The NBA’s Eastern Conference is a gauntlet of talent, and as we wrap up the first full week of the 2025-26 season (October 20-26), the league handed out its Player of the Week honors. Milwaukee Bucks superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo snagged the Eastern nod, averaging a monstrous 36.0 points, 16.0 rebounds, and 7.0 assists on 68.3% shooting across his games. On paper, it’s the kind of stat line that screams dominance—especially capping it off with a 40-point, 14-rebound, nine-assist masterpiece on Sunday. But let’s pump the brakes. In a week where the East’s guard play lit up the league and under-the-radar performers flipped narratives, Giannis’s award feels like a default nod to the Greek Freak’s reputation rather than a true meritocracy.
Player of the Week should celebrate the players who single-handedly elevated their teams amid tough schedules, overcame adversity, or simply outshone the field in impact. Giannis had a great week, sure, but he wasn’t the only one carrying a franchise on his back—or dropping jaws with rookie audacity. He played two games against two of the worse in the NBA and only one against a decent opponent (who the Bucks lost to).
Just look at that truly pathetic shot chart. It is Giannis so far this season. No mid range at all. No skill. No improvement. Still terrible at the free throw line. A one trick pony that we all know will fail in the playoffs.
LaMelo Ball: The Unicorn’s Triple-Double Machine Keeps Charlotte Dreaming
If we’re talking all-around brilliance, LaMelo Ball is the name that should’ve topped the ballot. The Hornets guard orchestrated Charlotte’s surprising 3-1 start, averaging 23.5 points, 6.0 rebounds, and a league-high-tying 8.0 assists per game while flirting with triple-doubles nightly. In a Wednesday blowout win over the Wizards, LaMelo dropped 20 points and eight dimes with just three turnovers, turning a middling roster into a fast-break frenzy.
Giannis? He’s got Damian Lillard and a stacked frontcourt to lean on. LaMelo’s doing this with training wheels still on for the Hornets’ rebuild. His flair—those no-look passes and deep bombs—has Charlotte relevant again, and his efficiency (45.5% FG) proves he’s matured beyond the meme. Player of the Week isn’t just about raw points; it’s about making your team better. LaMelo did that in spades.
Jalen Brunson: The Knicks’ Ice-Cold Assassin in the Clutch
New York Knicks fans know Jalen Brunson as their closer, and this week, he was surgical. Averaging 30.3 points, 4.0 rebounds, and 5.7 assists, Brunson torched defenses en route to a 3-1 Knicks record. His Sunday explosion—37 points, seven assists, and three steals in a heartbreaker against Miami—nearly willed the Knicks to victory despite a brutal road slate.
Compare that to Giannis: The Bucks faced softer competition, Brunson’s doing it from the guard spot, navigating double-teams with skill and style. Brunson’s 45.3% shooting isn’t gaudy, but his mid-range mastery and poise in crunch time (hello, game-winners) make him the East’s most reliable star right now. The Knicks are contenders because of him—not in spite of him.
VJ Edgecombe: The Rookie Phenom Who Stole the Show
Hold onto your seats: In his NBA debut week, VJ Edgecombe—the No. 2 overall pick out of Baylor, now lighting it up for the Heat—averaged 24.5 points, 6.5 rebounds, and 5.5 assists on 46.3% shooting. This 19-year-old Bahamian blur transitioned seamlessly from college dominance to pro savagery, capping preseason hype with real-season fireworks (think 26 points and five steals in a Friday thriller).
Rookies rarely sniff Player of the Week, but Edgecombe’s two-way terror—disrupting passing lanes while slashing to the rim—has Miami’s revamped backcourt humming alongside Jimmy Butler. Giannis is a veteran MVP; Edgecombe is rewriting the rookie script. In a league obsessed with youth, snubbing him feels like ignoring the next big thing.
Tyrese Maxey is playing like a man possessed, averaging a blistering 34.0 points, 4.0 rebounds, and 7.5 assists to propel the Sixers to a 4-0 start. His midweek eruption—40 points on 7-of-9 from deep, plus six assists—dismantled the Knicks in a statement win, all while Embiid nurses a minor tweak.
Maxey’s 45.5% efficiency belies his explosiveness; he’s the East’s fastest scorer, turning turnovers into transition daggers. Giannis dominates inside; Maxey owns the break. With Philly eyeing another Finals run, Maxey’s week wasn’t just stats—it was a coronation. Why reward the expected when lightning like this strikes?
Donovan Mitchell: Spida’s October Onslaught Keeps Cleveland Elite
Donovan Mitchell feasted in October, averaging 35.5 points on 55.0% shooting, 11.0 boards, and 4.0 threes per game across the Cavs’ undefeated streak. Even in a “down” game (17 points Tuesday), he stuffed the stat sheet with steals and triples, but his highs—like 40-plus explosions—powered Cleveland’s defense-first identity.
At 30.0 points for the season already, Mitchell’s the East’s most dynamic scorer, blending volume with victory (Cavs 4-0). Giannis rebounds like a monster, but Mitchell’s creating his own gravity without a true big man next to him. Cleveland’s atop the standings because Spida’s dialed in—full stop.
Norman Powell: The Heat’s Unsung Sixth Man Turned Starter
Last but not least, Norman Powell—fresh off his offseason move to Miami—emerged as the Heat’s X-factor, averaging 21.5 points and a surprising 7.5 rebounds with 2.5 assists on 48.3% shooting. His Wednesday clinic (28 points, nine boards, four dimes) sparked a comeback win over the Knicks, proving he’s more than a microwave scorer—he’s a full-course meal.
Powell’s rebounding surge (up from last year’s 3.2) fits Miami’s gritty ethos perfectly, and at 24.0 points per game overall, he’s outpacing his career norms. Giannis is the Bucks’ alpha; Powell’s the Heat’s glue guy elevating a contender. In a week of guard galore, his versatility got slept on.
Time to Rethink the Award
Giannis is a lock for All-NBA, no doubt. He will probably set his bot army to fake vote for him (allegedly!) like they did the past seasons. But Player of the Week? This honor belongs to the innovators, the overachievers, the ones turning heads when no one’s watching. Ball’s vision, Brunson’s clutch gene, Edgecombe’s rookie rage, Maxey’s blaze, Mitchell’s firepower, and Powell’s grit all outshone the Freak this week. The East is deeper than ever. Stop defaulting to the big name and start celebrating the symphony. Giannis doesn’t impact games that matter. He played two easy opponents and failed when it mattered. Worse still, the way he plays is killing his team, a ball hog in every sense of the word.
On paper, Giannis Antetokounmpo dropped another monster stat line—40 points, 14 rebounds, 9 assists, nearly a triple-double with 2 steals and 2 blocks to boot. He shot an absurd 70% from the field (14-20 FG) and was basically a walking highlight reel. Stats don’t tell the whole story. Last night at Rocket Mortgage FieldHouse, amid a shorthanded roster (no Kevin Porter Jr., Cole Anthony, or Kyle Kuzma), Giannis performance had some cracks that the Cavs exploited like a leaky defense in pickup ball.
The Shooting Splits: Efficient, But Not Elite
Giannis finished 14-of-20 from the field, which sounds like vintage Freak mode. But peel back the layers: That efficiency was built on paint dominance (think drives and putbacks), not the all-around threat we saw in his prime. He went 1-of-1 from deep—cool, but one attempt? In a game where Cleveland’s perimeter defense sagged off him just enough to dare a jumper, he didn’t test them. Last season, he averaged over 2 three-point attempts per game; here, it was a measly one. The Cavs packed the lane with Evan Mobley (23 points, 8 boards) and Jarrett Allen, forcing Giannis into that 11-of-16 free-throw line trip. Solid? Sure. But 69% from the stripe (11-16) isn’t closing territory—those five misses at the line were daggers in a five-point defeat.
And don’t get me started on true shooting percentage. At 74%, it’s good, but in a high-volume night like this, you’d want north of 80% to drag a depleted Bucks squad over the finish line. Donovan Mitchell (24 points, including 10 in the clutch fourth) and Sam Merrill (17 off the bench, tying Giannis for game-high at halftime) feasted because Giannis couldn’t stretch the floor. He again had 0/2 from mid range, exactly like previous two games of the season. Pathetic and it’s killing his team.
Rebounding: Volume Without Victory
Fourteen boards? That’s Giannis being Giannis—aggressive, physical, snatching every loose ball like it’s his birthright. But here’s the rub: The Bucks got out-rebounded 51-44 overall, with Cleveland grabbing seven more on the offensive glass for second-chance points that proved fatal. Giannis had the volume, but where were the contested boards against Mobley, who boxed him out masterfully? Midway through the third, the Cavs led the rebound battle 30-17 while up by 16. Milwaukee clawed back to tie it late, but those early misses on the glass let Cleveland build a cushion Giannis spent the whole second half erasing… only for it to slip away.
It’s like having the biggest hammer in the toolbox but forgetting the nails. The Bucks needed team rebounding to fuel transition buckets, but with Giannis logging heavy minutes (likely 38+), fatigue crept in.
Playmaking: Assists Galore, But Turnovers Tell a Different Tale
Nine dimes? Chef’s kiss. Giannis orchestrated like a maestro, finding cutters and kick-outs that kept Milwaukee in it during their third-quarter surge (they outscored Cleveland 34-24 to cut an 18-point deficit). But—and this is a big but—the Bucks coughed up 18 turnovers, leading to 24 Cleveland points. Giannis isn’t blameless here; in a game where ball-handling was thin without Porter and Anthony, he forced a few drives into traffic, resulting in live-ball turnovers that Mobley and Co. turned into fast breaks.
Remember that stretch in the second quarter where the Cavs ballooned their lead to 11 at half? A handful of those came off Milwaukee’s sloppiness, with Giannis’s aggressive style (love it, but risky) contributing. Cleveland had 10 steals—Lonzo Ball snagged a couple off high screens—and turned them into easy buckets. Assists are flashy, but in a one-possession game, those extra possessions killed the Bucks.
The Intangibles: Fatigue, Fouls, and Fourth-Quarter Fade
Giannis was probable with a toe sprain coming in, and you could see it in the fourth: He carried the load, scoring 12 of Milwaukee’s final 20, but the Bucks went ice-cold around him. With the game tied at 98, Cleveland ripped off a 7-0 run—Hunter’s step-back, Ball’s dagger three, Mitchell’s mid-ranger—and Giannis couldn’t buy a bucket in the final two minutes. He split free throws with 1:01 left to make it 112-107, but by then, the legs were gone.
Fouls, too: Giannis picked up his fourth late, limiting his aggression. And let’s be real—the Cavs were shorthanded too (no Darius Garland or Max Strus), yet their depth shone. Four guys in double figures (Mitchell, Mobley, Merrill, De’Andre Hunter at 17), while Milwaukee leaned hard on Giannis. Gary Trent Jr. added 19, but no one else cracked 15. It’s superstar isolation at its finest… and most frustrating.
Averaging 36 points, 16 boards, and 7 assists on 68% shooting to start the season? But he is not helping the team. Look at the plus minus box. In a league where balanced rosters (shoutout to Cleveland’s committee approach) beat top-heavy ones, Giannis’ way of playing masked systemic issues: injuries, turnovers, poor rebounding team-wide, and a lack of spacing that let the Cavs collapse without fear.
This loss stings because it was winnable—Bucks shot 50.6% to Cleveland’s 44.8%, but free throws (Cavs +8) and boards sealed it. Giannis was again non existent from mid range and terrible at free throws. Anyway you look at it, this is NOT a boxscore to be proud of.
So you have seen this chart before. It shows that Giannis, despite not being much good at dribbling, held the ball more than anyone. Despite his tendency for turnovers, he insists on bringing the ball down and then wasting time holding it.
Some say this is on purpose. For sure it helps boost his stats. Opponents shoot. Everyone on the Bucks team clears out for Giannis to boost his rebound stats. Then Giannis brings down the ball looking for an easy dunk. He often gets locked up and then wastes more time because he has no skills to disentangle himself. When he does pass it is often too late to team mates that are covered defensively. Still, when we link the amount of time Bucks’ players had the ball to their points, this is the chart:
Amazingly Giannis is 8th. Makes sense. Because even when he gets fouled, he converts free throws terribly. KPJ makes the most of what little time with the ball he is given.
Giannis’ tendency to dominate the ball for the Milwaukee Bucks has sparked considerable debate and criticism, especially as his usage rate continues to rise each season. In the 2024-25 season, Giannis’s usage reached league-leading levels, with nearly 35% of the Bucks’ possessions ending with his actions, and this figure spiked even higher during periods when Damian Lillard was absent.
Downsides of Giannis’s Ball Dominance
Ball-stopping and predictability: When so many possessions flow through Giannis, opposing defenses can focus on collapsing the paint and crowding him, making the Bucks’ offense more predictable and easier to scheme against in crucial playoff moments. This “heliocentric” approach often slows ball movement and reduces chances for teammates to find rhythm and confidence in key stretches.
Under-utilization of teammates: Despite talents like Lillard or Middleton, the offense has repeatedly struggled to maximize their skill sets because so many plays still funnel directly through Giannis. This creates a scenario where valuable offensive players become spot-up shooters or afterthoughts, rather than being integrated as dynamic threats. New players simply don’t touch the ball enough.
Sustainability and fatigue: The enormous responsibility placed on Giannis not only makes the Bucks vulnerable if he struggles or faces fatigue, but also risks injury or long-term wear as he is now in his 30s. Relying on one player to generate most of the offense makes the team less resilient in playoff series or against elite defenses.
Evidence of Problems
Usage rate trends: Giannis consistently leads the league or nears the top in usage rate, a classic trait of ball-dominant systems that have mixed playoff success. In clutch moments, the offense tends to stall or force Giannis into heavily contested shots, resulting in lower efficiency or turnovers.
Playoff disappointments: Playoff exits in recent seasons have frequently included criticism of the Bucks’ inability to adapt offensively when Giannis is neutralized. Ball dominance discourages other creators from developing confidence, shown in stagnant offense late in games.
Calls for diversified offense: Analysts, coaches, and even teammates have advocated for more diverse offensive sets by reducing Giannis’s workload and sharing playmaking responsibility, recognizing that a more balanced approach is essential to success at the highest levels of competition.
The narrative that Giannis “hogs” the ball is backed by the data and on-court impact: while the Bucks remain extremely reliant on his talents, this overreliance has financial and competitive costs, especially in the playoffs. For Milwaukee to reach its full potential, a clear shift toward more collaborative, multi-faceted offensive schemes is urgently needed.
What have we seen so far? Well the Bucks coaching team saw how Spanoulis used Giannis in the Olympics. But they can’t copy it. Why? Because Giannis has become hooked on getting his stat padding in every game and refuses to share the ball even now. If the Bucks’ marketing team was honest, this is what the graphic would look like after a game:
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s rhetoric about “winning the right way”—both in his immediate post-championship comments and in his conversation with Dwyane Wade at the All-Star Game—has often been presented as a humblebrag or a statement on competitive integrity. But peeling back the public applause, these statements reveal a deep undercurrent of individualism that, whether intentional or not, throws serious shade at the teammates and organization that propelled him to NBA stardom.
””It’s easy to go somewhere and go win a championship with somebody else… It’s easy. I could go to a super team and just do my part and win a championship. But this is the hard way to do it and this is the way to do it and we did it.”
Framing Himself as the Lone Hero
By championing the idea that it’s “easy” to join a superteam and “do your part”—and contrasting that with his own “hard way” victory—Giannis drew a not-so-subtle line through the league: there are players who win with help, and there is Giannis, who does it solo. The implication is that his teammates were mere supporting characters, passengers in his one-man campaign, rather than vital components of a true championship team.
His words to Wade reinforced this narrative: by highlighting Wade as someone who won “the right way” in Miami, Giannis continues to prop up the myth of the self-made superstar, glossing over the critical roles played by everyone around him. It’s not just a swipe at the concept of superteams; it’s a backhanded insult to those who wore the same uniform and bled the same colors during Milwaukee’s title run.
”I’m a huge, huge fan of you bro. The day after we won the championship I posted a picture of you on my story… Because you guys… You did it in Miami. You did it the right way. That’s how I want to do it.”
The Impact on Team Chemistry
What makes Giannis’s stance notably self-centered is the dismissiveness baked into the rhetoric. Khris Middleton’s clutch shooting, Jrue Holiday’s defense, and Brook Lopez’s presence in the paint—the foundation of the Bucks’ 2021 championship—are effectively relegated to footnotes in Giannis’s personal story.
By making such comments both publicly and in private conversation with icons like Wade, Giannis inadvertently puts himself at the center of the story, as if he alone triumphed against the odds. For a superstar whose brand often promotes humility and teamwork, this move is strikingly egotistical.
Hypocrisy and Selective Memory
Let’s not forget that even the “right way” championship teams—Wade’s 2006 Heat included—relied heavily on key contributions from both stars and role players. By heralding himself and Wade as paragons of solo achievement, Giannis ignores both NBA history and the realities of how teams win titles.
His statements, when placed under a microscope, read less like inspiration and more like a subtle attempt to distance himself from those who helped raise the Larry O’Brien trophy alongside him.
Giannis is a hypocrite
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s constant need to frame his title as “harder,” “more authentic,” or “without help” only underlines how much the superstar mentality has eroded the team ethic in modern basketball. Instead of lifting his teammates up in victory, his words function as a subtle takedown—a way to make sure the spotlight, even after the final buzzer, never drifts far from his own shadow.
The 2025-26 NBA season has kicked off with an offensive explosion, and seven superstars—Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Aaron Gordon, Luka Dončić, Anthony Edwards, Victor Wembanyama, Tyrese Maxey, and Alperen Şengün—are leading the charge. Through the first two games, these players have delivered performances that are rewriting record books and setting the tone for an electrifying season. At the same time Giannis, playing two of the worse teams in the NBA for his first two games, still can’t shoot mid range, still has loads of turnovers, still can’t screen. He simply has not developed at all.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander is making an early MVP case with a jaw-dropping 45.0 points, 6.5 rebounds, and 5.0 assists per game on 47.4% shooting through two games. In the Oklahoma City Thunder’s season opener, a 141-135 double-overtime thriller against the Indiana Pacers, SGA erupted for a career-high 55 points (15-31 FG, 23-26 FT), tying Russell Westbrook for the most 50-point games in Thunder history. He followed it up in Game 2 with 35 points, 5 rebounds, 5 assists, 2 steals, and 2 blocks, powering OKC to another victory and a 2-0 start. His two-game total of 90 points ranks fourth all-time for an opening weekend in NBA history. SGA’s silky mid-range game, relentless drives, and 88.5% free-throw shooting are making him a nightly highlight reel. The Thunder look like title contenders, and Shai’s in the driver’s seat.
Aaron Gordon, the Nuggets’ high-flying forward, has shocked the league with 50.0 points, 8.0 rebounds, and 2.0 assists per game on an unreal 81.0% from the field. In Denver’s opener, a 137-131 overtime loss to the Golden State Warriors, Gordon exploded for a career-best 50 points, including a franchise-record 10 three-pointers, joining Michael Jordan and Kyrie Irving as one of the few to drop 50 in an opener. Known for his dunks and defense, Gordon’s sudden emergence as a long-range assassin alongside Nikola Jokić gives Denver a terrifying new dimension. This isn’t the AG we knew—this is a superstar reborn.
Luka Dončić: Lakers’ New Wizard Wows in Hollywood
Luka Dončić’s blockbuster move to the Los Angeles Lakers is paying immediate dividends. He’s averaging 43.0 points and 12.0 rebounds per game, with playmaking flair that’s lighting up Tinseltown. In the opener, a 119-109 loss, Luka delivered 43 points (17-27 FG), 12 rebounds, 9 assists, 2 steals, and 1 block in 41 minutes, showcasing his signature step-back threes and paint dominance. At 26, Luka’s vision and scoring touch are meshing perfectly even without LeBron James on the floor yet this season, making the Lakers’ offense a nightly spectacle. If this is Luka’s baseline in purple and gold, the league’s in trouble.
Anthony Edwards: Ant-Man’s Explosive Start
Anthony Edwards is staking his claim as the NBA’s next big thing, averaging 41.0 points per game for the Minnesota Timberwolves. In Game 1, he showcased his athleticism and shooting touch, setting the stage for a breakout season. Game 2 saw him drop 31 points (11-19 FG, 3-6 3PT) in a loss, but his efficiency and aggression were undeniable. Across both games, Edwards’ blend of highlight-reel dunks, deep threes, and improved playmaking alongside Rudy Gobert has Minnesota dreaming big. At just 24, Ant-Man’s confidence and swagger make every game must-watch TV. The Wolverine is clawing his way to superstardom.
Victor Wembanyama: The Alien’s Sophomore Surge
Victor Wembanyama, the San Antonio Spurs’ 7’4” unicorn, is averaging a monstrous 40.0 points, 15.0 rebounds, and 71.4% FG through two games. His opener was a masterclass, with a double-double featuring rim-rattling dunks, blocks that sent shots into the stands, and smooth perimeter shooting. His length and skill make him a defensive nightmare, while his offensive versatility has Spurs fans envisioning a dynasty under Gregg Popovich. Wembanyama isn’t just the future—he’s the present, and he’s rewriting what a big man can do.
Tyrese Maxey: Philly’s Speedy Scoring Sensation
Tyrese Maxey is torching defenses for the Philadelphia 76ers, averaging 40.0 points and 6.0 assists on 54.2% shooting. In the opener, he set the tone with blazing speed and a quick release, racking up points in bunches. Game 2 he had limited minutes, but his full performances show a star who’s taken a leap, complementing Joel Embiid with drives and jumpers. Maxey’s ability to score efficiently in transition and create for others is making Philly’s offense lethal. At 24, he’s no longer a rising star—he’s arrived, and the Sixers are reaping the rewards.
Alperen Şengün: Houston’s Triple-Double Titan
Houston Rockets center Alperen Şengün is a stat-sheet stuffer, averaging 39.0 points, 11.0 rebounds, and 7.0 assists on 50.0% shooting. His opener showcased his post dominance and passing wizardry, with a near-triple-double that set the tone for Houston’s 2-0 start. Game 2 kept the momentum, with Şengün’s soft touch and Jokić-like vision creating nightmares for opponents. His ability to score, rebound, and facilitate at 23 years old has the Rockets looking like playoff locks. Şengün’s Turkish hammer is pounding, and Houston’s frontcourt is a force.
A Season Already Ablaze
These seven stars aren’t just playing well—they’re setting the NBA on fire. With 50-point outbursts, triple-doubles, and record-breaking efficiency, the 2025-26 season is shaping up to be a historic one. Shai’s scoring, Gordon’s shooting, Luka’s playmaking, Edwards’ explosiveness, Wemby’s dominance, Maxey’s speed, and Şengün’s versatility are just the beginning. As we roll into Week 2, the question isn’t who’s playing better—it’s how much higher this ceiling can go. Oh and they are driving TV ratings crazy (unlike Giannis.) These players can dribble, control the game, shoot from any distance, provide solutions for their teams in tough matchups.
Giannis Antetokounmpo: Not Eclipsing
the New-Age Scorers
In a season opener that’s seen a barrage of 40+ point explosions from the likes of Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Aaron Gordon, and the rest of our highlighted seven, you might wonder where Milwaukee’s Greek Freak fits in. Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time MVP and perennial All-NBA beast, is off to another monster start—historically so, in fact. But against the easiest opponents possible. Through the Bucks’ 2-0 beginning (a
133-120 rout of the Wizards followed by a gritty win over the Raptors), he’s posted 30.0 points, 15.0 rebounds, and 5.0 assists per game, becoming the first player ever to hit 60-30-10 in a season’s opening duo. Game 1: 37 points, 14 boards, 5 dimes on 16-of-26 shooting. Game 2: A double-double that sealed the historic line, with his relentless drives and rim-finishing keeping Milwaukee’s offense humming. Of course to be fair, while the other players mentioned in this post where playing the toughest team’s in the league, Giannis was playing the very worse. And he is still a ball hog as you can see on the chart.
Giannis isn’t quite “close” to the supernova pace of those seven right now: He hasn’t shown the kind of tangible, eye-popping improvement that’s catapulting the others into uncharted territory. Those guys? We’re seeing Aaron Gordon morph into a 50-point, 10-three sniper (81% FG be damned); Luka Dončić
seamlessly integrating into a new Lakers system with 43-12 lines; Victor Wembanyama expanding his alien toolkit to 40-15 dominance; and Tyrese Maxey evolving from spark plug to 40-point Ferrari. It’s leap-year growth: New skills, higher ceilings, “holy crap, he can do that now?” moments that scream evolution. Again last night, no mid range shooting.
Giannis? He’s Giannis. The 30-15-5 is elite, sure—it’s MVP-adjacent and has the Bucks looking cohesive early under Doc Rivers—but it’s a refinement of what he’s done for years. His free-throw woes persist (around 57% last season, no signs of a breakthrough yet) and there’s no radical shift in playstyle to suggest he’s adapting to the league’s scoring arms race. Last year, he averaged 30.4-11.9-6.5; this year, it’s tracking eerily similar, just with more rebounding grunt work. No added pull-up range, no sudden point-forward explosion, no “I’ve unlocked mid-range mastery” arc like SGA. It’s dominance, but it’s familiar dominance—beautiful in its brutality, but not the “amazingly improved” revelation that’s got the others rewriting highlight reels. And in the 4th quarter nobody is expecting him to become clutch. Gary Trent Jr scored the same amount of points in half the minutes. In fact why was Giannis even on the floor at the end as the Bucks were blowing the Raptors out?
Don’t get it twisted: Giannis is still a walking triple-double threat who’s dragging Milwaukee toward contention despite roster flux (hello, Myles Turner spacing). If the Bucks gel around his paint-pounding, he could average 32-12-7 by midseason and remind everyone why he’s the Freak. But in this early-season fireworks show, where the narrative is all about who’s leveled up now, Giannis feels like the grizzled vet holding the fort rather than igniting the revolution. He’s close in impact, miles ahead in hardware, but that lack of a clear “new trick” keeps him a step behind the evolution parade—for now. Keep watching; the Greek Freak doesn’t stay stagnant for long.
Standing at 6’11” with a 7’3” wingspan and with explosive athleticism, he’s been aptly nicknamed the “Greek Freak.” His ability to overpower defenders, bulldoze to the rim, and dominate in transition has made him a perennial MVP candidate. However, as Giannis continues to evolve in his career, a recurring critique persists: his game leans heavily on his physical gifts, and he has yet to fully develop the diverse skill set necessary to elevate his game to new heights and ensure long-term success. It is now year 13, what excuse does he have?
The Foundation of Giannis’ Dominance
Giannis’ physical attributes are the cornerstone of his game. His ability to cover ground quickly, combined with his strength, makes him nearly unguardable in certain situations. In transition, he’s a freight train, capable of going coast-to-coast in a few strides, finishing with thunderous dunks over helpless defenders. In the half-court, his long strides allow him to attack the basket with a single step from the three-point line, often overpowering smaller defenders or outmaneuvering slower bigs. His physicality also used to shine on defense, where he could guard multiple positions, switch seamlessly, and protect the rim with his length. (Back when he cared to play defence.)
His efficiency at the rim—converting over 70% of his shots within three feet—stems from his ability to leverage his size and strength to create space and finish through contact. This physical approach has carried him to great heights, including an NBA title and Finals MVP honors, (a long time ago) but it also reveals the cracks in his game when opponents exploit his lack of versatility.
The Limitations of a One-Dimensional Approach
While Giannis’ physical gifts make him a matchup nightmare, his reliance on size and strength becomes a liability against certain defensive schemes, particularly in high-stakes playoff scenarios. Teams like the Toronto Raptors in 2019 and the Miami Heat in 2020 exposed this by employing strategies like the “wall” defense—packing the paint with multiple defenders to neutralize his drives. Without a reliable perimeter game or advanced playmaking skills, Giannis struggles when his path to the basket is cut off.
1. Lack of a Consistent Jump Shot
Giannis’ jump shooting remains a work in progress. His three-point shooting percentage has hovered around 29% for his career, with a high of 30.6% in the 2022-23 season on low volume (1.5 makes per game). Defenders often sag off him, daring him to shoot from beyond the arc or even from mid-range. This lack of shooting threat allows opponents to clog the paint, limiting his driving lanes and forcing him to take low-percentage shots. For comparison, players like Kevin Durant or Nikola Jokić, who combine size with shooting touch, keep defenses honest, creating space for themselves and their teammates.
2. Limited Post Moves
In the post, Giannis relies heavily on power moves—drop steps, spins, or bullying his way to the rim—rather than finesse. Unlike players like Hakeem Olajuwon or even Joel Embiid, who use a variety of footwork and countermoves to score efficiently, Giannis’ post game lacks diversity. Defenders who can match his physicality or anticipate his moves can force him into turnovers or contested shots. His turnover rate (3.7 per game in 2022-23) often spikes when teams force him into crowded areas without a refined arsenal to counter.
3. Playmaking and Decision-Making
While Giannis averages a respectable number of assists, his playmaking is more a product of his ability to draw help defense than advanced court vision. When defenses collapse on his drives, he often makes simple kick-out passes to open shooters, but he struggles to manipulate defenses with the precision of players like LeBron James or Jokić. His assist-to-turnover ratio (1.55 in 2022-23) reflects his tendency to force passes or drives into heavy traffic, particularly in playoff settings where defenses are more disciplined.
4. Free-Throw Shooting Woes
Giannis’ free-throw shooting has been a persistent weakness, with a career average of 68.5%. In high-pressure playoff games, this becomes a glaring issue, as teams intentionally foul him to exploit his inconsistency. His prolonged free-throw routine—often exceeding 10 seconds—also disrupts game flow and puts additional pressure on him mentally. Improving his free-throw percentage to a reliable 75-80% would not only boost his scoring but also deter teams from hacking him in crucial moments.
Playoff Struggles: When Size Isn’t Enough
The playoffs are where Giannis’ reliance on physicality is most exposed. In the 2019 Eastern Conference Finals, the Raptors’ “wall” strategy neutralized him, holding him to 22.7 points per game on 44.3% shooting, well below his regular-season averages. Similarly, in 2020, the Heat’s zone defense and physical play limited his effectiveness, leading to a second-round exit. Even in the Bucks’ 2021 championship run, Giannis’ success was partly due to favorable matchups and injuries to opponents like the Nets’ Kyrie Irving and James Harden. In 2023, the Heat once again exploited his limitations, with Giannis shooting just 23.5% from three and struggling against their defensive schemes in a first-round upset.
These playoff performances highlight a key issue: when teams take away Giannis’ primary weapon—his ability to attack the rim—his lack of secondary skills leaves the Bucks vulnerable. Elite defenses know they can afford to give him space on the perimeter, forcing him to either shoot or make plays under pressure, areas where he’s less comfortable. And when opponents care about the game you can be sure they will stop Giannis. What then?
The Path Forward: Developing a More Complete Game
To reach the next level and ensure longevity as an elite player, Giannis must diversify his skill set. Here are some areas where he could focus:
Developing a Reliable Jump Shot: Giannis doesn’t need to become a 40% three-point shooter, but improving his mid-range and three-point shooting to league-average levels (around 35%) would force defenders to guard him more closely, opening up driving lanes and creating space for teammates. Working with a shooting coach to refine his mechanics—particularly his release point and consistency—could yield significant dividends.
Expanding His Post Game: Adding finesse moves like fadeaways, hook shots, or up-and-under fakes would make Giannis more unpredictable in the post. Studying footage of players like Hakeem or Dirk Nowitzki could help him develop a more versatile scoring arsenal, reducing his reliance on brute force.
Improving Playmaking: Giannis could benefit from studying how players like Jokić or Draymond Green read defenses and make precise passes. Enhancing his ability to manipulate defenses with hesitation moves or pick-and-roll play would make him a more complete offensive hub.
Fixing Free-Throw Shooting: Simplifying his free-throw routine and building confidence at the line through repetition could push his percentage into the 75-80% range. This would not only boost his scoring but also make him a more reliable closer in tight games.
Adapting to Defensive Schemes: Giannis could work on recognizing and countering defensive strategies like zones or walls. Quick decision-making, such as passing out of double-teams or using pump fakes to draw fouls, would make him harder to game-plan against.
The Bigger Picture: Longevity and Legacy
At 30 years old (as of 2025), Giannis is past his prime and the physical toll of his playing style raises questions about longevity. Players who rely heavily on athleticism, like Russell Westbrook, often face challenges as their explosiveness wanes. By developing a more skill-based game, Giannis would ensure he remains a dominant force into his mid-30s, much like LeBron James, who evolved from a slasher to a versatile playmaker and shooter.
Moreover, expanding his skill set would solidify his legacy as one of the all-time greats. While he’s already a two-time MVP and champion, players like Michael Jordan, Kobe Bryant, and Kevin Durant elevated their games by adding layers of skill to their natural gifts. For Giannis to join that pantheon, he must show he can adapt when physicality alone isn’t enough.
His lack of a consistent jump shot, limited post moves, and struggles against elite playoff defenses highlight the need for a more well-rounded game. By investing in his shooting, playmaking, and overall basketball IQ, Giannis can transcend his current ceiling. For now, his physical dominance remains his greatest asset—but also his greatest crutch. The question is whether the Greek Freak can evolve into a complete player because the smarter defenses have clearly caught up with him.
As the Bucks navigate inconsistent playoff performances and mounting pressure to reclaim a title in 2025, questions linger about whether Giannis is the ideal leader to carry Milwaukee to another championship. While his on-court dominance is undeniable, leadership and team cohesion issues—both real and perceived—raise concerns about his ability to guide the Bucks to their ultimate goal.
Giannis’ Leadership Style: Passion or Pressure?
Giannis’ leadership is defined by intensity and authenticity. He’s vocal, often seen rallying teammates during timeouts or taking accountability in post-game press conferences. His work ethic sets a high bar, and he’s known for pushing teammates to match his drive. However, this approach can be a double-edged sword. Some reports suggest that his relentless demands for effort can create tension, particularly with veterans or players less inclined to embrace his all-in mentality. For instance, former teammate Jrue Holiday, a key piece of the 2021 championship, was traded in 2023 partly due to roster upgrades but also amid whispers of differing team dynamics. Could Giannis’ intensity alienate players who don’t share his singular focus?
Leadership in the NBA isn’t just about setting an example; it’s about fostering unity. Giannis’ public comments, like his candid remarks about needing “everybody on the same page” after playoff disappointments, hint at underlying cohesion issues. While his honesty is refreshing, it can also spotlight fractures within the locker room. Compare this to leaders like LeBron James or Stephen Curry, who balance accountability with diplomacy, ensuring teammates feel empowered rather than criticized. Giannis’ raw, unfiltered style may inspire some but risks isolating others, especially in high-stakes playoff moments where emotional intelligence is as critical as talent.
Team Cohesion: The Bucks’ Achilles’ Heel?
Milwaukee’s roster, built around Giannis, is talented but complex. Damian Lillard’s arrival in 2023 was meant to create a championship-caliber duo, yet the Bucks have struggled to gel. In the 2024 playoffs, injuries to Giannis and Lillard exposed a lack of cohesion, with the team faltering against Indiana in the first round. While injuries aren’t Giannis’ fault, leadership is tested in adversity. Critics argue he hasn’t fully bridged the gap between his game-dominating style and a cohesive team identity. The Bucks’ offense often feels like “Giannis plus shooters,” lacking the fluidity of teams like the Boston Celtics, where Jayson Tatum orchestrates a more collective attack.
Data backs this up: in the 2024-25 season, the Bucks rank in the top 10 for offensive efficiency but lag in assist-to-turnover ratio, suggesting less ball movement than elite offenses. Giannis, while an improved passer, still prioritizes drives to the rim, which can stagnate the offense when defenses collapse on him. A true leader elevates teammates’ strengths, but Lillard’s inconsistent integration—averaging fewer points and assists than in Portland—raises questions about whether Giannis is doing enough to empower his co-star. Leadership isn’t just about scoring 30 points; it’s about making the team greater than the sum of its parts.
All too often it feels like all Giannis cares about is his personal statistics. When the going gets tough he either tries to get rid of the ball and responsibilities or he does the same two moves that everybody expects.
The Playoff Pressure Cooker
Playoff failures amplify scrutiny on Giannis’ leadership. Since 2021, the Bucks have exited early in three of four postseasons, including a 2023 first-round upset to Miami. Giannis’ infamous “there’s no failure in sports” press conference after that loss was polarizing—some saw it as mature perspective, others as a deflection of accountability. Leaders like Michael Jordan or Kobe Bryant embraced pressure, using setbacks as fuel. Giannis’ mindset, while mentally healthy, can come off as lacking the killer instinct needed to rally a team through playoff adversity.
Moreover, his game has exploitable flaws. His limited shooting range (29% from three in 2024-25) allows defenses to clog the paint, daring him to shoot. While he’s improved his midrange and free-throw shooting, playoff opponents like Toronto (2019) and Miami (2020, 2023) have exposed this weakness. A leader adapts, but Giannis’ reluctance to diversify his offensive game can put teammates in tough spots, forcing them to compensate for predictable strategies. Compare this to Nikola Jokić, whose versatility creates opportunities for Denver’s role players, enhancing team cohesion.
Giannis is not young—31 in 2025— and doesn’t seem to be evolving as a leader. In fact he doesn’t seem to be evolving at all. His loyalty to Milwaukee, signing a max extension in 2023, shows commitment rare in today’s NBA. He’s also taken steps to improve, like refining his playmaking and engaging in film study to better read defenses. But it is not translating on to something actionable on the court.
The Bucks’ struggles aren’t solely on Giannis. Coaching changes (three head coaches since 2021) and roster turnover disrupt continuity. Injuries, particularly to Middleton and Giannis himself, have derailed playoff runs. Front-office decisions, like trading Holiday for Lillard, shift dynamics beyond Giannis’ control. Expecting him to be both superstar and perfect leader seems way beyong his abilities.
Can Giannis Lead Milwaukee to Another Title?
Giannis’ style—intense, unfiltered, and sometimes rigid—may not fully align with the nuanced demands of championship leadership. His inability to consistently elevate teammates, coupled with on-court limitations, raises valid concerns about team cohesion. The modern NBA demands adaptability and emotional finesse, areas where Giannis is not growing.
For Milwaukee to reclaim a championship, Giannis must evolve beyond being the team’s engine. He needs to foster a culture where stars thrive, role players feel empowered, and playoff strategies diversify. The Bucks’ front office must also provide stability, but as the face of the franchise, Giannis bears the weight of leadership. Until then, doubts about his ability to unify and elevate the Bucks will linger. And this season it is even worse. It really seems as if he likes the narrative that he alone is worth anything on the roster. That is a selfish way to pretend to be a leader.
The Milwaukee Bucks enter the 2025-26 NBA season as one of the league’s most intriguing enigmas. After a tumultuous 2024-25 campaign marked by injuries, inconsistent play, and a first-round playoff exit, the Bucks made bold moves in the offseason. They waived Damian Lillard following his Achilles injury, stretching his contract to create cap space, and signed former Indiana Pacers center Myles Turner to pair with superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. This shift signals a return to “Point Giannis” as the offensive focal point, surrounded by shooters and defenders. But with roster turnover, questions about depth, and lingering trade rumors around Antetokounmpo, predictions for the Bucks vary wildly—from playoff contenders to potential lottery dwellers.
Win Total Projections: A Middling Outlook with Giannis-Sized Upside
The consensus among oddsmakers and analysts pegs the Bucks’ regular-season win total at around 42.5, a slight dip from their 48 wins last year. This reflects the loss of Lillard’s scoring punch and concerns over team chemistry, but it also underscores faith in Antetokounmpo’s ability to carry the load. Betting sites like BetMGM and FanDuel list the over/under at 42.5, with juice leaning slightly toward the over at -120 in some spots. VSiN projects a similar range, emphasizing how far Antetokounmpo can drag a “barren” roster, especially since Giannis hasn’t really added any skills.
Optimistic takes suggest Milwaukee could push toward 45-50 wins if healthy. Doc’s Sports highlights the Bucks’ seven straight seasons with 45+ wins, recommending bets on over 45 at +152 or even 50+ at +410, citing their talent for beating lesser teams. CBS Sports echoes this, pointing to Antetokounmpo’s late-2024-25 surge (29.3 points, 11.4 rebounds, 7.9 assists over 21 games) and additions like Gary Trent Jr., Taurean Prince, and A.J. Green for spacing. On X, fan Nathan Marzion predicts 53-29, dismissing exact wins as long as they secure a top-6 seed.
Pessimists, however, see a floor of 37-40 wins if injuries strike or cohesion falters. Odds Shark notes declining winning percentages and a weakened depth chart, making the under tempting. DraftKings projects a baseline of 48 wins with Antetokounmpo healthy but warns of a 37-45 roster without him. X user Mr Ass advises taking the under on 42.5, predicting Antetokounmpo averages 27+ PPG but plays fewer than 65 games.
Overall, the win total hinges on health and adaptation. If the Bucks gel early, they could exceed expectations; if not, a rebuild looms.
Seeding and Playoff Predictions: Play-In Bound or Top Contender?
In the Eastern Conference, predictions place the Bucks as a mid-tier team, likely fighting for seeds 5-8. ESPN ranks them in the middle of the pack, noting their top-3-point shooting percentage last season but low volume in attempts. SB Nation sees them at No. 9 in the East, behind rising squads like the Knicks, Cavaliers, and Magic. The Guardian predicts a competitive East but doesn’t spotlight Milwaukee as a top threat.
Playoff odds are favorable at -215, but conference title hopes are long at +1900. FanDuel gives them +750 to reach the East Finals and +1800 for the NBA Finals. Sporting News projects them as a second-round exit at best, citing injuries to stars like Tyrese Haliburton and Jayson Tatum opening the East but not enough for Milwaukee to capitalize fully.
Fan predictions on X are more varied. Alex Sage sees them as a “competitive 2nd round exit,” while DRich calls a top-6 seed “very likely” with Turner’s athleticism boosting defense. Others like Nathan Grubel rank them 11th, fearing a Giannis absence derails everything. Bold outliers include Taylor predicting a 2026 ring after a 6th seed, or Snatch forecasting a Finals appearance. Some, like Zach Langley, predict they miss the playoffs entirely due to depth issues.
The East’s perceived weakness (injuries to Boston, Indiana) could help, but Milwaukee must outperform rising teams like Detroit, Orlando, and Atlanta.
Award Contenders: Giannis in the Spotlight
Antetokounmpo dominates award talk. Multiple sources predict him as an MVP contender, needing 8+ assists and a top-4 seed. SI.com calls him a “long shot” but builds a case around his dominance. ClutchPoints offers bold predictions like Giannis leading in scoring, rebounding, and assists for Milwaukee. On X, fans like Snatch and Infinite Sports see him winning MVP outright. It is clear that this regular season the Bucks have been built to support Giannis’ stat chasing again.
Other breakout candidates include A.J. Green (X-factor per Infinite Sports) and Gary Trent Jr. (highest 3P% per Marzion). Turner is hailed as “10x better than Lopez” for defense.
Reasons for Optimism: Defense, and Spacing
The Bucks’ ceiling starts with Antetokounmpo, whose commitment quells trade speculation. Turner’s addition addresses rim protection and athleticism, allowing slower-paced, defensive games. Shooters like Trent, Prince, and Green provide spacing, potentially boosting 3-point volume. Late-2024-25 streaks (8-1 runs) show resilience. Social media users like Ryan Koller predict 55 wins with average defense from all rotations.
A weakened East (Celtics, Pacers down) offers opportunity. Hoops & Headlines predicts a better record than last season. But essentially the Bucks look like they are aiming for an impressive regular season knowing well that they are going to be smoked in the playoffs again.
Reasons for Pessimism: Depth, Injuries, and Trade Drama
Depth is a glaring issue—projected rotations include Kevin Porter Jr., Cole Anthony, and Kyle Kuzma, raising chemistry concerns. Antetokounmpo’s health is pivotal; without him, wins plummet. Trade rumors persist, with Fadeaway World speculating he stays but unrest lingers. X user Maltman predicts 40-45 wins and an early exit, fearing mediocrity.
Offense could stagnate without Lillard, and rebounding suffers without key bigs. Some like The House that Kami Built see low seeding due to missed games.
Fan Sentiments: Hope Mixed with Realism
On social media, Bucks fans remain loyal. Michael Redd reflects on the 2024-25 disappointments but urges appreciating Giannis. Podcasts like Bucks University offer bold takes, including preseason reactions. Broader predictions vary, with some like Takes seeing a 7th seed and ECF run. Others, like DOM, rank them 5th in the East.
A Season of Uncertainty and Potential
The 2025-26 Bucks are a Giannis-led wildcard. Predictions lean toward 42-45 wins, a play-in spot, and MVP buzz for the Greek Freak, but success depends on health, defense, and buy-in. If they exceed expectations, a deep playoff run isn’t impossible in a wide-open East. If not, trade winds could blow stronger. Buckle up, Milwaukee—it’s going to be a ride. Milwaukee’s floor remains high, but their ceiling depends on rapid roster cohesion and finding an answer to close games when the postseason arrives.
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a polarizing figure in the NBA, admired for his work ethic and humility but also criticized for multiple reasons both on and off the court. Dislike often stems from a mixture of his playing style, incidents involving opponents, his public persona, and perceptions of his behavior.
On-Court Reasons for Dislike
1. Physical and Aggressive Playing Style
Many critics argue that Giannis’ dominance relies more on brute athleticism than skill, with players and fans perceiving his approach as “bulldozing,” lacking finesse, or being unrefined. This has led to accusations of being “boring” or taking the “easy route” by overpowering defenders rather than out-skilling them. Very often this is offensice fouls he all too often gets away with. It is also boring to watch as he has an extremely limited set of ways to score. Especially his dunks are very predictably the same ol same ol all the time.
2. Dirty or Reckless Plays
There have been notable incidents—like undercutting shooters, hard fouls, or physical altercations—that have led to accusations of recklessness or even dirty play. Though some former players defend him as not intentionally dirty, the reputation persists due to repeated aggressive incidents against opponents such as Jayson Tatum and driving plays that result in injuries. His physical dominance sometimes leads to others getting hurt, which is sometimes considered dangerous if not outright unsportsmanlike by fans and media.
3. Unsportsmanlike or Childish Antics
Opponents and commentators have called out Giannis for gestures like faking a handshake after a hard foul or reactively escalating situations in the heat of the game. Jaylen Brown, for example, labeled Giannis “a child” for such antics after receiving an elbow and being on the receiving end of a pulled-back handshake.
4. Clutch Performance and Playoff Disappointments
Despite his MVPs and championship, critics have pointed to specific playoff failures, perceived shortcomings in leadership, and offensive limitations (like shooting and free throws) as reasons to question his greatness and underachiever labels. When his teams falter, detractors highlight his inability to adapt or “raise his game,” fueling negative discussion.
Off-Court Reasons for Dislike
1. Incidents with Teammates and Staff
There have been viral incidents of Giannis slapping or berating teammates, such as the recent episode with Greek teammate Giannoulis Larentzakis during a team huddle. While some dismiss this as passionate leadership or even cultural banter, others see it as lacking respect or unnecessarily aggressive. We get it, he is annoyed that the league knows how to shut him down when it counts.
2. Locker Room Behavior and Internal Frustration
Reports and viral clips have surfaced of locker room outbursts, confrontational meetings, and visible frustration taken out on teammates, which can be interpreted as poor leadership or lack of composure under pressure.
3. Media Relationships and Perceived Arrogance
Episodes of walking out on reporters following tough losses or being selective about his communication have led to friction and media-driven narratives about him being inaccessible or having a chip on his shoulder. Worse still he often plays the “I was so poor” story when he has no real answer to basketball related questions.
4. Xenophobia and Outsider Status
A distinct stream of criticism from both fans and some players arises from his international roots. Some commentators and NBA insiders bluntly say part of the negativity is due to Giannis being a “foreigner,” lacking the typical “American swag,” or not coming up through U.S. basketball circuits—prompting feelings that he’s “not one of us”. This bias is echoed in NBA locker rooms and the media. Most importantly he seems totally hypocritical claiming he “feels Nigerian” the one minute, then “Greek at heart” the next and then “my home is in Milwaukee” just a second later.
5. Viral “Disrespect” Incidents
On and off the court, Giannis has had confrontations with other players’ families (e.g., a notable incident with Tyrese Haliburton’s father postgame) , or the ball game indicent and opposing staff (the “ladder incident” in Philadelphia) where his reactions have been called unprofessional or unduly emotional. And he is ultra hypocritical about his kids of course.
Jealousy and Resentment: Some dislike may ultimately be rooted in jealousy, as Giannis’ physical gifts and meteoric rise are seen as “unfair” by former greats or less gifted players. It does seem like he has been over hyped and under delivered.
Weirdness: He does not seem to want to fit in. He doesn’t train with other players, he makes weird Dad jokes, pretty infantile, he makes people uncomfortable very often with his approach.
Stat padding: It is hard not to see a lot of what he does as putting his personal stats above everything. And then blaming the rest of the roster.
Ungrateful. The ultimate snub, after Khris, Jrue and Brook got him to the Finals he kept saying he “did it the right way” implying he was the only star on the team. But the stat padding is legit.
Nepotism. Both Thanasis and now Alex have no place on an NBA bench. If an adult 30 year NBA player wants them as cheerleaders he should ask the Bucks to hire them as such, not take up a valuable team place.
Excuses excuses. He has been in the league 13 years now and still falls back on the same excuses when he fails. Sad that his fans still think “if only he improves X Y Z this season” even now. And his “no failure in sports” speech was the most disrespectful ever.
Sneaky manipulation of trades, whilst all along pretending he knows nothing. We now know for sure that he dictates terms pretty clearly. Coaches, players, trades are all signed off by him but then he plays the innocent ignoramus. And a question about how he gets all star votes lingers too.
Vegas Odds and Win Total: The hosts found the Milwaukee Bucks’ over/under win total of 42.5 surprising, especially considering Giannis Antetokounmpo is still the best player in the conference [00:00]. The Bucks’ odds to win the conference were set at 20-to-1, the eighth-best in the East [00:07].
Confidence in the Over: The hosts were in strong agreement that the 42.5 win line is too low, projecting the Bucks to be at least a 46-win team [00:55]. They ultimately settled on a “triple lock” for the over [03:11].
Team Changes and Strengths
Key Personnel Shifts: The team, which won 48 games last year, made several moves, which the hosts summarize as essentially trading Brook Lopez for Miles Turner and Damian Lillard for Cole Anthony [00:13]. They also note the addition of Thanasses and Alex A. [01:06].
Shooting Prowess: Despite the roster changes, the Bucks were highlighted as a “sneaky great shooting team,” having the number one three-point shooting percentage (38.5%) in the league last year. Several role players were shooting over 40% from deep [00:21].
Miles Turner Upgrade: Turner is viewed as a significant improvement over Brook Lopez, making the team’s core identity “absolutely seamless” [01:54].
Motivation and Edge: The team is seen as highly motivated, with coach Doc Rivers not wanting to rebuild, Giannis trying to win, and several rotation players like Turner, Kevin Porter Jr., and Cole Anthony playing with a “chip on their shoulder” [04:17].
Areas of Concern and Trade Speculation
Playmaking Concern: A point of disagreement was the absence of another dedicated ball-handler besides Giannis, a role Damian Lillard provided [02:06].
Giannis’s Future: The possibility of a trade was acknowledged, though the hosts agreed that it would be “much more likely to be an offseason thing than an inseason thing” [03:01].
Hypothetical In-Season Trade: In a purely speculative exercise, if Giannis were to be traded mid-season, the most likely destination suggested was the San Antonio Spurs to pair him with Victor Wembanyama [07:28]. Other teams mentioned were Houston and Oklahoma City [07:45].
Video Details:
Channel: Bill Simmons
Title: How Good Will the Bucks Be? | The Bill Simmons Podcast
The Milwaukee Bucks over under 42 and a half they are 20 to1 to win the conference which is the eighth best odds in the East even though they have the best player in the conference in Giannis minus 215 for the playoffs they were 48 and 34 last year they turned Lopez into Miles Turner they turned Dame Lillard into Cole Anthony and they turned Conaughtan into Coffee and Harris and they’re deep and they’re a sneaky great shooting team
zack great didn’t take a lot but they were the number one three-point shooting team by percentage 38.5 last year they had Prince Green Porter Trenton Rollins all over 40% turner was at 39.6 porter’s 37 dame was actually lower than all those numbers and uh and they have shooting and they have Giannis and this number is dumbfounding to me because I don’t think they’re trading Giannis this season and I just don’t see a world where this isn’t like a 46- win team well look I mean what did they win last year 48 yeah yeah and they added Thanasses and Alex antento brainer and Russell Westbrook talk about a freakoff we This is We got the All the freaks are in Milwaukee it’s a G-rated freakoff it’s the real freakoff right here in Milwaukee Town now uh I think this team actually makes more sense than last year’s team i think that like the version of this team now I got hammered i want to like right hand up i got smashed at the outset of the playoffs because this version of Milwaukee with all those shooters going up against Indiana i thought that that Freak was going to be able to assert his will and this and the shooters on Milwaukee would keep them in and the Pacers ran them the fuck off the floor and I lost a bunch of money but I still think that the core identity of this Milwaukee team like Turner coming in makes it makes it absolutely seamless he’s an improvement over Brook Lopez i mean a huge improvement i didn’t think Brooke was good last year he was fine i I think where I would disagree with you is that like who do who do I want dribbling the basketball other than Giannis and at least I had like another guy to do that with Dame last year in a pick and roll combination that made sense kevin Porter Jr is probably a little overt taxed in the role he’s going to get same same with Ryan Rollins but as long as you I mean like and Giannis typically plays about 65ish games so like the remaining 15 to 20 are going to be big for how much if if for how much they go over this number i am also an over giannis plus shooting just makes a lot of sense to me if he gets to 657 desperate Giannis well this is my back is to the wall career-wise and I’ve thought about this all summer and I’m tired of losing Yiannis kuzma can’t be worse um I think I think Jericho Sims is like a decent backup center i agree with and again but the wild card is like is there a world where this goes really south and Giannis is not on the team after the tread deadline i agree with you i think that’s much more likely to be an offseason thing than an inseason thing so I am taking without much thought actually this is an aggressive over for me yeah I have it as I’m locking it down so am I triple lock triple lock triple lock it’s on my locks it’s Tuesday October the 14th we’re taping this podcast doc River’s birthday triple lock on how about that triple on Doc Rivers’s birthday
Doc Rivers doesn’t I mean he left Boston the moment they were even hinting on rebuilding like he doesn’t want to rebuild with anybody giannis if he’s going to be there is going to try to win every game possible miles Turner just signed this deal and is pissed at Indiana and he’s going to want to beat everybody too they also a lot of the guys in this rotation are still like chip on their shoulder nobody believes in me why don’t people think I’m good guys like Kevin Porter what the fuck has he ever done like he’s still playing like he’s proven himself trent over and over again gets discounted in free agency portoris like he’s born with that chip cole Anthony about like I was six man of the year candidate like hot minute given away i’m f I think Cole Anthony could play crunch time for them uh I like I like that Rollins i thought he was pretty good for them last year and Green is just like the one thing we’ve seen with shooters like that they get better every year that they’re in the league right they always go up and I thought he was good last year i think this team’s going to be good he’s a AJ Green’s a good player great chemistry with Giannis portoris is just rock steady offense off the bench we barely even mention him we take him for granted because he just does what he does i think that I’m stunned that this line is so low like I I I don’t think the trade is priced is that what’s happening that’s it i think people think he’s just going to ask for a deal i have them I think they’re either fourth or fifth in the East i I have them or Atlanta sure four or five i think they’re not a playing team i think they’re four that makes tons of sense i six for me for sure we’re all in agreement so I did write down if we did get to vote for I assume you’re going to get your vote back would be my guess i haven’t asked for it but if uh Oh you don’t you don’t want the vote anymore do you i mean there’s I’m torn but we’ll see how it You know if you don’t have the vote you can gamble that’s why nobody offered it to me but I’m uh if they added an LVP award for most damaging player who played at least 25 minutes on a playoff team don’t do this to Kyle kosma’s minus 250 i can’t even think who would be another like heavy prohibitive favorite he’s not that’s not him he’s not I know he became a punchline last year like he’s not a bad NBA player he’s going to bounce back this year you predicting the Koosma bounceback koozma bounceback will I hit the legacy button or not most 2020 champion Kzma legacy button the Koosma legacy well they need him because if he actually can be somewhat what he looked like three years ago before House’s Wizards contaminated him well he not contaminated he got bit by a spider he was his own you know it was a self-sabotage alongside what was happening with the team the problem with him what happened is that he checked the fuck out two years ago and you can’t flip a switch in in in this league and show up with a team that’s contending and get your head right for for contending so we’re going to see this off season with this group is his head in the right place i’m proud that we got through this whole segment without talking about Giannis’s future and where he’s going to go well we kind of did we talked around it you have a whole season to do that yeah if there was one team if we’re wrong and he gets traded during the season oh boy you could only pick one team that that trade would happen to what is the team do I have to go first i’ll go first go ahead san Antonio okay because I don’t think the Knicks I just don’t think it’s an appetizing trade for the Bucks i’m not trading Giannis for what the Knicks are offering houston good so you guys took one and two so what’s that trade shenon i don’t know it you just asked me to name a team stop there i’m not going any further shenon mine is Reed Shepard oklahoma City that’s insane okay just saying they have the picks and the players prey’s even more risk averse than Zack they have What’s What’s the risk of taking on Giannis they just won the championship we just We all pick We all picked them to lock in over 62 and a half wins what are they trading for Giannis for does Giannis hurt that Giannis diminishes their win potential if I feel comfortable predicting that he will not get traded it’s okay see that’s fine i’m reporting that right now this is a purely it’s a ridiculous exercise so I gave an answer i don’t think San Antonio is ridiculous it’s not it’s not i think that’s the team that makes a ton of sense and by the way Giannis and Wemb is it absolute like Zack putting the microphone down walking away doing like a couple laps and doing this a few times yeah you you that’s all fine but just acknowledge that that is an enormous fuck you to Milwaukee there’s nothing they’re getting back from San Antonio other than we’ll be good in 5 years guys we’ll be good again in five years fox can be in that trade i was going to say and we’ll be good again in five years castle could be in that trade we’ll be good again in the East in three years there’s a bunch of picks that could go in that trade that’s what I mean that’s what I’m saying kelly Ool could be in that trade i love Kelly Ool l Cornet on top l Cornet hanging up don’t mention L Cornette
Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” has been a dominant force in the NBA for years. Over the last three regular seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25), he’s averaged around 30.6 points per game (PPG), putting him among the league’s elite scorers. Fans and analysts often hail this as proof of his all-time greatness, with back-to-back-to-back 30+ PPG campaigns. But let’s pump the brakes. While the raw numbers look impressive, a deeper dive reveals that Giannis’ scoring is overrated. It’s padded by factors like excessive free-throw attempts, limited shooting range, and efficiency that doesn’t hold up under scrutiny—especially when compared to other top scorers or in high-stakes playoff scenarios. Don’t get me wrong: Giannis is a superstar. But treating his PPG as untouchable overlooks some glaring flaws.
1. Overreliance on Free Throws: Volume Over Efficiency
One of the biggest knocks on Giannis’ scoring is how much it depends on getting to the free-throw line. Over the last three seasons, he’s averaged a whopping 11.2 free-throw attempts (FTA) per game—leading the league in that category. That’s more than players like Shai Gilgeous-Alexander or Luka Dončić, who also drive a lot but incorporate more perimeter scoring.
Sure, drawing fouls is a skill, and Giannis’ physicality makes him a nightmare for defenders. But here’s the issue: his free-throw percentage (FT%) has been mediocre at best, hovering around 64% across these seasons (64.5% in 2022-23, 65.7% in 2023-24, and 61.7% in 2024-25). That’s well below the league average for high-volume scorers, who often shoot 80-90% from the line. As a result, he’s leaving points on the table—points that could make his scoring look even more dominant if he converted at a higher rate.
This foul-baiting style inflates his PPG without requiring the same level of skill diversity as other scorers. For context, in 2022-23 alone, nearly 40% of his points came from free throws, thanks to those 12.3 attempts per game. Critics argue this makes his scoring “predictable and biased” by officiating, as seen in games where refs swallow their whistles, and his output drops. Without this crutch, his averages might dip closer to 25-27 PPG, putting him in good-but-not-great territory.
2. Limited Shooting Range: Great at the Rim, But That’s It
Giannis is arguably the best finisher at the rim in NBA history, with field-goal percentages (FG%) north of 55-61% in these seasons. His euro-steps and dunks are highlight-reel stuff. But step back a few feet, and the story changes. His three-point shooting (3P%) has been abysmal: 27.5% in 2022-23, 27.4% in 2023-24, and a career-low 22.2% in 2024-25. He attempts fewer than 2 threes per game on average, meaning defenses can sag off him and clog the paint without fear.
This lack of versatility means his scoring is “overrated away from the rim,” as one analysis put it. Compare that to players like Kevin Durant or Stephen Curry, who can score from anywhere, forcing defenses to respect their entire game. Giannis’ approach works in the regular season when teams aren’t scheming as intensely, but it limits his ceiling as a “complete” scorer. In an era where spacing and shooting rule, relying almost exclusively on drives feels outdated—and overrated when propped up by sheer athleticism rather than skill.
3. Efficiency Metrics Don’t Stack Up to Peers
True Shooting Percentage (TS%) is a gold-standard metric for scoring efficiency, accounting for field goals, threes, and free throws. Giannis’ TS% over the last three seasons averages about 62.6% (60.5% in 2022-23, 64.9% in 2023-24, 62.5% in 2024-25). That’s solid for a big man, but for someone averaging 30+ PPG, it’s not elite. High-volume scorers like Nikola Jokić or Joel Embiid often post TS% in the 65-70% range while matching or exceeding his points.
In comparisons of top scorers over the last three seasons, Giannis ranks outside the top tier in relative TS% (adjusted for league average). For instance, players like Curry or Durant have historically been +5-10% above league average on similar volume, while Giannis hovers around +2-4%. His low FT% drags this down—imagine if he shot 80% from the line; his TS% could jump to 68-70%, making his scoring truly unstoppable. As it stands, the metric reveals inefficiency masked by volume.
Some argue TS% “downplays” Giannis because of his high FTA, but that’s the point: efficiency includes making those shots. He’s getting more opportunities than most, yet not capitalizing fully.
4. Playoff Drops: Regular-Season Hero, Postseason Question Marks
The regular season is one thing, but championships are won in the playoffs—and that’s where Giannis’ scoring often falters. Over the last three years, he’s averaged 29.4 PPG in the postseason, but across only 8 games due to injuries (missing the entire 2023-24 playoffs). More telling is the efficiency drop: In the 2022-23 playoffs, his TS% plummeted to 52.5% from 60.5% in the regular season, with FT% at a dismal 45.2%.
Defenses wall up the paint in the playoffs, exposing his lack of outside shooting. As one Reddit discussion noted, people overhype his playoff scoring by focusing on raw points while ignoring “significant drops in efficiency.” Even in his strong 2024-25 playoff showing (33.0 PPG, TS% 65.1%), turnovers spiked to 4.6 per game, showing vulnerability under pressure. This inconsistency suggests his regular-season PPG is boosted by a less intense environment, making it overrated as a measure of true scoring prowess.
5. Contextual Factors: Games Played and Team Support
Finally, let’s talk durability and context. Giannis played only 63 games in 2022-23 and 67 in 2024-25—missing significant time due to injuries. While his per-game averages hold up, sustaining that over a full 82-game slate is another story. Other top scorers like LeBron James or Kevin Durant have logged more minutes while maintaining efficiency.
The Bucks’ system also plays a role. With shooters like Damian Lillard drawing attention, Giannis benefits from open lanes. But when the team struggles (as in recent playoff exits), his scoring doesn’t elevate them enough. Critics have called his overall impact “overrated,” pointing to underachievement in key moments. Even in the regular season against better opponents Giannis seems unable to make a difference.
Impressive, But Not Untouchable
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s 30+ PPG over the last three seasons is a testament to his talent and work ethic. But it’s overrated because it relies too heavily on free throws, lacks range, and doesn’t translate as efficiently in playoffs or against top defenses. If he improves his FT% and adds a reliable jumper, he could silence the doubters. Until then, let’s appreciate the numbers for what they are: great, but not the full story of elite scoring.
As the NBA landscape evolves, teams chasing a championship often look for that perfect complementary piece—a veteran who brings experience, skill, and clutch performance without demanding the spotlight. Enter Khris Middleton, the 34-year-old forward currently with the Washington Wizards. While his 2024-25 season was marred by injuries and a mid-season trade, Middleton’s track record suggests he could still be a game-changer for a contender. (Here is why he is unique in the way he fits with Giannis.)
A Proven Championship Pedigree
Khris Middleton isn’t just another role player; he’s a bonafide winner. His crowning achievement came in 2021 when he helped lead the Milwaukee Bucks to their first NBA title in 50 years. During that postseason, Middleton averaged 23.6 points, 7.6 rebounds, and 5.1 assists per game, stepping up as the reliable second option alongside Giannis Antetokounmpo. His performance in the Finals against the Phoenix Suns was legendary—scoring 40 points in Game 4 and delivering clutch shots that sealed the series.
This isn’t ancient history. Even in recent years, Middleton has shown flashes of that same reliability. In the 2023 playoffs, despite injuries, he averaged 24.7 points, 9.2 rebounds, and 4.7 assists against the Indiana Pacers. For teams like the New York Knicks or Boston Celtics, who are built around star duos but need depth in high-stakes moments, Middleton’s experience could be invaluable. He’s been through the wars, knows how to handle pressure, and has a gold medal from Team USA at the 2020 Olympics to boot.
Versatile Skill Set That Fits Any System
What makes Middleton so appealing is his well-rounded game. Standing at 6’7″ with a 6’11” wingspan, he’s a prototypical 3-and-D wing who can guard multiple positions. His career 38.8% three-point shooting forces defenses to respect him from deep, opening lanes for stars like Jalen Brunson or Luka Doncic on a potential new team.
Offensively, Middleton excels in mid-range pull-ups and off-ball movement, making him a low-usage scorer who doesn’t need the ball to impact games. Defensively, he’s averaged over a steal per game in multiple seasons and can switch onto guards or forwards. In an era where versatility wins titles—think of players like Jrue Holiday or Derrick White—Middleton’s ability to adapt is a huge plus.
Even at 34, his advanced metrics from healthier stretches show promise. In the 2023-24 season with the Bucks, he posted a true shooting percentage of 59.3% and a player efficiency rating (PER) of 18.4. For a contender, he could slot in as a third or fourth option, providing spacing and stability without ego clashes.
Navigating Recent Challenges: Injuries and Context
It’s fair to address the elephant in the room: Middleton’s 2024-25 season was underwhelming. After bilateral ankle surgeries in the offseason, he missed the start of the year and debuted in December. Traded to the Wizards in February as part of a deal that sent Kyle Kuzma to Milwaukee, he averaged just 10.7 points, 3.7 rebounds, and 3.4 assists in 22.1 minutes over 37 games. Injuries, including a knee contusion and ankle issues, limited him further, leading to multiple DNPs.
However, context matters. The Wizards are in full rebuild mode, prioritizing youth like Alex Sarr and Bub Carrington. Middleton was brought in more for veteran leadership than star production, serving as a mentor to a roster averaging under 25 years old. On a contending team with better spacing and fewer minutes demands, he could rebound—much like how veterans like Al Horford have thrived in reduced roles.
Analysts note that health is key for Middleton, as it was for the Bucks’ post-2021 struggles. If he regains form, his value skyrockets; if not, his expiring contract minimizes risk.
Ideal Fits for Contending Teams
Several teams could benefit from Middleton’s addition via trade or buyout. The Knicks, for instance, have eyed him as a postseason boost, valuing his shooting and defense alongside Mikal Bridges and OG Anunoby. In Philadelphia, he could provide wing depth for Joel Embiid and Tyrese Maxey, easing the load on aging stars.
The Cleveland Cavaliers, predicted by some to win the 2025 title, might see him as a veteran upgrade over aging pieces. Even Western Conference teams like the Dallas Mavericks or Oklahoma City Thunder could use his experience in closing lineups. Social media buzz from X users highlights his potential “championship value” in trades, with fans noting his ability to “carry” in key moments.
His $33.3 million player option for 2025-26, which he exercised, makes him an expiring deal—attractive for salary matching in trades without long-term commitment. The Wizards, focused on tanking, might waive or trade him for assets, as suggested in recent reports.
The Bottom Line: Undervalued Asset with Upside
In a league where championships are won by depth and intangibles, Khris Middleton offers a rare blend of skill, experience, and humility. While his prime may be behind him, his contributions to the Bucks’ title run prove he can elevate a good team to great. For any squad with championship aspirations—be it the Knicks, Cavs, or beyond—acquiring Middleton could be the low-risk, high-reward move that tips the scales.
As the 2025-26 season approaches, keep an eye on Middleton’s situation in Washington. If he lands on a contender, don’t be surprised if he becomes the X-factor in another deep playoff journey. The Bucks made the biggest mistake in trading him. Unless the only purpose of the team is to make Giannis look good in the regular season, because that is what it looks like right now.
As the 2025-26 NBA season kicks off, the Milwaukee Bucks find themselves at a crossroads. With a revamped roster featuring stars like Giannis Antetokounmpo, Myles Turner, and Kyle Kuzma, the team is poised for contention in the Eastern Conference. But one glaring omission stands out: Russell Westbrook. Just days ago, the former MVP inked a one-year deal with the Sacramento Kings, marking his seventh team in as many years. This move comes after speculation linked Westbrook to Milwaukee, with analysts like Kendrick Perkins vocally advocating for the fit. Instead, the Bucks opted to maintain the status quo, including re-signing Thanasis Antetokounmpo—Giannis’ older brother—who continues to occupy a roster spot despite minimal on-court impact.
It’s hard not to see this as a massive wasted opportunity. While family loyalty is admirable, prioritizing it over a proven veteran like Westbrook could haunt the Bucks in their quest for another championship. Westbrook, at 36, still brings a unique blend of energy, leadership, and production that could have elevated Milwaukee’s bench and overall dynamism. Let’s dive into why passing on Russ is such a regrettable decision, breaking down the “family stacking” issue and the myriad ways Westbrook could have transformed this team.
The Bucks’ Curious Prioritization: Family Over Firepower?
First, a quick look at the Bucks’ roster decisions. Milwaukee has undergone significant changes this offseason, adding pieces like Turner for rim protection and Kuzma for scoring versatility. However, one constant remains: Thanasis Antetokounmpo. Signed to a veteran’s minimum deal, Thanasis has been with the Bucks since 2019, primarily as a locker-room presence and occasional end-of-bench player. His stats tell the story—averaging under 3 points and 2 rebounds per game in limited minutes, he’s more symbolic than substantive.
This isn’t to diminish the Antetokounmpo brothers’ inspiring journey from Greece to NBA stardom. Giannis has repeatedly credited his family for his success, and keeping Thanasis around fosters team morale. But in a league where every roster spot counts—especially for a title contender like the Bucks—allocating one to a player with negligible impact feels like nepotism over necessity. Reports suggest the Bucks explored veteran guards but ultimately stood pat, allowing Westbrook to head west. It’s a choice that prioritizes sentiment over strategy, and in the cutthroat NBA, that can be costly.
Why Russell Westbrook Would Have Been a Game-Changer for the Bucks
Now, onto the heart of the matter: Russell Westbrook’s potential impact. Despite his age and a nomadic recent career (from the Nuggets last season to now the Kings), Westbrook remains a force. He’s a nine-time All-Star, the all-time triple-double leader, and a player who embodies relentless energy. Analysts and fans alike have pointed to Milwaukee as an ideal landing spot, with ESPN’s Kendrick Perkins stating outright, “I think he should be on the Milwaukee Bucks right now.” Here’s a detailed breakdown of what Westbrook could have brought:
1. Elite Playmaking and Bench Leadership
The Bucks’ backcourt is solid with Cole Anthony and Kevin Porter Jr. handling point guard duties, but depth is a concern. Westbrook, thriving in a bench role during his time with the Clippers and Nuggets, averaged around 11 points, 5 rebounds, and 4 assists last season—efficient production in limited minutes. His ability to push the pace would have injected life into Milwaukee’s second unit, which struggled with stagnation in recent playoffs.
Imagine Westbrook orchestrating fast breaks, dishing to shooters like Gary Trent Jr. or lobs to Turner. His vision and passing—honed over 17 seasons—would alleviate pressure on Giannis, allowing the Greek Freak to focus on scoring rather than initiating offense. As one analyst noted, “Westbrook would be instant offense off the bench.”
2. Rebounding and Defensive Intensity
One of Westbrook’s underrated strengths is his rebounding prowess. As a guard, he averages over 7 rebounds per game career-wise, grabbing boards that spark transition opportunities. Pairing him with Giannis—who thrives in the open court—could have created a rebounding tandem reminiscent of Russ’s OKC days with Kevin Durant. The Bucks ranked middling in rebounding last season; Westbrook’s tenacity would address that, turning defensive stops into quick scores.
Defensively, while not the lockdown player of his prime, Westbrook’s athleticism and competitiveness add edge. Perkins highlighted this, saying Westbrook could “bring an edge the Bucks are missing.” In a conference loaded with guards like Jalen Brunson and Tyrese Haliburton, that intensity matters.
3. Veteran Mentorship and Locker-Room Presence
Beyond stats, Westbrook’s intangibles are invaluable. He’s a former MVP with championship experience (albeit without a ring), known for his work ethic and leadership. The Bucks, coming off a 48-34 season and early playoff exit, need that veteran voice to guide younger players like Andre Jackson Jr. and Chris Livingston.
Westbrook’s fiery personality could ignite a team that sometimes lacks urgency. As Clutch Points reported, his speed and athleticism make him “an ideal fit next to Giannis.” Contrast this with Thanasis’ role—more cheerleader than contributor—and the opportunity cost becomes clear.
4. Fit in the System and Low-Risk Addition
Critics might point to Westbrook’s shooting woes (career 30% from three) or turnover-prone style, but in a bench role, these are mitigated. The Bucks’ spacing with shooters like Trent and Kuzma would give him driving lanes, and under coach Doc Rivers—who has a history with vets—Westbrook could thrive without dominating the ball.
A one-year, minimum deal (what he signed with Sacramento) would have been low-risk, high-reward. Reddit discussions echoed this: “Bucks could use him… he’d make a great 6th man.”
A Championship Window Squandered?
The Milwaukee Bucks had a golden chance to add a Hall-of-Fame caliber player who could address key weaknesses, all while maintaining their core. Instead, by sticking with family-oriented roster spots, they’ve let Westbrook join a Western Conference rival. As the season unfolds, if the Bucks’ bench falters or their energy wanes, fans will undoubtedly wonder “what if?” It’s not too late for Milwaukee to learn from this—prioritize winning over everything else. For now, though, this feels like an enormous wasted opportunity in the Giannis era. But at the end of the day that is exactly what it was: Giannis again making the wrong choices.
Alex Antetokounmpo, the youngest member of the Antetokounmpo basketball family, is currently on a two-way contract with the Milwaukee Bucks, having spent previous seasons developing in the NBA’s G League and overseas. While his career is still in its early stages, his unique athletic profile and family name have kept him in the spotlight. However, the influence of nepotism on his NBA pathway and the Bucks’ roster construction continues to provoke discussion and criticism.
Player Profile and Physical Attributes
Standing at 2.03 meters (about 6’7″) with a wingspan reportedly reaching 7’2”, Alex is an athletic combo forward. His background includes experience in both European leagues (Aris Thessaloniki) and NBA G League teams, such as the Wisconsin Herd and Raptors 905. He’s known for his physical tools, competitive drive, and the potential to fill multiple forward roles on the floor.
Strengths
Athleticism and Length: Alex’s physical attributes—elite length, solid leaping ability, and good size for a wing—make him a versatile defender and potential transition weapon.
Energy and Hustle: He plays with effort, often making positive hustle plays, chasing rebounds, and disrupting passing lanes with deflections.
Open Floor Play: He’s particularly effective in transition and filling lanes for fast breaks, running the floor well and drawing fouls.
Passing Vision and Rebounding: Alex has shown flashes as a ballhandler with decent passing instincts, and he’s a strong offensive rebounder for his position.
Weaknesses
Raw Skillset: While his athleticism is undeniable, Alex is regarded as a raw prospect. He does several things at a decent level but doesn’t yet excel in any specific area.
Shooting Consistency: His shooting mechanics and shot selection are inconsistent, resulting in below-average percentages, especially from three-point range. His feet orientation and repetitive shooting form need significant work.
Ball Handling: He remains turnover-prone, with loose ball-handling, especially under pressure or when forced to use his left hand.
Decision Making: Tends to make questionable decisions with the ball, telegraphing passes or choosing poor moments for aggressive plays.
Defensive Awareness: Despite physical tools, he sometimes struggles with defensive rotations, help defense, and maintaining focus.
Statistical Snapshot (G League Averages):
Season
Team
MPG
PPG
RPG
APG
FG%
3P%
FT%
2023-24
Wisconsin Herd
21.2
5.7
2.9
0.6
32.0
19.6
71.4
2022-23
Wisconsin Herd
22.3
5.8
3.1
0.8
37.2
24.7
55.9
Career
18.6
5.0
2.6
0.6
36.7
24.7
63.3
NBA Potential
Despite his potential upside, Alex currently projects as a fringe rotation player—his ceiling will depend on significant development in skill areas and decision-making. Scouts note he could become a switchable defender and secondary playmaker with 3-and-D value, but this requires improvement in perimeter shooting, ball security, and on-ball defense.
Nepotism and Its Impact on the Bucks
The Antetokounmpo family connection undeniably influences roster decisions. Giannis’s status as the franchise centerpiece has led the Bucks to extend opportunities to his brothers, including Thanasis and Alex, often at the expense of more competitive or developmental roster spots. High-profile commentators have called out this nepotism, suggesting it undermines meritocratic team building and can create resentment or frustration among teammates striving for opportunities on talent alone.
Limited Roster Spots: Two-way and end-of-bench positions are valuable for developing young talent. Allocating these to family members primarily for off-court harmony or star retention can stunt the growth of other prospects.
Locker Room Dynamics: Nepotism may strain relationships if players feel roles aren’t earned, potentially affecting locker room morale and on-court chemistry.
Team Performance: While strengthening Giannis’s ties to Milwaukee may have intangible benefits, it can impair overall competitiveness if the roster isn’t built purely on merit.youtube
So what’s the point?
Alex Antetokounmpo’s NBA journey is emblematic of both the opportunities and controversies created by family ties in pro sports. He embodies raw physical talent and hustle but lacks a specialized skill set at the moment. For now, his presence on the Bucks is less a product of exceptional on-court impact than of Giannis’s influence, and ongoing nepotism risks diminishing the franchise’s talent pipeline and fairness in player development.
The real problem is Giannis. A 30 year old adult claiming he needs his brothers around to perform? Are we all serious?
There really is not that much to go on so here are all my sources for this post.
Giannis Antetokounmpo, even after over a decade in the league has certain aspects of his game stubbornly underdeveloped. These weaknesses—ranging from inconsistent shooting to poor screening and defensive lapses—can be traced back to his unconventional entry into basketball. Unlike many NBA stars who honed their skills from childhood, Giannis didn’t start playing organized basketball until he was around 13 years old, first touching a basketball at that age and beginning professional play in Greece at 16. This late start meant he missed out on years of foundational training, where muscle memory for technical skills like shooting form, screen-setting technique, and quick decision-making is typically built. Instead, Giannis has relied heavily on his extraordinary physical gifts—length, speed, and power—to compensate, but these gaps persist, affecting both his individual performance and the Milwaukee Bucks’ team dynamics.
Struggles at the Charity Stripe and Beyond: The Shooting Woes
One of the most glaring and persistent issues in Giannis’ arsenal is his shooting, particularly from the free-throw line and long range. Despite years of practice and tweaks to his routine, his career free-throw percentage hovers at a mediocre 69.3%, dipping to 61.7% in recent seasons. This isn’t just a minor flaw; it’s a strategic vulnerability that opponents exploit, especially in playoffs, by fouling him intentionally to disrupt drives and force him to the line. Insiders have pointed out that if Giannis could convert at a higher rate—given he leads the league in free-throw attempts—he’d likely have more MVP trophies, as it would naturally boost his scoring average without additional shots.
Beyond free throws, his overall shooting profile reveals deficiencies. He’s historically struggled with three-pointers and mid-range shots, posting some of the lowest field-goal percentages in the league in these areas during playoffs. While recent developments show improvement in mid-range efficiency (hitting 54.5% over stretches and ranking second league-wide in certain periods), his form lacks the fluidity of players who drilled jumpers from a young age. And of course he has no mid range when it matters in the playoffs or harder regular season games. This ties directly to his late start: Shooting is a skill rooted in repetition and mechanics developed early. Without that foundation, Giannis’ attempts often look mechanical or forced, relying on power rather than touch. In half-court sets, defenses sag off him, daring him to shoot, which clogs driving lanes and limits his effectiveness as a playmaker.
The Art of the Pick: Why Giannis Can’t Set Effective Screens
Screen-setting might seem like a basic team skill, but for Giannis, it’s a glaring weakness that hampers the Bucks’ offense. Analysts describe his screens as “ghost screens”—half-hearted efforts where he doesn’t establish a solid base, sets them too high, or angles them poorly, allowing defenders to slip through easily. With his massive 7-foot, 253-pound frame, he should be a screening powerhouse, but instead, he often prioritizes rolling to the rim for his own scoring opportunities, leading to shoddy execution. Statistically, this shows: He averages just over two screen assists per game, generating only five points, and the Bucks rank near the bottom in off-screen efficiency at 0.5 points per possession.
This flaw is particularly damaging in pick-and-roll heavy schemes with stars like Damian Lillard, where effective screens create space for pull-ups or drives. Without them, the offense stagnates, forcing isolation plays. Again, the late start explains this: Screening requires precise footwork, body positioning, and timing—fundamentals drilled in youth leagues. Giannis, who jumped straight into high-level play without that base, treats it as an afterthought, leaning on his athleticism to dominate individually rather than synergize with teammates.
Giannis’ screening IQ is obviously something that can’t magically appear. He doesn’t understand angles at the most fundamental level. He also doesn’t understand
Defensive Reactions: Elite Talent with Occasional Lapses
Giannis is a defensive monster—his length and instincts earned him DPOY honors—but he isn’t flawless. Critics note he struggles with quick reactions in certain scenarios, like chasing guards around screens or maintaining off-ball awareness. He can “fall asleep” off the ball, failing to rotate promptly or box out, which leads to easy rebounds or cuts for opponents. While his help defense is elite, perimeter switching exposes slower lateral quickness against shifty guards, and his reactions in complex schemes can lag.
This isn’t about effort but ingrained habits. Starting basketball late meant less exposure to defensive drills that build anticipation and reaction speed. Players like Kawhi Leonard or Draymond Green, who started young, have that intuitive read-and-react ability honed over years. For Giannis, defense is more reactive to his physical tools than proactive fundamentals, making him vulnerable in playoff matchups where teams scheme to isolate these gaps.
Passing and Decision-Making: The Half-Court Hurdles
Giannis’ passing is another area where limitations shine through. While he averages solid assists, he’s not a “great passer,” as opponents like Alperen Sengun have exploited by collapsing the paint and forcing him into tough decisions. In half-court sets, he struggles with quick reads, often over-dribbling (sometimes for 14 seconds) or opting for isolation shots instead of hitting open teammates. This contributes to the Bucks’ low rankings in passes and assists, turning a potential juggernaut into a predictable unit.
Tied to his late start, decision-making under pressure requires basketball IQ built from countless reps in varied scenarios. Without early immersion, Giannis defaults to his strengths—driving or pulling up—rather than orchestrating like a true point forward.
Ball-Handling, Counter Moves, and Other Bad Habits
Giannis’ handle lacks creativity, making him predictable when trapped. He
doesn’t have a wide array of counter moves, often resorting to the same Euro-step or spin without variation. Bad habits compound this: fascination with inefficient isolation mid-rangers or dribble-up threes, poor off-ball movement, and inconsistent boxing out. These stem from relying on physical dominance rather than refined skills, a byproduct of skipping foundational years.
The Cost of a Late Bloom and Paths Forward
Giannis’ weaknesses aren’t from lack of effort—he’s worked tirelessly to improve. But starting at 13 meant building a skyscraper on a shallow foundation; the cracks show in technical areas requiring early muscle memory. For the Bucks to contend, Giannis must evolve beyond isolation heroics, embracing team play like better screens and quicker passes. At 30, there’s still time, but these lingering issues remind us: Even freaks of nature have human origins.
In the NBA’s endless hypothetical superteam debates, few pairings spark as much intrigue as Giannis Antetokounmpo and Stephen Curry. On paper, the Greek Freak’s athletic dominance combined with Curry’s unparalleled shooting seems like a recipe for dynasty-level success. But dig deeper, and the fit starts to unravel. Giannis’s playing style—dominated by ball possession, physical drives, and limited off-ball contributions—clashes with Curry’s need for fluid motion, elite screening, and quick decision-making.
The Screening Issue: Giannis’s Weakness Undermines Curry’s Greatest Strength
Stephen Curry’s game revolves around off-ball movement and using screens to create space for his lethal three-point shooting. He’s thrived with screen-setters like Draymond Green, who not only set solid picks but also read defenses, slip when needed, and facilitate from the short roll. Giannis, however, is notoriously poor at this fundamental big-man skill, often prioritizing his own scoring over team play.
Observers have noted that Giannis tends to set screens too high or fails to establish a solid base, allowing defenders to slip around easily and disrupt the play. In pick-and-roll situations, he frequently slips the screen prematurely to hunt mismatches in the post, demanding the ball instead of creating opportunities for others. This self-focused approach was critiqued in analyses of his role with the Bucks, where even fans and analysts questioned his commitment to screening as a key offensive tool. For Curry, who relies on screens to generate 40% of his shots (per NBA tracking data), this would be disastrous. Without reliable picks, defenses could switch or hedge more aggressively on Curry, stifling his rhythm and forcing him into contested looks. Giannis’s athleticism might help in transition, but in half-court sets—where Curry does his damage—his screening lapses would turn the offense stagnant.
Social media echoes this sentiment, with recent discussions highlighting Giannis’s bad screening as a persistent flaw that hampers guard-big synergies. In a system like Golden State’s, where screening is an art form, Giannis’s habits would clash, leaving Curry isolated and underutilized.
Ball Dominance: Giannis’s Hogging Habits Would Starve Curry’s Off-Ball Brilliance
Giannis is one of the league’s highest-usage players, often controlling the ball for extended possessions to bulldoze to the rim. This “ball hog” label isn’t new—it’s been thrown at him in high-profile feuds, like with James Harden, who implied Giannis’s style lacks passing nuance. Stats back it up: Giannis’s usage rate hovers around 33-35%, meaning he touches the ball on a massive portion of possessions, often leading to iso-heavy play. Critics argue this pads his stats but doesn’t elevate teammates as effectively as true facilitators.
Curry, conversely, excels off the ball, using gravity to warp defenses even without possession. Pairing him with Giannis would force Curry into a spot-up role more often, diminishing his playmaking (he averaged 6.5 assists in 2024-25). Recent Bucks games highlighted this issue: when Giannis dominated the ball, teammates like Damian Lillard saw reduced touches, leading to frustration and inefficiency. On X (formerly Twitter), users frequently call out Giannis’s hogging, with posts noting how it led to losses despite his gaudy lines. In a Curry-led offense, this possessiveness would create tension, as Steph’s motion-based system demands quick ball movement—not prolonged dribble drives.
Clutch-Time Reliability: Giannis Falters When It Matters Most
Curry is synonymous with clutch performance, hitting game-winners and thriving under pressure with a career 43% three-point shooting in clutch situations. Giannis? His clutch stats tell a mixed story at best, often marred by poor free-throw shooting and decision-making. In 2024-25, he shot just 68.8% from the line in clutch minutes, missing key opportunities. Overall clutch efficiency ranks him mid-tier among stars, with a +15.1 net rating but inconsistent scoring (3.6 PPG in clutch games).
Critics point to playoff meltdowns, like the 2023 first-round exit where his free-throw woes (notably in clutch spots) contributed to the Bucks’ collapse. On X, discussions label him “not clutch,” citing games where he deferred or bricked in crunch time. For a duo with Curry, who’d draw double-teams late, Giannis’s unreliability—especially from the stripe—could cost championships. Defenses would foul him intentionally, turning potential wins into free-throw lotteries.
The Core Problem: Giannis’s Basketball IQ and Reaction Speed Don’t Fit Advanced Schemes
Most damning is Giannis’s perceived low basketball IQ, slow processing, and struggles with complex plays—traits that would torpedo a partnership with Curry’s cerebral, read-and-react style. Gilbert Arenas famously questioned Giannis’s smarts, asking if he’s “smarter than LeBron James or Stephen Curry” and arguing his success stems from athleticism, not intellect. Videos and analyses highlight players doubting his IQ, noting he relies on raw power over nuanced reads.
Reddit threads debate this, with many concluding he’s not “high IQ” despite stats. His reaction time in half-court offenses is slower, often leading to forced drives rather than exploiting mismatches creatively. Curry’s Warriors run intricate sets with split actions, back screens, and rapid decisions—Giannis’s inability to “think or react fast” would bog it down. Even his passing, while improved (7.3 APG in 2024), is critiqued as basic, not elite like Jokic’s or LeBron’s. In advanced plays, he’d struggle to adapt, turning a dynamic offense into a predictable one.
Hypothetical analyses of a Giannis-Curry pairing acknowledge the gravitational pull but warn of stylistic clashes. While some see it as “unfair” dominance, others note Giannis’s limitations would hinder Curry’s freedom.
A Superteam That Sounds Better Than It Plays
Giannis Antetokounmpo is a force of nature, but his screening deficiencies, ball-hogging, clutch inconsistencies, and limited IQ make him a poor fit for Stephen Curry’s ecosystem. Curry needs space creators and quick thinkers; Giannis provides brute force but at the cost of flow. In a league where chemistry trumps talent alone, this duo would frustrate more than dominate. Better to keep them apart—let Giannis bulldoze in Milwaukee, and Curry dance in the Bay. Real skills matter and Giannis simply hasn’t developed them at all. If anything he is getting worse (at ft% and 3pt% for sure.) As usual, Bucks (and Golden State) fans are talking as if the NBA is a video game.
In the ever-evolving drama of the NBA, few stories capture the tension between player power and organizational loyalty quite like the recent saga involving Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Milwaukee Bucks. On October 8, 2025, the two-time MVP made headlines with comments that hinted at a potential exit from Milwaukee if the team doesn’t contend for a championship this season. “Right now, my focus is on the Bucks,” Giannis said, “but it’s human nature to change your mind if things don’t go as planned.” These words, amid swirling trade rumors linking him to the New York Knicks—especially after their blockbuster acquisition of Karl-Anthony Towns—sparked immediate backlash.
Enter NBA legend Charles Barkley, who didn’t mince words during an appearance on ESPN. Barkley lambasted Giannis for what he perceives as entitlement, stating, “These guys, they feel like they’re entitled to play for the championship every year. … Everybody wants to win a championship, but the Bucks have done everything they possibly could.” Barkley’s critique resonates deeply, not just because of his Hall of Fame credentials, but because it highlights a stark reality: the Bucks have bent over backward to build a contender around Giannis, often at great cost to their future. In this blog post, we’ll dive into why Barkley is spot-on and why Giannis’s stance comes across as ungrateful, given the franchise’s extraordinary efforts.
The Bucks’ Investment in an Unknown Prospect
Let’s rewind to 2013. The Milwaukee Bucks, a small-market team often overshadowed in the NBA landscape, took a gamble on a lanky, relatively unknown teenager from Greece in the NBA Draft. Selected 15th overall, Giannis Antetokounmpo was far from a sure thing—raw talent with immense potential but little polish. The Bucks didn’t just draft him; they invested years in his development. Through dedicated coaching, strength training, and on-court opportunities, they transformed him from a skinny prospect into the “Greek Freak,” a dominant force who would go on to win two MVP awards, a Defensive Player of the Year honor, and lead the team to glory.
This patience and belief paid off spectacularly in 2021 when Giannis delivered a championship to Milwaukee, ending a 50-year drought. His 50-point masterpiece in the Finals closeout game earned him MVP honors, cementing his legacy. But the Bucks’ commitment didn’t start or end there—it was a foundational bet on his future that no other team might have made.
All-In Moves: Trades, Contracts, and Coaching Changes
Barkley’s point about the Bucks doing “everything they possibly could” isn’t hyperbole; it’s backed by a series of bold, franchise-altering decisions. In 2020, sensing the need for a defensive anchor to complement Giannis, Milwaukee traded Eric Bledsoe, George Hill, and multiple first-round picks to acquire Jrue Holiday. This move was pivotal, directly contributing to the 2021 title run.
Post-championship, the Bucks rewarded Giannis with a five-year, $228 million supermax extension in December 2020, securing his services and signaling their long-term vision. When the team hit a rough patch, they didn’t hesitate to shake things up. In May 2023, they fired championship-winning coach Mike Budenholzer after a first-round playoff exit to the Miami Heat. They hired Adrian Griffin in June 2023, only to dismiss him mid-season despite a 30-13 record, replacing him with Doc Rivers—moves that aligned with Giannis’s preferences for change.
The Bucks went even further in September 2023, trading Jrue Holiday, Grayson Allen, and more picks to Portland for Damian Lillard, pairing Giannis with another superstar guard in a desperate bid to reignite contention. This trade mortgaged their draft capital through 2031, leaving the team with limited flexibility. As Barkley noted, “The Bucks have done everything they can.”
Entering the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee continued their all-in approach. They signed Myles Turner to a four-year, $107 million deal in July 2025, adding rim protection to bolster the frontcourt alongside Giannis. Free-agent additions like Gary Trent Jr., Taurean Prince, and Delon Wright deepened the roster, pushing the payroll over $170 million and deep into the luxury tax’s second apron. These aren’t half-measures; they’re sacrifices that have capped the team’s future options, all to maximize Giannis’s prime.
Even on a personal level, the Bucks have shown loyalty by keeping Giannis’s brother, Thanasis Antetokounmpo, on the roster since 2019. Despite his limited on-court impact, this provides family stability—a rare perk in the cutthroat NBA.
Injuries, Not Incompetence: The Real Culprit Behind Recent Struggles
Giannis’s hints at departure ignore a crucial factor: injuries, not front-office failures, have been the primary roadblock. In the 2024 playoffs, his absence due to injury contributed to a first-round loss to the Indiana Pacers. The Bucks’ core has been plagued by health issues, but the organization has responded by rebuilding the roster aggressively. As Barkley emphasized, “I want someone to love me as much as the Bucks love Giannis.”
In contrast to Barkley’s era, where stars like him endured years with underperforming teams without demanding trades (though Barkley himself requested one from the 76ers in the early ’90s for similar reasons), modern players expect perennial contention. But Milwaukee has delivered far beyond what’s typical for a small-market franchise. Ownership even changed hands in 2014 to fund arena upgrades and retain Giannis, demonstrating a commitment to infrastructure and stability.
The Entitlement Factor: Forgetting Roots and Undermining Loyalty
Giannis’s comments smack of entitlement because they overlook his origins. Without the Bucks’ faith and resources, he might not have evolved into the superstar he is today. He publicly praised the organization’s efforts in 2021, vowing loyalty, but his recent waffling undermines that narrative. Expecting annual titles ignores the NBA’s increasing parity, with powerhouse Eastern Conference rivals like the Boston Celtics and Philadelphia 76ers.
Barkley’s frustration is echoed across the league and media. As one analyst put it, “The Bucks have given Giannis everything he wanted—they traded a ton for Jrue, for Dame, and now put themselves in cap hell.” Giannis’s stance feels ungrateful, especially when compared to players who stuck it out in tougher situations. The Bucks aren’t a dysfunctional franchise; they’re a model of player-centric building, and Barkley’s call-out serves as a reminder that loyalty should be a two-way street.
Time for Gratitude, Not Exit Threats
Charles Barkley isn’t just stirring the pot—he’s highlighting a fundamental truth about the NBA’s player-empowerment era. The Milwaukee Bucks have exhausted every avenue to build around Giannis Antetokounmpo, from draft investments and blockbuster trades to coaching overhauls and massive contracts. In return, veiled threats of departure come across as entitled and ungrateful, especially from a player who owes much of his success to the franchise’s unwavering support.
As the 2025-26 season unfolds, Giannis has a chance to repay that loyalty with performance and commitment. But if Barkley’s words ring true, perhaps it’s time for the Greek Freak to reflect on how far the Bucks have carried him—and how much further they could go together. In a league where rings are the ultimate goal, true greatness also involves appreciating the journey and the team that made it possible.
In the high-stakes world of the NBA, superstar players like Giannis Antetokounmpo hold immense leverage, especially when their contracts include player options. As the 2025-26 season tips off, whispers about the Greek Freak’s future with the Milwaukee Bucks are growing louder amid trade rumors and questions about the team’s championship viability. While Giannis can’t walk away immediately after this season, his contract structure sets him up for unrestricted free agency as early as the summer of 2027 – at the end of the 2026-27 season. Once he declines his player option, the Bucks will have zero recourse to keep him. Let’s break down the rules, his contract details, and why Milwaukee is essentially at his mercy.
Giannis’s Contract: A Timeline of Security and Flexibility
Giannis has been a Buck since 2013, rising from a raw rookie to a two-time MVP and 2021 NBA champion. His loyalty has been rewarded with massive extensions, but the latest one – signed in October 2023 – gives him an exit ramp that’s hard for the front office to block.
The current deal is a three-year, $175 million maximum veteran extension that kicked in for the 2025-26 season. Here’s the breakdown:
2025-26: $54.1 million (guaranteed).
2026-27: $58.5 million (guaranteed).
2027-28: $62.8 million (player option).
The first two years are fully guaranteed, meaning Giannis is locked in through the end of the 2026-27 season. But the third year? That’s where his power shines. The player option for 2027-28 allows Giannis (or his representatives) to decide by June 29, 2027, whether to exercise it and stay with Milwaukee for one more year at that salary. If he declines – opting out – he hits unrestricted free agency (UFA) in the summer of 2027, free to sign with any team of his choosing.
This isn’t some obscure loophole; it’s a standard feature in NBA supermax contracts for stars like Giannis, who qualify under the Designated Veteran Player rules. These extensions allow teams to pay above the salary cap but often include player-friendly terms like options to maintain flexibility in a league where careers are short and contention windows narrow.
Prior to this extension, Giannis was already under a five-year, $228 million deal from 2020 that carried him through 2025-26, but the new extension superseded the final year for cap purposes. The Bucks front office, led by GM Jon Horst, structured it this way to keep their star happy while navigating the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) restrictions, including the over-36 rule (Giannis turns 33 in 2027, so no over-38 issues yet). But by building in the player option, they’ve handed Giannis the keys to his own destiny.
NBA Rules on Player Options and Free Agency: The Bucks’ Hands Are Tied
To understand why the Bucks can’t stop Giannis from leaving, we need to dive into the NBA’s free agency rules under the current CBA.
A player option is a contractual clause that gives the player – not the team – the unilateral right to decide whether to fulfill the final year(s) of the deal. If exercised, Giannis would play out 2027-28 in Milwaukee. But if he opts out, that year vanishes, and he becomes an unrestricted free agent. As a UFA, any NBA team can negotiate and sign him without restrictions – no qualifying offers, no right of first refusal, nothing. The Bucks’ Bird Rights (which allow over-the-cap re-signings) wouldn’t apply if he opts out and signs elsewhere; they’d only help if he stays or returns later.
Contrast this with restricted free agency, where teams can match offers. Player options like Giannis’s bypass that entirely. The CBA explicitly prohibits contracts from including clauses that limit a player’s free agency after the option period, ensuring stars can chase rings or bigger paydays elsewhere.
Moreover, Giannis doesn’t have a no-trade clause in this extension, meaning the Bucks could theoretically trade him before the opt-out deadline without his consent. But if Giannis wants to play out his guaranteed years and then bolt via free agency, Milwaukee has no leverage. They can’t force him to exercise the option, extend early (he’s eligible for a four-year, $275 million extension starting October 2026, but only if he stays), or block his departure.
In practice, this creates massive trade leverage for Giannis even before 2027. After the 2025-26 season, with just one guaranteed year left, his value skyrockets for contending teams. The Bucks would face a “trade now or lose for nothing” dilemma – a scenario that’s played out with stars like Kevin Durant and James Harden. Recent reports indicate Giannis is already exploring options, with interest from teams like the Knicks, and the Bucks are bracing for potential mid-season drama if results falter.
Why Now? The Bucks’ Window Closing and Giannis’s Leverage
Giannis has repeatedly affirmed his commitment to Milwaukee, saying he’s “locked in” but leaving the door open for change if the team doesn’t contend. The Bucks have surrounded him with talent like Damian Lillard and recent additions, but back-to-back early playoff exits have fueled doubts. At 30 years old (turning 31 in December 2025), Giannis knows his prime won’t last forever. Opting out in 2027 could net him a new supermax elsewhere – potentially over $300 million – with a contender.
For the Bucks, the nightmare is losing their franchise cornerstone for nothing. They can’t poison-pill his contract or use opt-out protections because the CBA doesn’t allow it. Their only plays are winning big this and next season to convince him to extend early or trading him on his terms to recoup assets.
The Bottom Line: Player Power in the Modern NBA
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s player option embodies the shift toward player empowerment in the NBA. By the end of the 2026-27 season, if he chooses to walk, the Bucks are spectators – unable to match offers, extend forcibly, or retain rights. It’s a stark reminder that even loyal stars like the Greek Freak prioritize championships over sentiment. As trade rumors swirl into the 2025-26 season, Milwaukee must deliver, or risk watching their MVP depart on his own terms.
If Giannis Antetokounmpo declines his player option, he would be able to leave the Milwaukee Bucks and become an unrestricted free agent in the summer of 2027, immediately after the conclusion of the 2026-27 NBA season. His current contract guarantees him two more years, covering the 2025-26 and 2026-27 seasons, with a player option for the 2027-28 season—which he can choose whether or not to accept. If he opts out, the earliest possible departure is July 2027. What is most likely? At the end of this (failed again) Bucks’ season, they try to trade him for as much talent and draft capital they can. Giannis has no choice. But at the end of that second season he returns to Greece.
While Giannis Antetokounmpo has indeed struggled with consistent playoff success, with six first-round exits in his ten playoff appearances (60% first-round exit rate) , a few more top 100 NBA players of all time have actually had worse or comparable playoff failures relative to their talent and expectations.
Karl Malone – Often ranked in the top 15-20 all-time
Karl Malone holds the unfortunate record for most playoff games (193) without winning a championship. Despite being a two-time MVP and reaching two Finals, he suffered multiple devastating losses:
Lost both Finals appearances to Michael Jordan’s Bulls (1997, 1998)
Had significant playoff efficiency drops compared to regular season performance
His transition-heavy style was less effective against disciplined playoff defenses
Charles Barkley – Universally considered top 20-25 all-time
Barkley had a worse playoff series record than Giannis, going 12-13 in playoff series throughout his career :
Only one Finals appearance (1993 loss to Bulls)
Eight first-round exits, compared to Giannis’s six
Career playoff record of 62-61, barely above .500
Steve Nash – Two-time MVP, often ranked 30-40 all-time
Nash never reached an NBA Finals despite his elite regular season success :cbc+1
Played 120 career playoff games without a championship
Series record of 11-12 in the playoffs
Multiple devastating playoff exits with Phoenix despite having superior teamsyoutubecbc
Reggie Miller – Hall of Famer, top 50-75 all-time
Miller’s playoff record was remarkably similar to current Giannis :
Series record of 14-15 in 29 playoff series
Eight first-round exits throughout career
Only one Finals appearance (2000 loss to Lakers)
Played 144 playoff games without winning a championship
Patrick Ewing – Top 50 player, #1 draft pick with championship expectations
Despite being the centerpiece of multiple strong Knicks teams, Ewing never won a championship :
Went 0-5 against Michael Jordan’s Bulls in playoff matchups
139 career playoff games without a title
Known for several crucial playoff failures, including the infamous missed finger-roll
Players with Similar or Slightly Better Records
Chris Paul – Top 75 player, “Point God”
Paul has had numerous devastating playoff collapses :
Record holder for most blown 2-0 playoff leads (4)
Series record barely above .500 at 72-68 overall
Only advanced past the second round twice in 13 playoff appearances
Eight first-round exits in his career
James Harden – Former MVP, top 75 player
Despite regular season excellence, Harden has underperformed in crucial playoff moments :
Multiple playoff collapses, including the infamous 2018 Western Conference Finals
Known for poor elimination game performances
Only one Finals appearance (2012 with OKC as sixth man)
Recent Struggles in Context
Giannis’s recent struggles three consecutive first-round exits from 2023-2025 are concerning. But while Giannis’s six first-round exits in ten appearances represent genuine playoff struggles, at least 5-7 other top 100 players had worse or comparable playoff failures relative to their talent and expectations. Players like Karl Malone, Charles Barkley, Steve Nash, Reggie Miller, and Patrick Ewing all had more devastating playoff careers when accounting for their lack of championships and multiple crushing defeats.
Why Giannis Struggles in the Playoffs: A Comprehensive Analysis
Giannis Antetokounmpo isn’t inherently “bad” in the playoffs—he still puts up impressive individual numbers—but he faces specific, exploitable weaknesses that championship-level teams have learned to target systematically. His playoff struggles stem from a combination of technical limitations, strategic vulnerabilities, and psychological factors that become magnified under postseason pressure.
The Primary Weaknesses
Free Throw Shooting: The Fatal Flaw
Giannis’s most glaring weakness is his free throw shooting, which deteriorates significantly in the playoffs :
Career playoff free throw percentage: 62% compared to 69.3% in regular season
Recent playoff performance: As low as 57% in some series
Strategic impact: Teams deliberately foul him late in games, knowing he’s likely to miss
His excessively long free throw routine (15-20 seconds per shot) creates mental pressure and allows fans to affect his concentration. The routine lacks fluidity and doesn’t mirror his actual shooting motion, making it essentially “not a basketball act”.
The “Giannis Wall” Strategy
Since 2019, teams have deployed a devastating defensive scheme called “The Wall” that has consistently neutralized his dominance :
How it works:
Three defenders collapse on Giannis when he drives, forming a “wall”
Two additional defenders stay back to contest his kick-out passes
Forces him into difficult shots or turnovers
Historical success against Giannis:
2019 Raptors: Pioneered the strategy, won series 4-2
2020 Heat: Perfected it, dominated series 4-1
2022 Celtics: Used effectively despite losing 4-3
2023-2025: Multiple teams continue using variations successfully
Three-Point Shooting Vulnerability
Teams actively encourage Giannis to shoot three-pointers, knowing it plays away from his strengths :
Recent playoff 3PT%: 25-27%, well below league average
Strategic exploitation: Defenses sag off him, daring him to shoot
Shot selection issues: Takes contested threes instead of driving when teams expect it
Psychological and Tactical Factors
Pressure and Decision-Making
Giannis struggles with decision-making when facing intense playoff pressure :
Turnover increase: Higher turnover rate in playoffs, especially against walls
Forcing shots: Tends to force drives into set defenses rather than making correct passes
Takes it personally: Admits he gets emotional when facing “The Wall” strategy
Supporting Cast Dependency
Unlike other superstars, Giannis requires exceptional supporting cast performance to succeed :
2021 championship context: Won with injured opponents (Nets’ Big 3, Lakers’ stars)
Recent struggles: When Middleton, Holiday, or Lillard struggle, Bucks lose
Role player reliance: Needs shooters to make open shots when he passes out of walls
Screen Setting Deficiency
An underrated weakness that affects team offense :
Poor technique: Sets “ghost screens” that don’t create real advantages
Low efficiency: Only 30th percentile as pick-and-roll roll man
Impact on teammates: Limits Damian Lillard’s effectiveness in pick-and-roll
Why These Weaknesses Are Magnified in Playoffs
Preparation Time
Playoff teams have extensive time to study and prepare specific schemes :
Regular season success doesn’t translate when teams gameplan specifically for him
Coaches like Nick Nurse, Erik Spoelstra excel at exploiting these weaknesses systematically
Defensive Intensity and Focus
Playoff defenses are more disciplined and committed to executing complex schemes :
Teams willing to sacrifice individual defense to build effective walls
Better communication and rotation on defensive schemes
More physical play that disrupts his rhythm
Clutch Moments and Mental Pressure
High-stakes situations expose his technical limitations :
Free throw struggles become magnified in close games
Increased pressure affects decision-making under duress
The Championship Exception: 2021
Giannis’s 2021 championship run succeeded because of unique circumstances :
Opponent injuries: Brooklyn’s Big 3 were injured, Lakers eliminated early
Supporting cast peak: Middleton and Holiday played at their highest level
Health: Giannis overcame his own knee injury to deliver historic Finals performance
Giannis isn’t “bad” in the playoffs—he’s a victim of solvable basketball problems that he hasn’t adequately addressed. His combination of free throw struggles, three-point shooting deficiencies, and vulnerability to sophisticated defensive schemes creates a blueprint that disciplined playoff teams can exploit. Unlike transcendent playoff performers who elevate their games under pressure, Giannis’s technical limitations become more pronounced when facing elite, prepared defenses with months to gameplan specifically for his weaknesses.
In the whirlwind world of the NBA, where superstars chase championships and global endorsements, few stories tug at the heartstrings quite like Giannis Antetokounmpo’s. The man they call the Greek Freak—born in Athens to Nigerian immigrant parents, risen from street-hustling kid to two-time MVP and NBA champion—has always worn his roots on his sleeve. But today, a new chapter unfolds that’s less about highlight reels and more about family foundations: Giannis’ wife, Mariah Riddlesprigger, and their four young children have officially settled permanently in Athens, Greece. Their sons have even started kindergarten at the prestigious Athens College, marking a bold pivot toward the homeland that shaped him.
This isn’t just a seasonal relocation; it’s a seismic shift for a family that’s called Milwaukee home since Giannis was drafted in 2013. As the Bucks gear up for another title run, Giannis faces his first NBA season separated from his loved ones. What does this mean for the 30-year-old phenom? Could it fuel his fire on the court, or add an emotional weight to his already Herculean load? Or is he preparing for a return to Greece soon?
## A Family Forged in Adversity: Giannis’ Journey from Sepolia Streets to NBA Stardom
To understand the significance of this move, we need to rewind to Giannis’ origins. Born Giannis Sina Ugo Antetokounmpo on December 6, 1994, in Athens’ gritty Sepolia neighborhood, he grew up stateless for years—his parents, Charles and Veronica, had fled Nigeria in the early 1990s seeking better opportunities, only to face poverty and discrimination in Greece. The family scraped by selling watches and handbags on the streets, with young Giannis and his brothers (Thanasis, Kostas, and Alex) pitching in to keep food on the table.
Basketball became their escape. Scouted by local coach Spiros Velliniatis at age 13, Giannis’ raw athleticism— that impossible blend of 6’11” frame, speed, and power—propelled him from Filathlitikos’ youth teams to the NBA in a meteoric rise. By 2013, he was in Milwaukee, dragging his family across the Atlantic for a shot at the American Dream. Today, three of the four brothers play professionally in the NBA, and their AntetokounBros Academy in Athens offers free training to underprivileged kids, echoing the support they once received.
Enter Mariah Riddlesprigger, a philanthropist and former college volleyball star whom Giannis met in Milwaukee. The couple, who married in a lavish summer 2024 ceremony after welcoming three children, have built a life centered on quiet joys amid the spotlight. Their kids—Liam Charles (born February 10, 2020), Maverick Shai (August 18, 2021), Eva Brooke (September 14, 2023), and the newest addition, Aria Capri (born around June 2025)—represent the next generation of Antetokounmpos. Rarely seen in public, they’ve been fixtures at Bucks games and family milestones, like the 2022 premiere of Disney+’s *Rise*, the film chronicling their immigrant saga.
Giannis has always been vocal about fatherhood’s pull. In interviews, he’s said he’d retire on the spot if Liam asked for more playtime, underscoring how family anchors his relentless drive. Now, with the kids’ early years in flux, the pull of Greece feels inevitable.
## The Move: From Milwaukee Winters to Athenian Sunsets
Whispers of a Greek return have swirled for years—Giannis bought a sprawling, futuristic apartment complex in the upscale Paleo Psychiko suburb of Athens back in 2023 for an estimated €10 million ($11 million), complete with units for his mother and brothers. But this summer, it became reality. As of September 2025, Mariah and the four children have made the transatlantic leap permanent, trading Milwaukee’s chilly, humid climate (where even July highs rarely top 26°C/79°F) for Athens’ Mediterranean warmth.
The kids’ integration is already underway. Five-year-old Liam and four-year-old Maverick kicked off the school year at Athens College, one of Greece’s most elite institutions, known for its rigorous bilingual curriculum and alumni like shipping magnates and politicians. It’s no accident; Giannis, ever the planner, chose it to give his sons “only the best” from their formative years. Two-year-old Eva and four-month-old Aria are settling into the family rhythm, with the household buzzing in a quiet neighborhood where passersby remain blissfully unaware of their famous residents.
This isn’t a trial run. Sources close to the family confirm it’s a multi-year commitment, with Giannis commuting between continents during the offseason and, presumably, holidays. The Bucks star returned to Milwaukee practice just days ago, but the separation marks uncharted territory for a man who’s thrived on stability.
## Why Now? Roots, Climate, and a Vision for the Future
So, what sparked this bold step? It’s a cocktail of personal, cultural, and practical factors. Foremost: Mariah’s preference. When Giannis polled her on Milwaukee versus Athens, she chose the Greek capital without hesitation, citing the vibrant community, milder weather, and cultural richness. “Greece suits us better,” insiders note, a sentiment echoed in Giannis’ own long-held dreams of returning home.
Giannis has been candid about his love for Athens. In a July 2025 interview, he declared, “I’m definitely thinking of coming to Greece permanently when I retire… Athens is my home.” His tears after captaining Greece to a bronze at EuroBasket 2025—the country’s first medal since 2009—spoke volumes about his emotional tether. The move aligns with his vision: exposing his kids to their heritage, fluent Greek lessons, and summers on sun-drenched islands, all while nurturing the AntetokounBros legacy through local philanthropy.
Practically, it’s savvy. With business ventures blooming in Greece (from real estate to the family’s academy), and rumors of a post-NBA stint with Filathlitikos—the club that launched him—rooting the family there streamlines logistics. Unlike LeBron James, whom he admires, Giannis has hinted he’s not chasing a 40-year-old career; he wants to peak now and pivot sooner, perhaps ending his playing days in the Hellenic League.
## The Ripple Effects: Emotional Turbulence, On-Court Fuel, and Long-Term Legacy
No sugarcoating it: this separation could test Giannis like never before. For the first time, he’ll lace up for Bucks games without his family’s courtside cheers or post-practice cuddles. “It will not be easy,” those in his circle admit, especially with a newborn at home. The 8-hour time difference and grueling travel—private jets notwithstanding—could amplify the isolation of NBA life, potentially stirring anxiety or homesickness. We’ve seen stars like Kevin Durant grapple with similar family strains; for Giannis, whose identity is so intertwined with family, it might manifest as restless energy or, worse, distraction.
Yet, there’s profound upside. Psychologically, knowing his kids are immersed in their cultural bedrock could lighten his load, freeing mental bandwidth for the court. Imagine the motivation: every dunk a dedication to providing that “best” education, every assist a step toward a post-retirement life unmarred by regret. History shows fatherhood sharpens focus—post-Liam’s birth, Giannis averaged 29.5 points in the 2020-21 championship run. This move might supercharge that, turning transatlantic longing into unbreakable resolve.
On the family front, it’s a win for stability. Milwaukee’s transient NBA scene pales against Athens’ extended-family vibe, where Veronica can dote on grandkids and the brothers collaborate on ventures. For the children, it’s a bilingual, multicultural upbringing—Greek summers, American holidays—that mirrors Giannis’ own hybrid identity, fostering resilience they’ll need in a global world.
Career-wise, it signals maturity. At 30, with a supermax extension through 2028, Giannis is eyeing legacy beyond rings. Settling his family in Greece positions him as a bridge-builder: the immigrant kid who returns to uplift, not just extract. It could extend his prime by reducing burnout, and if whispers of an Athens NBA expansion hold water, who knows? The Greek Freak might one day headline a Euro league.
Of course, risks linger. If the Bucks falter or injuries mount (recall his 2023 knee scare), the pull of home might accelerate retirement talks. And logistically? Balancing Daddy duty with 82 games demands ninja-level scheduling.
## Closing the Circle: A Freakish Return to Roots
Giannis Antetokounmpo’s family move to Athens isn’t an ending—it’s a homecoming that closes the circle on a life story scripted in struggle and stardom. From Sepolia’s shadows to Milwaukee’s spotlight, he’s always chased wholeness: for himself, his brothers, his parents, and now his children. This decision, though laced with sacrifice, underscores his core value—family above all.
As the season tips off, watch for that extra gear in Giannis’ game. It might just be the fuel to chase another ring, knowing his little freaks are thriving where it all began. In a league of mercenaries, the Greek Freak remains gloriously grounded. And in doing so, he reminds us: true greatness isn’t measured in trophies alone, but in the homes we build across oceans.
Personally I think it will be a convenient excuse. When he fails again this year to achieve anything in the post season he will use his family as an excuse to justify playing in Europe with a Greek team. And all he has said over the years about loyalty to the Bucks and the place that has been home all these years will go out the window…
*Sources: Proto Thema English, New Greek TV, People Magazine, Greek Reporter, Hellenic Daily News.*
The AntetokounBros brand, spearheaded by the Antetokounmpo brothers—Giannis, Thanasis, Kostas, Alex, and Francis— has opened physical stores in Athens, Greece, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin, alongside an e-commerce platform. Despite the star power of Giannis Antetokounmpo, a two-time NBA MVP, and the brothers’ inspiring story, there are signs that the AntetokounBros stores may be facing challenges.
1. High Price Points and Perceived Value
One of the most frequently cited issues with AntetokounBros stores is the pricing of their merchandise. Customers have noted that the products, while high-quality and imported from Greece, come with price tags that are higher than average for similar streetwear or sports apparel. For example, reviews mention that the cost reflects the premium nature of the products, but this can deter budget-conscious consumers, especially in a competitive market where brands like Nike, Adidas, or even team-specific NBA merchandise offer comparable items at lower prices.
The AntetokounBros brand emphasizes its “Made in Greece” ethos, which supports local manufacturers and ensures quality. However, the added cost of producing in Greece, coupled with international shipping or import expenses for the Milwaukee store, likely contributes to the higher prices. For fans who associate the brand with the Antetokounmpo brothers’ inspiring journey, the premium pricing may feel justified, but for casual shoppers, the cost could be a barrier, limiting the brand’s mass-market appeal.
2. Limited Inventory and Product Availability
Another challenge is the occasional lack of inventory, which impacts the availability of specific sizes, styles, or popular items. Customer feedback highlights instances where desired products were out of stock, particularly in the Milwaukee store. This issue can frustrate shoppers, especially those who visit the physical stores expecting a full range of merchandise. Limited inventory may stem from supply chain constraints, given the brand’s commitment to producing in Greece, which could lead to delays or smaller batch productions compared to larger, globally sourced competitors.
In retail, stockouts can significantly harm customer satisfaction and loyalty. If fans visit the store—especially during high-traffic events like Bucks games or the grand opening—and find limited options, they may turn to alternative brands or the online NBA store, which offers a broader selection of Giannis-related merchandise.
3. Over-Reliance on Brand Ambassadors and Niche Appeal
The AntetokounBros brand is heavily tied to the personal story and fame of the Antetokounmpo brothers, particularly Giannis, a global basketball icon. While this connection drives initial interest, it may also limit the brand’s appeal to a niche audience—primarily Milwaukee Bucks fans, Giannis supporters, and those with ties to Greek culture. Unlike broader streetwear brands like Supreme or Off-White, which cultivate a universal urban aesthetic, AntetokounBros’ messaging around “brotherhood” and “Made in Greece” may not resonate with a wider demographic.
Additionally, the brand’s reliance on the brothers as ambassadors, while powerful, places pressure on their public image and availability. For instance, incidents like Giannis publicly addressing employee negligence at the Athens airport store in 2023 could negatively impact the brand’s reputation. Such moments, while rare, highlight the risks of a brand so closely tied to its founders’ personal conduct.
4. Operational and Management Challenges
Operational missteps have also surfaced as potential issues. A notable example is the 2023 incident at the Athens International Airport store, where Giannis found the store closed during operating hours due to employee negligence. His public frustration, captured on video, underscored potential weaknesses in store management and staff accountability. While this was an isolated event, it raises questions about the brand’s operational oversight, especially as it expands to multiple locations.
Managing physical retail stores requires robust systems for inventory, staffing, and customer service—areas where the AntetokounBros brand, still relatively new to the retail space, may lack experience. The brothers’ primary focus on their basketball careers and other ventures (e.g., investments in sports teams and philanthropy) might limit their ability to oversee day-to-day operations, leaving gaps that could affect store performance.
5. Intense Competition in the Streetwear and Sports Apparel Market
The streetwear and sports apparel market is fiercely competitive, with established giants like Nike, Under Armour, and Fanatics dominating the space. These brands benefit from economies of scale, extensive distribution networks, and partnerships with multiple athletes and teams. AntetokounBros, as a smaller, family-owned brand, faces an uphill battle to carve out a significant market share.
Moreover, Giannis’ partnership with Nike for his signature shoe line creates a complex dynamic. Fans looking for Giannis-branded merchandise may opt for his Nike Zoom Freak sneakers or Bucks jerseys, which are more widely available and often cheaper than AntetokounBros apparel. The brand’s focus on streetwear rather than performance gear may also limit its appeal to sports fans who prioritize function over fashion.
6. Location-Specific Challenges
The physical stores’ locations may contribute to their challenges. In Athens, the flagship store at Eleutherios Venizelos Airport and the Ermou Street location benefit from high foot traffic, but they cater to a mix of tourists and local fans, which may not guarantee consistent sales year-round. The Milwaukee store, located at The Trade Hotel in the Deer District, is strategically placed near Fiserv Forum, but its success relies heavily on game-day crowds and Bucks-related events. During the NBA off-season or periods with fewer events, foot traffic may decline, impacting sales.
Additionally, the Milwaukee store’s 1,400-square-foot space, while well-designed, may feel restrictive compared to larger retail experiences offered by competitors. Customers seeking a broader selection or a more immersive shopping environment might prefer online shopping or larger sports apparel retailers.
7. Scaling Challenges and Brand Expansion
The AntetokounBros brand has ambitious plans for growth, including the launch of a global e-commerce platform and potential future stores. However, rapid expansion can strain resources, especially for a brand still establishing its retail footing. The costs of opening and maintaining physical stores, combined with the investment in an e-commerce platform, may stretch the brand’s financial and operational capacity.
Furthermore, the brand’s commitment to producing in Greece, while admirable, could complicate scaling. Sourcing materials, managing production, and ensuring timely delivery across continents add layers of complexity compared to brands that rely on more flexible, global supply chains. If demand grows, the brand may struggle to keep up without compromising its core values or quality.
8. Customer Experience and Marketing
While customer reviews praise the Milwaukee store’s exceptional service and welcoming atmosphere, with staff like Nemo, Kayla, and Dimitrios earning high marks, the brand’s overall marketing strategy may need refinement. The AntetokounBros narrative—centered on family, legacy, and Greek heritage—is compelling, but it may not be effectively communicated to a broader audience. Social media presence, influencer partnerships, and targeted campaigns could help elevate the brand’s visibility beyond Bucks fans and Greek diaspora communities.
Additionally, the grand opening events, such as the one in Milwaukee in October 2023, generated significant buzz, with autograph signings and giveaways drawing crowds. However, sustaining that excitement requires ongoing engagement, such as exclusive product drops, collaborations, or community events. Without consistent marketing efforts, the stores risk fading into the background amidst larger competitors.
What about Nike? NBA.com? Bucks?
While the AntetokounBros stores have not been explicitly reported as failing, they face significant challenges that could hinder their long-term success. High prices, limited inventory, niche branding, operational hiccups, and intense competition all pose risks in a crowded retail landscape. The brand’s strengths—its authentic story, high-quality products, and connection to the Antetokounmpo brothers—provide a solid foundation, but addressing these challenges will be critical to ensuring sustainability.
They never made sense anyway. Nike, NBA official merchandise and the Bucks products are very popular and much closer to the zeitgeist of what a fan might want. These stores always seemed like more of a bloated ego project than a solid business.
Anyway you look at this shot chart it is truly pathetic:
Giannis missed open lay ups against a team that had nobody to guard him. He was playing on his own most of the time and still missed them. And what about this famous mid range? Even with no defence
he got nothing. Don’t even start me with the three points. Sure, you have to keep trying and an easy game like this may be a good opportunity but this is simply ludicrous.
Somehow everyone still treats him like the hero though!
His box score isn’t really much better. 50% field goal percentage, 0% from three and his usual terrible free throw shooting.
And people still chant MVP???? As usual he had the ball in his hand more than anyone despite not playing more minutes. This is terrible any way you slice it yet Bucks’ fans are ecstatic.
Giannis finished with 26 points, 12 rebounds, and 10 assists, shooting 9-of-18 from the field in 33 minutes. On the surface, those numbers scream dominance, but dig deeper, and the cracks show. His scoring output, while solid, was inefficient for a player of his caliber against a Hawks defense that ranks among the league’s worst, allowing 119.6 points per game. Going 9-for-18—barely over 50%—is underwhelming when you consider Giannis’s season field goal percentage hovers around 60.5%. Against a team struggling to stop anyone in the paint, he should’ve been feasting, not settling for a pedestrian 52.9% shooting night. He left points on the table, and for a Bucks squad aiming to assert dominance in the East, that’s a red flag.
Then there’s the rebounding. Τhe Bucks got crushed on the glass early, especially in the second quarter when Atlanta flipped a deficit into a lead with a 17-9 run fueled by second-chance opportunities. Giannis, with his size and athleticism, should’ve owned the boards against a Hawks frontcourt missing key pieces like Jalen Johnson and Clint Capela. Instead, he let Brook Lopez (13 rebounds) carry the load, which is fine for team ball but exposes a lack of assertiveness from the superstar in a game where Milwaukee’s interior presence should’ve been overwhelming.
The Bucks’ offense stalled late, tied at 121 with just over a minute left, and Giannis’s decision-making faltered. He had a dunk attempt blocked by Atlanta’s Garrison Gueye, leading to a Caris LeVert three that knotted the score. That’s not just a defensive miscue by the Hawks—it’s a failure by Giannis to finish strong or adjust to the help defense. A player of his experience should’ve either powered through or kicked it out to an open shooter like Damian Lillard (23 points) instead of forcing a play that got stuffed. The Bucks won thanks to clutch plays from Lopez and Lillard, not because Giannis took control when it mattered most.
Defensively, Giannis was solid but not suffocating. Trae Young dropped 28 points and 13 assists, carving up Milwaukee’s defense with ease at times. Giannis, often touted as a Defensive Player of the Year candidate, didn’t disrupt Young enough to throw Atlanta’s offense off track. The Hawks shot 48.9% from the field and stayed in the game far longer than they should’ve against a Bucks team with a top-tier defensive rating. Giannis’s presence in the paint deterred some drives, but his impact felt muted against a guard-heavy attack that he’s capable of shutting down when fully locked in.
Finally, the minutes restriction—capped at around 32-33 minutes due to a lingering calf strain—might explain some of this, but it doesn’t excuse it entirely. If Giannis is on the floor, he’s expected to dominate, not coast. The Bucks needed this win to stay sharp in a tight Eastern Conference race, and while they got it, Giannis’s performance was more workmanlike than transcendent. Against a depleted Hawks team on the second night of a back-to-back, this should’ve been a blowout, not a four-point squeaker. Giannis got the stat line, but he didn’t impose his will the way a two-time MVP should, leaving fans and analysts alike wondering why he didn’t bury Atlanta when he had the chance.
Khris Middleton and Giannis Antetokounmpo thrived together because their skills complemented each other perfectly on the court, creating a dynamic partnership that fueled the Milwaukee Bucks’ success. Middleton’s versatility as a scorer, particularly his ability to shoot from outside and handle the ball, paired seamlessly with Giannis’s dominance inside and relentless drives to the basket. While Giannis drew defensive attention with his physicality and playmaking, Middleton capitalized on the space created, knocking down jumpers or making smart plays in clutch moments. Their chemistry wasn’t just about stats—it was built on trust and Khris’ willingness to sacrifice for the team.
Over their 12 years together, they developed an intuitive understanding, often seen in how Giannis would find Middleton for open looks or how Middleton could steady the offense when Giannis faced heavy pressure. Middleton’s calm, methodical style balanced Giannis’s explosive energy, making them a tough duo to defend. Their bond grew from early battles for minutes into a partnership that delivered a championship in 2021, with Middleton’s 40-point Finals game showcasing how important he was for the team. (Giannis’ 50 point performance was secondary, the series had already been decided.) Injuries and time might’ve limited their peak, but their on-court fit was a big reason they clicked so well.
Let’s break down why Khris Middleton and Giannis Antetokounmpo worked so well together by digging deeper into their on-court synergy, individual skill sets, statistical impact, and the evolution of their partnership with the Milwaukee Bucks.
Complementary Skill Sets
Giannis is a force of nature—6’11”, with a freakish blend of speed, power, and length. His game thrives on attacking the rim, where he’s averaged double-digit free-throw attempts in multiple seasons (e.g., 10.3 per game in 2020-21) and consistently posted field-goal percentages above 55% by living in the paint. Defenses often collapse on him, especially in the half-court, using walls or double-teams to limit his drives. That’s where Middleton’s skill set becomes the perfect counterpunch.
Middleton, at 6’7”, is a polished wing with a smooth mid-range game and reliable three-point shooting (career 38.8% from deep). Unlike Giannis, whose outside shot has been a work in progress (29.2% career from three…and falling fast this season), Middleton excels at spacing the floor. Defenders can’t sag off him, which prevents them from clogging the lane entirely against Giannis. Middleton’s ability to score off the catch or create his own shot—averaging around 20 points per game in their prime years together—gave the Bucks a secondary option who could punish teams for overcommitting to Giannis. Think of games like Game 4 of the 2021 Finals: Middleton dropped 40 points, including 10 in the fourth, while Giannis still drew the defense’s focus.
What has changed since then? Well , the league now knows Giannis is a one trick pony and often just one determined defender can neutralize him when it counts. But Giannis is more of a ball hog than ever, more focused on stat padding and less of a team player than ever.
Pick-and-Roll and Off-Ball Dynamics
Their two-man game was lethal, especially in pick-and-roll or hand-off situations. Giannis often acted as the screener or roller, using his size and athleticism to either dive to the rim or pop out for a pass. Have you see just how badly he screens for Dame? It is a joke, Giannis is now measureably one of the worse screeners in the NBA.
Middleton’s ball-handling (averaging 4-5 assists per game in peak seasons) and decision-making let him exploit the chaos Giannis caused. If the defense switched, Middleton could isolate smaller guards with his post-up game (he’s sneaky good at this, with a 1.05 points-per-possession efficiency in the post per Synergy data from past seasons). If they doubled Giannis, Middleton relocated for open threes or attacked closeouts with his underrated first step. What has changed? Giannis simply can’t cause the same amount of chaos. Dame gets a last second terrible desperation pass most of the time.
Off the ball, Giannis’s gravity used to pull defenders inward, while Middleton’s movement kept offenses honest. Middleton wasn’t a standstill shooter—he’d cut, flare, or use off-ball screens to find gaps. Their 2020-21 title run showed this: Giannis’s usage rate hovered around 32%, yet Middleton’s true shooting percentage stayed above 57%, proving he thrived without needing the ball constantly.
Statistical Symbiosis
Lineup data backs up their impact. In the 2020-21 season, Bucks lineups with both Giannis and Middleton on the floor outscored opponents by 8.7 points per 100 possessions, per NBA.com stats. Their net rating together often topped the team’s overall mark, reflecting how they amplified each other. Middleton’s presence boosted Giannis’s assist numbers—Giannis averaged 5-6 assists in their best years, with many going to Middleton on kick-outs or dump-offs. Conversely, Giannis’s rim pressure inflated Middleton’s effective field-goal percentage, as he feasted on cleaner looks.
Clutch Chemistry
In high-stakes moments, their trust shone brightest. Middleton’s ice-cold demeanor paired with Giannis’s ferocity gave Milwaukee a dual-threat late-game attack. Look at the 2021 playoffs: Middleton averaged 23.6 points on 43.8% shooting, stepping up when Giannis faced injury (like in the Nets series) or foul trouble. Middleton’s buzzer-beater in Game 1 vs. Miami, we all know he will deliver when it matters.
Evolution and Fit
Their partnership wasn’t instant. Middleton arrived in 2013 via trade from Detroit, a year before Giannis was drafted. Early on, they competed for touches under Jason Kidd, with Middleton as the steadier scorer and Giannis the raw prospect. As Giannis blossomed into an MVP (2019, 2020), Middleton adapted, ceding the spotlight while refining his role as the Robin to Giannis’s Batman. Coach Mike Budenholzer’s system—emphasizing pace, space, and Giannis as a point-forward—unlocked their potential. Middleton’s willingness to play off Giannis, rather than demand equal usage, cemented their fit.
But this is not a Doc Rivers mistake. He is doing the best he can with Giannis and carefully studied the way the Greek national team coach – Spanoullis- used him in the Olympics for ideas. He tries to keep Giannis out in the fourth quarter as much as possible. But you can’t teach a low IQ player like Giannis new tricks.
Intangibles
Beyond stats, their personalities meshed. Giannis’s relentless drive paired with Middleton’s quiet confidence created a yin-yang dynamic. They shared a work ethic—Middleton grinding from a second-round pick to All-Star, Giannis from a skinny unknown to MVP—and a team-first mindset. Post-game interviews often showed mutual respect, like Giannis calling Middleton “the head of the snake” after big nights. That bond held through injuries (Middleton’s knee issues, Giannis’s ankle scares) and carried them to the 2021 title.
In short, Khris played so well with Giannis because their games were puzzle pieces—Middleton’s finesse filled the gaps in Giannis’s brute-force style, and their trust turned individual brilliance into a championship formula. But Giannis changed. As it became apparent that the ring winning was a fluke he became poisoned by his own hype machine. The MVP chants in the Bucks’ arena went to his head. He truly believed he was the only one carrying the team even though in fact, he is the reason they lose.
To make it worse the fans turned on Khris, only increasing the pressure. Placing more emphasis on regular season games and only seeing Giannis points/rebounds/assists because that is what the Bucks’ marketing team kept promoting. Giannis the superhero. And this is where it got them. A dead end.
Damian Lillard’s performance dipping when Giannis Antetokounmpo is on the floor isn’t a straightforward “he’s worse” situation—it’s more about fit, usage, and how their games mesh (or don’t) on the Milwaukee Bucks as of February 26, 2025. Lillard joined the Bucks in 2023 to pair with Giannis, forming a superstar duo. Yeah, remember Giannis shouting about “winning it the right way” and not wanting to be part of a superteam? Well the on-court results have shown some serious lack of basketball IQ on Giannis’ part. Let’s break down why Lillard’s numbers and impact tend to take a hit when sharing the court with Giannis, based on stats, playstyle clashes, and team context.
We all know that Dame was Giannis’ choice. As was losing Jrue. As was trading Khris. So let’s take a closer look at the first of these three wrong decisions.
First, look at the numbers this season. Lillard’s averaging 25.8 points, 7.2 assists, and 4.5 rebounds overall, with a 42.9% field goal percentage and 35.8% from three. But in lineups with Giannis, his scoring drops slightly—per NBA advanced stats, Lillard’s usage rate falls from 31.2% when Giannis is off to around 27% when they’re together. Giannis, a ball-dominant force (32.7 points, 11.7 rebounds, 6.2 assists), commands the offense with a 33.8% usage rate. Both thrive with the ball in their hands—Lillard as a pick-and-roll maestro, Giannis as a freight train in transition and the paint. (And I am not using the term “freight train” in a positive way here. He misses way too many at the rim, waaay too many free throws and he ruins the flow by playing like that. )
When they share the floor, Lillard often cedes primary creation duties, shifting to more off-ball roles like spot-up shooting, which isn’t his natural strength. Let’s re think that, eh? The experienced ball handler cedes to the forward that leads in travelling and other violations…
Their playstyles amplify this. Lillard’s elite skill is his deep-range shooting and ability to break down defenses in isolation or pick-and-roll sets—he’s historically taken 30+ footers and orchestrated late-game possessions. Giannis, meanwhile, clogs the paint and excels driving downhill, but his lack of a reliable jumper (20% from three this year) lets defenses sag off him, shrinking the floor. Opponents build a “wall” against Giannis, packing the lane, which can cramp Lillard’s driving lanes and force him into contested mid-range shots or kickouts. Cleaning the Glass data shows the Bucks’ offensive rating drops to 114.2 with both on, compared to 117.8 with Lillard alone—suggesting less efficiency together.
Spacing is a big culprit. Giannis’s presence draws double-teams inside, but without consistent outside shooting from him, defenses don’t respect the Bucks’ perimeter as much. Lillard’s three-point attempts per game are down to 8.2 this season from 10.5 in his last Portland year, and his catch-and-shoot opportunities haven’t fully clicked—his effective field goal percentage on threes dips from 58% solo to 54% with Giannis, per Second Spectrum tracking. Milwaukee’s supporting cast (like Brook Lopez or Khris Middleton) helps, but the lack of synergy between the stars leaves Lillard less room to operate his preferred game.
Defensively, it’s not a huge factor, but it’s worth noting. Lillard, at 6’2” and 34 years old, isn’t a lockdown guy—he’s targeted in switches, averaging 0.7 steals but often a step slow. Pairing them means opponents attack Lillard, pulling Giannis into help situations that can disrupt their rhythm. This doesn’t directly make Lillard “worse” offensively, but it tires him out, potentially sapping his scoring punch.
Then there’s the adjustment factor. In Portland, Lillard was the unquestioned alpha, running 35-40 minutes of heliocentric offense. With Giannis, he’s adapting to a co-star role under coach Doc Rivers, who leans heavily on Giannis’s physicality. It is hard not to emphasize the hole that the Bucks have dug themselves into by promoting Giannis as the ultimate MVP player all the time. The pressure on Dame is unfair and constant from day one.
Lillard’s assist numbers creep up with Giannis (7.5 vs. 6.8 without), showing he’s facilitating more, but his scoring efficiency takes a hit—true shooting percentage drops from 60.1% solo to 57.8% together. He’s less comfortable deferring or playing second fiddle, especially when Giannis’s freight-train drives don’t always set up Lillard’s preferred catch-and-shoot looks. All too often Giannis simply gets caught up in traffic and makes a bad desperation pass with no clock left and every opponent 100% certain that Dame has to take that shot.
Contrast this with Giannis’s prior pairing with Khris Middleton, a better spacer (38.5% from three this year) who complemented Giannis by stretching defenses without needing the ball as much. Lillard’s ball-dominant style overlaps with Giannis’s, and neither is a natural off-ball mover like a Steph Curry. Fans often point this out—some argue Lillard looks “lost” or “disengaged” when Giannis dominates, a sentiment echoed in games like their February 25 loss to Houston, where Lillard shot 5-for-14 with Giannis on.
It’s not that Lillard’s inherently worse with Giannis—it’s that their strengths haven’t fully synced. Lillard’s at his best creating in space; Giannis consumes space. Until the Bucks tweak their scheme—more stagger minutes, better spacing lineups, or Lillard embracing off-ball movement—the numbers and eye test suggest he’s less effective in this tandem than he could be alone.
For me the biggest problem is how everyone treats Dame. As if Giannis is too sacred to criticise. It is always Dame’s fault if the Bucks lose. This is inaccurate and unfair. Dame has regretted being traded for sure as he is wasting his last good years on a team that clearly cannot work with a Giannis who lacks the IQ to change.
Giannis Antetokounmpo is one of the NBA’s most well known and loved players, but he’s had too many moments in big games where mistakes impacted the Milwaukee Bucks’ chances of winning. Pinpointing specific errors that definitively “cost” a game can be tricky—basketball is a team sport, and outcomes often hinge on collective performance—but there are notable instances in crucial matchups where Giannis’s decisions or miscues played a significant role in a Bucks loss. I did a different blog post with the stats (check it out here) but I thought I should remind you all of some stand out dumb plays which are characteristic.
Tonight was a characteristic example. With the Bucks down 104-103 and 30 seconds left, Giannis fouled Alperen Sengun in the backcourt—an unnecessary play given the situation. Sengun made both free throws, pushing the lead to three, and Houston held on to win 106-103. Giannis had 34 points and 14 rebounds, but that low-IQ foul shifted the game’s outcome, as the Bucks couldn’t recover. It was a pivotal mistake, reflecting fan frustration with his decision-making in crunch time. Because he does it all the time.
One glaring example comes from the 2023 playoffs, Game 5 of the Eastern Conference First Round against the Miami Heat. The Bucks, up 3-1 in the series, lost 128-126 in overtime at home, getting eliminated by the 8th-seeded Heat. Giannis struggled at the free-throw line, going 10-for-23 for the game. In the clutch, with the Bucks down by two in the final seconds of regulation, he missed two free throws that could have tied it up. Miami’s Jimmy Butler then forced OT with a buzzer-beater. Giannis finished with 38 points and 20 rebounds, but those misses—especially given his season-long 64.5% free-throw shooting—shifted momentum and left the Bucks vulnerable. The Heat sealed the upset, and Giannis’s free-throw woes were a key talking point.
Another instance is from the 2020 Eastern Conference Semifinals, Game 4 against the Heat. The Bucks were down 2-1 in the series, and this game was pivotal to avoid a 3-1 hole. Late in the fourth quarter, with the score tight, Giannis committed an offensive foul by charging into a defender while driving to the basket. He finished with 19 points before exiting early due to an ankle injury, but that foul—his fifth—sapped Milwaukee’s momentum at a critical juncture. The Heat won 115-104, taking a commanding series lead. Miami’s defensive scheme, often called the “wall,” baited Giannis into physical drives, and his decision to barrel through rather than pass or pull up was a costly misjudgment. The Bucks lost the series in five.
In the 2019 Eastern Conference Finals, Game 4 versus the Toronto Raptors, Giannis’s play contributed to a turning point in the series. Milwaukee led 2-1, but Toronto stormed back to win 120-102. Giannis scored 12 points on 5-for-16 shooting and fouled out with over seven minutes left after picking up his sixth foul on a questionable defensive reach. His absence down the stretch let Toronto pull away. He also turned the ball over seven times, including sloppy passes under pressure from Kawhi Leonard and the Raptors’ swarming defense. The Bucks dropped the next two games, and the series slipped away. Giannis’s inability to stay disciplined and on the floor was a factor in squandering their lead.
Finally, in the 2021 NBA Finals, Game 5 against the Phoenix Suns—while the Bucks ultimately won the title—Giannis nearly cost them a crucial win. Up 3-1 in the series, Milwaukee led 108-107 with under a minute left. Giannis, guarding Devin Booker, overcommitted on a pump fake, fouling Booker and sending him to the line. Booker made both free throws, giving Phoenix a 109-108 lead. Giannis redeemed himself with a block on Deandre Ayton seconds later, preserving a 123-119 victory, but that defensive lapse could’ve swung the game and the series momentum. It’s a rare Finals example where his error didn’t fully cost them, but it teetered on the edge.
These moments—free-throw misses, offensive fouls, turnovers, and poor defensive decisions—showcase recurring themes in Giannis’s game: occasional recklessness driving to the rim, struggles with free throws in clutch spots, and lapses in discipline under pressure. Context matters—teammate injuries, coaching decisions, and opponents’ brilliance (like Butler’s 2023 heroics)—also shaped these outcomes. Most Bucks’ fans use them to excuse Giannis. But in these high-stakes games, Giannis’s miscues were the real difference-makers.
Everyone acts as if he is improving. He isn’t. If anything the difference between what Giannis thinks he can do and reality now has an even bigger gap. Doc Rivers knows and tries to keep him out. But he still finds a way to mess up high pressure games.
Here is his box score
Yeah, as usual. Basically only stat padding defensive rebounds. As usual the wasted 3 point attempt. And particularly bad shooting.
Grok3 has an interesting and very valid summary of stuff I have been writing about elsewhere regarding Giannis in the playoffs:
“Limited Outside Shooting: Giannis isn’t a consistent threat from beyond the arc. His three-point shooting has improved over the years, but it’s still not elite (career 28.6% as of the 2023-24 season). Defenses often sag off him, daring him to shoot from deep.
Free-Throw Struggles: His free-throw percentage hovers around 70% (career 70.2% through 2023-24), which is decent but not great for a star player. In high-pressure situations, like the playoffs, this can be a liability—teams may exploit it with intentional fouls.
Reliance on Physicality: Giannis thrives on his size, strength, and athleticism to dominate drives and finishes at the rim. If he faces physical defenses or loses a step as he ages, his effectiveness could dip unless he diversifies his game further.
Playmaking Limitations: While he’s a solid passer for a big man (career 5.0 assists per game), he’s not a primary ball-handler or elite playmaker like LeBron James or Nikola Jokić. His assist numbers often come from straightforward reads rather than complex orchestration.
Post Game Needs Refinement: Despite his size (6’11”), Giannis doesn’t have a polished low-post game with a variety of moves. He relies more on power and quickness than finesse or footwork in the paint.
Defensive Versatility Has Limits: He’s an elite defender—capable of guarding 1 through 5 in spurts and a former Defensive Player of the Year (2019-20)—but he’s not always lockdown against smaller, quicker guards or sharpshooting wings due to his size.
Predictable Drives: Giannis often attacks the basket with a head-down, euro-step-heavy style. Savvy defenses (e.g., the “Wall” strategy used by the Raptors in 2019) can clog the paint and force him to kick out or take tougher shots.
Injury Concerns: His aggressive, physical style has led to occasional injuries, like knee and ankle issues. While he’s generally durable, his long-term health could be a question as he enters his 30s (he turned 30 in December 2024).”
It is interesting how Grok also takes issue with a matter most choose to disregard when evaluating Giannis. And that is his massive performance drop off in high pressure situations. Here is what Grok says:
“Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playoff performance has been a mixed bag, and it’s a hot topic among fans and analysts. While he’s undeniably a regular-season juggernaut—two MVPs and a Defensive Player of the Year award—his postseason play has drawn criticism for not always matching that dominance. Let’s break it down based on how he’s performed and the recurring knocks against him in the playoffs.
One big critique is his efficiency—or lack thereof—when the stakes get higher. Take the 2022 Eastern Conference Semifinals against the Celtics: Giannis put up monster stats (33.9 points, 14.7 rebounds, 7.1 assists per game), but his shooting splits were rough—49.1% from the field and 67.9% from the free-throw line. He became the first player to notch 200 points, 100 rebounds, and 50 assists in a single series, yet the Bucks lost in seven games. Critics point to his 45.7% field goal percentage in that series (down from his regular-season norm) and argue he was more of a volume scorer than an efficient one, especially with Khris Middleton sidelined.
Then there’s the free-throw issue. Giannis has never been a sharpshooter from the line, and it’s bitten him in the playoffs. In the 2023 first-round upset against the Heat, he shot 15-for-23 (65.2%) in the two games he played before a back injury knocked him out. Miami exploited this, and the Bucks crashed out as the No. 1 seed. His career playoff free-throw percentage sits at 66.2% (through 2023-24), compared to 70.2% in the regular season—small drop, big moments.
His style of play also gets exposed when teams build a “wall” to stop his drives. The 2019 Raptors famously used this tactic in the Eastern Conference Finals, holding Giannis to 41.5% shooting and 12.3 points per game in the final four games (all losses after a 2-0 lead). Similarly, the Heat in 2020 limited his impact, and Miami took that series 4-1. Defenses collapse on him, and without a reliable jumper—he’s at 27.6% from three in the playoffs career-wise—he can struggle to create space or punish teams from outside.
Injuries have also played a role, though not entirely his fault. He missed most of the 2023 Heat series with a bruised back and sat out the entire 2024 first-round loss to the Pacers with a calf strain. The Bucks went 0-5 in playoff games he’s played since May 11, 2022 (Game 5 vs. Boston), fueling the narrative that he’s faltering when it counts. Without him, Milwaukee actually won 3 of 8 in those stretches, which raises questions about team construction as much as his play.
So, does he play “badly” in the playoffs? When he’s off, it’s magnified—shooting dips, turnovers spike (4.0 per game career playoff average), and teams dare him to beat them from deep or the line. “
After more than a decade in the NBA, the AI makes valid points. Giannis once reached the ring and failed terribly every other year.
Is Giannis requesting a trade? Will he be goat? Will he win another ring? This is what people are asking Google. But then they also seem to very often ask “is Giannis injured” and “will he be playing tonight?”
The Warriors have often been suggested as a potential trade target for Giannis. This reflects in Google searches. But not in reality.
People love to play the “what if” game, imagining some sort of ultra team which would include their favorite players. Here is why Giannis will stay with the Warriors forever though:
He has said so many times. This is the weakest of arguments. He may well be saying one thing officially but simultaneously allowing rumours to spread.
He has made a big thing in the past about not joining ‘superteams’. Again he has backpedalled on this one, getting Lillard for starters. So doesn’t seem very valid.
The Bucks have no incentive to make a trade. Why on earth would they ever allow it? So essentially he would have to ask for it. After all he has said about loving it there and the people and the city etc. Again, this is possible.
So the commonly used reasons are weak. Here are the more realistic problems with Giannis going to another NBA team:
4. He would have to pick a championship contender. Which current championship contender would even be able to combine Giannis in their roster though? Nobody! Here are the current bookie favourites for 2024-25 NBA Championship Odds:
5. Giannis can’t play that kind of ball! Celtics, Thunder, Cavaliers, Nuggets rely on fast moving, extremely technical tactical basketball. Giannis knows one kind of game, the one where he brings the ball down and tries to dunk. They don’t need that, they don’t want that, he could not possibly fit with any of those teams. He lacks the speed of thought and the ability to understand advanced plays and basketball systems.
6. Other teams would have to trade everything to get him. If the Knicks wanted him for example, they would essentially swap their existing super stars to get him. So the Bucks would become like the Knicks (currently 3d in the East) and the Knicks would be…well nothing. At best 5th in the East like the Bucks are now. So what is the point?
7. The way Giannis has been promoted these past years has greatly reduced the trade value of all other players on the Bucks. Even Dame would likely not get much anymore because everyone was too busy blaming him since he came to the Bucks. So forget any interesting joint trade package. The Bucks have no chips to sit at the table with.
8. Giannis is a seriously limited player, incompatible with the way the game is now played. He is one of the worse ball screeners, he doesn’t understand angles, he has the worse 3point shot in the history of the NBA, his free throws are getting worse, he is terrible in clutch situations. In essence a dinosaur. Don’t be fooled by the stat padding, the truth appears in the playoffs and harder matchups. He suddenly has no mid range and looks lost if his one trick pony approach doesn’t work.
9. He seems to like the narrative of being a sole hero on a useless team. So why not continue? Everyone at the Bucks will treat him like a gracious hero and loyal player. He can pretend it was his choice to stay. He can smash various franchise records with the help of a team designed around him.
10. He has an easy and obvious out. Returning to Greece to play with one of the Euroleague contenders. By then he can claim some old injury if he fails there too. But again he will be treated like a returning here in Greece.
So rejoice Bucks fans! Looks like Giannis will stay in Milwaukee for a long time yet!
Why not both? Well, of course someone can feel as if he belongs to multiple countries. No reason not to. And Giannis has multiple influences due to his amazing life story. But let’s hear it from him:
A great interview indeed. “A lot of people think my mom or my dad are from Greece, but no. Both of my parents are black. Both of my parents are Nigerian.”
“I grew up in a Nigerian home,” Antetokounmpo said. “Obviously, I was born in Greece and went to school in Greece. But at the end of the day when I go home, there is no Greek culture. It’s straight-up Nigerian culture. It’s about discipline, it’s about respecting your elders, having morals.”
Well that is pretty clear. In fact he throws shade on Greeks as people that don’t respect their elders and don’t have morals.
It was clear that the NBA wanted to promote into Africa using Giannis and other players.
But it didn’t work out and they retracted that whole effort. Africa is too focused on soccer. It just didn’t work. So Giannis redirected to Greece which was easier. Win win, sponsorship in both countries gallore!
Giannis confusion and lack of clarity is best described by the way he closes the interview: “There were a lot of times when I was in Greece where people said, ‘You’re not Greek. You’re Nigerian because you’re black.’ But then there have been a lot of times where it’s been the opposite, where people say, ‘You’re not African. You’re Greek. You’re ‘The Greek Freak.’ ’ But I don’t really care about that. Deep down, I know who I am and where I am from. That’s all that matters to me.”
Does it matter what Giannis feels like he is? Unless you are a racist, not really. But it does seem a bit hypocritical when he lays on the emotion for all three of his countries. Because now he is also American. That’s where he lives, that’s were he makes his money, that’s where he married and had kids.
“This is my home” and “this is my city”, right in the US of A. Again and again. A Greek politician wrote an interesting article on this topic that is worth reading in whole:
“IS GIANNIS GREEK?
The term “Greek-American”, I suppose we all know . I also assume we understand what it means: someone who is originally from Greece and lives in America. The term does not specify whether he or she was born in Greece or descended from parents, grandparents or great-grandparents who are Greek. It does not specify whether he or she speaks good Greek, goes to church every Sunday, visits Greece often, or owns property here. He does not specify where his ancestors lived in 1500 AD, 500 AD or 500 BC. He does not specify if all his ancestors were Greek or if there was a grandmother who was English, German, Irish. So, without defining the factors that shape ethnic identity, we can’t determine the percentage of Greek and American that make up John Pappas’ personality, can we? There is the 5th generation Greek-American who doesn’t even know where Greece is on the map, there is the Greek-American who left to the US to study, stayed and married there, comes back at least once a year, and keeps dreaming of returning. If the former is 5% Greek and 95% American, the latter is the reverse.
So, someone who was born to Nigerian parents in Greece and grew up, went to school, made his bones here and now has a career in America is both Nigerian to some extent, Greek to some extent, and American to some extent. At the same time. The ratio depends on many objective factors. If Giannis puts down roots in America, after 40 years “American” will greatly increase his percentages compared to “Greek” and “Nigerian”, does anyone disagree? But it also depends on a subjective: how he feels. And Giannis has told us how he feels: A Greek of Nigerian descent. Makes sense, doesn’t it? Could it be something else?
And because he has Greek nationality, he plays for the Greek national team and represents us like Mirella Maniani, Kachi Kahiasvili or Artiom Kuregian used to represent us, none of whom are natives of our country. Do we mind? I don’t mind at all. In a world without barriers, blood is stirring. George Papandreou has 37.5% Greek blood (25% from his grandfather and 12.5% from his Polish great-grandfather’s wife). But that didn’t stop him from becoming prime minister. So I can’t understand either those who launch fireworks like “Giannis is much more Greek than some people who…” or the others, on the opposite side, who resent him for wearing the national team jersey being the presumably best player in the world. And because many of them are also divine, I remind them that St. Moses, whose memory the Orthodox Church commemorates on August 28, is called “the Ethiopian” and was a currant, blacker than John. If God accepted him into the bosom of holiness (he was even a thief before he repented), why don’t you, my god, accept John into the bosom of Greek basketball?
I remember many darker players, who were cheered by the nation when they led the Greek teams and the National Team to distinctions: from the late Roy Tarpley, who had given Aris the European Cup in 1993, to Sophocles Schorsianitis, who is also blacker than Giannis. Not to mention many other legendary names of the Greek courts, basketball and football, who had no trace of Greek blood in their veins. In all the great Greek basketball teams, foreigners outnumber Greeks, but we don’t mind if they represent Piraeus, the Athens Trifylli, Thessaloniki, the Union of Constantinople. And even with annual contracts – today I am, tomorrow I am not – without speaking Greek. So if it is convincing for them to feel honoured, as Marcelo said (in English), wearing the red (green, yellow, etc.) jersey, why does it seem unconvincing that Giannis feels the same honour with the national team jersey?
There is, of course, a difference. The other players came to the country legally, not by crossing the border, as Giannis’ family did. This difference leads some to the bulletproof conclusion that those who are proud (I’m one of them) of Giannis striding half the court in three steps before he nails it are also pro-illegal immigration (I’m not one of them). Adding to the misunderstanding is the fact that the “solidarity” side uses a stupid argument: if Giannis hadn’t come to Greece, his talent would not have been showcased. So, we should let the Afro-Asian militias come in, in case some great basketball or even curling talent emerges, who knows! The reasoning is of similar wisdom to “if it hadn’t been for the Asia Minor Catastrophe, your grandfather wouldn’t have come from Ayvali, he wouldn’t have known your grandmother from Faliro, so you wouldn’t have existed.” Does that mean you owe a debt of gratitude to Kemal? Do you know how much talent is now lost somewhere in the depths of Africa?
Must all of Africa migrate to Sepolia to become known for their talents? However, we know very well how much Greek talent is leaving a country that has become a dystopian nightmare, and because of illegal immigration. If I had to weigh up the sporting, scientific, artistic, etc. talents that emerged from the mass invasion on the one hand, and the transformation of my country into a multicultural mob and Athens into Islamabad on the other, I would a thousand times rather we lost those talents, and Giannis included, and regained the Greece we had in the 1960s. Look at Omonia, Panepistimiou and Patision in movies of the era and do the comparison.
But because time does not turn back, John is a good case study. His family didn’t come to avoid war, but to find a better fortune. They tried to survive by working. Yes, by trafficking, but not by crime. They gave their four children, born here, Greek names. Yes, and Nigerian so as not to be cut off from their roots, but Greek prevailed. As Giannis he is known around the world, not as Sina Ugo. Greek Freak is his nickname, not Greek-Nigerian. That means assimilation. He didn’t go to the KNE to join the whole world’s infernos, he went to the Philathlete. He chose instead of walking up and down the Stadium protesting, he ran up and down the floor declaring – both in words and deeds – that he will try hard to escape his “fate”.
He was baptized an Orthodox Christian along with his brother Alexander, a significant Greek date: October 28 (in 2012, when he was 17 years old). The parish priest of St. Meletius was his mentor. “I don’t remember him ever complaining or feeling hurt by life and being aggressive towards society,” says the (highly regarded) Fr. Evangelos Ganas, and adds: “What I can’t forget was the look in John’s eyes. There was an innocence and a hope. There was no fear and resentment.” Certainly, a much more Christian attitude than that of the knife-wielding guardian, who, when, in his first matches with the national team, Giannis was trying to find his role, was rejoicing, along with his dark-skinned, African-faced protégé, that the national team lost but the “Nigerian” did not score a point, concluding from this that… God is Greek (and, of course, white), and apparently punished us for putting black on the team, so we lost. (I guess he saved it for us in the game against Germany, too.)
Giannis kisses the national flag, waves the Greek flag and refuses to… stain it with his signature, when his Greek-American fans ask him to do so, while some natives claim the right to burn it. He participates in films with social messages, offering his gold-plated image for free. He has charitable social work that keeps him away from the cameras. If that doesn’t show loyalty and devotion to Greece and its values, what does? So, the path of this child proves that there are, among the bereaved, those who can integrate, want to integrate and, in doing so, benefit both our society and themselves. And it makes the need to separate the wheat from the chaff even more urgent.
I don’t want to be misunderstood: for those who have already come! Our borders (and incentives) must be closed tightly for any new invaders, even if we lose new talent. I won’t mention how here, I’ve written dozens of articles on the subject, but I’ll emphasize once again that those who want to integrate show it early and in the details.
These details will determine whether they will be naturalized as Greek citizens (i.e. obedient). Because for every Yannis who wants to be Greek, there are thousands of Ahmed and Mohamad who don’t. When you give citizenship, without any criteria, to Afro-Asians, 99% Muslims, with the only condition that they have lived 4-5 years or have been born in Europe, at some point, the whole of Europe will become an Islamic caliphate, through democratic procedures. So, rightly, John did not get Greek citizenship when he was a child, even though he was born here. The same should apply to all immigrants. The concept of citizenship should also be legally separated from nationality, with the main difference being the right to vote. (Other differences could be the degree of access to social and welfare programs and to health care benefits.)
An immigrant, even if he becomes a European citizen, will not vote and, of course, will not be elected. This right will be granted, from the second generation onwards, if certain criteria are met. If they are not met, not even for great-grandchildren! Why should the 3rd descendant of a Pakistani family living in an Islamic ghetto get the right to vote, the same or worse than his grandparents? European experience (and relevant research) proves that 2nd and 3rd generation Muslim immigrants are twice as likely to be more bigoted and live more marginalized lives than the 1st generation. Why should they vote? To send Islamic parties and crypto-jihadist MPs to European parliaments?
John’s family was not Muslim. His mother dressed fashionably, she wanted to look European. She left her children free, to be kneaded into the society of their new homeland. They made Greek friends and had relationships with Greek women. They made these multi-racial but ONLY-POLITICAL couples, who I said I was happy to see living as Greeks, in a speech I gave – about the danger of Islamism – and I was attacked by the whole cesspool of uneducated patriots. Yannis’ brother Kostas is preparing, I hear, to marry one of “our” girls. Good crowns! Why not rejoice in the joy of people who loved not only Greece but also its culture, our way of life and want to live like us, here? Because their skin is dark? A little darker than Skourletis’, are we going to make an issue of it?
But there is another parameter, which I have to touch on and I leave it last: the percentage of foreign elements that are assimilated. A society has a limit of resistance to the incorporation of foreign elements. If it exceeds it, it loses its cohesion and its identity. I would not want the country to be flooded with Nigerians, even if they all had John’s intentions and good nature. Nor by Monegasques. A society with Greeks, with all its vices, is a recognizable and largely predictable society, and that gives you security. It’s your home, where you know its “houja”. Like when the ceiling is dripping and you know where to put the plastic bowl if it rains heavily. Being around strangers is intimidatingly unpredictable. And that limit of endurance has long since been exceeded.
That is why we are happy every time John “shoots” the opposing basket, but we are deeply concerned about the spike in crime caused by those who did not choose his path. We protest that they are not being deported and we regret that John has left the country, voluntarily. He too is a Greek boy (of Nigerian origin, at least) who had to emigrate to live his dream. Because the Greek taxpayer also paid for his own development, education and health, but now this investment is paying off in another economy. Just like the huge investment lost due to the brain drain. How many of the 300,000 or so young Greeks who “score” in technology and science in other countries will return to Greece at a productive age and how many will become the new generations of Greek-Americans, Greek-Australians, Greek-Canadians, etc. permanent residents abroad?
So Giannis declares himself to be Greek. But, we all know, that every year he will become more American. That is, less Greek. Like the 300,000 Greek refugees of the crisis. Therein lies the problem.”
For anyone that lasted reading all that but, more importantly, for those seeing how Giannis promotes himself, the conclusion is clear: Giannis is like the wind. He will say whatever it takes depending on the situation. He will pretend to be emotional about being Greek one day. Hey they let him lead the Olympic team even though he hardly ever turns up for the national team during the year. “Milwaukee is home” the next minute. And he will wax lyrical about his Nigerian roots if the NBA tells him to or some sponsor there pays enough.
Many years from now it will be shared in business school as an obvious blunder of epic dimensions. A franchise in a ‘small market’ (untrue but that is how it is presented) wins a championship after many years thanks to an amazing MVP player that everyone loves. And then…. constant failure as they drove themselves into the ground for another half century.
But how?
The rise of the Bucks I have documented here. They carefully traded players that could play around Giannis’ many weaknesses. And they won the NBA finals! Dream rag to riches story both for Giannis and the Bucks franchise. And that’s when the mistakes started:
Overpromising. “Khris let’s run it back!” said an exuberant Giannis on winning the chip. Many players say this. It’s only natural when you are on top of the world. The problem is that they acted as if it would be easy. As if they deserved that championship. They didn’t.
Running it back. It quickly became apparent that the team was nowhere near the other contenders. But the Bucks didn’t change anything. Some players read the signs and had had enough of the Giannis’ bullshit. Everyone was annoyed by the way he hogged the spotlight. But the media knew, anyone that knows ball knew. Giannis only got 1 vote for 1st place in MVP the next year. It was over. We all knew he can’t do clutch. And it just got worse because…
Make it OK to blame everyone else. It’s either the coaching staff or the rest of the roster. And this is official, from the top, the Bucks’ marketing machine is promoting Giannis as the ultimate tool so indirectly answering the question “what is to blame for our failures?” with “well, must be something other than Giannis!”
Catch22 of killing trade value for the rest of the roster. The Bucks are so busy protecting their investment in Giannis that they don’t realize that they are effectively killing their potential for trades. The NBA is no longer about throwing money around to get players. It is only about what assets you have that others want. But when you are constantly using the narrative of Giannis being perfect and everyone else to blame? Beverley , George Hill, Donte DiVincenzo were practically worthless as trade assets by the time the Bucks gave them away.
Hiding Giannis in the playoffs with pretend injuries. It really doesn’t matter if he was genuinely injured or it was a ploy. The Bucks would have lost those series anyway. The fact of the matter is that they have hyped Giannis to overplay in the regular season by promoting his stats above everything and everyone else.
Giannis weaknesses become apparent to all. This year they tried to spread the myth of Giannis mid range shot. It isn’t true of course. The NBA has moved ahead, the game is played in a way which makes Giannis almost irrelevant in the playoffs. Running and dunking, bully ball in the paint, only works in regular season match ups where the opponents don’t want to risk injury. Players like Wemby have the complete package. Giannis saying “I won’t take 3s” in a league of 3s is simply stupid. Especially when he is shooting the worse of any player in NBA history.
So what will happen? These playoffs they will hope to get to the second round at least. Then they can pretend that
“with a few additions”
“with some changes to the coaching staff”
“with different tactics”
or some other equally hairbrained excuse for dumbies, they will have a better chance next year. Then the season will roll as always, with the Bucks killing themselves to be high in the rankings in the regular season and failing again abysmally in the playoffs. Eventually Giannis will demand a trade if he has run out of excuses or if they lose badly enough from the first round.
And it will be too late.
Even without the significant potential for injury with the way he plays, the league has moved ahead without him. It’s not just his lack of 3. Giannis’ biggest problem is that he is one of the worse screeners in the NBA, he simply doesn’t understand angles at all. He can’t play advanced systems or even understand them. He can’t switch fast enough. He trains in such a stupid way that he is getting worse at free throws even. And most of all he is a victim of his own myth. He actually believes he is one of the best players in the NBA even though he lacks connections to the other players in meaningful ways and most don’t want him on their teams.
So even if he changes team, Giannis will fail. Badly. Maybe a team that wants him to try hard in the regular season so they can rest their aging superstars for the playoffs. Will his ego allow him such a role? Can he handle being benched in the playoffs? In any case the Bucks will be without options, without a young core for the future and with a sad memory of what they think could have been.
Feel free to use this for your MBA reading material. Don’t forget to play sad violin music while you read.
*Giannis isn’t a fail story of course for himself personally, he is so rich that all this is almost irrelevant to him even if his career keeps on this downhill trajectory.
Looking at his defensive rating it is clear that Giannis has given up trying in defence since he won DPOY. Every year he gets worse. (Lower is better for defensive rating.)
Other than racking up the easy defensive rebounds when nobody else is around….nada. It becomes clear when we look at any defensive metric which is multi factorial, for example the top 10 this season in Stable Rebounds/75 1. Kevon Looney 2. Isaiah Hartenstein 3. Steven Adams 4. Jonas Valanciunas 5. Andre Drummond 6. Ivica Zubac 7. Karl-Anthony Towns 8. Domantas Sabonis 9. Donovan Clingan 10. Walker Kessler.
Up there on the top right are the kings of defence. Rim protectors who also score well in D-Lebron (an all inclusive defence metric.) Giannis is nowhere, less steals, less blocks, less offensive rebounds, less everything. Here are the top in defensive rating this season, a good mix of various positions:
The Top 10 in Post Defense as per basketball index:
Domantas Sabonis
Jakob Poeltl
Wendell Carter Jr.
Nikola Vucevic
Deandre Ayton
Georges Niang
Jusuf Nurkic
Clint Capela
Trayce Jackson-Davis
Victor Wembanyama
And here is rim protection in the effective defensive percentage in relation to rim contests. Giannis has stopped almost everything in order to stat pad this season.
Next time some idiot starts shouting “MVP” when Giannis does something cool, maybe rethink it. He is now missing so many games he is out of that competition for this season and probably out of the scoring lead too.
