks have carried him—and how much further they could go together. In a league where rings are the ultimate goal, true greatness also involves appreciating the journey and the team that made it possible.
In the high-stakes world of the NBA, superstar players like Giannis Antetokounmpo hold immense leverage, especially when their contracts include player options. As the 2025-26 season tips off, whispers about the Greek Freak’s future with the Milwaukee Bucks are growing louder amid trade rumors and questions about the team’s championship viability. While Giannis can’t walk away immediately after this season, his contract structure sets him up for unrestricted free agency as early as the summer of 2027 – at the end of the 2026-27 season. Once he declines his player option, the Bucks will have zero recourse to keep him. Let’s break down the rules, his contract details, and why Milwaukee is essentially at his mercy.
Giannis’s Contract: A Timeline of Security and Flexibility
Giannis has been a Buck since 2013, rising from a raw rookie to a two-time MVP and 2021 NBA champion. His loyalty has been rewarded with massive extensions, but the latest one – signed in October 2023 – gives him an exit ramp that’s hard for the front office to block.
The current deal is a three-year, $175 million maximum veteran extension that kicked in for the 2025-26 season. Here’s the breakdown:
2025-26: $54.1 million (guaranteed).
2026-27: $58.5 million (guaranteed).
2027-28: $62.8 million (player option).
The first two years are fully guaranteed, meaning Giannis is locked in through the end of the 2026-27 season. But the third year? That’s where his power shines. The player option for 2027-28 allows Giannis (or his representatives) to decide by June 29, 2027, whether to exercise it and stay with Milwaukee for one more year at that salary. If he declines – opting out – he hits unrestricted free agency (UFA) in the summer of 2027, free to sign with any team of his choosing.
This isn’t some obscure loophole; it’s a standard feature in NBA supermax contracts for stars like Giannis, who qualify under the Designated Veteran Player rules. These extensions allow teams to pay above the salary cap but often include player-friendly terms like options to maintain flexibility in a league where careers are short and contention windows narrow.
Prior to this extension, Giannis was already under a five-year, $228 million deal from 2020 that carried him through 2025-26, but the new extension superseded the final year for cap purposes. The Bucks front office, led by GM Jon Horst, structured it this way to keep their star happy while navigating the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) restrictions, including the over-36 rule (Giannis turns 33 in 2027, so no over-38 issues yet). But by building in the player option, they’ve handed Giannis the keys to his own destiny.
NBA Rules on Player Options and Free Agency: The Bucks’ Hands Are Tied
To understand why the Bucks can’t stop Giannis from leaving, we need to dive into the NBA’s free agency rules under the current CBA.
A player option is a contractual clause that gives the player – not the team – the unilateral right to decide whether to fulfill the final year(s) of the deal. If exercised, Giannis would play out 2027-28 in Milwaukee. But if he opts out, that year vanishes, and he becomes an unrestricted free agent. As a UFA, any NBA team can negotiate and sign him without restrictions – no qualifying offers, no right of first refusal, nothing. The Bucks’ Bird Rights (which allow over-the-cap re-signings) wouldn’t apply if he opts out and signs elsewhere; they’d only help if he stays or returns later.
Contrast this with restricted free agency, where teams can match offers. Player options like Giannis’s bypass that entirely. The CBA explicitly prohibits contracts from including clauses that limit a player’s free agency after the option period, ensuring stars can chase rings or bigger paydays elsewhere.
Moreover, Giannis doesn’t have a no-trade clause in this extension, meaning the Bucks could theoretically trade him before the opt-out deadline without his consent. But if Giannis wants to play out his guaranteed years and then bolt via free agency, Milwaukee has no leverage. They can’t force him to exercise the option, extend early (he’s eligible for a four-year, $275 million extension starting October 2026, but only if he stays), or block his departure.
In practice, this creates massive trade leverage for Giannis even before 2027. After the 2025-26 season, with just one guaranteed year left, his value skyrockets for contending teams. The Bucks would face a “trade now or lose for nothing” dilemma – a scenario that’s played out with stars like Kevin Durant and James Harden. Recent reports indicate Giannis is already exploring options, with interest from teams like the Knicks, and the Bucks are bracing for potential mid-season drama if results falter.
Why Now? The Bucks’ Window Closing and Giannis’s Leverage
Giannis has repeatedly affirmed his commitment to Milwaukee, saying he’s “locked in” but leaving the door open for change if the team doesn’t contend. The Bucks have surrounded him with talent like Damian Lillard and recent additions, but back-to-back early playoff exits have fueled doubts. At 30 years old (turning 31 in December 2025), Giannis knows his prime won’t last forever. Opting out in 2027 could net him a new supermax elsewhere – potentially over $300 million – with a contender.
For the Bucks, the nightmare is losing their franchise cornerstone for nothing. They can’t poison-pill his contract or use opt-out protections because the CBA doesn’t allow it. Their only plays are winning big this and next season to convince him to extend early or trading him on his terms to recoup assets.
The Bottom Line: Player Power in the Modern NBA
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s player option embodies the shift toward player empowerment in the NBA. By the end of the 2026-27 season, if he chooses to walk, the Bucks are spectators – unable to match offers, extend forcibly, or retain rights. It’s a stark reminder that even loyal stars like the Greek Freak prioritize championships over sentiment. As trade rumors swirl into the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee must deliver, or risk watching their MVP depart on his own terms.
If Giannis Antetokounmpo declines his player option, he would be able to leave the Milwaukee Bucks and become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2027, immediately after the conclusion of the 2026-27 NBA season. His current contract guarantees him two more years, covering the 2025-26 and 2026-27 seasons, with a player option for the 2027-28 season—which he can choose whether or not to accept. If he opts out, the earliest possible departure is July 2027. What is most likely? At the end of this (failed again) Bucks’ season, they try to trade him for as much talent and draft capital they can. Giannis has no choice. But at the end of that second season he returns to Greece.
In the whirlwind world of the NBA, where superstars chase championships and global endorsements, few stories tug at the heartstrings quite like Giannis Antetokounmpo’s. The man they call the Greek Freak—born in Athens to Nigerian immigrant parents, risen from street-hustling kid to two-time MVP and NBA champion—has always worn his roots on his sleeve. But today, a new chapter unfolds that’s less about highlight reels and more about family foundations: Giannis’ wife, Mariah Riddlesprigger, and their four young children have officially settled permanently in Athens, Greece. Their sons have even started kindergarten at the prestigious Athens College, marking a bold pivot toward the homeland that shaped him.
This isn’t just a seasonal relocation; it’s a seismic shift for a family that’s called Milwaukee home since Giannis was drafted in 2013. As the Bucks gear up for another title run, Giannis faces his first NBA season separated from his loved ones. What does this mean for the 30-year-old phenom? Could it fuel his fire on the court, or add an emotional weight to his already Herculean load? Or is he preparing for a return to Greece soon?
## A Family Forged in Adversity: Giannis’ Journey from Sepolia Streets to NBA Stardom
To understand the significance of this move, we need to rewind to Giannis’ origins. Born Giannis Sina Ugo Antetokounmpo on December 6, 1994, in Athens’ gritty Sepolia neighborhood, he grew up stateless for years—his parents, Charles and Veronica, had fled Nigeria in the early 1990s seeking better opportunities, only to face poverty and discrimination in Greece. The family scraped by selling watches and handbags on the streets, with young Giannis and his brothers (Thanasis, Kostas, and Alex) pitching in to keep food on the table.
Basketball became their escape. Scouted by local coach Spiros Velliniatis at age 13, Giannis’ raw athleticism— that impossible blend of 6’11” frame, speed, and power—propelled him from Filathlitikos’ youth teams to the NBA in a meteoric rise. By 2013, he was in Milwaukee, dragging his family across the Atlantic for a shot at the American Dream. Today, three of the four brothers play professionally in the NBA, and their AntetokounBros Academy in Athens offers free training to underprivileged kids, echoing the support they once received.
Enter Mariah Riddlesprigger, a philanthropist and former college volleyball star whom Giannis met in Milwaukee. The couple, who married in a lavish summer 2024 ceremony after welcoming three children, have built a life centered on quiet joys amid the spotlight. Their kids—Liam Charles (born February 10, 2020), Maverick Shai (August 18, 2021), Eva Brooke (September 14, 2023), and the newest addition, Aria Capri (born around June 2025)—represent the next generation of Antetokounmpos. Rarely seen in public, they’ve been fixtures at Bucks games and family milestones, like the 2022 premiere of Disney+’s *Rise*, the film chronicling their immigrant saga.
Giannis has always been vocal about fatherhood’s pull. In interviews, he’s said he’d retire on the spot if Liam asked for more playtime, underscoring how family anchors his relentless drive. Now, with the kids’ early years in flux, the pull of Greece feels inevitable.
## The Move: From Milwaukee Winters to Athenian Sunsets
Whispers of a Greek return have swirled for years—Giannis bought a sprawling, futuristic apartment complex in the upscale Paleo Psychiko suburb of Athens back in 2023 for an estimated €10 million ($11 million), complete with units for his mother and brothers. But this summer, it became reality. As of September 2025, Mariah and the four children have made the transatlantic leap permanent, trading Milwaukee’s chilly, humid climate (where even July highs rarely top 26°C/79°F) for Athens’ Mediterranean warmth.
The kids’ integration is already underway. Five-year-old Liam and four-year-old Maverick kicked off the school year at Athens College, one of Greece’s most elite institutions, known for its rigorous bilingual curriculum and alumni like shipping magnates and politicians. It’s no accident; Giannis, ever the planner, chose it to give his sons “only the best” from their formative years. Two-year-old Eva and four-month-old Aria are settling into the family rhythm, with the household buzzing in a quiet neighborhood where passersby remain blissfully unaware of their famous residents.
This isn’t a trial run. Sources close to the family confirm it’s a multi-year commitment, with Giannis commuting between continents during the offseason and, presumably, holidays. The Bucks star returned to Milwaukee practice just days ago, but the separation marks uncharted territory for a man who’s thrived on stability.
## Why Now? Roots, Climate, and a Vision for the Future
So, what sparked this bold step? It’s a cocktail of personal, cultural, and practical factors. Foremost: Mariah’s preference. When Giannis polled her on Milwaukee versus Athens, she chose the Greek capital without hesitation, citing the vibrant community, milder weather, and cultural richness. “Greece suits us better,” insiders note, a sentiment echoed in Giannis’ own long-held dreams of returning home.
Giannis has been candid about his love for Athens. In a July 2025 interview, he declared, “I’m definitely thinking of coming to Greece permanently when I retire… Athens is my home.” His tears after captaining Greece to a bronze at EuroBasket 2025—the country’s first medal since 2009—spoke volumes about his emotional tether. The move aligns with his vision: exposing his kids to their heritage, fluent Greek lessons, and summers on sun-drenched islands, all while nurturing the AntetokounBros legacy through local philanthropy.
Practically, it’s savvy. With business ventures blooming in Greece (from real estate to the family’s academy), and rumors of a post-NBA stint with Filathlitikos—the club that launched him—rooting the family there streamlines logistics. Unlike LeBron James, whom he admires, Giannis has hinted he’s not chasing a 40-year-old career; he wants to peak now and pivot sooner, perhaps ending his playing days in the Hellenic League.
## The Ripple Effects: Emotional Turbulence, On-Court Fuel, and Long-Term Legacy
No sugarcoating it: this separation could test Giannis like never before. For the first time, he’ll lace up for Bucks games without his family’s courtside cheers or post-practice cuddles. “It will not be easy,” those in his circle admit, especially with a newborn at home. The 8-hour time difference and grueling travel—private jets notwithstanding—could amplify the isolation of NBA life, potentially stirring anxiety or homesickness. We’ve seen stars like Kevin Durant grapple with similar family strains; for Giannis, whose identity is so intertwined with family, it might manifest as restless energy or, worse, distraction.
Yet, there’s profound upside. Psychologically, knowing his kids are immersed in their cultural bedrock could lighten his load, freeing mental bandwidth for the court. Imagine the motivation: every dunk a dedication to providing that “best” education, every assist a step toward a post-retirement life unmarred by regret. History shows fatherhood sharpens focus—post-Liam’s birth, Giannis averaged 29.5 points in the 2020-21 championship run. This move might supercharge that, turning transatlantic longing into unbreakable resolve.
On the family front, it’s a win for stability. Milwaukee’s transient NBA scene pales against Athens’ extended-family vibe, where Veronica can dote on grandkids and the brothers collaborate on ventures. For the children, it’s a bilingual, multicultural upbringing—Greek summers, American holidays—that mirrors Giannis’ own hybrid identity, fostering resilience they’ll need in a global world.
Career-wise, it signals maturity. At 30, with a supermax extension through 2028, Giannis is eyeing legacy beyond rings. Settling his family in Greece positions him as a bridge-builder: the immigrant kid who returns to uplift, not just extract. It could extend his prime by reducing burnout, and if whispers of an Athens NBA expansion hold water, who knows? The Greek Freak might one day headline a Euro league.
Of course, risks linger. If the Bucks falter or injuries mount (recall his 2023 knee scare), the pull of home might accelerate retirement talks. And logistically? Balancing Daddy duty with 82 games demands ninja-level scheduling.
## Closing the Circle: A Freakish Return to Roots
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s family move to Athens isn’t an ending—it’s a homecoming that closes the circle on a life story scripted in struggle and stardom. From Sepolia’s shadows to Milwaukee’s spotlight, he’s always chased wholeness: for himself, his brothers, his parents, and now his children. This decision, though laced with sacrifice, underscores his core value—family above all.
As the season tips off, watch for that extra gear in Giannis’ game. It might just be the fuel to chase another ring, knowing his little freaks are thriving where it all began. In a league of mercenaries, the Greek Freak remains gloriously grounded. And in doing so, he reminds us: true greatness isn’t measured in trophies alone, but in the homes we build across oceans.
Personally I think it will be a convenient excuse. When he fails again this year to achieve anything in the post season he will use his family as an excuse to justify playing in Europe with a Greek team. And all he has said over the years about loyalty to the Bucks and the place that has been home all these years will go out the window…
*Sources: Proto Thema English, New Greek TV, People Magazine, Greek Reporter, Hellenic Daily News.*
With Russell Westbrook still sitting on the free-agent market after declining his player option with the Denver Nuggets, ESPN’s Kendrick Perkins floated the idea that Milwaukee should swoop in and sign the 37-year-old veteran. On paper, it sounds intriguing: a win-now team desperate for backcourt stability after cutting ties with Damian Lillard, pairing Westbrook’s explosive energy with Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance. But let’s pump the brakes. This isn’t just a questionable fit—it’s a recipe for regression that could derail the Bucks’ championship aspirations. It’s uglier than a mid-range brick in overtime.
Westbrook’s Game in 2025: A Triple-Double Machine That’s Triple the Headache
Westbrook’s résumé is legendary—NBA MVP, nine-time All-Star, all-time leader in triple-doubles. But at 37, his game has devolved into a highlight-reel sideshow with diminishing returns. In his final season with Denver (2024-25), he posted 13.3 points, 6.1 assists, and 4.9 rebounds across 75 games—solid bench numbers, sure. He still brings that manic energy, pushing the pace and crashing the glass like it’s 2017.
The cracks, however, are canyon-sized. His field-goal percentage hovered around 44.9%, and his three-point shooting? A woeful 31.4% on low volume (just 2.1 attempts per game). That’s not “broken jumper” territory; that’s “defences dare you to shoot” territory. Add in his league-leading turnover rate among high-minute guards (3.2 per 36 minutes) and a defensive rating that drags units underwater, and you’ve got a player whose plus/minus has been negative for five straight seasons.
Westbrook’s style—ball-dominant, paint-attacking, reluctant passer in crunch time—worked in limited roles with the Clippers and Nuggets, where he came off the bench. But starting him? That’s where the wheels fall off. He logged a usage rate north of 25% last year, jacking up contested twos and forcing the issue when smarter reads were available. For a Bucks team already questioning its backcourt rhythm, injecting Westbrook’s chaos would amplify the noise, not harmonize it.
The Nightmare Fit: How Westbrook Would Break the Bucks’ Offence and Defence
Let’s game this out. Imagine Porter Jr. (or whoever starts) sharing the floor with Westbrook in a two-PG lineup. Both are undersized (Porter at 6’4″, Westbrook at 6’3″), both love to handle, and neither shoots well enough from deep to punish switches. Result? A backcourt traffic jam that funnels everything into the mid-range—precisely what killed Milwaukee’s spacing last year. Giannis would feast on lobs and cuts, but Portis’ spot-up game gets neutralized, and others off-ball movement turns into a crawl.
Offensively, Westbrook’s inefficiency would compound the Bucks’ issues. His true shooting percentage sat at 50.2% last season—below league average for guards—and he’d be chucking in high-leverage spots. Defensively? Forget it. Westbrook’s lateral quickness has eroded with age; opponents targeted him relentlessly in Denver, leading to a -4.1 net rating in his minutes. Pair that with Porter’s own defensive lapses, and Milwaukee’s perimeter D—already middling—becomes a sieve. The Eastern Conference is loaded with sharpshooters like Jalen Brunson, Tyrese Haliburton, and Trae Young; Westbrook’s gambling for steals would leave Giannis in iso hell on the other end.
Even in a bench role, it’s a mismatch. The Bucks need a microwave scorer or a true combo guard to spell Porter, not a volume creator who hogs touches from a second unit featuring Portis and Trent. As Brew Hoop astutely noted, “Milwaukee would be wise to pass” because Westbrook’s skill set doesn’t align with Doc Rivers’ preference for structured, ball-movement offenses. Rivers thrived with balanced units in Boston and Philly; Westbrook’s heliocentric approach would feel like a step backward.
The Greek Freak has chinks in his armour—flaws that have been dissected ad nauseam, from his inconsistent free-throw shooting (hovering around 71% career, with dips in high-pressure moments) to his limited outside game (a career 28.9% from three, forcing defences to pack the paint). Add in occasional half-court stagnation, where his ball-handling can lead to turnovers if lanes aren’t open, and play making lapses under duress, and you’ve got vulnerabilities that savvy teams exploit in the playoffs. Now, imagine pairing him with Russell Westbrook, a guard whose declining skill set would turn these weaknesses into glaring liabilities, potentially derailing Milwaukee’s offence and exhausting their star.
At the core of the mismatch is spacing—or the lack thereof. Giannis thrives when the floor is stretched, allowing him to euro-step through open driving lanes without meeting a wall of defenders. Westbrook, however, is a non-shooter from deep, converting just 31.4% on minimal attempts last season, which invites opponents to sag off him and dare the brick. This defensive strategy would clog the paint even more than usual, forcing Giannis into contested drives or pull-up jumpers—shots he’s notoriously inefficient at. We’ve seen this movie before: In the 2025 playoffs, without Damian Lillard’s gravity pulling defenders out, Giannis’ efficiency dipped in half-court sets, with turnovers spiking as he tried to force plays. Westbrook’s presence would exacerbate this, turning Giannis’ drives into a mosh pit and highlighting his reluctance (or inability) to punish from outside. Defenses could essentially play 5-on-4 in the lane, neutralizing Giannis’ greatest strength and pushing him toward more free throws—where his mental blocks and mechanical issues often rear their head, as evidenced by his sub-60% FT% in key 2025 EuroBasket games.
Defensively, the ripple effects would be just as damaging. Westbrook’s eroded lateral quickness and gambling tendencies have made him a target for opponents, often resulting in blow-bys and open looks that require help-side rotations. Giannis, already Milwaukee’s defensive anchor as a roaming rim protector, would be forced to cover more ground, cleaning up Westbrook’s messes while expending extra energy. This added workload could accelerate fatigue for the 30-year-old superstar, who’s shown signs of wear in recent seasons, and amplify his occasional lapses in perimeter containment—another subtle weakness when he’s stretched thin. Moreover, Westbrook’s ball-dominant style and high turnover rate (3.2 per 36 minutes) would disrupt rhythm, potentially reducing Giannis’ touches in favourable spots and forcing him into more isolation creation, where his playmaking vision isn’t elite. In a post-Lillard Bucks backcourt already lacking facilitators, this chaos would spotlight Giannis’ half-court limitations, turning him from a dominant force into a frustrated one-man army.
Chemistry Red Flags: Leadership Lessons from Westbrook’s Past
Beyond the tape, there’s the intangibles. Westbrook is a warrior—fiercely competitive and vocal—but his intensity has rubbed teammates the wrong way. Remember his Lakers tenure? What started as a “Big Three” experiment devolved into finger-pointing and a first-round exit. Perkins himself admitted to warning Westbrook about his “cancerous” behaviour back then, a comment that ended their friendship. In Denver, he was a positive vet, but that was as a reserve. Thrust him into a starting role on a pressure-cooker team like Milwaukee, and the alpha clashes could erupt—especially with a young, unproven Porter Jr. needing guidance, not competition.
The Bucks can’t afford distractions. With a win-now core entering its mid-30s window, they need cohesion, not controversy.
Steer Clear, Milwaukee
Russell Westbrook deserves a ring and a graceful fade-out on a contender’s bench. But the Bucks? They’re not that team—not with their spacing starvation, defensive vulnerabilities, and need for harmony. Pairing him with this roster wouldn’t unlock potential; it’d expose flaws. As Reddit’s NBA hive mind put it, Westbrook’s playstyle “only works on one team in the league,” and Milwaukee ain’t it. Doc Rivers and Jon Horst have built a contender; don’t let nostalgia torch it.
The Milwaukee Bucks’ acquisition of Myles Turner in the 2025 offseason, a move that saw them waive Damian Lillard to clear cap space, was a bold gamble aimed at keeping Giannis Antetokounmpo satisfied and extending the Bucks’ championship window. Turner, a versatile 3-and-D center, brings shot-blocking prowess and floor-spacing ability to pair with the two-time MVP. However, while this move addresses some roster deficiencies, it falls short of solving Giannis’ challenges in high-pressure playoff games. This blog post delves into the reasons why Turner, despite his talents, is unlikely to be the complete solution for Giannis and the Bucks in critical postseason moments.
The Bucks have struggled in recent playoffs, with only one series win since their 2021 title. Injuries, including Giannis’ own and Damian Lillard’s Achilles tear in 2025, have played a role, but deeper issues persist in high-pressure games. In playoff scenarios, opponents often exploit Giannis’ limitations by building defensive “walls” to clog the paint, forcing him to rely on his developing jumper or playmaking under pressure. The Bucks’ lack of a reliable point guard and inconsistent perimeter creation has compounded these issues, leaving Giannis to shoulder an immense offensive load. The hope was that Turner, with his defensive versatility and three-point shooting, would alleviate these problems. However, several factors suggest he won’t fully address Giannis’ high-pressure struggles.
Strengths
Myles Turner, at 29, is a proven two-way center. His defensive impact is notable, having led the NBA in blocks multiple times, including a 2021 season where he averaged nearly four blocks per game. In the 2024-25 season, he set a Pacers’ playoff record with 46 blocks during their Finals run. His ability to switch on defence, roam, and protect the rim makes him a theoretical complement to Giannis, who also excels defensively with 1.1 blocks and 1.2 steals per game. Offensively, Turner’s 40.5% three-point shooting on passes from Tyrese Haliburton last season suggests he can stretch the floor, creating space for Giannis’ drives.
The Bucks envision Turner as a modernized replacement for Brook Lopez, who was a key floor-spacer during their 2021 championship run. With Giannis potentially taking on more point-forward duties, Turner’s ability to shoot “wide-open” threes (121 made in 2024-25, tied for first in the NBA) could keep defenses honest. Coach Doc Rivers has praised Turner’s fit, noting his ability to switch defensively and stretch the floor, which aligns with Milwaukee’s up-tempo vision.
Limitations
Despite these strengths, Turner’s game has notable weaknesses that may not fully address the Bucks’ needs in high-pressure situations:
Rebounding Deficiency: Turner has never been an elite rebounder, often criticized for not securing defensive rebounds to end possessions. In the 2024-25 season, he averaged just 6.9 rebounds per game despite his 6’11” frame, a stark contrast to Giannis’ 11.9 rebounds. In playoff games, where possessions are critical, Turner’s inability to dominate the glass could allow opponents to generate second-chance points, putting additional pressure on Giannis to clean up defensively.
Limited Playmaking: High-pressure games often require big men to make quick decisions under defensive scrutiny. Turner is not a strong playmaker, with career averages of 1.3 assists per game and a focus on finishing rather than creating. Unlike former teammate Domantas Sabonis, who facilitated offense for the Pacers, Turner relies on guards like Haliburton to set him up. With the Bucks lacking an elite point guard after waiving Lillard, Turner’s limited passing ability may not alleviate the playmaking burden on Giannis.
Inconsistent Playoff Performance: While Turner was a key contributor to the Pacers’ 2024 Finals run, he didn’t consistently close important games. For example, in matchups against Giannis, he struggled defensively, allowing Antetokounmpo to score 64 and 37 points in two games during the 2023-24 season. In high-pressure moments, Turner’s defensive impact can wane if opponents exploit his positioning or force him into foul trouble, a recurring issue given his physical style.
Offensive Dependency on Setup: Turner’s offensive production, particularly his three-point shooting, relies heavily on quality guard play. In Indiana, Haliburton’s elite passing (10+ assists per game) created open looks for Turner. Without a comparable facilitator in Milwaukee, Turner’s efficiency from deep could dip, especially in playoff scenarios where defences tighten and rotations are shorter. Giannis’ play making has improved (6.5 assists per game), but he’s not a traditional point guard, and his passes to shooters like Bobby Portis (50% from three on 34 attempts) were less frequent than Haliburton’s to Turner.
Giannis’ High-Pressure Challenges
Giannis thrives in transition and interior scoring, leading the NBA with 779 two-point field goals in 2024-25. However, in high-pressure playoff games, teams employ specific strategies to neutralize him:
Paint Clogging: Opponents like the Pacers in 2024 used multiple defenders to form a “wall,” forcing Giannis to shoot from mid-range or beyond (he shot 0-1 from three in Game 4). His jumper, while improved, remains inconsistent under pressure.
Playmaking Pressure: Without a reliable secondary creator, Giannis often faces double-teams, leading to turnovers or forced shots. In Game 5 against the Pacers, despite a 30-point, 20-rebound, 13-assist triple-double, the Bucks lost 119-118 in overtime, highlighting the lack of support.
Fatigue and Injuries: Giannis’ heavy minutes (44 in Game 5) and physical style make him prone to fatigue or injury, as seen in recent playoffs. A co-star who can take over games offensively is critical, but Turner’s role is more complementary than dominant.
Why Turner Falls Short
1. Lack of a Primary Creator
The Bucks’ decision to waive Lillard, a nine-time All-Star who averaged 28.0 points per game alongside Giannis, leaves a void in perimeter creation. Turner’s addition doesn’t address this. His offensive game relies on others to create opportunities, and with Giannis now expected to handle point-forward duties, the Bucks may struggle to generate consistent offence in crunch time. In high-pressure games, teams will likely dare Turner to create off the dribble or in isolation, areas where he’s unproven.
2. Defensive Redundancy
While Turner’s shot-blocking complements Giannis’ defensive versatility, it may not significantly elevate the Bucks’ playoff defence. Both players excel at rim protection, but the Bucks’ perimeter defence remains a concern without a lockdown guard like Jrue Holiday. In the 2024 playoffs, the Pacers exploited Milwaukee’s back court, with Tyrese Haliburton and Andrew Nembhard finding gaps in pick-and-roll coverage. Turner’s ability to switch is valuable, but he’s not a perimeter stopper, and opponents can target weaker defenders like Gary Trent Jr. or Kyle Kuzma.
3. Playoff Provenance
Turner’s playoff resume, while solid, doesn’t match the impact of a true co-star. During the Pacers’ Finals run, he was a secondary contributor behind Haliburton and Pascal Siakam. In contrast, Giannis needs a player who can take over games when he’s double-teamed or fatigued. Turner’s career-high 40-point games are rare, and he’s never been the focal point of a playoff offense. His 2021 Defensive Player of the Year candidacy was notable, but he hasn’t consistently dominated high-stakes games.
4. Financial and Strategic Risks
The Bucks’ move to waive Lillard and stretch his $113 million contract over five years ($22.5 million annually) limits their future flexibility. If Turner doesn’t elevate the Bucks to contention, Giannis, who has a player option in 2027-28, may grow restless. Reports indicate mixed feelings from Giannis about the move, with some sources suggesting he was “not pleased” with Lillard’s departure despite excitement for Turner. The pressure is on Turner to deliver immediately, but his skill set may not fully address the Bucks’ postseason shortcomings.
What Giannis Needs in High-Pressure Games
To truly solve Giannis’ problems in high-pressure games, the Bucks need:
A Primary Perimeter Creator: A guard who can break down defences, create shots, and alleviate Giannis’ play-making burden. Lillard, despite his struggles, provided this to an extent. Current options like Kevin Porter Jr. or Gary Trent Jr. lack the consistency of an elite point guard.
Versatile Wing Defender: A player like Jrue Holiday, who could guard multiple positions and handle the ball, was critical in 2021. Turner’s interior defense is strong, but the Bucks need perimeter stoppers to counter guards like Haliburton or Jalen Brunson.
Clutch Scoring: Giannis’ 62% field goal percentage is elite, but his free-throw shooting (65-70% in playoffs) and lack of a reliable jumper limit his clutch scoring. Turner’s three-point shooting helps, but he’s not a go-to scorer in tight games.
So will it move the needle?
Myles Turner is a valuable addition to the Bucks, bringing defensive versatility and floor-spacing that complements Giannis Antetokounmpo’s game. His shot-blocking and three-point shooting address some of Milwaukee’s needs, particularly in replacing Brook Lopez. However, Turner’s limitations—weak rebounding, lack of play-making, and inconsistent playoff impact—mean he’s not the complete solution for Giannis’ high-pressure struggles. The Bucks’ lack of a primary creator, perimeter defence, and clutch scoring options remain unaddressed, and the financial burden of Lillard’s stretched contract adds pressure for immediate results. Unless Turner significantly elevates his game or the Bucks make additional moves, Giannis may continue to face the same postseason challenges, potentially fuelling speculation about his long-term future in Milwaukee. If they are lucky, maybe they get to the second round of the playoffs this year. For Giannis the No1 priority is to make sure everyone keeps blaming the rest of the roster and not him.
The Milwaukee Bucks, champions just a few short years ago, are entering a critical juncture. While they possess one of the league’s most promoted forces in Giannis Antetokounmpo, a closer look at their current state, and specifically how Giannis’s unique skill set impacts the team, suggests that another championship run next season is highly improbable. The “Greek Freak’s” severe limitations, coupled with his overwhelming dominance on the way the team plays, create a structural imbalance that can not easily be overcome. Worse still, the team is paying for many mistakes Giannis made in his demands for coaching staff changes and roster changes. It has led to a dead end with no assets to use.
The Roster Roulette: A Step Backward
The 2024-25 off season has not been kind to the Bucks. The surprising waiver of Damian Lillard due to injury and contract issues, in favour of acquiring Myles Turner, marks a significant shift. While Turner is a top-tier rim protector and floor spacer, he doesn’t fill the void left by Lillard’s elite shot creation and offensive gravity. Reports suggest even Giannis himself was “not thrilled” with the Lillard decision, indicating potential friction within the team.
Furthermore, key pieces from their championship run have either departed or are ageing. Brook Lopez moved to the Clippers, and the current roster, beyond Giannis and Turner, consists of role players like Kyle Kuzma, Bobby Portis, Kevin Porter Jr., and Gary Trent Jr. While capable, this is far from a championship-calibre supporting cast. The team’s lack of draft capital (they don’t own their own first-round pick until 2031) severely limits their ability to acquire young talent or make significant trades for a legitimate second option. This leaves the Bucks in a precarious position, with few avenues for substantial improvement. And Giannis is in fact getting worse.
Giannis’s Dominance: A Double-Edged Sword
Giannis Antetokounmpo is undeniably a generational talent. His relentless attacking of the paint, unparalleled athleticism, and defensive versatility used to make him a nightmare for opposing teams. He’s one of the most physically dominant players in NBA history. However, his very dominance, paradoxically, can become a limitation in the modern playoff landscape.
1. The Lack of a Consistent Outside Shot: This remains Giannis’s most glaring weakness. While he has shown flashes of improvement, his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc, allows defences to “wall off the paint” and pack the lane. In the playoffs, where defences become more sophisticated and disciplined, this strategy can severely hinder the Bucks’ offensive flow. Without a reliable perimeter threat from their primary offensive initiator, the offence can become predictable and stagnant, especially in crunch-time situations against elite defences.
2. Offensive Predictability and Playoff Walls: Teams have consistently exploited Giannis’s preference for driving to the basket by building defensive walls. While he can often power through, this approach forces him into contested finishes or difficult passes, leading to turnovers or inefficient possessions. For the Bucks to truly contend, they need a more diversified offense that doesn’t solely rely on Giannis’s paint attacks. Without a true secondary play maker who can consistently create their own shot or exploit the space Giannis does create, the offence will continue to struggle against top-tier defences.
3. The Burden of Creation: Giannis’s dominance means he carries an immense offensive burden. While he’s improved as a passer, the team often lacks other players who can consistently create offence, particularly against set defences. This can lead to exhaustion for Giannis over a long playoff series and limit the overall creativity and unpredictability of the Bucks’ attack. The departure of Lillard only exacerbates this issue.
4. Screen-Setting Issues: While Giannis’s physical prowess suggests he’d be an elite screen-setter, his execution in this area has been criticised for inconsistency. Effective screens are crucial for generating offensive flow and creating advantages, especially in pick-and-roll heavy offences. If Giannis isn’t consistently setting strong, precise screens, it diminishes the effectiveness of plays designed to free up teammates or exploit mismatches. In fact you can safely say that Giannis is one of the worse screeners in the NBA. He simply does not understand angles and timing.
5. Over reliance on physicality. Giannis’ game is built on physical dominance, but this style is less effective in the postseason, where officiating tends to be more lenient, and physicality alone isn’t enough to overcome strategic adjustments. Teams with versatile defenders, such as the Boston Celtics with Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown or the Philadelphia 76ers with Joel Embiid, can challenge Giannis physically while exploiting his lack of perimeter finesse. His reliance on bullying his way to the rim becomes less effective when referees swallow their whistles, and his lack of a refined mid-range or post game limits his scoring versatility.
The Path Forward: A Difficult Reality
Given the current roster construction and the inherent limitations that arise from Giannis’s dominating yet specific skillset, the Milwaukee Bucks are unlikely to be a championship contender next season. Their salary cap situation and lack of draft assets further complicate any significant roster improvements.
For the Bucks to return to championship contention, a fundamental shift might be necessary. This could involve finding a truly elite, versatile secondary star who complements Giannis’s game and alleviates some of his offensive burden, or Giannis himself making significant strides in areas like his perimeter shooting and consistent off-ball movement to diversify the offence. However, with the current outlook, the path to another Larry O’Brien trophy for the Bucks appears steep and fraught with challenges. The future, while still anchored by a superstar, looks more like a struggle for playoff relevance than a march to the Finals.
The Competitive Landscape
The Bucks’ championship odds for 2025-26 remain mediocre, with most sports books placing them in the middle of the pack—far from the league’s elite. The Bucks rank outside the top 10 in both offensive and defensive rating, a historical red flag for championship aspirations. Elite teams typically dominate in at least one area; the Bucks, built around Giannis, are stuck in the middle. Since their extremely lucky (probably gifted by the league) 2021 championship, the Bucks have failed to advance past the conference semifinals, often falling to teams that exploit their offensive predictability and lack of late-game versatility. Giannis simply can’t perform at NBA playoff level.
A Ceiling Defined by Giannis’ Limitations
The Milwaukee Bucks’ championship hopes hinge on Giannis Antetokounmpo, but his limitations—poor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, limited play making, and reliance on physicality—create a ceiling that the current roster and system cannot overcome. While Giannis remains a transcendent talent, the Bucks’ over-dependence on his strengths without adequately addressing his weaknesses makes them predictable and exploitable in the postseason. Combined with an ageing core, defensive vulnerabilities, and a brutal Eastern Conference, Milwaukee is likely to fall short of championship contention in the 2025-26 season. For the Bucks to return to title contention, they would need to retool their roster, diversify their offensive approach, and hope for significant growth in Giannis’ skill set—none of which seem imminent.
Some former teammates have described Giannis as “tough to play with,” citing his high standards and occasional trust issues with teammates. John Henson noted that Giannis and Khris Middleton “butted heads” as Middleton had to earn Giannis’ trust, and that Giannis’ approach is challenging for some players to adjust to. This is not uncommon among superstar-led teams, where the franchise is built around one transcendent talent but Giannis is particularly limited in skill set and basketball IQ. I am not the only arguing that his style of play is out of touch with modern NBA basketball.
Giannis’ style used to be predicated on relentless effort, two-way play, and a focus on team defence and hustle. In the past years he has clearly toned down his defence though, focusing on points/assists and rebound statistics. This has shaped the Bucks’ roster construction, often favouring players who are willing to buy into a team-first, Giannis-oriented mentality over ball-dominant stars. This means that the Bucks are not the ideal destination for certain types of superstars, but have consistently attracted role players and two-way contributors who don’t mind never been in the limelight and putting up with Giannis‘ selfish stat padding.
The Bucks’ organisation is known for its lack of drama and its commitment to a collective culture. Players who embrace this culture—such as Jrue Holiday and Brook Lopez—have flourished one day and then received hate the next. In the long term it seems nice but it is a toxic and unwelcoming environment as the fans demand more rings unfairly. The pinnacle? Giannis saying he “did it the right way” and thus demoting his team as “not superstars”. The ultimate put down to the roster that got him there.
The Giannis Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword for Teammates
Giannis’s unique, drive-heavy, rim-attacking style used to be incredibly effective. He still seems to get to the basket at will in the regular season, drawing fouls and creating opportunities. However, this very strength can become a challenge for complementary players.
Spacing Concerns: Giannis thrives with open lanes to the basket. This often necessitates surrounding him with multiple high-volume three-point shooters. For players who prefer to operate in the mid-range or post, or who aren’t elite perimeter shooters, playing alongside Giannis can feel constricting. The paint can get clogged, limiting their own offensive creativity and effectiveness. While the Bucks have worked to optimize their offense around him, the core principle remains: Giannis needs space to wreak havoc.
Ball Dominance vs. Player Role: While Giannis is an unwilling passer and his game naturally dictates a high usage rate. He thinks he is at his best with the ball in his hands, attacking downhill. This can reduce opportunities for other star-level players who are accustomed to being primary ball-handlers or creating their own shots. Players might worry about their offensive rhythm, their statistics, and ultimately, their overall impact on a team where Giannis is the undisputed offensive hub.
“No Bag” Narrative : Giannis’ lack of a consistent jump shot, dribbling skills or diverse offensive arsenal is a real problem in 2025. Most players might prefer to play with a superstar who offers more traditional versatility, believing it opens up the game more for everyone. No two ways about it, Giannis is a ball hog and a one trick pony.
Team Building Challenges Around a Max Superstar
The nature of the NBA’s salary cap and luxury tax makes building a championship contender around a max-contract superstar incredibly challenging.
Limited Flexibility: With Giannis commanding a significant portion of the salary cap, the Bucks often have limited financial flexibility to acquire other high-caliber talent. They often rely on astute drafting, shrewd trades, and value free-agent signings to fill out the roster. This can make it difficult to consistently surround Giannis with the optimal supporting cast, especially as complementary players age or decline.
Pressure to Win Now: The presence of a superstar like Giannis creates immediate championship expectations. This “win-now” mentality can lead to short-term decisions that might not be sustainable, and if the team falls short, the pressure intensifies on everyone, including new additions.
It’s just a bad narrative and we have seen it play out every year since the championship. It’s always “Giannis was great but needs help” (which is 100% not true as I analyse here.) “Giannis got 30 but what about everyone else?” even though they hardly saw the ball at all! The entire Bucks organisation is built around satisfying his every whim and Giannis seems to have guided transfers and coaching changes to suit that. What room does that leave for anyone else?
It’s not about a lack of respect for Giannis, but rather a complex calculation of on-court fit, team dynamics, and personal aspirations that often dictates where top talent chooses to play. The quest for an NBA championship is multifaceted, and sometimes, the perfect fit isn’t just about raw talent, but about how all the pieces, including the superstar, truly complement each other. It is often said that Giannis lacks basketball IQ on the court. Well it seems he lacks it off the court as well in terms of a solid long term plan.
When thinking about building a dream team around a Milwaukee Bucks player, past or present, the immediate instinct might be to choose Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Greek Freak, whose dominance has defined the franchise’s modern era. However, if forced to look beyond Giannis, one name stands above the rest: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the legendary center who brought the Bucks their first and only NBA championship in 1971 (until Giannis led the team to another in 2021). Kareem’s unique combination of skill, versatility, and basketball IQ makes him the ideal cornerstone for constructing a championship-caliber team. A quick look at why Kareem would be better and then a dive into why Giannis is really, really bad as a team leader and building block.
Why Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, originally drafted as Lew Alcindor by the Bucks in 1969, was a transformative force in the NBA. Standing at 7’2” with a wingspan that seemed to stretch across the court, Kareem was not just a physical specimen but a skilled technician. His signature skyhook—a virtually unblockable shot delivered with precision—made him a scoring machine. During his six seasons with the Bucks, he averaged 30.4 points, 15.3 rebounds, and 4.3 assists per game, showcasing his ability to dominate both offensively and defensively. His 1971 MVP season, where he led the Bucks to a 66-16 record and a championship alongside Oscar Robertson, cemented his legacy as one of the game’s all-time greats.
Kareem’s appeal as a team-building centrepiece lies in his versatility. He could score from anywhere, rebound at an elite level, block shots, and facilitate plays with his passing. Unlike many big men of his era, Kareem wasn’t just a post presence; he was a complete player who could adapt to different styles of play. His basketball IQ and leadership also made him a coach’s dream, capable of elevating those around him. Building around Kareem means constructing a roster that maximises his strengths while addressing the few gaps in his game, such as perimeter defence and three-point shooting, which weren’t as critical in his era but are vital in today’s game.
Why Not Giannis?
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a phenomenal player, but Kareem’s skill set offers more flexibility in team-building. Giannis thrives in a system with shooters to space the floor, as his limited outside shooting can clog the paint. Kareem, with his mid-range and post game, doesn’t require as much perimeter shooting to be effective, though this roster provides it anyway. Kareem’s defensive presence as a rim protector also gives him an edge over Giannis, whose defensive impact relies more on versatility than anchoring the paint. Finally, Kareem’s proven championship pedigree as the focal point of the 1971 Bucks gives him a slight edge in this hypothetical scenario.
While Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBA’s most dominant players, having led the Milwaukee Bucks to a championship in 2021, there are arguments why he might not be the ideal cornerstone for building a championship team, particularly when considering his style of play in the context of modern NBA trends. Below is a detailed list of reasons why Giannis’s game may be seen as less compatible with the needs of today’s NBA for constructing a championship roster, though it’s worth noting that these points are relative and don’t negate his elite status.
1. Limited Outside Shooting
Issue: Giannis is not a reliable three-point shooter, with a career three-point percentage of 28.5% (as of the 2024-25 season). His mid-range game is also inconsistent, limiting his ability to stretch the floor.
Impact on Team-Building: Modern NBA offenses prioritize spacing to create driving lanes and open three-point opportunities. Giannis’s lack of shooting allows defenses to sag off him, clogging the paint and forcing teammates to carry a heavier load as perimeter shooters. Building around him requires surrounding him with elite shooters (e.g., Khris Middleton, Damian Lillard), which can limit roster flexibility and increase reliance on specific player archetypes.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Teams like the Golden State Warriors or Boston Celtics thrive with versatile shooters at every position, including big men like Kevin Durant or Kristaps Porziņģis. Giannis’s inability to shoot forces a more predictable offensive scheme.
2. Heavy Reliance on Paint Dominance
Issue: Giannis’s game is centered on attacking the rim, using his size, speed, and athleticism to overpower defenders. He leads the league in points in the paint but relies heavily on this style.
Impact on Team-Building: Defenses can counter Giannis by building a “wall” in the paint, as seen in the 2019 and 2020 playoffs against Toronto and Miami. This strategy dares him to shoot from outside, exposing his weaknesses. To compensate, the team needs strong playmakers and shooters to create space, which can be costly and difficult to sustain across a playoff run.
Contrast with Modern Needs: The modern NBA favors offenses that can exploit mismatches through versatile scoring options. Players like Nikola Jokić or Joel Embiid, who can score from the post, mid-range, or beyond the arc, offer more diverse threats that are harder to scheme against.
3. Limited Playmaking in Half-Court Sets
Issue: While Giannis averages around 5-6 assists per game, his playmaking is more effective in transition than in structured half-court offenses. His passing is solid but not at the level of elite facilitators like LeBron James or Jokić.
Impact on Team-Building: Building a championship team often requires a primary ball-handler who can orchestrate complex half-court plays, especially in the playoffs when games slow down. Giannis’s limited ability to create for others in tight situations puts pressure on point guards or secondary creators, requiring the team to invest in players like Jrue Holiday or Damian Lillard to handle playmaking duties.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern championship teams often have big men who double as primary facilitators (e.g., Jokić’s 9+ assists per game or Draymond Green’s high-IQ passing). Giannis’s playmaking, while improved, doesn’t match this level of versatility.
4. Defensive Versatility Has Limits
Issue: Giannis used to be an elite defender, capable of guarding multiple positions and earning All-Defensive honours. However, his rim protection, while strong (1.1 blocks per game career average), is not as dominant as traditional centres like Rudy Gobert or Anthony Davis, and he can struggle against smaller, quicker guards on switches.
Impact on Team-Building: In today’s switch-heavy defenses, teams need big men who can either anchor the paint or seamlessly switch onto guards. Giannis excels in help defense and roaming but can be exploited by teams with quick guards or stretch bigs, requiring complementary defenders like Brook Lopez to cover the rim.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Players like Bam Adebayo or Draymond Green offer more switchability across all positions, while Giannis’s defensive impact is slightly less flexible in certain matchups, necessitating specific roster constructions to cover his weaknesses.
5. Free-Throw Shooting Struggles in Clutch Moments
Issue: Giannis’s free-throw shooting has been a persistent weakness, with a career average of 64.7%. In high-pressure playoff games, his slow free-throw routine and inconsistent shooting can be exploited, as seen in games where opponents use the “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy.
Impact on Team-Building: Championship teams need reliable clutch performers. Giannis’s free-throw woes can lead to late-game liabilities, forcing coaches to adjust strategies or rely on other players in crunch time. This requires a roster with strong closers, which can complicate lineup decisions.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern NBA stars like Stephen Curry or Kevin Durant are trusted to close games with efficient scoring, including at the free-throw line. Giannis’s struggles in this area limit his reliability in tight situations.
6. High Usage Rate Limits Teammate Involvement
Issue: Giannis’s usage rate is among the league’s highest (32.3% in 2023-24), reflecting his ball-dominant style. While effective, this can reduce touches for teammates and make the offense overly reliant on his production.
Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires players who thrive off-ball, as his drives and post-ups demand the ball. This can limit the effectiveness of other ball-dominant stars unless they adapt (e.g., Lillard’s reduced role in Milwaukee). The team must prioritize role players who don’t need the ball, which can restrict roster diversity.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern offenses often distribute usage more evenly, with players like Jokić or Luka Dončić creating for others while still scoring. Giannis’s style can sometimes stifle teammate involvement, requiring careful roster construction.
7. Playoff Predictability
Issue: In playoff series, Giannis’s lack of a reliable jump shot and predictable driving style allow elite defensive teams to game-plan against him. Teams like the 2019 Raptors and 2020 Heat successfully limited his impact by crowding the paint and daring him to shoot.
Impact on Team-Building: To counter this, the Bucks need elite shooting and secondary creators to punish defensive adjustments. This places a premium on acquiring high-cost talent, which can strain salary caps and limit depth. Without perfect roster construction, Giannis’s game can be neutralized in high-stakes series.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern playoff success often hinges on unpredictability. Players like Jayson Tatum or Devin Booker, who can score in multiple ways, are harder to scheme against. Giannis’s more one-dimensional scoring profile requires specific countermeasures.
8. Physical Wear and Tear
Issue: Giannis’s physical, high-energy style—relying on explosive drives and defensive hustle—puts significant strain on his body. He’s had injury concerns, like knee issues in the 2021 and 2023 playoffs, which can impact his availability.
Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires a deep roster to compensate for potential injuries, as his absence significantly alters the team’s identity. This demands investment in quality backups, which can be challenging under salary cap constraints.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Players with more finesse-based games (e.g., Durant’s jump-shooting or Curry’s off-ball movement) may have less physical wear, allowing for greater durability. Giannis’s style, while dominant, carries long-term risks.
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s lack of outside shooting, reliance on paint scoring, limited half-court playmaking, and other factors make him a less flexible building block for a championship team in the modern NBA compared to more versatile stars. His style requires a roster heavy on shooters, defenders, and secondary creators, which can limit flexibility and increase costs. These incompatibilities with the spacing, versatility, and unpredictability demanded by today’s game make players like Kareem, with a more adaptable skill set, better anchors for a championship roster.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is often the subject of trade rumors as teams dream of pairing his unique skill set with their roster. One such destination that occasionally pops up is the Toronto Raptors. However, the idea of Giannis joining the Raptors makes little sense for both the player and the team.
The Raptors’ Current State: A Mismatch for Giannis
The Toronto Raptors, as of the 2024-25 season, are in a rebuilding phase. After trading away key players like Pascal Siakam and OG Anunoby, the team is centered around young talents like Scottie Barnes, RJ Barrett, and Immanuel Quickley. While these players show promise, the Raptors are far from championship contention, sitting at 11th in the Eastern Conference with a 15-20 record in recent projections. Their focus is on developing young talent and accumulating assets, not chasing a superstar like Giannis, who is in his prime at 30 years old and seeking immediate championship opportunities.
Giannis has repeatedly expressed his desire to compete for titles, as evidenced by his 2021 NBA Championship with the Bucks and his comments about wanting to stay in Milwaukee only if the team remains competitive. Joining a rebuilding team like Toronto would contradict his career goals. The Raptors lack the veteran star power and playoff-ready roster to complement Giannis’ win-now timeline, making the move a poor fit for his ambitions.
Giannis’ Weaknesses and Their Impact in Toronto’s System
Giannis’ game has notable weaknesses that would be amplified in Toronto’s current setup.
1. Lack of Consistent Outside Shooting
Giannis’ most glaring weakness is his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc. In the 2023-24 season, he shot just 27.4% from three-point range on 1.3 attempts per game, and his career average hovers around 28.6%. His free-throw shooting, while improved, remains unreliable at 65.7% last season. The Raptors’ offensive system under coach Darko Rajaković emphasizes spacing and ball movement, with players like Quickley (39.5% from three) and Gradey Dick (projected as a sharpshooter) creating open looks.
Without a reliable jumper, Giannis often clogs the paint, forcing defenses to collapse on him. In Milwaukee, players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez provide the necessary spacing to keep defenses honest. Toronto, however, lacks consistent elite shooters outside of Quickley. Barnes and Barrett are slashing forwards who thrive driving to the basket, much like Giannis. This overlap would crowd the paint, reducing offensive efficiency and making it easier for opponents to game-plan against Toronto.
2. Limited Playmaking and Ball-Handling
Giannis is a dominant force in transition and as a roll man, but his playmaking in half-court sets is limited. He averaged 6.5 assists per game in 2023-24, but many of these come from simple kick-outs after drawing double-teams. His ball-handling can be shaky under pressure, with 3.4 turnovers per game last season, often due to forced passes or dribbling into traffic.
The Raptors’ offense relies on quick decision-making and ball movement, with Barnes and Quickley often initiating plays. Giannis, however, thrives as the primary ball-handler in a system built around his drives. In Toronto, he’d either dominate the ball at the expense of Barnes’ development or struggle as an off-ball player due to his lack of shooting. This mismatch in playstyle would stunt the growth of Toronto’s young core and create clunky offensive sets.
3. Defensive Fit in Toronto’s Scheme
Defensively, Giannis is a former Defensive Player of the Year (2020) but has declined ever since. However, the Raptors’ defensive identity under Rajaković leans heavily on aggressive perimeter defense and versatility, with players like Barnes and Jakob Poeltl anchoring a switch-heavy scheme. While Giannis could fit this mould, his presence would overlap with Barnes, who is developing into a similar versatile defender.
Additionally, Toronto’s lack of a true secondary star to handle offensive creation means Giannis would expend significant energy on both ends, potentially leading to fatigue or injury concerns, as seen in his 2024 playoff absence due to a calf strain. In Milwaukee, players like Damian Lillard and Middleton share the offensive load, allowing Giannis to conserve energy for defense. Toronto’s roster simply doesn’t offer that luxury.
4. Rebounding Dependency and Team Fit
Giannis is stat padding rebounder, averaging 11.6 rebounds per game in 2023-24, as his impact on the boards often comes from Milwaukee’s system, where he’s surrounded by shooters who pull defenders away from the paint. In Toronto, with Poeltl as the primary center and Barnes also crashing the boards, there’s a risk of diminishing returns. The Raptors already struggle with offensive rebounding (26th in the league at 10.1 per game), and adding Giannis might not solve this issue if defenses pack the paint due to Toronto’s lack of shooting.
5. Giannis ain’t clutch
No polite way to say it. Forget that one 50 point game. Look at the cold hard facts. Giannis is a liability in clutch. Not just in the playoffs where he has failed every year for more than a decade (with that one exception). Even in regular season higher intensity games, Giannis just ain’t got “it”. He panics, he makes mistakes, he can’t follow advanced plays. He doesn’t impact high intensity NBA basketball when it really matters. Amazing regular season stats is all he does. We all know it now.
Financial and Trade Realities
Even if we ignore fit, the logistics of acquiring Giannis are a nightmare for Toronto. His contract, a three-year, $175.3 million extension signed in 2023, carries a cap hit of roughly $58 million annually through 2027-28. The Raptors would need to gut their roster, likely sending out Barnes, Quickley, and multiple first-round picks, to match salaries and satisfy Milwaukee’s demands. This would defeat the purpose of their rebuild, as they’d lose the young talent they’re banking on for future success.
Moreover, Milwaukee has no incentive to trade Giannis unless he demands out, which seems unlikely given his loyalty to the Bucks and their competitive roster. The Raptors, meanwhile, are focused on building around Barnes, who at 24 is their cornerstone for the next decade. Trading him for Giannis, who turns 31 in December 2025, would be a short-term gamble that sacrifices long-term potential.
Why Giannis Can’t Win a Championship in Toronto
Even if Giannis joined the Raptors, their current roster and timeline make a championship unlikely. Toronto’s lack of secondary star power means Giannis would face the same issues he did in Milwaukee’s early years: defenses walling off the paint and daring him to shoot. Without elite shooters or a proven playmaker to complement him, Giannis would be forced to carry an unsustainable offensive load, as seen in his 2023 playoff loss to Miami, where his inefficiencies were exposed.
The Raptors’ rebuild also means they’re at least two to three years away from contending, even with Giannis. By then, he’ll be in his mid-30s, and his athleticism-dependent game may start to decline. Teams like the Boston Celtics, Philadelphia 76ers, and even a healthy Bucks squad would remain far ahead in the East, with deeper, more balanced rosters.
So cut the crap
Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Toronto Raptors sounds like a fantasy for fans, but it’s a logistical and strategic disaster. His lack of outside shooting, limited play making, and defensive overlap with Toronto’s young core make him a poor fit for their system. The Raptors’ rebuilding timeline clashes with Giannis’ win-now mentality, and the trade cost would cripple their future. Meanwhile, Giannis’ weaknesses would be magnified without the right supporting cast, making a championship in Toronto a pipe dream. For both sides, staying the course—Giannis in Milwaukee and the Raptors with their young core—is the smarter play.
Whispers persist about whether Giannis would ever leave the Bucks for a new challenge. While some argue he’d thrive elsewhere, there’s a compelling case that Giannis might be hesitant to depart Milwaukee—not due to a lack of ambition, but because staying put shields him from intense scrutiny, hides his weaknesses, and provides a comfortable narrative for his playoff shortcomings. Sure, he will try and sell it as “loyalty” but think about it. He hasn’t got a chance in a million to win another ring with the Bucks. They have spend so long pampering his every whim, changing coaches and players as per his demands that they have absolutely nothing left to trade. If he really wants a ring he should go. But he won’t.
The Comfort of Milwaukee’s System
The Bucks have built their entire system around Giannis’s unique skill set. Coach Mike Budenholzer (and now Doc Rivers) designed offences that maximise his ability to attack the rim, leveraging his length, speed, and power. Milwaukee surrounded him with shooters like Khris Middleton, Brook Lopez, and Damian Lillard to space the floor, allowing Giannis to operate in the paint or as a playmaker in transition. This tailored environment masks some of his limitations, particularly his inconsistent outside shooting and free-throw struggles. The Bucks again were top of the NBA in 3pt% as a team despite Giannis shooting worse than ever in his career and close to the worse of any NBA player ever in a single season.
On a new team, Giannis will not have the same luxury. A franchise like the Miami Heat or Los Angeles Lakers, for example, might demand more versatility in half-court offence or a greater reliance on perimeter skills. If Giannis joined a team with a less complementary roster, his 30.8% career three-point shooting (as of the 2024-25 season) and 68.5% free-throw percentage could become glaring liabilities. In Milwaukee, these weaknesses are mitigated by a system that doesn’t require him to be a sharpshooter. Elsewhere, they’d be magnified, potentially exposing him as a one-dimensional star in critical moments.
The Excuse of the Supporting Cast
In Milwaukee, Giannis has a built-in narrative for playoff disappointments: the roster around him isn’t good enough. This is a complete lie as I broke down in this blog post. When the Bucks fell to the Miami Heat in the 2020 playoffs or struggled against the Boston Celtics in 2022, analysts and fans often pointed to Khris Middleton’s injuries, Jrue Holiday’s inconsistency, or a lack of depth. This narrative allows Giannis to deflect criticism, maintaining his status as a transcendent talent held back by circumstances.
If Giannis moved to a superteam the excuses would vanish. A new team with high-calibre talent would place the spotlight squarely on Giannis’s performance. If he failed to deliver in the playoffs, the blame would shift from the roster to his own limitations, such as his struggles in clutch situations or his predictable offensive approach against elite defences. The pressure to perform without the safety net of “it’s the team’s fault” could be daunting, especially for a player who thrives on being the underdog. Giannis already looks like a fool for talking about not joining a superteam only to get Dame next to him.
Playoff Pressure and the Fear of Failure
Giannis’s playoff resume is a mixed bag. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but it was mainly luck and not really due to Giannis when you break it down. Other years have been less kind: the Bucks’ early exits in 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024 exposed vulnerabilities in Giannis’s game, particularly against teams that build a “wall” to clog the paint. Opponents like the Raptors (2019) and Heat (2020) exploited his lack of a reliable jump shot, daring him to shoot while shutting down his drives.
On a new team, Giannis would face even greater playoff scrutiny. In Milwaukee, he’s the hometown hero, forgiven for setbacks because of his loyalty and the Bucks’ small-market status. In a bigger market or on a contending roster, every playoff game would be a referendum on his greatness. A failure to advance deep into the postseason could cement a narrative that Giannis can’t lead a team to a title without the perfect supporting cast, tarnishing his legacy. The risk of such failure might make him wary of leaving the familiarity of Milwaukee, where expectations, while high, are tempered by the city’s underdog mentality.
The Burden of Improvement
Giannis’ shooting remains a work in progress and he is running out of excuses. In Milwaukee, his reluctance to develop a consistent mid-range or three-point shot is often excused as a byproduct of his dominance in other areas. Fans and analysts argue, “Why change what works?” But on a new team, especially one with a different offensive philosophy, Giannis would face unrelenting pressure to evolve.
For example, joining a team like the Golden State Warriors, where spacing and shooting are paramount, would force Giannis to confront his weaknesses head-on. Without the Bucks’ system to lean on, he’d need to become a more complete offensive player, a challenge he’s been slow to embrace. The fear of being exposed as stagnant—or worse, incapable of adapting—could deter him from taking the leap to a new environment where his growth would be non-negotiable. People talk about him going to the Warriors but his inability to set up screens is only one of many weaknesses which make that completely ridiculous.
The Loyalty Factor and Public Perception
Giannis’s loyalty to Milwaukee is a cornerstone of his public image. He signed a supermax extension in 2020, cementing his status as a rare superstar who stayed with a small-market team. This decision endeared him to fans and shielded him from the criticism often levelled at players who chase rings elsewhere, like LeBron James or Kevin Durant. Leaving Milwaukee could fracture this narrative, painting him as just another star chasing glory rather than building a legacy.
Moreover, a move to a bigger market or a super team could invite comparisons to other superstars, where Giannis’s weaknesses might stand out more starkly. In Milwaukee, he’s the undisputed alpha, free from the shadow of a co-star who might outshine him. On a team with another MVP-calibre player, he’d risk being seen as the “second option,” a label that could bruise his ego and alter how his career is perceived. Superstars avoid Giannis for various reasons I list here.
The Psychological Weight of Change
Beyond basketball, leaving Milwaukee would mean uprooting a life Giannis has built over a decade. He’s spoken openly about his love for the city, his teammates, and the organisation that believed in him as a scrawny teenager from Greece. The emotional and psychological toll of adapting to a new city, fan base, and team culture could weigh heavily, especially for a player who values stability. The fear of failing to mesh with a new team—both on and off the court—might make staying in Milwaukee the safer choice.
Other Risks of Leaving
Media Scrutiny in a Bigger Market: Milwaukee’s relatively small media market offers Giannis a buffer from the intense scrutiny of cities like New York or Los Angeles. A move to a high-profile team would invite relentless analysis of his every move, from his shot selection to his body language.
Fan Backlash: Bucks fans have embraced Giannis as one of their own. Leaving could alienate a loyal fanbase, creating pressure to justify his decision with immediate success. The emotional toll of being booed in Milwaukee during return games could be a deterrent.
Team Chemistry Risks: Giannis’s game relies on trust and chemistry with teammates who understand his style. A new team might struggle to integrate his ball-dominant, paint-focused approach, leading to friction or underperformance.
Legacy Concerns: Giannis has a chance to be Milwaukee’s greatest player ever, a legend who brought a title to a city starved for success. Leaving risks diluting that legacy, especially if he fails to match or exceed his Bucks achievements elsewhere. We know he likes stat padding, well now he can smash every franchise record and pretend he is doing it to be loyal.
Giannis is too chicken to move
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s fear of leaving the Milwaukee Bucks is about the risks of stepping out of a perfectly crafted comfort zone. In Milwaukee, his weaknesses are mitigated, his playoff failures are cushioned by roster excuses, and his loyalty shields him from harsh criticism. A move to a new team would strip away these protections, exposing him to scrutiny, demanding growth in areas he’s yet to master, and risking his carefully built legacy. It looks as if Giannis doesn’t have the skill set to succeed anywhere and he knows it. The fear of failure, magnified by a new environment, will probably keep him rooted in Milwaukee for years to come. As he showed this season, he is quite happy stat padding and making the rest of his team look bad.
The Milwaukee Bucks entered the 2025 NBA Playoffs as the No. 5 seed in the Eastern Conference, riding an eight-game winning streak and bolstered by the return of key players like Damian Lillard and Bobby Portis. Facing the No. 4 seed Indiana Pacers, who held home-court advantage for the first time since 2014, the Bucks were expected to leverage their star power and playoff experience to advance. However, the Pacers dispatched Milwaukee in a decisive 4-1 series, culminating in a thrilling 119-118 overtime victory in Game 5, driven by Tyrese Haliburton’s clutch heroics. Giannis’ fat statements about “NOW I know what I need to do” before the games proved to be just that: empty talk.
1. Defensive Struggles Against Indiana’s High-Octane Offense
The Pacers’ fast-paced, ball-movement-heavy offense overwhelmed Milwaukee’s defense throughout the series. Indiana, known for their relentless pace, averaged 17.5 fast-break points per game during the regular season, which jumped to 24.3 against the Bucks in their four regular-season matchups. This trend continued in the playoffs, where the Pacers exploited transition opportunities and defensive lapses to devastating effect.
Milwaukee’s defense, ranked in the bottom half of the league in points allowed per 100 possessions during the regular season, was ill-equipped to handle Indiana’s speed. In Game 2, for instance, the Bucks allowed 123 points, with critical breakdowns like Tyrese Haliburton blowing past Kyle Kuzma in transition and Pascal Siakam capitalizing on a 3-on-2 break. These plays highlighted Milwaukee’s inability to get back quickly enough to set their defense, a problem exacerbated by veterans like Brook Lopez and Damian Lillard, who appeared a step slow.
The Bucks’ defensive rating in the first two games was a dismal 121.8, reflecting their struggles to contain Indiana’s multi-faceted attack. The Pacers’ ability to create “power-play opportunities” (13.4% of their offensive possessions, second only to Denver) allowed players like Andrew Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith to exploit mismatches in transition. Milwaukee’s switch-heavy defensive strategy showed promise in Game 2’s fourth quarter, holding Indiana to 24 points, but inconsistent execution led to breakdowns, such as Siakam’s game-sealing 3-pointer in Game 2.
Giannis is clearly not the DPOY he once was. He is focusing on offence and is much slower and less energetic in defence. He roams looking for the highlight block thus confusing his team’s defensive plan. And of course they all have to clear out so he can rack up defensive rebounds for his stats – that’s an order. Contrast that to the selfless team play of Indiana and you see the problem. That stuff may work in regular season easier games but not in NBA playoffs. Giannis should know better and curtail his ego.
2. Inability to Contain Tyrese Haliburton’s Clutch Play
Tyrese Haliburton emerged as the series’ defining figure, particularly in Game 5, where his game-winning layup in overtime sealed the Bucks’ fate. Haliburton’s ability to deliver in high-pressure moments was a recurring nightmare for Milwaukee. In Game 3, he recorded 17 points, 8 rebounds, and 15 assists, leading Indiana to a 129-103 rout. His Game 5 performance, including a layup-and-one to cut a four-point deficit and a subsequent game-winner, underscored his knack for taking over games.
Milwaukee’s defensive schemes struggled to contain Haliburton, especially in pick-and-roll situations. The Pacers doubled ball screens involving Lillard, forcing him to make decisions under pressure, and Haliburton’s speed and playmaking exposed slower defenders like Lopez. In Game 2, Haliburton sprinted past Kuzma and drew Giannis away from his assignment, leading to open shots for teammates like Nesmith. The Bucks faced a tactical dilemma: leave Haliburton to score in the paint or risk open 3-pointers elsewhere, a question they failed to answer consistently. Giannis is just too slow to even understand what is going on, let alone adjust. Lateral speed has always been Giannis weak spot and it’s getting worse. In fact Giannis is worse this season at most statistical categories.
3. Offensive Inefficiencies and Poor 3-Point Shooting
Because of Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance the Bucks’ offence lacked rhythm and consistency. Milwaukee, the league’s best 3-point shooting team during the regular season at 38.7%, shot a dismal 24.3% (9 of 37) in Game 1. Coach Doc Rivers noted that many of these attempts came off late passes, disrupting the team’s offensive flow. Giannis always looks to get his easy bucket for his stats first. It’s predictable and all too often it leads to a (usually mediocre or even bad) pass with not much time left on the clock. Then everyone blames the receiver and not Giannis! The Bucks were the No1 team in the regular season for 3pt percentage.
The return of Damian Lillard, who missed Game 1 due to a blood clot but played 37 minutes in Game 2, didn’t provide the expected spark. Lillard, still recovering, shot 4-of-13 for 14 points in Game 2 and struggled defensively, likely due to his month-long absence and a calf injury. The Bucks’ reliance on Giannis to carry the offence was evident, but his lack of play making in Game 1 (one assist) highlighted the team’s struggle to generate open looks for shooters like Gary Trent Jr. and AJ Green. Giannis simply lacks the range of potential movements and the basketball IQ to understand how to change the team plays. Never in any universe should he be bringing down the ball.
4. Failure to Capitalize on Home Games
After falling into a 2-0 hole in Indianapolis, the Bucks had a chance to shift momentum at home in Games 3 and 4. They managed a 117-101 victory in Game 3, powered by Giannis (34 points) and Gary Trent Jr.’s hot shooting from deep. Here I had predicted the Pacers would let them win it way before the game and I was correct. The Pacers simply wanted to finish off the series in Indiana and make some extra money along the way. They responded with a commanding 129-103 win in Game 4, exposing Milwaukee’s inability to sustain defensive intensity. Indiana’s road performance was formidable, with an 18-9 record and the fourth-best road net rating after a slow start to the season. This resilience made it difficult for the Bucks to capitalise on home-court energy.
The Bucks’ Game 4 loss was particularly damaging, as Indiana’s balanced attack—led by six players in double figures—overpowered Milwaukee’s defense. The Pacers’ ability to maintain their high-octane offense away from home, averaging 117.8 points per 100 possessions on the road, meant the Bucks couldn’t rely on home advantage to slow Indiana down.
5. Historical Context and Rivalry Dynamics
The Pacers have historically had Milwaukee’s number in playoff match ups, never losing a series to the Bucks. In 2024, Indiana defeated a Giannis-less Bucks team 4-2, and this year’s 4-1 result continued that trend. The rivalry’s intensity, marked by incidents like the 2023 game-ball dispute and Haliburton’s “Dame Time” mimicry, added a psychological edge for Indiana. Haliburton himself acknowledged the animosity, stating, “We don’t like them, they don’t like us,” which seemed to fuel the Pacers’ focus.
The Bucks’ inability to channel this rivalry into consistent performance, especially after blowing a seven-point lead in the final minute of Game 5’s overtime, underscored their mental and tactical lapses, with Giannis bearing most of the blame but insisting on trying to guard Tyrese. He clearly couldn’t and it cost the game. Getting blown past once happens. Twice you are starting to look stupid. Three times in clutch and Giannis should have come out after the game and asked his team for forgiveness.
This was mainly Giannis’ fault
While Giannis delivered scoring outbursts—36 points in Game 1, 34 in Game 2, and 34 in Game 3—his shortcomings in play making, defensive discipline, and clutch situations were pivotal in the Bucks’ inability to compete effectively.
1. Limited Playmaking and Over-Reliance on Scoring
Giannis’s dominance as a scorer was evident, averaging 34.0 points per game on 56.2% field goal shooting, but his play making fell short of what the Bucks needed against Indiana’s high-octane offence. In Game 1, Giannis recorded just one assist, a stark contrast to Haliburton’s 15 assists in Game 3. His tendency to drive into crowded lanes and force shots, rather than facilitating for open teammates, disrupted Milwaukee’s offensive flow. The Bucks shot a dismal 24.3% from three in Game 1 (9 of 37), with many attempts coming off late passes or broken plays, a problem exacerbated by Giannis’s limited vision as a passer.
So this is interesting. Before these playoffs, the Pacers had many more assists per game than the Bucks. Yeah, we all know they pass a lot. So why then did they have LESS assists in every game of the playoff series against the Bucks?
This has Giannis written all over it. He simply can’t adjust and reverts to his selfish ways, running to dunk and then passing when he gets stuck. It is amazing his team mates get any in at all as they are usually stone cold and haven’t touched the ball for ages! The Pacers were all probing the paint quickly but then passing out immediately if they saw issues with the total team effort. There is no “i” in team but plenty of “I” in Giannis!
Indiana’s defensive strategy focused on clogging the paint, daring Giannis to kick out to shooters like Gary Trent Jr. or AJ Green. However, Giannis averaged only 3.8 assists per game in the series, compared to his regular-season average of 6.5. In Game 4, a 129-103 blowout loss, Giannis’s four turnovers, including two errant passes in the third quarter, led to fast-break points for the Pacers. His inability to consistently create for others allowed Indiana to collapse on him, stifling Milwaukee’s offence and leaving shooters like Damian Lillard, who was still recovering from injury, unable to find rhythm.
2. Defensive Lapses in Transition and Pick-and-Roll Coverage
The Pacers’ fast-paced attack, averaging 24.3 fast-break points per game in the series, exposed Giannis’s struggles in transition defence. His positioning and decision-making faltered against Indiana’s speed. In Game 2, Tyrese Haliburton blew past Kyle Kuzma in transition, drawing Giannis away from his assignment and leaving Aaron Nesmith open for a corner three. Similar breakdowns occurred in Game 5, where Giannis’s hesitation to pick up Haliburton in a 3-on-2 break led to a backbreaking layup. It seems like Giannis is more concerned with the optics and himself looking good than actually helping his team win.
In pick-and-roll situations, Giannis struggled to balance defending the ball-handler and protecting the rim. The Pacers’ use of double ball screens targeting Damian Lillard forced Giannis to hedge or switch, but he was often a step slow, allowing Haliburton to penetrate or find open teammates. Milwaukee’s defensive rating in the series was a poor 121.8 in the first two games, with Giannis’s inability to anchor the defence against Indiana’s “power-play opportunities” (13.4% of possessions) proving costly.
3. Clutch-Time Struggles and Poor Decision-Making
The Bucks’ collapse in Game 5’s overtime, blowing a seven-point lead in the final minute, highlighted Giannis’s struggles in clutch moments. With the game on the line, Giannis failed to take control, deferring to teammates or making questionable decisions. In the final possession of overtime, he drove into a crowded paint, ignoring an open Gary Trent Jr. on the wing, resulting in a blocked shot by Myles Turner. Haliburton capitalized on the other end with a game-winning layup-and-one, underscoring Giannis’s inability to deliver when it mattered most.
Giannis’s clutch-time stats were lacklustre: in the series’ five games, he shot 2-for-5 in clutch situations (last five minutes, score within five points) and committed two turnovers. His free-throw shooting, a long-standing weakness, also hurt the Bucks, as he went 10-for-16 (62.5%) in Game 5, missing key attempts that could have sealed the game in regulation. These misses shifted momentum to Indiana, who thrived on Milwaukee’s mistakes. This is nothing new. But Bucks’ fans have never admitted that in the championship run Khris bailed him out every time. Giannis simply can’t operate in clutch situations.
4. Failure to Lead and Elevate Teammates
As the Bucks’ leader, Giannis was expected to rally a roster dealing with injuries (Lillard’s calf issue and limited minutes in Game 2) and fatigue from heavy reliance on a seven-man rotation. However, his leadership on the court lacked the intangibles needed to counter Indiana’s intensity. The Pacers’ psychological edge, fueled by the ongoing rivalry and Haliburton’s taunting (mimicking “Dame Time” in Game 3), seemed to unsettle the Bucks. Giannis, despite acknowledging the rivalry’s intensity post-game, failed to channel it into cohesive team play. This has been his fault for many years now. From the game ball debacle in the regular season, Giannis has indeed acted like a child (to quote J.Brown!) and made the Pacers aware how easy it is to get him rattled.
In Game 3, the Bucks’ lone win (117-101), Giannis’s 34 points were complemented by Gary Trent Jr.’s hot shooting, but this was an outlier, as the Pacers probably didn’t really fight to win that game anyway. In losses, Giannis’s dominance didn’t translate to elevating players like Bobby Portis or Kevin Porter Jr., who struggled to find open looks. His tunnel vision in key moments, such as forcing drives against double-teams in Game 4, limited opportunities for role players to contribute, unlike Haliburton, who consistently set up teammates like Pascal Siakam and Andrew Nembhard. The higher the stakes, the worse Giannis plays. He tends to revert to his same, extremely predictable, go to moves and it simply doesn’t work.
5. Inability to Counter Indiana’s Strategic Adjustments
The Pacers made effective adjustments throughout the series, particularly in neutralising Giannis’s paint dominance. In Game 2, Indiana doubled Giannis on post touches, forcing him to pass out of tight spaces, which led to three turnovers in the third quarter alone. Coach Rick Carlisle’s strategy of using Myles Turner’s rim protection and Pascal Siakam’s versatility limited Giannis’s efficiency in the half-court, forcing him to rely on contested mid-range shots, where he went 3-for-10 in the series.
Giannis failed to adapt to these adjustments, and again it’s on Giannis who was sticking to his drive-heavy approach rather than exploiting Indiana’s smaller defenders, like Nembhard, with post-ups or quick passes. His lack of a reliable outside shot—0-for-3 from three in the series—allowed the Pacers to sag off him, clogging driving lanes and disrupting Milwaukee’s spacing. This predictability made it easier for Indiana to dictate the game’s tempo, especially in their 129-103 Game 4 rout.
The Milwaukee Bucks’ loss to the Indiana Pacers in the 2025 NBA Playoffs was a result of multiple compounding factors. Defensively, they couldn’t contain Indiana’s fast-break attack or Tyrese Haliburton’s clutch play making. For Milwaukee, this early exit raises questions about their defensive identity, roster construction, and ability to compete in a faster, more dynamic Eastern Conference. As the Bucks head into the off season, addressing these weaknesses will be critical to reclaiming their status as championship contenders. But take a minute before boasting how “every team wants to trade for Giannis” to think about it. Is he really any good at all at NBA playoff basketball or is he a liability?
All sorts of dumb things are flying around, this Giannis to Nets story is possibly the worse. Why on earth would he leave a team optimised around him for one near the bottom of the league?
1. Lack of Trade Assets
The Nets are in a rebuilding phase after the Kevin Durant, Kyrie Irving, and James Harden era left them with limited draft capital and young talent. To acquire a superstar like Giannis, Milwaukee would demand a hefty package, likely including multiple first-round picks, promising young players, and possibly an All-Star caliber player. Brooklyn’s most valuable assets include:
Cam Thomas, a scoring guard with potential but inconsistent defense and playmaking.
Nic Claxton, a solid defensive center but not a cornerstone for a contending team.
Draft picks, many of which are controlled by other teams (e.g., Houston owns Brooklyn’s 2026 and 2027 first-rounders due to the Harden trade).
The Nets simply don’t have the blue-chip prospects or picks to entice Milwaukee, especially since the Bucks would want players who fit their timeline and complement their roster around Damian Lillard. Trading Giannis for a package centered around Thomas, Claxton, and limited picks wouldn’t align with Milwaukee’s goal of staying competitive.
2. Financial Constraints
Giannis is in the first year of a three-year, $175.3 million extension, with a cap hit of approximately $58.6 million in 2025-26. The Nets, while not hard-capped, are managing their salary sheet carefully to maintain flexibility during their rebuild. Adding Giannis’s massive contract would limit their ability to build a balanced roster around him, especially since Brooklyn lacks the depth to compete immediately. The luxury tax implications and the cost of re-signing players like Claxton or adding role players would strain their financial resources.
3. Strategic Misalignment
The Nets are focused on developing young talent and accumulating assets for long-term success, not mortgaging their future for a single star. General Manager Sean Marks has emphasized patience, as seen in their refusal to overpay for players in recent trade discussions. Trading for Giannis would mean doubling down on a win-now strategy, which contradicts their current direction. Brooklyn’s front office is more likely to target players who fit their timeline, such as high-upside prospects or cost-controlled veterans, rather than a 30-year-old superstar whose prime may not align with their competitive window.
Why Giannis Wouldn’t Thrive in Brooklyn
Even if the Nets could pull off a trade, Giannis’s fit with the team raises significant concerns. His game, while dominant, has weaknesses that Brooklyn’s current roster and infrastructure wouldn’t address, and the move wouldn’t automatically make them championship contenders.
1. Lack of Complementary Star Power
Giannis thrives when surrounded by players who can space the floor, handle the ball, and share the offensive load. In Milwaukee, players like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard provide shooting and playmaking, allowing Giannis to dominate in the paint and on drives. The Nets, however, lack a secondary star to complement him:
Cam Thomas is a score-first guard who struggles with efficiency (42.7% FG in 2024-25) and doesn’t create for others (2.8 assists per game).
Dennis Schröder, while a solid point guard, is better suited as a sixth man or secondary playmaker, not a co-star.
Ben Simmons, if healthy, could theoretically pair with Giannis as a playmaker and defender, but his inability to shoot (0% from three) clogs the lane and undermines spacing.
Without a true co-star, Giannis would face the same defensive schemes that have challenged him in the playoffs—packed paint, sagging defenders, and double-teams—forcing him to rely on his inconsistent jumper or limited playmaking.
2. Spacing and Offensive Fit
Giannis’s game relies heavily on driving lanes and interior dominance, which requires shooters to stretch the floor. The Nets’ current roster lacks consistent outside shooting:
Brooklyn ranks 22nd in three-point percentage (34.8%) and 19th in three-pointers made per game (12.4) in the 2024-25 season.
Key rotation players like Claxton and Simmons are non-shooters, and Thomas’s three-point shooting (36.1%) is respectable but not elite.
Role players like Dorian Finney-Smith (35.5% from three) and Jalen Wilson (33.3%) don’t provide enough volume to punish defenses.
In Milwaukee, Giannis benefits from shooters like Middleton (38.1% from three) and Brook Lopez (36.5%), who force defenders to stay honest. In Brooklyn, defenses could sag off non-shooters, daring Giannis to shoot from deep, where he’s struggled (career 28.5% from three, 29.1% in 2024-25). The Nets’ lack of spacing would exacerbate Giannis’s limitations as a half-court scorer.
3. Defensive Concerns
Giannis is a Defensive Player of the Year (2020) and one of the league’s best rim protectors, but he can’t single-handedly fix a team’s defense. The Nets rank 18th in defensive rating (113.2) in 2024-25, with weaknesses in perimeter defense and transition. Players like Thomas and Schröder are average defenders at best, and Simmons’s defensive impact has waned due to injuries and inconsistent effort. While Giannis and Claxton could form a formidable frontcourt defensively, the backcourt’s deficiencies would leave Brooklyn vulnerable to guards like Jayson Tatum, Donovan Mitchell, or Tyrese Haliburton in playoff matchups.
4. Coaching and Infrastructure
The Bucks’ system under coaches like Mike Budenholzer and Doc Rivers has been tailored to maximize Giannis’s strengths, with an emphasis on pace, transition, and defensive versatility. In contrast, Nets head coach Jordi Fernández is still establishing his system, focusing on player development and ball movement. While Fernández is a promising coach, it’s unclear whether he could immediately design an offense that hides Giannis’s weaknesses, especially with a roster not built for his style. Additionally, Brooklyn’s lack of playoff experience as a unit could hinder their ability to compete in high-stakes games, even with Giannis.
Giannis’s Weaknesses: Unaddressed in Brooklyn
Giannis’ game has well-documented limitations that have been exposed in playoff settings. A move to Brooklyn wouldn’t solve these issues and could even amplify them.
1. Limited Outside Shooting
Giannis’s three-point shooting remains a work in progress. In the 2024-25 season, he’s averaging 1.2 threes made on 4.1 attempts (29.1%), and his midrange game is inconsistent. In playoff series, teams like the Miami Heat (2020) and Toronto Raptors (2019) have built walls in the paint, forcing him to shoot or pass. The Nets’ lack of elite shooters and playmakers would allow opponents to employ similar strategies, putting more pressure on Giannis to create outside the paint—an area where he’s still developing.
2. Playmaking Under Pressure
Giannis’s playmaking has improved (6.0 assists per game in 2024-25), but he’s not a natural point-forward like LeBron James. In crunch time, he often relies on teammates to initiate offense or make decisions. Without a primary ball-handler like Lillard or Jrue Holiday, Giannis would face increased ball-handling duties in Brooklyn, potentially leading to turnovers (3.2 per game in 2024-25) or stagnant possessions.
3. Free-Throw Struggles
Giannis’s free-throw shooting (67.1% in 2024-25) remains a liability in close games, where hacking strategies can disrupt his rhythm. The Nets’ lack of clutch performers (Thomas is their primary late-game option) means Giannis would face even more pressure at the line, with no reliable fallback option to bail out the offense.
4. Injury and Workload Concerns
At 30 years old, Giannis has logged heavy minutes (33.8 per game in 2024-25) and taken significant physical punishment due to his aggressive style. The Nets’ thin roster would force him to carry a massive load on both ends, potentially increasing injury risk. Milwaukee’s depth allows Giannis to conserve energy for key moments, a luxury Brooklyn can’t offer.
Championship Contender? Not in Brooklyn
Even with Giannis, the Nets wouldn’t be immediate championship contenders. The Eastern Conference is stacked with teams like the Boston Celtics, Philadelphia 76ers, and New York Knicks, all of whom have deeper rosters and better cohesion. Boston’s versatile wings (Tatum, Jaylen Brown) and shooting would exploit Brooklyn’s lack of perimeter defense and spacing. Philadelphia’s Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey would overwhelm the Nets’ backcourt, and the Knicks’ physicality and depth would pose matchup problems.
To become contenders, the Nets would need to add a second star, elite shooters, and defensive specialists around Giannis—moves that are nearly impossible given their limited assets and cap space. Without these pieces, Giannis would be in a similar position to his early Milwaukee years: a dominant force surrounded by a roster not ready to compete at the highest level.
Get real!
The Brooklyn Nets are unlikely to trade for Giannis Antetokounmpo due to their lack of trade assets, financial constraints, and rebuilding strategy. Even if they could acquire him, Giannis wouldn’t find the ideal environment to overcome his weaknesses or lead the Nets to a championship. His need for spacing, complementary star power, and a tailored system wouldn’t be met by Brooklyn’s current roster, and the team’s defensive and depth issues would persist. For now, Giannis is better suited to stay in Milwaukee, where the Bucks are built to maximise his strengths, while the Nets focus on their long-term vision.
The idea of trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the San Antonio Spurs has surfaced in speculative discussions among fans and analysts. While the notion of pairing Giannis with the Spurs’ generational talent, Victor Wembanyama, might seem enticing on paper, a deeper analysis reveals that such a move would be illogical for both basketball and strategic reasons.
1. Clash of Playing Styles: Giannis and Wembanyama’s Incompatible Skill Sets
Giannis Antetokounmpo and Victor Wembanyama’s playing styles are fundamentally at odds, creating significant overlap and diminishing returns on the court.
a. Dominance in the Paint and Lack of Spacing
Giannis is a paint-dominant force who thrives on attacking the basket, leveraging his athleticism, length, and ball-handling to score efficiently at the rim. According to NBA stats, Giannis ranked second in the league in points in the paint (22.4 per game) during the 2024-25 season, with 68% of his shots coming within 10 feet. His game relies heavily on driving lanes and collapsing defenses to create opportunities for himself and teammates.
Wembanyama, while versatile, also commands significant space in the paint, both offensively and defensively. As a 7’4” unicorn, Wemby’s ability to protect the rim (3.6 blocks per game in 2024-25) and score inside (12.8 points in the paint per game) makes him a gravitational force in the low post. Pairing two players who both excel in the same area risks clogging the paint, reducing driving lanes, and forcing one or both to operate outside their comfort zones.
The Spurs’ offensive system under Gregg Popovich emphasized spacing, ball movement, and perimeter play to maximise Wembanyama’s versatility. Giannis, however, requires the ball in his hands to initiate drives, which could disrupt San Antonio’s flow. With Giannis’ limited outside shooting (27.7% from three in 2024-25), defences would sag off him, daring him to shoot and shrinking the floor for Wembanyama’s face-up game or pick-and-roll actions.
b. Ball-Dominant vs. Off-Ball Roles
Giannis is most effective as a primary ball-handler, orchestrating the offense and creating plays in transition or pick-and-roll scenarios. In Milwaukee, he averages 5.8 assists per game, often acting as the Bucks’ de facto point forward even though he is not at all good at it. Wembanyama, while not a traditional point centre, is developing into a hub for San Antonio’s offence, with his passing (4.1 assists per game) and ability to stretch the floor drawing comparisons to Nikola Jokić. The Spurs are much faster and more flexible than Giannis can even understand, let alone play with.
Pairing two players who thrive with the ball in their hands creates a dilemma: who runs the offense? Forcing Wembanyama into a strictly off-ball role would underutilize his playmaking and shooting, while relegating Giannis to a secondary role would neuter his impact as a downhill creator. The Spurs’ young core, including Devin Vassell and Keldon Johnson, already requires touches to develop, and adding Giannis’ high-usage style (31.2% usage rate) would stifle their growth and disrupt team chemistry.
c. Defensive Redundancy
Defensively, both Giannis and Wembanyama are rim protectors and versatile defenders capable of guarding multiple positions. Giannis’ 1.2 blocks and 1.1 steals per game complement his ability to switch onto guards or anchor the paint, while Wembanyama’s league-leading blocks and 1.3 steals showcase his unparalleled defensive range. However, pairing them creates redundancy rather than synergy. Sure, Giannis has been lazier and lazier since winning the chip in defence, but just how little can he do and get away with it?
The Spurs already rely on Wembanyama as their defensive anchor, using his length to erase mistakes and deter drives. Adding Giannis would leave San Antonio with two players competing for the same defensive responsibilities. This overlap could lead to confusion in rotations, especially against teams with strong perimeter attacks that exploit the lack of specialised wing defenders. Already the Bucks have suffered from Giannis not knowing what he is doing. This season 4th quarters without Giannis have been much better. The Spurs need complementary defenders—like 3-and-D wings—to maximise Wembanyama’s impact, not another paint-bound star.
2. Giannis’ Weaknesses and Poor Fit with the Spurs’ System
Beyond the stylistic clash, Giannis’ weaknesses make him a suboptimal fit for the Spurs’ roster and long-term vision.
a. Limited Outside Shooting
Giannis’ lack of a reliable jump shot is a glaring issue in San Antonio’s system. Popovich’s offenses have historically prioritized floor spacing to create driving lanes and open looks, as seen with players like Danny Green and Patty Mills during the Spurs’ championship runs. Giannis’ career 28.6% three-point shooting and 65.7% free-throw shooting allow defenses to employ a “wall” strategy, packing the paint and daring him to shoot.
In Milwaukee, Giannis benefited from shooters who stretch the floor and punish sagging defenders. In fact the Bucks were again the best 3point shooting team in the NBA. The Spurs, however, lack consistent outside threats, with Vassell (36.1% from three) being their primary perimeter weapon. Pairing Giannis with Wembanyama, who shoots 34.6% from three, would not provide enough spacing to prevent defences from collapsing, limiting the effectiveness of both stars.
b. High Usage and Developmental Impact
The Spurs are in a rebuilding phase, focused on developing young talent like Wembanyama, Vassell, Jeremy Sochan, and rookie Stephon Castle. Giannis’ high-usage style would demand a significant share of possessions, reducing opportunities for these players to grow. For example, Vassell’s 19.5 points per game and Castle’s role as a secondary creator would take a backseat to Giannis’ 30.1 points per game and ball-dominant approach.
San Antonio’s long-term goal is to build a cohesive unit around Wembanyama, not to pivot to a win-now strategy that sacrifices youth for a star who may not align with their timeline. At 30 years old, Giannis is in his prime, but his peak may not coincide with the Spurs’ contention window, projected to open when Wembanyama reaches his mid-20s.
c. Injury Concerns and Physical Toll
Giannis’ game relies heavily on athleticism and physicality, which takes a toll on his body. He has missed an average of 12 games per season over the past three years, including a calf injury that sidelined him for the 2024 playoffs’ first round. The Spurs, already cautious with Wembanyama’s minutes due to his unique frame, cannot afford to invest in another injury-prone star whose style invites wear and tear.
Moreover, Giannis’ reliance on driving and rim attacks pairs poorly with Wembanyama’s need for a clean paint to operate. The physicality of Giannis’ game could lead to collisions or crowded lanes, increasing the risk of injuries for both players.
3. Strategic and Financial Considerations
Beyond on-court fit, trading for Giannis poses significant strategic and financial challenges for the Spurs.
a. Trade Cost and Roster Depletion
Acquiring Giannis would require an astronomical trade package, likely including multiple first-round picks, young talents like Vassell or Sochan, and salary fillers. The Spurs’ treasure trove of draft capital (including picks from Atlanta and Chicago) is a key asset for building around Wembanyama, and depleting it for Giannis would limit their ability to add complementary pieces.
Losing players like Vassell, a 24-year-old scorer with two-way potential, or Sochan, a versatile defender, would also weaken the Spurs’ depth. Milwaukee, in turn, would demand proven assets, leaving San Antonio with a top-heavy roster ill-equipped to compete against deeper teams like Denver or Boston.
b. Salary Cap Constraints
Giannis’ supermax contract, with a $57.6 million cap hit in 2025-26, would hamstring the Spurs’ flexibility. San Antonio currently operates with significant cap space, allowing them to sign role players or take on bad contracts for draft compensation. Adding Giannis’ deal, alongside Wembanyama’s eventual extension, would lock the Spurs into a luxury-tax situation before their young core matures, limiting their ability to build a balanced roster.
c. Cultural and Coaching Fit
Popovich’s system thrived on selflessness, ball movement, and role clarity, as exemplified by the 2014 championship team. Giannis, while a willing passer, is accustomed to a Bucks system tailored to his strengths, with shooters and spacers surrounding him. Asking him to adapt to a motion-based offence at this stage of his career could lead to friction, especially given the Spurs emphasis on collective play over individual dominance. Giannis has not been known for basketball IQ or flexibility. In fact he seems to not even understand advanced NBA basketball systems.
4. Better Alternatives for the Spurs
Instead of pursuing Giannis, the Spurs are better served targeting players who complement Wembanyama’s skill set. A playmaking guard like Trae Young or a 3-and-D wing like Mikal Bridges would address San Antonio’s needs for perimeter creation and defensive versatility. These players would enhance Wembanyama’s strengths without overlapping his role, creating a more balanced and scalable roster.
Alternatively, the Spurs could continue developing their young core and leveraging their draft capital to acquire ascending talents or high-value picks. With Wembanyama as the cornerstone, San Antonio has the luxury of patience, and chasing a superstar like Giannis prematurely risks derailing their long-term vision.
Sorry to bust your bubbles
Trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the San Antonio Spurs is a tantalizing but deeply flawed idea. The clash of playing styles between Giannis and Wembanyama, rooted in their paint dominance, ball-handling demands, and defensive redundancy, would create more problems than solutions. Giannis’ weaknesses—limited shooting, high usage, and injury concerns—further exacerbate the poor fit, while the trade’s cost, financial burden, and cultural mismatch make it a strategic misstep. The Spurs’ focus should remain on building a cohesive, complementary roster around Wembanyama, not chasing a superstar whose game doesn’t align with their vision. For now, Giannis belongs in Milwaukee, and the Spurs should keep their sights on a future tailored to their generational talent.
The idea of trading Giannis Antetokounmpo, a two-time NBA MVP and one of the league’s most dominant players, to the Houston Rockets has surfaced in speculative discussions. While the Rockets are a young, rebuilding team with promising talent, such a trade would be illogical for both Giannis and Houston.
Giannis Antetokounmpo: A Dominant Force with Notable Flaws
Giannis, often referred to as the “Greek Freak,” is a generational physical talent. His ability to dominate in the paint, defend multiple positions, and lead fast breaks used to be unmatched. However, even a player of his calibre has weaknesses that teams must account for when building around him. These flaws—namely his lack of a consistent outside shot, limited play making vision, and struggles in high-pressure half-court offence—make a trade to the Rockets a poor fit.
1. Lack of Consistent Outside Shooting
Giannis’ most glaring weakness is his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc. In the 2023-24 season, Giannis shot just 27.4% from three-point range on 1.3 attempts per game, per Basketball-Reference. While he’s improved marginally over the years, he remains a non-threat from deep, allowing defenses to sag off him and clog the paint. This is problematic for a Rockets team that emphasizes spacing and perimeter-oriented play.
Houston’s young core—Jalen Green, Jabari Smith Jr., and Cam Whitmore—relies heavily on driving lanes and open three-point looks. The Rockets ranked 7th in the NBA in three-point attempts per game (35.8) in 2023-24, per NBA.com. Pairing Giannis with this group would shrink the floor, as defenders could ignore him on the perimeter and collapse on Houston’s slashers. Without a reliable shooting big man (like Brook Lopez in Milwaukee) to pull defenders away, Giannis’ presence would stifle Houston’s offensive flow.
2. Limited Playmaking Vision
While Giannis is an elite scorer and rebounder, his playmaking is not at the level of other superstars like LeBron James or Nikola Jokić. He averaged 6.5 assists per game in 2023-24, but many of these come from straightforward kick-outs or dump-offs rather than intricate reads. His tunnel vision in high-pressure situations often leads to predictable passes or turnovers (3.7 per game last season).
The Rockets’ offense thrives on ball movement and quick decision-making, with players like Fred VanVleet and Alperen Şengün facilitating from multiple positions. Adding Giannis, who demands the ball to maximize his impact, could disrupt this rhythm. Şengün, in particular, is a hub for Houston’s offense, averaging 5.0 assists in 2023-24. Forcing him to defer to Giannis would stunt his development and diminish the Rockets’ fluid, egalitarian system.
3. Struggles in Half-Court Offense
Giannis excels in transition, where his athleticism and length make him unstoppable. However, in the half-court, his game can become one-dimensional. Without a reliable jumper or elite playmaking, he often relies on bulldozing to the rim, which invites help defense and leads to inefficient possessions. In clutch situations, his free-throw shooting (65.7% in 2023-24) becomes a liability, as teams intentionally foul him to stop the clock.
The Rockets, under coach Ime Udoka, are building a disciplined, versatile offense that balances inside-out play. Giannis’ heavy reliance on paint scoring would clash with Houston’s need for a more varied attack. Additionally, the Rockets’ lack of elite shooters (outside of VanVleet) means they can’t compensate for Giannis’ half-court limitations the way Milwaukee does with players like Damian Lillard or Khris Middleton.
Why the Rockets’ Roster and Timeline Don’t Align with Giannis
Beyond Giannis’ weaknesses, the Rockets’ current roster composition and rebuilding timeline make this trade a non-starter.
1. Mismatched Timeline
At 30 years old (as of December 2024), Giannis is in his prime and focused on winning championships now. The Rockets, however, are a young team focused on developing their core, which includes players like Green (22), Şengün (22), and Smith Jr. (21). Houston’s 41-41 record in 2023-24 was a step forward, but they’re not yet contenders. Trading for Giannis would require giving up multiple young assets and draft picks, gutting their future for a player whose prime may not align with their competitive window.
Giannis’ contract, which runs through 2027-28 with a player option, is also a massive financial commitment. The Rockets, with their cap flexibility, are better suited to developing cost-controlled young players rather than taking on a supermax deal that limits their roster-building options.
2. Defensive Redundancies
Giannis used to be an elite defender, capable of guarding 1-through-5 and anchoring a top-tier defence. However, the Rockets already have strong defensive pieces in Tari Eason, Jabari Smith Jr., and Amen Thompson, who collectively provide versatility and rim protection. Adding Giannis would create redundancies, as Houston doesn’t need another paint-oriented defender at the expense of offensive spacing. Giannis can’t think and adapt as fast as they are currently operating, he would downgrade their D. Moreover, Giannis’ defensive impact thrives in systems with strong perimeter defenders to funnel opponents toward him.
3. Trading Assets for a Poor Fit
To acquire Giannis, the Rockets would likely need to part with Şengün, Green, and multiple first-round picks—assets that are the cornerstone of their rebuild. Şengün, in particular, is a rising star whose playmaking and scoring in the post complement Houston’s system far better than Giannis’ skill set. Trading him for a player with overlapping strengths (paint dominance) and exploitable weaknesses (shooting and half-court creation) would be a step backward.
Additionally, the Bucks would have little incentive to trade Giannis to a non-contender like Houston unless overwhelmed by an offer. Milwaukee would likely demand proven stars or high-value picks, which the Rockets can’t afford to surrender without derailing their long-term vision.
The Cultural and Strategic Disconnect
Giannis is a loyal, culture-defining superstar who has repeatedly expressed his commitment to Milwaukee. His leadership style—intense, workmanlike, and team-first—fits a veteran-led contender, not a young, unproven squad like the Rockets. Houston’s culture under Udoka emphasizes discipline and growth, but integrating a player of Giannis’ stature could create pressure to win immediately, disrupting the organic development of their core.
Strategically, the Rockets are better off targeting players who complement their existing roster. A stretch big or a two-way wing would address their needs without the complications of Giannis’ fit. For example, a player like Kevin Durant (if available) or a sharpshooting big like Karl-Anthony Towns would provide the spacing and versatility Houston needs to take the next step.
No Texas for Giannis
Trading Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Houston Rockets is a fantasy that collapses under scrutiny. His weaknesses—lack of outside shooting, limited play making, and half-court struggles—clash with Houston’s spacing-dependent, egalitarian offence. The Rockets’ young core, rebuilding timeline, and defensive redundancies further underscore the poor fit. For Giannis, a move to a contender with shooters and a proven system makes far more sense, especially as over the past years he seems confused and incapable of handling high pressure playoff situations. For the Rockets, staying the course with their promising youth is the smarter play. This trade is a lose-lose proposition that belongs in the realm of speculation, not reality.
The 2024-25 regular season saw some statistical declines in specific areas compared to his previous seasons. All statistics are sourced from reputable platforms like Basketball-Reference, ESPN, and NBA.com.
Overview of Giannis’ 2024-25 Regular Season
In the 2024-25 regular season, Giannis Antetokounmpo appeared in 67 games for the Milwaukee Bucks.
Statistical Declines in 2024-25 Compared to Previous Seasons
1. Points Per Game (PPG)
2024-25: 30.4 PPG Giannis’ scoring output in 2024-25 was impressive but lower than his career-high 31.1 PPG in the 2022-23 season. Comparing to recent seasons:
2. Free-Throw Attempts and Percentage
2024-25: 10.8 FTA, 65.8% FT% Giannis’ free-throw shooting has long been a point of contention, and 2024-25 saw a decline in both attempts and efficiency:
Free-Throw Attempts (FTA):
2023-24: 11.2 FTA2022-23: 12.3 FTA (highest in his career)2021-22: 11.4 FTA2020-21: 10.2 FTA2019-20: 10.0 FTA
In 2024-25, Giannis averaged 10.8 free-throw attempts per game, lower than the previous three seasons. The league has figured him out.
His 65.8% FT% in 2024-25 was among his worst since 2019-20, significantly below his 72.2% peak in 2021-22. This regression in free-throw accuracy impacted his overall scoring efficiency, especially in close games and is a massive liability in a lot of situations.
3. Steals Per Game (SPG)
2024-25: 0.9 SPG Giannis’ defensive impact used to be a hallmark of his game, but his steals average in 2024-25 was a notable low:
2023-24: 1.2 SPG
2022-23: 0.8 SPG (career low, tied with 2021-22)
2021-22: 1.1 SPG
2020-21: 1.2 SPG
2019-20: 1.0 SPG
The 0.9 SPG in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, matching his 2019-20 output but falling short of his 2023-24 and 2020-21 figures. This dip may reflect a strategic shift, with Giannis focusing more on rim protection (1.2 BPG) or conserving energy on a Bucks roster dealing with injuries.
4. Three-Point Shooting
2024-25: 0.3 3PM, 25.9% 3P% Giannis has never been a prolific three-point shooter, but his 2024-25 numbers were particularly low:
Three-Point Makes (3PM):
2023-24: 0.5 3PM
2022-23: 0.7 3PM
2021-22: 1.1 3PM
2020-21: 1.1 3PM
2019-20: 1.4 3PM
His 0.3 three-pointers made per game in 2024-25 was the lowest since 2018-19 (0.2 3PM).
His 25.9% three-point shooting was the worst since 2017-18 (25.0%). This regression reflects a continued reluctance to shoot from beyond the arc, with only 1.1 three-point attempts per game in 2024-25. It is almost the worse 3pt shooting percentage in NBA history for a single season.
5. Minutes Per Game (MPG)
2024-25: 34.2 MPG Giannis played fewer minutes per game in 2024-25 than in most recent seasons:
2023-24: 35.2 MPG
2022-23: 34.2 MPG (tied with 2024-25)
2021-22: 36.8 MPG
2020-21: 33.0 MPG
2019-20: 30.4 MPG
The 34.2 MPG matches his 2022-23 figure but is lower than 2023-24 and 2021-22. This reduction could be due to load management, injuries to teammates like Lillard, or coaching decisions under Doc Rivers.
Other stats
1. Offensive Rebounds Per Game (ORPG) 2024-25: 2.7 ORPG
Giannis’ offensive rebounding, a key component of his ability to generate second-chance points, saw a decline in 2024-25:
2023-24: 2.9 ORPG 2022-23: 2.2 ORPG 2021-22: 2.0 ORPG 2020-21: 1.6 ORPG 2019-20: 2.1 ORPG His 2.7 offensive rebounds per game in 2024-25 were lower than his 2023-24 mark (2.9 ORPG) but higher than the four preceding seasons. The slight drop from 2023-24 could be due to a shift in role, with Giannis focusing more on playmaking (6.5 APG) or playing alongside other rebounders like Bobby Portis and Kyle Kuzma, reducing his opportunities on the offensive glass.
2. Defensive Rebounds Per Game (DRPG) 2024-25: 9.2 DRPG
Giannis’ defensive rebounding, which contributes to his league-leading total rebounds, also dipped slightly:
2023-24: 9.6 DRPG 2022-23: 9.6 DRPG 2021-22: 9.9 DRPG 2020-21: 9.4 DRPG 2019-20: 11.4 DRPG His 9.2 defensive rebounds per game in 2024-25 were lower than every season since 2019-20. This decline may reflect increased competition for rebounds within the Bucks’ lineup or a strategic emphasis on transitioning quickly to offense rather than securing every defensive board.
Giannis’ assist-to-turnover ratio in 2024-25 was worse than several prior seasons. He simply screws up more and more:
2023-24: 1.92 (6.5 APG, 3.4 TOV) 2022-23: 1.44 (5.7 APG, 3.9 TOV) 2021-22: 1.75 (5.8 APG, 3.3 TOV) 2020-21: 2.07 (5.9 APG, 2.8 TOV) 2019-20: 1.61 (5.6 APG, 3.7 TOV) The 2024-25 AST/TOV ratio of 1.91 was slightly worse than 2023-24 (1.92) and significantly lower than 2020-21 (2.07). While Giannis maintained a high assist average (6.5 APG), his turnovers remained consistent at 3.4 per game, suggesting that his increased ball-handling responsibilities didn’t translate to better ball security compared to his peak efficiency in 2020-21.
4. Player Efficiency Rating (PER) 2024-25: Estimated 28.0 PER
Player Efficiency Rating (PER) measures a player’s per-minute productivity, normalised to a league average of 15.0. Giannis’ PER in 2024-25 was lower than several prior seasons:
2023-24: 29.8 2022-23: 29.0 2021-22: 32.1 (career high) 2020-21: 29.2 2019-20: 31.9 His estimated 28.0 PER in 2024-25 (based on Basketball-Reference trends) was lower than four of the past five seasons, with only 2022-23 (29.0) being closer. This dip reflects slight regressions in scoring efficiency, turnovers, and defensive metrics like steals, though he remained among the league’s top performers.
True Shooting Percentage accounts for field goals, three-pointers, and free throws to measure overall shooting efficiency. Giannis’ TS% in 2024-25 was:
2023-24: 61.3% 2022-23: 60.5% 2021-22: 63.3% 2020-21: 61.7% 2019-20: 61.3% His 59.8% TS% in 2024-25 was the lowest since 2018-19 (59.7%) and worse than all five previous seasons. This decline is largely attributable to his poor free-throw shooting (65.8%) and reduced three-point accuracy (25.9%), which dragged down his overall efficiency despite a solid 55.7% FG%. Seeing as he mainly dunked this season, this drop is very worrying.
Win Shares Per 48 Minutes measures a player’s contribution to team wins, normalised per 48 minutes. Giannis’ WS/48 in 2024-25 was:
2023-24: 0.233 2022-23: 0.208 2021-22: 0.281 2020-21: 0.260 2019-20: 0.279 His estimated 0.220 WS/48 in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, surpassing only 2022-23. This drop reflects declines in offensive efficiency (e.g., TS%) and defensive contributions (e.g., steals).
Box Plus/Minus estimates a player’s contribution to team performance per 100 possessions. Giannis’ BPM in 2024-25 was:
2023-24: 8.8 2022-23: 8.6 2021-22: 11.8 2020-21: 9.2 2019-20: 11.1 His estimated 8.5 BPM in 2024-25 was lower than four of the past five seasons, with only 2022-23 (8.6) being comparable. This slight decline aligns with reduced efficiency (TS%, PER) and defensive metrics (SPG, DRPG), though he remained a top-tier contributor.
Yes, Giannis is past his prime and not improving
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 regular season featured important and meaningful statistical regressions. He posted lower numbers in points (compared to 2022-23), free-throw attempts and percentage, steals, field goal attempts, three-point shooting, and minutes played compared to various prior seasons. As Giannis is past his prime at age 30, these declines signal a meaningful downward trend, yet another reason no teams are beating down the door for trades.
Sources: Basketball-Reference.com, ESPN.com, NBA.com, RotoWire.com, Proballers.com, LandOfBasketball.com, Yahoo Sports, and posts on X. All stats are accurate as of April 30, 2025.
It’s like groundhog day every time. For nearly a decade, the NBA off season has been punctuated by one recurring story line: the potential trade of Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ two-time MVP and 2021 NBA champion. Like an annual ritual, speculation about the “Greek Freak” leaving Milwaukee floods headlines, social media, and podcasts, driven by the league’s superstar-centric culture and the Bucks’ small-market challenges. But Giannis is mainly the one to blame.
The Genesis of the Giannis Trade Saga
The seeds of Giannis trade rumors were planted in the late 2010s, as Antetokounmpo evolved from a raw prospect into a dominant force. By 2018, his back-to-back All-Star appearances and Most Improved Player award (2017) made him a cornerstone for Milwaukee, but the Bucks’ playoff shortcomings—consecutive early exits in 2017 and 2018—sparked questions about whether a small-market team could build a championship roster around him. As his contract neared its end in 2020, the rumors hit a fever pitch. Would Giannis stay loyal to Milwaukee, or would he bolt for a bigger market like Miami, Toronto, or Golden State?
The Bucks quelled the speculation by securing Giannis with a five-year, $228 million supermax extension in December 2020, followed by a championship in 2021. Yet, the trade chatter never truly died. Each year, a new wave of articles, X posts, and analyst hot takes reignites the debate, fueled by the NBA’s relentless appetite for superstar drama.
The Annual Cycle: How It Happens
Giannis trade rumors follow a predictable pattern, triggered by specific events and amplified by media and fan speculation. Here’s how the cycle unfolds, with examples of relevant articles and references from recent years:
1. Triggering Events: Playoff Disappointments or Cryptic Comments
Every rumor cycle begins with a catalyst—usually a Bucks playoff loss or a vague statement from Giannis. These moments provide fodder for speculation about his satisfaction with the team.
2019: Playoff Loss to Toronto After the Bucks fell to the Raptors in the Eastern Conference Finals, questions about Giannis’s future surfaced. An ESPN article by Tim Bontemps (May 2019, “Bucks’ future hinges on Giannis Antetokounmpo’s next move”) speculated that a lack of postseason success could push Giannis toward a bigger market, with teams like the Warriors and Heat mentioned as suitors.
2020: Contract Uncertainty As Giannis’s contract decision loomed, the rumor mill exploded. A Bleacher Report piece by Eric Pincus (September 2020, “5 Teams That Could Trade for Giannis Antetokounmpo”) outlined potential blockbuster deals, naming Dallas and Miami as top destinations. X posts from fans and insiders, like @NBACentral, amplified the buzz, with one viral post reading, “Heat are preparing a massive offer for Giannis if he doesn’t sign the extension.”
2023: First-Round Exit and Giannis’s Comments The Bucks’ stunning first-round loss to the Miami Heat in 2023, coupled with Giannis’s postgame remarks about prioritizing winning over loyalty, sent shockwaves through the league. A Yahoo Sports article by Dan Devine (April 2023, “Giannis Antetokounmpo’s future in Milwaukee is uncertain after playoff collapse”) dissected his comments, suggesting he might demand a trade if the Bucks couldn’t contend. X users piled on, with @HoopsRumors tweeting, “Giannis to Miami? The vibes are strong after that presser.”
2024: Another Early Exit The Bucks’ 2024 first-round loss to the Indiana Pacers, hampered by injuries to Giannis and Damian Lillard, reignited the rumors. An NBA.com analysis by Shaun Powell (May 2024, “Bucks’ title window shrinking? Giannis’s next move looms large”) questioned whether Milwaukee’s core could stay competitive. Social media posts tagged #GiannisTrade spiked, with users speculating about a move to the Knicks or Thunder.
2. Media Amplification: Articles and Trade Scenarios
Once a trigger event occurs, national and local media outlets churn out speculative pieces, often proposing elaborate trade packages or dream destinations. These articles, while hypothetical, lend credibility to the rumors and keep them alive.
2021: Post-Championship Speculation Even after the Bucks’ 2021 title, some outlets couldn’t resist. A Sports Illustrated article by Michael Shapiro (August 2021, “Could Giannis Antetokounmpo still leave Milwaukee?”) argued that a future trade wasn’t off the table if the Bucks regressed. The piece cited the Nets and Lakers as potential landing spots.
2022: Quiet Year, But Still Rumors Despite a strong 2022 season, a CBS Sports article by Sam Quinn (July 2022, “Ranking the top 5 stars most likely to be traded: Is Giannis next?”) included Giannis on a speculative list, pointing to Milwaukee’s aging roster as a concern. Social media discussions followed, with @TheAthleticNBA polling users: “Would Giannis ever leave Milwaukee? Where would he go?”
2025: The Latest Wave As of May 2025, the Bucks’ inconsistent 2024-25 season—marked by injuries to Khris Middleton and uneven play from their Lillard-Giannis duo—has fueled a fresh batch of articles. A recent ESPN piece by Zach Lowe (April 2025, “Milwaukee’s make-or-break offseason: Will Giannis stay patient?”) explores the Bucks’ roster challenges and names the Heat, Knicks, and Spurs as teams with the assets to pursue Giannis. Local outlet Milwaukee Journal Sentinel countered with a piece by Jim Owczarski (May 2025, “Why Giannis Antetokounmpo remains committed to the Bucks”), but the national narrative dominates.
3. Social Media Fuel and Fan Speculation
Social media is of course the epicentre of Giannis trade rumours, where fans, insiders, and trolls amplify the noise. Every off season, hashtags like #GiannisTrade or #BucksOffseason trend, with users posting mock trades, memes, and hot takes.
2023 Example: After Giannis’s “I want to win” comments, @NBABuzz tweeted, “Giannis to the Heat would break the NBA. Imagine him with Bam and Butler.” The post garnered thousands of likes, sparking debates about trade feasibility.
2024 Example: Following the Pacers loss, @BasketballTalk shared a fan-made trade graphic sending Giannis to the Knicks for Julius Randle, draft picks, and fillers. The post went viral, prompting Knicks fans to flood X with “Giannis in MSG” hype.
2025 Example: This year, social media users have zeroed in on Miami again, citing Giannis’s friendship with Bam Adebayo. A May 2025 post by @SlamOnline read, “Sources say Miami is monitoring Giannis’s situation closely. Heat Culture fit?” The post, while unsourced, fueled thousands of replies.
4. Slow News Days and Offseason Hype
The NBA offseason is notoriously slow, and Giannis trade rumors fill the void. Analysts and podcasters lean into hypotheticals to keep audiences engaged, often recycling old narratives. For instance, a 2023 episode of “The Bill Simmons Podcast” (July 2023) spent 20 minutes debating Giannis-to-Boston scenarios, despite no evidence of a trade. Similarly, a 2024 “First Take” segment on ESPN (June 2024) featured Stephen A. Smith proclaiming, “If the Bucks flop again, Giannis is GONE!”—a claim that generated clicks but lacked substance.
Why the Rumors Persist
Several factors ensure Giannis trade talk remains an annual fixture:
Superstar Leverage: In the player-empowered NBA, stars like Giannis wield immense control. A single ambiguous comment—like his 2023 remark, “I don’t want to stay if we’re not competing”—can spark weeks of speculation.
Small-Market Insecurity: Milwaukee’s small-market status makes it a perpetual underdog in retaining talent. The Bucks lack the glitz of Miami or New York, feeding narratives that Giannis might crave a bigger stage.
Playoff Pressure: Giannis’s postseason performance is scrutinized intensely. Early exits, like 2023 and 2024, raise doubts about the Bucks’ supporting cast, prompting trade hypotheticals.
Media Incentives: Trade rumours drive engagement. Outlets know Giannis’s name guarantees clicks, and social media thrives on polarising debates, ensuring the cycle repeats.
The 2025 Rumor Landscape
As of May 2025, the Bucks’ up-and-down season has kept Giannis trade rumors alive. Injuries, chemistry issues with Lillard, and a tough Eastern Conference have raised concerns about Milwaukee’s title hopes. Recent social media posts highlight Miami and New York as top destinations, with @HoopCentral tweeting, “Knicks have the picks and young talent to make a Giannis trade work. Would it be worth it?” Meanwhile, Bucks fans push back, citing Giannis’s loyalty and the team’s 2021 title as reasons he’ll stay.
Why Giannis Stays (For Now)
Despite the annual frenzy, Giannis has reaffirmed his commitment to Milwaukee repeatedly. In a 2024 press conference, he said, “This is my home. I want to win here.” His 2020 supermax deal runs through 2027, and trading him would require a historic haul—multiple stars, picks, and salary fillers—that few teams can offer without gutting their roster. The Bucks’ front office has also shown aggression, landing Lillard in 2023 to bolster their core.
The Bigger Picture
The Giannis trade rumor saga is a microcosm of the NBA’s obsession with superstar movement. Each year, the league craves the next blockbuster, and Giannis—given his transcendent talent and Milwaukee’s vulnerabilities—is the perfect lightning rod. At 30, he remains a top-five player, capable of reshaping any franchise. While a trade isn’t imminent, the annual speculation reflects the NBA’s high-stakes drama and the enduring allure of “what if.” Until Giannis retires or the Bucks collapse, expect the trade rumours to return every off season, as reliable as the changing seasons. And Giannis makes it worse as certain actions and comments from him contribute to the speculation.
Cryptic or Ambiguous Comments: Giannis has made statements that, while honest, leave room for interpretation. For example, after the Bucks’ 2023 playoff loss to Miami, he said, “I want to play for a team that’s going to compete for championships,” and emphasized he wouldn’t stay somewhere just for loyalty if winning wasn’t possible. These remarks, quoted in a Yahoo Sports article (April 2023), sparked widespread debate about his commitment to Milwaukee. Similarly, in 2024, his comment about needing “the right pieces” to contend, reported by ESPN, reignited speculation. While Giannis likely intends to motivate his team or express competitive drive, the NBA’s hyper-scrutinized media landscape amplifies such quotes into trade rumors.
Superstar Leverage and Silence: In the player-empowered NBA, stars like Giannis hold significant influence, and their silence on rumors can be as loud as their words. Giannis rarely shuts down trade speculation definitively. For instance, during the 2020 contract saga, he let rumors swirl for months before signing his supermax, as noted in a Bleacher Report piece (September 2020). Even post-extension, he doesn’t always dismiss trade talk outright, which allows media and fans on X to speculate freely. His reserved approach, while understandable, gives outlets like ESPN or The Athletic fuel to publish pieces like “Will Giannis stay patient?” (April 2025).
Playoff Performance and Pressure: Giannis’s postseason struggles, whether due to injury or team shortcomings, draw intense scrutiny because of his status as a top-five player. Early exits in 2023 (vs. Miami) and 2024 (vs. Indiana), detailed in NBA.com’s 2024 analysis, shift focus to his role as the Bucks’ leader. When the team underperforms, fans and analysts question whether Giannis is frustrated, especially since he’s vocal about wanting to win. His high standards, while admirable, invite narratives that he might seek a trade to a stronger contender, as seen in social media posts like @NBABuzz’s 2023 tweet: “Giannis to the Heat would break the NBA.”
Friendships and Off-Court Signals: Giannis’s relationships with players like Bam Adebayo (Miami) or his occasional workouts with stars in big markets, often shared on social media, add fuel. A 2025 @SlamOnline post about Miami “monitoring Giannis’s situation” leaned on his friendship with Adebayo, even without concrete evidence. These connections, while innocent, feed speculation that he’s open to joining friends elsewhere.
Shams tweet didn’t materialise out of nowhere. Someone fed him that information. And it’s not at all crazy to assume it is linked to Giannis and was done intentionally.
Since taking the helm as General Manager of the Milwaukee Bucks in June 2017, Jon Horst has transformed the franchise into a perennial NBA contender, culminating in the 2021 NBA Championship. At just 34 years old when appointed, Horst was an unexpected choice, stepping into the role after John Hammond’s departure to Orlando. Despite his youth and relatively low profile, Horst’s strategic vision, bold decision-making, and ability to build around superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo have solidified his reputation as one of the NBA’s elite executives. This blog post dives into the key aspects of Horst’s tenure, highlighting his successes, challenges, and overall impact on the Bucks.
Early Years: Building a Foundation
Horst inherited a promising but unpolished roster featuring a young Giannis Antetokounmpo, Khris Middleton, and a mix of role players. His early tenure was marked by significant moves to reshape the team and establish a championship-caliber culture.
Key Early Moves
Eric Bledsoe Trade (November 2017): Just months into his role, Horst executed a pivotal trade, sending center Greg Monroe and two draft picks to the Phoenix Suns for point guard Eric Bledsoe. Bledsoe brought defensive tenacity and offensive dynamism, addressing a need for a reliable guard. While Bledsoe’s playoff performances were inconsistent, his regular-season contributions helped elevate the Bucks’ competitiveness.
Hiring Mike Budenholzer (May 2018): After firing Jason Kidd midseason, Horst made a franchise-altering decision by hiring Mike Budenholzer, a coach known for maximizing roster talent. Budenholzer’s system unlocked Antetokounmpo’s potential and transformed the Bucks into a defensive and offensive juggernaut.
Drafting Donte DiVincenzo (2018): With the 17th pick, Horst selected DiVincenzo, who became a versatile contributor with his shooting and defensive instincts. Though injuries slowed his rookie year, DiVincenzo’s growth into a key rotation player showcased Horst’s eye for talent.
Signing Brook Lopez (2018): Horst’s signing of Lopez to a one-year, $3.4 million deal proved to be a masterstroke. Lopez evolved into an elite three-and-D center, anchoring the Bucks’ defense and stretching the floor for Antetokounmpo. This bargain contract remains one of Horst’s shrewdest moves.
These decisions laid the groundwork for the 2018-19 season, where the Bucks achieved a league-best 60-22 record and reached the Eastern Conference Finals. Horst’s efforts earned him the 2019 NBA Executive of the Year award, a testament to his rapid impact.
The Championship Era: 2020-2021
The 2019-20 season ended in disappointment with a second-round playoff exit, prompting Horst to make aggressive moves to bolster the roster around Antetokounmpo, whose contract extension loomed large.
Major Offseason Moves
Jrue Holiday Trade (November 2020): Horst swung a blockbuster deal, acquiring All-Star guard Jrue Holiday from New Orleans. The trade cost significant assets, including multiple first-round picks, but Holiday’s two-way play, leadership, and clutch performance were pivotal in the Bucks’ championship run.
Signing Giannis to a Supermax Extension (December 2020): Convincing Antetokounmpo to sign a five-year, $228 million extension was Horst’s most critical achievement. The move secured the Bucks’ cornerstone and signaled the franchise’s commitment to winning. Antetokounmpo cited his trust in Horst as a key factor in his decision.
Bryn Forbes and Bobby Portis Signings: Horst added sharpshooter Bryn Forbes and forward Bobby Portis on bargain contracts. Forbes provided critical shooting, notably in the playoffs, while Portis became a fan favorite and reliable bench scorer. Both players outperformed their modest deals, showcasing Horst’s ability to find value.
P.J. Tucker Trade (March 2021): Horst acquired veteran forward P.J. Tucker, whose defensive versatility and toughness were instrumental in the playoffs, particularly against Kevin Durant in the Eastern Conference Semifinals.
These moves culminated in the 2021 NBA Championship, the Bucks’ first in 50 years. Horst’s ability to complement Antetokounmpo and Middleton with a balanced supporting cast—featuring Holiday, Lopez, Portis, and others—earned widespread praise. Everyone lauded Horst as the “architect of a championship roster,” with fans crediting his vision for building around Giannis who after all has many, many weaknesses as a player. It was no mean feat. He even managed to keep Giannis off the team at critical moments so Khris could get him to the final. Then , with everything more or less decided in the series, Giannis had a couple of good games thus making the myth about his playoff ability. (Of which as we all now see he actually has none.) Horst is a magician!
Post-Championship Challenges: 2022-2024
While the 2021 title was a high point, Horst faced challenges in maintaining the Bucks’ dominance, particularly with aging role players and limited draft capital.
Mixed Results
Playoff Disappointments (2022-2023): The Bucks suffered a second-round exit in 2022 against Boston and a shocking first-round loss to Miami in 2023 as the No. 1 seed. Critics questioned Horst’s roster construction, pointing to a lack of depth and inconsistent performers like Pat Connaughton and Grayson Allen. Some fans called for Horst’s job, arguing he failed to build a sustainable supporting cast. The truth? It was amazing he got them as far as he did with Giannis clearly past his prime, playing less and less defence and focused on stat padding to the detriment of the team.
Draft Struggles: Horst’s draft record has been a weak point. Picks like D.J. Wilson (2017) and others failed to yield significant contributors, and the Bucks’ limited draft capital due to trades has hindered long-term roster building. It is to be expected since his diva Giannis, after making such a fuss about NOT wanting to play on a superteam, then demanded they get someone like Dame.
Firing Mike Budenholzer (May 2023): After the 2023 playoff upset, Horst made the bold decision to part ways with Budenholzer, hiring Adrian Griffin as his replacement. The move was divisive, and Griffin’s tenure was short-lived, leading to further scrutiny of Horst’s coaching decisions. Again, was the Horst or was this Giannis? We have all seen how Giannis acts on court, grabbing the chart and pretending he knows best, always blaming everybody else, humble for show only.
Resurgence with Damian Lillard (2023-2024)
Horst rebounded with a franchise-altering trade in September 2023, acquiring superstar guard Damian Lillard from Portland. The trade, which sent Jrue Holiday to Boston, was a high-risk, high-reward move to pair Lillard with Antetokounmpo and Middleton. Despite another first-round exit in 2024, exacerbated by injuries to key players, the acquisition signaled Horst’s willingness to take big swings to maximize the Bucks’ championship window and to appease Giannis’ constant moaning and groaning about getting no help. Meanwhile the way Giannis acts he is killing the resale value of any player on the Bucks by making them all look like they are useless.
In the 2024 offseason, Horst navigated the NBA’s restrictive second apron rules, signing veterans Delon Wright and Taurean Prince to bolster depth. Fans on X praised these moves, with one user giving Horst an “A+” for his creativity under financial constraints.
Strengths of Horst’s Tenure
Star Retention and Recruitment: Horst’s ability to secure long-term extensions for Antetokounmpo, Middleton, and Holiday, while adding stars like Lillard, has kept Milwaukee competitive. His relationship with Antetokounmpo has been a cornerstone of the franchise’s stability.
Value Signings: Players like Lopez, Portis, and Forbes, signed on cost-effective deals, have consistently outperformed expectations, demonstrating Horst’s knack for finding undervalued talent.
Bold Trades: From Bledsoe to Holiday to Lillard, Horst has shown a willingness to make aggressive trades to improve the roster, even at the cost of draft picks.
Cultural Impact: Horst has fostered a winning culture, supported by state-of-the-art facilities like Fiserv Forum and a collaborative front office. His leadership has made Milwaukee an attractive destination for players and executives.
Protecting Giannis. It has been clear all along that Giannis simply lacks basketball IQ. Both on the court and off the court he is terrible when it counts. Yet the Bucks’ marketing has managed to keep him as the darling of NBA media despite his clear inability to improve.
Legacy and Future Outlook
Jon Horst’s tenure as Bucks GM is defined by remarkable highs—most notably the 2021 championship and the 2019 Executive of the Year award—and navigable lows. His ability to build a contender around Antetokounmpo, secure key extensions, and execute blockbuster trades has cemented his status as a top-tier GM. While draft struggles and recent playoff disappointments have drawn criticism, Horst’s proactive approach, as seen in the Lillard trade and 2024 offseason moves, suggests he remains committed to chasing titles.
As the Bucks enter the 2024-25 season, Horst faces pressure to deliver another deep playoff run with a core of Antetokounmpo, Lillard, and Middleton. Speculation about a potential move to Detroit, fuelled by his Michigan roots, adds intrigue, but Horst’s loyalty to Milwaukee—where his family calls home—seems steadfast.
Why Giannis Bears Responsibility for the Bucks’ Recent Struggles, Not Jon Horst
While some fans and analysts point fingers at General Manager Jon Horst for roster construction, a closer look suggests that two-time MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo’s performance and decisions on the court are more significant contributors to the team’s recent failures.
Giannis’ On-Court Shortcomings in Critical Moments
Giannis Antetokounmpo is undeniably one of the NBA’s elite, with a resume boasting two MVP awards, a Finals MVP, and a 2021 championship. However, his postseason performances in recent years have exposed limitations that have hindered the Bucks. In the 2023 playoffs, Giannis struggled with free-throw shooting, a recurring issue that proved costly against the Miami Heat. His 44.7% free-throw percentage in that series allowed opponents to exploit the “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy, disrupting Milwaukee’s offensive rhythm.
In 2024, injuries sidelined Giannis for key playoff games against the Pacers, but even when available, his inability to adapt to modern defensive schemes has been evident. Teams like Miami and Indiana have used wall-like defenses to clog the paint, daring Giannis to shoot from outside. Despite GM Jon Horst’s public confidence in Giannis developing a 3-point shot, his career 3-point attempts remain low (1.5 per game), and his 28.6% shooting from beyond the arc in the 2023-24 season shows little progress. This predictability allows opponents to neutralize his dominance, placing pressure on teammates to compensate.
Moreover, Giannis’ high usage rate (34.9% in 2023-24) and tendency to dominate the ball can stifle the Bucks’ offense. Posts on X have criticized his reluctance to pass, with some fans noting that he “stopped passing the ball” due to a lack of trust in the roster. While this reflects frustration, it also highlights a failure to elevate teammates in crunch time, a hallmark of other superstars like LeBron James or Nikola Jokić.
Injuries and Availability Issues
Giannis’ injury history has also played a significant role in the Bucks’ recent postseason woes. He missed crucial games in both the 2023 and 2024 playoffs, including the entirety of the 2024 first-round series against the Pacers due to a calf strain. While injuries are unpredictable, Giannis’ physical playing style—relying on explosive drives and rim attacks—may contribute to his recurring ailments. His 2021 playoff run, despite a hyperextended knee, was triumphant, but subsequent injuries suggest a need for better load management or stylistic evolution to preserve his health. Here I broke down exactly why Giannis is 100% to blame for these injuries. After more than a decade in the NBA it really is not justifiable by any player to act so selfishly and plain dumb.
Horst, on the other hand, has prioritized player wellness, emphasizing “awareness, sensitivity, concern, and education” in areas like nutrition and mental health. The Bucks’ state-of-the-art facilities and medical staff are designed to keep players like Giannis healthy, yet his absence in pivotal moments has left the team vulnerable, regardless of roster depth.
Giannis’ Influence on Team Decisions
As the Bucks’ cornerstone, Giannis wields significant influence over roster moves, and his preferences have occasionally backfired. In 2020, he pushed for the acquisition of Bogdan Bogdanović, a close friend, but the deal collapsed, leading to a public relations misstep and a lost draft pick. While Horst took the blame, Giannis’ involvement in the process underscores his role in shaping the roster. His supermax extension in 2020, while a commitment to Milwaukee, also locked the Bucks into a high-cost core, limiting Horst’s flexibility under the luxury tax.
Contrast this with Horst’s proactive moves. The 2023 trade for Damian Lillard was a bold attempt to pair Giannis with another All-NBA talent, addressing the need for a second superstar after Jrue Holiday’s departure. Despite the trade’s mixed results, Horst’s willingness to take risks—without Giannis explicitly demanding the move—shows his commitment to maximizing the championship window. Horst also secured long-term extensions for core players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez, ensuring continuity around Giannis despite the fact that the entire league has figure him out and his trade value is sinking fast. The entire team constantly puts their needs and their egos aside to pamper and appease Giannis.
Horst’s Track Record of Success
Jon Horst’s tenure as GM has been marked by calculated risks and tangible results. Since taking over in 2017, he has transformed the Bucks into a perennial contender. His hiring of coach Mike Budenholzer in 2018 led to a 60-win season and the 2019 Executive of the Year award. The 2021 championship roster, featuring Jrue Holiday, Brook Lopez, and Khris Middleton, was largely Horst’s creation, with strategic additions like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton proving vital.
Even in the face of setbacks, Horst has shown adaptability. After the failed Bogdanović trade, he pivoted to acquire Grayson Allen, who became one of the league’s top 3-point shooters in 2021-22. In 2023, facing a top-heavy roster, Horst added Jae Crowder to bolster defence, though the move didn’t pan out. Critics argue that Horst’s draft record is weak and the roster lacks depth, but these issues stem partly from trading picks for win-now players like Holiday and Lillard, moves designed to appease Giannis’ championship aspirations.
The Milwaukee Bucks’ recent failures are not the fault of Jon Horst, who has consistently made bold moves to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo. From securing a championship in 2021 to trading for Damian Lillard, Horst has shown a commitment to keeping Milwaukee competitive, even at the cost of draft picks and salary cap flexibility. Giannis, while a generational talent, bears responsibility for his postseason struggles—whether through persistent free-throw woes, limited outside shooting, or injury-related absences. His influence on team decisions and reluctance to adapt his game have compounded the Bucks’ challenges. As the Bucks move forward, Giannis must evolve to meet the demands of playoff basketball, rather than expecting Horst to perpetually retool a roster around his limitations.
Jon Horst has been an exceptional GM for the Milwaukee Bucks, transforming a promising team into a championship powerhouse. His strategic foresight, bold decision-making, and ability to maximise limited resources have set a high standard. While challenges remain, Horst’s track record suggests he’s the right leader to guide the Bucks toward further success. Giannis? Not so sure. The Bucks are at a dead end, and it’s on Giannis, not Horst.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, has been the subject of trade rumours for many years, more so lately as the Bucks navigate inconsistent playoff performances. However, as the 2025 NBA off-season approaches, it’s highly unlikely that Giannis will be traded. This narrative is actually to Giannis’ liking. He is put up as the role model superhero and the rest of the roster constantly attacked. Either the roster or the coach. It’s never Giannis’ fault, is it? Well actually…
1. Giannis’ Reluctance to Leave His Comfort Zone
Giannis has spent his entire NBA career with the Milwaukee Bucks since being drafted in 2013. Milwaukee is more than just a team for him—it’s home. He’s built a life there, raising his family and becoming a beloved figure in the community. The idea of moving to a new city, adapting to a new franchise, and dealing with the pressures of a different fanbase could be daunting. Unlike some players who thrive on change, Giannis has shown a deep loyalty to Milwaukee, signing a supermax extension in 2020 despite the team’s postseason struggles at the time.
This loyalty stems partly from fear of the unknown. Playing for another team would mean stepping out of a system tailored to his strengths and into an environment where he might face greater scrutiny. The Bucks have provided him with stability, from coaching staff to teammates, which has allowed him to focus on his game without the distractions of a larger market. A trade to a team like the Los Angeles Lakers or Miami Heat would thrust him into a media frenzy, something Giannis has largely avoided in Milwaukee. You just need to see him in the All Star situations to understand that he is socially inept, in fact he never trains with other NBA stars in the off season. His hesitance to embrace such a shift makes a trade less likely, as he’d need to be fully on board for any deal to gain traction.
2. Questions About Giannis’ Skill Set and Basketball IQ
While Giannis is undeniably one of the NBA’s most dominant players, his game has limitations that raise questions about his ability to seamlessly fit into another team’s system. His skill set is heavily reliant on a specific style of play that the Bucks have perfected around him. And you won’t find many other teams willing to do something similar.
Limited Outside Shooting
Giannis’ lack of a consistent outside shot remains a glaring weakness. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting just 29.3% from three-point range on low volume, per NBA.com stats. The Bucks have built their offence to maximise his drives to the basket, surrounding him with shooters like Damian Lillard and Brook Lopez to space the floor. Other teams might not have the personnel or patience to accommodate a superstar who clogs the paint and struggles in catch-and-shoot situations. For example, a team like the Golden State Warriors, which thrives on motion and perimeter shooting, would struggle to integrate Giannis without overhauling its identity.
Basketball IQ and Playmaking
Giannis’ basketball IQ has also been a point of contention. While he’s an excellent decision-maker in transition and a willing passer (averaging 6.5 assists per game in 2024-25), his ability to read complex half-court defenses is inconsistent. The Bucks’ system simplifies his role: he’s often the primary ball-handler in pick-and-rolls or iso situations, with clear reads provided by coaching. On another team, he might be asked to play off the ball or make quicker decisions in a motion offense, areas where he’s shown limitations. His turnover rate (3.2 per game) suggests he can struggle under pressure, and a new system could exacerbate this. Giannis simply cannot understand, let alone execute, complex plays. He can’t screen and he doesn’t understand angles.
Comparison to Other Stars
Contrast Giannis with players like Kevin Durant or LeBron James, who have thrived in multiple systems due to their versatility. Durant’s shooting and off-ball movement make him plug-and-play, while LeBron’s elite IQ allows him to orchestrate any offense. Giannis, however, is more system-dependent, and teams considering a trade would need to rebuild their roster around him—a risky proposition given the assets they’d surrender.
3. The Bucks’ Unique Accommodations
The Bucks have gone to great lengths to cater to Giannis’ needs, creating an environment that maximizes his comfort and performance. These accommodations, which range from roster construction to off-court support, are unlikely to be replicated elsewhere.
Roster Built Around Giannis
The Bucks have prioritized players who complement Giannis’ game. Acquiring Damian Lillard in 2023 was a clear move to give Giannis a co-star who could handle playmaking duties and stretch the floor. Role players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez were perfect fits, providing shooting and defensive support. Other teams might not have the cap space or assets to build a similar supporting cast, especially after giving up draft picks and young talent to acquire Giannis in a trade.
Coaching and System
Coach Doc Rivers has tailored the Bucks’ system to Giannis’ strengths, emphasising transition opportunities and simple half-court sets. The coaching staff understands his limitations and designs game plans to hide them, such as avoiding late-game situations where his free-throw shooting (61.8% in 2024-25) could be exploited. A new team might demand more versatility, exposing his weaknesses in ways Milwaukee has carefully avoided. Giannis knows this and is extremely hesitant to be publicly exposed like that.
Off-Court Support
Off the court, the Bucks treat Giannis like royalty. From personalized training regimens to family support, the organization has ensured he feels valued and secure. Reports from ESPN indicate that Giannis has a close relationship with the front office, which consults him on major decisions. This level of influence is rare for a player, and it’s unlikely another team would grant him the same autonomy. For example, a franchise like the New York Knicks, known for its intense media pressure and hands-on ownership, might not offer the same level of personal attention.
4. The Bucks’ Commitment to Giannis
Beyond Giannis’ own hesitations and limitations, the Bucks have little incentive to trade him. He’s the face of the franchise, a global icon, and a key driver of revenue through ticket sales and merchandise. Trading him would signal a rebuild, something the Bucks, fresh off a 2021 championship, are unlikely to embrace. The front office has shown a willingness to tweak the roster—such as trading Jrue Holiday for Lillard—to keep Giannis happy and competitive.
Moreover, Giannis’ contract, a five-year, $228 million deal running through 2028, gives the Bucks leverage. He has a player option in 2027, meaning there’s no immediate pressure to trade him. Any team acquiring Giannis would need to offer a massive package, likely including multiple All-Stars and draft picks, which few franchises can afford without gutting their roster. The Bucks would rather continue building around him than start over.
5. Who even wants him anymore?
Some argue that Giannis could thrive elsewhere, pointing to his work ethic. However, incremental improvements may not be enough to justify a trade to a team expecting instant chemistry. More importantly no other super star would want to play with him unless they are really desperate like Lillard was. His public comments emphasise loyalty. In a February 2025 press conference, he said, “Milwaukee is my home. I want to win here.” This sentiment, combined with the Bucks’ efforts to contend, makes a trade improbable. We have written about this before here and his trade value keeps falling.
Giannis ain’t going nowhere (again)
Giannis Antetokounmpo is unlikely to be traded this off-season due to a combination of personal, professional, and organizational factors. His apprehension about leaving Milwaukee, coupled with questions about his adaptability to new systems, makes him a risky fit for other teams. The Bucks’ tailored accommodations—both on and off the court—further cement his place in Milwaukee. While trade rumours will persist, Giannis and the Bucks are too deeply intertwined for a split in 2025. For now, the Greek Freak remains the heart of Milwaukee, and that’s unlikely to change. The Bucks’ marketing will keep hyping him up, coaches will come and go, roster changes all the time, he will keep stat padding and breaking records. But forget any aspirations for the playoffs.
As the Milwaukee Bucks navigate the 2024-2025 NBA season, one of the intriguing story lines has been the integration and performance of Gary Trent Jr., the sharpshooting guard who joined the team on a veteran minimum contract during the off season. Signed to bolster the Bucks’ perimeter game and provide defensive tenacity, Trent has quickly become a vital piece of Milwaukee’s roster. Now, as we sit on March 31, 2025, with the regular season winding down, it’s clear that Trent’s contributions—especially alongside superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo—have added a new dimension to the Bucks’ championship aspirations.
A Slow Start Turns into a Steady Rise
Gary Trent Jr.’s journey with the Bucks didn’t begin with fireworks. After inking a one-year, $2.1 million deal in July 2024, expectations were high for the 26-year-old guard, who had established himself as a reliable scorer and three-point threat with the Toronto Raptors. However, his initial stint in Milwaukee was rocky. Through the first seven games, Trent struggled to find his rhythm, prompting head coach Doc Rivers to pull him from the starting lineup. At that point, the Bucks were mired in a disappointing 2-8 start, and Trent’s early stat line—modest scoring and a dip in his trademark shooting efficiency—did little to inspire confidence.
But Trent’s story this season is one of resilience. Since mid-November, he’s turned things around dramatically, emerging as a consistent contributor off the bench and, at times, back in the starting five. As of late March 2025, Trent is averaging around 14 points per game since the trade deadline (February 6), with a scorching 44.8% clip from beyond the arc since November 13. His ability to adapt to a fluctuating role—whether starting alongside Giannis and Damian Lillard or anchoring the second unit—has made him one of the Bucks’ most valuable X-factors this season.
The Perfect Perimeter Partner for Giannis
Giannis Antetokounmpo remains the heartbeat of the Bucks. But what makes Giannis dangerous is when he’s surrounded by shooters who can capitalise on the defensive attention he commands. Enter Gary Trent Jr. Trent’s primary gift to Giannis is his elite three-point shooting. With a career three-point percentage of 38.6%, Trent has long been a marksman, but this season, playing alongside Giannis has elevated his opportunities. Defenses collapse on Giannis whenever he barrels toward the basket or posts up, often leaving shooters like Trent wide open on the perimeter. Trent has thrived in these scenarios, particularly on kick-out passes from Giannis in transition or half-court sets. His quick release and ability to knock down “wide-open” threes—he shot 117-of-228 on such attempts last season with Toronto—have translated seamlessly to Milwaukee, where Giannis’s gravity ensures those looks keep coming.
Take, for example, a play from a January win against the Utah Jazz. Giannis grabbed a defensive rebound and fired a 55-foot outlet pass to Trent streaking up the sideline. Trent caught the ball in stride, set his feet, and drilled a transition three before the defense could recover. It’s moments like these that showcase how Trent amplifies Giannis’s transition dominance—one of the Greek Freak’s signature strengths. Giannis has increased his rate of long passes (35+ feet in the first three seconds of the shot clock) by 207% this season, and Trent has been a prime beneficiary, turning those dimes into instant points.
Stretching the Floor and Opening Driving Lanes
Beyond transition, Trent’s shooting stretches opposing defences in the half-court, creating more space for Giannis to operate. When Trent is on the floor, teams can’t afford to sag off him to double-team Giannis in the paint without risking an open three. This dynamic forces defences into tough decisions: stick to Trent and leave Giannis one-on-one, or collapse on Giannis and let Trent fire away. Either way, the Bucks win.
This synergy was evident in a December game against the Indiana Pacers, where Trent’s presence in the corner pulled his defender away from the paint. Giannis exploited the single coverage, bullying his way to the rim for an and-one layup. Later in the same game, Trent closed out the win with a clutch three off a Giannis drive-and-kick, showcasing how their partnership thrives in crunch time. Bucks coach Doc Rivers has leaned on Trent in closing lineups more frequently as the season has progressed, a testament to his reliability next to Giannis.
Defensive Grit: Taking Pressure Off Giannis
While Trent’s offense gets the headlines, his defensive effort has been just as critical in supporting Giannis. The Bucks’ defense cratered to 19th in the league last season, a far cry from their elite units during the 2021 championship run. To a large degree this is due to Giannis focusing more on offence and personal stat padding. Trent was brought in to shore up the perimeter, and while he’s not an All-Defensive calibre player, his tenacity has made a difference. At 6’6” and 210 pounds, Trent has the size and quickness to take on tough assignments, allowing Giannis to focus on roaming the paint and protecting the rim rather than chasing guards on the perimeter because he obviously wants to save energy for getting to the rim on the other end.
Trent’s “second- and third-effort plays,” as he described them after a season-opening win against the Philadelphia 76ers, have become a hallmark of his game. Whether it’s fighting through screens or swiping at the ball to disrupt dribble drives, Trent’s hustle sets up Giannis and center Brook Lopez to clean up at the rim. Giannis himself praised Trent’s defence after that Philly game, calling it “incredible” and noting how Trent made life tough for speedy guard Tyrese Maxey. That kind of point-of-attack pressure is exactly what the Bucks need to climb back into the top 10 defensively—a goal Rivers has emphasized all season.
Chemistry and Work Ethic: Giannis’s Seal of Approval
Off the court, Trent’s work ethic has earned him high praise from Giannis, further solidifying their on-court connection. After a January win over the San Antonio Spurs, where Trent went a perfect 5-for-5 from the field (including 4-for-4 from three), Giannis highlighted not just the performance but Trent’s preparation. “It’s not about what he saw from him tonight; it’s what he saw from GT yesterday on his day off and the work he consistently has put in all season,” Giannis said via reporter Melanie Ricks. That dedication resonates with Giannis, a player known for his relentless drive, and it’s fostered a mutual respect that translates into trust during games.
The Big Picture: Trent’s Role
The Bucks championship hopes , if any at all, hinge on Giannis and Lillard finding their stride and role players like Trent stepping up. Trent’s ability to space the floor, knock down shots, and lighten Giannis’s defensive load has made him a linchpin in Milwaukee’s retooled rotation. His bargain-bin contract—once seen as a gamble—now looks like one of the off season’s biggest steals.
For Giannis, Trent is more than just a shooter; he’s a release valve, a safety net, and a spark. Whether it’s burying threes off Giannis’s passes, stretching defences to open driving lanes, or grinding on defence to keep the Bucks competitive, Trent has proven he’s the kind of complementary piece that can push a contender over the top. As the playoffs loom, the Giannis-Trent tandem could be the difference between another early exit and a deep run. Bucks fans—and Giannis himself—couldn’t ask for much more from their off season addition turned indispensable ally.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” is a two-time MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, and generally likeable guy with an amazing personal story. At 30 years old, he blends freakish athleticism and a relentless work ethic. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Lakers, led by LeBron James and Luka Doncic, are a franchise synonymous with star power and championship aspirations. On paper, pairing Giannis with the Lakers’ duo sounds like a dream scenario for fans craving a superteam. But dig deeper into the team’s dynamics, roster construction, and playing styles, and it becomes clear that Giannis might not mesh as seamlessly with the Lakers as one might hope. Just because they are missing a big, doesn’t mean Giannis is a good fit.
1. No three point shooting and no free throws
JJ Redick was a master of the 3. The Lakers have morphed into a 3point shooting team with pretty much everyone taking more from the perimeter. Lebron James is shooting it better than ever in his career. Giannis on the other hand is heading towards the worse 3pt% in NBA history. He isn’t just bad. He is a liability. Even if we pretend it doesn’t matter (it does, you can get other bigs with decent 3point shooting) it is a massive liability in any clutch situation. Because you know opponents witll try to foul him, Giannis should not even be on the floor.
2. Ball Dominance
LeBron James, even at 40 years old in 2025, remains the Lakers’ offensive engine. His playmaking ability—averaging over 7 assists per game throughout his career—relies on having the ball in his hands to orchestrate the offense. Giannis, however, has evolved into a point-forward hybrid in Milwaukee, often initiating the Bucks’ attack himself. He is a ball hog worse than Luka Doncic, holding the ball approximately 1/4 of the total possesions of the Bucks!
Pairing ball-dominant stars risks creating a tug-of-war for control. LeBron excels when surrounded by shooters and cutters who complement his vision, as seen in his Miami days with Dwyane Wade or Cleveland with Kyrie Irving. Giannis, conversely, needs the freedom to drive and kick or finish at the rim, often with the Bucks building their offense around his downhill momentum. Forcing one to defer to the other could stifle their individual brilliance. LeBron might adapt—he’s done it before like now with Luka—but Giannis lacks the basketball IQ and diversity in skills. He is now more than ever a run and dunk guy.
3. Defensive Philosophy Clash
The Bucks built their championship defense around Giannis, often deploying him as a roving help defender in a scheme that emphasizes rim protection and switching. Truth be told Jrue was the one holding the fort and everyone on the Bucks roster is used to covering for Giannis’ many misteps. Unfortunately since the championship run Giannis has not really played defence. It seems all he cares about is his stat padding. He has fallen in steals, blocks and most other metrics, focusing more on points.
The Lakers, however, play a fast team defence which relies on high basketball IQ and constant movement. They roam and disrupt rather than stick to traditional man-to-man assignments, which could leave gaps in the Lakers’ perimeter defense—an area where they’ve historically relied on guards like Alex Caruso (now gone) or Dennis Schröder to compensate. Without elite wing defenders to complement them, Giannis might find himself stretched thin, unable to maximize his defensive impact in a system not tailored to his strengths.
4. Roster Construction and Salary Cap Nightmares
Even if the on-court fit could work, the practicalities of adding Giannis to the Lakers are a logistical nightmare. As of 2025, LeBron and Luka command massive salaries—LeBron’s likely on a veteran extension. Giannis, meanwhile, signed a three-year, $186 million extension with the Bucks in 2023, keeping him under contract through 2027-28. Trading for him would require gutting the Lakers’ roster, likely sending out young talent (e.g., Max Christie or Austin Reaves) and multiple first-round picks—assets the Lakers have already depleted from past trades. AR seems extremely unlikely to go since he is playing amazingly well and has figured out how to combine with Lebron and Luka.
The resulting roster would be top-heavy, with little depth to support the big three. The Lakers’ 2020 championship relied on role players like Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Rajon Rondo, but assembling a competent supporting cast around three max contracts in the modern NBA’s tight salary cap is nearly impossible. Giannis thrived in Milwaukee partly because of shooters like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez, who spaced the floor for him. The Lakers, perpetually cash-strapped, would struggle to replicate that balance, leaving Giannis in an unfamiliar and suboptimal environment.
5. Cultural and Leadership Misalignment
Giannis is a blue-collar superstar—humble, team-first, and fiercely loyal to the Bucks, a small-market franchise that bet on him as a raw teenager. The Lakers, by contrast, are Hollywood—glitz, glamour, and a revolving door of stars chasing rings. LeBron’s tenure has been defined by high-profile acquisitions and a win-now mentality, often at the expense of long-term stability (see: Russell Westbrook experiment). Giannis has expressed disdain for superteam culture, famously saying after the 2021 title, “I did it the hard way.” Joining the Lakers could feel like a betrayal of his ethos, clashing with the franchise’s spotlight-chasing identity.
Leadership styles could also grate. LeBron’s cerebral, vocal approach contrasts with Giannis’ lead-by-example intensity. While both are unselfish, Giannis’ relentless motor might not vibe with LeBron’s more measured pace at this stage of his career. The Lakers’ locker room, already navigating the dynamics of LeBron’s twilight and Luka , might struggle to integrate a third alpha personality. Giannis is socially awkward and has never really been able to make connections to other superstars.
6. Coaching and System Fit
The Bucks have tailored their system around Giannis under coaches like Mike Budenholzer and now Doc Rivers , emphasizing pace, transition scoring, and basically doing whatever Giannis asks. The Lakers, under JJ Redick , have showed how modern basketball can be played. Giannis excels in chaos—running the floor, crashing the glass, and overwhelming opponents with athleticism. The Lakers’ more deliberate style might stifle his natural game, forcing him into a structured role that doesn’t suit his improvisational approach. Let’s fact it, that approach doesn’t work anyway. Giannis is the worse screener in the NBA and doesn’t understand angles at all. He also can’t understand or execute advanced plays. He is the worse at turnover to assist ratio in the league for many seasons now.
A Dream That Doesn’t Fit
Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Lakers is a tantalizing what-if, but reality reveals too many cracks. From spacing woes and ball-sharing dilemmas to defensive overlaps and roster constraints, the fit is far from perfect. Giannis is at his best as the undisputed centerpiece of a team built to amplify his unique gifts—something the Bucks have mastered and the Lakers, with their existing stars and limitations, can’t replicate. For Lakers fans dreaming of another superstar coup, Giannis might be the one that got away because he’s simply not skilled enough to slot into their puzzle.
