Greek Freak Analyzed

Tag: bullshit

  • Why Does Giannis Antetokounmpo Wear Number 34?

    Why Does Giannis Antetokounmpo Wear Number 34?

    Beyond his incredible athleticism and inspiring rise from humble beginnings, fans often notice the number he proudly wears on his jersey: 34. While jersey numbers can sometimes be arbitrary, Giannis claims the choice of 34 carries deep personal significance tied to his family and his journey.

    The Family Connection: A Tribute to His Parents

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s story is one of resilience, family, and loyalty, and his jersey number is a direct reflection of that. He has openly shared that he chose 34 as a tribute to his parents, Charles and Veronica Antetokounmpo, who were born in 1963 and 1964, respectively. When you combine the last digits of their birth years—3 from 1963 and 4 from 1964—you get 34. This simple yet heartfelt gesture showcases Giannis’ deep gratitude for the sacrifices his parents made to give him and his brothers a better life. It’s also kinda dumb and possibly retrospectively applied to impress. After all his personal story is a big part of his personal brand. After all using 1964 and 1963 he could have picked pretty much any jersey number. Why just the last digit? Why the 3 first? He could just as well have number 43. It makes zero sense. Here is what AI says:

    Born in Athens, Greece, to Nigerian immigrants, Giannis grew up in a tight-knit family facing significant challenges. His parents worked tirelessly, often selling goods on the streets to provide for their five sons. Charles and Veronica instilled in Giannis a sense of hard work, perseverance, and unity—values that have defined his career and personal life. By wearing 34, Giannis says keeps his parents close to him on the court, honoring their legacy and the foundation they built for his success.

    A Number Rooted in His Origin Story

    The choice of 34 isn’t just a numerical nod to his parents’ birth years; it’s also a symbol of Giannis’ origin story. Before he became an NBA superstar, Giannis was an unknown teenager playing in Greece’s lower basketball leagues. His family’s immigrant background and financial struggles shaped his early years, and he didn’t even pick up basketball seriously until his mid-teens. The number 34 ties him to that past—a reminder of where he came from and the people who supported him along the way. Or at least that’s what he says! Because it doesn’t really make much sense.

    When Giannis was drafted by the Milwaukee Bucks in 2013 as the 15th overall pick, he brought with him not just raw talent but also a unique perspective shaped by his upbringing. The number 34 became a way to carry his family’s journey with him into the NBA, grounding him as he transitioned from a lanky prospect to a global icon.

    Consistency Across His Career

    Giannis has worn number 34 consistently throughout his professional career with the Bucks. This consistency speaks to his character—loyal, steadfast, and unwavering in his principles. Either that or he is too lazy to start over at a new franchise. While some athletes might choose a number for its flashiness or cultural cachet (think Michael Jordan’s 23 or LeBron James’ 6), Giannis’ choice, if in fact it was a choice, tries to point to his brand.

    Interestingly, Giannis didn’t wear 34 during his early basketball days in Greece with Filathlitikos, where he sported number 13 instead or number 4. However, once he arrived in Milwaukee, he settled on 34, and it’s been a constant ever since. The Bucks have embraced this number as synonymous with their franchise star, and it’s now etched into the team’s history, especially after Giannis’ iconic 50-point performance in Game 6 of the 2021 NBA Finals to clinch the championship.

    A Symbol of Unity for the Antetokounmpo Brothers

    Family extends beyond just his parents for Giannis—his brothers also play a significant role in his life and career. Thanasis, Kostas, and Alex Antetokounmpo have all pursued basketball, with Thanasis even joining Giannis on the Bucks roster. While his brothers have worn different numbers (Thanasis wears 43, for example), Giannis’ 34 serves as a unifying thread for the family’s collective journey in the sport. It’s a subtle way of representing the Antetokounmpo legacy, which has grown from the streets of Athens to the NBA hardwood. Kostas wears number 37. Alex wears number 29. Go figure. They either don’t share the same passion for family loyalty or just don’t bullshit as much as Giannis.

    In interviews, Giannis often speaks about the importance of family, crediting his brothers for pushing him and keeping him grounded. The number 34, in a way, encapsulates that brotherhood, linking his individual success to the shared dreams and struggles of the Antetokounmpo clan.

    The Cultural Impact of 34

    Giannis’ rise to stardom has made number 34 more than just a jersey number—it’s a symbol of inspiration for fans, especially those from immigrant backgrounds or underdog stories. The “Greek Freak” nickname and his larger-than-life personality have turned 34 into a recognizable brand. Bucks fans proudly wear 34 jerseys, and young players around the world look to emulate the two-time MVP who turned adversity into triumph.

    It’s true that the number 34 has been worn by some of the NBA’s most iconic players. “Shaq” wore number 34 during his time with the Los Angeles Lakers, where he won multiple championships. “Sir Charles” made the number 34 famous during his time with the Phoenix Suns. Hakeem Olajuwon,
    “The Dream” wore number 34 with the Houston Rockets, where he won his NBA titles. Also Ray Allen, Wendell Carter jr, even Elgin Baylor wore it once for a season. But sure, you can choose to believe that Giannis picked it because of his parents if you prefer…

    Did He Have Other Options?

    When Giannis joined the Bucks, it’s worth noting that jersey numbers aren’t always a free-for-all choice—teams have retired numbers or current players occupying certain digits. For example, the Bucks have retired numbers like 1 (Oscar Robertson), 8 (Marques Johnson), and 32 (Brian Winters), but 34 was available. Giannis may well have had other numbers in mind, but he’s never publicly wavered from his commitment to 34. It’s unlikely that the personal significance of the number made it his top choice from the start, and the Bucks were happy to oblige their future cornerstone. He probably just made up the story retrospectively. It’s a bit like when you get a new SIM card with a strange number and you try to make sense of it in order to remember it. “Oh, yes, it’s my birthday backwards except the second and fifth digits are different!”

    More Than Just a Number? It doesn’t matter anymore

    So, why does Giannis wear 34? It’s a tribute to his parents, Charles and Veronica, whose birth years inspired the choice. It’s a link to his roots in Greece and the sacrifices his family made. It’s a constant in a career marked by extraordinary growth, and it’s a symbol of the unity that defines the Antetokounmpo family. For Giannis, 34 isn’t just a number—it’s a story, a legacy, and a reminder of what drives him every time he steps onto the court.

    Then again, it’s probably 100% bullshit. His kids are called Liam, Maverick and Eva. In many Nigerian cultures it is important to honour ancestors by naming children after parents or other relatives. This is a way to keep the family lineage alive and to pass on positive qualities. This practice is very common in many ethnic groups, including the Yoruba and Igbo people. So Giannis must be related to his Ford Maverick because he sure didn’t think to name them after his parents!

    As Giannis continues to build his career, number 34 will undoubtedly remain a defining part of his identity. For fans, it’s a number that represents not just a basketball player, but a man who turned his family’s dreams into reality—one dunk, one block, and one heartfelt tribute at a time. It also shows just how gullible his fans are. More than likely the selection of number 34 was completely random when he arrived at the Bucks and he totally made up the meaning he now says it has. But that’s what his fans like and they are more than willing to lap up any stupid story he comes up with!

  • No skills, no talent, only self belief. Did Giannis really say that about himself?

    No skills, no talent, only self belief. Did Giannis really say that about himself?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo recently made waves with a bold statement: “No skills, no talent, just self-belief.” On the surface, it’s the kind of gritty, underdog rhetoric that’s fuelled his rise from a scrawny Greek prospect to a two-time MVP and NBA champion. But let’s peel back the layers—this claim isn’t just humble bravado. It’s a smokescreen, a clever way to dodge accountability for the glaring inadequacies he’s failed to address over the years. Far from a testament to his growth, it’s an admission that self-belief has been his crutch, papering over a lack of real development in key areas of his game.

    First, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: his shooting. Giannis has been in the league since 2013, and yet his jump shot remains a work in progress—at best. His career three-point percentage hovers around 28%, and his free-throw shooting has been a playoff liability, famously exploited during the Bucks’ 2021 title run. Teams still sag off him, daring him to shoot, and too often, he obliges with clunky, inconsistent results. For a player with his physical gifts—6’11”, with a wingspan that defies logic—you’d expect more refinement by now. Compare him to someone like Kevin Durant, who honed his shooting to lethal precision, or even LeBron James, who turned a shaky jumper into a reliable weapon. Giannis? He’s still banking on athleticism and “self-belief” to bulldoze his way to the rim. That’s not growth; that’s stubbornness.

    Then there’s his playmaking. Sure, he racks up assists—averaging 6.0 per game in the 2023-24 season—but it’s less a sign of elite vision and more a byproduct of defences collapsing on his drives. His passes are often predictable, lacking the creativity or precision of a true floor general like Nikola Jokić or Chris Paul. When the Bucks needed him to elevate his teammates in crunch time against the Heat in the 2023 playoffs, he faltered, and Miami’s zone defense exposed his inability to adapt. Self-belief doesn’t fix tunnel vision; skill does. Yet Giannis seems content to lean on his raw power rather than expand his basketball IQ.

    Defensively, he’s a force—don’t get me wrong. But even there he relies only on physical tools and there is no nuanced improvement. He’s a roving help defender but ask him to lock down a shifty guard one-on-one or navigate complex pick-and-roll schemes, and the cracks show. Modern NBA defences demand versatility, not just rim protection. Giannis hasn’t evolved into the cerebral defender he could be—he’s still coasting on those freakish measurables. And they are becoming less and less relevant to winning in the NBA when it really counts.

    The “no skills, no talent” line might play well with fans who love his everyman charm, but it’s a cop-out. It suggests his success is some mystical triumph of will, not the result of deliberate craft. And maybe that’s the problem: Giannis hasn’t had to grind as hard on the finer points because his athleticism and the Bucks’ system have carried him this far. But the league is changing—teams are smarter, schemes are tighter, and raw talent alone doesn’t cut it anymore. His 2021 Finals run was a peak, no doubt, but since then, we’ve seen diminishing returns. The Bucks’ early playoff exits in 2023 and 2024 hint at a ceiling he’s unwilling to push past.

    Contrast this with peers like Jayson Tatum, who’s sharpened his mid range game, or Luka Dončić, who’s mastered pace and control. Giannis, meanwhile, is still the freight train—unstoppable until you figure out the tracks. Saying “just self-belief” isn’t inspiring; it’s a red flag that he’s hasn’t prioritised tangible skill development over the long haul. At 30 years old, with over a decade in the NBA, the clock’s ticking for Giannis to prove he’s more than a one-trick pony. Self-belief got him here, but it won’t keep him at the top. The Giannis mythos is real—hustle, heart, and an unrelenting motor—but let’s not kid ourselves: claiming “no skills, no talent” isn’t humility. It’s a mask for a superstar who’s plateaued, banking on charisma and past glory to hide the truth. Time will tell if he’s got the guts to reinvent himself—or if he’ll keep running the same play, hoping the league doesn’t catch up.

    BTW Nike, nice touch to add the “freakishly hard work”. But it won’t really make a difference if Giannis keeps failing to improve.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s “No Failure in Sports” Speech: Irrational and Disrespectful

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s “No Failure in Sports” Speech: Irrational and Disrespectful

    On April 26, 2023, after the Milwaukee Bucks were unceremoniously bounced from the NBA playoffs by the eighth-seeded Miami Heat, Giannis Antetokounmpo stepped up to the podium for a postgame press conference. When asked by The Athletic’s Eric Nehm if he viewed the Bucks’ season as a failure, Giannis didn’t just deflect—he launched into a two-minute philosophical sermon that’s since been hailed as a moment of wisdom and perspective. “There’s no failure in sports,” he declared. “There’s good days, bad days. Some days you’re able to be successful, some days you’re not. Some days it’s your turn, some days it’s not your turn.” He even threw in a Michael Jordan reference for good measure: “Michael Jordan played 15 years, won six championships. The other nine years was a failure? That’s what you’re telling me?”

    The internet erupted. Fans praised his humility, analysts lauded his maturity, and even fellow athletes like Naomi Osaka and Steve Kerr chimed in with admiration. But let’s pump the brakes on the hero worship for a second. While Giannis’s speech might sound profound on the surface, it’s worth digging deeper. In my view, this take isn’t just irrational—it’s disrespectful to the very essence of competitive sports, the fans who invest in it, and the teammates who poured their hearts into a season that ended in undeniable disappointment. Here’s why.

    The Irrationality: Failure Is the Backbone of Sports

    Giannis’s core argument—that failure doesn’t exist in sports because it’s all just “steps to success”—is a feel-good soundbite that crumbles under scrutiny. Sports are built on the binary of winning and losing. Every game, every season, has a clear objective: to come out on top. When you don’t, you’ve failed to meet that goal. It’s not about good days or bad days—it’s about results. To suggest otherwise is to ignore the fundamental structure of competition.

    Take his Michael Jordan example. Giannis asks if Jordan’s nine non-championship seasons were failures. Well, yes, Giannis—they were, at least in the context of the ultimate goal. Jordan himself would tell you that. The man was famously fuelled by every loss, every slight, every season that didn’t end with a ring. He didn’t shrug off those nine years as “steps” in some philosophical journey—he saw them as failures to overcome. That’s why he pushed himself to six titles. Giannis’s attempt to re frame Jordan’s career as a gentle progression dismisses the relentless drive that defined MJ’s legacy. Failure isn’t a dirty word; it’s a motivator.

    And let’s talk about the Bucks’ 2022-23 season specifically. This wasn’t just a “bad day.” The Bucks finished with the NBA’s best regular-season record (58-24), secured the No. 1 seed in the East, and entered the playoffs as title favorites. They then proceeded to lose in five games to a Miami Heat team that barely squeaked into the postseason as a No. 8 seed. Giannis himself missed two and a half games with a back injury, and when he returned, he struggled down the stretch—shooting 10-of-23 from the free-throw line in Game 5 and committing costly turnovers. This wasn’t a noble effort derailed by fate; it was a collapse of historic proportions. Calling it anything less than a failure is irrational—it denies the reality of what happened on the court.

    Sports aren’t a participation trophy factory. The idea that “there’s no failure” because you tried your best might work in a youth rec league, but in the NBA—where millions of dollars, legacies, and fan expectations are on the line—it’s a cop-out. Failure exists because success is finite. Only one team wins the championship. Everyone else falls short. That’s not a flaw in the system; it’s the whole point.

    The Disrespect: Undermining Fans, Teammates, and the Game

    Beyond its shaky logic, Giannis’s speech carries a whiff of disrespect that’s hard to ignore. First, let’s consider the Bucks fans. These are people who packed Fiserv Forum all season, shelled out hard-earned money for tickets, and rode the emotional rollercoaster of a team that looked poised to dominate. When that team choked in the first round, those fans had every right to feel let down. Telling them “there’s no failure” doesn’t validate their passion—it dismisses it. It’s as if their investment, their heartbreak, doesn’t matter because, hey, it’s just “not our turn.” That’s not perspective; it’s a refusal to own the moment.

    Then there’s the teammates. Khris Middleton dropped 33 points in Game 5, Brook Lopez added 18, and the Bucks still couldn’t close it out. These guys battled through injuries and adversity all year, only to see their season end in a gut-wrenching overtime loss. Giannis’s breezy “good days, bad days” rhetoric glosses over their collective effort—and their collective shortfall. Failure isn’t just personal; it’s a team reality. By denying it, Giannis risks alienating the very people who fought alongside him. Imagine being Grayson Allen, who missed a crucial floater at the buzzer, hearing your superstar say there’s no failure. Does that inspire you, or does it feel like your struggle was just shrugged off?

    Finally, the speech disrespects the game itself. Basketball, like all sports, thrives on stakes. The thrill of victory and the agony of defeat are what make it worth watching. When Giannis reduces a playoff exit to a philosophical musing about life’s ups and downs, he strips away the urgency that defines professional athletics. If there’s no failure, why bother competing? Why push through a back injury? Why care at all? His words might sound enlightened, but they undermine the intensity that makes sports compelling in the first place.

    The Context: A Defensive Dodge, Not a Deep Truth

    Let’s not kid ourselves—Giannis wasn’t delivering some premeditated TED Talk. This was a raw, emotional reaction to a tough question, one he’d heard from Nehm the previous year after another playoff disappointment. His sigh, his “Oh my God,” his jab at the reporter’s own career (“Do you get a promotion every year?”) all scream defensiveness, not revelation. He was hurt, frustrated, and maybe a little embarrassed. That’s human, and it’s relatable. But dressing it up as profound wisdom doesn’t make it true.

    Compare this to how other greats handle failure. LeBron James, after the 2011 Finals loss to Dallas, owned it: “I’ve got to get better.” Kobe Bryant, after countless setbacks, turned failure into fuel, famously saying it “doesn’t exist” only in the sense that it’s a mindset to conquer, not ignore. Giannis, by contrast, seems to want failure erased from the conversation entirely. That’s not maturity—it’s avoidance.

    The Fallout: A Missed Opportunity

    Here’s the real shame: Giannis had a chance to say something meaningful. He could’ve acknowledged the failure, taken accountability, and vowed to come back stronger—words that would’ve resonated with Bucks fans and fired up his team for next season. Instead, he leaned on a platitude that sounds nice but means little in the cutthroat world of the NBA. It’s not about wallowing in defeat; it’s about recognizing it so you can grow from it. By denying failure, Giannis denied himself—and his team—that growth.

    Giannis is a likable guy—humble, hardworking, and a phenomenal talent. His journey from selling trinkets on Athens streets to NBA superstardom is inspiring. But that doesn’t make his take immune to critique. Sports aren’t a self-help seminar. They’re a proving ground where failure is real, tangible, and necessary. To pretend otherwise isn’t just irrational—it’s disrespectful to everyone who lives and breathes the game.

    So, no, Giannis, there is failure in sports. And that’s okay. It’s what makes the wins worth chasing. The Bucks’ 2022-23 season didn’t end because it “wasn’t their turn”—it ended because they fell short. Call it what it is, learn from it, and move on. That’s the real lesson here, not some sugarcoated denial of the obvious. To make things worse it doesn’t look like Giannis or the Bucks learnt anything at all as they simply repeated the failure the next year and are heading to repeat it again this season. What sort of speech will he put together this time I wonder?

  • Giannis’ mid range myth part 1

    Giannis’ mid range myth part 1

    Again today, in an easy match up which the Bucks won easily and Giannis had no opponent, people started talking about his mid range. It sure looked good when it went in, eh? Let’s look at the facts. (Part 2 of this here)

    Against the Jazz with no Hendricks , Juzang , Cody Williams , John Collins or Walker Kessler the Bucks were basically playing around as if in their gym. Even so, I would say the picture isn’t looking good. He missed three shots next to the rim. (In the orange circle I added.) And he scored 4/6 in the ‘mid range’. Oh and he wasted a 3point attempt.

    Because Giannis has no mid range. It is clear when he is actually being defended by someone. Even without Porzingis, on the 4th of December 2024 this is a more realistic look at Giannis’ mid range.

    He isn’t even scoring them so well right next to the rim against shorter opponents. And just 3/8 from the ‘mid’ range. And of course the wasted 3point shot as usual. And here is Giannis against the Knicks January 12th 2024. Even worse!

    This data is pretty solid. Here is the shot chart for Giannis over his career. He clearly has specific positions and can’t do anything with his left hand.

    And here is playoff Giannis. Which isn’t even counting tough matchups seeing as he has only progressed in the playoffs twice in his many years in the NBA.

    In the playoffs he is pretty much a one trick pony and head on down the middle. Why is this a problem? Because I am not the only one looking at this shot charts. Opponents know how to neutralise him. And they do when it counts.

    So save me the talk about “Giannis mid range” becoming a threat to the league. The only thing it threatens is to further confuse the Bucks into incorrect decisions on how they should play as a team. A weapon is only a weapon when it is consistent when you need it. Not in trash time against easy teams.

    DATA SOURCE

    STATMUSE. COM