Greek Freak Analyzed

Tag: ball

  • KYLE KUZMA was second best player of the bucks last season??

    KYLE KUZMA was second best player of the bucks last season??

    So you have seen this chart before. It shows that Giannis, despite not being much good at dribbling, held the ball more than anyone. Despite his tendency for turnovers, he insists on bringing the ball down and then wasting time holding it.

    Some say this is on purpose. For sure it helps boost his stats. Opponents shoot. Everyone on the Bucks team clears out for Giannis to boost his rebound stats. Then Giannis brings down the ball looking for an easy dunk. He often gets locked up and then wastes more time because he has no skills to disentangle himself. When he does pass it is often too late to team mates that are covered defensively. Still, when we link the amount of time Bucks’ players had the ball to their points, this is the chart:

    Amazingly Giannis is 8th. Makes sense. Because even when he gets fouled, he converts free throws terribly. KPJ makes the most of what little time with the ball he is given.

    Giannis’ tendency to dominate the ball for the Milwaukee Bucks has sparked considerable debate and criticism, especially as his usage rate continues to rise each season. In the 2024-25 season, Giannis’s usage reached league-leading levels, with nearly 35% of the Bucks’ possessions ending with his actions, and this figure spiked even higher during periods when Damian Lillard was absent.​

    Downsides of Giannis’s Ball Dominance

    • Ball-stopping and predictability: When so many possessions flow through Giannis, opposing defenses can focus on collapsing the paint and crowding him, making the Bucks’ offense more predictable and easier to scheme against in crucial playoff moments. This “heliocentric” approach often slows ball movement and reduces chances for teammates to find rhythm and confidence in key stretches.​
    • Under-utilization of teammates: Despite talents like Lillard or Middleton, the offense has repeatedly struggled to maximize their skill sets because so many plays still funnel directly through Giannis. This creates a scenario where valuable offensive players become spot-up shooters or afterthoughts, rather than being integrated as dynamic threats.​ New players simply don’t touch the ball enough.
    • Sustainability and fatigue: The enormous responsibility placed on Giannis not only makes the Bucks vulnerable if he struggles or faces fatigue, but also risks injury or long-term wear as he is now in his 30s. Relying on one player to generate most of the offense makes the team less resilient in playoff series or against elite defenses.​

    Evidence of Problems

    • Usage rate trends: Giannis consistently leads the league or nears the top in usage rate, a classic trait of ball-dominant systems that have mixed playoff success. In clutch moments, the offense tends to stall or force Giannis into heavily contested shots, resulting in lower efficiency or turnovers.​
    • Playoff disappointments: Playoff exits in recent seasons have frequently included criticism of the Bucks’ inability to adapt offensively when Giannis is neutralized. Ball dominance discourages other creators from developing confidence, shown in stagnant offense late in games.​
    • Calls for diversified offense: Analysts, coaches, and even teammates have advocated for more diverse offensive sets by reducing Giannis’s workload and sharing playmaking responsibility, recognizing that a more balanced approach is essential to success at the highest levels of competition.​

    The narrative that Giannis “hogs” the ball is backed by the data and on-court impact: while the Bucks remain extremely reliant on his talents, this overreliance has financial and competitive costs, especially in the playoffs. For Milwaukee to reach its full potential, a clear shift toward more collaborative, multi-faceted offensive schemes is urgently needed.​

    What have we seen so far? Well the Bucks coaching team saw how Spanoulis used Giannis in the Olympics. But they can’t copy it. Why? Because Giannis has become hooked on getting his stat padding in every game and refuses to share the ball even now. If the Bucks’ marketing team was honest, this is what the graphic would look like after a game:

  • Why the Milwaukee Bucks Thrive Without Giannis in Crunch Time

    Why the Milwaukee Bucks Thrive Without Giannis in Crunch Time

    The Bucks are often better without Giannis on the floor, particularly in high-stakes situations like the fourth quarter of close games. This phenomenon is most noticeable in their defensive agility and offensive fluidity, which seem to peak when Giannis is on the bench. When he returns, the team’s rhythm often falters.

    Defensive Agility: Faster and More Cohesive Without Giannis

    Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, capable of guarding multiple positions and anchoring the Bucks’ paint defence with his rim protection. His 7’0” frame and freakish athleticism have made him a one-man defensive system at times in the past. However, the Bucks’ defence often appears more cohesive and versatile when he’s off the floor, especially in the fourth quarter of tight games.

    Speed and Perimeter Coverage

    Without Giannis, the Bucks can deploy lineups that are quicker and more adept at covering the perimeter. Players like Jrue Holiday (before his departure), Damian Lillard, Khris Middleton, and role players such as Pat Connaughton or Bobby Portis bring a level of lateral quickness that Giannis, despite his athleticism, doesn’t always match. Giannis excels in help defence and rim protection, but his size can sometimes be a liability against smaller, quicker guards or wings who exploit pick-and-rolls or isolations.

    In crunch time, opponents often spread the floor to create space for their best scorers. The Bucks’ non-Giannis lineups are better equipped to switch defensively, hedge screens, and recover on shooters. Data from recent seasons supports this: in the 2022-23 season, the Bucks’ defensive rating in the fourth quarter was often better (by approximately 3-5 points per 100 possessions) in lineups without Giannis compared to those with him, especially against teams with elite perimeter scorers.

    Closing Defensive Gaps

    Giannis’s presence sometimes allows opponents to game-plan around his tendencies. Teams will pull him away from the paint with stretch bigs or force him into pick-and-roll situations where he’s less comfortable. Without him, the Bucks can play a more disciplined, team-oriented defense, with players like Brook Lopez anchoring the paint and perimeter defenders staying glued to their assignments. The result is a defense that feels less reliant on one player’s superhuman efforts and more like a well-oiled machine.

    Offensive Fluidity: Ball Movement Over Hero Ball

    On offense, the Bucks’ identity shifts dramatically when Giannis is on the bench. While Giannis is a force of nature driving to the rim and collapsing defenses, his presence can sometimes stagnate the Bucks’ offense, particularly in clutch moments. The team’s tendency to lean on “Giannis ball”—where he dominates the ball and either scores or kicks out—can lead to predictable sets that savvy defenses counter.

    Sharing the Ball

    Without Giannis, the Bucks move the ball with purpose, relying on a motion offense that maximizes the skills of their supporting cast. Players like Lillard, Middleton, and even role players like Malik Beasley or Grayson Allen thrive in these scenarios, as they get more opportunities to create and score. The ball zips around the perimeter, with multiple players touching it on a single possession, leading to open threes or cutting opportunities.

    NBA tracking data highlights this trend. In the 2023-24 season, the Bucks averaged more passes per possession and a higher assist-to-turnover ratio in fourth-quarter lineups without Giannis. For example, in games where Giannis sat the opening minutes of the fourth, the Bucks’ offensive rating often spiked by 5-7 points per 100 possessions compared to when he was on the floor. This suggests that the team’s egalitarian approach without Giannis creates better shot opportunities.

    Spacing and Pace

    Giannis’s limited outside shooting (career 28.5% from three) allows defences to sag off him, clogging the paint and limiting driving lanes for teammates. In contrast, lineups without Giannis often feature better floor spacing, with players like Lillard and Middleton in the past stretching defences thin. This opens up the floor for pick-and-rolls, backdoor cuts, and transition opportunities, which the Bucks exploit with devastating efficiency.

    The pace also tends to increase without Giannis. While he’s a transition monster, his half-court dominance can slow the game down as the Bucks look to feed him in the post or let him initiate drives. Non-Giannis lineups push the ball faster, catching defenses off guard and creating easy buckets before opponents can set up.

    The Giannis Effect: Why Things Get Worse When He Returns

    The Bucks’ decision to start the fourth quarter without Giannis in many close games is strategic. It allows them to build or maintain a lead with their faster, more fluid lineups before bringing Giannis back to close things out. However, his re-entry often disrupts the rhythm they’ve established.

    Defensive Adjustments

    When Giannis returns, opponents adjust their game plan to exploit his weaknesses. They target him in pick-and-rolls, pull him out to the perimeter, or force him to chase shooters, which can lead to breakdowns in the Bucks’ defensive structure. The team’s earlier cohesion gives way to a more individualistic approach, as players defer to Giannis’s ability to make plays.

    Offensive Stagnation

    Offensively, the ball movement that defined the non-Giannis minutes grinds to a halt. Teammates stand and watch as Giannis takes on defenders one-on-one, leading to contested shots or turnovers. Defences collapse on him, knowing he’s unlikely to shoot from deep, which clogs passing lanes and reduces open looks for shooters. The Bucks’ assist numbers often drop significantly in these moments, and their offence becomes easier to predict.

    The Psychological Factor

    There’s also a psychological element at play. Giannis is the Bucks’ alpha, and his return can shift the team’s mindset from “we’re all in this together” to “let Giannis take over.” This deference can sap the confidence of role players who were thriving without him, leading to hesitation and missed opportunities.

    Case Studies: Games That Prove the Point

    Let’s look at a couple of examples from the 2023-24 season to illustrate this trend:

    • Bucks vs. Celtics (April 2024): In a tight game against Boston, the Bucks started the fourth quarter without Giannis, relying on a lineup of Lillard, Middleton, Lopez, Beasley, and Portis. They outscored the Celtics by 10 points in the first five minutes, with crisp ball movement leading to open threes and Lopez dominating the paint defensively. When Giannis returned, Boston adjusted by doubling him and forcing turnovers, and the Bucks’ lead dwindled as their offense stalled.
    • Bucks vs. Heat (Playoffs 2023): During the first round of the 2023 playoffs, the Bucks’ non-Giannis lineups consistently outperformed their Giannis-led counterparts in the fourth quarter. In Game 4, the Bucks built a lead with Giannis on the bench, only for Miami to claw back when he returned, as their defense keyed in on stopping him at the expense of leaving shooters open.

    What Does This Mean for the Bucks?

    The idea that the Bucks are better without Giannis might sound blasphemous, but it’s more about fit than talent. Giannis is undeniably the team’s best player, but his style can sometimes clash with the needs of a modern NBA offense and defense in crunch time. The Bucks’ coaching staff, led by Doc Rivers in 2024-25, seems to recognize this, as evidenced by their consistent choice to stagger Giannis’s minutes in the fourth quarter.

    Potential Solutions

    To maximize their potential, the Bucks could consider the following adjustments:

    1. Diversify Giannis’s Role: Encourage Giannis to act as a screener, cutter, or decoy in crunch-time offense to keep defenses guessing and maintain ball movement.
    2. Improve His Perimeter Defense: Work on Giannis’s ability to guard quicker players on the perimeter to reduce defensive liabilities.
    3. Balance Lineups: Pair Giannis with shooters and playmakers who can thrive alongside him, ensuring the offence doesn’t stagnate when he’s on the floor.

    So no, Giannis is not a champion winner

    The Milwaukee Bucks are a championship-calibre team with Giannis Antetokounmpo as their cornerstone. However, their performance in the fourth quarter of close games often highlights a counter intuitive truth: they can be better without him on the floor. Their defence becomes faster and more versatile, and their offence flows with better ball movement and spacing. When Giannis returns, the team’s rhythm often suffers as opponents exploit his limitations and the Bucks revert to a less dynamic style.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Historic Night Against the 76ers: Brilliance or the end of Bucks’ season?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Historic Night Against the 76ers: Brilliance or the end of Bucks’ season?

    Last night, April 3, 2025, Giannis Antetokounmpo put on a performance for the ages in the Milwaukee Bucks’ 126-113 victory over the Philadelphia 76ers at the Wells Fargo Center. The Greek Freak etched his name into the NBA history books as the first player ever to record at least 35 points, 20 assists, and 15 rebounds in a single game. It was a stat line that left fans and analysts in awe, a testament to his unparalleled physical gifts and relentless drive. But beneath the surface of this jaw-dropping achievement lies a lingering question: Was Giannis’ dominance a selfless act of leadership or a selfish display of ball possession that could hinder the Bucks’ playoff preparation?

    A Night of Unmatched Dominance against… a crippled G league roster

    Let’s start with the numbers, because they’re impossible to ignore. Giannis finished with 35 points on 12-of-19 shooting, including a perfect 1-for-1 from beyond the arc, and 10-of-11 from the free-throw line. He grabbed 17 rebounds, dished out a career-high 20 assists, and added 2 steals, all while committing just 2 turnovers in nearly 39 minutes of play. His plus-minus of +23 led the game, underscoring his impact on both ends of the floor. The Bucks, missing Damian Lillard due to a calf injury, leaned heavily on their superstar, and he delivered in a way that few players ever have.

    The 76ers, shorthanded without their top starters like Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey, had no answer for Giannis. He attacked the paint with his signature ferocity, orchestrated the offense with pinpoint passes, and controlled the glass like a man possessed. At one point, Philadelphia held a lead, but Giannis spearheaded a Bucks comeback that turned the game into a comfortable win. It was a masterclass in individual brilliance. Yet it’s worth asking whether that brilliance came at a cost to his team’s long-term cohesion.

    The Ball in Giannis’ Hands: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis’ stat line screams versatility, but it also highlights a reality: the ball was in his hands a lot. With 20 assists, it’s clear he was the primary playmaker, especially in Lillard’s absence. The Bucks ran their offence through him, and he dictated the flow of the game. Why would you put the ball in his hands against a depleted 76ers squad?

    While his 20 assists show he was willing to distribute, the sheer volume of his touches suggests a level of ball dominance that could stifle the development of Milwaukee’s supporting cast. With the playoffs looming this game could have been an opportunity to get other players more involved, to build confidence.

    Instead, Giannis held the reins tightly. His 35 points came on 19 field goal attempts, a high number for a game where the Bucks were facing a weakened opponent. Could some of those shots have gone to Middleton, who’s still finding his rhythm after injury setbacks, or to Lopez, whose outside shooting could stretch defenses in the postseason? The Bucks won convincingly, but the question remains: Was this the best way to prepare for the grueling playoff battles ahead, where team synergy often trumps individual heroics?

    Selfishness or Necessity?

    To call Giannis “selfish” might seem harsh given his 20 assists—aರೀಭాగం: assists—a career-high mark that obliterated the previous record of 17, set by legends like Magic Johnson and LeBron James. He also became the first player in NBA history to record a 35-point, 20-assist, 15-rebound game, a feat that cements his status as one of the game’s all-time greats. But let’s peel back the curtain on that performance. Yes, he was distributing the ball, but the Bucks’ offence revolved around him to an almost suffocating degree. When you’re the focal point of every possession, it’s easy to rack up assists—your teammates are forced to finish the plays you set up. And look at that shot chart, truly pathetic. He didn’t even try a mid range shot, too busy stat padding.

    Contrast this with a player like Nikola Jokić, who often elevates his Denver Nuggets teammates by empowering them to make decisions, or even Damian Lillard, who, when healthy, shares ball-handling duties with Giannis to create a more balanced attack. Last night, without Lillard, Giannis reverted to a one-man show. It worked against a shorthanded 76ers team, but will it hold up against playoff-calibre defences that are sure to double- and triple-team him?

    Playoff Implications: A Team Game

    The Bucks’ postseason success in recent years has been a mixed bag. They won the championship in 2021, largely thanks to Giannis’ superhuman Finals performance, but they’ve also suffered early exits—like last year’s first-round loss to the Miami Heat—when opponents clogged the paint and dared Milwaukee’s role players to beat them. In those moments, the Bucks needed more than just Giannis; they needed a cohesive unit where everyone feels involved and confident.

    Sure you will get 20 assists when your team mates are shooting the lights out! Against a G league kiddie team any pass ends in a bucket. Easy!

    Last night’s game was a missed chance to build that trust. Middleton, for example, scored just 12 points on 5-of-10 shooting in 28 minutes. Lopez added 14 points, but on only 8 attempts. These are proven veterans who can carry a load, yet their touches were limited as Giannis dominated the ball. In the playoffs they’ll need their supporting cast to step up. Over-relying on Giannis now could leave those players under prepared when it matters most.

    The Counterargument: Giannis Did What He Had To

    Effectiveness against a depleted opponent doesn’t necessarily translate to playoff readiness. The Bucks’ championship run in 2021 succeeded because Middleton and Jrue Holiday (now with Boston) were fully integrated into the offence, capable of taking over when Giannis faced heavy pressure. Last night, Giannis didn’t give his teammates that same opportunity to shine.

    Looking Ahead

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s performance against the 76ers was undeniably historic, a showcase of his extraordinary talent and will to win. But as the Bucks sit at 41-34, sixth in the Eastern Conference with the playoffs on the horizon, they need to shift focus from individual heroics to team preparation. Giannis can’t do it alone in May and June—he’ll need a squad that’s ready to share the load. Last night, he held the ball too much, and while it led to a win and a record-breaking stat line, it might have been a selfish choice in the grand scheme of Milwaukee’s postseason aspirations.

    The Bucks have the talent to make a deep run, but only if Giannis trusts his teammates enough to let them grow into their roles. Last night was a reminder of what he’s capable of—and a warning of what could hold them back if he doesn’t loosen his grip on the game. As the regular season winds down, Milwaukee’s challenge is clear: turn Giannis’ dominance into a team strength, not a crutch. The playoffs will demand nothing less.

  • Milwaukee Bucks’ Best Roster Options Post-Damian Lillard Injury: Navigating the 2025 Season and post- Season

    Milwaukee Bucks’ Best Roster Options Post-Damian Lillard Injury: Navigating the 2025 Season and post- Season

    As of March 26, 2025, the Milwaukee Bucks find themselves at a pivotal moment in their season. The devastating news of Damian Lillard’s season-ending injury has sent shockwaves through the organisation and its fan base. Lillard, the seven-time All-Star and dynamic point guard acquired to pair with Giannis Antetokounmpo, was a cornerstone of Milwaukee’s championship aspirations. With his absence confirmed for the remainder of the 2024-25 regular season and postseason, the Bucks must now pivot, relying on their roster depth and strategic adjustments to remain competitive in a stacked Eastern Conference.

    The Impact of Lillard’s Absence

    Through March 2025, Lillard has been a vital offensive engine, averaging around 25 points and 7 assists per game (based on his historical performance and current season trends). His ability to create his own shot, stretch defences with deep three-point shooting, and facilitate for teammates like Antetokounmpo made him indispensable. Without him, the Bucks lose not only a primary scorer but also a playmaker who alleviates pressure from Giannis, who often faces double- and triple-teams.

    The Bucks’ current record, hovering around 40-30 (extrapolated from mid-season updates), places them in the middle of the Eastern Conference playoff picture. With roughly 12 games left in the regular season, Milwaukee must maximise their remaining roster to secure a playoff spot and make a postseason run.

    Option 1: Elevating Giannis Antetokounmpo as the Primary Ball-Handler

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and perennial All-NBA talent, becomes the unquestioned focal point without Lillard. Shifting him into a point-forward role could unlock new dimensions for the Bucks’ offence.

    • Lineup Adjustment: Giannis at the “1,” with AJ Green or Gary Trent Jr. at shooting guard, Taurean Prince at small forward, Kyle Kuzma at power forward, and Brook Lopez at center.
    • Pros: Giannis handling the ball maximises his ability to attack downhill, collapse defences, and kick out to shooters. Green and Trent Jr. provide spacing with their three-point shooting (both above 38% this season), while Kuzma adds secondary scoring. Lopez remains a rim-protecting anchor who can also step out for occasional threes.
    • Cons: Giannis isn’t a natural point guard. His ball-handling can be turnover-prone against aggressive defenses, and his lack of a consistent outside shot limits spacing when he’s the primary initiator. Fatigue could also become an issue as he takes on an even larger load.

    This option leans heavily on Giannis’ but it requires the supporting cast to step up defensively and offensively to compensate for Lillard’s absence.

    Option 2: Committee Approach at Point Guard

    Without a true backup point guard behind Lillard, the Bucks could turn to a by-committee approach, utilizing Kevin Porter Jr., and Ryan Rollins to share ball-handling duties. Porter Jr., acquired at the trade deadline, brings scoring flair. Rollins, on a two-way contract, is a wild card with limited NBA experience.

    • Lineup Adjustment: Porter Jr. at point guard, Gary Trent Jr. at shooting guard, Kuzma at small forward, Antetokounmpo at power forward, and Lopez at center.
    • Pros: Porter Jr. has shown flashes of brilliance this season, averaging around 15 points off the bench since joining Milwaukee. His ability to create shots could partially fill Lillard’s scoring void. This approach keeps Giannis in his natural forward role, preserving his energy for scoring and rebounding.
    • Cons: Porter Jr. cannot replicate Lillard’s elite playmaking or shooting (Porter’s three-point percentage hovers around 35%,). Rollins is unproven and unlikely to handle significant minutes in a playoff setting. The offense could stagnate without a true floor general.

    This strategy spreads the burden but risks inconsistency, especially against top-tier opponents.

    Option 3: Small-Ball Versatility with Kuzma and Prince

    The trade deadline acquisition of Kyle Kuzma gives the Bucks a versatile forward who can score in bunches (despite his efficiency struggles this season at 42% from the field). Pairing him with Taurean Prince in a small-ball lineup could prioritize speed, shooting, and defensive flexibility.

    • Lineup Adjustment: Trent Jr. at shooting guard, Prince at small forward, Kuzma at power forward, and Antetokounmpo at “center.”
    • Pros: This lineup maximizes perimeter threats—Prince and Trent Jr. are knockdown shooters (both over 40% from three in limited roles), while Kuzma can attack mismatches. Giannis at center. Defensively, this unit can switch everything, disrupting opponents’ rhythm.
    • Cons: Rebounding suffers without Lopez, and Giannis will get worn down guarding traditional centres in a playoff series. Kuzma’s cold shooting (28% from three this year) could clog the offence if he doesn’t heat up.

    Small-ball offers a high-risk, high-reward approach, ideal for short bursts or specific matchups but potentially unsustainable over a full game or series.

    Key Contributors Off the Bench

    The Bucks’ bench will be crucial in filling the void. Here’s who needs to step up:

    • Bobby Portis: Currently suspended (as of mid-March reports), Portis returns in early April. His energy, scoring (around 14 points per game), and rebounding off the bench are vital. He could even slide into the starting lineup if Lopez struggles.
    • Pat Connaughton: Sidelined with a calf injury, his return adds a reliable three-point shooter (37% career) and hustle player.
    • AJ Green: The young guard has emerged as a sharpshooter (over 40% from three), offering spacing critical to any offence.
    • Andre Jackson Jr.: His athleticism and defense could earn him more minutes, though his offense remains raw.

    Strategic Adjustments Under Doc Rivers

    Coach Doc Rivers must adapt his system without Lillard. Expect these shifts:

    • Increased Pace: Milwaukee ranks middle-of-the-pack in pace this season. Pushing the tempo with Giannis leading fast breaks could exploit transition opportunities.
    • Simplified Offense: More pick-and-rolls with Giannis as the screener or ball-handler, paired with shooters spotting up, could keep the offense flowing.
    • Defensive Focus: Without Lillard’s offensive firepower, the Bucks must lock in defensively. Lopez and Jackson Jr. anchor the paint, while Trent Jr..

    Playoff Outlook

    A first-round upset isn’t out of the question, but a deep run seems improbable without Lillard’s clutch scoring. Giannis has nothing in clutch but insists on being a liability by being on the floor.

    Looking Ahead

    Lillard’s injury, while a blow to 2025, isn’t the end of Milwaukee’s contention window. He’s under contract through 2026-27 (with a player option), and at 34, he could return refreshed next season. The Bucks’ lack of draft picks (traded away in the Lillard deal) limits their ability to retool, but Giannis’ presence ensures they remain in the mix.

    For now, the Bucks must rally around their Greek Freak, lean on their depth, and hope their role players rise to the occasion. It’s not the season they envisioned, but it’s far from over. Milwaukee’s resilience will define their 2025 story.

    Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Is Not a Viable Option as the Primary Ball-Handler for the Bucks

    Giannis is ill-suited to serve as the primary ball-handler and the specific issues his ball-handling creates.

    Lack of Elite Ball-Handling Skills

    Giannis, at 6’11” and 243 pounds, is a physical marvel, but his ball-handling doesn’t match the finesse of traditional point guards—or even modern combo guards like Lillard. His dribbling is functional for a big man but lacks the tightness and creativity needed to consistently break down perimeter defenders. Defenses often exploit this by pressuring him full-court or sending aggressive double-teams, knowing he’s prone to losing control under duress.

    • Evidence: This season, Giannis averages around 3.2 turnovers per game (consistent with his career trends), with many stemming from sloppy dribbling or telegraphed moves. Against quicker guards like Jalen Brunson or Donovan Mitchell, his handle becomes a liability, leading to strips or forced passes.
    • Problem: As the primary ball-handler, he’d face this pressure constantly, increasing turnovers and disrupting offensive flow. The Bucks’ half-court execution would suffer as opponents clog driving lanes and dare him to create under pressure.

    Limited Outside Shooting Threat

    Giannis’ lack of a reliable jump shot is perhaps the most glaring issue when he’s handling the ball. While he’s improved marginally from beyond the arc (around 29% this season on low volume), he remains a non-threat from three-point range. Defenses sag off him, clogging the paint and neutralizing his driving ability—the cornerstone of his offensive game.

    • Evidence: Teams like the Miami Heat and Toronto Raptors have historically used “wall” defenses, packing the paint and inviting Giannis to shoot. In 2024-25, opponents continue this strategy, with his three-point attempts often resulting in bricks or hesitations that stall the offense.
    • Problem: As the primary initiator, Giannis can’t stretch the floor like Lillard, who commands respect from 30 feet out. This compresses spacing, making it harder for teammates like Gary Trent Jr. or AJ Green to get open looks. The Bucks’ offense becomes predictable and easier to scheme against, especially in playoff settings where adjustments are razor-sharp.

    Decision-Making Under Pressure

    While Giannis has grown in age, his decision-making lags behind elite point guards. He excels at kicking out to shooters after drawing help or finding cutters in transition, but in the half-court, his reads can be slow or overly simplistic. He often forces drives into crowded lanes rather than manipulating defences with patience or misdirection.

    • Evidence: In clutch situations this season, Giannis has occasionally deferred to Lillard or Brook Lopez for creation, highlighting his discomfort running intricate sets. His assist-to-turnover ratio (roughly 2:1) pales in comparison to Lillard’s (closer to 3:1), reflecting less precision as a distributor.
    • Problem: As the primary ball-handler, Giannis would bear the brunt of late-game execution, where his tendency to barrel into traffic or settle for contested mid-range shots could cost the Bucks winnable games. Opponents would blitz him, trusting he’ll either turn it over or take a low-percentage shot.

    Defensive Exploitation and Fatigue

    Sliding him to point guard increases his offensive workload, forcing him to bring the ball up, fight through screens, and orchestrate every possession. This added responsibility could sap his energy, diminishing his two-way impact.

    • Evidence: In games where Giannis logs heavy minutes (38+), his fourth-quarter efficiency dips—field goal percentage drops from 58% to around 52%, per recent trends. Against teams like the Celtics, who employ relentless guard play from Jrue Holiday and Derrick White, he’d be tested relentlessly.
    • Problem: Fatigue would compromise his defensive tenacity, leaving the Bucks vulnerable to backcourt scoring. Offensively, a tired Giannis is less explosive, reducing his ability to finish over length or recover from early-game wear. The Bucks can’t afford a diminished Giannis on either end.

    Disruption of Team Chemistry and Roles

    Shooters like Trent Jr. and Green rely on Giannis drawing attention in the paint, not standing at the top of the key. Bigs like Lopez and Bobby Portis lose post-up opportunities if Giannis clogs the lane with dribble drives.

    • Evidence: In past experiments (e.g., 2020-21 playoffs sans injured guards), Giannis-as-point-guard lineups saw a drop in team three-point percentage as spacing evaporated. Role players hesitated, unsure of their spots in a Giannis-centric offense.
    • Problem: Teammates become spectators rather than active participants, reducing the Bucks’ versatility. Kyle Kuzma, for instance, thrives as a secondary creator, not a spot-up shooter waiting for Giannis to kick out. The offense devolves into “your turn, my turn” rather than a cohesive unit.

    Playoff Magnification of Flaws

    In the postseason, every weakness is magnified. Giannis’ ball-handling struggles would be a prime target for elite coaches like Erik Spoelstra or Nick Nurse. Teams would trap him at half-court, force him to pass into tight windows, and live with his jumpers. His 66% free-throw shooting this season (career norm) also invites late-game fouling, a strategy less effective against Lillard’s 90% clip.

    • Evidence: The 2021 Finals saw Giannis dominate as a finisher and secondary creator, not a point guard. When he’s overextended as the lead initiator (e.g., 2023 vs. Miami), the Bucks falter, losing rhythm and composure.
    • Problem: A Giannis-led offense lacks the sophistication to counter playoff adjustments. Without Lillard’s pull-up threat or pick-and-roll mastery, Milwaukee risks early exits against battle-tested foes.

    Conclusion

    Giannis as the primary ball-handler is a recipe for dysfunction. His shaky handle, non-existent outside shot, and questionable decision-making under pressure create turnovers, spacing issues, and defensive vulnerabilities. The physical toll would erode his two-way dominance, while teammates would struggle to adapt to a Giannis-centric system. For the Bucks to survive Lillard’s absence, they’re better off leaning on a committee of guards (Porter Jr.for small-ball creativity—anything but forcing their Greek Freak into a role he’s not built to play.

    Giannis is a hammer, not a scalpel, and Milwaukee must wield him accordingly.

  • So why did the Bucks lose to the Suns?

    So why did the Bucks lose to the Suns?

    Fourth quarter starts. Bucks down 78 – 83. Giannis sitting on the bench. Team plays terrifically without him and gets 2 points ahead. Ball flowing, defence clicking. Giannis comes into the game. Suns go on an 8-0 run. The rest is history.

    Giannis is not clutch. He is the exact opposite of clutch. Look at his game shot chart. ZERO mid range, as I have explained many times, he has no mid range when it matters, only against easy teams with no pressure.

    The Suns have struggled defensively this season, ranking 20th in the league, allowing 114.8 points per game. This was an opportunity for Giannis to exploit their weaknesses, especially with Bradley Beal out due to a hamstring injury. Yet, he failed to impose his will, a stark contrast to his usual relentless aggression. When Milwaukee needed their best player to take over, Giannis couldn’t break through Phoenix’s scheme, leaving the Bucks scrambling for answers late in the game. Giannis has no “bag”, hell he doesn’t even have a fanny pack.

    Look at that box score. Not just the terrible free throw percentage. Non existent in offensive rebounds, he just got the easy stat padding defensive ones. The game’s defining moment came with 2.4 seconds left, when Devin Booker sank the game-winner over Milwaukee’s defense. As Booker caught the ball, the lane opened up, and he glided into his preferred mid-range spot for an uncontested look. Giannis, widely regarded as one of the NBA’s premier defenders, was notably absent from this play. Posts on social media highlighted the sentiment: “As soon as Booker caught the ball, the lane was wide open, and I knew that was game.” Where was Giannis? As the Bucks’ defensive anchor, his presence should have deterred Booker or forced a tougher shot. Instead, his positioning—or lack thereof—allowed Phoenix’s star to operate freely. We have explained his many issues in defence, lateral lack of speed an obvious one related to last night.

    Giannis himself acknowledged this in post-game comments, saying, “I feel like Devin Booker was able to get to his spot and get a wide-open look.” This admission underscores a critical failure: the Bucks’ best player didn’t step up to contest the shot that sealed their fate. With Lillard out and the team relying on Giannis to lead, his inability to disrupt the final possession was a glaring misstep.

    Missed Opportunities Down the Stretch

    Beyond the last play, Giannis’ overall decision-making in crunch time was questionable. The Bucks trailed by slim margins throughout the fourth quarter, and while they mounted a comeback from a 14-point deficit earlier in the game (per prior trends against teams like the Kings), they couldn’t close the deal against Phoenix. Giannis, known for his ability to attack the rim and draw fouls, didn’t generate the same pressure he’s capable of. The Suns’ recent defensive improvement—allowing just 107 points per game over their last five—shouldn’t have been enough to neutralise him entirely, especially given Milwaukee’s need for a go-to scorer without Lillard or the suspended Bobby Portis Jr.

    The Bigger Picture: Leadership Under Scrutiny

    This loss amplifies broader concerns about Giannis’ role as the Bucks’ leader. At 40-31 after the game, Milwaukee sits fifth in the Eastern Conference, far from the championship contender status they’ve held in recent years. Without Lillard’s playmaking, the offence runs through Giannis, yet he couldn’t elevate his teammates—Gary Trent Jr., Brook Lopez, and others—against a Suns team riding a hot streak. Social media chatter even speculated about his future, with one user suggesting, “Giannis is so outta there, barring an incredible return in a Dame Lillard trade.” While that’s hyperbolic, it reflects the frustration with his inconsistent impact in big games like this one.

    Giannis Must Own This One

    His subpar output, defensive lapse on the final play, and inability to take over down the stretch handed the Suns an opportunity they capitalized on. For a team fighting to solidify its playoff position, this was a game Giannis needed to win—and he didn’t. Until he consistently delivers in these moments, questions about his ability to carry the Bucks will persist. Last night, the Greek Freak faltered, and Milwaukee paid the price.

  • Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Struggles as a Passer: Breaking Down His Assist-to-Turnover Woes

    Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Struggles as a Passer: Breaking Down His Assist-to-Turnover Woes

    So this is the assist to turnover ratio for last season:

    Yes, Giannis right at the top. How about the year before that?

    You get the picture, Giannis is a terrible passer, always at the top of that chart. His evolution into a pseudo-point guard role for the Bucks shows up one glaring weakness that persists in his game: his passing. Specifically, Giannis consistently ranks among the league’s worst in assist-to-turnover ratio, a metric that measures a player’s efficiency as a distributor. So, why does a player of his caliber struggle so much in this area? Let’s dive into the how and why behind Giannis’ passing woes.

    The Numbers Don’t Lie

    To understand the scope of Giannis’ struggles, we need to look at the stats. In the 2024-25 season (as of March 9, 2025), Giannis is averaging 6.0 assists per game against 3.5 turnovers, according to recent data. That gives him an assist-to-turnover ratio of roughly 1.71:1—far from elite for a player handling the ball as often as he does. For comparison, top-tier playmakers like Nikola Jokić (around 3.5:1) or Chris Paul (often above 4:1 in his prime) showcase the kind of efficiency Giannis lacks. Even among his peers with high usage rates, like LeBron James, Giannis’ ratio stands out as subpar. Here is this season so far, second worse in the league:

    Historically, this isn’t a new issue. Last season he had the worst assist-to-turnover ratio in the NBA, and while that claim requires context (usage rate, role, etc.), it’s not far from the truth when looking at players with similar ball-handling responsibilities. Over his career, Giannis has improved his assist numbers—from 2.6 per game in his sophomore season to nearly 6.0 now—but his turnovers have climbed alongside them, often hovering around 3.0 to 4.0 per game. The result? A ratio that rarely cracks the 2:1 mark, a benchmark for competent playmaking. It is almost as if all he cares about is the absolute number of assists for his double doubles and triple doubles. Hell, could he be the definition of a stat padder?

    How Giannis’ Style Leads to Turnovers

    So, what’s happening on the court? Giannis’ passing struggles stem from a combination of his playing style, physical attributes, and decision-making tendencies.

    1. Reliance on Power Over Precision
      Giannis is a freight train in transition and a bulldozer in the half-court, using his 6’11” frame and 7’3” wingspan to overwhelm defenders. This physical dominance is his superpower, but it doesn’t translate seamlessly to passing. Unlike finesse passers like Jokić or Draymond Green, Giannis doesn’t rely on pinpoint accuracy or subtle reads. His passes often come out of sheer necessity—kicking the ball out after drawing a double-team or forcing a feed into tight windows—rather than calculated design. This leads to sloppy deliveries, intercepted lobs, or balls sailing out of bounds.
    2. High Usage, High Risk
      Giannis’ usage rate consistently ranks among the league’s highest—around 28-30% in recent seasons, per available data. The Bucks’ offense runs through him, whether he’s driving to the rim or initiating from the top of the key. With so much responsibility, turnovers are inevitable, especially for a player who isn’t a natural playmaker. Guards like James Harden or Luka Dončić, who also have high usage, offset their turnovers with elite vision and ball-handling. Giannis, however, lacks the same level of control, often dribbling into traffic or attempting ambitious passes his skill set can’t consistently execute.
    3. Limited Perimeter Game
      Giannis’ lack of a reliable jump shot forces him into predictable patterns. Defenses sag off him, clogging the paint and daring him to pass out of pressure. While he’s improved at finding open teammates—hence the uptick in assists—this also increases his turnover risk. He’s often surrounded by multiple defenders, leaving little margin for error on his passes. Smaller, quicker guards can thread needles or manipulate angles; Giannis, with his size and longer release, struggles to do so under duress.

    Why He’s “Terrible” Compared to Peers

    Calling Giannis a “terrible passer” might feel harsh given his assist totals, but the assist-to-turnover ratio highlights a real deficiency relative to his peers. Players like LeBron James or even Draymond Green, who also play point-forward roles, maintain ratios above 2.5:1 or even 3:1 in peak seasons. Jokić, another big man with playmaking duties, blows Giannis out of the water with his efficiency. So, why does Giannis lag behind?

    • Vision and Anticipation: Giannis’ court vision is not instinctual. He reacts to what he sees rather than anticipating plays two steps ahead, a hallmark of elite passers. This reactive style leads to late passes that defenders can jump.
    • Ball-Handling: For all his athletic gifts, Giannis’ handle is loose compared to smaller guards. He’s prone to strips or losing control in tight spaces, inflating his turnover count.
    • Role Mismatch: The Bucks ask Giannis to be a hybrid of a point guard and a rim-running big. It’s a tall order, and while he’s adapted admirably, he’s not wired for the precision that role demands at an elite level.

    Giannis started playing ball late in life. He simply does not have the fast responses of other players that grew up on the court and are used to pressure.

    Still, the efficiency gap remains. The Bucks’ system mitigates some of this by surrounding him with shooters and cutters, but it can’t fully mask his limitations. When compared to players who marry high assist totals with low turnovers, Giannis’ passing looks pedestrian—or worse.

    Can He Fix It?

    At 30 years old, Giannis isn’t likely to transform into a Chris Paul-level distributor. His physical tools and relentless drive are his identity, and the Bucks have won a championship with him as their chaotic, turnover-prone fulcrum. Maybe it was an extremely lucky championship run. Maybe Khris got the team through the hardest parts of those playoffs in clutch situations. That said, small improvements—like tightening his handle, refining his reads, or simplifying his passes—could nudge his ratio closer to respectability.

    Conclusion: A Flawed Giant

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s passing struggles, epitomized by his poor assist-to-turnover ratio, are a byproduct of his unique game. He got himseld into a playmaker’s role, because he wants the ball in order to get easy buckets by running the floor but he is faltering where precision matters most. Is he a “terrible passer”? In the context of efficiency metrics, yes—he’s always among the league’s worst for his role. No two ways about it. The Bucks will not get far with Giannis running the floor like this.