Tag: officiating

  • Giannis in the “friendly” against Latvia: selfish and dangerous!

    Giannis in the “friendly” against Latvia: selfish and dangerous!

    Last night, on August 20, 2025, Greece faced off against Latvia in a EuroBasket warm-up game at the Acropolis Tournament. What was supposed to be a triumphant return for Giannis Antetokounmpo turned into a frustrating display of individualism over team play. Greece may have won 104-86, but Giannis’ performance was anything but the heroic effort some headlines are painting it as. In fact, it was downright selfish and poorly executed in key areas, raising questions about his fit with the national team as they gear up for EuroBasket 2025.

    The Context: High Expectations for the Greek Freak

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time NBA MVP and Milwaukee Bucks superstar, hadn’t played a competitive game in nearly four months. This exhibition against Latvia—featuring NBA talent like Kristaps Porzingis—was meant to be his tune-up, a chance to shake off the rust and lead Greece to dominance. Instead, what we saw was a player who seemed more focused on padding his own stats than elevating his teammates. Greece’s national team has struggled in recent prep games without him, averaging just 66.7 points per game in their first four exhibitions. But with Giannis back, the offense exploded to 61 points in the first half alone—yet much of that felt forced through one man, highlighting a selfish approach that could spell trouble in tighter contests.

    Stat Line Breakdown: Numbers That Mask the Issues

    At first glance, Giannis’ box score looks impressive: 25 points, 10 rebounds, 3 assists, 2 steals, 2 blocks, shooting 9-of-12 from the field (75%) and 7-of-9 from the free-throw line (78%), all in just 15 minutes. But let’s dig deeper. These stats scream inefficiency in team context and a me-first mentality.

    Here’s a quick table comparing Giannis’ output to what we’d expect from a true team leader in an international setting:

    CategoryGiannis’ StatsExpected for Team PlayCritique
    Points2515-20 (balanced scoring)Hogged shots, taking 12 attempts in 15 minutes— that’s nearly one shot per minute, leaving little room for others.
    Rebounds108-12Solid, but many were uncontested; Latvia’s poor interior defense gifted him easy boards rather than earned through hustle.
    Assists36+Pathetic for a player of his caliber. Only 3 dimes? This shows he prioritized scoring over setting up teammates like Kostas Sloukas (who had 10 assists).
    Shooting Efficiency75% FGHigh, but volume mattersEfficient, sure, but at what cost? Dominating the ball led to fewer touches for Greece’s shooters, who went 14-26 from three as a team but could have done more with better distribution.
    Minutes Played1520-25Benched early? Or pulled because his style wasn’t meshing? He exploded for 20 points in the first half but faded, suggesting stamina or focus issues.
    TurnoversNot reported (assumed low)MinimalWithout full details, we can’t ignore potential sloppy plays; his aggressive style often leads to charges and travels in international rules.
    Defensive Impact2 STL, 2 BLKEliteFlashes of brilliance, but Latvia scored 86 points—too many for a “defensive anchor” like Giannis to allow, especially against a Porzingis-led squad that shot poorly (Porzingis: 7 points on 2-7 FG).

    These numbers reveal a player who was effective in isolation but detrimental to fluid team basketball. Giannis’ 20 points in just 10 first-half minutes might sound like dominance, but it came via 8-9 two-pointers and free throws—basically bullying his way inside without much creativity or involvement of others. In the NBA, this works because of spacing and rules, but in FIBA play, where physicality is ramped up, it borders on selfishness.

    Selfish Play: Ball-Hogging and Ignoring Teammates

    The most glaring issue was Giannis’ selfishness. In 15 minutes, he attempted 12 field goals— that’s a usage rate that would make even prime James Harden blush. While Greece built a 61-45 halftime lead, it felt like a one-man show rather than a cohesive unit. Teammates like Giannoulis Larentzakis (14 points, including hot three-point shooting) had to wait for scraps, only heating up in the third quarter when Giannis sat. And those 3 assists? Barely enough to qualify as playmaking. Compare that to Sloukas’ 10 assists, and it’s clear who was actually facilitating.

    Post-game reactions on social media were overwhelmingly positive, but that’s the hype machine at work. Fans gushed over the “Greek Freak unleashed,” but critics like us see the cracks: a player more interested in personal highlights than building chemistry. More importantly there was clearly an officiating issue with the Latvian players frustrated at dirty plays by the Greeks all game long.

    Badly Executed Moments: Rust or Ego?

    Giannis’ play was bad in subtle ways that stats don’t capture. His free-throw shooting at 78% (7-9) is decent but missed opportunities in a game where Latvia fouled aggressively. Defensively, while he had blocks and steals, Latvia’s 86 points indicate lapses—Porzingis may have struggled, but role players like Rihards Lomazs (17 points) found open looks too easily. And let’s talk rust: after four months off, Giannis looked gassed by the end of his stint, forcing shots instead of deferring.

    Greece won by 18, but against a Latvia team missing full strength (Porzingis limited to 19 minutes and clearly frustrated at the dirty plays he received early on), this should have been a blowout. Instead, it was a grind until the fourth quarter, partly because Giannis’ iso-heavy style disrupted rhythm. You have to wonder if the Bucks are not regretting allowing him to play and risk injury, since he clearly does not understand how to behave safely on the court.

    What This Means for Greece and EuroBasket 2025

    This performance is a red flag. If Giannis continues this selfish approach, Greece risks imploding in EuroBasket, where team basketball reigns supreme. Coach Vassilis Spanoulis needs to rein him in, emphasise passing, and integrate him better. Remember, international success comes from unity, not one-man heroics.

  • The Small Market Sweetheart Narrative: OKC doing what the Bucks did.

    The Small Market Sweetheart Narrative: OKC doing what the Bucks did.

    The confetti has fallen, the champagne is (finally) dry in Oklahoma City, and the Thunder are the 2025 NBA champions! It’s a fantastic story for a young, exciting team led by the brilliant Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. But as we celebrate their triumph, a familiar whisper has grown into a discernible hum among basketball fans: Does this victory, much like the Milwaukee Bucks’ championship in 2021, expose a league agenda to push small-market teams into the spotlight?

    The Thunder’s Ascent: A Fairytale or a Script?

    The Oklahoma City Thunder’s journey to the 2025 NBA title is undeniably compelling on the surface. A meticulously constructed roster through smart drafting, patient development, and shrewd trades has blossomed into a legitimate powerhouse. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s MVP-caliber season, coupled with the emergence of young stars like Chet Holmgren and Jalen Williams, created a dynamic and entertaining team that captured the imagination of many. They finished with a league-best 68 wins and battled through a tough playoff bracket, ultimately defeating the Indiana Pacers in a thrilling seven-game Finals.

    However, a closer look at their Finals opponent, the Indiana Pacers, and the narrative surrounding the series, has led some to draw parallels with the 2021 Bucks’ run. The Pacers, another relatively small-market team, made a surprising charge to the Finals. The series itself was highly competitive, but the unfortunate injury to Pacers star Tyrese Haliburton in Game 7 certainly altered the landscape. While no one wishes injury on a player, it undeniably removed a significant obstacle for the Thunder.

    This is where the conspiracy theories begin to swirl. The idea isn’t that the NBA actively caused Haliburton’s injury, but rather that certain circumstances or officiating tendencies might subtly favor the desired narrative of a small-market triumph.

    The Bucks’ 2021 Title: A Precedent?

    Rewind to 2021. (Here a detailed run through of all the “lucky” moments.) The Milwaukee Bucks broke a 50-year championship drought, defeating the Phoenix Suns in the Finals. At the time, many hailed it as a victory for small-market teams, a testament to building through the draft and developing homegrown talent. It was a refreshing change from the “super team” era that had dominated the league for years.

    But even then, some raised eyebrows. Critics pointed to questionable foul calls in key moments, particularly in the Eastern Conference Finals against the Brooklyn Nets, where a hobbled Kevin Durant pushed the Bucks to the brink. The narrative of “the league wanting a small market to win” gained traction. The idea was that the NBA, conscious of criticisms about parity and the dominance of major market franchises, was subtly steering the ship towards a more feel-good story.

    The “Small Market” Agenda: Why Would the NBA Do It?

    The core of this theory rests on the idea of the NBA’s desire for compelling storylines and, ultimately, increased viewership and engagement. While big markets like Los Angeles and New York always draw attention, a truly organic, underdog success story from a smaller market can resonate deeply with fans across the league. It creates hope for other smaller teams and diversifies the championship landscape, potentially broadening the NBA’s appeal.

    Consider these points often cited by proponents of the theory:

    • Narrative Control: The NBA is a business, and compelling narratives drive interest. A Cinderella story from a small market can be more captivating than another championship for an established powerhouse.
    • Parity Illusion: Promoting small-market champions can create an illusion of parity, even if underlying systemic issues (like free agency advantages for big markets) persist.
    • Player Retention: A successful small-market team might encourage stars to stay with their drafting team rather than always seeking out major markets, which could be beneficial for the league’s overall competitive balance.
    • Refereeing Nuances: This is often the most controversial aspect. Proponents suggest that subconscious biases, or even subtle directives, might lead to more favorable whistle-blowing for the “desired” outcome, particularly in tightly contested games or pivotal moments. Again, this isn’t about outright rigging, but rather an accumulation of small, borderline calls that tip the scales.

    Is It a Conspiracy, or Just Good Storytelling?

    Ultimately, it’s incredibly difficult to prove or disprove a “league agenda.” The NBA is a complex ecosystem, and every championship team faces its share of favorable and unfavorable bounces. The Oklahoma City Thunder’s inspiring championship run undoubtedly provides excellent fodder for the “small market sweetheart” narrative just as the Bucks’ run did. The NBA, like any major sports league, thrives on drama, compelling stories, and fan engagement. Whether that translates into active manipulation or simply a greater appreciation for the organic rise of a team like the Thunder is a question that will likely remain debated in sports bars and online forums for years to come.

    For sure it puts many of us off though.

  • The Officiating Conundrum: Giannis Gets a Free Pass every time

    The Officiating Conundrum: Giannis Gets a Free Pass every time


    A persistent critique among fans, analysts, and even some players is that officiating tends to favor Giannis, overlooking violations that stem from his aggressive style and, some argue, a lack of refined skill in certain areas.

    Giannis’s “Unique Playing Style”

    To understand the officiating debate, we first need to unpack Giannis’s approach to the game. Unlike traditional superstars who rely on jump-shooting finesse (think Kevin Durant) or guard-like ball-handling (like Kyrie Irving), Giannis thrives on physicality. His game is built around bulldozing drives to the rim, leveraging his length and athleticism to finish through contact. He averages over 30 points per game in recent seasons, with a significant chunk coming from paint scoring and free throws—often 10-12 attempts per game.

    This style, while undeniably effective, invites scrutiny. Critics argue that Giannis’s reliance on power over precision leads to violations that referees either miss or choose to ignore. And worse still, they try to justify it as some sort of “new” style, or “unique” approach. It just ain’t basketball.

    The Traveling Debate

    One of the loudest complaints about Giannis is his alleged traveling. Social media platforms frequently highlight clips of Giannis taking what appear to be extra steps during his drives. A typical sequence involves him gathering the ball mid-stride, taking two or three long steps, and then launching toward the rim. Per NBA rules, a player can take two steps after gathering the ball, but Giannis’s strides are so massive that they can look like more. Giannis does often travel any way you interpret the rules. But he hardly ever gets called for it.

    For example, during a 2023 playoff game against the Miami Heat, a viral clip showed Giannis driving from the top of the key, appearing to take four steps before dunking. Fans cried foul, but no call was made. The reality is murkier: slow-motion replays often reveal that his gather step aligns with the rule, but the sheer length of his strides creates an optical illusion. Still, referees rarely call traveling on him, which fuels perceptions of leniency. Data from the NBA’s Last Two Minute (L2M) reports shows traveling calls are down league-wide—only 0.3 per game in clutch situations—suggesting this isn’t unique to Giannis but part of a broader officiating trend. Giannis travels obviously and in your face very often no matter how you choose to interpret a gather step. He palms the ball and all sorts of other rare violations because he never learnt how to handle the ball as a kid. He started late in life and just lacks the instincts.

    Offensive Fouls and Physicality

    Another sore point is Giannis’s physicality on offense. Critics argue he initiates contact as much as defenders do, yet he’s rarely called for offensive fouls. His signature Euro-step or shoulder-lowering drives often see him barreling into defenders, who end up on the floor while Giannis gets the and-one call. In the 2021 Finals against the Phoenix Suns, Deandre Ayton visibly struggled to defend Giannis without fouling out, while Giannis averaged 35.2 points and 11.4 free-throw attempts per game. It is plain dangerous and unsportsmanlike yet his fans see it as “dominance” instead of what it truly is: technical foul level lack of ability to change direction even if the defender is in a legal position.

    Statistically, Giannis is called for offensive fouls sparingly—about 0.8 per game in the 2022-23 season, compared to 3.1 personal fouls drawn. Compare this to someone like Nikola Jokić, who averages 1.2 offensive fouls despite a less aggressive driving style. The disparity raises questions: Referees are obviously hesitant to penalise Giannis’s physicality because it’s his hallmark.

    Some argue this reflects a skill gap. Unlike players with polished post moves or pull-up jumpers, Giannis leans heavily on momentum and strength. When finesse isn’t an option, contact becomes inevitable, and referees seem to give him the benefit of the doubt. Social media posts often highlight this, with users joking that Giannis’s “skill” is “running through people and getting away with it.”

    Free-Throw Violations: A Technicality Overlooked?

    A less discussed but notable issue is Giannis’s free-throw routine. NBA rules require shooters to attempt their free throw within 10 seconds of receiving the ball. Giannis routinely pushes this limit, often taking 12-14 seconds as he goes through an elaborate routine. In the 2021 playoffs, fans in Brooklyn famously counted down his routine, and referees began enforcing the rule sporadically, calling violations a handful of times.

    Yet, league-wide, these calls remain rare. In the 2022-23 season, only 15 free-throw violations were called across all players, per NBA officiating logs. Giannis’s slow routine disrupts game flow, and critics see it as another area where referees cut him slack. While not a “skill” issue per se, it’s a technical violation that could be enforced more consistently.

    Why the Perception of Favoritism?

    So, why do fans and analysts feel Giannis gets preferential treatment? Several factors are at play:

    1. Star Treatment: The NBA has long been criticized for giving superstars leeway. Giannis benefits from a reality where referees hesitate to call ticky-tack fouls that could derail a marquee player’s impact. Giannis, as a global icon, fits this mould.
    2. Physicality Bias: The league’s shift toward freedom of movement has made referees more lenient on contact, especially for players like Giannis who thrive in the paint. L2M reports show that “no-calls” on physical plays are up 20% since 2018, reflecting a broader tolerance.
    3. Skill vs. Athleticism Narrative: The critique that Giannis lacks “skill” is pervasive. His limited jump shot (29% from three in 2022-23) and reliance on drives feed a narrative that he’s a one-dimensional player who needs officiating help to dominate. This however is absolutely true. Giannis is a one trick pony and – worse still – he is predictable.
    4. Highlight Culture: Social media amplifies scrutiny. Every missed call on Giannis becomes a viral clip, while similar no-calls for others (like Joel Embiid’s elbow-heavy post-ups) get less attention. Social media users often share side-by-side comparisons, like Giannis’s drives versus James Harden’s travels, to argue inconsistency.

    Calling every potential violation would bog down games. If referees whistled every possible travel or offensive foul Gianniswould spend half the game on the bench. The NBA’s emphasis on flow benefits Giannis.

    The Bigger Picture

    The officiating debate around Giannis isn’t just about him—it’s about the NBA’s evolving standards. The league wants high-scoring, fast-paced games, and that means letting physicality slide more than in the hand-check era of the 1990s. Giannis, as a player who embodies this shift, becomes a lightning rod for criticism. His violations, real or perceived, aren’t unique; they’re amplified by his dominance and the spotlight he commands.

    Does officiating “considerably help” Giannis?

    The evidence suggests he benefits from leniency, particularly on travelling and offensive fouls. Are violations overlooked due to a “lack of skill”? That’s harsher—Giannis’s game prioritises athleticism over finesse, but that’s a choice, not a flaw. The truth lies in the gray area: He plays on the edge of the rules, and referees, like fans, are often too captivated to blow the whistle. The NBA has created the Giannis myth precisely by allowing him to break the rules consistently and officials are now used to it. In playoff situations this is for sure under greater scrutiny however. At 30 Giannis is not developing any new skills and has not become any more nuanced in his game. If anything he is worse, relying more than ever on rim finishes.

    I expect this topic to come up more and more. On the one hand Giannis is less and less relevant to the NBA when it matters as he is no longer a playoff factor. Also teams have figured out how to neutralise him even with the officiating help he gets. But the difference between the Giannis myth and the hard reality is that he would not score half as much if the refs were officiating him properly.