Greek Freak Analyzed

Tag: team

  • Why Giannis didn’t top any Eurobasket25 stats

    Why Giannis didn’t top any Eurobasket25 stats

    Giannis Antetokounmpo averaged 32.0 minutes per game across the 7 games he played for Greece in EuroBasket 2025 but in fact only faced one serious opponent, Turkey, where he failed in a most spectacular way. He was extremely lucky and wise to sit out the game vs Nurkic where he would have lost anyway. But let’s look at other EuroBasket 25 stats.

    First of all Greece is still 8th in FIBA power rankings. Turkey went up a lot, Greece didn’t. Why? Because Greece clearly did not deserve a medal! If they had met any of the other teams above them in the rankings in a knock out stage (other perhaps than Spain and Lithuania) they would have lost. They were extremely lucky with the brackets and injuries of opponents.

    Top Scorers (Total Points) Luka Dončić – Slovenia 243

    Players with many less games are at the top of all categories in fact

    Giannis also had 3.7 turnovers per game and as usual was terrible from the free throw line.

    So how did he dominate the conversations? After all just one

    bronze medal after 11 years of trying is a pretty pathetic achievement for someone who says he is one of the best players in the world. Giannis really milked sensationalism. Whether discussing death threats (ludicrous, all famous people get them all the time but don’t make a fuss about it) or acting all emotional upon winning the bronze, Giannis has also been busy enjoying fake news about his charity work. An extremely popular viral “news item” on social media claimed he donated his entire “25 million signing on bonus” which of course is 100% untrue on every level.

    Giannis was also careful to pick when and how he played. He avoided Nurkic, knowing he would be obliterated if he played that game. He

    strategically showed up when he knew he could do his thing only. And the one time he needed to be “the

    best”, against the only decent team Greece faced, Turkey wiped him out completely easily. For those desperate to idolise him it was yet another minor misfortune (as it always is since 2021, every time he faces a more serious opponent) and they quickly focused on the win against Finland instead.

    Now to the NBA, same recipe. He will dominate his personal stats, lose to the better teams and make an early playoff exit. He will indirectly blame his roster as usual and then the summer party of trade talks. It is never Giannis’ fault. After all these years in the NBA and all these years with the Greek national team, no, it’s not his fault. It’s everyone and everything else always, eh?

  • Greece’s Bronze Medal at EuroBasket 2025 Feels Like a Lucky Escape

    Greece’s Bronze Medal at EuroBasket 2025 Feels Like a Lucky Escape

    Bracket Luck, Opponent Injuries, and Giannis’ Big-Game Blues

    As the confetti settled in Riga, Latvia, on September 14, 2025, Greece’s national basketball team stood on the podium, bronze medals gleaming around their necks. It was their first EuroBasket medal in 16 years, a triumphant return to Europe’s elite basketball stage since Vassilis Spanoulis led them to bronze in 2009. Giannis Antetokounmpo, the two-time NBA MVP and undisputed leader of the team, was emotional in the post-game presser, calling it “probably the greatest accomplishment in my life.” The 92-89 thriller over Finland in the bronze medal game capped a rollercoaster tournament for the Greeks, with Giannis dropping 30 points and snagging 17 rebounds to seal the deal. Fans back home erupted in celebration, and rightfully so—representing Greece on the international stage is no small feat.

    But let’s pump the brakes on the euphoria for a moment. While Greece’s run was inspiring, a closer look at the tournament reveals just how much luck factored into their podium finish. The bracket draw handed them a relatively soft path through the knockout stages, sparing them from several superior teams until it was too late. Opponent injuries provided additional breaks, weakening key rivals at crucial moments. And when they finally faced a genuine powerhouse in the semifinals—Turkey—the cracks in Greece’s armor showed, particularly with Giannis Antetokounmpo reverting to his all-too-familiar pattern of underperforming in high-stakes international games. Let’s face it: Greece was not the third best team of the tournament. Not even the 6th best team. They would have lost a knock out game against Serbia, France, Bosnia or other teams. They were just lucky they didn’t.

    (Greece in the FIBA power rankings, as the 8th best European team. We all know that)

    The Bracket Lottery: Dodging Bullets in the Knockout Draw

    EuroBasket 2025 featured 24 teams divided into four groups, with the top four from each advancing to a round of 16 in Riga. From there, it was single-elimination knockout basketball—no second chances. Greece, placed in Group C in Limassol, Cyprus, navigated the group stage with a mix of grit and Giannis magic. They stunned defending champions Spain in a key win, but also dropped a game to Bosnia and Herzegovina without their star due to knee discomfort. Finishing strong, they advanced to the knockout rounds, where the real luck kicked in.

    The round of 16 matchup was a gift: Greece drew Israel, a solid but far from elite squad that barely scraped out of Group D. Giannis exploded for 37 points in an 84-79 victory, but let’s be real—Israel isn’t the kind of opponent that tests a medal contender’s depth. They were the leftovers from a group that saw powerhouses like France and Slovenia advance with ease. Meanwhile, on the other side of the bracket, heavy hitters were duking it out early. Serbia, loaded with NBA talent like Nikola Jokić’s supporting cast, faced a tough Latvia in the round of 16. Finland, powered by Lauri Markkanen, took on a battle-hardened Georgia. And Germany, the eventual champions, cruised past weaker opposition but were primed for deeper clashes.

    Greece’s quarterfinal draw? Lithuania, a basketball-mad nation with a storied history, but one that was conveniently hobbled (more on that later). The Greeks pulled out an 87-76 win, with Giannis scoring 29 points and the team dominating fast breaks 20-4. Impressive, sure, but Lithuania wasn’t at full strength, and avoiding a semifinal showdown with the likes of Serbia or a full-powered France was a massive break. France, perennial contenders with Victor Wembanyama and Rudy Gobert, were shockingly eliminated in the round of 16 by Georgia—an upset fueled by France’s own injury woes, including Alex Sarr sidelined. Slovenia, led by Luka Dončić, bowed out early too, knocked out in a bracket that funneled the top seeds away from Greece’s path.

    The semifinal against Turkey was the first time Greece truly collided with a top-tier team, and it was a 94-68 blowout loss that exposed their limitations. Had the draw been less forgiving—say, a quarterfinal against Germany or a round of 16 rematch with a healthy Spain—Greece might not have sniffed the semifinals. The bracket’s geography worked in their favor: Their half featured Israel and a depleted Lithuania, while the other side absorbed the brunt of the tournament’s elite talent. Serbia fell to Finland in the quarters, and Germany methodically dismantled everyone in their way en route to gold. Greece essentially lucked into a path that maximized Giannis’ individual brilliance against lesser foes while minimizing team tests until the end.

    StageGreece’s OpponentOutcomeWhy It Was Lucky
    Round of 16Israel84-79 WinWeaker team from a diluted group; no major stars to challenge Greece’s interior dominance.
    QuarterfinalsLithuania87-76 WinHistoric powerhouse, but ravaged by injuries (see below); avoided full-strength Serbia or France.
    SemifinalsTurkey68-94 LossFirst elite matchup; bracket shielded them from earlier clashes with Germany or Finland.
    Bronze MedalFinland92-89 WinClose game against a strong but fatigued 4th-place team; revenge for potential earlier bracket pitfalls.

    This table highlights how Greece’s knockout run was cushioned by the draw. Without it, their bronze dream might have ended in the quarters.

    Lucky Breaks from Opponent Injuries: The Hidden Edge

    EuroBasket 2025 was dubbed “EuroInjuries” by some pundits, with a staggering number of stars sidelined across the tournament. Greece wasn’t immune—Giannis missed a group game with knee issues—but their opponents suffered even more, tilting key games in their favor.

    Start with the quarterfinals against Lithuania. The Balts entered the matchup missing Rokas Jokubaitis, their promising point guard, who suffered a serious knee injury early in the tournament and was ruled out for the rest. Margiris Normantas, another key backcourt option, twisted his ankle, further depleting their guard rotation. Lithuania’s offense, which relies on sharp ball movement and perimeter shooting, sputtered without these players, allowing Greece to control the pace and exploit mismatches inside. A full-strength Lithuania—potentially with Jokubaitis orchestrating alongside veterans like Jonas Valančiūnas—could have forced Giannis into more double-teams and disrupted Greece’s rhythm. Instead, the Greeks feasted on easy buckets, shooting 63% from two-point range.

    In the round of 16, Israel wasn’t decimated, but the broader injury wave hit teams that could have altered the bracket. For instance, if France (missing Alex Sarr and others) had advanced, they might have crossed paths with Greece later. Even in the bronze game, Finland was without some depth pieces, though Lauri Markkanen gutted it out. Markkanen’s Utah Jazz teammate Walker Kessler was limited by a minor tweak, reducing Finland’s rim protection in the clutch moments where Greece pulled away.

    The semifinals against Turkey offered a glimmer of hope for Greece via injuries: Veteran wing Cedi Osman, a key scorer for the Turks, was battling swelling in his leg and could barely put weight on it ahead of the game. Coach Ergin Ataman called it “alarming,” and Osman was limited to spot minutes. But Turkey’s depth, led by Alperen Şengün’s dominant 25-point, 12-rebound performance, overwhelmed Greece anyway. Still, without Osman’s full contribution, one wonders if the blowout would have been as lopsided—though it didn’t matter for Greece’s luck narrative, as it propelled them to the easier bronze matchup.

    These injuries weren’t isolated; the tournament saw Bogdan Bogdanović (Serbia) out with a hamstring pull, Johannes Voigtmann (Germany) sidelined, and more, creating chaos that indirectly benefited Greece by eliminating or weakening potential bracket foes. It’s basketball’s cruel reality: One tweak can swing a medal.

    The Turkey Wake-Up Call: Giannis, the Non-Factor in Crunch Time

    If the bracket and injuries were Greece’s luck charms, the semifinal against Turkey was the reality check—and it centered on Giannis Antetokounmpo. The “Greek Freak” had been a monster throughout the tournament, averaging over 25 points and double-digit rebounds, carrying Greece on his broad shoulders. But against a serious contender? He vanished.

    Turkey dismantled Greece 94-68, holding the two-time MVP to a tournament-low 12 points on 6-of-13 shooting. He grabbed 12 boards and dished 5 assists, but his plus/minus was a brutal -30, and he was visibly frustrated by constant double- and triple-teams. Ercan Osmani, Turkey’s defensive specialist, clamped down on him, forcing turnovers (Greece had four early) and limiting his drives. Şengün owned the paint, outdueling Giannis in a battle of bigs that highlighted Greece’s lack of secondary options.

    This isn’t new for Giannis in international play. He’s a playoff beast in the NBA, but FIBA games against top teams often see him neutralized—remember his muted Olympics performances or past EuroBaskets where defenses packed the lane and dared teammates to shoot? Against Turkey, Greece’s supporting cast (Thomas Walkup, Kostas Papanikolaou) couldn’t punish the help defense, leading to a 26-point drubbing. It took the easier bronze game for Giannis to rediscover his form, but the semifinal exposed that Greece’s success hinged on him feasting against inferior competition. If they’d faced Germany earlier—Dennis Schröder’s MVP squad that thrived on team basketball—Giannis might have been similarly stifled, ending their run prematurely.

    Celebrate, But Acknowledge the Luck

    Greece’s bronze is a proud moment, a testament to Spanoulis’ coaching and Giannis’ leadership. They overcame group-stage hiccups, including playing without their star, and delivered in the bronze thriller. But stripping away the hype, their path was greased by a favorable bracket that sidestepped powerhouses like a healthy France or Serbia until the semis. Opponent injuries, from Lithuania’s backcourt woes to Turkey’s Osman question mark, provided unearned edges. And when push came to shove against Turkey, Giannis’ big-game international jitters reminded everyone that Greece isn’t a dynasty—they’re a one-man show that lucked into the spotlight.

    In basketball, luck is part of the game, but in a tournament this stacked, it can make all the difference between podium glory and early exit. Greece should savor the bronze; they earned the celebration, even if fortune lent a helping hand. What’s next for the Greeks? With Giannis entering his prime, a deeper roster could turn luck into legacy. For now, though, this feels like the basketball gods smiling on Athens on the back of a seriously badly organised tournament.

  • Can the Bucks copy what Greece is doing with Giannis?

    Can the Bucks copy what Greece is doing with Giannis?

    The way Greece deploys Giannis differs markedly from his role with the Bucks, highlighting the contrasts between NBA team dynamics and FIBA. Let’s break it down based on his usage, role, and impact. Sure, up to now he has avoided any serious match ups. He knew to sit out the game against Nurkic who probably had his number and has generally played against much easier opponents. But that’s not all.

    A More Isolated, Scoring-Heavy Role with Greece

    With the Bucks, Giannis operates as the primary offensive engine in a balanced NBA system, but he’s surrounded by complementary pieces like shooters (e.g., Damian Lillard before his departure) and secondary creators who help distribute the load. Milwaukee’s offence often runs through pick-and-rolls, drive-and-kick actions, and staggered minutes with players like Khris Middleton, allowing Giannis to conserve energy for his signature rim attacks while sharing playmaking duties. His usage rate hovers around 35-38% in recent seasons, but it’s mitigated by the team’s depth and the 48-minute NBA game length.

    In contrast, Greece under coach Vassilis Spanoulis treats Giannis as an absolute focal point—essentially the “unquestioned alpha” in a roster lacking the Bucks’ spacing and depth. The Greek squad, featuring his brothers Thanasis and Kostas Antetokounmpo, Tyler Dorsey, Kostas Sloukas, and Kostas Papanikolaou, relies heavily on Giannis to carry the load, especially without elite NBA-caliber support like Nick Calathes or Georgios Papagiannis. This has led to more isolation-heavy usage, where he’s often triple-teamed but still explodes for 25+ points in eight straight EuroBasket games—a streak that’s extended to 10 now.

    This isolation emphasis stems from FIBA’s tighter court (91 feet vs. NBA’s 94) and distinct rules—no defensive three-second violation, shorter shot clock (24 seconds vs. 30), and more physical play—which amplify Giannis’ drives but expose the team’s limited shooting. Spanoulis has even opted for small-ball lineups, positioning Giannis as the “five” (center) against mixed defences to exploit mismatches. Teammate Tyler Dorsey called him an “unstoppable force,” noting how the team rallies around his dominance despite the roster’s gaps.

    Fewer Minutes, But Higher Intensity and Efficiency

    One stark difference is minutes played. With the Bucks, Giannis logs 33-35 minutes per game over an 82-game grind, often showing fatigue in clutch moments (as discussed in prior analyses of his high usage). At EuroBasket, he’s averaging under 30 minutes per outing—e.g., 29 in the Israel win—thanks to shorter 40-minute games and blowouts when he’s on. This rest allows fresher legs, leading to absurd efficiency: 78% FG against Israel and 82% vs. Georgia, far surpassing his NBA marks (around 60% FG overall).

    However, officiating has been a point of contention. Spanoulis blasted refs after the Spain game, arguing Giannis gets “hacked” without calls—e.g., just 12 free throws despite driving relentlessly—compared to stars like Luka Dončić (20-23 FTs per game). In Milwaukee, Giannis draws 10-12 FTAs per game with NBA whistles favouring stars; in FIBA, the physicality (and perceived bias) forces him to power through without as many trips to the line, making his scoring even more reliant on athleticism.

    Rebounding and Defence: Amplified by Necessity

    Rebounding is similar (9.8 at EuroBasket vs. 11.9 with Bucks), but Greece’s weaker interior depth means Giannis crashes harder—e.g., 14 vs. Spain and 10 vs. Israel—while also anchoring a switch-heavy defence. With the Bucks, he shares this with bigs like Brook Lopez (pre-trade); here, he’s the lone rim protector, leading to more blocks and steals (e.g., 2 each vs. Georgia). Assists are slightly lower (4 vs. 6.5), as Greece’s offence funnels through his drives rather than complex Bucks sets, though he flashed play making with 9 vs. Spain.

    The Bigger Picture: Hero Ball vs. System Ball

    Ultimately, Greece uses Giannis as a one-man wrecking crew—isolating him to “play superhero every possession” in a depth-starved setup—yielding MVP-level output but exposing vulnerabilities if he’s off (Greece lost their only game without him, 80-77 to Bosnia). With the Bucks, he’s the hub of a more distributed system, reducing his touches but enhancing team efficiency. This FIBA freedom suits his game on the smaller court, where his length and speed overwhelm, but it risks burnout in knockouts—like tomorrow’s quarterfinal vs. Lithuania.

    If Greece advances (they’re three wins from a title, their first since 2005), it could validate this usage as a blueprint for high-stakes play. For Bucks fans, it underscores why Milwaukee needs better support around him heading into 2025-26. Giannis’ EuroBasket run (second-highest scorer at 30 PPG behind Dončić’s 34) proves he’s adaptable, but his true test is blending this dominance with NBA balance.

    Unprecedented Usage Rate for a Big Man in the NBA

    In the 2023 NBA season, Giannis recorded a usage rate of 38.77%, one of the highest in NBA history, trailing only behind ball-dominant guards like Russell Westbrook and James Harden. Usage rate measures the percentage of a team’s offensive possessions a player uses while on the court, and Giannis’ figure is extraordinary for a power forward/centre. Unlike perimeter ball-handlers who typically dominate usage, big men rarely command such a large share of the offence.

    This high usage translates to Giannis controlling the ball for extended periods, often driving to the basket or creating plays. While this maximises his individual impact, it can limit touches and scoring opportunities for teammates. The Bucks have attempted to diversify their offence in recent seasons, slightly reducing Giannis’ usage and increasing roles for players like Khris Middleton and Damian Lillard. Yet, Giannis remains the undisputed focal point of Milwaukee’s attack.

    Impact on Teammates’ Offensive Rhythm

    Giannis’ ball dominance has a measurable effect on his teammates. Data from sources like StatMuse and NBA.com shows that players like Khris Middleton often perform better in terms of scoring efficiency and usage when Giannis is off the court. For example, Middleton’s effective field goal percentage and per-game scoring tend to rise in minutes without Giannis, suggesting that the latter’s heavy ball-handling can disrupt teammates’ offensive rhythm.

    This dynamic is particularly evident in lineups where Giannis’ presence reduces teammates to secondary roles, limiting their ability to find a consistent flow. The Bucks have experimented with staggered lineups to balance this, giving players like Middleton and Lillard more opportunities to handle the ball. However, the team’s heavy reliance on Giannis as the primary creator often overshadows these efforts, especially in crunch time.

    Shooting Efficiency: A Growing Concern

    While Giannis excels at scoring in the paint, his shooting efficiency from the free-throw line and beyond the arc remains a weak point. His free-throw percentage has declined in recent seasons, dipping below 65% in some years—well below the league average for primary scorers. This inefficiency is particularly costly in high-pressure situations, where missed free throws can shift momentum.

    Similarly, Giannis’ three-point shooting is a liability. Over the past few seasons, his three-point percentage has hovered between 22% and 28%, and his attempts have decreased, reflecting either reluctance or a strategic shift away from long-range shots. This lack of outside shooting makes his offensive game predictable, forcing him to rely heavily on drives to the basket. In turn, this can lead to contested shots, increased physical wear, and offensive stagnation against elite defences that clog the paint.

    Turnovers, Fatigue, and Clutch Performance

    Giannis’ aggressive style contributes to his turnover rate, which averages around 3 per game but can spike in playoff scenarios or under defensive pressure. These turnovers often stem from ambitious passes or drives into crowded lanes, exacerbated by fatigue. Playing 33-35 minutes per game on average, Giannis’ high usage and physical playing style take a toll, particularly in the fourth quarter.

    While Giannis scores a significant portion of his points (approximately 29.8%) in the final period, his shooting and free-throw percentages dip slightly in clutch moments. This suggests that fatigue impacts his decision-making and efficiency late in games. Moreover, the Bucks’ defensive lapses during Giannis’ extended ball-handling sequences can leave them vulnerable, as opponents capitalize on transition opportunities or exploit mismatches.

    In clutch situations, Giannis’ impact on win probability is mixed. He often generates points through sheer force, but his inefficiencies and turnovers can undermine Milwaukee’s execution when balanced play is critical.

    The Bigger Picture: Stats vs. Team Success

    Giannis’ individual stats are undeniably impressive—his scoring, rebounding, and playmaking place him among the league’s elite. However, his high usage rate, shooting inefficiencies, and late-game challenges raise questions about whether his style priorities individual production over optimal team outcomes. The data suggests that his ball dominance can suppress teammates’ contributions, while his inefficiencies from the free-throw line and beyond the arc limit his versatility in crucial moments. With Greece this is not the case. Giannis wants to play less so he doesn’t risk injury and Greece wants him off the court at parts of the game when he would be a detriment.

    In tougher games, particularly in the playoffs, balanced team play and clutch execution are paramount. Giannis’ current approach, while dominant, may hinder the Bucks’ ability to maximise their championship potential. To address this, Milwaukee could further diversify their offence, encouraging more playmaking from supporting stars like Middleton and Lillard while refining Giannis’ role in late-game scenarios.

    So yes, the Bucks could try it but…

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s playing style is a double-edged sword. His historic usage rate and relentless aggression make him a superstar, but they also come at a cost. By limiting teammates’ involvement, struggling with shooting efficiency, and showing vulnerabilities under fatigue, Giannis’ approach can hinder the Bucks in high-stakes games. A more balanced offensive strategy could unlock Milwaukee’s full potential and elevate their chances of winning another championship. But the sad truth is that this sort of approach only works in the Mickey mouse world of the FIBA tournament with second rate players and professionals who do not want to risk injury. Most of them are not playing at full capacity like they would in NBA playoffs where as we have seen many times, Giannis simply cannot move the needle when it counts.

  • Most used Bucks’ lineups and what they show

    Most used Bucks’ lineups and what they show

    Came across the chart and it is extremely interesting food for thought. Last season the most used lineup didn’t include Giannis and guess what? It was also one of the most productive line ups!

    The 2024-25 NBA season was a rollercoaster for the Milwaukee Bucks, blending moments of dominance with frustrating inconsistencies. This graphic captures the essence of their on-court strategy by highlighting the team’s most utilised five-man lineups. This image isn’t just a snapshot of player combinations—it’s a window into how the Bucks structured their rotations under head coach Doc Rivers, emphasising spacing, defence, and star power. But beyond the numbers, it raises deeper questions about team dynamics, particularly around superstar Giannis Antetokounmpo. While these lineups posted impressive net ratings during the regular season, the Bucks’ playoff flameout once again spotlighted Giannis’ tendency to prioritise personal milestones over collective success, often to the team’s detriment. Let’s break it down step by step.

    Understanding the Graphic: A Visual Breakdown

    The infographic, titled “Most Used Bucks Lineups” for the 24/25 season, ranks four key five-man units based on minutes played together. Each lineup is presented with player headshots aligned by position—Guard, Guard, Forward, Forward, Center—alongside their shared court time and net rating (a measure of points scored minus points allowed per 100 possessions). The green backdrop and clean design make it easy to digest, but the real story lies in the personnel and performance metrics.

    Here’s a detailed rundown of each lineup, inferred from player appearances, jerseys, and cross-referenced with season stats from reliable sources like NBA.com and Reddit discussions on Bucks rotations:

    1. Damian Lillard (Guard), Gary Trent Jr. (Guard), Khris Middleton (Forward), Giannis Antetokounmpo (Forward), Brook Lopez (Center)
    • Minutes Played: 121
    • Net Rating: +22.2
      This was the Bucks’ go-to starting unit for much of the season, blending Lillard’s elite scoring and playmaking with Trent’s sharpshooting from the perimeter. Middleton provided veteran savvy and spacing, while Giannis dominated the paint and Lopez anchored the defense with his rim protection and outside shooting. The high net rating reflects excellent offensive efficiency (likely around 120+ points per 100 possessions) and solid defense, thanks to Lopez’s blocks and Giannis’ versatility. This group embodied the Bucks’ “championship or bust” aspirations, excelling in transition and half-court sets.
    1. Damian Lillard (Guard), Pat Connaughton (Guard), Taurean Prince (Forward), Giannis Antetokounmpo (Forward), Brook Lopez (Center)
    • Minutes Played: 110
    • Net Rating: +14.5
      A slight variation on the starter-heavy lineup, this unit swapped Trent for Connaughton (a reliable 3-and-D wing) and Middleton for Prince (a versatile forward acquired in the offseason for depth). The result was a more defensive-minded group, with Connaughton’s energy and Prince’s length helping on the boards and in switches. While the net rating dipped slightly from the top lineup, it still indicated strong performance, particularly in games where Middleton rested or dealt with injuries. Offensive rating might have hovered around 115, bolstered by Lillard-Giannis pick-and-rolls.
    1. Damian Lillard (Guard), Gary Trent Jr. (Guard), Taurean Prince (Forward), Khris Middleton (Forward), Brook Lopez (Center)
    • Minutes Played: 80
    • Net Rating: +8.5
      Notably, this is the only lineup in the graphic without Giannis, relying instead on a balanced mix of shooting and defense. Lillard and Trent handled the backcourt, Prince and Middleton provided forward flexibility, and Lopez remained the constant at center. The lower minutes suggest it was used in specific matchups or when Giannis sat, but the net rating—while positive—lagged behind the Giannis-inclusive groups. This could point to better ball movement without Giannis’ ball-dominant style, though the sample size is smaller. Discussions on Reddit highlighted similar bench-heavy units performing well defensively, with ratings around 102 points allowed per 100 possessions.
    1. Gary Trent Jr. (Guard), Pat Connaughton (Guard), Taurean Prince (Forward), Giannis Antetokounmpo (Forward), Bobby Portis (Center)
    • Minutes Played: 57
    • Net Rating: +26.0
      The least used but most efficient of the bunch, this lineup featured a smaller, faster frontcourt with Portis stepping in for Lopez. Trent and Connaughton offered shooting, Prince added switchability, and Giannis thrived in a more open floor. The sky-high net rating screams “small sample success,” likely driven by explosive offense (perhaps 130+ offensive rating) in blowouts or against weaker benches. Portis’ energy and rebounding complemented Giannis perfectly here, making it a potent closing or comeback unit.

    These lineups collectively showcase the Bucks’ strategy: heavy reliance on star talent like Lillard and Giannis, supplemented by role players for shooting and defense. The positive net ratings across the board contributed to a 48-34 regular-season record, good for 5th in the East. However, the varying inclusion of Giannis hints at an underlying issue—while his presence often elevated efficiency, it sometimes came at the cost of team cohesion.

    The Regular Season Mirage: Strong Lineups, But Lingering Concerns

    On paper, these combinations were a recipe for success. The top lineup’s +22.2 net rating rivals championship-calibre units, driven by Giannis’ all-around dominance (averaging 30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, and 6.5 assists per game). Pairing him with spacers like Lopez and Trent allowed for drive-and-kick opportunities, while defensive anchors kept opponents in check. Midseason analyses praised rotations like the third-most-used group (similar to our #3 here), which boasted a 101.7 defensive rating without Giannis, suggesting the supporting cast could hold its own.

    Yet, cracks appeared. The Bucks cycled through 11 starting lineups early on due to injuries and inconsistencies, with Giannis-centric units dominating minutes but occasionally leading to stagnant offense. Giannis’ high usage rate (often over 35%) meant the ball stuck in his hands, reducing touches for shooters like Middleton and Lillard. This worked in the regular season against lesser competition, but foreshadowed playoff vulnerabilities.

    Why Giannis Falls Short When It Really Counts: Stats Over Substance

    Here’s where the narrative shifts from celebration to scrutiny. Despite gaudy regular-season numbers and lineup efficiencies, the Bucks crashed out in the first round of the 2025 playoffs, losing in five games. Giannis posted monster averages—33.0 points, 15.4 rebounds, and 6.6 assists—but the team faltered. In his final game, he even notched a historic 30/20/10 performance, joining an elite club, yet it came in a loss that ended their season. This pattern isn’t new; it’s a recurring theme in Giannis’ career, where personal accolades mask deeper issues in high-stakes moments.

    Critics argue Giannis prioritizes stats to the team’s detriment, a claim substantiated by infamous incidents like his 2023 stat-padding episode. During a game against the Wizards, Giannis intentionally missed a shot at the rim to grab his own rebound and secure a triple-double, a move slammed as “cheap” and “self-serving” by the New York Post. Such behavior undermines team morale and focus, especially when the Bucks needed every edge in close contests. Videos and analyses highlight how stat-chasing leads to downfall, with Giannis himself acknowledging the pitfalls—yet repeating them.

    In playoffs, this manifests as inefficiency when it matters most. Back in 2020, with the Bucks down 3-0 to the Heat, scrutiny fell on Giannis’ inability to lead despite MVP-caliber play, questioning his clutch gene. Fast-forward to 2025: his stellar stats couldn’t prevent another early exit, partly due to poor decision-making in crunch time. Giannis’ free-throw struggles (around 65% career) force him into hero-ball mode, leading to turnovers and stagnant possessions that hurt lineups reliant on his drives. ESPN reports captured his frustration with team effort post-losses, but insiders note his ball dominance fatigues teammates and limits their involvement. The 2021 championship is looking more and more as a notable freaky exception, maybe even a set up by the NBA to give a smaller franchise a title.

    Compare this to peers like Nikola Jokic, who elevates teams through unselfish play. Giannis’ approach, while yielding All-NBA honours, has coincided with three straight first-round exits post-2021 title (often blamed on injuries, but patterns persist). A shocking stat: Giannis led the league in points but ranked poorly in clutch-time efficiency, with the Bucks posting a negative net rating in fourth quarters of close games. social media posts and forums echo accusations of “stat padding” over team wins, with one user noting how his triple-double hunts mirror Russell Westbrook’s criticised seasons.

    Ultimately, these lineups prove the Bucks have the talent for regular-season success, but Giannis’ stat-focused mindset hampers adaptability in the playoffs. To reclaim contention, he must shift toward team-first basketball—distributing more, trusting rotations, and ditching the padding. Until then, graphics like this will remain bittersweet reminders of untapped potential. Casual fans will suck up the Bucks’ marketing about all the points he scored and records he broke. People that care about the team will wonder why Giannis can’t develop in a meaningful way and how much longer his team mates will have to cover up for his many weaknesses.

  • Giannis and the Greek National Team: A Blessing or a Barrier to Rebuilding?

    Giannis and the Greek National Team: A Blessing or a Barrier to Rebuilding?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo ,a two-time NBA MVP, NBA champion, and global superstar, his presence on any team is transformative. For the Greek national basketball team, his participation in international competitions like FIBA EuroBasket and the Olympics is a source of immense pride and optimism. However, while Giannis brings unparalleled talent and attention to Greek basketball, there’s a growing argument that his dominance inadvertently holds back the team’s long-term development and delays a necessary rebuild. Remember back when the Greek team was , well, a team? Not just a support cast for a diva.

    The Giannis Effect: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s impact on the Greek national team is undeniable. In EuroBasket 2022, he averaged 29.3 points, 8.8 rebounds, and 4.7 assists per game, showcasing his ability to dominate against elite competition. More recently, in a preparation game for EuroBasket 2025 against Latvia, Giannis delivered 25 points and 10 rebounds in just 15 minutes of play, reinforcing his ability to single-handedly shift the momentum of a game. His athleticism, versatility, and relentless work ethic make him a focal point for Greece, drawing defensive attention and creating opportunities for teammates.

    However, this dominance comes with challenges. The Greek national team has become heavily reliant on Giannis to carry the offensive and defensive load, often at the expense of developing a cohesive team identity. His presence can mask underlying weaknesses in the roster, coaching strategy, and player development pipeline, delaying the inevitable need for a rebuild. Below, we explore the key ways in which Giannis’ role might hinder Greece’s long-term growth.

    1. Over-Reliance on Giannis’ Superstar Play

    The Greek national team’s game plan often revolves around Giannis as the primary scorer, playmaker, and defensive anchor. While this strategy maximizes his individual impact, it can stifle the development of other players. In games where Giannis plays limited minutes or sits out, as seen in some EuroBasket 2025 preparation games, the team struggles to maintain consistency. For example, Greece’s offense often becomes stagnant without Giannis’ ability to drive to the basket or create open looks for teammates. This reliance creates a “Giannis-or-bust” dynamic, where the team’s success hinges on his performance rather than a balanced collective effort.

    This over-reliance also affects younger players who might otherwise step into larger roles. Talented players like Giannoulis Larentzakis, who scored 14 points in the Latvia game, or emerging prospects like Alexandros Samodurov, often find their roles reduced to complementary pieces around Giannis. Without opportunities to take on primary scoring or playmaking responsibilities, these players may not develop the confidence or experience needed to lead the team in the future, especially post-Giannis.

    2. Tactical Challenges and Positional Shifts

    Head coach Vassilis Spanoulis has introduced a tactical system designed to function with or without Giannis, acknowledging his sporadic availability due to NBA commitments and insurance issues. However, this flexibility comes at a cost. In EuroBasket 2025 preparations, Spanoulis has experimented with using Giannis as the primary center, a role he has publicly expressed reluctance to play due to the physical toll it takes. With key big man Georgios Papagiannis absent from the roster, Giannis is tasked with rim protection, rebounding, and screening—roles that expose him to greater injury risk and wear him down over the course of a tournament.

    This positional shift highlights a deeper issue: Greece’s lack of depth in the frontcourt. Instead of investing in developing young bigs who could share the load, the team leans on Giannis to fill multiple roles. This approach not only risks his health—especially concerning given his history of calf strains, foot sprains, and patella tendinopathy—but also delays the development of a sustainable frontcourt rotation for the future.

    3. Insurance Issues and Limited Availability

    Giannis’ participation in international competitions is often complicated by logistical challenges, particularly insurance disputes between the Greek Basketball Federation and the Milwaukee Bucks. In the lead-up to EuroBasket 2025, Giannis missed several preparation games due to unpaid insurance, which protects him in case of injury while on national duty. While these issues were eventually resolved, his delayed integration into the team disrupted chemistry and limited the coaching staff’s ability to experiment with different lineups.

    This sporadic availability forces Greece to build a system that can function without its best player, which is a double-edged sword. While it encourages versatility, it also means the team is rarely at full strength during critical preparation periods. Younger players or role players who could benefit from extended minutes alongside Giannis are instead forced to adapt to a system that prioritizes his eventual return, further delaying the development of a new core.

    4. Delaying the Inevitable Rebuild

    Greece’s national team has not won a EuroBasket medal since 2005, and their recent performances—fifth in 2017, eighth in 2015, and fifth in 2007—reflect a program that has struggled to compete with Europe’s elite. While Giannis’ presence elevates Greece’s ceiling, it also papers over cracks in the roster and infrastructure. The team’s reliance on veterans like Kostas Sloukas, who at 35 is aiming to end Greece’s 16-year medal drought, underscores a lack of young talent ready to take the reins.

    A rebuild would require prioritizing the development of younger players, even at the expense of short-term success. However, with Giannis in his prime at age 30, there’s pressure to maximize his window by surrounding him with experienced veterans rather than unproven prospects. This approach risks creating a gap in the talent pipeline, as emerging players are not given the opportunity to gain meaningful international experience. For example, players like Tyler Dorsey or Konstantinos Mitoglou, who showed promise in preparation games, are often relegated to secondary roles when Giannis is on the court.

    5. Cultural and Strategic Implications

    The intense focus on Giannis as the team’s centrepiece can create a culture where other players feel overshadowed or hesitant to take initiative. The Greek national team’s identity has become synonymous with Giannis, which may discourage the development of a collective ethos that could sustain the program after his international career winds down.

    Strategically, Greece’s coaching staff must balance leveraging Giannis’ unique skills with building a system that can outlast him. The current approach, which prioritizes short-term competitiveness, may yield strong performances in tournaments like EuroBasket 2025 but does little to address long-term needs. A true rebuild would involve taking risks, such as giving more minutes to younger players or experimenting with new tactical systems, even if it means sacrificing some wins in the present.

    The Case for a Rebuild

    To secure long-term success, Greece must begin transitioning away from its Giannis-centric model. This doesn’t mean sidelining the superstar but rather using his presence to elevate younger players and build a more balanced roster. Here are some steps Greece could take to initiate a rebuild:

    1. Develop Young Talent: Identify and nurture young prospects like Alexandros Samodurov or other emerging players in the Greek domestic leagues. Giving them significant roles in preparation games, even alongside Giannis, would accelerate their development.
    2. Diversify the Offense: Move away from a Giannis-or-bust offensive strategy by empowering players like Larentzakis or Dorsey to take on playmaking responsibilities. This would create a more versatile attack and reduce the pressure on Giannis.
    3. Strengthen the Frontcourt: Invest in developing big men who can share rim protection and rebounding duties, reducing the physical toll on Giannis and ensuring depth for the future.
    4. Build Team Chemistry: Use preparation games to experiment with lineups that don’t rely solely on Giannis, fostering chemistry among role players and preparing for scenarios where he’s unavailable.
    5. Long-Term Vision: Shift the focus from immediate medal contention to building a sustainable program that can compete post-Giannis. This might mean accepting short-term struggles in exchange for long-term gains.

    Balancing the Present and Future

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s commitment to the Greek national team is a testament to his love for his country and basketball. However, his overwhelming presence can inadvertently delay the necessary rebuild that Greece needs to remain competitive in the post-Giannis era. By relying too heavily on his individual brilliance, the team risks stunting the growth of younger players, neglecting roster depth, and postponing strategic changes that could ensure long-term success.

    All too often he hogs not just the ball in game situations but also the attention. All too often he fails to deliver when it counts. They can hardly justify not inviting him but when he comes he is like a sledgehammer in everything he does. The challenge for Greece is to strike a balance: leverage Giannis’ prime years to chase medals while simultaneously investing in the next generation. This requires bold decisions from the coaching staff and the Greek Basketball Federation, including a willingness to prioritise development over immediate results. For now, the Greek Freak remains the biggest obstacle to a sustainable future while never quite having proved that he can be truly be a part of a team that will deliver.

    Many are tired of the scenario we are likely to see in the Euro 2025. Early success, impressive performances in the easy games and then when the going gets tough…same story. Giannis posts some big numbers but the rest of the team suddenly seems inadequate. That is not how basketball works. Unless you are working for the Giannis’ marketing team that is.

  • Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Lackluster Showing in Greece’s Friendly Against France

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s Lackluster Showing in Greece’s Friendly Against France

    As the EuroBasket 2025 tournament looms, all eyes were on Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks superstar and Greece’s talisman, in the final preparation game against France on August 24, 2025. Expectations were sky-high for the two-time NBA MVP, especially after his explosive 25-point, 10-rebound performance in just 15 minutes against Latvia earlier in the preparation campaign. However, in this critical tune-up match against a formidable French squad, Giannis delivered a performance that left fans, analysts, and perhaps even his own team questioning his readiness for the upcoming tournament.

    A Disappointing Statistical Output

    Giannis, known for his dominance on both ends of the court, failed to live up to his “Greek Freak” moniker against France. In approximately 18 minutes of play, he managed only 12 points on a dismal 4-of-11 shooting from the field, including 0-for-3 from beyond the arc. His free-throw shooting, a persistent Achilles’ heel, was equally troubling, converting just 4 of 8 attempts. While he grabbed 7 rebounds and dished out 2 assists, these numbers pale in comparison to the double-double heroics he displayed against Latvia. More concerning were his 4 turnovers, which highlighted a lack of composure under France’s defensive pressure.

    For a player of Giannis’ caliber, who averaged 30.4 points, 11.9 rebounds, and 6.5 assists on 60.1% shooting in the 2024-25 NBA season, this performance was a significant step backward. The friendly against France was a chance to assert his dominance against a team considered one of the favorites for EuroBasket, yet he appeared out of sync and unable to impose his will on the game.

    Struggles Against France’s Defensive Scheme

    France, even without key NBA stars like Victor Wembanyama and Rudy Gobert, showcased a disciplined and physical defensive approach that seemed to rattle Giannis. The French frontcourt, led by players like Guerschon Yabusele and Mathias Lessort, effectively neutralized Giannis’ drives to the basket. They employed a strategy of crowding the paint and daring him to shoot from mid-range or beyond, areas where he has historically struggled. Giannis’ inability to adjust was glaring—his three-point attempts were ill-advised, and his mid-range game was non-existent, forcing him into contested drives that often ended in turnovers or blocked shots (he was blocked twice).

    Moreover, France’s guards, such as Dennis Schröder (playing for Germany but a comparable defensive pest), pressured Greece’s ball-handlers, disrupting Giannis’ ability to receive the ball in advantageous positions. Without the support of key teammates like Kostas Sloukas, who was rested for this game, Giannis was left to create offense almost single-handedly, a role that exposed his limitations when not surrounded by a fully cohesive unit. His frustration was evident, as he picked up a technical foul in the third quarter after arguing a non-call, further derailing Greece’s momentum.

    Lack of Leadership and Impact

    Beyond the numbers, Giannis’ overall impact on the game was surprisingly muted. As the unquestioned leader of the Greek national team, he is expected to elevate his teammates and set the tone, especially in high-stakes preparation games like this one. However, his body language suggested frustration rather than inspiration. There were moments where he appeared disengaged, particularly in the second half, where Greece’s offense stagnated, and France capitalized with a 12-2 run to pull away.

    Greece’s head coach, Vassilis Spanoulis, has built the team’s strategy around Giannis’ versatility, but in this game, the lack of a clear Plan B when Giannis struggled was telling. His teammates, perhaps overly reliant on his usual heroics, failed to step up, and Giannis did little to rally them. Compare this to his performance at the Paris 2024 Olympics, where he averaged 25.8 points and carried Greece to their first Olympic appearance in 16 years, and it’s clear that something was off against France.

    Fatigue or Rust?

    One possible explanation for Giannis’ subpar performance could be fatigue or rust. After a grueling 2024-25 NBA season, where he played 44 minutes in a playoff overtime loss to the Pacers and earned All-NBA First Team honors for the seventh consecutive year, it’s possible that Giannis is not yet in peak form. His limited participation in earlier friendlies—missing games against Belgium, Montenegro, and Italy due to an insurance dispute with the Bucks and a strategic rest plan—may have left him underprepared for France’s intensity. While his 15-minute outburst against Latvia showed flashes of brilliance, sustaining that level against a deeper, more experienced French team proved challenging.

    Additionally, Greece’s roster management raises questions. With key players like Sloukas and Dinos Mitoglou rested for the France game, Giannis was forced to shoulder an even heavier load, which France exploited. This lack of team cohesion could be a warning sign for EuroBasket, where Greece will face tough Group C opponents like Spain, Italy, and Georgia.

    Fan and Analyst Reactions

    The sentiment among fans, particularly on social media, was one of disappointment. One user noted, “Giannis and his copains les arbitres couldn’t get it done. France’s defence ate him up, and he looked lost out there.” While some of this criticism may be exaggerated, it reflects a broader concern about Giannis’ ability to perform against elite international competition when the stakes are high. Greek media, which hailed him as “unstoppable” after the Latvia game, were more reserved in their analysis of the France matchup, with some outlets questioning whether Greece’s reliance on Giannis could backfire in the tournament.

    Analysts have also pointed out that Giannis’ performance against France mirrors some of his struggles in the NBA playoffs, where teams with strong interior defenders and disciplined schemes have limited his effectiveness. If Greece hopes to contend for a medal—their first since 2009—they’ll need Giannis to find ways to overcome such defenses, whether through improved playmaking, better shot selection, or greater leadership.

    What This Means for EuroBasket 2025

    This friendly against France was Greece’s final tune-up before their EuroBasket campaign begins on August 28 against Italy in Limassol, Cyprus. While it’s just an exhibition game, the loss raises concerns about Greece’s ability to compete with the tournament’s heavyweights. Group C is no cakewalk, with Spain, led by Santi Aldama, and a talented Italian squad posing significant challenges. If Giannis continues to struggle against physical defenses or fails to elevate his teammates, Greece’s hopes of ending their 16-year medal drought could be in jeopardy.

    Moreover, the absence of players like Giorgios Papagiannis and Nikos Rogkavopoulos, coupled with the aging core of Sloukas and Kostas Papanikolaou, puts even more pressure on Giannis to perform at an MVP level. His performance against France suggests that he’s not yet in top gear, and with the tournament just days away, time is running out to find his rhythm.

    Another wake-Up Call for the Greek Freak

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s lackluster performance against France was a stark contrast to the media hype. Some of us have been saying it all year. His struggles with efficiency, turnovers, and leadership, combined with France’s effective defensive strategy, exposed vulnerabilities that Greece must address before EuroBasket 2025. While it’s unfair to judge Giannis solely on one friendly game, this outing serves as a wake-up call. For Greece to succeed, Giannis needs to rediscover his MVP form, adapt to defensive schemes, and inspire his teammates to rise to the occasion. Otherwise, the Greek Freak’s EuroBasket dreams—and those of a nation—may fall short once again. And more importantly the myth of Giannis as a solution to any team’s problems when it counts. He just can’t seem to ever deliver.

    (Featured image from here.)

  • Antetokounmpo brothers on the same team? Makes no sense!

    Antetokounmpo brothers on the same team? Makes no sense!

    Having all three (or even four) Antetokounmpo brothers—Giannis, Thanasis, and Kostas (occasionally including Alex)—on the same team, especially the Greek national basketball team, may sound like a dream for curious fans or as a marketing story. However, from a basketball and team-building perspective, it actually makes little sense.

    1. Overlapping Skill Sets, Not Complementary Roles

    The Antetokounmpo brothers, while all extremely athletic and hardworking, share similar physical profiles and playing styles. Giannis is a ball-dominant forward but Thanasis and Kostas (and Alex, to an extent) are also lengthy, athletic forwards—generally specialising in defence, hustle, and energy. They are not elite shooters or play makers. Having several players with similar roles and limitations (especially non-superstar siblings) can lead to roster redundancy and limit tactical flexibility. Most successful national teams are built by blending complementary skills: shooters, passers, rim protectors, and versatile role players.

    2. Team Chemistry vs. Nepotism and Meritocracy

    Bringing siblings onto the same roster can risk perceptions—and realities—of favoritism. The ideal for national teams is picking the absolute best in each position, giving the country the highest chance of success. The Greek national team routinely features NBA, EuroLeague, and top Greek league talent in every position, so spots are incredibly competitive. Choosing brothers as a package (especially if not all are among the country’s top players) could erode trust within the team and anger fans or other deserving players who are left out.

    3. Distraction and Media Hype

    The story of “all the Antetokounmpo brothers together” would attract enormous attention and media scrutiny. While this brings publicity, it can also distract from the squad’s actual preparations and objectives. The focus can shift from building a winning team system to the novelty of the family lineup, which could upset team dynamics or create unwanted off-court narratives the coach must manage.

    4. Sibling Dynamics—Strengths and Pitfalls

    There are benefits to sibling chemistry—knowing each other’s tendencies, supporting one another, and fostering a positive locker room culture. But this can easily turn into on-court arguments, frustrations, or unintended rivalry. Studies in team sports suggest that siblings on the same team sometimes struggle with boundaries, criticism, and balancing the family bond with broader team unity. If one of the brothers receives more or less playing time, it can create tension or even resentment—harming both family and team morale.

    5. National Team Depth and Opportunity Cost

    Greece doesn’t lack basketball talent. The national team regularly qualifies for major tournaments and features an array of EuroLeague and NBA players. Forcing the inclusion of multiple Antetokounmpos can mean other players—perhaps a needed shooter, ball-handler, or defensive specialist—are left out, reducing the overall ceiling of the team. National teams must put winning first, not family reunions.

    6. Evidence: Actual Roster Decisions

    Historically, while there have been moments when more than one Antetokounmpo was named to a preliminary roster, rarely are all three featured in the final 12-man squad for a major tournament, and performances suggest balancing the roster is prioritized. For instance, as recently as the EuroBasket 2025 preliminary roster, Giannis and Kostas are included, with Thanasis ruled out due to injury and Alex not among the final picks—demonstrating a merit-based approach and the challenges of fitting multiple brothers onto a balanced squad125.

    Will it happen?
    While the Antetokounmpo brothers have each made notable achievements, and their shared story inspires millions, national team basketball demands the sharpest focus on fit, balance, and the high-stakes realities of international competition. Assembling all three brothers on the court, especially when not all are among Greece’s very best, risks sacrificing team strength for sentiment and spectacle—which doesn’t make sense if the goal is to win medals and maximise the nation’s basketball legacy. Despite consistently delivering strong individual performances and drawing global attention to Greek basketball, Giannis has failed to lead Greece to any significant international medals or deep tournament runs—a reality that has frustrated fans and analysts alike.

    High Hopes, Early Exits

    • 2016 Olympic Qualifiers: Giannis averaged a solid 15.3 points, 5.7 rebounds, and 2 blocks per game. However, Greece was eliminated by Croatia and failed to qualify for the Rio Olympics.
    • 2019 FIBA World Cup: This tournament was highly anticipated, as Giannis entered as the reigning NBA MVP—the first to play in a FIBA World Cup. Expectations were sky-high, but Greece failed to progress past the second round, finishing 11th overall. This exit was widely described as disappointing, given the roster’s talent and Giannis’s status as an NBA superstar.
    • EuroBasket 2022: Antetokounmpo showcased extraordinary stats—29.3 points, 8.8 rebounds, 4.7 assists per game, leading all scorers and being named to the All-Tournament Team. Yet, Greece lost in the quarter-finals to Germany, and Giannis was ejected after two unsportsmanlike fouls in that match, again cutting short the team’s title aspirations.
    • 2024 Paris Olympics: After helping Greece earn their first Olympic basketball appearance in 16 years, Giannis was the team’s flagbearer and central figure. He averaged a tournament-high 25.8 points with very efficient shooting, but Greece could only muster a 1–2 record in the group stage and were eliminated in the quarter-finals, this time by Germany.

    Why Haven’t Results Matched the Hype?

    • No Medals Despite NBA Stardom: Across all major tournaments from 2014 through 2024, Giannis and Greece have never reached the semifinals of a EuroBasket, World Cup, or the Olympics, let alone won a medal.
    • Mismatch of Styles and Roles: Giannis’s unique playstyle—most effective as a ball-dominant forward in the NBA—has been harder to maximize in international basketball, where different rules, roster depth, and the absence of NBA spacing have limited his impact on winning at the highest level, despite impressive box scores.
    • Unmet Expectations: The gap between NBA success and international results has drawn criticism and disappointment from Greek fans and the media, putting extra pressure on Antetokounmpo each cycle. Greek journalists and some international observers have not hesitated to question why “the Greek Freak” has been unable to elevate his national team to the podium.

    Giannis’s Perspective

    Despite the lack of medals, Giannis has repeatedly pushed back on the idea of “failure” in sports, famously arguing that every loss is a step towards future success and that his journey with Greece—win or lose—is a source of pride and growth. Still, results on the court remain clear: Giannis’s time with the Greek national team has been marked by unfulfilled potential and a string of high-profile exits, fuelling debate about how best to build around such superstars in the international game. Especially someone like Giannis who is used being pampered with the Bucks where the entire roster essentially works to make him look good all the time.

  • Kevin Porter Jr. on the Bucks: Strengths, Weaknesses, and the Giannis Factor

    Kevin Porter Jr. on the Bucks: Strengths, Weaknesses, and the Giannis Factor

    The addition of Kevin Porter Jr. (KPJ) to the Bucks roster introduces an intriguing dynamic. KPJ, a talented young guard, brings a unique skill set but also faces challenges in carving out a significant role alongside a superstar like Giannis.

    Kevin Porter Jr.’s Strengths

    Kevin Porter Jr. is a versatile guard known for his scoring ability, playmaking, and athleticism.

    1. Scoring Versatility: KPJ can score at all three levels—inside, mid-range, and beyond the arc. His ability to create his own shot off the dribble makes him a valuable offensive weapon. In his time with the Houston Rockets, he averaged 19.2 points per game in the 2022-23 season, showcasing his scoring prowess.
    2. Playmaking: As a combo guard, KPJ has shown flashes of excellent court vision. He can facilitate the offense, averaging 6.3 assists per game during his Rockets tenure. His ability to handle the ball and set up teammates adds another dimension to the Bucks’ offense.
    3. Athleticism and Finishing: KPJ’s athleticism allows him to attack the rim with authority. He’s capable of posterizing defenders and finishing through contact, which complements the Bucks’ fast-paced, transition-heavy style.
    4. Defensive Potential: At 6’4” with a solid wingspan, KPJ has the physical tools to be a disruptive defender. While not yet a lockdown defender, he’s shown the ability to guard multiple positions when engaged.

    Kevin Porter Jr.’s Weaknesses

    Despite his talent, KPJ has areas of his game that need refinement, particularly in a structured environment like Milwaukee:

    1. Decision-Making: KPJ’s decision-making can be erratic. He sometimes forces shots or makes risky passes, leading to turnovers. His assist-to-turnover ratio (1.9:1 in 2022-23) reflects this inconsistency, which can be problematic in high-stakes playoff games.
    2. Shooting Efficiency: While KPJ can score, his efficiency is a concern. His three-point shooting hovered around 36.6% in Houston, but his shot selection often leads to low-percentage attempts. This inefficiency could clash with the Bucks’ need for spacing around Giannis.
    3. Defensive Consistency: KPJ’s defensive effort has been inconsistent. He can be a liability when not fully engaged, which is a concern for a Bucks team that relies on stout defense to contend for titles.
    4. Off-Court Concerns: KPJ’s history of off-court issues, including legal troubles, has raised questions about his maturity and reliability. While these are not directly related to his on-court performance, they can impact team chemistry and his role.

    The Bucks’ System and KPJ’s Fit

    The Bucks’ offense revolves around Giannis Antetokounmpo who demands the ball in the paint and thrives in transition. The team’s supporting cast, including players like Damian Lillard and Khris Middleton, has always been designed to complement Giannis by providing spacing, defence, and secondary play making. KPJ’s skill set overlaps with some of these roles but doesn’t perfectly align with the Bucks’ needs.

    KPJ’s ability to handle the ball and create offense could theoretically ease the playmaking burden on Lillard and Giannis. However, his inconsistent shooting and decision-making make him a less-than-ideal fit as a spot-up shooter or off-ball player, roles often required of Bucks guards. Additionally, Milwaukee’s defensive scheme under coach Doc Rivers emphasizes discipline and communication, areas where KPJ has yet to prove himself consistently.

    How Giannis’s Presence Impacts KPJ’s Development

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance is both a blessing and a challenge for young players like KPJ. While playing alongside a superstar provides opportunities to learn and compete at a high level, it can also stifle development. Here’s how Giannis’s presence might hinder KPJ’s growth:

    1. Ball Dominance: Giannis is the focal point of the Bucks’ offense, often initiating plays and commanding touches in the paint. His usage rate (around 32% in recent seasons) leaves limited opportunities for KPJ to handle the ball and develop as a primary playmaker. In Houston, KPJ was a primary option, but in Milwaukee, he’s relegated to a secondary or tertiary role, which limits his ability to refine his decision-making and leadership.
    2. Offensive Hierarchy: The Bucks’ pecking order is clear: Giannis and Lillard are the top options. KPJ, as a younger player, must adapt to a lower-usage role, which can stunt his offensive growth. His scoring instincts may be underutilised, forcing him to focus on spot-up shooting or cutting—skills that are not his strongest.
    3. Pressure to Win Now: The Bucks are in a championship-or-bust mode, with Giannis at the peak of his prime (30 years old in 2025). This high-stakes environment leaves little room for KPJ to experiment or make mistakes, both critical for a young player’s development. Coach Rivers is unlikely to give KPJ extended minutes if his play doesn’t immediately translate to wins.
    4. Cultural Fit: KPJ’s past off-court issues and inconsistent effort could clash with this environment, potentially leading to reduced trust from coaches and teammates. Without a strong support system to guide him, KPJ’s development could stall. This is a team designed to pamper Giannis.

    Potential Paths for KPJ’s Development

    For KPJ to thrive in Milwaukee, he must address his weaknesses and leverage his strengths within the Bucks’ system. Here are some potential strategies:

    1. Embrace a Sixth-Man Role: KPJ could excel as a spark plug off the bench, leading the second unit with his scoring and play making. This role would give him more freedom to handle the ball while still contributing to wins.
    2. Improve Efficiency: Focusing on better shot selection and increasing his three-point accuracy would make KPJ a better fit alongside Giannis. Studying players like Jrue Holiday, who thrived as a complementary piece, could guide his development.
    3. Defensive Growth: Committing to defence would earn KPJ more trust from Rivers and Giannis. Becoming a two-way player would secure him consistent minutes.
    4. Mentorship from Veterans: Learning from Lillard and Middleton, both experienced scorers and playmakers, could help KPJ refine his decision-making and professionalism. Most of all he has to kill his ego to put up with Giannis.

    So is KPJ a go or will he be another Giannis scapegoat?

    Kevin Porter Jr. is a talented but flawed player with the potential to be a valuable asset for the Milwaukee Bucks. His scoring, play making, and athleticism are undeniable strengths, but his decision-making, efficiency, and defensive consistency need work. Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance creates challenges for KPJ’s development by limiting his touches, role, and margin for error. For KPJ to grow in Milwaukee, he must adapt to a complementary role, improve his efficiency, and embrace the Bucks’ winning culture. If he can do so, he could carve out a meaningful place here. If not, his time in Milwaukee may be short-lived, especially with trade rumours swirling around Giannis and the team’s future. Nobody ever blames Giannis so life with the Bucks is a constantly perilous journey of being the scape goat.

  • Giannis is the worse team mate ever – Some case studies of players that thrived after they left him

    Giannis is the worse team mate ever – Some case studies of players that thrived after they left him

    Many players who shared the court with Giannis during his tenure left for new teams, seeking better opportunities to shine. While no former Bucks player has explicitly blamed Giannis YET for their failure to “fully bloom” in Milwaukee, the dynamics of playing alongside a ball-dominant superstar can limit roles and opportunities. I consider it more and more likely that over the years we will hear horror stories about how he squashed team mates’ chances and how they bloomed away from him.

    The Giannis Effect: A Double-Edged Sword

    Giannis’ game is a force of nature but his high-usage style (often exceeding 30% usage rate) means the Bucks’ offense revolves around him, which can marginalize teammates who need the ball to thrive. The Bucks’ roster-building strategy has prioritized veterans and role players to complement Giannis, often leaving younger or secondary stars with limited touches. While this approach led to a title, it’s sparked speculation about whether some players felt stifled. Some examples:

    1. Malcolm Brogdon (2016–2019)

    Bucks Tenure: Drafted 36th overall in 2016, Malcolm Brogdon quickly became a key contributor, earning the 2017 Rookie of the Year award. He averaged 12.8 points, 3.4 rebounds, and 3.8 assists over three seasons, shooting 40.2% from three. His steady play helped the Bucks reach the Eastern Conference Finals in 2019.

    Why He Left: In 2019, Brogdon became a restricted free agent, and the Bucks faced a luxury tax crunch. They facilitated a sign-and-trade to the Indiana Pacers for a first-round pick and two second-rounders, prioritizing cap flexibility to retain Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez. Brogdon later expressed disappointment, noting he wanted to stay but felt the Bucks’ financial constraints and roster priorities didn’t align with his value.

    Post-Bucks Career: In Indiana, Brogdon blossomed into a primary ball-handler, averaging 19.1 points and 7.0 assists in his first season (2019–20). He later joined the Boston Celtics, winning Sixth Man of the Year in 2023, and now starts for the Washington Wizards, posting career-high numbers. His role as a lead guard in Indiana and Boston suggests he needed more touches than Milwaukee’s Giannis-centric system allowed.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: There’s no direct evidence of Brogdon blaming Giannis, but his comments about the Bucks’ “business decision” hint at frustration with their roster strategy. Giannis’ ball-dominant style limited Brogdon’s playmaking opportunities, as the Bucks leaned on him as a catch-and-shoot guard rather than a primary creator. Brogdon’s success elsewhere suggests he outgrew the secondary role Milwaukee envisioned.

    2. Eric Bledsoe (2017–2020)

    Bucks Tenure: Acquired from the Phoenix Suns in 2017, Eric Bledsoe was a dynamic point guard who complemented Giannis with his defense and athleticism. He averaged 15.4 points, 4.6 assists, and 1.5 steals over three seasons, earning All-Defensive First Team honors in 2019. However, his playoff struggles—shooting 31.5% from the field in the 2019 ECF—drew criticism.

    Why He Left: In 2020, the Bucks traded Bledsoe, Grayson Allen, and draft picks to the New Orleans Pelicans for Jrue Holiday, aiming to bolster their championship hopes. Bledsoe’s inconsistent postseason play and the Bucks’ urgency to maximize Giannis’ prime drove the move. Bledsoe didn’t publicly criticize Milwaukee, but reports suggested he felt underutilized offensively.

    Post-Bucks Career: In New Orleans, Bledsoe averaged 12.2 points and 3.8 assists, a step down from his Bucks role. He later bounced between the Clippers and Trail Blazers before retiring in 2024. While he didn’t achieve greater success, his time in New Orleans offered more ball-handling freedom, though injuries and age (31 at the trade) limited his impact.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: No explicit blame surfaced, but Bledsoe’s role as a defensive specialist and secondary scorer in Milwaukee contrasted with his earlier days as a primary option in Phoenix. Giannis’ dominance and the Bucks’ shift to a heliocentric offense may have restricted Bledsoe’s ability to showcase his full skill set, contributing to perceptions that he underperformed.

    3. Jrue Holiday (2020–2023)

    Bucks Tenure: Acquired in a blockbuster trade in 2020, Jrue Holiday was instrumental in the Bucks’ 2021 championship, providing elite perimeter defense and clutch playmaking. He averaged 17.7 points, 6.4 assists, and 1.5 steals over three seasons, earning All-Defensive honors and fan adoration.

    Why He Left: In 2023, the Bucks traded Holiday to the Portland Trail Blazers (who flipped him to the Boston Celtics) as part of a package for Damian Lillard. The move was driven by Giannis’ public pressure to win another title and the front office’s belief that Lillard’s offensive firepower would elevate the team. Holiday expressed shock and hurt, having wanted to retire in Milwaukee, but didn’t directly blame Giannis even though Giannis obviously signed off on the deal.

    Post-Bucks Career: In Boston, Holiday thrived as a two-way star, winning his second NBA title in 2024. His role as a complementary piece alongside Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown allowed him to focus on defense and timely scoring, arguably a better fit than Milwaukee’s high-pressure environment. His success in Boston suggests he adapted well to a new system.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: Holiday hasn’t publicly blamed Giannis, but the trade stemmed from Giannis’ vocal desire for roster upgrades, as he hinted at leaving if the Bucks didn’t contend. Holiday’s departure was a byproduct of Milwaukee’s “win-now” mentality around Giannis, and some speculate his playmaking was underutilized in a system tailored to Giannis’ drives and kickouts.

    4. Jabari Parker (2014–2018)

    Bucks Tenure: Selected second overall in 2014, Jabari Parker was expected to be Giannis’ co-star. He averaged 15.3 points and 5.5 rebounds over four injury-plagued seasons, showing flashes of scoring prowess but struggling defensively. Two ACL injuries derailed his development, and he clashed with coach Jason Kidd over his role.

    Why He Left: In 2018, the Bucks declined to re-sign Parker, who joined the Chicago Bulls on a two-year, $40 million deal. Parker later said he felt the Bucks didn’t invest in his growth, citing inconsistent roles and a lack of offensive freedom. He didn’t name Giannis directly but alluded to the team’s shift toward a Giannis-centric system.

    Post-Bucks Career: Parker’s career spiraled after Milwaukee, with stints in Chicago, Washington, Atlanta, Sacramento, and Boston yielding diminishing returns. He last played in the NBA in 2022 and now competes overseas. While he didn’t bloom elsewhere, his Chicago signing was seen as a chance to reclaim his stardom, which never materialized due to injuries and fit issues.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: Parker’s comments about the Bucks’ system indirectly point to Giannis’ rise as the focal point. As Giannis emerged as a superstar, Parker’s role shrank, exacerbated by his injuries and defensive limitations. The Bucks’ pivot to building around Giannis likely marginalized Parker, though his own health issues were a bigger factor.

    5. Donte DiVincenzo (2018–2022)

    Bucks Tenure: Drafted 17th overall in 2018, Donte DiVincenzo evolved into a valuable 3-and-D guard, averaging 9.0 points and 4.0 rebounds over four seasons. He played a key role in the 2021 championship, shooting 40.1% from three in the playoffs.

    Why He Left: In 2022, DiVincenzo was traded to the Sacramento Kings in a deal for Serge Ibaka, as the Bucks sought frontcourt depth. He later signed with the Golden State Warriors and then the New York Knicks. DiVincenzo expressed frustration with the Bucks’ decision, feeling he was blossoming into a starter but was expendable due to roster priorities.

    Post-Bucks Career: DiVincenzo thrived in New York, averaging 15.5 points and 3.7 rebounds in 2023–24, earning a starting role and All-Star buzz. His growth as a two-way guard suggests he needed a larger offensive role than Milwaukee offered, where he was primarily a spot-up shooter.

    Did Giannis Play a Role?: DiVincenzo hasn’t blamed Giannis directly, but his expanded role in New York highlights how Giannis’ ball dominance limited his touches. The Bucks’ system prioritized Giannis’ playmaking, relegating DiVincenzo to a 3-and-D role that capped his potential as a creator.

    Other Notable Departures

    • Thon Maker (2016–2019): The 10th overall pick in 2016, Maker showed promise as a stretch big but averaged just 4.6 points in Milwaukee. Traded to Detroit in 2019, he sought a bigger role but faded from the NBA by 2021. His exit was more about fit than Giannis’ influence, though the Bucks’ focus on veterans like Brook Lopez limited his minutes.
    • Grayson Allen (2021–2023): Acquired in 2021, Allen became a sharpshooting starter, averaging 10.7 points and shooting 40.8% from three. Traded to Phoenix in the Lillard deal, he signed a four-year, $70 million extension in 2024. Allen hasn’t criticized Giannis, but his larger role in Phoenix suggests he benefited from a system less centered on one star.

    Analyzing the Narrative: Is Giannis to Blame?

    No player has explicitly said, “Giannis held me back,” but the pattern is clear: many who left Milwaukee thrived in systems where they had more offensive freedom or defined roles. Giannis’ high-usage style and the Bucks’ championship-or-bust mentality often forced teammates into complementary roles—spot-up shooting, defense, or hustle plays. This can stifle players who crave ball-handling or scoring opportunities, as seen with Brogdon and DiVincenzo.

    However, blaming Giannis oversimplifies the issue. The Bucks’ front office, constrained by luxury tax limits and a lack of draft picks, prioritised veterans over developing young talent. Injuries (Parker, Bledsoe) and coaching changes (five head coaches since 2013) also disrupted continuity. Giannis himself has emphasised winning over individual glory, but his pressure to contend—evident in comments like, “I don’t want to be 20 years on the same team and don’t win another championship”—has pushed the Bucks to make win-now trades, often at the expense of players like Holiday or Brogdon.

    A Star’s Shadow or a Team’s Strategy?

    Giannis Antetokounmpo’s dominance has undeniably shaped the Bucks’ identity, and while no player has directly blamed him for their departure, his high-usage role and the team’s win-now approach have limited opportunities for some. Players like Brogdon, Holiday, and DiVincenzo found greater success elsewhere, but their exits were driven more by financial constraints, trades, or roster fit than personal grievances with Giannis. The “Greek Freak” is both a blessing and a challenge—a superstar who demands a system tailored to his strengths. Players around him need to have zero ego and put up with the franchise focused on hiding Giannis’ many weaknesses.

    As the Bucks face another uncertain offseason, with Damian Lillard’s injury and trade rumors swirling, the question remains: can Milwaukee build a roster that maximizes Giannis while empowering others to bloom? Or will more players leave, chasing opportunities beyond his shadow?

  • Why the Milwaukee Bucks Thrive Without Giannis in Crunch Time

    Why the Milwaukee Bucks Thrive Without Giannis in Crunch Time

    The Bucks are often better without Giannis on the floor, particularly in high-stakes situations like the fourth quarter of close games. This phenomenon is most noticeable in their defensive agility and offensive fluidity, which seem to peak when Giannis is on the bench. When he returns, the team’s rhythm often falters.

    Defensive Agility: Faster and More Cohesive Without Giannis

    Giannis is a defensive juggernaut, capable of guarding multiple positions and anchoring the Bucks’ paint defence with his rim protection. His 7’0” frame and freakish athleticism have made him a one-man defensive system at times in the past. However, the Bucks’ defence often appears more cohesive and versatile when he’s off the floor, especially in the fourth quarter of tight games.

    Speed and Perimeter Coverage

    Without Giannis, the Bucks can deploy lineups that are quicker and more adept at covering the perimeter. Players like Jrue Holiday (before his departure), Damian Lillard, Khris Middleton, and role players such as Pat Connaughton or Bobby Portis bring a level of lateral quickness that Giannis, despite his athleticism, doesn’t always match. Giannis excels in help defence and rim protection, but his size can sometimes be a liability against smaller, quicker guards or wings who exploit pick-and-rolls or isolations.

    In crunch time, opponents often spread the floor to create space for their best scorers. The Bucks’ non-Giannis lineups are better equipped to switch defensively, hedge screens, and recover on shooters. Data from recent seasons supports this: in the 2022-23 season, the Bucks’ defensive rating in the fourth quarter was often better (by approximately 3-5 points per 100 possessions) in lineups without Giannis compared to those with him, especially against teams with elite perimeter scorers.

    Closing Defensive Gaps

    Giannis’s presence sometimes allows opponents to game-plan around his tendencies. Teams will pull him away from the paint with stretch bigs or force him into pick-and-roll situations where he’s less comfortable. Without him, the Bucks can play a more disciplined, team-oriented defense, with players like Brook Lopez anchoring the paint and perimeter defenders staying glued to their assignments. The result is a defense that feels less reliant on one player’s superhuman efforts and more like a well-oiled machine.

    Offensive Fluidity: Ball Movement Over Hero Ball

    On offense, the Bucks’ identity shifts dramatically when Giannis is on the bench. While Giannis is a force of nature driving to the rim and collapsing defenses, his presence can sometimes stagnate the Bucks’ offense, particularly in clutch moments. The team’s tendency to lean on “Giannis ball”—where he dominates the ball and either scores or kicks out—can lead to predictable sets that savvy defenses counter.

    Sharing the Ball

    Without Giannis, the Bucks move the ball with purpose, relying on a motion offense that maximizes the skills of their supporting cast. Players like Lillard, Middleton, and even role players like Malik Beasley or Grayson Allen thrive in these scenarios, as they get more opportunities to create and score. The ball zips around the perimeter, with multiple players touching it on a single possession, leading to open threes or cutting opportunities.

    NBA tracking data highlights this trend. In the 2023-24 season, the Bucks averaged more passes per possession and a higher assist-to-turnover ratio in fourth-quarter lineups without Giannis. For example, in games where Giannis sat the opening minutes of the fourth, the Bucks’ offensive rating often spiked by 5-7 points per 100 possessions compared to when he was on the floor. This suggests that the team’s egalitarian approach without Giannis creates better shot opportunities.

    Spacing and Pace

    Giannis’s limited outside shooting (career 28.5% from three) allows defences to sag off him, clogging the paint and limiting driving lanes for teammates. In contrast, lineups without Giannis often feature better floor spacing, with players like Lillard and Middleton in the past stretching defences thin. This opens up the floor for pick-and-rolls, backdoor cuts, and transition opportunities, which the Bucks exploit with devastating efficiency.

    The pace also tends to increase without Giannis. While he’s a transition monster, his half-court dominance can slow the game down as the Bucks look to feed him in the post or let him initiate drives. Non-Giannis lineups push the ball faster, catching defenses off guard and creating easy buckets before opponents can set up.

    The Giannis Effect: Why Things Get Worse When He Returns

    The Bucks’ decision to start the fourth quarter without Giannis in many close games is strategic. It allows them to build or maintain a lead with their faster, more fluid lineups before bringing Giannis back to close things out. However, his re-entry often disrupts the rhythm they’ve established.

    Defensive Adjustments

    When Giannis returns, opponents adjust their game plan to exploit his weaknesses. They target him in pick-and-rolls, pull him out to the perimeter, or force him to chase shooters, which can lead to breakdowns in the Bucks’ defensive structure. The team’s earlier cohesion gives way to a more individualistic approach, as players defer to Giannis’s ability to make plays.

    Offensive Stagnation

    Offensively, the ball movement that defined the non-Giannis minutes grinds to a halt. Teammates stand and watch as Giannis takes on defenders one-on-one, leading to contested shots or turnovers. Defences collapse on him, knowing he’s unlikely to shoot from deep, which clogs passing lanes and reduces open looks for shooters. The Bucks’ assist numbers often drop significantly in these moments, and their offence becomes easier to predict.

    The Psychological Factor

    There’s also a psychological element at play. Giannis is the Bucks’ alpha, and his return can shift the team’s mindset from “we’re all in this together” to “let Giannis take over.” This deference can sap the confidence of role players who were thriving without him, leading to hesitation and missed opportunities.

    Case Studies: Games That Prove the Point

    Let’s look at a couple of examples from the 2023-24 season to illustrate this trend:

    • Bucks vs. Celtics (April 2024): In a tight game against Boston, the Bucks started the fourth quarter without Giannis, relying on a lineup of Lillard, Middleton, Lopez, Beasley, and Portis. They outscored the Celtics by 10 points in the first five minutes, with crisp ball movement leading to open threes and Lopez dominating the paint defensively. When Giannis returned, Boston adjusted by doubling him and forcing turnovers, and the Bucks’ lead dwindled as their offense stalled.
    • Bucks vs. Heat (Playoffs 2023): During the first round of the 2023 playoffs, the Bucks’ non-Giannis lineups consistently outperformed their Giannis-led counterparts in the fourth quarter. In Game 4, the Bucks built a lead with Giannis on the bench, only for Miami to claw back when he returned, as their defense keyed in on stopping him at the expense of leaving shooters open.

    What Does This Mean for the Bucks?

    The idea that the Bucks are better without Giannis might sound blasphemous, but it’s more about fit than talent. Giannis is undeniably the team’s best player, but his style can sometimes clash with the needs of a modern NBA offense and defense in crunch time. The Bucks’ coaching staff, led by Doc Rivers in 2024-25, seems to recognize this, as evidenced by their consistent choice to stagger Giannis’s minutes in the fourth quarter.

    Potential Solutions

    To maximize their potential, the Bucks could consider the following adjustments:

    1. Diversify Giannis’s Role: Encourage Giannis to act as a screener, cutter, or decoy in crunch-time offense to keep defenses guessing and maintain ball movement.
    2. Improve His Perimeter Defense: Work on Giannis’s ability to guard quicker players on the perimeter to reduce defensive liabilities.
    3. Balance Lineups: Pair Giannis with shooters and playmakers who can thrive alongside him, ensuring the offence doesn’t stagnate when he’s on the floor.

    So no, Giannis is not a champion winner

    The Milwaukee Bucks are a championship-calibre team with Giannis Antetokounmpo as their cornerstone. However, their performance in the fourth quarter of close games often highlights a counter intuitive truth: they can be better without him on the floor. Their defence becomes faster and more versatile, and their offence flows with better ball movement and spacing. When Giannis returns, the team’s rhythm often suffers as opponents exploit his limitations and the Bucks revert to a less dynamic style.

  • Giannis Won’t Be Traded This Off-Season

    Giannis Won’t Be Traded This Off-Season

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the Milwaukee Bucks’ superstar and two-time NBA MVP, has been the subject of trade rumours for many years, more so lately as the Bucks navigate inconsistent playoff performances. However, as the 2025 NBA off-season approaches, it’s highly unlikely that Giannis will be traded. This narrative is actually to Giannis’ liking. He is put up as the role model superhero and the rest of the roster constantly attacked. Either the roster or the coach. It’s never Giannis’ fault, is it? Well actually…

    1. Giannis’ Reluctance to Leave His Comfort Zone

    Giannis has spent his entire NBA career with the Milwaukee Bucks since being drafted in 2013. Milwaukee is more than just a team for him—it’s home. He’s built a life there, raising his family and becoming a beloved figure in the community. The idea of moving to a new city, adapting to a new franchise, and dealing with the pressures of a different fanbase could be daunting. Unlike some players who thrive on change, Giannis has shown a deep loyalty to Milwaukee, signing a supermax extension in 2020 despite the team’s postseason struggles at the time.

    This loyalty stems partly from fear of the unknown. Playing for another team would mean stepping out of a system tailored to his strengths and into an environment where he might face greater scrutiny. The Bucks have provided him with stability, from coaching staff to teammates, which has allowed him to focus on his game without the distractions of a larger market. A trade to a team like the Los Angeles Lakers or Miami Heat would thrust him into a media frenzy, something Giannis has largely avoided in Milwaukee. You just need to see him in the All Star situations to understand that he is socially inept, in fact he never trains with other NBA stars in the off season. His hesitance to embrace such a shift makes a trade less likely, as he’d need to be fully on board for any deal to gain traction.

    2. Questions About Giannis’ Skill Set and Basketball IQ

    While Giannis is undeniably one of the NBA’s most dominant players, his game has limitations that raise questions about his ability to seamlessly fit into another team’s system. His skill set is heavily reliant on a specific style of play that the Bucks have perfected around him. And you won’t find many other teams willing to do something similar.

    Limited Outside Shooting

    Giannis’ lack of a consistent outside shot remains a glaring weakness. In the 2024-25 season, he’s shooting just 29.3% from three-point range on low volume, per NBA.com stats. The Bucks have built their offence to maximise his drives to the basket, surrounding him with shooters like Damian Lillard and Brook Lopez to space the floor. Other teams might not have the personnel or patience to accommodate a superstar who clogs the paint and struggles in catch-and-shoot situations. For example, a team like the Golden State Warriors, which thrives on motion and perimeter shooting, would struggle to integrate Giannis without overhauling its identity.

    Basketball IQ and Playmaking

    Giannis’ basketball IQ has also been a point of contention. While he’s an excellent decision-maker in transition and a willing passer (averaging 6.5 assists per game in 2024-25), his ability to read complex half-court defenses is inconsistent. The Bucks’ system simplifies his role: he’s often the primary ball-handler in pick-and-rolls or iso situations, with clear reads provided by coaching. On another team, he might be asked to play off the ball or make quicker decisions in a motion offense, areas where he’s shown limitations. His turnover rate (3.2 per game) suggests he can struggle under pressure, and a new system could exacerbate this. Giannis simply cannot understand, let alone execute, complex plays. He can’t screen and he doesn’t understand angles.

    Comparison to Other Stars

    Contrast Giannis with players like Kevin Durant or LeBron James, who have thrived in multiple systems due to their versatility. Durant’s shooting and off-ball movement make him plug-and-play, while LeBron’s elite IQ allows him to orchestrate any offense. Giannis, however, is more system-dependent, and teams considering a trade would need to rebuild their roster around him—a risky proposition given the assets they’d surrender.

    3. The Bucks’ Unique Accommodations

    The Bucks have gone to great lengths to cater to Giannis’ needs, creating an environment that maximizes his comfort and performance. These accommodations, which range from roster construction to off-court support, are unlikely to be replicated elsewhere.

    Roster Built Around Giannis

    The Bucks have prioritized players who complement Giannis’ game. Acquiring Damian Lillard in 2023 was a clear move to give Giannis a co-star who could handle playmaking duties and stretch the floor. Role players like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez were perfect fits, providing shooting and defensive support. Other teams might not have the cap space or assets to build a similar supporting cast, especially after giving up draft picks and young talent to acquire Giannis in a trade.

    Coaching and System

    Coach Doc Rivers has tailored the Bucks’ system to Giannis’ strengths, emphasising transition opportunities and simple half-court sets. The coaching staff understands his limitations and designs game plans to hide them, such as avoiding late-game situations where his free-throw shooting (61.8% in 2024-25) could be exploited. A new team might demand more versatility, exposing his weaknesses in ways Milwaukee has carefully avoided. Giannis knows this and is extremely hesitant to be publicly exposed like that.

    Off-Court Support

    Off the court, the Bucks treat Giannis like royalty. From personalized training regimens to family support, the organization has ensured he feels valued and secure. Reports from ESPN indicate that Giannis has a close relationship with the front office, which consults him on major decisions. This level of influence is rare for a player, and it’s unlikely another team would grant him the same autonomy. For example, a franchise like the New York Knicks, known for its intense media pressure and hands-on ownership, might not offer the same level of personal attention.

    4. The Bucks’ Commitment to Giannis

    Beyond Giannis’ own hesitations and limitations, the Bucks have little incentive to trade him. He’s the face of the franchise, a global icon, and a key driver of revenue through ticket sales and merchandise. Trading him would signal a rebuild, something the Bucks, fresh off a 2021 championship, are unlikely to embrace. The front office has shown a willingness to tweak the roster—such as trading Jrue Holiday for Lillard—to keep Giannis happy and competitive.

    Moreover, Giannis’ contract, a five-year, $228 million deal running through 2028, gives the Bucks leverage. He has a player option in 2027, meaning there’s no immediate pressure to trade him. Any team acquiring Giannis would need to offer a massive package, likely including multiple All-Stars and draft picks, which few franchises can afford without gutting their roster. The Bucks would rather continue building around him than start over.

    5. Who even wants him anymore?

    Some argue that Giannis could thrive elsewhere, pointing to his work ethic. However, incremental improvements may not be enough to justify a trade to a team expecting instant chemistry. More importantly no other super star would want to play with him unless they are really desperate like Lillard was. His public comments emphasise loyalty. In a February 2025 press conference, he said, “Milwaukee is my home. I want to win here.” This sentiment, combined with the Bucks’ efforts to contend, makes a trade improbable. We have written about this before here and his trade value keeps falling.

    Giannis ain’t going nowhere (again)

    Giannis Antetokounmpo is unlikely to be traded this off-season due to a combination of personal, professional, and organizational factors. His apprehension about leaving Milwaukee, coupled with questions about his adaptability to new systems, makes him a risky fit for other teams. The Bucks’ tailored accommodations—both on and off the court—further cement his place in Milwaukee. While trade rumours will persist, Giannis and the Bucks are too deeply intertwined for a split in 2025. For now, the Greek Freak remains the heart of Milwaukee, and that’s unlikely to change. The Bucks’ marketing will keep hyping him up, coaches will come and go, roster changes all the time, he will keep stat padding and breaking records. But forget any aspirations for the playoffs.

    (Here an older post on this topic in relation to common Google search queries about Giannis being traded. And here are all the details about his contract limitations.)

  • Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Might Never Work With the Lakers

    Why Giannis Antetokounmpo Might Never Work With the Lakers

    Giannis Antetokounmpo, the “Greek Freak,” is a two-time MVP, Defensive Player of the Year, and generally likeable guy with an amazing personal story. At 30 years old, he blends freakish athleticism and a relentless work ethic. Meanwhile, the Los Angeles Lakers, led by LeBron James and Luka Doncic, are a franchise synonymous with star power and championship aspirations. On paper, pairing Giannis with the Lakers’ duo sounds like a dream scenario for fans craving a superteam. But dig deeper into the team’s dynamics, roster construction, and playing styles, and it becomes clear that Giannis might not mesh as seamlessly with the Lakers as one might hope. Just because they are missing a big, doesn’t mean Giannis is a good fit.

    1. No three point shooting and no free throws

    JJ Redick was a master of the 3. The Lakers have morphed into a 3point shooting team with pretty much everyone taking more from the perimeter. Lebron James is shooting it better than ever in his career. Giannis on the other hand is heading towards the worse 3pt% in NBA history. He isn’t just bad. He is a liability. Even if we pretend it doesn’t matter (it does, you can get other bigs with decent 3point shooting) it is a massive liability in any clutch situation. Because you know opponents witll try to foul him, Giannis should not even be on the floor.

    2. Ball Dominance

    LeBron James, even at 40 years old in 2025, remains the Lakers’ offensive engine. His playmaking ability—averaging over 7 assists per game throughout his career—relies on having the ball in his hands to orchestrate the offense. Giannis, however, has evolved into a point-forward hybrid in Milwaukee, often initiating the Bucks’ attack himself. He is a ball hog worse than Luka Doncic, holding the ball approximately 1/4 of the total possesions of the Bucks!

    Pairing ball-dominant stars risks creating a tug-of-war for control. LeBron excels when surrounded by shooters and cutters who complement his vision, as seen in his Miami days with Dwyane Wade or Cleveland with Kyrie Irving. Giannis, conversely, needs the freedom to drive and kick or finish at the rim, often with the Bucks building their offense around his downhill momentum. Forcing one to defer to the other could stifle their individual brilliance. LeBron might adapt—he’s done it before like now with Luka—but Giannis lacks the basketball IQ and diversity in skills. He is now more than ever a run and dunk guy.

    3. Defensive Philosophy Clash

    The Bucks built their championship defense around Giannis, often deploying him as a roving help defender in a scheme that emphasizes rim protection and switching. Truth be told Jrue was the one holding the fort and everyone on the Bucks roster is used to covering for Giannis’ many misteps. Unfortunately since the championship run Giannis has not really played defence. It seems all he cares about is his stat padding. He has fallen in steals, blocks and most other metrics, focusing more on points.

    The Lakers, however, play a fast team defence which relies on high basketball IQ and constant movement. They roam and disrupt rather than stick to traditional man-to-man assignments, which could leave gaps in the Lakers’ perimeter defense—an area where they’ve historically relied on guards like Alex Caruso (now gone) or Dennis Schröder to compensate. Without elite wing defenders to complement them, Giannis might find himself stretched thin, unable to maximize his defensive impact in a system not tailored to his strengths.

    4. Roster Construction and Salary Cap Nightmares

    Even if the on-court fit could work, the practicalities of adding Giannis to the Lakers are a logistical nightmare. As of 2025, LeBron and Luka command massive salaries—LeBron’s likely on a veteran extension. Giannis, meanwhile, signed a three-year, $186 million extension with the Bucks in 2023, keeping him under contract through 2027-28. Trading for him would require gutting the Lakers’ roster, likely sending out young talent (e.g., Max Christie or Austin Reaves) and multiple first-round picks—assets the Lakers have already depleted from past trades. AR seems extremely unlikely to go since he is playing amazingly well and has figured out how to combine with Lebron and Luka.

    The resulting roster would be top-heavy, with little depth to support the big three. The Lakers’ 2020 championship relied on role players like Kentavious Caldwell-Pope and Rajon Rondo, but assembling a competent supporting cast around three max contracts in the modern NBA’s tight salary cap is nearly impossible. Giannis thrived in Milwaukee partly because of shooters like Khris Middleton and Brook Lopez, who spaced the floor for him. The Lakers, perpetually cash-strapped, would struggle to replicate that balance, leaving Giannis in an unfamiliar and suboptimal environment.

    5. Cultural and Leadership Misalignment

    Giannis is a blue-collar superstar—humble, team-first, and fiercely loyal to the Bucks, a small-market franchise that bet on him as a raw teenager. The Lakers, by contrast, are Hollywood—glitz, glamour, and a revolving door of stars chasing rings. LeBron’s tenure has been defined by high-profile acquisitions and a win-now mentality, often at the expense of long-term stability (see: Russell Westbrook experiment). Giannis has expressed disdain for superteam culture, famously saying after the 2021 title, “I did it the hard way.” Joining the Lakers could feel like a betrayal of his ethos, clashing with the franchise’s spotlight-chasing identity.

    Leadership styles could also grate. LeBron’s cerebral, vocal approach contrasts with Giannis’ lead-by-example intensity. While both are unselfish, Giannis’ relentless motor might not vibe with LeBron’s more measured pace at this stage of his career. The Lakers’ locker room, already navigating the dynamics of LeBron’s twilight and Luka , might struggle to integrate a third alpha personality. Giannis is socially awkward and has never really been able to make connections to other superstars.

    6. Coaching and System Fit

    The Bucks have tailored their system around Giannis under coaches like Mike Budenholzer and now Doc Rivers , emphasizing pace, transition scoring, and basically doing whatever Giannis asks. The Lakers, under JJ Redick , have showed how modern basketball can be played. Giannis excels in chaos—running the floor, crashing the glass, and overwhelming opponents with athleticism. The Lakers’ more deliberate style might stifle his natural game, forcing him into a structured role that doesn’t suit his improvisational approach. Let’s fact it, that approach doesn’t work anyway. Giannis is the worse screener in the NBA and doesn’t understand angles at all. He also can’t understand or execute advanced plays. He is the worse at turnover to assist ratio in the league for many seasons now.

    A Dream That Doesn’t Fit

    Giannis Antetokounmpo to the Lakers is a tantalizing what-if, but reality reveals too many cracks. From spacing woes and ball-sharing dilemmas to defensive overlaps and roster constraints, the fit is far from perfect. Giannis is at his best as the undisputed centerpiece of a team built to amplify his unique gifts—something the Bucks have mastered and the Lakers, with their existing stars and limitations, can’t replicate. For Lakers fans dreaming of another superstar coup, Giannis might be the one that got away because he’s simply not skilled enough to slot into their puzzle.

  • What Doc Rivers said to Dame and Giannis in their secret meeting

    What Doc Rivers said to Dame and Giannis in their secret meeting

    Here’s a possible version of what Doc Rivers might have said to Giannis Antetokounmpo and Damian Lillard during their recent private meeting following the Milwaukee Bucks’ loss to the Golden State Warriors on March 18, 2025. This is my creative interpretation based on the context of the Bucks’ struggles, their offensive woes, and the reported nature of the meeting. Just to be clear I have absolutely no inside knowledge or first hand information about the meeting.

    “Alright, fellas, thanks for sitting down with me. Look, we’re not playing like the team I know we can be. I’m not here to point fingers; I’m here to figure this out with you two, because you’re the heart of this squad. I know I will be fired if we don’t do well in the playoffs, it’s the nature of the league. But let’s at least agree how we will go about it. We have said a lot of things over this time together and we have half assed tried a few things.

    Dame you probably feel the same, everyone has been blaming you from the day you came to the Bucks, no surprise. So how do you want to play it? The rest of the season means nothing. I suggest you take some time off and make sure you have no injuries bothering you. I mean nothing at all, not even a little finger twist. First round is probably the Pacers, if you are both playing top of your game we got them.

    Giannis, you’re playing at an MVP level, no question—30 points, 12 boards, 6 assists a night. Dame, you’re giving us 25 and 7, shooting lights-out when you get your looks. But something’s off, and it’s not just on you, it’s on all of us, me included. Our offence is stalling out late in games. The ball’s not moving, the spacing’s a mess, and we’re not attacking the way we should. I’ve seen it, you’ve seen it, we talk about it in the tape room all the time and we’ve got to fix it. Giannis I have been sugar coating it too long for you, I will just keep you out in clutch. Your free throws are a liability and you just kill ball flow. Either get in line and play as the team wants to play or sit on the bench in the fourth quarter. I mean it. I have nothing to lose anymore, don’t care what anybody says. If you want me fired do it now, but this is what will happen if you don’t. Sure I will get you in the game if I can, depends on the match ups. But when you are looking lost or they are shutting you down I won’t put up with your 4th quarter shit anymore. Not in the playoffs. If it bruises your ego not to be on the court in the final minutes I no longer care.

    Giannis, when you’re driving downhill or setting screens, are you getting the support you need? No, you are not. Why? Because you are not looking, you are not getting everybody involved. Dame, when you’re running the show, are we putting you in spots to close games out? We’ve got two of the best in the world right here, and I need us to be on the same page. Tell me who you want where now. I will get rid of anyone you don’t like and tell them to do whatever you think they need to do, but tell me now clearly. Not in the huddle. If we get to the second round things will be tougher. Maybe Brunson will be injured or something. We make it to the Conference Finals and make it look like we were legit out there and our jobs are safe. Otherwise me and Dame are getting fired and Giannis I guess you will have to look around the league for your future.

    Tell me what’s working, what’s not, and how we get this thing rolling again. Screw the regular season. Doesn’t matter if we drop a few spots, no difference now. If you need time off, take time off, I will cover you with excuses. If you want to try some other roster combination we try it now, I don’t care, got nothing to lose at this point. I’m sorry I didn’t do this earlier but I didn’t want to lay the pressure on you two.

    End of the day though it is what it is. And it’s looking dangerously close to total shit show if you two don’t start winning games. Yes you two. Not talking about the other kids on the team. You are it.

    So if you disagree tell me now. I can quit. No shame in that for me. I prefer it to going into the playoffs again with everyone saying it’s my fault with a team that doesn’t even do what I ask it to. I don’t want to be some bitter old man who has signed an NDA and can’t even tell the media how none of you did anything I asked you to. Giannis I love you man but no more bullshit with you grabbing the boards and drawing up plays. You want that, I walk. No hard feelings and I swear I will be rooting for you guys to win. But I truly believe that if we have one chance in hell to get to the Conference Finals and not all look like fools this season is if you do exactly what I say, when I say it, exactly as I draw it out.

    Are you in?”