Tag: point

  • The NBA’s Worst 3-Point Shooting Seasons: A Historical Dive and Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 Campaign to be the worse!

    The NBA’s Worst 3-Point Shooting Seasons: A Historical Dive and Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 Campaign to be the worse!

    The 3-point shot has become the heartbeat of modern NBA basketball, revolutionizing strategy and elevating players like Stephen Curry and Damian Lillard to legendary status. But for every sharpshooter, there’s a player whose struggles from beyond the arc become infamous. Whether due to poor shot selection, lack of range, or just an off year, some NBA seasons stand out for their abysmal 3-point percentages—especially when players take enough shots to make the numbers meaningful.

    Defining “The Worst”: Setting the Ground Rules

    To fairly assess the worst 3-point shooting seasons, we need a minimum threshold of attempts—otherwise, a player going 0-for-2 could claim the crown, which isn’t insightful. Historically, the NBA uses 82 made 3-pointers as a qualifier for the league lead in 3-point percentage (since 2013-14), but for the “worst” mark, a lower bar like 50 or 100 attempts ensures we’re looking at players who actually tried to shoot from deep, not just took a few errant heaves.

    The Historical Bottom Feeders

    1. John Salmons, 2009-10 Season (Chicago Bulls/Milwaukee Bucks) – 18.5% (20-for-108)
      John Salmons, a solid journeyman wing, had a career defined by versatility rather than shooting prowess. In the 2009-10 season, split between the Bulls and Bucks, he posted one of the lowest 3-point percentages ever for a player with over 100 attempts. At 18.5%, Salmons’ struggles were a mix of poor shot selection and a lack of natural touch from deep. His 108 attempts showed he was given the green light, but the results were disastrous. This mark stands as a benchmark for futility among players with a significant sample size.
    2. DeMar DeRozan, 2018-19 Season (San Antonio Spurs) – 15.6% (7-for-45)
      DeRozan’s midrange mastery is well-documented, but his 3-point shooting has always been a weak spot. In 2018-19, his first year with the Spurs, he took a career-low 45 attempts from beyond the arc and made just 7, yielding a ghastly 15.6%. While this falls short of a 50-attempt minimum some might prefer, it’s notable for a star player and reflects his reluctance—and inability—to adapt to the 3-point-heavy era under Gregg Popovich’s system.
    3. Josh Smith, 2007-08 Season (Atlanta Hawks) – 25.3% (38-for-150)
      Josh Smith was an athletic marvel—dunking, blocking shots, and soaring through the lane—but his 3-point shot was a liability. In 2007-08, he jacked up 150 triples and hit just 38, for a 25.3% clip. Smith’s insistence on shooting from deep, despite his clear limitations, made this one of the most inefficient high-volume seasons of its time. His career 28.5% from 3 underscores that this wasn’t a fluke; he just wasn’t built for it.
    4. Antoine Walker, 2000-01 Season (Boston Celtics) – 25.6% (98-for-383)
      Antoine Walker loved the 3-pointer, perhaps too much. In 2000-01, he launched a staggering 383 attempts—massive volume for that era—and connected on only 98, resulting in a 25.6% success rate. Walker’s shoot-first mentality and willingness to fire away made him a pioneer of sorts, but his inefficiency at that volume lands him on this list. It’s a testament to both his confidence and his struggles adapting to a skill he never fully mastered.
    5. Charles Barkley, 1995-96 Season (Phoenix Suns) – 28.0% (49-for-175)
      Yes, even Hall of Famers can flounder from deep. Barkley, known for his bruising post play and rebounding, took 175 3-point shots in 1995-96 and made just 49, for a 28.0% mark. While not as low as others percentage-wise, the volume and his reputation as a non-shooter make this season stand out. Barkley’s career 26.6% from 3 shows this was par for the course, but 175 attempts from a power forward in the mid-90s was bold—and often ugly.

    Honorable Mentions

    • Russell Westbrook, 2015-16 Season (Oklahoma City Thunder) – 29.6% (71-for-240): Westbrook’s aggression extended to his 3-point shooting, often to his detriment. This season wasn’t his worst percentage-wise, but the volume and inefficiency foreshadowed his career-long inconsistency from deep (30.5% overall).
    • Giannis Antetokounmpo, 2015-16 Season (Milwaukee Bucks) – 17.1% (7-for-41): An early-career low point for Giannis, though the small sample size keeps it off the main list. It’s a reminder of how little he has improved, because this season he is heading to a similar percentage!

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 Season: A Potential Contender?

    Now, let’s turn to the Greek Freak. As of March 29, 2025, Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 2024-25 season is shaping up as one of his worst from beyond the arc. Known for his dominance inside and in transition, Giannis has never been a reliable 3-point shooter—his career average sits at 28.6%—but this year, he’s plumbing new depths. Through roughly 60-65 games (assuming he’s played most of the Bucks’ schedule to date), he’s averaging around 1.7 to 2.2 3-point attempts per game, a decrease from his peak volume seasons (e.g., 4.7 attempts in 2022-23).

    This dip isn’t entirely surprising. Giannis has trended toward fewer 3s under Doc Rivers, with only about 5-6% of his shots coming from deep this season, down from 13.8% two years ago. The Bucks’ strategy has leaned into his strengths—slashing, posting up, and drawing fouls—rather than forcing an outside game he’s never fully developed. Yet, if he maintains this pace and finishes with, say, 15-for-75 (20%) over 75 games, he’d join the ranks of the worst 3-point seasons for a star player with a decent sample size.

    Could Giannis Crack the List?

    To land among the all-time worst, Giannis would need to:

    • Increase his attempts: At his current rate (2 per game), he’d finish with around 150-160 attempts if he plays 80 games. If he stays at 20%, that’s 30-for-150—a mark that rivals Josh Smith’s 25.3% on similar volume.
    • Sustain the slump: His current 20-22% is bad, but not unprecedented for him (see 2015-16’s 17.1%). However, with more attempts, it could become historically notable.

    Right now, he’s on pace to finish below Salmons’ 18.5% if he dips further, though his lower volume (likely under 100 attempts) might keep him off stricter lists. Still, for a two-time MVP and perennial All-NBA talent, a sub-22% season would be a glaring blemish, especially in an era where 3-point shooting is a prerequisite for many stars.

    Why Giannis Struggles

    Giannis’ 3-point woes stem from his mechanics and shot selection. His form—stiff, deliberate, and often rushed—lacks the fluidity of natural shooters. Defences sag off him, daring him to fire, as if he’s rarely taken enough reps to refine the skill. But we know he has. This season, his focus has shifted even more to the paint, to get easy stat padding buckets and average 30+ points per game. That’s all he seems to care about. 3-point struggles are a footnote and something he does out of frustration that more and more teams know how to shut him down in the paint.

    The Verdict

    Giannis’ 2024-25 season won’t topple Salmons or DeRozan for sheer futility unless he inexplicably ramps up his attempts and keeps missing. But if he finishes below 20% on, say, 80-100 attempts, he’d carve out a spot among the worst star-player 3-point seasons—think Barkley or early-career Westbrook territory. For now, he’s a cautionary tale of what happens when a superstar neglects the 3-point revolution. It is particularly entertaining when Giannis fans complain about Jokic and other bigs getting the limelight. Jokic is shooting better than ever in his career this year at an impressive 41.2%. Because that is what intelligent players do, they develop their game.

    Giannis is regressing. His fans say “who cares?” well come trade time you will see who cares! Especially since his free throws are worse than ever too! It gets to the stage where the coach says “just don’t shoot 3s” and the opposing coaches in clutch say “just foul Giannis, we have an almost 1 in 2 chance he misses!”

  • Milwaukee Bucks’ Best Roster Options Post-Damian Lillard Injury: Navigating the 2025 Season and post- Season

    Milwaukee Bucks’ Best Roster Options Post-Damian Lillard Injury: Navigating the 2025 Season and post- Season

    As of March 26, 2025, the Milwaukee Bucks find themselves at a pivotal moment in their season. The devastating news of Damian Lillard’s season-ending injury has sent shockwaves through the organisation and its fan base. Lillard, the seven-time All-Star and dynamic point guard acquired to pair with Giannis Antetokounmpo, was a cornerstone of Milwaukee’s championship aspirations. With his absence confirmed for the remainder of the 2024-25 regular season and postseason, the Bucks must now pivot, relying on their roster depth and strategic adjustments to remain competitive in a stacked Eastern Conference.

    The Impact of Lillard’s Absence

    Through March 2025, Lillard has been a vital offensive engine, averaging around 25 points and 7 assists per game (based on his historical performance and current season trends). His ability to create his own shot, stretch defences with deep three-point shooting, and facilitate for teammates like Antetokounmpo made him indispensable. Without him, the Bucks lose not only a primary scorer but also a playmaker who alleviates pressure from Giannis, who often faces double- and triple-teams.

    The Bucks’ current record, hovering around 40-30 (extrapolated from mid-season updates), places them in the middle of the Eastern Conference playoff picture. With roughly 12 games left in the regular season, Milwaukee must maximise their remaining roster to secure a playoff spot and make a postseason run.

    Option 1: Elevating Giannis Antetokounmpo as the Primary Ball-Handler

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and perennial All-NBA talent, becomes the unquestioned focal point without Lillard. Shifting him into a point-forward role could unlock new dimensions for the Bucks’ offence.

    • Lineup Adjustment: Giannis at the “1,” with AJ Green or Gary Trent Jr. at shooting guard, Taurean Prince at small forward, Kyle Kuzma at power forward, and Brook Lopez at center.
    • Pros: Giannis handling the ball maximises his ability to attack downhill, collapse defences, and kick out to shooters. Green and Trent Jr. provide spacing with their three-point shooting (both above 38% this season), while Kuzma adds secondary scoring. Lopez remains a rim-protecting anchor who can also step out for occasional threes.
    • Cons: Giannis isn’t a natural point guard. His ball-handling can be turnover-prone against aggressive defenses, and his lack of a consistent outside shot limits spacing when he’s the primary initiator. Fatigue could also become an issue as he takes on an even larger load.

    This option leans heavily on Giannis’ but it requires the supporting cast to step up defensively and offensively to compensate for Lillard’s absence.

    Option 2: Committee Approach at Point Guard

    Without a true backup point guard behind Lillard, the Bucks could turn to a by-committee approach, utilizing Kevin Porter Jr., and Ryan Rollins to share ball-handling duties. Porter Jr., acquired at the trade deadline, brings scoring flair. Rollins, on a two-way contract, is a wild card with limited NBA experience.

    • Lineup Adjustment: Porter Jr. at point guard, Gary Trent Jr. at shooting guard, Kuzma at small forward, Antetokounmpo at power forward, and Lopez at center.
    • Pros: Porter Jr. has shown flashes of brilliance this season, averaging around 15 points off the bench since joining Milwaukee. His ability to create shots could partially fill Lillard’s scoring void. This approach keeps Giannis in his natural forward role, preserving his energy for scoring and rebounding.
    • Cons: Porter Jr. cannot replicate Lillard’s elite playmaking or shooting (Porter’s three-point percentage hovers around 35%,). Rollins is unproven and unlikely to handle significant minutes in a playoff setting. The offense could stagnate without a true floor general.

    This strategy spreads the burden but risks inconsistency, especially against top-tier opponents.

    Option 3: Small-Ball Versatility with Kuzma and Prince

    The trade deadline acquisition of Kyle Kuzma gives the Bucks a versatile forward who can score in bunches (despite his efficiency struggles this season at 42% from the field). Pairing him with Taurean Prince in a small-ball lineup could prioritize speed, shooting, and defensive flexibility.

    • Lineup Adjustment: Trent Jr. at shooting guard, Prince at small forward, Kuzma at power forward, and Antetokounmpo at “center.”
    • Pros: This lineup maximizes perimeter threats—Prince and Trent Jr. are knockdown shooters (both over 40% from three in limited roles), while Kuzma can attack mismatches. Giannis at center. Defensively, this unit can switch everything, disrupting opponents’ rhythm.
    • Cons: Rebounding suffers without Lopez, and Giannis will get worn down guarding traditional centres in a playoff series. Kuzma’s cold shooting (28% from three this year) could clog the offence if he doesn’t heat up.

    Small-ball offers a high-risk, high-reward approach, ideal for short bursts or specific matchups but potentially unsustainable over a full game or series.

    Key Contributors Off the Bench

    The Bucks’ bench will be crucial in filling the void. Here’s who needs to step up:

    • Bobby Portis: Currently suspended (as of mid-March reports), Portis returns in early April. His energy, scoring (around 14 points per game), and rebounding off the bench are vital. He could even slide into the starting lineup if Lopez struggles.
    • Pat Connaughton: Sidelined with a calf injury, his return adds a reliable three-point shooter (37% career) and hustle player.
    • AJ Green: The young guard has emerged as a sharpshooter (over 40% from three), offering spacing critical to any offence.
    • Andre Jackson Jr.: His athleticism and defense could earn him more minutes, though his offense remains raw.

    Strategic Adjustments Under Doc Rivers

    Coach Doc Rivers must adapt his system without Lillard. Expect these shifts:

    • Increased Pace: Milwaukee ranks middle-of-the-pack in pace this season. Pushing the tempo with Giannis leading fast breaks could exploit transition opportunities.
    • Simplified Offense: More pick-and-rolls with Giannis as the screener or ball-handler, paired with shooters spotting up, could keep the offense flowing.
    • Defensive Focus: Without Lillard’s offensive firepower, the Bucks must lock in defensively. Lopez and Jackson Jr. anchor the paint, while Trent Jr..

    Playoff Outlook

    A first-round upset isn’t out of the question, but a deep run seems improbable without Lillard’s clutch scoring. Giannis has nothing in clutch but insists on being a liability by being on the floor.

    Looking Ahead

    Lillard’s injury, while a blow to 2025, isn’t the end of Milwaukee’s contention window. He’s under contract through 2026-27 (with a player option), and at 34, he could return refreshed next season. The Bucks’ lack of draft picks (traded away in the Lillard deal) limits their ability to retool, but Giannis’ presence ensures they remain in the mix.

    For now, the Bucks must rally around their Greek Freak, lean on their depth, and hope their role players rise to the occasion. It’s not the season they envisioned, but it’s far from over. Milwaukee’s resilience will define their 2025 story.

    Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Is Not a Viable Option as the Primary Ball-Handler for the Bucks

    Giannis is ill-suited to serve as the primary ball-handler and the specific issues his ball-handling creates.

    Lack of Elite Ball-Handling Skills

    Giannis, at 6’11” and 243 pounds, is a physical marvel, but his ball-handling doesn’t match the finesse of traditional point guards—or even modern combo guards like Lillard. His dribbling is functional for a big man but lacks the tightness and creativity needed to consistently break down perimeter defenders. Defenses often exploit this by pressuring him full-court or sending aggressive double-teams, knowing he’s prone to losing control under duress.

    • Evidence: This season, Giannis averages around 3.2 turnovers per game (consistent with his career trends), with many stemming from sloppy dribbling or telegraphed moves. Against quicker guards like Jalen Brunson or Donovan Mitchell, his handle becomes a liability, leading to strips or forced passes.
    • Problem: As the primary ball-handler, he’d face this pressure constantly, increasing turnovers and disrupting offensive flow. The Bucks’ half-court execution would suffer as opponents clog driving lanes and dare him to create under pressure.

    Limited Outside Shooting Threat

    Giannis’ lack of a reliable jump shot is perhaps the most glaring issue when he’s handling the ball. While he’s improved marginally from beyond the arc (around 29% this season on low volume), he remains a non-threat from three-point range. Defenses sag off him, clogging the paint and neutralizing his driving ability—the cornerstone of his offensive game.

    • Evidence: Teams like the Miami Heat and Toronto Raptors have historically used “wall” defenses, packing the paint and inviting Giannis to shoot. In 2024-25, opponents continue this strategy, with his three-point attempts often resulting in bricks or hesitations that stall the offense.
    • Problem: As the primary initiator, Giannis can’t stretch the floor like Lillard, who commands respect from 30 feet out. This compresses spacing, making it harder for teammates like Gary Trent Jr. or AJ Green to get open looks. The Bucks’ offense becomes predictable and easier to scheme against, especially in playoff settings where adjustments are razor-sharp.

    Decision-Making Under Pressure

    While Giannis has grown in age, his decision-making lags behind elite point guards. He excels at kicking out to shooters after drawing help or finding cutters in transition, but in the half-court, his reads can be slow or overly simplistic. He often forces drives into crowded lanes rather than manipulating defences with patience or misdirection.

    • Evidence: In clutch situations this season, Giannis has occasionally deferred to Lillard or Brook Lopez for creation, highlighting his discomfort running intricate sets. His assist-to-turnover ratio (roughly 2:1) pales in comparison to Lillard’s (closer to 3:1), reflecting less precision as a distributor.
    • Problem: As the primary ball-handler, Giannis would bear the brunt of late-game execution, where his tendency to barrel into traffic or settle for contested mid-range shots could cost the Bucks winnable games. Opponents would blitz him, trusting he’ll either turn it over or take a low-percentage shot.

    Defensive Exploitation and Fatigue

    Sliding him to point guard increases his offensive workload, forcing him to bring the ball up, fight through screens, and orchestrate every possession. This added responsibility could sap his energy, diminishing his two-way impact.

    • Evidence: In games where Giannis logs heavy minutes (38+), his fourth-quarter efficiency dips—field goal percentage drops from 58% to around 52%, per recent trends. Against teams like the Celtics, who employ relentless guard play from Jrue Holiday and Derrick White, he’d be tested relentlessly.
    • Problem: Fatigue would compromise his defensive tenacity, leaving the Bucks vulnerable to backcourt scoring. Offensively, a tired Giannis is less explosive, reducing his ability to finish over length or recover from early-game wear. The Bucks can’t afford a diminished Giannis on either end.

    Disruption of Team Chemistry and Roles

    Shooters like Trent Jr. and Green rely on Giannis drawing attention in the paint, not standing at the top of the key. Bigs like Lopez and Bobby Portis lose post-up opportunities if Giannis clogs the lane with dribble drives.

    • Evidence: In past experiments (e.g., 2020-21 playoffs sans injured guards), Giannis-as-point-guard lineups saw a drop in team three-point percentage as spacing evaporated. Role players hesitated, unsure of their spots in a Giannis-centric offense.
    • Problem: Teammates become spectators rather than active participants, reducing the Bucks’ versatility. Kyle Kuzma, for instance, thrives as a secondary creator, not a spot-up shooter waiting for Giannis to kick out. The offense devolves into “your turn, my turn” rather than a cohesive unit.

    Playoff Magnification of Flaws

    In the postseason, every weakness is magnified. Giannis’ ball-handling struggles would be a prime target for elite coaches like Erik Spoelstra or Nick Nurse. Teams would trap him at half-court, force him to pass into tight windows, and live with his jumpers. His 66% free-throw shooting this season (career norm) also invites late-game fouling, a strategy less effective against Lillard’s 90% clip.

    • Evidence: The 2021 Finals saw Giannis dominate as a finisher and secondary creator, not a point guard. When he’s overextended as the lead initiator (e.g., 2023 vs. Miami), the Bucks falter, losing rhythm and composure.
    • Problem: A Giannis-led offense lacks the sophistication to counter playoff adjustments. Without Lillard’s pull-up threat or pick-and-roll mastery, Milwaukee risks early exits against battle-tested foes.

    Conclusion

    Giannis as the primary ball-handler is a recipe for dysfunction. His shaky handle, non-existent outside shot, and questionable decision-making under pressure create turnovers, spacing issues, and defensive vulnerabilities. The physical toll would erode his two-way dominance, while teammates would struggle to adapt to a Giannis-centric system. For the Bucks to survive Lillard’s absence, they’re better off leaning on a committee of guards (Porter Jr.for small-ball creativity—anything but forcing their Greek Freak into a role he’s not built to play.

    Giannis is a hammer, not a scalpel, and Milwaukee must wield him accordingly.

  • Is Giannis the worse 3point shooter in NBA history?

    Is Giannis the worse 3point shooter in NBA history?

    For starters, most people respond with “who cares if he can’t shoot the 3?” They could be correct, let’s look in more detail. Here are his career 3point percentages per season:

    This should very much worry everybody. Not having a good shot could not be a major problem maybe. But getting worse every year needs further analysis. Combine this with the fact that he is shooting free throws worse than ever in his career and it is extremely worrying. Much like with that analysis, the only rational conclusion is that Giannis:

    1. Is training for strength in some stupid way which affects his shooting a lot. (Here about the mid range myth.)
    2. Hasn’t got the body IQ to figure out how to control his shooting motion.
    3. Hasn’t got the business IQ to ask for help from people that know. (He famously refuses to train with other NBA stars in the summer.)

    If Giannis keeps shooting like this season he will slot in for second worse 3point shooter in NBA history after all these people you have probably never heard of.

    This isn’t even a fair comparison since Denis Johnson hardly played in the 3point era we are living. Yep, that’s right, this is “the 3point era” and Giannis thinks any team would want to trade for him when he is shooting 18%? In fact let’s look at that all time terrible 3points shooters list again and you will see that almost all of them shoot the free throw better than Giannis! And – more importantly – they had the intelligence not to attempt that many shots from 3.

    Maybe this year is a fluke, let’s look at the entire last season. Oh, no, he is still terrible, one of the worse in the league, here they are ranked by worse 3point percentage:

    So in a league that lives by the 3, Giannis should not even think about wasting a shot like that. And – worse still – the way he plays in the paint which some people admire, often ends up in free throws which he then misses. Maybe thirty years ago he could get away with it. In the modern NBA Giannis already looks like a relic. No, worse, a relic that has no idea how to improve.