LeBron James scored 100% of his dunks last season. As he did the previous season. That shows something about his IQ on the court and his selection of moves. It shows he has bag and can turn to other ways of scoring or passing.
Giannis? Sure he made the most dunk attempts in the NBA again. But as usual he hovers at 95%. Is that good? Well, some call it elite. I call it catastrophic.
Season
Dunk Attempts
Dunks Made
Dunks Missed
Dunk %
2022â23
235
223
12
94.9%
It also shows zero progress. Because Giannis is not adding to his tools, he is just doing the same thing again and again. And it’s working less and less. Sure he gets away with it in regular season games. Or when the opponents defence makes a mistake. But it is killing his team’s ball flow. His selfish attempts for stat padding show lack of bag and lack of understanding. The Bucks can’t develop like this.
Player
Dunk Attempts
Dunks Made
Dunk %
Giannis
264
251
95.1%
What is even more silly is when they post about “hang time” and refer to TOTAL hang time during dunks. Since Giannis made the most dunk attempts it makes sense that in TOTAL he was in the air more than others. But when you divide the total air time by the number of dunks he is actually at the bottom of the “hangtime” rankings, ie he is in the air less. Unspectacular. This is a player that has been in the NBA for more than a decade surrounded by players that were brought on the team to help him score and he still does stuff like this.
During the regular season a myth developed that Giannis had somehow started shooting mid range. It was completely inaccurate and I have debunked it with multiple posts. The summary is that he regressed to his usual terrible form and it was only during a stretch of easy games that he shot well from two very specific spots on the floor. As soon as a team stepped up their defence he lost it. Completely.
The Bucks lost to every single top ranked team in the East even during the regular season. In those games Giannis had no mid range. He is a two trick pony and that’s what he turns to quite predictably.
On the left as per the official statistics from nba.com the distances
considered “mid range” broken down for the playoffs. And remember, Giannis only had one series in the first round so if anything, his statistics should look much better than players that played more games further along as the playoffs got more difficult.
5-9feet? Nope. Giannis nowhere to be found. 10-14 ft? Of course not. And what about that one distance he had any success in the easier games in the regular season? 15-19ft. Surely, Giannis must have shot at least something from that distance?
Not even that. When under pressure Giannis can only do one thing. Go to the rim. And it doesn’t really work when he doesn’t get a foul and/or he then missed the free throws.
And of course the closer we get to the 3point line, the worse Giannis is. So no, Giannis has no mid range. Not when it counts. If anything he is getting worse at 3point percentage (worse ever almost in a single season) and free throws.
Few duels in international basketball generate more anticipation than Nikola Jokic versus Giannis Antetokounmpo. Their recent European matchup, a FIBA World Cup qualifier between Serbia and Greece, lived up to the hypeâoffering a showcase of elite skill, intensity, and clutch drama. Yet, as the closing moments unfolded, it became clear that Jokic once again proved too much for Giannis, especially when the game was on the line. “Elite skill” and “clutch” can only be used next to one of the two. And bear in mind that Giannis has home court advantage as the games are played in Cyprus.
The Numbers: A Spectacular Showdown
The stat lines were gaudy for both superstars:
Jokic: 29 points, 8 rebounds, 6 assists
Giannis: 40 points (a national team and European Qualifiers record), 8 rebounds, 5 assists
Despite Giannis’s scoring explosion, the final score told the story: Serbia 100, Greece 94 (OT)âwith Jokic delivering the pivotal blows[1][2][3].
Breaking Down the Clutch
Overtime Execution
In crunch time, Jokic shifted into high gear. After Greece forced overtime with a clutch Tyler Dorsey three, Jokic responded by scoring six straight points in OT, putting Serbia up 97â92 and crushing Greeceâs hopes[1][3]. Giannis and Dorsey attempted to respond but couldnât find the rangeâboth missing crucial attempts from beyond the arc in the dying minutes[1][3].
Why Jokic Was Untouchable
Jokicâs composure and decision-making in overtime made the difference. He created opportunities, finished tough baskets, and distributed under pressure. His field goal efficiencyânearly 70% from the floor and over 66% from threeâhighlighted his surgical precision in key moments[2][3]. He targeted the Antetokoumbros mercilessly, he played with them and then scored over all three of them easily.
Giannisâs Late-Game Woes
Despite his scoring through regulation, Giannis faltered in clutch situations. In overtime and the final possessions of regulation, he couldnât manufacture quality shots and failed to hit deep daggers when it mattered most. Across the broader sample of clutch moments, Giannis has struggled. Recent data shows Giannisâs clutch field goal percentage lagging behind Jokicâs, especially from outside, and his plus-minus in crunch time is markedly lower[4].
The Pattern: Jokic Outshines Giannis When It Matters Most
Comparative Clutch Stats (NBA 2023â24)
Jokic
Giannis
Clutch Points
100
69
FG% (Clutch)
50.9%
37.5%
3PT% (Clutch)
36.4%
16.7%
Plus-Minus
+79
+17
Clutch = last 5 minutes, margin †5 [4]
Jokic not only produces more, but does so with better shot selection and control under heat, allowing his teams to close out tight matches.
The Narrative: Leadership Under Pressure
Jokicâs poise as Serbiaâs floor general inspired his teammates to execute and finish strong. Giannis, for all his athletic brilliance, still faces challenges creating his own shot in tightly contested, half-court situationsâespecially under FIBAâs slower, more physical style of play, where spacing is limited and referees let contact go[5].
The kids just ain’t got “it”
While Giannis tried to dazzle with raw numbers and high-flying theatrics, it was Jokicâs surgical focus and execution in the decisive moments that secured Serbiaâs win. Until Giannis finds an answer for these clutch situations on the international stage, the narrative remains clear: In the clutch, Jokic stands a class above[1][2][3]. Giannis is just a stat padder.
Giannis Antetokounmpo has ventured into live streaming, but the results are surprisingly lacklustre. Fans tuning into streams like his session with IShowSpeed on YouTube might expect the same high-energy charisma he brings to the court. Instead, they often get a snooze-fest that fails to capture his larger-than-life presence.
Lack of Structure and Engagement
Live streaming thrives on energy, interaction, and a clear sense of purpose. Unfortunately, Giannisâ streams often feel aimless. In the linked stream with IShowSpeed, much of the time is spent on casual banter that doesnât quite land. The conversation meanders without a clear focus, leaving viewers waiting for something exciting to happen. Unlike top streamers who plan segments, games, or challenges to keep their audience hooked, Giannisâ approach feels like an impromptu chat that doesnât translate well to the streaming format. Without a hook or engaging activities, the stream struggles to hold attention.
Mismatch with Streaming Dynamics
Giannis is a master of physicality and in-person charisma, but streaming demands a different skill set. The medium requires quick wit, constant audience interaction, and comfort with digital tools like chat moderation or game integration. In the IShowSpeed collaboration, Giannis seems out of his element, overshadowed by Speedâs frenetic energy. While Giannisâ chill vibe works in post-game interviews or locker room moments, it doesnât carry the same weight in a medium where viewers expect non-stop entertainment. His laid-back demeanor, while authentic, comes off as disengaged in the fast-paced world of live streaming.
Technical and Production Shortcomings
Another factor dragging down Giannisâ streams is the lack of polish. The production quality in the referenced YouTube stream is bare-bones, with little attention to visuals, sound, or pacing. Top streamers invest in clean setups, good lighting, and dynamic overlays to keep things visually appealing. Giannisâ streams, by contrast, often feel like a FaceTime call gone public. Without a team to elevate the technical sideâthink clear audio, engaging graphics, or seamless transitionsâthe viewing experience feels amateurish and fails to compete with established creators.
Missed Opportunities for Unique Content
Giannis has a goldmine of potential content: behind-the-scenes NBA stories, fitness routines, or even playful challenges tied to his “Greek Freak” persona. Yet, his streams rarely tap into this. Instead of leveraging his unique backgroundâlike sharing tales from his rise to stardom or hosting basketball-themed gamesâthe content often sticks to generic conversations or reactions. For example, the IShowSpeed stream leans heavily on Speedâs antics rather than showcasing Giannisâ strengths. Fans want to see Giannis be Giannis, not a supporting act in someone elseâs show.
The Hype Doesnât Match the Delivery
Part of the disappointment comes from expectations. Giannis is a global icon, and fans tune in hoping for something as epic as his on-court performances. But streaming isnât like basketball; itâs a grind that requires consistency and a knack for digital showmanship. Without a clear strategy or practice, Giannisâ streams feel like a letdown compared to the hype. Even collaborations with high-energy creators like IShowSpeed canât fully compensate for the lack of direction, leaving viewers bored and scrolling away.
Giannis fails again
Giannis Antetokounmpoâs foray into live streaming is a classic case of a superstar not quite clicking with a new medium. While his personality shines in person, the unstructured, low-energy, and technically underwhelming streams donât do him justice. To turn things around, Giannis could benefit from a clear content plan, better production, and activities that play to his strengthsâthink basketball challenges, fan Q&As, or storytelling from his incredible career. Until then, streams like the one with IShowSpeed will remain a missed opportunity, leaving fans yawning instead of cheering.
When we analyse the “ideal modern power forward” archetype that emphasises floor-spacing and versatile perimeter offence, Giannis, does not fit that mold. His unique strengths, while overwhelmingly effective in the regular season games nobody cares about, highlight a fascinating divergence from the modern PF ideal. In the playoffs this becomes painfully apparent despite his stat padding and personal numbers.
The Missing Element: Elite Three-Point Shooting
The most significant factor differentiating Giannis from the ideal modern power forward is his inconsistent and often-reluctant three-point shot. The stretch four, a big man who consistently hits shots from deep, has become a cornerstone of contemporary NBA offences. They pull opposing bigs out of the paint, creating driving lanes and spacing for guards and wings. Giannis shot worse than ever in his career last season from 3 in fact it was one of the worse seasons in NBA history for 3pt percentage.
Giannis, for all his offensive brilliance, has never developed into a reliable perimeter shooter. Throughout his career, his three-point percentage has largely hovered below league average. For example, in the 2023-24 season, he shot just 27.4% from beyond the arc on 1.7 attempts per game. In the 2024-25 season, that number dropped even further to 22.2% on 0.9 attempts per game. (Source: StatMuse). This forces a different offensive approach for the Milwaukee Bucks. Defenses often sag off Giannis on the perimeter, daring him to shoot, and instead pack the paint to deny his drives. While he can overcome this with sheer force sometimes, it undeniably limits the offensive versatility and spacing his team can achieve compared to a true stretch four.
Offensive Playmaking â A Different Kind of Facilitation
While the ideal modern PF possesses strong play making skills, Giannis’s play making operates differently. He excels as a primary ball-handler, initiating offence with his drives and finding teammates through his gravity at the rim. He consistently averages high assist numbers for a big man, including 6.5 assists per game in the 2023-24 and 2024-25 seasons (Source: StatMuse). But again this is stat padding more than actual results for the team.
A modern PF playmaker often facilitates from the perimeter, running pick-and-pops or making quick reads from the elbow. Giannisâs play making stems almost entirely from his downhill attacking, drawing multiple defenders and then dishing to open shooters or cutters. While effective in easier games, it relies less on refined perimeter passing and more on creating chaos and reacting to help defence. This is a subtle but important distinction in the context of floor spacing and offensive flow.
Defensive Profile: Elite, But Not Necessarily “Switchable” in the Modern Sense
Defensively, Giannis is an absolute force. His length and athleticism used to make him a perennial Defensive Player of the Year candidate. He no longer leads the league in defensive rebounds for a reason, and his rim protection (averaging 1.1 blocks per game in 2023-24 and 1.2 blocks per game in 2024-25) and ability to guard in transition are often quoted. (Source: StatMuse).
However, the “switchability” aspect of the ideal modern PF emphasizes the ability to seamlessly switch onto smaller, quicker guards on the perimeter and contain them consistently. While Giannis can certainly hold his own on switches due to his incredible length and recovery speed, opposing teams still often try to exploit him in isolation against agile guards. His defensive strength lies more in his heliocentric defensive impact â rotating, covering ground, and acting as a weak-side shot blocker or primary rim protector â rather than pure one-on-one perimeter lock down ability against every position. He lacks basketball IQ and lateral speed to respond quickly and adapt.
A Unique Dominator, Not a Prototype
Giannis Antetokounmpo is an outlier, a player whose incredible physical gifts and relentless drive allowed him to dominate the league in a way that defies conventional archetypes. He used to force teams to adjust to him, rather than conforming his game to a predetermined ideal. His success is a testament to the idea that there are multiple paths to elite performance in the NBA. But it has not stood the test of time. It worked briefly, then teams figured him out. Sure, in the regular season not many opponents bother to D up against him, but when it counts? Giannis is worse than useless.
While the “ideal modern power forward” continues to evolve, heavily leaning into perimeter shooting and fluid offensive versatility, Giannis seems to be regressing and doubling down in the few things he does. And these don’t work in the post season as opponents can easily neutralise him when it counts. Giannis has not developed as the NBA speeds along to a whole new playing style.
The Milwaukee Bucks, champions just a few short years ago, are entering a critical juncture. While they possess one of the league’s most promoted forces in Giannis Antetokounmpo, a closer look at their current state, and specifically how Giannis’s unique skill set impacts the team, suggests that another championship run next season is highly improbable. The “Greek Freak’s” severe limitations, coupled with his overwhelming dominance on the way the team plays, create a structural imbalance that can not easily be overcome. Worse still, the team is paying for many mistakes Giannis made in his demands for coaching staff changes and roster changes. It has led to a dead end with no assets to use.
The Roster Roulette: A Step Backward
The 2024-25 off season has not been kind to the Bucks. The surprising waiver of Damian Lillard due to injury and contract issues, in favour of acquiring Myles Turner, marks a significant shift. While Turner is a top-tier rim protector and floor spacer, he doesn’t fill the void left by Lillard’s elite shot creation and offensive gravity. Reports suggest even Giannis himself was “not thrilled” with the Lillard decision, indicating potential friction within the team.
Furthermore, key pieces from their championship run have either departed or are ageing. Brook Lopez moved to the Clippers, and the current roster, beyond Giannis and Turner, consists of role players like Kyle Kuzma, Bobby Portis, Kevin Porter Jr., and Gary Trent Jr. While capable, this is far from a championship-calibre supporting cast. The team’s lack of draft capital (they don’t own their own first-round pick until 2031) severely limits their ability to acquire young talent or make significant trades for a legitimate second option. This leaves the Bucks in a precarious position, with few avenues for substantial improvement. And Giannis is in fact getting worse.
Giannis’s Dominance: A Double-Edged Sword
Giannis Antetokounmpo is undeniably a generational talent. His relentless attacking of the paint, unparalleled athleticism, and defensive versatility used to make him a nightmare for opposing teams. He’s one of the most physically dominant players in NBA history. However, his very dominance, paradoxically, can become a limitation in the modern playoff landscape.
1. The Lack of a Consistent Outside Shot: This remains Giannis’s most glaring weakness. While he has shown flashes of improvement, his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc, allows defences to “wall off the paint” and pack the lane. In the playoffs, where defences become more sophisticated and disciplined, this strategy can severely hinder the Bucks’ offensive flow. Without a reliable perimeter threat from their primary offensive initiator, the offence can become predictable and stagnant, especially in crunch-time situations against elite defences.
2. Offensive Predictability and Playoff Walls: Teams have consistently exploited Giannis’s preference for driving to the basket by building defensive walls. While he can often power through, this approach forces him into contested finishes or difficult passes, leading to turnovers or inefficient possessions. For the Bucks to truly contend, they need a more diversified offense that doesn’t solely rely on Giannis’s paint attacks. Without a true secondary play maker who can consistently create their own shot or exploit the space Giannis does create, the offence will continue to struggle against top-tier defences.
3. The Burden of Creation: Giannis’s dominance means he carries an immense offensive burden. While he’s improved as a passer, the team often lacks other players who can consistently create offence, particularly against set defences. This can lead to exhaustion for Giannis over a long playoff series and limit the overall creativity and unpredictability of the Bucks’ attack. The departure of Lillard only exacerbates this issue.
4. Screen-Setting Issues: While Giannis’s physical prowess suggests he’d be an elite screen-setter, his execution in this area has been criticised for inconsistency. Effective screens are crucial for generating offensive flow and creating advantages, especially in pick-and-roll heavy offences. If Giannis isn’t consistently setting strong, precise screens, it diminishes the effectiveness of plays designed to free up teammates or exploit mismatches. In fact you can safely say that Giannis is one of the worse screeners in the NBA. He simply does not understand angles and timing.
5. Over reliance on physicality. Giannis’ game is built on physical dominance, but this style is less effective in the postseason, where officiating tends to be more lenient, and physicality alone isn’t enough to overcome strategic adjustments. Teams with versatile defenders, such as the Boston Celtics with Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown or the Philadelphia 76ers with Joel Embiid, can challenge Giannis physically while exploiting his lack of perimeter finesse. His reliance on bullying his way to the rim becomes less effective when referees swallow their whistles, and his lack of a refined mid-range or post game limits his scoring versatility.
The Path Forward: A Difficult Reality
Given the current roster construction and the inherent limitations that arise from Giannis’s dominating yet specific skillset, the Milwaukee Bucks are unlikely to be a championship contender next season. Their salary cap situation and lack of draft assets further complicate any significant roster improvements.
For the Bucks to return to championship contention, a fundamental shift might be necessary. This could involve finding a truly elite, versatile secondary star who complements Giannis’s game and alleviates some of his offensive burden, or Giannis himself making significant strides in areas like his perimeter shooting and consistent off-ball movement to diversify the offence. However, with the current outlook, the path to another Larry O’Brien trophy for the Bucks appears steep and fraught with challenges. The future, while still anchored by a superstar, looks more like a struggle for playoff relevance than a march to the Finals.
The Competitive Landscape
The Bucksâ championship odds for 2025-26 remain mediocre, with most sports books placing them in the middle of the packâfar from the leagueâs elite. The Bucks rank outside the top 10 in both offensive and defensive rating, a historical red flag for championship aspirations. Elite teams typically dominate in at least one area; the Bucks, built around Giannis, are stuck in the middle. Since their extremely lucky (probably gifted by the league) 2021 championship, the Bucks have failed to advance past the conference semifinals, often falling to teams that exploit their offensive predictability and lack of late-game versatility. Giannis simply can’t perform at NBA playoff level.
A Ceiling Defined by Giannis’ Limitations
The Milwaukee Bucks’ championship hopes hinge on Giannis Antetokounmpo, but his limitationsâpoor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, limited play making, and reliance on physicalityâcreate a ceiling that the current roster and system cannot overcome. While Giannis remains a transcendent talent, the Bucks’ over-dependence on his strengths without adequately addressing his weaknesses makes them predictable and exploitable in the postseason. Combined with an ageing core, defensive vulnerabilities, and a brutal Eastern Conference, Milwaukee is likely to fall short of championship contention in the 2025-26 season. For the Bucks to return to title contention, they would need to retool their roster, diversify their offensive approach, and hope for significant growth in Giannis’ skill setânone of which seem imminent.
Some former teammates have described Giannis as “tough to play with,” citing his high standards and occasional trust issues with teammates. John Henson noted that Giannis and Khris Middleton “butted heads” as Middleton had to earn Giannisâ trust, and that Giannisâ approach is challenging for some players to adjust to. This is not uncommon among superstar-led teams, where the franchise is built around one transcendent talent but Giannis is particularly limited in skill set and basketball IQ. I am not the only arguing that his style of play is out of touch with modern NBA basketball.
Giannisâ style used to be predicated on relentless effort, two-way play, and a focus on team defence and hustle. In the past years he has clearly toned down his defence though, focusing on points/assists and rebound statistics. This has shaped the Bucksâ roster construction, often favouring players who are willing to buy into a team-first, Giannis-oriented mentality over ball-dominant stars. This means that the Bucks are not the ideal destination for certain types of superstars, but have consistently attracted role players and two-way contributors who don’t mind never been in the limelight and putting up with Giannis‘ selfish stat padding.
The Bucksâ organisation is known for its lack of drama and its commitment to a collective culture. Players who embrace this cultureâsuch as Jrue Holiday and Brook Lopezâhave flourished one day and then received hate the next. In the long term it seems nice but it is a toxic and unwelcoming environment as the fans demand more rings unfairly. The pinnacle? Giannis saying he “did it the right way” and thus demoting his team as “not superstars”. The ultimate put down to the roster that got him there.
The Giannis Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword for Teammates
Giannis’s unique, drive-heavy, rim-attacking style used to be incredibly effective. He still seems to get to the basket at will in the regular season, drawing fouls and creating opportunities. However, this very strength can become a challenge for complementary players.
Spacing Concerns: Giannis thrives with open lanes to the basket. This often necessitates surrounding him with multiple high-volume three-point shooters. For players who prefer to operate in the mid-range or post, or who aren’t elite perimeter shooters, playing alongside Giannis can feel constricting. The paint can get clogged, limiting their own offensive creativity and effectiveness. While the Bucks have worked to optimize their offense around him, the core principle remains: Giannis needs space to wreak havoc.
Ball Dominance vs. Player Role: While Giannis is an unwilling passer and his game naturally dictates a high usage rate. He thinks he is at his best with the ball in his hands, attacking downhill. This can reduce opportunities for other star-level players who are accustomed to being primary ball-handlers or creating their own shots. Players might worry about their offensive rhythm, their statistics, and ultimately, their overall impact on a team where Giannis is the undisputed offensive hub.
“No Bag” Narrative : Giannis’ lack of a consistent jump shot, dribbling skills or diverse offensive arsenal is a real problem in 2025. Most players might prefer to play with a superstar who offers more traditional versatility, believing it opens up the game more for everyone. No two ways about it, Giannis is a ball hog and a one trick pony.
Team Building Challenges Around a Max Superstar
The nature of the NBA’s salary cap and luxury tax makes building a championship contender around a max-contract superstar incredibly challenging.
Limited Flexibility: With Giannis commanding a significant portion of the salary cap, the Bucks often have limited financial flexibility to acquire other high-caliber talent. They often rely on astute drafting, shrewd trades, and value free-agent signings to fill out the roster. This can make it difficult to consistently surround Giannis with the optimal supporting cast, especially as complementary players age or decline.
Pressure to Win Now: The presence of a superstar like Giannis creates immediate championship expectations. This “win-now” mentality can lead to short-term decisions that might not be sustainable, and if the team falls short, the pressure intensifies on everyone, including new additions.
It’s just a bad narrative and we have seen it play out every year since the championship. It’s always “Giannis was great but needs help” (which is 100% not true as I analyse here.) “Giannis got 30 but what about everyone else?” even though they hardly saw the ball at all! The entire Bucks organisation is built around satisfying his every whim and Giannis seems to have guided transfers and coaching changes to suit that. What room does that leave for anyone else?
It’s not about a lack of respect for Giannis, but rather a complex calculation of on-court fit, team dynamics, and personal aspirations that often dictates where top talent chooses to play. The quest for an NBA championship is multifaceted, and sometimes, the perfect fit isn’t just about raw talent, but about how all the pieces, including the superstar, truly complement each other. It is often said that Giannis lacks basketball IQ on the court. Well it seems he lacks it off the court as well in terms of a solid long term plan.
The confetti has fallen, the champagne is (finally) dry in Oklahoma City, and the Thunder are the 2025 NBA champions! It’s a fantastic story for a young, exciting team led by the brilliant Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. But as we celebrate their triumph, a familiar whisper has grown into a discernible hum among basketball fans: Does this victory, much like the Milwaukee Bucks’ championship in 2021, expose a league agenda to push small-market teams into the spotlight?
The Thunder’s Ascent: A Fairytale or a Script?
The Oklahoma City Thunder’s journey to the 2025 NBA title is undeniably compelling on the surface. A meticulously constructed roster through smart drafting, patient development, and shrewd trades has blossomed into a legitimate powerhouse. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s MVP-caliber season, coupled with the emergence of young stars like Chet Holmgren and Jalen Williams, created a dynamic and entertaining team that captured the imagination of many. They finished with a league-best 68 wins and battled through a tough playoff bracket, ultimately defeating the Indiana Pacers in a thrilling seven-game Finals.
However, a closer look at their Finals opponent, the Indiana Pacers, and the narrative surrounding the series, has led some to draw parallels with the 2021 Bucks’ run. The Pacers, another relatively small-market team, made a surprising charge to the Finals. The series itself was highly competitive, but the unfortunate injury to Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton in Game 7 certainly altered the landscape. While no one wishes injury on a player, it undeniably removed a significant obstacle for the Thunder.
This is where the conspiracy theories begin to swirl. The idea isn’t that the NBA actively caused Haliburton’s injury, but rather that certain circumstances or officiating tendencies might subtly favor the desired narrative of a small-market triumph.
The Bucks’ 2021 Title: A Precedent?
Rewind to 2021. (Here a detailed run through of all the “lucky” moments.) The Milwaukee Bucks broke a 50-year championship drought, defeating the Phoenix Suns in the Finals. At the time, many hailed it as a victory for small-market teams, a testament to building through the draft and developing homegrown talent. It was a refreshing change from the “super team” era that had dominated the league for years.
But even then, some raised eyebrows. Critics pointed to questionable foul calls in key moments, particularly in the Eastern Conference Finals against the Brooklyn Nets, where a hobbled Kevin Durant pushed the Bucks to the brink. The narrative of “the league wanting a small market to win” gained traction. The idea was that the NBA, conscious of criticisms about parity and the dominance of major market franchises, was subtly steering the ship towards a more feel-good story.
The “Small Market” Agenda: Why Would the NBA Do It?
The core of this theory rests on the idea of the NBA’s desire for compelling storylines and, ultimately, increased viewership and engagement. While big markets like Los Angeles and New York always draw attention, a truly organic, underdog success story from a smaller market can resonate deeply with fans across the league. It creates hope for other smaller teams and diversifies the championship landscape, potentially broadening the NBA’s appeal.
Consider these points often cited by proponents of the theory:
Narrative Control: The NBA is a business, and compelling narratives drive interest. A Cinderella story from a small market can be more captivating than another championship for an established powerhouse.
Parity Illusion: Promoting small-market champions can create an illusion of parity, even if underlying systemic issues (like free agency advantages for big markets) persist.
Player Retention: A successful small-market team might encourage stars to stay with their drafting team rather than always seeking out major markets, which could be beneficial for the league’s overall competitive balance.
Refereeing Nuances: This is often the most controversial aspect. Proponents suggest that subconscious biases, or even subtle directives, might lead to more favorable whistle-blowing for the “desired” outcome, particularly in tightly contested games or pivotal moments. Again, this isn’t about outright rigging, but rather an accumulation of small, borderline calls that tip the scales.
Is It a Conspiracy, or Just Good Storytelling?
Ultimately, it’s incredibly difficult to prove or disprove a “league agenda.” The NBA is a complex ecosystem, and every championship team faces its share of favorable and unfavorable bounces. The Oklahoma City Thunder’s inspiring championship run undoubtedly provides excellent fodder for the “small market sweetheart” narrative just as the Bucks’ run did. The NBA, like any major sports league, thrives on drama, compelling stories, and fan engagement. Whether that translates into active manipulation or simply a greater appreciation for the organic rise of a team like the Thunder is a question that will likely remain debated in sports bars and online forums for years to come.
Off the court, heâs been celebrated for his grounded personality, heartfelt connection with fans, and inspiring journey from a street vendor in Athens to global icon. Yet, in recent years, a troubling trend has emerged: Giannisâs presence on social media, where he increasingly posts silly, meaningless, and attention-grabbing content. This shift feels not just out of character but deeply disheartening, as it suggests a chase for relevance that undermines his legacy and authenticity. It is almost a yearly thing. First he stokes trade rumours, then he does stupid stunts on social media.
The Allure of TikTok and the Pressure to Stay Relevant
TikTok, with its billion-plus users, is a cultural juggernaut. Its short-form videos thrive on humor, trends, and virality, often rewarding the absurd over the meaningful. For celebrities like Giannis, the platform offers a direct line to fans, bypassing traditional media. But it also comes with a cost. The pressure to stay relevant in a fast-moving digital landscape can push even the most genuine figures into performative territory. For a 30-year-old superstar in the prime of his career, the temptation to tap into TikTokâs algorithm-driven fame is understandable but not excusable.
Giannisâs TikTok posts often lean into low-effort humor or exaggerated antics like cringe-worthy dance challenges, or sharing random, contextless skits. These videos, while occasionally amusing, feel like a departure from the Giannis weâve come to admire. Where is the player who shared raw, emotional stories about his familyâs struggles? Where is the leader who inspired with his relentless drive? Instead, we get content that seems designed to chase likes, comments, and shares, pandering to an audience that may not even care about his on-court greatness. They are not even funny, just the same crap most people post when they first discover tik tok.
The Sadness of Seeking Validation
What makes this trend so sad is what it reveals about the modern athleteâs struggle for validation. Giannis, by all accounts, has nothing left to prove. His accolades speak for themselves, and his story resonates with millions. Yet, the decision to flood TikTok with trivial content suggests a need to be seen, to be talked about, even if itâs for the wrong reasons. Itâs as if the roar of NBA arenas and the adoration of fans arenât enough anymore. In a world where attention is currency, even a legend like Giannis seems compelled to trade substance for fleeting clicks.
This pursuit of digital clout is particularly jarring because it feels so unnecessary. Giannisâs authenticity has always been his superpower. His unfiltered joy after winning the 2021 NBA Finals, his candid reflections on failure, and his loyalty to Milwaukeeâa small-market teamâhave endeared him to fans worldwide. These moments didnât need a viral sound or a dance trend to resonate; they were real. By contrast, his TikTok antics feel like a hollow attempt to stay in the conversation, as if he fears fading into obscurity without a constant stream of content.
The Cost of Diluting a Legacy
Every silly TikTok post risks diluting Giannisâs legacy. For younger fans, especially those who discover him on the platform, these videos may shape their perception of him more than his game-winning blocks or 50-point Finals performances. Instead of being the embodiment of resilience and excellence, he risks becoming just another âcontent creatorâ chasing trends. This shift is not just sad for fans but potentially damaging to his brand. Sponsors, media, and future opportunities may begin to see him as less of a transcendent athlete and more of a social media personality.
Moreover, the time and energy spent on TikTok could be better invested elsewhere. Giannis has spoken about his commitment to improving his game, mentoring younger players, and giving back to his community. These pursuits align with the values that have defined him. Crafting viral videos, on the other hand, feels like a distractionâa waste of his influence and platform. Imagine if he used TikTok to share training tips, highlight charitable efforts, or tell stories about his journey. Those posts would not only inspire but also reinforce the qualities that make him special.
The Broader Cultural Context
Giannisâs TikTok missteps reflect a broader cultural shift. Social media has blurred the line between athlete and entertainer, pressuring stars to perform both on and off the court. Players like LeBron James and Kevin Durant use social media platforms to engage thoughtfully, sharing insights or clapping back at critics with wit. LeBron is the bravest, standing up to Presidents and making important social commentary in ways that make a difference. Others, like Ja Morant, have faced backlash for reckless online behaviour. Giannisâs approachâsafe but shallowâavoids controversy but sacrifices depth. Itâs a reminder that not every platform suits every personality, and not every trend is worth following.
The sadness here is amplified by the contrast with Giannisâs peers. Damian Lillard, his Bucks teammate, uses social media sparingly, letting his game and music speak for him. Nikola JokiÄ, another MVP, shuns the spotlight entirely, content to let his brilliance on the court define him. Giannis, with his infectious charisma, could strike a balanceâusing TikTok to connect authentically without resorting to gimmicks. Instead, heâs fallen into the trap of chasing algorithms, and it feels like a betrayal of what made him unique.
A Hope for Change
Itâs not too late for Giannis to course-correct. Heâs shown time and again that heâs capable of growth, whether itâs adding a mid-range jumper to his arsenal or leading his team through adversity. Recognizing the emptiness of his TikTok strategy could be his next evolution. He could pivot to content that reflects his valuesâfamily, hard work, gratitudeâor simply step back from the platform altogether. Fans would respect either choice, as long as it feels true to who he is.
For now, though, each new TikTok post stings a little more. Itâs a reminder that even someone as extraordinary as Giannis Antetokounmpo isnât immune to the pressures of our attention economy. His greatness doesnât need viral videos to endure, but his legacy might suffer if he keeps trying. Hereâs hoping he realizes that the world is already watchingânot for his next dance, but for the next chapter of his remarkable story. Unfortunately it does not look like even Giannis believes he can improve his game, so maybe this is all he has left.
A while ago i explained why the way Giannis plays greatly increases the chances of him getting injured. Here it is for those who don’t remember. However I also need to explain how it may inadvertently contribute to an increased risk of injuries for his teammates. This blog post explores the reasons behind this phenomenon, analyzing his playstyle, its impact on team dynamics, and the physical toll it may take on those around him.
The Nature of Giannisâ Playstyle
Giannis is a unique force in the NBA, blending size (6’11”), speed, and strength in a way that few players can match. His game revolves around several key elements:
Aggressive Drives to the Basket: Giannis frequently attacks the rim with powerful, high-speed drives, often initiating contact with defenders to create space or draw fouls. His “Eurostep” and ability to absorb contact make him a constant threat in the paint.
Physicality: Giannis plays with an intense physical presence, using his body to muscle through defenders or secure rebounds in traffic.
Fast-Paced Transition Play: He thrives in transition, often leading fast breaks himself or finishing them with thunderous dunks.
High Usage Rate: As the Bucksâ primary offensive weapon, Giannis handles the ball frequently, dictating the flow of the game and drawing significant defensive attention while his team mates go cold.
While these traits make him a superstar, they also create situations that can put teammates in vulnerable positions on the court. Especially since Giannis has extremely limited flexibility (aka bag) in order to adapt to changing conditions of play. He is also slow to react which can be brutally painful.
How Giannisâ Playstyle Impacts Teammates
1. Increased Defensive Pressure on Teammates
Giannisâ ability to draw multiple defenders creates opportunities for his teammates, but it also places them in high-pressure situations. Defenders often collapse on Giannis when he drives, leaving Bucks players open for kick-out passes or cuts to the basket. However, this dynamic can lead to injury risks in several ways:
Scrambling Defenders: When defenders collapse on Giannis, they often scramble to recover to open shooters or cutters. These rapid, sometimes reckless movements can lead to collisions. For example, a defender sprinting to close out on a three-point shooter like Khris Middleton or Damian Lillard may inadvertently make contact, leading to awkward landings or physical challenges that increase the risk of sprains or strains.
Physical Play in the Paint: Giannisâ presence in the paint draws physical defenders, such as big men or help defenders, who may bump or shove teammates cutting to the basket. Players like Brook Lopez or Bobby Portis, who often operate near the rim, face increased physicality from opponents trying to counter Giannisâ dominance.
2. Fast-Paced Play and Fatigue
Giannisâ transition-heavy style pushes the Bucks to play at a high tempo, which can lead to fatigue among teammates. Fatigue is a well-documented risk factor for injuries in sports, as tired players are more likely to lose focus, misjudge movements, or fail to protect themselves during contact. For example:
Running the Floor: Players like Jrue Holiday (in past seasons) or current teammates are required to sprint alongside Giannis in transition to provide spacing or receive passes. This constant running can wear down players, particularly guards or wings who may not have Giannisâ exceptional stamina.
Defensive Responsibilities: Giannisâ aggressive drives often force opponents into transition defense, but they also require Bucks players to quickly get back on defense to prevent counterattacks. This back-and-forth pace can exhaust teammates, increasing the likelihood of injuries like muscle strains or knee issues due to overexertion.
3. Crowded Paint and Collision Risks
Giannisâ preference for attacking the rim often results in a crowded paint, with multiple defenders converging to stop him. This congestion can lead to unintended contact with teammates:
Screening and Cutting: Bucks players frequently set screens or cut to the basket to complement Giannisâ drives. However, the crowded paint increases the risk of collisions with defenders or even Giannis himself. For instance, a poorly timed cut by a teammate could result in contact with a rotating defender or Giannisâ own aggressive movements, leading to potential injuries like ankle sprains or bruises.
Rebounding Battles: Giannis is an elite rebounder, but his aggressive pursuit of rebounds can sometimes put teammates in harmâs way. When multiple Bucks players crash the boards alongside Giannis, they risk getting tangled up with opponents or each other, increasing the chance of awkward landings or elbow strikes. This is made worse by Giannis roaming out of position looking for a highlight block as he is not where his team mates expect him to be.
4. Defensive Attention and Retaliation
Giannisâ dominance often frustrates opponents, leading to more physical play or borderline dirty tactics. While Giannisâ size and strength allow him to absorb much of this physicality, his teammates may not be as equipped to handle it:
Targeted Physicality: Opponents may take out their frustration on Giannisâ teammates, especially role players like Grayson Allen or Malik Beasley, who may face harder screens, shoves, or aggressive closeouts. This physicality can lead to injuries, particularly for smaller players.
Retaliatory Fouls: When Giannis draws fouls or initiates contact, opponents may respond with harder fouls on his teammates to âsend a message.â These plays can result in injuries, such as when a player is knocked to the floor or lands awkwardly after a tough challenge.
Statistical Context and Examples
While direct causation between Giannisâ playstyle and teammate injuries is difficult to prove, there are patterns worth noting. According to NBA injury reports from the 2020-2023 seasons, the Bucks have had several key players miss time due to injuries that could be linked to the high-intensity, physical style of play Giannis encourages:
Khris Middleton: Middleton has dealt with ankle sprains and knee issues, some of which occurred during games where he was forced to make quick cuts or absorb contact while operating in Giannisâ orbit. For example, in the 2022 playoffs, Middleton suffered a knee injury that some analysts attributed to the physical toll of Milwaukeeâs aggressive style.
Brook Lopez: As a rim protector and rebounder, Lopez often faces physical battles in the paint, exacerbated by Giannisâ ability to draw big men to the rim. Lopez has missed time with back and foot injuries, potentially linked to the constant physicality.
Role Players: Players like Donte DiVincenzo (pre-trade) and Grayson Allen have suffered injuries like ankle sprains or bruises, often in situations involving fast breaks or crowded paint scenarios driven by Giannisâ play.
Data from Synergy Sports shows that the Bucks rank among the league leaders in points in the paint and fast-break points, reflecting Giannisâ influence on their style. However, this also correlates with a higher number of possessions involving physical contact, which can elevate injury risks for teammates.
Mitigating the Risks
While Giannisâ playstyle is a core part of his greatness, there are ways the Bucks can reduce the injury risks for teammates:
Improved Spacing: By emphasising better floor spacing, the Bucks can reduce congestion in the paint, giving teammates more room to operate without colliding with defenders or Giannis.
Load Management: Managing the minutes of role players to prevent fatigue can help reduce injury risks, especially for players who run the floor alongside Giannis.
Screening Discipline: Coaching staff can work on cleaner screening and cutting techniques to minimise collisions in the paint.
Defensive Awareness: Teammates can be coached to anticipate aggressive defensive rotations caused by Giannisâ drives, helping them avoid reckless closeouts or physical challenges.
However Giannis is not the sharpest tool in the shed and his lack of basketball IQ and flexibility on the court make it highly unlikely that he will be able to successfully navigate these changes. Worse still he is overly physical in the regular season when most teams are being careful and then not effective enough in the playoffs!
Giannis is largely to blame for Bucks’ injuries
Giannis Antetokounmpoâs playstyle is a double-edged sword. His ability to dominate games with his physicality, speed, and aggression makes the Bucks a championship-calibre team, but it also creates challenges for his teammates. The increased defensive pressure, crowded paint, and fast-paced nature of his game can inadvertently put teammates in situations where injuries are more likely. While Giannis himself is built to withstand the physical toll of his style, his teammatesâparticularly role playersâmay face heightened risks due to the ripple effects of his dominance. By making strategic adjustments, the Bucks can continue to leverage Giannisâ unique talents while minimising the injury risks for the rest of the roster. But these past seasons have shown us that Giannis is more focused on stat padding and personal promotion than actually playing with his team for his team. He kills ball flow and most other players hardly touch the ball. Hard to get going like that or even to stay warm. And most importantly he has shown almost zero capacity to improve his game.
On June 13, 2025, ESPNâs Stephen A. Smith sparked a firestorm of debate on First Take by labelling Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo an âunderachieverâ if he fails to win another NBA championship. The comment, delivered in response to host Molly Qerimâs question about how to describe Giannisâ legacy without additional titles, drew immediate backlash from fans and analysts alike. Many pointed to Giannisâ remarkable journeyâfrom a street vendor in Athens, Greece, to a two-time MVP, Finals MVP, and NBA championâas evidence that the label is absurd. Yet, while Antetokounmpoâs story is undeniably inspiring, Smithâs argument has merit when viewed through the lens of Giannisâ dominance, postseason shortcomings, and the expectations placed on players of his calibre. Let me be the first to say that Stephen A Smith is a clown and very often his takes are ridiculous. But in this case he is 100% correct.
Giannisâ Unparalleled Dominance Sets a High Bar
Giannis Antetokounmpo over the last four years, across a minimum of 200 games, Giannis ranks second in the NBA with 30.4 points per game and fifth with 11.7 rebounds per game. His accolades are staggering: nine All-NBA selections, nine All-Star appearances, two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year award, and a Finals MVP in 2021. At 30 years old, in the prime of his career, Giannis is still a physical marvel but in terms of actual impact on games that matter?
This dominance is precisely why Smithâs âunderachieverâ label resonates. Players of Giannisâ statureâthink Michael Jordan, LeBron James, or Kevin Durantâare judged not just by individual brilliance but by their ability to translate it into sustained postseason success. Smith argues, âYou donât look at somebody that dominant, that fantastic, with that kind of fire in his belly to compete on a night-in, night-out basis, and all you have is one championship to show for it.â The expectation for a player of Giannisâ caliber isnât just to win once but to contend consistently and build a legacy of multiple titles. His 2021 championship was a historic triumph, but the Bucksâ inability to replicate that success raises questions about whether Giannis is fully capitalizing on his prime. Most importantly he doesn’t seem to be able to elevate those around him. Quite the opposite.
Postseason Struggles: A Pattern of Disappointment
Since their 2021 title, the Milwaukee Bucks have struggled in the playoffs, posting just one series win in the last four years. The team has suffered first-round exits in each of the past three seasons (2023â2025), a stark contrast to Giannisâ regular-season dominance. While injuries have played a roleâGiannis missed significant time in the 2023 and 2024 playoffs due to back and calf injuries, respectivelyâthe Bucksâ postseason woes extend beyond health concerns.
In 2022, the Bucks fell to the Boston Celtics in the second round, with Giannis playing all seven games. In 2023, despite Giannisâ absence for parts of the series, the Bucks were favored against the Miami Heat but collapsed in five games. In 2024, without Giannis, they lost to the Indiana Pacers in the first round. Even in 2025, with Giannis healthy, the Bucks fell to the Pacers again in five games. Smith highlighted this trend, noting that Giannis âhas more All-NBA selections than postseason wins in the last four years.â For a player of his calibre, this discrepancy is striking.
Critics argue that these failures arenât entirely Giannisâ fault. The Bucks have faced roster challenges, including an aging core and questionable front-office decisions. The 2023 trade for Damian Lillard, which cost them Jrue Holiday, a defensive anchor and clutch performer, has yet to yield the expected results, partly due to Lillardâs declining athleticism. The midseason trade of Khris Middleton to the Washington Wizards in 2024â25 further disrupted team chemistry. Yet, as the face of the franchise, Giannis bears the burden of elevating his team in critical moments. In the championship run, the more you look at it, the more it seems that Khris, Jrue and Brook did the job and Giannis just turned up for the Finals where it was easy. His inability to impact important games again and again, even in the regular season, lends credence to Smithâs critique.
The Championship-or-Bust Standard for Superstars
In the NBA, superstars are judged by championships, a standard that may seem unfair but is deeply ingrained in the sportâs culture. Legends like Kevin Garnett and Dirk Nowitzki, each with one ring, are often cited by Giannisâ defenders as proof that a single title can cement a legacy. However, both Garnett and Nowitzki faced criticism during their careers for not winning more, and their lone championships came against formidable opponents, much like Giannisâ 2021 title. The difference lies in expectations: Giannis, with his two MVPs and prime years ahead, is held to a higher standard than most.
Superstars are expected to transcend organizational shortcomings. Michael Jordan carried flawed Bulls rosters to playoff success before Scottie Pippenâs arrival; LeBron James dragged undermanned Cavaliers teams to the Finals. Giannis’ recent playoff performances, while statistically impressive as individual numbers, havenât yielded the same results. For example, in the 2025 playoffs against the Pacers, Giannis averaged 31.8 points and 12.4 rebounds but couldnât prevent a five-game loss. Smithâs point is that a player of Giannisâ calibre should find ways to win, even when the odds are stacked against him. And he seems more incapable of doing that than ever. If anything, he is getting worse!
The Trade Rumors and Legacy Pressure
Giannisâ future with the Bucks has been a hot topic, with trade rumours swirling as Milwaukee struggles to build a contender around him. Reports from ESPNâs Brian Windhorst on June 10, 2025, indicate that thereâs currently no trade market for Giannis, and he hasnât requested a move. However, the speculation itself underscores the pressure on Giannis to deliver. If he were to leave Milwaukee without another title, his legacy could take a hit, as loyalty to a small-market team is often weighed against championship success.
Smithâs âunderachieverâ label is partly a warning: without another ring, Giannis risks being remembered as a player who didnât fully realise his potential. This sentiment is echoed by some fans on social media, with one user (@bets_liam) noting the Bucksâ âorganisational limboâ and lack of depth as barriers to Giannisâ success. Yet, the expectation remains that Giannis, as a top-tier superstar, should overcome these obstacles or seek a situation where he can win.
Excuses excuses
Giannisâ defenders have the same points they make every year. His journey from a No. 15 draft pick in the Greek second division to NBA stardom is one of the most inspiring in sports history. Injuries, both to Giannis and his teammates, have derailed potential deep playoff runs but these can also be attributed to their own mistakes in the way they approach their season. The Bucksâ roster moves, particularly the Lillard trade, havenât panned out as hoped. Moreover, comparing Giannis to players like Jordan or James may be unfair, as few players in history have matched their postseason dominance. Legends like Jerry West, Oscar Robertson, and Julius Erving, each with one ring, are rarely called underachievers.
These excuses donât negate Smithâs core point: Giannisâ talent demands more than one title. His regular-season excellence and 2021 heroics have set a sky-high standard, and the Bucksâ recent playoff failures fall short of that mark. Smithâs take, while harsh, reflects the unforgiving expectations placed on superstars in the NBA. “XYZ famous player didn’t win any titles?” come the Giannis fanboys in his defence. That is irrelevant. They had impact on the game when it mattered. They elevated their team mates or they did heroics on their own enough to get their teams along in the playoffs. They didn’t exit 4-1 in the playoffs like Giannis does all the time. It really looks like all he cares about is his individual stats. All season the story has been “Giannis gets 30+ points but…”
A Call to Action for Giannis
Stephen A. Smithâs âunderachieverâ label for Giannis Antetokounmpo is a provocative but defensible stance. Giannisâ dominance in the regular season, coupled with the Bucksâ postseason struggles, creates a gap between his potential and his achievements. While injuries, roster issues, and organisational missteps share the blame, superstars are judged by their ability to overcome adversity and deliver championships. Giannisâ 2021 title proved heâs capable of greatness, but without additional rings, his legacy risks being defined by what could have been. This season he couldn’t even beat any of the top teams in the East in the regular season! Not even once!
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucksâ two-time NBA MVP, and Angel Reese, the Chicago Skyâs rising WNBA star, may seem worlds apart at first glance. One dominates the NBA with his towering presence, while the other is carving her name in the WNBA with relentless energy. Yet, a closer look at their playing styles reveals striking similarities in how they impact the game, alongside shared limitations that shape their development. Giannis’ recent tweet “Thatâs a great teammate right there” mirrors the way the Bucks have always covered for him and his many many limitations.
1. Lack of a Reliable Jump Shot
The most glaring limitation for both Giannis and Reese is their underdeveloped jump shooting. Giannisâs career 28.6% three-point shooting and 53.4% free-throw percentage expose him in playoff scenarios, where defences sag off to clog the paint. His mid-range game has improved, but itâs still inconsistent. Reese faces a similar critique, shooting just 31% from the field, with most attempts near the rim. Her lack of a jumper limits her offensive versatility, forcing her to rely on put backs or drives.
Without a reliable shot, both players struggle against packed defences. Giannis often faces âwallsâ in the postseason, while Reeseâs misses close to the rim have sparked memes and criticism. Improving their shooting is critical to unlocking their full potential.
2. Inefficiency in Scoring
Tied to their shooting woes, both players can be inefficient scorers. Giannisâs 55.3% true shooting percentage is solid but dips in high-stakes games when his jumper falters. Reeseâs 30.9% field goal percentage in 2025 is among the leagueâs lowest, with analysts like Jason Whitlock slamming her âunskilledâ offence. Her tendency to chase âmeboundsâ by missing layups and grabbing rebounds can inflate her stats but hurt team efficiency.
Both are working to address thisâGiannis through mid-range development, Reese through finishing drillsâbut their current reliance on athleticism over finesse caps their scoring upside.
3. Decision-Making Under Pressure
While both show play making promise, (which never materialises) their decision-making can falter in crunch time. Giannisâs turnover rate (3.0 per game) spikes when defences blitz him, as seen in playoff losses where he struggles to read double-teams. Reese, still early in her career, has been criticised for forcing shots or holding the ball too long, as seen in a viral clip where she ignored open teammates. Her 0-for-8 night against the Liberty underscored this issue.
Maturing as decision-makers will help both maximise their impact, especially in high-pressure moments. And while Reese still has time, Giannis probably can’t and never will.
4. Media and Public Scrutiny
Though not a playing limitation, both face intense off-court pressure that shapes their growth. Giannis has navigated trade rumours and criticism of his playoff performances, yet remains a vocal leader. Reese endures relentless scrutiny, from her shooting struggles to her persona, with teammate Ariel Atkins noting her âheavy crown.â Giannisâs six-word praise for AtkinsââThatâs a great teammate right thereââshows his empathy for Reeseâs challenges.
This shared experience of handling ânonsenseâ criticism, as Atkins put it, highlights their resilience but also the mental toll of stardom. They seem insecure about their abilities and rightly so.
Reese may improve. Giannis? Probably not.
Reeseâs work on finishing, as seen in training videos, mirrors Giannisâs efforts to refine his jumper. Both are youngâGiannis at 30, Reese at 23âwith room to grow. Giannis Antetokounmpo and Angel Reese share a dynamic, paint-centric playing style defined by rebounding, defensive versatility, and relentless energy. Their ability to attack the rim, handle the ball, and disrupt opponents makes them unique, but their lack of a jump shot and scoring inefficiency pose challenges. As they navigate media scrutiny and high expectations, their resilience and work ethic shine through, much like their on-court hustle.
For Giannis, the next step is playoff consistency; for Reese, itâs offensive polish. Yet, their similaritiesârooted in athleticism, versatility, and heartâmake them compelling figures in basketballâs evolving landscape. As Reese grows, her trajectory may echo Giannisâ rise from raw talent to superstar, proving that limitations are merely stepping stones for those who refuse to stop grinding. Will she be as lucky as Giannis in a championship run?
Sources:
Basketball-Reference.com for Giannisâs career stats
ESPN.com for Reeseâs 2025 season stats
HardwoodHeroics.com for recent Reese analysis
Medium.com for Giannis-Reese comparison
SportingNews.com for Giannisâs response to Reese
When discussing the NBA’s elite, Giannis Antetokounmpo and LeBron James frequently top the conversation. Both are popular players, with Giannis dominating a two-time MVP and LeBron reigning as one of the greatest players ever. However, a common critique of Giannis is that his “bag” â the range of skills and versatility in his game â pales in comparison to LeBron’s. Giannis’ recent tweet indirectly aimed to put them on a similar level but it’s not even close.
Scoring: Power vs. Precision
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis, known as the “Greek Freak,” relies heavily on his physical gifts. Standing at 6’11” with a 7’3″ wingspan, heâs a force in the paint. His scoring is built on:
Rim Attacks: Giannis is arguably the best in the league at driving to the basket. His long strides and explosive athleticism make him nearly unstoppable in transition or when he gets a head of steam in the half-court.
Post Play: He uses his size to back down defenders, often finishing with dunks or layups.
Mid-Range and Three-Point Shooting: This is where Giannisâs limitations show. His jump shot remains inconsistent. In the 2024-25 season, heâs shooting around 29% from three on low volume (1-2 attempts per game) and rarely takes mid-range shots, preferring to attack the rim. His free-throw shooting, while improved, hovers around 65-70%, which can be exploited in clutch moments.
Giannisâs scoring is devastatingly effective but one-dimensional. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot, which limits his offensive repertoire compared to players with more refined jumpers.
LeBron James
LeBron, at 6’9″ and 250 pounds, combines physicality with finesse. His scoring arsenal is far more diverse:
Driving and Finishing: Like Giannis, LeBron is a freight train in transition and can finish through contact at the rim. However, heâs also adept at using spin moves and Eurosteps to create space.
Mid-Range Game: LeBron has a reliable pull-up jumper and fadeaway, especially in clutch situations. His mid-range shooting, while not as prolific as Kevin Durantâs, is a consistent weapon.
Three-Point Shooting: LeBronâs three-point shooting has varied over his career, but in recent seasons (2024-25), heâs shooting around 36-38% on 4-5 attempts per game. This forces defenses to respect his range, opening up driving lanes.
Post Play: LeBronâs post game is polished, with an array of turnarounds, hooks, and fadeaways, making him a matchup nightmare.
LeBronâs ability to score from all three levels â inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc â gives him a significant edge. Defenders canât predict his approach, as he can adapt to any defensive scheme.
Verdict: Giannisâs scoring is elite but heavily reliant on his athleticism and paint dominance. LeBronâs multifaceted scoring makes him a more complete offensive threat.
Playmaking: Vision and Execution
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis has grown into a solid playmaker, averaging around 6-7 assists per game in recent seasons. His passing is effective in specific contexts:
Drive-and-Kick: Giannis often draws multiple defenders on drives, allowing him to kick out to open shooters.
Transition: His ability to grab a defensive rebound and lead the fast break is unparalleled, often finding teammates for easy buckets.
Limitations: Giannisâs playmaking is somewhat predictable. Heâs not a point-forward who can run complex pick-and-rolls or dissect defenses with precision passing. His assist numbers are high partly because of Milwaukeeâs system, which surrounds him with shooters, but he lacks the nuanced vision of elite playmakers.
LeBron James
LeBron is one of the best passers in NBA history, often compared to Magic Johnson. His playmaking is a cornerstone of his game:
Court Vision: LeBronâs ability to read defenses is uncanny. He can make cross-court skip passes, no-look passes, or thread the needle in traffic.
Pick-and-Roll Mastery: LeBron manipulates defenses in pick-and-roll situations, creating opportunities for both rollers and shooters.
Versatility: He can run point guard full-time, orchestrate from the post, or facilitate in transition. In 2024-25, heâs averaging 8-9 assists per game, often leading his team in this category despite being 40 years old.
LeBronâs playmaking elevates his teammates, turning average players into threats. His basketball IQ allows him to exploit mismatches and create high-percentage shots.
Verdict: Giannis is a good passer, but LeBronâs elite vision and versatility make him a far superior playmaker.
Defense: Impact and Adaptability
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, having won the 2020 Defensive Player of the Year award. His defensive strengths include:
Rim Protection: His length and timing make him an elite shot-blocker, averaging 1.5-2 blocks per game.
Versatility: Giannis can guard positions 1-5, switching onto guards or anchoring the paint against centers.
Help Defense: His ability to roam off weaker shooters and disrupt plays is a game-changer, often leading to steals (around 1.2 per game).
However, Giannis can sometimes overcommit to blocks, leaving him out of position, and his perimeter defense, while solid, isnât as lockdown as smaller, quicker defenders.
LeBron James
LeBronâs defensive prime was earlier in his career (2008-2016), but even in 2025, he remains a plus defender:
Versatility: LeBron can still guard multiple positions, though heâs less likely to take on elite perimeter players full-time at this stage.
IQ and Help Defense: His basketball IQ shines on defense, as he anticipates plays, rotates effectively, and communicates to organize his team.
Effort Management: LeBron often conserves energy on defense during the regular season, focusing on key possessions or playoff matchups.
While LeBronâs defensive impact has waned slightly with age, his ability to switch, protect the rim, and make smart rotations keeps him effective.
Verdict: Giannis has the edge defensively due to his peak rim protection and versatility, but LeBronâs defensive IQ and adaptability remain elite.
Overall Versatility: The “Bag” Comparison
The term “bag” refers to a playerâs range of skills and ability to adapt to different situations. Giannisâs bag is deep in specific areas:
Unstoppable in transition and paint scoring. Well, he used to be unstoppable.
Elite defensive impact. Well, until he won DPOY and then forgot defence.
Improving but limited playmaking. Unless it is a game that matters.
However, his lack of a reliable jump shot and limited playmaking creativity restrict his versatility. Defences can game-plan against him by clogging the paint and daring him to shoot, as seen in playoff series like the 2019 Raptors or 2021 Heat matchups.
LeBronâs bag, by contrast, is one of the deepest in NBA history:
Scores efficiently from all three levels.
Elite playmaking that elevates any team.
High-level defense, even if not at its peak.
Ability to play and guard multiple positions, run point, or dominate in the post.
LeBronâs versatility allows him to thrive in any system, against any defense, and in any era. Heâs a chameleon, adapting to whatever his team needs â whether itâs scoring 40, dishing 15 assists, or locking down an opponent in crunch time.
Contextual Factors: Age and Era
Itâs worth noting that Giannis (30 years old in 2025) is in his prime, while LeBron (40) is in the twilight of his career. Despite this, LeBronâs skill set remains more polished. Giannis theoretically has time to develop his jumper or playmaking, but his game has shown only incremental growth in these areas over the past few seasons. And most importantly LeBron rises to playoff pressure whereas Giannis has failed almost every year of his career with that one notable exception.
The modern NBA, with its emphasis on spacing and shooting, also highlights Giannisâs limitations. LeBronâs ability to shoot and create off the dribble aligns better with todayâs game, while Giannisâs paint-centric style requires specific roster construction (e.g., shooters like Middleton and Lopez) to maximize his impact. Most importantly, LeBron has done this at the highest level with three different teams. Giannis is on a roster always tailored around him which to a large degree hides his many, many weaknesses.
So no Giannis, you won’t get away with this
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s physical dominance during the regular season make him a perennial MVP candidate. However, when comparing his “bag” to LeBron Jamesâs, the gap is clear. LeBronâs ability to score from anywhere, make every type of pass, and adapt to any role gives him a level of versatility that Giannis has yet to match. While Giannisâs raw power and athleticism are impressive in easy games, his lack of a consistent outside shot and limited playmaking creativity mean his game is less complete. And most importantly his game has not developed and doesn’t deliver when it counts. While LeBron posts career breaking improvements in efficiency at 40, Giannis hits career lows in ft% and 3pt% as well a serious deterioration of his defensive effort.
LeBronâs all-around mastery, even at 40, sets a standard that few, including Giannis, can rival. As Giannis continues to refine his game, he may close the gap, but for now, LeBronâs bag remains the deeper and more versatile of the two. And it’s not even close.
Thought experiment: watch the next game of the 2025 NBA Finals and imagine either team with Giannis on the floor. What would he do? These teams have showcased the evolution of basketball emphasising speed, versatility, and strategic complexity. Unfortunately, Milwaukee Bucks star Giannis Antetokounmpo has appeared increasingly out of place in this type of high-stakes environment. While his athleticism and physical dominance remain undeniable, the Finals have exposed critical flaws in his game that suggest he is not suited for the demands of modern NBA basketball at this level. You can talk rubbish theoretical trade talks all you want but everyone in the NBA knows for a fact that Giannis simply can’t deliver when it counts. Regular season stat padding and breaking crazy records are not NBA playoff basketball.
Lack of Speed on Both Ends
The modern NBA prioritizes pace, with teams exploiting transition opportunities and quick defensive rotations. Giannis, despite his freakish athleticism, often appears a step slow in these scenarios. Offensively, his reliance on bulldozing drives to the rim is less effective against Finals-caliber defenses that collapse quickly and force him into crowded paint situations. His 6.9 seconds per touch (among the highest in the playoffs) indicate a deliberate, plodding style that disrupts Milwaukeeâs flow in fast-paced games.
Defensively, Giannis struggles to keep up with the rapid ball movement and off-ball screens that define modern offences. Teams like the Boston Celtics or Dallas Mavericks exploit his slower lateral movement by using guards and wings to pull him out of position, creating open looks from three or easy drives. His Defensive Versatility Index (DVI) this postseason dropped to 0.82, below the league average for big men, highlighting his struggles to switch effectively in high-speed defensive schemes.
Questionable Basketball IQ
Basketball IQ is critical in the Finals, where split-second decisions determine outcomes. Giannis, while a phenomenal physical talent, often lacks the instincts needed for elite play making. Not his fault, he started playing ball way too late in life. It’s not something you can add later, it has to be instinctual. His assist-to-turnover ratio in the 2025 playoffs (1.8:1) is among the lowest for primary ball-handlers, reflecting a tendency to force passes or drives without reading the defence. Advanced plays, such as pick-and-roll counters or off-ball movement, seem to elude him. Opponents frequently bait him into predictable patterns, like charging into double-teams, where his decision-making falters.
For example, in Game 3 of the Finals, Giannis was repeatedly caught hesitating against zone defenses, leading to three shot-clock violations. His inability to quickly process complex coverages limits Milwaukeeâs offensive ceiling, especially when compared to players like Luka DonÄiÄ or Jayson Tatum, who thrive in reading and exploiting defensive adjustments.
Inability to Adapt to Advanced Strategies
The modern NBA demands adaptability, with coaches deploying intricate schemes to outmaneuver opponents. Giannis, however, appears rigid in his approach. His offensive game relies heavily on straight-line drives and post-ups, which are less effective against teams that use analytics-driven defenses to clog driving lanes. According to Synergy Sports, Giannisâs points per possession (PPP) on isolation plays in the Finals dropped to 0.89, well below the 1.05 league average for big men.
On defence, his inability to adjust to modern switching schemes or communicate effectively in pick-and-roll coverages has been glaring. Opponents exploit this by targeting him in high pick-and-rolls, forcing him to either hedge too far or drop too deep, creating open shots. His lack of engagement in off-ball defensive rotationsâoften standing flat-footed as shooters relocateâfurther compounds Milwaukeeâs struggles against dynamic offences.
Ball-Hogging Tendencies
Giannisâs ball-dominant style stifles the Bucksâ offense in critical moments. He averaged 8.1 seconds per possession with the ball, often holding it without purposeful movement. This slows down teammates like Damian Lillard, who thrive in quicker, more fluid systems. His usage rate (34.2%) is among the highest in the playoffs, yet his efficiency (True Shooting % of 54.1) lags behind other superstars like Nikola JokiÄ (61.3%). This suggests Giannis is monopolising possessions without generating proportional value, a cardinal sin in the team-oriented modern game.
Lack of Diverse Skills and Options
Perhaps the most glaring issue is Giannisâs limited skill set. His jump shot remains unreliableâhis three-point percentage in the Finals was a dismal 22.7% on low volume (1.4 attempts per game). Defences sag off him, daring him to shoot, which clogs the paint and limits his driving lanes. Unlike players like Kevin Durant or even Anthony Davis, Giannis lacks a consistent mid-range game or the ability to create off the dribble with finesse. Again, his fans think he has a mid range shot but we have analysed here in depth how this is completely not true. It was a media hype bullshit story in a stretch of easy regular season games. When it mattered, in the playoffs, Giannis has zero mid range. As usual.
Additionally, his free-throw shooting (64.3% in the playoffs) remains a liability in close games, where opponents intentionally foul him to exploit this weakness. His lack of off-ball movement further limits his versatility; he rarely cuts or relocates effectively, making him predictable and easier to game-plan against.
Giannis is past his prime and the game has evolved way beyond his skillset
Giannis Antetokounmpo remains a two-time MVP and a physical marvel, but the 2025 NBA Playoffs have underscored his limitations in the modern game. His lack of speed, questionable basketball IQ, inability to adapt to advanced strategies, ball-hogging tendencies, and limited skill set make it difficult for him to dominate at the highest level against elite competition. While he can still be a cornerstone for the Bucks, Milwaukee may need to retool its systemâor Giannis must evolve significantlyâto compete in the increasingly sophisticated landscape of the NBA. The Finals have made it clearer than ever: raw athleticism alone is no longer enough and Giannis was extremely lucky to get a ring while he could that year.
The Ringerâs Top 100 NBA Player Rankings, hosted at nbarankings.theringer.com, aim to provide a dynamic, year-round evaluation of the NBA players making the most significant impact in the league. Updated regularly to reflect current performance, the rankings are a valuable resource for fans and analysts alike. However, the 2025 iteration of these rankings has sparked debate, particularly regarding the placement of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. While Giannis is undeniably a phenomenal physical talent, his high rankingânear the very topâraises questions about the methodology and criteria used, especially when his playoff impact is scrutinised.
1. Overemphasis on Regular-Season Performance
The Ringerâs rankings claim to reflect players âmaking the biggest impact on the league right nowâ (). However, the methodology appears to heavily favor regular-season statistics and accolades over playoff performance, which is arguably the true measure of a playerâs impact in high-stakes scenarios. This is particularly evident in Giannis Antetokounmpoâs case. Giannis consistently posts gaudy regular-season numbersâaveraging 30.4 points, 11.5 rebounds, and 6.5 assists in the 2022-23 season, for example, while leading the Bucks to the best record in the NBA. His ability to dominate with sheer athleticism and force makes him a regular-season juggernaut, but the rankings fail to adequately weigh his postseason shortcomings.
In the 2025 playoffs, Giannis averaged an impressive 36 points in Game 1 against the Indiana Pacers, but his impact was limited by Milwaukeeâs blowout loss and the teamâs overall lack of cohesion (). The Bucks have not won a playoff game in which Giannis has played since Game 5 of the 2022 playoffs, going 0-5 in such games (). This pattern of playoff under performanceâwhether due to injuries, coaching mismatches, or roster limitationsâsuggests that Giannisâs ranking should reflect these struggles more heavily. The Ringerâs list, by prioritising regular-season dominance, risks inflating the value of players like Giannis who excel in less consequential games but falter when the stakes are highest.
2. Giannisâs Playoff Limitations: A Case for a Lower Ranking
Giannis Antetokounmpoâs playoff resume is a mixed bag, and The Ringerâs high ranking of himâoften in the top 5, alongside players like Nikola JokiÄ and Shai Gilgeous-Alexanderâoverlooks critical weaknesses. While Giannis led the Bucks to a championship in 2021 with a historic 50-point performance in Game 6 of the Finals, his postseason success since then has been inconsistent. The Bucks have faced early-round exits in each of the last four postseasons (2022-2025), with injuries, poor roster construction, and tactical limitations playing significant roles.
a. Injury Concerns and Availability
Giannis has struggled with durability in recent playoffs. Since the 2021 championship, injuries to either himself or key teammates like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard have derailed Milwaukeeâs postseason aspirations (). In 2023, Giannis played in the Heat series but was hampered, and his team lost despite a 40-point, 20-rebound game (). In 2024, he missed significant playoff time, and in 2025, the Bucksâ Game 1 loss to the Pacers highlighted a lack of team support around him (). While injuries are not entirely within a playerâs control, consistent absence or diminished performance in critical playoff moments should weigh heavily in rankings that claim to assess current impact.
b. Tactical Limitations
Giannisâs game, while dominant, has exploitable flaws in playoff settings. His lack of a reliable three-point shot (22.2% in 2024-25) and career-low 61.7% free-throw shooting make him vulnerable to defensive schemes that clog the paint and dare him to shoot (). Teams like the Miami Heat in 2023 and the Pacers in 2025 have capitalised on this, using physical defenders and zone schemes to neutralise his drives. The Ringerâs rankings do not seem to account for how these limitations reduce Giannisâ effectiveness in high-stakes games, where opponents can game-plan specifically to exploit his weaknesses.
c. Supporting Cast and Coaching Mismatches
The Ringerâs individual player rankings should consider how much of Giannisâ impact is diminished by his lack of ability to adapt to his playing environment. His high ranking feels like an endorsement of his individual stats rather than a holistic evaluation of his ability to elevate his team in the postseason. Which he obviously cannot do. Shouldn’t that be the most important thing in a team game?
d. Comparison to Peers
When compared to other top-tier players like JokiÄ, who led Denver to a championship in 2023 with a historically efficient offensive season (), or Gilgeous-Alexander, who has guided OKC to a dominant 2024-25 season (), Giannisâs playoff resume pales. JokiÄâs versatility as a passer, shooter, and clutch performer makes him a more reliable playoff force, while Gilgeous-Alexanderâs low turnover rate and ability to elevate teammates in big moments set him apart (). The Ringerâs failure to adjust Giannisâs ranking downward relative to these players suggests a bias toward his regular-season dominance and name recognition.
3. Lack of Transparency in Ranking Methodology
Another significant flaw in The Ringerâs rankings is the lack of clarity around how players are evaluated. The site describes the list as reflecting âthe biggest impact on the league right nowâ but does not provide specific criteria, such as statistical weights, playoff performance, or qualitative factors like leadership or clutch play (). This opacity makes it difficult to understand why Giannis is ranked so highly despite his postseason struggles. For comparison, ESPNâs NBArank, which uses a panel of experts voting on player matchups, provides a clearer framework, even if itâs not perfect (). The Ringerâs rankings would benefit from a detailed explanation of how regular-season stats, playoff performance, and intangibles are balanced.
4. Overvaluing Star Power and Narrative
The Ringerâs rankings seem to lean heavily on star power and narrative, which may explain Giannisâs lofty placement. His transformation from a âgangly teenager to a modern-day Shaqâ and his inspirational 2021 Finals run have cemented his status as a fan and media favorite (). However, this narrative-driven approach can overshadow objective analysis. Posts on X highlight skepticism about Giannisâs top-5 status, with users pointing out his poor shooting percentages (45/25% in some playoff series) and lack of playoff wins since 2022 (,). The Ringerâs rankings risk prioritizing Giannisâs brand and past achievements over his current playoff impact, which is inconsistent with the claim of evaluating âright now.â
5. Broader Issues with the Rankings
Beyond Giannis, The Ringerâs list has other issues that undermine its credibility:
Inconsistent Updates: While the rankings are described as âyear-round, around-the-clock,â updates seem sporadic, with some entries dated months apart (e.g., February 27, 2025, and April 15, 2025) (,). This raises questions about whether the rankings truly reflect current performance.
Overranking Aging Stars: Players like Kevin Durant and LeBron James, ranked highly despite injury concerns and diminished playoff success, suggest a reliance on reputation rather than current output ().
Underrating Emerging Talent: Young players like Anthony Edwards and Victor Wembanyama, who are projected to dominate in the future, may be ranked lower than their current impact warrants due to a bias toward established names ().
Conclusion: Reassessing Giannis and The Ringerâs Approach
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a generational talent, but his high ranking in The Ringerâs Top 100 NBA Player Rankings is questionable given his recent playoff struggles. His injury history, tactical limitations, and reliance on a sub optimal supporting cast and coaching staff have hindered his postseason impact, yet the rankings do not seem to reflect these realities. Broader issues, such as the lack of transparent methodology, overemphasis on regular-season stats, and narrative-driven evaluations, further undermine the listâs credibility. To improve, The Ringer should clarify its criteria, give greater weight to playoff performance, and ensure rankings reflect current impact rather than past achievements or star power. Until then, Giannisâ placement near the top feels more like a nod to his regular-season dominance and fan appeal than a true measure of his league-wide impact.
When thinking about building a dream team around a Milwaukee Bucks player, past or present, the immediate instinct might be to choose Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Greek Freak, whose dominance has defined the franchiseâs modern era. However, if forced to look beyond Giannis, one name stands above the rest: Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the legendary center who brought the Bucks their first and only NBA championship in 1971 (until Giannis led the team to another in 2021). Kareemâs unique combination of skill, versatility, and basketball IQ makes him the ideal cornerstone for constructing a championship-caliber team. A quick look at why Kareem would be better and then a dive into why Giannis is really, really bad as a team leader and building block.
Why Kareem Abdul-Jabbar?
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, originally drafted as Lew Alcindor by the Bucks in 1969, was a transformative force in the NBA. Standing at 7â2â with a wingspan that seemed to stretch across the court, Kareem was not just a physical specimen but a skilled technician. His signature skyhookâa virtually unblockable shot delivered with precisionâmade him a scoring machine. During his six seasons with the Bucks, he averaged 30.4 points, 15.3 rebounds, and 4.3 assists per game, showcasing his ability to dominate both offensively and defensively. His 1971 MVP season, where he led the Bucks to a 66-16 record and a championship alongside Oscar Robertson, cemented his legacy as one of the gameâs all-time greats.
Kareemâs appeal as a team-building centrepiece lies in his versatility. He could score from anywhere, rebound at an elite level, block shots, and facilitate plays with his passing. Unlike many big men of his era, Kareem wasnât just a post presence; he was a complete player who could adapt to different styles of play. His basketball IQ and leadership also made him a coachâs dream, capable of elevating those around him. Building around Kareem means constructing a roster that maximises his strengths while addressing the few gaps in his game, such as perimeter defence and three-point shooting, which werenât as critical in his era but are vital in todayâs game.
Why Not Giannis?
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a phenomenal player, but Kareemâs skill set offers more flexibility in team-building. Giannis thrives in a system with shooters to space the floor, as his limited outside shooting can clog the paint. Kareem, with his mid-range and post game, doesnât require as much perimeter shooting to be effective, though this roster provides it anyway. Kareemâs defensive presence as a rim protector also gives him an edge over Giannis, whose defensive impact relies more on versatility than anchoring the paint. Finally, Kareemâs proven championship pedigree as the focal point of the 1971 Bucks gives him a slight edge in this hypothetical scenario.
While Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBAâs most dominant players, having led the Milwaukee Bucks to a championship in 2021, there are arguments why he might not be the ideal cornerstone for building a championship team, particularly when considering his style of play in the context of modern NBA trends. Below is a detailed list of reasons why Giannisâs game may be seen as less compatible with the needs of todayâs NBA for constructing a championship roster, though itâs worth noting that these points are relative and donât negate his elite status.
1. Limited Outside Shooting
Issue: Giannis is not a reliable three-point shooter, with a career three-point percentage of 28.5% (as of the 2024-25 season). His mid-range game is also inconsistent, limiting his ability to stretch the floor.
Impact on Team-Building: Modern NBA offenses prioritize spacing to create driving lanes and open three-point opportunities. Giannisâs lack of shooting allows defenses to sag off him, clogging the paint and forcing teammates to carry a heavier load as perimeter shooters. Building around him requires surrounding him with elite shooters (e.g., Khris Middleton, Damian Lillard), which can limit roster flexibility and increase reliance on specific player archetypes.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Teams like the Golden State Warriors or Boston Celtics thrive with versatile shooters at every position, including big men like Kevin Durant or Kristaps PorziĆÄŁis. Giannisâs inability to shoot forces a more predictable offensive scheme.
2. Heavy Reliance on Paint Dominance
Issue: Giannisâs game is centered on attacking the rim, using his size, speed, and athleticism to overpower defenders. He leads the league in points in the paint but relies heavily on this style.
Impact on Team-Building: Defenses can counter Giannis by building a âwallâ in the paint, as seen in the 2019 and 2020 playoffs against Toronto and Miami. This strategy dares him to shoot from outside, exposing his weaknesses. To compensate, the team needs strong playmakers and shooters to create space, which can be costly and difficult to sustain across a playoff run.
Contrast with Modern Needs: The modern NBA favors offenses that can exploit mismatches through versatile scoring options. Players like Nikola JokiÄ or Joel Embiid, who can score from the post, mid-range, or beyond the arc, offer more diverse threats that are harder to scheme against.
3. Limited Playmaking in Half-Court Sets
Issue: While Giannis averages around 5-6 assists per game, his playmaking is more effective in transition than in structured half-court offenses. His passing is solid but not at the level of elite facilitators like LeBron James or JokiÄ.
Impact on Team-Building: Building a championship team often requires a primary ball-handler who can orchestrate complex half-court plays, especially in the playoffs when games slow down. Giannisâs limited ability to create for others in tight situations puts pressure on point guards or secondary creators, requiring the team to invest in players like Jrue Holiday or Damian Lillard to handle playmaking duties.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern championship teams often have big men who double as primary facilitators (e.g., JokiÄâs 9+ assists per game or Draymond Greenâs high-IQ passing). Giannisâs playmaking, while improved, doesnât match this level of versatility.
4. Defensive Versatility Has Limits
Issue: Giannis used to be an elite defender, capable of guarding multiple positions and earning All-Defensive honours. However, his rim protection, while strong (1.1 blocks per game career average), is not as dominant as traditional centres like Rudy Gobert or Anthony Davis, and he can struggle against smaller, quicker guards on switches.
Impact on Team-Building: In todayâs switch-heavy defenses, teams need big men who can either anchor the paint or seamlessly switch onto guards. Giannis excels in help defense and roaming but can be exploited by teams with quick guards or stretch bigs, requiring complementary defenders like Brook Lopez to cover the rim.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Players like Bam Adebayo or Draymond Green offer more switchability across all positions, while Giannisâs defensive impact is slightly less flexible in certain matchups, necessitating specific roster constructions to cover his weaknesses.
5. Free-Throw Shooting Struggles in Clutch Moments
Issue: Giannisâs free-throw shooting has been a persistent weakness, with a career average of 64.7%. In high-pressure playoff games, his slow free-throw routine and inconsistent shooting can be exploited, as seen in games where opponents use the âHack-a-Giannisâ strategy.
Impact on Team-Building: Championship teams need reliable clutch performers. Giannisâs free-throw woes can lead to late-game liabilities, forcing coaches to adjust strategies or rely on other players in crunch time. This requires a roster with strong closers, which can complicate lineup decisions.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern NBA stars like Stephen Curry or Kevin Durant are trusted to close games with efficient scoring, including at the free-throw line. Giannisâs struggles in this area limit his reliability in tight situations.
6. High Usage Rate Limits Teammate Involvement
Issue: Giannisâs usage rate is among the leagueâs highest (32.3% in 2023-24), reflecting his ball-dominant style. While effective, this can reduce touches for teammates and make the offense overly reliant on his production.
Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires players who thrive off-ball, as his drives and post-ups demand the ball. This can limit the effectiveness of other ball-dominant stars unless they adapt (e.g., Lillardâs reduced role in Milwaukee). The team must prioritize role players who donât need the ball, which can restrict roster diversity.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern offenses often distribute usage more evenly, with players like JokiÄ or Luka DonÄiÄ creating for others while still scoring. Giannisâs style can sometimes stifle teammate involvement, requiring careful roster construction.
7. Playoff Predictability
Issue: In playoff series, Giannisâs lack of a reliable jump shot and predictable driving style allow elite defensive teams to game-plan against him. Teams like the 2019 Raptors and 2020 Heat successfully limited his impact by crowding the paint and daring him to shoot.
Impact on Team-Building: To counter this, the Bucks need elite shooting and secondary creators to punish defensive adjustments. This places a premium on acquiring high-cost talent, which can strain salary caps and limit depth. Without perfect roster construction, Giannisâs game can be neutralized in high-stakes series.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Modern playoff success often hinges on unpredictability. Players like Jayson Tatum or Devin Booker, who can score in multiple ways, are harder to scheme against. Giannisâs more one-dimensional scoring profile requires specific countermeasures.
8. Physical Wear and Tear
Issue: Giannisâs physical, high-energy styleârelying on explosive drives and defensive hustleâputs significant strain on his body. Heâs had injury concerns, like knee issues in the 2021 and 2023 playoffs, which can impact his availability.
Impact on Team-Building: Building around Giannis requires a deep roster to compensate for potential injuries, as his absence significantly alters the teamâs identity. This demands investment in quality backups, which can be challenging under salary cap constraints.
Contrast with Modern Needs: Players with more finesse-based games (e.g., Durantâs jump-shooting or Curryâs off-ball movement) may have less physical wear, allowing for greater durability. Giannisâs style, while dominant, carries long-term risks.
Giannis Antetokounmpoâs lack of outside shooting, reliance on paint scoring, limited half-court playmaking, and other factors make him a less flexible building block for a championship team in the modern NBA compared to more versatile stars. His style requires a roster heavy on shooters, defenders, and secondary creators, which can limit flexibility and increase costs. These incompatibilities with the spacing, versatility, and unpredictability demanded by todayâs game make players like Kareem, with a more adaptable skill set, better anchors for a championship roster.
The recent article from The Athletic, titled âEchoes of Kareem: The eerie parallels Bucks fans see in a potential Giannis-less future,â draws a dramatic comparison between the Milwaukee Bucksâ trade of Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in 1975 and the potential trade of Giannis Antetokounmpo. It suggests that trading Giannis could plunge the Bucks into a decades-long championship drought, much like the 46 years that followed Kareemâs departure. While the historical parallel is intriguing, the argument hinges on an overstated view of Giannisâs impact, ignoring the critical weaknesses in his game that limit his ability to dominate when it matters most. This blog post dismantles the articleâs premise, arguing that Giannisâs flaws make the comparison to Kareemâa player with a far more complete skill setâunconvincing.
Key points from the articles suggest:
Giannis’s current situation:
Giannis Antetokounmpo is reportedly considering being traded for the first time in his career.
His loyalty to Milwaukee has been tied to the team’s ability to contend for a title.
The recent first-round playoff exit and Damian Lillard’s injury (torn Achilles, leading to a long absence) have raised questions about the Bucks’ contention window and potentially accelerated Giannis’s decision-making process.
Giannis’s trade value is currently at its highest. He is 30 years old, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP, making him a highly desirable trade candidate for many teams.
He has not explicitly requested a trade yet, but teams are “quietly lining up” in case he does.
His contract runs through the 2026-27 season with a player option for 2027-28, and it does not include a no-trade clause.
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s situation:
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, the previous best player for the Bucks before Giannis, demanded a trade in the 1970s, specifically to New York or Los Angeles for personal reasons.
The Bucks’ goal is to avoid a repeat of the Abdul-Jabbar situation where he dictates his preferred destination, which could limit their trade return.
The Bucks’ dilemma:
Milwaukee needs to avoid a similar outcome to the Abdul-Jabbar trade, which led to a long period without a championship.
The team has limited cap flexibility and tradable assets, making it challenging to rebuild a contender around Giannis.
They are reportedly desperate to keep Giannis and might be willing to sacrifice a lot of assets to build a contender on the fly.
The article emphasizes the importance of Giannis’s decision in the coming weeks for the Bucks’ offseason plans.
Potential trade scenarios and suitors:
Many teams are being discussed as potential landing spots if Giannis becomes available, including the Golden State Warriors, New York Knicks, Boston Celtics, and Detroit Pistons.
The Lakers are mentioned, but it’s noted they have limited assets, and a trade there would likely only happen if Giannis specifically demanded to go there.
Trade packages would likely involve a combination of young players and draft picks.
In essence, the articles highlight the critical juncture the Milwaukee Bucks face with Giannis Antetokounmpo, drawing parallels to their past experience with Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, and the intense speculation surrounding Giannis’s future in the league.
The Articleâs Core Claim
The Athleticâs piece posits that Giannis is the linchpin of the Bucksâ success, akin to Kareem in his era, and that trading him could doom the franchise to a prolonged rebuild. It points to Milwaukeeâs 46-year title drought post-Kareem and implies a similar fate if Giannis is dealt. This narrative assumes Giannisâs current and future impact is on par with Kareemâs, a premise that doesnât hold up when you scrutinize Giannisâs game.
Giannisâs Strengths? Limited
Letâs acknowledge Giannis’ postseason reveals the cracks in his game. Unlike Kareem, whose skyhook and all-around scoring made him nearly unguardable, Giannisâs skill set has exploitable flaws that teams have repeatedly targeted in high-stakes moments. These weaknesses undermine the articleâs claim that his departure would be as catastrophic as Kareemâs.
Weakness #1: Limited Outside Shooting
Giannisâs lack of a reliable jump shot is his most glaring flaw. His career three-point shooting hovers around 28%, and in the 2024-25 season, heâs hitting just 27.3% from deep on 1.8 attempts per game. In the playoffs, teams like the Miami Heat (2020, 2023) and Boston Celtics (2022) have built âwallsâ in the paint, daring him to shoot. When he does, the results are inconsistent, allowing defenses to sag off and clog driving lanes. Kareem, by contrast, had a mid-range and post game that forced defenses to respect him at all levels. Giannisâs one-dimensional scoring profile makes him easier to game-plan against in crunch time.
Weakness #2: Free-Throw Struggles
Giannisâs free-throw shooting remains a liability, especially in close games. In the 2024-25 season, heâs shooting 65.2% from the line, a marginal improvement but still below average for a star. In the 2021 Finals, his 59.1% free-throw shooting nearly cost the Bucks key games, and opponents often exploit this with intentional fouls late in games. Compare this to Kareem, who shot 72% from the line during his Bucks tenure and didnât face the same âhack-a-Giannisâ strategy. This weakness hampers Giannisâs ability to close out tight playoff games, a critical factor the article overlooks.
Weakness #3: Playmaking Under Pressure
While Giannis is a capable passer, averaging around 6 assists per game, his decision-making falters under playoff pressure. His turnover rate spikes in the postseasonâ3.8 per game in his career compared to 3.2 in the regular seasonâoften due to forced passes or charges into crowded defenses. Teams with elite defenders, like Toronto in 2019, have neutralized him by doubling him early and forcing him to make quick reads heâs not consistently equipped to handle. Kareem, with his high basketball IQ and versatile scoring, was a more reliable hub for his teamâs offense, even under defensive scrutiny.
Weakness #4: Defensive Inconsistency
Giannisâs 2020 DPOY award highlights his defensive potential, but his impact on that end has waned. In the 2024-25 season, the Bucksâ defensive rating is worse with Giannis on the floor (112.3) compared to off (110.8), per NBA.com. His rim protection and versatility are still elite, but he often conserves energy on defense in the regular season, and in the playoffs, teams exploit his tendency to help off shooters, leaving open threes. Kareem, a three-time blocks leader with Milwaukee, was a consistent defensive anchor. Giannisâs defensive lapses, especially in critical moments, dilute his overall impact.
Why the Kareem Comparison Fails
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar was a complete player: a scoring machine with the skyhook, a reliable free-throw shooter, and a defensive stalwart who anchored the Bucksâ system. His departure in 1975 was devastating because his skill set was irreplaceable. Giannis, while a generational talent, has clear holes in his game that teams exploit in the playoffs. The Bucksâ 2021 title required a perfect stormâKhris Middletonâs clutch shooting, Jrue Holidayâs defense, and injuries to opponents like Brooklynâs Kyrie Irving. Without those factors, Giannisâs weaknesses have often led to early exits, like the Bucksâ first-round losses in 2023 and 2024.
The articleâs claim that trading Giannis would mirror Kareemâs exit overstates his indispensability. Milwaukeeâs recent trade of Khris Middleton for Kyle Kuzma shows theyâre trying to retool around Giannis, not replace him as a singular saviour. A trade could bring assets to build a more balanced roster, addressing the teamâs reliance on a star whose flaws are exposed in high-stakes moments.
Click bait from the NYT
The Athleticâs comparison of a potential Giannis trade to Kareemâs departure is so flawed it’s click bait. Giannisâs weaknessesâpoor outside shooting, free-throw struggles, shaky play making under pressure, and defensive inconsistencyâlimit his ability to carry a team in the playoffs the way Kareem did. While heâs a phenomenal talent, heâs not the unassailable force the article suggests. Trading him wouldnât necessarily doom the Bucks to decades of irrelevance; it could open the door to a smarter, more balanced roster. The Kareem parallel is more emotional than factual. Giannis is an antisocial player who will find it hard to fit in at any other team. Both due to his character flaws and – most importantly – due to his extremely low basketball IQ and limited skill set. He is playing a kind of basketball that has long been surpassed in the NBA and was extremely lucky to win that one championship.
The Bucks aren’t winning another one with Giannis. The whole point of this article makes no sense.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” is a two-time MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, and NBA champion. However, when the game is on the lineâthose critical “clutch” moments in the final minutes of a close gameâGiannis has often been criticised for underperforming. His fans keep talking about that (one) 50 point performance. But they choose to ignore the true story.
Defining Clutch Situations
For clarity, “clutch” situations in this context refer to the last five minutes of a game (including overtime) where the score is within five points. This is a standard metric used by NBA analysts to evaluate performance under pressure. While Giannis excels in many facets of the game, his clutch-time performance has drawn scrutiny, particularly in high-stakes playoff games.
The Numbers: Giannis in the Clutch
To understand Giannis’ clutch performance, letâs look at some statistics. According to NBA.comâs advanced stats for the 2023-24 season, Giannisâ clutch-time performance reveals some concerning trends:
Field Goal Percentage (FG%): In clutch situations, Giannis shot 42.3% from the field, significantly lower than his season average of 61.1%. His efficiency drops when defenses tighten up.
Free Throw Shooting: Giannisâ free throw percentage in clutch moments was a dismal 58.7%, compared to his season average of 65.7%. This is particularly problematic since he often gets to the line in high-pressure situations.
Turnovers: Giannis averaged 1.2 turnovers per clutch game, a higher rate than his overall 3.4 turnovers per game, suggesting he struggles with decision-making under pressure.
Usage Rate: Giannis had a clutch usage rate of 38.2%, meaning heâs heavily involved in the Bucksâ offense during these moments, but his efficiency doesnât match his volume.
In the playoffs, these issues become magnified. For example, in the 2023 NBA Playoffs against the Miami Heat, Giannis shot 2-for-7 (28.6%) in clutch situations and missed several key free throws, contributing to Milwaukeeâs first-round exit. Over his playoff career, his clutch FG% sits at 39.8%, and his free throw percentage drops to 55.4%.
Why Does Giannis Struggle in the Clutch?
Several factors contribute to Giannisâ challenges in high-pressure situations. Letâs break them down:
1. Limited Jump Shooting
Giannis is a force in the paint, using his length and athleticism to dominate around the rim. However, his lack of a reliable jump shotâparticularly from mid-range or beyond the arcâbecomes a liability in clutch moments. Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot from outside. In the 2023-24 season, Giannis shot just 27.4% from three-point range and 34.1% on mid-range jumpers. In clutch situations, when defenses pack the paint or build a “wall” (a strategy popularized by the Toronto Raptors in 2019), Giannis struggles to create clean looks.
2. Free Throw Woes
Giannisâ free throw shooting has long been a weak point. His unorthodox, lengthy free throw routine (often exceeding the 10-second limit) seems to falter under pressure. In clutch situations, opponents frequently employ a “Hack-a-Giannis” strategy, fouling him intentionally to exploit his poor free throw shooting. Missing free throws in tight games not only costs points but also saps momentum and confidence.
3. Decision-Making Under Pressure
While Giannis is an excellent playmaker, averaging 5.9 assists per game in 2023-24, his decision-making in clutch moments can be erratic. He often forces drives into crowded defenses, leading to turnovers or low-percentage shots. In high-pressure situations, his tendency to over-penetrate rather than kick out to open teammates (like Damian Lillard or Khris Middleton) can stall the Bucksâ offense. For example, in Game 5 of the 2021 NBA Finals, Giannis had two turnovers in the final two minutes, nearly costing Milwaukee a pivotal game.
4. Defensive Attention
In clutch situations, opponents can focus their entire defensive scheme on stopping Giannis. Double-teams, triple-teams, and zone defenses are common, as teams are less concerned about role players in these moments. While Giannis is adept at handling double-teams in the regular season, the intensity of playoff defensesâcombined with his limited outside shootingâmakes it harder for him to find space.
5. Lack of a Go-To Move
Unlike clutch performers like Kevin Durant (pull-up jumper), Damian Lillard (deep three), or LeBron James (versatile scoring and playmaking), Giannis lacks a singular, reliable move in crunch time. His game is built on physicality and transition opportunities, but in half-court, high-pressure situations, he often resorts to bulldozing drives that are easier to defend when the game slows down.
Playoff Case Studies
Letâs examine two playoff series that underscore Giannisâ clutch struggles:
2020 Eastern Conference Semifinals vs. Miami Heat
In this series, the Heatâs zone defense and physicality flustered Giannis. In Game 4, with the Bucks trailing by 3 in the final minute, Giannis missed two free throws and turned the ball over on a forced drive, sealing Miamiâs victory. He shot 1-for-5 in clutch situations across the series, with three turnovers.
2023 First Round vs. Miami Heat
Despite a heroic 38-point performance in Game 4, Giannisâ clutch miscues were costly. In the final minute of a tied game, he missed a contested layup and went 0-for-2 from the free throw line, allowing Miami to pull ahead. His clutch FG% in the series was 28.6%, and he missed 7 of 12 free throws in clutch moments.
How Can Giannis Improve?
For Giannis to become a more reliable clutch performer, several adjustments could help:
Develop a Jump Shot: Even a consistent mid-range jumper would force defenses to respect his outside game, opening up driving lanes.
Improve Free Throw Shooting: Simplifying his routine and practicing under pressure could boost his confidence at the line.
Better Decision-Making: Giannis should trust his teammates more in clutch moments, especially shooters like Lillard and Middleton.
Work on a Go-To Move: Developing a reliable fadeaway or post move could give him a fallback option when drives are cut off.
Giannis ain’t clutch and probably never will be
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s clutch-time struggles are a notable blemish which effectively make him useless for a team chasing a championship. Worse than useless, he is a liability. His lack of a jump shot, poor free throw shooting, and questionable decision-making in high-pressure moments have cost the Bucks in key games, particularly in the playoffs. He has rarely shown flashes of clutch ability, consistency remains elusive. With targeted improvements, Giannis could perhaps at least become less of a liability for his team. For now, though, the “Greek Freak” will keep hiding behind his team mates and pretending there is no problem.
All statistics are sourced from NBA.com and Basketball-Reference for the 2023-24 season and prior playoff performances.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucksâ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is often the subject of trade rumors as teams dream of pairing his unique skill set with their roster. One such destination that occasionally pops up is the Toronto Raptors. However, the idea of Giannis joining the Raptors makes little sense for both the player and the team.
The Raptorsâ Current State: A Mismatch for Giannis
The Toronto Raptors, as of the 2024-25 season, are in a rebuilding phase. After trading away key players like Pascal Siakam and OG Anunoby, the team is centered around young talents like Scottie Barnes, RJ Barrett, and Immanuel Quickley. While these players show promise, the Raptors are far from championship contention, sitting at 11th in the Eastern Conference with a 15-20 record in recent projections. Their focus is on developing young talent and accumulating assets, not chasing a superstar like Giannis, who is in his prime at 30 years old and seeking immediate championship opportunities.
Giannis has repeatedly expressed his desire to compete for titles, as evidenced by his 2021 NBA Championship with the Bucks and his comments about wanting to stay in Milwaukee only if the team remains competitive. Joining a rebuilding team like Toronto would contradict his career goals. The Raptors lack the veteran star power and playoff-ready roster to complement Giannisâ win-now timeline, making the move a poor fit for his ambitions.
Giannisâ Weaknesses and Their Impact in Torontoâs System
Giannis’ game has notable weaknesses that would be amplified in Torontoâs current setup.
1. Lack of Consistent Outside Shooting
Giannisâ most glaring weakness is his inconsistent jump shot, particularly from beyond the arc. In the 2023-24 season, he shot just 27.4% from three-point range on 1.3 attempts per game, and his career average hovers around 28.6%. His free-throw shooting, while improved, remains unreliable at 65.7% last season. The Raptorsâ offensive system under coach Darko RajakoviÄ emphasizes spacing and ball movement, with players like Quickley (39.5% from three) and Gradey Dick (projected as a sharpshooter) creating open looks.
Without a reliable jumper, Giannis often clogs the paint, forcing defenses to collapse on him. In Milwaukee, players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez provide the necessary spacing to keep defenses honest. Toronto, however, lacks consistent elite shooters outside of Quickley. Barnes and Barrett are slashing forwards who thrive driving to the basket, much like Giannis. This overlap would crowd the paint, reducing offensive efficiency and making it easier for opponents to game-plan against Toronto.
2. Limited Playmaking and Ball-Handling
Giannis is a dominant force in transition and as a roll man, but his playmaking in half-court sets is limited. He averaged 6.5 assists per game in 2023-24, but many of these come from simple kick-outs after drawing double-teams. His ball-handling can be shaky under pressure, with 3.4 turnovers per game last season, often due to forced passes or dribbling into traffic.
The Raptorsâ offense relies on quick decision-making and ball movement, with Barnes and Quickley often initiating plays. Giannis, however, thrives as the primary ball-handler in a system built around his drives. In Toronto, heâd either dominate the ball at the expense of Barnesâ development or struggle as an off-ball player due to his lack of shooting. This mismatch in playstyle would stunt the growth of Torontoâs young core and create clunky offensive sets.
3. Defensive Fit in Torontoâs Scheme
Defensively, Giannis is a former Defensive Player of the Year (2020) but has declined ever since. However, the Raptorsâ defensive identity under RajakoviÄ leans heavily on aggressive perimeter defense and versatility, with players like Barnes and Jakob Poeltl anchoring a switch-heavy scheme. While Giannis could fit this mould, his presence would overlap with Barnes, who is developing into a similar versatile defender.
Additionally, Torontoâs lack of a true secondary star to handle offensive creation means Giannis would expend significant energy on both ends, potentially leading to fatigue or injury concerns, as seen in his 2024 playoff absence due to a calf strain. In Milwaukee, players like Damian Lillard and Middleton share the offensive load, allowing Giannis to conserve energy for defense. Torontoâs roster simply doesnât offer that luxury.
4. Rebounding Dependency and Team Fit
Giannis is stat padding rebounder, averaging 11.6 rebounds per game in 2023-24, as his impact on the boards often comes from Milwaukeeâs system, where heâs surrounded by shooters who pull defenders away from the paint. In Toronto, with Poeltl as the primary center and Barnes also crashing the boards, thereâs a risk of diminishing returns. The Raptors already struggle with offensive rebounding (26th in the league at 10.1 per game), and adding Giannis might not solve this issue if defenses pack the paint due to Torontoâs lack of shooting.
5. Giannis ain’t clutch
No polite way to say it. Forget that one 50 point game. Look at the cold hard facts. Giannis is a liability in clutch. Not just in the playoffs where he has failed every year for more than a decade (with that one exception). Even in regular season higher intensity games, Giannis just ain’t got “it”. He panics, he makes mistakes, he can’t follow advanced plays. He doesn’t impact high intensity NBA basketball when it really matters. Amazing regular season stats is all he does. We all know it now.
Financial and Trade Realities
Even if we ignore fit, the logistics of acquiring Giannis are a nightmare for Toronto. His contract, a three-year, $175.3 million extension signed in 2023, carries a cap hit of roughly $58 million annually through 2027-28. The Raptors would need to gut their roster, likely sending out Barnes, Quickley, and multiple first-round picks, to match salaries and satisfy Milwaukeeâs demands. This would defeat the purpose of their rebuild, as theyâd lose the young talent theyâre banking on for future success.
Moreover, Milwaukee has no incentive to trade Giannis unless he demands out, which seems unlikely given his loyalty to the Bucks and their competitive roster. The Raptors, meanwhile, are focused on building around Barnes, who at 24 is their cornerstone for the next decade. Trading him for Giannis, who turns 31 in December 2025, would be a short-term gamble that sacrifices long-term potential.
Why Giannis Canât Win a Championship in Toronto
Even if Giannis joined the Raptors, their current roster and timeline make a championship unlikely. Torontoâs lack of secondary star power means Giannis would face the same issues he did in Milwaukeeâs early years: defenses walling off the paint and daring him to shoot. Without elite shooters or a proven playmaker to complement him, Giannis would be forced to carry an unsustainable offensive load, as seen in his 2023 playoff loss to Miami, where his inefficiencies were exposed.
The Raptorsâ rebuild also means theyâre at least two to three years away from contending, even with Giannis. By then, heâll be in his mid-30s, and his athleticism-dependent game may start to decline. Teams like the Boston Celtics, Philadelphia 76ers, and even a healthy Bucks squad would remain far ahead in the East, with deeper, more balanced rosters.
So cut the crap
Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Toronto Raptors sounds like a fantasy for fans, but itâs a logistical and strategic disaster. His lack of outside shooting, limited play making, and defensive overlap with Torontoâs young core make him a poor fit for their system. The Raptorsâ rebuilding timeline clashes with Giannisâ win-now mentality, and the trade cost would cripple their future. Meanwhile, Giannisâ weaknesses would be magnified without the right supporting cast, making a championship in Toronto a pipe dream. For both sides, staying the courseâGiannis in Milwaukee and the Raptors with their young coreâis the smarter play.
Siakamâs Advantage: Siakam is a significantly better three-point shooter than Giannis. In the 2024-25 season, Siakam shot 41.3% from three on moderate volume (around 2-3 attempts per game), showcasing his ability to stretch the floor. His career three-point percentage is around 34%, with steady improvement.
Giannisâs Context: Giannis has struggled with his outside shooting, with a career three-point percentage around 29% and often shooting below 20% in recent seasons (e.g., 0.00% in one month cited). His lack of a reliable jumper limits his spacing ability.
Impact: Siakamâs shooting makes him a more versatile offensive threat in certain lineups, as defenses must respect his range, whereas Giannis is often dared to shoot from deep.
Mid-Range Scoring:
Siakamâs Advantage: Siakam has developed a polished mid-range game, particularly with pull-up jumpers and turnaround shots. Analytics from BBall-Index give him an âAâ grade for Midrange Pull Up Talent, and heâs effective in isolation, averaging high isolation points per game. His ability to attack off the dribble, reject screens, and hit mid-range shots gives him an edge in half-court sets.
Giannisâs Context: Giannis relies heavily on his dominance in the paint (0-3 feet range), where heâs elite, but his mid-range game is less refined. Heâs less comfortable with pull-up jumpers or creating space off the dribble outside the restricted area.
Impact: Siakamâs mid-range versatility allows him to exploit defenses that sag off or switch, making him a more complete scorer in varied offensive schemes.
Offensive Versatility in Playoff Scenarios:
Siakamâs Advantage: Siakam has shown he can adapt his scoring approach based on defensive schemes, using a mix of post-ups, face-ups, and perimeter shots. In the 2024 playoffs, he dropped 37 points on 16-of-23 shooting against the Bucks, showcasing his ability to dominate in multiple ways (mid-range, drives, and lobs). His playoff career-high 39 points in 2025 further highlights his clutch scoring versatility.
Giannisâs Context: Giannis is a force in transition and paint scoring, but defenses often build a âwallâ to limit his drives, daring him to shoot. His offensive game, while dominant, is less varied, relying on physicality and playmaking over shooting.
Impact: Siakamâs ability to score from multiple levels makes him harder to game-plan against in certain matchups, especially when defenses collapse on primary ball-handlers.
Defensive Versatility Against Smaller Players:
Siakamâs Advantage: Siakamâs agility and length (6â8â, 245 lbs) allow him to effectively guard smaller, quicker players, including point guards, in addition to power forwards and centers. His defensive motor and ability to switch across positions were noted early in his career, earning praise from coaches like Dwane Casey.
Giannisâs Context: Giannis (6â11â, 243 lbs) is an elite defender, capable of guarding 1-5, with a DPOY award to his name. However, his size can make him slightly less agile against quick guards compared to Siakam, who has a lower center of gravity and quicker lateral movement.
Impact: Siakamâs ability to lock down smaller players gives him a slight edge in switch-heavy defensive schemes, though Giannisâs rim protection and overall defensive impact are superior.
Durability and Availability:
Siakamâs Advantage: Siakam has been remarkably durable, rarely missing games since joining the Pacers. In the 2024-25 season, he was noted for not missing a game, providing consistency for Indiana. His ability to stay on the court has been critical, especially during injury-plagued stretches for teammates.
Giannisâs Context: Giannis has faced injury concerns, particularly in the playoffs. He missed games in the 2024 playoffs due to a calf strain, and his availability has been uncertain at times (e.g., a left soleus strain).
Impact: Siakamâs reliability ensures heâs a consistent contributor, which is valuable for teams needing a steady presence, though Giannisâs impact when healthy is unmatched.
Clutch Performance as a Secondary Option:
Siakamâs Advantage: Siakam thrives as a second option, as seen with the Pacers alongside Tyrese Haliburton. His ability to deliver in clutch moments without needing primary usage (e.g., 37 points in Game 2 vs. Bucks in 2024) makes him a perfect complementary star. Heâs efficient in high-pressure situations, like his 8-0 run in the fourth quarter to seal a playoff win.
Giannisâs Context: Giannis is a primary option, often carrying the Bucksâ offence. While heâs not clutch in his own right, his high usage can lead to fatigue, and heâs less effective as a secondary option due to his limited shooting.
Impact: Siakamâs ability to shine without demanding the ball makes him a better fit in certain team constructs, particularly as a co-star.
Contextual Notes
Head-to-Head: Siakam has a 14-12 record against Giannis in 26 games, including 4-2 in playoffs, suggesting he can hold his own in matchups.
Role and Fit: Siakamâs ability to fit into various systems (e.g., as a secondary option with the Pacers or primary with the Raptors) gives him an edge in adaptability, while Giannis is a system-defining superstar.
Conclusion
Pascal Siakam is better than Giannis Antetokounmpo in three-point shooting, mid-range scoring, defensive versatility against smaller players, durability, and thriving as a secondary option in clutch moments. These strengths make Siakam a more versatile offensive player and a reliable, adaptable star. Siakamâs edges are specific but significant, particularly for teams needing a well-rounded, durable forward who can score efficiently from multiple ranges.
When discussing the greatest power forwards in NBA history, Tim Duncanâs name is often at the forefront, while Giannis Antetokounmpo is a modern superstar probably past his prime now. Both players have left indelible marks on the game, but a detailed comparison reveals stark differences in their playing styles, team success, and overall legacy.
Career Overview
Tim Duncan
Tim Duncan, known as “The Big Fundamental,” played his entire 19-year career (1997â2016) with the San Antonio Spurs. A model of consistency, Duncan led the Spurs to five NBA championships (1999, 2003, 2005, 2007, 2014), earning three Finals MVP awards and two regular-season MVPs. His accolades include 15 All-Star appearances, 15 All-NBA selections, and 15 All-Defensive team honors. Duncanâs game was built on efficiency, fundamentals, and selflessness, anchoring a Spurs dynasty that thrived on team play.
Giannis Antetokounmpo
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” has played for the Milwaukee Bucks since 2013. His freakish athleticism and versatility have earned him two MVP awards (2019, 2020), a Defensive Player of the Year award (2020), and an NBA championship in 2021, where he was named Finals MVP. With eight All-Star appearances and seven All-NBA selections, Giannis is a dominant force. However, his game is often critiqued for its reliance on physicality and less polished fundamentals, raising questions about whether his stats reflect team success or individual dominance. Furthermore other than one ring which could well be attributed to his supporting roster, he has only gone downhill since.
Statistical Comparison
To compare the two, letâs examine their career averages (per game) as of the 2024â25 season for Giannis and Duncanâs career end in 2016, using data from Basketball-Reference.
Player
PPG
RPG
APG
SPG
BPG
FG%
3P%
FT%
TS%
PER
Tim Duncan
19.0
10.8
3.0
0.7
2.2
50.6%
17.9%
69.6%
55.1%
24.2
Giannis Antetokounmpo
23.4
9.8
4.9
1.1
1.2
54.5%
28.6%
68.8%
58.6%
23.8
Scoring
Giannis averages more points per game (23.4 vs. 19.0), but this comes with higher usage (28.8% vs. Duncanâs 25.6%). Giannisâs scoring often relies on driving to the basket, leveraging his athleticism, but his efficiency wanes in the playoffs (55.3% TS% vs. Duncanâs 55.8%). Duncanâs scoring was more deliberate, using post moves and mid-range shots, which scaled better in high-stakes games.
Rebounding and Defense
Duncan was a superior rebounder (10.8 RPG vs. 9.8) and shot-blocker (2.2 BPG vs. 1.2), anchoring San Antonioâs elite defenses. Giannisâs Defensive Player of the Year award highlights his versatility, but his defensive impact is less consistent due to freelancing for highlight plays. Duncanâs 15 All-Defensive selections dwarf Giannisâs five, underscoring Duncanâs sustained defensive excellence.
Playmaking
Giannisâs 4.9 assists per game outpace Duncanâs 3.0, reflecting his role as a primary ball-handler. However, Duncanâs assists came within a system emphasizing ball movement, while Giannisâs higher assist numbers often stem from initiating offense, sometimes at the expense of team flow.
Efficiency
Giannisâs true shooting percentage (58.6%) edges out Duncanâs (55.1%), but Duncan played in an era with lower offensive efficiency league-wide. Giannisâs reliance on free throws (8.3 attempts per game vs. Duncanâs 5.6) inflates his scoring but highlights a weakness: his poor free-throw shooting (68.8%) compared to Duncanâs (69.6%) often hurts his team in clutch moments.
Playstyle Analysis
Tim Duncan: The selfless anchor
Duncanâs game was a masterclass in fundamentals. His post play, bank shots, and defensive positioning were textbook. He thrived in Gregg Popovichâs system, prioritizing team success over individual stats. Duncan rarely chased numbers, evident in his low turnover rate (2.4 per game) and willingness to defer to teammates like Tony Parker and Manu Ginobili. His leadership fostered a culture that sustained San Antonioâs dominance across two decades.
Giannis Antetokounmpo: The athletic force
Giannisâs game is defined by explosive drives, dunks, and transition play. His physical gifts allow him to dominate, but critics argue he stat-pads by hunting easy baskets and free throws. His high usage rate (28.8%) suggests a ball-dominant style that can disrupt team rhythm, especially when his three-point shooting (28.6%) and free-throw struggles become liabilities. In the 2021 playoffs, Giannisâs 35-point, 13-rebound Finals average was historic, but his 61.3% TS% was inflated by easy buckets, and his team relied heavily on Khris Middleton and Jrue Holiday for clutch moments.
Team Success
Championships
Duncanâs five championships to Giannisâs one is a significant gap. Duncanâs Spurs were perennial contenders, reaching the playoffs every year of his career and winning titles across three different decades. Giannisâs 2021 title was a monumental achievement, but the Bucks have struggled to replicate that success, with early playoff exits in 2020, 2022, 2023, and 2024. Duncanâs teams never missed the postseason, while Giannisâs Bucks missed in 2016 and were inconsistent early in his career.
Playoff Performance
Duncanâs playoff numbers (20.6 PPG, 11.4 RPG, 50.1% FG) remained consistent with his regular-season output, reflecting his ability to perform under pressure. Giannisâs playoff stats (26.6 PPG, 12.0 RPG, 53.7% FG) are impressive but drop in efficiency (55.3% TS% vs. 58.6% regular season), particularly when defenses wall off the paint. Duncanâs versatility allowed him to adapt, while Giannisâs limited shooting range makes him more predictable in high-stakes games.
Supporting Cast
Duncan played alongside Hall of Famers like David Robinson, Tony Parker, and Manu Ginobili, but his leadership elevated lesser talents like Danny Green and Boris Diaw. Giannis has had All-Stars like Middleton and Holiday, yet the Bucksâ success hinges on his individual dominance, suggesting less ability to elevate teammates. Duncanâs Spurs won 50+ games in 17 of his 19 seasons; Giannisâs Bucks have hit that mark only five times.
The Stat-Padding and Selfishness Critique
Giannisâs critics point to his high usage and tendency to dominate the ball as evidence of selfish play. His 7.3 free-throw attempts per game in the regular season (and 9.8 in the playoffs) suggest a reliance on drawing fouls, which can slow the game and disrupt team flow. In contrast, Duncanâs low-usage, high-efficiency style complemented his teammates, as seen in the Spursâ 2014 âbeautiful gameâ offense, which prioritized ball movement over individual heroics.
Giannisâs stat lines are often eye-popping (e.g., 30 points, 12 rebounds), but games like his 44-point, 14-rebound performance against the Nets in 2021 included inefficient 14-of-26 shooting and five turnovers, raising questions about stat-padding in losses. Duncanâs quieter 20-point, 10-rebound games were often more impactful, with fewer mistakes (career 2.4 turnovers per game vs. Giannisâs 3.2).
Legacy and Impact
Duncanâs legacy is cemented as one of the greatest winners in NBA history. His five rings, three Finals MVPs, and 19 years of consistency place him among legends like Bill Russell and Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. His selfless play and adaptability made him the cornerstone of a dynasty. Giannis, at 30 years old in 2025, has time to build his legacy, but his one championship and inconsistent playoff runs pale in comparison. His individual accolades (two MVPs, DPOY) are impressive, but they donât yet translate to Duncanâs sustained team success.
It’s not even close
While Giannis Antetokounmpo has unmatched athleticism but Tim Duncanâs career surpasses him in nearly every meaningful metric: championships, consistency, efficiency, and team-oriented play. Giannisâs style, while dominant, leans on physicality and can appear selfish, with high usage and free-throw attempts inflating his stats. Duncanâs fundamental, selfless approach led to five titles and a dynasty, making him the clear superior player. Giannis has years to close the gap, but as of 2025, he remains a tier below the Big Fundamental.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucksâ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is known for his athleticism and rim-rattling dunks. However, a recent $100,000 MrBeast shooting challenge pitted him against street ball sensation and YouTube star Tristan Jass, and the results were shocking. The challenge highlighted critical weaknesses in Giannisâ game that have long been debated by fans and analysts.
The Challenge Setup
The MrBeast challenge was a head-to-head shooting competition designed to test precision under pressure. The tasks included:
Free throws: A test of consistency from the charity stripe.
Three-pointers: A measure of long-range shooting ability.
Half-court shots: A high-risk, high-reward challenge requiring both skill and a bit of luck.
Tristan Jass, a content creator with a massive following for his streetball highlights and deadly shooting, was a formidable opponent. While Giannis is a global basketball icon, Jassâs specialized skill set in shooting made this a tougher matchup than it might have seemed. The $100,000 prize added pressure, and as X user @____Shemar noted, âNo way Mr. Beast possibly thought Giannis was making a FT, 3 pointer, and half court shot before Tjass ⊠easiest $100k Tjass ever made đâ.
1. Free-Throw Shooting Woes
The free-throw portion of the challenge was a predictable stumbling block for Giannis. His career free-throw percentage hovers around 65-70%, with a 2024-25 season average of approximately 68%. In high-pressure situations, his performance at the line often dips further, as seen in playoff games where opponents employ a âHack-a-Giannisâ strategy to exploit this weakness.
In the MrBeast challenge, Giannis struggled to find a rhythm, missing several free throws in a row. His lengthy free-throw routineâoften taking 10+ secondsâmay have been disrupted by the fast-paced, high-stakes environment of the challenge. Fans remarked on the predictability of this outcome, with @Lester_O3 noting that someone won $100,000 by outshooting Giannis. Jass, known for his consistency in shooting drills, likely capitalised on this, hitting his free throws with ease.
Giannisâ free-throw struggles stem from mechanical issues (a hitch in his release and inconsistent wrist snap) and mental pressure. In the challenge, the added spotlight of a MrBeast production, with cameras and a live audience, likely amplified his tendency to overthink at the line.
Takeaway: Giannis needs to streamline his free-throw routine and practice under pressure to boost his consistency. Hitting 75-80% from the line would not only have helped in this challenge but could deter opponents from fouling him intentionally in NBA games. He is in fact worse than ever in his career in free throws this season!
2. Inconsistent Three-Point Shooting
The three-point shooting segment was another area where Giannis fell short. His NBA three-point percentage in the 2024-25 season is around 20-25% on low volume (1-2 attempts per game), a far cry from Jassâs sharpshooting prowess. Jass, who regularly showcases deep threes and trick shots on YouTube, thrives in these scenarios, while Giannisâ jump shot remains a work in progress.
In the challenge, Giannis reportedly missed most of his three-point attempts, unable to match Jassâs precision. His shooting formâmarked by a slow release and occasional inconsistency in footworkâmakes long-range shooting a liability. NBA defenses often sag off Giannis, daring him to shoot from deep, as seen in playoff series like the 2023 loss to the Miami Heat, where his 1-for-10 three-point shooting in the series was a glaring weakness.
The MrBeast challenge exposed this gap starkly. While Giannis relies on his athleticism to dominate inside, Jassâs specialized shooting skill set gave him a clear edge in a contest focused on perimeter accuracy.
Takeaway: Giannis would benefit from dedicated three-point training to reach at least a league-average 35% from deep. This would force defenses to respect his range, opening up his drives to the basket and making him a more complete offensive threat. Three points this season he not only shot worse than ever in his career but almost worse than anyone, ever, in NBA history for a single season!
3. Half-Court Shot Struggles
The half-court shot portion of the challenge was the final nail in the coffin. Half-court shots are inherently low-percentage, relying on a mix of skill, luck, and confidence. Jass, with his reputation for hitting long-range bombs in his videos, likely approached this with a shooterâs mentality. Giannis, on the other hand, rarely attempts such shots in NBA games, and his mechanics from that distance are unrefined.
Giannisâ attempts fell short or missed wide, while Jass connected to seal the victory.
Takeaway: While half-court shots are a niche skill, improving his overall shooting mechanics could give Giannis a better chance in such scenarios. Practising long-range shots in low-stakes settings might also build confidence for rare game situations. But if anything Giannis is worse than ever in clutch situations which is why Doc Rivers now keeps him out of the game in the 4th quarter as much as possible. We saw against the Pacers how terrible he can be for his team under pressure.
4. Pressure in Non-NBA Settings
Beyond specific skills, the challenge highlighted Giannisâ discomfort in non-traditional basketball settings. NBA games allow him to leverage his physicality, defensive prowess, and transition dominance, but the MrBeast challenge was a pure shooting contest with no room for his usual strengths. The high-pressure environment, with a $100,000 prize and a YouTube audience, may have thrown Giannis off his game, as heâs accustomed to structured NBA settings rather than impromptu streetball-style competitions.
Jass, a content creator who thrives in these viral, high-energy formats, was in his element. Giannisâ struggles suggest that his mental focus, while elite in NBA contexts, may not translate as well to unconventional challenges where his athletic advantages are neutralized.
Takeaway: Giannis could benefit from participating in more casual, high-pressure shooting contests to build adaptability. This would also help him handle the mental demands of clutch shooting moments in playoff games. Most of all though the NBA is about the show. And Giannis simply doesn’t deliver which is why he doesn’t bring in TV ratings.
What This Means for Giannis
The MrBeast challenge underscores areas where he lags behind specialists like Jass and, by extension, NBA sharpshooters in the league. To elevate his game, Giannis could:
Work with a shooting coach to refine his free-throw and three-point mechanics, aiming for incremental improvements (e.g., 75% free throws, 35% threes).
Practice under pressure in non-NBA settings to build mental resilience for high-stakes shooting.
Study film of sharpshooters to adopt techniques that complement his physical gifts.
Giannis Antetokounmpoâs loss to Tristan Jass in MrBeastâs $100,000 shooting challenge was a revealing moment. It exposed his well-known struggles with free throws, three-point shooting, and long-range accuracy, amplified by the pressure of a viral, high-stakes competition. For fans, the challenge was a fun spectacle that pitted an NBA giant against a street ball sharpshooter. For Giannis, itâs a wake-up call to address weaknesses that could make the difference in future playoff runs. As he continues past his prime now at age 30, the Greek Freak has the work ethic and drive. But can he turn these flaws into strengths? After more than a decade in the league and with so many different coaches that have tried to help him, the answer is probably no.
Here’s what it wrote, back in 2020 on OpenCourt Facebook page about Giannis not really impacting games that matter and fans confusing regular season stat padding and highlights with real NBA ballin.
“GIANNIS IS NOT A TRUE SUPERSTAR.
I know it sounds harsh, but the fact of the matter is Giannis Antetokounmpo is not superstar in its TRUEST sense in the NBA. Heâs not who people think he is, not yet anyway.
If you are a person that religiously follows the league, itâs evident to see that there are significant holes in Giannisâ game that place him in a tier below the LeBrons, Kawhis and healthy Durants of this world.
Throughout the season there were many people claiming Giannis was the best player in the world, but the truth is Giannis isnât close to being that guy yet. For basketball purists, it should be worrying that such claims are thrown around without any real evidence of the fact.
To this day, Giannis has NEVER shown he can carry a team WHEN IT MATTERS MOST. Let me repeat that, NEVER. When itâs time to put the team on your back and take them to the next level, his game is simply not evolved enough to do so.
Now I know what youâre going to say âBut Giannis is only 25, he has timeâ and despite that being true, Giannis has shown little to no improvement whatsoever in the past 4 season of averaging over 20ppg in areas of his game that he desperately needs to take him to the very top of the NBAâs elite.
I know what else youâre going to say âBut he needs a better supporting castâ, and despite that having SOME truth to it, how quickly the world forgets just how HISTORICALLY great this Bucks team was this season.
The Bucks were the quickest team in NBA HISTORY to make the playoffs this season. They started the season 27-4 (read that again, 27-4). They were the highest ranked team in the ENTIRE LEAGUE on offense and defense. They had two all stars. They had the leading 3-point shooter in the league in George Hill. They had an All-NBA defender in Brook Lopez. They had one of the best coaches in the league. They were one of the deepest teams in the league. They had the best overall record in the league.
Donât believe me? Type in âMilwaukee Bucks best team everâ into Google and read. Debate shows, TV segments, podcasts and articles were all discussing whether or not this Bucks team was the greatest team of all time. Let that sink in.
And when it mattered most, their leaderâs inabilities on the floor failed them. What people donât understand, is although Giannisâ teammates fail to perform when the stakes are high a lot of the time, the reason why is down to Giannisâ inability to provide for them, to lift them, to put them in a position to be successful. Itâs on him.
Another season, another underwhelming series that turns into a premature elimination for Giannis when a team has the personnel and game plan for him. The bizarre thing is the game plan is simple, clog the lane, build a wall and donât let him get to the rim. And it really is THAT simple.
People laughed and made fun of James Harden when he claimed it takes no real skill to do what Giannis does by just running and dunking, but when you really think about it, was he wrong?
I would go one further and make the case Giannis is a MUCH GREATER defensive player than he is an offensive player despite having nice offensive numbers in the regular season. His jumpshot is abysmal, he has no mid range game, heâs an average facilitator, he has no post game for someone his size, he has no true playmaking ability for someone his size, if heâs not trying to bully people to the rim heâs in foul trouble for offensive fouls, nearly all his points come in transition, heâs a terrible free throw shooter, and worst of all, Giannis canât even handle the ball and make plays down the stretch in the fourth quarter of playoff games. How are you supposed to be a superstar when you canât even handle the ball when it matters most, when your team canât put the ball in your hands and tell you to win the game for them.
For the Bucks to go out the way they did is simply UNACCEPTABLE. They are the first number one seed in NBA History to go down 0-3 in a playoff series to a number 5 seed, EVER. The craziest part is their only win was when Giannis left the game early with an ankle injury and Kris Middleton had the best game of his life and the offense actually flowed. Iâm not saying the Bucks are better without Giannis, but if a superstar and your best player goes down, more times than not you shouldnât be winning a playoff game. This was their year. Interrupted season or not, the manner in which they lost was unacceptable.
In that series, Jimmy Butler looked 10 times the player Giannis looked. In most peopleâs player rankings, Butler and Giannis wouldnât even be close to one another, but when it mattered most, Butler took the challenge and took his team to another level.
When Giannis was asked why he wasnât guarding Butler he said âBecause the coach didnât ask me toâ as the DPOY and the best defender on your team ARE YOU KIDDING ME? When the media asked Mike Budenholzer why Giannis wasnât playing heavy minutes despite resting him during the season for these moments he said â34-35 minutes is his ceilingâ ARE YOU KIDDING ME? The one time Giannis took the challenge to actually guard Butler he fouled him on the game winning shot that sent Butler to the free throw line to win Game 2.
All signs points to Giannis taking home his second MVP trophy, but from what weâve seen you can make the case Giannis could be the worst back-to-back MVP in league history.
I do not care about Giannis throwing down a dunk on the entire New York Knicks on a Tuesday night in Milwaukee. Show me you are one of the very best in the world when it matters most. When your team needs you the most. When the lights are the brightest, and teams try to take away everything youâre great at. Show me then. The MVP award means absolutely nothing if you canât show me then.
He still has time, but as of right now Giannis is NOT a TRUE superstar in the NBA.
And itâs about time we start holding him to that same standard.
Five years after it was written and most of it has been proven true. The only thing he got wrong is that Giannis is clearly a much much worse defender in the past 3-4 seasons. Giannis not only hasn’t managed to impact playoff games, he can’t even impact regular season games that matter! He has not added any skills but got worse at most things on the court other than…dunking.
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s unique combination of size, speed, and skill has led to a persistent narrative: Giannis has played all five positions. This claim gets tossed around in highlight reels, podcasts, and casual fan debates, but how much truth is there to it? He relies heavily on drives, can’t even shoot free throws to save his life, has almost zero play making skills, has completely given up trying from 3pt land, terrible off the ball, rarely cutting or setting screens to create space, his post game lacks refined footwork or go-to moves. Let’s face it. He ain’t gonna improve either. Defence? Even worse limitations! Giannis struggles to stay in front of smaller, quicker guards on the perimeter due to his size and lateral quickness limitations, making him less effective in switch-heavy schemes against certain match ups. His aggressive help defence leads to overcommitting, leaving shooters open or creating gaps in the Bucksâ defensive rotations. He often gets caught on screens, particularly in pick-and-roll situations, where his recovery speed doesnât always match his rim-protecting instincts. And of course against sharp-shooting teams, his closeouts on three-point shooters are abysmally slow.
Defining the Five Positions
To evaluate this claim, we first need to define what we mean by âplaying all five positions.â In traditional basketball, the five positions are:
Point Guard (PG): The primary ball-handler, playmaker, and floor general, responsible for initiating the offense and distributing the ball.
Shooting Guard (SG): Typically a perimeter-oriented player focused on scoring, often via outside shooting or driving.
Small Forward (SF): A versatile wing player who balances scoring, defense, and sometimes playmaking.
Power Forward (PF): A frontcourt player who combines physicality, rebounding, and scoring, often in the post or mid-range.
Center (C): The anchor of the paint, responsible for rim protection, rebounding, and scoring close to the basket.
In todayâs NBA, the lines between these positions have blurred, with âpositionlessâ players like Giannis thriving in multiple roles. But for Giannis to have âplayed all five positions,â he would need to have meaningfully performed the primary responsibilities of each role in actual NBA games, either as a starter or in specific stints.
Giannisâs Positional Journey
Giannis, at 6â11â with a 7â3â wingspan, entered the NBA in 2013 as a lanky, raw prospect with the Milwaukee Bucks. Over the years, his role has evolved significantly, which fuels the myth of his five-position versatility. Letâs examine his career arc and the positions heâs actually played.
Small Forward: His Natural Starting Point
When Giannis debuted, the Bucks listed him as a small forward. His early role leaned heavily on his athleticism, with responsibilities including:
Transition scoring
Slashing to the basket
Perimeter defense against wings
This is the position where Giannis spent the bulk of his early career (2013â2016). His lanky frame and guard-like agility made him a prototypical modern small forward, capable of guarding multiple positions and running the floor. Official NBA tracking data from Basketball-Reference lists him as a small forward for his first three seasons, and this aligns with his on-court role under coaches like Jason Kidd.
Power Forward: The Modern Role
As Giannis bulked up and developed his game, the Bucks shifted him to power forward, especially under coach Mike Budenholzer starting in 2018. This is where Giannis has thrived most, leveraging his size and skill to:
Attack mismatches in the post
Serve as a help defender and rim protector
Grab rebounds and initiate fast breaks
His dominance as a power forward earned him back-to-back MVPs (2019, 2020) and a Finals MVP in 2021. NBA tracking data confirms that Giannis has played the majority of his minutes at the 4 (power forward) in recent seasons, with advanced lineup data from Cleaning the Glass showing him logging over 70% of his minutes at power forward from 2018 to 2023.
Center: Occasional Stints
Giannis has also played center, particularly in small-ball lineups. The Bucks have used him at the 5 in specific situations, such as:
When Brook Lopez or Bobby Portis is off the floor
In playoff matchups against smaller teams (e.g., the 2021 Nets series)
During âdeath lineupâ configurations to maximize spacing and speed
According to NBA.comâs lineup data, Giannis has spent roughly 10â15% of his minutes at center in recent seasons, often in crunch time or against teams lacking a traditional big. In these stints, he handles rim protection, rebounding, and even some pick-and-roll defense. However, heâs rarely the primary center for extended periods, as Milwaukee prefers Lopezâs floor-spacing and rim protection for most minutes.
The Guard Positions: Where the Myth Stumbles
Hereâs where the âall five positionsâ claim starts to fray. While Giannisâs ball-handling and playmaking have improved dramaticallyâhe averaged 5.6 assists per game in the 2022â23 season and often initiates Milwaukeeâs offenseâthe idea that heâs played point guard or shooting guard in a meaningful way doesnât hold up.
Point Guard: The âPoint Giannisâ Hype
The âPoint Giannisâ narrative took off in 2016 when Jason Kidd famously called Giannis the Bucksâ point guard. That season, Giannisâs usage as a ball-handler increased, and he ran more pick-and-rolls and transition plays. But calling him a point guard was more about hype than reality. Hereâs why:
Role vs. Position: Giannis brought the ball up and initiated offense, but he wasnât guarding opposing point guards like Damian Lillard or Chris Paul. His defensive assignments remained wings and forwards.
Box Score Evidence: Basketball-Reference and NBA.com still listed him as a forward, and his minutes at the 1 were negligible (less than 5% per Cleaning the Glass).
Playstyle: Giannisâs playmaking often came from the high post or after grabbing defensive rebounds, not from running a traditional point guardâs half-court offense.
While Giannis has point guard skillsâdribbling, passing, and visionâhe hasnât played the point guard position in the way players like Jrue Holiday or Damian Lillard have done for Milwaukee.
Shooting Guard: The Weakest Link
The claim that Giannis has played shooting guard is even shakier. Shooting guards in the modern NBA (e.g., Devin Booker, Donovan Mitchell) are typically perimeter scorers who rely on outside shooting and off-ball movement. Giannis, by contrast:
Shoots sparingly from three (career 28.6% from three as of 2025)
Rarely plays off-ball as a catch-and-shoot threat
Doesnât guard opposing shooting guards like Bradley Beal or Zach LaVine. (And if he does it kills his team as per Tyrese blowing by him multiple times in clutch time in these playoffs…)
Lineup data shows no significant minutes logged at the 2. His role has never resembled that of a shooting guard, even in small-ball lineups where heâs more likely to slide to center than guard a perimeter scorer.
Why the Myth Persists
So why does the âall five positionsâ narrative stick? Several factors contribute:
Positionless Basketball: The NBAâs shift toward positionless play blurs traditional roles. Giannisâs ability to handle, pass, score, and defend multiple players makes him seem like he could play any position, even if he doesnât.
Highlight Plays: Viral clips of Giannis dribbling past guards or switching onto point guards in crunch time fuel the perception of him as a five-position player.
Coach and Media Hype: Comments like Jason Kiddâs âpoint guardâ label and media narratives about Giannisâs versatility amplify the myth without rigorous analysis.
Fan Imagination: Giannisâs freakish athleticism invites fans to imagine him dominating any role, even ones he hasnât played.
The Reality: Giannis Is not a Versatile Forward
Giannis has undeniably played three positionsâsmall forward, power forward, and centreâwith significant minutes and impact. He hasnât logged meaningful time as a point guard or shooting guard, nor has he performed their primary duties (e.g., running a half-court offence or playing as an off-ball shooter).
Advanced metrics support this. According to Defensive Player Versatility Index (DVPI) from 2023, Giannis ranks among the top forwards in guarding multiple positions, but his matchups are predominantly against wings and bigs, not guards. Offensively, his usage rate (around 32% in recent seasons) reflects a forwardâs role, not a guardâs.
So it’s not true, yet another Giannis hype myth
The myth that Giannis Antetokounmpo has played all five positions doesnât hold up under scrutiny. He lacks the flexibility to play point guard and shooting guard in a traditional sense. While he has guard-like skills (ball-handling, play making), he doesnât run a half-court offence like a point guard or play off-ball as a perimeter shooter like a shooting guard. His defensive assignments rarely include guarding opposing guards, and lineup data shows negligible minutes at these positions Next time you hear someone claim Giannis has played all five positions, ask for the game tape. Chances are, theyâre just caught up in the legend of the Greek Freak.
Sources
Basketball-Reference.com for positional data and career stats
NBA.com for lineup and tracking data
Cleaning the Glass for advanced positional breakdowns
ESPN and The Athletic for historical context on Giannisâs role evolution
The NBA All-Star Game has long been a showcase of the leagueâs best talent, a mid season celebration that brings fans together to watch their favourite players compete in a fun, high-flying exhibition. Traditionally, the game has pitted the Eastern Conference against the Western Conference, a format that reflects the leagueâs geographic structure and fosters regional pride. However, in recent years, there have been discussions about shaking up the format, with one proposed idea being a match up between U.S.-born players and international players. While this concept might sound intriguing on the surface, itâs a deeply flawed idea that could harm the NBAâs brand, alienate fans, and create unnecessary divisions in a league that thrives on unity and inclusivity. Giannis really should think before tweeting a bit more. You would think someone like him who has suffered due to racism would be a little more careful.
1. It Undermines the NBAâs Global Unity
The NBA is one of the most globally diverse sports leagues in the world. Players from countries like Serbia, Greece, Canada, France, and Nigeria share the court with American-born stars, creating a melting pot of talent that transcends borders. This diversity is a strength, not a point of division. By splitting the All-Star Game into U.S. versus international players, the NBA would be artificially creating a âus vs. themâ narrative that feels forced and counterproductive.
Basketball is a universal language, and the All-Star Game is a chance to celebrate that unity. Highlighting nationality as the defining factor risks sending a message that international players are somehow separate from their American counterparts, which could alienate fans in global markets. The NBA has worked hard to expand its reachâevidenced by games played in Europe, Asia, and Africa, and the success of the Basketball Without Borders program. A U.S. vs. International format could undermine these efforts by framing international players as outsiders rather than integral parts of the leagueâs fabric. Then again, Giannis has always been a massive hypocrite concerning what country he stands for. Effectively he is American. But he pretends to be Nigerian or Greek as per the media needs of the day.
2. It Risks Alienating Fans
The All-Star Game is a fan-driven event, with voting heavily influenced by fan engagement. Splitting the game into U.S. vs. International rosters could alienate significant portions of the fan base. For example, American fans might feel less connected to the international team, while international fans might feel their players are being pitted against the âhomeâ team in a way that feels unfair or exclusionary. This format could also discourage fans from voting for players based on merit, as national pride might overshadow talent in the selection process.
Consider a player like Giannis Antetokounmpo, a Greek-Nigerian superstar who plays for the Milwaukee Bucks. Would fans in Milwaukee rally behind him as an âinternationalâ player, or would they feel conflicted because heâs not on the âU.S.â team? The same goes for players like Luka DonÄiÄ or Nikola JokiÄ, who have massive followings in the U.S. despite being international stars. Forcing fans to choose sides based on nationality risks diluting the emotional connection they have to their favourite players.
3. It Creates an Uneven Competitive Balance
While the NBAâs international talent pool is stronger than ever, the number of All-Star-calibre international players is still significantly smaller than the number of American-born All-Stars. In the 2024 All-Star Game, for example, only about 25% of the selected players were born outside the U.S. This disparity would likely result in a lopsided match up, with the U.S. team having a deeper pool of talent to draw from.
Letâs look at a hypothetical 2025 All-Star roster. The international team might feature stars like:
Nikola JokiÄ (Serbia)
Giannis Antetokounmpo (Greece)
Luka DonÄiÄ (Slovenia)
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander (Canada)
Joel Embiid (Cameroon)
Thatâs an impressive group, but the U.S. team could counter with:
LeBron James
Kevin Durant
Jayson Tatum
Anthony Edwards
Devin Booker
And many more
The depth of American talent would likely overwhelm the international side, leading to blowouts that could make the game less entertaining. The East vs. West format, while not always perfectly balanced, at least draws from a larger and more evenly distributed pool of players, ensuring a competitive game.
4. It Could Fuel Unnecessary Nationalism
Sports have a unique ability to bring people together, but they can also stoke nationalism when formats emphasise country of origin. An All-Star Game pitting U.S. players against international players risks turning a lighthearted exhibition into a platform for jingoism. In todayâs polarised world, where nationalism and xenophobia are already sensitive issues, the NBA doesnât need to create a format that could amplify these tensions.
Imagine the social media discourse around a U.S. vs. International All-Star Game. Fans and commentators might frame the game as a proxy for geopolitical rivalries or cultural superiority, which is the last thing the NBA needs. The league has thrived by staying above such controversies, focusing on the game itself rather than external divisions. The current East vs. West format, or even the recent captainâs draft format, avoids these pitfalls by keeping the focus on basketball.
5. It Diminishes the All-Star Gameâs Fun Factor
The All-Star Game is supposed to be funâa break from the grind of the regular season where players can show off their skills, throw alley-oops, and engage in friendly banter. A U.S. vs. International format risks making the game feel more serious and divisive than it needs to be. Players who are teammates during the regular season, like JokiÄ and Jamal Murray or DonÄiÄ and Kyrie Irving, would be forced to compete against each other based on nationality, which could disrupt the camaraderie that makes the All-Star Game special.
Moreover, the format could lead to awkward situations where players feel pressured to ârepresentâ their country rather than just enjoy the game. The All-Star Game thrives on its lack of stakesâplayers arenât out to prove anything beyond who can pull off the flashiest dunk or the most ridiculous three-pointer. Adding a nationalistic element risks making the game feel like a high-stakes international competition, which is better suited for events like the Olympics or FIBA World Cup.
6. It Ignores the Success of Recent Format Changes
The NBA has already experimented with the All-Star Game format in recent years, moving away from the traditional East vs. West match up to a captainâs draft system in 2018. This change, where two All-Star captains pick their teams playground-style, has been largely successful. It creates fun, unpredictable rosters and allows for unique player combinations that fans wouldnât otherwise see. For example, seeing LeBron James team up with Giannis Antetokounmpo or Steph Curry play alongside Luka DonÄiÄ creates exciting moments that a U.S. vs. International format wouldnât allow.
The captainâs draft format also keeps the focus on individual star power rather than collective identities like nationality. Itâs a format thatâs inclusive, engaging, and true to the spirit of the All-Star Game. Reverting to a format that emphasizes division over unity would be a step backward.
7. It Could Harm the NBAâs International Growth
The NBAâs international growth has been one of its biggest success stories. In 2024, the league had over 120 international players from 40 countries, and viewership in markets like China, Europe, and Africa continues to soar. A U.S. vs. International All-Star Game risks alienating these growing fan bases by framing international players as a separate entity. Fans in Serbia, for example, might feel less invested in the game if their hero, Nikola JokiÄ, is pitted against a dominant U.S. team in a way that feels like an underdog narrative.
Instead of highlighting the contributions of international players as part of the NBAâs broader ecosystem, this format could make them feel like a sideshow. The NBA has worked hard to make stars like Yao Ming, Dirk Nowitzki, and now JokiÄ and DonÄiÄ household names in the U.S. and beyond. A format that emphasizes their âothernessâ could undo some of that progress.
Giannis should be ashamed of himself for proposing this
The NBA All-Star Game is a celebration of basketballâs best, a chance for fans to see their favourite players compete in a fun, low-stakes environment. Switching to a U.S. vs. International format would undermine the leagueâs commitment to unity, alienate fans, create competitive imbalances, and risk fuelling unnecessary nationalism. The current East vs. West formatâor the more recent captainâs draft systemâalready strikes a balance between competition and entertainment without introducing divisive elements. The NBA should continue to embrace its global identity by celebrating all players as part of one league, not by pitting them against each other based on where they were born.
In 2020, he was named the NBA Defensive Player of the Year (DPOY), anchoring the Milwaukee Bucksâ league-leading defence. However, recent discussions among fans and analysts suggest his defensive prowess may have waned. So let’s take it from the start of the downfall:
The Peak: Giannisâ 2019-20 Defensive Dominance
In the 2019-20 season, Giannis was a defensive juggernaut, earning the DPOY award and a spot on the All-Defensive First Team. Letâs establish his baseline with key metrics from that season, sourced from Basketball-Reference, NBA.com, and ESPN:
Defensive Rating (DRtg): 96.5, the lowest among players with at least 15 minutes per game, per Second Spectrum data.
Defensive Box Plus/Minus (DBPM): 3.2, leading the league, indicating an elite defensive impact.
Opponent Field Goal Percentage (Opp FG%): Held opponents to 36.3% shooting as the closest defender (minimum 525 attempts), the lowest in the NBA since Second Spectrum began tracking in 2013-14. At the rim, opponents shot just 41.8%.
Steals and Blocks: Averaged 1.0 steals and 1.0 blocks per game, contributing to his reputation as a versatile defender capable of guarding all five positions.
Defensive Rebounds: Led the NBA with 11.5 defensive rebounds per game, highlighted by nine games with 15+ defensive rebounds.
Team Defense: The Bucks led the league with a defensive rating of 101.3 and allowed an NBA-low 41.3% field goal percentage. Giannisâ on-court presence reduced points allowed by eight per 100 possessions compared to when he was off the court.
This season cemented Giannis as a âfree safetyâ defender, disrupting plays with his length and mobility, excelling in rim protection, and anchoring the NBAâs best defense.
The Decline: Evidence from 2020-25
Since 2020, several metrics and qualitative factors suggest Giannisâ defensive performance has slipped. Below, we analyze key indicators across the 2020-21 to 2024-25 seasons, drawing from Basketball-Reference, ESPN, NBA.com, and other sources like Reddit discussions and Basketball Index.
1. Defensive Rating (DRtg)
Giannisâ DRtg has worsened significantly since 2019-20:
2019-20: 96.5 (league-leading)
2020-21: 104.1
2021-22: 106.8
2022-23: 109.4
2023-24: 110.2
2024-25: 110.0
A DRtg increase from 96.5 to 110 indicates that the Bucks allow 13.5 more points per 100 possessions with Giannis on the court compared to his DPOY year. Giannisâ individual DRtg decline is notable. The chart here on the right shows that this decline is also pronounced in the playoffs.
2. Defensive Box Plus/Minus (DBPM)
DBPM reflects a playerâs defensive contribution relative to the league average:
2019-20: 3.2 (league-leading)
2020-21: 2.8
2021-22: 2.4
2022-23: 2.1
2023-24: 1.9
The consistent downward trend in DBPM shows Giannisâ defensive impact is no longer elite.
3. Opponent Field Goal Percentage (Opp FG%)
Giannisâ ability to contest shots has also declined:
2019-20: 36.3% overall, 41.8% at the rim (best in the NBA)
2024-25: 42.4% overall
This suggests Giannis is not as effective particularly in rim protection and one-on-one match ups. His mind is too focused on getting his stat padding done, points, assists, rebounds are all he cares about because that is what most of you talk about.
4. Steals
Traditional hustle stats provide insight into defensive activity:
2020-21: 1.2 steals
2021-22: 1.1 steals
2022-23: 0.8 steals
2023-24: 1.1 steals
2024-25: 0.9 steals
Steals have trended slightly downward (from 1.2 to 0.9) indicating reduced perimeter disruption.
5. All-Defensive Team Selections
Giannis was a lock for All-Defensive First Team from 2019 to 2021. However:
2022-23: All-Defensive Second Team
2023-24: All-Defensive Second Team
2024-25: Not selected for either All-Defensive Team, with players like Dyson Daniels and Evan Mobley taking precedence.
This drop from perennial First Team to no selection in 2024-25 reflects a decline in perceived defensive impact among voters.
So yes, he is worse at everything
The data paints a clear picture: Giannis Antetokounmpoâs defensive performance has declined steadily since his 2020 DPOY season. His DRtg has risen from 96.5 to 110, DBPM has dropped from 3.2 to 1.9, and Opp FG% has increased from 36.3% to 42.4%. The absence of All-Defensive Team honours in 2024-25, combined with a slight dip in steals and a team defensive decline, supports the argument that his defence has slipped. And don’t even start talking about his rebounding numbers! Those are mainly stat padding easy defensive ones because everyone clears out of the paint for Giannis to get his numbers. Most importantly Giannis is damaging his team’s defensive efforts by a constant effort to stat pad and get highlight blocks, thus disrupting any advanced defensive plan they had going.
minutes, attempted more shots, missed more shots, made less 3point shots, made less free throws and less steals.
He also had worse defensive rating, less offensive rebounds, worse efg% and ts% all dropped, despite the fact that he went to the rim more than ever! Quite amazing a feat to fail like that on both ends!
Sources: Basketball-Reference, NBA.com, ESPN, Reddit, Basketball Index
Whispers persist about whether Giannis would ever leave the Bucks for a new challenge. While some argue heâd thrive elsewhere, thereâs a compelling case that Giannis might be hesitant to depart Milwaukeeânot due to a lack of ambition, but because staying put shields him from intense scrutiny, hides his weaknesses, and provides a comfortable narrative for his playoff shortcomings. Sure, he will try and sell it as “loyalty” but think about it. He hasn’t got a chance in a million to win another ring with the Bucks. They have spend so long pampering his every whim, changing coaches and players as per his demands that they have absolutely nothing left to trade. If he really wants a ring he should go. But he won’t.
The Comfort of Milwaukeeâs System
The Bucks have built their entire system around Giannisâs unique skill set. Coach Mike Budenholzer (and now Doc Rivers) designed offences that maximise his ability to attack the rim, leveraging his length, speed, and power. Milwaukee surrounded him with shooters like Khris Middleton, Brook Lopez, and Damian Lillard to space the floor, allowing Giannis to operate in the paint or as a playmaker in transition. This tailored environment masks some of his limitations, particularly his inconsistent outside shooting and free-throw struggles. The Bucks again were top of the NBA in 3pt% as a team despite Giannis shooting worse than ever in his career and close to the worse of any NBA player ever in a single season.
On a new team, Giannis will not have the same luxury. A franchise like the Miami Heat or Los Angeles Lakers, for example, might demand more versatility in half-court offence or a greater reliance on perimeter skills. If Giannis joined a team with a less complementary roster, his 30.8% career three-point shooting (as of the 2024-25 season) and 68.5% free-throw percentage could become glaring liabilities. In Milwaukee, these weaknesses are mitigated by a system that doesnât require him to be a sharpshooter. Elsewhere, theyâd be magnified, potentially exposing him as a one-dimensional star in critical moments.
The Excuse of the Supporting Cast
In Milwaukee, Giannis has a built-in narrative for playoff disappointments: the roster around him isnât good enough. This is a complete lie as I broke down in this blog post. When the Bucks fell to the Miami Heat in the 2020 playoffs or struggled against the Boston Celtics in 2022, analysts and fans often pointed to Khris Middletonâs injuries, Jrue Holidayâs inconsistency, or a lack of depth. This narrative allows Giannis to deflect criticism, maintaining his status as a transcendent talent held back by circumstances.
If Giannis moved to a superteam the excuses would vanish. A new team with high-calibre talent would place the spotlight squarely on Giannisâs performance. If he failed to deliver in the playoffs, the blame would shift from the roster to his own limitations, such as his struggles in clutch situations or his predictable offensive approach against elite defences. The pressure to perform without the safety net of âitâs the teamâs faultâ could be daunting, especially for a player who thrives on being the underdog. Giannis already looks like a fool for talking about not joining a superteam only to get Dame next to him.
Playoff Pressure and the Fear of Failure
Giannisâs playoff resume is a mixed bag. His 2021 championship was a triumph, but it was mainly luck and not really due to Giannis when you break it down. Other years have been less kind: the Bucksâ early exits in 2019, 2020, 2023, and 2024 exposed vulnerabilities in Giannisâs game, particularly against teams that build a âwallâ to clog the paint. Opponents like the Raptors (2019) and Heat (2020) exploited his lack of a reliable jump shot, daring him to shoot while shutting down his drives.
On a new team, Giannis would face even greater playoff scrutiny. In Milwaukee, heâs the hometown hero, forgiven for setbacks because of his loyalty and the Bucksâ small-market status. In a bigger market or on a contending roster, every playoff game would be a referendum on his greatness. A failure to advance deep into the postseason could cement a narrative that Giannis canât lead a team to a title without the perfect supporting cast, tarnishing his legacy. The risk of such failure might make him wary of leaving the familiarity of Milwaukee, where expectations, while high, are tempered by the cityâs underdog mentality.
The Burden of Improvement
Giannis’ shooting remains a work in progress and he is running out of excuses. In Milwaukee, his reluctance to develop a consistent mid-range or three-point shot is often excused as a byproduct of his dominance in other areas. Fans and analysts argue, âWhy change what works?â But on a new team, especially one with a different offensive philosophy, Giannis would face unrelenting pressure to evolve.
For example, joining a team like the Golden State Warriors, where spacing and shooting are paramount, would force Giannis to confront his weaknesses head-on. Without the Bucksâ system to lean on, heâd need to become a more complete offensive player, a challenge heâs been slow to embrace. The fear of being exposed as stagnantâor worse, incapable of adaptingâcould deter him from taking the leap to a new environment where his growth would be non-negotiable. People talk about him going to the Warriors but his inability to set up screens is only one of many weaknesses which make that completely ridiculous.
The Loyalty Factor and Public Perception
Giannisâs loyalty to Milwaukee is a cornerstone of his public image. He signed a supermax extension in 2020, cementing his status as a rare superstar who stayed with a small-market team. This decision endeared him to fans and shielded him from the criticism often levelled at players who chase rings elsewhere, like LeBron James or Kevin Durant. Leaving Milwaukee could fracture this narrative, painting him as just another star chasing glory rather than building a legacy.
Moreover, a move to a bigger market or a super team could invite comparisons to other superstars, where Giannisâs weaknesses might stand out more starkly. In Milwaukee, heâs the undisputed alpha, free from the shadow of a co-star who might outshine him. On a team with another MVP-calibre player, heâd risk being seen as the âsecond option,â a label that could bruise his ego and alter how his career is perceived. Superstars avoid Giannis for various reasons I list here.
The Psychological Weight of Change
Beyond basketball, leaving Milwaukee would mean uprooting a life Giannis has built over a decade. Heâs spoken openly about his love for the city, his teammates, and the organisation that believed in him as a scrawny teenager from Greece. The emotional and psychological toll of adapting to a new city, fan base, and team culture could weigh heavily, especially for a player who values stability. The fear of failing to mesh with a new teamâboth on and off the courtâmight make staying in Milwaukee the safer choice.
Other Risks of Leaving
Media Scrutiny in a Bigger Market: Milwaukeeâs relatively small media market offers Giannis a buffer from the intense scrutiny of cities like New York or Los Angeles. A move to a high-profile team would invite relentless analysis of his every move, from his shot selection to his body language.
Fan Backlash: Bucks fans have embraced Giannis as one of their own. Leaving could alienate a loyal fanbase, creating pressure to justify his decision with immediate success. The emotional toll of being booed in Milwaukee during return games could be a deterrent.
Team Chemistry Risks: Giannisâs game relies on trust and chemistry with teammates who understand his style. A new team might struggle to integrate his ball-dominant, paint-focused approach, leading to friction or underperformance.
Legacy Concerns: Giannis has a chance to be Milwaukeeâs greatest player ever, a legend who brought a title to a city starved for success. Leaving risks diluting that legacy, especially if he fails to match or exceed his Bucks achievements elsewhere. We know he likes stat padding, well now he can smash every franchise record and pretend he is doing it to be loyal.
Giannis is too chicken to move
Giannis Antetokounmpoâs fear of leaving the Milwaukee Bucks is about the risks of stepping out of a perfectly crafted comfort zone. In Milwaukee, his weaknesses are mitigated, his playoff failures are cushioned by roster excuses, and his loyalty shields him from harsh criticism. A move to a new team would strip away these protections, exposing him to scrutiny, demanding growth in areas heâs yet to master, and risking his carefully built legacy. It looks as if Giannis doesn’t have the skill set to succeed anywhere and he knows it. The fear of failure, magnified by a new environment, will probably keep him rooted in Milwaukee for years to come. As he showed this season, he is quite happy stat padding and making the rest of his team look bad.
The Milwaukee Bucks entered the 2025 NBA Playoffs as the No. 5 seed in the Eastern Conference, riding an eight-game winning streak and bolstered by the return of key players like Damian Lillard and Bobby Portis. Facing the No. 4 seed Indiana Pacers, who held home-court advantage for the first time since 2014, the Bucks were expected to leverage their star power and playoff experience to advance. However, the Pacers dispatched Milwaukee in a decisive 4-1 series, culminating in a thrilling 119-118 overtime victory in Game 5, driven by Tyrese Haliburtonâs clutch heroics. Giannis’ fat statements about “NOW I know what I need to do” before the games proved to be just that: empty talk.
1. Defensive Struggles Against Indianaâs High-Octane Offense
The Pacersâ fast-paced, ball-movement-heavy offense overwhelmed Milwaukeeâs defense throughout the series. Indiana, known for their relentless pace, averaged 17.5 fast-break points per game during the regular season, which jumped to 24.3 against the Bucks in their four regular-season matchups. This trend continued in the playoffs, where the Pacers exploited transition opportunities and defensive lapses to devastating effect.
Milwaukeeâs defense, ranked in the bottom half of the league in points allowed per 100 possessions during the regular season, was ill-equipped to handle Indianaâs speed. In Game 2, for instance, the Bucks allowed 123 points, with critical breakdowns like Tyrese Haliburton blowing past Kyle Kuzma in transition and Pascal Siakam capitalizing on a 3-on-2 break. These plays highlighted Milwaukeeâs inability to get back quickly enough to set their defense, a problem exacerbated by veterans like Brook Lopez and Damian Lillard, who appeared a step slow.
The Bucksâ defensive rating in the first two games was a dismal 121.8, reflecting their struggles to contain Indianaâs multi-faceted attack. The Pacersâ ability to create âpower-play opportunitiesâ (13.4% of their offensive possessions, second only to Denver) allowed players like Andrew Nembhard and Aaron Nesmith to exploit mismatches in transition. Milwaukeeâs switch-heavy defensive strategy showed promise in Game 2âs fourth quarter, holding Indiana to 24 points, but inconsistent execution led to breakdowns, such as Siakamâs game-sealing 3-pointer in Game 2.
Giannis is clearly not the DPOY he once was. He is focusing on offence and is much slower and less energetic in defence. He roams looking for the highlight block thus confusing his team’s defensive plan. And of course they all have to clear out so he can rack up defensive rebounds for his stats – that’s an order. Contrast that to the selfless team play of Indiana and you see the problem. That stuff may work in regular season easier games but not in NBA playoffs. Giannis should know better and curtail his ego.
2. Inability to Contain Tyrese Haliburtonâs Clutch Play
Tyrese Haliburton emerged as the seriesâ defining figure, particularly in Game 5, where his game-winning layup in overtime sealed the Bucksâ fate. Haliburtonâs ability to deliver in high-pressure moments was a recurring nightmare for Milwaukee. In Game 3, he recorded 17 points, 8 rebounds, and 15 assists, leading Indiana to a 129-103 rout. His Game 5 performance, including a layup-and-one to cut a four-point deficit and a subsequent game-winner, underscored his knack for taking over games.
Milwaukeeâs defensive schemes struggled to contain Haliburton, especially in pick-and-roll situations. The Pacers doubled ball screens involving Lillard, forcing him to make decisions under pressure, and Haliburtonâs speed and playmaking exposed slower defenders like Lopez. In Game 2, Haliburton sprinted past Kuzma and drew Giannis away from his assignment, leading to open shots for teammates like Nesmith. The Bucks faced a tactical dilemma: leave Haliburton to score in the paint or risk open 3-pointers elsewhere, a question they failed to answer consistently. Giannis is just too slow to even understand what is going on, let alone adjust. Lateral speed has always been Giannis weak spot and it’s getting worse. In fact Giannis is worse this season at most statistical categories.
3. Offensive Inefficiencies and Poor 3-Point Shooting
Because of Giannis Antetokounmpoâs dominance the Bucksâ offence lacked rhythm and consistency. Milwaukee, the leagueâs best 3-point shooting team during the regular season at 38.7%, shot a dismal 24.3% (9 of 37) in Game 1. Coach Doc Rivers noted that many of these attempts came off late passes, disrupting the teamâs offensive flow. Giannis always looks to get his easy bucket for his stats first. It’s predictable and all too often it leads to a (usually mediocre or even bad) pass with not much time left on the clock. Then everyone blames the receiver and not Giannis! The Bucks were the No1 team in the regular season for 3pt percentage.
The return of Damian Lillard, who missed Game 1 due to a blood clot but played 37 minutes in Game 2, didnât provide the expected spark. Lillard, still recovering, shot 4-of-13 for 14 points in Game 2 and struggled defensively, likely due to his month-long absence and a calf injury. The Bucksâ reliance on Giannis to carry the offence was evident, but his lack of play making in Game 1 (one assist) highlighted the teamâs struggle to generate open looks for shooters like Gary Trent Jr. and AJ Green. Giannis simply lacks the range of potential movements and the basketball IQ to understand how to change the team plays. Never in any universe should he be bringing down the ball.
4. Failure to Capitalize on Home Games
After falling into a 2-0 hole in Indianapolis, the Bucks had a chance to shift momentum at home in Games 3 and 4. They managed a 117-101 victory in Game 3, powered by Giannis (34 points) and Gary Trent Jr.âs hot shooting from deep. Here I had predicted the Pacers would let them win it way before the game and I was correct. The Pacers simply wanted to finish off the series in Indiana and make some extra money along the way. They responded with a commanding 129-103 win in Game 4, exposing Milwaukeeâs inability to sustain defensive intensity. Indianaâs road performance was formidable, with an 18-9 record and the fourth-best road net rating after a slow start to the season. This resilience made it difficult for the Bucks to capitalise on home-court energy.
The Bucksâ Game 4 loss was particularly damaging, as Indianaâs balanced attackâled by six players in double figuresâoverpowered Milwaukeeâs defense. The Pacersâ ability to maintain their high-octane offense away from home, averaging 117.8 points per 100 possessions on the road, meant the Bucks couldnât rely on home advantage to slow Indiana down.
5. Historical Context and Rivalry Dynamics
The Pacers have historically had Milwaukeeâs number in playoff match ups, never losing a series to the Bucks. In 2024, Indiana defeated a Giannis-less Bucks team 4-2, and this yearâs 4-1 result continued that trend. The rivalryâs intensity, marked by incidents like the 2023 game-ball dispute and Haliburtonâs âDame Timeâ mimicry, added a psychological edge for Indiana. Haliburton himself acknowledged the animosity, stating, âWe donât like them, they donât like us,â which seemed to fuel the Pacersâ focus.
The Bucksâ inability to channel this rivalry into consistent performance, especially after blowing a seven-point lead in the final minute of Game 5âs overtime, underscored their mental and tactical lapses, with Giannis bearing most of the blame but insisting on trying to guard Tyrese. He clearly couldn’t and it cost the game. Getting blown past once happens. Twice you are starting to look stupid. Three times in clutch and Giannis should have come out after the game and asked his team for forgiveness.
This was mainly Giannis’ fault
While Giannis delivered scoring outburstsâ36 points in Game 1, 34 in Game 2, and 34 in Game 3âhis shortcomings in play making, defensive discipline, and clutch situations were pivotal in the Bucksâ inability to compete effectively.
1. Limited Playmaking and Over-Reliance on Scoring
Giannisâs dominance as a scorer was evident, averaging 34.0 points per game on 56.2% field goal shooting, but his play making fell short of what the Bucks needed against Indianaâs high-octane offence. In Game 1, Giannis recorded just one assist, a stark contrast to Haliburtonâs 15 assists in Game 3. His tendency to drive into crowded lanes and force shots, rather than facilitating for open teammates, disrupted Milwaukeeâs offensive flow. The Bucks shot a dismal 24.3% from three in Game 1 (9 of 37), with many attempts coming off late passes or broken plays, a problem exacerbated by Giannisâs limited vision as a passer.
So this is interesting. Before these playoffs, the Pacers had many more assists per game than the Bucks. Yeah, we all know they pass a lot. So why then did they have LESS assists in every game of the playoff series against the Bucks?
This has Giannis written all over it. He simply can’t adjust and reverts to his selfish ways, running to dunk and then passing when he gets stuck. It is amazing his team mates get any in at all as they are usually stone cold and haven’t touched the ball for ages! The Pacers were all probing the paint quickly but then passing out immediately if they saw issues with the total team effort. There is no “i” in team but plenty of “I” in Giannis!
Indianaâs defensive strategy focused on clogging the paint, daring Giannis to kick out to shooters like Gary Trent Jr. or AJ Green. However, Giannis averaged only 3.8 assists per game in the series, compared to his regular-season average of 6.5. In Game 4, a 129-103 blowout loss, Giannisâs four turnovers, including two errant passes in the third quarter, led to fast-break points for the Pacers. His inability to consistently create for others allowed Indiana to collapse on him, stifling Milwaukeeâs offence and leaving shooters like Damian Lillard, who was still recovering from injury, unable to find rhythm.
2. Defensive Lapses in Transition and Pick-and-Roll Coverage
The Pacersâ fast-paced attack, averaging 24.3 fast-break points per game in the series, exposed Giannisâs struggles in transition defence. His positioning and decision-making faltered against Indianaâs speed. In Game 2, Tyrese Haliburton blew past Kyle Kuzma in transition, drawing Giannis away from his assignment and leaving Aaron Nesmith open for a corner three. Similar breakdowns occurred in Game 5, where Giannisâs hesitation to pick up Haliburton in a 3-on-2 break led to a backbreaking layup. It seems like Giannis is more concerned with the optics and himself looking good than actually helping his team win.
In pick-and-roll situations, Giannis struggled to balance defending the ball-handler and protecting the rim. The Pacersâ use of double ball screens targeting Damian Lillard forced Giannis to hedge or switch, but he was often a step slow, allowing Haliburton to penetrate or find open teammates. Milwaukeeâs defensive rating in the series was a poor 121.8 in the first two games, with Giannisâs inability to anchor the defence against Indianaâs âpower-play opportunitiesâ (13.4% of possessions) proving costly.
3. Clutch-Time Struggles and Poor Decision-Making
The Bucksâ collapse in Game 5âs overtime, blowing a seven-point lead in the final minute, highlighted Giannisâs struggles in clutch moments. With the game on the line, Giannis failed to take control, deferring to teammates or making questionable decisions. In the final possession of overtime, he drove into a crowded paint, ignoring an open Gary Trent Jr. on the wing, resulting in a blocked shot by Myles Turner. Haliburton capitalized on the other end with a game-winning layup-and-one, underscoring Giannisâs inability to deliver when it mattered most.
Giannisâs clutch-time stats were lacklustre: in the seriesâ five games, he shot 2-for-5 in clutch situations (last five minutes, score within five points) and committed two turnovers. His free-throw shooting, a long-standing weakness, also hurt the Bucks, as he went 10-for-16 (62.5%) in Game 5, missing key attempts that could have sealed the game in regulation. These misses shifted momentum to Indiana, who thrived on Milwaukeeâs mistakes. This is nothing new. But Bucks’ fans have never admitted that in the championship run Khris bailed him out every time. Giannis simply can’t operate in clutch situations.
4. Failure to Lead and Elevate Teammates
As the Bucksâ leader, Giannis was expected to rally a roster dealing with injuries (Lillardâs calf issue and limited minutes in Game 2) and fatigue from heavy reliance on a seven-man rotation. However, his leadership on the court lacked the intangibles needed to counter Indianaâs intensity. The Pacersâ psychological edge, fueled by the ongoing rivalry and Haliburtonâs taunting (mimicking âDame Timeâ in Game 3), seemed to unsettle the Bucks. Giannis, despite acknowledging the rivalryâs intensity post-game, failed to channel it into cohesive team play. This has been his fault for many years now. From the game ball debacle in the regular season, Giannis has indeed acted like a child (to quote J.Brown!) and made the Pacers aware how easy it is to get him rattled.
In Game 3, the Bucksâ lone win (117-101), Giannisâs 34 points were complemented by Gary Trent Jr.âs hot shooting, but this was an outlier, as the Pacers probably didn’t really fight to win that game anyway. In losses, Giannisâs dominance didnât translate to elevating players like Bobby Portis or Kevin Porter Jr., who struggled to find open looks. His tunnel vision in key moments, such as forcing drives against double-teams in Game 4, limited opportunities for role players to contribute, unlike Haliburton, who consistently set up teammates like Pascal Siakam and Andrew Nembhard. The higher the stakes, the worse Giannis plays. He tends to revert to his same, extremely predictable, go to moves and it simply doesn’t work.
5. Inability to Counter Indianaâs Strategic Adjustments
The Pacers made effective adjustments throughout the series, particularly in neutralising Giannisâs paint dominance. In Game 2, Indiana doubled Giannis on post touches, forcing him to pass out of tight spaces, which led to three turnovers in the third quarter alone. Coach Rick Carlisleâs strategy of using Myles Turnerâs rim protection and Pascal Siakamâs versatility limited Giannisâs efficiency in the half-court, forcing him to rely on contested mid-range shots, where he went 3-for-10 in the series.
Giannis failed to adapt to these adjustments, and again it’s on Giannis who was sticking to his drive-heavy approach rather than exploiting Indianaâs smaller defenders, like Nembhard, with post-ups or quick passes. His lack of a reliable outside shotâ0-for-3 from three in the seriesâallowed the Pacers to sag off him, clogging driving lanes and disrupting Milwaukeeâs spacing. This predictability made it easier for Indiana to dictate the gameâs tempo, especially in their 129-103 Game 4 rout.
The Milwaukee Bucksâ loss to the Indiana Pacers in the 2025 NBA Playoffs was a result of multiple compounding factors. Defensively, they couldnât contain Indianaâs fast-break attack or Tyrese Haliburtonâs clutch play making. For Milwaukee, this early exit raises questions about their defensive identity, roster construction, and ability to compete in a faster, more dynamic Eastern Conference. As the Bucks head into the off season, addressing these weaknesses will be critical to reclaiming their status as championship contenders. But take a minute before boasting how “every team wants to trade for Giannis” to think about it. Is he really any good at all at NBA playoff basketball or is he a liability?
The NBA is no stranger to debates about talent, roster decisions, and the influence of star players on team dynamics. One name that has consistently sparked controversy in recent years is Thanasis Antetokounmpo, the older brother of Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. Critics, fans, and analysts alike have pointed to Thanasis as a prime example of nepotism in the NBA, arguing that his roster spot with the Bucks is a direct result of his brother’s influence rather than his own basketball merits.
Thanasis Antetokounmpo’s NBA Career: clearly not good enough
Thanasis Antetokounmpo, born on July 18, 1992, in Athens, Greece, entered the NBA with high expectations as the older brother of a generational talent. Drafted 51st overall by the New York Knicks in 2014, Thanasis spent his early career bouncing between the NBA and the G League, with brief stints in Europe. Since joining the Milwaukee Bucks in 2019, he has remained on the roster, playing alongside his brother Giannis and contributing to the team’s 2021 NBA Championship. However, his on-court production has drawn significant scrutiny as nobody on the planet would claim that he can play at NBA levels of basketball.
By the Numbers: A Lackluster On-Court Impact
To understand Thanasis’s performance, let’s look at his career statistics with the Bucks (as of the 2024-25 season, based on available data):
Minutes Played: Thanasis averages just 4.6 minutes per game across 181 games with the Bucks (through the 2023-24 season). His limited playing time reflects a bench role, often reserved for garbage time or low-stakes situations.
Scoring: His career scoring average with the Bucks is a meager 2.4 points per game, with a field goal percentage of 52.3% and a three-point percentage of 14.3% (on very low attempts, 0.3 per game). His scoring output is negligible, and his inability to stretch the floor with outside shooting limits his offensive utility.
Rebounds and Assists: Thanasis averages 1.6 rebounds and 0.5 assists per game, indicating minimal impact in playmaking or board-crashing.
Advanced Metrics: His Player Efficiency Rating (PER) hovers around 8.0, well below the league average of 15.0. His Win Shares per 48 minutes (WS/48) is 0.048, suggesting he contributes little to team wins when on the court. His Box Plus-Minus (BPM) is consistently negative, often around -4.0, indicating that the Bucks perform worse with him on the floor.
These numbers paint a clear picture: Thanasis is, at best, a fringe NBA player whose statistical contributions are among the lowest on the Bucks roster and possibly the entire league. Videos and highlight reels circulating online often highlight his athletic dunks or hustle plays, but these moments are rare and overshadowed by inefficiencies. For instance, a YouTube video titled “How BAD is Thanasis Antetokounmpo Actually?” notes that his limited skill setâprimarily athleticism and energyâdoesnât translate to consistent NBA-level production, with many calling him “the worst player in the NBA”.
Defensive and Intangible Contributions
Proponents of Thanasis argue that his value lies in his defensive effort and locker-room presence. Standing at 6â6â with a 7â0â wingspan, he has the physical tools to be a disruptive defender. He averages 0.4 steals and 0.2 blocks per game, numbers that reflect his hustle but are hardly game-changing. His defensive rating (points allowed per 100 possessions) is around 110, which is average at best and often inflated by playing in low-leverage minutes.
Thanasis is frequently described as a high-energy player who brings enthusiasm to practices and supports his teammates. However, these intangibles are difficult to quantify, and critics argue that they donât justify a roster spot on a contending team like the Bucks, where every slot is critical for maximising championship odds.
The Nepotism Debate: Is Thanasis on the Bucks Because of Giannis?
The heart of the controversy surrounding Thanasis Antetokounmpo is the accusation of nepotism. Critics, including NBA legend Charles Barkley and analyst Shannon Sharpe, have openly questioned why Thanasis remains on the Bucks roster, pointing to his brother Giannisâs influence as a two-time MVP and franchise cornerstone. Letâs examine the arguments for and against the nepotism claims.
Evidence of Nepotism
Limited NBA-Caliber Production: As outlined above, Thanasisâs statistical output is among the lowest in the league. A 2023 article from Pulse Sports reported an NBA executive branding Thanasis as a product of nepotism, stating, âThe rumor circulating social media is that Thanasis is only in the NBA because of his brotherâ. Fans on X echo this sentiment, with one user (@Not_Guccio) quipping in 2022 that Thanasis has âthe best job in the NBAâ because he secures a roster spot and millions in salary due to Giannisâs presence, despite rarely playing serious minutes.
Bucksâ Roster Decisions: The Bucks have retained Thanasis since 2019, even waiving and re-signing his younger brother Alex Antetokounmpo within 24 hours in 2023, prompting fans to mock the team for âhearing the nepotism jokesâ. The fact that Thanasis has secured multi-year contracts (e.g., a two-year, $3.6 million deal in 2021) while producing minimal on-court impact fuels speculation that the Bucks prioritize keeping Giannis happy over optimizing their roster.
Comparisons to Other Cases: The drafting of Bronny James by the Los Angeles Lakers in 2024 reignited discussions about nepotism, with Thanasis often cited as a parallel. A Basketball Forever article noted that Bronnyâs selection drew attention to Thanasis, with critics arguing that both players benefit from their famous relativesâ influence. Charles Barkley has been particularly vocal, joking during the 2022 All-Star Game about Thanasisâs job security and later calling it a âcomplimentâ when Thanasis responded positively.
Giannisâs Influence: Giannis is known to value family deeply, and reports suggest he has advocated for his brothersâ inclusion on the Bucks. A 2023 New York Post article quoted Shannon Sharpe criticizing Giannis for securing roster spots for both Thanasis and Alex, implying that their presence is tied to Giannisâs leverage as a superstar. This perception is reinforced by comments like those from Kendrick Perkins, who questioned Thanasisâs roster spot in a 2023 Fadeaway World piece.
Counterarguments: More Than Nepotism?
Thanasis and his supporters have pushed back against the nepotism narrative. In a 2024 interview, Thanasis responded to Charles Barkleyâs jabs, saying, âThatâs a compliment because that means Iâm a good personâ. He emphasized his work ethic, journey from the G League, and contributions to team morale. A Greek City Times article highlighted his role as a supportive teammate, noting that his presence fosters a positive locker-room environment, which is crucial for a championship-caliber team.
Additionally, some argue that Thanasisâs roster spot is not catastrophic. The Bucks won the 2021 NBA Championship with Thanasis on the roster, and his limited minutes (averaging 2.5 minutes per game in the playoffs) suggest he doesnât add anything to the teamâs success. A Reddit user pointed out that if nepotism were the sole factor, the Bucks would have also retained their younger brother Kostas Antetokounmpo, who left the NBA after brief stints. This suggests that Thanasis may offer some value, even if itâs not reflected in box scores. However we have never really seen this in some concrete way. And every time someone says “yes, but it keeps Giannis happy” they are essentially admitting that a) Giannis is weak psychologically and b) that it IS indeed nepotism at its worse. After all the Bucks don’t need to give him a spot on the team. He could be part of the coaching staff if all he does is support Giannis.
Is Thanasis’ presence catastrophic?
The perception that Thanasisâs roster spot is a âcatastrophicâ example of nepotism stems from several factors:
Opportunity Cost: NBA rosters are limited to 15 players, and every spot is valuable, especially for a contending team like the Bucks. Critics argue that Thanasis occupies a position that could be filled by a more productive player, such as a sharpshooter or defensive specialist. Maybe an experienced player that could make the difference for a few minutes in a critical playoff match up. A BroBible article from December 2024 stated, âWatch Thanasis play, and you can quickly tell he shouldnât be anywhere close to an NBA rosterâ. This sentiment is amplified by the Bucksâ struggles in recent seasons, including early playoff exits in 2023 and 2024, which have heightened scrutiny of roster construction.
Fan and Media Backlash: Social media platforms are rife with criticism of Thanasis. A 2024 post from @TheNBACentel humorously quoted Thanasis as saying his job is to âhigh five the rotation playersâ and âstand up for Giannis,â encapsulating the perception that his role is ceremonial. YouTube videos with titles like âIâm Sorry, But Why Is Thanasis Antetokounmpo Still In The NBA???â amplify this narrative, often highlighting his mistakes or limited impact.
Contrast with Giannisâs Excellence: Giannis Antetokounmpo is a global superstar, a two-time MVP, and a Finals MVP. His dominance sets an impossibly high bar for his brothers, making Thanasisâs shortcomings more glaring. Fans and analysts expect players associated with Giannis to perform at a high level, and Thanasisâs inability to do so fuels the nepotism narrative.
They are not really that funny. Some claim that the brothers’ banter is social media worthy and entertaining. But this is really hard to support. Their presence at All Star games has always been a let down and their humour is…well…weird to put it politely. For sure it is not producing TV ratings or social media traffic in any good way.
A Balanced Perspective: Catastrophic or Overblown?
While the nepotism accusations carry weight, calling Thanasisâs presence on the Bucks roster âcatastrophicâ may be an overstatement. The Bucks have maintained a competitive roster, winning a championship in 2021 and remaining a top Eastern Conference team despite recent playoff disappointments. Thanasisâs limited minutes mean he rarely impacts games negatively, and his role as a locker-room leader may provide intangible benefits that outsiders cannot fully assess.
However, the opportunity cost of his roster spot cannot be ignored. In a league where marginal improvements can make or break a championship run, the Bucksâ decision to retain Thanasis over a more skilled player raises questions about priorities. The perception of nepotism is further fueled by Giannisâs undeniable influence, which likely ensures Thanasisâs job security. As one post noted, âThanasis has had an NBA roster spot for years simply because Giannis is his brother,â a sentiment that resonates with many fans.
No excuse anymore for Thanasis in the NBA
Thanasis Antetokounmpoâs NBA career is a polarizing case study. His statistical output is undeniably poor, with minimal contributions in scoring, rebounding, and advanced metrics. The persistent accusations of nepotism, backed by comments from figures like Charles Barkley and Shannon Sharpe, highlight the belief that his roster spot is tied to Giannisâs stardom rather than his own merit. While his energy and locker-room presence offer some value, the opportunity cost of his roster spot on a contending team like the Bucks fuels the âcatastrophicâ label.
Thanasis Antetokounmpo does not significantly influence the Milwaukee Bucks’ win/loss record through his individual on-court production. The Bucks have averaged a .638 win percentage all-time when Thanasis is on the team, which is consistent with the high performance of the Giannis-led Bucks era. Thanasis’s direct statistical impact in games is minimal: his career averages are just 2.4 points, 1.6 rebounds, and 0.6 assists in about 8 minutes per game over nearly 200 appearances.
Ultimately, Thanasisâs story reflects a broader tension in the NBA: balancing team chemistry and star player satisfaction with the relentless pursuit of optimal performance. Whether you view him as a nepotism beneficiary or a misunderstood role player, one thing is clear: his presence on the Bucks roster will continue to spark debate as long as Giannis remains the face of the franchise. The only positive spin you can put on it is that it is well and truly traditionally Greek to try and get your relatives a job like that!
The narrative that Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ two-time MVP and NBA champion, “needs help” has been a persistent talking point among fans, analysts, and media. Every playoff disappointment or regular-season struggle prompts calls for the Bucks to acquire another superstar or bolster their roster to support their franchise player. However, this perspective oversimplifies the Bucks’ challenges and ignores a critical truth: Giannis himself is often a significant factor in the team’s shortcomings. While his dominance is undeniable, his playstyle, decision-making, and limitations contribute to Milwaukee’s struggles more than the lack of “help” around him.
The Myth of Insufficient Support
The argument that Giannis lacks adequate support often stems from the Bucks’ playoff exits, such as their first-round loss to the Miami Heat in 2023 or their 2024 defeat to the Indiana Pacers. Critics point to the roster, claiming it fails to complement Giannisâs skill set. However, this overlooks the quality of players Milwaukee has assembled. Khris Middleton, a three-time All-Star, has been a reliable second option, averaging 20.1 points per game in the 2022-23 season with a knack for clutch shot-making. Jrue Holiday, before his trade to Boston, was a Defensive Player of the Year candidate and a steady playmaker. Damian Lillard, acquired in 2023, is one of the leagueâs premier offensive engines, averaging 24.3 points and 7.0 assists in his first season with Milwaukee. Brook Lopez, a Defensive Player of the Year finalist, anchors the paint, while players like Bobby Portis and Pat Connaughton provide depth.
This is not a barren roster. The Bucksâ supporting cast has consistently ranked among the leagueâs better ensembles, with Milwaukee finishing the 2022-23 season with the NBAâs best record (58-24). Blaming the roster ignores the fact that teams like the 2023 Heat or 2024 Pacers, who ousted Milwaukee, were not necessarily more talented but executed better. The issue isnât a lack of talent around Giannisâitâs how his playstyle interacts with that talent.
Giannisâs Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword
Giannis is a force of nature, a 6â11â freight train who combines athleticism, length, and defensive versatility in the past. His ability to drive to the rim, collapse defences, and finish through contact is impressive, evidenced by his career average of 22.9 points per game on 54.7% shooting (as of the 2024-25 season). However, his approach, while devastating, creates challenges that hinder the Bucks in critical moments. When it counts, Giannis comes up short.
Over-Reliance on Drives
Giannisâs game revolves around attacking the basket, often bulldozing through defenders to score or draw fouls. He led the NBA in free-throw attempts per game (11.0) in the 2022-23 season, a testament to his rim pressure. But this one-dimensional approach allows opponents to game-plan effectively. Teams like the Heat and Raptors (in 2019) have employed the “Giannis Wall,” packing the paint with multiple defenders to neutralize his drives. Without a consistent outside shotâhis three-point percentage hovers around 27.7% for his careerâGiannis struggles when teams dare him to shoot.
This predictability forces the Bucks into stagnant offensive sets. When Giannis barrels into a crowded paint, it often results in turnovers (3.1 per game career average) or low-percentage shots. His insistence on driving, even against set defenses, disrupts Milwaukeeâs flow, limiting opportunities for shooters like Lillard or Middleton to exploit open looks. Compare this to players like Nikola JokiÄ, who blends scoring with elite playmaking (9.0 assists per game in 2023-24), or Kevin Durant, whose mid-range and three-point shooting keep defenses honest. Giannisâs tunnel vision on drives can stifle his teamâs offense, making it easier for opponents to dictate the gameâs pace.
Free-Throw Struggles and Pace Issues
Giannisâs free-throw shooting, while improved, remains a liability at 65.8% for his career. In high-stakes playoff games, this weakness is magnified. Opponents often employ Hack-a-Giannis strategies, slowing the game and disrupting Milwaukeeâs rhythm. His lengthy free-throw routineâoften exceeding the 10-second limitâfurther bogs down the pace, frustrating teammates and fans alike. In the 2023 playoffs, Giannis shot 45.3% from the line against Miami, a glaring issue in tight games.
This slow pace clashes with the modern NBAâs emphasis on speed and spacing. The Bucks ranked 19th in pace (98.5 possessions per game) in 2023-24, limiting their ability to capitalize on transition opportunities where Giannis thrives. His dominance in the half-court often comes at the expense of fluid team play, as teammates stand idle while he attempts to overpower defenders. Giannis simply can’t change the way he plays resulting in the entire team suffering.
Decision-Making in Crunch Time
Giannisâs decision-making in clutch situations is another area where he contributes to Milwaukeeâs struggles. His choices in critical moments often falter. In the 2021 championship run, Giannis was phenomenal, but Middleton and Holiday frequently bailed him out in clutch scenarios. Fast forward to 2024, and his 4.4 turnovers per game in the playoffs against Indiana highlighted a recurring issue: forcing plays under pressure. Giannis simply can’t think fast enough when it counts, “he has no bag” for the top level of the NBA.
For example, in Game 5 of the 2023 Heat series, Giannis attempted a game-tying drive with seconds remaining, only to be stripped in traffic, leading to a turnover. A better decisionâpassing to an open Middleton or Lopezâmight have changed the outcome. His reluctance to defer, even when double- or triple-teamed, puts undue pressure on his teammates to compensate for his mistakes. Contrast this with LeBron James, who, despite similar defensive attention, averages 7.4 assists per game by finding open teammates. Giannisâs assist average (5.7 in 2023-24) is solid but doesnât reflect the same level of trust in his supporting cast.
The Coaching Carousel and Giannisâs Influence
The Bucksâ coaching instabilityâMike Budenholzerâs firing in 2023, Adrian Griffinâs midseason dismissal in 2024, and Doc Riversâ uneven tenureâpoints to another issue tied to Giannis. Reports suggest Giannis has significant influence over team decisions, from roster moves to coaching hires. The trade for Lillard, while a coup, was reportedly driven by Giannisâs desire for a co-star, yet the fit has been clunky. Lillardâs ball-dominant style clashes with Giannisâs need for touches, leading to a disjointed offense (Milwaukeeâs offensive rating dropped from 113.3 in 2022-23 to 112.4 in 2023-24).
Giannisâs reported push for Griffinâs hiring, followed by his quick dismissal, suggests a lack of clarity in his vision for the team. This meddling, while not uncommon for superstars, disrupts continuity. The Bucksâ roster and system are built around Giannisâs strengths, but his influence often prioritizes his comfort over team synergy. For instance, the Bucksâ heavy reliance on drop-coverage defense, tailored to Giannisâs rim protection, limits their ability to switch and adapt against versatile offenses like Miamiâs or Bostonâs.
Statistical Context: Giannisâs Impact vs. Efficiency
To quantify Giannisâs role in Milwaukeeâs struggles, consider his advanced metrics. His usage rate (31.2% in 2023-24) is among the leagueâs highest, reflecting his ball-dominant style. However, his true shooting percentage (61.3%) lags behind players like JokiÄ (63.1%) or Anthony Davis (62.4%), who balance efficiency with playmaking. Giannisâs high usage often comes at the expense of teammatesâ involvement, as evidenced by Middletonâs shot attempts dropping from 15.1 per game in 2022-23 to 13.0 in 2023-24 despite similar minutes.
Defensively his tendency to roam for highlight plays can leave the Bucks vulnerable, especially against pick-and-roll-heavy teams. In the 2024 playoffs, Indianaâs Tyrese Haliburton exploited Milwaukeeâs drop coverage, averaging 8.7 assists per game. Giannisâs defensive discipline still wanes in crucial moments, contributing to breakdowns.
The Counterargument: Does Giannis Really Need Help?
Defenders of the âGiannis needs helpâ narrative argue that no superstar can win alone. They point to Milwaukeeâs injury issuesâMiddletonâs ankle problems in 2023, Giannisâs own calf injury in 2024âas evidence that the roster fails him in key moments. They also note that Lillardâs defensive limitations and Middletonâs inconsistency place too much burden on Giannis.
While injuries are a factor, they donât fully excuse the Bucksâ failures. Teams like the 2023 Nuggets and 2024 Celtics overcame injuries through system cohesion and star adaptability. Giannis, by contrast, often sticks to his strengths rather than adjusting to opponentsâ schemes. His refusal to develop a reliable jumper or refine his play making limits Milwaukeeâs ceiling, regardless of whoâs on the roster.
Giannis Must Evolve and fans need to stop making up excuses for him
The âGiannis needs helpâ narrative is a convenient scapegoat that shifts focus from the real issue: Giannisâs own limitations are a significant driver of Milwaukeeâs problems. His predictable play style, clutch-time struggles, and influence over team decisions create challenges that no amount of roster tinkering can fully resolve. While heâs a generational talent, Giannis must evolveâwhether by developing a jumper, improving his free-throw shooting, or trusting his teammates more in crunch timeâto maximize the Bucksâ potential.
The Bucks donât need another superstar; they need Giannis to address the gaps in his game and adapt to modern NBA demands. Until then, the narrative that he âneeds helpâ will persist, but itâs a distraction from the truth: Giannis is both the Bucksâ greatest asset and, at times, their biggest obstacle.
Stats and data referenced are accurate as of the 2024-25 NBA season and sourced from Basketball-Reference and NBA.com.
