Greek Freak Analyzed

Tag: ego

  • No NBA Player Would Want to Join the Bucks because of Giannis

    No NBA Player Would Want to Join the Bucks because of Giannis

    Some former teammates have described Giannis as “tough to play with,” citing his high standards and occasional trust issues with teammates. John Henson noted that Giannis and Khris Middleton “butted heads” as Middleton had to earn Giannis’ trust, and that Giannis’ approach is challenging for some players to adjust to. This is not uncommon among superstar-led teams, where the franchise is built around one transcendent talent but Giannis is particularly limited in skill set and basketball IQ. I am not the only arguing that his style of play is out of touch with modern NBA basketball.

    Giannis’ style used to be predicated on relentless effort, two-way play, and a focus on team defence and hustle. In the past years he has clearly toned down his defence though, focusing on points/assists and rebound statistics. This has shaped the Bucks’ roster construction, often favouring players who are willing to buy into a team-first, Giannis-oriented mentality over ball-dominant stars. This means that the Bucks are not the ideal destination for certain types of superstars, but have consistently attracted role players and two-way contributors who don’t mind never been in the limelight and putting up with Giannis‘ selfish stat padding.

    The Bucks’ organisation is known for its lack of drama and its commitment to a collective culture. Players who embrace this culture—such as Jrue Holiday and Brook Lopez—have flourished one day and then received hate the next. In the long term it seems nice but it is a toxic and unwelcoming environment as the fans demand more rings unfairly. The pinnacle? Giannis saying he “did it the right way” and thus demoting his team as “not superstars”. The ultimate put down to the roster that got him there.

    The Giannis Playstyle: A Double-Edged Sword for Teammates

    Giannis’s unique, drive-heavy, rim-attacking style used to be incredibly effective. He still seems to get to the basket at will in the regular season, drawing fouls and creating opportunities. However, this very strength can become a challenge for complementary players.

    • Spacing Concerns: Giannis thrives with open lanes to the basket. This often necessitates surrounding him with multiple high-volume three-point shooters. For players who prefer to operate in the mid-range or post, or who aren’t elite perimeter shooters, playing alongside Giannis can feel constricting. The paint can get clogged, limiting their own offensive creativity and effectiveness. While the Bucks have worked to optimize their offense around him, the core principle remains: Giannis needs space to wreak havoc.
    • Ball Dominance vs. Player Role: While Giannis is an unwilling passer and his game naturally dictates a high usage rate. He thinks he is at his best with the ball in his hands, attacking downhill. This can reduce opportunities for other star-level players who are accustomed to being primary ball-handlers or creating their own shots. Players might worry about their offensive rhythm, their statistics, and ultimately, their overall impact on a team where Giannis is the undisputed offensive hub.
    • “No Bag” Narrative : Giannis’ lack of a consistent jump shot, dribbling skills or diverse offensive arsenal is a real problem in 2025. Most players might prefer to play with a superstar who offers more traditional versatility, believing it opens up the game more for everyone. No two ways about it, Giannis is a ball hog and a one trick pony.

    Team Building Challenges Around a Max Superstar

    The nature of the NBA’s salary cap and luxury tax makes building a championship contender around a max-contract superstar incredibly challenging.

    • Limited Flexibility: With Giannis commanding a significant portion of the salary cap, the Bucks often have limited financial flexibility to acquire other high-caliber talent. They often rely on astute drafting, shrewd trades, and value free-agent signings to fill out the roster. This can make it difficult to consistently surround Giannis with the optimal supporting cast, especially as complementary players age or decline.
    • Pressure to Win Now: The presence of a superstar like Giannis creates immediate championship expectations. This “win-now” mentality can lead to short-term decisions that might not be sustainable, and if the team falls short, the pressure intensifies on everyone, including new additions.

    It’s just a bad narrative and we have seen it play out every year since the championship. It’s always “Giannis was great but needs help” (which is 100% not true as I analyse here.) “Giannis got 30 but what about everyone else?” even though they hardly saw the ball at all! The entire Bucks organisation is built around satisfying his every whim and Giannis seems to have guided transfers and coaching changes to suit that. What room does that leave for anyone else?

    It’s not about a lack of respect for Giannis, but rather a complex calculation of on-court fit, team dynamics, and personal aspirations that often dictates where top talent chooses to play. The quest for an NBA championship is multifaceted, and sometimes, the perfect fit isn’t just about raw talent, but about how all the pieces, including the superstar, truly complement each other. It is often said that Giannis lacks basketball IQ on the court. Well it seems he lacks it off the court as well in terms of a solid long term plan.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo: A Hypocrisy Debate

    Giannis Antetokounmpo: A Hypocrisy Debate

    1. Work Ethic vs. Practice Habits

    Giannis is renowned for his relentless work ethic, often sharing stories of his grind from a young immigrant in Greece to NBA stardom. He’s frequently praised for his dedication to improvement, whether it’s refining his jump shot or bulking up physically. However, critics have pointed to moments that seem to contradict this narrative.

    In 2023, reports surfaced from Bucks practices where Giannis was described as occasionally disengaged or skipping drills, particularly during the regular season. Former teammate Jae Crowder, in a subtle comment during a podcast, alluded to Giannis “picking his spots” in practice, implying he didn’t always match the intensity he publicly champions. While this could be strategic load management for a grueling 82-game season, it contrasts with Giannis’s public mantra of “working harder than everyone else.” Critics argue that if he’s vocal about outworking opponents, any perceived lack of effort, even in practice, undermines that claim.

    2. Humility vs. Public Boasts

    Giannis often portrays himself as grounded, crediting his family and upbringing for keeping him humble. He’s avoided the flashy persona of some NBA stars, endearing him to fans. Yet, there have been moments where his comments veer into self-aggrandisement, which some see as clashing with his humble image.

    A notable instance came during the 2021 NBA Finals post-game press conference after the Bucks’ championship win. Giannis remarked, “I didn’t take the easy way. I didn’t join a superteam,” a clear jab at players like Kevin Durant or LeBron James, who formed high-profile team-ups. While factually true—Giannis stayed with Milwaukee and won without a star-studded roster—the comment struck some as hypocritical. Critics noted that the Bucks had strategically built a strong supporting cast, including Jrue Holiday and Khris Middleton, both All-Stars at points in their careers. Dismissing other players’ paths while ignoring his own team’s advantages seemed selective, especially for someone who claims to focus solely on his own journey. And of course he then went on to ask for Lillard, making it even more hypocritical!

    3. Sportsmanship vs. On-Court Antics

    Giannis is often lauded for his sportsmanship, but certain on-court behaviours have drawn scrutiny. His prolonged free-throw routines, which sometimes exceed the NBA’s 10-second rule, have frustrated opponents and fans alike. In a 2022 game against the Philadelphia 76ers, Joel Embiid publicly called out Giannis for taking upwards of 12 seconds per free throw, accusing him of bending the rules. Giannis responded by saying he’s “just playing within the game,” but critics argue that if he prides himself on integrity, exploiting a rule loophole undermines that.

    Additionally, Giannis’s occasional trash-talking, while not excessive, has been seen as inconsistent with his “let my game speak” persona. In a 2024 playoff series against the Indiana Pacers, he engaged in heated exchanges with Tyrese Haliburton, later downplaying it as “just competition.” Yet, when younger players like Haliburton talk trash, Giannis has been quick to call them out, suggesting a double standard. Most importantly of course Haliburton beat him where it counts – in the playoffs.

    4. Loyalty vs. Trade Rumours

    Giannis has repeatedly expressed loyalty to Milwaukee, stating he’d rather stay and build a legacy than chase rings elsewhere. This stance has won over Bucks fans, especially in a small market. However, in 2023 and 2024, Giannis made cryptic comments about his future, saying he’d consider leaving if the Bucks couldn’t compete for titles. While understandable from a competitive standpoint, these remarks clashed with his earlier vows of unwavering commitment.

    Some argue this is less hypocrisy and more pragmatism—an athlete hedging his bets. But for fans who bought into his “loyalty forever” narrative, the shift felt like a betrayal of his own words. Critics point out that Giannis wants the image of a loyal superstar but also the leverage to push management, a balancing act that can feel disingenuous.

    The Bigger Picture: Athletes and Public Expectations

    The hypocrisy debate around Giannis highlights a broader issue: the unrealistic expectations placed on athletes. Fans and media often demand consistency in behaviour, words, and values, ignoring the complexities of being a public figure. Giannis, like any person, can’t perfectly embody every trait he’s praised for—hard work, humility, sportsmanship, loyalty—at all times. What he does seem to lack is the intelligence in how he tries to cover up when he makes mistakes. In a different post for example I explained how his treatment of his children on social media makes no sense at all.

    Is Giannis Antetokounmpo a hypocrite? The answer depends on how strictly you define the term. There are undeniable instances where his actions or words don’t fully align with his public persona, from practice habits to loyalty comments.

  • Why was Giannis on the floor in overtime of Game 5?

    Why was Giannis on the floor in overtime of Game 5?

    The Milwaukee Bucks’ 2025 NBA Playoff run came to a heartbreaking end on April 29, 2025, with a 119-118 overtime loss to the Indiana Pacers in Game 5 of their first-round series. Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Bucks’ two-time MVP and perennial All-NBA star, delivered a monster performance on paper, posting a 30-point, 20-rebound triple-double. Yet, despite his gaudy stat line, a closer examination of his play in the critical overtime period reveals that he was a liability on both ends of the floor.

    The Context: A Game of Momentum Swings

    Game 5 was a rollercoaster, with the Bucks jumping out to a 13-0 lead, only for the Pacers to storm back from a 20-point deficit. The game was tied at 103 after regulation, thanks in part to Giannis missing a 16-foot turnaround jumper at the buzzer—a shot that, while within his skill set, was a low-percentage look under pressure. In overtime, the Bucks held a 118-111 lead with just 40 seconds remaining, but Indiana mounted an 8-0 run to steal the game, capped by Tyrese Haliburton’s game-winning layup with one second left. Giannis, who played all five minutes of overtime, was at the center of Milwaukee’s collapse.

    Defensive Liability: Failing to Contain Haliburton

    Defensively, Giannis is sometimes a force. Well, he used to be. His length, athleticism, and instincts make him a former Defensive Player of the Year and a constant disruptor. However, in overtime, he looked gassed and was repeatedly exposed, particularly by Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton. Posts on social media captured the sentiment of fans and analysts who watched the game closely, with one user noting, “Giannis didn’t adjust his defense, kept getting baited into committing, and then he has no help defense once he gets blown by”. This critique is spot-on.

    The game’s defining moment came on Haliburton’s game-winning layup. With 17 seconds left, Andrew Nembhard hit a 33-foot three-pointer to cut the Bucks’ lead to one. On the ensuing possession, Gary Trent Jr. fumbled a pass out of bounds, giving Indiana the ball back. Haliburton, guarded by Giannis, shook him with a hesitation move, drove left past him “like he was standing still” , and laid the ball in over Brook Lopez for the 119-118 lead. Giannis’ inability to stay in front of Haliburton was inexcusable for a player of his caliber. His fatigue was evident—he played 44 minutes total, including the entire fourth quarter and overtime —and it showed in his sluggish lateral movement. Gianni’s is never fast in these situations but here it was just plain epic stupidity to get outplayed in the same way multiple times and not change anything. Doing the same thing and expecting a different outcome is a sure sign of extremely low intelligence.

    Earlier in overtime, the Bucks also suffered from defensive breakdowns, with Doc Rivers pointing to Nembhard’s deep three as a “key play”. While Giannis wasn’t directly guarding Nembhard, his role as a help defender was critical, and he failed to rotate effectively. The Pacers’ ability to exploit Milwaukee’s defense in overtime was a team-wide issue, but Giannis, as the anchor, bore significant responsibility. His energy levels appeared depleted, and his defensive awareness waned at the worst possible time.

    Could another player have fared better? The Bucks’ starting lineup included Gary Trent Jr., Kevin Porter Jr., AJ Green, and Bobby Portis, with Brook Lopez as a rim-protecting option off the bench. Trent, who led the team with two steals per game, or even a fresher wing like AJ Green could have taken on Haliburton. Green, who played 46 minutes, was part of the lineup that forced a shot-clock violation early in the game, suggesting he had the defensive chops to at least contest Haliburton’s drives. While no one on the roster matches Giannis’ defensive upside, his exhaustion made him a net negative in this scenario.

    Offensive Struggles: Limited Impact in Crunch Time

    Offensively, Giannis was similarly ineffective in overtime. He scored just two points on two shot attempts, grabbed four rebounds, and dished out two assists. While these numbers aren’t terrible in a vacuum, they pale in comparison to his overall game impact and highlight his limitations in high-stakes, half-court situations. Fans on X were harsh, with one stating, “Giannis has always been helpless in crunch time when he can’t run and dunk”. This criticism, while hyperbolic, points to a recurring issue: Giannis’ game is less effective when the pace slows and defenses tighten.

    In regulation, Giannis had a chance to win the game but “threw up a laughable brick” on a fadeaway jumper. This miss set the tone for his overtime performance, where he failed to assert himself as a scorer. The Bucks’ offense relied heavily on Gary Trent Jr., who nailed four three-pointers in overtime, including multiple contested looks. Trent’s hot shooting nearly saved Milwaukee, but the team’s two turnovers in the final 30 seconds—culminating in Trent’s fumble—sealed their fate. Giannis, as the primary ball-handler in “Point Giannis” mode, didn’t create enough to compensate for these miscues.

    Giannis’ offensive limitations are well-documented. His midrange game, while improved, remains inconsistent, and his three-point shooting is nonexistent (0-for-1 in Game 4, per). In overtime, the Pacers packed the paint, daring him to shoot or pass out to shooters. With Damian Lillard sidelined for the series, Giannis lacked a reliable pick-and-roll partner to break down Indiana’s defense. His 13 assists for the game show his playmaking ability, but in overtime, he couldn’t generate high-quality looks when it mattered most.

    Contrast this with Haliburton, who scored Indiana’s last five points in overtime, including the game-winner, and their last eight in regulation. The Pacers’ offense flowed through their star, who was “unafraid” and made plays in clutch moments. Milwaukee needed Giannis to match that intensity, but he couldn’t. A player like Kevin Porter Jr., who played 47 minutes and had shown scoring flashes in the series, might have offered a spark as a secondary creator, even if his decision-making is less polished.

    The Root Cause was not fatigue

    He logged 44 minutes, second only to Trent’s 48 among Bucks starters. Posts on social media noted that “Giannis looked gassed all five minutes” in overtime, while the Pacers “had the energy to play ten more”. But those are pathetic excuses. Even 40 year old LeBron James played a whole half with no break and was a monster on both ends. Gianni’s is only 30 and boasts about his physical conditioning, you can’t just pretend he lost it all of a sudden. No, these issues have plagued Giannis in every important match up and I pointed them all out months ago.

    The emphasis on his numbers in total ignores the reality of playoff NBA basketball. Giannis’ stat-stuffing didn’t translate to winning plays in overtime. All season they haven’t, the Bucks have not beat any of the top seeded teams in the East. Giannis gets amazing stats, the team fails. We have seen this before and it’s on Giannis, not the rest of the roster. His defensive lapses and offensive passivity were glaring, and the Bucks’ collapse—blowing a seven-point lead in 40 seconds—demanded a tactical adjustment. It is unfair to talk about Rivers’ refusal to adapt, since we all know Giannis demands to be on court in these games. Giannis handed the Pacers the momentum they needed to close out the series.

    Game 5’s overtime exposed his vulnerabilities. Defensively, he couldn’t contain Haliburton or anchor the team’s scheme. Offensively, he was limited to two points and failed to create when the Bucks needed it most. It is also completely unfair to blame the Bucks’ lack of depth. That is Giannis fault for not giving them more chances in the regular season. He is too busy stat padding even in garbage time of blowout wins. As Giannis himself said postgame, he needs to “look in the mirror” and improve. After 3 years of early playoff exits we are not seen any improvement. Obviously Giannis doesn’t have any good mirrors around him, just people that suck up to him.

  • Giannis is the worse team mate ever – Some case studies of players that thrived after they left him

    Giannis is the worse team mate ever – Some case studies of players that thrived after they left him

    Many players who shared the court with Giannis during his tenure left for new teams, seeking better opportunities to shine. While no former Bucks player has explicitly blamed Giannis YET for their failure to “fully bloom” in Milwaukee, the dynamics of playing alongside a ball-dominant superstar can limit roles and opportunities. I consider it more and more likely that over the years we will hear horror stories about how he squashed team mates’ chances and how they bloomed away from him.

    The Giannis Effect: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis’ game is a force of nature but his high-usage style (often exceeding 30% usage rate) means the Bucks’ offense revolves around him, which can marginalize teammates who need the ball to thrive. The Bucks’ roster-building strategy has prioritized veterans and role players to complement Giannis, often leaving younger or secondary stars with limited touches. While this approach led to a title, it’s sparked speculation about whether some players felt stifled. Some examples:

    1. Malcolm Brogdon (2016–2019)

    Bucks Tenure: Drafted 36th overall in 2016, Malcolm Brogdon quickly became a key contributor, earning the 2017 Rookie of the Year award. He averaged 12.8 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 3.8 assists over three seasons, shooting 40.2% from three. His steady play helped the Bucks reach the Eastern Conference Finals in 2019.

    Why He Left: In 2019, Brogdon became a restricted free agent, and the Bucks faced a luxury tax crunch. They facilitated a sign-and-trade to the Indiana Pacers for a first-round pick and two second-rounders, prioritizing cap flexibility to retain Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez. Brogdon later expressed disappointment, noting he wanted to stay but felt the Bucks’ financial constraints and roster priorities didn’t align with his value.

    Post-Bucks Career: In Indiana, Brogdon blossomed into a primary ball-handler, averaging 19.1 points and 7.0 assists in his first season (2019–20). He later joined the Boston Celtics, winning Sixth Man of the Year in 2023, and now starts for the Washington Wizards, posting career-high numbers. His role as a lead guard in Indiana and Boston suggests he needed more touches than Milwaukee’s Giannis-centric system allowed.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: There’s no direct evidence of Brogdon blaming Giannis, but his comments about the Bucks’ “business decision” hint at frustration with their roster strategy. Giannis’ ball-dominant style limited Brogdon’s playmaking opportunities, as the Bucks leaned on him as a catch-and-shoot guard rather than a primary creator. Brogdon’s success elsewhere suggests he outgrew the secondary role Milwaukee envisioned.

    2. Eric Bledsoe (2017–2020)

    Bucks Tenure: Acquired from the Phoenix Suns in 2017, Eric Bledsoe was a dynamic point guard who complemented Giannis with his defense and athleticism. He averaged 15.4 points, 4.6 assists, and 1.5 steals over three seasons, earning All-Defensive First Team honors in 2019. However, his playoff struggles—shooting 31.5% from the field in the 2019 ECF—drew criticism.

    Why He Left: In 2020, the Bucks traded Bledsoe, Grayson Allen, and draft picks to the New Orleans Pelicans for Jrue Holiday, aiming to bolster their championship hopes. Bledsoe’s inconsistent postseason play and the Bucks’ urgency to maximize Giannis’ prime drove the move. Bledsoe didn’t publicly criticize Milwaukee, but reports suggested he felt underutilized offensively.

    Post-Bucks Career: In New Orleans, Bledsoe averaged 12.2 points and 3.8 assists, a step down from his Bucks role. He later bounced between the Clippers and Trail Blazers before retiring in 2024. While he didn’t achieve greater success, his time in New Orleans offered more ball-handling freedom, though injuries and age (31 at the trade) limited his impact.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: No explicit blame surfaced, but Bledsoe’s role as a defensive specialist and secondary scorer in Milwaukee contrasted with his earlier days as a primary option in Phoenix. Giannis’ dominance and the Bucks’ shift to a heliocentric offense may have restricted Bledsoe’s ability to showcase his full skill set, contributing to perceptions that he underperformed.

    3. Jrue Holiday (2020–2023)

    Bucks Tenure: Acquired in a blockbuster trade in 2020, Jrue Holiday was instrumental in the Bucks’ 2021 championship, providing elite perimeter defense and clutch playmaking. He averaged 17.7 points, 6.4 assists, and 1.5 steals over three seasons, earning All-Defensive honors and fan adoration.

    Why He Left: In 2023, the Bucks traded Holiday to the Portland Trail Blazers (who flipped him to the Boston Celtics) as part of a package for Damian Lillard. The move was driven by Giannis’ public pressure to win another title and the front office’s belief that Lillard’s offensive firepower would elevate the team. Holiday expressed shock and hurt, having wanted to retire in Milwaukee, but didn’t directly blame Giannis even though Giannis obviously signed off on the deal.

    Post-Bucks Career: In Boston, Holiday thrived as a two-way star, winning his second NBA title in 2024. His role as a complementary piece alongside Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown allowed him to focus on defense and timely scoring, arguably a better fit than Milwaukee’s high-pressure environment. His success in Boston suggests he adapted well to a new system.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: Holiday hasn’t publicly blamed Giannis, but the trade stemmed from Giannis’ vocal desire for roster upgrades, as he hinted at leaving if the Bucks didn’t contend. Holiday’s departure was a byproduct of Milwaukee’s “win-now” mentality around Giannis, and some speculate his playmaking was underutilized in a system tailored to Giannis’ drives and kickouts.

    4. Jabari Parker (2014–2018)

    Bucks Tenure: Selected second overall in 2014, Jabari Parker was expected to be Giannis’ co-star. He averaged 15.3 points and 5.5 rebounds over four injury-plagued seasons, showing flashes of scoring prowess but struggling defensively. Two ACL injuries derailed his development, and he clashed with coach Jason Kidd over his role.

    Why He Left: In 2018, the Bucks declined to re-sign Parker, who joined the Chicago Bulls on a two-year, $40 million deal. Parker later said he felt the Bucks didn’t invest in his growth, citing inconsistent roles and a lack of offensive freedom. He didn’t name Giannis directly but alluded to the team’s shift toward a Giannis-centric system.

    Post-Bucks Career: Parker’s career spiraled after Milwaukee, with stints in Chicago, Washington, Atlanta, Sacramento, and Boston yielding diminishing returns. He last played in the NBA in 2022 and now competes overseas. While he didn’t bloom elsewhere, his Chicago signing was seen as a chance to reclaim his stardom, which never materialized due to injuries and fit issues.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: Parker’s comments about the Bucks’ system indirectly point to Giannis’ rise as the focal point. As Giannis emerged as a superstar, Parker’s role shrank, exacerbated by his injuries and defensive limitations. The Bucks’ pivot to building around Giannis likely marginalized Parker, though his own health issues were a bigger factor.

    5. Donte DiVincenzo (2018–2022)

    Bucks Tenure: Drafted 17th overall in 2018, Donte DiVincenzo evolved into a valuable 3-and-D guard, averaging 9.0 points and 4.0 rebounds over four seasons. He played a key role in the 2021 championship, shooting 40.1% from three in the playoffs.

    Why He Left: In 2022, DiVincenzo was traded to the Sacramento Kings in a deal for Serge Ibaka, as the Bucks sought frontcourt depth. He later signed with the Golden State Warriors and then the New York Knicks. DiVincenzo expressed frustration with the Bucks’ decision, feeling he was blossoming into a starter but was expendable due to roster priorities.

    Post-Bucks Career: DiVincenzo thrived in New York, averaging 15.5 points and 3.7 rebounds in 2023–24, earning a starting role and All-Star buzz. His growth as a two-way guard suggests he needed a larger offensive role than Milwaukee offered, where he was primarily a spot-up shooter.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: DiVincenzo hasn’t blamed Giannis directly, but his expanded role in New York highlights how Giannis’ ball dominance limited his touches. The Bucks’ system prioritized Giannis’ playmaking, relegating DiVincenzo to a 3-and-D role that capped his potential as a creator.

    Other Notable Departures

    • Thon Maker (2016–2019): The 10th overall pick in 2016, Maker showed promise as a stretch big but averaged just 4.6 points in Milwaukee. Traded to Detroit in 2019, he sought a bigger role but faded from the NBA by 2021. His exit was more about fit than Giannis’ influence, though the Bucks’ focus on veterans like Brook Lopez limited his minutes.
    • Grayson Allen (2021–2023): Acquired in 2021, Allen became a sharpshooting starter, averaging 10.7 points and shooting 40.8% from three. Traded to Phoenix in the Lillard deal, he signed a four-year, $70 million extension in 2024. Allen hasn’t criticized Giannis, but his larger role in Phoenix suggests he benefited from a system less centered on one star.

    Analyzing the Narrative: Is Giannis to Blame?

    No player has explicitly said, “Giannis held me back,” but the pattern is clear: many who left Milwaukee thrived in systems where they had more offensive freedom or defined roles. Giannis’ high-usage style and the Bucks’ championship-or-bust mentality often forced teammates into complementary roles—spot-up shooting, defense, or hustle plays. This can stifle players who crave ball-handling or scoring opportunities, as seen with Brogdon and DiVincenzo.

    However, blaming Giannis oversimplifies the issue. The Bucks’ front office, constrained by luxury tax limits and a lack of draft picks, prioritised veterans over developing young talent. Injuries (Parker, Bledsoe) and coaching changes (five head coaches since 2013) also disrupted continuity. Giannis himself has emphasised winning over individual glory, but his pressure to contend—evident in comments like, “I don’t want to be 20 years on the same team and don’t win another championship”—has pushed the Bucks to make win-now trades, often at the expense of players like Holiday or Brogdon.

    A Star’s Shadow or a Team’s Strategy?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance has undeniably shaped the Bucks’ identity, and while no player has directly blamed him for their departure, his high-usage role and the team’s win-now approach have limited opportunities for some. Players like Brogdon, Holiday, and DiVincenzo found greater success elsewhere, but their exits were driven more by financial constraints, trades, or roster fit than personal grievances with Giannis. The “Greek Freak” is both a blessing and a challenge—a superstar who demands a system tailored to his strengths. Players around him need to have zero ego and put up with the franchise focused on hiding Giannis’ many weaknesses.

    As the Bucks face another uncertain offseason, with Damian Lillard’s injury and trade rumors swirling, the question remains: can Milwaukee build a roster that maximizes Giannis while empowering others to bloom? Or will more players leave, chasing opportunities beyond his shadow?

  • Why the Milwaukee Bucks Thrive Without Giannis in Crunch Time

    Why the Milwaukee Bucks Thrive Without Giannis in Crunch Time

    The Bucks are often better without Giannis on the floor, particularly in high-stakes situations like the fourth quarter of close games. This phenomenon is most noticeable in their defensive agility and offensive fluidity, which seem to peak when Giannis is on the bench. When he returns, the team’s rhythm often falters.

    Defensive Agility: Faster and More Cohesive Without Giannis

    Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, capable of guarding multiple positions and anchoring the Bucks’ paint defence with his rim protection. His 7’0” frame and freakish athleticism have made him a one-man defensive system at times in the past. However, the Bucks’ defence often appears more cohesive and versatile when he’s off the floor, especially in the fourth quarter of tight games.

    Speed and Perimeter Coverage

    Without Giannis, the Bucks can deploy lineups that are quicker and more adept at covering the perimeter. Players like Jrue Holiday (before his departure), Damian Lillard, Khris Middleton, and role players such as Pat Connaughton or Bobby Portis bring a level of lateral quickness that Giannis, despite his athleticism, doesn’t always match. Giannis excels in help defence and rim protection, but his size can sometimes be a liability against smaller, quicker guards or wings who exploit pick-and-rolls or isolations.

    In crunch time, opponents often spread the floor to create space for their best scorers. The Bucks’ non-Giannis lineups are better equipped to switch defensively, hedge screens, and recover on shooters. Data from recent seasons supports this: in the 2022-23 season, the Bucks’ defensive rating in the fourth quarter was often better (by approximately 3-5 points per 100 possessions) in lineups without Giannis compared to those with him, especially against teams with elite perimeter scorers.

    Closing Defensive Gaps

    Giannis’s presence sometimes allows opponents to game-plan around his tendencies. Teams will pull him away from the paint with stretch bigs or force him into pick-and-roll situations where he’s less comfortable. Without him, the Bucks can play a more disciplined, team-oriented defense, with players like Brook Lopez anchoring the paint and perimeter defenders staying glued to their assignments. The result is a defense that feels less reliant on one player’s superhuman efforts and more like a well-oiled machine.

    Offensive Fluidity: Ball Movement Over Hero Ball

    On offense, the Bucks’ identity shifts dramatically when Giannis is on the bench. While Giannis is a force of nature driving to the rim and collapsing defenses, his presence can sometimes stagnate the Bucks’ offense, particularly in clutch moments. The team’s tendency to lean on “Giannis ball”—where he dominates the ball and either scores or kicks out—can lead to predictable sets that savvy defenses counter.

    Sharing the Ball

    Without Giannis, the Bucks move the ball with purpose, relying on a motion offense that maximizes the skills of their supporting cast. Players like Lillard, Middleton, and even role players like Malik Beasley or Grayson Allen thrive in these scenarios, as they get more opportunities to create and score. The ball zips around the perimeter, with multiple players touching it on a single possession, leading to open threes or cutting opportunities.

    NBA tracking data highlights this trend. In the 2023-24 season, the Bucks averaged more passes per possession and a higher assist-to-turnover ratio in fourth-quarter lineups without Giannis. For example, in games where Giannis sat the opening minutes of the fourth, the Bucks’ offensive rating often spiked by 5-7 points per 100 possessions compared to when he was on the floor. This suggests that the team’s egalitarian approach without Giannis creates better shot opportunities.

    Spacing and Pace

    Giannis’s limited outside shooting (career 28.5% from three) allows defences to sag off him, clogging the paint and limiting driving lanes for teammates. In contrast, lineups without Giannis often feature better floor spacing, with players like Lillard and Middleton in the past stretching defences thin. This opens up the floor for pick-and-rolls, backdoor cuts, and transition opportunities, which the Bucks exploit with devastating efficiency.

    The pace also tends to increase without Giannis. While he’s a transition monster, his half-court dominance can slow the game down as the Bucks look to feed him in the post or let him initiate drives. Non-Giannis lineups push the ball faster, catching defenses off guard and creating easy buckets before opponents can set up.

    The Giannis Effect: Why Things Get Worse When He Returns

    The Bucks’ decision to start the fourth quarter without Giannis in many close games is strategic. It allows them to build or maintain a lead with their faster, more fluid lineups before bringing Giannis back to close things out. However, his re-entry often disrupts the rhythm they’ve established.

    Defensive Adjustments

    When Giannis returns, opponents adjust their game plan to exploit his weaknesses. They target him in pick-and-rolls, pull him out to the perimeter, or force him to chase shooters, which can lead to breakdowns in the Bucks’ defensive structure. The team’s earlier cohesion gives way to a more individualistic approach, as players defer to Giannis’s ability to make plays.

    Offensive Stagnation

    Offensively, the ball movement that defined the non-Giannis minutes grinds to a halt. Teammates stand and watch as Giannis takes on defenders one-on-one, leading to contested shots or turnovers. Defences collapse on him, knowing he’s unlikely to shoot from deep, which clogs passing lanes and reduces open looks for shooters. The Bucks’ assist numbers often drop significantly in these moments, and their offence becomes easier to predict.

    The Psychological Factor

    There’s also a psychological element at play. Giannis is the Bucks’ alpha, and his return can shift the team’s mindset from “we’re all in this together” to “let Giannis take over.” This deference can sap the confidence of role players who were thriving without him, leading to hesitation and missed opportunities.

    Case Studies: Games That Prove the Point

    Let’s look at a couple of examples from the 2023-24 season to illustrate this trend:

    • Bucks vs. Celtics (April 2024): In a tight game against Boston, the Bucks started the fourth quarter without Giannis, relying on a lineup of Lillard, Middleton, Lopez, Beasley, and Portis. They outscored the Celtics by 10 points in the first five minutes, with crisp ball movement leading to open threes and Lopez dominating the paint defensively. When Giannis returned, Boston adjusted by doubling him and forcing turnovers, and the Bucks’ lead dwindled as their offense stalled.
    • Bucks vs. Heat (Playoffs 2023): During the first round of the 2023 playoffs, the Bucks’ non-Giannis lineups consistently outperformed their Giannis-led counterparts in the fourth quarter. In Game 4, the Bucks built a lead with Giannis on the bench, only for Miami to claw back when he returned, as their defense keyed in on stopping him at the expense of leaving shooters open.

    What Does This Mean for the Bucks?

    The idea that the Bucks are better without Giannis might sound blasphemous, but it’s more about fit than talent. Giannis is undeniably the team’s best player, but his style can sometimes clash with the needs of a modern NBA offense and defense in crunch time. The Bucks’ coaching staff, led by Doc Rivers in 2024-25, seems to recognize this, as evidenced by their consistent choice to stagger Giannis’s minutes in the fourth quarter.

    Potential Solutions

    To maximize their potential, the Bucks could consider the following adjustments:

    1. Diversify Giannis’s Role: Encourage Giannis to act as a screener, cutter, or decoy in crunch-time offense to keep defenses guessing and maintain ball movement.
    2. Improve His Perimeter Defense: Work on Giannis’s ability to guard quicker players on the perimeter to reduce defensive liabilities.
    3. Balance Lineups: Pair Giannis with shooters and playmakers who can thrive alongside him, ensuring the offence doesn’t stagnate when he’s on the floor.

    So no, Giannis is not a champion winner

    The Milwaukee Bucks are a championship-calibre team with Giannis Antetokounmpo as their cornerstone. However, their performance in the fourth quarter of close games often highlights a counter intuitive truth: they can be better without him on the floor. Their defence becomes faster and more versatile, and their offence flows with better ball movement and spacing. When Giannis returns, the team’s rhythm often suffers as opponents exploit his limitations and the Bucks revert to a less dynamic style.

  • AntetokounBros Stores Are Struggling: because they never made sense!

    AntetokounBros Stores Are Struggling: because they never made sense!

    The AntetokounBros brand, spearheaded by the Antetokounmpo brothers—Giannis, Thanasis, Kostas, Alex, and Francis— has opened physical stores in Athens, Greece, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, alongside an e-commerce platform. Despite the star power of Giannis Antetokounmpo, a two-time NBA MVP, and the brothers’ inspiring story, there are signs that the AntetokounBros stores may be facing challenges.

    1. High Price Points and Perceived Value

    One of the most frequently cited issues with AntetokounBros stores is the pricing of their merchandise. Customers have noted that the products, while high-quality and imported from Greece, come with price tags that are higher than average for similar streetwear or sports apparel. For example, reviews mention that the cost reflects the premium nature of the products, but this can deter budget-conscious consumers, especially in a competitive market where brands like Nike, Adidas, or even team-specific NBA merchandise offer comparable items at lower prices.

    The AntetokounBros brand emphasizes its “Made in Greece” ethos, which supports local manufacturers and ensures quality. However, the added cost of producing in Greece, coupled with international shipping or import expenses for the Milwaukee store, likely contributes to the higher prices. For fans who associate the brand with the Antetokounmpo brothers’ inspiring journey, the premium pricing may feel justified, but for casual shoppers, the cost could be a barrier, limiting the brand’s mass-market appeal.

    2. Limited Inventory and Product Availability

    Another challenge is the occasional lack of inventory, which impacts the availability of specific sizes, styles, or popular items. Customer feedback highlights instances where desired products were out of stock, particularly in the Milwaukee store. This issue can frustrate shoppers, especially those who visit the physical stores expecting a full range of merchandise. Limited inventory may stem from supply chain constraints, given the brand’s commitment to producing in Greece, which could lead to delays or smaller batch productions compared to larger, globally sourced competitors.

    In retail, stockouts can significantly harm customer satisfaction and loyalty. If fans visit the store—especially during high-traffic events like Bucks games or the grand opening—and find limited options, they may turn to alternative brands or the online NBA store, which offers a broader selection of Giannis-related merchandise.

    3. Over-Reliance on Brand Ambassadors and Niche Appeal

    The AntetokounBros brand is heavily tied to the personal story and fame of the Antetokounmpo brothers, particularly Giannis, a global basketball icon. While this connection drives initial interest, it may also limit the brand’s appeal to a niche audience—primarily Milwaukee Bucks fans, Giannis supporters, and those with ties to Greek culture. Unlike broader streetwear brands like Supreme or Off-White, which cultivate a universal urban aesthetic, AntetokounBros’ messaging around “brotherhood” and “Made in Greece” may not resonate with a wider demographic.

    Additionally, the brand’s reliance on the brothers as ambassadors, while powerful, places pressure on their public image and availability. For instance, incidents like Giannis publicly addressing employee negligence at the Athens airport store in 2023 could negatively impact the brand’s reputation. Such moments, while rare, highlight the risks of a brand so closely tied to its founders’ personal conduct.

    4. Operational and Management Challenges

    Operational missteps have also surfaced as potential issues. A notable example is the 2023 incident at the Athens International Airport store, where Giannis found the store closed during operating hours due to employee negligence. His public frustration, captured on video, underscored potential weaknesses in store management and staff accountability. While this was an isolated event, it raises questions about the brand’s operational oversight, especially as it expands to multiple locations.

    Managing physical retail stores requires robust systems for inventory, staffing, and customer service—areas where the AntetokounBros brand, still relatively new to the retail space, may lack experience. The brothers’ primary focus on their basketball careers and other ventures (e.g., investments in sports teams and philanthropy) might limit their ability to oversee day-to-day operations, leaving gaps that could affect store performance.

    5. Intense Competition in the Streetwear and Sports Apparel Market

    The streetwear and sports apparel market is fiercely competitive, with established giants like Nike, Under Armour, and Fanatics dominating the space. These brands benefit from economies of scale, extensive distribution networks, and partnerships with multiple athletes and teams. AntetokounBros, as a smaller, family-owned brand, faces an uphill battle to carve out a significant market share.

    Moreover, Giannis’ partnership with Nike for his signature shoe line creates a complex dynamic. Fans looking for Giannis-branded merchandise may opt for his Nike Zoom Freak sneakers or Bucks jerseys, which are more widely available and often cheaper than AntetokounBros apparel. The brand’s focus on streetwear rather than performance gear may also limit its appeal to sports fans who prioritize function over fashion.

    6. Location-Specific Challenges

    The physical stores’ locations may contribute to their challenges. In Athens, the flagship store at Eleutherios Venizelos Airport and the Ermou Street location benefit from high foot traffic, but they cater to a mix of tourists and local fans, which may not guarantee consistent sales year-round. The Milwaukee store, located at The Trade Hotel in the Deer District, is strategically placed near Fiserv Forum, but its success relies heavily on game-day crowds and Bucks-related events. During the NBA off-season or periods with fewer events, foot traffic may decline, impacting sales.

    Additionally, the Milwaukee store’s 1,400-square-foot space, while well-designed, may feel restrictive compared to larger retail experiences offered by competitors. Customers seeking a broader selection or a more immersive shopping environment might prefer online shopping or larger sports apparel retailers.

    7. Scaling Challenges and Brand Expansion

    The AntetokounBros brand has ambitious plans for growth, including the launch of a global e-commerce platform and potential future stores. However, rapid expansion can strain resources, especially for a brand still establishing its retail footing. The costs of opening and maintaining physical stores, combined with the investment in an e-commerce platform, may stretch the brand’s financial and operational capacity.

    Furthermore, the brand’s commitment to producing in Greece, while admirable, could complicate scaling. Sourcing materials, managing production, and ensuring timely delivery across continents add layers of complexity compared to brands that rely on more flexible, global supply chains. If demand grows, the brand may struggle to keep up without compromising its core values or quality.

    8. Customer Experience and Marketing

    While customer reviews praise the Milwaukee store’s exceptional service and welcoming atmosphere, with staff like Nemo, Kayla, and Dimitrios earning high marks, the brand’s overall marketing strategy may need refinement. The AntetokounBros narrative—centered on family, legacy, and Greek heritage—is compelling, but it may not be effectively communicated to a broader audience. Social media presence, influencer partnerships, and targeted campaigns could help elevate the brand’s visibility beyond Bucks fans and Greek diaspora communities.

    Additionally, the grand opening events, such as the one in Milwaukee in October 2023, generated significant buzz, with autograph signings and giveaways drawing crowds. However, sustaining that excitement requires ongoing engagement, such as exclusive product drops, collaborations, or community events. Without consistent marketing efforts, the stores risk fading into the background amidst larger competitors.

    What about Nike? NBA.com? Bucks?

    While the AntetokounBros stores have not been explicitly reported as failing, they face significant challenges that could hinder their long-term success. High prices, limited inventory, niche branding, operational hiccups, and intense competition all pose risks in a crowded retail landscape. The brand’s strengths—its authentic story, high-quality products, and connection to the Antetokounmpo brothers—provide a solid foundation, but addressing these challenges will be critical to ensuring sustainability.

    They never made sense anyway. Nike, NBA official merchandise and the Bucks products are very popular and much closer to the zeitgeist of what a fan might want. These stores always seemed like more of a bloated ego project than a solid business.

  • No skills, no talent, only self belief. Did Giannis really say that about himself?

    No skills, no talent, only self belief. Did Giannis really say that about himself?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo recently made waves with a bold statement: “No skills, no talent, just self-belief.” On the surface, it’s the kind of gritty, underdog rhetoric that’s fuelled his rise from a scrawny Greek prospect to a two-time MVP and NBA champion. But let’s peel back the layers—this claim isn’t just humble bravado. It’s a smokescreen, a clever way to dodge accountability for the glaring inadequacies he’s failed to address over the years. Far from a testament to his growth, it’s an admission that self-belief has been his crutch, papering over a lack of real development in key areas of his game.

    First, let’s talk about the elephant in the room: his shooting. Giannis has been in the league since 2013, and yet his jump shot remains a work in progress—at best. His career three-point percentage hovers around 28%, and his free-throw shooting has been a playoff liability, famously exploited during the Bucks’ 2021 title run. Teams still sag off him, daring him to shoot, and too often, he obliges with clunky, inconsistent results. For a player with his physical gifts—6’11”, with a wingspan that defies logic—you’d expect more refinement by now. Compare him to someone like Kevin Durant, who honed his shooting to lethal precision, or even LeBron James, who turned a shaky jumper into a reliable weapon. Giannis? He’s still banking on athleticism and “self-belief” to bulldoze his way to the rim. That’s not growth; that’s stubbornness.

    Then there’s his playmaking. Sure, he racks up assists—averaging 6.0 per game in the 2023-24 season—but it’s less a sign of elite vision and more a byproduct of defences collapsing on his drives. His passes are often predictable, lacking the creativity or precision of a true floor general like Nikola Jokić or Chris Paul. When the Bucks needed him to elevate his teammates in crunch time against the Heat in the 2023 playoffs, he faltered, and Miami’s zone defense exposed his inability to adapt. Self-belief doesn’t fix tunnel vision; skill does. Yet Giannis seems content to lean on his raw power rather than expand his basketball IQ.

    Defensively, he’s a force—don’t get me wrong. But even there he relies only on physical tools and there is no nuanced improvement. He’s a roving help defender but ask him to lock down a shifty guard one-on-one or navigate complex pick-and-roll schemes, and the cracks show. Modern NBA defences demand versatility, not just rim protection. Giannis hasn’t evolved into the cerebral defender he could be—he’s still coasting on those freakish measurables. And they are becoming less and less relevant to winning in the NBA when it really counts.

    The “no skills, no talent” line might play well with fans who love his everyman charm, but it’s a cop-out. It suggests his success is some mystical triumph of will, not the result of deliberate craft. And maybe that’s the problem: Giannis hasn’t had to grind as hard on the finer points because his athleticism and the Bucks’ system have carried him this far. But the league is changing—teams are smarter, schemes are tighter, and raw talent alone doesn’t cut it anymore. His 2021 Finals run was a peak, no doubt, but since then, we’ve seen diminishing returns. The Bucks’ early playoff exits in 2023 and 2024 hint at a ceiling he’s unwilling to push past.

    Contrast this with peers like Jayson Tatum, who’s sharpened his mid range game, or Luka Dončić, who’s mastered pace and control. Giannis, meanwhile, is still the freight train—unstoppable until you figure out the tracks. Saying “just self-belief” isn’t inspiring; it’s a red flag that he’s hasn’t prioritised tangible skill development over the long haul. At 30 years old, with over a decade in the NBA, the clock’s ticking for Giannis to prove he’s more than a one-trick pony. Self-belief got him here, but it won’t keep him at the top. The Giannis mythos is real—hustle, heart, and an unrelenting motor—but let’s not kid ourselves: claiming “no skills, no talent” isn’t humility. It’s a mask for a superstar who’s plateaued, banking on charisma and past glory to hide the truth. Time will tell if he’s got the guts to reinvent himself—or if he’ll keep running the same play, hoping the league doesn’t catch up.

    BTW Nike, nice touch to add the “freakishly hard work”. But it won’t really make a difference if Giannis keeps failing to improve.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Historic Night Against the 76ers: Brilliance or the end of Bucks’ season?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Historic Night Against the 76ers: Brilliance or the end of Bucks’ season?

    Last night, April 3, 2025, Giannis Antetokounmpo put on a performance for the ages in the Milwaukee Bucks’ 126-113 victory over the Philadelphia 76ers at the Wells Fargo Center. The Greek Freak etched his name into the NBA history books as the first player ever to record at least 35 points, 20 assists, and 15 rebounds in a single game. It was a stat line that left fans and analysts in awe, a testament to his unparalleled physical gifts and relentless drive. But beneath the surface of this jaw-dropping achievement lies a lingering question: Was Giannis’ dominance a selfless act of leadership or a selfish display of ball possession that could hinder the Bucks’ playoff preparation?

    A Night of Unmatched Dominance against… a crippled G league roster

    Let’s start with the numbers, because they’re impossible to ignore. Giannis finished with 35 points on 12-of-19 shooting, including a perfect 1-for-1 from beyond the arc, and 10-of-11 from the free-throw line. He grabbed 17 rebounds, dished out a career-high 20 assists, and added 2 steals, all while committing just 2 turnovers in nearly 39 minutes of play. His plus-minus of +23 led the game, underscoring his impact on both ends of the floor. The Bucks, missing Damian Lillard due to a calf injury, leaned heavily on their superstar, and he delivered in a way that few players ever have.

    The 76ers, shorthanded without their top starters like Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey, had no answer for Giannis. He attacked the paint with his signature ferocity, orchestrated the offense with pinpoint passes, and controlled the glass like a man possessed. At one point, Philadelphia held a lead, but Giannis spearheaded a Bucks comeback that turned the game into a comfortable win. It was a masterclass in individual brilliance. Yet it’s worth asking whether that brilliance came at a cost to his team’s long-term cohesion.

    The Ball in Giannis’ Hands: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis’ stat line screams versatility, but it also highlights a reality: the ball was in his hands a lot. With 20 assists, it’s clear he was the primary playmaker, especially in Lillard’s absence. The Bucks ran their offence through him, and he dictated the flow of the game. Why would you put the ball in his hands against a depleted 76ers squad?

    While his 20 assists show he was willing to distribute, the sheer volume of his touches suggests a level of ball dominance that could stifle the development of Milwaukee’s supporting cast. With the playoffs looming this game could have been an opportunity to get other players more involved, to build confidence.

    Instead, Giannis held the reins tightly. His 35 points came on 19 field goal attempts, a high number for a game where the Bucks were facing a weakened opponent. Could some of those shots have gone to Middleton, who’s still finding his rhythm after injury setbacks, or to Lopez, whose outside shooting could stretch defenses in the postseason? The Bucks won convincingly, but the question remains: Was this the best way to prepare for the grueling playoff battles ahead, where team synergy often trumps individual heroics?

    Selfishness or Necessity?

    To call Giannis “selfish” might seem harsh given his 20 assists—aರೀಭాగం: assists—a career-high mark that obliterated the previous record of 17, set by legends like Magic Johnson and LeBron James. He also became the first player in NBA history to record a 35-point, 20-assist, 15-rebound game, a feat that cements his status as one of the game’s all-time greats. But let’s peel back the curtain on that performance. Yes, he was distributing the ball, but the Bucks’ offence revolved around him to an almost suffocating degree. When you’re the focal point of every possession, it’s easy to rack up assists—your teammates are forced to finish the plays you set up. And look at that shot chart, truly pathetic. He didn’t even try a mid range shot, too busy stat padding.

    Contrast this with a player like Nikola Jokić, who often elevates his Denver Nuggets teammates by empowering them to make decisions, or even Damian Lillard, who, when healthy, shares ball-handling duties with Giannis to create a more balanced attack. Last night, without Lillard, Giannis reverted to a one-man show. It worked against a shorthanded 76ers team, but will it hold up against playoff-calibre defences that are sure to double- and triple-team him?

    Playoff Implications: A Team Game

    The Bucks’ postseason success in recent years has been a mixed bag. They won the championship in 2021, largely thanks to Giannis’ superhuman Finals performance, but they’ve also suffered early exits—like last year’s first-round loss to the Miami Heat—when opponents clogged the paint and dared Milwaukee’s role players to beat them. In those moments, the Bucks needed more than just Giannis; they needed a cohesive unit where everyone feels involved and confident.

    Sure you will get 20 assists when your team mates are shooting the lights out! Against a G league kiddie team any pass ends in a bucket. Easy!

    Last night’s game was a missed chance to build that trust. Middleton, for example, scored just 12 points on 5-of-10 shooting in 28 minutes. Lopez added 14 points, but on only 8 attempts. These are proven veterans who can carry a load, yet their touches were limited as Giannis dominated the ball. In the playoffs they’ll need their supporting cast to step up. Over-relying on Giannis now could leave those players under prepared when it matters most.

    The Counterargument: Giannis Did What He Had To

    Effectiveness against a depleted opponent doesn’t necessarily translate to playoff readiness. The Bucks’ championship run in 2021 succeeded because Middleton and Jrue Holiday (now with Boston) were fully integrated into the offence, capable of taking over when Giannis faced heavy pressure. Last night, Giannis didn’t give his teammates that same opportunity to shine.

    Looking Ahead

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s performance against the 76ers was undeniably historic, a showcase of his extraordinary talent and will to win. But as the Bucks sit at 41-34, sixth in the Eastern Conference with the playoffs on the horizon, they need to shift focus from individual heroics to team preparation. Giannis can’t do it alone in May and June—he’ll need a squad that’s ready to share the load. Last night, he held the ball too much, and while it led to a win and a record-breaking stat line, it might have been a selfish choice in the grand scheme of Milwaukee’s postseason aspirations.

    The Bucks have the talent to make a deep run, but only if Giannis trusts his teammates enough to let them grow into their roles. Last night was a reminder of what he’s capable of—and a warning of what could hold them back if he doesn’t loosen his grip on the game. As the regular season winds down, Milwaukee’s challenge is clear: turn Giannis’ dominance into a team strength, not a crutch. The playoffs will demand nothing less.

  • Why does Giannis hate ladders? A Look at the Bucks Star’s Controversial Side

    Why does Giannis hate ladders? A Look at the Bucks Star’s Controversial Side

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, is widely celebrated for his relentless work ethic, and inspiring journey from a street vendor in Greece to an NBA champion. Known as the “Greek Freak,” he’s often portrayed as a humble, likable figure—a family man with a contagious smile and a heartwarming story. But beneath the polished public persona, there have been moments that reveal a less flattering side of Giannis, including the infamous “Laddergate” incident in 2022. This event, paired with other glimpses of his behaviour, raises questions about whether Giannis can sometimes be, well, a pretty nasty person.

    Is Giannis a nice person?

    On November 18, 2022, after a tough loss to the Philadelphia 76ers at the Wells Fargo Center, Giannis found himself at the centre of a viral controversy. Following the game, he returned to the court to practice free throws—a routine he’s known for, given his historically shaky performance from the line. But what unfolded next was anything but routine. Arena workers were setting up for post-game cleanup, and a ladder was positioned near the basket where Giannis wanted to shoot. Frustrated, Giannis approached the ladder and, in a moment of apparent irritation, shoved it over, nearly hitting a staff member in the process. The incident was caught on video and quickly spread across social media, sparking outrage and debate.

    To some, it was a minor tantrum from a competitor upset after a loss (the Bucks fell 110-102, and Giannis had shot a dismal 4-for-15 from the free-throw line). To others, it was a disrespectful and entitled act toward hardworking arena staff just trying to do their jobs. The optics were undeniably bad: a multimillionaire athlete knocking over equipment in a fit of pique while minimum-wage workers scrambled to clean up after him.

    Giannis later addressed the incident, claiming he felt disrespected by a Sixers staff member who had interrupted his shooting and that the ladder situation escalated from there. He apologized, sort of, saying he’d never intentionally disrespect anyone. But the damage was done. Posts on X at the time captured the public’s mixed reactions—some defended his passion, while others called him out for what they saw as arrogance.

    A Pattern of Petulance?

    Laddergate wasn’t an isolated incident when it comes to Giannis showing a fiery—or some might say nasty—side. On the court, he’s known for his intensity, which sometimes crosses into questionable territory. He’s been accused of overly physical play, like the 2020 headbutt on Moe Wagner that earned him an ejection, or the occasional elbow that opponents argue isn’t accidental. Off the court, his interactions can carry an edge too. For instance, during the 2021 playoffs, he famously taunted the Brooklyn Nets by counting down their elimination seconds after a Game 7 win, a move that rubbed some fans the wrong way.

    More recently, in March 2025, Giannis’s Bucks have been struggling, and his demeanour has reflected that frustration. Reports of tense meetings with coach Doc Rivers and teammate Damian Lillard suggest a player under pressure, and while he’s praised for his leadership, there’s a flip side: a demanding personality that doesn’t always handle adversity with grace. His post-game comments can veer into passive-aggressive territory, like when he downplayed opponents or deflected blame after losses.

    The Headbutt Heard ‘Round the League (2020)


    One of the most blatant displays of Giannis’s temper came on August 11, 2020, during a game against the Washington Wizards. In the second quarter, Wizards forward Moe Wagner set a screen that Giannis didn’t appreciate—Wagner leaned in, and Giannis responded by charging at him and delivering a deliberate headbutt. The move was so out of character for the typically composed star that it stunned onlookers. Referees immediately ejected Giannis, and he was later suspended for one game by the NBA.

    Giannis downplayed it afterward, calling it a “terrible action” and claiming he lost his cool in the heat of the moment. But the incident left a mark. Wagner, for his part, shrugged it off, saying he’d taken worse hits, but fans and analysts weren’t so forgiving. Posts on social media at the time labelled Giannis a “bully” and questioned whether his physicality sometimes crossed into dirty play. It was a rare, ugly glimpse of a player who prides himself on discipline losing control—and taking it out on an opponent in a way that felt personal.

    The Nets Taunt in the 2021 Playoffs


    During the 2021 Eastern Conference Semifinals, Giannis and the Bucks faced off against Kevin Durant and the Brooklyn Nets in a gruelling seven-game series. The Bucks clinched it in overtime of Game 7, and as the final seconds ticked down, Giannis couldn’t resist rubbing it in. Standing at midcourt, he began counting down from 10, mocking the Nets’ elimination as their season slipped away. The Bucks crowd ate it up, but Nets fans—and some neutral observers—saw it as classless.

    Sure, trash talk is part of sports, and Giannis’s antics weren’t exactly vicious. But the glee he took in taunting a beaten opponent, especially after a series where he’d been criticized for his free-throw struggles, struck some as unnecessarily nasty. Durant, ever the stoic, didn’t respond directly, but the moment added fuel to the narrative that Giannis relishes twisting the knife when he’s on top.

    Shoving Jaylen Brown (2018)


    Rewind to May 2018, during the Bucks’ first-round playoff series against the Boston Celtics. In Game 4, Giannis got tangled up with Celtics star Jaylen Brown under the basket. As Brown tried to box him out, Giannis responded with a hard shove that sent Brown sprawling to the floor. No foul was called, but the play didn’t go unnoticed. Brown later called it a “dirty play,” and while Giannis avoided any formal punishment, the incident fed into early perceptions of him as a player who could use his size and strength in ways that skirted the line.

    At the time, Giannis was still establishing himself as a superstar, and some dismissed it as playoff intensity. But looking back, it’s part of a pattern: when challenged physically, Giannis doesn’t always back down—he pushes back, sometimes literally, and not always with finesse.

    The Free-Throw Line Spat with Montrezl Harrell (2022)


    Laddergate wasn’t the only drama from that November 2022 night in Philadelphia. Before the ladder incident, Giannis had a run-in with Sixers reserve Montrezl Harrell. After the game, Giannis returned to the court to work on his free throws, only to find Harrell there, refusing to let him shoot. Words were exchanged, and Harrell reportedly took the ball and walked off, escalating the tension. Giannis later vented about it in the press, saying Harrell “came at me” and implying he felt disrespected.

    Harrell fired back on Twitter, calling Giannis out for acting entitled and suggesting he wasn’t as tough as he portrayed. The spat didn’t turn physical, but it showcased Giannis’s thin skin when challenged—something that carried over into the ladder shove minutes later. It’s not hard to see how his frustration with Harrell boiled over into a nastier confrontation with the arena staff.

    Post-Game Snubs and Passive-Aggressive Jabs


    Giannis’s nasty side isn’t always physical—it can show up in his words and demeanour too. After a 2023 playoff loss to the Miami Heat, where the Bucks were upset in five games, Giannis bristled at a reporter’s question about whether the season was a failure. His response—“There’s no failure in sports… Do you get a promotion every year at your job?”—went viral, but it also carried a condescending edge that rubbed some the wrong way. He’s also been known to skip handshakes after losses, like against the Heat in that series, leaving opponents hanging in a move that’s subtle but pointed.

    More recently, in the 2024-2025 season, as the Bucks have struggled under Doc Rivers, Giannis has dropped passive-aggressive hints in press conferences. After a March 2025 loss to the Celtics, he remarked, “Some guys gotta step up,” a not-so-veiled shot at teammates like Damian Lillard. While he’s not wrong to demand more, his delivery can come off as petulant rather than inspiring.

    The Complexity of Giannis

    To be fair, Giannis isn’t a villain. His backstory—growing up in poverty, sharing a single pair of shoes with his brothers, and facing racism as an immigrant in Greece—makes his rise to stardom genuinely admirable. He’s also shown kindness, like his work with the Milwaukee community or his playful interactions with fans. But the Laddergate incident and other moments hint at a temper and ego that don’t always align with the “good guy” narrative the NBA loves to promote.

    Maybe it’s not that Giannis is inherently nasty, but that he’s human—flawed, emotional, and occasionally prickly under the weight of immense expectations. The ladder shove wasn’t a calculated act of malice; it was a spontaneous outburst from a guy who hates losing and sometimes lets that get the better of him. Still, it’s hard to excuse the disregard for the workers caught in the crossfire, and it’s those kinds of actions that stick in people’s minds. Maybe Giannis is nasty when he loses , which is human, but due to his low basketball IQ and social awkwardness he doesn’t even know how to react.

    What It Means Moving Forward

    As of March 28, 2025, Giannis remains a dominant force in the NBA, averaging over 30 points per game and chasing another title with the Bucks. His personal life is thriving too—he and his wife, Mariah Riddlesprigger, are expecting their fourth child. But incidents like Laddergate linger as reminders that even the most beloved athletes have their rough edges. For every highlight reel dunk or heartwarming quote, there’s a chance for a misstep that reveals a less polished side. As his performance dips and he is getting worse at a lot of things (worse free throw percentage in his career, worse 3point percentage in NBA history for a single season this year, etc) he most obviously can’t handle things psychologically.

    Fans and critics alike will keep watching Giannis, not just for his jaw-dropping play but for how he handles the spotlight. Can he channel that intensity without letting it spill over into moments of nastiness? Only time will tell. For now, Laddergate stands as a cautionary tale of what happens when passion tips into petulance.

  • Selfish in Greek: the definition. Exploring Selfishness and Its Translations into the Greek Freak

    Selfish in Greek: the definition. Exploring Selfishness and Its Translations into the Greek Freak

    Selfishness is one of those traits that’s universally understood yet endlessly debated. It’s the act of prioritizing yourself—sometimes at the expense of others—and it carries a weight that can feel both empowering and guilt-inducing, depending on the context. But how does a concept like selfishness translate across languages and cultures? Today, let’s dive into the idea of selfishness and explore how it might find expression in Greek, a language rich with nuance and history.

    What Does “Selfish” Really Mean?

    In English, “selfish” describes someone who’s excessively concerned with their own needs, desires, or benefits, often disregarding others. It’s got a negative vibe—think of someone hoarding the last slice of pizza or refusing to share notes before a big test. But selfishness isn’t always black-and-white. In small doses, it can be self-preservation, a necessary boundary. The trick is balance, right?

    Now, translating a loaded word like “selfish” into another language isn’t just about finding a dictionary equivalent—it’s about capturing the essence, the cultural undertones. Greek, with its ancient roots and philosophical legacy, offers some fascinating options.

    “Selfish” in Greek: The Linguistic Breakdown

    Greek doesn’t have a single, perfect one-word match for “selfish” that carries all its English baggage. Instead, the translation depends on the shade of meaning you’re chasing. Here are a few contenders:

    1. Εγωιστής (Egoistís) – This is the most direct translation, meaning “egoist” or “selfish person.” It comes from “εγώ” (egó), meaning “I” or “self,” and it’s a noun that labels someone who’s all about themselves. Think of it as the guy who’d rather win an argument than keep the peace. The adjective form, εγωιστικός (egoistikós), works for describing selfish behavior—like “That was a selfish move.”
    2. Φίλαυτος (Fílavtos) – This one’s a bit more poetic. It breaks down to “φίλος” (fílos), meaning “friend” or “lover,” and “αὐτός” (avtós), meaning “self.” So, fílavtos literally means “self-loving.” It’s got a vibe that could swing positive (self-care, anyone?) or negative (narcissism), depending on how it’s used. In ancient texts, it sometimes pops up to describe excessive self-regard.
    3. Αυτοτελής (Aftotelís) – This term is trickier. It means “self-sufficient” or “independent,” from “αὐτός” (self) and “τέλος” (end or purpose). While it’s not “selfish” in the negative sense, it hints at someone who operates for their own sake, which can overlap with selfish traits in certain contexts.
    4. Ιδιοτελής (Idiotelís) – Here’s a juicy one. It translates to “self-interested” or “self-serving,” derived from “ἴδιος” (ídios), meaning “private” or “personal,” and “τέλος” (purpose). Idiotelís carries a stronger whiff of ulterior motives—like someone helping you out only because it benefits them. It’s selfishness with a calculated edge.

    Cultural Nuances: Selfishness Through a Greek Lens

    Greek culture, shaped by everything from ancient philosophy to modern community values, adds layers to these words. Take the Stoics or Epicureans—philosophers who wrestled with self-interest versus the common good. A term like fílavtos might’ve sparked a debate: Is loving yourself a virtue or a vice? Meanwhile, idiotelís feels more transactional, less forgivable in a society that often prizes hospitality and collective harmony.

    In modern Greek, calling someone egoistís is a straightforward jab—it’s not a compliment. But the language’s flexibility lets you tweak the tone. Pair egoistikós with a playful nudge, and it might soften the blow: “Μην είσαι τόσο εγωιστικός!” (“Don’t be so selfish!”) could be a tease among friends.

    Why It Matters

    Words shape how we think about concepts, and selfishness is no exception. In English, it’s a blunt label; in Greek, the options let you zoom in on intent, degree, or even morality. Are you a fílavtos who’s just a little too into yourself, or an idiotelís scheming for personal gain? The choice of word paints a picture.

    Next time you’re pondering human nature—or maybe just annoyed at someone hogging the spotlight—try tossing a Greek twist into your vocabulary. It’s a fun way to see selfishness from a fresh angle, and who knows? Maybe it’ll spark a little self-reflection, too.

    The Case for Giannis Antetokounmpo as an Extremely Selfish Player

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” is celebrated as a two-time MVP, Finals MVP, and one of the NBA’s well known players. Fans and analysts alike laud his relentless drive and team-first mentality. But beneath the surface of his glittering accolades lies a player whose style, decisions, and demeanour paint a different picture—one of extreme selfishness. As of March 11, 2025, Giannis’s career offers plenty of evidence to suggest that his pursuit of personal glory often overshadows the collective good. Let’s break it down.

    The Ball-Hogging Bulldozer

    Watch Giannis play, and one thing becomes clear: the ball is his, and he’s not sharing it unless he has to. His game is built around bulldozing to the rim, leveraging his 6-foot-11 frame and freakish athleticism to overpower defenders. Sure, he averages over 5 assists per game across his career, but those numbers mask a truth—most of those passes come only after he’s exhausted every option to score himself. Teammates often stand around, reduced to spectators, as Giannis barrels through traffic, hunting his own shot. His usage rate consistently ranks among the league’s highest, hovering around 33% in recent seasons, a stat that screams “me-first.”

    Contrast this with true team players like Nikola Jokić, whose playmaking elevates everyone, or Stephen Curry, who thrives off-ball to create space. Giannis, meanwhile, demands the rock, and when he doesn’t have it, he’s visibly disengaged—sulking on the wing or jogging back on defense. His heliocentric style suffocates Milwaukee’s offense, turning skilled players like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard into glorified spot-up shooters. Selfish? You bet.

    The Free-Throw Fiasco

    Then there’s the free-throw routine. Giannis’s agonizingly slow approach—often exceeding the 10-second shot clock— isn’t just a quirk; it’s a selfish power play. He holds the game hostage, forcing everyone—teammates, opponents, refs, and fans—to wait on his terms. In the 2021 Finals, he famously airballed free throws and still took his sweet time, as if the spotlight mattered more than efficiency. Even as he’s improved to a respectable 70% shooter by 2025, the deliberate pace persists, a subtle flex of control that prioritizes his comfort over the flow of the game.

    Chasing Stats Over Wins

    Giannis’s stat lines are gaudy—30 points, 12 rebounds, 6 assists—but dig deeper, and you’ll see a player obsessed with padding numbers. Take his 2019-20 MVP season: he averaged 29.5 points and 13.6 rebounds in just 30.4 minutes per game, often sitting out fourth quarters because the Bucks were blowing teams out. Sounds impressive, right? Or is it a calculated move to juice per-minute stats while avoiding the grind of close games? When the stakes rise in the playoffs, his efficiency often dips—look at his 41.5% field goal percentage in the 2022 Eastern Conference Semifinals loss to Boston. The stat-chasing disappears when it’s not easy.

    And don’t forget the triple-doubles. Giannis has racked up over 40 by March 2025, but some feel forced. In a 2023 game against Washington, he grabbed a meaningless rebound in the final seconds to hit 10, prompting criticism that he cared more about the box score than the win. Selfishness isn’t always loud—it’s in the quiet pursuit of personal milestones.

    The Loyalty Myth

    Giannis loves to play the loyal hero, signing a supermax extension with Milwaukee in 2020 and preaching about staying with one team. Noble, until you realize it’s a selfish choice cloaked as virtue. By staying in a small market, he ensures he’s the undisputed king—no co-star can outshine him, no big-city pressure can expose him. He rejected joining forces with other superstars in Miami or Golden State, where he’d have to share the stage. Instead, he’s built a Bucks roster around his game, forcing Milwaukee to trade for Damian Lillard in 2023 to appease him, only to underutilize Lillard’s playmaking in favor of Giannis’s iso-heavy style. Loyalty? Or a calculated move to keep the throne?

    The Defensive Ego

    Yes, Giannis won Defensive Player of the Year in 2020, but even that reeks of selfishness. He often gambles for highlight-reel swats, leaving teammates to clean up when he misses. His four All-Defensive First Team nods (through 2022) are impressive, but his effort wanes when the Bucks are out of contention. In blowout losses, he’s been caught jogging back, more concerned with conserving energy for his next offensive explosion than locking down. A true team defender sacrifices stats for the system—Giannis sacrifices the system for his stats.

    The NBA Cup Obsession

    In 2024, Giannis led the Bucks to the NBA Cup title and snagged the tournament MVP with a triple-double (26 points, 19 rebounds, 10 assists). Fans cheered, but critics saw a player desperate to add another trophy to his mantle. He dominated the ball in the final against Oklahoma City, taking 22 shots while Lillard settled for 8. The Bucks won, but it was Giannis’s show—teammates were props in his quest for another accolade. His two All-NBA Cup Team selections (2023, 2024) further fuel the narrative: he thrives in spotlight moments that boost his legacy, even in a midseason gimmick.

    The International Spotlight

    Even with Greece, Giannis’s selfishness shines. As the flag bearer at the 2024 Paris Olympics and the 2022 EuroBasket scoring champ (29.3 points per game), he’s the face of Greek basketball. But his national team performances—like a 41-point outburst in a 2022 loss to Serbia—prioritize individual heroics over team success. Greece hasn’t medaled, yet Giannis soaks up the praise. It’s telling that his Olympic Qualifiers Player of the Tournament award in 2024 came in a tournament Greece won, but only to qualify—not to win gold.

    The Verdict

    Peel back the layers, and you see a player consumed by self-interest—hogging the ball, chasing stats, controlling the narrative. His “team-first” persona is a mirage; every move, from his free-throw dawdling to his Milwaukee loyalty, serves Giannis first. As of March 11, 2025, the Greek Freak’s legacy is undeniable—but so is his selfishness. Love him or hate him, he’s playing for one name: Antetokounmpo.

  • Giannis’ stat padding is costing the team

    Giannis’ stat padding is costing the team

    Here are the minutes per game in the Bucks’ championship year.

    A nice, even spread, five players above thirty minutes all

    close to each other. Eight after that also with meaningful minutes. This season it’s too early (Giannis missing games, Kuzma new in the rotation) but we can use last season to compare.

    That’s only 3 players above 30 minutes and only 6 above 20. So we have an older team in which fewer players are holding the ball for longer! And of course the prime suspect is Giannis who is holding the ball much more than in the championship year.

    So he sold away his friend Jrue to get Lillard the great ball handler and…Giannis handles the ball more instead of less! Pat and Brook have about the same possessions as they got back then, which isn’t much. About 9 and 5 usually which is basically nothing, they get the ball if everything else goes wrong or by accident. Khris fell from 18 to 11 due to injuries this season.

    At this point Bucks fans usually say “so what?” Giannis “has to” go above and beyond every night in order to win? But how does that help? He is clearly not helping his team improve like this. Maybe he should pay more attention to his GOAT Lebron who often doesn’t even score in the first quarter but takes a support role trying to get his team mates going.

    Just for comparison, this is the Memphis Grizzlies this season. Notice how evenly the playing time is spread across their players, resulting in them being much more energetic as a team. Oh and they are second in the standings.

  • The Bucks are at a dead end. And it’s on Giannis

    The Bucks are at a dead end. And it’s on Giannis

    A long time ago, as they often recount the tale, the Bucks brought a young athletic boy to their town. Sure he couldn’t dribble or shoot, but his body had amazing and unique characteristics. And he worked really hard. And the Bucks did everything they could to make him comfortable, brought his family over and much more.

    So as he started playing he won people over with his smile. It also became apparent he needed a mentor on the court, Khris was ideal and he has done it selflessly for all these years. Giannis had no clue about how the NBA game worked. Khris took the slack for him in any situation that Giannis couldn’t understand or simply lacked the skills.

    In defence that was Jrue’s job. Giannis can’t read opponents. He can’t operate fast enough. So Jrue plugged the holes. As the Bucks playing style evolved to suit Giannis they looked for young, cheap and no ego sharp shooters to spread around the floor. And when it came time for a center to help in the paint, they picked Brook precisely because of his lethal (and then quite unique for a big) 3 point ability.

    And it worked! With a lot of good luck in the playoffs and thanks to Khris, Jrue and Brook they got Giannis to the Finals. That series was the Bucks’ to lose as it turned out and they quite easily won it. Giannis even had an epic 50 point game for the books. Heck he even scored free throws! And what did he do?

    In the ultimate show of inexperience he said, implied and outright shouted two pretty lethal messages:

    1. I did this the right way, no help, no superteam
    2. We are going to run it back next year.

    1. About the “right way” he was soooo wrong. As I explain here that Bucks team was a superteam. But most importantly Giannis proclaimed to the whole world that he was the Bucks. On his own. Solo. No super team, just a bunch of losers and him.

    2. So they didn’t “run it back”. Αny player staying on after this had to further suck up any ego or leave. The narrative almost every game the Bucks lost from then on is “Giannis tried but was let down by the rest of the roster.” Every single time. He is busy stat padding, hogging the ball, everyone else looks terrible.

    What player in his right mind would even consider joining such a team? You would have to be pretty desperate, have no ego and no other offers. Enter poor Damien Lillard. A player who almost damaged the Blazers in a similar fashion except he is smarter and the Blazers realised it sooner and built a young core better. And of course Dame starts and gets the same abuse as everyone else. He has to work with Giannis’ inferior basketball IQ yet not make him look bad on court. This is a conundrum that Khris had figured out to a certain extent but is getting too old to carry for a whole game like he used to. Dame has to wait for Giannis to do his thing and if he gets stuck in traffic has to hope Giannis will see him so that he can get a – usually terrible – pass from him to try and score with little time and with the entire opponent’s roster knowing that he has few options.

    So Dame does the Khris thing. In crunch time Giannis just keeps giving him the ball as if saying “dude I have no idea what to do when up against teams that actually defend against me!” The problem is that Giannis has believed his own hype. He keeps training for strength, he keeps trying to play bully ball, he just looks at points/assists/rebounds at the end of the game as if that is all that matters. When they win in the regular season against lesser opponents the NBA media and the Bucks marketing team shout a lot about his personal stats looking for rare and weird ones like 30point games with more than 3.14 times rotation of the Earth around Jupiter while the game was being played. When they lose against better opponents or anyone that bothers to defend Giannis with a bit of effort it is “Giannis tried but XYZ.” The narrative is always “Giannis is top dog, must be the rest of them at fault“.

    And he is killing the Bucks in the meantime.

    (PS Tonight the Bucks lost to the Blazers. Giannis was “player of the game” according to Bucks marketing and many fans. How does that make sense? He controlled the game most of the time other than the first quarter when he let Dame bring the ball down for a while. He just kept running the same play and forcing the Bucks to play in the same way even though it was clearly not working. What would his idol Lebron James have done? Got more players involved. Changed it up. At worse Giannis should have left the younger players get more minutes. You are not the “best player” when you are effectively killing your team both short term and in the long term.)