Tag: hog

  • KYLE KUZMA was second best player of the bucks last season??

    KYLE KUZMA was second best player of the bucks last season??

    So you have seen this chart before. It shows that Giannis, despite not being much good at dribbling, held the ball more than anyone. Despite his tendency for turnovers, he insists on bringing the ball down and then wasting time holding it.

    Some say this is on purpose. For sure it helps boost his stats. Opponents shoot. Everyone on the Bucks team clears out for Giannis to boost his rebound stats. Then Giannis brings down the ball looking for an easy dunk. He often gets locked up and then wastes more time because he has no skills to disentangle himself. When he does pass it is often too late to team mates that are covered defensively. Still, when we link the amount of time Bucks’ players had the ball to their points, this is the chart:

    Amazingly Giannis is 8th. Makes sense. Because even when he gets fouled, he converts free throws terribly. KPJ makes the most of what little time with the ball he is given.

    Giannis’ tendency to dominate the ball for the Milwaukee Bucks has sparked considerable debate and criticism, especially as his usage rate continues to rise each season. In the 2024-25 season, Giannis’s usage reached league-leading levels, with nearly 35% of the Bucks’ possessions ending with his actions, and this figure spiked even higher during periods when Damian Lillard was absent.​

    Downsides of Giannis’s Ball Dominance

    • Ball-stopping and predictability: When so many possessions flow through Giannis, opposing defenses can focus on collapsing the paint and crowding him, making the Bucks’ offense more predictable and easier to scheme against in crucial playoff moments. This “heliocentric” approach often slows ball movement and reduces chances for teammates to find rhythm and confidence in key stretches.​
    • Under-utilization of teammates: Despite talents like Lillard or Middleton, the offense has repeatedly struggled to maximize their skill sets because so many plays still funnel directly through Giannis. This creates a scenario where valuable offensive players become spot-up shooters or afterthoughts, rather than being integrated as dynamic threats.​ New players simply don’t touch the ball enough.
    • Sustainability and fatigue: The enormous responsibility placed on Giannis not only makes the Bucks vulnerable if he struggles or faces fatigue, but also risks injury or long-term wear as he is now in his 30s. Relying on one player to generate most of the offense makes the team less resilient in playoff series or against elite defenses.​

    Evidence of Problems

    • Usage rate trends: Giannis consistently leads the league or nears the top in usage rate, a classic trait of ball-dominant systems that have mixed playoff success. In clutch moments, the offense tends to stall or force Giannis into heavily contested shots, resulting in lower efficiency or turnovers.​
    • Playoff disappointments: Playoff exits in recent seasons have frequently included criticism of the Bucks’ inability to adapt offensively when Giannis is neutralized. Ball dominance discourages other creators from developing confidence, shown in stagnant offense late in games.​
    • Calls for diversified offense: Analysts, coaches, and even teammates have advocated for more diverse offensive sets by reducing Giannis’s workload and sharing playmaking responsibility, recognizing that a more balanced approach is essential to success at the highest levels of competition.​

    The narrative that Giannis “hogs” the ball is backed by the data and on-court impact: while the Bucks remain extremely reliant on his talents, this overreliance has financial and competitive costs, especially in the playoffs. For Milwaukee to reach its full potential, a clear shift toward more collaborative, multi-faceted offensive schemes is urgently needed.​

    What have we seen so far? Well the Bucks coaching team saw how Spanoulis used Giannis in the Olympics. But they can’t copy it. Why? Because Giannis has become hooked on getting his stat padding in every game and refuses to share the ball even now. If the Bucks’ marketing team was honest, this is what the graphic would look like after a game:

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Historic Night Against the 76ers: Brilliance or the end of Bucks’ season?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Historic Night Against the 76ers: Brilliance or the end of Bucks’ season?

    Last night, April 3, 2025, Giannis Antetokounmpo put on a performance for the ages in the Milwaukee Bucks’ 126-113 victory over the Philadelphia 76ers at the Wells Fargo Center. The Greek Freak etched his name into the NBA history books as the first player ever to record at least 35 points, 20 assists, and 15 rebounds in a single game. It was a stat line that left fans and analysts in awe, a testament to his unparalleled physical gifts and relentless drive. But beneath the surface of this jaw-dropping achievement lies a lingering question: Was Giannis’ dominance a selfless act of leadership or a selfish display of ball possession that could hinder the Bucks’ playoff preparation?

    A Night of Unmatched Dominance against… a crippled G league roster

    Let’s start with the numbers, because they’re impossible to ignore. Giannis finished with 35 points on 12-of-19 shooting, including a perfect 1-for-1 from beyond the arc, and 10-of-11 from the free-throw line. He grabbed 17 rebounds, dished out a career-high 20 assists, and added 2 steals, all while committing just 2 turnovers in nearly 39 minutes of play. His plus-minus of +23 led the game, underscoring his impact on both ends of the floor. The Bucks, missing Damian Lillard due to a calf injury, leaned heavily on their superstar, and he delivered in a way that few players ever have.

    The 76ers, shorthanded without their top starters like Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey, had no answer for Giannis. He attacked the paint with his signature ferocity, orchestrated the offense with pinpoint passes, and controlled the glass like a man possessed. At one point, Philadelphia held a lead, but Giannis spearheaded a Bucks comeback that turned the game into a comfortable win. It was a masterclass in individual brilliance. Yet it’s worth asking whether that brilliance came at a cost to his team’s long-term cohesion.

    The Ball in Giannis’ Hands: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis’ stat line screams versatility, but it also highlights a reality: the ball was in his hands a lot. With 20 assists, it’s clear he was the primary playmaker, especially in Lillard’s absence. The Bucks ran their offence through him, and he dictated the flow of the game. Why would you put the ball in his hands against a depleted 76ers squad?

    While his 20 assists show he was willing to distribute, the sheer volume of his touches suggests a level of ball dominance that could stifle the development of Milwaukee’s supporting cast. With the playoffs looming this game could have been an opportunity to get other players more involved, to build confidence.

    Instead, Giannis held the reins tightly. His 35 points came on 19 field goal attempts, a high number for a game where the Bucks were facing a weakened opponent. Could some of those shots have gone to Middleton, who’s still finding his rhythm after injury setbacks, or to Lopez, whose outside shooting could stretch defenses in the postseason? The Bucks won convincingly, but the question remains: Was this the best way to prepare for the grueling playoff battles ahead, where team synergy often trumps individual heroics?

    Selfishness or Necessity?

    To call Giannis “selfish” might seem harsh given his 20 assists—aರೀಭాగం: assists—a career-high mark that obliterated the previous record of 17, set by legends like Magic Johnson and LeBron James. He also became the first player in NBA history to record a 35-point, 20-assist, 15-rebound game, a feat that cements his status as one of the game’s all-time greats. But let’s peel back the curtain on that performance. Yes, he was distributing the ball, but the Bucks’ offence revolved around him to an almost suffocating degree. When you’re the focal point of every possession, it’s easy to rack up assists—your teammates are forced to finish the plays you set up. And look at that shot chart, truly pathetic. He didn’t even try a mid range shot, too busy stat padding.

    Contrast this with a player like Nikola Jokić, who often elevates his Denver Nuggets teammates by empowering them to make decisions, or even Damian Lillard, who, when healthy, shares ball-handling duties with Giannis to create a more balanced attack. Last night, without Lillard, Giannis reverted to a one-man show. It worked against a shorthanded 76ers team, but will it hold up against playoff-calibre defences that are sure to double- and triple-team him?

    Playoff Implications: A Team Game

    The Bucks’ postseason success in recent years has been a mixed bag. They won the championship in 2021, largely thanks to Giannis’ superhuman Finals performance, but they’ve also suffered early exits—like last year’s first-round loss to the Miami Heat—when opponents clogged the paint and dared Milwaukee’s role players to beat them. In those moments, the Bucks needed more than just Giannis; they needed a cohesive unit where everyone feels involved and confident.

    Sure you will get 20 assists when your team mates are shooting the lights out! Against a G league kiddie team any pass ends in a bucket. Easy!

    Last night’s game was a missed chance to build that trust. Middleton, for example, scored just 12 points on 5-of-10 shooting in 28 minutes. Lopez added 14 points, but on only 8 attempts. These are proven veterans who can carry a load, yet their touches were limited as Giannis dominated the ball. In the playoffs they’ll need their supporting cast to step up. Over-relying on Giannis now could leave those players under prepared when it matters most.

    The Counterargument: Giannis Did What He Had To

    Effectiveness against a depleted opponent doesn’t necessarily translate to playoff readiness. The Bucks’ championship run in 2021 succeeded because Middleton and Jrue Holiday (now with Boston) were fully integrated into the offence, capable of taking over when Giannis faced heavy pressure. Last night, Giannis didn’t give his teammates that same opportunity to shine.

    Looking Ahead

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s performance against the 76ers was undeniably historic, a showcase of his extraordinary talent and will to win. But as the Bucks sit at 41-34, sixth in the Eastern Conference with the playoffs on the horizon, they need to shift focus from individual heroics to team preparation. Giannis can’t do it alone in May and June—he’ll need a squad that’s ready to share the load. Last night, he held the ball too much, and while it led to a win and a record-breaking stat line, it might have been a selfish choice in the grand scheme of Milwaukee’s postseason aspirations.

    The Bucks have the talent to make a deep run, but only if Giannis trusts his teammates enough to let them grow into their roles. Last night was a reminder of what he’s capable of—and a warning of what could hold them back if he doesn’t loosen his grip on the game. As the regular season winds down, Milwaukee’s challenge is clear: turn Giannis’ dominance into a team strength, not a crutch. The playoffs will demand nothing less.

  • So why did the Bucks lose to the Suns?

    So why did the Bucks lose to the Suns?

    Fourth quarter starts. Bucks down 78 – 83. Giannis sitting on the bench. Team plays terrifically without him and gets 2 points ahead. Ball flowing, defence clicking. Giannis comes into the game. Suns go on an 8-0 run. The rest is history.

    Giannis is not clutch. He is the exact opposite of clutch. Look at his game shot chart. ZERO mid range, as I have explained many times, he has no mid range when it matters, only against easy teams with no pressure.

    The Suns have struggled defensively this season, ranking 20th in the league, allowing 114.8 points per game. This was an opportunity for Giannis to exploit their weaknesses, especially with Bradley Beal out due to a hamstring injury. Yet, he failed to impose his will, a stark contrast to his usual relentless aggression. When Milwaukee needed their best player to take over, Giannis couldn’t break through Phoenix’s scheme, leaving the Bucks scrambling for answers late in the game. Giannis has no “bag”, hell he doesn’t even have a fanny pack.

    Look at that box score. Not just the terrible free throw percentage. Non existent in offensive rebounds, he just got the easy stat padding defensive ones. The game’s defining moment came with 2.4 seconds left, when Devin Booker sank the game-winner over Milwaukee’s defense. As Booker caught the ball, the lane opened up, and he glided into his preferred mid-range spot for an uncontested look. Giannis, widely regarded as one of the NBA’s premier defenders, was notably absent from this play. Posts on social media highlighted the sentiment: “As soon as Booker caught the ball, the lane was wide open, and I knew that was game.” Where was Giannis? As the Bucks’ defensive anchor, his presence should have deterred Booker or forced a tougher shot. Instead, his positioning—or lack thereof—allowed Phoenix’s star to operate freely. We have explained his many issues in defence, lateral lack of speed an obvious one related to last night.

    Giannis himself acknowledged this in post-game comments, saying, “I feel like Devin Booker was able to get to his spot and get a wide-open look.” This admission underscores a critical failure: the Bucks’ best player didn’t step up to contest the shot that sealed their fate. With Lillard out and the team relying on Giannis to lead, his inability to disrupt the final possession was a glaring misstep.

    Missed Opportunities Down the Stretch

    Beyond the last play, Giannis’ overall decision-making in crunch time was questionable. The Bucks trailed by slim margins throughout the fourth quarter, and while they mounted a comeback from a 14-point deficit earlier in the game (per prior trends against teams like the Kings), they couldn’t close the deal against Phoenix. Giannis, known for his ability to attack the rim and draw fouls, didn’t generate the same pressure he’s capable of. The Suns’ recent defensive improvement—allowing just 107 points per game over their last five—shouldn’t have been enough to neutralise him entirely, especially given Milwaukee’s need for a go-to scorer without Lillard or the suspended Bobby Portis Jr.

    The Bigger Picture: Leadership Under Scrutiny

    This loss amplifies broader concerns about Giannis’ role as the Bucks’ leader. At 40-31 after the game, Milwaukee sits fifth in the Eastern Conference, far from the championship contender status they’ve held in recent years. Without Lillard’s playmaking, the offence runs through Giannis, yet he couldn’t elevate his teammates—Gary Trent Jr., Brook Lopez, and others—against a Suns team riding a hot streak. Social media chatter even speculated about his future, with one user suggesting, “Giannis is so outta there, barring an incredible return in a Dame Lillard trade.” While that’s hyperbolic, it reflects the frustration with his inconsistent impact in big games like this one.

    Giannis Must Own This One

    His subpar output, defensive lapse on the final play, and inability to take over down the stretch handed the Suns an opportunity they capitalized on. For a team fighting to solidify its playoff position, this was a game Giannis needed to win—and he didn’t. Until he consistently delivers in these moments, questions about his ability to carry the Bucks will persist. Last night, the Greek Freak faltered, and Milwaukee paid the price.